Document 1g68O8xOG5LbYmgQGB49MbmNK
FILE NAME Rogers Corporation ROG
DATE 1972 Nov DOC ROG010
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Report - Rogers Corp - Asbestos Dust Survey
i"
ROGERS CORPORATION
FIBERLOYS DIVISION
7 BE
.
LL
O's
\
_..
.
_
_
al
_.
.
f
*
Lagerberg 00479
ROGERS CORPORATION
ROGERS CONNECTICUT
. ASBESTOS DUST SURVEY
On November 9 and 1972 a team of specialistsof
Redacted
|
!
Redacted
conducted an evaluation of the asbestos
exposure in the Fiberloys Division usinga mobile laboratory ,
meetings .. This evaluation consisted of air sampling for asbestos
;
7 respiratory function studies on exposed employees and meetingsmeetings |
with management in order to aid your organization in complying
with the Asbestos Standard establishebdy the Occupational Safety
and Health Act
:
+
We took twelve personal and general room air samples in this
T
Division and performed 113 respiratory function examinations in
a our mobile laboratory The results of our dust sampling were reviewed at the plant during the course of our management con-
.
ference on November 10 1972
Conclusions Conclusions and recommendations this report based
sam of tp he saml pling, i and onn persog nalobobservastions ervations
CONCLUSIONS
1
The ceiling Threshold Limit Value of 10 fibers was exceeded
in three of the twelve samples collected All three of these
-
samples
were
obtained
in the
Beater
Room
-
2 The current weighted average Threshold Limit Value of
ms
-... fibers apparently
----
- +
~~
~ .- -ne obtained Beater
ee -
_
;
__.
3.1976proposed Threshold LimLit imit Value
of 2 fibers
wasapparent thel Beay ter
Room
see
se
vem
eee en
v
. eee
warin Pm
Lagerberg 00480
controls are 4
Immediate engineerining dicated in the Beater
;
Room in order to reduce asbestos dust concentrations below
ceiling levels
5 A respirator maintenance program should be implemented in
the Beater Room in accordance with ANSI Standard 288.2-1969
60
.
A medical control program should be initiated for all new
current and terminating employees exposed to asbestos dust
in concentrations excess of 1 fiber as recommended by
-the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health in -
on -
their Criteria document asbestos.-
ms
. I ; ncluded reference -entitled
Asbestos Technique
7 - - - --
>
:;
~ cece wwwwwww
Redacted
ve nee eee
Joa RGN
12/26/72
cc
cactus
bbe
ewe
wevamnaite
Gane
tit tommnenenen
snveneee
ct ane
te
ete
ena
en
Lagerberg 00481
i
RECOMMENDATIRECOOMMENNDATSIONS
1.
pons
-
If possible asbestos fibers should be obtained in pulpable bags so that both the bag and its contents could be introduced into the process without the necessity of manually opening
- the bags
2
If it is found that pulpable bags cannot be used consideration
be soe
should given to providing local exhaust ventilation in
hood _.,
. + the form of some type of draft or suspended
at
soe ees mee re
effort capture and remove asbestos
ae
beater source ~ pee ee fibers at
sour efort - -c ----e =
ee
[ET
CS
grt
wouldventilation ventilation.
in periphepr eripy hery
~
of the waste drums which theasbest aso bess tos
deposited pulpable practical
dust 40
The cleaning and removal of
would best be accomplished
by vacuum cleaning rather than sweeping Sweeping may
generate hazardous dustconcentrations
Until engineeer ngi inen erig ng controls prove effective respirators
we
approved by the Bureau of Mines under Schedule 218 will
have to be worn in areas where dust concentrations exceed
the Threshold Limit Value
6
A respirator maintenance program should be instituted in
accordance with ANSI Z88.2-1969
7
In areas where concentrations of asbestos fibers exceed 10
fibers protective clothing is required This protective
clothing should consist of coveralls and head cove- ring
Respiratoarrse also needed in these areas
--
/
~
8 Contaminated clothing must be placeidn sealed containers
~
Se
CES
="
for transfer and
these
containers
must
be
marked with the
commences
ere
mene
mms
AS
~
-
~
asbestos warning sign
anotifie the clotd hing is
7
-contaminated with asbestos
10- Employees concentrations
provide lockd ers for
vo,
Lagerberg 00482
street and work clothes These lockers should
that street clothes do not become contaminated
dust
be so arranged with asbestos
_-
i
11
++
J.)
