To:
Jackson, Ryan[jackson.ryan@epa.gov]
From: The Washington Post
Sent: Mon 10/9/2017 4:02:07 PM
Subject: Federal Insider: Trump tries to weaken federal unions, but their membership grows in reaction
to GOP actions
Trump tries to weaken federal unions, but their membership grows in reaction to GOP actions
By Joe Davidson
.(Pool photo by Eliot Blondet via Agence France-Presse/Getty Images)
President Trump and Capitol Hill Republicans have been good for federal unions, even as they attempt to undermine the labor organizations and the public servants they represent.
With the GOP running the White House and Congress, membership in federal unions is on the rise, fed by an administration and legislature that leaves the workforce anxious about budget cuts, layoffs and an erosion of civil service protections.
The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), the biggest federal employee union, had a net increase of 1,022 members last month alone, part of almost 5,000 new members since January. Three of the four other major unions also reported growth -- the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) did not provide membership information -- with the National Federation of Federal Employees on pace to achieve 7 percent growth this year.
While membership has grown previously, important factors currently are White House and congressional proposals that would cut government contributions to federal employee benefits, significantly devaluing the 1.9 percent pay raise that staffers are slated to get in January. The union growth occurred even
Sierra Club v. EPA, 1:17-cv-01906
ED_001523_00001216-00001
before Thursday's House approval of a budget proposal that would reduce subsidies to the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program. The budget plan calls for $32 billion in cuts targeted at feds over 10 years. While unspecified in the House budget resolution, those hits could include damaging retirement proposals previously offered by Trump.
At the same time AFGE recorded impressive growth in September, Trump was doing his best to weaken federal unions through his executive order revoking the labor/management forums created by predecessor President Barack Obama.
The forums "have consumed considerable managerial time and taxpayer resources, but they have not fulfilled their goal of promoting collaboration in the Federal workforce," the order argues. "Public expenditures on the Council and related forums have produced few benefits to the public, and they should, therefore, be discontinued."
The governmentwide council and agency forums were designed to foster cooperation between unions and management. Discussions included such things as workplace safety, productivity and data security.
Trump's action is "a major step backward in the relationship between managers and front-line federal employees [that] will weaken efforts to make government more efficient and effective," according to NTEU.
"This is an ominous sign for the future of federal labor-management relations," NTEU President Tony Reardon added.
It's not the only one.
After Trump announced his appointees to the Federal Services Impasses Panel in July, union leaders were aghast. The panel resolves disputes between agencies and federal labor organizations. With Trump's appointees, labor leaders feel the deck is stacked against them.
"The Trump administration pulled out all of the stops on this one," said Randy Erwin, president of the National Federation of Federal Employees (NFFE). "The diversity of this panel ranges from people who publicly campaign against unions to people that actively litigate against unions. I have little faith that this panel can properly evaluate a dispute without inherent bias or personal
Sierra Club v. EPA, 1:17-cv-01906
ED_001523_00001216-00002
219 to 206, by the House last week, with no
Democratic support and 18 Republicans defecting from their party line. It's a
iMaHnah He rttph/wliskferetti rap of dffalgrnh^ bm^
Opiblbgaosra^
against "official time." Now, they can
argue, there is less reason for it.
On a related front, Trump's plan to weaken government through personnel
bKBtedffmiflwrsia^
IbqdHriiffipafihiwa^fCTndiSQndrDtfe
6wrrain1&Etew^^
^nratt^MBgrtdMbordfeifcfetorf^mkfcware paid by the government while
representing everyone in a bargaining unit, even those who don't pay dues.
That degradation led NTEU's Reardon to ask: "Since when is it acceptable to
Ste^EkJthfytaHiipateOTtl^fppiottdal^
antistated oimdoitihg pritttig^^eretier^id tbate^a^jr^ifecter^ ttre^toytess,
FtedwimgjdhaAjwMBtprf^
partaKaadl>idrfp^s financial
The fei^viffittifetoi^^
such as recruiting members, is not
allowed. Official time covers working with management on issues involving
ftetecfahfwnnployees, union members or not, such as safety and efficiency.
tefettsloin unions for protection. A law affecting the Department of Veterans Affairs, for example, weakens due process for all employees and eliminates
Agencies, as other feds can.
Dhriomnroc^tetiptfiteb dorwih of`Euf^cumim/rw<tAnpM^^bgnf'htt.is
A mir^i
tlwTonxiryat^iwahlth the latest example being the House-
passed budget," said Matt Biggs, legislative director of the International
pWAaEwmotHrnv
,ali
/ t pbm]
advertisement:
More from Federal Insider
PowerPost Perspective
federal employeev tw
kjr
hut
It's still a good deal
There are no dramatic changes in the 2018 Federal
Employees Health Benefits Program, and its premium
increase "is not out of line," said Walt Francis, an
independent health economist.
Sierra Club v. EPA, 1:17-cv-01906
ED_001523_00001216-00003
By Joe Davidson | Columnist Read more Recommended for you
Get the un Leadership newsletter
Conversations about management and leadership, in your inbox weekly.
OiUti U u
Share Federal insider: _ Click here to view in your browser.
click here. privacy. If you believe that this email has been sent to you in error or you no longer wish to receive email from The Washington Post, click here. Contact us
for help.
Sierra Club v. EPA, 1:17-cv-01906
ED_001523_00001216-00004