Document 06XVO3BqGb81mjn2V7LG9Kd4J

,January 2 6 19^8 Mr. Vllliam E. McCormick, The B F'. Goodrich C o ., Akron, Ohio. ' Dear M r . McCormick; I send you herewith the analyt of your employee, M r , results on the blood and urine The lead concentrations In both blood and urine are veil above normal levels. They indicate clearly that this man has had a . recent potentially hazardous exposure to lead compounds. There is more than the usual discrepancy betveen the lead levels in the blood and urine, but it will be noted that the urinary sample is concentrated, and this is probably responsible for the relatively h i g h lead c o n c e n t r a t i o n . In any case,, the lead c o n c e n t r a t i o n in the blood is veil above safe limits, and if there were clinical evidence of intoxication, these results would justify the diagnosis of lead intoxication. Cordially yours, RAK ef Ene. Bobert A. Kehoe, M. D. g 0004217. Karne: Material: Submitted Required: ( 7681-1021}.} Urine and Blood l-15-i}.8 b y M r . W i l l i a m McCo r m i c k , B. P. G o o d r i c h Company, Akron,Ohio Lead Analyses Urine A n a l y s i s H u m b e r - lj.8A-285 Volume = 100 ml, Sp. Gr. Mg. Pb/Liter = 1.021 = O.ij.2* Blood A n a l y s i s H u m b e r - I4.8A -286 Grams Spectrographic 18.7 Mg. Pb/100 g. 0.08 Dithizone 20.5 0.08 -Checked b y repeat analysis. Samples Collected: Samples Received: Samples Reported: I - I 5-I4.8 l-15-ij8 I - 22-I4.8