Document 0J2ozz6m9gjpZq3MjXZ8x4w1k

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ELDON DICKERSON & RUTH DICKERSON CASE NO. 398302 Plaintiffs, JUDGE HARRY HANNA A-BEST PRODUCTS, et al. Defendants. DEFENDANT INGERSOLL RAND CORPORATION'S REVISED RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S MASTER SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION PROPOUNDED TO VARIOUS DEFENDANTS IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE t. Now comes Defendant Ingersoll Rand Corporation ("I-R"), by its undersigned attorneys, and hereby submits its responses'and objections to Plaintiffs' Master Set ofInterrogatories and Requests for Production. I-R provided these Responses as a separate document, but asserts that the Answers are a response to each Request and its subpart as provided by Plaintiffs. /V INTERROGATORIES 1. John Clary. See also preliminary statement (a). Director, Product Liability Ingersoll-Rand Company 200 Chestnut Ridge Road Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey 07675 Assistant Company Counsel (1976-1982), Business Manager (1982-1985), Assistant Company Counsel (1985-1987), General Manager (1987-1990), Director, Product Liability (1990-Present). ' , / 3. j. Ingersoll-Rand Company reincoipforated in Bermuda on December 31, 2001 as " '-Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited. Ingersoll-Rand Company was incorporated in New Jersey in 1905. Principal place of business is 200 Chestnut Ridge Road, Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677. Note also, Ingersoll-Rand is a publicly traded company. See applicable filing(s) with the Securities and Exchange'Commission. 4.1 Unknown. 5. Ingersoll-Rand submits that to the best of its knowledge none of its corporate predecessors, subsidiaries, affiliates, divisions, holding companies or other related entities have ever mined, milled, or manufactured "asbestos products" or "asbestos containing products" as it believes these terms are defined. For over one hundred and twenty-five years, Ingersoll-Rand has manufactured or marketed numerous multi-use equipment, including compressors and pumps, some of which are manufactured by third parties or contain parts manufactured by third parties. Some of the equipment or its replacement parts may have had an internal component, including gaskets, packing or brake system, manufactured by third parties that contained encapsulated asbestos fibers. Regarding asbestos containing component parts that may have been incorporated into its equipment, Ingersoll-Rand purchased such component parts from various manufacturers based upon commercial availability and the particular application of the equipment being manufactured. Ingersoll-Rand does not maintain a list of the equipment which had an internal asbestos component part. The asbestos content, fiber type and composition of a component part would be only within the knowledge of the component's manufacturer and not this defendant. The following supplemental answer is in addition to and not in derogation of the original answer provided by Ingersoll-Rand. Plaintiffs counsel has provided the counsel for Ingersoll-Rand with documents alleged to have been obtained from Queen City Steel. Those documents identify the sale of Ingersoll-Rand products to Queen City Steel and contain some identification of the products. Said documents appear to identify during the period of 1946-1952 nine Ingersoll-Rand pumps and one Ingersoll-Rand Type 30 air compressor. The pumps identified are motorpumps. The nine pumps identified are: _ 1. 2RVN5 2. RVNS 1 3. 1 Vi RVN 3 4. 3 RVL 7 1/2 5. 1 Vi RVN 5 6. 4 RVL 10 7. 1 KRVS 1 8. 1 RVN 1 'A 9. 1 Vi KRVS 2 '` Regarding the nine above listed motor pumps, Ingersoll-Rand is presently unable to identify the type of gasket or packing seal utilized but will supplement/this answer if that information becomes available. Note, that said documents contain notations that some of the pumps were used to handle clear water, or liquid water service or water at room temperature. As a result, the gaskets or packing on those pumps inay have utilized an encapsulated non-asbestos fiber such as cotton or vegetable. The records also do not indicate whether mechanical seals were utilized in place of a stuffing box, which would eliminate the need for seal packing. j Regarding the Type 30 air compressor, in approximately 1972, a flood at the Ingersoll-Rand facility containing the documents relevant to this compressor destroyed those documents. Accordingly, Ingersoll-Rand is unable to identify the type of gaskets utilized in the compressor but will supplement this answer if that information becomes available. 