Document 0Joey3MjLp9obzrDkw158b3YJ
TO:
Distribution
VISTA POLYMERS INC. MAY 2 7 1987
Interoffice Communication
FROM: DATE:
SUBJ:
T. G. Grumbles May 22, 1987
UPDATE ON CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 65
PVC"\AtA
COMMERCIAL IMPACTS
Please refer to my memo of April 8 on the subject.
Basically,
Proposition 65 prohibits any discharge of listed carcinogens, or
reproductive toxins and will require labeling on products containing
the listed carcinogens. The specific labeling requirements are not
clear at this point.
The initial list promulgated by the Governor contained 29 chemicals, including several that Vista manufactures or has in our products.
The attached describes a recent court action requiring the addition
of 200 more chemicals to the list.
Several more chemicals
potentially impacting Vista products were added.
RPf'PH/prr t-.li/d,
' "A CT' T. G. Grumbles
JM02 '87 Route: -
aj o .16
C<5Va-
Attachment
DISTRIBUTION:
J. A. Hall R. E. Swantkowski B. E. A. Larsen S. K. Saborsky R. T. Means
cc W. L. McClain
tiLikozAc*JLsJb
OJ^ &-->
CA
i3~uvi--)
/(-ifcto vJUd--
VVV 000008812
Vista Chemical Company
15990 North Barker's Landing Road Post Office Box 19029
Houston, Texas 7722A Phone (713) 531-3200
June 15, 1987
Mr. Jeff Kempter Product Manager 32 Disinfectants Branch Registration Division (TS0767C) U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460
V1SHA
Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested
Dear Mr. Kempter:
Vista Chemical Company agrees to all conditions of your letter of May 28, 1987 regarding conditional registration for VMC-100 Mining Chemical.
Vista understands the conditions described and will proceed to develop the required test data. The label modifications will be made as requested prior to product shipment.
Sincerely,
Thomas G. Grumbles, C.I.H. Environmental Quality Manager
ajo
bcc
W. McClain I O. Kerfoot j A. Nielsen D. Smith P. Jernigan B. Larsen M. Tonkovich
Wv G00008813
Vista Chemical Company
15990 North Barker's Landing Road Post Office Box 19029
Houston, Texas 77224 Phone (713) 531-3200
June 15, 1987
Mr. J. P. Jones, Department Manager Safety, Security, Env. Health and
Industrial Hygiene United States Steel Corporation Mail Station CM-06 Fairless Hills, PA 19030
RE: Review of Vista Muriatic Acid MSDS
Dear Mr. Jones:
I have reviewed your comments on Vista's MSDS for Muriatic Acid. You noted what you believe to be two deficiencies in the MSDS (see attached). Vista believes the MSDS to be sufficient and no changes necessary. This is based on the following.
You noted no information was available on the medical conditions-
aggravated by HCL. Based on a review of the medical information on
HCL there are no specific medical conditions aggravated by exposure
to HCL.
Any chronic respiratory problem may be aggravated with
significant exposure based on the irritant properties of HCL.
Listing those conditions would not significantly add to the
communication of HCL hazards.
Regarding your comment on the primary route of exposure. Due to HCL's liquid state and general volatility all routes of exposure are possible and therefore, are discussed in Section 5 of the MSDS under the Nature of Hazard Section.
Please contact me if you have further questions on the above.
Sincerely,
-----------
Thomas G. Grumbles, C.I.H. Environmental Quality Manager
ajo
cc L. A. Mauerman
VVV 000008814