Inspectors met with the following facility representatives: Name Edward Simas Chuck Schadel Johannah Jacobson Victor Vilece Dustin Hafer Salina Liller Table 1: Inspection Attendee List Affiliation Telephone Email EPA Region 3 Inspectors and Contractors Lead Inspector (215) 814-2120 Simas.Edward@epa.gov Secondary (215) 814-5761 Schadel.Chuck@epa.gov Inspector (215) 814-2138 Jacobson.Johannah@epa.gov Site/Facility Representatives Chaney (301) 861-6094 vvilece@chaneyenterprises.com Enterprises Chaney (443) 871-3444 waughchapel@chaneyenterprises.com Enterprises State or County Representatives MDE (443) 934-0007 Salina.liller@maryland.gov Edward Simas, Chuck Schadel, and Johannah Jacobson displayed their credentials to Victor Vilece and Dustin Hafer at the outset of the inspection, and explained the purpose of the inspection was to observe compliance with its Permit.

Clean Air Act Compliance Inspection Report United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 - Seattle, WA Full Compliance Evaluation Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.

The next stage was to estimate the risk or probability that exposure to PFAS via one of these three scenarios would lead to a disease.

Month/Year Report Pollutant Result Limit/s June 2017 December 2018 December 2018 June 2019 pH Total Cadmium Total Lead Total Cyanide 8.7 S.U. .2 ug/l 2,700 ug/l 11 ug/l 6.5 S.U. - 8.0 S.U. .1875 ug/l 1,015 ug/l 5.9 ug/l According to EPA's records the Facility's groundwater remediation treatment system is expected to be ongoing and continues to be subject to EPA's NetDMR reporting requirements, which began August 1, 2019 for the Facility.

REGION 5 Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Division INSPECTION REPORT Inspection Date(s): Time: Media: Statute(s)/Program(s): Type of inspection: Access: 06/29/2022 - 06/29/2022 Announced: Yes Entry: 09:15 AM (CT) Exit: 02:30 PM (CT) Water Clean Water Act, NPDES, WWTP CEI - Compliance Evaluation Inspection Granted Permittee Name: Facility or Site Name: Facility/Site Physical Address: (City, state, zip code) County: Facility GPS Coordinates: UPPER SIOUX COMMUNITY USC WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY UPPER SIOUX LNDIAN RESERVATION (Latitude: 4445' N, Longitude: 9529' W) GRANITE FALLS, MN 56241 YELLOW MEDICINE 4445' N, 9529' W Facility/Site Identifier: Permit Number: 110043182631 MN0075001 Persons Participating in Inspection: Title Name Phone Lead Inspector Inspector Inspector Tribal Utility Consultant, IHS USC Director of Public Works Lead Inspector: Dean Maraldo Dean Maraldo Matthew Schulte Monica Dix Mike Termont, P.E.

The CEI was an EPA lead inspection.

CS 4 On the contrary, depending on the type of side chain included in the structure, the SCFPs can potentially lead to the formation of nonpolymeric PFAS substances as a result of degradation under environmental conditions (Fiedler et al., 2020; Danish EPA, 2013).

EPA Region 10 Raymond Andrews Lead Inspector Yes Yes Lummi Tribal Sewer Daniel Jeffries Lead Operator Yes Yes and Water District Lummi Sewer and Brad Solomon Sewer Manager Yes No Water District Facility Information Responsible Official?

REPORT OF RCRA COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION At CONAGRA Foods Packaged Foods, LLC 2467 Henry Ladyn Drive Fort Madison, Iowa 52627-1427 (319) 463-6226 EPA ID Number: IAD984566539 On June 15, 2022 By U.S.

REPORT OF RCRA COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION At Thompson Truck and Trailer 1190 Roosevelt Extension Dubuque, Iowa 52001 (319) 900-7625, Ext. 1171 EPA ID Number: IAD984591453 On May 18, 2022 By U.S.

Region 2 Enforcement & Compliance Assurance Division Air Compliance Branch Inspection Report Inspection Date: Facility Name: Facility Address: ICIS-Air/RMP ID #: Federal Facility: NCI: Facility size: Activity: State Referral: EJ: NAICS code: EPA Lead Inspector: EPA Asst.

Multi Flex does not use manganese (Mn), lead, or cobalt.

A failure of any one of these devices would, at best, compromise the charging system functionality, but it could also lead to immediate fire hazards and immediate or hidden shock hazards to anyone interacting with the system - maintenance, repair, adjacent activities, etc.

ECHA restriction proposal on PFAS Section IV Doc. type Date Rationale June 2023 ECHA restriction proposal on PFAS - Section IV Page 1 / 13 ECHA restriction proposal on PFAS Section IV Doc. type Date Rationale June 2023 Table of contents 1.

Nevertheless, these emissions lead only to increases in TFA concentrations that safely remain at orders of magnitude below scientifically established DNEL/PNEC levels and/or food intake or water quality standards for TFA.7 According to the trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)8 REACH registration dossier and Chemical Safety Report (CSR), this substance does not fulfil the criteria for a PBT or vPvB substance under Annex XIII REACH.