7. Unknown. Ingersoll-Rand did not manufacture the asbestos containing component parts that may have been incorporated into its equipment. Ingersoll-Rand 2 purchased such component parts from various manufacturers based upon commercial availability and the particular application of the equipment being manufactured. The asbestos content, fiber type and composition of a component part would be only within the knowledge of the component's manufacturer and not this defendant. 8. Unknown. Ingersoll-Rand did not manufacture the asbestos containing component parts that may have been incorporated into its equipment. Ingersoll-Rand purchased such component parts from various manufacturers based upon commercial availability and the particular application of the equipment being manufactured. 8.02 See Response to Interrogatory No. 5. Regarding the internal encapsulated asbestos containing component parts that may have been incorporated into its equipment/-' Ingersoll-Rand purchased such component part from various manufacturers based upon , commercial availability and the particular application of the equipment being manufactured. Upon information and belief, some of the component part manufacturers included Garlock, Flexitallic, Crane and Anchor Packing. 8.03 No. 8.04 Not applicable. 8.05 No as to the manufacture, distribution, and/or marketing. Unknown as to purchase and/or use. See Response to Interrogatory No. 5. Our best estimate is.that internal encapsulated asbestos containing component parts were removed when new government standards were promulgated for encapsulated gaskets and packing, and when alternative non-asbestos component products became commercially available from the component manufacturers. /. 8.06 See Response to Interrogatoiy No. 5. Regarding the internal Encapsulated asbestos containing component parts that may have been incorporated into its equipment, Ingersoll-Rand purchased such component parts from various manufacturers based upon commercial availability and the particular application of the equipment being manufactured. Upon information and belief, some of the component part manufacturers included Garlock, Flexitallic, Crane and Anchor Packing. 3 8.1 The following supplemental answer is in addition to and not in derogation of the original answer provided by Ingersoll-Rand. Plaintiffs counsel has provided the counsel for Ingersoll-Rand with documents alleged to have been obtained from Queen City Steel. Those documents identify the sale of Ingersoll-Rand products to Queen City Steel and contain some identification of the products. Said documents appear to identify during the period of 1946-1952 nine Ingersoll-Rand pumps and one Ingersoll-Rand Type 30 air compressor. The pumps identified are motorpumps. The nine pumps identified are: 1. 2RVN5 2. RVNS 1 3. 1 /2 RVN 3 4. 3 RVL 7 Vi 5. 1 l/2 RVN 5 6. 4 RVL 10 7. 1 KRVS 1 8. 1 RVN 1 Vi 9. 1 >/2 KRVS 2 Regarding the nine above listed motor pumps, Ingersoll-Rand is presently unable to identify the type of gasket or packing seal utilized but will supplement this answer if that information becomes available. Note, that said documents contain notations that some of the pumps were used to handle clear water, or liquid water service or water at room temperature. As a result, the gaskets or packing on those pumps may have utilized an encapsulated non-asbestos fiber such as cotton or vegetable. The records also do not indicate whether mechanical seals were utilized in place of a stuffing Box, which would eliminate the need for seal packing. Regarding the Type 30 air compressor, in approximately 1972,/a flood at the Ingersoll-Rand facility containing the documents relevant to this compressor destroyed those documents. Accordingly, Ingersoll-Rand is unable to identify the type of gaskets utilized in the compressor but will supplement this answer if that information becomes available. 8.2 Unknown. See Response to Interrogatory No. 8.1. t 8.3 Unknown. 