Telomer Research Program AR226-1421 Report Title: 1-Decanol, 3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,10,10,10-heptadecafluoroAlga, Growth Inhibition Test with Scenedesmus subspicatus, 72h, Limit Test with the Water Accommodated Fraction (WAF) Author(s): Dirk Scheerbaum RECEIVED OPPT NCIC 2003 July 18 12:00PM Contractor: Dr.

ss PRT Hie OKA1Y2 his g: 1g Study Title "TENNESSEE RIVER VALLEY SAMPLES 6 1733 i Author Mark E.

ACUTE CONTACT TOXICITY TO TERRESTRIAL INVERTEBRATES (HONEY BEE) TEST SUBSTANCE Identity: Perfluorooctanesulfonate; may also be referred to as PFOS or FC-95. (1-Octanesulfonic acid, 1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8heptadecafluoro-, potassium salt, CAS # 2795-39-3) Remarks field: The 3M production lot number was 217.

3 Prepared by: Pace Analytical Services, Inc.

BACK TO MAIN DESIGN AND STRUCTURE OF MULTI-CITY STUDY submitted to 3M Environmental Laboratory 935 Bush Avenue St.

ENVIRONMErNeTiArL LABOERrAtTaOnRY Analytical Report Revised August 12, 2005 Initial Quantitative Screening of Commercial Lots of Human Serum Obtained in 2004 for Endogenous Fluorochemicals Using Protein Precipitation and Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry Laboratory Request Number: E05-0120 Testing Laboratory 3M Environmental Health and Safety Operations 3M Environmental Laboratory 3M Environmental Laboratory Project Lead Mark E.

EI18636: Slide Revofpianecrewas lesionsfrom DuPoAnPFtO Study DateofReview: 28*Noveraber 2001-11-29 ReviewingPathologists: Dr E E McCoanndDnrJeR Flostler Stady No: HN-18636 StWuydlydT6i63f.le:CombinedChronic Toxicity/Oncogenicity StodywithLinuron, C8 end `Concolftuhesreivioewn: t`hTheerovfienrdailnlgcs.onTclhuesiroenvoifetwchoenrfeivrimeewdotfhtehceatrcwionsotguedniiecsewfafsectthoafttAhPeFyOwienretnheotDiunPcoonnstissttuednyt.in ``vaandstchoensmidsetreldi1l0byeexapldaencarteiaosnefdsrentshietJiavciktyfofoantohnedceovgeenlcotpimceenftfeocftpaonfcArPeaFtiOcianctihnear3eMffsetcutsd,y `sctoumdbyisnheodwwietdhthaenfuunlldseprecretprourmtionfg oAfPtFhOe-aicnidnuacrheydpeacripnlaarspiraoltihfaetrwaatisopnrsfesoemnth.yTpherepDluasPioant 2ts ahrefrletcootciaonruocifgnionmhaad.eqIutaschyoiunltdbheenoroitgeidntahlaitnttehreprceotamtmieonnotfotnhuensdteurdryebpuotrmteirnegilynroeftleicnttsetahdeed . fyaecartstshiatnkcneotwhlee3dMges,taunddydwisacsrriempionratteido.n oAfftihneaslecsuobflnepfancireorafttimhcialsecsotinoncisl,ubosaisnoandvaanwcaedaiimnttohrsee extensivereviewofthepancreasslidesfromthe 3Mstudytobecarried outbyDrMcConnell.

--- LaboRrepoarttRo evirsioyn1 Analytical Report of Data for PFOS Dietary LC50 Study in Northern Bobwhite (Sera and Liver) Laboratory Report No.

-_-- oDwupree1s530:2 Study Tide Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate: Age Effect on the PFOA Plasma Concentration in Post-Weaning Rats Following Oral Gavage "TEST GUIDELINES: None applicable AUTHOR: Paul M.

AR226-2109 ,;;^ri^^^;.;.;"^-;-'-.^"^~-"'-^2W^fl<i-aiK?

AR226-2257 ,y Steven H Swearingen 02/20/2002 09:43 AM To: Debbie J Mu I rooney/AE/DuPontSDuPont cc: Robert F Pinchot/DEV/AE/DuPont@DuPont.

AR226-2287 ^ Hobert L Ritchey ' 05/23/200211:24 AM To: cc: Subject M.

