ALABAMA RUNOFF POLL - Moore leads Strange: A new JMC Analytics poll released Sunday found former Alabama Judge Roy Moore leading Sen.

"Republican presidents tend to nominate one of two types of administrator to lead the Environmental Protection Agency.

Could we request that Gordon take the lead on that?

Rule for NOx/PM does not comply with CAA's four year lead time in CAA 202(a)(3)(C). i.

The decisions made by the EPA in this area have global implications as other countries will follow the U.S. lead.

Liz Menz j Director of Education | SIGMA - America's Leading Fuel Marketers 3930 Pender Drive, Suite 340, Fairfax, VA 22030 | Direct: 703,375,0483 j www.siama.ora From: Ford, Hayley [mailto:ford.hayley@epa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 5:18 PM To: Liz Menz <lmenz@sigma.org> Cc: Hupp, Millan <hupp.millan@epa.gov> Subject: RE: SIGMA Invitation - Administrator Scott Pruitt Hi Liz, I hope you're doing well!

"I am sure that Senator Blunt has taken many meetings and phone calls from a variety of entities and their lobbyists leading up to the drafting of' the bill, Saltzgiver said.

Liz Menz I Director of Education I SIGMA - America's Leading Fuel Marketers 3930 PP,ndP,r DriVP,, SuitP, 340, rairfax, VA 22030 I Dirnct: 703,375,0483 I www,siqma,org From: Ford, Hayley [mailto:ford.hayley@epa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 5: 18 PM To: Liz Menz <lmenz@sigma.org> Cc: Hupp, Millan <hupp.millan@epa.gov> Subject: RE: SIGMA Invitation - Administrator Scott Pruitt Hi Liz, I hope you're doing well!

California Regions AIR Emissions Standard for Lead California Regions AIR Proposed rule of the South Coast Air Quality Management District amends regulations under Rule 1420 regarding lead emissions from stationary sources.

Liz Menz I Director of Education I SIGMA - America's Leading Fuel Marketers 3930 PP,ndP,r DriVP,, SuitP, 340, rairfax, VA 22030 I Dirnct: 703,375,0483 I www,siqma,org From: Ford, Hayley [mailto:ford.hayley@epa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 5: 18 PM To: Liz Menz <lmenz@sigma.org> Cc: Hupp, Millan <hupp.millan@epa.gov> Subject: RE: SIGMA Invitation - Administrator Scott Pruitt Hi Liz, I hope you're doing well!

"Republican presidents tend to nominate one of two types of administrator to lead the Environmental Protection Agency.

This issue was noted during a previous EPA Inspection at this dairy conducted on 6/20/2013 Additionally, the berm leading to RCS 1 and the berm around the compost area leading to RCS 5 needed to be evaluated and maintained to ensure capacity for the 25-yr/24-hr rainfall event.

FILE NAME: KUB DATE: 2013 July 10 DOC#: KUB044 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: ILO Report - Historical Developments of Administrative Measures for Occupational Diseases in Japan A report commissioned by the ILO 10 July 2013 Historical developments of administrative measures for occupational diseases in Japan Ken Takahashi1and Yoshimasa Ish ii2 1 Department o f Environmental Epidemiology, University o f Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.

Cutbirth 4-3-2014 Email James Answers on line 1 washer and decker from Cutbirth (Attachment 15). 4-7-2014 Email to James Questions on 2012 lead and lead compounds Cutbirth (CBI Folder 2, tab 13). 4-7-2014 Email & James Answers to questions poised during the 8 at.

