Document 15QOabbEMNwYe8M32mByyqbRj
FILE NAME Kent KNT
DATE 1940 DOC KNT107
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Journal Article - Does Chronic Irritation Cause
Primary Carcinoma of the Human Lung - Archives of Pathology
CCT YT
ea
DR SESE ET IEICE TERE ATT EO MATE TT ge ett Seg Hee
942- 43
942--43 942-43
942-43
942--43 942-43 942-43 942-43
942-43
TEE
|g ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY
ad
5 ,
f
5
EDITORIAL BOARD
:
! LUDVIG HEKTOEN HEKTOEN Chicago Chief Editor :
JAMES EWING New York OSCAR T. SCULETZ Evanston Ill he
S. B. WOLBACH Boston
GEORGE H. WHIPPLE WHIPPLE Hochester N.
'
FRANK R. MENNE Portland Ore
1
i ae
Volume 30 Volume
30
Volume
1940 -
.% Ws wile}
338087
WAY
338087
KP
PUBLISHERS AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
CHICAGO ILL
OOM OOM IEICE Fs EOE
TL esS e E50R 9 ENE Ae
Critical Reviews
DOES CHRONIC
CARCINOMA CARCINOMA
IRRITATION CAUSE PRIMARY
OF THE HUMAN LUNG
MADGE
THURLOW THURLOW
AND
MACKLIN
ALD
CHARLES C. MACKLIN M.D.
LONDON LONDON ONTARIO ONTARIO CANADA
Primary cancer of the hung in common with other forms of
growth is almost universally believed to
malignant
chronic irritation which
originate through soune form of
in the bronchial
usually sets up a chronic inflammatory process :
view
mucosa The literature contains many examples of this ;
Thus
Davidson
stated
Numerous theories
mostly relating to the factor of
have been advanced
irritation in some form or another of the
respiratory tract to account for this phenomenon fourteen causes found chronic irritation
-
Simons who listed
of the bronchial bronchial mucosa a factor
common to all of them and
concluded that this cominon factor is the
cause of pulmonary cancer Fried 3 said
that irritation is
- . it is beyond doubt
as necessary a predisposing factor in the causation of
cancer of the lungs as it is in cancer of other
:
the commentators it
organs In the minds of
seems to make but little difference what the irritant
is so long as it is an irritant and there
are various
mechanical chemical thermal bacterial electrical
types
such as
more than
and radioactive Often
one type is at work on a given region as when an
of the
tongue's surface is
area
'
persistently scratched by a sharp stump of a tooth
mechanical with erosion of the epithelium and
tected tissues to irritants of bacterial
exposure of the unpro-
and chemical types The sine qua
: non seems to be that the irritant shall act
over a long period There is
constantly or at short intervals
is
no agreement as to the length of time that
required in any given case to produce a cancer is conceded that this
factor is a variable one and operates in
such
association with other variables
as age anatomic site and predisposition The
irritant too must
From the University of Western Ontario
1. Davidson M Cancer of
Medical School
England John Wright & Sons I.tthde. L1u9n3g0 and Other Other Intrathoracic
2. Simons E. .: Primary Carcinoma of the
Publishers Inc. 1937
Lung Chicago
Tumors Bristol
The Year Book
3. Fried R. M Primary Carcinoma of the
Wilkins Company 1932
Lung Baltimore Williams &
924
mato
have per s
phen
rable
canc
mult the c
path
1 the i mate
MAC MACKK LIN MACL KLIN PI RIMN ARY CARCINOALI OF LUNG 925
act sufficiently strongly to produce an effect in the tissue but not so
strongly as to cause total necrosis of the tissue
It seems certain also that in most if not all cases inflammation super-
venes in the region undergoing exposure to the irritant The inflamma-
tion is a reaction on the part of the tissues to the injury occasioned by the irritant It may theoretically at least be regarded as protective in nature though the means sometimes defeats the end as in silicosis Since
chronic inflammation is well nigh inevitable and universal concomitant
of chronic irritation the one term has often been used as synonymous with the other and thus it is that chronic inflammation is regarded as the etiologic agent in primary cancer of the lung without any distinetion being made between the fundamental irritating agent and the tissue
responses following its chronic action So widespread is this usage with regard to chronic inflammation indeed that we find it convenient in the following pages to discuss the alleged causes of primary cancer of the lung under headings of the pathologic conditions geuerally inflammatory in nature rather than of the specific irritants Commentators have found it difficult too to distinguish between chronic inflammation
per se and the chronic reparative process and it would seem that the two
phenomena are so involved one with the other as to be practically inseparable Thus if we were accurate we should ascribe the growth of the cancer to the hyperactive repair process with its urge to increased cell
multiplication reserving to chronic inflammation or to some other factor
the carcinogenic influence which first sets a cell or cells on the cancerous
path
It is our purpose in this review to bring forward data indicating that the thesis that primary carcinoma of the lung is due to chronic inflam- inflammatory changes in the lung is unproved We do not feel justified as yet in denying outright that chronic inflammation causes pulmonary
cancer but we affirm that on the whole the evidence now available does
not warrant such an assumption Even the carefully selected called positive evidence that is commonly regarded as supporting the thesis is
by no means equivocal
That chrone inflammation should have been implicated as the cause of cancer is not surprising for the two are often present in the same
region the lung changes changes
We would point out however that because primary cancer of
is not infrequently found associated with chronic inflammatory
in is no reason for assuming that it necessarily is due these
Indeed this association no more justifies the conclusion that the
cancer is so caused than does the circumstance of mau being ford near the scene of a crime establish beyond doubt that it was he who com-
mitted the fortuitous
crime His presence at the scene may have been merely It seems quite possible that chronic inflammation often stands
relation to primary cancer of the lung as does the immocent man at the
926
ARCHIPES OF PATHOLOGY
site of the crime Indeed in many cases the inflammatory changes are
neither the cause nor a chance associate of the cancer but are its result
Moreover even if at some inture time adequate proof should be forthcoming to show that in some cases chronic inflammation or irrita-
tion is the extrinsie
only
in
mass
data
cause of pulmonary cancer such proof can be
not in individual cases There are persons
used who
present no ^'vidence whatever of chronic inflammatory disease of the lungs who nevertheless show development of cancer of the lung and on the other hand there are persons who despite having suffered from
inflammatory diseaseosf the lungs for years never have cancer of the
long It is impossible to say of any one case that had the chronic
inflammatory change not existed cancer of the hung would not have
developed
ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENT
AND HEREDITY IN
THE ETIOLOGY
CANCER Op THE LUNG
OF
PRIMARY
with all other cancers the problem of the origin of primary cancer of the lung naturally divides itself into two aspects concerned with 1 supposed productive factors acting from outside the body and 2 constitutional factors inherent in the body and varying with the patient and particularly with the strain or line of descent These agencies are characterized as environmental and hereditary respectively The environmental factors may be subdivided into two categories 1 those that would be encountered in the course of ordinary living which are the various chronic irritants commonly used to explain human cancer and 2 those which have been discovered by inducing cancers in animals through the experimental use of specific chemical agents called carcinogens As man is not used in the experimental production of cancer all malignant growths arising in him must come under the heading of 1 tumors induced by the chronic irritations of ordinary life or 2 tumors arising on account of constitution These may be considered as
primary poles or extremes useful in our mental processes in the study of the causes of cancer Actually the constitutional factor enters into -
every production of tumor and the only point which needs to be determined with reference to is the extent to which it is participating in any given case So if the environmental factor is admitted all tumors are
of dual origin
We shall now review briefly the sources of called chronic irritation
to determine what proof has been brought forward to sustain the thesis
that chronic irritation causes pulmonary cancer man A large number of citations from the literature might be made in support of the idea that chronic irritation especially in the form of chronic inflammatory change is responsible for the genesis of primary cancer of the lung
MACKLIN MACKLIN MACKLIN MACKLIN PRIMARY CARCINOALA OF LENG 927
These would be in practically all cases merely opinions without any valid basis of proof They might be encountered with an equally large
number of statements questioning the role of chronic irritation in the causation of primary cancer of the lung These again would be opinions for the most part with no proof to sustain them They would show two things however first that the theory of chronic irritation has not been accepted without question and second that the burden of proof should rest on those who assert that primary cancer of the lung in man is caused by chronic irritation or inflammation
ALLEGED
ENVIRONMENTAL CAUSES OP PRIMARY OF THE HUMAN LUNG
CANCER
Simons listed a number of supposed general causes of primary pulmonary carcinoma in man and in them he finds a common factor namely chronic irritation These alleged causes should be divided into two sections 1 those capable of being produced by pulmonary cancer these are often found associated with such cancer because they are
sometimes the results of the presence of the cancer either alone or in
combination with other influences 2 those which are not capable of
being produced by cancer of the lung but which might be found associated with in the same patient in varying percentage of cases With regard to group 1 it might well be that in some instances these conditions conditions have been present before the cancer ever started although they are are not nucessarily the cause of the cancer while in others these conditions have
not been present until after the cancer started and are a direct result of the growth of the tumor We shall now discuss the conditions which
belong to group 1. They are chronic bronchitis pulmonary abscess asthma bronchiectasis pleurisy emphysema and conditions simulating pneumonia and influenza The conditions listed in group 2 by Simons *
