j-bcx Brake Lining ALPHABETICAL LISTING -- TRUCKS, TRAILERS, BUSES & AXLES 37 Year Model Brake Type Front Rear G.M.C.

Mt VH THE BENDIX CORPORATION FRICTION MATERIALS DIVISION TROY, NEW YORK S0LD to FORD MTR FIELD ACT DEP p 0 tiOX 2003 LIVONIA MI 40151 SHIPPED TO FORD MTR PITTSBURG DEP 2001 LEBANON RD W MIFFLIN PA 15122 CLEVELAND, TENN, CUSTOMER ACCOUNI NO, QQ1Q0 PLEASE REMIT TOi TERMS) P, 0, BOX 338, TROY, N,Y, 13181 sRipper no, 05506 N/20TH MU OF IADINO NO, 001964 ROUTING HELMS INVOKE DATE 00 16 67 INVOICE NUMBER PAGE NO, 00-0607 I DATE SHIPPED 00/15/67 ORDER DA!

/ THE BENDIX CORPORATION FRICTION MATERIALS DIVISION TROY, NEW YORK FORD MTR FIELD ACT DEP P 0 BOX 2003 LIVONIA HI 40151 SHIPPED TO FORD MTR PITTSBURG DEP 2001 LEBANON RD W MIFFLIN PA 15122 CLEVELAND, TENN.

M: J3I f-.V THE BENDIX CORPORATION FRICTION MATERIALS DIVISION TROY, NEW YORK *m iull.d litr ots* SOLO .p 0 fiOX 2t103 ,T5 U'VOtoJl Ml 4HX31 SHIPPED ro FOiU Mlft" CO M V PTS DEI* U S HIGHWAY TETEItBCRO NJ 07600 :CLEVELAND, TENH.

THE BENDIX CORPORATION FRICTION MATERIALS DIVISION TROY.

sh^eMIHE BEND1X CORPORATION FRICTION MATERIALS DIVISION TftOY, NEW YORK CLEVELAND, TENN.

SHiPPES THE BENDIX CORPORATION FRICTION MATERIALS DIVISION TROY, NEWARK CLEVELAND, TENN.

Charge Related to Discontinued Operations A $30 million charge, net of a $20 million income tax benefit, was recorded in 2001 related to potential asbestos obligations regarding the Automotive Products segment which was sold m 1998 See Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Diluted Earnings Per Share Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations, excludmg after-tax nonrecurring charges of $44 5 million and a $50 million tax benefit due to the reversal of reserves as a result of recent favorable Appellate level third party court decisions related to certain tax return issues, was $2 69 in 2001 compared to $3 80 in 2000 Diluted earnings per share, excludmg after-tax nonrecurring enlarges of $2 4 million, was $3 52 in 1999 Percentage ofRevenues Cost of Sales Selling and Administrative .