8.4 See Response to Interrogatory No. 8.1. 4 9. Subject to the Response to Interrogatory No. 8.1, unknown. 9.1 None. 12. Ingersoll-Rand did not manufacture or assemble the internal encapsulated asbestos containing component parts that may have been incorporated into its equipment. 13. No. 14. Unknown, Ingersoll-Rand did not manufacture or design the internal encapsulated' asbestos containing component parts that may Have been incorporated into its equipment.' The asbestos content, fiber type and composition of a component part would be only within the knowledge of the component's manufacturer and not this defendant. 17. Unknown, Ingersoll-Rand did not manufacture or design the internal encapsulated asbestos containing component parts that may have been incorporated into its equipment. The asbestos content, fiber type and composition of a component part would be only within the knowledge of the component's manufacturer and not this defendant. 18. No tests concerning potential health hazards were conducted as to asbestos containing products. Ingersoll-Rand objects to this interrogatory as argumentative to the extent that it implies that it was under a duty to provide warnings forjts products, or that any products sold by it would expose workers to harmful dust levels. 18.1 No tests concerning potential health hazards were conducted as to asbestos containing products. Ingersoll-Rand objects to this interrogatory as argumentative to the extent that it implies that it was under a duty to provide warnings for its products, or that any products sold by it would expose workers to harmful dust levels. ' 19. See Response to Interrogatory No. 18. 20. Not applicable. 5 21. No tests concerning potential health hazards were conducted as to asbestos containing products. Ingersoll-Rand objects to this interrogatory as argumentative to the extent that it implies that it was under a duty to provide warnings for its products, or that any products sold by it would expose workers to harmful dust levels. 23. No tests concerning potential health hazards were conducted as to asbestos containing products. Ingersoll-Rand objects to this interrogatory as argumentative to the extent that it implies that it was under a duty to provide warnings for its products, or that any products sold by it would expose workers to harmful dust levels. 41. No as to possible health effects of asbestos. Ingersoll-Rand objects to this interrogatoiy as argumentative to the extent that it implies that it was under a duty to provide warnings for its products, or that any products sold by it would expose workers to. harmful dust levels. 42. No. - 43. Ingersoll-Rand equipment would likely have included an instructions manual. 44. Unknown. Ingersoll-Rand equipment would likely have included an instructions manual. - / 46. No as to possible health effects of asbestos. Ingersoll-Rand objects to this interrogatory as argumentative to the extent that it implies that it was under a duty to provide warnings for its products, or that any products sold by it would expose workers to harmful dust levels. , / 48.1 None, Ingersoll-Rand has a seven year documents retention policy for sales records. 48.3 No. 48.4 No. 6 52. Ingersoll-Rand does not consider itself competent to offer opinions as to respirators, masks or other breathing devises, and will rely upon its expert(s). However, Ingersoll-Rand is aware that differences in the composition of the products play a large role in the friability and consequent respirability of asbestos fibers contained within such products. Where fibers are encapsulated, fiber emission is negligible, if any. 55.1 Ingersoll-Rand has not completed its investigation of the facts and circumstances which are the basis of this litigation and is unable to answer this Interrogatory at the present time. Ingersoll-Rand will supplement it answers pursuant to the Ohio Civil Rules. 56.1 Ingersoll-Rand has not completed its investigation of the facts and circumstances , which are the basis of this litigation and is unable to answer this Interrogatory at the present time. Ingersoll-Rand will supplement it answers pursuant to the Ohio Civil Rules. 