Letters Scientists Appeal to Quebec Premier Charest to Stop Exporting Asbestos to the Developing World January 28, 2010 Dear Premier Charest: As scientists from 28 countries, ded icated to protecting public health, we appeal to you to respect the overwhelmingly consistent body of scientific evidence and the consid ered judgment of the World Health Organization (WHO) that all forms of asbestos have been shown to be deadly and that safe use of any form of asbestos has proven impos sible anywhere in the world.
refid# 99ee537J3337b7rz1wyJG3j7L3 pages
Annual Enforcement Report Fiscal Year 2009 Enforcement Division Office of Compliance and Enforcement Texas Commission on Environmental Quality November 2009 The electronic annual enforcement report is available on the TCEQ's Web Page at http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/compliance/enforcement/reports/AER/annenfreport.html Table of Contents Introduction.............................................................................................................vii Glossary of Abbreviations for Programs........................................................................viii Executive Summary...................................................................................................ix The Environmental Tool Box.....................................................................................1-1 Pollution Prevention Through Technical Assistance..............................................1-1 Table 1-1: Technical Assistance Activities................................................1-2 Figure 1-1: Pounds of VOCs Reduced thru Technical Assistance.................1-3 Table 1-2: Event Coordination and Education Activities..............................1-3 Assistance to Small Businesses and Local Governments......................................1-4 Table 1-3: Small Business and Local Government Assistance Activities.........1-5 Figure 1-2: Multi-Media Site Visits & Resulting C2 Partnerships...................1-5 Investigations and Enforcement Policy...............................................................1-6 Figure 1-3: Routine Investigations..........................................................1-8 Figure 1-4: Complaints Investigated.......................................................1-8 Figure 1-5: Notices of Violation Issued....................................................1-9 Figure 1-6: Summary of Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Audit Privilege Act Statistics.................................................1-10 Table 1-4: Percent of Facilities Inspected by the TCEQ in Compliance.........1-11 Dollars and Sense...................................................................................................2-1 Figure 2-1: Total Number of Administrative Orders Issued by Fiscal Year................2-1 Figure 2-2: Number of Administrative Orders Issued by Media and FY....................2-2 Table 2-1: Summary of Administrative Penalties and SEPs by Fiscal Year...............2-3 Figure 2-3: Penalties and SEPs in Administrative Orders Issued............................2-4 Table 2-2: Summary of Civil Judicial Order Penalty Amounts and SEPs...................2-6 The Criminal Element..............................................................................................3-1 Table 3-1: Summary of Criminal Investigation Information by Fiscal Year.................3-1 Comparative Analysis of Performance.........................................................................4-1 i Figure 4-1: Percent of Orders Issued by Media Type...........................................4-1 Figure 4-2: Percent of Industry Types with Orders Issued.....................................4-2 Figure 4-3: Percent of Industry Types with Previous Orders Issued.........................4-3 Figure 4-4: Percent of Industry Types with Same or Similar Violations.....................4-4 Figure 4-5: Size of Regulated Entities with Administrative Orders Issued.................4-5 Table 4-1: Percent of Citations in Orders Issued.................................................4-6 Figure 4-6: Percent of Most Frequently Cited Rules or Statutes by Media Type.........4-7 Figure 4-7: Severity of Violations Included in Orders Issued...................................4-8 Assessment of Emissions Events...............................................................................5-1 Background.................................................................................................5-1 Rule Revisions.............................................................................................5-1 Data from FY 2008 and FY2009.......................................................................5-2 Reported Incidents........................................................................................5-3 Figure 5-1: Reported Incidents..............................................................5-4 Total Quantity of Emissions..............................................................................5-5 Figure 5-2: Total Quantity of Emissions....................................................5-6 Overall Trend in Reported Emissions..................................................................5-7 Figure 5-3: Overall Trend in Reported Emissions........................................5-8 Major Contaminants Released...........................................................................5-8 Figure 5-4: Major Contaminants Released................................................5-9 Top 5 Contributing Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes.........................5-10 Figure 5-5: Contributing SIC Codes......................................................5-11 Quantity of Contaminants by SIC Code............................................................5-12 Figure 5-6: Quantity of Contaminants by SIC Code..................................5-13 Highly