Document 1Q9DZjmkx7kZdwj2GR2QV2n3a

wo 33MM IInntteerrnnaall CCoorrrreessppoonnddeennccee To: To-" From: From; SSuubbjjeecctt: Date MTihchoaemlsJI. DDoiutgahseqrutlye DMaylleelsMLaanreslon CDh.aAs.esSaRndeecrsh: DM.AA SSoannstoergourd WLRAZWobeeslpme DD.. AA. SSainnddeerrss-LiLiffee CCyyccllee MMaannaaggeemmeenntt-- 272200--I1O0E5,--1I00 FFCC Ilsassuess CCoorree TTeeaamm MMeoeetiinngg MMiinnuulteess -fJuumnee 88,, 11999999 June 16,1999 June 16. 1999 "T1Th9he5e9ffoolllloowwiinngg mmiinnuteess rreffllec~t h:hee ddiissccuussssiioonnooff'tthhee FFCC Iaseless CCoorres TTeeaamm mmeeeettiinngg ooffnJuene,8, I~. A1L, VUnniisveenrsiittyooffTToorroonnttooRRuesseeamrrcshh--MManrHteennesMl~eti'Grraatthh (~bvyttletlesohhoonnee)} `cTTScouhhoroeeofppuCCeecroroaaarrtnteeeetsTTwweieii~ttanhhmtmththheaaeeggCrrRKaeoeresesdadse~dtatiaoorracceenhhnnEttPPenrrrrvootaijajieoienncrcttnaam""ppOeOrrcncuoctcppuuoorsrseeaan(nllcuefnf~r,aro.comFFhmaeatEEd~eT,T.drA&aaannSf$ddtSS)EELLDfaa~fbl~ooferrsaaoBttoofeofrFraFyyuioutttoconorndppiea~naosvtnaleeita,llddnlolyypfftuuhnnedd oorr Proposal etl and review Sun'actanU i~q the Canadian proposal details a,d review with the EHSAR Working Grou6p300m 4s Enviornmem." (anached dr~ft) Dale Bacon with the EHS&K Wo~ing Group as ~oon as prs. to develop possible. the 2G 2. dJeerrrsseeyxoGrouundwnated=r- MMiwikkeeSSaaannttoort roo//DDaealeeBBaraccoen- * TThheeCCoorree TTea~m aaggrreeeedd t1o0 thhee aacctliioonn sstteeppss pprrooppoosseedd bbyy EETT&ASS-Sg EEnnggiinneeeerriinngg:: = ReRRveevivieieewwwLtthehege aEEnnggAislnnp~eeecrtriisnng8 RReeppoorrtt RUnedvieeswaLnedga3lVARseppere~entations (MSDS, Literature) =+ PUMMeenreedet~erpwwsiitattFnhhrdAaAiim3rpeMpowororRtr~ekCCopoorfmemm~mEiinn~slgasiiitnioooennne//~rEEinn0nsVggiiISSnnoDeleSucrt,iiinLnogigntcsCCroaonlnussurtlta)annttss Prep~'e Framework of Engineering Solutions W3.DrDairnlnktkilnngecWnrtcr//ExeEoseareSStvtaannddoaagrde~u=- LLuaaerrrryZZaoebbeOl LLPaRarOrrnSy!,ZZNoob-beEelIl FrreOevSviiEee,wweewdddtthhNee-ddErrF~aqOSccAalle.cuullactiioonnssfoforrLiLfifeettiimmee DDrriinnkkiinngg WWaatter HHeeaalltthh AAddvvisisoorriieess ffoorr PFOS, N-EtFOSE, and N-EtFOSA. * TiTnhhteoe CCcouornreeenTTteeeeamxmprroeesffeeerrrrdeeddietthhsees.tstuuddyy ttootthhee EEHHSS&ARR WWoorrkkiinngg GGrroouuppffoor ppootteennttiiaall iinntteeggrraattiioonn into current exposure studio. E Elles ORNIOR TRINSD WA 530 5. 91% SMMuaabcdjeeecAAtvvtaaoiillPaarbbollteeecbbtyyiv33eMMOrffodorrerIInnIssnppePecactltiiomoennraavnn.dd3CCM.ooppyNyoii.nnggC2aa-ss0CC4o-on6n3ffi0id8ednetniatl IInnffoorrmmaattiioonn: Subject to Protective Order In Palmer v. 3M, No. C2-04-6309 Exhibit Znvre58m5ayie, | o3MtAo1o0n0z82z2e8r7 11559955..00000011 Lav y 4._AnaK lvslS s =Da avel Saadt eny Dave anders ioe he ings ofthe Kot nis underaenbyFredDeo Dave $~nclers reviewed the findings ofthe K-Salt analysis u~rtaken by Fred Del~oos. + Te Core Tom agro ith i son tps commended by heDeo Reg The Core Team ai~'eed with the action steps recommended by the DeRooa P~cpon to: Untand Regony uid Understand Resulator7. ~mi~line= Diop of Por Ime tmal Cosme Epon owes Develop List of Potential Intu'nalfExternal Customer Exposure Issues LR beni Bours hs Semin Ee Oe Assess Pot~tial Exposure l~ues - Occupational End Users fThe iSueled grbck EISER Workin Grows oon lard shined The K-Salt xe~n to report back to EH$&R Working Group as soon as relevant data is obtained for these first steps. SE.nd S_ SttaatteE e DDisin sccuussssd iioonn Isroped rice ourEMSER Suey for FC he llovin procs It was proposed to articu!ate our HS&P,, Strategy for the FC ~sue as the following process: 1. Tonsion ourprods eecemiins wih a lnc, ss persis, eve 1. Transition our products to those chemistries which, on balance, are leas persistent, have peresd al 10 se, 5d Pv ot 5 od htep reduced potential to accumulate, and have lower toxicity levels and have equivalent or soi improved perform&rice. 3 Dut he ainwork bth iin 34 nd withdrs comersmi 2. D~ing the transitiorL work both within 3M aM with downstream ~tomers te minimiz= ey sours a hae nd arom eee me unnecessmy exposures to humans and the environment (a broad-based sxmv~rdship pg. program). 5. prCeocmimiountpei prmoosctiisotlhy sake nployes, comer ea nde Communicate proactively with all 3M stakeholders (employees, customers, regulators, u'zde nt associations, etc) and reactively with detraeCor~. 4 PCoarhyiouckub eseeh progr ones ur ndrnanding of PC Caa'ry out a broad-based research program to increase our understanding of'FCs in rerio environmental and biological system|. 5. tEnhaan.ce 30 cpio eponsile, rsvonty spl of el cesnd Enhance 3M's reputation as a responsil~le, tn~stwonhy supplier of useful chemicals and products. hisThisdion tobe discussion to becond continued iinn been subsequent sings meetings. D-AS nm DAS:dmm sm a OLR SHOE WSianceectAvtaslarbolteeboym3eMOrodrerInnspeFcatmioenravn.d3CopyNiong673.0C4o.n6f3d0e8ntal formation Made Available by 3M for Inspection and Copying as Confidential Information: Subject to Protective Order In Palmer v. 3M, No. C2-04-6309 11559955..00000022 ps0 %, Shan awatooszzee 3MA10082288