FILE NAME Packings and Gaskets PAG DATE 1986 Oct 7 DOC PAG039 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Memo RE Asbestos Exposure Monitoring - Construction Storeroom UNION CARBIDE INTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE For vet oo Ses UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION TECHNICA tbe.

FILE NAME Packings and Gaskets PAG DATE 1986 DOC PAG063 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Testimony to EPA BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ASBESTOS PROPOSED MINING AND IMPORT RESTRICTIONS AND PROPOSED MANUFACTURING IMPORTATION AND PROCESSING PROHIBITIONS 40 CFR Part 763 Docket Control No. 62036 TESTIMONY OF FEL INCORPORATED MCCORD GASKET CORPORATION SUBSIDIARY OF CELL CORPORATION and VICTOR PRODUCTS DIVISION DANA CORPORATION July 22 1986 PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT : 17 17 11 - 12 12 Mr.

FILE NAME Packings and Gaskets PAG DATE 2004 Oct 15 DOC PAG051 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Invoice from Chem to Ford Chem Inc. 25 Jessie Street at Ecker Square Suite 1800 San Francisco CA 94105 415-896-2400 415-896-2444 ChemRisk Inc.

FILE NAME Rogers Corporation ROG DATE 1979 DOC ROG050 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Rogers Corp Commentary Upon Proposed Asbestos Standards within the State Implementation Plan for Air Quality ROGERS CORPORATION Commentary upon Proposed Asbestos Standards within the State Implementation Plan for Air Quality PROTECTED 3050 January 25 1979 RGS 052672 Rogers Corporation a Connecticut based manufacturer wishes to express its serious concern over the proposed asbestos emission and ambient standard portion of the State Implementation Plan for Air Quality We as users of various asbestos minerals do not pretend to be experts on asbestos related occupational and environmental hazards however we do have an inherent interest in terms of concern for employee safety and market impact in keeping current on medical scientific and technical developments in this area It is upon this knowledge that we base some of our objections to this proposed legislation Rogers Corporation does not minimize the known health hazards associ- ated with the use of asbestos quite the contrary we have installed sophisticated state the art engineering and administrative controls to insure worker safety and compliance to all applicable regulatory requirements in our manu- facturing facilities is from this experience in installing and operating state emission control devices that we draw our conclusion that industrial compliance to the proposed emission standard is not economically or technically possible We have been engaged for some time in the research and development of acceptable asbestos substitutes for use in our products A number of product changes especially in less critical applications involving asbestos substitution have already taken place However to date acceptable asbestos PROTECTED RGS 052673 , Page Page 2 substitutes for many of our high temperature high strength plastics applica- tions do not exist This fact coupled with a growing body of data possibly I implicating other asbestos fiber materials as potential health hazards lends support to our contention that the tunnel vision approach embodied in these proposals will not result in the stated goal of minimizing the health risk to both workers and the general public Indeed if this proposal is implemented we face the possible realization of the old adage Jumping out of the frying pan into the fire We would hope that responsible individuals within the DEP would re- re- alize our concerns over this proposal from the ensuing discussion Effective minimization of risk to development of respiratory cancer and other disabling diseases from the inhalation of hazardous particulates can only be achieved if industry regulatory agencies and the general public are aware of what is fact what is supposition and what is conjecture Regulatory action if it is to achieve its stated goals must be based on factual data concerning the nature and scope of the problem a realization of the capabilities and limitations of technology to provide the control mechanisms and finally an accurate as es - assess- ment of the economic and social impact of proposed control strategy The corner so speak of these proposed asbestos regulations are the relationship of a sharp rise in mesothelioma within Connecticut during a year period between 1960-1969 as compared to a similar interval between We refer here to recently published articles in the Hartford Courant Norwich Bulletin and Providence Journal copy attached which deal with recent Japanese research implicating fine fibrous fiberglass as respiratory carcinogens We also further elaborate on this later in our discussion PROTECTED RGS 052674 Page 3 1940-1949 and the estimated increase of asbestos use within Connecticut plotted DEP's Figure 8 page 10-15 between 1900-1969 Very serious deficiencies exist in this conjecture In the introduction to these proposals page 10-1 a statement is made alluding to DEP conducted " . . study of asbestos mesothelioma incidence 5,6 5,6 Review of indicated references fail to show a clear distinction has been made between asbestos and asbestos induced mesotheliomas Further in the mesothelioma discussion on page 10-14 of these proposals no distinction is mentioned between asbestos and asbestos related meso- thelioma In fact page 10-14 discussion does its best to implicate asbestos as the cause by innuendo and pure conjecture such " . . only four people were reported with known exposure to asbestos Eight others were felt to have experienced some exposure .. . of the remaining individuals in it is interesting to note that one person was listed as a toll collector

