Refine
Estimated Years 2000-2009Clear
6,589 results foundRefine Search
Heaters, Unit 2441-45 CHARLOTTE STREET KANSAS CITY.MO.
Document image
refid# QXz7ev7mp88nyX3vO0KOwLy961 page
Jas.
Document image
refid# ZnwDxXYVRnLbaXYLx35qBKqdV1 page
Boilers, Gas L.
Document image
refid# JrDGBZEMjRzQMzMdwnnVz6bdr1 page
Air Filters INDUSTRIAL MATERIALS DIVISION Owens-Illinois Glass Company MANUFACTURERS OF DUSTOP AIR FILTERS Newark, Ohio The Original Replacement Type "Dustop"--the Glass Wool Air Filter of High Efficiency and Low Cost for Use in All Types of Ventilating Systems or Wherever Air is Mechanically Circulated Dustop--The Owens-Illinois fibrous glass air filter is the modern answer to the demand for low cost, efficient air filtration.
Document image
refid# Gm9djqra0Q36xEOog5JwzZZOv1 page
Boilers, Steel Lookout Boiler & Mfg.
Document image
refid# 2RZ1BvOOX40646wd0KnDQj7Zp1 page
Pumps Th Nash Engineering Company South Norwalk, Conn., U.
Document image
refid# Gm69x40ERZpxoM3vB9rQvkN8q1 page
Air System Equipment Fans and Blower, The Lau Blower Company 2007 Home Avenue, Dayton, Ohio Manufacturers of Package Unit Furnace Blowers, Blower Wheels, Housings, Pulleys, Pillow Blocks, Complete Assemblies, Window Fans and Attic Fans Self-Aligning Pillow Blocks Hold-down bolts cannot affect the freedom of the bearing.
Document image
refid# BR2k8GopQz7OeRpgg5bV1oL1X1 page
Air System Equipment Motors GENERAL fp ELECTRIC Schenectady, N.
Document image
refid# 6bLRx27BJnGezQR8YwKrvdwLd1 page
Air System Equipment Motor, GENERAL ELECTRIC Schenectady, N.
Document image
refid# 5bBE8n48gDZ8xmKZDLMg5YQbe1 page
Air Conditioning * SSjcJSST McQuay, Inc. 1602 Broadway, N.E., Minneapolis 13, Minn.
Document image
refid# jm5bygrnDddwvr3gwM6eXVpZO1 page
Letters Scientists Appeal to Quebec Premier Charest to Stop Exporting Asbestos to the Developing World January 28, 2010 Dear Premier Charest: As scientists from 28 countries, ded icated to protecting public health, we appeal to you to respect the overwhelmingly consistent body of scientific evidence and the consid ered judgment of the World Health Organization (WHO) that all forms of asbestos have been shown to be deadly and that safe use of any form of asbestos has proven impos sible anywhere in the world.
Document imageDocument imageDocument image
refid# 99ee537J3337b7rz1wyJG3j7L3 pages
Annual Enforcement Report Fiscal Year 2009 Enforcement Division Office of Compliance and Enforcement Texas Commission on Environmental Quality November 2009 The electronic annual enforcement report is available on the TCEQ's Web Page at http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/compliance/enforcement/reports/AER/annenfreport.html Table of Contents Introduction.............................................................................................................vii Glossary of Abbreviations for Programs........................................................................viii Executive Summary...................................................................................................ix The Environmental Tool Box.....................................................................................1-1 Pollution Prevention Through Technical Assistance..............................................1-1 Table 1-1: Technical Assistance Activities................................................1-2 Figure 1-1: Pounds of VOCs Reduced thru Technical Assistance.................1-3 Table 1-2: Event Coordination and Education Activities..............................1-3 Assistance to Small Businesses and Local Governments......................................1-4 Table 1-3: Small Business and Local Government Assistance Activities.........1-5 Figure 1-2: Multi-Media Site Visits & Resulting C2 Partnerships...................1-5 Investigations and Enforcement Policy...............................................................1-6 Figure 1-3: Routine Investigations..........................................................1-8 Figure 1-4: Complaints Investigated.......................................................1-8 Figure 1-5: Notices of Violation Issued....................................................1-9 Figure 1-6: Summary of Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Audit Privilege Act Statistics.................................................1-10 Table 1-4: Percent of Facilities Inspected by the TCEQ in Compliance.........1-11 Dollars and Sense...................................................................................................2-1 Figure 2-1: Total Number of Administrative Orders Issued by Fiscal Year................2-1 Figure 2-2: Number of Administrative Orders Issued by Media and FY....................2-2 Table 2-1: Summary of Administrative