Document zoR3G8KYJMD8Qv8VmOrNqJVQB
Inter-office memo
TENNECO CHEMICALS, INC.
To H. H. IXihamel
At Burlington
Date February 27, 1969
From G. W. Leach
At Burlington
Subject Evaluation of 250-12 Type Resin Using Increased Monomer Charge
Copy to
P. F. Albanese R. S. Cole P. R. Scarito File ^
At Production's request. Process Engineering has compared and evaluated the results of Increasing the monomer charge in the 250-12 type homopolymer resin. In general, an upward trend was detected in productivity, while no significant in crease occurred in reaction time. It is recommended that pro duction continue to increase the monomer charge on this type resin to 11,550 lbs. per batch.
Only lots of 250-12 resin from the beginning of 1969 were evaluated (see appendix). The three main aspects that were monitored and compared were: reaction time, re3in properties, and pounds yield of resin per lot. Only lots which consisted of batches with the same recovered MVC to virgin MVC ratio were compared. This was an attempt to compare lots with the same kinetics.
Reaction time was an important consideration. A drastic increase in reaction time could nulify the increase in pro ductivity arising from the increased monomer charges. However, this was not the case. The maximum difference detected between the high and low charge average reaction times amounted to 0.2 hours (10.2 hours for low charge and 10.4 hours for high charge). This was well within the range of scatter encountered in the raw data and could not be considered significant.
Resin properties did not ehange appreciably. Particle size distribution shifted slightly. The higher charge lots were coarser than the low charge lots. This was expected since the water and methocel levels were not altered. The small variation was well within specification.
*
The adjusted productivities, based on the confounding
plant's usage, were astounding to say the least. The low
charge lots consistently adjusted slightly lower than the es
timated 67,000 pounds per lot indicating that 67,000 is a
good estimate of the low charge productivity. The high charge
lot, however, consistently adjusted substantially above the
68,500 pounds per lot that was estimated. The average pro
ductivity per lot ifor the low charge was 66,500 pounds/lot and
the high charge was 70,500 pounds per lot. I find It had to
believe the high charge adjustments, but the productivity has
definitely increased.
COLORITE 015568
\ 2-
V/hen the charge is increased to 11,550 pounds per hatch, a productivity of 70,750 pounds per lot can be expected. This is a 7 percent increase over 10,750 pound monomer charge lots. Perhaps another slight shift in particle size distribution will be experienced. If it changes out of specification, a small adjustment to the methocel charge should rectify the situation. Reaction time should not appreciably increase. I will monitor the results of the 11,550 pound monomer charge lots when they are run.
GWL/rJl Attachment
COLORITE 015569
Lot MVC (Virgin) Pounds (Recovered) Ave. Reaction Time Relative Viscosity Gels Dry Blend
Bulk Density Heat Stability Contamination
Average Maximum Screens +60 +80 +100 +140 +200 Thru Volatiles Lb./batch (Assumed) Adjusted lb./Batch
599001 599002* 599005 599004* 599005 399006
8750
10250 8750
8750
8750
8750
2000 10.5 2.45
500 10.12 2.42
2000 10.4 2.45
2000 10.56 2.42
2000 10.2 2.41
2000 10.3 2.41
9 9 12 10 6 7
7.1 6.6 7.8 6.2 11.6/ 7.6 10.0
51.5
--
51-5
--
50.2 --
50.9 --
31.2 --
30.9
--
5/0 4/0 4/0 4/0 4/0 4/0 9/1 7/0 7/2 6/1 6/1 11/0
Tr 4 55 92 100
-- .25 67.0 66.4
Tr Tr 64 61 59 89 92 98' 99 21 .29 .28 67.O 67 66.675
Tr Tr Tr
>2 1-1 4
49-50 37-31 57
88-87 83-82 88
98-97 97-97 97
2-5 3-3 3
.62 ..22
.25
67 67 67 66.4 66.4
* w Batches In lot had varying virgin to recovered mcnomer ratio.
COLORITE 015570
Comparison of Reaction Time & Resin Properties of Low & High Charge Lots PVC 250-12
399007* 399008* 399009 399010 399011 399013* 399014 399015 399016
9750
10750 8750
8750
9000
8750
8750
9000
9000
1000
-- 2000 2000 1500 2000 2000 2000 2000
10.58 9.65
10.15 10.2
10.78 10.1
10.1
9.96
10.62
2.44
2.41
2.42
2.45
2.44
2.42
2.42
2.41
2.44
10 14-15 5 9 9 12 10 10 7
7.4 6.4 7.0 6.8 7.3 7-0 6.4 6.7 6.6
31.2 --
31.0
--
31.0
--
32.0 0/100
32.2
--
32.0
--
31.5
--
30.8 0/96
31.3
--
4/0 6/0 6/0 6/0 6/0 4/0 10/0 7/0 4/0 9/0 9/0 7/1 9/0 8/2 7/1 Vi 9/1 6/0
Tr 11 67 91 98 2 .2 67 6t ,
Tr 34 76 94 100
--
.21 67
--
Tr 7 61 93 100
--
35 67
--
Tr 10 67 93 99 1 .21 67 67.95
Tr 13 68 93 99. 1 .36 68.5
--
Tr 8 62 88 96 4 32 67.O
--
Tr 12 66 89 96 4 .26 67
Tr 17 73 93 99 1 .26 68.5
--
Tr 5 60 90 99 1 .32 68.5 67.95
COLORITE 015571
Formulation No.: H-3122-D30
599017* 399018* 399019 399020* 399021* 399022 399023* 10500 10000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000
500
1000
2000 2000 2000 2000 2000
10.46 10.12 10.1 10.3 10.78 10.46 10.52
2.41
2.42
2.40 2.41 2.43 2.42 2.45
9 6 11 13-14 8 7 9
6.9 7.0 7.2 6.9 7-5 7-5
--
51.2
--
51.5
--
31.5
--
30.8 0/100
31.2
--
31.0
--
31.5
--
5/0 6/0 3/0 4/0 6/0 5/0 5/1 5/0 6/0 5/1 10/0 12/2 11/4 12/1
Tr 15 61 91 98 2 .54 68.5 72.438
Tr 7 68 92 98 2 .57 68.5 72.438
Tr 16 73 94 99 1 .4 68.5
--
Tr 11 70 93 99 1 .13 68.5
--
Tr 7 65 95 99
*
1 .4 68.5 71.10
Tr 6 60 90 98 2 .35 68.5 71.10
Tr 10 68 93 99 1 .32 68.5 `
--
66.5 M lbs. = Ave. Productivity/Lot Low Charge
70.5 M lbs. = Ave. Productivity/Lot High Charge
I
10.2 hrs. = Ave. Reaction Time Low Charge
10.4 hrs. = Ave. Reaction Time High Charge
COLORITE 015572