within the subject policies' coverage As noted above, the instant policies provided that " 'occurrence' means an accident, including continuous or repeated exposure to conditions, which results in bodily injury or property damage neither expected nor intended from the standpoint of the insured " An accident has been interpreted to mean" 'an unforeseen occurrence * * * of untoward or disastrous character' or 'an undesigned sudden or unexpected event' " Bituminous Casualty Com v Gust K Newborn Construction Co. 218 IU Add 3d 956. 965-66. 161 IU Dec 357. 578 N E 2d 1003 0991). quoting Aetna Casualty & Surety Co v Frever. 89 111 Add 3d 617, 619. 44 111 Dec 791, 411 N E 2d 1157 (19801 Our review therefore requires us to compare the allegations of the complaint with the policies and determine whether the allegations of the counterclaim allege or potentially allege an "occurrence" as that term is defined in the policy We now compare the allegations of the counterclaim and the relevant policy provisions Paragraph 71 ofthe counterclaim states that "BFG's counterclaims arise out of the transactions or occurrences, relating to the parties' actions and obligations to each other under the Agreement with respect to covered environmental matters, which are the subject matter of [Pneumo Abex's] complaint * * * " In paragraph 72 of the counterclaim, BFG sought a declaration of Pneumo Abex's obligation to reimburse BFG for environmental remediation **305***111 expenses provided for under "the Agreement" In paragraph 74 ofthe counterclaim, BFG claimed that Pnuemo Abex agreed to indemnify it for environmental liabilities relating to purchased assets or business under the agreement Paragraph 79 indicated that "Hazardous Substances," as defined m the agreement, had been identified at the various sites owned by BFG Paragraphs 80,82, and 84 indicated the presence of contamination at the Cleveland New Main, Cleveland Plating, and Tullahoma facilities exceeding human health and environmental protection *869 standards established under "Environmental Laws," as that term was defined in the agreement Paragraphs 81, 83, and 85 alleged that the contamination, if left unremediated, threatened human health and environmental concerns Those same paragraphs also alleged that the contamination occurred before BFG maintained "stewardship" over the property Paragraph 86 alleged "To date, BFG has incurred over $400,000 to identify and characterize the presence at the properties of 'Hazardous Substances' within the meaning of the Agreement, at or above levels of regulatory concern, to evaluate the risks posed by those substances to site Page 6 occupants, ground water resources and neighboring properties, and to implement appropriate response actions " Paragraph 88 further provided "These expenditures all constitute 'Environmental Liabilities' for which Pneumo Abex has agreed to indemnify BFG under the terms of Article 13 5 ofthe Agreement" Considering all ofthe allegations above, we do not find that they alleged "an accident, including continuous or repeated exposure to conditions, which [resulted] m bodily injury or property damage neither expected nor intended from the standpoint of the insured " We also find that the counterclaim did not seek relief for property damage Instead, the counterclaim sought indemnification for expenses incurred for remediating the environmental contamination contemplated by the parties in the asset purchase agreement Because the contamination and the expenses for remediating the contamination were contemplated by the parties, the damages complained of could not have arisen from an unforeseen occurrence On appeal, plaintiffs rely primarily upon Outboard Marine. 154 111 2d at 111,180 111 Dec 691.607NE2d 1204. and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co v Specialty Coatings Co. 180 111 App 3d 378. 382. 129 111 Dec. 306. 535 N E 2d 1071 fl989f They state that broad insuring language in Outboard Marine and Specialty Coatings is similar if not identical to the policy language in this case Plaintiffs also suggest that the allegations of environmental property damage caused by the insured m the BFG suit are similar to the allegations in the third-party actions in Outboard Marine and Specialty Coatings Because the third party actions m those cases triggered the duty to defend, plaintiffs claim that the BFG suit triggered the duty to defend in this case In Outboard Marine, several complaints were filed against Outboard Marine Corporation (OMC) by the state and federal environmental protection agencies for the discharge of polychlorinated byphenyls into the North Ditch, Waukegan Harbor, and Lake Michigan *870 The underlying suits also included a third-party complaint filed by OMC against the Monsanto Corporation The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) then joined Monsanto as a party defendant in an amended complaint Monsanto filed a cross-claim for indemnification against OMC m the event it was **306 ***112 found liable as a result of the EPA action OMC tendered the defense of the underlying actions to its insurers under comprehensive general liability insurance policies The policy language stated. " '[The insurer] will pay on behalf of the insured all Copr West 2003 No Claim to Orig U S Govt Works \

Not Reported in F Supp 2d (Cite as- 2002 WL 1203836 (S.D N.Y.)) t> Only the Westlaw citation is currently available United States District Court, S D New York RUTGERSWERKE AG and FRENDO S p A , Plaintiffs, v ABEX CORPORATION, Pneumo Abex Corporation and Whitman Corporation, Defendants No. 93 CIV 2914 JFK.

