Document 2q5OKJwGvEOZkMKRXVJLaV6Gg
k-nii- Q00') TH/iV-Wd o;:
An excerpt from clinical research
Authors:Frof. Dr. V/. Creutzfeldt Goett. Prof.. Londoj
German Medical -Journal - 98 (1973)
Paces 2311 - 231^ e-Georg Thiemc Publishers, Stuttgart, ) West Germany
*
to
-*
03
C.hronic-toxic "liver damage in PVC production workers
(0
Marstc? l<=>r, W.JC.Lelbach, R.Mueller, S.Juebe,_;C.E.Lsnge,H.G.Rohner
and G. Veltmun
-.... -r - --
--------*
------------- --
Medical Clinic (Director: Prof. Dr. K.J.Dengler) ^2?`Institute of Pathology (Director: Prof. Dr. P, Gediglc) and
3 Clinic for Skin Diseases (Director: Prof .Dr. A. Leinbrock) of the - Bonn University.
Po}yv*nyl chloride (PVC) h?s boon a popular plastic for 30 yesre-.
3 ^ no;; because of its Civej.`o aijpxxvjia uiuu pouaibj.lx tj.es. x t is mere--
$ fore produced in large industrial volumes worldwide, (3) . That ur.- i ^.til 19o6 no observations were mode public in the western; world ccr.-
Jj,/corning its chronic toxicity may be attributed to the widely ccccpt-
_ ^r^eo belief that the production of PVC involves merely relatively in-
Tert substances.
I Cl i yThe re-publication of a Rumanian study, first disclosed in 19c3(lS),
-v"SH^c'^our years lotcr(l9) deals with afflieetion caused by prolonged con-
t \ tact with PVC. The study,citing such affllcctions as e.g. the Raynaud
^7 Syndrome, dermatitis, (scleroderma), thyroid insufficiencies ar.d hope-
tomeg3ly pioneered other ucli studies originating froiiT'Prsnce (2,A,;
%
Britain (7), United States (3,5,6,13,1'!,22) and Germany (8,9,10,17).
However these reports summarised the affliction on the basis of 55
1 patients examined as being "occupational acrncsteolysis". More in-
depth symptomatology pointing to liver function bisi ur bonces was on
ly verified in 8 out of these 55 patients (7,8,9,10).
The diagnosis "occupational ocr-oosteolysis" overrules findings mode
in 39"-9 in the USSR which re?:a cod verified liver damages to PVC manu facture and which wore diagnosed as more or less pronounced hope tit-- bcs.
in 35 out of ^3 patients. Also ignored were the cited Rumanian find ing1; dealing with toxicity related hnpntomcyV les ( in * 50 cud of 163 patient.:-.) (18 anti 19) arid Rue:'inn reports citing, partially reb
el ini col "chronic-cpithellal-hepatlbidce in l9x> of workers examined,
Results
The in several PVC plant workers substantiativc esophageal varices and splenomegaly together with uncharacteristic livcrparenchyma changes and the vague literary reference to "cub-clinical" liver damages motivated us to further pursue the morphological substrate of liver changes by means of laboratory analyses, radiology and scintigraphic examinations, laparotomy and target liver punctures.
According to this procedure 20 out of ^5 autoclave workers in a PVC manufacturing plant between the ages of 30 to 56 and whose ex posure- to the chemical varies from 1-1/2 to 21 years, hove been examined to date in order to determine the presence of liver ir regularities. Tables 1 and 2 present corresponding findings. In addition the following parameters were rc-examlned, in most in stances more than once, and found to be near normal or normal:
R&S 131150
Sedimentation tests, hemograms, sugar tolerance, tests, urine analys
es, Lues reaction tests,
cholinesterase tests, acid phospha
tases, serum iron and copper, thymol, albumin tests and electro-
phoretically divided sub-fractioning; cholesterol, S-lipoprotein,tri
glyceride and plasmatic coagulation factor testing. To define sclero
derma the following immunology parameters were analyzed:
Rheumatic factors, anti-nuclear factors, LE cells,immunoglobulin
fractions G A and M, complement fraction JH A and cold antibodies.
