Document wrj21OJBKjm534o2eonon6R3Q
CONFIDENTIAL
AR226-3110
DPT478/992105
This report is ecmsiderea^!^;Study3-:^-"("^-tq^i e-^ ;:i-^-n^-r-'^"^s^-L--r''^^--1^ -^-^^"'^^^^-'-^^^^^s^-is^^^^rr^rT:^'^-"-----"^
Life .Scienees'.QualityAssuraneeiBepa^entrfbr.a^cfe yNa^^^"&-:i^ '
-
. -
:~
_. ;:'- .."..^rf'_-';:' \-\.:'^":'-Q':'iW''',?"Kw%:iv^^^^
The SporisoRis'requesteii^loa^ewMustdocume^
r
soon
-as
.
p
o
s
.
s
i
b
l.e.-."
^1^T
O^.e'-n-^,.e'.s7e-
j
E-co--n^im-J^--S-B";h-
;a:v-
&'-:'b-^^,^;
.
^
^
;
^
^
-
^
'
^
?
:
;
'
^
-
^
^
^
REPORT contaming;StudyEtirector;anai<^
In conroUance^tb^SEPjairy^
MOUSE MICRONUCLEUS TEST
~-1
D^FT
Sponsor
DuPojit Specialty Chemicals, Jackson Laboratory, Chambers Works, Deepwater, NJ 08023, USA.
Research Laboratory Huntingdon Life Sciences Ltd., Eye,
Suffolk, IP23 7PX,
ENGLAND.
Report issued
page } of 25 Company SarJiEzed. Doos r,={ c^.fa.n TSCA CBS
CONTENTS
DPT478/992105
COMPLIANCE WITH GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE STANDARDS.........................
Page 4
QUALITY ASSURANCE STATEMENT.................................................................................
5
6 SUMMARY................................................................................................................................
7 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................
TEST SUBSTANCE................................................................................................................... 9
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE.............................................................................................
10
ASSESSMENT OF RESULTS................................................................................................... 13
MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS.............................................................................................. 14
15 RESULTS...................................................................................................................................
16 CONCLUSION...........................................................................................................................
17 REFERENCES...........................................................................................................................
TABLES
1.
Summary of results and statistical analysis......................................................................
18
2. Results for individual animals - 24 hour sampling time..................................................
19
3. Results for individual animals - 48 hour sampling time..................................................
20
Company Sanii;2ed. Dy;s r:st coriain TSCA CBI
DPT478/992105
Page
APPENDICES
1. Mortality data...................................................................................................................
21
2. Preliminary toxicity test - Clinical signs and mortalities.................................................
22
3.
Micronucleus test - Clinical signs and mortalities...........................................................
23
4.
Historical vehicle control values......................................................................................
24
5.
Historical positive control values.....................................................................................
25
3:
Compsrsy Sc a-n:it--"--- n1JoO---^.cw^JSCACW
DPT478/992105
COMPLIANCE WITH GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE STANDARDS
The study described in this report was conducted in compliance with the following Good Laboratory Practice standards and I consider the data generated to be valid.
.-' _.'
The United Kingdom Good Laboratory Practice Regulations 199?[(Statutory
Instrument No. 654).
\
^
\
OECD Principles of Good Laboratory Practice (as revised^n 1997), ENV/MC/CHEM(98)17.
. ^ . ^ EC Council Directive 87/18/EEC of 18 December 1986^'Official Journal No.
LI 5/29).
\;;., Christine E. Mason, B.Sc.,
Study Director,
'\-.
Huntingdon Life Sciericeffilstd,- v
_,- ^-^iiBSa^a:?^
'w
'""
^i-
\:^
S
,
/
i:.': y
"^w ...r
Date
:4:
Compar'y Ssnitized. Does not contain TSCA C3f
QUALITY ASSURANCE STATEMENT
DPT478/992105
The following have been inspected or audited in relation to this study:
Study Phases Inspected
Date of Inspection
Date of Reporting
Protocol
Process Based Inspections
Report
Protocol: An audit of the protocol for this study was conducted and reported to the Study Director
and Company Management as indicated above.
Process based inspections: At or about the time this study was in progress inspections and audits of other routine and repetitive procedures employed on this type of study were carried out. These were
promptly reported to appropriate Company Management.
Report Audit: This report has been audited by the Quality Assurance Department. This audit was-'
conducted and reported to the Study Director and Company Management as indicated above. The methods, procedures and observations were found to be accurately described and the reported results to reflect the raw data.