57. Ingersoll-Rand has not completed its investigation of the facts and circumstances which are the basis of this litigation and is unable to answer this Interrogatory at the present time. Ingersoll-Rand will supplement it answers pursuant to the Ohio Civil Rules. 58. The last date an internal encapsulated asbestos containing component part was utilized in Ingersoll-Rand's equipment is unknown. Our best estimate is that internal encapsulated asbestos containing component parts were no longer utilized when new government standards were promulgated for encapsulated gaskets and. packing, and when viable alternative non-asbestos component parts became commercially available from the component manufacturers. REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION: ' 1. Defendant Ingersoll-Rand objects to Request for Production No. 1 as same is vague, overly broad and general. For over 125 years, Ingersoll-Rand has manufactured or marketed multi-use equipment, including compressors and pumps, some of which are manufactured by third parties or contain parts manufactured by third parties. Some of the equipment or its replacement parts may have had an internal component, including gaskets or packing, manufactured by third parties that contained encapsulated asbestos fibers. Regarding gaskets or packing, Ingersoll-Rand purchased such component parts from various manufacturers based upon commercial availability and the particular 7 application of the equipment being manufactured. Ingersoll-Rand does not maintain a list of the equipment which had an internal asbestos component part. The asbestos content, fiber type and composition of any gasket or packing component part would be only within the knowledge of the component's manufacturer and not this defendant. Without waiving such objection, Ingersoll-Rand Product Brochures of its equipment are available for inspection at the law firm of Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, 7lh Floor, Bulkley Building, 1501 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44115-2108. By providing these Product Brochures for review and inspection, Defendant in now way represents that these specific brochures involve equipment that definitively incorporated asbestos-containing gaskets or packing. The following supplemental answer is in addition to and not in derogation of the original answer provided by Ingersoll-Rand. Plaintiffs counsel has provided the counselfor Ingersoll-Rand with documents alleged to have been obtained from Queen City Steel. Those documents identify the sale of Ingersoll-Rand products to Queen City Steel and contain some identification of the products. Said documents appear to identify during the period of 1946-1952 nine Ingersoll-Rand pumps and one Ingersoll-Rand Type 30 air compressor. The pumps identified are motorpumps. The nine pumps identified are: 1. 2 RVN 5 2. RVNS 1 3. 1 /z RVN 3 4. 3 RVL 7 '/2 5. 1 Vi RVN 5 6. 4 RVL 10 7. 1KRVS1 8. 1 RVN 1 '/2 9. 1 14 KRVS 2 . ; ' Regarding the nine above listed motor pumps, Ingersoll-Rand ispresently unable to identify the type of gasket or packing seal utilized but will supplement this answer if that information becomes available. Note, that said documents contain notations that some of the pumps were used to handle clear water, or liquid water service of water at room temperature. As a result, the gaskets or packing on those pumps may/have utilized an encapsulated non-asbestos fiber such as cotton or vegetable. The records also do not indicate whether mechanical seals were utilized in place of a stuffing box, which would eliminate the need for seal packing. Attached as Exhibit A, a brochure of Type RV Motorpump. Attached as Exhibit B, a brochure of a Type KRVS Motorpump. Regarding the Type 30 air compressor, in approximately 1972, a flood at the Ingersoll-Rand facility containing the documents relevant to this compressor destroyed those documents. Accordingly, Ingersoll-Rand is unable to identify the type of gaskets utilized in the compressor but will supplement this answer if that information becomes 8 available. Attached as Exhibit C, is a brochure of a Type 30 Reciprocating Air Compressor. 