These analyses were however later abandoned as it became increasing^^
!a
4" \"s ^
W (4 4 vs A 1 A aIp
VS A 1 *SA *A A
Atin4>vtAl 4 a f cttN A St ^ M a M P
v/ere consistently negative. Only one patient examined showed signs of cholelithiasis (case 15) ; a changeable solitary concretion whose discharge was not obstructed.
According to test results indicated in Tables 1 and 2, it may be
deduced' that in most patients' coses neither the biochemical para
meters followed to determine liver function nor laparoscopic and
histological findings warrant special attention. The in, isolated
cases found deviations from the normal were all very slight, incon
sistent and ambiguous. Only a combined study of liver profiles and
related histological evaluations acquired any significance when ap
praised on the basis of job-related exposure to a given product(sj,
otherwise such findings might be regarded as rather insignificant
anamnesis. The outline of attention-worthy findings according to
frequency of occurrence (Table 3)shows, that,in the grouping pre
sented, the designated acroostoollysic was not the main symptom of
occupational diseases within the PVC manufacturing field (2-0,
13,lA,22) but thrombocytopenia.and more or less pronounced chronlc-
toxicliver damages (121 with splenomegaly and slgnb of portal hy-
pertension in'some cases.------------
---- - ...
-3-
Conclusions:
Since it has been impossible to compile on?/ meaningful data relating to work-area concentrations to date and since our knowledge of olie PVC production process is only sparse, ques tions concerning etiological relationship and pathogenecity remain unanswered for the time being.
The morphological picture Is however linked to acceptance of
chronic-toxic liver impairment as might result from e.g. con
tinuous or repeated contact with chlorinated hydrocarbons.
Aside from other -as yet unclear subjects is the formal genesis
of liver function changes and one question stands out from ot
hers namely the question of why portal hypertension occurs in
some cases. This point is of special theoretic and practical
clinical interest. Classification of these cases in the cate
gory of intra-hepatic, pre- or intrasinusoidal block formations
and howr this relates to the histological picture on the basis
of'septal fibrosis in the portal canal and system; fr. bro; 'with
collagenisation of the sinusoidal murals (I,11,i6,l0) a; encoun
tered in these cases has not been conclusively defined
use
of the fact that portal'vein pressures in these patleu .,ds not '
yet been measured.
The relative frequency of slight to pronounced sol* omegaly en countered, points to asbu..option of liver fibrosis.
Corresponding preventive clinical studies in other P'rC manufactur ing facilities and processing plants appear to warrant action. Periodic and subsequent checking of our patients er.d extensive animal experiments to gain more in-depth knowledge of cause and prevention are planned.
l) From a total of - 120 PVC workers from a given plant, to date
45 have been examined in the Clinic of Dermatology of the
Bonn University because of skin sensitivity manifestations
and also on the basis of prophylaxis. Most of these workers
showed signs of etiologicolly undetermined liver function dis
turbances according to clinical and/or biochemical tests. By
May 1973, 2C workers had been subjected to laparotomy as it
was considered that their symptoms 'warranted .such action. Fre
quency of liver function impairments cannot be made on this
basis,
(
R&S 131151
,1c 1
Mi/wp.i"; i , clin3 enl :>rid bJ o r hr-mi cn 1 fi i i 711:; obtnli.cd
.
i-'.:-. As r -' *
blUrusi:!, ts*anr:ii:.j iinrt' and a Ileal Inc j-husphi-taco,
n v:
cr oc"1 v.-d
6 analyses and 2 a no ] y:.os ittc mace' t.o determine liver lincl. J one c;i the bncia d^H uj.:
bi'omophthaleln sodium or die,odium phenol tcti-abromophthsleln.
