FRICTION MATERIALS DIVISION ' TROY, NEW YORK CLEVELAND, TENN.

TROY;.

tn:24- -ttv.

**309***115 In Bituminous, the defendants-insureds were sued by the State of Illinois for various acts and omissions related to the design, manufacture, and installation of the heating, ventilating, and air conditioning *874 system (HVAC) in the State of Illinois Building The defendants tendered the claims to the.r insurance company, Bituminous Casualty The policy provided that the insurer would defend any suit seeking damage against the insured for property damage, which was defined in the policy as loss of the use of tangible property caused by an occurrence Bituminous filed a declaratory judgment action which sought a determination that it had no duty to defend or indemnify on the grounds that the complaint alleged a breach of contract and that a comprehensive general liability policy was not intended to pay the costs for repairing or replacing the insured's defective work and products The trial court found m favor ofBituminous and granted its motion for summary judgment On review, the appellate court concluded that the State's complaint did not allege a loss ofuse oftangible property caused by an occurrence and affirmed the trial court Bituminous, 218 111 App 3d at 966, 161 111 Dec 357. 578 NE 2d 1003 In our view, the instant case is analogous to the facts in Hydra and Bituminous Upon de novo review of the paragraphs relied upon by plaintiffs in the counterclaim, we conclude that the allegations concern a breach ofthe asset purchase agreement, and do not amount to claims for environmental property damage caused by an "occurrence" as required under the policies at issue Here, the Pneumo complaint and the counterclaim solely concern whether monies are owed for the breach of the asset purchase agreement between the parties Significantly, the first paragraph of the Pneumo complaint characterizes the nature of the action as "an action by Pneumo Abex for declaratory and other relief arising out of a breach of a written contract" Further, the "WHEREFORE" clause of the same pleading first seeks a declaration that "BFG has failed to fulfill its obligations under the [asset purchase] Agreement" A review of the counterclaim reveals that it too concerns the parties' obligations arising out ofthe asset purchase agreement The mere mention ofthe words "hazardous substances" or "contamination" in the counterclaim does not establish that "those conditions" on the properties were the result of an "occurrence " The language of the policies in the instant case is identical to the policy in Hydra where the Insurers were legally obligated to pay damages because of property damage caused by an occurrence As we noted above, an occurrence means an accident under the instant Page 9 policies and an accident has been defined as " 'an unforeseen occurrence * * * of untoward or disastrous character' or 'an undesigned sudden or unexpected event' '' Bituminous, 218 111 App 3d at 965-66, 161 111 Dec 357,578N E 2d 1003, quoting;Aetna Casualty, 89IU Add 3d at 619,44 111 Dec 791,411 NE 2d 1157 Here, the underlying complaint *875 reveals that the asset purchase agreement concerns indemnity provisions pertaining to environmental liabilities We do not find that the environmental liabilities referred to in BFG's counterclaim arose from an unforeseen occurrence because the primary purpose of the asset purchase agreement was to provide indemnification for their remediation Therefore, we conclude that the trial court correctly ruled that the money damages sought were not for property damage and were not a result of an "occurrence" but, rather, were the result of a breach of the asset purchase agreement * *310 * * * 116 For the reasons above, we conclude that the trial court correctly held the allegations in the counterclaim did not amount to property damages caused by an occurrence As a result, the allegations did not fall within or potentially within the policies' coverage, and the Insurers' motion to dismiss was properly granted Because of our finding on the first issue, we need not address the second issue in this case For the reasons above, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed Affirmed CERDA and BURKE.

FRICnqNlMATER!

Friction ftlatoriate *" Division !

11572-1000 MXY/dal RESPONSE: See Answers to Interrogatory Nos. 41 and 104 in Dana Corporation's Supplemental Answers and Objections to Plaintiffs' Interrogatories Regarding Warner Electric Brake & Clutch Company Pursuant to Order Dated October 20, 2003.

