Document r6pEd7L2532axJVJxnEw54Gvr

To: Dravis, Samantha[dravis.samantha@epa.gov] Cc: Bolen, Brittany[bolen.brittany@epa.gov] From: Burhop, Anna Sent: Wed 5/24/2017 1:34:22 PM Subject: ACC Comments on EPA Evaluation of Existing Regulations (May 15, 2017) ACC Comment on EPA Evaluation of Existing Regulations 5.15.17.pdf ACC Formaldehyde Panel Letter to EPA on Regulations and the Formaldehyde....pdf ACC Biocides Regulatory Reform May IS.docx ACC Hexavalent Chromium Panel Comment.pdf ACC-CPTD TCE response to EPA-HQ-QA-2017-0190.pdf ACC-PCB Panel response to EPA-HQ-QA-2017-0190.pdf EPA Rea Reform - Dll Comments 051117.docx Revisit EGBE TRi Delisting Petition Final May 2017.pdf Samantha, As we discussed yesterday, attached are the comments that ACC submitted last Monday. In addition to the broader comments, our panels also submitted chemical-specific comments: Formaldehyde Biocides Hexavalent Chromium PCBs TCE Diisocyanates Glycol Ethers Thanks again for taking the time to come to the meeting yesterday. The group really appreciated it and enjoyed having the time to pick your brain a bit. It was great to finally meet you! -Anna Anna Burhop\ American Chemistry Council 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008274-00001 Director, Environment Regulatory and Technical Affairs 700 2nd Street NE | Washington, DC | 20002 (202) 249-6440 anna burhop@americanchemistrv.com www.americanchemistrv.com +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ This message may contain confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee do not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this email by mistake and delete this email from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of email transmission. American Chemistry Council, 700 - 2nd Street NE, Washington, DC 20002, www.americanchemistry.com 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008274-00002 /-- American* I V* Chemistry Biocides Panel Council May 15,2017 Submitted via http://www.regiilaiions.gov EPA Regulatory Reform Task Force c/o Sarah Rees Director, Office of Regulatory Policy and Management Office of Policy (mail code 1803A) US Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington DC 204060 Re: Evaluation of Existing Regulations, Docket EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 Dear Dr. Rees: The American Chemistry CounciTs (ACC) Biocides Panel (Panel)1 appreciates the opportunity to respond to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA or Agency) request for recommendations on regulations, guidance, policy or practices that should be repealed, replaced, or modified pursuant to President Trump's Executive Order 13777, "Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda."2 The Panel identifies below regulations and policies in the regulation of antimicrobial pesticides that are unnecessary, ineffective, and/or impose costs that exceed benefits and suggests actions EPA should take to address these issues. We also provide some suggestions for improvement in the way EPA regulates antimicrobials. Action on these suggestions would yield greater government efficiencies, greater predictability as to the legal requirements for the antimicrobial pesticide registrant community and ultimately save tax dollars. I. Mutual Recognition between FDA and EPA is Needed There are clear opportunities for EPA and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to reduce duplication of work. As described below, when FDA and EPA have standards that are sufficiently similar to one another, FDA and EPA could cut down on administrative burdens and duplication by recognizing each other's reviews. A. EPA's Pesticides Program Should Return to Following the Long Established Position of FDA's Foods Program that a Potable Water Rinse Removes 1 The Panel is composed of more than 50 companies that manufacture and formulate antimicrobial pesticides for use in industrial processes, material preservation, marine antifouling, industrial water treatment, public health applications and numerous other uses. The Panel focuses on the broad range of scientific, regulatory, legislative, legal and educational issues unique to antimicrobial pesticides, as well as those issues affecting all pesticide products. 2 See 82 Fed. Reg. 17793 (April 13, 2017). 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008275-00001 May 15, 2017 Page 2 Residues of Concern EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Antimicrobials Division (AD) recently expanded the scope of its dietary risk assessments for antimicrobial pesticides, including both active and inert ingredients. This change has been implemented as EPA implements its 2013 data requirement regulations for antimicrobials, 40 CFR Part 158, Subpart W (158W) but is not required by those rules. Without any public documentation or process, the Agency has set aside both its own and the FDA's longstanding approach to potable water rinse (PWR) and adopted a new regulatory interpretation that imposes burdens on both EPA and registrants with no corresponding benefit. Significantly, in many cases, EPA is re-reviewing substances already cleared by FDA for the same uses but doing so using a different standard. The Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) of 1996 changed the jurisdictional division of antimicrobials used in food-related applications between the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). FQPA amended certain provisions of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), and in the process, transferred to EPA from FDA regulatory jurisdiction certain new food safety criteria as requirements for pesticide registration. Accordingly, EPA is now responsible for the administration of section 408 of the FFDCA, which requires pesticide residues on food to have a tolerance or exemption from tolerance.3 FDA, on the other hand, is responsible for administration of section 409 of the FFDCA, which requires food additives--including antimicrobials used in food or that may become a component of food as a result of their intended use--to meet certain standards. For over 50 years, FDA's position has been that a PWR removes residues of substances used on food contact surfaces (e.g., components of dish washing liquids) such that they do not require regulation. EPA applied the same rationale as FDA after it assumed jurisdiction over antimicrobial residues in 1996 until this year. In other words, the use of a hard surface disinfectant (HSD) when followed by a PWR was considered a non-food use and, thus, a dietary risk assessment was not required.4 More recently, however, EPA has taken the position that it will no longer accept the FDA approach.5 EPA has not publicized its rationale for this change in position or for its sudden implementation. No public process has taken place. Notice and comment rulemaking to support 3 While tolerances apply only to foods in commerce, EPA applies the same standard to pesticide residues on foods in homes through FIFRA section 2(bb), which provides that "[t]he term "unreasonable adverse effects on the environment" means ... (2) a human dietary risk from residues that result from a use of a pesticide in or on any food inconsistent with the standard under section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 346a)..." 7U.S.C. 136(bb). 4 EPA's past policy was consistent with FDA's policy that products with a PWR do not require a tolerance. See "Sanitizing Solutions: Chemistry Guidelines for Food Additive Petitions." US Food and Drug Administration. January, 1993. EPA continued this policy in effect until very recently. In fact, EPA continues to reference this FDA guidance document, included it in the 158W docket, and uses the FDA method for the default determination of dietary consumption. 5 See, Letter from Stephen Knizner, Director, Antimicrobials Division, to Hasmukh Shah, Manager, Biocides Panel, November 15, 2016 (Attachment A). 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008275-00002 May 15, 2017 Page 3 this change that has regulatory consequences has not occurred. EPA representatives have said in meetings with the Panel, and in a letter to the Panel in November 2016, that data submitted showing measurable residues of one active ingredient following a potable water rinse, underlie its new position. However, there is no public documentation of EPA's change in position. EPA has failed to acknowledge the magnitude of its change, seek input on the issue of whether this response is an appropriate response or, most importantly, to consider alternative approaches based on existing science. Instead, AD unilaterally and without any advance notice or public process has begun asserting that an antimicrobial for use on hard surfaces even if followed by a PWR will be considered a food use unless the registrant demonstrates "no reasonable expectation of residues." AD has not provided any guidelines on what the "no reasonable expectation of residues" means. EPA fails to acknowledge that proving such a negative is a scientific impossibility or that FDA, and even EPA until recently, has applied de minimis thresholds for decades. The requirement for risk assessments and tolerance exemptions will apply to all antimicrobial active and inert ingredients regardless of whether a potable water rinse is required on the label. The burden on EPA and industry will be massive, with literally thousands of inert ingredients (such as fragrance components) suddenly requiring approval. It also results in the anomalous situation that uses FDA does not consider as potentially leaving residues on food are considered to do so by EPA. For example, a dishwashing detergent that makes no antimicrobial claims is regulated only by FDA. Due to the dishwasher's rinse function, FDA considers these products to leave no residue and thus does not require an approval. If the same product, however, were to have an antimicrobial claim, EPA will require additional data, perform a dietary risk assessment and possibly require a tolerance exemption. EPA's additional requirement imposes tremendous burdens on industry and EPA for little, if any, benefit. There are other ways--applying sound science--to address legitimate concerns raised by residue data (for one active ingredient) submitted to EPA, rather than entirely discarding a policy that has served EPA, FDA and the public well for over 50 years. It also makes little sense for two agencies with jurisdiction over virtually the same uses to follow such different procedures. This is a significant issue of concern for the Panel's member companies and all registrants and applicants of antimicrobials. The Panel urges EPA to revert to the approach developed by FDA and, until very recently, applied by EPA. This requires no regulatory action, just a change in EPA policy. Such action presents an opportunity to reduce burdens that were imposed without being fully vetted through the necessary process. These burdens will weigh on EPA as much as industry, and they will waste EPA resources on efforts that cannot be justified in relation to the commensurate risk to the public. In the event EPA finds it imperative to develop a new approach, it should proceed through notice and comment, which the Panel submits is legally required for such a significant and burden-increasing change. B. EPA Should Accept GRAS Substances and other FDA Authorizations in lieu of Performing Separate Assessments Prior to 1996, FDA regulated hard surface sanitizers used on food contact surfaces as indirect 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008275-00003 May 15, 2017 Page 4 food additives. FDA's regulations at 21 CFR 174.5(d)(1) permit unrestricted use of substances that are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) for any use in food as indirect food additives. Under this regulation, FDA recognized that the likely intake of antimicrobials from indirect food additive uses would be trivial compared to any use involving direct addition to food. FDA also recognized that performing additional risk assessments for such trivial uses in antimicrobials was a waste of the Agency's resources. Pursuant to this regulation, FDA had no restriction on indirect uses of GRAS substances other than good manufacturing practice. Thus, prior to August 1996, substances with GRAS uses in food could be freely and legally used in antimicrobials with food contact applications, including hard surface sanitizers. The logic and the applicable science underpinning FDA's conclusion have not changed; yet EPA now burdens itself and the industry with unnecessary risk assessments and unnecessary regulations. Given the Administration's objective to reduce unnecessary regulations, EPA should consider avoiding a needless number of regulations by adopting one that is similar to FDA's regulation at 21 CFR 174.5(d)(1). By following FDA's standing determination that a substance that has GRAS uses in food is acceptable generally in indirect food uses, EPA could exempt such substances from the requirement of a tolerance when they are used as inerts in antimicrobial formulations. This would avoid the development of hundreds of new regulations that regulations that even FDA has concluded are unnecessary. EPA would also avoid wasting resources that are needed elsewhere. If EPA were to proceed as suggested, it should exempt substances whether in the GRAS use listed in FDA's regulations or favorably reviewed by FDA under its current GRAS notice program or in another equivalent manner and permitting such substances to be used as inerts in antimicrobials. In addition to GRAS reviews by FDA itself, the FDA recognizes reviews by other organizations that establish GRAS status of substances for use in food under FFDCA. A prime example is the process established by the Flavor Extracts Manufacturer's Association (FEMA) to assess food flavors for GRAS status under the law. Food flavors are often natural or synthetic versions of substances in food which yield the flavor of the food. Today, most food flavors marketed in the US meet the FEMA standard for GRAS and are marketed solely on that basis. For over 50 years, FEMA has conducted its reviews and shared its findings with FDA. During that period, FDA has never formally challenged FEMA's process or conclusions in any significant way. To the contrary, FDA lists information on flavors FEMA has reviewed in publically available databases on FDA's web site. Based on its knowledge of the rigor and credibility of the FEMA reviews, FDA has not sought to regulate as food additives many thousands of food flavors that FEMA has reviewed. Moreover, over two thousand such flavors have been confirmed as safe for their food uses by the FAO/WHO Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives and by the European Food Safety Authority. Therefore, EPA can have confidence in applying a standard that substances reviewed by FDA as GRAS for use in food contact petitions or notice processes as well as substances determined to be GRAS by other equivalent standards should be exempted from the requirement of a tolerance as inert ingredients in antimicrobials generally. In addition, EPA should further accept as exempt from tolerance requirements as an inert in antimicrobials any substance that is expected to result in a trivial intake compared to its safe level in food or food contact materials. FDA has applied such an approach under its threshold of regulation (TOR) exemption process for over 25 years.6 The TOR exemption permits substances 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008275-00004 May 15, 2017 Page 5 resulting in very low dietary intakes or in intakes that are small compared to established safe levels in food. EPA should follow this TOR exemption approach as well. Finally, EPA should further accept for use as an inert component of an antimicrobial, any substance that FDA has authorized for indirect food use without restriction to food type or condition of use.67 In establishing the safety of such a substance, FDA's review establishes a highly conservative intake assessment and may require larger margins of safety relative to animal testing than typically applied by EPA.8 C. EPA and FDA Should Issue the SOPs to Implement the MOU regarding Dual-Approval Antimicrobials The Biocides Panel worked closely with FDA and EPA between 2011 and 2013 to establish a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to eliminate duplicate reviews of antimicrobial uses.9 Following execution of the MOU, FDA and EPA committed to adoption of standard operating procedures (SOPs) for implementing the MOU. It is almost four years since the MOU was signed yet the SOPs have not been issued. Industry has been hesitant to submit to the dual review process anticipated in the MOU without clear SOPs. EPA can facilitate development of products subject to joint jurisdiction by following through on the commitment to develop and publish SOPs. This will provide a clearly described process so industry can take advantage of the MOU to avoid unnecessary duplication. D. EPA and FDA should Develop a Single, Harmonized Approach to Food Additives/Antimicrobial Residues that Eliminates the need for Dual Agency Review For those antimicrobials that require approval under section 408 of FFDCA, EPA should not duplicate FDA's risk assessment. FDA has long been recognized as an authority on safety assessments.10 Thus, EPA should not reinvent a process that has evolved based on 50 years of strong science and is a global standard. EPA and FDA should work together (with FDA in the lead) to continue to evolve one standard for risk assessment for uses that are authorized as safe under section 409 of the FFDCA. In this way EPA should be able to accept FDA's assessment of intake and safety as meeting the requirements of section 408 of FFDCA. 6 60 FR 36595 (My 17, 1995). 7 See https://www.fda.goy/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/PackagingFCS/FoodTvpesConditionsofUse/default.htm . 8 FDA always applies a minimum 1000-fold safety margin for subchronic animal data. 9 See 80 Fed. Reg. 10682 (February 27, 2015) and docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2003-0004 at https://www.regulatiQns.goy/docket?D=EPA-HQ-OPPT-2003-0004. 10 FDA's EU counterpart, the European Food Safety Authority applies similar principles to such safety assessments in Europe as do other regulators worldwide. 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008275-00005 May 15, 2017 Page 6 E. EPA Should Defer to FDA Jurisdiction over Antimicrobials Intended for Use on or in Class II-III Medical Devices. FIFRA and the FFDCA provide EPA and FDA, respectively, with jurisdiction over antimicrobials that are intended for use in medical settings. As a result, antimicrobial products used in medical settings are often subject to overlapping and duplicative reviews and approvals by EPA and FDA. This redundancy results in substantial delay with respect to obtaining required approvals, as well as uncertainty within regulated industry regarding the approvals that may be required for a particular antimicrobial application in a medical setting. The Panel suggests that EPA use the regulatory reform initiative to resolve this issue by adopting FDA's approvals for certain antimicrobials used in medical devices. Specifically, the Panel suggests that EPA defer to FDA jurisdiction with respect to the following products: i. Any liquid or non-liquid antimicrobial product, including any "pesticide device" as defined under FIFRA, that is intended for use on a Class II-III device that includes sterilization claims and/or associated public health claims. In general: (i) Class II devices include those that contact mucous membranes on a human, do not penetrate the blood barrier, and should be sterilized; and (ii) Class III devices include those that are introduced directly into the human body and require sterilization. ii. Any antimicrobial treatment that is included in a Class II-III device regardless of claims. iii. Any antimicrobial product used in a medical device that is subject to a change in device classification that triggers the need for FDA review and approval. FDA's review and evaluation process, as required under the FFDCA, is sufficient to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the antimicrobial products identified above. Additional FDA regulatory requirements, including Quality System Regulation/Good Manufacturing Practices and adverse event reporting requirements, help to further ensure that the antimicrobial products and applications are safe and effective for their intended use. Accordingly, to the extent that FDA approval has been obtained for the antimicrobial products identified above, the Panel suggests that EPA regulation, registration, labelling and record keeping not be required for that antimicrobial use. EPA could achieve this result by issuing its own guidance document or a joint guidance document with FDA that sets forth EPA's position that it is deferring to FDA jurisdiction and approval for these antimicrobial products. Such a position could include an administrative adoption of FDA's approvals as being sufficient to satisfy EPA regulation, registration, labeling and recordkeeping requirements. II. The Human Subjects Review Board Should be Given A More Limited Mandate and Reconstituted EPA created the Human Subjects Review Board (HSRB the Board) in response to section 201 of 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008275-00006 May 15, 2017 Page 7 the FY 2006 Appropriations Act.11 The HSRB is a Federal Advisory Committee intended to implement enhanced protections for human subjects intentionally exposed to pesticides for research that would be submitted to or relied upon by EPA. The Panel's Antimicrobial Exposure Task Force II (AEATF) has worked with EPA and the HSRB for the past 11 years to obtain approval of 7 studies evaluating exposure to antimicrobial pesticides during application. As a result of this experience, the Panel has the following recommendations to streamline the HSRB process. The Panel supports and recognizes the intended purpose of the HSRB and, thus, based on our experience and our support for the Board, we suggest the following to increase increase its efficiencies and reduce costs. Most importantly, the Panel suggests that EPA consider limiting the HSRB to reviewing intentional human exposure studies intended to evaluate toxicity endpoints. This is consistent with the statutory mandate and will result in greatly reduced burdens. Protection of human subjects will not be compromised in studies that do not evaluate toxicity endpoints because these studies involve exposures allowed under current labelling and other protections remain in effect. The Panel is also concerned that the HSRB is not constituted appropriately to review many of the studies put before it. For example, the HSRB recently was called upon to review human studies involving sensitization, yet there was only one member with a background in this highly specialized area of toxicology and medicine. Thus, the Panel suggests EPA ensure that the HSRB is appropriately constituted for the studies it is asked to review. This can be accomplished by considering the areas in which studies are being proposed during the preparation for each meeting, and then adding a modest number of relevant experts for review of studies in a particular discipline during that meeting. It may be most effective to have a standby group of pre-cleared experts in scientific specialties (e.gdermal sensitization) who can be called upon when studies in their areas of expertise are being reviewed. III. EPA Should Develop and Implement New and Amended Efficacy Methods Through a Robust, Transparent Process An important step in the process of obtaining EPA approval to market a new antimicrobial product is efficacy testing. For public health products, EPA requires submission of efficacy data. To be accepted by EPA, efficacy studies must be conducted in accordance with protocols that have been recognized and accepted by EPA. Some of these protocols are developed through standard-setting organizations such as AOAC International. Others are developed privately, reviewed and accepted by EPA, and others are developed in-house by EPA's microbiology laboratory in the Biological and Ecological Effects (BEAD) Division of OPP. The BEAD Laboratory also has a process of continually changing its implementation of accepted methods through amendments to its Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). These are not subject to any review and, once implemented, all members of the regulated community are expected to follow them. Through its BEAD laboratory process, EPA has implemented several efficacy testing policies 11 See 71 Fed. Reg. 6071 (February 6,2006). 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008275-00007 May 15, 2017 Page 8 that have not been adequately vetted by the scientific community. These typically have not been tested on multiple actives in multiple laboratories to ensure reproducibility. Thus, there is no certainty the methods appropriately measure efficacy. For example, EPA recently implemented new efficacy testing guidance for the human pathogen Candida auris (a yeast).12 The EPA seeks to require use of a new, non-validated, efficacy method for C. auris rather than using the longaccepted method required to demonstrate efficacy against all other yeasts. Similarly, EPA has for decades relied upon the AOAC Use Dilution Method and the AOAC Germicidal Spray test to assess efficacy of hard surface antimicrobials. While the AOAC test methods have not changed, the BEAD laboratory has continually changed its procedures for implementing those two methods over those years. This has changed the test, resulting in products that passed using the procedures in place at the time of registration no longer passing. EPA should adopt new efficacy testing methods that reflect the current state of science. However, it also has a responsibility to make sure those methods are robust, reliable and reflect a realistic level of effectiveness. To accomplish this goal, EPA should follow a transparent public process to adopt its principal new methods. Where protocols involve widely-used types of products (e.g. hard surface antimicrobials or pre-moistened towelettes), the process should include completion of full collaborative studies to ensure results are fully validated and reproducible. Protocols for niche products or emerging areas or pathogens (e.g., active antimicrobial surfaces) can be subject to a different process, but the Agency should be careful to apply a consistent standard to reviewing all such applications. IV. Conclusion The Panel requests that EPA carefully consider these suggestions. Each offers real opportunities to allow EPA to accomplish its statutory goals in a less burdensome way. Please feel free to contact Komal K. Jain at (202) 249-6212 or komaljain@americanchemistry.com if you have any questions about these comments or require additional information. Sincerely, Komal K. Jain Senior Director, American Chemistry Council Biocides Panel 12 Interim Guidance for the Efficacy Evaluation of Products for Claims against Candida auris; see https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/interim-guidance-efficacv-evaluation-products-claims-against-candidaauris-0 (last accessed May 13, 2017). 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008275-00008 Am merimcan --' Chemistry Council May 15,2017 EPA Regulatory Reform Task Force c/o Sarah Rees Director, Office of Regulatory Policy and Management Office of Policy (mail code 1803 A) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20460 Submitted electronically via www. resulations.gov Re: Docket EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 Dear Dr. Rees: The American Chemistry Council (ACC) 1 welcomes the opportunity to comment on existing EPA regulations in need of repeal, replacement, or modification in response to the Federal Register notice published on April 13, 2017 (82 FR 17793) . ACC has publicly called for and supported efforts to better address the burden of regulation and implement regulatory reform. The chemical industry needs a sound regulatory landscape in order to maximize the historic competitive advantage provided by shale gas. This shale gas advantage represents a game-changer for U.S. manufacturing, and the Administration can and should leverage this competitive advantage through improved public policy. Reducing overly complex regulatory burdens is a key step for enhancing the chemical industry's ability to help drive economic growth and job creation throughout the broader economy. ACC represents a diverse set of companies engaged in the business of chemistry, which drives innovations that e nable a more sustainable future, provides 810,000 manufacturing and high -tech jobs--plus nearly six million related jobs --that 1 The American Chemistry Council (ACC) represents the leading companies engaged in the business of chemistry. ACC members apply the science of chemistry to make innovative products and services that make people's lives better, healthier and safer. ACC is committed to improved environmental, health and safety performance through Responsible Care, common sense advocacy designed to address major public policy issues, and health and environmental research and product testing. The business of chemistry is a $797 billion enterprise and a key element of the nation's economy. It is one of the nation's largest exporters, accounting for ten cents out of every dollar in U.S. exports. Chemistry companies are among the largest investors in research and development. Safety and security have always been primary concerns of ACC members, and they have intensified their efforts, working closely with government agencies to improve security and to defend against any threat to the nation's critical infrastructure. 1 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008276-00001 support families and communities, and enhances safety through a diverse set of products and investments in R&D. Existing Regulations Deserve More Scrutiny Historically, agencies, including EPA, spend relatively little time on improving existing regulations through retrospective review and devote the bulk of their resources to the development and issuance of new regulations and regulatory requirements. This i s unfortunate, because the country could achieve greater protection at less cost if it were to regulate in a smarter manner, such as foe using on minimizing regulatory burden while still protecting human health and the environment 2 For this reason, regulatory experts and economists support greater attention to retrospective review to improve existing regulations.3 Under the Trump Administration 's regulatory reform agenda, federal agencies are being asked to shift resources from developing and issuing new rules to examining and eliminating or improving existing regulations to reduce burdens. ACC supports this shift in focus. The Appropriate Societal Goal is to Reduce Opportunity Cost At the heart of the Trump Administration's regulatory reform agenda is the goal of reducing the opportunity cost of existing regulations. In his February 2, 2017 , memorandum to federal agencies, Dominic Mancini, Acting Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Accountability (OIRA), wrote, "Costs should be measured as the opportunity cost to society. OMB Circular A -4 defines this concept." According to Circular A-4, "The principle of willingness to pay captures the notion of opportunity cost by measuring what individuals are willing to forgo to enjoy a particular benefit." In his April 5 memorandum to federal agencies (M -17-21), Acting Administrator Mancini expanded upon this point: For regulations that expand consumption and/or production options -- sometimes referred to as "enabling" regulatory actions or regulations -- cost savings should include the full opportunity costs of the previously foregone activities. Opportunity cost in this context would equal the sum of consumer and producer surp lus, minus any fixed costs. ...Generally, "one-time" regulatory actions (i.e., those actions that are not periodic in nature) that expand production or consumption options would qualify as EO 13771 de-regulatory actions. This criterion --reducing opportunity cost --is not new and enjoys widespread sup port from economists and policy analysts alike. It also resonates with elected officials seeking to preserve the benefits of regulation while fostering innovation and economic growth. 2 Tengs, Tammy O., and John D. Graham. "The opportunity costs of haphazard social investments in life saving." In Risks, costs, and lives saved: Getting better results from regulation, Robert Hahn, Ed. (1996): 172. 3 Aldy, Joseph E. "Learning from experience: an assessment of the retrospective reviews of agency rules and the evidence for improving the design and implementation of regulatory policy." Administrative Conference of the United States (2014). 2 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008276-00002 To this end, ACC recommends a three-step screening process for reducing opportunity cost: (1) focus on regulatory requirements of greatest concern to manufacturers; (2) apply a screen to identify reforms where opportunity cost reductions are relatively clear or obvious; and (3) prioritize reforms that can be implemented as quickly as possible (i.e., "reform-ready" proposals) to ensure that the resulting public benefits accrue as quickly as possible. Each step in this sequential process is important, as the remainder of this section describes. 