NORTHERN KENTUCKY OFFICE SUITE 340 1717 DIXIE HIGHWAY COVINGTON, KENTUCKY 41011-4704 606-331 -2838 513-381-2838 FAX: 513-381-6613 DAYTON, OHIO OFFICE SUITE 900 110 NORTH MAIN STREET DAYTON, OHIO 45402-1 786 937-228-2838 FAX: 937-228-2816 ROBERTA.

AR226-2158 / Oscar T Garza 07/12/2001 08:05 AM To: cc: Subject: Karl G Kronberg/AE/DuPont@DuPont, Chris E Shoop/AE/DuPont@DuPont Robert L Ritchey/CL/DuPont@DuPont Re: Surfactant Modeling Note #2 - Possible Funding Request Fyi -Trini Forwarded by Oscar T Garza/AE/DuPont on 07/12/2001 07:03 AM - Robert F Pincnot 07/12/2001 07:23 Aim To: cc: Subject: David M Rurak/AE/DuPont@DuPont Oscar T Garza/AE/DuPont@DuPont Re: Surtactant Modeling Note #2 - Possible Funding Request Q Dave, Yes it does.

AR226-2357 /y Andrew S Hartten ""'"" 02/20/2004 10:46 AM To: cc: Subject: Mark Houlday/AE/DuPont@DuPont Re: Proposed Monitoring Locations-Need to Discuss Please print, thanksl -------------------- Forwarded by Andrew S Hartten/AE/DuPont on 02/20/2004 10:50 AM -------------------------- "Steve Williams" <steve.williams@epa.state.oh.us> on 02/19/2004 05:46:26 PM To: cc: Subject: <Libelo.laurence@epamail.epa.gov>, Andrew S Hartten/AE/DuPont@DuPont Re: Proposed Monitoring Locations-Need to Discuss Andrew and Laurence, Unfortunately, my schedule will not allow me to attend or tie in by phone to the meeting on February 26.

AR226-2489 OiiPtffl Waslincrer!

AR226-2523 I I THIRD QUARTER 2003 C-8 SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER I MONITORING REPORT I FOR WASHINGTON WORKS FACILITY AND LOCAL, LETARTAND DRY RUN LANDFILLS I WASHINGTON, WV I I I Date: October 2003 Project No.: D6WW7423.01 18983632.00028 18983633.00Q26 18983634.00026 I I I CORPORATE REMEDIATION GROUP An Alliance between DuPonf and UffS Diamond I Barley Mill Plaza, Building 27 Wilmington, Delaware 19805 I I I ASH026479 EID779761 EID779761 I sudac waist IwuS Ommdwatef htonltorir^ RepMt Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS I 1.0 Introduction.......................... 2.0 C-8 Analytical Reporting.,...

Proceedings of WTC2005 World Tribology Congress III September 12-16, 2005, Washington, D.C., USA WTC2005-63881 NANO-TRIBOLOGY OF A POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE TRANSFER FILMS USING MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION AND MICROTRIBOMETRY Inkook Jang*, Pamela L.

E054210 Interim Re ort #I8 Notthem Alabama Potable Water Systems, Decemger 2005 Interim Report #18: Analysis of Water Samples from Northern Alabama Potable Water Systems, December 2005 Study Title ANALYSIOSF PERFLUOROBUTANESULFON(PAFTBES), PERFLUOROHEXANESULFONATE (PFHS), AND PERFLUOROOCTANESULFONATE (PFOS) IN WATER, SOIL, SEDIMENT, FISH, CLAMS, VEGETATION, SMALL MAMMALIVER AND SMALL MAMMASLERUM USING LC/MS/MS FOR THE 3M DECATURMONITORINGPROGRAM Data Requirement EPA TSCA Good Laboratory Practice Standards 40 CFR 792 Author Michelle D.

"McCrea, Deborah" <mccrea@taftlaw.com> 03/06/2009 02 :34 PM Taft I Deborah McCrea / Legal Assistant Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP 425 Walnut Street, Suite 1800 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202-3957 Tel : 513 .381 .2838 " Fax : 513 .381 .0205 www.taftlaw.com / mccrea@taftlaw .com To NCIC OPPT@EPA cc "Bilott, Robert A."

JU N 2 2 2000 StateAssistance Program r< .C f I ^ 1 sA~~ /-L/eS- Barriers to NEPPS Implementation: Flexibility A Draft Discussion Paper Prepared for: Reinvention Action Council Meeting June 7,2000 Sierra Club v.

PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE & RISK OF HEMORRHAGIC STROKE: Final Report of The Hemorrhagic Stroke Project May 10, 2000 Prepared by: Ralph I.

The Pump Handle A water cooler for the public health crowd Subscribe to feed Home About Contributors OSHA Paper Subscribe Confined Space @ TPH U.S.

FILE NAME: Hopeman Brothers (HB) DATE: 2007 Jan 10 DOC#: HB009 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Barry Castleman Notes (Word document dated 1/10/07) HOPEMAN BROTHERS Hopeman Brothers was a customer of asbestos panel manufacturer Johns-Manville Corporation, which began to affix "Health hazard caution warning labels on marine "Marinite" sheets in 1970.

FILE NAME: Doubt Science (DBTS) DATE: 2003 DOC#: DBTS001 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Egilman Journal Article from AJIM - Exposing the 'Myth' of ABC, 'Anything But Chrysotile1 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE 44:540-557 (2003) Exposing the "Myth" of ABC, "Anything But Chrysotile": A Critique of the Canadian Asbestos Mining Industry and McGill University Chrysotile Studies David Egilman, md, mph,1'2* Corey Fehnei, ab,2 and Susanna Rankin Bohme, am2 B ackground Beginning in the 1930s, the Canadian asbestos industry created and advanced the idea that chrysotile asbestos is safer than asbestos o f otherfiber types.

FILE NAME: Doubt Science (DBTS) DATE: 2006 DOC#: DBTS008 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Editorial from Environmental Health - Selected Science: An Industry Campaign to Undermine an OSHA Hexavalent Chromium Standard Environm ental Health: A Global Access Science Source q BiotVled Central Com mentary Open Access Selected science: an industry campaign to undermine an O S H A hexavalent chromium standard David M ichaels*1, Celeste Monforton1 and Peter Lurie1'2 Address: 'The Project on Scientific Knowledge and Public Policy, Department o f Environmental and Occupational Health, The George Washington University School o f Public Health and Health Services, 2100 M Street NW, Suite 203, Washington, DC, 20037, USA and 2Public Citizen Health Research Group, 1600 20th Street NW, Washington, DC, 20009, USA Email: David Michaels* - eohdmm@gwumc.edu; Celeste Monforton - eohcnm@gwumc.edu; Peter Lurie - plurie@citizen.org * Corresponding author Published: 23 February 2006 Received: 10 November 2005 Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source 2006, 5:5 5 doi: 10.1186/I476-069X-5- Accepted. 23 February 2006 This article is available from: http^/www.ehjournal.net/content/5/1/5 2006 Michaels et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

FILE NAME: Union Carbide (UC) DATE: 2002 DOC#: UC192 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Legal - Deposition of Barry Castleman / \: IN RE- ASBESTOS LITIGATION IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION'S SUPPLEM ENTAL RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS' M ASTER INTERROGATORIES Pursuant to the Texas Rules o f Civil Procedure, Defendant Union Carbide Corporation ( "Union Carbide"), hereby responds to Plaintiffs' Master Interrogatories as fo llo w s: GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1.