BRAKE FRICTION MATERIAL NUMBER EXPIR APPL# 030476 030479 030479 030220 030220 030481 030481 030860 030860 040582 040582 020843 020843 020629 020629 020989 020989 020988 020988 030071 030071 030153 030719 030719 030700 030700 030862 030862 030863 030863 030699 030699 030877 030877 040060 040060 030951 030951 030952 030952 040130 040130 040314 040314 040315 040315 040471 040471 030478 030478 030480 030480 07 06 07 06 07 06 07 06 07 06 07 06 07 06 01 07 01 07 01 08 01 08 07 05 07 05 07 05 07 05 07 05 07 05 01 06 01 06 01 06 01 06 07 06 07 06 07 06 07 06 07 06 01 07 01 07 01 07 01 07 01 07 01 07 01 07 01 07 01 07 01 07 01 07 01 07 01 07 01 07 01 07 01 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 06 07 06 07 06 07 06 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 02100 5/6/2005 MARKINGS AMBRAKE NS202H FF AMBRAKE NS209 FF AMBRAKE NS209H FF AMBRAKE NS217 FF AMBRAKE NS217H FF AMBRAKE NS227 FF AMBRAKE NS227H FF AMBRAKE NS231 FF AMBRAKE NS231HFF AMBRAKE NS265 FF AMBRAKE NS265H FF AMBRAKE NS282 FF AMBRAKE NS282H FF AMBRAKE NS283 FF AMBRAKE NS283H FF AMBRAKE NS284 FF AMBRAKE NS284H FF AMBRAKE NS285 FF AMBRAKE NS285H FF AMBRAKE NS296 FF AMBRAKE NS296H FF AMBRAKE NS300H FF AMBRAKE NS301 FF AMBRAKE NS301HFF AMBRAKE NS304 FF AMBRAKE NS304H FF AMBRAKE NS306 FF AMBRAKE NS306H FF AMBRAKE NS307 FF AMBRAKE NS307H FF AMBRAKE NS308 FF AMBRAKE NS308H FF AMBRAKE NS309 FF AMBRAKE NS309H FF AMBRAKE NS31 OFF AMBRAKE NS31 OH FF AMBRAKE NS312 FF AMBRAKE NS312H FF AMBRAKE NS313 FF AMBRAKE NS313H FF AMBRAKE NS315 FF AMBRAKE NS315HFF AMBRAKE NS317 FF AMBRAKE NS317H FF AMBRAKE NS318 FF AMBRAKE NS318H FF AMBRAKE NS319 FF AMBRAKE NS319HFF AMBRAKE NS525 EE AMBRAKE NS525H EE AMBRAKE NS530 FF AMBRAKE NS530H FF SECTION 10-16

Compliance List of Automotive Safety Devices SUPPLEMENT 1, 2005 Section 10--Friction Material APRIL 29, 2005 Automotive Manufacturers Equipment Compliance Agency, Inc.

L'lnstitut de I'Amiante The Asbestos Institute Montreal, March 10,2000 Dear Sir/Madam: Object: New Information Web Site on Chrvsotile We are pleased to inform you that a new Internet site dedicated to chrysotile will soon be on line at www.chrysotlle.com.

Page i of 16 -----------BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----------Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf 8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7zlT+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, GlYCUirpUwca/kjCEl/7mDJq7E4T14ViOEljSYibriOdj9r4K7yfgQjImd49wG3s rLVwpVxlY+8s+PBFohOKcg== <SEC-DOCUMENT>0000950130-97-005059.txt : 19971117 <SEC-HEADER>0000950130-97-005059.hdr.sgml : 19971117 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000950130-97-005059 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 3 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19970930 FILED AS OF DATE: 19971114 SROS: NONE FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: CENTRAL INDEX KEY: STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: IRS NUMBER: STATE OF INCORPORATION: FISCAL YEAR END: HOECHST CELANESE CORP 0000812427 PLASTIC MAIL, SYNTH RESIN/ 135568434 DE 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: SEC.

CAUSE NO. 2000-05-1962-C ROBERT HENRY VILLARREAL, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Heirs and Estate of JOHN HENRY VILLARREAL IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiffs. vs.