Document 2jkn9030rzVOXVwegBRxD1yZ5

To: michael.g.bird@exxonmobil.com <michael.g.bird@exxonmobil.com>; Bruce Jarnot <jarnotb@api.org> From: Galvin, Jennifer B <Jennifer.B.Galvin@conocophillips.com> Cc: brian.e.doll@exxonmobil.com <brian.e.doll@exxonmobil.com>; stephen.m.bowes@exxonmobil.com <stephen.m.bowes@exxonmobil.com>; Cagen, Stuart Z SHLOIL-SHOIL- SHS <stuart.cagen@shell.com>; Russell White <whiter@api.org> Bcc: Received Date: 2007-08-08 18:52:33 GMT Subject: RE: Alternate to PI calls? RE: Shanghai BHRC-TC Bruce, I would like to ask for a short, 30 min. conf call of the TC to decide on how to go forward with this issue. Please set one up. Thanks, Jennifer Galvin 918-661-3865 918-662-1139 (fax) 918-519-6302 (cell) -----Original Message----From: michael.g.bird@exxonmobil.com [mailto:michael.g.bird@exxonmobil.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 1:34 PM To: Bruce Jarnot Cc: brian.e.doll@exxonmobil.com; Galvin, Jennifer B; stephen.m.bowes@exxonmobil.com; stuart.cagen@shell.com; Russell White Subject: Re: Alternate to PI calls? RE: Shanghai BHRC-TC The reason for the proposed resumption of calls was to stimulate exchange between Otto & Rich on the actual study mechanics over & above the QA/QC scope & function. At this time i.e. as the study end is in sight and individual schedules are full, there is more need than ever for good communication. I think we should try to encourage this between Rich & Otto and provide any and every opportunity - the recent reports and their interface gives us a valid reason for a call and to do this jointly is an efficient use of their time. If we can try for one such call in the month I think it might avoid problems. I think Jerry's activity is independent of this and though communication with him is always welcome - and appreciate the thought Bruce- you'll understand that it wouldn't satisfy the above. Michael Michael G. Bird, PhD., DABT Toxicology & Environmental Sciences Division, ExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc. 1545 Route 22 East P.O. Box 971 Annandale, New Jersey 08801-0971 tel: 9087301060 fax: 908 730 1199 SH ELL-MCCLU RG-054950 Email: michael.g.bird@exxonmmobil.com This document and all information contained within this electronic message may be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are on notice that any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution, or taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically transmitted materials is prohibited. "Bruce Jarnot" <jarnotb@api.o rg> To "Galvin, Jennifer B" <Jennifer.B.Galvin@conocophillips.co 08/07/0711:19 m>, <michael.g.bird@exxonmobil.com>, AM <stuart.cagen@shell.com> cc "Russell White" <whiter@api.org>, <brian.e.doll@exxonmobil.com>, <stephen. m. bowes@exxonmobil.com> Subject Shanghai Alternate to PI calls? RE: BHRC-TC SHELL-MCCLURG-054951 Michael. Jennifer, Stuart - We might want to defer the re-start of periodic PI conference calls until after the QA/QC initiative has gotten up and running... The QA/QC team already faces strong competition for PI availability, including travel (Richard returns to Shanghai tomorrow, Otto returns next week), end-of-study activities (e.g., developing or receiving the preliminary CC data set) and SRP-Subteam discussions re: case ascertainment I ERP-Subteam inquiries re: informed consent). If the TC has specific questions perhaps stemming from mid-year progress reports - I could try to schedule a one-off conference call with Pis. Might it instead be useful to schedule a monthly Technical Committee conference call with Jerry Rice, in lieu of monthly PI calls during 3Q 2007 - given Jerry's leadership role on the SRP/ERP panels and QA/QC team? Best Regards - Bruce. -----Original Message----From: Galvin, Jennifer B [mailto:Jennifer.B.Galvin@conocophillips.com] Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 5:31 PM To: michael.g.bird@exxonmobil.com; stuart.cagen@shell.com Cc: Russell White; Bruce Jarnot; brian.e.doll@exxonmobil.com; stephen. m. bowes@exxonmobil.com Subject: RE: Shanghai BHRC-TC I don't have a problem with this starting to happen again. I think the question from the Pis will be, what is it you want us to talk about, so we just need to be prepared to answer that question. Have a good weekend everyone. Thanks, Jennifer Galvin 918-661-3865 918-662-1139 (fax) 918-519-6302 (cell) -----Original Message----From: michael.g.bird@exxonmobil.com [mailto:michael.g.bird@exxonmobil.com] Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 1:28 PM To: Galvin, Jennifer B; stuart.cagen@shell.com Cc: Russell White; Bruce Jarnot; brian.e.doll@exxonmobil.com; stephen. m. bowes@exxonmobil.com Subject: Fw: Shanghai BHRC-TC SH ELL-MCCLU RG-OS49S2 Now that the contract issues have been settled I wondered if we could get back to our previous modus operandi for the BHRC Technical Committee to have occasional but regular calls with the Pis for review and update. For instance Stuart & I had each taken the lead previously on calls with Otto & Richard respectively, with other TC members participating in these as schedules permitted. With the interdependency of the DP and CC studies in terms of data transfer it may make more sense now to have combined calls with Otto & Richard - again for purposes of update, identifying any potential hurdles and to facilitate exchange. Jennifer & Stuart if you are on board this, I would very much like to see this reimplimented. Michael Michael G. Bird, PhD., DABT Toxicology & Environmental Sciences Division, ExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc. 1545 Route 22 East P.O. Box 971 Annandale, New Jersey 08801-0971 tel: 9087301060 fax: 908 730 1199 Email: michael.g.bird@exxonmmobil.com This document and all information contained within this electronic message may be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are on notice that any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution, or taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically transmitted materials is prohibited. SH ELL-MCCLU RG-054953