are trauma tuberculosis pueumonoconiosis chalicosis syphilis roentgen iqadiations inhalation of dust especially from tarred roads smoke especially if bearing chemical irritants as in certain of the industries motor exhaust fumes and war gas various industrial and occupational
hazards involving the breathing of hot air especially if bearing chemical
fumes tobacco smoke or the air of certain mines such as those of Schneeberg Bohemia which contain not only irritant dusts but radio-
active substances substances as well It will be found that as industry ends and
new chemicals are encountered this second list of conditions which are
supposed either rightly or wrongly to cause cancer of the lung will
increase
Let us review first the course of development of a cancer of the lung so that we may see why the conditions in group 1 are so often found
associated with this malady
HOTTIE TET EEE CIEE
ML ae eae
ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY
COURSE OF DEVELOPMENT OF TYPICAL CANCER OF THE LUNG
Although no one has followed the course of a cancer of the lung
from its onset to its full expression the following outline is regarded regarded as
probably accurate The epithelium in some local region of the bronchus undergoes a change which makes it malignant to the rest of the body
At this point we are not discussing what the nature of the change is or whether this change is occasioned by forces inherent in the cells or is
by extrinsic brought about
influences The cells whose ability to differ-
entiate into normal cells and to organize into normal tissue has been
wholly or partly lost still retain their ability to grow and do grow The growth at first is probably slow This is the beginning of the tumor In
thue the tumor causes a narrowing of the bronchus so that au obstruction
to airflow ensues together with a handicap to the normal bronchial
eliminative mechanism This impairment of function is followed by
degenerative changes in the part of the ling served by the involved bronchus The irritation produces a congh often nonproductive at
first of chronic character which simulates that of chronic bronchitis
Inflammatory changes in the mucous membrane follow the damming
back of the excretions normally wafted away by the cilia or removed by
the peristaltoid action of the broncinus or by coughing The cough grows worse and streaked sputuu is produced When the obstruction to the bronchus is complete either through blocking of the lumen by the
growth within or by pressure on the bronchus by the encircling growth without there is atelectasis in the lung beyond the point of obstruction
This is followed by bronchiectasis of the bronchi in the collapse area which dilate to make up for lost volume of lung Another effect of the diminution in volume of lung is compensatory emphysema in the alveoli
of the surrounding lung tissue These become more dilated with coughing An asthmatic wheeze may develop in the narrowed bronchus before
it is completely obstructed If the center of the tumor becomes infected and undergoes necrosis
the patient may show an abscess of the lung with drainage of the pus through the bronchus If the tumor grows extensively toward the
periphery of the lung before it breaks down the pleura becomes inflamed
and pleural effusion results The pus may rupture into the pleural cavity and the patient may be operated on for empyema without the cancer of the Jung being recognized The onset of the symptoms may be
acute and simulate influenza or pneumonia or the onset may be gradual
and tuberculosis may be diagnosed In any of these steps an erroneous
diagnosis may be made and the patient may later when the cancer is
discovered
asume
assume
that
the
"
chronic bronchitis
"
influenza
asthma
or tuberculosis which he was supposed to have was the cause of the
cancer The physician sometimes accepts at face value statements to
Sree AE ea
wea
te
MACKLIN PRIMARY CARCINOMA OF LING 929
the effect that the patient had chronic bronchitis for some time before the cancer was recognized and that the one was therefore the cause of
the other
The course of bronchogenic cancer as is probably true for all other
cancers can be divided into three periods First there is a silent
period which lasts from the moment of the initial change of normal cells into cancer cells up to the time when symptoms of such severity begin that the patient associates them with the onset of his illness This
stage is apparently the longest and is completely silent as far as the localized activities are concerned though symptoms may be produced from a metastasis in some other region but may give rise to vague
general symptoms The second or symptomatic period is characterized by the onset of symptoms which progress up to the time of the diagnosis of cancer of the lung or until death if the diagnosis is not made This period may be relatively brief only a few months or at the most it
may be a few years The third period is the diagnosed stage and is usually the briefest it is nonexistent if the diaguosis is not made In
most cases it lasts from
death for relatively few
for a brief time
the time
patients
of diagnosis of cancer of the long have been operated on and cured
until
even
It is evident then that because of the initial silent period there is
trouble in ascertaining whether any particular chronic inflammatory disease preceded the onset of the cancer of the lung Thus bronchitis coming before the diagnosed period is thought to antedate the cancer although the cancer existed in the silent period before the onset of the chitis The symptomatic period before cancer of the lung is recognized during which the patient may have various pulmonary symptoms helps to confuse cause and effect of cancer of the lung and to make patient and physician alike interpret the symptoms produced by the cancer as symptoms of conditions giving rise to the growth
SPECIFIC CALLED CAUSATIVE FACTORS OF CANTER
Of THE LUNG GROGP 1
Chronic Bronchitis bronchitis has been looked on by some writers as of importance in the etiology of cancer of the lung because
bronchial mucosa 1 it produces chronic inflammation of the
and 2
it is found with some frequency in the histories of patients with cancer
of the hung What evidence is there to support or to deny the assertion
that chronic bronchitis plays a causative role in pulmonary cancer One
of the first arguments that will occur to any one is that bronchitis may
be generalized in distribution while cancer of the lung is localized The
inflammatory changes of bronchitis are widespread and peripheral as
well as central while cancer of the fute is localized and is usually bilar
JOJOJUJEJ
JUJEJO IR JE
je
||||||||| atatakataka atatakataka Pescagar
930
ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY
If chronic inflammatory changes induce the cancer why does not the cancer originate diffusely over the hing
Chronic bronchitis has no special predilection for the male sex but
cancer of the lung occurs about four times as often in males as in
females It would seem if chronic bronchitis is a major cause of cancer of the lung that meu should be minch greater sufferers from bronchitis ihan are women yet no such preponderance has been mentioned in the
texts ou discases of the lungs and mortality statistics do not show more bronchitis in males than in females
Although might be assumed that the regeneration of the bronchial
epithelium in chronic bronchitis would lead to cancer of the lung we must ask if there is proof that it does so First is bronchitis followed
more uten by cancer of the lung than not Second how many patients with cancer of the lung give a history of chronic bronchitis that is of such long duration that it can legitimately be looked on as baving antedated even the silent period of the cancer's growth There are no
adequate answers to either of these questions because we do not know how many persons in the population lave chronic bronchitis and we have
little idea of how long the silent period can be Since most takers of clinical histories content themselves with stating that the patient had complained of chronic bronchitis failing to give the time during which the bronchitis existed we cannot place much reliance on reports in which is merely stated that a certain percentage of patients with cancer of the ling have had bronchitis First we should have to exclude all those in whom bronchitis probably followed instead of antedated the silent period of the pulmonary cancer
Since we know that cancer in general is slow growing and that in men who have worked in the Schneeberg mines cancer of the lung may develop from ten to twenty years after they have been pensioned off from work the mines we should probably have to allow a minimum of at least ten years before the cancer was diaguosed as the period during which it was probably present in the silent stage Therefore all patients with cancer of the lung in whom chronic bronchitis started within
the last ten years before the diagnosis of cancer of the hung was made should be excluded as most probably being patients in whom the cough was either the result of the tumor or coexistent with it though not actually caused by it Those who had a history of cough for more than ten years might possibly be looked on as patients in whom the cough antedated the cancer although this would not inevitably be so Second we should then compare the latter group of patients with the general population in regard to the incidence of chronic bronchitis If 10 per cent the population past 40 have a history of chronic bronchitis we need not be surprised if 10 per cent of patients with cancer of the lung
UTTAR AP IET AL ee pee
that thiscondi- WY condi- MIP Waray 2S [Poysey
remembered remembered that this condi-
AYHOSPHPEN par LfToasuyy
observations observations are cited show that Bo aphpse op Ysnona aBsc] agent agent pulmonary pulmonary cancer have for- ev ocupoave Cavuouynd saop wey
the lung lung causes chronic chronic bronchitis bronchitis ot], yO foun udraoq g waste
explains certain certain percentage percentage percentage the cases cases ayl Yo asayo ayy jou st pie found and that unless unless chronic chronic bron- Agent Jo sasna ogy jo 9duyI. found more often patients patients patients with cancer ey punop oq ased wogipuoes population population the same age and as JO MOIsHpaG Aq Pasnvs SisupapTE patients patients cancer of the lung how- Jo datosaid ayp JO YNsar v Moreover Moreover chronic chronic chronic bronchitis bronchitis includ- AUOAYA DYY [om SIPPY
Popespsuourry
an average average from numerous series nogonpoe? ayy ib NONn duposndd Dp
, stpysitasg diMoedy) fo apor mg WY daolasarpy pus vonyNdod pussuad ayy
bronchitis bronchitis bronchitis is no means universally universally punoy ApuoNtos alout st Suny ayy