1) Focus on Regulations Affecting Manufacturers ACC recommends that the Task Force focus on regulations imposing unnecessary costs on theU .S. manufacturing sector , because the economic activity generated from manufacturing has a greater multiplier effect than that of any other major sector of the economy. According to the National Association of Manufacturers: For every $1.00 spent in manufacturing, another $1.81 is added to the economy. That is the highest multiplier effect of any economic sector. In addition, for every one worker in manufacturing, there are another four employees hired elsewhere. 4 With that said, there is new research suggesting that manufacturing's impacts on the economy are even larger than that if we take into consideration the entire manufacturing value chain plus manufacturing for ot her industries' supply chains. That approach estimates that manufacturing could account for one-third of GDP and employment. Along those lines, it also estimated the total multiplier effect for manufacturing to be $3.60 for every $1.00 of value -added output, with one manufacturing employee generating another 3.4 workers elsewhere.5 U.S. manufacturers represent a powerful engine of economic growth , so the Task Force should pay particular attention to regulations affecting U .S. manufacturers, including chemical manufacturers. Within the broad manufacturing sector, the value-add provided by the business of chemistry is particularly notable. About 96% of all manufactured goods are directly touched by the business of chemistry, which is an almost $800 billion enterprise that employs more than 800,000 people in the USA. 2) Screen Regulations of Concern Based on the Clarity of Opportunity Cost Reductions The best candidate regulations for reform are those where reductions in opportunity cost are clear and obvious. The following types of regulations fit this description: existing regulations that are outdated based on the evolution of s cience or new technology ; existing regulations that address an insignificant problem as determined by credible new science or data ; existing regulation s that are ineffective due to a credible (e.g., peer reviewed) retrospective review ; existing regulatory requirements that are particularly 4 Source: NAM calculations using IMPLAN. See the NAM website at: http://www.11am.0rg/Newsroom/Facts-About-Manufacturing/_ 5 Source: Manufacturers Alliance for Productivity and Innovation. See the MAPI website at: https://www.mapi.net/forecasts-data/how-important-us-manufacturing-today 3 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008276-00003 uncertain or ambiguous ; and existing regulations that present an unnecessary barrier to entry for a product or service . In addition, reform candidates include existing regulatory requirements where net benefits ar e not maximized per a credible (e.g., third-party, peerreviewed) cost-benefit analysis. When prioritizing among dozens, if not hundreds, of regulations of concern nominated by the public , the Task Force would be on solid economic footing if it focused on regulations where there is a clear pathway to reduction of the opportunity cost. 3) Prioritize Reforms that can be Implemented Quickly Once candidates for reform are identified, prioritization can be facilitated by identifying the time needed to achieve reform. In other words, regulators ought to prefer reforms that can be achieved quickly (e.g., within a few months) versus slowl y (e.g., over multiple years). For example, a reform that can be achieved without going through a lengthy public comment period should be preferred over a reform that requires notice -andcomment rulemaking in this particular circumstance . The sooner the reform can be implemented, the sooner the net benefits will accrue to the public. In addition, because agencies are required to eliminate two regulations for every new significant rule per EO 13771, agencies would be wise to "bank" opportunity cost savings as soon as possible i n order to "pay" for future regulatory actions. The Task Force should reach for the "lowest hanging fruit" when it comes to selecting among candidate reforms. Specific Recommendations for Reform ACC utilized this three-step process to identify specific candidates for reform. Of several dozen regulatory requirements identified b y ACC members, the following meet the previously described screening criteria and are deemed "most promising" in terms of their potential to reduce the opportunity cost relatively quickly, meaning in less than one year's time. We recommend that EPA prioritize these specific reforms. Eliminate "Once In, Always In " Policy In 1995, EPA issued a memorandum setting forth a policy to address when a "major" stationary source of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) can reduce its emissions to become an "area" source and therefore not subject to Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 112 major source requirements such as the stringent maximum achievable control technology (MACT) 6 This memo allowed a major source to becom e an area source by obtaining federally enforceable limits on its potential to emit HAPs if it did so before the initial compliance date of the applicable MACT standard. The memo only allowed this narrow window for a major source to voluntarily reduce its emissions to become an area source, meaning if a source did not reduce its emissions during this one -time opportunity, it* 4 6 Memorandum from John Seitz, Director OAQPS to [Regional Administrators], "Potential to Emit for MACT Standards - Guidance on Timing Issues." May 16, 1995. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-08/documents/pteguid.pdf 4 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008276-00004 would be required to comply with the MACT standards in perpetuity. Therefore, this policy became known as the "Once In, Always In" policy. The policy is neither required nor supported by the Clean Air Act. The memo was meant to be initial and transitional guidance until a formal policy could be established through rulemaking; however, EPA has never codified the policy and instead appli es it with binding effect as though it were a rule. The regulated community has long opposed this policy and EPA's enforcement of it as if it were a rule. EPA should withdraw this policy to allow a major source to voluntarily accept enforceable emissions limitations below the major source threshold and be reclassified as an area source with respect to MACT applicability. Withdrawing "Once In, Always In" would result in positive environmental, economic, and energy impacts. There will be a strong incentive for those sources able to reduce their HAP emissions below major source thresholds to do so in order to lessen the administrative burdens and costs of complying with myriad regulations applicable to major sources. Because the "Once In, Always In" policy was issued by Agency memorandum, it could be withdrawn without going through the public notice-and-comment process. Fix New Source Review (NSR) In 2001, President Bush's National Energy Policy Development Group issued findings and recommendations for a National Energy Policy which included a recommendation that EPA review NSR regulations, including administrative interpretation and implementation of those regulations. In 2002, EPA finalized changes to NSR that would provide greater regulatory certainty while preserving environmental protections and benefits derived from the NSR program. In spite of legal challenges to various aspects of this NSR reform, the D.C. Circuit Court largely upheld EPA's rul es. In September 2006, the Bush-EPA proposed various revisions to the NSR regulations to "remove barriers that the NSR program can impose to prevent.. .sources from operating their facilities in the most efficient manner." 7 The rulemaking was not finalized before President Bush left office, but EPA should revisit and finalize the multiple improvements that could be made to the program that were included in the rule package. Some r egulatory exp erts have offered specific recommendations to improve the program via guidance, via regulation, and via legislation.8 In addition to these short -term reform opportunities , ACC identified the following specific candidates for reform where opportunity cost savings could be achieved over a longer period of time (longer than one year). We recommend that EPA also pursue these specific reforms, because the opportunity cost savings could be significant and justify a longer implementation period. 7 See, "Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR): Debottlenecking, Aggregation, and Project Netting," 71 FR 54235, (Sept. 14, 2006). https://www.gno.gov/fdsvs/pkg/FR-2006-09-14/Ddf7E6-15248.Ddf 8 Fraas, A., John D. Graham, and Jeff Holmstead. "EPA's new source review program: time for reform? Environmental Law Review (2017). 5 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008276-00005 Review and Repeal 2015 NAAQS for Ground-level Ozone In 2015, EPA finalized a more stringent ozone NAAQS despite the fact that the ObamaEPA's out-of-cycle reconsideration of the 2008 ozone NAAQS left states scrambling to fully implement the 2008 standard. EPA did not finalize designations until May 2012 and failed to finalize SIP guidance until February 2015. Significant portions of the population live in areas that do not meet the 2008 standard primarily due to EPA's reconsideration and the subsequent implementation delays. These areas should be given appropriate time to implement the 2008 standard of 75 ppb and come into attainment before pivoting to meeting the 70 ppb standard, particularly in light of EPA's conclusion that almost the entire U.S. would meet a 70 ppb standard by 2025 by implementing on-the-books rules. Should EPA proceed with design ating areas as non -attainment with the 70 ppb standard as soon as October 2017, communities and areas designated as "nonattainment" will have a harder time attracting and retaining industry and sustaining economic activity and growth. Industry located in a n onattainment area faces increased operating costs, permitting delays, and restrictions on building or expanding facilities. These challenges increase the "time to market" for innovative new products. Air permitting is further complicated since new facilit ies and proposed expansions in nonattainment areas cannot proceed until their precursor emissions are offset at ratios greater than 1:1. Some areas will be subject to these offset programs for the first time under the 2015 standard, which will present additional burdens for the areas. Offsets are not always readily available even in areas that have been desig nated non-attainment previously, and, in some cases, offset prices can be extremely high. For example, offset prices in the Houston -Galveston- Brazoria, TX , nonattainment area are currently more than $200,000/ton for NOx and $300,000/ton for VOC. For these reasons , ACC both supports EPA expeditiously reviewing the 2015 Ozone NAAQS and congressional action to delay designations under the standard, should EPA opt to maintain it . This will allow states to capture these anticipated air quality improvements before progressing designations. During the 2015 ozone NAAQS rulemaking, and in subsequent evaluations, EPA correctly identified that there are instances where naturally occurring, or background, ozone concentrations exceed the selected level of the standard. In the final rule, EPA decided not to consider proximity to background ozone levels even though the Agency retains the discretion to do s o - and has done so in the past : in 1997, proximity to background ozone levels was one of three factors that led EPA to reject a 70 ppb standard and instead establish the standard at 0.08 ppm. Still, during the most recent evaluation, EPA did not make full use of the flexibility afforded in the statute to provide relief to areas affected by substantial backgr ound ozone concentrations. To the contrary : EPA proposed in its November 17, 2016, SIP Implementation Rule to further narrow the application of international transport provisions. In the event EPA proceeds with implementing the 70 ppb standard, it should at least provide the maximum flexibility to address background ozone and provide meaningful implementation tools to ease state and regulated community burden. 6 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008276-00006 In addition and due to the 70 ppb standard being so close to background concentrations , EPA should revisit its Exceptional Events Rule (EER) to provide for exclusion of air quality data influenced by lightning and biogenic events. EPA should not unnecessarily limit EER's applicability to only the narrow band of five regulatory actions. In particular, exceptional events data should be excludable from the calculation of background concentrations used in PSD permit air quality analysis. Finally, EPA should address international transport through EER to the broadest degree possible. A natural confluence of weather patterns that exacerbates routine international transport should be excludable as an exceptional event. EPA could also amend methodologies and data handling conventions in Appendix I to 40 C.F.R . Part 50 to address data where the principal contributor to an exceedance is attributable to background concentrations. Streamline Rules on Leak Detection and Repair EPA's Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) rules are antiquated, in need of consolidation, and too costly. An alternative to the time -intensive effort required to overhaul these rules is to improve EPA's rule on using optical gas imaging cameras (40 CFR 60.18). Current LDAR rules require Method 21 point -by-point monitoring for lea ks for every LDAR component, which includes but is not limited to valves, pumps, compressor seals, and pressure relief devices. Infrared cameras are now voluntarily used in manufacturing to detect leaks in a much more expedient and efficient manner. There seems to be no real need to overlap a periodic individual component monitoring program (Method 21) with the alternative (camera) leak monitoring, but this is what the Agency has done - resulting in no effective advantage for the camera monitoring option. An option to use the optical gas imaging camera technology should be allowed in lieu of traditional Method 21 LDAR monitoring. To further incentivize the use of the optical gas imaging camera, EPA should remove the current requirement in the alternative w ork practice (40 CFR 60.18 (g)(h) and (i ] to require an associated annual Method 21 survey of each component. The annual Method 21 survey adds additional costs and complexity and does not result in additional emission reductions. To further improve the alternative work practice for the optical gas imaging camera, EPA should revise the recordkeeping requirements to clarify that a video record is not required for each individual valve, connector, or other piece of equipment surveyed. A video record of each area or portion of the plant that covers multiple pieces of equipment should suffice, such as a short video segment to document leaking components only. In addition, the cost of connector monitoring via EPA Method 21 versus environmental benefit is extremely high in most circumstances . Thus, EPA should evaluate whether the current rules that require connector monitoring should be revised and perhaps exclude it from these existing rules, as appropriate. Reduce Oversight Charges to PRPs at CERCLA Sites The majority of potentially responsible part ies ( PRPs) agree that CERCLA oversight charges, including multipliers to address "indirect costs" not associated with a particular site, have become excessive due to guidance documents (i.e., directives) that should be 7 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008276-00007 modified to limit charges to just those applicable at the site. 9 GAO and EPA's Inspector General have also been critical of the Agency's oversight charges. There are many ways EPA could reform these practices, including amending the National Contingency Plan at 40 CFR 300 to define and put reasonable limits on EPA's oversight charges , and modifying directives10 that created this problem. Another alternative would be to modif y the 2002 Memorandum entitle d, "CERCLA Future Response Costs: Settlement, Billing and Collection," to clarify the documentation requirements for EPA to demonstrate that a response cost is not inconsistent with the NCP. The memo should also b e modified to state that it can be relied on by PRPs. Improve the Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Test EPA addresses WET in NPDES permits to control the discharge of specific substances. EPA first distributed its draft WET implementation guidance in December 2004 , in which the Agency noted that the WET guidance was designed to provide recommendations for the implementation of NPDES WET programs to state authorities. EPA has also issued guidance on the "Test of Significant Toxicity" (TST) approach, which is designed to help determine if discharges have a "reasonable potential" under WET and thus receive permit limits for WET. In May 2012, EPA issued a WET Spreadsheet, which is designed to be used to determine this "reasonable potential" and to assess permit compliance . 11 A significant concern during the development of the WET test was EPA's overlooking the presence of "false positives." Despite this, states including California have adopted it and rolled this test into their programs. EPA should reexamine the WET test to account for some of the concerns raised during its development. This issue is discussed in greater detail in the comments submitted by the Federal Water Quality Coalition, which ACC supports. 12 Add Aerosol Cans to Federal Universal Waste Regulations (40 CFR 273) Non-empty aerosol cans are not included in the federal definition of a universal waste despite their fulfillment of the relevant criteria. EPA's three goals in administering the universal waste program are to: 1) encourage resource conservation while ensuring adequate protection of human health and the environment; 2) improve implementation of the current Subtitle C hazardous waste regulatory program; and 3) provide incentives that result in les s of these wastes dispos ed in municipal landfills or incinerators. When EPA first promulgated the universal waste regulatory program in 1995, it listed selection criteria for wastes to be considered universal.13 These include a waste generated in a wide variety of nonindustrial settings, generated by a vast community, and ones that may be present in significant volumes in nonhazardous waste management systems. Non-empty 9 In 2015, EPA billed private parties more than $100 million in oversight charges. See EPA, "Superfund Remedial Annual Accomplishments." 10 For example, OSWER Directive No. 9832.13, "Transmittal of the Superfund Cost Recovery Strategy," July 16, 1988, requires a PRP to pay for "costs incurred by EPA in obtaining assistance from third parties., .and may also involve the recovery of past costs incurred by the Agency" (page 32). 11 http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/docs.cfm?view=allprog&program id=45&sort=date published. 12 ACC also supports the FWQC's comments on EPA's TMDL policies. 13 60 FR 25493 (May 11, 1995). 8 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008276-00008 aerosol cans, as well as paint and paint -related wastes and waste antifreeze, satisfy all of these criteria. States like Califom ia and Colorado have been safely and responsibly managing aerosol waste cans as a universal waste for several years. Ohio also proposed addition of all three (non -empty aerosol cans, paint and paint related wastes, hazardous antifreeze) in late 2016. EPA should amend the federal universal waste rules codified at 40 CFR 273 to designate non-empty aerosol spray cans , including paint and paint -related wastes, and waste antifreeze, as a new category of universal waste. This would provide generators increased flexibility by not counting them against the generators' monthly total of hazardous waste (thereby affecting its generator status) as well as reduce notification and recordkeeping requirements. This chang e would come without any interruption in the safe and responsible management of waste aerosol cans. Enhance Coordination of the e-Manifest System (40 CFR 260, 262-265, 271) EPA is current ly working with states, industr y, and related stakeholders to develop a national electronic manifest system that will facilitate the electronic transmission of the uniform manifest form. It is intended to make the use of the manifest more effective and convenient for its users. Some states already administer an e-Manifest program similar to the one EPA is de veloping for the national level , and U.S . DOT separately regulates shipments of hazardous waste under 40 CFR 171 -180. Under these requirements, facilities are required to sign and verify a hard copy hazmat shipping p aper. EPA has stated on its website that , independent of its own national e -Manifest system, "A paper copy will still be required to meet U.S. DOT purposes."14 EPA should ensure that its new national e -Manifest system aligns with existing state level e-manifest programs, including the reporting timelines. To the extent possible, EPA and U.S. DOT should coordinate to ensure that manifest requirements between the t wo agencies are not duplicative, and U.S. DOT should consider accepting electronic versions of its shipping paper. Improve "Mixture " and "DerivedFrom " Rules (40 CFR 261.3(a) and 261.3(c)(2)(i)) EPA's "mixture" rule generally provides that a mixture of solid waste and one or more hazardous wastes listed in subpart D of Part 261 is a hazardous waste unless it has been excluded from 261.3(a)(2) under 260.20 and 260.22, or 261.3(g) or (h). Separately, under the "derived -from" rule, any solid waste generated from the treatment, storage, or disposal of a hazardous waste, including any sludge, spill residue, ash emission control dust, or leachate (but not including precipitation run -off) is a hazardous waste, except as otherwise provided in 261.3(c)(2)(ii), (g) or (h). Thus, sludges from waste treatment or leachate from a hazardous waste disposal facility i s often classified as hazardous simply because it was generated from a hazardous waste. The mixture and derived -from rules operate regardless of whether the mixing or treatment eliminates the properties (in that particular batch) that originally caused EPA to list the waste. This has resulted in potential over-classification of mixtures or treated materials as* 9 14 https://www.epa.gov/hwgenerators/hazardous-waste-electronic-manifest-svstem-e-manifest#ffequent. 9 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008276-00009 hazardous wastes, introducing a number of potentially unnecessary regulatory requirements for their management that may not be necessary given that s ome of these wastes may lack the appropriate hazardous nature. EPA should modify or amend both these existing mles to require that the hazard determination be made based on the actual composition of the waste at the time of disposal following its treatm ent or mixture. EPA itself has acknowledged "inequities" in both of these rules. This change would greatly improve the appropriate classification and management of wastes that are actually hazardous. Finalize Denial ofPEER Petition to Revise RCRA Corrosivity Characteristic In April 2016, EPA tentatively denied a petition from the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) that requested EPA revise the alkaline hazardous waste thresholds under RCRA used to designate a waste as "corrosive." The Agency's denial was appropriately supported in part by information compiled in comments by a coalition of industry trade associations in September 2015 . ACC participated in this coalition to highlight the significant concerns associated with an unnecessary revision of the corrosivity characteristic, including the universe of wastes that would be inappropriately classified as corrosive under the revised pH level. EPA granted PEER'S request for a 210 -day extension to the comment period on its tentative denial. ACC, through its industry coalition, submitted supplemental comments during this extended period that supported EPA's decision and confirmed that its denial was an appropriate choice. As EPA stated in its decision, it would be inappropriate to revise the corrosivity characteristic as requested by the PEER petition. Despite this fact, PEER has significantly delayed the denial process for m ore than a year. ACC recommends that EPA resolve this matter by finalizing its denial of the PEER petition. Modify Regulation of Wastewater Emissions Under the Clean Air Act 40 CFR 63 Subpart G and JJJ contain MACT standards for HAPs for the production of synthetic organic chemical s and Group IV Polymers and Resins. Within these subparts, HAP emissions from wastewater streams generated by the production processes are defined as either Group 1 or Group 2 with HAP concentration thresholds. Group 1 streams (those with over 1,000 ppm organic HAP) must be managed by either recovery systems, incineration, or in closed/covered wastewater treatment systems. These two regulations were among the first in the MACT program written by EPA. Later, a better, more cost -effective approach was developed for first, the pharmaceutical industry (Subpart GGG) and, then, for the miscellaneous chemical manufacturing industry (Subpart FFFF) based on learnings from the earlier rules. This was to establish a separate category for "sol uble HAPs" with a higher Group 1 threshold of 30,000 parts per million. Methanol, an organic compound used in chemical manufacturing, is infinitely soluble in water and also highly biodegradable. Subpart G and JJJ cause chemical manufacturers to spend inordinate amounts of capital and operating expense to avoid managing wastewater 10 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008276-00010 streams with over 1,000 ppm methanol in open -type wastewater treatment systems. This additional cost results in negligible impacts to the environment. This overly -protective and seemingly arbitrary/unfounded regulation also impedes the manufacture of other potential products. For these reasons, ACC supports de-listing methanol as a HAP. Modify the RCRA Tank System Daily Inspection Requirement Daily tank system visual inspections are required on all pipes, valves, pumps, tanks, secondary containment, and any other equipment that contacts hazardous waste and is part of the tank system. The costs associated with conducting these inspections on a daily basis is overly burdensome, and the requirement for these inspections to occur daily is unnecessary. For example, data from one ACC member facility indicates that the annual cost associated with daily inspections for one facility's 14 tanks is $118,625. On the other hand, the annual cost for these same tank inspections on a weekly basis would be $16,900--a significant difference of $101,725 at just one facility. Another ACC member facility spends seven hours every day inspecting its four RCRA tank systems. This results in an annual cost for daily inspections of about $153,300 . If these inspections were conducted on a weekly basis, the annual cost would be $21,840, a difference of $131,460. If EPA reduced the freque ncy of these required inspections, the cost savings modeled by these two facilities would be mirrored throughout industry, leading to a substantial burden reduction for a relatively simple change. EPA should modify this overly burdensome daily inspection requirement for RCRA tank systems (40 CFR 265.195). ACC recommends that EPA change the required inspections to occur on a weekly basis instead of daily. If these weekly inspections revealed an issue of concern, EPA could then require daily inspections for a specified period of time following the company's remedy of the issue. The reduced frequency and additional flexibility in the frequency of these inspections would have a significant and immediately tangible reduction on the burden on industry. Specific Recommendations on TSCA On June 22, 2016, the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) was amended by the Frank R. Lautenberg Act for Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (" LCSA"). LCSA was passed with overwhelming bipartisan support, the result of years of negotiation and with input from industry, environment, public health, animal rights, and labor groups . LCSA protects Americans' health and our environment, supports economic growth and manufacturing in the U.S., and promotes America's role as the world's leading innovator. The LCSA overhaul of TSCA is substantial. EPA began implementation expeditiously, with many new provisions taking immediate effect on enactment. Enactment also started the clock on the prom ulgation of a series of important "framework" regulations essential to LCSA implementation. The three "framework" regulations for Inventory "reset," prioritization of chemicals for risk evaluation, and for the performance of risk evaluations, are nearing completion and scheduled to be promulgated in June 2017. After these rules are published, EPA has only an additional year (until June of 2018, again by statutory mandate) to develop any supporting policies, procedures, and guidance needed for LCSA implementation, including implementation of the framework regulations. 