Warning signs designed in conformance with the National
Institute of Occupational Safety and Health should be posted throughout the plant where concentrations of asbestos dust
a
exceetd he Threshold Limit Value
rn
by trained . In areas where the Threshold Limit Value or ceiling levels
een
Etm:ay be exceeded monitoring monitoring and evaluation must be performed-
every six months This should be done a properly
we
=
AS poo
individual
,
aaa 13 employees and transferred
concentrations
requirements control program
examination within days __...__ individual's
exposedconcentrations
4
b
17 chest
oo
.
questisyo stn em qn uea stii onr naie re
d
Pulmonary function tests to include forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in one second
It should be noted that any individual who indicates a history of respiratory disease such as asthma bronchitis or emphysema should be carefully medically evaluated before job placement
in an asbestos exposure area
;
e - 14 medsai mecmea dicl al controls must be performed on all current "7" employees working in these areas be
15 (a
-*S-
Physical must examinations examinati~ ons o(0 n exposed employees
be provided
-
on a yearly basis
;
at
a
should 167 -Termination physical examinations must also be provided
termination of employment
include of the requirements of the medicalmedical control program
woven
nee ve amms
.
Lagerberg 00483
rr
DDISCUSISION SCUSSION
eed
The purpose of our survey was to aid you in complying with the asbestos standard which became effective on July 7 1972. Air
samples were taken to determine dust concentrations and respiratory function tests were performed fulfill one part of the medical
requirements
-
--.-
The eventual
goal
theasbestos
is
to reduce
employee
a a
_
- should below 2. _".... exposures to 2 fibers air eight working day 2}...
possible
be reduced
this level 00 20h un.
e - ngine engie neerir ng coi ntroln s asbg estos dust
-
concentr of a yourt plani t cao n ben reds uced to levels
Thres whichh is theo proposl ed Thrd eshold Limit Value for
_
1976
___ Discussions at the plant have indicated that it possible to
obtain asbestos fibers in pulpable bags permitting both the bag
and its contents to be introduced into the process without the
:
necessity of manually opening the bags It isunderstood that
the asbestos fibers along with the
containing them would
be introduced into a pulper and then to the beater at the
a.
""
proper time This process would have the advantage of wetting the asbestos fibers before they were introduced to the beater tending to reduce the amount of dry fibers which are now shaken
; loose during the manual handling operations
'
<7"
If for reason it is found that pulpable bags cannot be used
it might be possible to capture and remove the asbestos fibers
posible generated during the manual operations by the introduction of
7
some type of draft or suspended hood For greatest effect ~
the should be close possible such a in-
- order ~d - ust be withininfluenc--e - ~---
-
- hoods Considering asbestos emitted --
into the work atmosphere
:
thewaste container
circumference ..._.. __-..
cont captura ing ani d removn ing asbe estos r fibers
frompotential source
%
Lagerberg 00484
HOUSEKEEP ANI D FNLOG OR CARE
. + It appeared from observation that it was the practice of employees
to use brooms to sweep up containing scrap and waste
Vacuum cleaners or a central vacuum should be substituted for
brooms to help avoid the unnecessary generation of dust into the
of :
work atmosphere The cleaning of machines equipment and structural
..
*
parts the buildings should also be done by vacuuming for the
-
, same reason
-
"". Another sou ofr dusc t ce an be theportable vacuum cleaner itself
7
the not itself al. if
exhaust port is
provided with an absolute filter
~~~
~~~
i:U, nfortunately the small respirable fibers can pass through a
~~~
7
. . vacuum cleaner while the tra dusp t ip s tre appd ed The only way
as toinsure that the vacuum cleaner is not itself presentinga hazard
to the health of your employees is to have an absolute filter i
the exhaust port Needless to say this filter needs be
a
replaced periodically
;
RESPIRATORY PROTECTION
concentrations
.
should respirator
areas
where
they
can
:
become
personal dirty from borne
dust
The use of plastic bags for protective equipment when it is not
in use is an acceptable practice
~
.
When the use permanent type respirators is instituted each
employee should be issued his own respirator and instructed in
+
its care Each employee should also have a clean place in which
' to store his respirator and the respirators should be maintained
|=
_
-
. in accordance with ANSI Z88.2-1969 200 0
tees
of using his respirator in ... employee has the responsibility t accordance with the instructions and training he has received from management Management has the responsibility to see that the respirators are used in accordance with this instruction and training Each employee is responsible to guard against damage
Lagerberg 00485
a
eee
=F
+
or replaced immediately
For asbestos dust concentrations
listed by the Bureau of Mines in
that
it
found in your plant a respirator the 21B Schedule is acceptable
The employer is responsible for periodically inspecting the
:.. respiratorosf all employees for defects including a leak check
for ..: Respirators should be cleaned and disinfoencrt ege uld ar basis
~ and storage should be provided each respirator
.
