Document 37DxBVJw6pBDk6GpKk1eo9o2n

STATUS OF SHAC ACTIVITIES PMSB REPORT - AUGUST 18, 1982 1982 SHAC Results and Goals Accomplishment See attachment. Hourly Safety Committee --Attendance was 100%. --Gene Crain was elected new chairman. --Arnold Glass spoke on purpose and membership of plant safety committees. --Plantwide concerns: Traffic mirror cleaning Machine shop door accessway Department 33 safety shower Gas cylinder storage under piperack AN-5 WOB entry permit incident --Plan advertising program to promote fitness. Vessel Inspection Program Status As of July 31, 1982, the percentage of vessel inspections on schedule was 98.6% versus 97.8% on 3/31 and about 95% on 12/31/81. A total of 18 vessels were listed as delinquent, with the following distribution: EB - 2 SM - 1 P2-4 Environmental LA PA -1 -1 -1 Esters - 1 Methanol - 1 AN-6 Further improvement should be accomplished through added line emphasis (monthly reporting to general superintendents). SHAC has requested action plans for com pliance, written AVIP memo to superintendents, or verbally contacted supervisors each quarter. 1982 Safety & Housekeeping Inspection Preparation Guidelines --See attached memo. --Do not recommend traditional picnic (would suggest picnic at year end if plant plant injury goals are met). --Proposed inspection dates: October 18, 19, and 20 (Monday through Wednesday). Safety Shower/Eyebath Standards --J. W. Bullock is preparing engineering standard to be reviewed by SHAC in.August. --Chocolate Bayou, Krummrich, and Queeny plants and SS&P in St. Louis have been surveyed with regard to highlighting standards. --Recommendation to SAC/PMSB for next meeting. 8-17-82 001973 sc LAM003178 c & 5 u X <0 o c .a O' V TJ O s o p a 53 *0 * oS . P 0 \D * i/i n > H A no* >3 *4 tt S' s "q * * S3 -H I ; sv 1 T" >* 5^ S CD QI I 1+ cu IH >* h NNN CO CQ CD o\ aw a* HHH III O' C *0 P C P Cl (J at S*o P O 4) U <H 2 si *8 8 5V . ' 5C ^ jG 0 g a *p U-l CD n l p ^3 J y 5O p<0 So .X 0) >1 *P *P J5>, - pn as- U 0) * o-4 M M Sfis S 01 6H 3 *0 n s0 PP 8 S.s S -5 >, a p a c p0 H<3 0)0 <0H W Cu -P O P *c1 P30) -PoH yP n *0 -p co P O' *0 CO P <H n O' O* P 0 o* c m o ' 0.*h p a -h w P -P ` XA U III IIIII o T3 S i p 6 *H uu a p p 0 <p 0< p0 -H >1 > p <0 -* P Q< Q m S CD H S O P y a s j p 5 I 0> 2a 0> ^p >P p M 0 P O' X H O a G a 0 o co S <o 5 P *0 > OP Pa C 6 <P H & *0 p p uo *H H P C p Hk SS v *o P C 0 n *o * a *o S <P 0 P > X *o >. M *H O' 88 p a o P OH as n c p a P >1 P 2 a O P ||s s CO P *c nil -H C0 P na <F S S' I'S' a-3 oo a. B O u >* 1 8 .3 _ Hb O *o 3 h c ' P *P n ph S 8.1 8 o a 5 P G Jw O P O* *P -4 P I,, Ps &O >n PCS P *H 3 P oc p Op -pw n a __ rH *J 6 *0*0 ^4 <H <H >1 <P4 hU 0 O'-* 4PJ OO 0 ou n p >-m, <h 5 X 0 *J ^4 W C 4HJ 4J P 0-40O 3 c > 0 0 I d w o O' a -h <H 20 p *g >5 *3 p \0 w cu g P CO P6 C H O M -H % a" pp s* am ma <c >o UP 00 _a as H /** ,* -j v n .''V'W ' 'T' \ *`.7 . '* ` - .v-' vV' v"* o s. Ss S *3 -l >o p H > >1 85 - M s p < > Op Cm <p ts h y 3 .:v-v s H r4 *3 S 8 3 8& SC LAM003179 1982 TEXAS CITY SAFETY AND HOUSEKEEPING INSPECTION PMSB Approved Plan Due to the present economic climate the 1982 safety/housekeeping inspection will be conducted by an in-house inspection team. The inspection team makeup will be as follows: Plant Manager, General Superintendent - Manufacturing, PT Superintendent, Maintenance Superintendent, Manu facturing Supervisor, and LP&S Representative. The inspection is expected to be more thorough than those held in the past because team members are familiar with Texas City procedures. Preparation Guidelines Proposal Theme - Lean and Mean, Safe and Clean Tone - Safety Without Cosmetics Evaluation - Heavy emphasis on the evaluation of adherence to safety rules, procedures, and practices and the degree of people involvement and promotion of safety in each area. Housekeeping appearance will be judged in comparison to a standard which is acceptable for day-to-day operation. Orderliness is the most important criterion. Preparation Guidelines Areas should be prepared to a safety standard which would achieve an outstanding rating, and to a housekeeping standard which is acceptable for day-to-day operation. The goal is to prepare for the inspection without using overtime or contract help. In spite of this, good housekeeping appearance cam be achieved by starting early and careful allocation of manpower as the inspection date nears. Wasteful practices are to be avoided. Painting efforts should focus on safety highlighting instead of cosmetic painting. 8-11-82 SC 001975 LAM003180 1982 SAFETY AND HOUSEKEEPING INSPECTION TEAM G. L. Tromblee - Plant Manager D. W. Daues - Supt. of Manufacturing H. E. Crow - Maintenance Supt. R. M. Fritz - PT Manager T. L. Nelson - Personnel Supervisor M. Riddle - LP&S Engineer Area Inspection Ratings Outstanding Stands out from all areas No safety practice deficiencies Housekeeping performance equal to achievement potential Excellent Superior to most areas Few safety practice deficiencies Housekeeping performance.nearly equal to achievement potential Good Favorable compared to acceptable standard Some deficiencies in safety practice Housekeeping performance at acceptable level Unsatisfactory Inferior compared to acceptable standard Unacceptable level of safety deficiencies Unacceptable housekeeping level Areas Individual Units Main Shops, Instrument Shop, Electrical Shop Stores Office Buildings Research 1, 2, 3 Control Lab Warehouses Fire Station West Gate Main Gate SC 001976 LAM003181