Document x1od8GNOgywbkJ7gyp23dxwmQ

Page 1 - IS>^3 FINAL REPORT E pidem iology, 220-3W -05 M edical D epartm ent 3M Company St. P aul. M N 55144 Date: June 17,2003 Title: Descriptive Analysis o f Serum Fluorochemical Concentrations from Decatur Employee Participants o f the 2002 Medical Surveillance Program Protocol Number: N/A IRB Approval: N/A Principal Investigator: Co-investigators: Geary W. Olsen, D.V.M., Ph.D. Jeffrey H. Mandel, M.D. Study Director: Jeffrey H. Mandel, M.D. 000070 Page 2 ABSTRACT In the Spring 2002, 54 3M Company Decatur (Alabama) employees voluntarily participated in the fluorochemical medical surveillance program. As part of this program, a blood sample was collected from each participating employee for determination o f five serum fluorochemicals. These fluorochemicals were: perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS); N-ethyl perfluorooctanesulfonamidoacetate (PFOSAA); N-methyl perfluorooctanesulfonamidoacetate (M570); perfluorooctanoate (PFOA); and perfluorohexanesulfonate (PFHS). The serum PFOS concentrations ranged from 0.082 to 4.2580 ppm with an arithmetic mean o f 1.621 ppm (95% Cl 1.283 - 1.958) and a geometric mean o f 1.008 ppm (95% Cl 0.733 - 1.388). None o f the employees tested had serum concentrations that exceeded the Biologic Limit Value o f 5 ppm for PFOA [range 0.025 - 4.810 ppm; arithmetic mean = 1.497 ppm (95% Cl 1.084-1.910); geometric mean = 0.713 ppm (95% Cl 0.483-1.055)]. Comparison o f the employees' 2002 serum fluorochemical concentrations with the most recent previous measurements suggested a decline in concentrations for PFOA, PFHS, PFOSAA and M570. A decline in serum PFOS concentrations was not observed. Cautious interpretation is warranted of any trend in serum concentrations because neither potential workplace exposure information or actual time since last test was incorporated in the analyses. OOOO*?! INTRODUCTION Page 3 In the Spring 2002, the fluorochemical medical surveillance program was offered to employees at the 3M Company Decatur (Alabama) chemical manufacturing plant. Results have been reported elsewhere for previous fluorochemical medical surveillance programs at the Decatur manufacturing plant (Olsen et al. 1999; 2001a; 2003a), as well as the 3M Antwerp (Belgium) fluorochemical manufacturing plant (Olsen et al. 1999; 2001b; 2003a) and the 3M Cottage Grove (Minnesota) fluorochemical manufacturing plant (Gilliland and Mandel 1996; Olsen et al. 1998; 2000; 2003b). There were fewer participants in the 2002 Decatur fluorochemical medical surveillance program than in previous examination years (1994,1997, 2000) at this manufacturing site. This was likely due to the fact that the 2002 fluorochemical medical program was offered after the company's announcement to cease production o f perfluorooctanesulfonyl fluoride (POSF)-related materials. This resulted in fewer production employees at the Decatur manufacturing site compared to previous years. The purpose o f this study is to report the serum fluorochemical concentrations that were measured in 2002 and compare the participants' results with their most recent previous serum concentrations. METHODS The fluorochemical medical surveillance program is offered to employees at the Decatur manufacturing site on a periodic basis. Participation is voluntary. As part o f the 2002 program, a blood sample was collected from each participating employee for determination o f five serum fluorochemicals. These fluorochemicals were: perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS, C sF n S O s'); N-ethyl 000072 Page 4 perfluorooctanesulfonamidoacetate (PFOSAA, CgFi7S02N(CH2CH3)CH2C0 0 '); Nmethyl perfluorooctanesulfonamidoacetate (M570, CgFi7S02N(CH3)CH2C0 0 ); perfluorooctanoate (PFOA, C7F 15C O O ); and perfluorohexanesulfonate (PFHS, C6F13SO3). The five fluorochemicals were determined by high performance liquid chromatography electrospray tandem mass spectrometry methods (Hansen