2. Ingersoll Rand is in possession of the documents, which Plaintiff Counsel presented to Ingersoll Rand's Counsel in Cleveland, Ohio, said documents apparently representing information which Plaintiff Counsel obtained from Queen City Steel. These documents identify the sale of Ingersoll-Rand products to Queen City Steel and contain some identification of the products. Said documents appear to identify during the period of 1946-1952 nine Ingersoll-Rand pumps and one Ingersoll-Rand Type 30 air compressor. The pumps identified are motorpumps. The nine pumps identified are RVN 5, RVNS 1, 1 54 RVN 3, 3 RVL 7 !4, 1 !4 RVN 5, 4 RVL 10, 1 KRVS 1,1 RVN 1 14, and 1 !4 KRVS 2. Since Plaintiff Counsel supplied these documents to Ingersoll-Rand's Cleveland, Ohio Counsel, and as such is obviously in possession of duplicate copies, Ingersoll Rand sees no need to provide the same information which Plaintiff Counsel already has. Additionally, Ingersoll Rand in no way represents that the referenced equipment in these documents incorporated an internal encapsulated asbestos-containing component part. 3. None. 6. None. 7. None. 8. None. 9. None. 10. None. 11. None. 12. None. 13. None. 14. None. 15. None. 9 16. Defendant Ingersoll-Rand objects to Request for Production No. 1 as same is vague, overly broad and general. For over 125 years, Ingersoll-Rand has manufactured or marketed multi-use equipment, including compressors and pumps, some of which are manufactured by third parties or contain parts manufactured by third parties. Some of the equipment or its replacement parts may have had an internal component, including gaskets or packing, manufactured by third parties that contained encapsulated asbestos fibers. Regarding gaskets or packing, Ingersoll-Rand purchased such component parts from various manufacturers based upon commercial availability and the particular application of the equipment being manufactured. Ingersoll-Rand does not maintain a list of the equipment which had an internal asbestos component part. The asbestos content, fiber type and composition of any gasket or packing component part would be only within the knowledge of the component's manufacturer and not this defendant. Without waiving such objection, Ingersoll-Rand Product Brochures of its equipment are available for inspection at the law firm of Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, 7th Floor, Bulkley t. Building, 1501 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH ,44115-2108. By providing these Product Brochures for review and inspection. Defendant! in now way represents that these specific ' brochures involve equipment that definitively incorporated asbestos-containing gaskets or packing. The following supplemental answer is in addition to and not in derogation of the original answer provided by Ingersoll-Rand. Plaintiffs counsel has provided the counsel for Ingersoll-Rand with documents alleged to have been obtained from Queen City Steel. Those documents identify the sale of Ingersoll-Rand products to Queen City Steel and contain some identification of the products. Said documents appear to identify during the period of 1946-1952 nine Ingersoll-Rand pumps and one Ingersoll-Rand Type 30 air compressor. The pumps identified are motorpumps. The nine pumps identified are: 1. 2 RVN 5 2. RVNS 1 3. 1 Vi RVN 3 4. 3 RVL 7 Vi 5. 1 y2 RVN 5 6. 4 RVL 10 7. 1 KRVS 1 8. 1 RVN 1 y2 9. 1 y2 KRVS 2 */ .' 7 - Regarding the nine above listed motor pumps, Ingersoll-Rand is presently unable to identify the type of gasket or packing seal utilized but will supplement this answer if that information becomes available. Note, that said documents contain notations that some of the pumps were used to handle clear water, or liquid water service or water at room temperature. As a result, the gaskets or packing on those pumps may have utilized an encapsulated non-asbestos fiber such as cotton or vegetable. The records also do not indicate whether mechanical seals were utilized in place of a stuffing box, which would 10 eliminate the need for seal packing. Attached as Exhibit A, a brochure of Type RV Motorpump. Attached as Exhibit B, a brochure of a Type KRVS Motorpump. Regarding the Type 30 air compressor, in approximately 1972, a flood at the Ingersoll-Rand facility containing the documents relevant to this compressor destroyed those documents. Accordingly, Ingersoll-Rand is unable to identify the type of gaskets utilized in the compressor but will supplement this answer if that information becomes available. Attached as Exhibit C, is a brochure of a Type 30 Reciprocating Air Compressor. 