with cancer of lung that when is WLSTUL TOC PR SHUG sO the tronsor has caused caused the bronchitis bronchitis fsasra oy JO Jaqronte aduny vo ui
there is way of showing that that QxwoSsaad ayZ asnv2eq st I punoy
conceivably conceivacboncleivyably have antedated antedated the tumor of stoned yo soioysay ayy. UL puny
patients with cancer cancer of lung SHOPS Jug AVS UTD OAL STILT,
as Ou] UL paytodar soso yo
of pulmonary carcinoina carcinoina has not been Soylis ato I squanud oyl yo yuaa
dx] Gg qhoqu UG dFO1 UE ano TOU SANp
saaotT Aq pasnys yey Aut
bronchitis bronchitis bronchiectasis frequently frequently PUROTPTULIS JOU St GRaad IA9
primary cancer of the lung following following arp ur Soaanbary syr
spuotuad so]
a bronchus bronchus by tumor tumor Hence Hence prisuad ayy ur ueyy sunyp ayy jo
clinically or autopsy autopsy a large per- t AWOL ouy suqepoyue SEM
cancer the lung it is caused by aay SuOIpPUOS OAsy aD YouyAs ut
in the majority majority Zacher Zacher ) Os puv SUIQOLA SH fo JUIOS Us lasts over much longer period period period yey CP) rsprp Ong vonod
benign tumor can almost always grow aauusnus Te st SHitpuorqd outed
bronchus before killing killing the patient ThereA-L SIOTLIAL OU} To IsopY
2ouRa
Quart poss Ae 24:29 1935 st iavp ou
dounos<Tkurpaaaxe sr uot
Wehnschr 967 1931 24:29 SEV TOUS UShoyyE (Csesuo QOL) sean, 7Z
Wehnschr 967 ayp Wt paramos Yop SUP WOT ITUOIYS SEM MOT (puod
WOposayU JSAUOUNTTOD 9p, PoPeEUlaL , UOS[OYIEN PUR [PEMxeyy iq
uonypidopdose-ayppalt stp) UL SOTSUOIY SIUO.LYDS JO AUSPINUT aly HO PPP
AQUI OM Jou Op aay MpyeuNptopyy rou ayy, sof ayqistiudsas an
suv Lb Stag sp yoy yaoi 8 AIG ANY} JO FOMOUE Iso1sua 917}
SUIMpyWL SHLpUEIE OMOIP pLTp vavtp OF Pepoadxs aq Avur Ftp oy Jo
WII YA syuoned jo quo Jod gg SHjuosq OTTO perp savy Tory
-ndlod petouad ap jo yuas sad QO JP
Oav7OUT Woaasqjog diysuoneper pay
pe asnus AUY TM ALI} WROITAS SLUMPING MUOATD Jo SEOYSUT UPAR
6
PNA FO
PIONLOMED
RTO
AMPA
ON TIN OF WONTINISEE
SOHC IOIEIO TOI UIE TEESE
EOS
Er oe ea
eae
ema nee
ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY
fore bronchiectasis is always an accompaniment of a benign tumor of
the lung of any duration according to Wessler and Robin It may be of course that a patient who has had bronchiectasis
to some other cause may subsequently have cancer of the lung
due In
such a case the bronchiectasis preceded but did not necessarily cause
the cancer Many patients have bronchiectasis who never have cancer
of the lung indeed Graham Singer and Ballon stated that in patients
in primary lesion is bronchiectasis it is striking that there
but few examples of carcinoma which have developed in a bron-
chiectatic dilatation
Until the proponents of the idea that the chronic inflammation caused
by brouchiectasis induces cancer of the lung can show that bronchiectasis which preceded the onset of the cancer is followed by cancer in the inflammatory zone of the wall of the bronchiectatic cavity in a percentage of cases which is significantly higher than the percentage of cases of cancer of the lung in the population of the same age and sex distribution which is without bronchiectatic cavities we may conclude that
no relation has been demonstrated between the chronic inflammatory
changes occurring in bronchiectasis and pulmonary cancer
Asthma Asthma although not primarily inflammatory in nature may induce chronic thickening of the mucosa as well as of the muscle coats It has been advanced by some authors as one of the causative
agents in cancer of the lung As in the case of the two conditions just discussed asthmatic symptoms may result from the presence of a pulmonary cancer and so a history of asthma preceding the diagnosis of the cancer cannot be accepted as evidence that asthma caused the cancer On the other hand true asthma of long duration may be found in persons in whom cancer of the lung later develops and again this need
not imply a causal relation between the two conditions unless cancer of the lung can be found in persons with chronic asthma in far greater proportion than in the general population Again we have no idea of the true incidence of asthma which antedates cancer of the lung in
patients with this form of cancer since publications based on the clinical histories give for the most part merely a statement that asthma occurred in certain percentage of cases of cancer of the lung without giving any idea of the length of time during which the asthma had
existed before the cancer was diagnosed
From cases reported in the literature it seems that on the average about 7 per cent of patients with cancer of the lung had a history of asthma Therefore even if asthma is looked on as contributing to the
6. Wessler H. and Robin C. B. Am M. Sc 183 164 1932
7. Graham E. .; Singer J. and Balton H. .: Surgical Discases of the
:
Chest Philadelphia Lea & Fehiger 1935 p 815
TOUTE
Tere Caer Terre
large alveolar alveolar spaces
other other "LL A
sareesees 6
associated with regen- VS OE
Tg
epithelium and reasonably looked on Fey {1094} ayy UTEPSAS
of the . Emphysemn Emphysemn Emphysemn the compensatory compensatory Jo sasus Jo saris accompaniment acompaniment cancer cancer of lung in the later stages sucMIpdor asauy Wod.M oq
atelectasis ensued and then result result cause SE TL
suypoosqayy ur
incidence this this condition the the general population population population oq Aue uoisugra peanayd
incidence incidence conconddition icotndiitoionn antedating cancer cancer SHTYyoHOIG
therefore can reliable reliable deductions deductions Suravoyoy oq} puy
alveolar emphysema emphysema plays in causing cancer cancer the the Lene
poaudosorsuing wuatdua 1
Abscess.This Abscess.This may associated associated with cucer of the uTaCditt 10; Ayqeocins breakdown breakdown of center the growth so vy, payeys y SIPS pur
such history should be recorded recorded frequently SUIpuy OF ATA
TIA
of the lung Funk Funk that pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary ayy st Suny ay]
in man past should should make one one suspect suspect that yuorped YoyAs
present presenats Sep ay sty Aq anhorur Jou pae Suny ayy jo sauna
involvement involvement of the pleura in form of dry peamopd v
ASTIN
effusion or empyema empyema may be found in patients with7 PANT
symptom st ypord Wmutipeur 2 complains One the methods diagnosis diagnosis diagnosis cancer cancer of osNUD aiNdsqo JO ssaosqe centrifuging aspirated aspirated from sediment pleural effusion effusion aaouua TTT sjuonud 103 cancer cells the sediment Baker Baker Bates Bates poozszapun ATISUO SI patient with pulmonary pulmonary cancer cancer may treated oY) Jo Mya uv se Suny for some time without the underlying underlying cause of Cannot
group cases JOU setp opor U yng unl
Summing up evidence evidence this group cases we youpar apo.t ayy oy
conclusions conclusionemphyssema justifiabljusetifable justifiable abscess Because Because chronic fuamony Sunt ayz jo
asthma emphysema emphysema abscess presence SB tumor SIL ST TOT ALOU, JOU SI
found result of the presence association association association ay,
sasNTD3} To
inevitable inevitable inevitable
and cancer
that certain certain degree degree found association any JaTe
cancer the lung lung will found proved proved un
wavy ayy jo aq Sar a4
cancer The crucial point conditions actually actually goons jo aavyonpoad sv
these chronic chronic inflan~-natory inflan~-natory conditions actually penpsuoiq ayy jo vores|
M. 1879 1930 asuryo Saojrumuryur ue spams you st snitis
and Ellis R. Lancet 1935 , says padyys-pasinq e yas ad
ANNIOtOp OP Joo wruasdydtra avpooap owotuyu | ato Mey
BUMUOMPAOJLOU St Jnasaud ye Joord US Sop oy, jo Jaonvo Joo TM syuoned ue sey ye ey Suny alt 30 AWOUED UTE Spode cf CaO AOUL ALP Poco seip JOLIN] Aavtouynd 2 Jo WSHO sy UOTsonb puosog Suyepayre vuayyse ana wy adcoid wes ano
[YU TPE PE OSMUa BOSE
LP VOUOPTAI OU SLIT ATO PUL
OOHLDINS 10
OSTA [UNL B stort ott Aq st yp foouna Areuotuynd oF vomsodsrpord-
PPO ONE AO PINGOR LIME AME NINATES IEN N T TINTOEN EG
ADOPCJLAPALAPA
DOJENJEH EJC10
DOJENJEHEHEJC10 DOJENJEHEHEJC10 Initierenesbat
Initierenesbat
934
ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY PATHOLOGY
predispose to cancer of the lang is that their presence actually antedating the probable time of onset of the tumor is found in significantly higher percentages of patients with cancer of the lung than of those
without cancer of the lung when the two groups are kept comparable
as 10 age sex and industrial occupation where there is the slightest sus-
picion that such occupation might be a cause of pulmonary cancer
We have shown that such evidence has not been advanced for any
one of the aforementioned conditions because there has been little
attempt to separate the patients with cancer of the lung into two groups those in whom the pulmonary conditions were a result of the presence of
the tumor or at least were initiated after the tumor had started to grow
and those in whom the conditions might legitimately be interpreted as
having antedated the cancer There also has been little attempt on the
part of those who affirm that these conditions predispose to cancer of the hung to ascertain the incidence of these conditions in the general
population of the same age and sex as the group with cancer of the lung The opinions advanced by the supporters of the idea that these chronic pulmonary conditions cause cancer of the hung have largely been based on the finding of these conditions in an appreciable number of patients
with cancer of the lung without regard to their incidence in the general
population We have shown that no single one of has been proved to be the cause of cancer of the hung
these conditions The addition of
a number of uncertainties may make a larger number but it does not
add to the accuracy cause cancer of the to cause cancer of
of the result If none of these has been shown to
hung the sum total of them has not been shown the lung nor has the common factor resident in
them chronic irritation been shown to be conducive to the formation
of tumors of the lung
GROUP 11
We now turn to the second group of called chronic irritations
listed by Simons which are looked on as causing cancer of but which are not symptoms of the disease itself although
the hang
in some
instances they may simulate some of these conditions
Influensa a search for previous infections of the lung which
might explain the origin of primary pulmonary cauicer and especially its apparently great increase since 1920 workers have suggested that influenza might be a major factor Askanazy Winternitz Wason
and McNamara and others found metaplasia in the bronchial epithelium
following influenza which in some cases was almost indistinguishable
from malignant growth There is no proof that the epithelial metaplasia
10. Askanazy .: Centralbl f allg Path u path Anat 443 1919
11. Winternitz M. .; Wason J. M. and McNamara F. .:
of Influenza New Haven Conn Yale University Press 1920