Helen Comb, B.Sc., Principal Auditor,
Department of Quality Assurance, Huntingdon Life Sciences Ltd.
Date
Company Sa'iiiized. Dcss not contain TSCA CBS
SUMMARY
DPT478/992105
This study was designed to assess the potential induction of micronuclei bxJIUHHl11 bone
marrow cells of mice. Mice were treated with a single intraperitoneal adnunisfranononhe test
substance at dose levels of 50, 100 and 200 mg/kg bodyweight. A preliminary toxicity test had
previously shown that a dose of 200 mg/kg was expected to be approximately the maximum
tolerated; this level was therefore selected as an appropriate maximum'Tonuse-in the micronucleus
test.
v""
.
\
\
The test substance and negative control were administered by.mtraperitoneal mjectionaaThe negative
control group received the vehicle, purified water. A positive conteobgroup was dosed orally, by
v ^ " intragastric gavage, with mitomycin C at 12 mg/kg bodyweight /-';;<'
Bone marrow smears were obtained from five male and five female-animals in the negative control,
each of the test substance groups and the positive-control.group 24>liours after dosing. In addition
bone marrow smears were obtained from five male ana'fiv&tfemale animals in the negative control and high level treatment groups 48 hours after dosing. jQne^me^ua&om each animal was examined
for the presence of micronuclei in 2000 immalweserythrocytes. The proportion of immature
erythrocytes was assessed by examinatiomof at leastdQOO erythrocytes from each animal. A record
of the incidence of micronucleated mature erythrocytes?was also kept.
Mice treated with the test sutstance.-did'not-show^any significant increase in the frequency of
micronucleated immature,erythrocytes:at either sampling time.
, ...-m.k.^A;'. .
\^. .'..
There was no significant decrease^m tnKproportion of immature erythrocytes after treatment of the
cs"
animals with toe-test substance. ^
vi'
\ "^
\
No statistically significant increases in the frequency of micronucleated immature erythrocytes and
ase'in the.'preportion of immature erythrocytes were observed in mice treated
[andskilled'2o4r 48 hours later, compared to vehicle control values (p>0.01 in
The positive control compound, mitomycin C, produced large, highly significant increases in the frequency of micronucleated immature erythrocytes.
thafUU^^H It is concluded
did not show any evidence of causing chromosome damage or
bone marrow cell toxicity wheir^dministered by intraperitoneal injection in this in vivo test
procedure.
6R-.S !-')'
C^^S^.C^.--------TSC.CB,
INTRODUCTION
DPT478/992105
The purpose of this study was to assess the potential '^^^^IHHRf^ i"^^ mutagenic effects in
mice following acute intraperitoneal administration usmg an in vrv<3"cytogenetic system (Boiler and Schmid 1970, MacGregor et al 1987, Mavoumin et al 1990). The intraperitoneal route was chosen for this particular study to maximise potential absorption of the test substance.
The procedures used were based on the recommendations of the following guidelines:
OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals. (1997) Genetic Toxicology: Mammalian
Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test, Guideline 474.
EEC Annex to Directive 92/69/EEC (1992) Part B : Methods for determination of
toxicity, B.12. Mutagenicity (Micronucleus test). 0.1 No. L 383 A, 35, 154.
US EPA (1998) Health Effects Test Guidelines. OPPTS 870.5395 Mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test. EPA 712-C-98-226.
The bone marrow micronucleus test, originally developed by Matter and Schmid (1971), is a widely employed and internationally accepted short-term assay for identification of genotoxic effects (chromosome damage and aneuploidy) associated with mutagens and carcinogens (Mavoumin et al 1990). This in vivo system allows consideration of various factors including pharmacokinetics,
metabolism and DNA repair which cannot be accurately modelled in an in vitro system. Young adult mice are chosen for use because of the high rate of cell division in the bone marrow, the wealth of
background data on this species, and their general suitability for toxicological investigations.
In mitotic cells in which chromosomal breakage has been caused by the test substance or its metabolites, acentric fragments of the chromosomes do not separate at the anaphase stage of cell division. After telophase these fragments may not be included in the nuclei of the daughter cells and
hence will form single or multiple micronuclei (Howell-Jolly bodies) in the cytoplasm of these cells. Micronuclei are seen in a wide variety of cells, but erythrocytes are chosen for examination since
micronuclei are not obscured by the main nucleus and are therefore easily detected in this cell type (Boiler and Schmid 1970).