et al. 2001). Analyses were conducted at Tandem Labs (Salt Lake City, UT) using validated methods that have been detailed elsewhere (Tandem Labs 1999; 2001a; 2001b). Fluorochemical concentrations were measured in pg/mL and reported as parts per million (ppm). RESULTS A total of 54 Decatur employees (41 males, 13 females) voluntarily participated in the 2002 fluorochemical medical surveillance program. Measures o f central tendency for the five fluorochemicals are reported in Table 1. The serum PFOS concentrations ranged from 0.082 to 4.2580 ppm (Table 1) with a mean (arithmetic) o f 1.621 ppm (95% Cl 1.283 - 1.958). Because the concentrations were skewed (i.e., log normal distribution), a geometric mean was also calculated for PFOS (1.008 ppm, 95% Cl 0.733 - 1.388). Presented in Table 2 are results for the 30 Decatur employees who participated in both the 2000 and 2002 fluorochemical medical surveillance programs. The arithmetic mean differences are based on subtracting the employees' 2000 serum fluorochemical concentrations from their respective 2002 serum fluorochemical concentrations. There was no statistically significant (p < .05) mean difference between serum PFOS 00007a Page 5 concentrations for these 30 employees. On the other hand, the mean serum fluorochemical concentrations significantly (p < .05) decreased for PFOA, PFHS, PFOSAA and M570 in this two year interval (Table 2). Figures 1 through 5 provide a paired comparison o f the 30 employees' 2000 and 2002 serum fluorochemical concentrations. It should be noted that employees labeled #14 and #18 (see x axis) in Figure 1 are the same as employees #4 and #16 in Figure 2, respectively. Because o f the long serum elimination half-life o f PFOS and PFOA (Burris et al. 2002), we suspect that the 2000 serum concentrations o f these two employees might have been in error (biased upwards). Presented in Table 3 are the mean differences in serum PFOS and PFOA concentrations for 44 employee participants o f the 2002 fluorochemical medical surveillance program in relation to their most recent previous serum fluorochemical measurements (i.e., prior to the 2002 fluorochemical medical surveillance program). The previously most recent measurements for these 44 employees ranged between blood samples collected between 1997 and 2001. Mean serum PFOS concentrations did not decrease for these 44 employees whereas mean serum PFOA concentrations significantly (p < .05) decreased. Data are not presented for PFHS, PFOSAA and M570 because they were not measured in the 1997 fluorochemical surveillance program which was the most recent previous measurement for some employees. Presented in Table 4 are the mean differences in serum PFOS and PFOA concentrations for the 11 employee participants in the 2002 fluorochemical medical surveillance program who also participated in the PFOA Biologic Limit Value (BLV) program in 2001 (after completion o f the 2000 fluorochemical medical surveillance 000074 Page 6 program). The purpose for the PFOA BLV program is explained, in detail, elsewhere (3M Company 2001). Basically, 3M established the BLV (5 ppm serum PFOA) to represent the best estimate o f a level o f a chemical substance or its metabolite in a biological fluid that if present, even on a chronic basis, would not be expected to pose, or correlate with, a significant risk o f adverse health effects to the worker(s). By establishing this BLV at 5 ppm for PFOA, the exposure guideline committee at 3M did not intend to imply that serum levels of PFOA greater than the BLV immediately impose a significant risk of adverse health effects. However, if an employee's serum PFOA level either meets or exceeds the BLV, it should be understood that corrective actions (which may include temporary removal from the immediate work area) may need to be applied, on a case-by-case basis, at the direction o f 3M Corporate Occupational Medicine. The PFOA BLV program was directed at those workers