Document 2NjBgYmk17J3d4nRv1o2n9Ggp

agenda /0~ 3 Q ua^c^- HEALTH. SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE Marriott Castle Bermuda Salon D Wednesdj Member 26, 1990 8:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. I. OPENING OF MEETING II. APPROVAL OP MINUTES OP PREVIOUS MEETING III. ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION ON GROUNDWATER ISSPES F. Borrelli /Group IV. TASK FORCE ACTIVITIES A. Waste Minimization Task Force B. Brocka B. Transportation - VCM Emergency Response Network - Survey - Legal Issues - Next Step - East Coast Response Effort M. Scheck R. Luss F. Borrelli F. Borrelli C. Workshop on MSDS^ & Labels - Discussion on follow-up activities F. Borrelli V. OLD BUSINESS A. Vinyl Chloride Standard B. Angiosarcoma Registry C. Cercla - Definition of Federally-Permitted Releases D. SARA 313 Date - 1989 E. "Third Third" FO 24 Waste VI. NEW BUSINESS Group VII. ENFORCEMENT UPDATE/REGULATORY AND LEGAL Group ^tolApferiATE ON OTHER VI ACTIVITIES M. Scheck IX. NEXT MEETING AND ADJOURNMENT CTL018933 The Vinyl Institute, A Division of The Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc. Wayne Interchange Plaza II, 155 Route 46 West, Wayne, New Jersey 07470, (201) 890-9299 Antitrust Reminder Group activities of competitors are inherently suspect under the antitrust laws. Many agreements among competitors, however, are both legal and beneficial to the industry. The best vehicle for enjoying the benefits of permitted agreements among competitors while avoiding the pitfalls of illegal agreements is by belonging to a trade association like SPI which takes its obligations in this regard very seriously. All SPI staff members are well versed in antitrust matters and the association relies heavily on their judgment to see that topics which may give an appearance of an agreement that would violate the antitrust laws are not discussed at SPI meetings. The fact that an SPI staff member is present at a meeting, however, should not invite probing to determine how far a discussion can proceed before it becomes apparent that it is improper and is cut off. It is the responsibility of each member in the first instance to avoid raising improper subjects for discussion. This reminder has been prepared to assure that participants in SPI meetings are aware of this obligation. The Dos and Don'ts presented below highlight only the most basic antitrust principles. Each participant in an SPI meeting should be thoroughly familiar with the SPI Bulletin, "The Antitrust Laws and You--A Guide and Introduction to an Understanding of the Federal Antitrust Laws," and should consult counsel in all cases involving specific situations, interpretations, or advice. PONT 1. Do not, in fact or appearance, discuss or exchange information regarding: (a) Individual company prices, price changes, price differentials, mark-ups, discounts, allow ances, credit terms, etc., or data that bear on price, e g.. costs, production, capacity, inventories, sales, etc. (b) Industry pricing policies, price levels, price changes, differentials, etc. (c) Changes in industry production, capacity or inventories. (d) Bids on contracts for particular products; procedures for responding to bid invitations. (e) Plans of individual companies concerning the design, production, distribution or marketing of particular products, including proposed territones or customers. (f) Matters relating to actual or potential individual suppliers that might have the effect of excluding them from any market or of influencing the business conduct of firms toward such suppliers or customers. 2. Do not discuss or exchange information regarding :he above matters during social gatherings incidental to SPI-sponsored meetings, even n ost 3. Do not meet without SPI staff or counsel presen' DO 1. Adhere to prepared agendas for all SPI meetings and object any time meeting minutes do not accurately reflect the matters which transpired 2. Understand the purposes and authority of each SPl group in which you participate. 3. Consult with the SPI General Counsel and your company counsel on all antitrust questions relating to SPI meetings. 