Penalties and SEPs by Fiscal Year...............2-3 Figure 2-3: Penalties and SEPs in Administrative Orders Issued............................2-4 Table 2-2: Summary of Civil Judicial Order Penalty Amounts and SEPs...................2-6 The Criminal Element..............................................................................................3-1 Table 3-1: Summary of Criminal Investigation Information by Fiscal Year.................3-1 Comparative Analysis of Performance.........................................................................4-1 i Figure 4-1: Percent of Orders Issued by Media Type...........................................4-1 Figure 4-2: Percent of Industry Types with Orders Issued.....................................4-2 Figure 4-3: Percent of Industry Types with Previous Orders Issued.........................4-3 Figure 4-4: Percent of Industry Types with Same or Similar Violations.....................4-4 Figure 4-5: Size of Regulated Entities with Administrative Orders Issued.................4-5 Table 4-1: Percent of Citations in Orders Issued.................................................4-6 Figure 4-6: Percent of Most Frequently Cited Rules or Statutes by Media Type.........4-7 Figure 4-7: Severity of Violations Included in Orders Issued...................................4-8 Assessment of Emissions Events...............................................................................5-1 Background.................................................................................................5-1 Rule Revisions.............................................................................................5-1 Data from FY 2008 and FY2009.......................................................................5-2 Reported Incidents........................................................................................5-3 Figure 5-1: Reported Incidents..............................................................5-4 Total Quantity of Emissions..............................................................................5-5 Figure 5-2: Total Quantity of Emissions....................................................5-6 Overall Trend in Reported Emissions..................................................................5-7 Figure 5-3: Overall Trend in Reported Emissions........................................5-8 Major Contaminants Released...........................................................................5-8 Figure 5-4: Major Contaminants Released................................................5-9 Top 5 Contributing Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes.........................5-10 Figure 5-5: Contributing SIC Codes......................................................5-11 Quantity of Contaminants by SIC Code............................................................5-12 Figure 5-6: Quantity of Contaminants by SIC Code..................................5-13 Highly Reactive Volatile Organic Compounds (HRVOCs).....................................5-14 Figure 5-7: HRVOCs..........................................................................5-15 Investigation and Enforcement of All Incidents.....................................................5-16 Figure 5-8: Investigation & Enforcement of All Incidents............................5-17 Emissions Events Investigations........................................................................5-18 Figure 5-9: Emissions Events Investigations...........................................5-19 Excessive Emissions Events.............................................................................5-20 Figure 5-10: Excessive Emissions Events..............................................5-21 Table 5-1: FY 2009 Total Number of Incidents Reported.....................................5-22 Table 5-2: FY 2009 Total Quantity of Air Contaminants (pounds) Reported.............5-23 ii Table 5-3: FY 2009 Total Quantity of Air Contaminants (pounds) Reported, Listed by Air Contaminant.............................................................................5-24 Table 5-4: FY 2009 Total Number of Incidents Reported by SIC Code...................5-25 Table 5-5: FY 2009 Total Quantity of Air Contaminants by Source Category...........5-26 Table 5-6: FY 2009 Total Quantity of HRVOCs Emitted......................................5-27 Table 5-7: FY 2009 Agency Response to Maintenance, Shutdown, Startup and Opacity Incidents, Listed by Region.................................................................5-28 Table 5-8: FY 2009 Agency Response to Emissions Events, by Region.................5-29 Table 5-9: FY 2009 Agency Response to Incidents Listed by Incident Type............5-30 Results of Enforcement