2,
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
0
Atte an cnet fee
ee
we
areas where concentrations of asbestos exceed 10 fibers
1
protective clothing is required The most important requirements |
eamrpelocyoeveeralls and head covering which should be prov: ided for each
e fett ung
.
. en
-
other Visitors and
"
personnel who enter areas where concentrations
_
exceed 10 fibers should also be wearing protective clothing
;
and head covering A disposable smock would appear to be sufficient
for transient personnel
LAUNDRY
,
ot ee .....
Al _
The laundry who washes the protective clothing must be notified
writing that the clothing is contamwi itn h a ast bee std os The
laundering of contaminated clothing shall be done in such a manner as to prevent release of fibers into the atmosphere
-.+! Soiled clothing for the laundry should be placeidn plastic bags
and sealed and labeled as containing asbestos The appropriate
warning signs should be prominently displayed
LOCKER ROOMS " .
~~ me
Se,
v
oo
It www.w the employer's respons proi vidb e si epal rati e lt ocky ers -
om
__ employeee xpos sed
--
-
1 - - centrations above the Threshosl houldd .-----.- -
becontaminated should
______-.. asbestos
-
-
WARNING SIGNS
__
eee
ee
_
_
__
Signs used to warn against the asbe ofsat sbeo sts os should include
_
the design recommended by the National Institute of Occupational
Safety and Health
Lagerberg 00486
ASBESTOS SCRAP
Asbestos scrap containers should be kept closed except when the material is being deposited There appeared to be carelessness on the part of the employees in throwing scrap into these containers
This creates unnecessary dust and the practice should be eliminated
When a waste container is filled it should be sealed and made
ready for disposal
;
- MONITORING PROGRAM
nee ae
coe
nae
=
nen
eet tee ee te
soe
~
wee
ae
accordance - _-~ ies
the law regular monitoring program must be --~
-
theenvironment
samples ci +p controls outlined methods - --~ -
1 methods analysis
desirable monitoring
improvements
determine their effectiveness
TOOTAttached to the end of this report is a release entitled Asbestos
Tech Methn od andi Analq ysis u Techne ique
management __ Asdiscussedat the
conferenciemplementation oan . i _ medical function is to assist you with the ^ control program and to provide you with the
^ the necessary pulmonary function tests
sie | Redacted
of a
1 semen,
medical
**
opportunity to complete
1
Lagerberg 00487
___
Z
ROGERS CORPORATION
FIBERLOYS DIVISION
ROGERS CONNECTICUT
.
DATA
METHOD OF SAMPLING - 37 mm Millipore Type AA filters
_- METHOD Coun - t Coue ntd ed using phase contrast microscope
SAMPLE
oo
a
eee he .
pee
cele
SAMPLE
272 Breathing back of
:
4
calendar Neil Hart Finishing Room
-Trace
Breathing
1+
inspecting stacking
FinishingDepartment
packaging
.
ir
-274
operator Breathing zone dryeG r renier
end
of
> Det
:
Det
276
Francis Clements - adding asbestos tobeater
and cleaning up
under Breathing zone of operator of
machine 851 R. Trobiak
cut
TO
ts
58
Trace
277
'
_..
278
_* 278
_
General room sample across aisle from
sliding beater in front of double
. Beater Room
doors-
.
|
_
7. 8.1
-
a
0
General roomsample neanerar wall acrossaisle ss
_ from exhaust blower ontop of dryer sss _ Trace
279
Breathing zone of operator atfeedend of a
dryer Richard Frechette
Not Det
ee ;
Used Mektron Division
Lagerberg 00488
ee
- 10 -
_
:
ee
eS
SAMPLE
NUMBER
LOCATION REMARKS
FIBERS
283
Used in Mektron Division
as 284
_
J 7.
Breathing zone of Beater Room employee
Saul Ahola adding asbestos to beater
285
"
Breathing zone of Beater Room employee Saul
Ahola During hour's operation
..286 ~Breathing zone of Beater Room employee- oe mee
c Fray ncis Clements adding -asbestosto beater won
2a used
io
Division
289
{at
:
Breathingof
calendar Skelley Department
26.0
9.4
4.2
ye ae
Not
7
:
Rd
- Lagerberg 00489
-
=->--
wey
we
eee
.
ve
eee
a
an
a
ee ce
ee
ce
eee
pm
eee
ene
ee
ee
eee
nt
we
eee
ve
nee
mee
a
ee
tne
ce
tee
eee
ee
et
coe
wee
eee
ce
ee
s
a Ter
.
FICHER
a
es et
A hy He: 3. .