The Pathology
follow the 1 had and inci died
tion to 1
can
give
infl be : wit
and
MACKLIN MACK MACKLIN L @ PRI IMAN RY CARCINOMA CARCINOMA OF LUNG 935
following influenza went on to cancer formation since carcinoma of the lung bas developed in only a very small part of the population who had influenza in 1918 ani recovered In patients who had influenza and who have since died of some other disease there has been no higher incidence of cancerous change in the lungs than in patients who have died without having had influenza Thus if 50 per cent of the population now at the ages of 40 to 50 had influenza in the period from 1918 to 1920 one would expect to find that 50 per cent of the patients with cancer of the lung who are now between the ages of 40 and 50 would give a history of having had influenza Before one may attribute to influenza a part in the causation of caucer of the hung it will have to
be shown that influenza has occurred in far greater number of persons
with cancer of the lung than in persons not having cancer of the lung and even then there would be no conclusive proof that a short attack of influenza lasting but a few weeks could produce such lasting changes as to initiate a pulmonary cancer Even with specific carcinogenic agents whose effect has been definitely demonstrated a single applica tion or repeated applications for a short time do not usually result in cancer to be effective they must be applied frequently and over a long period or must be introduced into the body in such a way that their
effect is continuous
Other arguments against the role of influenza in causing cancer of the lung are as follows Influenza is generalized cancer of the lung is localized Jufluenza affects both sexes equally cancer of the lung predominates in the male sex The increase in cancer of the lung began to be noted in some countries before the 1918 epidemic of influenza
Finally it must be remembered that cancer of the hug may begin its symtomatic period as an attack simulating influenza from which the patient does not completely recover There is fever lassitude cough and then a dragged partial recovery The patient says that be had an attack of influenza but what actually happened was that his pulmonary cancer began to show itself with respiratory symptoms that simulated an influenzal attack Therefore before deciding that a history of influenza in a patient with cancer of the lung is indicative that
influenza is a causative agent one must be sure as with the other diseases discussed that the disease was true influenza and that it ante-
dated or probably antedated the onset of the cancer i there should have been a period of at least ten years between the influenza and the diagnosis of cancer Even that might be too short a time but anything
under that is almost certain to be too brief an interval
An average derived from mumerous series of cases of cancer of the
lung reported in the literature shows that in 12.4 per cent the patient gave a history of previous attacks of influenza some of which may have
SO
UOTE
API OP ETAT ATO IEICE
Meee
930-
ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY
been results of the presence of the cancer rather than the cause
12
Kerley
found that although the influenza epidemic had been particularly severe
in Iceland there had been no great increase in the incidence of pul-
monary tumor there
Boyd Hill and Maxwell and Nicholson
among others have felt that influenza probably does not play any role in cancer of the lung Until can be shown that true influenza ante-
dating the dinghisis cancer of the lung by ten years or more occurs
in the history of patients with pulmonary cancer more often than in
the history of patients without pulmonary cancer one cannot accept
influenza as having been proved to be an agent in producing primary
pulmonary carcinoma
|
Tuberculosis If chronic inflammatory changes are looked on as a possible or even a probable source of cancer of the lung it is natural
that tuberculosis should have been regarded as an etiologic agent because
in
of its chronicity Ewing felt that tuberculosis was associated with
cancer of the lung unduly frequently but practically all other workers have felt that there was a very infrequent association between the two conditions Unless tuberculosis and cancer of the lung are mutually exclusive one should find about the same proportion of pulmonary cancers in persons dying of tuberculosis provided of course that the two groups compared are kept constant in regard to age and sex as one finds in population not dying of tuberculosis The necessity of the proviso is at once apparent since the highest absolute number of deaths from tuberculosis is usually among the young and among females One finds for example in Canadian data for 1936 that 1 of every 8 men who died between the ages of 40 and 44 died of pulmonary tuberculosis
Let assume that all of these had tuberculosis and that none had a
cancer of the lung erroneously diagnosed Also 1 of every 100 men who died at the same age died of recognized cancer of the lung One would expect without any significance being attached to the finding that 1 of every 8 men dying of pulmonary cancer between the ages of 40 and
41 would also have active tuberculosis and that 1 of every 100 men
dying between the ages of 40 and 44 with tuberculosis would also have
cancer of the lung
Chiari stated that from 3 to 12 per cent of patients with cancer of the lung have active tuberculosis These figures deal with men of all ages dying of tumor of the lung Again illustrating from Canadian data and taking only men dying after the age of 40 since pulmonary tumor
12. Kerley P. .: Brit J. Radiol 333 1925 13. Boyd W Canad M. A. J. 210 1930 14. Hill R. .: Edinburgh M. J. 320 1934 15. Ewing .: Neoplastic Diseases ed 3 Philadelphia W. B. Saunders Com-
pany 1928
16. Chiari IL Klin Wchnschr 183 1938
MACKLIN MACKLIN MACKLIN PRIMIKY PRIMIKY CARCINT OF LUNG
-fl
is relatively uncommon before that age we find that approximately 3.3
per cent of men dying in 1936 in Canada died of what
as mary tuberculosis This
was diagnosed
probably represents the minimal esti-
mate of men dying with active tuberculosis in Canada in
that bas's we should
that year On
of cancer of
expect approximately 3.3 per cent of males dying
the lung after 40 to show in addition to the
" tuberculosis a figure agreeing with Chiari's data
cancer active In countries in
which there is far more tuberculosis than in Canada the
patients dying of cancer of the
proportion of
addition will be far
lung who have active tuberculosis in
higher than 3.3 per cent in countries in which the tuberculosis rate is lower the
proportion will be under 3.3
It is found on
per cent
examining the records of those persons with pulmo-
nary cancer who showed active tuberculosis of the
the caucer did not
lungs at autopsy that
grow in the wall of the tuberculons
cavity where the
inflammatory changes were taking place in the
The tuberculosis was
majority of instances
more often found in the lung opposite to the
in which the cancer developed than in the
one
from the reports in which the sites
same hung if one can judge
of the two diseases were given in the
autopsy protocol Or if the disease was
was not in the
present in the same lung it
same lobe Even if the two
same par of the lung which is
processes are found in the
might be due to
apparently rarely the case this still
Maxwell and
chance association Most authors including Nicholson Chiari Funk Hill Husted
Boyd
mann and others have
and Beil-
expressed the opinion that there cannot be
demonstrated any causative influence on the part of tuberculosis in
ducing cancer of the lung
Fried ** said
pro-
It is of interest that the
occurrence of tuberculosis and of cancer in the
same organ is rarely seen at necropsy
same person or in the This observation taken together
with the frequency of tuberculosis in the general
to conclude that tuberculosis does
population leads one
not predispose to cancer of the lung
Puctimonia onset of cancer of the lung may simulate
monia so that the patient may give a history of
phet-
thinks was the cause of the
puctumonia which he
pulmonary tumor On the other hand the
patient may have had true
or
pneumonia either antedating the silent period
antedating the symptomatic period of the cancer without there being
any association between the two Since pnetanon^>a is by no means
iancommon disease one would
many expect to find a great
an
fif the
fation who have had
popu-
puetumonia and recovered therefore
expect to find an equal percentage of
one would
who have had
patients with cancer of the lung
pneumonia without there being any significance in the
Hustel and Belfmarin G Acta path et microbiol Scandiumx 14:14 )
Fried' py 17
SOTO
AE AU AU ICSU TSU IE DEAE MEME ot
th at se se see esteseemeetee en
ARCHIVEARCS HIVES OF PATHOLOGY
fact Thuis in Canada 5 per cent of the men dying after the age of 40
in 1936 died of pneumonia ably 3 men who recovered
was at that time about 25
For every man that died there were probsince the mortality rate in pneumonia is or
per cent Therefore we can assume that
another 15 per cent of men dying at that age had had the disease at
some carlier date lait had recovered and died of something else There-
fore we should not be surprised to find that about 15 per cent of patients
with pulm^-^ ngcancer give a history of having had true pneumonia The pneumonia have occurred in the same lobe in which the cancer
was to develop or had already developed or it may have occurred in different lobe or on the apposite side as was the case with the patient
reported by Graham and Singer As the incidence of the history of pneumonia in cases of cancer of
the lung we find the following data Parish found this history in
of 32 cases Matz in 15.2 per cent of 138 cases Hill in 10 of 107
cases Maxwell and Nicholson in 7 of 100 cases These are the figures
wee should expect if pucumonia has no relation sehatever to the produc-
tion of cancer of the lung
Har GassinIgt is not to be wondered at that war gassing has
been suggested as possible cause of pulmonary cancer in some cases There would seem to be only two possible ways in which war gas might cause caucer of the lung 1 by a direct carcinogenic effect in which case it would probably have to be applied repeatedly in small doses over
a long period sivce a few exposures would probably not induce ; cancer
21 by the production of a chronic inflammatory condition in the lung that would be carcinogenic The first assumption carries little weight
because it has not been shown that war gases have a specific carcinogenic
effect and because there is no history of numeros repeated applications
of them the second reason is also without much value since we have found that none of the chronic inflammatory or degenerative conditions
