Document 2jko9zmwJYL09GYEJ5R8LXM2N
Asbestosis far from hopeless, expert says
;A-n.v rnr. paip: <; j. '"ii: : . 'i !v j
VAV n ir^-'
QUINCY -- Shipyard workers who are getting results from asbestos-related lung disease tests and~6eing advised to seek medical help may have another problem -- finding the ap propriate treatment.
Dr. Robert Clubb, medical di rector of the Boston-based Na tional Asbestosis Foundation, maintains the medical profession is not fully aware of how treatable the disease is.
"It is felt by the majority of the physicians that asbestosis is a hopeless disease and that's not true... there are a lot of things that can be done for these peo ple," Clubb said.
Dr. Bartley Cilento of Scituate, president of the Norfolk South District Medical Society, dis agrees with that assessment. He maintains most physicians in the county have been appraised of the situation and are prepared to con trol the disease in their patients. "Asbestosis was a subject of dis cussion at one of our more recent meetings," he said.
"You can have a positive test, but it does not mean its life threat ening."
Some 300 workers at the Quincy shipyard last week began receiv ing results of tests done in Novem
ber by Dr. Irving Selikoff of New York. The study was confined to those who worked at the yard 12 or more years ago.
Selikoff said he could not com ment on the specific results until the study is completed.
Earlier reports indicated the results would show more than 80 percent of the workers suffering from scar tissue frqpi asbestos.
But if the calls to the Norfolk County Hospital in Braintree, which specializes in respiratory disease, are any indication, the
number of positive results is not high.
Kevin Kenny, public relations
director for the hospital, said four
men called last week saying Selikoff had recommended they seek medical help. Each sched uled appointments.
The disease can't be cured, but the symptons can be treated, he said. The hospital can prescribe medicine to reduce lung conges tion and exercises to increase the capacity of the undamaged sec tions of the lung.
In some cases the patients will only need to be told to stop smok ing and avoid contact with any other dangerous substances that could harm lungs already dam aged, he said.
Clubb said other studies showed that 95 percent of those exposed to
asbestos develop some type of \
lung-related diseases over time, ;
including lung cancer and bronchitis.
It takes 10 years for the first signs of complications to surface and then the complications be come increasingly worse over the next 20 to 40 years.
"But I think that just because there is scar tissue, that does not mean they're going to get cancer; not at all." He said about 10 percent develop cancer of the lungs, while another 20 percent develop other fatal bronchial com plications.
But what that really means is that 70 percent won't die from the
disease," Clubb said. He said something must be
done to ensure "that these guys do obtain good medical care and means for proper survival. What is going to happen is that when they develop shortness of breath and can no longer function on the job, then I imagine they will either quit, be fired of retire."
It is up to labor unions, industry and insurance cotnpanies to ensure the proper medical treat ment, he said. ^ .
i.vv
The facts on asbestos
Fifteen years aeo_ asbestos figured
in the news only in terms of the world
market for its uses, the price, and
whether its applications could be
expanded to the general benefit of
mankind. Today, we are uncomfort
ably aware of walking on floor tiles
made from it, or under ceiling tiles
from which tiny, invisible, deadly
fibres may be drifting down -- to join
those that billow forth from the brake
linings of automobiles.
Awareness_of hazard to asbestos
-workers- has been fairly well estab
lished for some years, officially rec
ognized to a degree by the changed
attitudes of the Workmen's Compen
sation Board. The apprehended threat
to the general public is a more recent
phenomenon, and one that has been
marked by chaotic responses. Should
this ceiling be allowed to remain?
Should that duct be torn out? Would it be wise to close the school altogeth er? Would paint hold the fibres in
place on fire dampers? How many
fibres per cubic centimetre can be
tolerated? Is there no alternative
substance?
In dealing with any threat, it is a
fairly sound rule to begin by taking its
measure; by assembling the facts
from the best known authorities and,
if necessary, by commissioning new
studies. The Ontario Government has
made the right move by setting up a
three-man royal commission to look
into the hazards of asbestos and to
recommend safety standards.