A few hours after the last mitosis is completed, erythroblasts expel their nucleus. Young erythrocytes, less than 24 hours old, stain blue with Giemsa due to the presence of ribonucleic acid and are termed polychromatic (immature). This ribonucleic acid gradually disappears so that more mature erythrocytes stain orange/pink (ie they show nonnochromatic staining). Virtually all the chromosome damage detected in immature erythrocytes will have been caused during the recent exposure to the test substance. Mature erythrocytes may also be examined for the presence of micronuclei. No substantial increases in the incidence of micronuclei in mature erythrocytes would usually be expected 24 hours after administration of a chromosome-damaging agent; any micronucleus-Iike artefacts (which could otherwise possibly give a false positive result) are therefore readily distinguishable in this cell type (Schmid 1976).
tefe^
7:
Comply .S2.>...^t-.--^------- oic^nTSCACBl
DPT478/992105
Substances which interfere with the mitotic spindle apparatus will cause non-disjunction (unequal separation of the chromosomes at anaphase resulting in aneuploidy) or lagging chromosomes at anaphase which may not be incorporated into the daughter nuclei. These lagging chromosomes are not excluded from the erythroblast with the main nucleus and hence also give rise to micronuclei. Any toxic effects of the test substance on the nucleated cells may lead either to a reduction in cell division or to cell death. These effects in turn lead to a reduction in the number of nucleated cells and immature erythrocytes; to compensate for this, peripheral blood is shunted into the bone marrow (von
Ledebur and Schmid 1973). If the proportion of immature erythrocytes is found to be significantly
less than the control value, this is taken as being indicative oftoxicity. A very large decrease in the proportion would be indicative of a cytostatic effect. The bone marrow is sampled twice after treatment to allow for variations in the rate of absorption and metabolism of test substances and to allow for any delay in erythrocyte production as a result of cytostatic or cytotoxic effects (MacGregor et al 1987). The protocol was approved by Huntingdon Life Sciences Management on 8 October 1998, by the Sponsor on 21 October 1998 and by the Study Director on 20 November 1998. The study was performed between 30 November 1998 and 5 January 1999 at the Department of Genetic Toxicology, Huntingdon Life Sciences, Eye, Suffolk, IP23 7PX, England. Subsequently statistical analysis was performed by the Department of Statistics, Huntingdon Life Sciences, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, PE18 6ES, England.
^
8:
Con^ny Sanit^sd. Do=s ^ c^" TSCA C3f
Identity: Chemical name:
TEST SUBSTANCE
DPT478/992105
Intended use:
Appearance: Storage conditions: Batch number: Expiry date: Purity: Date received:
Surfactant in the polymerisation of
fluoromonomers
Pale yellow slurry
Room temperature
f-3
2 years from date of receipt
25%
23 June 1998
The above information with regard to the physical characterisation of the test substance is the responsibility of the Sponsor.
Company Sar^lzecL D; .,,;<,.-;t. ^,,..-.T..i-L(,^,:.;-!, 'E{-v''-"^A/^^ft'S-*-*l
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
DPT478/992105
ANIMALS
&
*.
All animals in this study were Specific Pathogen Free CD-1 outbred albino mice of Swiss origin.
Males weighed between 28 and 30 grams and fqmales weighed between 22 and 24 gramsaim despatch
from Charles River UK Limited, Margate, Kent, England.
H
< ^
On arrival the weight of the animals was checked and found to be acceptable. The animals were randomly assigned to groups and tail marked. Each group was kept, with the sexes separated, in plastic cages and maintained in a controlled environment, with the thermostat set at 22C and relative humidity set at 50%. The room was illuminated by artificial light for 12 hours per day. All animals were allowed free access to pelleted expanded rat and mouse No. 1 maintenance diet (SQC grade obtained from Special Diets Services Ltd, Witham, Essex, UK) and tap water ad libitum. Food and
tap water are routinely analysed for quality at source. Dietary contaminants are not suspected of having any significant effect on parameters measured in this test in this laboratory at any time over the last ten years. All animals were acclimatised for a minimum of five days, examined daily and weighed prior to dosing.
TEST SUBSTANCE FORMULATION AND ADMINISTRATION
Suspensions of the test substance were individually prepared on the day of the test, using identical methods for each phase of the test, in purified water (prepared by reverse osmosis of tap water). All dosages cited in this report are stated in terms of the purity of the test substance, ie 25%.