engaged in the production o f PFOA which, in Decatur, occurred in 1999 and continued into 2001. None o f the 11 employees who were tested in 2001 under the direction o f the BLV program had serum PFOA concentrations that exceeded the BLV (5 ppm) in either 2001 or 2002 (Table 4). There was no statistically significant decrease in serum PFOA concentrations among the 11 employees tested in the initial BLV analysis for Decatur in 2001 in relation to serum PFOA concentrations reported in their 2002 fluorochemical medical surveillance examinations (Table 4). None o f the remaining 43 participating employees exceeded the BLV for PFOA in 2002 (Table 1). 000075 Page 7 DISCUSSION The employee participants o f the 2002 Decatur fluorochemical medical surveillance program had a distribution o f serum PFOS concentrations comparable to the results obtained from prior serum fluorochemical assessments. These previously collected data were obtained from fluorochemical surveillance programs conducted at Decatur in 1994,1997 or 2000 (Olsen et al. 1999, 2 001,2003a) or with a random sample o f production employees in 1998 (O ten et al. 2003c). Likewise, the distributions o f serum PFOA, PFHS, PFOSAA and M570 concentrations were similar to prior assessments (Olsen et al. 2003a; 2003b; 2003c). Analysis o f the 54 employees' 2002 results suggests, overall, there has been a modest decline in the serum concentrations of PFOA, PFHS, PFOSAA and M570 since the 2000 fluorochemical medical surveillance program. The mean serum PFOS concentration did not decline in this two year time period. Because potential exposure to POSF-related materials occurred during 2000 and 2001, it is not possible to determine whether the decline in PFOA, PFHS, PFOSAA and M570 is the result o f serum elimination, reduced opportunity for potential workplace exposure or both. On the other hand, serum PFOS concentrations did not decrease. This observation may be a function o f poor serum elimination (Burris et al. 2002) and/or opportunity for potential workplace exposure to POSF-related materials through 2001. An ongoing study is examining the serum half-life o f elimination for PFOS, PFOA and PFHS among 27 retirees followed for 5 years at the Decatur and Cottage Grove manufacturing sites. Results from this investigation should be available in 2004. Presently, the estimated serum half-lives o f elimination for PFOS and PFOA are 8.7 000076 years (SD = 6.1) and 4.4 years (SD = 3.5), respectively (Burris et al. 2002). These estimates, however, are based on only 9 o f these retirees followed for 18 months. There are several limitations to the analyses presented in this report. The results arise from a small subset o f employees who voluntarily participated in the 2002 Decatur fluorochemical medical surveillance program. The number o f employees in the 2002 fluorochemical medical surveillance program is only 20 percent of those who participated in the 2000 fluorochemical medical surveillance program (n = 263). Attrition of employees due to production cessation o f POSF-related materials occurred between 2000 and 2002. Unlike 2000, no employee interview data were collected in 2002 to provide an estimate o f exposure to POSF-related production areas for these workers. Therefore, it was not possible to associate serum fluorochemical concentrations to potential workplace exposures in the 2000-2002 time period. Actual time was not taken into account in the comparison of the most recent prior test results compared to the 2002 serum fluorochemical measurements. Knowledge regarding the serum elimination half- life o f these fluorochemicals remains sparse. More precise estimates o f the serum elimination half-lives o f PFOS, PFOA and PFHS are forthcoming from a separate study designed to analyze the half-lives from 27 retirees o f the 3M Decatur and Cottage Grove manufacturing sites. Because o f these limitations, there needs to be cautious interpretation of any time