11 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008276-00011 ACC i s strongly committed to the effective implementation of LCSA . This support includes completion and promulgation of the regulations required by statute. Effective implementation of LCSA should remain an Agency priority. In that vein, ACC has offered numerous comments and suggestions to EPA in the regulatory dockets for the proposed framework and other LCSA implementing regulations. Our comments here are intended to supplement, and not detract, from those ongoing efforts. New Chemicals Program Statutory changes to the way EPA reviews new chemicals before manufacture and market entry took effect on June 22, 201 6. An important change was that EPA must now make an affirmative safety deter mination before manufacture can start. The statute, however, did not change the safety standard itself, which continues to require measures to protect against unreasonable risks if needed. Likewise, the statute did not change the timeline expected for most pre-market reviews to be completed by the Agency within 90 days. Nevertheless, immediately upon enactment, a backlog swelled of Pre-Manufacture Notice (PMNs) review, the majority of which are not completed within the 90 -day prescribed time frame period . Each of these represents a new chemical product that cannot be manufactured while the chemical company that developed it, and its supply chain, waits on EPA to complete the review. Chemistry touches 9 6% of all domestic products, so a delay at the top of the supply chain has adverse ripple effects throu ghout the economy. Inability to begin production of new chemicals directly impacts jobs and job creation, both with respect to the manufacture of the chemistry and the inability to develop improved and more competitive consumer products and services that r ely on the new chemistries. ACC has separately urged EPA to resolve this backlog as qui ckly as possible. Some recent Agency efforts appear to have nibbled at the backlog, but more needs to be done, and quickly, to restore the expeditious review of PMNs. As part of this effort, it would be helpful for EPA to commit to providing engineering reports and other documentation supporting PMN review to submitters and articulating a defined process for early and frequent consultation with respect to the adequacy of the PMN and supporting documentation, to reduce the overall process burden and review delays. It would also be helpful for EPA to post its new guidance and instructions on making PMN submissions in easy-to-find locations to a public website for transpa rency purposes (for example, guidance in the form of power point presentations offered at recent stakeholder meetings). Existing PMN guidance should be updated promptly to align with new LCSA interpretations and requirements. Framework Rules LCSA offers an integrated and systematic process to conduct risk evaluat ions of chemicals in commerce. The process is based on a careful and r ational design that allows the Agency to target and focus on highest priorities for review first, which preserves Agency resources, assures pace and throughput of reviews, and delivers the greatest benefits and val ue for public health purposes. The first framework rule requires EPA to sort the chemicals on the TSCA Inventory based on whether they are currently used in 12 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008276-00012 commerce. EPA can use this information as an input for risk -based, tiered screening for selection of chemicals for prior itization for risk evaluation. Recently reviewed new chemicals entering commerce, as well as chemicals no longer active in commerce, can be assigned lower priority for risk evaluation by the Agency. Because the Inventory Reset rule and Prioritization rule would be under development for a year after LCSA enactment, to begin the first risk evaluations under the new statute promptly, Congress "kick started" the risk evaluation process by directing EPA to select the first 10 chemicals for risk evaluation from its Work Plan chemic als list. This has been done. The amended statute, however, contains throughput and pace requirements for risk evaluations, and to meet statutory requirements, additional chemicals wi 11 need to be selected for high -priority designation to move them into the risk evaluation process. These selections must be made in accordance with the prioritization process to be set out by regulation in June. Completing the prioritization and risk evaluation rules in the manner directed by Congress is thus essential to achieving efficient and effective implementation of LCSA, and should continue to be a top priority for EPA. Chemical Data Reporting By regulation under Section 8 of TSCA , EPA requires chemical manufacturers and importers to report periodically with respect to chemicals on the TSCA Inventory. The last such submission cycle , ending in 2016 , was a major undertaking that placed a substantial burden on manufacturers to make an electronic submission of a wide variety of information about manufacture and import of chemicals. While this Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule originally focused on production and use of chemicals in commerce in large quantities, more recent reporting cycles have r equested information in smaller and smaller quantities. We urge EPA seek opportunities to reduce the reporting burden on industry in the next chemical data reporting cycle , scheduled to occur in 2020 . It would be helpful for EPA to justify the needs for data to ensure that data collection appropriately supports prioritization screening under LCSA with appropriate focus, and does not impose an unnecessary collection burden on industry. Nomenclature Procedures to assign new chemicals "names" are complex, and there are multiple naming conventions recognized and reflected for ch emicals on the TSCA Inventory. A consequence of this is that over the years, many chemically identical substances appe ar on the Inventory multiple times with multiple names. Section 8(b)(3) of LCSA includes a new nomenclature provision that allows the Agency to recognize chemically identical substances appearing on the Inventory multiple times as a single chemical substance. The Inventory Reset rule has not yet been promulgated, so it is unclear whether and how EPA plans to operationalize this provision as part of the Inventory Reset. However, effective implementation of this provision could yield meaningful and su bstantial regulatory burden reductions for industry, since companies may be able to streamline and aggregate numerous operations for chemically identical substances - everything from storage to transportation to training. A nomenclature equivalency exercise should be 13 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008276-00013 conducted as a counterpart to the Inventory Reset process. At the same time, where current nomenclature assigns the same CAS name to substances that pose different hazards, EPA has the opportunity to address these assignments in a manner that will help support LCSA implementation, which itself depends on inputs of high quality and accurate information. As a counterpart to the Inventory Reset process, EPA should evaluate opportunities to improve current nomenclature to ensure that hazard information and classifications are accurate for each substance. Conclusion Thank you for the opportunity to submit recommendations for reform. ACC recognizes that the Task Force will have to choose among hundreds of potential reforms. A screening and prioritization process based on reducing opportunity cost is appropriate and consistent with the Trump Administration's regulatory agenda. ACC utilized such a process and identified several specific reforms for the Task Force to consider. In some cases, the Agency can implement the reform relatively quickly. In other cases, implementation will take lo nger. In every case, reform can reduce the opportunity cost, which will benefit the public without sacrificing regulatory objectives. With respect to implementation of the recently enacted TSCA reform law, ACC recommends that the Agency adhere to the implementation schedule as required under the statute, with the aim of providing sufficient transparency and certainty for the regulated community and to avoid creating any disincentives for market innovation. Sincerely, Anna Burhop 14 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008276-00014 / \ American* C V-" Chemistry Council U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Mail Code 7401-M EPA East Building Washington, DC 20460 Submitted via www.regulations.gov May 15,2017 Re: Docket ID # EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190; S takeholder Input on Regulations Appropriate for Repeal, Replacement or Modification; the Formaldehyde Emission Standards for Composite Wood Products Dear Sir or Madam: The American Chemistry Council's1 Formaldehyde Panel (Panel) appreciates this opportunity to provide comments to the EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) regarding regulatory reform opportunities involving regulations governing chemical safety activities under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and identification of those regulations that might be appropriate for repeal, replacement or modification per Executive Order 13777 on Enforcing the Re gulatory Agenda. In follow-up to the oral comments presented by the Panel during the May 1, 2017 public meeting, the Panel has identified aspects of the Formaldehyde Emission Standards for Composite Wood Products 2 that should be modified to alleviate unnecessary regulatory burdens. The Panel has long supported the establishment of national emission standard s which are performancebased and set emissions levels that are equivalent to the levels established under the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Airborne Toxic Control Measure (ATCM). Although EPA states the final rule is "consistent, to the extent EPA deemed appropriate and practical considering TSCA Title VI, with the requirements currently in effect in California under the California Air Resources Board's (CARB) Air Toxics Control Measure to Reduce Formaldehyde Emissions from Composite Wood Products (ATCM) (Ref. I),"3 it instead goes well beyond Congressional intent and is inconsistent with the CARB standard. The rule as cur rently written represents a departure from the performance -based standard intended by Congress and as implemented under the CARB ATCM. Notably, the differences in the EPA's final rule and the CARB standard will create compliance confusion, stifle innovation and increase manufacturing 1 The American Chemistry Council (ACC) represents the leading companies engaged in the business of chemistry. ACC members apply the science of chemistry to make innovative products and services that make people's lives better, healthier and safer. ACC is committed to improved environmental, health and safety performance through Responsible Care, common sense advocacy designed to address major public policy issues, and health and environmental research and product testing. 2 81 Fed. Reg. 89674 (Dec. 12, 2016). 3 Id. at 89675. americanchemistry.com 700 Second St., NE | Washington, DC 20002 | (202) 249.7000 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008277-00001 Docket ID # EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 May 15,2017 Page 2 costs. The Panel submitted significant detailed comments in October 20134 and May 2014,5 when the EPA's rule was in development , but the issues raised in our previous comments have not been adequately or sufficiently addressed. Below we highlight two specific issues in the final rule that should be modified to ensure that it does not unduly disadvantage technologies that clearly meet the emissions standards. 1. The EPA's Final Rule Should Adopt CARB's Approach For The Treatment of Laminated Products While the emissions levels set in the EPA's final rule are equivalent to the CARB ATCM for formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products , the treatment of laminate d products bonded to urea formaldehyde resins is a departure from the technology neutral CARB ATCM standard. EPA's current approach creates a situation where laminated products made by attaching a wood or woody grass veneer to a compliant core or platform with either a phenol formaldehyde resin or a resin formulated with no added formaldehyde as part of the resin cros s linking structure are treated differently than other laminated products. Recommended Amendment to Final Rule - Section III.A.3 of the final rule should be modified to explicitly exempt all laminated products from the definition of hardwood plywood. Any future EPA action associated with laminate d products should be evaluated through a separate formal notice and comment period. 2. The EPA's Final Rule Should Not Endorse a Move Away From Urea-Formaldehyde-Based Resin Technologies EPA's final rule encourages a move away from urea -formaldehyde-based resins, despite the fact that this chemistry has been proven to meet established CARB emissions standards. The approach in EPA's final rule to regulating laminated products would favor the use of no added formaldehyde resins over formaldehyde -based resins. The experience under CARB and the scientific underpinnings of testing and certification processes demonstrate that a performance based approach that does not discriminate against technologies meeting the standards can ensure compliance with the statutorily mandated emissions limits while meeting diverse market needs and minimizing economic impact. There is no basis to support an approach to regulate laminated products that would promote the use of no added formaldehyde resins over formaldehyde -based resin technologies, including ultra-low emitting formaldehyde resins. Notably, manufacturers of composite wood products continue to rely on urea -formaldehyde-based resin technologies in products that comply with or perform better than the CARB Phase 2 emissions standards, which is a testimony to the effectiveness and capability of urea-formaldehyde-based resins. By taking a performance -based approach tied to emissions limits, the CARB program encouraged advancement in all technologies and provided the widest array of options for panel 4 Docket ID # EPA-HQ-OPPT-2012-0018-0581. 5 Docket ID # EPA-HQ-OPPT-2012-0018-0610. 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008277-00002 Docket ID # EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 May 15,2017 Page 3 manufacturers and the downstream chain of commerce. CARB's performance-based regulation for laminated products is consistent with the ASTM test methodology for assessing performance under temperature and humidity conditions. Notably, the s tatute prescribes the use of temperature and humidity levels set by ASTM E -1333 test method and i f a laminated product meets the emission test under those conditions, it would be in compliance, regardless of whether it contained ultra-low emitting formaldehyde or no-added formaldehyde resins. Manufacturers of laminated products should have the flexibi lity to comply with EPA's rule using any chemistry meeting set emission standards. Recommended Amendment to Final Rule - This final rule should clearly include an exemption for laminated products made with compliant platforms. Recommended Amendment to Final Rule - This final rule should refrain from prescribing resin chemistries or formulations that can qualify as ultra-low emitting formaldehyde technology. As summarized above, to improve the final rule, EPA should exempt the inclusion of laminated products from the final rule and address this issue in a separate formal notice and comment period. EPA should also modify the rule to clarify that any technology that effectively meets the established emissions standards complies with the final rule and that EPA does not encourage a move away from those technologies which meet the standards. We appreciate the opportunity to provide input as the Agency identifies ways to improve its rulemaking process. Feel free to contact me by phone ( 202-249-6707) or email ( kimberly white@americaiichemistry.com) with any questions related to these comments. Sincerely, Kimberly Wise White, PhD American Chemistry Council (ACC) Senior Director, Chemical Products & Technology Division On Behalf of the ACC Formaldehyde Panel 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008277-00003 American1 --' Chemistry Council May 15, 2017 Submitted via Samantha K. Dravis Regulatory Reform Officer and Associate Administrator Office of Policy Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Mail Code 1804A 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20460 Re: Evaluation of Existing Regulations, 82 Fed. Reg. 17793 (April 13, 2017); Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 Dear Ms. Dravis: The American Chemistry Council's Hexavalent Chromium Panel (Panel)1 appreciates the opportunity to submit these comments in response to the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) request for public input to inform its Regulatory Reform Task Force (Task Force) evaluating existing regulations. The Panel requests the Task Force support the development and completion of a risk assessment for hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)). The completion of this risk assessment will alleviate unnecessary regulatory burdens. EPA has suffered much public criticism for its lack of progress on evaluating and taking appropriate action on substances found in drinking water. The Panel understands and supports the need for EPA's deliberate assessment and review of the science prior to making a decision whether to establish a drinking water standard or health advisory, or to defer a chemical to state regulatory action. EPA should complete the process of determining whether Cr(VI) meets the criteria for EPA regulatory action under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). 1 ACC represents the leading companies engaged in the business of chemistry. ACC members apply the science of chemistry to make innovative products and services that make people's lives better, healthier and safer. ACC is committed to improved environmental, health and safety performance through Responsible Care, common sense advocacy designed to address major public policy issues, and health and environmental research and product testing. The business of chemistry is a $797 billion enterprise and a key element of the nation's economy. It is the nation's largest exporter, accounting for fourteen percent of all U.S. exports. 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008278-00001 Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 May 15, 2017 Page 2 The SDWA is clear in its requirements that EPA regulate only those substances that meet the Act's criteria: The contaminant may have an adverse effect on the health of persons. The contaminant is known to occur or there is a substantial likelihood that the contaminant will occur in public water systems with a frequency and at levels of public health concern. In the sole judgment of the Administrator, regulation of the contaminant presents a meaningful opportunity for health risk reductions for persons served by public water systems.2 This process has three steps: 1) the development of a risk assessment to evaluate whether the substance may have an adverse effect on human health; 2) an analysis of the occurrence of the substance in public water systems; and 3) a determination whether the presence in water systems occurs at levels posing a human health concern. EPA has started the process for Cr(VI) and should complete it. We offer our perspective on these three steps: 1. Can Cr(VI) have an adverse effect on human health? In 1981, EPA set an enforceable drinking water standard, the maximum contaminant level (MCL), for total chromium at 100 parts per billion (ppb) to be health protective for all forms of chromium, including Cr(VI). The total chromium standard assumes that 100 percent of the chromium in drinking water is Cr(VI).3 In 2008, a governmental 2-year rodent study conducted by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) reported that small intestine cancers were observed late in the study in a few of the mice, but not in rats, at the higher doses (doses greater than 30,000 ppb) used in this study.4 This finding is important because it was the first observation of this type of effect. This finding triggered a series of other studies to investigate how these tumors were formed (mode of action (MOA) studies). Importantly, these studies investigated whether the effects in laboratory mice are relevant for humans at the far lower levels present in groundwater as reported by EPA. 2 42 U.S.C. 300g-l(b)(l)(A). 3 See https://www.epa.gov/dwstandardsregulations/chromium-drinking-water. 4 NTP. 2008a. Final technical report on the toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of sodium dichromate dihydrate in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice, available at http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/files/546 web FINAL.pdf; NTP. 2008b. NTP Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Sodium Dichromate Dihydrate (CAS No. 7789-12-0) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Drinking Water Studies). Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser. 546:1-192, available at https://www.ncbi.nlrn.nih.gov/pubmed/18716633. 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008278-00002 Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 May 15, 2017 Page 3 Using only NTP data, EPA issued a draft Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) assessment of Cr(VI) in 2010, which was reviewed by an independent expert peer review panel in May 2011. The peer review panel urged EPA to consider the results of significant new MOA research on Cr(VI) before finalizing the assessment.5 In 2012, EPA rescheduled the time frame for completion of its assessment to allow for consideration of the MOA research. The MOA research has been completed. The research investigated the biochemistry, in vivo genotoxicity, histopathology, toxicogenomics, and in vitro genotoxicity of Cr(VI). In addition, toxicokinetics data measured the rates and capacity of Cr(VI) reduction to trivalent chromium in human and rodent stomach contents. The MOA data were used to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model, which allows policy analysts to extrapolate high dose rodent data to low doses and to translate rodent data to humans, including sensitive individuals. A list of the peer-reviewed publications resulting from the MOA research is attached (Attachment A). EPA should complete an assessment for Cr(VI) using all of the NTP and MOA data to answer the question of whether Cr(VI) can have an adverse effect on human health. 2. Does Cr(VI) occur in US groundwater used for drinking water? EPA's Office of Drinking Water has completed its occurrence study for Cr(VI) as part of the third Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR-3).6 The UCMR-3 monitoring data indicate low levels of Cr(VI) occur throughout the United States in groundwater sources used for drinking water. EPA collected over 62,000 samples from 4,500 large water systems (greater than 10,000 households) and 800 smaller systems (less than 10,000 households). EPA data indicate that the levels of Cr(VI) in 95% of the systems sampled reported levels less than 3.4 ppb. These levels are well below the MCL of 100 ppb for total chromium. Natural Cr(VI) is found in groundwater, typically at low levels (generally 1 to 5 ppb), and in certain geologic formations containing chromium minerals, such as serpentine rocks. Scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey have reported that Cr(VI) found in groundwater and some drinking water sources in the Mojave Desert is naturally occurring from chromiumcontaining minerals from geologic formations, including serpentine rock in those 5 See https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris drafts/recordisplay.cfm?deid=221433. 6 See https://www.epa.gov/dwucmr/third-unregulated-contaminant-monitoring-rule. 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008278-00003 Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 May 15, 2017 Page 4 formations. Much of the rest of California has naturally-occurring levels of chromium in rocks, soil and stream sediments.7,8 Duke University researchers monitored groundwater in North Carolina and reported, "the groundwater chemistry and strontium isotope variations are consistent with water-rock interactions as the major source for Cr(VI) in groundwater. Our results indicate that Cr(VI) is most likely naturally occurring and ubiquitous in groundwaterfrom the Piedmont region in the eastern United States..."79 8 3. Does the presence in water systems occur at levels posing a human health concern? EPA concludes in its recent six-year review of existing drinking water standards that the national primary drinking water regulation (NPDWR) for Cr(VI) is "not appropriate for revision at this time" because "health effects assessment in process (as of December 2015) or contaminant nominated for health assessment,"10 further noting "Chromium VI is being assessed by the EPA IRIS Program."11 According to IRIS Program website, Cr(VI) is in step 1 of the process, which is draft development.12 Thus, until EPA completes its health risk assessment, this question remains unanswered for EPA. While the Panel agrees that the NPDWR should not be revised until the health effects assessment is completed, we urge EPA to accelerate completion of its risk assessment for Cr(VI). If EPA chooses to not complete its own risk assessment, it can be informed by assessments completed by other regulatory agencies. Health Canada and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) have each reviewed the NTP and MOA data and published their analyses. 7 Izbicki JA, Ball JW, Bullen TD, and Sutley SJ. 2008. Chromium, chromium isotopes and selected trace elements, western Mojave Desert, USA. Appl Geochem, 23(5): 1325-1352, available at http://ca.water.usgs.gov/news/2008/Chromium-report.pdf. 8 Bailey A, Kubran WJ, Merlone M, Michelotti E, Mosiak C, and Pedroja D.2013. A Water Supply Optimization Strategy-Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District No. 1, available at http://www.bren.ucsb.edu/research/2013Group Projects/documents/SYWater Report Final.pdf 9 Vengosh A, Coyte R, Karr J, Harkness JS, Kondash AJ, Ruhl LS, Merola RB, and Dywer GS. 2016. Origin of Hexavalent Chromium in Drinking Water Wells from the Piedmont Aquifers of North Carolina Environ Sci Tech Let, 3: 409-414, available at http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00342. 10 Table VI-1, National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Announcement of the Results of EPA's Review of Existing Drinking Water Standards and Request for Public Comment and/or Information on Related Issues, 82 Fed. Reg. 3518, 3525 (Jan. 11, 2017). 11 Table VI-2, 82 Fed. Reg. at 3527. 12 https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris2/chemicalLanding.cfm7substance.nmbr=144 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008278-00004 Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 May 15, 2017 Page 5 TCEQ completed a risk assessment of Cr(VI), considering the NTP and MOA data as well as the PBPK model. TCEQ set a reference dose that corresponds to 100 ppb for oral exposure to Cr(VI). TCEQ considers this value to protect against potential long-term and short-term adverse health effects (i.e., to be protective of both non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic effects).13 Completion of an EPA determination is vitally important for the US public. While EPA's total chromium MCL of 100 ppb covers all forms of chromium, including Cr(VI), this MCL was based upon a dermatitis endpoint. With the NTP study findings of small intestine cancer at high doses and no EPA determination related to this effect, states have little scientific basis upon which to make their regulatory decisions. Media stories, using the aspirational California Public Health Goal (PHG) as their basis,14 imply that the low levels of Cr(VI) reported in the UCMR-3 data are a public health risk, raising unwarranted public concern about the safety of drinking water.15 This concern has resulted in increasing state legislative action to set enforceable standards for Cr(VI) in drinking water, often without full consideration of the scientific data.16 Moreover, these media stories have generated fear among the public about drinking tap water with very low ppb levels of Cr(VI) and undermined public confidence in their tap water. California provides an example of why EPA should complete its health risk assessment. In 2011, the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) set a PHG 13 TCEQ. 2016. Development Support Document, Final, September 23, 2016, Hexavalent Chromium Oral Preference Dose, CAS Registry Number: 18540-29-9, available at https://www.tceq.texas.gov/assets/public/implementation/tox/dsd/final/chromium.ord.pctf See also Haney J. 2015a. Use of dose-dependent absorption into target tissues to more accurately predict cancer risk at low oral doses of hexavalent chromium. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 71: 93-100, available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230014002608; Haney J. 2015b. Implications of dosedependent target tissue absorption for linear and nonlinear/threshold approaches in development of a cancer based oral toxicity factor for hexavalent chromium. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 72:194-201, available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230015000926; Haney J. 2015c. Consideration of non linear, non-threshold and threshold approaches for assessing the carcinogenicity of oral exposure to hexavalent chromium. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 73: 834-852, available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230015300957. 14 California defines a Public Health Goal as "the level of a chemical contaminant in drinking water that does not pose a significant risk to health. PHGs are not regulatory standards." See https://oehha.ca.gov/water/publichealth-goals-phgs. 15 See, e.g., "New report finds 'Erin Brockovich1 chemical in US drinking water," available at http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/20/health/chromium-6-in-drinking-water/; "What is chromium-6 and how did it infiltrate America's drinking water?," available at http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/chromium-6-washmany-drinking-supplies/. 16 See, e.g., New York State Senate Bill S4381, available at http://legislation.nysenate.gov/pdf/bills/2017/S4381. 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008278-00005 Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 May 15, 2017 Page 6 of 0.02 ppb for Cr(VI).17 The PHG was based largely on data from the 2008 NTP study, and did not consider the MOA research or PBPK model. This contrasts with the TCEQ assessment that did consider all of the data (NTP, MOA, and PBPK) in its analysis to set a reference dose that corresponds to the EPA 100 ppb total chromium drinking water standard. Using the 0.02 ppb PHG, the California Department of Public Health (DPH)18 finalized an MCL for Cr(VI) of 10 ppb in 201419 with a compliance date of 2020. In its supporting materials, DPH reported that the aggregate cost of complying with the 10 ppb MCL would be $870 million, based on 130 water systems that could not easily meet the 10 ppb standard.20 California reported that water bills for consumers in water systems that required treatment to meet the 10 ppb standard could increase by $5,600 per year or $469.17 per month.21 DPH reported that "for the smaller water systems, no more than 0.3 [theoretical excess cancer] cases might be avoided for any of the seven evaluated MCLs."22 On May 5, 2017, the 10 ppb MCL was voided by the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento. The Court ruled that the California DPH failed to conduct an economic feasibility analysis as required by law. The Court remanded the case to the DPH with orders to withdraw the current MCL and establish a new MCL that considers economic feasibility and pays particular attention to small water systems. By completing the health risk assessment step required under the SDWA, EPA can provide clarity to the states when addressing levels of this natural substance in drinking water. Given the broad occurrence of Cr(VI) across the US, largely from geologic formations and minerals, the Panel urges EPA to make the development of a risk assessment for Cr(VI) a high priority. Moreover, this assessment should be based on the full scientific database, including 17 See https://oehha.ca.gov/water/public-health-goal-fact-sheet/final-technical-support-document-public-healthgoal-hexavalent. 18 While the MCL was established by the California DPH, a restructuring has moved future drinking water actionsto the State Water Control Board. 19 See http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking.water/certlic/drinkingwater/ChromiumS.shtmL 20 On January 9, 2017, Mark Bartson, head of the Technical Operations Section of the State Baard's Division of Drinking Water, stated that there were a total of 7,588 public water systems in California. Of these, 4,430 were either community water systems or non-community, non-transient water systems that must comply with MCLs. Approximately 197 of these water systems operated one or more water sources that contained Q-(VI) at levels exceeding the 10 ppb MCL. Mr. Bartson stated that the Division of Drinking Water is "not tracking" 67 of these systems because they had an "easy out," a simple and straightforward way of achieving compliance, such as taking a well out of service. Mr. Bartson stated that the Division of Drinking Water was then "tracking" approximately 130 water systems with respect to compliance with the new MCL. 21 Initial statement of reasons, Table 8; available at https://archive.cdph.ca.gov/services/DPOPP/regs/Documents/DPH-ll-OQ5HCMCLISOR.pdf 22 Id. at 25. 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008278-00006 Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 May 15, 2017 Page 7 the recent MOA research on Cr(VI) and the PBPK model.23 We urge that EPA set an aggressive completion schedule, including public comment and scientific peer review. Given the availability of new research and the disparate approaches to assessing the potential public health risk of Cr(VI) taken by California and Texas, state regulatory agencies and the public would greatly benefit from a federal risk assessment of Cr(VI) in drinking water. We appreciate EPA's consideration of these comments. If you have any questions about these comments, please contact Ann M. Mason at ann mason@americanchemistry.com or 202.249.6704 or Laura Brust at laura brust@americanchemistry.com or 202.249.6139. Sincerely, / / ^ -7 ^ Ann M. Mason Senior Director, American Chemistry Council Attachment A: List of Peer-Reviewed MOA Research Publications 23 This research has resulted in more than 20 peer-reviewed publications. A complete list of publications is included as Attachment A. The research data, publications, and other details of this research are available at http://cr6study.info/. 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008278-00007 Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 May 15, 2017 Page 8 Attachment A List of Peer-Reviewed MOA Research Publications Overview The Cr(VI) Mode of Action (MOA) Research Study was designed to understand how hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] in drinking water is associated with carcinogenesis in rats and mice. The project involved investigators from multiple institutions and conducted two 90-day drinking water studies, using one in the same mouse (B6C3F1) and rat (Fisher 344) strains used in the NTP study. The in-life portions of the study (i.e. the exposure, macro- and microscopic examinations, and some biochemical analyses) were conducted at the same research facility that conducted the NTP study to further minimize inter study variability. Histological lesions, biochemical analyses, toxicogenomic analyses, pharmacokinetic analyses, and mutational analyses were examined in the target tissues of interest, i.e. the small intestine and oral mucosa, of the mice and rats. In addition, in vitro cell culture studies were conducted to further inform the Cr(VI) MOA. The Cr(VI) MOA Research Study used the same concentrations of Cr(VI) in drinking water as the NTP study and also included lower Cr(VI) concentrations, which are more indicative of possible environmental exposures, such as U.S. drinking water. See http://cr6study.info/ for more information on the MOA research. Publications Cullen JM, Ward JM, Thompson CM. 2016. Reevaluation and classification of duodenal lesions in B6C3F1 mice and F344 rats from 4 studies of hexavalent chromium in drinking water. Toxicol Path. 44(2): 279 289. De Flora S, Camoirano A, Micale RT, La Maestra S, Savarino V, Zentilin P, Marabotto E, Suh M, Proctor DM. 2016. Reduction of hexavalent chromium by fasted and fed human gastric fluid. I. Chemical reduction and mitigation of mutagenicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 306: 113-119. Kirman CR, Suh M, Proctor DM, Hays SM. 2017. Improved physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for oral exposures to chromium in mice, rats, and humans to address temporal variation and sensitive populations. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 325: 9-17. Kirman CR, Suh M, Hays SM, Gurleyuk H, Gerads R, De Flora S, Parker W, Lin S, Haws LC, Harris MA, Proctor DM. 2016. Reduction of hexavalent chromium by fasted and fed human gastric fluid. II. Ex vivo gastric reduction modeling. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 306: 120-133. Kirman CR, Aylward LL, Suh M, Harris MA, Thompson CM, Haws LC, Proctor DM, Lin SS, Parker W, Hays SM. 2013. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for humans orally exposed to chromium. ChemBiol Interact. 