Stability and homogeneity of the test substance and of the test substance in the vehicle were not determined in this test and remain the responsibility of the Sponsor. Chemical analysis of dosing
formulations for achieved concentration or stability was not performed in this study.
Mitomycin C, obtained from Sigma Chemical Company, batch numbers 48H2510 and 48H2511 were used as the positive control compound. They were prepared as a solution in purified water, at a concentration of 0.6 mg/ml and pooled, just prior to administration.
All animals in all groups were dosed with the standard volume of 20 ml/kg bodyweight. The test substance and negative control were dosed by intraperitoneal injection, and mitomycin C, the positive control compound, was administered orally by intragastric gavage.
DATES OF DOSING Preliminary toxicity test:
Micronucleus test:
Group 1-2: 30 November 1998
Group 3 - 4: 2 December 1998
7 December 1998
10: COR---- Sanitized. Does net contain TSCA CS8
DPT478/992105
PRELIMINARY TOXICITY TEST
The purpose of this test was to determine a suitable dose level for use in the micronucleus test. The dosages employed were used to give an approximate indication of the maximum tolerated dose, ie the highest dosage which would be expected to elicit signs oftoxicity without producing extreme clinical signs or having a significant effect on survival. The experimental design is shown below:
Group
Treatment
Concentration
(mg/ml)
Dosage
(nig/kg)*
Number of mice Male Female
12.5 6.25
10 11.25
250
2
2
125
2
2
200
2
2
225
2
2
* Dosage expressed in terms of purity of test substance, ie 25%
Following dosing, the animals were observed regularly during the working day for a period of 48 hours and any mortalities or clinical signs of reaction during the experiment were recorded. At the end of this observation period, surviving animals were sacrificed and discarded.
MICRONUCLEUS TEST
From the results obtained in the preliminary toxicity study (see RESULTS), dose levels of 50, 100 and 200 ing/kg bodyweight were chosen for the micronucleus test. The experimental design is shown
below:
Group
Treatment
Concentration (mg/ml)
Dose
(mg/kg)*
Number of mice
Male
Female
Vehicle control
-
2.5
50
100
10
200
Mitomycin C
0.6
12
10 . 10
5
5
5
5
10
10
* Dosage expressed in terms of purity of test substance, ie 25%
: 11 :
Company Sanitized. Does ^ co^En TSCA CBE
DPT478/992105
Following dosing, the animals were examined regularly and any mortalities or clinical signs of reaction were recorded. Five males and five females from the negative control, each of the test substance groups and the positive control group were sacrificed 24 hours after dosing. In addition five male and five female animals in the negative control and high level treatment groups were sacrificed 48 hours after dosing.
The animals were killed by cervical dislocation following carbon dioxide inhalation and both femurs dissected out from each animal. The femurs were cleared of tissue and the proximal epipbysis removed from each bone. The bone marrow of both femurs from each animal was flushed out and pooled in a total volume of 2 ml of pre-filtered foetal calf serum using a 2 ml disposable syringe fitted with a 21 gauge needle. The cells were sedimented by centrifugation, the supernatant was discarded and the cells were resuspended in a small volume of fresh serum. A small drop of the cell
suspension was transferred to a glass microscope slide and a smear was prepared in the conventional manner (Schmid 1976). At least three smears were made from each animal. The prepared smears were fixed in methanol (> 10 minutes). After air-drying the smears were stained for 10 minutes in
10% Giemsa (prepared by 1 : 9 dilution ofGurr's improved R66 Giemsa (BDH) with purified water). Following rinsing in purified water and differentiation in buffered purified water, the smears were air-dried and mounted with coverslips using DPX.
The stained smears were examined (under code) by light microscopy to determine the incidence of micronucleated cells per 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes per animal. Usually only one smear per animal was examined. The remaining smears were held temporarily in reserve in case of technical problems with the first smear.
