Document 2j8ExyVr2MrQ6RJv9pv9ymxD7

**>. ** g .^ iUyu&siK. INTRA-COMPANY CORRESPONDENCE JUN 25 1963 t* *r. II. A. Lots - Granville flM Hr. It. V. Saith - Toledo ktilM ItrmODS FOR EVALUATION KAVLO WIST **" Juno!1*, 1863 m Mr. 3. C. tecs - Berlin Mr. J. K. Boynton - Hew York Hr. R. E. Davis - Newark Hr. F. H. Sdvtrds - Toledo Kr. A. S. ScvUn - New York Hr* C. fa\ r Toledo*^-' ,*Cr. J. . Rkoaac - Berlin Hr. J. K. Ues:lc.s-c - Granville I fcsve read ever yesr note ef June 20th addressed to Boynton on sethods of w.*:Hunting Kaylo dust, Then you ere talking about health fcaxarcs free dust, < ui* dealing vith e tetter uhieh should bs evaluated by soaeono trzir.ad in the *ir*>vrt* techniques. So have ir. the past used Owens-Illinois* specialise to cheek on chti hazards in our plant due to industrial dust. If there is question con cerning Kayio dust, as it youId be usee by people who fabricate fittings for our &ayl, it is suggested that Hr. Boynton notify F. H. Edwards. that, sc appraisal of the industrisl hazard involved in the fabrication of Kayio block be aads. I ota sure that Mr. Schssrds can obtain such an analysis fro* qualified people which will alio;: us to proparly determine whether there la a hazard free fabrica ting Kaylo or not. Detersinntiocs such &s outlined in your letter vouId give a quantitative appraisal of bov such dust could be airborne, but would not determine whether there via any industrial hazard fres? such dust. The second point is the aoro iaportant. 1** ? e-j. W/J31150