~
ety
>i
\_&
yt
u
ral
Yi |
...
...
...
+ =
Pe gelep eqs Ny rep wees mea i s eet
. .
-
2
{ Pz)
. .
a
.
=
7
White ground
~.
Pa
7
Care
1o7e 4t hal
a
HARIFIL :
Nay Cause Cause Oplaced Oplaced Lung Injure Injure
:
aluati Gone Cancer
DO KOT BREATHE PLET
we
Use only with adequate dilation dilation dilation and
.
,
approved vampiratory protective protective devices
cr
t
e+
~ ~- - . -- - .
.
eee
ee
-
cence ccna unmeet e mes ene cn geen ee eam ems enna canner rat eH gi ee catetae i cee ee ee
-
,
F
_
a
.
ae
Be
ee
ee :
wees
*e
fon
* Number are in hack
.
i
Lagerberg 00490
Introduction A Introduction Introduction Introduction Introduction Introduction
The purposes of sampling an borne contaminant such as asbestos
are to determine the time weighted average employee breathing zone
exposure as well as to determine the sources of the exposure .
.
The exposure employee
determinedbysamtap ken nel ar hie s s
Source exposures
breathing zone SourceSourceexpexpoosuressexpousurers esadreeterminedin part by general
oomair samples taken near a suspected source
__.
ra
The sampling equipment and analysis are the same in both cases
*
Principles of Sampling
In order to collect a sample representative of borne dust
which likely to enter the subject's respiratory system it
is necessary to position a collection apparatus near the nose .
and mouth of the subject or in his breathing zone
-
oe 1 ~emeaeenemee,
come
eee
-
ose
we
aa
tt
fo
wet
ee
ee
eee
eee
ee
en
.
>
~~
we
ctteee
_
The concentration of dustin the air to which a workeris exposed- wee ee
will willdepending naturenature the operationupon the type of work performed performed by the operator and the position of
the operator relative to the source of the dust The amount of
dust inhnted by a worker can vary daily seasonally and with
Lagerberg 00491
the weather In order to obtain representative samples of workers
exposures it is necessary to collect samples under varying conditions
of weather
shift
on different days
.
and at different
times
e
during a
The percentage ofworking times spenton different tasks will affect
_
the concentrationsofdusttheworker inhales since "the different tasksusually result inexposure concentrations The
percentage cancan determined schedules observation
of routines
average weighted exposure can be determined by using
Hours
Hours cone
look of actual hours worked
average
average
concentration
The concentration of any air contaminant resulting from an industrial
.
operation also varies with time Therefore a longer sampling
time will better approximate the actual average
-,
following ~~." With the-following
recommended
sampling procedureit is possible
-
~
sampling to collectsamplesat theworkers
breathingbreathing zone
forperiods
ss
from to
8hours
thus
permitting
the
t
evaluationof average
desifr ull 8 ha our shib ft shift -l - desirabe le desirableand
5
mh
-recomended -recommended procedure procedure : Furthermore Furthermore Furthermore Furthermore chrst chrst exposures of more more
Lagerberg 00492
rane neunramaas
ry ?
-
0
-3 ~
. e
normal
pat ern
2,
samplers
,...,...
use
samplers
samplers samplers . ;
,...
evaluating daily exposures samples should be collected as near
as possible to the workers breathing zone
.
~
samples room air
General
should be taken to identifysources
se ofexposuresas well as determine the levels to peoplepeople
passing through the area areexposed wee ee ee
ee
e
forSampling Sampling
Necessary Equipment
1. Sampling pump preferably battery operawitthetd he capability
he
drawing 1-2 liters per minute through a filter
'
2
One hose approximately 2 feet long
3 One hose to filter adapter
4
4 37mm Millipore type AA filters mounted in an open filter
holder
5.
Timer
ee
-
Collectingthe Sample _ -
mee
ee
mm nme
em mee
tame
trae ei wm
emt
Check sampling t buttorios operative that the
;
:
have a sufficient charge for theanti.
cipated sampling time
Redacted
-
a
.
i 00493 _ Redacted '
cof
-
|
Lagerberg 00493
__
nae
ry
eran
os)
Time tere
2
Connect theintet
3.
Connect the other end of the hose to the filter hose adapter
-- --
Remove red plug from filter holder assembly attach
;
filter
adapter to the
assembly
-~ 5. _ Attach pump to belt employee atand run hose over ee
one
shoulder sr employee eng
opposite
_
__
6 Attach filter toemployee's lapel Be sure that the filter
holder is not pointing upwards
a.