Reactive Volatile Organic Compounds (HRVOCs).....................................5-14 Figure 5-7: HRVOCs..........................................................................5-15 Investigation and Enforcement of All Incidents.....................................................5-16 Figure 5-8: Investigation & Enforcement of All Incidents............................5-17 Emissions Events Investigations........................................................................5-18 Figure 5-9: Emissions Events Investigations...........................................5-19 Excessive Emissions Events.............................................................................5-20 Figure 5-10: Excessive Emissions Events..............................................5-21 Table 5-1: FY 2009 Total Number of Incidents Reported.....................................5-22 Table 5-2: FY 2009 Total Quantity of Air Contaminants (pounds) Reported.............5-23 ii Table 5-3: FY 2009 Total Quantity of Air Contaminants (pounds) Reported, Listed by Air Contaminant.............................................................................5-24 Table 5-4: FY 2009 Total Number of Incidents Reported by SIC Code...................5-25 Table 5-5: FY 2009 Total Quantity of Air Contaminants by Source Category...........5-26 Table 5-6: FY 2009 Total Quantity of HRVOCs Emitted......................................5-27 Table 5-7: FY 2009 Agency Response to Maintenance, Shutdown, Startup and Opacity Incidents, Listed by Region.................................................................5-28 Table 5-8: FY 2009 Agency Response to Emissions Events, by Region.................5-29 Table 5-9: FY 2009 Agency Response to Incidents Listed by Incident Type............5-30 Results of Enforcement Actions..................................................................................6-1 Figure 6-1: Impact Analysis of Administrative and Civil Judicial Orders....................6-2 Figure 6-2: Results of Administrative and Civil Judicial Orders Permitting and Process Changes......................................................................6-3 Figure 6-3: Results of Administrative and Civil Judicial Orders Clean Up, Monitoring, and Recordkeeping Requirements......................................6-4 Figure 6-4: Results of Administrative and Civil Judicial Orders Pollution Prevention.......................................................................................6-5 Table 6-1: Twenty-Five Largest Estimated Pollutant Reductions from Orders Issued..6-6 Tables Table Descriptions .................................................................................................T-1 Table T-1A: Total Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2009 (9/1/2008 8/31/2009)..........T-3 Table T-1B: On-site Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2009 (9/1/2008 8/31/2009).......T-4 Table T-2A: Total Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2008 (9/1/2007 8/31/2008)..........T-5 Table T-2B: On-site Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2008 (9/1/2007 8/31/2008).......T-6 Table T-3A: Total Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2007 (9/1/2006 8/31/2007)..........T-7 Table T-3B: On-site Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2007 (9/1/2006 8/31/2007).......T-8 Table T-4A: Total Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2006 (9/1/2005 8/31/2006)..........T-9 Table T-4B: On-site Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2006 (9/1/2005 8/31/2006).....T-10 Table T-5A: Total Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2005 (9/1/2004 8/31/2005)........T-11 Table T-5B: On-site Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2005 (9/1/2004 8/31/2005).....T-12 Table T-6: Total Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2004 (9/1/2003 8/31/2004)..........T-13 Table T-6: On-site Investigations Conducted Fiscal Year 2004 (9/1/2003 8/31/2004)......T-14 iii Table T-7: Complaints Investigated Fiscal Year 2009 (9/1/2008 8/31/2009)...................T-15 Table T-8: Complaints Investigated Fiscal Year 2008 (9/1/2007 8/31/2008)...................T-16 Table T-9: Complaints Investigated Fiscal Year 2007 (9/1/2006 8/31/2007)...................T-17 Table T-10: Complaints Investigated Fiscal Year 2006 (9/1/2005 8/31/2006)..................T-18 Table T-11: Complaints Investigated Fiscal Year 2005 (9/1/2004 8/31/2005)..................T-19 Table T-12: Complaints Investigated Fiscal Year 2004 (9/1/2003 8/31/2004)..................T-20 Table T-13: Notices of Violation Issued (Mailed) from Regional Offices Fiscal Year 2009 (9/1/2008 8/31/2009)..........................................................T-21 Table T-14: Notices of Violation Issued (Mailed) from Regional Offices Fisc
refid# ky0yvJ4x6Dj4q31OpeDMdpaV717 pages
Hilary Term [2011] UKSC 10 On appeal from: [2009] EWCA Civ 1159; [2009] EWCA Civ 1211 JUDGMENT Sienkiewicz (Administratrix of the Estate of Enid Costello Deceased) (Respondent) v Greif (UK) Limited (Appellant) Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council (Appellant) v Willmore (Respondent) before Lord Phillips, President Lord Rodger Lady Hale Lord Brown Lord Mance Lord Kerr Lord Dyson JUDGMENT GIVEN ON 9 March 2011 Heard on 26, 27 and 28 October 2010 Appellant (Greif) Jeremy Stuart-Smith QC Charles Feeny (Instructed by Hill Dickinson LLP) Appellant (Knowsley) Jeremy Stuart-Smith QC Charles Feeny (Instructed by Berrymans Lace Mawer LLP) Respondent (Sienkiewicz) Christopher Melton QC Richard Pearce (Instructed by Norman Jones Solicitors) Respondent (Willmore) David Allan QC Simon Kilvington (Instructed by John Pickering & Partners LLP) LORD PHILLIPS Introduction 1.
refid# z989Y26pQ8LY7Dz2OBEbwRoB84 pages
file:///C|/Users/MadeK42/Desktop/whysner-upload/Whysner,%20John%20--%2010-27-08%20--%20pm.txt 1 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 3 DEPARTMENT 323 HON.