204(1): 13-27. Kirman CR, Hays SM, Aylward LL, Suh M, Harris MA, Thompson CM, Haws LC, Proctor DM. 2012. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for rats and mice orally exposed to chromium. Chem-Biol Interact. 200(1): 45-64. 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008278-00008 Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 May 15, 2017 Page 9 Kopec AK, Thompson CM, Kim S, Forgacs AL, Zacharewski TR. 2012. Comparative Toxicogenomic Analysis of Oral Cr(VI) Exposure Effects in Rat and Mouse Small Intestinal Epithelium. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 262(2): 124-138. Kopec AK, Kim S, Forgacs AL, Zacharewski TR, Proctor DM, Harris MA, Haws LC, Thompson CM. 2012. Genome-wide gene expression effects in B6C3F1 mouse intestinal epithelia following 7 and 90 days of exposure to hexavalent chromium in drinking water. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 259(1): 13-26. O'Brien T, Ding H, Suh M, Thompson C, Parsons BL, Harris MA, Winkelman WA, Wolf JC, Hixon JG, Schwartz AM, Myers MB, Haws LC, Proctor DM. 2013. Assessment of K-Ras mutant frequency and micronucleus incidence in the mouse duodenum following 90-days of exposure to Cr(VI) in drinking water. Mutat Res. 754(1-2): 15-21. Proctor DM, Suh M, Aylward LL, Kirman CR, Harris MA, Thompson CM, Gurleyuk H, Gerads R, Haws LC, Hays SM. 2012. Hexavalent chromium reduction kinetics in rodent stomach contents. Chemosphere. 89(5): 487-493. Rager JE, Ring CL, Fry RC, Suh M, Proctor DM, Haws L, Harris MA, Thompson CM. 2017. High-Throughput Screening Data Interpretation in the Context of In Vivo Transcriptomic Responses to Oral Cr(VI) Exposure. Toxicol Sci. Suh M, Thompson CM, Kirman CR, Carakostas M, Haws LC, Harris M, Proctor D. 2014. High concentrations of hexavalent chromium in drinking water alter iron homeostasis in F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice. Food Chem Toxicol. 65: 381-388. Thompson CM, Bichteler A, Rager JE, Suh M, Proctor DM, Haws LC, Harris MA. 2016. Comparison of in vivo genotoxic and carcinogenic potency to augment mode of action analysis: case study with hexavalent chromium. Mutat Res-Gen Tox En. 800-801: 28-34. Thompson CM, Rager JE, Suh M, Ring CL, Proctor DM, Haws LC, Fry RC, Harris MA. 2016. Transcriptomic Responses in the oral cavity of F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice following exposure to Cr(VI): implications for risk assessment. Env Mol Mut. 57: 706-716. Thompson CM, Seiter J, Chappell MA, Tappero RV, Proctor DM, Suh M, Wolf JC, Haws LC, Vitale R, Mittal L, Kirman CR, Hays SM, Harris MA. 2015. Synchrotron-based imaging of chromium and y-H2AX immunostaining in the duodenum following repeated exposure to Cr(VI) in drinking water. Toxicol Sci. 143(1): 16-25. Thompson CM, Wolf JC, Elbekai RH, Paranjpe MG, Seiter JM, Chappell MA, Tappero RV, Suh M, Proctor DM, Bichteler A, Haws LC, Harris MA. 2015. Duodenal crypt health following exposure to Cr(VI): Micronucleus scoring y-H2AX immunostaining, and synchrotron X-ray fluorescence microscopy. Mutat Res. 789-790: 61-66. Thompson CM, Young RR, Suh M, Dinesdurage HR, Elbekai RH, Harris MA, Rohr AC, Proctor DM. 2015. Assessment of the Mutagenic Potential of Cr(VI) in the Oral Mucosa of Big Blue Transgenic F344 Rats. Environ Mol Mutagen. 56: 621-628. 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008278-00009 Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 May 15, 2017 Page 10 Thompson CM, Kirman CR, Proctor DM, Haws LC, Suh M, Hays S, Hixon JG, Harris MA. 2014. A chronic oral reference dose for hexavalent chromium-induced intestinal cancer. J Appl Toxicol. 34: 525-536. Thompson CM, Proctor DM, Suh M, Haws LC, Kirman CR, Harris MA. 2013. Assessment of the mode of action underlying development of rodent small intestinal tumors following oral exposure to hexavalent chromium and relevance to humans. Crit Rev Toxicol. 43(3): 244-274. Thompson CM, Fedorov Y, Brown DD, Suh M, Proctor DM, Kuriakose L, Haws LC, Harris MA. 2012. Assessment of Cr(VI)-lnduced Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity Using High Content Analysis. PLoS ONE. 7(8): e42720. Thompson CM, Hixon JG, Proctor DM, Haws LC, Suh M, Urban JD, Harris MA. 2012. Assessment of Genotoxic Potential of Cr(VI) in the Mouse Duodenum: An In Silico Comparison with Mutagenic and Nonmutagenic Carcinogens Across Tissues. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 64(1): 68-76. Thompson CM, Proctor DM, Suh M, Haws LC, Hebert CD, Mann JF, Shertzer HG, Hixon JG, Harris MA. 2012. Comparison of the Effects of Hexavalent Chromium in the Alimentary Canal of F344 Rats and B6C3F1 Mice Following Exposure in Drinking Water: Implications for Carcinogenic Modes of Action. Toxicol Sci. 125(1): 79-90. Thompson CM, Proctor DM, Harris MA. 2012. Duodenal GSH/GSSG Ratios in Mice Following Oral Exposure to Cr(VI). Toxicol Sci. 126(1): 287-288. Thompson CM, Proctor DM, Haws LC, Hebert CD, Grimes SD, Shertzer HG, Kopec AK, Hixon JG, Zacharewski TR, Harris MA. 2011. Investigation of the Mode of Action Underlying the Tumorigenic Response Induced in B6C3F1 Mice Exposed Orally to Hexavalent Chromium. Toxicol Sci. 123(1): 58-70. Thompson CM, Haws LC, Harris MA, Gatto NM, Proctor DM. 2011. Application of the U.S. EPA Mode of Action Framework for Purposes of Guiding Future Research: A Case Study Involving the Oral Carcinogenicity of Hexavalent Chromium. Toxicol Sci. 119(1): 20-40. Young RR, Thompson CM, Dinesdurage HR, Elbekai RH, Suh M, Rohr AC, Proctor DM. 2015. A Robust Method for Assessing Chemically Induced Mutagenic Effects in the Oral Cavity of Transgenic Big Blue Rats. Environ Mol Mutagen. 56: 629-636. 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008278-00010 American' --' Chemistry Council May 15, 2017 Docket EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 Office of Regulatory Policy and Management Office of Policy U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Mail Code 1803A Washington, DC 20460 Re: Evaluation of Existing Regulations, Docket EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 (82 Fed. Reg. 17793, April 13, 2017) Dear Sirs: The Chemical Products and Technology Division of the American Chemistry Council (ACC/CPTD)1 requests that the Agency review policy guidance issued in 2014 by the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER)2 as part of its evaluation of regulations that, among other things, eliminate jobs or inhibit job creation, impose costs in excess of benefits, or rely on information that has not been reproduced. This 2014 guidance - related to remediation of sites contaminated with trichloroethylene (TCE)- imposes significant costs on the public and private sector and impedes progress towards productive use of brownfield land with little or no public benefit. The potential impact is highlighted by the recent addition of a subsurface intrusion component to the Hazard Ranking System for placement of a site on the National Priorities List (NPL) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).3 1 ACC represents the leading companies engaged in the business of chemistry. ACC members apply the science of chemistry to make innovative products and services that make people's lives better, healthier and safer. ACC is committed to improved environmental, health and safety performance through Responsible Care, common sense advocacy designed to address major public policy issues, and health and environmental research and product testing. ACC's Chemical Products and Technology Division is composed of a wide range of more than 60 self-funded product and sector groups that are focused on specific chemistries and related technologies. Members participating in these groups include large and small manufacturers, formulators, downstream users, distributors, suppliers and other trade associations. 2 US EPA. Memo from Robin H. Richardson (Acting Director, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. Compilation of Information Relating to Early/Interim Actions at Superfund Sites and the TCE IRIS Assessment (August 27, 2014). (Richardson memo) OSWER is now known as the Office of Land and Emergency Management (OLEM). 3 82 Fed. Reg. 2760 (January 9, 2017). americanchemistry.com 700 Second St., NE | Washington, DC | 20002 | (202) 249-7000 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008279-00001 ACC/CPTD Comment on Docket EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 May 15, 2017 Page 2 Despite the fact that the 2014 guidance has been interpreted by many as having the force of law or regulation regarding early mitigation at remediation sites and interpretation of data on developmental effects, it was not subject to public notice and comment. In response to repeated calls for review of the policy, EPA has argued that the guidance memo is "not a regulation nor a rule," while simultaneously noting that it "operationalized the [EPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS)] TCE Assessment."4 Although not a formal regulation, such "operationalization" is clearly covered by Executive Order 13771 which indicates that -- [f]or purposes of this order the term "regulation" or "rule" means an agency statement of general or particular applicability and future effect designed to implement, interpret, or prescribe law or policy or to describe the procedure or practice requirements of an agency.5 As such, we urge EPA to consider the 2014 guidance memo, and related memos issued by EPA regional offices, as part of its review of regulations that impose costs that exceed benefits or are based on irreproducible information. EPA's Assessment of the Non-Cancer Effects of TCE Differs from Other Authoritative Groups EPA's 2011 IRIS assessment for TCE reestablished cancer potency factors and lowered the chronic (lifetime) reference concentration (RfC - for inhalation) and reference dose (RfD for water consumption) for non-cancer effects significantly.6 The non-cancer reference values are based primarily on developmental effects (/.e., fetal heart malformations, or FHM) reported in studies from a single laboratory. The results are inconsistent with GLP studies conducted by other researchers. Published reviews of the studies that observed these effects have described numerous limitations in the methodology, including the use of non-standard statistical methods, the failure to run concurrent control experiments, and the pooling of control groups.7 In reviewing the same data, the National Research Council dismissed the FHM findings because of the unusually flat dose-response curve and the inconsistency of the results with those from other, better conducted studies.8 Similarly California's Office of Environmental 4 Letter from Enrique Manzanilla, Director Superfund Division, EPA Region 9, to Mr. Mike Mielke, Silicon Valley Leadership Group (November 19, 2015). 5 Executive Order 13771. Presidential Executive Order on Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs (January 30, 2017). 6 US EPA. IRIS Toxicity Profile for Trichloroethylene (CASRN 79-0 1-6). Washington DC, USEPA (2011). 7 For example, Hardin PD et al. Trichloroethylene and dichloroethylene: a critical review of teratogenicity. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 73:931-955 (2005). 8 National Research Council (NRC). Assessing the Human Health Risks of Trichloroethylene: Key Scientific Issues. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. (2006). americanchemistry.com 700 Second St., NE | Washington, DC 20002 | (202) 249.7000 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008279-00002 ACC/CPTD Comment on Docket EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 May 15, 2017 Page 3 Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) rejected the FHM studies because they did not produce a meaningful or interpretable dose-response relationship.9 OEHHA also noted that the results are not consistent with earlier developmental and reproductive toxicological studies done outside this lab in other animal species. More recently, in a 2014 update of the assessment of the fetal heart data, seven of 11 EPA scientists characterized the confidence in the doseresponse evaluation of the cardiac data as "low," a conclusion that differs significantly from that of the 2011 IRIS assessment.10 1D1e1s2pite the clear concern about the FHM studies expressed by scientists -- including many within the Agency - EPA has made no attempt to update or correct its assessment. EPA Guidance Memos Establish Short-Term Action Levels Following the release of the IRIS assessment for TCE, EPA's Regions 9 and 10 issued policy guidance outlining investigation approaches and response measures to address exposures to TCE in indoor air from the subsurface (i.e., vapor) intrusion pathway.11,12 In both cases, the policy established action levels based on the RfC from the 2011 IRIS assessment and provided guidance on "accelerated and urgent response actions." As a result of confusion generated by the release of guidance from the two regional offices, OSWER subsequently issued its 2014 guidance memo which indicated that the Agency "expects to take early actions" based on the IRIS RfC. The 2014 memo further noted - [l]n most cases, it is assumed that a single exposure at any of several developmental stages may be sufficient to produce an adverse developmental effect, but the RfC for a single exposure hasn't been determined yet by EPA.13 Despite acknowledging that the RfC was developed to protect against chronic (i.e., lifetime) exposure to TCE, the memo has been interpreted to require action based on sampling results in excess of the RfC collected over 24 hours or less. 9 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). Public health goals for chemicals in drinking water-trichloroethylene. OEHHA. Sacramento, CA (2009). 10 TCE developmental cardiac toxicity assessment update (undated). (Document ID EPA-HQ-QPPT-2012-07230045 available at http://www.regulations.gov) 11 Memo from Enrique Manzanilla, Director Superfund Division, EPA Region 9. EPA Region 9 Response Action Levels and Recommendations to Address Near-Term Inhalation Exposures to TCE in Air from Subsurface Vapor Intrusion (July 9, 2014). 12 Memo from Joyce C. Kelly, Office of Environmental Assessment, EPA Region 10. OEA Recommendations Regarding Trichloroethylene Toxicity in Human Health Risk Assessments (December 13, 2012). 13 Richardson memo, at 2. americanchemistry.com 700 Second St., NE | Washington, DC 20002 | (202) 249.7000 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008279-00003 ACC/CPTD Comment on Docket EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 May 15, 2017 Page 4 The application of the low levels dictated by the RfC to acute (short-term) exposures to TCE outlined in the 2014 memo has dramatically expanded the number of buildings requiring investigation at remediation sites and the number of indoor air samples to be collected and analyzed in these buildings. Concerns among federal, state, and local authorities regarding the potential for future vapor intrusion exposures have resulted in calls for cleanup of groundwater contamination beyond that otherwise required by CERCLA or state requirements. Public outreach about potential TCE exposure by EPA and state authorities has generated unnecessary confusion and concern. Operationalization of the Guidance Memos has had a Significant Economic Impact Enforcement of the very low levels indicated by the RfC has resulted in unnecessary evacuations of residences, dramatic expansion of the number of buildings requiring investigation and the number of samples to be collected and analyzed, and calls for remediation of groundwater not used as drinking water. According to an April 2014 memo from EPA Region 9, the Agency's decision to expand the area to be monitored at four remediation sites in the South Bay region in California based on TCE vapor-intrusion concerns resulted in an almost four-fold increase in the number of residences (from 96 to 358) and commercial buildings (from 59 to 270) requiring investigation.14 Earlier this month, EPA's Region 5 announced the need to conduct indoor air testing in at least 75 residences at the PMC Superfund site in Michigan as a result of TCE in soil gas samples.15 Significantly, Region 5 had previously touted the PMC site as an example of successful redevelopment of contaminated land.16 The costs of the implementation of the accelerated action policy outlined in the memos from Region 9 and 1017 and supported by the 2014 Richardson memo are difficult to estimate. In the rulemaking to add subsurface intrusion to the ranking system for NPL sites issued earlier this year, EPA estimates that the cost of an investigation would increase by between $35,000 and $69,000 with the addition of a vapor intrusion assessment.18 Based on these estimates, the Briefing Memo from Melanie Morash, Remedial Project Manager, to Enrique Manzanilla, Director, Superfund Division (April 29, 2014). EPA to test for toxic vapors in some homes. Petoskey News (May 9, 2017) Available at http://www.petoskevnews.com/featured-pnr/epa-to-test-for-toxic-vapors-in-some-homes/article c66e31bf8e55-5352-9686-a2d5531ce8ba.html. US EPA. Success Story - PMC Groundwater Superfund Site (October 2010). Available at https://semspub.epa.gov/work/05/928680.pdf. EPA Region 7 issued a similar memo relating to action levels for TCE in November 2016. US EPA. Addition of a subsurface intrusion (Ssl) component to the Hazard Ranking System (HRS) - Regulatory Impact Analysis (December 2016). Available at https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EPA-HQ-SFUND2010-1086-0108. americanchemistry.com 700 Second St., NE | Washington, DC 20002 | (202) 249.7000 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008279-00004 ACC/CPTD Comment on Docket EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 May 15, 2017 Page 5 cost of the recently announced sampling at the PMC site in Michigan would total between $330,000 and $645,000. Extrapolating this estimate for a single site to the more than 1000 sites that EPA suggested could be impacted by this year's NPL rulemakinggeneratesan estimated cost of $330 million or more.19 In light of the significant impact that EPA's policy guidance related to addressing TCE exposure from subsurface vapor intrusion has had, and will continue to have, we urge EPA to consider the OSWER and regional guidance memos as part of its review of the impact of Agency regulations. Please feel free to contact me at srisotto@americanchemistry.com, or at 202-249 6727, if you have questions about the above information. Sincerely, Steve Rigotto Stephen P. Risotto Senior Director The EPA estimate of 1073 sites is based on those locations the Agency considered eligible for federal NPL listing and does not include the large number of sites that are being addressed at the state and local level. While the NPL evaluation was not explicitly limited to TCE contamination, TCE and related substances currently are a primary factor in vapor intrusion investigations. ACC estimates that the potential number of sites affected by EPA's TCE policy far exceeds the estimate in the NPL rulemaking. americanchemistry.com 700 Second St., NE | Washington, DC 20002 | (202) 249.7000 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008279-00005 f (American' C ' Chemistry Council May 15, 2017 Docket EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 Office of Regulatory Policy and Management Office of Policy U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Mail Code 1803A Washington, DC 20460 Re: Evaluation of Existing Regulations, Docket EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 (82 Fed. Reg. 17793, April 13, 2017) Dear Sirs: The Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) Panel of the American Chemistry Council (ACC)1 requests that the Agency review several aspects of its regulations and guidance regarding the handling, use, and disposal of PCBs. In particular, the PCB Panel requests that EPA - Eliminate the regulatory confusion surrounding the disposal options for PCB remediation wastes with as-found concentrations2 of less than 50 parts per million (<50 ppm) PCB by clarifying that all such wastes can be managed in disposal facilities other than those regulated under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), including in municipal solid waste landfills, Expressly authorize the management of in-use/in-commerce PCBs based on actual concentrations, not on the original source of the PCBs or on the date on which PCBs were added to the material, and 1 ACC represents the leading companies engaged in the business of chemistry. ACC members apply the science of chemistry to make innovative products and services that make people's lives better, healthier and safer. ACC is committed to improved environmental, health and safety performance through Responsible Care, common sense advocacy designed to address major public policy issues, and health and environmental research and product testing. The PCB Panel represents companies and trade associations with an interest in the assessment of risks presented by exposure to these compounds. 2 The preamble to 40 C.F.R. 761.61 states: "Any person cleaning up and disposing of PCBs managed under this section shall do so based on the concentration at which the PCBs were found." (Emphasis added.) The significance of the "as found" concentration is made clear by 40 CFR 761.50(b)(3). americanchemistry.com 700 Second St., NE | Washington, DC | 20002 | (202) 249-7000 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008280-00001 ACC PCB Panel Comment on Docket EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 May 15, 2017 Page 2 Make the regulatory interpretations of the terms "use" and "disposal" consistent with their plain meanings. Modify the PCB analytical rules to authorize use of the automated soxhlet EPAapproved extraction method available for individual and composite samples (Method 3541). Eliminate the Regulatory Confusion Surrounding Disposal of PCB Remediation Wastes Containing <50 ppm The ACC PCB Panel supports and incorporates by reference the comments of the Utility Solid Waste Activities Group (USWAG) on this docket to the extent those comments relate to the disposal of as-found <50 ppm PCB remediation waste, and the corresponding need for regulatory clarity regarding the disposal of these wastes. EPA has long recognized that remediation waste containing <50 ppm PCBs "has little inherent potential to pose an unreasonable risk to health or the environment" and consequently has historically not required that wastes containing <50 ppm PCBs be managed in disposal facilities regulated underTSCA.3 Consistent with the view that wastes containing < 50 ppm PCBs do not require disposal in a TSCA disposal unit, one of the major objectives of EPA's 1998 amendments to the PCB regulations was to establish a common-sense regulatory regime for the disposal of remediation wastes containing low-level PCBs. In a report prepared by EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics used to support the proposed 1998 PCB amendments, EPA explained that: The proposed regulation makes a number of changes in disposal requirements for remediation wastes: wastes would be regulated on "as found" basis, instead of according to the original concentration of materials ... wastes may be disposed in the minimum technique necessary to protect human health and the environment. Since much PCB remediation wastes are found in low concentrations (including large quantities of wastes found in concentrations of less than 50 ppm), substantial quantities will be disposed in municipal solid waste landfills.4 EPA highlighted this important change in the final rule as one of the most significant cost-saving elements of the entire package of 1998 amendments, explaining that "[sjignificant 68 Fed. Reg. 4934, 4937 (January 31, 2003). 4 US EPA. Final Report: Costs of Compliance with the Proposed Amendments to the PCB Regulation, at 4-104 (December 6,1994). americanchemistry.com 700 Second St., NE | Washington, DC 20002 | (202) 249.7000 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008280-00002 ACC PCB Panel Comment on Docket EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 May 15, 2017 Page 3 cost savings result from changes to the disposal requirements for PCB remediation waste. EPA will now allow wider latitude in selecting disposal methods for PCB remediation wastes, resulting in a lowering of disposal costs, and producing a cost savings estimated at approximately $80.5 million/year."5 The Agency reiterated this point when describing the new disposal option for wastes containing <50 ppm PCBs when it noted that "[t]oday's rule expands the options for off-site disposal; for example, PCB remediation waste containing <50 ppm PCBs may be sent off-site for disposal in State-approved land disposal facilities for the management of municipal solid waste landfills...."6 In establishingthis common-sense approach, EPA explained that "[i]n finalizing several variances from the anti-dilution rule, EPA is simply recognizing that where PCBs have already been released, the critical disposal issue is to mitigate the damage from the release."7 Notwithstanding the plain language of EPA's regulations and the supporting rulemaking record, considerable confusion has arisen over the years about whether the regulations allow all (versus only a subset of) as-found <50 ppm PCB remediation wastes to be disposed of in a municipal solid waste landfill. For example, while EPA's PCB Question and Answer Manual, originally issued in September 2001 and updated from time to time ("Q&A Manual"), states that all PCB remediation wastes may be managed based on the actual concentration of PCBs in the waste (/.e., the "as-found" concentration),8 other portions of the Q&A Manual suggest that this option is limited to only a certain subset of remediation wastes found with concentrations of <50 ppm PCBs.9 The Q&A Manual has been interpreted as meaning that remediation wastes found at concentrations<50 ppm PCBs can be disposed of in non-TSCA units only when the wastes are generated under the so-called "self-implementing cleanup option" (under 40 C.F.R. 761.61(a)), while identical wastes generated under the alternative performance-based cleanup option (under 40 C.F.R. 761.61(b)) or the PCB Spill Cleanup Policy must be managed in TSCA landfills. Not only does this guidance contradict the plain language of the regulations, it also lacks support from an environmental risk perspective. Recommended Action: EPA should clarify its PCB disposal regulations to expressly provide that all PCB remediation wastes with as-found concentrations <50 ppm PCB may be managed in non-TSCA disposal facilities, including municipal solid waste landfills, 5 63 Fed. Reg. 35384, 35433 (June 29,1998). 6 Id at 35409 7 Id. at 35388. 8 See, e.g., EPA, PCB Question & Answer Manual ("Q&A Manual"), 75 (June 2014) ("As-found concentration," Q. 1, Q. 6). 9 See, e.g., id at 48 (June 2014) (" 761.50(b)(3)(H) Post-'78 Waste" Q.l, suggesting PCB remediation waste managed under the PCB Spill Cleanup Policy must be disposed of based on the concentration of the source of the spill and not on the as-found concentration of the PCB remediation waste). americanchemistry.com 700 Second St., NE | Washington, DC 20002 | (202) 249.7000 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008280-00003 ACC PCB Panel Comment on Docket EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 May 15, 2017 Page 4 regardless of whether those wastes are managed under any part of 40 C.F.R. 761.61 or under the PCB Spill Cleanup Policy. The requested clarification will provide regulatory certainty and eliminate unnecessary costs, therefore promoting efficient and environmentally protective cleanups.10 Regulate the Use and Distribution in Commerce of PCB-Containing Products Based on their Actual Concentrations As discussed above, the federal PCB regulations provide that PCB remediation wastes be managed based on the concentration at which PCBs are found in the waste (as opposed to the concentration of the PCBs in the original source material). This approach reasonably reflects the fact that any risks that might be presented by PCBs depend upon the concentration of the PCBs at the time of exposure (thus, in the context of PCB remediation waste, disposal). EPA should expand this common sense, risk-based principle to regulation of the use and distribution in-commerce of PCB-containing materials. Currently, the PCB regulations authorizing use and distribution in commerce of PCBcontaining materials do not reflect such a risk-based approach, at least not in a consistent manner. Instead, these authorizations and corresponding regulatory requirements vary in some instances depending on the history of the product. For example, while the regulations deem certain materials (i.e., those that contain <50 ppm PCB, provided they were "legally manufactured, distributed in commerce or used before October 1,1984 ..." and have not been contaminated with PCBs as a result of spills, leaks or other improper disposal) "excluded PCB products" which are not subject to the federal PCB use and disposal requirements, other materials with similar PCB concentrations (i.e., <50 ppm PCB) must be managed as TSCA waste if they are contaminated by "PCB bulk product waste." As a practical matter, this could mean that two items with identical concentrations of PCBs, may be subject to different requirements simply because of the history of the equipment.11 Recommended Action: EPA should therefore revise the federal PCB regulations to make clear that the regulations impose no obligation to establish and/or document the history of PCBs in a given material and/or piece of equipment in order to determine whether they fall within the scope of a use or distribution in-commerce authorization. In See, e.g., EPA, letter from John Melone, EPA National Program Chemicals Division, to M. Kelly McTigue (August 13,1999). Note that while EPA's reinterpretation of the definition of "PCB bulk product waste" (October 24, 2012) provides some practical relief, it does not go far enough. For example, it applies only in the disposal context and not to in-use or in-commerce materials. Even in the disposal context, it may only be used where PCB bulk product waste and associated contaminated material are attached at the time of designation for disposal americanchemistry.com 700 Second St., NE | Washington, DC 20002 | (202) 249.7000 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008280-00004 ACC PCB Panel Comment on Docket EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 May 15, 2017 Page 5 addition, EPA should amend the definition of "Excluded PCB Products" to eliminate the requirement that the PCBs came from a source that was authorized in 1984. Make the Regulatory Interpretationsof "Use" and "Disposal" Consistent with Their Plain Meanings TSCA explicitly prohibits most uses of PCBs except to the extent authorized by EPA. Pursuant to that authority, EPA has promulgated extensive PCB use authorizations in 40 CFR 761.30. These use authorizations, for the most part, encompass what would normally be considered actual uses of PCBs (e.g., transformers using PCB-containing dielectric fluid). However, EPA has previously attempted to equate the use of property contaminated by spills of PCBs with the use of PCBs by suggesting that the "[u]se of the contaminated property is prohibited unless it has been decontaminated pursuant to 40 CFR 761.30(u)." 