Micronuclei are identified by the following criteria:
Large enough to discern morphological characteristics Should possess a generally rounded shape with a clearly defined outline Should be deeply stained and similar in colour to the nuclei of other cells - not black Should lie in the same focal plane as the cell Lack internal structure, ie they are pyknotic There should be no micronucleus-like debris in the area surrounding the cell. The proportion of immature erythrocytes for each animal was assessed by examination of at least 1000 erythrocytes. A record of the number of micronucleated mature erythrqcytes observed during assessment of this proportion was also kept as recommended by Schmid (1976).
k) 12:
Comply SanEi;zcd. D3?-; ^ c--ta.n TSCA C3I
DPT478/992105
ASSESSMENT OF RESULTS
The results for each treatment group were compared with the results for the concurrent control group
using non-parametric statistics. Non-parametric statistical methods were chosen for analysis of
results because:
They are suited to analysis of data consisting of discrete/integer values with ties such
as the incidence ofmicronucleated immature erythrocytes The methods make few assumptions about the underlying distribution of data and
therefore the values do not require transformation to fit a theoretical distribution (where data can be approximately fitted to a normal distribution, the results of nonparametric analysis and classical analysis of variance are very similar) 'Outliers' are frequently found in the proportion of immature erythrocytes for both control and treated animals; non-parametric analysis based on rank does not give these values an undue weighting. Unless there is a substantial difference in response between sexes (which occurs only rarely) results for the two sexes are combined to facilitate interpretation and maximise the power of statistical analysis.
For incidences ofmicronucleated immature erythrocytes, exact one-sided p-values are calculated by permutation (StatXact, CYTEL Software Corporation, Cambridge, Massachussetts). Comparison of several dose levels are made with the concurrent control using the Linear by Linear Association test
for trend in a step-down fashion if significance is detected (Agresti et al. 1990); for individual inter-
group comparisons (ie the positive control group) this procedure simplifies to a straightforward
permutation test (Gibbons 1985). For assessment of effects on the proportion of immature erythrocytes, equivalent permutation tests based on rank scores are used, ie exact versions of Wilcoxon's sum of ranks test and Jonckheere's test for trend.
A positive response is normally indicated by a statistically significant dose-related increase in the incidence of micronucleated immature erythrocytes for the treatment group compared with the concurrent control group (P0.01); individual and/or group mean values should exceed the laboratory historical control range (Morrison and Ashby 1995). A negative result is indicated where individual and group mean incidences of micronucleated immature erythrocytes for the group treated with the test substance are not significantly greater than incidences for the concurrent control group (P>0.01) and where these values fall within the historical control range. An equivocal response is obtained when the results do not meet the criteria specified for a positive or negative response.
Bone. marrow cell toxicity (or depression) is normally indicated by a substantial and statistically
significant dose-related decrease in the proportion of immature erythrocytes (P0.01). This decrease
would normally be evident at the 48 hour sampling time; a decrease at the 24 hour sampling time is
not necessarily expected because of the relatively long transition time of erythroid cells [late normoblast --> immature erythrocyte (approximately 6 hours) -> mature erythrocyte (approximately
30 hours)].
13:
Ccmpsny SanSSiZseL Soss rst conSa^ TSCA CS!
DPT478/992105
MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS All specimens, raw data and study related documents generated during the course of the study at Huntingdon Life Sciences, together with a copy of the final report, are lodged in the Huntingdon Life
Sciences Archives.
Such specimens and records will be retained for a minimum period of five years from the date of issue of the final report. At the end of the five year retention period the Sponsor will be contacted and advice sought on the future requirements. Under no circumstances will any item be discarded without the Sponsor's knowledge. Huntingdon Life Sciences will also retain a copy of the final report
in its Archives indefinitely.
14: Company Sani'i'ssei. Cocs r?( csntam TSCA CBi
IP
RESULTS Mortality data for the entire experiment are presented in Appendix 1.
DPT478/992105
PRELIMINARY TOXICITY TEST
The details of any toxic reactions observed are given in Appendix 2.
Results showed that a dose level of 200 mg/kg was approximately the maximum tolerated, and this level was considered to be an appropriate maximum for use in the micronucleus test. Dose levels of 50, 100 and 200 mg/kg bodyweight were chosen for use in the main test.
MICRONUCLEUS TEST
Table 1 gives a summary of the results of the micronucleus test and the results of statistical analysis. The results for individual animals at the 24 and 48 hour sampling times are presented in Tables 2 and 3 respectively. Appendix 4 summarises the vehicle control values for micronucleated polychromatic
erythrocytes obtained in previous, unrelated experiments. Appendix 5 summarises the corresponding values obtained for the positive control in previous, unrelated experiments.
Clinical signs and mortalities
No mortalities were obtained in the micronucleus test.