'
Something of the kind might have
occurred sooner (Opposition nagging
goes back quite a long way) but the
move is welcome nevertheless --
doubly so with the assurance of Labor
Minister Robert Elgie that the new
commission would neither stall nor
displace other efforts to obtain infor mation or establish safety. "If further immediate action of a remedial na ture appears to be warranted," said Dr. Elgie, "we will not hesitate to act simply because a commission has been appointed to conduct a thorough study of the entire subject."
There is much to be studied, and a number of different opinions to be resolved -- among them the selection of a standard of safety in terms of
fibres per cubic centimetre of air. New Democratic Party Leader Mi chael Cassidy, noting that the Gov ernment had been reviewing occupa tional exposure standards since 1978. said that the current standard of two fibres was much too high and that it should be .5or .1.
This proposal carries with it the weight of apparent U.S. Government endorsement. Earlier this month, Jo Lindhard, an employee with the stan dards branch of the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration in Washington, said that within a year
the United States would probably adopt a standard between .5 and .1 (The standard at present is the same as Ontario^ -- 2 fibres per cc.)
The royal commission may be able to help make an intelligent choice. The scientific and medical back grounds of its members encourage optimism: the chairman, Stefan Dupre, has served on the National Research Council; Fraser Mustard is dean of health science at McMaster University; and Robert Uffin is dean of applied sciences at Queen's Uni versity, and formerly chief science advisor to the federal Government.
We may not all breathe more easily now that the commission has been set up -- but in time we may..
FMSI 05571
Defense Witness for Firm Disputes
Man's Claim That He Has Asbestosis
By MYRNA OLIVER
Tlnwi Staff Writer
A Philadelphia pulmonary disease expert asserted Wed
nesday that former Long Beach Naval Shipyard worker
Richard J. Hogard has chronic bronchitis caused by smok
ing and does not have asbestosis as Hogard claims.
Dr. William Weiss offered the diagnosis as the first de
fense witness for Johns-Manvilie Carp., the world's largest
miner and manufacturer of asbestos, in Hogard's Los An
geles Superior Court trial against asbestos manufacturers.
Hogard claims Johns-Manvilie and Raybestos-Manhat-
tan Inc. failed to warn him of the health hazards of work
ing with their asbestos insulation products and thus were
responsible for his contracting asbestosis.
Questioned by Johns-Manvilie attorney Fulton Haigh
about Hogard's physical condition, Weiss said with convic
tion: "1 believe he has chronic bronchitis attributable to
heavy cigarette smoking."
Weiss said in answer to Haight's questioning that asbes
tos dust cannot cause bronchitis. The prime cause of
bronchitis, he said, is cigarette smoking.
Weiss' diagnosis was a direct contradiction to that of Dr.
Oscar J. Balchum, head of County-USC Medical Center's
lung disease unit, who testified earlier on Hogard's behalf.
Balchum said Hogard has asbestosis and does not have
bronchitis.
Balchum examined Hogard several times from 1975 to
1977. Hogard left the shipyard with a disability pension in
late 1975 after the doctor advised him to get away from as
bestos fibers. Balchum, like Hogard's other doctors, also
advised him to quit smoking, a feat Hogard testified he has
been unable to accomplish. .
Weiss, a professor of pulmonary medicine at Hahne
mann Medical College, Philadelphia, and former practi
tioner and researcher at Philadelphia General Hospital,
never personally examined Hogard. He made his diagnosis
from examining X-rays and results of lung function tests
made by Balchum.
Showing jurors ,an X-ray which still bore Balchum's
pencil marks, Weiss said the scarring which Balchum had
attributed to asbestosis was actually caused by Hogard's
smoking. Lines Balchum had identified on the X-ray as
"pleural thickening," another symptom of the irreversible
asbestosis. were described by Weiss as mere "muscle sha
dows."
"This is normal," the manufacturers' medical witness
said, "for a man who has smoked a pack of cigarettes a day
for 25 years."
One reason Balchum had insisted Hogard had no chronic
bronchitis was that tests showed no obstruction of air flow
common in the disease. Questioned about that during
cross-examination by Hogard's attorney Robert B. Stein
berg, Weiss said many people with bronchitis never show
such obstruction until the disease advances into emphyse
ma.
Weiss said a high red blood cell count, called polycythe-
nia, helped move the diagnosis away from asbestosis to
bronchitis.