FILE NAME Synkaloid SYN DATE August 31 1984 DOC SYN006 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION 1984 Legal - Defense response to interrogatories LAW OFFICES BRANSON FITZGERALD & HOWARD A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION : 500 ALLERTON STREET POST OFFICE BOX 2189 CITY CALIFC OARLN II FOARNIA TELEPHONE 415 365-7710 a Attorneys forSYNKOLOID COMPANY NN _ ee . ee JKC ASBESTOS WPL BKH B___ - 5 ee SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF CALIFORNIA product CITY AND COUNTY OF SANSANFRANCISCO add list to Dougo product product ilst for IN RE SHIPYARD AND APPLICATOR CASES CLAPPER & BRAYTON CNoo nstr8u0c4t4i16on Interview Interview CONSOLIDATED FOR DISCOVERY ANSWERS OF SYNKOLOID , / COMPANY TO | INTERROGATORIES PROPOUNDED BY PLAINTIFFS 14 PROPOUNDING PARTY 15 RESPONDING PARTY 1 16 SET NUMBER : 17 PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANT SYNKOLOID COMPANY TWENTY 18 NEAL BAKER 19 20 V5 V5 V5 PPlalinatiiffntPilainftifff 21 ABEX CORPORATION et al 22 Defendants 23 24 /// No 821066 25 /// 26 /// LOUIS BLEILY Plaintiff 2 VS. 3 ABEX CORPORATION et al Defendants DIVMOLH PAN VINHORETV X 2189 719 BOX 36 VINHORETVE OFICE ALLE 415 FITZGER POST FELPHONE ALLE OFFICE FIEBSCH431 FELEPHONE FIEBESCH431 Branso FRANK BOLDUC vs.

FILE NAME: General Motors (GM) DATE: 1986 May 15 DOC#: GM046 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Published Article Presented at GM Cancer Research Foundation - Mesothelioma and Mineral Fibers 9 - ^ B ' _]2L1Y_lii_57(lO) : 1905-1911.

FILE NAME: Georgia Pacific (GP) DATE: 1975 Apr DOC#: GP083 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Journal Article - Occupational and Community Asbestos Exposure from Wallboard Finishing Compounds srcoxn si uns N l l V I M I I< 1y \ O l - . 5 i , N u . 10 B U L L i: T 1 X O 1' T 11 \l X 1, \Y Y C) R K A C A D E M Y O l M 1 1) 1 C I N E 1i i j !

FILE NAME: Georgia Pacific (GP) DATE: 1977 DOC#: GP047 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Purchase Order

FILE NAME: Georgia Pacific (GP) DATE: 1977 July 6 DOC#: GP105 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Letter to CPSC RE Asbestos - Spackling Compound & Proposed Ban Georgia-Pacific Corporation F90o0rllsa.uvdy,.OnrjeibgoAnm$7m20e4 Telephone (20%) 222-2261 PLAINTIFFS EXHIBIT GP-265 July 6, 1977 Mr.

FILE NAME: Marley (MAR) DATE: 1983 DOC#: MAR011 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Newspaper Articles NTER OFFICE LETTER -F O R M I0 2 -E THE MARLEY COMPANY IMPORTANTI a lw ays send co pi TO OFFICES INVOLVED To: COMPANY PRESIDENTS, LINE EXECUTIVES AND PLANT MANAGERS From Bob Best Attn: Q_ Office Corporate Safety Date May 6, 1983 SUBJECT The attached articles are for your information only.

FILE NAME: ZW^W^ DATE: : DOC#: W^ DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION/ZZW INDUSTRIAL VENTILATION A Manual of Recommended Practice COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRIAL VENTILATION P. 0.

FILE NAME: Asbestos Cement Pipe and Sheet (ACPS) DATE: 1977 Mar 16 DOC#: ACPS022 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Unpublished Report - Dust Exposures During the Cutting and Machining of Asbestos/Cement Pipe ASBESTOS EXPOSURES DURING THE CUTTING AND MACHINING OF ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPE Prepared for The A/C Pipe Producers Association 1600 Wilson Boulevard , Suite 1308 Ar lington, Virginia 22209 Prepared by Wesley M, Noble, B.S.

FILE NAME: ZW^W^ DATE: K DOC#: W^ DOCUMENT DESCRIPTIONDZ^ZZY /Z^ZtZ .'

FILE NAME: Asbestos in Hair Dryers (HD) DATE: D DOC#: HD0 OCUMENT DESCRIPTION: W^>Z'Z'Z ZZWZZ .......... .._._-.-'.---..-"-....... - . ___......_ .......__.__

FILE NAME: Asbestos in Hair Dryers (HD) DATE: DOC#: HD0 OCUMENT DESCRIPTION: 'DZZZZZZ&Z TI1(' Gill.