JJ
aO
0S
CO
<h o
*-(
4-> 0
V)
40 81
C>
0. 0, 2
Q d
O0
CO
c
O J->
.c
3O
CO
8 4) fl^N
H
O p Cl CO
mU
4) O O (0 O
(0
W 0)
0. O
O
(0 < 8j K >1 Oa
O
w---
CO
i a E
<0 c 0
f--( 0 oC 0 0 r( CO
S H*C *H O CO wA Q-P
rrt-aot tofr-:
o
E0 WC
c6) *0
r-t CJ
O. <0
01 03
o
+>
ou
n o.
fc. o a)
raI
x
w E
xn.-HC
Oo
El!?!.
r-< O lA
8.
N
JO (0
8f C J-> JO
4>
40 O
SHrlJJ C
8t E O -H
%-< fi C E *H Q O -H
Tl o x; O lA
fQ r-t P-4 rH-7
** ** iH
S3 E
%
H CM
To
CO
CM 0J r-t r-t
A A,
H
o
o CO
8
&> to 4C->0 CO JZ wo
o
a> c
rC-tOC-3O"
SA
C\O ol-l
0 m0
1 E,--- O >ro in N i; H 0d x\ EcA 0 0 ;<(A U r-( O E X K * E 8-<'--'
CO
& >> rl O O 4J ci O O P O <
t\
1 33 A
3'/i none
2 32 A+ 3V.
ii
.3 3J A
J
n
3
1.glass of wine
3
1 bottle beer
5.8 23
3 U.S 19 3 - 1.1 13.1 4 '
4 41 A+ 3'/t
1 bottle beer
U
1.1 g; 19
5 34 A
3
1 bottle beer
<' <7 7 31
A+ 18
A+ 16V.
1972 Bill
ArostchiteIsI Ca?
none
3-*4 bottles
veer
U
33 ?.
21,4 j
1
*^rt>- I
41 II
17 15
i3 i
51
74 99'119/133 149/ICS/173
62/53/58/70/94 133
37/54/73/74/75 75.il/Sl
39-111/114/210 2jJ
11C'1!9/137 l*3.'i63 175 EO.'fO.?! /100
V.'/45/22
+ + +
8 AS A 9 42 A
si/ none
i
/ j none
1 bottle beer 1'glass beer
10 31 A
4 none
11 47 A 12 since 1967 hyperlipicamy
up to 2
12
56
A+ is
(liver function
pgif^uroence)
bottles beer
upper abdomen
2 bottles
8.8 13
u 13.3 23 23
(63)
3 1,7 7.1 (28)
1.5
5.2 15
15
6,1
17/25/30/37/38
2ly3':w23t5niA
92': 32/132 51/87/59/133
",-'122/115/141
13 35 A
4>/< sensitive to'
nonc-pressure
beer 1 bottle
7.6 95/144/171
1-4 33 A ncSYse
13 35 A
l'/l none
1C 30 A+ 21
1955 Icterus 1963 chronic
l.f,d.(*)
beer "u
1 glass beer3
1,3
8.5 32 30
(27)
]Ijlili 'll4/132 '
6.3 17 17 56 115-134/211
8.7 15
15
12-'.';7J/J7fi 187/193
17 44 A 13V. none
1.9
1$ <1 + I'/i right upper
up to.2
33 abdomen sensitive bottles
(/>
CO
19 30 A + 2Vi to pressure
20 30 A + 4
none none
* /ijA-,P;
beer
up to 2 bottles
1.5 3
j,,O C1
CJ1
to
13
6.1 19
17
(47)
8.4 17
7.5 15 15
13S'149'152 151 143'160/189 l5'224
111/157/202 54'12i/IJ7
* A ^Autoclave maintenance worhei's plus other functions in the manufacturing procc
** Figures in parenthesis = values via substrnoptlnized method.
* i/1 * i
1
1
Radiol o-', L col .'iivd 1 ;i]);!]'o:'con 1 c- hi:.' lul ogl cal fi icJ Ln,-.:- obtO.1 nod
from 20 l'VC orhers (ri\.t t:t t*`t avc: ms 1: 11 e: i s. i c <- v;o rhors)
y. - t ?; yr; esophagus (E)or fundus
(f) varices
Laparotomy
Histology
T"
Signs of capsular
centro-lobuiar col.i.agerui:
fibrosis, splenomegaly of sinusoid murals,groups
fatty degeneration
37 Bo
--COt
--I.
