Page 3489 1 The latency tells us that any exposure a 2 few years before the diagnosis will probably have no 3 impact because the disease development will take 4 longer than that. 5 Q Okay.

1 and Dr.

Page 3541 1 Q Can you tell us how much money you make for 2 these consulting jobs that we have gone over?

Page 3435 1 Q And you would agree with me, wouldn't you, 2 Doctor, that if somebody was aware, if a manufacturer 3 was aware of a threshold limit value for the 4 development of a disease with the use of its products, 5 it would be a good idea to warn individuals who may 6 come into contact with those products about that 7 threshold limit value, wouldn't you?

Page 3441 1 Q I understand.

1 Good afternoon.

1 at Walter Reed, and its function is to study the Page 3638 2 pathology of the different organs. 3 It got its start looking, as the name might 4 imply, at war wounds. 5 In fact, if you go to the museum, you will 6 find that there are lots of Lincoln's hair and the 7 bullet that killed Lincoln and a piece of his skull 8 and things of this sort. 9 Military injuries were where it got its 10 start and then it branched out to be all of the entire 11 spectrum of human pathology.

Page 3725 1 .its results cannot therefore readily be generalized to 2 all brake maintenance workers. 3 How does the fact that the study was limited 4 to volunteers impact on its ability to be read as 5 applying across the board?

1 Thank- you, Your Honor.

1 negligent in failing to warn users, consumers, Page 3777 2 mechanics, et cetera, about the need to take 3 precautions during the replacement of brake materials 4 to prevent dust from being released and being breathed 5 into the air. 6 That is why our verdict form looks 7 different, I know, from the Grewe verdict form and 8 from verdict forms that have been submitted in the 9 past. 10 I will also tell Your Honor, and I told Mr. 11 Williams this, I am also concerned about the 12 possibility, given the specifics of the Wood case, 13 creating the possibility of an inconsistent verdict 14 with the jury given the problems and concerns I have 15 with the negligent instructions that Your Honor gives 16 and the strict liability instructions. 17 I think from reading the past instructions 18 that we have done many times together, I think your 19 instructions are proper for negligence and strict. 20 The problem I have is that I don't think we 21 can meet the test for strict liability.

1 Number 30.

1 determination.

1 A Yes, you did.

1 beginning, Your Honor?

Page 3807 1 MR.