17. None. 18. See Response to Request No. 16. 21. None. 26. None. 27. To be supplied. Ingersoll-Rand notes it is a publicly traded company its applicable financial records are filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 28. Ingersoll-Rand has not completed its investigation of the facts and circumstances which are the basis of this litigation and is unable to answer this Request at the present time. Ingersoll-Rand will supplement it answers pursuant to the Ohio Civil Rules. 29. Ingersoll-Rand has not completed its investigation of the facts and circumstances which are the basis of this litigation and is unable to answer this Request at the present time. Ingersoll-Rand will supplement it answers pursuant to the Ohio Civil Rules. 35. None. 36. None known as to asbestos. 11 37. None known as to asbestos. 38. None known as to asbestos. 41. None. 51. Unknown 52. The information supplied in these Responses is not based solely upon the ^ knowledge of the executing party, but includes ^ome information assembled by and/or ' within the knowledge of the party's authorized Agents, representatives, and, unless ` privileged, attorneys. Because much of the information is of, or relates to, events of many years ago, it is difficult, if not impossible, for this Defendant to retrieve or reconstruct some of the requested information. Many of the individuals who might have had personal knowledge of the matters to which Plaintiffs' discovery relate are deceased or are otherwise are unavailable to Defendant, and investigations to date indicate that some information in documents which might relate to matters inquired into by Plaintiffs' discovery may have been destroyed pursuant to Defendant's normal record retention policy or are otherwise unable to find. This Defendant is engaged in a continuing investigation in an attempt to locate or confirm the absence of such information or documents and this Defendant is also engaged in a continuing investigation with respect to the matters inquired into by Plaintiffs'-discovery. Therefore, this Defendant reserves the right to amend these responses if new or more accurate information becomes available or if errors are discovered. Furthermore, these responses are given without prejudice to this Defendant's right to rely at trial on subsequently discovered information or on information inadvertently omitted from these responses as a result of mistake, error or oversight. ; i /; 12 Respectfully submitted, Of Counsel: GALLAGHER, SHARP, FULTON FULTON & NORMAN DANIEL J. MICHALEC (0042733) Attorneys for Defendant Ingersoll Rand Corporation Seventh Floor-Bulkley Building 1501 Euclid Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44115 Telephone: (216) 241-5310 Facsimile: (216)241-1608 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Hard copy of the foregoing have been served upon Plaintiffs Counsel, Ladd Gibke, Esq., BARON & BUDB P.C., 3102 Oak Lawn Avenue, Suite 1100, Dallas, Texas 75219, via Federal Excess this day ofApril, 2002, with a Notice of Service filed electronically via CLAD on this /_ day of April, 2002, such electronic filing constituting notice to all Counsel of Record. Of Counsel: GALLAGHER, SHARP, FULTON FULTON & NORMAN j-LSfL VIRGINIA HEIDLOFF (0014348) DANIEL J. MICHALEC (0042733) Attorneys for Defendant Ingersoll Rand Corporation Seventh Floor-Bulkley Building 1501 Euclid Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44115 Telephone: (216) 241-5310 Facsimile: (216) 241-1608 | tft) ingersoll-Ralanndd Cameron Pump Division . 11 Broadway New York, N. Y. 10004 Type RV General Purpose Motorpump Single stage end suction overhung impeller general purpose pump close coupled to a motor driver. Designed for continuous service handling hot and cold liquids. M-7113.10 Sheet 481 Feb., 1967 FIRST EDITION Dem. ft Exp. on 166. Pvmp Size and Type 1RVN1 IRVNIft 1RVN2 1RVN3 IRVNL2E 1RVNL3E 1RVNL2D IRVNL30 1RVNL5D 1V4RVN1 1%RVN2 1%RVN3 1%RVN5 1%RVN7% Speed RPM 1750 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 1750 3450 3450 3450 3450 Approximate Shlppmj Wt., lbs. IE or DP XP 145 175 145 175 165 -- ____ 180 205 175 200 190 215 185 210 200 225 235 280 155 -185 175 200 190 215 225 270 245 300 Suction Din. m 1% 