Pinzon: As you are aware, we have asked on several occasions for the opportunity to speak with USEPA's and ATSDR's representatives to the C-8 Assessment of Toxicity Team ("CAT Team") established under the Consent Order between E.I. duPont de Nemours and Company ("DuPont") and the State of West Virginia.
refid# dQgvkMB9kM2XDGxVb9Zq75E9q2 pages
West Virginia Department OF Environmental Protection Office Of Legal Services 1356 Hansford Street Charleston, WV 25301 8 =a 2JGE z 55 = oF = oo Re: C-8 Assessment Of Toxicity Team Work Under November 14, 2001 Consent Order Between DuPont And State Of West Virginia (Order No.
refid# RjKxZmE59yzqZVzmXdyOB9B5V2 pages
Volume Pano, Topic ; DuPont Company
refid# baGwvzzDQvN4qELGYwRnpj3OZ8 pages
Kennedy (duPont), M.
refid# 3Q4kkezkyMm6v5LL0J0X1QLVE2 pages
If It caa be calculated ilthout the official request procedures fro* MDF to DuPont, please put It Into practice.
refid# bBKdpOJxXgNgynxMMNM6aameZ2 pages
While DuPont does not believe this information is substantial risk information reportable under TSCA 8(e), DuPont is submitting the information to the TSCA 8(e) office in view of the Agency's continued interest in perfluorinated substances .
refid# 3ekp1GQyezjqDmmz4ZyEnEvyy2 pages
DuPont did not stamp the copyof the document attached hereto at Exhibit A as "confidential" under the terms ofthe Protective Orders in either case. 2
refid# wgD570XxQr2o1rJjdE2jwyBwB2 pages
Any expenses incurred as a result of accurately supplying the information requested above shall be covered by DuPont.
refid# wDjaD3Zx3b10rkBg6xxvkpjND2 pages
. >1 have a dual role in DuPont.
refid# 71DDkzx7v49qmdjB48mRe0jY62 pages
We have, therefore, encloascoepdy ofour submission to USEPA's IRIS Submission Desk concerning C8 to alert the non-DuPont CAT Team membersofthe typeofinformation that is available on C-8.
refid# e7Ye7xqXywg0OM7mYgKk57x8q3 pages
C~) Although DuPont does not believe that the information provided in this letter meets the criteria for TSCA section 8(e) reporting, DuPont is forwarding this information to the EPA public docket identified above and, as a precaution, to the EPA TSCA 8(e) office, in light of the Agencyzs continued interest in perfluorinated substances .
refid# B5X1a4y6wmO8yg8kz4xoYnq7m1 page
Hefter: As a supplement to our prior letters, including letters dated July 3, 2003, and July 31, 2003, regarding DuPont's reporting of PFOA drinking water contamination data to USEPA under TSCA, we enclose copies of additional documents on such matters, including e-mails exchanged among DuPont's in-house counsel, Bernie Reilly, Andrea Malinowski, and John Bowman.
refid# GK32950mkE32KXqMeZpO014y72 pages
Dupont's philosophy can be seen in the May 22, 1984 memo from J.A.
refid# m3Ey51NZjVmOReKy2M30jyq42 pages
JoA *te (134QC C apti#a j and Recycled to Soppier (53000) f DuPont U ee far ^ Pnxkjcing ' Tdon> Firw hes ; (770OIB) C ontened In Product!
refid# wqEgja1yyBmMO5BpDoKy3NBmo25 pages
\..... 01/30/2002 01:21 PM To: cc: Subject: Robert F Pinchot/DEV/AE/DuPont@ DuPont, Catherine A Barton/AE/DuPont@ DuPont, Andrew S Hartten/AE/DuPont@ DuPont Theodore H Carskl/AE/DuPontDuPont Draft modeling report Robert, Cathie and Andrew Here is the draft report.
refid# 71MxkerzM82drpa3p6y1K7eVe8 pages