refid# rpZjzOEGaXmZKN4KpX40KVNw7208 pages
WO AMENDMENT 2700-2003-2 EFFECTIVE DATE: 10/14/2003 DURATION: This amendment is effective until superseded or removed. 2770 Page 8 of 15 FSM 2700 - SPECIAL USES MANAGEMENT CHAPTER 2770 - FEDERAL POWER ACT PROJECTS 2770.4 - Responsibility 1.
refid# eNvqw9vab0oXy7Oe2326jr8G2 pages
Message From: CQMBEST, JOHN C [AG/1000] [/0=MONSANTO/QU=NA-1000-01/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JJCQMB2] Sent: 7/24/2008 7:28:40 PM To: PEIRCE, BOB [AG/1000] [bob.peirce@monsanto.com]; MITCHELL, BRADLEY C [AG/1000] [bradley.c.mitchell@monsanto.com]; YOUNG, GLYNN [AG/1000] [glynn.young@monsanto.com]; KASPER, GARRETT D [AG/1000] [garrett.d.kasper@monsanto.com] Subject: RE: response to POISON PROFITS Attachments: POISONED PROFITS - ACC Comm Plan draft.doc Bob, Attached is an electronic version of the ACC Strategic Communications Plan; my additions/suggestions for our internal consideration are noted in red.
refid# a4moEg7DzMadJVwpZDdy8NyKY8 pages
please let myself or Alice know.
refid# 71yGOZkX19r1848qyJqNQGbxB2 pages
October 29, 2002 Information Quality Guidelines Staff Mail Code 28221T U.S.
refid# 8VvZY5jJ0YXOQ2eewVEMpERRK77 pages
FOR RELEASE June 13, 2007 PRESS CONTACT: Cathy Cook Ph: (202) 293-5800 Email: ccook@therobertsgroup.net The Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association of the United States Supports H.R. 2693, Legislation to Assure Workplace Safety in Flavor Manufacturing The Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association of the United States (FEMA) supports H.R. 2693, legislation introduced by Representatives Woolsey, Miller, and colleagues to require the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to set safety standards for diacetyl.
refid# Nq9QKxxrLYaYzO85jvN3KJnE1 page
FACTS ABOUT PERCHLORATE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW MEDIA ROOM ABOUT US SCIENCE, HEALTH & TECHNOLOGY ISSUE BACKGROUND CONTACT US GLOSSARY LINKS JOIN THE DISCUSSION SEARCH THE PERCHLORATE INFORMATION BUREAU IS A PUBLIC EDUCATION PROJECT DEDICATED TO ENSURING THAT: the media and the public have access to credible information about perchlorate in the environment; best available science drives government actions on setting standards for perchlorate in water; and the potential impacts of perchlorate regulation on water systems, agriculture and taxpayers are understood.
refid# Gn0D4qvmLe87meakBo0dK2oV2 pages
FILE NAME: Talc (TALC) DATE: 2009 Oct 9 DOC#: TALC197 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Letter from Personal Care Council to Chinese Company RE Physical Tests of Talc Personal Care Products Council Ccrrrr.itied tc Safely, Quality & Innova'ion Formerly (Chinese Translation to Follow) October 9, 2009 Mr.
refid# jmMprk4YBKQg24xwjbyjVD0828 pages
FILE NAME: Talc (TALC) DATE: 2004 June DOC#: TALC177 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Article from Law Journal Website - Is Toxic Tort Reform Leading to the Same Disability Claims with New Labels 'bi Burnhan, Brown - Attorneys at Law, Oakland, California SlOtJ-f'.
refid# 99wBrg4g4rEZgwD65N9e234N68 pages
NEAll HT wr EHP content ML version o i f hrc s accessible this article i vote pe L310 TA to individuals with disabilities.
refid# KJ1avBQ45JBdMeQVn8X66g85x6 pages
rer-is-zmon 11:47 sins pop loo FEE THE SOCIETY OF THE PLASTICS INDUSTRY, INC 1if <& PRUTZE rem . --_ FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET 2i w wo KarenLannon /PamMoselw ey mow`:AllenC.Weiw dmanF/ =2 E EPA E 04/15/01 202.260.9555 a Sy -- 202.260.2797 1 Clarification of 4/13/01 FMG/EPA Ouacent Oroxneviey Drisasecomuent Dneaseasery OrieassRecvcis "Tmhis feuxisaintended to cltaherConifidfentyial Business Information (CBI) and non-CB MpraensuefnstcartuisoensrsasGrsouupb'sm(iFbtMyGt)TehtdeoSEocPiAetoynofFritdhaeyP,lAapsiecls1I3n,d2u0s0c1y,aInnca.ds(SpPrIe)sFelunotreotpdooElyPmAm.er 55 onMarch7,2001. 1.
refid# XROgGOpmoQw28dyN9rKamB4E41 page
woo ge CR ] .
refid# nN3peokamn4YB8p2x0xv3VZNR11 pages