Clinical signs for animals treated with the test substance are detailed in Appendix 3. Clinical signs for the high level group were consistent with the maximum tolerated dose having effectively been
achieved. No adverse clinical signs were obtained for the vehicle control or positive control treated animals over the duration of the test.
Micronucleated immature erythrocyte counts (mie)
The test substance did not cause any statistically significant increases in the number of micronucleated immature erythrocytes at either sampling time (P>0.01).
Mitomycin C caused large, highly significant increases (P0.001) in the frequency of micronucleated
immature erythrocytes.
Micronucleated mature erythrocytes (mme)
The test substance did not cause any substantial increases in the incidence of micronucleated mature erythrocytes at either sampling time.
Proportion of immature erythrocytes (% ie/ie + me)
The test substance failed to cause any significant decreases in the proportion of immature erythrocytes (P>0.01).
Mitomycin C caused a statistically significant decrease in the proportion (P0.01).
: 15 :
Company Sc^t^rf. Do:; :--1 c^a^ TSCA C5!
CONCLUSION
DPT478/992105
No statistically significant increases in the frequency of micronucleated immature erythrocytes and se in the proportion of immature erythrocytes were observed in mice treated nd killed 24 or 48 hours later, compared to vehicle control values (p>0.01 in
It is concluded thatlHJ^JUkdid not show any evidence of causing chromosome damage or
bone marrow cell toxicity when administered by intraperitoneal injection in this in vivo test
procedure.
16:
Company Ssn^d. Do- ".=.t contain TSCA CS1
REFERENCES
DPT478/992105
AGRESTI, A., MEHTA, C.R. and PATEL, N.R. (1990) Exact inference for contingency tables with ordered categories. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85,453.
BOLLER, K. and SCHMID, W. (1970) Chemical mutagenesis in mammals. The bone marrow of the
Chinese hamster as an w vivo test system. Haematological findings after treatment with Trenimon (translation). Humangenetik, 11, 34.
GIBBONS, J.D. (1985) Nonparametric Statistical Inference, 2nd edition. Marcel Dekker, New York.
MacGREGOR, J.T., HEDDLE, J.A., fflTE, M., MARGOLIN, B.H., RAMEL, C., SALAMONE, M.F., TICE, R.R. and WILD, D. (1987) Guidelines for the conduct of micronucleus assays in mammalian bone marrow erythrocytes. Mutation Research, 189,103.
MATTER, B. and SCHMID, W. (1971) Trenimon-induced chromosomal damage in bone marrow cells of six mammalian species, evaluated by the micronucleus test. Mutation Research, 12,417.
MAVOURNIN, K.H., BLAKEY, D.H., CIMINO, M.C., SALAMONE, M.F. and HEDDLE, J.A. (1990) The in vivo micronucleus assay in mammalian bone marrow and peripheral blood. A report of the US Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program. Mutation Research, 239,29.
MORRISON, V. and ASHBY, J. (1995) High resolution rodent bone marrow micronucleus assays of 1,2-dimethylhydrazine : implication of systemic toxicity and individual responders. Mutagenesis, 10,
129.
SCHMID, W. (1976) The micronucleus test for cytogenetic analysis. In: HOLLANDER, A. (ed.) Chemical Mutagens, Principles and Methods for their Detection, Vol. 4, p.31. Published by Plenum
Press, New York.
von LEDEBUR, M. and SCHMID, W. (1973) The micronucleus test.
Mutation Research, 19, 109.
Methodological aspects.