7
Remove clear plastic cover over filter cover in which blue
plug is inserted
8 Turn on pump and timer Adjust to desired air flow usually
2 liters per minute
\
9
While the sample is being taken observe the worker to identify
dust sources from his work practices or equipment
10.
a
sample been
collected .
whee
t
a
ied
cover and remove f+ ilter assemblyfrom adapter -= =
Sampling Tim~ :
The samplinttigmie me will be determined by dust concentrations in
Ly
the air High concentrations require a shorter sampling time
A melirtmiem sampling time of
Lagerberg 00494 15 intrintes is required required to determine
?
RS
a
eee
Te
| ly
"oi y
+
exposu asr bestose dust
In order to determine average employee exposures sampling time should range from a minimum of 90 minutes at 2 liters per minute
to a full 8 hours at 1 to 2 liters per minute|
-"""
Work schedules and previous sampling experience dictate the '
ya
SAMPLE ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
aie
a
~
-
Mounting the sample
zi
The prepaired dissolving
membrane milliliter of 1 solution of
dimethyl phthalate and diethyl oxalate The index of refraction
'
of this medium thus prepared is ND = 1.47
To prepair a sample for microscopic examination a drop of the
- mounting medium is placed on specially cleaned standard 25mm x
75microscopic slide A shaped piece lean reglet ngth h
~
of about 1
centimeter is excised from the filter with a scapel
solution A mumber 1 coverslip cleaned with Iense tissue is
-
placed over the filter filter wedge Slight pressure on the coverslip coverslip
achieves conturatbetween and
the mounting
The sample
Lagerberg 00495
T
~T
nS
cole ie
examined
as
as
transparent
;
howover a
waiting time of at least 20 minutes is advisable
.
. . The optical homogeneity of the resulting mount is nearly perfect
with only slight background granularity undorphase contrast
which disappears
disappears The- ee
ees
within one day
withindays mounting
sample shouldcounted. Cee
andi
- Be
nn nn
if
Evaluation of the Sample
The
filter
samples
mounted in in
a
mannerdescri abb oveead re
evaluated
...
...
...
... in terms of the concentration of asbestos fibers greater than 5
:
microns micro meters in length A microscope equipped with
contrast optics with a four millimeter high achromatic
objective is suitable for this determination TOX eye pieces one
ofof which contains a Porton or other suitable reticlaet the level
of the limiting diaphragm should be used The left half
of the Porton reticle field serves to define the counting area
-
of the field Twenty fields located at random on the sample are
counted and total asbestos longer fibers- than 5 microns are-
-recorded particlehaving anaspectratio of3 greater vo
ee
nee
ee
_
considered
cena ce me
on
.
Tete teen meereintttemensee etteianaee ~
tenes
vo
ge
fas
The following formula is used to calculate the number of fibers
per milliliter assuming the use of the milliporo 37mm typo AA
Filter said the optiesdescribed above
Lagerberg 00496
ae
TTT
oa)
ee
eee
ee
ee
ee
ee
ee
-7--7-
mee
va
sampling average fibers K fibers rate in liters x sampling time in minutes
Where K = 1/1
J
used If a different filter of optical system is
X = Filter area
sf
Field are 5 = iy
7 / 1,000
As fields asrequiredtoyieldat least100fiberstotal -mete mes ome
-_ count should counted general the minimum minimum number Cee memes
maximum
t
_
an
There may difficulty in counting a field containing over 20
fibers because in addition to the fibers being counted there are also present a number of grains which interfere with the accuracy
of the count
Calibration of Sampling Pumbs
The accurate calibration of a sampling device is essential to
the correct interpretation of an instrument's indication The
frequency of calibration is somewhat dependent on the use care
and - handling to which the pump is subjected Pumps should be
see
|
mot calibrated theyhavesubjected to havo misuse
-- ---_ repairedmanufacturer If hard
_
usage isgiven the instrumenitnstrument instrument , more frequentfrequentfrequent calibration calibration be
:
my
necessary
Lagerberg 00497
Y
wegen
ry
an!
ce
en
ee
ee
sf.
aegqee
<
cece
eee
nee vente eee pe gee
The use of an accurate rotoauter should be sufficient to check
_ the pump's calibration To perform this calibration the rotometer is placed in free air that the air low in first through
oo. the calibrating rotometer second through the ilor and third
__ retotm he re ett ome etr er the ramp itself itself The filter
should be prepared as described under coming coming racedure The rotometer will indiente the air flow to the lign The rotometer
uc.
should have a range of 0.6 1pm to 6 11
.
.
Lagerberg 00498
v
ee
T
ROGERS CORPORATION DUST SURVEY
Ex L 42fl 7
Plant
Fiberloys
Pump No. Sample No.