12 Use of a building that is contaminated with PCBs is no more a use of PCBs than using a wet floor is use of the water. Given the ubiquity of PCBs, the interpretation suggested by EPA in 2005 would unnecessarily transform thousands, if not millions, of property owners and their tenants into "unauthorized users" of PCBs. Certainly, EPA can conclude that exposure to PCBs above a certain level poses an unreasonable risk to human health or the environmentthat must be addressed under the appropriate program, but that is very different from asserting that the mere presence of PCBs in a structure constitutes the unauthorized use of PCBs by those who use the structure. Similarly, the Agency's inconsistent interpretation of what constitutes "disposal" has created confusion in the regulated community and impeded redevelopment of brownfields properties. Section 6(e) of TSCA directs EPA to "promulgate rules to prescribe methods for disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls." "Disposal" is not defined in the statute, and under rules of statutory construction should be given its plain meaning (i.e., "to get rid of something"). That meaning is reflected in the definition found at 40 CFR 761.3: Disposal means intentionally or accidentally to discard, throw away, or otherwise complete or terminate the useful life of PCBs and PCB items. Disposal includes spills, leaks, and other uncontrolled discharges of PCBs as well as actions relating to containing, transporting, destroying, degrading, decontaminating, or confining PCBs. Under this definition, only activities that "complete or terminate the useful life of PCBs" qualify as "disposal". Problems arise, however, when EPA classifies or describes other types of70 70 Fed. Reg. 37837 (June 30, 2005). americanchemistry.com 700 Second St., NE | Washington, DC 20002 | (202) 249.7000 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008280-00005 ACC PCB Panel Comment on Docket EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 May 15, 2017 Page 6 activities or events (e.g., cleanup or remedial activities, or migration of PCBs through soil) as "disposal." For example, EPA regional offices have asserted that the post-1978 migration of PCBs that were spilled or otherwise released into the environment before 1978 constitutes "illegal disposal" within the meaning of the rules. The EPA regions have asserted that position even though the regulation explicitly states that sites containing such wastes are presumed not to present an unreasonable risk of injury,13 and that the Regional Administrator can require the owner or operator to dispose of such waste only if he/she first finds that the contamination presents an unreasonable risk.14 The interpretation by the regional offices is inconsistent with the rule, the preamble, and the definition of disposal; subjects every owner of property that has pre-1978 PCB contamination to potential enforcement actions for "illegal disposal;" and, given the ubiquity of PCBs, impedes redevelopment of brownfields properties. Further, the interpretation is wholly unnecessary, given EPA's extensive risk-based cleanup authority under CERCLA and numerous state cleanup programs. Recommended Action: EPA should clarify that the use of a property contaminated with PCBs below a level that presents an unreasonable risk does not constitute unauthorized use of PCBs under 40 CFR 761.30; EPA also should ensure consistencyin the interpretation of the term "disposal" such that the natural migration of PCBs released into the environment before 1978 does not constitute "illegal disposal" within the meaning of the regulations. Modify the Rules for Analysis of PCB Remediation Wastes EPA's PCB disposal regulations specify particular analytical methods that must be employed when extracting samples of PCB wastes for purposes of determining appropriate disposal options and cleanup verification. In particular, the regulations specify the use of a traditional soxhlet extraction procedure (Method 3540) rather than the equally effective, significantly faster and much more cost-effective automated soxhlet extraction method (Method 3541). EPA's own labs acknowledge the advantages of Method 3541, and Method 3541 is routinely used by EPA in other contexts including Superfund cleanups. There is no scientific, environmental, or risk-based rationale for not allowing the regulated community to use the automated soxhlet extraction method to analyze PCB content under the federal PCB program. Recommended Action: EPA should modify the PCB analytical rules throughout 40 C.F.R. Part 761 (including 40 C.F.R. 761.61(a)(5)(B)(iv), 761.253, 761.272, 761.292, 761.358 13 40 CFR 761.50(b)(3)(i)(A). 14 63 Fed. Reg. 35384, 35401 (June 29,1998). americanchemistry.com 700 Second St., NE | Washington, DC 20002 | (202) 249.7000 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008280-00006 ACC PCB Panel Comment on Docket EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 May 15, 2017 Page 7 and 761.395) to expressly authorize the use of the most recent EPA-approved extraction method available for the chemical extraction of PCBs from individual and composite samples (currently Method 3541). Please feel free to contact me at srisotto@americanchemistry.com, or at 202-249-6727, if you have questions about the above information. Sincerely, Steve Rigotto Stephen P. Risotto Senior Director americanchemistry.com 700 Second St., NE | Washington, DC 20002 | (202) 249.7000 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008280-00007 jr ^American* ( V Chemistry Council Diisocyanates Panel Submitted Via Email May 15,2017 Sarah Rees Director Office of Regulatory Policy and Management Office of Policy U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20460 www.regulations.gov, Laws-Regs@epa.gov Re: Evaluation of Existing Regulations, Docket EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 Dear Ms. Rees, The American Chemistry Council Diisocyanates Panel1 appreciates the opportunity to provide comments to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in response to the Agency's request for comments on regulations that may be appropriate for repeal, replacement, or modification in accordance with Executive Order 13777 "Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda." The Panel would like to highlight the following issues for substances methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) and toluene diisocyanate (TDI) that impose unnecessary regulatory burdens on the diisocyanates industry and should be considered for review by the Agency. 1. EPA Should Remove TDI from the Drinking Water Candidate Contaminants List 1CCL1 and the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program fEDSPl List TDI was identified for inclusion on the Final EDSP List 2 solely because of its inclusion on the Third Candidate Contaminants List (CCL3), and with no regard for the physical/chemical and reactive properties which preclude occurrence of the substance in drinking water sources. As is the case for most isocyanate substances, TDI hydrolyzes rapidly upon contact with water making TDI's occurrence in water scientifically implausible. Moreover, TDI's high reactivity with water would render EDSP test results irrelevant. The inclusion of TDI on the Agency's EDSP List 2 creates the potential for costly, unnecessary and wasteful regulatory testing.* 700 1 The Diisocyanates Panel represents the U.S. companies that manufacture or import methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) and/or toluene diisocyanate (TDI). The Panel is comprised of BASF Corporation, Covestro LLC, Dow, Huntsman Corporation and Wanhua Chemical (America) Co., Ltd." americanchemistry.conT 700 Second St., NE | Washington, DC 20002 | (202) 249.7000 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008281-00001 The Panel urges EPA to promptly remove TDI from EDSP List 2 and the CCL3. For additional information, see Attachment A: Panel Comments Submitted to EPA on Draft Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List 4, April 6, 2015. 2. EPA Should Update its New Chemicals Guidance for Isocvanates-Based Substances The diisocyanates industry has seen an increase in Significant New Use Rules (SNURs) being issued for new isocyanate-based substances applying for a Premanufacture Notice (PMN) under EPA's New Chemicals Program. EPA has issued a series of at least 35 proposed or final SNURs for PMN chemicals on isocyanate-based polymers and related chemicals with vaguely supported explanations. For example, with regard to one SNUR, EPA provided the following as its rationale: "Based on SAR [structure-activity relationship] analysis of test data on analogous diisocyanates, EPA identified concerns for respiratory sensitization." 2 It is difficult for any member of the public to submit informed and meaningful comment when so little information is provided in support of the SNURs. Indeed, even the PMN submitters, who have access to confidential business information (CBI) about their PMN substances, likely also lack a clear understanding of EPA's reasoning. EPA should be more transparent about why it is proposing such SNURs consistent with required protection of CBI. ACC has previously commented3 on the lack of scientific basis for SNURs on isocyanate-based chemistries. Clearly, this is an area of chemistry where innovation is vigorous but where EPA's lack of clarity could stifle this innovation. To guide companies as they continue to develop new chemical substances, EPA should provide a detailed explanation of the basis for its concerns about diisocyanates. EPA itself has acknowledged that its current (2010) explanation of those concerns (not revised since 1997) is outdated.4 EPA should revise and update that explanation since it is continuing to rely on a 1997 summary. In addition, EPA should provide each PMN submitter with EPA's internal analysis (redacting any CBI) of any risk that may be presented by the former PMN chemical. More recently, the Agency has indicated in a proposed rulemaking that for new isocyanatebased substances submitted as PMNs, the Agency expects to issue consent orders imposing 2 See e.g. 81 Fed. Reg. 74755 (October 27,2016) (PMNs P-15-378, P-15-559); 81 Fed. Reg. 21830 (April 13, 2016) (PMNs P-15-27, P-15-247, P-15-221; 80 Fed. Reg.59593 (Oct. 2,2015) (PMNs P-15-221, P-15-247, P-15-278); 80 Fed. Reg. 845 (Jan. 7, 2015) (PMNs P-13-365, P-13-392, P-13-393, P-13-471, P-13-563, P-13-617, P-13-618, P-13 619, P-14-60, P-14-478); 79 Fed. Reg. 63821 (Oct. 27,2014) (PMN P-14-357); 78 Fed. Reg. 48051 (Aug. 7,2013) (PMNs P-13-232, P-13-338); 78 Fed. Reg. 27048 (May 9,2013) (PMN P-11-60); 78 Fed. Reg.12684 (Feb. 25,2013) (PMNs P-11-115, P-12-73); 77 Fed. Reg. 61118 (Oct. 5,2012) (PMNs P-08-611, P-11-485, P-11-486, P-11-488, P 11-489, P-11-548, P-11-635, P-11-636); 77 Fed. Reg. 58666 (Sept. 21,2012) (PMN P-04- 834); 77 Fed. Reg. 20296 (Apr. 4, 2012) (PMN P-11-662). 3 Comments of the American Chemistry Council and Its Diisocyanates and Aliphatic Diisocyanates Panels on Proposed Significant New Use Rules for Certain Isocyanate-Based Substances, Docket Nos. EPA-HQ-OPPT-20140760, EPA-HQ-OPPT-2014-0277, EPA-HQ-OPPT-2014-0166, April 23, 2015, PMNs P-13-365, P-13-392, P-13 393, P-13-471, P-13-563, P-13-617, P-13-618, P-13-619, and P-14-60; Docket No. EPA-OPPT-2015-0388, May 13, 2016, PMNs P-15-221, P-15-247, P-15-278. 4 EPA, TSCA New Chemicals Program (NCP) Chemical Categories (Aug. 2010), https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/201410/documents/ncp chemical categories august 2010 version O.pdf 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008281-00002 0.1% limits on total residual isocyanates if used in a process that generates a vapor or particulate.5 The Panel has submitted comments asking EPA to provide their scientific rationale for the 0.1% limit as it is unclear why the Agency is taking this approach. If EPA is applying different criteria when reviewing isocyanate-based PMN substances, the diisocyanates category guidance document should be updated to reflect this shift in Agency policy with these chemistries. EPA should also provide adequate justification for any modifications. EPA needs to explain and be more transparent regarding the basis for its decision making and ensure its rationale is scientifically valid. Without this updated guidance, the regulated community lacks clear direction regarding the parameters EPA considers when issuing SNURs or consent orders on isocyanate-based PMN substances. Each of the proposed PMN SNURs incorporates recordkeeping requirements as specified in certain provisions of 40 C.F.R. 721.125.These requirements for other SNURs have proven to be quite burdensome to downstream chemical users, adversely impacting the marketplace, and of little utility to EPA. SNUR recordkeeping requirements can stifle technology and innovation of improved materials. Downstream processors (especially small businesses) frequently opt to use a substance that will not require all of the onerous requirements associated with using the chemical that has a SNUR, which could be a less hazardous material than the substance without a SNUR. Therefore, the recordkeeping requirements may discourage innovative technologies and "greener" chemicals from entering the marketplace. Consequently, EPA should ensure that recordkeeping requirements are commensurate with their benefits. For additional information, see Attachment B: Comments of the American Chemistry Council Diisocyanates Panel on Proposed Significant New Use Rules for Certain Isocyanate-Based Substances, March 6, 2017. 3. EPA Should Approve the Panel Petition to Delist MDI from the List of Hazardous Air Pollutants fHAPs! Under the Clean Air Act The Panel urges EPA to grant its petition to remove MDI from the list of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) under Section 112(b) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The petition was submitted on December 23, 2002. Over twelve years ago, EPA announced that the petition was complete - the first phase of review - as of March 7, 2005. See 70 FR 30407. EPA has not notified the Panel of any action on the second phase of review, the substantive technical review. The Panel submitted the petition and supplemental materials that support EPA's delisting of MDI based upon its assessment of the human health impacts associated with people living in the vicinity of facilities emitting MDI, and the environmental impacts associated with emissions of MDI to the ambient air and deposited onto soil or water. As the original petition and the supplemental materials demonstrated, MDI has a very low vapor pressure, emissions to the air, therefore, are minimal. Because of its reactivity, it is rapidly hydrolyzed by water, and so has a very short lifetime in the environment. Beyond the fence line of MDI facilities, potential exposures to MDI are expected to be extremely 5 81 Fed. Reg. 74757 (October 27, 2016); Significant New Use Rule on Certain Chemical Substances; Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2015-0810. 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008281-00003 low. The data demonstrate that MDI "may not be reasonably anticipated to cause any adverse effects to human health or the environment," 42 U.S.C. Section 7612(b)(3)(C), and MDI therefore should be removed from the HAPs list. EPA is required under Section 112(b)(3)(A) of the CAA to either grant or deny a petition to delist a specific HAP within 18 months of the receipt of a complete petition. In this matter, the statutory period passed in September 2007, almost 10 years ago. Therefore, the Panel seeks an approval of the petition expeditiously. For additional information, see Attachment C: Petition of the American Chemistry Council Diisocyanates Panel to Remove 4,4'-Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate from the List of Hazardous Air Pollutants Under Section 112(B) of the Clean Air Act. Also, please note the following EPA docket houses all the MDI petition submissions: EPA Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-20050085 http://www.regulations.gOv/#idocketDet3il:DM3PA~HO-GAR-20CI5-0085 4. EPA Should Approve the Panel Petitions to Delist MDI and TDI From Regulation as Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCsl Under the Clean Air Act The Panel urges EPA to grant its petitions to exempt MDI and TDI from regulation as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) under the CAA. On January 2, 1998, the Panel submitted a petition to exempt TDI from regulation as a VOC. The Panel submitted a similar petition to exempt MDI from the definition of VOC on August 19, 1998. The petitions provide data which demonstrate that both compounds are ozone inhibitors under most environmental conditions. EPA has taken no official action on either petition despite the fact that TDI and MDI clearly meet all criteria for VOC exemption. Exempting these compounds would further the purposes of the CAA by focusing regulatory attention on substances that actually contribute to ozone formation. The Panel therefore urges EPA to move forward expeditiously to exclude TDI and MDI from the regulatory definition of a VOC at 40 C.F.R. 51.100(s). EPA has recognized that there are important policy reasons to exempt ozone-inhibiting compounds from the definition of a VOC. In particular, doing so ensures that states are not wasting their efforts on reducing emissions that do not appreciably affect ambient ozone levels. See 57 Fed. Reg. 3941, 3945 (Feb. 3, 1992). Exempting such compounds helps ensure that public and private resources aimed at improving air quality are focused on pollutants that actually contribute to ozone formation. Instead, because EPA has not exempted TDI and MDI from regulation as VOCs, states continue to receive credit for reducing TDI and MDI emissions even though such reductions do not help states attain the national ambient air quality standards. This is contrary to the very purpose of the CAA. For additional information, see Attachment D: Petition to Exempt Toluene Diisocyanate from Regulation as a Volatile Organic Compound, January 21, 1998; and Attachment E: Petition to Exempt Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate from Regulation as a Volatile Organic Compound, August 18, 1998. 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008281-00004 The Panel welcomes this effort to identify and alleviate examples of regulatory burdens that have accumulated for industry over the years. We look forward to working with the Agency as the regulatory reform effort continues. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at sahar_osman-svpher@americaiichemistrv.com or 202-249-6721. Sincerely, Sahar Osman-Sypher Director, Diisocyanates Panel Attachments 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008281-00005 List of Attachments Attachment A: Panel Comments Submitted to EPA on Draft Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List 4, April 6, 2015 Attachment B: Comments of the American Chemistry Council and Its Diisocyanates and Aliphatic Diisocyanates Panels on Proposed Significant New Use Rules for Certain IsocyanateBased Substances, March 6, 2017 Attachment C: Petition of the American Chemistry Council Diisocyanates Panel to Remove 4,4'Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate from the List of Hazardous Air Pollutants Under Section 112(B) of the Clean Air Act Attachment D: Petition to Exempt Toluene Diisocyanate from Regulation as a Volatile Organic Compound, January 21, 1998 Attachment E: Petition to Exempt Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate from Regulation as a Volatile Organic Compound, August 18, 1998 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008281-00006 American1 Chemistry Council Submitted Via Email www.regulations.gov May 15,2017 EPA Regulatory Reform Task Force do Sarah Rees, Director Office of Regulatory Policy and Management Office of Policy 200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Mail Code 1803A, Washington, DC 20460 RE: Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda; Executive Order 13777; Evaluation of Existing Regulations; Docket EPA-HQ-OA-2017-0190 RE: Recommendation to Alleviate Unnecessary Regulatory Burdens as it Relates to the TRI Delisting Petition for Ethylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether (EGBE) Dear Dr. Rees: I am writing on behalf of the Glycol Ethers Panel of the American Chemistry Council (ACC).1' 2 On February 24, 2017, President Trump signed Executive Order 13777, ,,,Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda,"" which established a federal policy ,,,to alleviate unnecessary regulatory burdens"" on the American people. Section 3(a) of the EO directs federal agencies to establish a Regulatory Reform Task Force (Task Force). One of the duties of the Task Force is to evaluate existing regulations and ,,,,makc recommendations to the agency head regarding their repeal, replacement, or modification."" The Federal Register notice for this policy was published on April 13, 2017 (Federal Register, Vol. 82, No. 70, page 17793: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsvs/pkg/FR-2017-04-1 j/pdf/201707500.pdf). The ACC Glycol Ethers Panel respectively requests that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reevaluate the TRI delisting petition on ethylene glycol monobutyl ether (EGBE) the Panel submitted to EPA, and, pursuant to EO 13777, promptly delist EGBE from the Toxics Release Inventory. The attached original petition, submitted to the EPA Office of Information Analysis and Access on January 23, 2015, requested that EPA remove ethylene glycol monobutyl ether (EGBE; CAS #11176-2) from the category "Certain Glycol Ethers" under the list of chemicals requiring reporting under 1 The American Chemistry Council (ACC) is the major trade association in the US representing leading companies engaged in the business of chemistry. ACC is committed to improved environmental, health and safety performance through Responsible Care, health and environmental research, and product testing. 2 Members of the ACC Glycol Ethers Panel are The Dow Chemical Company and Eastman Chemical Company. americanchemistry.com 700 Second St., NE | Washington, DC | 20002 | (202) 249-7000 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00001 the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) pursuant to Sections 313(d) & (e) of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA). As the attached petition demonstrates, available scientific data indicate that EGBE poses low potential hazard to human health and the environment. The petition was denied by EPA on October 8, 2015 (Federal Register Vol. 80, No. 195 Page 60818 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsvs/pkg/FR-2015-1 o08/pdf/20.1.5-25674.pdf T There now is an even stronger basis for making essentially the same statutory findings under EPCRA and removing EGBE from the TRI reporting list. As demonstrated in this petition, EGBE releases and exposures are now lower than those that formed the basis for EPA"s Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) determinations.3 Delisting under EPCRA would remove a significant disincentive to the use of EGBE, a solvent that has proven to be highly effective in a variety of important water-based coating formulations with demonstrable volatile organic compound (VOC)-reduction benefits. For the reasons set forth in full in this petition, the EPCRA delisting criteria are fully satisfied and EPA should remove EGBE from the TRI reporting list. Because EGBE poses low potential harm to the environment or to humans from low TRI emissions, and because reporting of such substances is both a regulatory and cost burden with no benefit to public health, this substance should not be listed for regulatory reporting purposes under TRI. The Panel respectfully requests that EPA reverse its October 8, 2015 decision and accept the original petition request pursuant to EO 13777. The attached original cover letter and delisting petition provide additional information. A summary of the rationale for delisting EGBE can be found on pages 90-100 of the January 2015 delisting petition. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Ifyou have any questions or require additional information regarding the attached comments, please contact me (Jon_busch@americanchemistry.com; 202 249-6725). Sincerely, Jonathon T. Busch Manager, Glycol Ethers Panel Director, Chemical Products & Technology Division 3 When EPA proposed to remove EGBE from the Clean Air Acf's list of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) in November 2003, it specifically determined, based on exposure assessments utilizing 1993 TRI data, that there is "reasonable assurance" that any potential adverse human health and environmental effects "will not occur" from EGBE facility releases (68 Fed. Reg. 65648, 65660 (Nov. 21,2003). In the final rale, the Agency concluded "with confidence" that releases of EGBE "may not reasonably be anticipated to cause any adverse effects to human health" or "adverse environmental effects" (69 Fed. Reg. 69320, 69322 (Nov. 29, 2004). americanchemistry.com 700 Second St., NE | Washington, DC 20002 | (202) 249.7000 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00002 /~~\ American' C Chemistry Council January 23, 2015 Mr. Arnold E. Layne Director Office of Information Analysis and Access (Mail Code 284 IT) Office of Environmental Information Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460 CC: Daniel R. Bushman, Ph.D. TRI Petitions Coordinator Office of Information Analysis and Access (Mail Code 2842T) Office of Environmental Information Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460 Re: Transmittal of Petition to Delist EGBE from Certain Glycol Ethers Category on TRI Dear Mr. Layne and Dr. Bushman: On behalf of its Ethylene Glycol Ethers Panel, the American Chemistry Council (ACC) is pleased to submit the attached petition to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to remove ethylene glycol monobutyl ether (EGBE) from the category Certain Glycol Ethers under the list of chemicals requiring reporting under the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) pursuant to Sections 313(d) & (e) of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA). As the attached petition demonstrates, available scientific data indicate that EGBE poses low potential hazards to human health and the environment, making an assessment of exposure appropriate under EPA's policy for making TRI listing decisions under EPCRA. When EPA proposed to remove EGBE from the Clean Air Act's list of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) in November 2003, it specifically determined, based on exposure assessments utilizing 1993 TRI data, that there is "reasonable assurance" that any potential adverse human health and environmental effects "will not occur" from EGBE facility releases (68 Fed. Reg. 65648, 65660 (Nov. 21, 2003). In the final rule, the Agency concluded "with confidence" that releases of EGBE "may not reasonably be anticipated to cause any adverse effects to human health" or "adverse environmental effects" (69 Fed. Reg. 69320, 69322 (Nov. 29, 2004). 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00003 2 - - There now is an even stronger basis for making essentially the same statutory findings under EPCRA and removing EGBE from the TRI reporting list. As shown in this petition, EGBE releases and exposures are now lower than those that formed the basis for EPA's HAPs determinations. Delisting under EPCRA would remove a significant disincentive to the use of EGBE, a solvent that has proven to be highly effective in a variety of important water-based coating formulations with demonstrable volatile organic compound (VOC)-reduction benefits. For the reasons set forth in full in this petition, the EPCRA delisting criteria are satisfied and EPA should remove EGBE from the TRI reporting list. As you know, EPCRA 313(e)(1) provides that EPA will respond to a petition to add or delete a chemical from the TRI list within 180 days of receipt. In the meantime, ACC would welcome the opportunity to meet with you and the staff who will be responsible for evaluating the petition, in order to discuss methods and findings and to answer any questions. To arrange such a meeting, please contact me at your convenience at (202 249-6725; ion buseh@americanchemistrv.eom. Sincerely, Jonathon T. Busch Manager, Ethylene Glycol Ethers Panel Director, Chemical Products & Technology Division 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00004 Before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency PETITION OF THE AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL'S ETHYLENE GLYCOL ETHERS PANEL TO REMOVE ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOBUTYL ETHER FROM THE TOXICS RELEASE INVENTORY UNDER SECTION 313 OF THE EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW ACT OF 1986 Jonathon Busch Director, Ethylene Glycol Ethers Panel Technical Consultants: Miranda Henning Suzanne Persyn Duncan Turnbull, D.Phil. ENVIRON International Corporation 136 Commercial Street, Suite 402 Portland, ME 04101 American Chemistry Council 700 2nd Street, NE Washington, DC 20002 (202) 249-6725 December 29, 2014 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00005 Petition Pursuant to Section 313(d) & (e) of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-toKnow Act of 1986 (EPCRA), the Ethylene Glycol Ethers Panel of the American Chemistry Council hereby petitions the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to remove ethylene glycol monobutyl ether (EGBE) from the list of chemicals subject to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) reporting requirements of the EPCRA Section 313. As demonstrated below, available scientific data indicate that EGBE poses low potential hazards to human health and the environment, making an assessment of exposure appropriate under EPA's policy for making TRI listing decisions under EPCRA. Conservative estimates of exposures resulting from plant emissions of EGBE are well below Integrated Risk Information System reference values for human inhalation and ingestion health risks and are also far below conservative benchmarks for acute human health effects and ecotoxicity. When the Administrator removed EGBE from the Clean Air Act's list of Hazardous Air Pollutants in November 2004, he specifically determined, based on exposure assessments utilizing 1993 TRI data, that there is "reasonable assurance" that any potential adverse human health and environmental effects "will not occur" from EGBE facility releases (68 FR 65660). He concluded "with confidence" that releases of EGBE "may not reasonably be anticipated to cause any adverse effects to human health" or "adverse environmental effects" (69 FR 69322). As demonstrated in this petition, there is an even stronger basis for making essentially the same statutory findings under EPCRA and removing EGBE from the TRI reporting list. Based on the most recent TRI data available, EGBE releases and exposures are significantly lower than those that formed the basis for EPA's Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) determinations. Delisting under EPCRA would remove a significant disincentive to the use of EGBE, a solvent that has proven to be highly effective in a variety of important water-based coating formulations with demonstrable volatile organic compound (VOC)-reduction benefits. Delisting would also eliminate the potential for confusion and misdirected community priorities that currently exists because EGBE-using facilities are unfairly singled-out as significant sources of "toxics" despite the Administrator's findings that EGBE releases may not reasonably be anticipated to cause adverse human health or environmental effects. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in full in this petition, the EPCRA delisting criteria are satisfied and the Panel therefore respectfully requests that EPA remove EGBE from the TRI reporting list. 