"A fair number of people with bronchitis do develop po-
lycythema," he said. "It never happens in asbestosis."
Disagreeing with other experts, Weiss said asbestosis
develops only after about 20 years of constant exposure to
asbestos fibers. Hogard worked with asbestos materials
about 10 years.
Anyone with asbestosis also should have "crackles," dry
crackling noises while breathing, Weiss said, and no test
results showed Hogard had them. An asbestosis victim, he
added, could only expect to get worse, and Hogard's lung
function tests in 1977 actually showed some improvement
over those in 197ft
I
Hogard, 4t), has saia ne smoked one pack oi cigarettes a
day since he was 15. (Haight insists pre-trial statements
by Hogard indicate he regularly smoked two packs a day.)
The asbestos manufacturers have maintained that Ho
gard's cough, by now familiar to jurors, and lung scarring
were caused by smoking and a 1978 bout with pneumonia.
Weiss said X-rays taken in 1979 and 1980 showed an
added scar tissue on Hogard's lungs, which he attributed
directly to the pneumonia.
.
As for the effect of asbestos on chances of getting lung
cancer, Weiss said he believes the key cause is smoking
and that asbestos would be only an "enhancing agent." He
said a smoker working with asbestos would have a five
times greater risk of getting lung cancer than a smoker in
another occupation--an estimate far lower than that of
other researchers. The Hogard case in the courtroom of Judge Earl F. Riley
is being watched by litigants across the nation who hope it
will establish guidelines for settling their own similar cases
out of court. More than 1,000 such suits are pending in the
Los Angeles Superior Court alone.
........ ....... . .. ' 1
f,, '
Asbestosis: Johns-Manvilie view
To the Editor of The Day:
-
Your Feb. 21 1980 editorial,
"Money and morals look to source
for cost of asbestosis," is a continua
tion of the media's regrettable pat
tern of publishing only those items
which sensationalize a subject
rather than which tend to inform the
public in a balanced report.
I would like to specifically respond
to some of the statements in your ed
itorial. You are quite right that
knowledge of asbestosis did exist in
the 1930s. At that time, however, the
disease was thought to be confined to
the very intense occupational expo
sures found in asbestos textile mills.
Steps were taken then and after
wards to control the dust exposure
and to learn more about the medical
aspects of asbestos exposure.
In the early 1930s the asbestos in
dustry and its Insurance carriers un
derwrote medical studies on asbes
tos-related disease. Seminars,
attended by the chief medical officer
of the U.S. Public Health Service
and his counterpart in Canada, were
conducted during these studies. A
documented history of continuing in
dustry participation in medical stu
dies can be traced from the 1930s up
to today.
Further there are some additional
facts about exposures in the ship
yards that the media continually
chooses to overlook:
The government specifically re
quired that asbestos products be
used for insulation and fire protec
tion in warships.
The government was responsible
for the shipyard work practices in
the Navy yards.
The government followed the
U.S. Public Health Service recom
mended standard for exposure set in
1938.
As late as 1946 the government
published a study which indicated
that insulation work in the shipyards
was not a hazardous occupation.
The association between exposure
to asbestos and lung cancer in insu
lation workers was not confirmed
until publication of a study in 1964 by
Dr. Irving Selikoff of Mount Sinai
School of Medicine. In that same
year Johns-Manvilie began putting a
caution label on its asbestos insula
tion products, seven years before
government regulations required
such labeling.
.
From this same study the medical
community now agrees that "but for
cigarette smoking, lung cancer
would not have been a significant
disease factor among asbestos
workers." It is beyond our under
standing why this association be
tween cigarette smoking, asbestos
exposure and lung cancer is contin
ually overlooked by the media when
they print stories about asbestos-
related disease.
Also, asbestos is not the only
known cause of mesothelioma. The
medical community has identified
the existence of mesothelioma in po
pulations exposed to naturally oc-
curing zeolites (a silicate used in
water softening and as an absor
bent) and in sugar cane workers in
Louisiana.
' James F. Reis
The writer is director, Asbestos
Policy, for Johns-Manvilie Corp.,
Denver, Colo.
/
; : ":r~ ; ;,*j .
. rr ** _'}. K^ /, G r*
2! t<\ . ^
FMS1 05572