cn
CO
2
3 (E)
4
3
Obvious capsular flbro- centro-lobuiar collapse,slight
-sis, initial reconstruc- increase collagenlc fibrils in
tlon,considerable splerio portal system
megaly
Obvious capsular firbro-
sis,initial reconstruc
tion,*red spots and reti
culation, splenomegaly Reticular capsular fibro Collagenization of sinusoid
sis, hepatomegaly
murals, slight fatty deg.of
^regeneration
cells, slight starcell sidero
sis Slight portal fibrosis,fatty
deg', slight starcell activa
tion, hydropic swelling
6+
(E&F)
7+ (E&F)
8
Initial to complete re construction, portal hy pertension, ascites,ob vious fcspiexiomegaly
Septal and central fibrosis
Reticular to surface co vering capsular fibrosis,
initial regeneration,ini tial port3l hypertension, obvious splenomegaly
Irregular to septal fibrosis, roundcell infiltration into portal system, white blood cell necrosis, starcell acti
vation
Spotti' capsular fibrosis
Indication of portal system fibrosis, isolated fatty de generation
9 Slight capsular fibrosis, Indication of rcptal/portal
slight splenomegaly
fibrosis, ccnt7'olobulor colie
genlzntion of sinusoid mure!
fatty deg., slight starcell
10 Obvious capsular fibrosis activation
initial reconstruction,
splenomegaly
Slight septal fibrosis,mas si',
collogenizatJ c )i of sinusoid
murals
n Indicated capsular fibro
sis, and possible initial Massive fibre: ! r of the porta
reconstruction
canals, sept:.!1 intralobular-
fibrosis,
stive activity
not in civic'..-::':'.-, slight dis
semination of .fatty deg.
1?f .
13 Ik 15 16 17 -' 18
iy 20
Irregular capsular fibro -* 1 *..:
heps tumegsly
Sep tel fibrosis in pcrtsO eo:.
narrow intrslobihl er ee;-': ,
Slight choj or; hrwf-j r , 1.5 ghty l
disseminated fatty dog.
- Slight capsular fibrosis
Slight fibrosis in port^^ca
nal, slight cholcstcrosis,
fatty deg. single cell necro
nn
n
sis, glycogen deposits Isolated intralobular fibrosi
massively disseminated fatty
cleg.
Obvious capsular fibrosis
Indicated septal fibrosis in
portal canals, massive fatty
deg., starcell activation , (grouped)
Slight capsular fibrosis
Obvious capsular fibrosis
--
-- ---^ .
-
Slight portal canal fibrosis,
massively disseminated (small droplet) fatty deg.,slight starcell activation, massive glycogen deposits. Cirrho ti c/s-ep ta l('r c c ons tru c t i o .lumpy cell regenerates
Fine to medium granular re construction
Uncertain paunoiogical'finding
Septal fibrosis, massive col.* genization of sinusoid murals
widely disseminated fatty do
slight starcell siderosls.
m Indicated spetal fibrosnW^ slight (large droplet) fatty deg.,slight starcell activa tion
- Hepatomegaly, questionable re construction, fatty' deg.in the
liver
Indicated septal fibrosis/ portal canals, massively dis seminated (large droplet) fr. ty deg.,single cell necrosis starcell activation
R&S 131154
R&S 131155
Table 3.- Frequency of pc tholoy'.. cel f1 nd i i i in <:0 (' \a)!>:.era
Symptoms
Increased pbenoltetrabromophthalein retention
Thrombocytopenia
Liver-spleen changes determined
via laparorrhaphic tests *
'
Splenomegaly in selective spleen'iscintigrams (present in 2 patients1 liver-scinitgram as well)
Clinical splenomegaly
Clinical splenomegaly
Acroosteolysis
'
, -. ,
Esophageal varices (2 patients also showed signs of fundus varices)
Count 19 16
14 7
7
6
U
* All 19 cases showed signs of slight to massive hepatic changes, according to-histological findings.
A
i