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00006 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 6 2.0 BACKGROUND 10 2.1 Synonyms 10 2.2 History of EGBE Regulation under EPCRA 10 2.3 Removal of EGBE from the Clean Air Act HAPs List 11 2.4 Regulatory Standards and Guidelines 13 2.5 Production and Use 13 3.0 HAZARD ASSESSMENT 16 3.1 Chemical and Physical Properties 16 3.2 Potential Human Health Hazards 17 3.2.1 Noncancer Toxicity 17 3.2.2 Potential Carcinogenicity 22 3.3 Ecotoxicity 26 3.4 Evaluation of Potential Hazards of EGBE and Implications for TRI Listing 27 3.4.1 Low Potential for Adverse Chronic Human Health Effects 27 3.4.2 Low Potential for Significant Adverse Ecological Effects 29 3.4.3 Conclusion 29 4.0 CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING ACUTE AND CHRONIC HUMAN EXPOSURES 31 4.1 Acute Toxicity 31 4.2 Chronic Toxicity 31 5.0 EMISSIONS INVENTORY 34 6.0 INHALATION EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT AND RISK CHARACTERIZATION 35 6.1 Overview of the Tiered Modeling Method for Assessing Risks from Air Exposures 37 6.2 Step A and B Prescreening 40 6.2.1 Step A Prescreening Methodology 40 6.2.2 Step A Results 41 6.2.3 Step B Prescreening Methodology 41 6.2.4 Step B Results 44 6.3 Chronic Inhalation Exposure Assessment forIndividual Facilities 44 6.3.1 Tier 1 Screening for Individual Facilities 44 6.3.2 Tier 2 Screening for Individual Facilities 47 6.4 Chronic Inhalation Exposure Assessment forClusters of Facilities 52 6.4.1 Facility Cluster Evaluation Tiered Screening Methodology 52 6.4.2 Step A Screening (Cluster Evaluation) 52 6.4.3 Step B Screening (Cluster Evaluation) 54 6.4.4 Tier 2 Screening (Cluster Evaluation) 56 6.5 Uncertainty Analysis 58 ii 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00007 6.5.1 Conservatism of Step A through Tier 2 59 6.5.2 Tier 3 Modeling (Individual Facilities) 61 6.5.3 Tier 3 Modeling (Clusters of Facilities) 64 6.5.4 Conservatism of the Tiered Modeling Approach 65 6.6 Acute Exposure Margin of Exposure(MOE) Assessment 67 6.6.1 Acute Exposure Assessment for Individual Facilities 68 6.6.2 Acute Exposure Assessment for Clusters of Facilities 70 6.6.3 Acute Margin of Exposure (MOE) Assessment 71 6.7 Risk Characterization Conclusions for Potential EGBE Inhalation Exposures 72 7.0 SURFACE WATER EXPOSURES AND RISKS 73 7.1 Exposure Profiles 73 7.2 Exposure Equations 74 7.3 Exposure Assumptions 75 7.4 Results and Conclusions 77 8.0 ECOLOGICAL RISKS 79 8.1 HAPs Delisting Ecological Risk Assessments 79 8.1.1 The Panel's ERA 79 8.1.2 EPAERAs 80 8.1.3 Tier 1 ERA 81 8.1.4 Tier 2 ERA 82 8.2 Updated ERA 82 8.2.1 Problem Formulation 83 8.2.2 Exposure Assessment 83 8.2.3 Effects Assessment 84 8.2.4 Risk Characterization 87 8.3 Conclusions 88 9.0 SUMMARY AND RATIONALE FOR DELISTINGEGBE 90 9.1 Delisting EGBE Is Fully Consistent with EPCRA's TRI Listing Criteria as Interpreted by EPA 90 9.2 Substantial Conservatism is Incorporated into Every Primary Element of the Toxicological, Exposure, and Ecological Assessments Presented in this Petition 93 9.2.1 IRIS Reference Values 93 9.2.2 Exposure Assessments 94 9.2.3 Ecological Risk Assessment 95 9.3 In Light of the HAPs Delisting Decision, EPA's Policy of Ensuring Consistency with Other Agency Decisions Supports Removal of EGBE from the TRI Reporting List 96 9.4 Removing EGBE from the TRI Would Promote the Local Risk Management and Pollution Prevention Objectives of EPCRA 97 10.0 REFERENCES 101 iii 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00008 Table ES-1 Table ES-2 Table ES-3 Table 2-1 Table 3-1 Table 3-2 Table 5-1 Table 6-1 Table 6-2 Table 6-3 Table 6-4 Table 6-5 Table 6-6 Table 6-7 Table 6-8 Table 6-9 Table 6-10 Table 6-11 Table 6-12 Table 6-13 Table 6-14 Table 7-1 Table 7-2 Table 7-3 Table 7-4 Table 7-5 Table 7-6 TABLES Key Findings of the Qualitative Hazard Evaluation Key Findings of the Exposure and Risk Assessments Sources of Uncertainty and Conservatism Regulatory Standards and Guidelines Applicable to EGBE Physical and Chemical Properties of EGBE Aquatic Ecotoxicity Data for EGBE Comparison of Glycol Ether TRI-Related Releases from 1993 through 2011 Screening Table Showing Threshold Emissions (tpy) for the Reference Concentration of 1.6 mg/m3 Number of Facilities with Total TRI-Reported Air Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers Relative to 4.9 tpy (Step A) Number of Facilities with Total Air Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers Greater than Site-Specific Screening Values (Step B) Long-Term (Chronic Exposure) Tier 1 Modeling Results Long-Term (Chronic Exposure) Tier 2 Modeling Results (2009, 2010, and 2011 TRI Data) ZIP Codes with More than One Facility Reporting Air Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers to the TRI in 2009 through 2011 ZIP Codes and Facilities Identified for Dispersion Modeling Following Step B Screening Results of Chronic Tier 2 & Tier 3 Exposure Modeling for Facility Clusters Uncertainty Analysis Long Term (Chronic Exposure) Tier 3 Modeling for Selected Facilities (2009, 2010, and 2011 TRI Data) Comparison of Concentrations Using the Tiered Modeling Approach Total TRI Air Emissions (Fugitive and Point-Source Air) by Year for Selected Facilities Short-Term (Acute Exposure) Tier 1 Modeling Results Results of Acute Tier 2 & 3 Modeling for Facility Clusters Results of Short-Term Tier 2 & 3 Modeling and Acute MOE Analysis for Selected High Emitting Facilities Hazards from Surface Water Exposure to EGBE, Residential Scenario: Ingestion of EGBE in Drinking Water Hazards from Surface Water Exposure to EGBE, Residential Scenario: Dermal Contact with EGBE While Bathing and Showering Hazards from Surface Water Exposure to EGBE, Recreational Scenario: Incidental Ingestion of EGBE in Surface Water While Swimming Hazards from Surface Water Exposure to EGBE, Recreational Scenario: Dermal Contact with EGBE in Surface Water While Swimming Summary of Hazards from Surface Water Exposures to EGBE Comparison of Hazards from Surface Water Exposures Predicted in HAPs Petition and This Petition IV 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00009 Table 8-1 Table 8-2 Table 8-3 Table 8-4 Table 8-5 Table 9-1 Table 9-2 Table 9-3 TABLES EGBE Emissions Rates Used in Level III Mackay Distribution Model (kg/hr) Modeled EGBE Exposure Concentrations Used in This and Previous Ecological Risk Assessments EQC Level III Input Parameter Values Exposure Assumptions for Small Mammals Chronic Species Sensitivity Distribution Calculations for EGBE Key Findings of the Qualitative Hazard Evaluation Key Findings of the Exposure and Risk Assessments Sources of Uncertainty and Conservatism FIGURES Figure 1-1 Figure 2-1 Figure 5-1 Figure 8-1 Figure 8-2 Structure of Ethylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether (EGBE) Annual Production and Consumption of EGBE in the United States (1970 2009) Maximum individual Facility Annual Certain Glycol Ether Releases to Air (2000-2011) Aquatic Organism Species Sensitivity Distribution Approach Aquatic Organism Species Sensitivity Distributions for EGBE APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Toxicity Values in Laboratory Mammals Emissions Inventory Outcome of Screening Procedure for Long-Term Exposures Outcome of Long-Term Tiered Modeling in Support of Uncertainty Analysis Outcome of Short-Term Tiered Modeling Tier 2 and Tier 3 Modeling Output Files (CDROM) v 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00010 % ACGHI ADI AEGL A o AT ATSDR BAA BAL BCF BHA BMC BOD BW CAA CAS C, CICAD cm2 cm3 CMA CMI C w DAet/enf DGBE DNA ECETOC EC50 ED EF EGBE EGBEA EGEE EGME EGPE EPA EPCRA ERA EU EV ACRONYMS percent American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists average daily intake Acute Exposure Guideline Level oral absorption factor averaging time Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry 2-butoxyacetic acid 2-butoxyacetaldehyde bioconcentration factor butylated hydroxyanisole benchmark concentration biological oxygen demand body weight Clean Air Act Chemical Abstracts Service concentration of EGBE in diet item / Concise International Chemical Assessment Document square centimeters cubic centimeters Chemical Manufacturers Association Can Manufacturers Institute concentration of EGBE in water absorbed dose per event diethylene glycol butyl ether deoxyribonucleic acid European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals median effect concentration exposure duration exposure frequency ethylene glycol monobutyl ether 2-butoxyethyl acetate ethylene glycol monoethyl ether ethylene glycol monomethyl ether ethylene glycol monopropyl ether United States Environmental Protection Agency Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act ecological risk assessment European Union event frequency VI 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00011 gps HAP Hb HQ HSDB IARC IR IRa 1 Rd/ef IRIS IRw kg kg/hr kg/kg BW-day km km2 Kow L/day LC50 LD50 LOAEL m m3/kg BW-day MCV MEK mg/cm2 mg/kg mg/kg BW-day mg/L mg/m3 MIBK mM MOE |jg/m3 NED NEI NIOSH NOAEL NOEC ACRONYMS grams per second hazardous air pollutant hemoglobin hazard quotient Hazardous Substance Data Bank International Agency for Research on Cancer ingestion rate inhalation rate food ingestion rate Integrated Risk Information System water ingestion rate kilograms kilograms per hour kilograms per kilogram body weight per day kilometers square kilometers octanol-water partition coefficient liter per day lethal concentration for 50% of test organisms lethal dose for 50% of test organisms lowest observed adverse effect level meter cubic meters per kilogram body weight per day mean corpuscular volume methyl ethyl ketone milligrams per square centimeter milligrams per kilogram milligrams per kilogram body weight per day milligrams per liter milligrams per cubic meter methyl isobutyl ketone millimolars Margin of Exposure micrograms per cubic meter National Elevation Dataset National Emissions Inventory National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health no observed adverse effect level no observed effect concentration VII 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00012 NTP OEM PBPK Pi POTW ppm RfC RfD RME ROS SA SARA TDI TGME TLV TNF tpy TRI TRV USGS UTM VOC WHO ACRONYMS National Toxicology Program original equipment manufacturing physiologically based pharmacokinetic proportion of organism's diet made up by diet item /' publicly owned treatment works parts per million reference concentration reference dose reasonable maximum exposure reactive oxygen species skin surface area exposed Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act of 1986 total daily intake triethylene glycol methyl ether threshold limit value tumor necrosis factor alpha tons per year Toxics Release Inventory toxicity reference value U.S. Geological Survey Universal Transverse Mercator volatile organic compound World Health Organization VIII 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ethylene glycol monobutyl ether (EGBE) (Chemical Abstract Service [CAS] number 111 76-2) is used primarily as a solvent in the manufacture of paints, coatings, metal cleaners, and household cleaners and as a chemical intermediate in the production of other chemicals. It has been used for more than 60 years because of its valuable and unique properties, especially its ability to make water-based, environmentally sound products work effectively. EGBE is regulated under Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) because it is a member of the "Certain Glycol Ethers" category of compounds as currently defined on the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI). Section 313(d) of EPCRA calls for the removal of a chemical from the TRI where "there is not sufficient evidence to establish" that the chemical "is known to cause or can reasonably be anticipated to cause" any of three types of effects: (A) significant adverse acute human health effects; (B) (i) cancer or teratogenic effects, or (ii) serious or irreversible reproductive dysfunctions, neurological disorders, heritable genetic mutations, or other chronic health effects; or (C) a significant adverse effect on the environment of sufficient seriousness, in the judgment of the Administrator, to warrant reporting of facility releases. As detailed in the human health and ecological hazard assessment presented in Section 3 of this petition and summarized in Table ES-1, the available evidence indicates that EGBE presents low potential hazards to human health and the environment. The scientific data support the conclusions in the current Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) assessment (EPA 2010)a that EGBE is not immunotoxic, genotoxic, or teratogenic, and does not cause adverse reproductive effects. The toxic effects of EGBE are secondary to its irritant and hemolytic effects, and United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has determined that prevention of hemolytic effects in humans will also protect against all other potential toxic effects (EPA 2010, 68 FR 65656, 69 FR 69322). The data show, moreover, that humans are relatively insensitive to the hemolytic effects of EGBE. Even minor prehemolytic effects are expected to occur in humans, if they occur at all, only at exposure concentrations/doses far in excess of levels that might occur near EGBE-using facilities. The human-equivalent lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) is significantly above 500 milligrams per kilogram body weight per day (mg/kg BW-day), and prehemolytic effects are not predicted in humans even in EGBE-saturated atmospheres (EPA 2010, Udden 2000, 2002). a Although the 1999 IRIS assessment is currently under review, the review is limited to updating the carcinogenicity evaluation to incorporate EPA's recent cancer hazard evaluation for EGBE (EPA 2005a). See 71 Federal Register [FR] 77018 (EPA 2006). 1 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00014 For similar reasons, the potential carcinogenicity of EGBE in humans is appropriately characterized under EPA's TRI listing criteria as low to nonexistent based on a hazard evaluation. The IRIS assessment finds "limited" animal evidence of carcinogenicity and concludes that the human carcinogenic potential of EGBE "cannot be determined" (EPA 2010). Subsequent mechanistic studies led EPA to determine that that nonlinear, nongenotoxic modes of action are likely responsible for the increased incidence of tumors observed in rodent studies (EPA 2005a). Consequently, even if the limited rodent findings are relevant to humans, the relatively low sensitivity of humans (including subpopulations such as children) to the hemolytic effects of EGBE means that, as EPA has stated, "we would not expect to find these tumors in humans following environmental exposures" (69 FR 69322). EGBE likewise poses a very low potential ecological hazard judged by the criteria EPA has developed for making listing decisions under EPCRA. As summarized in Table ES-1, it has a relatively short residence time in the atmosphere, high water solubility, low octanol-water partition coefficient (Kow), low vapor pressure, and low bioconcentration factor. Thus, EGBE has very low potential for persistence or bioaccumulation. Consistent with the findings of a series of comprehensive ecotoxicity assessments-- including the recently updated Concise International Chemical Assessment Document (CICAD) (WHO 2010), the European Union (EU) Risk Assessment (INERIS 2005); and Environment Canada (2002)--EPA determined in the Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAPs) proceeding that that EGBE causes only "very minor" effects that "are unlikely to be ecologically significant" (68 Fed. Reg. 65657). The updated ecological hazard evaluation in Section 3 of this petition supports that conclusion. Acute toxicity to most aquatic organisms has been found at concentrations in the vicinity of 1,000 milligrams per liter (mg/L) while chronic toxicity to most aquatic organisms has been found at concentrations above 100 mg/L. For the most sensitive species, acute and chronic aquatic toxicity likewise has been reported only at levels that are properly evaluated as high under EPA's TRI listing criteria (Table ES-1). No data have been found indicating that EGBE is toxic to terrestrial mammals or birds. The data indicate, in short, that EGBE is "practically non-toxic" to fish and invertebrates under established EPA criteria and, therefore, presents "a low risk to the environment" (Staples 1998). For these reasons, the human health and ecological hazard evaluation presented here supports a determination that EGBE has "low toxicity and unrealistic exposures would be necessary for it to pose a risk to communities" (59 FR 61442). Under these circumstances, EPA's interpretation of EPCRA Section 313(d)(2) calls for the consideration of exposure levels in determining whether to delete EGBE from the TRI reporting list. Significantly, this is an issue the Agency has addressed in a statutory setting that is virtually identical to Section 313(d) of EPCRA. On November 29, 2004, EPA Administrator Michael O. Leavitt granted the Panel's petition to remove EGBE from the list of HAPs under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) (EPA 2004a). Section 112 authorizes the removal of a listed HAP based on a determination that "the substance may not reasonably be anticipated to cause any adverse effects to the human health or any adverse environmental effects." In assessing exposures to EGBE, EPA determined that the 1993 TRI data (on which our HAPs 2 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00015 petition was largely based) provided an "adequate" and "reasonable representation" of the sources and levels of EGBE emissions. Application of conservative exposure models led the Administrator to find that maximum estimated exposures from EGBE-emitting facilities are well below the IRIS reference concentration (RfC) and reference dose (RfD). He therefore concluded, "with confidence," that releases of EGBE "may not reasonably be anticipated to cause any adverse effects to human health" (69 FR 69322). Relying on similar conservative modeling based on the 1993 TRI data, the Administrator likewise found that there are adequate data on environmental effects of EGBE to determine that ambient concentrations, bioaccumulation, or deposition of EGBE are not reasonably anticipated to cause any adverse environmental effects (68 FR 65657). This petition updates the hazard, exposure, and ecological assessments that EPA reviewed and prepared in the HAPs delisting proceeding, consistent with the assumptions and methodologies that EPA found to be "appropriate," "acceptable," and "conservative." Section 4 reviews the bases for and substantial conservatism built into the IRIS RfC and RfD, which are used to evaluate the results of the exposure assessments prepared for this petition, as they were in the HAPs decision. Nationwide exposure potential is assessed in Section 5 by developing an inventory of Certain Glycol Ether releases using 2009, 2010, and 2011 TRI data. Because EGBE comprises 52 percent (%) of the United States annual consumption of glycol ethers (SRI 2010), the inventory's assumption that all releases of Certain Glycol Ether are EGBE (in the absence of facility-specific data to the contrary) generally overstates EGBE releases by a factor of two. As described in Section 6, every facility listed in the TRI database is subjected to a screening process very similar to that used in the HAPs proceeding to determine which facilities have the potential to have maximum annual average concentrations of EGBE at or beyond the fenceline greater than the IRIS RfC of 1.6 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3). In addition, an analysis of clusters of multiple facilities within the same zip code is used to evaluate the maximum potential combined exposures from closely located sources of EGBE. A comparison of annual emissions reported to TRI from 2000 through 2011 is used to demonstrate that interannual variability in reported emissions among high emitting facilities is relatively low and that the tiered modeling approach in this petition provides a sufficient margin of safety that encompasses reasonable interannual variability in facility EGBE emissions. Section 6 also includes a reasonable worst-case assessment of the potential for acute irritation effects from EGBE facility releases using the Margin of Exposure (MOE) methodology EPA has employed in prior TRI listing decisions. Section 7 evaluates the potential health effects of EGBE posed by human surface water ingestion and dermal exposures against the IRIS RfD of 0.1 mg/kg BW-day, based on essentially the same conservative assumptions and models that EPA characterized in the HAPs evaluation, with updates to reflect the estimated surface water concentration based on 2009, 2010, and 2011 TRI data, the current RfD, and changes in EPA (2004b) guidance for dermal risk assessment. 3 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00016 Section 8 updates the three ecological risk assessments (ERAs) conducted in the HAPs proceeding by applying 2009, 2010, and 2011 TRI data to the Mackay Level III fugacity model, to yield updated estimates of the maximum surface water concentration. In addition, Section 7 applies an updated toxicity reference value (TRV) for aquatic organisms that was identified in a supplemental review of the ecotoxicity literature for EGBE. The results, summarized in Table ES-2, reveal that EGBE exposures are well below the IRIS RfC and RfD for inhalation and dermal/ingestion exposures as well as appropriate ecotoxicity reference values. Consequently, the hazard quotients (HQs)--the ratio of maximum exposures to applicable health and environmental reference values--are also well below 1 indicating, in accordance with the National Contingency Plan (EPA 1990a) and EPA (1989) risk assessment guidance, that adverse health and environmental effects are unlikely. Similarly, the acute MOE for the estimated maximum hourly concentration of EGBE is above 5, which indicates no significant concern for potential acute effects because, among other things, the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) is based on human data. As discussed in Section 9.2 and as summarized in Table ES-3, the exposure and risk estimates developed in this petition are likely overstated by wide margins, perhaps by as much as five orders of magnitude. EPA (2003) has acknowledged that substantial conservatism is incorporated into every primary element of the evaluation, including the IRIS and ecotoxicity reference values, the emissions inventory, and the models and assumptions used to estimate maximum exposures. The scientific evidence therefore supports a finding that "there is not sufficient evidence to establish" that EGBE satisfies any of the three listing criteria of EPCRA Section 313(d). Delisting EGBE is also consistent with the policies and goals of the TRI program as articulated by EPA. As developed in Section 9.3, the Agency has emphasized the need to ensure that TRI listing decisions are consistent with "other EPA decisions on the same chemical, to the extent that such decisions relate to the same basic criteria for human health and the environment" (52 FR 5481). That consideration is especially important here because, as summarized in Table ES-2, human and environmental exposures are consistent with or less than those that formed the basis of the Agency's November 2004 HAPs findings that releases of EGBE "may not reasonably be anticipated to cause any adverse effects to the human health" or "adverse environmental effects" (EPA 2004a, 69 FR 69322). By their terms, these findings encompass the health and ecotoxicity listing criteria of EPCRA Section 313(d) and, therefore, should be accorded considerable weight here. Delisting EGBE also would promote the goals of the TRI program by focusing community risk management and pollution prevention efforts on other chemicals that EPA has determined present significant human health and environmental risks (see Section 9.4). Of special importance in this regard is the fact that delisting would remove the current disincentive to the use of EGBE in waterborne coating formulations that have demonstrable environmental benefits in the form of substantial reductions in volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions. Deleting EGBE from the TRI reporting list also would maintain the credibility of the program by eliminating the confusion that currently results because facilities are inappropriately singled out 4 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00017 as major sources of "toxics" on the basis of EGBE releases that, as EPA has found, may not reasonably be anticipated to cause adverse human health or environmental effects. The case for deleting EGBE from the TRI reporting list, in sum, is straightforward and compelling. Because the delisting criteria of EPCRA Section 313(d) as interpreted by EPA are met, and because the local risk management and pollution prevention purposes of the statute would be well served by delisting, the Panel respectfully asks EPA to grant this petition. 5 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00018 1.0 INTRODUCTION This petition, submitted by the American Chemistry Council's Ethylene Glycol Ethers Panel (the Panel) under Section 313(d) & (e) of the Emergency Planning and Community Rightto-Know Act (EPCRA), seeks the removal of ethylene glycol monobutyl ether (EGBE) from the list of chemicals subject to the reporting requirements of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) program. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) number for EGBE is 111-76-2, and its chemical structure is illustrated in Figure 1-1 below. The American Chemistry Council is a trade organization for chemical manufacturers. The American Chemistry Council's contact is Mr. Jonathon Busch, Director of the Ethylene Glycol Ethers Panel. He can be reached at the mailing address listed on the cover of this petition, by phone at 202-249-6725, or by e-mail at ion busch@americanchemistry.com.b Members of the Ethylene Glycol Ethers Panel are The Dow Chemical Company, Eastman Chemical, and LyondellBasell. Panel members Dow, Eastman, along with LyondellBasell account for all domestic manufacture of EGBE (SRI 2010). Section 313(d) of EPCRA (42 U.S.C. 11023(d)(2)(A)-(C) & (d)(3)) calls for the delisting of a chemical where "there is not sufficient evidence to establish" that-- (A) The chemical is known to cause or can reasonably be anticipated to cause significant adverse acute human health effects at concentrations expected to exist beyond facility site boundaries as result of continuous or frequently recurring releases; (B) The chemical is known to cause or can reasonably be anticipated to cause in humans-- (i) cancer or teratogenic effects, or b There is an underscore symbol between Mr. Busch's first and last names within his email address. 6 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00019 (ii) serious or irreversible-- (I) reproductive dysfunctions, (II) neurological disorders, (III) heritable genetic mutations, or (IV) other chronic health effects. (C) The chemical is known to cause or can reasonably be anticipated to cause, because of-- (i) its toxicity, (ii) its toxicity and persistence in the environment, or (iii) its toxicity and tendency to bioaccumulate in the environment, a significant adverse effect on the environment of sufficient seriousness, in the judgment of the Administrator, to warrant reporting under this section. This petition evaluates EGBE based on these criteria. In accordance with United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) interpretation of the EPCRA listing criteria (59 Fed. Reg. 61432 [EPA 1994a]), the petition presents in Section 3 a qualitative assessment of the potential hazards EGBE poses to human health and the environment. Because the hazard assessment supports the conclusion that EGBE presents a low potential for adverse human health and ecological effects, we also present in Sections 4 through 8 conservative assessments of potential human and environmental exposures resulting from facility releases of EGBE and how such exposures compare to highly protective criteria for preventing adverse human health and ecological effects. Specifically, the petition is organized as follows: Section 2 presents background information on the chemical identity of EGBE, regulatory history, current standards and guidelines, production, and use. Section 3 presents a qualitative evaluation of the potential human health and ecological hazards posed by EGBE: The physical and chemical properties of EGBE are reviewed, focusing on properties relevant to potential health and environmental effects including persistence and bioaccumulation. The human health hazard evaluation reviews and updates the current Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) toxicological assessment of EGBE (EPA 2010) and the reviews appearing in the 2004 Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) delisting decision (68 Fed. Reg. 65648 [EPA 2003], 69 FR 69320 [EPA 2004a]) and in EPA's (2005a) report, An Evaluation of the Human Carcinogenic Potential of Ethylene Glycol Butyl Ether. Acute and chronic health effects are addressed separately in order to directly evaluate EGBE against the first two listing criteria set forth in EPCRA Section 313(d)(2)(A) & (B). The ecological hazard evaluation likewise builds on the ecotoxicity assessments developed or approved by EPA in the HAPs rulemaking as well as a series of recent comprehensive reviews by the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Union (EU), and Environment Canada, all of which have reached similar conclusions about the low potential ecotoxicity of EGBE. 7 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00020 Section 3 closes with a review and application of EPA's criteria for considering exposure in making TRI listing decisions under EPCRA (59 Fed. Reg. 61432 [EPA 1994a). The next five sections of the petition evaluate potential human and environmental exposures resulting from EGBE facility releases based on conservative modeling and highly protective criteria for preventing potential health and ecological effects. Section 4 describes the criteria used in this petition for evaluating chronic human exposures to EGBE, viz. the IRIS reference concentration (RfC) and reference dose (RfD). Section 5 follows the general approach used in the HAPs delisting decision by constructing an inventory of EGBE releases based on the 2009, 2010, and 2011 TRI reports for Certain Glycol Ethers, which provide the most up-to-date data available (the HAPs assessment was based largely on 1993 TRI data). Section 6 presents the screening approach used to evaluate both chronic and acute exposures. Chronic exposures are assessed by applying EPA modeling guidance to develop conservative estimates of maximum annual average concentrations of EGBE at or beyond facility fencelines and comparing those estimates against the IRIS RfC. Because estimated maximum annual average concentrations for all facilities in the 2009, 2010 and 2011 inventories are below the RfC based on unrealistically conservative screening assumptions, application of more sophisticated tiered modeling is unnecessary in this case under EPA (1992a) modeling guidelines. Nevertheless, tiered modeling is used fora sample of the highest EGBE-emitting facilities in order to estimate the degree of conservatism incorporated into the screening results. It should be noted, an examination of trends in maximum TRI-reported Certain Glycol Ether emissions from for reporting years from 2000 to 2011 (see Figure 5-1) indicated there has been remarkably little variability in the Certain Glycol Ether emissions from the highest emitting facilities over the past decade. Similar to the HAPs assessment, cumulative exposures from closely located sources of EGBE (i.e., within the same zip code) are evaluated. Acute exposures are assessed by developing conservative estimates of maximum hourly average concentrations of EGBE at or beyond facility fencelines for the highest emitting facilities (i.e. those facilities that did not screen out in two highly conservative prescreening steps). The resulting estimates of the maximum hourly EGBE concentration in ambient air for the facilities are evaluated using the Margin of Exposure (MOE) methodology EPA has used in previous TRI listing decisions, using the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) derived from human data in Section 3 of the petition. Section 7 evaluates human health exposure and risks associated with EGBE in surface water against the IRIS RfD. Again, the same models and assumptions used in the HAPs assessment are employed here, updated to reflect the surface water concentration modeled from 2010 TRI release data, the most recent version of the Mackay fugacity model (EQC v2.02; CEMC 2003), and current EPA (2004b) guidance for dermal risk assessment. Potential exposures were evaluated based on 2009, 2010, and 2011 TRI release data but the human health exposure assessment was conducted with the 2010 TRI data because they represented 8 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00021 the worst-case scenario from the recent TRI data. The estimated exposures based on these data are well below the RfD. Section 8 presents an ecological risk assessment (ERA) for EGBE, based on the models and assumptions used in the HAPs assessment, EGBE releases to air, land, and water as reported in the 2009, 2010, and 2011 TRI, and a supplemental literature review to identify appropriate target species and toxicity reference values (TRVs). Section 9 presents a summary of the hazard, exposure, and risk assessments developed in the preceding sections, identifies the elements of conservatism built into these assessments, and evaluates the results under the listing/delisting criteria of EPCRA Section 313(d)(2). In addition, EPA policies for the interpretation and administration of the TRI program are reviewed, and other considerations relevant to the question of whether to delist EGBE are discussed. References are listed in Section 10, and five appendices provide detailed data and analysis that form the basis for the hazard, release inventory and exposure assessments described in Sections 3 through 8. Appendix A tabulates laboratory bioassay studies of EGBE, including the compilation published in the 1998 Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) toxicological profile of EGBE, and a table of subsequent studies. Appendix B is the emissions inventory. Appendix C presents the chronic screening results for airborne emissions. Appendix D provides results of a quantitative uncertainty analysis, which demonstrates the health protectiveness of the overall approach to evaluating inhalation exposures. Appendix E presents the acute screening results for airborne emissions. Finally, Appendix F, provided as electronic files on CDROM, are the model output files from both the Tier 2 and Tier 3 modeling. 9 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00022 2.0 BACKGROUND This section provides background information on EGBE (CAS 111-76-2), including a list of synonyms, history of EGBE regulation, regulatory standards and guidelines, chemical and physical properties, and production and use. 2.1 Synonyms EGBE has many synonyms (NICNAS 1996 , HSDB 1997, ECETOC 1994), including: 2-butoxyethanol ethylene glycol butyl ether 2-butoxy-1-ethanol ethylene glycol monobutyl ether 2-BE ethylene glycol mono-n-butyl ether 2-n-butoxyethanol 3-oxa-1-heptanol beta-butoxyethanol butoxyethanol ethylene glycol n-butyl ether glycol butyl ether glycol monobutyl ether monobutyl ethylene glycol ether butyl glycol butyl glycol ether ethanol 2-butoxy monobutyl glycol ether n-butoxyethanol o-butyl ethylene glycol EGBE is marketed in the United States under various trade names, including: Eastman EB Solvent Butyl CELLOSOLVE Solvent Butyl OXITOL DOWANOL EB Ektasolve EB Glycol Ether EB Poly-Solv EB 2.2 History of EGBE Regulation under EPCRA EGBE is regulated under EPCRA because it is a member of the "Certain Glycol Ethers" category of chemicals as currently defined in the TRI. Regulation of glycol ethers is an outgrowth of developmental studies conducted or sponsored by industry in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Subsequently, the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) concluded that two glycol ethers--ethylene glycol monomethyl ether (EGME) and ethylene glycol monoethyl ether (EGEE)--had the potential to cause adverse reproductive, embryotoxic, and teratogenic effects in laboratory animals (NIOSH 1983). Several state regulatory agencies assumed that the effects observed in EGME and EGEE were applicable to all glycol ethers. Thus, as a result of the 1983 NIOSH findings, the Maryland Department of Environmental Protection included glycol ethers in a list of chemicals for which it planned to collect use information (Maryland 1985). Maryland's list of chemicals was subsequently incorporated into 10 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00023 the Section 313 list of Title III of the Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), or EPCRA. Glycol ethers were initially defined as chemicals with the formula, R-(OCH2CH2)n-OR' Eqn. 1 where: R = alkyl or aryl groups R' = R, H, or groups which, when removed, yield glycol ethers with the structure: R-(OCH2CH2)n-OH n = 1,2, or 3. In 1994, EPA redefined the glycol ether category to exclude compounds having alkyl chains of more than seven carbon members in length (59 FR 34386 [EPA 1994b]). The redefinition eliminated the need for nonionic surfactant manufacturers and users to report emissions of those chemicals to the TRI. As a result, the category, which is now called "Certain Glycol Ethers," is defined as follows (http://www.epa.qov/ttn/atw/qlycol2000.pdf): R-(OCH2CH2)n-OR' Eqn. 2 where: n = 1,2, or 3 R = alkyl C7 or less; or R = phenyl or alkyl substituted phenyl; R' = H, or alkyl C7 or less; or OR' consisting of carboxylic acid ester, sulfate, phosphate, nitrate, or sulfonate. 