AR226-2358 DRAFT PHASE II MONITORING/SAMPLING WORK PLAN DUPONT WASHINGTON WORKS SITE WASHINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA Date: March 2004 Project No.: 507423 18983990.04006 18983992.04006 CORPORATE REMEDIAT10N GROUP An Alliance between DuPont and URS Diamond Barley Mill Plaza, Building 27 Wilmington, Delaware 19805 EXP000387 Draft Document Do Not Cite or Quote, March 30, 2004 Draft Phase II Monitoring/Sampling Work Plan____ _____ ______Table Of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 1 Introduction....................--...............................--...,........--................--..................... 2.0 Background Information............................................................................................ 3 3.0 Air Modeling Verification Study............................................................................... 5 3.1 Phase II Air Monitoring Activity...................................................................... 5 3.1.1 Air Sampling Events, Duration and Locations.................................... 5 3.1.2 Number of Samples ............................................................................. 5 3.1.3 Sampling Equipment, Methods and Schedule..................................... 6 3.1.4 3.1.5 3.1.6 3.1.7 3.1.8 Analytical Methods..............................................................................6 Meteorological Monitoring.................................................................. 7 Meteorological Data..........................--............................................... 7 Model Selection and Methodology...................................................... 8 Receptor Selection.........--................................................................... 8 3.2 Progress Reports and Results --.........................................................................8 4.0 Water Monitoring Activities...................................................................................... 9 4.1 Private Water Sources..........................;............................................................ 9 4.1.1 West Virginia: GIST Conclusions and Recommendations For 4.1.2 West Virginia Private Water Supply Sources...................................... 9 West Virginia: Private Water Supply Sources Activities.................. 10 4.1.3 Ohio: GIST Conclusions and Recommendations for Ohio Private Water Supply Sources........................................................... 11 4.1.4 Ohio: Private Water Supply Sources Activities................................. 12 4.2 Public Water Sources...................................................................................... 13 4.2.1 West Virginia: GIST Conclusions and Recommendations for 4.2.2 West Virginia Public Water Supply Sources..................................... 13 West Virginia Public Water Supply Sources Activities.................... 13 4.2.3 Ohio: GIST Conclusions and Recommendations for Ohio 4.2.4 4.2.5 Public Water Supply Sources............................................................ 14 Ohio Public Water Supply Sources Activities................................... 14 Ohio: OEPA Recommended Well Installation at Little Hocking Water Association Well Field............................................. 15 5.0 Surface Water and Groundwater Monitoring........................................................... 17 6.0 Surface Soil/Biota (Vegetation) Sampling............................................................... 18 7.0 Schedule and Reporting...................................................................--.---......--...... 20 8.0 21 References.......................................................................................................... 2004WorkPlan4.doc Wilmington, DE EXP000388 I Draft Document Do Not Cite or Quote, March 30, 2004 Draft Phase II Monitoring/Sampling Wori< Plan Table of Contents Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 TABLES, Summary Data for Proposed Sampling Locations In and Around DuPont Washington Works Site Summary of GIST Private Water Source Sampling Recommendations Summary of GIST Public Water Source Sampling Recommendations Figure 1 Figure 1.5 Figure 2 Figure 2A Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 FIGURES Offsite Monitoring Locations Near the Washington Works Facility/Local Landfill in West Virginia and Ohio OVSTube Offsite Monitoring Locations Near the Dry Run Landfill in West Virginia Wind Rose - DuPont Washington Works Offsite Monitoring Locations Near the Letart Landfill in West Virginia Public Water Source Monitoring Locations in West Virginia and Ohio Proposed Locations of the Four Shallow Wells at the Little Hocking Well Field Washington Works MOU Schedule Appendix A APPENDICES Phase II Quality Assurance Project Plan, DuPont Washington Works Site, Washington, West Virginia 2004WorkPlan4.doc Wilmington, DE EXP000389 Draft Document Do Not Cite or Quote, March 30, 2004 Draft Phase II Monitoring/Sampling Wo* Plan ______ ________ Introduction 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Phase n Monitoring/Sampling Work Plan (Work Plan) is referenced as Appendix 5 in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and E.

AR226-3327 Surface Protection Solutions 6-May-2004 Company SanFtfzed.

StudyTitle AnalyticLaalboratorRyeporton PresencaendConcentratioofn Potassium Perfluorooctanesulfonatien Serum and Liver of Sprague-Dawley' Rats Exposed to PFOS viaGavage REPORT AMENDMENT NO.