1% 1% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Approximate Dimensions LWH 1931 8 1934 e 2014 8 2034 8 9 9 9 9 22% 8 2234 8 9 9 2214 8 9 22V4 8 9 2434 1034 1034 2034 8 9% 2134 8 9% 2134 8 9% 2354 10ft 10% 25 1034 1034 Pump Size md Type i%#VNL1 134pVNL134 134RVNL5 134RVNL734 154RVNL10 2RVN1 2RVN734 2RVNUV4 2RVNL734 2RVNL10 2RVNU5 3RVNL10 3RVNL15 3RVNL20 3RVNL25 Sp*td RPM 1750 1750 3450 3450 3450 1750 3450 1750 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 Approximate SMppiag Wt., lbs. TE or DP XP 175 205 195 220 245 290 265 320 335 390 165 195 255 310 205 230 275 330 345 400 370 425 355 410 380 435 465 565 485 725 Section Die. 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 214 214 214 314 4 4 4 4 Approixmet* Dimensions LV H 21ft 8 9 22ft 8 9 24ft 10ft 10ft 25% 10ft 10ft 28-6 10% 1214 21ft 8 9 2594 9% 1014 2214 8 9 25% 10ft 10ft 2814 10% 12ft 30 10% 1214 2814 10% 12ft 30 toft 12ft 3014 13 14ft 34 14 1414 Peaap Size md Type 114RVH5 1!4RVH7'A 114RVH10 1%RVH15 2RVH15 2RVH20 2RVH25 3RVS1 3RVST14 Jrttvbz 3RVS3 3RVS5 3RVS714 3RVS10 3RVSI5 3RVH25 3RVH30 3RVH40 4RVL5 4RVL716 4R\/|_10 f 10 5 - _20 4RVL25 4RVL30 Speed RPM 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 1750 1750 1750 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 1150 1150 1150 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 AppcoxlMt. Stliooin* Wl.( Ibt* TE or DP XP 270 315 290 345 360 415 385 44Q 400 455 485 585 505 745 200 220 -- 235 270 290 360 415 550 685 730 230 245 260 260 315 345 415 470 790 830 1250 470 525 495 550 560 680 495 550 560 680 625 840 735 880 775 920 Section DU. l 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Approximate Dimension* L 27 27 30ft 30ft 30% 32% 32% 25ft 25ft 25ft 25ft 28 31ft 31ft 34ft 36 36 36 34ft 34% 34% 34% 34% 36% 36%36% W 12% 12% 12% 12% 13% 13% 13% 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 15% 16% 16% 19% 19% 19% 19% 19% 19% 19% 19% H 11% 11% 12% 12% 14 14% 14% 13 13 13 13 11% 13ft 13ft 13ft 15 16 16 16ft 16ft 17 16ft 17 17 18 18 Pvmp Size and Type 5RVL5 5RVL7% 5RVU0 5RVLI5 5RVL13 5RVL2D 5RVL20 5RVL25 5RVL30 5RVL40 5RVL50 5RVL60 5RVH30 5RVH40 5RVH50 5RVH60 5RVH75 5RVH100 6RVL15 6RVL20 6RVL40 6RVL50 6RVL60 6RVL75 6RVL100 '? Speed RPM 1150 1150 1150 1150 1750 1150 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1150 1150 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Approximate /' TEor DP XP 495 550 520 575 585 705 650 2 865 585 r ; 705 760 ' 905 650 865 760 905 800 945 1050 1335 1200 1550 1350 1775 975 1225 1375 1475 1600 -- 1125 1525 1725 1850 2250 2350 950 1175 1050 1200 1350 1650 1500 1850 1600 1975 1725 2375 1850 2475 Suction DU 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Approximate Dimension* L 35 35 35 37 35 37 37 37 37 38ft 38ft 39% 40% 41% 41% 44% 44% 53% 42% 42% 44 44 51% 51ft 54% W 21% 31% 21% 21% 21% 21% 21% 21% 21% 21% 21% 21% 25% 25ft 25% 25% 25% 25% 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 H 14% 14% 15% 16% 15% 16% 15% 16% 16% 17% 17% 18% 21 22 22 23 23 24 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 Form 70628 8-F6 [iffj Ingersoll-Rand Cameron Pump Division IX Broadway New York, N. Y. 10004 Type ICRVS Moforpump Single stage end suction overhung impeller general purpose pump close coupled to a motor driver. Designed for continuous service handling hot and cold liquids. PUMP FEATURES CIOSE-COUPLED DESIGN in sP DL -l_ _I------i ii BS MHltllM (B) Compact . -- i-------------- 1---- i No nlianment gSsj MIIHIIIM gS Only one stuffing box BUILT-IN SEAL P; v QQO-fl wnVyj Spring-loaded, self adjusting PRE-LUBRICATED BEARINGS Sealed, grease lubricated type VERSATILITY OF MOUNTING J feggEH Horizontal, vertical or side-wall Four standard discharge positions OFF-THE-SHELF SHIPMENT ,, / i' CUSTOMER BENEFITS , Low initial cost } Low installation cost Fewer parts--less maintenance /' No stuffing box maintenance No routine lubrication Adaptable to a variety of piping arrangements Immediate availability Ingersoll-Rand Co., 1966 1 P*p Six mi Typ ?4KRVSA14 14KRVSAV4 54KRVSA14 14KRVSA14 14KRVSA1 krvsaii4 1KRVSI14 1KRVS2 IKRVS3 1KRV55 114KRVSA14 114KRVSA14 1 Ukrvsaw 114KRVSA14 IJ4KRVSAI 1V4KRVSA1V4 114KRVSA2 114KRVSA3 1V4KRV514 IpiKRVSW iwkrvsK mKRVSVi 114KRVS14 CpnJ WM 1750 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 1750 1750 