T.

I instructed me when I asked what his 2 plaintiffs specific testimony is or 3 whether he Will give plaintiff specific ' 4 testimony, asked me to inquire of the 5 professor, 111 do that only because 6 that's the only way I'm going to find 7 out if he even plans to do this-; but I;; 8 am absolutely not waiving any rights by 9 inquiring today because there is no Way 10 I was-prepared to cross-examine the 11 doctor today regarding any plaintiff 12 specific testimony. 13 He was not so disclosed,-and it 14 takes me completely by surprised. 15 BY MR.

loaded cartridges can be a means of protection... or deadly killers.

/' __ ^Balkam BALKAMP, IRC. ladianapolis, Indiana 46241

Page 285 "' 'A ' ' abdomen 196:17 ability 248:18 able 108:13 121:25 138:12 155:17 165:23 196:24 197:2 263:14 aboard 106:18 abortion 45:17 about 14:11 16:20 18:6 18:20 19:25 20:7,22 22:8,11;15 23:6,14 24:4 25:9,10,12,18 25:22 215:4,19,22 27:5,19,23 28:1,3,21 29:18 30:8,11,14,15 31:8^17 32:24 33:6 35:18 36:23,24 37:21 : 37:22,23 38:239:8 : 39:15,16,25 40:12,18 40:25 41:3,17 42:4 44:11,17,25 45:10,12 45:15,17,18,21 46:8 46:22 49:12,12 51:6 53:23,24 54:10,11 55^15^16,23 56:11 56:12,14,20 59:4 61:6jT5,20,25 62:14 62:16,22 64:11,12 66:22 67:20 68:8 69:5;10 70:2,24 71^3 72:23,24;25 75:25 75:!

PROCEDURE BULLETIN -Tra b GROUNDING OF PLUG-CONNECTED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMEK sc 004377 -- I.

SCHEDULE"A" DOCUMENTS TO BE PRODUCED AT DEPOSITION 1.

DISPERSION OF ASBESTOS IN POLYSTYRENE "Calidria" Asbestos RG-600 Untreated "Calidria" Asbestos These electron micrographs show that surface-treated "Calidria" asbestos RG-600 disperses more readily in polystyrene resin than untreated "Calidria" asbestos.

Subject to and without waiving these objections, and insofar as Abex understands this interrogatory, see Answer to Interrogatory Nos. 19 and 20. -73-

INTERROGATORY NO. 39: Withdrawn by plaintiff or stricken by the Court.

INTERROGATORY NO. 77: Describe, in detail, any and all tests, if any, conducted by Defendant, any predecessor or any related company, or anyone acting on behalf thereof, concerning the quantity, quality or threshold limit values of asbestos dust or particles to which applicators or consumers of asbestos-containing products were exposed while using any product identified in response to Interrogatory Nos. 19 and 42, Including:________________________ ___ _______ _ _________________ (a) The product being used; (b) Identify any and all person(s), firms) or entity(ies) conducting or participating in the conducting of said test; (c) State the dates) of said test: (d) Describe the methodology, results and conclusions of said test; (e) Identify any and all documents referring to, relating or reflecting said test or the results and conclusions thereof; and, (f) Identify any and all persons to whom any document referring to, relating to or reflecting the results or conclusions of said test was sent.

Page 155 1 THE WITNESS: Yeah, I'd like to hear it again, 2 Judge. 3 (Record read.) 4 THE WITNESS: That's what I thought.

1 A I'm not surprised at that.

1 their opinion, did you consider cost of developing Page 246 2 alternative materials to substitute out for asbestos in 3 making that determination?

Page 7 1 2 APPEARING TELEPHONICALLY: The Defendant, Yarway Corporation, was represented by Ms.