4. Protest against any discussions or meeting activities which appear to violate the antitrust laws; disassociate yourself from any such discussions or activities and leave any meeting in which they continue. CTL018934 # minutes ^ JOINT MEETING LEGAL COMMITTEE AND HEALTH, SAFETY & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE South Seas Plantation Captiva Island, Florida Thursday May 10, 1990 1:30 pm ATTENDEES: See Attached List I OPENING OF MEETING AND SELF INTRODUCTIONS Frank Borrelli, Chairman of the Health, Safety & Environment Committee convened the meeting at 1:30 pm and asked for self introductions. He noted that Mr. Luss, as chairman of the Legal Committee would be co-chairing the meeting. II TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE Mr. Ledvina gave a detailed presentation and responded to questions on the TCLP as promulgated on March 29, 1990. He reviewed its impact on the industry. Copies of Mr. Ledvina's overheads were agreed to be attached to the minutes of the meeting. Discussion focused on the Land Disposal Restrictions program. III TRANSPORTATION - EAST COAST RAIL SAFETY Mr. Borrelli summarized the activity of several companies that have been meeting to review transportation issues, including a February 15, 1990 meeting with Conrail and their contractor. He reported on recent activities in the mutual aid response area and noted that a survey had been disseminated by VI staff at his request to determine interest in formalizing a mutual aid response network. Mrs. Scheck reported on the results of the survey. Mr. Schiffer noted that the VI may be the proper place for a discussion on the issue in general, but that engineering related issues may effect the viability of such a program and that the Chemical Manufacturers' Association may be the appropriate focus for that discussion. Mr. Borrelli suggested a follow up meeting to discuss the issue and noted that he would work with VI staff to set up such a session and that it would include an appropriate CMA staff person. IV EDC OSHA/EDC Seminar: Mr. Graybill reviewed the results of a Committee survey done at his request to explore the interest in holding a special meeting to share member company experience in methods used to achieve lowered expsoure levels as they relate to EDC. He noted positive feedback in holding such a meeting and reviewed possible potential sites/dates. Following ----------------1 l-'yi'-'-f I^i,rnnreinn| Mt- r.rayhi 1 1 + 4-ha+- ho i.irm 1 A unrV nut______________ The Vinyl Institute, A Division of The Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc. Wayne Interchange Plaza II, 155 Route 46 West, Wayne, New Jersey 07470, (201) 890-9299 ___ CTL018935 the details for such a meeting, but that he would the person within PPG who would assist in putting meeting together, as his job responsibilities are scheduled to change in the near term. not the be OSHA/EDC Litigation Update: Mr. de la Cruz noted that he had distributed May 3 a copy of the final brief filed April 30 in the SPI (VI) appeal of the ethylene dichloride provisions of the air contaminants rule issued by OSHA. Mr. de la Cruz reviewed the extended briefing schedule established by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Mr. de la Cruz also noted that should the Court schedule oral arguments, that that process would not begin until early 1991. LITIGATION UPDATE A. California Proposition 65: Mr. de la Cruz updated the group on the status of the implementation of Prop 65 and noted that the exclusion for FDA governed products stands at this time. B. Fire Litigation: Mr. Luss noted that the trial in the Dupont Plaze Hotel fire in Puerto Rico is ongoing and reviewed the fire investigations undertaken by the industry. Mr. Luss also reviewed the HappyLand Social Club fire in New York City. He commented that a fire investigation team had been sent to New York immediately after the fire due to New York State's marketshare liability statutes and, therefore, the potential involvement of the vinyl industry is likely to be seen in the litigation. C. Other: Mr. Luss noted an increased amount of activity in the environmental area as it related to criminal charges developing over the next several years. He suggested that companies review their own policies and procedures in the regulatory compliance and reporting areas. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Mrs. Scheck updated the group on the status of the reauthorization of the Clean Air Act. She asked members to notify her of any potential provisions that could have a unique impact on the vinyl industry, should VI/SPI legislative involvement be needed. OLD BUSINESS Vinyl Chloride Rule: Mr. de la Cruz noted that it is his understanding that the vinyl chloride rule had been sent May 10 to the Office of Management and Budget and that no problems are seen that would deter its final publication. When it is published, the elements of the settlement agreement reached in 1988 will be implemented. New Jersey Labeling: Mr. Ledvina updated the group on the labeling requirements in effect in New Jersey. Mr. Goodman commented that he had done a recent presentation internal at OxhChem that he would be glad to make available to those who are interested. CTL018936 Ontario Level I Study: As follow up to a special HSE meeting with companies working on the Level One studies in Canada, Mr. Holbrook stated that the contractor's report has not yet been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment by either Radian (retained by BFGoodrich) or by O'Connor Associationes (retained by ESSO). He summarized the proposed emission levels contained in the Radian report as they relate to process emissions (10 ppm/3 hour average); reactor openings (15 lbs/1 million pounds produced); RVCM levels in suspension and dispersion process; equipment leaks. He noted that the leaks proposed would not be considered maximum allowable control technology (MACT) in the U.S. Mrs. Russotto commented that ECVM has been working on a model plant and that she would keep the VI apprised on this activity. FO 24 Wastestream Survey: Mrs. Scheck noted that following a Jaunary 23 meeting a survey had been conducted on wastestream classification procedures and practices. Mr. de la Cruz noted that comments had been filed January 8 with EPA on the Agency's Proposed Rule for Third Third scheduled wastes incorporating information on FO 24. Mr. Ledvina noted that the 900 page rule was released May 8 and that it should be in the Federal Register within the next several weeks. Catalytic Oxychlorination Process of Aliphatic Hydrocarbon as New Sources of Dioxins: Following a discussion of this item at the previous meeting, Mrs. Scheck noted that she had provided committee members a copy of the more detailed report. Wastewater Effluent - Mssrs. Holbrook and Graybill noted that their companies have both reviewed this issue since the report from Europe and noted no conforming findings. Mrs. Russotto updated the committee on pertinent studies underway within the European Council of Vinyl Manufacturers addressing the degradation of vinyl chloride in water as well as a European Commission study on volatile organic compounds. She offered to share both reports with VI members when completed. - SARA 313: Mrs. Scheck noted that Medline now has available for computer access all data collected under SARA for 1988 and 1989 data will be inputted as forwarded to the Government. She inquired whether as a result of the computer availability of the data there was any further need for the VI to collect this information. It was agreed that at least for 1989 data, collection should take place if Medline access is not up to data. that Material Safety Data Sheets: Mr. Luss suggested that during the summer months a meeting be held in the Atlanta area to review current company practices related to labeling and MSDS use and related issues. There being general agreement that there was interest in proceeding, Mr. Luss and Mrs. Scheck will work together on the details for such a meeting. CTL018937 VIII NEW BUSINESS A. Waste Minimization Mr. Ledvina reviewed previous Committee discussions on the issue of waste minimization and noted the reasons that the issue c recycling of catalyst containers had been specifically discussed. Following a discussion on U.S. Department of Transportation regulations governing container reuse and current limitations on bulk shipments, Mr. Stromberg suggested that while an obvious solution is not apparent, it would be useful to identify the packaging experts within member companies and convene a meeting to further explore the issue. Mr. Gellner offered to chair a task force to pursue the issue. Companies who expressed an interest in participation on the Task Force included VISTA, BFGooddrich, OxyChem, Georgia Gulf, CertainTeed, Akzo and Atochem. B. Groundwater Individual member company representatives were to discuss activity related to this issue. It was agreed that this would be discussed at the next regularly scheduled meeting. C. Company Practices - Reporting: Following a discussion on current company practices regarding the reporting of spills and releases, it was agreed that this was an area