which war gases caused such as chronic bronchitis emphysema asthma
activated pulmonary tuberculosis and pulmonary fibrosis can reasonably
be linked with the development of cancer of the lung
From
data
supplied
by
Malz
and
by
Stein
and
=>
Joslin
on
United
States Veterans of the World War we see that of 164 men with cancer
of the lung 8 or 4.8 per cent gave a history of having been gassed in
the war 75 to 80
Maxwell in the age
and $ Nicholson found 4 men from among about
range of World War veterans who had historics of
having been gassed in the war and who also had pulmonary cancer
19. Graham
A. and Singer L. .; A. M. A. 301 1371 1933
20. Parish T. .: Practitioner 125 1930
21. Matz P. A. M. A. 2086 1938
22. Stein F.
and Joslin H. .: 0 Song Gynec & Obst 902 1938
MACKLIN MACKLIN AL PRIMARY CZ OF
They held that war gassing has un In order to evaluate adequately the
role in causing
possible role of
cancer of the lung war gassing in the
? of cancer of the lung we need to know the following facts
Wprhoadtuctisiotnhe number of World War veterans living at the present time What percentage of these were gassed in the war In what number of World War veteraus has cancer of the lung developed up to the present
What percentage of these were gassed in the war Is the percentage of gassed men significantly higher in the group with caucer of the lung than in the group without cancer of the lung To these questions we have no exact answers but we have the following data Approximately
4,750,000 men were accepted by local draft boards Of these 740,000 were rejected at camps because of physical and mental defects About
87,000 d'ed of war injuries and disease leaving approximately 3,923,000 men who survived the war Of these about 75,000 had been gassed
and had survived These figures are taken from the Military Surgeon
of October 1936,2" and from Matz's about 1.9 per cent of the enlisted men
the deati rate in the ensuing years has
article on war
were gassed and been about equal
gases Thus survived H
in the gassed
and nongassed groups we should expect that about 1.9 per cent of the
surviving veterans have been gassed If the death rate has been differ-difer-
ential in the two groups that figure will be higher if the gassed veterans have not died in such great mumbers and lower if they have died in
larger mumbers than the rest of the veterans
Stein
and
"
Joslin
reported
that
of
164
veterans
with cancer
of
the
4.3
cent gave a history of having been gassed This would
lapupnegar to pbeer two and a half times the proportion of gassed men in the
veterans group in general But if we calculate what departure from
the average percentage of gassed men one might expect in so small a
sample of veterans as a group of 164 we find that on the one band no
gassed men might be found and on the other as many as 4.1 per cent
might have been gassed without there being any causal relation between
the gassing and the cancer Therefore the 4.8 per cent found is not
far removed from the 4.1 per cent expected owing to variations in
samples of veterans and we can conclude that the difference is not enough to suggest that the gassing played any part in the production of cancer Moreover even if gassing were conceded to have induced cancer
25.2 per of the lung in some veterans it would be obvious that most
developed in veterans without previous gassing also that in most of the men who were gassed cancer of
such cancers
cent and
the hung has
not develope-d c this lesion has appeared in only several hundred
among a possible seventy thousand
23. Grifith C. .: Mil Surgeon 251 1936
OIA EE IPOOOeseAT EIT ITO
9411
ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY
Occupations in Relation to Primary Cancer of the Although many attempts been made to link the occupation of the patient
with his pulmonary cancer these attempts have been unsuccessful with
the sole exception of the pulmonary cancer which occurs in the miners of Schneeberg and Joachimsthal in Bohemia the incidence of which is
so high in comparison with that of cancer of the lung in other places
in comparison and so high
with the incidence among the neighbors who
are not working the mines that there seems to be little doubt that this
occupation is strongly productive of cancer of the lung It is still a disputed point as to what the carcinogenic agent is in these mines
Arsenic radioactive emanations and borne molds present in the
mines have been implicated
Outdoor occupations in which dust is inhaled have been thought
in he represented unduly among the patients with pulmonary cancer
Duguid ** indoor occupations have been found to be represented in
undue numbers Bonser Industrial hazards Schachter 20 labor-
ing jobs Brockbank 27 chromium dust Alwens Banke and Jonas ** iron oxide in silica dust rather than the silica itself Campbell 2"silica
dust Anderson and
exposure to coal gas
Dibic Dible Klotz metal grinding
in the air or to coal tar on the skin and
the preparation and sale of tobacco the Kennaways
have all been
)
brought forward as possible causes of cancer of the lung instances the occupation given at the time the diagnosis made may not have been the occupation of the patient at
In all such of cancer is the time bis
cancer developed perhaps twentoyr twenty years before More-
over one must always take into consideration the district from which
the data were drawn Thus in an agricultural district practically all the pulmonary cancers will be found in farmers just as will most of the
gastric cancers and most of the chronic nephritis In district where mining is the sole occupation most of the pulmonary caneers will be in miners in districts where every one is working in tobacco all
the pulmonary cancers will be in tobacco workers and so on For any one district the effect of occupation must be determined by finding the percentage of males of certain ages working in that occupation who
24. Duguid J. Lancet 111 1927 25. Bonser G. M J. Hyg 340 1929 218 1934 26. Schachter J. de m^'d de Paris 700 1932 abstracted Am J. Cancer 165 1933 27. Brockbank W Quart J. Med 1:32 1932 28. Alwens W Bauke E. E. and Jonas W Klin Wehnschr 1854 1936 29. Campbell A Brit M. J. 755 1938 39. Anderson C. S. and Dible J. .: J. Hyg 185 1938 31. Dible .: Lancet 982 1934 32. Klotz M Am J. Cancer 35:38 1939
33. Kennaway N. and Kennaway E. J. Hyg 236 1936
MACKMACL KLIN PI RIMN ARY CARCINOMLA OF
have pulmonary cancers as compared with the percentage of males of the same ages not in that industry who have such cancers One must not
compare the incidence of cancer of the hungin middle males work-
ing in mines with the incidence of cancer of the lung all the rest of
the villagers males and females of all ages One must try to keep the two populations populations compared as constant as possible with respect to all factors with one exception namely the factor being investigated Thus
if one is attempting to ascertain the possible effect of dusty occupations
on the incidence of pulmonary cancer one must be sure that one deals
with all those exposed to the same type of dust on the one hand and
with those who do not meet that dust on the other Also the distri-
butions of the groups compared must be the same as to age and sex
Third those exposed to the dust must not be
moef eting factor which might also theoretically theoretically be productive
some other
pulmonary pulmonary cancer for
example tobacco smoke Even these simple rules are seldom followed
lung in ascertaining the role of any occupation in determining the onset of
cancer of the
a Silicosis Because of the fibrosis which occurs in the kings
of persons affected with silicosis it has been suggested that this may
silicosis have a role
induced by
to play in producing cancer of the lung The changes
are
the connective tissue rather than in the
epithelium of the bronchus and so it is not probable that silica will
prove to be carcinogenic
Silicosis was carefully looked for by Berblinger in 50 cases of pulmonary cancer and no evidence of it was found although silicosis is very common in his district Jena Germany That list clause changes the whole aspect of the finding Had silicosis been rare in his
district his failure to find it would have given no indication of any possible lack of relation between the two Till found no relation
in between silicosis and cancer of the lung his cases or in reviewing reviewing
the literature If the cases of pulmonary cancer are in a district where
there is a high incidence of silicosis we should find the two occurring
together with some frequency; if the cases are in district where there
is little silicosis we should expect the two conditions to be associated
seldom if they are not causally related That the conclusions drawn
from the incilence of these two diseases must be carefully caftrolled
statistically is pointed out an editorial in the British Medical Journal
in discussion of the cases of Anderson and Dible These authors
found a high silica content in 12 of their 70 cases of pulmonary cancer as compared with 48 cases used as controls The editorial points out
34. Berblinger W
839. 1932
Med Klim 1337 1931 abstracted Am J. Cancer 16
35. Silicosis und Pulmonary Carcinoma editorial Brit M. 411 1938
OOOO SEAL ATA
TALI IEE IED
CHC se80 se see seoneanmenen sat
ee
seminal oe oe
942
ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY
that even if their conclusion is correct that sifica plays a role in causing
pulmonary cancer the conclusion is not justified by the material they
bad It goes on say that such a conclusion would be justified only if there were a series of almost 3,000 controls this figure being based on the
incidence of primary cancer of the lung in the general population Klotzfound Klotzfound pulmonary cancer in 8 per cent of his series of 50
cases of silicosis as contrasted with 1.17 per cent of 4,500 unselected unselected
autopsies which he used as controls The latter group of autopsies were apparently on patients of 15 years and upward as it did not include the autopsies of the pediatric service The objection to conclusions
based on such material is this In using unselected autopsies perhaps
to obtain a called random sample the control material was most
dissimilar from the cases of silicosis under review Among the subjects
of unselected autopsies would be a large number of females while the
patients with silicosis Cancer of the lung is
would be entirely or almost entirely most frequent in males therefore one
males would
to find more cases of cancer of the lung among patients with
expect
silicosis than among the subjects of autopsies in general merely on on the
basis of unequal sex distribution Again the patients with silicosis are
for the most part in the middle age group or old age group for it takes
years for silicosis to develop Cancer of the lung is most frequent
after 40. The subjects of unselected autopsies will include many patients in age groups well below 40 an age at which cancer of the lung is infrequent On the basis of age distribution we should expect to find
more cases of cancer of the lung among patients with silicosis than among
unselected subjects of autopsies Finally there will be variations in the
percentage of cases of pulmonary cancer from group to group of autopsy
cases even when these groups are standardized for age and sex these
variations are attributable merely to the difference in samples of the
population in each case may be that Klotz's # conclusions are correct and that pulmonary
cancer is more frequent among patients with silicosis than among a
group similar in age and sex but his conclusions as unsound mutil
without silicosis
he has compared
But we must reject his silicotic patients
with a group of men of the same age distribution as the patients with
silicosis and made due allowance for possible variations between different
samples of the population
b Asbestosis Few cases of asbestosis associated cancer of the lung have been reported Egbert and Geiger Here again we should expect to find the two conditions
the same person in some cases on chance distribution
with primary Hornig *
associated in
alone Since
336.6. Egbert D. S. and Geiger A. .: Am Rev. Tuberc 143 1936 37. Hornig .: Ztschr f Krebsforsch 281 1938
Hen ae aarae
te
ising
they :
ly if
.