2
148
Results cc
Date Counted
1.18 1.18
Survey for Type of Contaminant
Asbestos
Grade
Location
3590
Beater Room -- Pulper
.
Date 2/9/76
|
|
Time Start
_
9:52
Time End
-
10:30
- Total Time
38 minutes
Sampling Rate
2
'
Sample Volume
76
_
AREA
Personal Sample XXX Name _ Edward Max
_ Conditions and Operations
1. Loading Pulper 2 bags chrysotile 12 bags crucidulite
2. Splash on cassette - avoid
min
liters
Tentative Recommendations
-
1 Ae ee Se ma e tN
ye
'
Lagerberg 00499
ROGERS CORPORATION DUST SURVEY
Plant
Fiberloys
e
.
Pump No.
Casella 045
Sample No. Results c0
148Y
2.05 .
2.05
Date Counted
Survey for Type of Contaminant
Asbestos
Grade
D3590
Location Beater Room - Pulpe
Date 2/9/76
Time Start
871
.
Time End
- 89503
Total Time
2318 minutes
.
Sampling Rate
2
min
AREA
.
Personal Sample
. Sample Volume 46.5
XX Name _ Judy Neal
liters
Conditions and Operations
1. Truck driver and helper
2. Loading pulper during test 2 bags chrysotile 12 bags crucidulite
Tentative Recommendations
CT
er
~~
Lagerberg 00500
ROGERS CORPORATION DUST SURVEY
Plant
Fiberloys
.
Pump No. Casella 045
Sample No.
149Y
Results ficc
0.10
Date Counted
Survey for Type of Contaminant Asbestos
Grade
Location
3102
Calender Feeder
Date 2/9/76
Time Start
89503
.
Time End
95049
-Total Time
5546 minutes
Sampling Rate
2
AREA
Personal Sample
' Sample Volume
111.5
.
XX | Name Norma Mooney
min
liters
Conditions and Operations
1. No Dust - Material well bound
Tentative Recommendations
Lagerberg 00501
ROGERS CORPORATION DUST SURVEY
Plant
Fiberloys
Pump No.
2
Sample No.
148
Results cc
Date Counted
Survey for Type of Contaminant
Asbestos
Grade
Location
3590
Beater Room - Pulper
1.18
Date 2/9/76
Time Start
Time End
9:52
10:30
Total Time
Sampling Rate
*
Sample Volume
38 minutes 2
76
AREA
Personal Sample XXX Name
_Edward Mag
Conditions and Operations
1. Loading Pulper 2 bags chrysotile 12 bags crucidulite
2. Splash on cassette - avoid
min
liters
Tentative Recommendations
Lagerberg 00502
ROGERS CORPORATION DUST SURVEY
Plant
Fiberloys
Pump No.
2
Sample No.
149
Results ficc
Date Counted
Survey for Type of Contaminant
Asbestos
Grade
3102 .
Location
Inspection
0.30
Date
AREA
2/9/76
.
Time Start
10:53
.
Time End
Total Time
11:49
minutes
Sampling Rate
2
Personal Sample
- Sample Volume
112
XX | Name
Ted Billings
Conditions and Operations
1. Well bound sheet
min
liters
Tentative Recommendations
-
Lagerberg 00503
ROGERS CORPORATION DUST SURVEY
Plant Fiberloys Division
Pump No.
2
Sample No. Results cc
110
.248
Date Counted
Survey for Type of Contaminant
Grade -
3590
3590
Asbestos Crocidolite
Location
Beater Room - Pulper
-
Date
May 30 1975
Time Start
1:15
Time End
1:55
Total Time
40 minutes
AREA
Sampling Rate
2
Sample Volume
Personal Sample XXX [ Name Ray Courte anche
min
liters
Conditions and Operations 1 Furnished 12 bags crocidolite
Let bag plastic go in pulper Fish out with hook Wash clean
Bag wet placed in barrel for disposal Very careful not to get asbestos on floor Operators wet down floor before cleaning Washed skid One cycle 14 hours until next Tentative Recommendations
1 1 Lagerberg 00504
aie eet
ROGERS CORPORATION DUST SURVEY
Plant Fiberloys Division Division
Pump No.
1
Sample No.