trend analysis o f the serum fluorochemical concentrations o f the 54 Decatur employees who participated in the 2002 fluorochemical medical surveillance program. We conclude that the serum fluorochemical concentrations o f the 54 employees who voluntarily participated in the 2002 Decatur fluorochemical medical surveillance 000077 Page 9 program did not increase to any substantial extent since the 2000 fluorochemical medical surveillance program. For a number o f employees, their serum PFOA, PFHS, PFOSAA and M570 serum concentrations appeared to have decreased. None of the employees tested had serum PFOA concentrations that exceeded the PFOA BLV of 5 ppm. Cautious interpretation is warranted o f any time trend in serum concentrations because neither potential workplace exposure information or actual time since last test was not incorporated in the analyses. 000078 Page 10 REFERENCES Burris JM, Lundberg JK, Olsen G, Simpson C, Mandel J. 2002. Determination o f serum half-lives o f several fluorochemicals. St. Paul (MN):3M Company. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency docket A R-226-1086. Gilliland FD, Mandel JS. 1996. Serum perfluorooctanoic acid and hepatic enzymes, lipoproteins, and cholesterol: a study o f occupationally exposed men. Am J Ind Med 29:560-568. Hansen KJ, Clemen LA, Ellefson ME, Johnson HO. 2001. Compound-specific, quantitative characterization o f organic fluorochemicals in biological matrices. Environ Sei Technol 35:766-770. Olsen GW, Gilliland FD, Burlew MM, Burris JM, Mandel JS, Mandel JH. 1998. An epidemiologic investigation o f reproductive hormones in men with occupational exposure to perfluorooctanoic acid. J Occup Environ Med 40:614-621. Olsen GW, Burris JM, Mandel JH, Zobel LR. 1999. Serum perfluorooctane sulfonate and hepatic and lipid clinical chemistry tests in fluorochemical production employees. J Occup Environ Med 41:799-806. Olsen GW, Burris JM, Burlew MM, Mandel JH. 2000. Plasma cholecystokinin and hepatic enzymes, cholesterol and lipoproteins in ammonium perfluorooctanoate production workers. Drug Chem Toxicol 23:603-620. Olsen GW, Logan PW, Simpson CA, Burris JM, Burelw MM, Lundberg JK, Mandel JH. 2001a. Descriptive summary o f serum fluorochemical levels among employee participants o f the year 2000 Decatur fluorochemical medical surveillance program. St. Paul (MN):3M Company. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency docket AR-2261030a020a. Olsen GW, Schmickler MN, Tierens JM, Logan PW, Burris JM, Burlew MM, Lundberg JK, Mandel JH. 2001b. Descriptive summary o f serum fluorochemical levels among employee participants o f the year 2000 Antwerp fluorochemical medical surveillance program. St. Paul (MN):3M Company. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency docket AR-226-1030a020b. Olsen GW, Burris JM, Burlew MM, Mandel JH. 2003a. Epidemiologic assessment o f worker serum perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) concentrations and medical surveillance examinations. J Occup Environ Med 45:260270. 000073 Page 11 Olsen GW, Butenhoff JL, Mandel JH. 2003b. Assessment of lipid, hepatic and thyroid function in relation to an occupational biologic limit value for perfluorooctanoate. St. Paul (MN):3M Company. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency docket AR-226. Olsen GW, Logan PW, Hansen KJ, Simpson CA, Burris JM, Burlew MM, Vorarath PP, Venkateswarlu P, Schumpert JC, Mandel JH. 2003c. An occupational exposure assessment o f a perfluorooctanesulfonyl fluoride production site. Biomonitoring. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. (in press). Tandem Labs. 1999. Assay validation report. Quantitative determination o f PFOS, PFOSA, PFOSAA, N-MeFOSE-OH, N-EtFOSE, POAA, and PFHS in human serum by LC/MS/MS. Study No. NWBS98-082, Report No. NWBR99-005. NWT Inc., Salt Lake City, UT., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency docket AR-226-1208. Tandem Labs. 2001a. Quantitative determination of PFOS, PFOSA, PFOSAA, POAA, PFHS, M556 and M570 in human serum by LC/MS/MS. Assay revalidation report. Study No. NWBS00-040, Report No. NWBR00-108. NWT Inc., Salt Lake City, UT., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency docket AR-226-1209. Tandem Labs. 2001b. Quantitative determination of PFOS, PFOSA, PFOSAA, POAA, PFHS, M556 and M570 in human serum by LC/MS/MS. Assay revalidation addendum report. Study No. NWBS00-040, Report No. NW BR00-122. NWT Inc., Salt Lake City, UT., US Environmental Protection Agency docket AR-226-1210. 3M Company. 2001. Documentation o f an Occupational Biological Limit Value (BLV) for Perfluorooctanoate [CF3(CF2)gC02]. St. Paul (MN):3M Company. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency docket AR-226. 000060 Page 12 Table 1: Measures of Central Tendency for Five Serum Fluorochemical Concentrations for 54 Decatur Employee Participants of the 2002 Medical Fluorochemical Surveillance Program Statistic Range Mean 95% C.I. Geometric mean (G.M.) 95% C.I. of G.M. PFQ 0.082-4.580 1.621 1.283-1.958 1.008 0.733-1.388 PFQA 0.025-4.810 1.497 1.084-1.910 0.713 0.483-1.055 PFHS 0.007-0.943 0.285 0.210-0.359 0.147 0.101-0.214 PFOSAA 0.002-0.074 0.013 0.009-0.017 0.008 0.006-0.011 M57Q 0.002-0.432 0.061 0.037-0.085 0.026 0.018-0.038 Page 13 Table 2: Differences in Serum Fluorochemical Concentrations Between 2002 and 2000 Fluorochemical Medical Surveillance Programs for 30 Decatur Employee Participants in 2002 Stgtjgtfg Range of difference Mean difference 95% C.I. pros (-1.649)-1.069 0.195 (-0.031)-0.422 PFOA (-3.905)-0.091 -0.544 (-0.904)-0.184 PFHS (-1.018)-0.059 -0.062 (-0.132)-0.009 PFOSAA (-0.172)-0.021 M570 (-0.906)-(-0.007) -0.039 -0.178 (-0.058)-(-0.021) (-0.270)-(-0.085) p value .96 .002 .04 <.0001 .0002 Page 14 Table 3: Differences in Serum PFOS and PFOA Concentrations Between 2002 Fluorochemical Medical Surveillance Results and the Previous Most Recent Measurements (1997-2001) for 44 Decatur Employee Participants in 2002 Statistic Range of difference PFQS (-1.649)-1.069 EFQA (-3.905)-1.260 Mean difference 0.212 -0.274 95% C.I. 0.031-0.392 (-0.560)-0.011 p value .99 .03 000063 Page 15 Table 4: Differences in Serum PFOS and PFOA Concentrations Between 2002 Fluorochemical Medical Surveillance Results for 11 Employees and their Previous Biologic Limit Value (BLV) Results in 2001 S ta tistic Range of difference PFOS (-1.250)-0.989 PFOA (-0.590)-0.990 Mean difference 0.175 0.267 95% C.I. (-0.240)-0.590 (-0.095)-(0.629) t-ratio 0.94 1.64 p value .82 .93 Page 16 Figure 1. Comparison of PFOS Concentrations, in Ascending 2002 PFOS Concentration Order, for 30 Decatur Employees Who Participated in the 2000 and 2002 Fluorochemical Medical Surveillance Programs PFOS 2000 PFOS 2002 PFOS Concentration (ppm) PFOA Concentration (ppm) Page 17 Figure 2. Comparison of PFOA Concentrations, in Ascending 2002 PFOA Concentration Order, for 30 Decatur Employees Who Participated in the 2000 and 2002 Fluorochemical Medical Surveillance Programs PFOA 2000 PFOA 2002 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Employee Page 18 Figure 3. Comparison of PFHS Concentrations, in Ascending 2002 PFHS Concentration Order, for 30 Decatur Employees Who Participated in the 2000 and 2002 Fluorochemical Medical Surveillance Programs PFHS Concentration (ppm) PFHS 2000 PFHS 2002 O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Employee ? Page 19 Figure 4. Comparison of PFOSAA Concentrations, in Ascending 2002 PFOSAA Concentration Order, for 30 Decatur Employees Who Participated in the 2000 and 2002 Fluorochemical Medical Surveillance Programs PFOSAA 2000 PFOSAA 2002 PFOSAA Concentration (ppm) Page 20 Figure 5. Comparison of M570 Concentrations, in Ascending 2002 M570 Concentration Order, for 30 Decatur Employees Who Participated in the 2000 and 2002 Fluorochemical Medical Surveillance Programs M570 Concentration (ppm) M570 2000 M570 2002 O Oo OS Employee <4