17:
Compaq Sanded. DC:: ^ cc^ain TSCA CBS
TABLE 1 Summary of results and statistical analysis
DPT478/992105
Sampling time
24 Hours
48 Hours
Treatment Vehicle control
iA----J Mitomycin C
Vehicle control
Dose (ing/kg)
% ie/(ie+me) f
44
Incidence mie (mean) 0.5
50
43
0.9
100
45
0.5
200
42
0.9
12
38**
65.6***
43
0.4
200
42
0.2
Incidence mme (total)
0.3 0.6 1.6
0.0 2.3 0.0 0.3
% ie/(ie+me) mie mme
Proportion of immature erythrocytes Number of micronucleated cells observed per 2000 immature erythrocytes examined Number ofmicronucleatted cells calculated per 2000 mature erythrocytes examined
Results of statistical analysis using the appropriate nonparametric method of analysis based on permutation (one-sided probabilities):
*** P< 0.001 ** P<0.01
(highly significant) (significant)
otherwise P>0.01
(not significant)
f Occasional apparent errors of 1% may occur due to rounding of values for presentation in the
Cosn?^y Sa^iii^d. Do.: ^t cousin T3CA C31
DPT478/992105
TABLE 2
Results for individual animals - 24 hour sampling time
Treatmeart Vehicle control
C--]
I--l) (--B 1
Mitomycin C
Dose rmg/kgt
50 100 200 12
Animal
number
M201 M202 M203 M204 M205 F206 F207 F208 F209 F210
M211 M212 M213 M214 M215 F216 F217 F218 F219 F220
M221 M222 M223 M224 M225 F226 F227 F228 F229 F230
M231 M232 M233 M234 M235 F236 F237 F238 F239 F240
M241 M242 M243 M244 M245 F246 F247 F248 F249 F250
% ie/(ie+me)
44 46 44 34 44 45 49 50 43 45
40 45 44 40 48 34 41 48 46 46
45 45 42 40 45 46 45 47 44 48
43 41 46 36 42 44 43 43 40 43
34 34 39 44 33 34 50 37 35 38
Incidence
mie 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0
2 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 1 1
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 1
1 0 3 2 2 0 0 0 1 0
42 69 100 56 97 59 15
75 92 51
me
640 612 650 794 567 653 555 608 621 683
736 630 631 752 788 701 601 645 730 580
609 551 666 672 641 640 618 646 639 583
644 723 673 703 785 792 793 849 691 590
798 863 638 702 751 702 526 631 674 649
Incidence |
mme 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 2 0
%ie/(ie+me) mie
me mme
Proportion of immature erythrocytes Number ofmicronucleated cells observed per 2000 immature erythrocytes Total number of mature erythrocytes examined for micronuclei Number of micronucleated mature erythrocytes
19
Comssny Ssnit'ssd. D;
^t^n TSCA C51
DPT478/992105
TABLES
Results for individual animals - 48 hour sampling time
Treatment
Dose
Animal
%
Incidence
me
(Ag/kg)
number
ie/(ie+me)
mie
.
Vehicle control
M301
44
M302
41
M303
47
M304
38
M305
46
F306
43
F307 . 36
2
577
1
611
0
641
0
692
0
787
0
632
0
699
F308
46
{----^ F309
43
F310
45
200
M331
48
M332
42
M333
38
M334
43
M335
46
F336
37
F337
45
F338
45
F339
34
F340
38
0
543
0
656
1
623
0
580
1
648
0
890
0
743
0
598
0
693
0
608
1
627
0
769
0
693
Incidence
mme
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
% ie/(ie+me)
mie me mme
Proportion of immature erythrocytes Number ofmicronucleated cells observed per 2000 immature erythrocytes Total number of mature erythrocytes examined for micronuclei Number of micronucleated mature erythrocytes
fe
somp.ny Ssniltet!. Dc:3 -.:. conts'n TSCA CBI
APPENDIX 1 Mortality data
DPT478/992105
Preliminary Toxicity Test
Micronucleus Test
Group
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5
Treatment
Dosage (mg/kg)
250
------------12--5 --
------------2--00 --
225
Vehicle
--------------50 --
------------10--0 --
200
Mitomycin C
12
Mortality ratio = No. of deaths No. dosed
Males
Females
Combined
0/2
0/2
0/4
0/2
0/2
0/4
0/2
0/2
0/4
1/2
0/2
1/4
0/10 0/5
0/10 0/5
0/20 0/10
0/5
0/5
0/10
0/10 0/5
0/10 0/5
0/20 0/10
D
:21 : Company Sss-sltized. Cc:s not c;3."itai'n TSCA C5i
^R-.^
DPT478/992105
APPENDIX 2
Preliminary toxicity test - Clinical signs and mortalities
Treatmeni
Dose
250
(mg/kg)
125
200
225
Approx. time after
dosing
(hr:mm) 0: 15 3 :50
6:40
22:40
30:30
46:05
0:20 2:20
18 20 26 10 41 45 47 55
0:20 4:55
Male
U
P,U,HP,
SR P, U, HP,
SR
P,U,HP,
SR,
1(REPC)
P.U.HP,
SR, 1(REPC),
1(EPC) P, U, HP, SR.1CEPC)
Female
Male
U,SR P.U.HP,
SR'
P, U, HP, SR
HP,1(P,U)
HP,1(U,P)
HP, 1(P)
'
U, 1(HP),
!
