Document 3JN3bNR7kyXDG7xpBkQkEv7ND

AR226-2525 dL^> /L^-, - /5:800 c^s - ^ ^ENNY, ;l_o, ci-or) C. /^S L-a ^ _y^< "ERE ARE THE RESULTS FOR THE C-B IN ^ftTER SAMPLES THAT Y-JL, A':;; T^'-iY COl-LF:CTED. I SHOW A COMPARISON OF EXP STATIC" V3 CHS^-tlL.L. TWO 3F" E'ip WE, BTPiTTOMS- 'SAMPLES i-iERE H3T REPORTED, I'LL C--ECK CM THIS. i-WTEReSTINS- I'LL LEAVE IT TO YOli TG FORWARD TO TERRY, BILL. AMD^SON SINCE YO'J Di.) "Mf-: UCKK; I'LL SEND TO CRU": RESULTS fiRE VS" R3",'ER, UPLT; {: ^N3 i3C7i-4 Tl'i POLY;^:- MTKE **^->!-B-*-X-***-%-***-S-w--X--H---fr*^"^*-'*-&-r^#**- EXPERIMENTAL STATION TEST UELL. tS? WELL ft331 t-ELL MW-4 OHIO RIVER -1 OHIO RIVER -1 DUPLICATE 0'rlIC RIVER ~E . OH 1C RIVER -S DUPLICATE OHIO RIVER -3 (NEAR OUTFALL) OHIO RIVER -.3 DUPLICATE OHIO RIVER -4 OHIO RIVER -4 DUPLICATE OH-ZO RIVER -5 OHIO RIVER ~5 DUPLICATE OHIO RIVER -6 OHIO RIVE^ -6 DUPLICATE MEW LUBECK MELL -F NEW U.!BCK WELL -F DUPL NEM LUBECiC UELL -B MEW LU'y=:C'-: HELL -B 3UPL 3LD LLiBECK VJELL -I C-LD LUBECK WELL ~1 DUPL 7.1 < 1 ^7 < 1 3.9 19.6 l&.B S. 3.1 '4.5 ^a.8 ? <l .0 < 1. < t < 1 < 1 8.8 4.1 <PPB C-85 \ CHSMHiLL l.g 0,1 o,s NOT DETECTED NOT DETECTED NOT DETECTED NOT DETECTED 11.0 1S.O 0.8 I .1 1.1 1,1 O.S 0.6 NOT SE-TECTED MCT DETECTED 0,3 NOT DITECTE:; 5ESTROYED 1,, ! '..9 8 0 VO 10 l>-> . . 0\ EID136981