n the
i 50 sted
were
lude
-ons -ons
haps
most
jects
the sales could could with a the
are
takes quent dients ng is
find mong mong mong n the Topsy these f the
imary ga ga
reject
tients with
ferent
imary
Since
MACKLIN MACK MACKLIN L PRI I MAN RY CIRCINOGLA OF LUNG 943
asbestosis occurs in ten of middle age cancer of the lung may be found
in these patients in a higher percentage than in the general population
bu we have no proof that is found in greater percentage when a group
of men of similar age from the general population is used as the
standard The criticism that was made with respect to Klotz's data
on silicosis may be made also of the data of Lynch and Smiths Lynch
and Smith have reported that in 2.343 consecutive necropsies over a
period of twelve years cancer of the lung was found seven times an
incidence of 0.3 per cent In the 35 cases of asbestosis in some of which
the lesions were very mild cancer of the lung was found twier an
incidence of 5.7 per cent Are these values significant they asked
or is the sample of cases too small
Before such figures can be of any
value they must select from their 2.343 consecutive necropsy records
orly those on males since their 35 cases of abestosis doubtless all relate
males They must then select from these records on males only those
on males in the age range of the males with asbestosis When this is
done it will be easier to decide whether the incidence of pulmonary
cancer is higher among patients with asbestosis than it among those
without asbestosis
c Pneumonoconiosis Odier dusts besides silica are said to cause cancer of the lung There may be much or little dust depending on the occupations of the patients with cancer of the lung and on the district in which they live rural patients will have little coal pigment while residents of industrial cities like Pittsburgh will all have a great deal South Africau miners have a high incidence of pneumunoconiosis but a low incidence of cancer of the lung Vorwald and Karr examined
the records of 15,587 persons who had long been exposed to dusty
atmospheres and found that only 3 of them had caucer of the lung He
stated that the dust must be carcinogenie before its presence will induce
cancer of the lung
Arkin
and
Wagner and
**
Berblinger
both
found
pneumonoconiosis rare in their series of cases of pulmonary carcinoma
d Tarred Roads Dusts and emanations from tarred roads have bean said to be responsible for the increase of pulmonary cancer noted
in the last two decades Campbel" l but workers in Russia where
tarred roads are few have noted the same increase in cancer of the
lung as has occurred in other countries Husted.17 in Denmark found
that patients with primary cancer of the Cammin about the same
proportion from areas where there were no tarred roads as from areas
38. Lynch K. M. and Smith W. .: Am J. Cancer 567 1939 39. Vorwald A. and Karr J. W Am J. Path 14:49 1938 40. Arkin A. and Wagner D. .; J. A. M. A. 106 1936 41. Campbell J. A Lancet 233 1934 J. Indust Byg & Toxicol
449
SOI TL IEAL reared
944
ARCHIPEARS CHIPES OF OGY
where tarring had been carried out Boyd found no evidence that
tarring had played any role in his 14
12
the conclusions which
cases Valade pointed out that
of
Campbell " reached as to the efficacy of this type
dust in causing cancer of the lung were based
the
which produce high number of
on
reactions of mice
that what might be
spontaneous pulmonary cancers and
carcinogenic for mice need not he so for men We
may conclude that there is no demonstrable proof at
that
form of dust has any role in
present
any
producing cancer of the lung for it has not
been demonstrated that
pneumonoconiosis is present in the lungs of
with patients
pulmonary cancer in any higher proportion than in
group corresponding
of the general population
habit Other agents such as
roentgen rays tobacco smoke and motor
exhaust fumes have been
that
suggested as possible causes The suggestion
roentgen rays are a cause is almost absurd for the
are that only a small
of
probabilities
has
percentage
those in whom cancer of the lungs
developed ever had their chest under
for diagnosis of their
roentgen rays before they came
where there is
cancer Motor mechanics working in garages
an abundance of exhaust fumes are said to show
incidence of pulmonary cancer than the
no higher
bellstated bellstated
that
exhaust
gases
from
general population and Campinternal combustion engines do
not increase pulmonary cancer in mice Tobacco
factor in the increase of
smoke might be one
pulmonary cancer The
is one which
permits long continued application of the smoke to the bronchiai
mucosa it is or at least was a habit more prevalent among men
there are two possible agents which might prove to be
namely heat and the derivatives of
cancer producing
tobacco There are those who
point out that the increase in the
increase in the
consumption of tobacco parallels the
incidence of pulmonary cancer This
have significance
If tobacco is
may or may not
a factor it must be proved that deriva-
tives of tobacco are
carcinogenic or that the repeated application of
heated smoke is conducive to
in cigaret smoke
cancer McNally stated that the tar
contains enough chemical irritants to
increase in cancer of the lung
Koffo
'
found
account for the
cancerous women 42 who exhibited
among a group of 5,000
cancer in what he called the smoke
stream namely the lips these women were heavy
tongue jaws larynx and
smokers He found
pharynx
All of
burnt tobacco
that the products of
produced carcinoma when painted on rabbit
he feels that there
ears and
are probably many aromatic substances in tobacco that are carcinogenic His findings are
suggestive But the increase
42. Valade M. P. cited in
521 1939
Carcinogenesis in the Lung Annotations Lancet
43. Campbell A
McNally W.
45. Roffe V. FL
Brit J. Exper Path 146 1936 Am J. Cancer 1502 1932 Dentsche med Wehnsehr 1267
1937
jen thats eR hte
MACKLIN MACKLIN MICKLIN MARY MARY CARCINOMA OF LENG 945
in cancer of the lung should be much
greater among females than among
males since smoking has increased among women far more
the last two decades than it has
rapidly in
among men Data published by the
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company * show that the incidence is not
policyholders greater among females The rates among the industrial
of 45 74 years of age show that in 1917 the rate for
cancer among females was 2.5
pulmonary
per hundred thousand This rose to 8
per hundred thousand in 1938 an increase of 220
cent
The rate
for cancer of the lung in males rose in the same period from 3.2 to almost
23 per hundred thousand an increase of more than 600
per cent
Their
conclusion is that it appears doubtful that smoking is factor in
cancer of the lung
causing
Controlled observations over a longer period are
to settle
this point Tovestigators must not
necessary
rest content with finding that a high
percentage of patients with pulmonary cancer are tobacco smokers
;
they must find that the percentage of smokers in this group is sig-
nificantly higher than that in the general population of a similar
and sex distribution
age
When we review all the theories on the cause of pulmonary cancer
we find that not one supposed cause has been proved to he a real
cause
and that none of the alleged causes has been investigated with suffi-
cient statistical accuracy to enable the observer to
ing any weight No one cause no suru of
pass an opinion carry-
causes no common factor
in them namely chronic irritation through inflammation of the bron-
chial mucosa has been demonstrated to occur with
in patients with cancer of the
any greater frequency
lung than in group from the general
population of comparable age and sex distribution at a time sufficiently
long before the onset of the cancer that it may be interpreted as ante-
dating this rather than following it Naturally any condition which
is a sequela of cancer of the lung may be found
patients with pulmonary cancer than in
more frequently in
persons not affected with this
type of cancer Such a condition when
obviously the result of cancer
of the lung must be excluded from a discussion of the latter's
causes
e Schneeberg Miners
the miners of the
The high frequency of cancer of the lung
among
Schneeberg and Joachimsthal valleys has been
recognized for many years It seems that this occupation is one which
does enhance the incidence of pulmonary cancer beyond that known
elsewhere and apparently beyond that of the neighbors of The
who do not work in the mines Thus
valleys
Pirchan and Sikl stated that
12 of 19 Schneeberg miners dying in 1929-1930 had cancer of the lung
at autopsy Of 12 miners dying in 1932 9 had a clinical diagnosis of
46. Cancer of the Lung a Ins Co. 20 1930
47. Pirchan A. and Sikl
Growing Health Problem Statist .: Am J. Cancer 681 1932
Bull
_
Metrop
Life
He
946
ARCHIES OF PATHO
pulmonary cancer Siklreported Siklreported Siklreported similar figures for the miners of
Joachimsthal Of 15 miners dying in eighteen months autopsies were
carried out on 10 of these 8 had carcinoma of the lung
The
age of these men was 49 and the
lung
average
,
average period of exposure in the
mines was seventeen years years This incidence of cancer of the lung has
not been equaled anywhere else in the world The cobalt the arsenic
the dust the radioactive emanations all have been incriminated Sikl *
stated thngechnical analysis of the lungs showed no trace of important foreign elements The test for radioactivity was negative although although
he felt that radioactive emanations in the mines may have a part in
producing pulmonary cancer Maisin " quoted de Laet as saying that in Belgium pulmonary cancer has not developed in workers workers in radium
although they wear no masks and are covered with and breathe the dust of the works all the time However the plant had been in operation only twelve years at the time of de Laet's report
Of interest in this connection are Martland's 5" findings findings in workers with radium paint The girls who died of osteogenic osteogenic sarcoma were exhal-
ing radioactive air as shown by tests yet none none of them presented cancer of the lung A whole series of questions to which we have as yet no
answers and may never have arise If the radioactive emanations in
the air in the Schneeberg mines are responsible for cancer of the why did the radium paint workers in the United States die of bonelaunndg
? not lung tumors especially as it was shown that the lungs were exposed
to radioactive emanations May it be that there is an inherited factor
for cancer of the lung in the Schneeberg miners which has been increased
through continued inbreeding in these rather isolated mountain
valleys with a small population and that the carcinogenic agent in the mines whatever it may he enhances an already present tendency toward pulmonary cancer Is it possible that taken in small doses the radioactive substance induces pulmonary cancer which may have a long latent period whereas radium taken in presumably larger quantities as is the case when radium paint is swallowed may induce bone tumors with a shorter latent period of development Thus these victims would die of osteogenic sarcoma before they had time to develop pulmonary cancers Certain that although the miners have a very high incidence of cancer of the hung they do not have a high incidence of those chronic
pulmonary conditions which are supposed to
the lung Thus Pirchan and Sikl # said that
predispose to
of the 9 men
cancer of with clin-
ically diagnosed cancer of the lung not one had a history of chronic
pulmonary disease that was not directly related to to the onset of the
cancer
48. Sik IL Ztschr f Krebsforsch 609 1930
49. Maisin .; Cancer Bruxelles 111 1934 abstracted Am J. Cancer 28 -
164 1936
,
50. Martland H. .: Am J. Cancer 2435 1931
MACKLIN MICKLIN PRIMARY CARCINOMACARCINOMA OF LUNG 947
Throughout this discussion we have repeatedly emphasized that it
makes no difference how great is the percentage of patients with cancer
of the lung who point to any particular disease in their past history
provided that a similarly great percentage of the general population bas
had the same disease in which the whole
Thus if the cancerous patients come from a region population has had measles every patient with
cancer of the lung` will give a history of measles Il 90 per cent of the
population past 40 have had tuberculosis 90 per cent of
with cancer of the lung will probably give a history of If the main occupation in the district is farming most of
with cancer of the lung will be farmers but if mining
the patients tuberculosis the patients
is the main
industry most of the patients with cancer of the lung will be miners
This fact has been little appreciated by those who argue that because 25 or 50 or 75 per cent of patients with cancer of the lung give a history of particular disease that disease must be carcinogenic hence we shall
try to present this matter more in detail at this point
In the accompanying chart the first rectangle represents a theoretic
population One fourteenth of them black bar at the top is charac
terized by having a certain disease X. The subsequent rectangles represent those portions of the population which have had some other
condition condition Thus in rectangle 2 we might indicate those who had had for example chronic bronchitis in 3 those who had had influenza in
4 those with arteriosclerosis and so on We will assume that none
of these groups overlap Now it will be seen that one fourteenth of
the population in rectangle 2 also has disease X. the same proportion as was present in the general population This is true of the groups represented in rectangles 2 to The group in 7 shows a much higher concentration of X patients than do the other groups while the group in 8 has fewer X patients than has the general population From such
diagram one would be justified in looking on the group in 7 as
probably peculiarly susceptible to disease X while those in 8 would
be considered relatively immume that all the groups are comparable
ficant factors are concerned
We are assuming this example as far as sex age and other signi- signi-
forteth Now let us arrange these same data in rectangle 9 which represents
the population affected with X which is one forteth of the total
population Here we see that three groups each have a fourth of the
patients with group 5 one X patients
discase X. These are 2 3 and 7. Group 4 has an eighth sixteenth and groups 6 and 8 each a thirty second of all If we looked at this column without viewing the data in
columns to 8 we should be very likely to conclude that groups 2 3
and 7 are equally susceptible to X and that groups and 8 are the most
immune to this disease The latter conclusions would of course he
wrong as the data in the rest of the diagram clearly show
ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY
It is in the latter form that the data dicaling with the cause of pul-
monary cancer are usually presented We are told that a certain percentage of patients with cancer of the lung give a history of chronic
bronchitis or of influenza or of some other coudition and if this
per-
centage is high it is assumed that the disease named is an important
4 68
g
| read
fae
ined
1. The general population is represented in rectangle 1. Those with a history
of a disease which we will call X are shown by the black bar at the top This is
one fourteenth of the total area of rectangle All percentages percentages in this figure are
of course theardie and are
used merely for purposes of demonstration
;