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 1750 1750 3450 1750 3450 ApctoxhMto Wlf/ft!! DP 45 50 55 60 70 i ii 130 135 140 175 55 60 65 70 80 110 115 120 70 80 80 85 TE w XP 45 50 55 60 70 95 140 150 215 55 60 65 70 80 115 120 130 65 70 80 80 85 SvcHo* DU. m 1% 1 ri 114 114 m {U i% {a i 1% m 2 2 2 2 2 AppronUm. ErnmniMl L WH 1614 8 8 1654 8 8 16% 6 8 16% 8 8 16% 8 8 16'A 8 8 16% 8% 9% 1854 6% 9% 1854 8% 9% 23 I0V4 ii 18% 18% 18% 18% 18% 1814 10 10 10 to 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 18% 10 18V4 10 10 10 19 19 $ 814 814 19 814 814 19 19 814 814 PvopSlx* mi Typ 114KRVS54 154KRV5I HWS* 114KRVS3 114KRVS5 2KRVS14 2KRVS14 2KRVS54 2KRVS1M 2KRVS2 2KRVS3 2KRVS5 2KRVS714 3KRVSV4 3KRVS54 3KRVSI 3KRVS2 3KRVS3 3KRVS5 3KRVS714 3KRVS10 3KRVS15 SpMd RPM 1750 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 1750 1750 1750 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 1750 1750 1750 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 3450 ApproxUwU Shlpptaf Wt., tu. TE or DP I XP 90 100 V loo 130 135 135 140 140 150 175 215 P 65 95 135 140 145 180 200 ; 75 85 95 140 145 155 i 220 ; 250 95 ,,/ 95 105 ''105 145 145 150 160 155 165 190 230 210 260 260 350 320 450 Section DU. 2 2 2 2 2 2 214 214 2% 214 214 214 214 214 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ApproiUwf* Diattnaioft* L WH 19 19 sg 8 19 8% 8% 19 8% 8% 19 8% 8% 23 1014 ii 19 9 914 19. 9 9% 19 9 9% 19 9 9% 19 9 10% t9 9 1014 23 1014 10% 23 1014 11 1914 1014 1114 1914 1014 1114 1914 1014 1114 1914 1014 I2H 1914 1014 1214 23 1214 1214 23 2514 1214 1214 118 2514 1214 1214 Form 70626 8-F6 Reciprocating Air Compressors m compressor you can count on. In the 1V2 to 30 hp class, no other com pressor can match the Ingersoll-Rand Two-Stage Reciprocating Type 30 for reli ability, versatility, and ease of installation. The T-30 has proved its reliability in over rne million installations all over the world. Its tried-and-true design has made it the number one seller in its horsepower range. Count on the T-30 to be there for you when you need it. It won't let you down. After all, it's the pick of professionals-- and it's backed by the leader in long-last ing air compressors, Ingersoll-Rand. Designed for maximum performance Heat-fighting finned intercooler Finned copper tubing dissipates heat six times faster than bulk cast iron. Number of tubes per nest increases with compressor capacity--as many as 20 are used. The result is a cooler running, more efficient compressor that uses less power. Rugged one-piece connecting rods No adjustment required. Overhung crankshaft design makes possible solid-end connecting rods. No bolts and nuts to come loose. Separate cast cylinders Each cylinder is separately cast, precision-bored to close tolerances, and bolted to the crankcase. If a cylinder fails, only that one cylinder needs replacement--no need to re place the entire crankcase block. The heat of compression is dissipated by the deep radial fins on the cylinder head. The air flow from the flywheel is drawn across the cylinder to remove this heat from the compressor. Balanced overhung crankshaft Stiff, overhung crankshaft rotates on two liberally sized, heavy-duty ball bearings for long life. Precision ground, replaceable crankpin bushing is per fectly aligned. Entire shaft is precisionbalanced, runs with minimum vibration. Centrifugal unloader On higher horsepower motors where the starting torque of t^e motor re quires extra time for the compressor to come up to speedj the centrifugal unloader prevents the compressor from starting under load. Eliminates the possibility of stalling or burning out the motor. Standard on 71T2, 15T and 30T compressors. Continuous low-level oil protection Optional tamperproof switch, where supplied, automatically stops com pressor if crankcase oil level gets too low. Functions continuously and cannot be reset without adding oil. Quick-acting finger valve Made of heat-treated stainless steel. Large flow area, less heat and carbon build-up than with multiple small valves. Standard on 234, 242 and 253 compressors. Concentric ring valve High-quality stainless steel, with con centric inlet and discharge rings. Large flow area for longer valve life. Standard on 71T2,15T and 30T compressors. Finned Intercooler Splash f Lubrication-J