Actions..................................................................................6-1 Figure 6-1: Impact Analysis of Administrative and Civil Judicial Orders....................6-2 Figure 6-2: Results of Administrative and Civil Judicial Orders Permitting and Process Changes......................................................................6-3 Figure 6-3: Results of Administrative and Civil Judicial Orders Clean Up, Monitoring, and Recordkeeping Requirements......................................6-4 Figure 6-4: Results of Administrative and Civil Judicial Orders Pollution Prevention.......................................................................................6-5 Table 6-1: Twenty-Five Largest Estimated Pollutant Reductions from Orders Issued..6-6 Tables Table Descriptions .................................................................................................T-1 Table T-1A: Total Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2009 (9/1/2008 8/31/2009)..........T-3 Table T-1B: On-site Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2009 (9/1/2008 8/31/2009).......T-4 Table T-2A: Total Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2008 (9/1/2007 8/31/2008)..........T-5 Table T-2B: On-site Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2008 (9/1/2007 8/31/2008).......T-6 Table T-3A: Total Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2007 (9/1/2006 8/31/2007)..........T-7 Table T-3B: On-site Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2007 (9/1/2006 8/31/2007).......T-8 Table T-4A: Total Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2006 (9/1/2005 8/31/2006)..........T-9 Table T-4B: On-site Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2006 (9/1/2005 8/31/2006).....T-10 Table T-5A: Total Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2005 (9/1/2004 8/31/2005)........T-11 Table T-5B: On-site Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2005 (9/1/2004 8/31/2005).....T-12 Table T-6: Total Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2004 (9/1/2003 8/31/2004)..........T-13 Table T-6: On-site Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2004 (9/1/2003 8/31/2004)......T-14 iii Table T-7: Complaints Investigated Fiscal Year 2009 (9/1/2008 8/31/2009)...................T-15 Table T-8: Complaints Investigated Fiscal Year 2008 (9/1/2007 8/31/2008)...................T-16 Table T-9: Complaints Investigated Fiscal Year 2007 (9/1/2006 8/31/2007)...................T-17 Table T-10: Complaints Investigated Fiscal Year 2006 (9/1/2005 8/31/2006)..................T-18 Table T-11: Complaints Investigated Fiscal Year 2005 (9/1/2004 8/31/2005)..................T-19 Table T-12: Complaints Investigated Fiscal Year 2004 (9/1/2003 8/31/2004)..................T-20 Table T-13: Notices of Violation Issued (Mailed) from Regional Offices Fiscal Year 2009 (9/1/2008 8/31/2009)..........................................................T-21 Table T-14: Notices of Violation Issued (Mailed) from Regional Offices Fisc
Document imageDocument imageDocument imageDocument image
refid# ky0yvJ4x6Dj4q31OpeDMdpaV717 pages
Hilary Term [2011] UKSC 10 On appeal from: [2009] EWCA Civ 1159; [2009] EWCA Civ 1211 JUDGMENT Sienkiewicz (Administratrix of the Estate of Enid Costello Deceased) (Respondent) v Greif (UK) Limited (Appellant) Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council (Appellant) v Willmore (Respondent) before Lord Phillips, President Lord Rodger Lady Hale Lord Brown Lord Mance Lord Kerr Lord Dyson JUDGMENT GIVEN ON 9 March 2011 Heard on 26, 27 and 28 October 2010 Appellant (Greif) Jeremy Stuart-Smith QC Charles Feeny (Instructed by Hill Dickinson LLP) Appellant (Knowsley) Jeremy Stuart-Smith QC Charles Feeny (Instructed by Berrymans Lace Mawer LLP) Respondent (Sienkiewicz) Christopher Melton QC Richard Pearce (Instructed by Norman Jones Solicitors) Respondent (Willmore) David Allan QC Simon Kilvington (Instructed by John Pickering & Partners LLP) LORD PHILLIPS Introduction 1.
Document imageDocument imageDocument imageDocument image
refid# z989Y26pQ8LY7Dz2OBEbwRoB84 pages
file:///C|/Users/MadeK42/Desktop/whysner-upload/Whysner,%20John%20--%2010-27-08%20--%20pm.txt 1 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 3 DEPARTMENT 323 HON.
Document imageDocument imageDocument imageDocument image
refid# rpZjzOEGaXmZKN4KpX40KVNw7208 pages
FILE NAME: Talc (TALC) DATE: 2009 Oct 9 DOC#: TALC197 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Letter from Personal Care Council to Chinese Company RE Physical Tests of Talc Personal Care Products Council Ccrrrr.itied tc Safely, Quality & Innova'ion Formerly (Chinese Translation to Follow) October 9, 2009 Mr.
Document imageDocument imageDocument imageDocument image
refid# jmMprk4YBKQg24xwjbyjVD0828 pages