BRAKE FRICTION MATERIAL NUMBER EXPIR APPL # 040877 040249 040250 021053 020478 040056 030469 030865 030845 030467 030868 021116 030869 040381 040382 040383 030870 040384 030871 040385 030847 030872 030964 040386 030848 030849 030873 040387 021117 021118 040380 040435 030470 040388 030468 030846 040389 030965 030965 030874 040477 040478 040479 040473 030850 030966 030950 040057 021119 040474 030174 030967 01 08 07 07 07 07 01 06 07 05 01 07 07 06 01 07 07 06 07 06 01 07 01 06 01 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 01 07 07 07 01 07 07 07 01 07 01 07 01 07 07 07 01 07 01 07 01 07 07 07 01 06 01 06 07 07 07 07 07 06 07 07 07 06 07 06 07 07 01 07 01 07 01 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 01 07 07 06 01 07 01 07 01 06 07 07 07 06 01 07 10725 05575 05575 02100 02100 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 78400 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 78400 78400 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 02050 78400 02050 78400 02050 5/6/2005 MARKINGS ACD 709 FF ADB PM FF ADB SM FE ADV AF 105 GG ADV AF102 EE ADVICS AA220 EF ADVICS AA250H GH ADVICS AI971 EF ADVICS FK260 FE ADVICS FK320H GH ADVICS M9214H GG ADVICS M9219H FF ADVICS M9225 FF ADVICS M9226 FE ADVICS M9228 FF ADVICS M9229 FF ADVICS M9229H FF ADVICS M9230 FF ADVICS M9231HFF ADVICS M9235 FF ADVICS M9236 FF ADVICS M9250 FF ADVICS M9259 FF ADVICS M9261 FF ADVICS M9283 FF ADVICS M9286 FF ADVICS M9287 GG ADVICS M9292 FF ADVICS M9297 EE ADVICS M9298 FF ADVICS MP526 FF ADVICS PC513 GG ADVICS PC518GG ADVICS PC519 FF ADVICS PC553H GH ADVICS PC554 EF ADVICS PS506H EE ADVICS PS509 FE ADVICS PS509H FE ADVICS PS530 FF ADVICS PS534 FF ADVICS PS545 FF ADVICS PS558H FF ADVICS PV565H FG ADVICS SP12FF ADVICS T536 FE ADVICS VC001 EF ADVICS VC002 EF ADVICS VC003 FG ADVICS VC005H FF ADVICS VC007 FF ADVICS VC009 FF SECTION 10-4

Compliance List of Automotive Safety Devices For Three-Year Period 2001-2004 Section 10--Friction Material FEBRUARY 8, 2005 Automotive Manufacturers Equipment Compliance Agency, Inc.

Dated: April 2004 PNEUMO ABEX CORPORATION, as successor-in-interest to Abex Corporation, Robert W.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ST.

March 2, 2001 Expert report of David S.

0000950159-99-000084.txt at www.sec.gov --------- BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE---------Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmasterwww.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7zlT+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, DGueHnOz9Ewl2BPk2WtYLWyLT8XgVuZSQfPKZgxIvqDTaLSVmcHSnIP4eKjen5AJ gxE3VvIDfsaijQ+9j ZulzA== <SEC-DOCUMENT>0000950159-99-000084.txt : 19990412 <SEC-HEADER>0000950159-99-000084.hdr.sgml : 19990412 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000950159-99-000084 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 6 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19981231 FILED AS OF DATE: 19990331 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 19990409 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: CENTRAL INDEX KEY: STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: IRS NUMBER: STATE OF INCORPORATION: FISCAL YEAR END: CROWN CORK & SEAL CO INC 0000025890 3411 231526444 PA 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: FILM NUMBER: 10-K 001-02227 99583876 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: CITY: STATE: ZIP: BUSINESS PHONE: </SEC-HADER> <DOCUMENT> <TYPE>10-K <SEQUENCE>1 <TEXT> ONE CROWN WAY PHILADELPHIA PA 19154 215-698-51 (Mark One) [X1 [] UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (FEE REQUIRED) For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED) For the transition period from to Commission file number 1-2227 http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/25890/0000950159-99-000084.txt 02/24/2000 0000950159-99-000084.txt at vAVw.sec.gov Page 2 of 82 Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc.

CAUSE NO. 00-03144-E BILLY RAY CULWELL, et al., Plaintiffs, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF C vs.

SHEIN LAW CENTER, LTD.