Document 3JKLgXzM00GpaB6Ndo4QVJeYy

Arnold%5fRemand%5fOrder.TIF?box=Inbox&MsgId=6031_1465854_56665_4598_931733_0_606&bodyP... 11/29/01 12:51 PM IN th DHITEU Siiuu FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CKRISTI DIVISION NOV C 9 2001 Michael N, Milby, ClKfcof CflOt BILLY ARNOLD AND SYBIL ARNOLD; RICHARD BOYLE AND BARBARA BOYLE; ROBERT McCULLOUCH AND ANNETE McCULLOUGK, PlaintiffS, vs. AC&S, INC., et al., Defendants. S 5 6P` S CIVIL ACTION NO. C-01-478 ORDER Or. this day came on to be considered Defendant Garlock Inc.'s ("Garlock") Application and Notice of Removal1 and Emergency Motion to Transfer Civil Action Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 151(b)(5) for Venue Determination as well as Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand for lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, for Mandatory Abstention, or for Discretionary Abstention or Equitable Remand and Plaintiffs' Motion to Sever all Claims against Bankrupt Defendants in the above-styled action. for reasons stated herein, the Court ORDERS that all claims against the Debtor- m this action be SEVERED and 'As ar. initial matter, Garlock has moved to supplement its Application and Notice of Removal with "inadvertently omitted pleadings." The Court grants Garlock's motion without expressing an opinion on the reasons for Garlock's incomplete removal of the instant case. :GarlocK removed nine cases at the same time to this Court based on alleged "related to" jurisdiction. The bankruptcy referred tc t.nroughour this Order (and in the otner eight cases) is Case Number 01-10578, pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court 1 P aS e flhttp://us.f96.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter/Amold%5fRemand%5fOrder.TIF?box=Inbox&MsgId=6031_1465854_56665_4598_931733_0_606&bodyPart=3&filename=Amold%5fRemand%5fOrder.TIF&download=1&YY=59538&or i o n&Soi ate