2.3 Removal of EGBE from the Clean Air Act HAPs List In the 1990 Amendments to Clean Air Act (CAA), Congress expanded the list of HAPs, based on the EPCRA Section 313 list and other compilations of chemicals, to include the glycol ether category. EGBE remained on the CAA HAPs list, as part of the glycol ethers category, until it was delisted on November 29, 2004 (69 FR 69320 [EPA 2004a]). The Administrator's HAPs delisting decision granted our 1997 petition (CMA 1997),c which used 1993 TRI data (and other sources of information on potential sources) and exposure modeling adapted from EPA (1992a) modeling guidance to demonstrate that maximum EGBE exposures fall below IRIS reference values. Additionally, we prepared an ERA, also in accordance with EPA guidelines, showing that EGBE releases are not reasonably anticipated to pose adverse effects on the environment. The delisting provision of Section 112(b)(3)(C) of CAA [42 U.S.C. 7412(b)(3)(C)] is substantively at least as broad and stringent as that in EPCRA. The CAA provides that a chemical may be removed from the HAPs list if EPA finds that: cAt that time, the American Chemistry Council was known as the Chemical Manufacturers Association (CMA). 11 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00024 there is adequate data on the health and environmental effects of the substance to determine that emissions, ambient concentrations, bioaccumulation of deposition of the substance may not reasonably be anticipated to cause any adverse effects to the human health or adverse environmental effects. In reviewing and granting our HAPs delisting petition, EPA reevaluated the adequacy of the existing IRIS reference values by examining scientific data published after the 1999 IRIS assessment (EPA 1999a), including new toxicological studies addressing the relevance of limited rodent carcinogenicity data to humans, and conducted supplemental exposure modeling on some of the issues raised by the petition (discussed in greater detail below). The Agency's review of the scientific record included a series of findings that should weigh heavily in the evaluation of this petition to remove EGBE from EPCRA's TRI reporting list. First, with respect to the potential human health effects of EGBE exposure, EPA reaffirmed the adequacy of the previous IRIS RfC (13 milligrams per cubic meter [mg/m3]) and RfD (0.5 milligrams per kilogram body weight per day [mg/kg BW-day]) as protective against all known or potential human health effects of EGBE, including any potential sensitive subpopulations (68 FR 65654, 65656 [EPA 2003]). This review included a reevaluation of the 1999 IRIS carcinogenicity assessment, which had concluded, under the then-current EPA (1986a) Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment, that EGBE is a "possible human carcinogen based on limited laboratory animal evidence and a lack of human studies" (EPA 1999a). Based on post-IRIS toxicological studies testing the relevance of the limited animal findings to humans, EPA concluded that the previous IRIS "RfC and RfD values for EGBE have been set at levels that prevent... the precursor events that would lead to tumors" in rodents. The Agency found, accordingly, that even if the rodent tumor findings are relevant to humans at all, "we would not expect to find these tumors in humans following environmental exposures" (69 FR 69322). Second, EPA found "the petition's overall approach to exposure assessment to be acceptable" (68 FR 65653), and made the following specific determinations. The use of the 1993 TRI database to construct a complete list of emitting sources and emission levels "provides an adequate basis for dispersion modeling and the exposure assessment and is acceptable for that purpose" (68 FR 65652). The five-tier modeling approach used in our HAPs petition to evaluate maximum inhalation exposures "followed appropriate modeling guidance" and "would tend to overestimate rather than underestimate maximum annual ambient average concentrations" (68 FR 65652). EPA also observed that the modeling and assumptions used to assess ingestion and dermal exposures arising from surface water levels of EGBE, including supplemental analyses conducted by the Agency, were "conservative," and the exposure estimates found to be below the IRIS RfD represented a "worst-case exposure scenario" (68 FR 65653-54). Third, EPA's evaluation of potential environmental risks included the development of its own ERA, which was based in part on the same "worst-case exposure scenario" for predicted maximum surface water concentrations used in the evaluation of human ingestion and dermal 12 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00025 exposures. In addition, the Agency noted that the TRVs for small mammals and aquatic species used in the ERA "were derived from very minor effects which were unlikely to be ecologically significant at the population level of ecological organization" (68 FR 65657). Based on these and other findings, EPA concluded that maximum exposures to EGBE fall well below the IRIS RfC and RfD, as well as the TRVs developed to assess ecological risks. The Administrator (69 FR 69322) summarized the basis for the HAPs delisting of EGBE as follows: We can therefore conclude with confidence that emissions, ambient concentrations, bioaccumulation, or deposition of EGBE may not reasonably be anticipated to cause any adverse effects to the human health. Likewise, EPA found, based on the ERA, that "there are adequate data on environmental effects of EGBE to determine that ambient concentrations, bioaccumulation, or deposition of EGBE are not reasonably anticipated to cause adverse environmental effects" (68 FR 65657). 2.4 Regulatory Standards and Guidelines Federal and state regulatory standards and guidelines for EGBE are listed in Table 2-1. 2.5 Production and Use As described by ATSDR (1998), ethylene glycol monoalkyl ethers are not manufactured as pure compounds but must be separated from the diethers and higher glycols (NTP 1993, as cited in ATSDR 1998; NIOSH 1990, as cited in ATSDR 1998). There are two common methods of producing EGBE: (1) reaction of ethylene oxide with anhydrous butyl alcohol in the presence of a catalyst, and (2) direct alkylation of ethylene chlorohydrin or ethylene glycol using sodium hydroxide and an alkylating agent such as dibutyl sulfate (HSDB 1997, as cited in ATSDR 1998; NIOSH 1990, as cited in ATSDR 1998; Rowe and Wolf 1982, as cited in ATSDR 1998). By far, the dominant method of EGBE production is treatment of butyl alcohol with ethylene oxide. all domestic EGBE (SRI 2010). Between 1970 and 2009, production of EGBE in the United States increased by nearly five-fold from 53,500 tons per year (tpy) to approximately 250,000 tpy (Figure 2-1, SRI 2010). Between 1999 and 2007, however, production of EGBE has fluctuated between 254,500 and 292,000 tpy, without showing a clear increase in production from year to year (SRI 2010). There was a 14% decrease in production of EGBE between 2007 and 2009 (SRI 2010). The overall average annual growth rate in EGBE production is expected to be 2.8% between 2009 and 2014 (SRI 2010). Because of its favorable physical, chemical, and technical characteristics, EGBE has become the largest volume glycol ether consumed in the United States (SRI 2010). In 2009, United States consumption of EGBE was 135,000 tpy, which represents approximately 52% of all ethylene glycol ethers consumed (SRI 2010). This rate of consumption of EGBE represents a 13 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00026 1% increase since 1990, when consumption was 132,000 tpy (SRI 2010). During the economic recession in 2008-2009, the United States EGBE consumption dropped 19% from 166,500 tpy to 133,500 tpy between 2007 and 2009. The overall average annual growth rate of domestic EGBE consumption was expected to be 3.1% between 2009 and 2014 (SRI 2010). Because this growth in consumption is predicted to outpace growth in production, a concurrent decrease in exports was expected (SRI 2010). Despite growth in consumption since 1990, overall nationwide emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers to all media have decreased from 26,782 tpy in 1990 to 7,229 tpy in 2011, a reduction of 70% (www.epa.gov/triexplorer). The reduction in emissions is likely attributable principally to increased regulation under the CAA and state air pollution laws; corporate product stewardship programs (some no doubt in response to "right-to-know" initiatives like EPCRA itself); and the 1994 redefinition of the Certain Glycol Ethers category, which removed nonionic surfactant glycol ethers from the chemicals covered by the listing. Of the 135,000 tpy of EGBE consumed in the United States in 2009, 68,500 tons (51%) were used as solvents in paints, coatings, and inks (SRI 2010). In addition, 20,500 tons (15%) were used as solvents in metal cleaners and liquid household cleaners and 29,000 tons (21%) were used as solvents in other products (SRI 2010). Consumption of EGBE as a chemical intermediate in the production of 2-butoxyethyl acetate (EGBEA) accounted for 9,000 tons (7%) of EGBE consumption (SRI 2010). Consumption for production of other chemicals [including tris(2-butoxyethyl)phosphate, di(2-butoxyethyl)adipate and di(2-butoxyethyl)phthalate] accounted for another 7,500 tons (6%) of EGBE consumption (SRI 2010). Approximately 80% of EGBE consumed in surface coatings is used for industrial and specialty coatings; the remainder is used in architectural coatings (SRI 2010). Industrial coatings are defined as coatings that are factory-applied to manufactured goods as part of the production process (SRI 2004). They are also known as original equipment manufacturing (OEM) coatings. OEM coatings that contain EGBE include automotive paints, lacquers, quick drying varnishes, and enamels. Other industrial paints and coatings that employ EGBE include (1) coatings for metal cans and coils, ships, trucks, buses, and farm machinery and (2) paints and finishes for wood products, metal furniture, and fixtures (NPCA 1997, as cited in SRI 2004). Specialty coatings are those that are used primarily where durability is a key objective. Specialty coatings include high performance maintenance coatings, automotive refinishing paints, and aerosol paints (NPCA 1997, as cited in SRI 2004). Architectural coatings are paints and coatings that are applied onsite to new and existing residential, commercial, institutional, and industrial buildings. These products are generally distributed through retail and wholesale outlets and are bought by consumers, painters, contractors, builders, and government agencies (NPCA 1997, as cited in SRI 2004). The following are source categories that use EGBE and thus are potentially affected by this petition: Auto and light duty truck (surface coating) Leather tanning and finishing operations 14 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00027  Manufacture of paints, coatings, and adhesives Metal can (surface coating) Metal coil (surface coating) Metal furniture (surface coating) Printing, coating, and dyeing of fabrics Printing/publishing (surface coating) Wood furniture (surface coating) Synthetic organic chemical manufacturing Ship building and repair (surface coating) Semiconductor manufacturing 15 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00028 3.0 HAZARD ASSESSMENT Given EGBE's (CAS 111-76-2) widespread use (as detailed in Section 2.5), it has undergone extensive toxicological testing in laboratory animals. Animal bioassay data are supplemented by information from case reports of intentional human ingestion episodes and controlled human exposure experiments, as well as ecotoxicological testing on microbes, plants, and aquatic organisms. EGBE has been tested for acute, subchronic, and chronic toxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, immunotoxicity, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity. Although no toxicity data are available for terrestrial wildlife or birds, acute and chronic toxicity tests have been performed on a variety of aquatic organisms. The extensive database on the potential adverse human health effects of EGBE is reviewed in the EGBE IRIS assessment (EPA 2010) and the ATSDR toxicological profile of EGBE (ATSDR 1998). EGBE's potential ecological hazards have been extensively reviewed in a series of assessments by WHO the Concise International Chemical Assessment Document or CICAD (WHO 1998, 2010), EU (INERIS 2006), and Environment Canada (2002). These assessments provide the starting point and primary basis for the qualitative hazard assessment presented in this section of the petition, supplemented as appropriate by descriptions of subsequently published studies. 3.1 Chemical and Physical Properties EGBE's chemical and physical properties, excerpted from the ATSDR toxicological profile for EGBE (ATSDR 1998), are summarized in Table 3-1. Additional information and implications of these properties are discussed in this subsection. EGBE is considered "readily" biodegradable (Price et al. 1974, as cited in ATSDR 1998) and has a relatively short residence time in the environment. Its half-life in both surface water and soil ranges from 7 days to 4 weeks, while its half-life in groundwater is 14 days to 8 weeks, and its half-life in the atmosphere is approximately 3.3 hours to 33 hours (Howard et al. 1991, as cited in ATSDR 1998). EGBE is highly mobile in soil and unlikely to partition from the water column to organic matter contained in sediments or suspended solids (Swann et al. 1983). The volatilization of EGBE from surface water and moist soil is slow (Lyman et al. 1982, as cited in ATSDR 1998). In the atmosphere, EGBE is expected to exist almost entirely in the vapor phase, although EGBE may be physically removed from air by precipitation (Eisenreich et al. 1981, as cited in ATSDR 1998). The Hazardous Substance Data Bank (HSDB; http://toxnet.nlm.nih.qov) reports that an estimated bioconcentration factor (BCF) of 3 was calculated for EGBE, concluding that the potential for bioconcentration in aquatic organisms is low. The most important mechanism of removal of EGBE from aerobic soil and water is microbiotic degradation (ATSDR 1998). Concentrations of EGBE of less than 500 milligrams per liter (mg/L) were readily degraded by microorganisms in bench scale degradation tests using domestic activated sludge, with reported biodegradation rates of greater than 63% after three days and 100% after five days (Assessment Technologies, Inc. 1996). A 20-day biological 16 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00029 oxygen demand (BOD) test and an aerobic degradability 28-day closed bottle test resulted in EGBE degradation rates of 75% and 88% respectively (NICNAS 1996). Because EGBE does not undergo hydrolysis or direct photolysis in aquatic environments (Howard 1993, as cited in ATSDR 1998), abiotic degradation processes are assumed to play a negligible role in determining the ultimate fate of EGBE in surface water, groundwater, and soil. However, Atkinson (1987) calculated an atmospheric half-life of 17 hours for EGBE based on a second order photooxidation rate of 2.3 x 10-11 cubic centimeters (cm3)/molecules-second. Therefore, abiotic degradation can significantly affect the fate of EGBE in air. Limited data are available regarding degradation products of EGBE. The intermediate products of aerobic biodegradation were not identified in any of the screening tests considered by ATSDR (1998). However, as observed in human and animal studies (Johanson etal. 1989, as cited in ATSDR 1998), 2-butoxy-ethanol acetate (BAA) may enzymatically hydrolyze to EGBE and acetic acid as a result of biodegradation. By analogy to animal metabolism (Ghanayem et al. 1987, as cited in ATSDR 1998), it is possible that any EGBE formed through enzymatic hydrolysis may undergo further enzymatic oxidation (e.g., via dehydrogenase) to the butoxyacetaldehyde and finally to 2-butoxyacetic acid before being degraded to carbon dioxide and water. The reported products of photodegradation of EGBE in the atmosphere are propionaldehyde (CAS 123-38-6), butyraldehyde (CAS 123-72-8), butyl formate (CAS 592-84 7), 2-hydroxyethyl formate (CAS 628-35-3), 3-hydroxybutyl formate, 2-hydroxybutyl formate, and an organic nitrate (Tuazon et al. 1998, as cited in INERIS 2005). No data are available on the anaerobic degradation products of EGBE. Given its relatively short residence time in the atmosphere, high water solubility, low octanol-water partition coefficient (Kow), and low vapor pressure (Table 3-1), EGBE released to the atmosphere partitions to surface water and soil. The Mackay fugacity model predicts that, although approximately 99% of EGBE released to the environment is released to the air, approximately 98% of the EGBE released partitions into soil and surface water at equilibrium (Section 8.2.2, below; Cadmus 2000a). 3.2 Potential Human Health Hazards In this section, we briefly describe the pertinent information available on the potential health effects of human exposure to EGBE, both noncancer effects from brief (acute) and repeated (subchronic and chronic) exposures, and information on the potential carcinogenicity of EGBE. 3.2.1 Noncancer Toxicity EGBE is well absorbed via the inhalation, dermal, and oral routes of exposure and is widely distributed throughout the body and metabolized primarily via alcohol dehydrogenase to BAA, which is rapidly excreted in urine. Studies in humans and rats indicate that the metabolic pathways are similar for both species. However, in humans, unlike rats, some BAA is conjugated with glycine or glutamine prior to excretion, while rats also have a minor oxidation pathway involving O-dealkylation by a cytochrome P450 dealkylase (CYP 2E1) that is not 17 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00030 involved in human metabolism of EGBE (EPA 2010). The following subsections describe the acute and chronic health effects of EGBE. More detailed information on these effects is available in the ATSDR (1998) and EPA (2010) toxicology profiles. 3.2.1.1 Acute Toxicity EGBE's acute toxicity has been evaluated in a number of studies in experimental animals, with the oral lethal dose to 50% of the test population (LD50) ranging from 320 to 3,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (ACGIH 2003). The oral LD50 values vary depending on the species, sex, and age of the test animals. The order of sensitivity from the most to the least sensitive is: rabbits (320 mg/kg) > adult rat (560 mg/kg) > mouse (1,230 mg/kg) > rat weanling (3,000 mg/kg). By inhalation, the lethal concentration for 50% of test organisms (LC50) has been reported as 700 parts per million (ppm) in mice exposed for seven hours, and 486 ppm in rats exposed for four hours (ACGIH 2003). Severe hemolysis and hemoglobinuria are primary signs in rodents near these lethal levels, but humans are much less sensitive to the hemolytic effects of EGBE than rodents. In a series of three studies reported by Carpenter et al. (1956), small groups of humans and rats were exposed concurrently for four hours to 113 ppm (547 mg/m3) EGBE; for two 4-hour periods separated by a 30-minute break to 195 ppm (944 mg/m3); or for eight hours to 100 ppm (484 mg/m3). While the rats showed increased red blood cell fragility, no increase in red blood cell fragility was seen in the humans, although they did experience nasal and ocular irritation. Increased red blood cell fragility has been reported in rats at airborne concentrations as low as 62 ppm (300 mg/m3) (Carpenter et al. 1956). Similarly, acute ingestion of EGBE at doses as low as 32 mg/kg produced red blood cell hemolysis in adult rats (Ghanayem et al. 1987, NTP 2000, Long et al. 2000, Nyska et al. 1999, while no hemolytic effects were seen in a case of attempted suicide by ingestion of EGBE solution providing a dose of EGBE of 1,100 to 1,500 mg/kg (Gualtieri et al. 1995). In vitro studies confirm that rat red blood cells are extremely sensitive to the hemolytic effects of EGBE's primary metabolite, BAA, particularly compared to human red blood cells. In studies with blood from rats, dogs, rabbits, and humans, hemolysis occurred in rat red blood cells at BAA concentrations of 0.05% (500 mg/L) or more in normal saline, while red blood cells from dogs, rabbits, and humans did not undergo hemolysis at BAA concentrations up to 2% or 20,000 mg/L (ICI 1985, as cited in CIR 1996). Similarly, Bartnik et al. (1987) reported complete hemolysis of rat red blood cells within one hour at 7.5 millimolar (mM) BAA or about 875 mg/L, and 20% hemolysis at 2.5 mM (about 300 mg/L). In contrast, human red blood cells showed no hemolysis at the highest concentration tested, 15 mM (1,750 mg/L), even after two hours of exposure, while rat red blood cells had 2% hemolysis at a concentration as low as 1.25 mM (about 150 mg/L). The same authors also found a more modest difference in sensitivity to the parent EGBE. Exposure of rat red blood cells to 200 mM (about 23,000 mg/L) EGBE produced 100% hemolysis within 30 minutes, but the same concentration produced no hemolysis of human red blood cells in 30 minutes, although it did cause 100% hemolysis after 2 hours of exposure, as did 30 minutes exposure of human erythrocytes to a higher concentration (250 mM or 30,000 mg/L) of EGBE (Bartnik et al. 1987). Similarly, Ghanayem and Sullivan (1993) 18 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00031 observed no effect on mean corpuscular volume (MCV) or hematocrit in vitro in human red blood cells exposed to concentrations of BAA causing 50% to 60% increases in these parameters in rat red blood cells. Udden (2002) reported similar patterns of changes in red cell rigidity and MCV in rat and human red blood cells exposed to 100-fold different concentrations of BAA; rat red blood cells were 100-fold more sensitive than human red blood cells to these effects. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling (Corley et al. 1994) predicts that the acute exposures necessary for such concentrations of BAA are unlikely even in consumer product or occupational settings (Udden 2002, ACGIH 2003), much less in the ambient air near EGBEemitting facilities, where limited empirical data as well as estimates based on air quality modeling indicate that concentrations well below 1 mg/m3 are likely (WHO 2010, INERIS 2006; EPA 2003). Because of what the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) has called the "minimal potential for 2-butoxyethanol exposures to produce red blood cell hemolysis in humans as compared to rats," assessments of acute health hazards have defined mucous membrane irritation of the nose and eye as the critical effect of short-term exposures in humans, not hemolytic effects (CalEPA 1999, ACGIH 2003). As already mentioned, Carpenter et al. (1956) found that four adult male volunteers exposed to 113 ppm (550 mg/m3) EGBE for four hours, and two men and two women exposed to 100 ppm (485 mg/m3) for eight hours reported eye, nose, and throat irritation. Erythrocyte osmotic fragility and urinalysis were normal in the subjects during and after exposure, and no other evidence of systemic toxicity was found. In another study (Johanson et al. 1986), seven healthy male adults were exposed to 20 ppm (97 mg/m3) EGBE in a chamber experiment designed to assess pulmonary uptake and metabolism of EGBE during light exercise. The authors reported that none of the subjects complained or showed any adverse effects from two hours of exposure. As described in detail in Section 6, the short-term Tier 3 modeling results indicate that ambient concentrations near EGBE-emitting facilities are at least a factor of 5 below the NOAEL in this study. Hence, no acute toxic effects due to EGBE are likely adjacent to EGBE-emitting facilities. 3.2.1.2 Subchronic and Chronic Toxicity The 2010 IRIS assessment directly addresses the subject of the subchronic and chronic toxicity of EGBE, concluding that it is not immunotoxic, genotoxic, or teratogenic, and does not cause adverse reproductive effects of the sort that have been attributed to EGME and EGEE (EPA 2010). There was no reduction in the immune response to injected antigens in two studies in rats exposed to EGBE at up to 500 mg/kg BW-day, for up to 21 days (EPA 2010). EGBE had negative results in tests for genotoxicity in multiple studies: Salmonella typhimurium bacteria, Chinese hamster ovary cells (gene mutation, sister chromatid exchange, and chromosome aberration assays), and in vivo mouse micronucleus assay. Weakly positive, but not reproducible, responses were seen in a few in vitro studies, but EPA has determined in the IRIS assessment (EPA 2010) and the HAPs delisting decision (68 Fed. Reg. 65655 [EPA 2003]), that the overall weight of evidence indicates that EGBE is neither mutagenic nor clastogenic. 19 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00032 As summarized in the IRIS assessment (EPA 2010), EGBE has been extensively tested for reproductive and developmental effects by oral and inhalation exposure in rats, mice, and rabbits. While some generalized toxicity was seen at high exposure levels associated with EGBE's hematologic effects, there was no indication of the specific reproductive effects attributed to EGME and EGEE, and no adverse effects on reproduction or development at doses below those associated with hematologic effects (EPA 2010). These studies support the conclusion that hemolysis is the most sensitive toxicity endpoint for rodents from a variety of exposure routes (EPA 2010). The extensive EGBE animal toxicology database lacks any indication of neurotoxicity. Human experience indicates that intentional ingestion of large amounts of EGBE (i.e., suicide attempts) can result in coma, possibly secondary to metabolic acidosis, but exposure from normal use has not resulted in any reports of potential neurotoxicity. Specific neurotoxicology studies have been performed in animals by standard testing guidelines for three other ethylene glycol ethers (diethylene glycol butyl ether [DGBE], triethylene glycol methyl ether [TGME], and ethylene glycol monopropyl ether [EGPE]) and none of these studies have indicated a concern for neurotoxicity. Any neurotoxicity testing of EGBE would be constrained by the well-known hemolytic effects in rodents that would limit the highest dose that could be tested. As described in the IRIS assessment, intravascular red blood cell hemolysis is the primary response in sensitive species following inhalation, oral, or dermal exposure to EGBE (EPA 2010). This primary hemolytic effect may also result in secondary toxic effects in spleen, liver, kidney, bone marrow, and thymus. However, hemolysis is the effect seen at the lowest exposure levels--i.e., it is the most sensitive endpoint (EPA 2010). The IRIS assessment concludes, therefore, that prevention of hemolysis will also be protective for all other toxic effects. Review of the recent research on the hemolytic effects of EGBE has led EPA (2010) to draw the following conclusions, apart from contact-site irritant effects. Other effects resulting from EGBE are secondary to hemolysis. The primary metabolite of EGBE, BAA, is the proximate toxicant. Several species including humans are less sensitive than rats to the hemolytic effects of BAA. Groups who might be thought to be more sensitive than average (including children, the elderly, or those with congenital hemolytic diseases) do not show an increased hemolytic response to BAA. 3.2.1.3 Relative Insensitivity of Humans to EGBE's Hemolytic Effects It is important to note that EGBE is an exception to the general default assumption that humans are as sensitive as or more sensitive than the most sensitive animal species. In the case of EGBE, substantial rigorous data exist that demonstrate that humans are much less sensitive to the critical hemolytic effects of EGBE and its metabolite, BAA. The IRIS assessment describes six published PBPK models for EGBE. Employing the Corley et al. (1994, 1997) model, which allows both EGBE and BAA to be modeled in both humans and rats, EPA (2010) calculated tissue dose (BAA in blood) as a function of EGBE dose, route, and species. The 20 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00033 model demonstrated that prehemolytic changes in rat red blood cells occur at less than 1 % of the level at which such changes are observed in human red blood cells. In the study used as the basis for the RfC and RfD, for example, the EGBE lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) for prehemolytic changes in rat red blood cells, 31 ppm, 6 hours/day, 5 days/week was predicted to produce a peak blood concentration of BAA of 0.167 mM (EPA 2010). As noted earlier, Bartnik et al. (1987) reported no hemolysis of human red blood cells exposed to BAA levels almost 100 times higher (i.e., 15 mM) for three hours in vitro. Udden's (2002) comprehensive study supports a susceptibility factor for rats as compared to humans of at least 100 (i.e., humans are at least lOOtimes less sensitive than rats). Udden (2002) used a series of more specific and sensitive indicators of subhemolytic effects to quantify the difference in susceptibility to BAA of rat and human erythrocytes. Rat red blood cells were exposed to BAA at concentrations of 0, 0.025, 0.050, 0.075 and 0.1 mM, about an order of a magnitude lower than those used in previous work by Ghanayem (1989). Heparinized blood samples obtained from healthy adult volunteers were exposed to BAA at concentrations of 0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10 mM, concentrations 100 times greater than those used for rat erythrocytes. The indices used to evaluate subhemolytic changes caused by BAA included microhematocrit, hemoglobin, red blood cell count, percent hemolysis determined by a colorimetric procedure, MCV calculated from microhematocrit and red blood cell count, distribution of red blood cell size, red cell deformability, erythrocyte osmotic fragility, erythrocyte density and red blood cell morphology. For each of these measures of prehemolytic effects, Udden (2002) found that human blood was at least 100 times less sensitive than rat blood. Specifically, a significant change in human erythrocyte deformability was observed at 7.5 and 10 mM while in rat a significant change was first seen at 0.05 mM. There was a comparable increase in human and rat red blood cell size at concentrations of 10 mM and 0.1 mM BAA, respectively. BAA did not significantly affect the osmotic fragility of human erythrocytes until reaching concentrations greater than 7.5 mM, while significant effects were noted in rat erythrocytes at BAA concentrations as low as 0.05 mM. Cell density was also markedly decreased in rat erythrocytes treated with 0.1 mM BAA while only slight effects were noted in human erythrocytes treated with 10 mM BAA. Finally, no changes were noted in the morphology of the human erythrocytes treated with 10 mM BAA while rat erythrocytes treated with 0.1 mM showed increased numbers of spherocytes compared to controls. Udden (2000) previously demonstrated that "[S]tomatocytes, cup-shaped cells, and spherocytes are the principal morphological features of erythrocytes from rats exposed [in vivo] to [EGBE], or in vitro exposure to BAA." Udden (2002) also conducted investigations on the blood from 11 more healthy subjects as well as hospitalized children and adults treated with 10 mM BAA. There was a slight increase in hemolysis in the samples from hospitalized adults, but the degree was not considered physiologically significant and was no greater than the hemolysis seen in the controls of the healthy adults. No difference was seen in the degree of hemolysis of the BAA treated erythrocytes of children. These findings are consistent with previous work by Udden (1994) showing that erythrocytes from potentially sensitive populations of humans, including young and 21 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00034 elderly subjects as well as those suffering from sickle cell disease and hereditary spherocytosis, were resistant to the hemolytic effect of BAA. The findings of Udden (2002) are supported by Gualtieri (1995), who reported actual data from suicide attempts by an individual whose blood concentration reached at least 4.9 mM BAA with no evidence of hemolysis. The Corley et al. (2005) PBPK model also predicts that the level of BAA in humans exposed continuously by inhalation to an EGBE-saturated atmosphere (greater than 1,000 ppm)d would result in maximum blood concentrations of BAA of just 2 mM, well below the level needed to produce hemolysis in human red blood cells (Udden 2002, EPA 2010). These observation and modeling predictions imply that it would be physically impossible to achieve a blood concentration of BAA in humans high enough to cause the critical toxic effect of EGBE in rodents, hemolysis, via inhalation of EGBE vapor, further confirming its low toxicity potential in humans. The low hemolytic potential of EGBE in humans is further supported by the limited data on the effects of ingestion of EGBE by humans. EPA (2010) summarizes several cases of suicide attempts involving ingestion of large quantities of mixtures containing EGBE. These cases rarely resulted in hemolysis, despite ingestion of doses of EGBE as high as 1,500 mg/kg in some cases. Hematuria was noted in a couple of cases, but it is unclear whether this was due to hemolysis caused by EGBE and its metabolite BAA, or if it was secondary to the metabolic acidosis that developed at these high doses. 