in which more information may be needed to talk realistically about how practices compare. Mr. Kachtick agreed to develop a questionnaire at the appropriate time and to gather additional information. XI ENFORCEMENT UPDATE Mr. Luss updated the group on Occidental's NESHAP settlement at its Pennsylvania facility as noted in the April 25 Federal Register. He noted that all companies should carefully review existing NESHAPS requirements and their required use by pilot plants. X NEXT MEETING There being no other business, the meeting was adjourned. next regularly scheduled meeting will be held from 8 am on September 26, immediately preceding the Vinyl Chloride Assocaition meeting at the Marriott in Bermuda. The 2 pm Safety CTL018938 MEETING ATTENDEES: Doug Niewoehner, Air Products & Chemicals Nancy Russotto, European Council of Vinyl R.T. Kelly, CertainTeed Corp. C.A. Gellner, CertainTeed Corp. E.S. Schiffer, Georgia Gulf Doug Sherly, Air Products & Chemicals Frank Borrelli, Georgia Gulf Meredith Scheck, Vinyl Institute W.C. Holbrook, BFGoodrich Cris Lunn, Borden Chemicals and Plastics Erv Schroeder, Shintech Don Goodman, OxyChem Sanford Stromberg, Atochem Jim Kachtick, OxyChem Larry Burmeier, Dow Sherry Carr, CertainTeed John Krokosky, Dow Chemical Don Pearson, PPG Industries Clark Graybill, PPG Industries Tom Goeke, Klockner Pentaplast Bob Leeks, Akzo Chemicals Peter de la Cruz, Keller & Heckman Joe Ledvina, Vista Manufacturers CTL018939 TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC PROMULGATED MARCH 29, 1990 REPLACES EP TOX AS A CHARACTERISTIC OF HAZARDOUS WASTE USES DILUTE ACIDIC SOLUTION TO EXTRACT A SOLID WASTE (TCLP) WASTEWATERS ARE ANALYZED DIRECTLY WITHOUT EXTRACTION CTL018940 TC CHEMICALS FINAL RULE INCLUDES 25 NEW ORGANICS PLUS THE 14 EP MATERIALS VCM REGULATORY LEVEL 200 PPB; EDC 500 PPB THE TCLP BECOMES THE NEW TEST TC WASTES BECOME HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES UNDER SECTION 101(14) OF CERCLA (RQ ADDED AT 40 CFR 302) CTL018941 EFFECTIVE DATE ALL GENERATORS OF MORE THAN 100 AND LESS THAN lr000 KG/MONTH MUST COME INTO COMPLIANCE WITH SUBTITLE FOR MANAGEMENT OF THEIR TC WASTES WITHIN ONE YEAR OF PUBLICATION. (3/29/91) ALL GENERATORS OF lr000 KG/MONTH OR MORE MUST COMPLY WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE DAY OF PUBLICATION. (9/25/90) CTL018942 LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS (LDR) TC WASTES NOT IMMEDIATELY SUBJECT TO THE LDR PROGRAM NEWLY IDENTIFIED WASTE WILL BE SUBJECT TO A SIX MONTH DEADLINE FOR LDR DETERMINATION WITH NO HAMMER TO TAKE EFFECT. OWNER OR OPERATOR OF A NEWLY-REGULATED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT MUST RETROFIT 4 YEARS FROM THE DATE OF PROMULGATION OF THE ADDITIONAL CHARACTERISTIC. WASTEWATER SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS COULD BE REQUIRED TO RETROFIT SOONER ONCE THE LDR IS PROMULGATED. CTL018943 TABLE 1 - EP TOXICITY REGULATORY LEVELS EPA HW Number CONTAMINANT REGULATORY Leve1 (mg/1) D004 D005 D006 D007 D016 DO 12 D008 D013 D009 D014 DOIO DOll D015 DOl 7 Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium 2,4-D Endrin Lead Lindane Mercury Methoxyc h1 or Selenium Silver Toxaphene 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 5.0 100.0 1.0 5.0 10.0 0.02 5.0 0.4 0.2 10.0 1.0 5.0 0.5 1.0 CTL018944 TABLE 2 - TC REGULATORY LEVELS EPA HW Number CONTAMINANT REGULATORY Level (mg/1) D004 D005 D018 D006 D019 D020 D021 D022 D007 D023 D024 D025 D026 DO 16 D027 D02B D029 D030 D012 D031 D032 D033 D034 D008 D013 D009 D014 D035 D036 D037 D03B DOIO D011 D039 D015 D040 D041 D042 D017 D043 Arsenic(*) Barium!*) Benzene Cadmium(*) Carbon Tetrach1 oride Chiordane Chlorobenzene Chloroform Chromium(*) o-Cresol m-Cresol p--Creso1 Cresol 2,4-D(*) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethylene 2,4-Dinitrotoluene Endrin(*) Heptac hlor Hexac hlorobenzene Hexac h1orobutadiene Hexachloroethane Lead(* ) Lindane(*) Mercury(*) Methoxychlor(* ) Methyl ethyl ketone Nitrobenzene Pen tac hlorophenol Pyridine Se1enium(*) Si1ver(#) Tetrachloroethylene Toxaphene(*) Trich1oroethylene 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2,4,5--TP (Si 1 vex)(#) Vinyl chloride 5.0 100.0 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.03 100.0 6.0 5.0 200.0 200.0 200.0 200.0 10.0 7.5 0.5 0.7 0.13 0.02 0.008 0.13 0.5 3.0 5.0 0.4 0.2 10.0 200.0 2.0 100.0 5.0 1 .0 5.0 0.7 0.5 0.5 400.0 2.0 1.0 0.2 1 (*) On the EP Toxicity constituent list CTL018945