Results cc
111
, 229
Date Counted
Survey for Type of Contaminant _ Asbestos
Grade -
3590
Location Beater Room - Pulper Helper
Date
May 30 1973
Time Start Time End
1:19 1:59
Total Time
40 minutes
Sampling Rate
2
min
Sample Volume
liters
,
t
AREA
Personal Sample
XXX Name Don Eliber
Conditions and Operations Same as Sample No. 110
Tentative Recommendations
Lagerberg 00505
.T NO
7919-9
PAGE 1
INTRODUCTION
Two 2 airborne asbestos dust samples were taken by Mr. Edward J. Sweeney Manager of Process Engineering of Rogers Corporation Rogers Connecticut The samples labeled Numbers 65 and 66 were analyzed to determine the asbestos concentration in the sampled air
RESULTS
The following pages include particle count data and Rogers Corporation dust survey sheets Analytical results are tabu-
lated below
Sample
No.
65 66
Fibers
.40 .40
.42
Filter
61,071 64,125
Liters Sampled
f
58
42
Fibers
1,05 1.53
NOTE Fibers counted are greater than 5 microns in length
CALCULATION
A. F Af Af
EFA
where
F
= Fraction of filter analyzed
Nf = Number of fields of view counted
Af = Area of field .0056 mm EFA = Effective filtration area in mm 855 mm
B. Ntf -
No
F V 1000
where
Ntf = Total number of fibers of air
No = Number of fibers counted in Nc fields
V
= Volume of air in liters
YORK RESEARCH CORPORATION
ce
ee
YORK STAMFORD CONNECTICUI
Lagerberg 00506
REPORT NO 7919-9
:
PAGE 2
ICH_WST_SHOVEL ryt ss OF PT 2. ICH_WST_SHOVEL
Saas me Ree PT 2. ICH_WST_SHOVEL ICH_WST_SHOVEL
ICH_WST_SHOVEL
lu.Fiberloys Division
ey Ro 2
ste uneono"
Chie Ro Sb 6655ee Ers e et _- .
Nobiles Nobiles Nobiles ce | 1.05 1.05
Love 07 am quceemsm enmt pete ires s
6/14/74 6/14/74 2016 Comt |
4 aman coors
gercay fer:
599
*
fates coe net
|
Asbestos | nee Ae ae RNS OE REI | +
Re 171 171
Haople Bu
3590 Grafes
Ore weet noe
7 meee oe - 8k ten Se Oe oe UGE gene Ae Ra RR
ST
locatin
~
8
pulper .
rm 8
ee
ee
OE BUR CRITI, ED ts
Jase:
Seeat
8:48
me ee
enor
eet ee we
9:17 Ti
Zad 1 Rew
Total TimTimee
Oe
29 minutes
er a or ete Rees
hel
smelt "
TREA TREA L _l PersonalSampiz i XX _.
~
ae
Sompie Valuma -58
gsae James Larkin
news litera
:
rh asbestos to pulper
plastic puaes of crocidolite =" packed in
bestos ae
# - pulpable
2. Operators wears mask
3. Charges plastic bag
Sy Or eara tee +
Mn
oat
-
:
aeenee.
?
so
ree on
et
LLL
Deum
ee
ete Cw k ew
and
all
then pulls
out
the
plastic
Lagerberg 00507
|
,
REPORT NO 7919-9
PAGE 3
Fiberloys Division
June 6 1974
eaten +4
Bow
Tas
2
- rep ww ee pEovee
Betgte pb. __. 66es a a, * La ee ot oe AO
. 1.53 Pasits cc 6/14/74
6/14/74
6/164/174/74 6/14/74 Err. Comted
Las a0
ae eee
Zer 35
Powe
fi
s
Ch Moaavk wa wkd
Asbestos
hina ey re |
[a
nine Asbestos TtTEDs D.
ae
.
eee ce
ae
a
ot 1
<-
te weennen Pele ne toe ne ee
ET
Time
Start
ee AM 11:40 a11:40 ee
enn
im Tina Ind
12:01 PM
_
Patel be
21 minutes
atie
Stapling Late ween
Sepia Sepia Volume
etrnder Laganfe= liters +
Non James Larkin
;
nat ee Asbestos opened a
ae
OE
;
to pulper
,
-
crecidolite - plastic
paperbestos paperbestos as ags
5 - pulpable
Operator wears mask
:
ete tacisc "OS. er Oe o on Ms aatrts a + te ne - meee
_
8
cat Ya
hE
Ble
ee
ce eed
1 Lagerberg
REPORT NO
PAGE 3
AIRBORNE ASBESTOS FIBER COUNT
FOR ROGERS CORPORATION ROGERS CONNECTICUT
BY
YORK RESEARCH CORPORATION ONE RESEARCH DRIVE
STAMFORD CONNECTICUT 06906
~
YORK RESEARCH CORPORATION
YORK a
STAMFORD CONNECTICUT Lagerberg 00509
,
REPORT NO
4
PAGE
INTRODUCTION
Five 5
airborne asbestos dust samples # 148
J Sweeney
taken under the supervision were and
blank
of Mr. Edward J. Sweeney
Manager of Process Engineering of Rogers Corporation Rogers Connecticut These samples were analyzed to determine the
asbestos concentration in the sampled air
RESULTS
The following pages include particle count data and Rogers
Corporation dust survey sheets
Analytical results are listed below
Sample
No.