CHESTERTON COMPANY et al 15 ) CORPORATION'S RESPONSES TO ) PLAINTIFFS SPECIAL Defendants ) INTERROGATORIES 16 ) ) Trial Date 3/22/10 17 ) Action Filed 7/29/09 18 19 PROPOUNDING PARTY : 20 RESPONDING PARTY 21 SET NUMBER 22 Plaintiffs RHODA EVANS and BOBBY EVANS Defendant KUBOTA CORPORATION ONE 1 23 Defendant KUBOTA CORPORATION hereby provides Responses to Plaintiff's Special 24 Interrogatories Propounded to Defendant Kubota Corporation Individually and as Successor 25 interest to Kubota Iron and Machinery Works and Kubota America as follows 26 GENERAL OBJECTIONS 27 Responding Party Defendant KUBOTA CORPORATION contends that many of these 28 interrogatories are objectionable as overly broad unduly burdensome not reasonably calculated DEFENDANT KUBOTA CORPORATION'S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS SPECIAL INTERROGATORIESINTERROGATORIES SET ONE reliable nor admissible as evidence In conducting its business KUBOTA CORPORATION has created documents that may have been kept in numerous different locations and may have been moved from site to site As required by law these responses reflect all responsive information identified by KUBOTA CORPORATION pursuant to a diligent search and reasonable inquiry To the extent that any discovery requires more KUBOTA CORPORATION 6 objects because the discovery requests KUBOTA CORPORATION to conduct a search beyond 7 the scope of permissible discovery contemplated by law and compliance with such requests 8 would impose an undue burden on KUBOTA CORPORATION 9 KUBOTA CORPORATION interprets these interrogatories as requesting information 10 that is not protected by the attorney privilege and the attorney product doctrine 11 KUBOTA CORPORATION provides the information in these responses solely for the purpose 12 of the present litigation KUBOTA CORPORATION expressly reserves all objections to the 13 attempted use of this information beyond the present forum complex asbestos litigation in Los 14 Angeles County 15 KUBOTA CORPORATION's investigation and discovery are ongoing KUBOTA 16 CORPORATION reserves the right to object to future discovery on the same or related matters 17 and does not waive any objection by providing the information reflected in these responses 18 KUBOTA CORPORATION further reserves the right to object to the admissibility of any of 19 these responses in whole or in part at trial in any action on any grounds including but not 20 limited to materiality relevance and privilege 21 Subject to the foregoing General Objections that are included without being individually 22 repeated in each of the following responses KUBOTA CORPORATION responds 23 KUBOTA'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES 24 25 SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO.1 26 IDENTIFY the June 29 2005 announcement regarding the occurrence of many 27 occupational victims of asbestos as well as the victims asbestos dust from environmental 28 exposure around the Kanzaki plant 3 DEFENDANT KUBOTA CORPORATION'S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES SET ONE RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO 1 KUBOTA objects to this request as it invades the right to privacy of various individuals and their families is overly broad in scope unduly burdensome oppressive harassing irrelevant 4 and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence as to information 5 related to other containing products besides asbestos pressure pipe The HD requested information is also protected by a confidentiality provision Compromise agreements 7 and statements of sympathy are also protected by Evidence Code sections 1152 and 1160 8 Should KUBOTA be ordered to reveal such information said order will force KUBOTA to 9 breach its confidential contract with third parties This demand also requests information that 10 may be protected by the attorney and attorney work product privileges 11 SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO 2 12 IDENTIFY the approximately 75 former workers of the Kanzaki Plant developed 13 mesothelioma as a result of their exposure to the plant's containing products and have 14 died as a result of this fatal disease 15 RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO 2 16 KUBOTA objects to this request as it invades the right to privacy of various individuals 17 and their families is overly broad in scope unduly burdensome oppressive harassing irrelevant 18 and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence as to information 19 related to other containing products besides asbestos pressure pipe The 20 requested information is also protected by a confidentiality provision Compromise agreements 21 and statements of sympathy are also protected by Evidence Code sections 1152 and 1160 22 Should KUBOTA be ordered to reveal such information said order will force KUBOTA to 23 breach its confidential contract with third parties This demand also requests information that 24 may be protected by the attorney and attorney work product privileges 25 SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO 3 26 IDENTIFY the families you have compensated of deceased workers of the Kanzaki Plant 27 who developed mesothelioma as a result of their exposure to the plant's containing 28 products 4 DEFENDANT KUBOTA CORPORATION'S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES SET ONE RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO 3 2 KUBOTA objects to this request as it invades the right to privacy of various individuals 3 and their families is overly broad in scope unduly burdensome oppressive harassing irrelevant 4 and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence as to information 5 related to other containing products besides asbestos pressure pipe The 6 requested information is also protected by a confidentiality provision Compromise agreements 7 and statements of sympathy are also protected by Evidence Code sections 1152 and 1160 Should KUBOTA be ordered to reveal such information said order will force KUBOTA to breach its confidential contract with third parties This demand also requests information that 10 may be protected by the attorney and attorney work product privileges 11 SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO 4 12 Do YOU contend that residents of Arnagasaki City Japan did not develop mesothelioma 13 during and after the years the Kanzaki Plant produced containing products as a result of 14 exposure to the Kanzaki Plant's containing products 15 RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO 4 16 KUBOTA objects to this request as it invades the right to privacy of various individuals 17 and their families is overly broad in scope unduly burdensome oppressive harassing irrelevant 18 and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence as to information 19 related to other containing products besides asbestos pressure pipe The 20 requested information is also protected by a confidentiality provision Compromise agreements 21 and statements of sympathy are also protected by Evidence Code sections 1152 and 1160 22 Should KUBOTA be ordered to reveal such information said order will force KUBOTA to 23 breach its confidential contract with third parties This demand also requests information that 24 may be protected by the attorney and attorney work product privileges 25 SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO 5 26 If your response to Interrogatory No. 4 is anything other than an unqualified no state 27 all facts supporting YOUR contention 28 5 DEFENDANT KUBOTA CORPORATION'S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES SET ONE RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO 5 KUBOTA objects to this request as it invades the right to privacy of various individuals and their families is overly broad in scope unduly burdensome oppressive harassing irrelevant 4 and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence as to information 5 related to other containing products besides asbestos pressure pipe The 6 requested information is also protected by a confidentiality provision Compromise agreements and statements of sympathy are also protected by Evidence Code sections 1152 and 1160 Should KUBOTA be ordered to reveal such information said order will force KUBOTA to breach its confidential contract with third parties This demand also requests information that 10 may be protected by the attorney and attorney work product privileges 11 SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO 6 12 If your response to Interrogatory No. 4 is anything other than an unqualified no 13 IDENTIFY all DOCUMENTS that support YOUR contention 14 RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO 6 15 KUBOTA objects to this request as it invades the right to privacy of various individuals 16 and their families is overly broad in scope unduly burdensome oppressive harassing irrelevant 17 and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence as to information 18 related to other containing products besides asbestos pressure pipe The 19 requested information is also protected by a confidentiality provision Compromise agreements 20 and statements of sympathy are also protected by Evidence Code sections 1152 and 1160 21 Should KUBOTA be ordered to reveal such information said order will force KUBOTA to 22 breach its confide