HP,1(U) HP,1(P,U)
HP,1(P) HP,1(P)
21 :00
22 : 35*
28:45
45:30
Mortalities
0/2
0/2
0/2
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
U, HP
U, 1(P) P, U, HP,
SR
U, HP U, HP
P,U
P, U, HP, SR
P, U, HP
P, U, HP,
SR,
1(EPC)
HP, 1(P)
P, U, HP, SR,
1(EPC)
P, U, HP, 1(EPC),
1(REC)
1(P,U,HP.
SR.UG,
P,U,HP,
SR,
1(EPC)
HP,1(P)
EC.KIE)
1(P,U,HP, SR, EPC)
P.HP, 1(EPC)
P,HP,1(U, HP,1(P) 1(P,U,HP, HP,1(P,
SR, EPC)
SR, EPC,
EPC)
UG)
0/2
0/2
0/2
1/2
0/2
* Observations performed on one male animal only.
Type of reaction:
EPC Eyes Partially Closed, EC Eyes Closed, HP Hunched Posture, KIE Killed in Extremis, P Piloerection, SR Slow Respiration, REC Right Eye Closed, REPC Right Eye Partially Closed, U Underactive, UG Unstable Gait.
Clinical signs shown refer to all animals within that dose group and sex, except where x(...), x denoting the number of animals displaying the clinical sign(s) within the brackets.
Ccmp^Sa-^d.-3-^c^.TSCACBI
APPENDIX 3 Micronucleus test Clinical signs and mortalities
DPT478/992105
Treatment
Dose (mg/kg)
Approx. time after
dosing (hr min)
1 25 5 25
21 -55
1 05 5 05 21 40
l:10a 5: 10a
21:45a 0:30b
4:35b
21:05b
28 : 15b
44:50b
50
Male
Female
100
Male
Female
200
Male
Female
1(P, HP, SJ) 1(P, HP, SJ)
1(HP),2(P) 1(P)
P, U, HP P.U.HP,
2(SR)
P, HP U,HP,2(SR),
3(P)
P.U.HP, 3(SR), 1(EC)
P, HP P, HP P, HP
U, 4(HP) P,HP,3(U)
P, HP,
3(P,U,HP)
1(SR),
3^ u, HP)
3(P, HP) 3(P, HP) 3(P, HP)
Mortalities
0/5
0/5
0/5
0/5
0/10
0/10
a 24 hour sacrifice b 48 hour sacrifice
NB No adverse clinical signs were noted for the vehicle or positive control groups throughout the experiment
Type of reaction:
EC Left Eye Closed, HP Hunched Posture, P Piloerection, SJ Swollen Jaw, SR Slow Respiration, U Underactive.
Clinical signs shown refer to all animals within that dose group and sex, except where x(...), x denoting the number of animals displaying the clinical sign(s) within the brackets.
23:
Corripsny Sani'uzsd.
^vtcants^TSCACBl
APPENDIX 4
DPT478/992105
Historical vehicle control data (August 1995 - June 1998) Percentage of micronucleated immature erythrocytes (individual animals)
Mj 0.6-1.0 I.I.IJ IA.2.0 1.1-2.5 IMS 1.1-U 3.W.O. .1-J <A.5.0 5.1-5^ iA<.0 6.1-tJ Frequency distribution of micronucleated immature erythrocytes per 1000 cells
Historical vehicle control data (August 1995 - June 1998) Percentage of micronucleated immature erythrocytes (group mean values)
u w n
O.Xj
06-O.t
IA.2.0
2.1.U
K-16
2.7.H
Frequency distribution of micronucleated immature erythrocytes per 1000 cells
24:
Company S eized. Cc-noEc^nTSCACBi
DPT478/992105
APPENDIX 5 Historical positive control data (August 1995 - June 1998) Frequency of micronucleated erythrocytes (individual animals)
20.0
. 0-10
11-10
21-31)
31-411
41-50
51-60
61.711
7140
1140 91.10D 101-10 111.21)
Frequency distribution of micronucleated immature erythrocytes per 1000 cells
Historical positive control data (August 1995 - June 1998) Frequency of micronucleated immature erythrocytes (group means)
25.0
&
5
a u u
3 h
0-10
11-21)
21-30
31-40
41-50
11-6(1
61.70
7140
1140
Frequency distribution of micronucleated immature erythrocytes per 1000 cells
25: ?SS3?;ySa.~t;"(iseri. Foss ''.".{ c'?n{a;n TSCA CEE