Document 2qMe3eRDdJwr86wmvgvp2oYY5

1 difference between Langer and I. He happens to think, Page 55 j ! 2 and I have no reason to question him, that they are not ' 3 even asbestos fibers any longer. 4 Q And you're referring to Dr. Langer's paper 5 of -6 A 2003 I think. : ) 1% 7 Q Regarding the, in essence the subject relates ' 8 to what temperature does the chemical composition of 9 the chrysotile fiber take on some different property? i ; 10 A Well, it's not that simple but he's written 11 about it several times. I would say his last paper is j ; 12 where he galvanizes his views about it. And I think 13 it's 2003 or 2004. 14 Q Do you find that paper to be an authoritative 15 piece of the medical scientific literature? , ! \ r 16 A I would think so. I don't have any reason to 17 think it would not be. 18 Q Do you rely on it? 19 A I do rely on it. 20 Q Okay. Can you give me in summary similar to 21 the summary that you just gave for your opinions in the 5 22 Rizzi case regarding your opinions in this case, 23 Dr. Paustenbach? 24 A Well, I think the summary would be very 25 similar. I think the state of the art discussion would ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SERVICES (415) 288-4280