148 148Y 149
149Y
Blank
Fibers
.64
.68
.24
.08
1.00
:
Liters
.
Filter Sampled Fibers
89,705 95,311 33,639 . 11,213
0
76 46.5
112 : 111.5
0
1.18 2.05 0.30 0.10 0.00
YORK RESEARCH CORPORATION
d *
-_
STAMFORD CONNECTICUT
_
Lagerberg
00510
--
--
----
REPORT NO
PAGE
S
METHODOLOGY
Sample examination utilized phase contrast microscopy techniques
and NIOSH procedures throughout The counting field area
was equivalent to 0.0061 mm The optics consisted of a
Porton 45 x phase objective lens a 10 x ocular lens and a
reticle
~
Fe.
e-
Calculation of airborne
=== 1 C1 === F W A
concentration
m
2. C
asbestos fiber
=
FW A
where
Cj, = airborne fiber concentration in fibers 5
cfimlter Cz = airborne fiber concentration in fibers 5
/
filter
F = average fiber count in fibers 5 field
B = average fiber count of blanks control filters
fibers in
> 5 field
W = 855 mm for 37 mm diameter filter portion of
effective filter mounted
counting A = the area of the
field of a calibration
reticle expressed in field
'
.V
= total air volume collected through filter expressed in milliliters
-from USPHS Membrane Filter Method '74
Prepared by
.
, ;
>
|
Approved by
oe.
' Tested By
Douglas Newar Rand
Douglas Newhard
Environmental Biologist
Manager
Chemical Facilities
Michael Horowitz
Senior Chemist
YORK RESEARCH CorporATION
STAMFORD CONNECTICUT
Lagerberg 00511
ROGERS CORPORATION DUST SURVEY
Plant
Fiberloys
Pump No. Sample No.
2
anaanedl
148
Results cc
Date Counted
Survey for Type of Contaminant
Asbestos
Grade
Location
3590
Beater Room - Pulper
1.18 1.18
Date 2/9/76
Time Start
Time End
9:52 10:30
AREA
Total Time
38 minutes
Sampling Rate
2
Sample Volume
76
|
Personal Sample | XXXXXX Name __ Edward Max
Conditions and Operations
Loading Pulper 2 bags chrysotile 12 bags crucidulite
2 Splash on cassette - avoid
min
liters
Tentative Recommendations
Lagerberg 00512
ROGERS CORPORATION DUST SURVEY
Plant
Fiberloys
Pump No.
Casella 045
Sample No. Results ficc
148Y
_
2.05
Date Counted
Survey for Type of Contaminant
Asbestos
Grade
D3590
Location _Beater Room - Pulper
Date 2/9/76
_ Time Start
45
871
Time End
89503
Total Time
Sampling Rate Sample Volume
2318 minutes
2
46.5
min
liters
AREA
Personal Sample XX | Name
Judy Neal
Conditions and Operations
1. Truck driver and helper
2. Loading pulper during test 2 bags chrysotile 12 bags crucidulite
Tentative Recommendations
__ Lagerberg 00513
ROGERS CORPORATION DUST SURVEY
Plant
Fiberloys
Pump No. 2
Sample No.
149
Results cc
Date Counted
Survey for Type of Contaminant
Grade
3102 .
Asbestos
Location
Inspection
0.30
Date AREA
2/9/76 Personal Sample XX
Time Start
10:53
Time End Total Time
Sampling Rate
11:49
56 minutes
2
Sample Volume
112
Name
Ted Billings
Conditions and Operations 1. Well bound sheet
min
liters
Tentative Recommendations
-
_. Lagerberg 00514
ROGERS CORPORATION DUST SURVEY
Plant
Fiberloys
;
Pump No. Casella 045
Sample No. Results cc
149Y
0.10
Date Counted
Survey for Type of Contaminant _ Asbestos
Grade
Location
3102
an,
Calender Feeder
Date 2/9/76
AREA
Personal Sample
Time Start
89503
Time End Total Time
Sampling Rate
95049 5546 minutes
2
Sample Volume
111.5
:
XX | Name
Norma Mooney
min
liters
Conditions and Operations 1. No Dust - Material well bound
Tentative Recommendations
Lagerberg 00515