Welder at work; left, without exhaust ventilation; right, with exhauster working.

' y .S' - - T. b: \ * - ' r' AUGUST, 1946 Industrial Hygiene Digest (Vol.10, No. 8) Slitelatule Gbstlacts MEDICAL ENGINEERING LEGAL -- decisions and trends dndusfaial Health Iflews t ;.

July 3, 1945 BEPORT OF MEETING WITH THE AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE FOUNDATION Pittsburgh - June 29, 1945 Mr* K.

NEW YORK OFFICE September 12, 1945 SIDEROSIS L.

September 14, 1946 Mr* Kempton.Duna, Treasurer American Brake Shoe Company Sew Tork Office Ret Siderosis Replying to your letter of September 12 oonoSrning the article by Drs.

SXDERGSX8 January SO, 1948 Ur* K* Dunn, Treasurer New York Office Thank you very much for your letter of January 26th* X appreciate your consideration of this more than X oould tell because X realise that a lot of money is involved and that the returns we may expect will more or less be tangible rather than a definite financial dividend* However, I do honestly feel that Brake Shoe has made a tremendous contribution through this study to our knowledge of dust diseases and X have been extremely proud of the faot that you and management have taken the enlightened end liberal view of the whole situation* Whichever way the experiment turns out X am quite sure that the contribution will be no less important* X know that Dr* Vorwald sinoerely believes that it will give us the answers otherwise he would not suggest its being done* If we are able to show that our grinding dusts are not capable of producing definite occupational disease in experimental animals, we will not only feel better about those oases of nodulation we have oaused but will be able to evaluate future exposures muoh sore readily* If, on the other hand, we find that definite silloosis can be jroduoed then we know where we stand* The implications of this study as X have said before, are far-reaching and as Dr* Vorwald has pointed out, if results thus far prove to be conclusive, we will bare to change our present thinking and interpretation of nodular x-ray shadows in oooupa* tional disease* X have high hopes for the results of this work and after many discussions with Dr* Gardner and Dr* Vorwald, it Is a piece of research that has been needed for a long time* Am X correct in assuming that you will inform Dr* Vorwald of our $$oislon?

I IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUI ' PEORIA COUNTY ILLINOIS WILMER NALL, ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC., ) j ABEX CORPORATION, THE BENDIX ) CORPORATION, DELCO, a Division) of General Motors Corporation,) GATKE CORPORATION, JOHNS- ) MANVILLE SALES CORPORATION, ) JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, .)

Hr.

of the characteristics of our current production formulae.

EXPERIHEHT1L HCRX - SARAKAC IABORATCET grinding Dust Exposure go.

1 undercoat sealer by a manufacturer or distributor other than itself, to any of the following entities: 2 (a) Chrysler-Plymouth Corp.; 3 (b) Ford Motor Company; (c) General Motors; 4 (d) American Motors; (e) Nissan Motors; 5 (f) Mitsubishi Motor Car Division; (g) Volkswagon; 6 (h) British Leyland; (i) Sears & Roebuck. 7 RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 116: 8 See Wagner's response to Interrogatory No. 111. 9 INTERROGATORY NO. 117: 10 If the answer to any part of Interrogatory No. 116 is 11 affirmative, please state: 12 (a) the identities of each manufacturer or dis tributor and the above-named entity which received the 13 automobile undercoat sealer; 14 (b) the date(s) of each shipment, sale or dis tribution of automobile undercoat sealer for which 15 defendant has data or information; 16 (c) the quantity and type, including trade or brand name, of the automobile undercoat sealer 17 shipped, sold or distributed to each of the above- named entities. 18 RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 117: 19 See Wagner's response to Interrogatory No. 116. 20 INTERROGATORY NO. 118: 21 At any time during the period 1948 to 1978, has defen 22 dant manufactured automobile brake linings or brake assemblies?

, ir; W7 /Y^cb-.'

VOLUME I1 New York D .

M II 0 3 A H D D M KE.

Ans.