8 t *- I <x> Inter Ollice Mr.

1 which is in re: All Asbestos Cases.

Page 960 1 In fact, during the time from December until 2 March, April, May or so of 1981, did Mr.

1 are doing the work that you are concerned about?

1 would.

1 Circuit case and there is a Fourth Circuit case, Page 3799 2 Miller versus Raybestos-Manhattan, 1984, which is not 3 binding on this Court. 4 MR.

1 him or after him another person like Nollie Wood, as Page 3908 2 we are all unique in God's eyes. 3 And we pay for a lot of things that are 4 unique, a lot of money in society.

I am in receipt of your 1981 May 7 memo to E.

U-r '12* *r:*4 1* \~ / ./ v Ur.

PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT 173"* P*WWVvi Anue, N VV WBfl5W.DC ?

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FLETCHER McDANIEL, et ux.

SAF-JH-^F Houston, Texas July 21, 1982 SAF STUDIES, SURVEYS & REPORTS Texaco USA Amarillo Plant Asbestos Mr.

UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION ROBINSON F|_AZA II.

EXHIBIT UC-655^1 TO {NAME)._ Norris/J.

ELANESE ENGINEERING RESINS PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT UC-977 December 13, 1984 Union Carbide Corporation Metals Division 100 Oceangate, 10th Floor Long Beach, Ca 90802 Attn: Mr.