2. This rectangle represents per cent which has bad chronic also larve X.
the proportion of the bronchitis Note that
total population namely 25 one fourteenth of this group
3. This rectangle represents those in the paquilation namely 25 per cent who have bad infinenza One fourteenth of them have X.
This rectangle represents those in the population
manely 12.5
cent One fourteenth of them have X.
5. This represents the part of the population which
per cent One fourteenth of them have X.
who has
have arteriosclerosis asthma namely 6.25
proportion namely 6. This represents the part of the population with a history of war gassing
namely 3.12 per cent One teenth of them have X. Because X has developed
in the five groups 2 to 6 in the same proportion as in the general population we
cannot assign a specific role to any of these conditions in the production of discase X.
7. This is the part of the population who are miners of radioactive
3.12 per cent
ores n^uely Here the incidence of X is eight times as great as that found in
the general population or in the five preceding groups of the population It
that some factor associated with mining of these ores is productive of Xa.ppeBaurts -
because not all miners have X and because many who are not miners do have X
other factors besides the mining of these ores enter into the canse of X.
8. This is the part of the population which has a history of tuberculosis
25 per cent The incidence of X is much lower here than in the
if some factor inhibiting the development of X was present in gtehinsergarlopuoppulation as
9. This rectangle shows the part of the population in which X
fourth of these have had
develops
;
One
bronchitis another fourth influenza another fourth
exposure to radioactive ores One eighth have arteriosclerosis one sixteenth have
asthma one second have had tuberculosis and one second have been
gassed Data in the latter form are usually used to determine the importance
of any specific disease as a cause of cancer of the long It is assumed that all the
groups in the rectangles 1 to 9 are of the same age and sex distribution and that
no group in any rectangle overlaps that in any other
.
MACKLIN CARCINOMLA
OF LUNG 949
causative factor in producing carcinoma of the lung If the percentage is low it is assumed that the disease has no significance in the causation of cancer of the lung The diagram in figure 1 shows that it is only when the disease in question is found in much higher percentage of the group with pulmonary cancer than of the general population that one can consider that it has an etiologic role in producing pulmonary cancer
But even this is not enough It is necessary that the group in the
general population which we are using as a control for the pulmonary cancer population be comparable to the latter in all respects except that the general group does not have cancer of the lung otherwise one might find that the group with cancer of the hang had the condition in question in higher percentage than had the general population without there being any significance in that fact For example some of the veterans of the World War are asking for compensation for cancer of the lung which they claim was brought on by the chronic pulmonary diseases which they contracted through expostire encountered during military service Now how might one go about settling the justice of such a claim One might say The incidence of pulmonary cancer among war veterans much higher than among the general population therefore it must have been the hardships of military service which caused this increase We are assuming for the sake of the argument that it is more frequent among war veterans But the war veterans are all males and the general population holds more females than males Hence an adjustment for sex would have to be made as to make both groups comparable Next the average age of the war veterans lies between 45 and 60 while the age of the general population will range
all the way from birth to 100 years The two groups must be made
comparable as far as age is concerned Then one might argue that although the hardships of military service did not actually cause pulmonary cancers they caused these lesions to develop much earlier because the age at which the cancers were developing in the veterans was much younger than that of the patients with such cancers in the general papniation But again the age distributions in the two groups are different the ages of the veterans being concentrated in the range
from 45 to 60 while the general population has those under 45 among whom pulmonary cancer is not frequent and those from 60 on among whom is frequent Hence only those among the voters who were destined to get cancer of the lung at younger ages would be included in the veteran group Those in whom it will develop after 00 are not included since the veterans have not yet reached 60 years and over In this way the average age at which pulmonary cancer developed in the veterans would be less than that at which it develops in the general population
Hot aun
950
ARCHIE OF PATHOLOGY
SUPPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS A GENERAL DISCUSSION
The introduction of consideration of experimental work into a discussion of carcinoma of the human lung may seem irrelevant but it is
not really so For a few decades the experimental production cinoma by called chronic irritants leut strong confirmation
idea that chronic irritation was the sine qua non of all cancer
of carto tlie
Thus
when no evident chronic irritaut was found it was assumed that it was
present anyway as witness the citations at the beginning of the paper The evident irritants were mechanical thermal chemical and bacterio-
logic agents Sometimes it was stated that it was not the irritant but
the chronic inflammatory changes set up by it that produced the cancer
In recent times however we have come to look on carcinogens as
involving more specific agents Certain viruses such as that of Rous
have been shown to be the cause of certain definite animal tumors
Specific chemical bodies such as dibenzanthracene and the estrogens have been shown to produce carcinoma on repeated application Much
depends apparently on the chemical formula comparatively minor alterations in the structure of the compound ntean wide alterations in the
carcinogenic power A large literature has grown up around these carcinogens Cook Andervont * and others
It has been found duce cancer and that
experimentally that not all chronic irritants prosome of the highly carcinogenic agents are not
irritating that what may be carcinogenic for one animal need not be
for another animal or even in another strain of the same animal and
finally that what is carcinogenic for one organ in an animal need not
be productive of cancer in auother organ of the same animal
Let us illustrate these points briefly Some marked irritants such as mustard gas are not cancer producing although they cause intense
inflammatory reactions Visser and ten Seldam ) Again some highly carcinogenic chemicals are nonirritating when applied to the skin Andervont . Tar painted on the skin of rats did not produce cancer
of the skin while if painted on mice or rabbits it did cause such cancer
The same tar painted on mice differing in their genetic susceptibility produced cancer of the skin in highly susceptible mice and failed to
produce cancer in highly resistant mice Kreyberg ) It is of interest
51. Cook W Proc 52 Andervont H. .: Tumors in A Symposium Press 1938 p 54 54
Roy Soc London s 111 485 1932
Effect of Bacterial Products on Growth of
on Cancer Madison Wis University of
Malignant Wisconsin
53. Visser J. and ten Seldam E. .: 3092 1937
Geneesk tijdschr v Nederl
54. Kreyberg .: GeneticGenetic and Constitutional Aspects of Spontaneous and Induced Tumors in A Symposium on Cancer Madison Wis University of Wisconsin Press 1938 p 183
th
st e St
vi
lele
P
F
...
'
|
"
t
.
c
U
]
|
f i
|
i
ALACKLIN MACKLIN PREALARY CARCINOMACARCINOMA OF LUNG 951
that cotton mule spinners suffer from entatieous cancer due to the coustant spraying of the skin with liquid petrolatum whereas they do not
exhibit cancer of the lung in any increased percentage although they con-
stantly inhale air in which the same oil is present in the form of tine spray Simpson Chimney sweepers had a high percentage of cancer of the skin yet the constaut inhalation of an atmosphere containing the same carbon particles as caused cutaneous cancer did not lead to cancer of the hung Injections of estrogens are productive of
cancer of the breast and of the uterus in mice but not of cancer of the
gastrointestinal tract or of the lung Therefore it can be stated that before any condition such as chronic
pulmonary disease can be regarded as producing cancer it must be proved beyond doubt that 1 the condition is capable of producing
_
cancer apart from any ability to cause chronic inflammatory change 2 that it is capable of producing cancer in the animal under discussion and 3 that is capable of producing cancer in the specific organ in question Merely to show that a condition induces chronic inflammatory changes in an organ is no longer sufficient for it is known that chronic inflammatory changes can exist for long periods without producing cancer and also that cancer van occur with no reasonable evidence of preceding inflammation for instance in retinal blastoma shortly
after birth
PROBABLE KOLE OF HEREDITY IN PULMONARY CANCER
Although specific carcinogens can produce cancerous changes are
the conditions mentioned earlier in the paper shown to be carcinogenie?
