Document 2qYmy255DE1KxZomzvp5yjX0L

Monsanto me M. IMtirjIi iMhHwrt St. iMh, MiMMri Dill Mmm: 8*4-100 June 7, 1912 Mr. Ronald Clark Editorial Pago Editor ST, PAUL PIONEER PRESS 55 1. 4th Street St. Paul, m 58101 Dear Mr. Clark: Your May 17 editorial on PCS chemicals wrongly assails industry's actives In sorting a review of the latest healtheffects information on PCBs. Contrary to your assertion that "those pushing for the review are eager to resume manufacturing and using PCBs," Monsanto Company, formerly the sole U.S. producer of PCBs, has no intention or desire whatsoever to resume PCB production. Once PCBs had been judged an environmental problem, Monsanto took prompt and responsible action toward them. In 1972, the company voluntarily began phasing out the sale of PCBs for certain uses, and by 1977 had halted all PCB manufacture. This occurred two years prior to the 1979 federal ban on new production of PCBs. Your editorial also states that industry studies of PCB effects "ought to generate more skepticism than optimism." Setting aside the patent unfairness in implying that all Industry health-related research is suspect you and your readers should know that the studies you cited (done by contractors for th Edison Electric Institute and the Chemical Manufacturers Association) are not original research but rather reviews of recent research done primarily by government agencies, universities and medical schools. Among this work, for example, is a study performed by the National Instituta for Occupational Safety and Health involving more than 2,500 electrical equipment manufacturing workers, more than half of whom were exposed to PCBs on the job in excess of 21 years. This study found no excess deaths among the workers nor any increase in mortality due to cancer, cardiovascular disease or neurological disorders. Similar findings have emerged from other epidemiologic studies. . MOMS 002196  Mr, Ronald Clark --2 Monsanto feels that so open-minded reading of the couplet ,scientific record on PCB health effects leads a reasonable f person to conclude that PCla, while environmentally long-lived ; sad a potential source of temporary dermatitis, are not Inauui cancer agents nor are they associated with other long-term serious health effects. In short, the "sign of welcome relief" on PGBs rejected by you is entirely justified in our opinion. Monsanto supports reasonable regulations and disposal requirements for PCBs. Again, we are not interested in going back into the PCI business. But we are concerned about overly zealous controls based upon incomplete science and an hysterical public fear of these compounds out of all proportion to their genuine risks. Sincerely, John H. Craddock, Ph.D. Product and Environmental Safety Director /c ' : v4t KB IMS MImm PCS BaeltVlhavixasBantal Mfect Fact Sheet P Ungulate^' BLstcay Fact finest iB fwsajgtioo Msto^ Stefc Sheet * beet 8. 8. Collin L. J. O'Neill HONS 00219? WATER_PCB-SD0000007691