It has been assumed that they may be because one has no other explain
nation of pulmonary cancer if one insists on the presence of extrinsic
factors as the sole causative agents of all cancers
But cancer is a
problem of failure of differentiation of organization and of growth
differentiation organization and growth are problems of the inherent
makeup of the cell itself and of its ability to utilize certain chemicals
in its metabolic processes Therefore one should not overlook the fact
that idiopathie alterations in the inherent makeup of the cell may
be responsible for cancerous changes without the intervention of any
carcinogenic agent In other words the cancer may arise through hereditary causes It is known that under the inuer of hereditary
determiners descendant cells of the original zygote differentiate into
cells with quite widely differing potentialities Absence or alteration
of these determiners for normal differentiation may also be hereditary
Thus the alterations necessary for changing a normal cell into a cancer
may be under the aegis of determiners locateidn the germ plas~-n
55. Simpson S. .: Quart J. Med 413 1929
952
ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY PATHOLOGY
that This alteration sui generis may come about
mechanisms
One may
through two different he a somatic mutation i c a sudden departure
from the normal line of cells from which the altered cell sprang which
departure then becomes hereditary for all cells descended from .
original mutating cell That such a mutation should occur would be
wholly unexpected since there was no factor in the
germ cell from which the individual came which playedorirgoinlael ifnertdieltiezre-d
mining accurrence of the mutation The patient with cancer of the ;
hung in this case would not have come from a strain in which factors
cancer of the lung were inherited nor would he be able to have
more offspring in whom cancer of the lung would develop than a
without cancer of the lung
person
The second mechanism would be one in which the
into a
tendency to alter
cancerous cell would have been inherited being due to factors
resident in the fertilized germ cell Just as there are inherited factors
which guide the destiny of the entodermal cells which form
bile duct then liver so that this
gut then
development proceeds noraially in an
orderly fashion at definite times the life of the embryo the times
differing depending on whether the cabryn comes from
or a human
a mouse a dog
ovtum and just as there are inherited factors which
cartilaginous development at the
permit
the luniau
epiphysial lines for so many years in
humerus but for a different number of years in the femur
before the cartilage cells cease proliferating and allow boue
cease so there may be inherited factors
growth to
location at
which permit cells in a specific
a specific time in the life history of the individual to alter
and become cancer cells
What proof bave we that these last two mechanisms are possible
and that not all cancer nor indeed all pulmonary cancer needs be inter-
preted as arising through the agency of extrinsic
First with the single exception of the pulmonary ccaanrcceirnoogfentihce fScahcnteoer-s
berg and Joachimsthal miners we have
of the lung in man is
no adequate proof that cancer
evidence but
caused by extrinsic factors This is negative
it should be of value in forcing us to hunt for other
causes of human pulmonary cancer before
cancer as being due to external
we accept all pulmonary
agents For the idea that sporadie somatic
mutations or hereditary alterations are
of the human
frequently the cause of cancer
lung we have the following indirect additional evidence
The vast majority of such cancers in
man appear to rise from one
point of origin as would be
expected were a somatic mutation the
cause whereas if external agents acting on the lung were
we should expect that the
responsible
tumors would be multiple and over both
lungs Thus tumors induced in mice by hydrocarbons
chiogenic as in man but
are not bron-
subpleural and may be multiple rather than
;
MLICKLIN MAC MACKLIN MACKK LIN MACKL LIN PI RIMN ARY CARCINOMA OF LENG 953
single and may be bilateral
in the germ cells and that
Second we know that mutations do occur the cells with such mutations are then
propagated as a new line of individuals There is no reason to suppose that matations are limited to germ cells alone and that such mutations
could not occur in any somatic cell in the body
Have we any evidence that definite hereditary factors may be present in the germ cell which cause cancer of the lung to appear at definite time in the life cycle of the individual As far as cancer of the lung is concerned we have no human pedigrees that would prove it to be
inherited and again the evidence must be indirect Cancerous altera-
tions of cells have been found to be inherited in strains of mammals in
which experimentation is possible The type of cancer produced by the strain is more or less constant Thus there are strains with a high incidence of pulmonary tumors Lynch 50 others with a high incidence of mammary tumors and others with a high incidence of hepatic
tumors There are strains of mice in which several types of tumors
may be capable of developing but which tend to die of the type developing first thus obscuring the other cancerous potentialities Since
man biologically is much more closely identified with other mammals than he is differentiated from them it would be reasonable to
suppose
that if cancer shows dependence on hereditary factors in mice the same will be true for man although the actual mode of inheritance may differ widely in the two species
In rectal gastric
evidence that related
mammary and members of a
uterine cancer
family tend to
in man we see good
resemble each other
more closely in the production of these tumors at a definite time in
recog- their life than do unrelated members of
This suggests that hereditary factors play
not in all of these tumors Cancer of
a community Macklin Macklin Macklin ) a predominant role in many the lung was seldom recog-
nized before 1900. Hence even if it were inherited and transmitted
according to a simple scheme so that one would
familial cases we should not have many records
frequently
of familial
encounter
instances
owing to the fact that pulmonary cancers in the preceding generations remained undiagnosed
Finally we may use the evidence furnished by tumors in twins
Macklin ) True we have no records of pulmonary cancers in twins since
of
but
since cancer
of
the
lung
is
like
is like all
occurs in the lungs instead of elsewhere
much when we use tumors in twins to
xcept "
other cancers
it
that it
we may not be assuming too
show that cancer and heuce
pulmonary cancer may be inherited If one examines records of can-
56 Lunch C. J. J. Exper Med 747 1931
57. Macklin M. T
.
a Familial Incidence of Cancer
Cancer Madison Wis University of Wisconsin Press 1938 p
277 1940
in 32
Symposium on B Heredity
Om atibL
954
ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY
cers in monozygotic and dizygotic twins one finds the following facts
Monozygotic twins with an identical inheritance resemble each other
far more often in and at about the have with respect This is true even
having a caneer and having it in the same organ
same time of life than do dizygotic twins who may
to cancer either an identical or a different heredity
when the dizygotic twins studied are all of the same
sex thus eliminating differences in environment due to occupation
which are present when the twius are of the opposite sex This would
indicate that fog somatic mutations may he responsible for some
cancers they are probably not responsible for all for it would be very
rave for identical twins to have an identical somatic mutation in the
same organ at about the same age were that mutation not under the
guiding influence of heredity
To sum up then it would seem that the called chronic irritants
supposed to be responsible for cancer of the lung have not been proved to be causes of such cancer since 1 many have cancer of the lung who are not exposed to these chronic irritants while 2 many exposed
to them never have cancer of the lung Until such proof is forthcoming investigators are closing their minds to other perhaps fruitful passibilities by insisting that because specific carcinogens are responsible for cancer of the lung in some instances they must be in all Such an atti-
inde is no more reasonable than to state that because diabetes develops
an animal from which the pancreas has been removed all diabetics
are without a pancreas Sporadic mutations and hereditary influences may and most probably do play a large role in causing pulmonary
cancers as well as other types of malignant growth
SUMMARY
Tu conclusion then we may say that none of the specific diseases or conditions causing chronic inflammation of the lungs can be said to have been proved to be causes of cancer of the lung They have not been shown to be suore common in patients with pulmonary cancer than in group of the general population of similar age and sex and
until those nary
a significant difference can be be found between their incidence in
with pulmonary cancer as compared with those without
cancer their causal relation to this type of cancer will
pulmo-
remain
purely speculative This of course refers to chronic inflammatory
discases which have antedated the cancer by a suflicient number of
years so that they can be excluded from being interpreted as the result
not the cause of the cancer
Chronic irritation especially disease as a cause of pulmonarypulmonary
in the form of chronic inflammatory
cancer has been assumed the idea has
been copied from text to text repeated from author to author with
MAR KLIN MACKLIN MACKLIN MACMKALCIKNLIN PRIMARY
CIRCINOMET CIRCINOMET OF
LENLGENG 935
little critical analysis of its possible role Sonaie Sonaie
tary factors must be
matations and heredi
considered and their probable role in
cancer of the lung recognized Trne
causing
carcinogenic carcinogenic
duction of cancer of the hung will no doubt be found aagsenmtosdefronr tinhdeustprro- p yro-
expands its use of chemicals But But as
industry
develop some types of cancer will will
one seventh of meu over 40 and since about one fifth of all
cers in males are in the lungs
can-
lungs one thirty fifth or about 3
all men over 40 will die of this
per cent of
increase in the
type of cancer cancer There may be an
increase
the maximal
incidence of cancer of the lung in any industry beyond
rate for caucer of the lung in the general
one can never state that
population but
lung had he
any patient would not have had cancer of the
not beeu in that occupation Thus
of
even with the presence
carcinogenic agents admitted their role in
cannot
be
proved
in
in in
any
individual
causing cancer of the lung lung
100
case nor can they be said to be
per cent effective effective since a certain
to the carcinogenic
percentage of persons exposed
without this
agents would have had pulmonary pulmonary carcinoma even
exposure The effectiveness of
producing carcinoma of the
any carcinogenic agent in
of increase of
lung can be judged only by the increntent increntent
incidence
carcinoma of the lung in large groups not by its total
It is therefore impossible impossible to
an absolute role in
carcinogenesis
carcinogenesis
in
any assign to any extrinsic factor
carcinogenesis in any individual case
F tee encom ermem IIE UAT IL ag