3.2.2 Potential Carcinogenicity The National Toxicology Program (NTP) (2000) evaluated the carcinogenicity of EGBE in rats and mice exposed by inhalation. NTP (2000) reported that its study results indicate no evidence of carcinogenic activity in male F344/N rats and equivocal evidence of carcinogenic activity in female F344/N rats, based on increased combined incidence of benign and malignant pheochromocytomas (mostly benign). NTP (2000) also reported some evidence of carcinogenic activity in male B6C3F1 mice based on increased incidence of hemangiosarcomas of the liver, and some evidence of carcinogenic activity in female B6C3F1 mice based on increased incidence of forestomach squamous cell papillomas or carcinomas. EPA concluded in the HAPs delisting decision in 2003 (68 FR 65656) "that the available data establish a plausible nonlinear, nongenotoxic mode of action for the moderate increase observed by NTP (2000) in the incidence of forestomach tumors in female mice." The Agency summarized the impact of this finding on its assessment of human health risk due to EGBE emissions as follows: ... the exposure concentrations necessary to cause hyperplastic effects in humans would be much higher than the existing RfD and dThe theoretical EGBE maximum airborne concentration is greater than 1,100 ppm, but in recent acute studies, the highest attainable concentrations were 600 to 700 ppm. 22 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00035 RfC for EGBE. Given that humans, including potentially sensitive subpopulations such as children, have no known organ for the retention of a comparable target dose of EGBE or its metabolites, we feel it is reasonable to conclude that the RfC and RfD developed for EGBE are sufficient for the prevention of hyperplasia and associate tumors in humans. Similarly, EPA (68 FR 65656) found that the available data "establish a plausible nonlinear, nongenotoxic mode of action for the moderate increase observed by NTP (2000) in the incidence of liver tumors in male mice." Thus, given "the relatively low sensitivity of humans, including subpopulations such as children, to the hemolytic effects of EGBE, we feel it is reasonable to conclude that the [1999] EGBE RfC and RfD (EPA 1999a) are sufficient for the prevention of hemolysis and associate tumors in humans." Accordingly, the Administrator (69 FR 69322) determined that the IRIS reference values will protect against both cancer and noncancer effects: ... it is reasonable to expect that a lack of hemolytic effects in humans would preclude the formation of liver tumors in humans and that a lack of hyperplastic effects in the region of the gastroesophogeal junction in humans would preclude the formation of gastrointestinal tumors in humans. That is, the data support the finding that we would not expect to find these tumors in humans following environmental exposures. The RfC and RfD values for EGBE have been set at levels that prevent both the precursor events that would lead to tumors and other noncancer effects ... The HAPs delisting findings are reaffirmed in the IRIS toxicological review of EGBE (EPA 2010), which concluded that the data establish a plausible nonlinear mode of action for both the forestomach and liver tumors in mice. Regarding the pheochromocytomas in female rats, EPA (2010) noted that, "given the marginal dose response, lack of tumor evidence in any other organ system of the rats, and reported difficulties in distinguishing pheochromocytomas from nonneoplastic adrenal medullary hyperplasia, this tumor type was not given significant weight in the qualitative or quantitative assessment of EGBE cancer potential." The forestomach tumors were found to develop through sustained cytotoxicity and cell regeneration brought about by irritation and breakdown of the forestomach's gastric mucosal barrier. This mechanism has been proposed for several other chemicals that cause rodent forestomach tumors, such as butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), propionic acid, and ethyl acrylate (Kroes and Wester 1986, Harrison 1992, Clayson etal. 1990, 1991). A recent International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) assessment of the mechanism of rodent forestomach tumors and their potential relevance to humans specifically finds that the same irritation-based epigenetic mode of action accepted in EPA's carcinogenicity assessment is supported for EGBE (IARC 2006). The EPA (2010) evaluation identifies a multistep mode of action for EGBE-induced mouse forestomach tumors: 23 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00036 1. Deposition of EGBE/BAA in the stomach and forestomach via consumption or reingestion of EGBE laden mucus, salivary excretions, and fur material 2. Retention of EGBE/BAA in food particles of the forestomach long after being cleared from other organs 3. Metabolism of EGBE to 2-butoxyacetaldehyde (BAL), which is rapidly metabolized to BAA systemically and in the forestomach 4. Irritation of target cells by BAA leading to hyperplasia and ulceration 5. Continued injury by BAA and degeneration leading to high cell proliferation and turnover 6. High levels of cell proliferation and turnover leading to clonal growth of spontaneously initiated forestomach cells While such a process might theoretically occur in humans exposed to a sufficiently high dose of EGBE, that dose would be substantially higher than the RfC or RfD, given that humans do not possess an anatomical equivalent to the mouse forestomach where EGBE and metabolites might be retained. Also, humans would not be expected to produce sufficiently high concentrations of BAA in other potentially sensitive tissues chronically to permit tumors to develop via this mode of action. Similarly, EPA (2010) concluded that the mouse liver tumors arose secondary to ironinduced oxidative stress resulting from the EGBE-induced hemolysis. It presented the following nine-step summary mode of action: 1. EGBE is metabolized to BAL, which is subsequently oxidized to BAA 2. BAA causes red blood cell swelling, triggering sequestration in the spleen by resident macrophages. When the capacity of these macrophages becomes overwhelmed, the damaged red blood cells make their way into the liver 3. Excess hemoglobin (Hb) from damaged red blood cells is taken up by phagocytic (Kupffer) cells of the liver and stored as hemosiderin 4. Oxidative damage and increased synthesis of endothelial and hepatocyte deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) are initiated by one or more of the following events: Generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) from Hb-derived iron within Kupffer cells and perhaps from within hepatocytes and sinusoidal endothelial cells Activation of Kupffer cells to produce cytokines/growth factors that suppress apoptosis and promote cell proliferation 5. ROS results in oxidative DNA damage to hepatocytes and endothelial cells 6. ROS modulates hepatocyte and endothelial cell gene expression 7. ROS stimulates hepatocyte and endothelial cell proliferation 8. ROS promotes initiation of hepatocyte and endothelial cells 9. ROS promotes neoplasm formation 24 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00037 Support for the importance of several of these steps in the mode of action, particularly Steps 4, 5, 6, and 7, has accrued from studies performed since the initial publication of the NTP draft report in 1998. The validity of this pathway has been endorsed by independent scientific peer review of EPA's analysis (EPA 2010). Corthals et al. (2006) addresses one previous area of uncertainty regarding EPA's mode of action and the potential involvement of the short-lived intermediate metabolite of EGBE, BAL. Because BAL has exhibited some genotoxic activity in some assay systems, EPA scientists reviewing the HAPs delisting petition noted that the possibility of a genotoxic mode of action involving BAL had not been ruled out (68 Fed. Reg. 65660). Thus, although the Agency found PBPK modeling sufficient to find "that genotoxicity is not a factor in tumor development" when it deleted EGBE as a HAP; it nevertheless called for additional research (69 Fed. Reg. 69322). The study by Corthals et al. (2006), conducted in Dr. James Klaunig's laboratory at the Indiana University School of Medicine, was specifically designed to further explore the possible BALgenotoxicity mode of action. Corthals et al. (2006) demonstrate that BAL does not express any genotoxic activity, as measured by the Comet assay, in mouse endothelial cells, the cell type from which hemangiosarcomas develop. EGBE and BAA also showed no genotoxic activity in this assay. DNA damage was produced in these cells, however, when treated with hemolyzed red blood cells, ferrous sulfate, or hydrogen peroxide, supporting the proposed role of reactive oxygen species generated from red blood cell hemolysis in the mode of action for mouse liver hemangiosarcomas. Hemolyzed red blood cells were also shown to activate macrophages, as evidenced by increased levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFa), and activated macrophages produced DNA damage in endothelial cells and stimulated endothelial cell proliferation (Corthals et al. 2006), providing further support for the mode of action accepted by EPA. Subsequently, EPA (2010) concluded: Under the Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment (U.S. EPA, 2005, 086237), EGBE is deemed "not likely to be carcinogenic to humans" at environmental concentrations below or equivalent to the RfD and RfC, based on laboratory animal evidence, mode-ofaction information, and limited human study information. The available data indicate that carcinogenic effects from EGBE are not likely to occur in humans in the absence of the critical noncancer effects, including hepatic hemosiderin staining and irritant effects at the portal of entry, and are not likely to be carcinogenic to humans exposed to levels at or below the RfC and RfD values derived in this assessment. Similar considerations led IARC to conclude that EGBE is not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans (Group 3) on the basis of limited evidence in experimental animals and inadequate evidence in humans (IARC 2006, Cogliano 2004). Based on these considerations, it is reasonable to conclude that EGBE presents no cancer risk to individual living near EGBE-emitting facilities. 25 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00038 3.3 Ecotoxicity The ecotoxicity of EGBE has been evaluated in five reviews, all of which conclude that EGBE poses a low potential for adverse ecological effects (WHO 1998, Staples 1998, Devillers et al. 2002, Environment Canada and Health Canada 2002, INERIS 2006). No information on the toxicity of EGBE to terrestrial organisms, including reptiles, birds, or wild mammalian species, was identified from the primary scientific literature or reviews. Acute aquatic ecotoxicity data are available for nine fish species and seven aquatic invertebrate species, while chronic ecotoxicity data are available for one amphibian species, two fish species, four aquatic invertebrate species, and eight species of algae, bacteria, and protozoans. Species tested include freshwater and marine vertebrates and invertebrates. All aquatic toxicity values listed in the five recent reviews cited above and identified in a supplemental search of the primary literature are compiled and sorted by organism, endpoint, and exposure duration in Table 3-2. Based on acute ecotoxicity testing, the most sensitive aquatic species to EGBE are mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus) and grass shrimp (Palaeomonetes pugio), which have 96hour LC50 values of 6.7 mg/L and 5.4 mg/L, respectively (Biospherics 1981, as cited in Environment Canada and Health Canada 2002). However, both concentrations are more than an order of magnitude less than any other reported acute concentrations for EGBE. The ecotoxicity evaluation in the CICAD declined to rely on these findings because they represent "such an extreme outlier compared with the range of other data that it is difficult to justify [their] use as the basis for" selecting a toxicity criterion (WHO 2005). The primary study (Biospherics 1981, as cited in Environment Canada and Health Canada 2002) was not available. However, the EU concluded that the study was not valid in the derivation of its predicted no effect concentration because of the methods employed in the original study (INERIS 2005). Therefore, the reliability of the grass shrimp and mummichog LC50 values is open to question. The next most sensitive species to acute exposures is an oyster (Crassostrea virginica), which has an LC50 of 89 mg/L (EPA 1984, as cited in WHO 1998; 2010). Several other fish and invertebrate species have LC50 values between 100 and 200 mg/L, but most fish species tested have LC50 values greater than 1,000 mg/L (Table 3-2). Relatively few aquatic chronic toxicity data are available for EGBE. The lowest reported chronic value for EGBE is from a reproduction study on a rotifer (Brachionus calyciflorus). Ten percent of the test population was affected at 7.2 mg/L and the median effect concentration (EC50) was 164 mg/L (Devillers et al. 2002). A blue-green algae species (Microcystis aeruginosa) and a protozoan (Entosiphon sulcatum) experienced growth effects with EGBE concentrations of 35 and 91 mg/L, respectively (Bringmann and Kuhn 1980, as cited in Staples et al. 1998). Two copepods (Daphnia magna and Ceriodaphnia dubia) experienced reproduction effects at EGBE concentrations near 130 mg/L (Devillers et al. 2002, 2003). Overall, most available aquatic chronic toxicity values for EGBE are below 1,000 mg/L (Table 3-2). 26 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00039 3.4 Evaluation of Potential Hazards of EGBE and Implications for TRI Listing EPA has interpreted the listing criteria of Section 313(d)(2) of EPCRA to call for a weight-of-evidence hazard assessment of the potential for a chemical to cause the three types of adverse effects specified in the statutory text: acute, chronic, and ecotoxic effects. Because "virtually any chemical substance can elicit a toxicological response at some dose level," EPA's interpretation recognizes that "the mere presence of the toxic response is not used in isolation in listing decisions under EPCRA Section 313" (59 FR 61445 [EPA 1994b]). Accordingly, EPA's interpretation of the listing criteria calls for the consideration of exposure in certain circumstances, depending on the type of hazard in question. In the case of adverse acute human health effects, Section 313(d)(2)(A) explicitly calls for an exposure evaluation of whether such effects occur "at concentration levels that are reasonably likely to exist beyond facility site boundaries as a result of continuous, or frequently recurring, releases" (42 U.S.C. 11023(d)(2)(A)). Thus, EPA's interpretation provides for the consideration of exposure in determining whether to list or delist based on acute health effects. For chronic human health hazards addressed in EPCRA Section 313(d)(2)(B), the Agency has adopted the view that exposure considerations are not appropriate in making listing determinations "for chemicals that exhibit moderately high to high human toxicity ... based on a hazard assessment." Consideration of exposure is called for, however, in the case of "chemicals that exhibit low to moderately low toxicity based on a hazard assessment" (59 FR 61441). Thus, "in instances where the hazard assessment indicates that... a chemical is of low toxicity and unrealistic exposures would be necessary for it to pose a risk to communities ..., EPA may use exposure considerations in its listing decisions" (59 FR 61442). For the adverse environmental effects subject to EPCRA Section 313(d)(2)(c), EPA reads EPCRA to call for listing solely on the basis of a hazard assessment "for chemicals that are highly ecotoxic or induce well-established adverse environmental effects" that "do not affect solely one or two species but rather cause changes across a whole ecosystem," such as chemicals that threaten the "sustainability of a fragile ecosystem such as an estuary." Exposure is an appropriate factor, however, in listing and delisting decisions on "chemicals that are low or moderately ecotoxic but do not induce well-documented serious adverse effects" on entire ecosystems (59 FR 61433, 61441). The hazard assessment presented above indicates that EGBE poses low potential hazards to human health and the environment. Because exposure is always a relevant factor for acute human health effects, the following discussion focuses on chronic human health and ecological hazards with respect to the appropriateness of considering exposure. 3.4.1 Low Potential for Adverse Chronic Human Health Effects The extensive data on the mode of action of EGBE as a toxicant, its limited spectrum of toxic effects, and the documentation in vitro and in vivo that humans are relatively insensitive to 27 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00040 its toxic effects, all show that EGBE is appropriately considered a low-toxicity chemical. The scientific evidence supports the conclusion that EGBE is not immunotoxic, genotoxic, or teratogenic, and it does not cause adverse reproductive effects. All of the toxic effects of EGBE seen in rodents are secondary to the irritant and hemolytic effects of EGBE and its primary metabolite, BAA, and EPA has determined that prevention of hemolytic effects in humans will also protect against other toxic effects (EPA 2010). The current IRIS assessment concludes that EGBE is "not likely to be carcinogenic to humans at environmental concentrations below or equivalent to the RfD and RfC" and that tumors observed in rodent studies are secondary to EGBE's noncarcinogenic toxic effects (EPA 2010). The available data also demonstrate that the primary toxic effect of EGBE exposure-- hemolysis produced by EGBE's primary metabolite BAA--can reasonably be expected to occur in humans only at doses that are unrealistically high, thus making EGBE a low-toxicity chemical for which exposure is a relevant consideration in the delisting determination. Because human red blood cells are relatively resistant to the hemolytic effects of EGBE, particularly compared to laboratory rats, based on the PBPK model used by EPA (2010) in its assessment, the daily oral dose necessary to achieve a blood BAA concentration high enough to cause even minor prehemolytic effects (>10 mM, based on Udden [2002]) would be at least 700 mg/kg BW-day. Evaluated under EPA's TRI listing criteria (EPA 1994a, 1992c) and previous listing decisions, EGBE is clearly a low-toxicity chemical (like e.g., ethylene glycol, 62 FR 24919 [EPA 1997a]). Such ingestion exposures to EGBE, moreover, are unrealistically high in relation to expected community exposures in the vicinity of EGBE-emitting facilities. Assuming water consumption of 2 liters per day (L/day) by a 70-kilogram (kg) human, the water concentration that theoretically would be needed to achieve a hemolytic concentration of BAA in blood would be more than 4,000 times greater than the highest surface water concentration of EGBE that has been reported at a contaminated site (ATSDR 1998, Environment Canada 2002), and over 140 times previous estimates of surface water concentrations resulting from EGBE facility emissions (WHO 2010, INERIS 2006). For the primary anticipated route of exposure to EGBE for TRI-related exposures-- inhalation--the available data indicate that hemolysis is not expected to occur in humans, even if exposed continuously by inhalation to an EGBE-saturated atmosphere (greater than 1,000 ppm) (see Section 3.2.1.2 above).6 Such concentrations are, of course, physically impossible, and in any case they are 100 to 1,000 times higher than typical occupational exposure levels, and 50 times higher than the occupational threshold limit value (TLV) (ATSDR 1998, ACGIH 2003), even farther above available (albeit limited) data on ambient air concentrations of EGBE (IPCS 1997, ECETOC 2005, WHO 2005), and much higher still--by a factor of approximately 100,000--than previous estimates of ambient air concentrations based on air dispersion modeling of emissions from EGBE-using facilities (WHO 2010, INERIS 2006). eThe theoretical EGBE maximum airborne concentration is greater than 1,100 ppm, but in recent acute studies, the highest attainable concentrations were 600 to 700 ppm. 28 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00041 The limited laboratory animal carcinogenicity data do not justify an elevated hazard evaluation for EGBE under EPA's TRi listing criteria and listing precedents. As noted in Section 3.2.2, the current IRIS assessment classifies EGBE as "not likely to be carcinogenic to humans at environmental concentrations below or equivalent to the RfD and RfC" (EPA 2010). EPA has twice determined that even the higher carcinogenicity classification (based on the former cancer classification criteria) of "possible" human carcinogen does not support listing under EPCRA 313(d)(2)(B) (titanium dioxide, 53 FR 23108 [EPA 1988]; butyl benzyl phthalate, 60 FR 9299 [EPA 1995a]). Based on these precedents, it would be inappropriate to list a chemical that is classified as "not likely to be carcinogenic to humans." 3.4.2 Low Potential for Significant Adverse Ecological Effects EGBE's potential to cause adverse ecological effects should likewise be characterized as low under EPA's TRI listing criteria. The Agency found recently that EGBE causes only "very minor effects which were unlikely to be ecologically significant at the population level of ecological organization" (68 Fed. Reg. 65657 [EPA 2003]). EGBE therefore cannot be considered a high toxicity ecological hazard under the EPA's TRI listing criteria on the basis of "well-established adverse environmental effects" "across a whole ecosystem" (59 FR 61441 [EPA 1994b]). Furthermore, the "very minor" ecological effects of EGBE do not occur at concentrations that are considered to be low or moderate-to-low under EPA's TRI listing guidelines. To the contrary, EGBE has low potential for persistence and bioaccumulation. LOAELs for acute toxicity to aquatic organisms are in most cases 1,000 mg/L or higher, and most chronic toxicity values are between 100 and 1,000 mg/L. The lowest LC50 for acute toxicity to an aquatic organism is 89 mg/L, and the lowest concentration reported to cause chronic aquatic toxicity is 7 mg/L. Under EPA's TRi listing criteria (EPA 1994a, 1992c) and previous listing decisions, EGBE meets the criteria for a low-toxicity chemical based on ecological effects. See, for example, Butyl Benzyl Phthalate (60 FR 9299 [EPA 1995a]); Diethyl Phthalate (61 FR 39356 [EPA 1996b]); Di-(2-Ethylhexyl) Adipate (61 FR 39891 [EPA 1996c]); Ethylene Glycol (62 FR 24919 [EPA 1997a]); Methyl Ethyl Ketone (63 FR 15195 [EPA 1998a]); Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (64 FR 8769 [EPA 1999c]). it is also readily apparent that the concentrations found to cause aquatic toxicity are far above the surface water concentrations likely to be present in communities near EGBE-emitting facilities. The lowest reported aquatic toxicity level (7 mg/L for chronic effects) is greater than the highest surface water concentration of EGBE that has been reported at a contaminated site (5.7 mg/L; ATSDR 1998, Environment Canada 2002), and about a thousand times higher than available empirical and modeled estimates of surface water concentrations resulting from EGBE facility emissions (Environment Canada 2002, WHO 2010, INERIS 2006). 3.4.3 Conclusion EPA's interpretation of the TRI listing criteria of EPCRA Section 313(d)(2) calls for the consideration of exposure levels for potential adverse chronic human health and significant 29 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00042 environmental effects if "a chemical is of low toxicity and unrealistic exposures would be necessary for it to pose a risk to communities" (59 FR 61442). As discussed above, even relatively minor prehemolytic effects are not expected in humans even at exposures: (1) that are considered high under EPA's TRI listing criteria and precedents and (2) that are far above exposures likely to occur in communities near EGBEemitting facilities. EPA's findings in the HAPs delisting decision and in its carcinogenicity evaluation (EPA 2010) confirm that prevention of hemolysis protects against any other potential adverse health effect of EGBE exposure. Similarly, the available ecotoxicity data continue to support EPA's determination in the HAPs proceeding that EGBE emissions present the potential for only "very minor effects" that are "unlikely to be ecologically significant," and indicate that such minor effects are expected to occur only at concentrations (1) that are clearly high under EPA's TRI listing criteria and precedents and (2) that are far above exposures likely to occur in communities near EGBE-emitting facilities. Accordingly, EGBE presents a low potential for adverse effects on human health or the environment, and an exposure assessment is warranted. 30 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00043 4.0 CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING ACUTE AND CHRONIC HUMAN EXPOSURES As noted earlier, under Section 313 of EPCRA, a chemical may be added to TRi on the basis of acute toxicity in humans, chronic toxicity in humans, or significant adverse effects on the environment. The criteria for evaluating acute and chronic human exposures are addressed below as they relate to EGBE. 4.1 Acute Toxicity As specified in Section 313(d)(2) of the statute, a chemical may be added to the list of chemicals requiring reporting under Section 313 if: the chemical is known to cause or can reasonably be anticipated to cause significant adverse acute human health effects at concentration levels that are reasonably likely to exist beyond facility site boundaries as a result of continuous or frequently recurring releases; As discussed by EPA (2010) and ATSDR (1998), and noted in Section 3.2.1.1 of this petition, EGBE is of low acute toxicity, with the most sensitive endpoint in humans being eye and upper respiratory tract irritation at airborne concentrations above the occupational TLV of 20 ppm (97 mg/m3). Such a concentration is far higher than anything that has been monitored or modeled near an EGBE-emitting facility (IPCS 1997, ECETOC 2005, WHO 2010, INERIS 2006), and would not, therefore be "reasonably likely to exist beyond facility site boundaries as a result of continuous, or frequently recurring, releases." 4.2 Chronic Toxicity The EPA HAPs delisting decision used the IRIS RfC and RfD to evaluate potential chronic human health effects from facility releases of EGBE. EPA's policies and precedents under EPCRA's TRI listing provisions strongly support the use of IRIS criteria where available (59 FR 61444-45 [EPA 1994b]). Accordingly, the evaluation of chronic human exposures and risks in this petition is based on the IRIS reference levels. EPA derived the RfC and RfDf after a careful review of the available dose-response database for EGBE, emphasizing mechanistic information. EPA used dose-response information for EGBE-induced hematological effects as the basis for the IRIS RfC and RfD values. EPA derived both the RfC and the RfD from data on hemosiderin staining in the liver in rats in the 2-year NTP (2000) inhalation study. Using benchmark concentration (BMC) and PBPK modeling, EPA estimated that the 95% lower f The RfD is defined by EPA as "an estimate (with uncertainty spanning perhaps an order of magnitude) of a daily oral exposure to the human population (including sensitive subgroups) that is likely to be without an appreciable risk of deleterious effects during a lifetime." Similarly, the RfC is defined as "an estimate (with uncertainty spanning perhaps an order of magnitude) of a continuous inhalation exposure to the human population (including sensitive subgroups) that is likely to be without an appreciable risk of deleterious effects during a lifetime. 31 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00044 confidence limit on the concentration predicted to produce a 10% increase in hemosiderin staining was 16 mg/m3. To derive the RfC, EPA applied an intraspecies uncertainty factor of 10, to account for variation in sensitivity within the human population. Because the PBPK model was used, and because the adverse effect endpoint was a minimally adverse effect in a species more sensitive than humans, EPA used an uncertainty factor of 1 for LOAEL-to-NOAEL extrapolation, resulting in the final RfC of 1.6 mg/m3. EPA derived the oral RfD based on the same data as the RfC by using the Corley et al. 1994, 1997) PBPK model to perform route-to-route extrapolation to derive the 95% lower confidence limit on the daily oral dose of EGBE predicted to produce a 10% increase in hemosiderin staining of 1.4 mg/kg BW-day. To derive the RfD, EPA applied an intraspecies uncertainty factor of 10, to account for variation in sensitivity within the human population. Because the PBPK model was used, and because the adverse effect endpoint was a minimally adverse effect in a species more sensitive than humans, EPA used an uncertainty factor of 1 for LOAEL-to-NOAEL extrapolation, resulting in the final RfD of 0.1 mg/kg BW-day (rounded). Both the RfD and RfC are based on the occurrence of hemolytic effects in rats. As noted previously, there is extensive evidence, both in vivo and in vitro that humans are much less sensitive than rats to the hemolytic effects of EGBE. Studies by Udden (2000, 2002) show that prehemolytic effects occur in rat red blood cells at concentrations of BAA, the proximate hemolytic agent, at least 100 times lower than concentrations that might affect human red blood cells. EPA accounts for this difference in susceptibility only partially in its derivation of the RfD and RfC by not using the standard 10-fold uncertainty factor for interspecies extrapolation, but rather assumes an interspecies correction factor of 1, implying that humans are equally sensitive rather than less sensitive than rats. However, the available relative toxicity data indicate that the actual interspecies factor from rats to humans is much less than 1. The hemolytic anemia comparative data from Udden et al. (2000, 2002) indicates that this interspecies factor should be no greater than 0.01, rather than 1, as used by EPA in deriving the RfD and RfC. This clearly demonstrates the very conservative nature of hemolytic effects in rats as a point of departure for establishing the EPA IRIS RfD and RfC. Clearly, the interspecies uncertainty factor and point of departure are very conservative. Indeed, there is also little reason to believe that the IRIS intraspecies uncertainty factor of 10 is scientifically justified. As discussed in the IRIS assessment, investigation of population groups that might be expected to show increased sensitivity to hemolytic effects of EGBE (e.g., the young, the old, and individuals with sickle cell anemia or hereditary spherocytosis), did not reveal increased susceptibility. Thus, the IRIS intraspecies uncertainty factor of 10 is also likely to contribute undue conservatism to the RfC and RfD. Another significant element of conservatism in the RfC and RfD relates to the fact that they were designed to be protective for continuous daily exposure for a full lifetime to EGBE. The emissions of interest in this petition are likely to fluctuate over time. As EPA recognized in the HAPs delisting decision (see Section 6.2.3, below), the lifetime average exposure level (which is the relevant metric for comparison to the RfD and RfC) will be substantially lower than 32 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00045 the peak concentration at the point of maximum impact (as assumed in the exposure assessment of this petition), thus providing an additional margin of safety. 33 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00046 5.0 EMISSIONS INVENTORY As previously discussed, EPA determined in the HAPs delisting proceeding (68 FR 65651-52 [EPA 2003]) that the EPCRA TRI database "provide[s] a reasonable representation of ... EGBE emissions" and "an adequate basis for dispersion modeling and ... exposure assessment." Accordingly, this petition has conservatively developed an emission inventory of potential EGBE sources that includes all facilities that submitted TRI reports for Certain Glycol Ethers for the 2009, 2010, and 2011 calendar years, and which reported a non-zero release of Certain Glycol Ethers to air, either from onsite point or fugitive sources. In addition, because this petition also includes an assessment of potential human health and ecological risks based on exposures to other environmental media, facilities reporting non-zero releases of Certain Glycol Ethers to soil and surface water were added to the facilities included in emissions inventory (www.epa.gov/triexplorer). For the risk evaluation presented in Sections 6 through 8, it was conservatively assumed that all Certain Glycol Ethers released are EGBE for facilities without site-specific data on the proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers released that is EGBE.a Because EGBE represents 52% of ethylene glycol ethers consumed in the United States (SRI 2010), the application of this assumption in Sections 6 through 8 of this petition may overestimate exposures by two-fold. Table 5-1 presents summary information on the distributions and magnitude of releases to air, water, and land, as well as changes in releases since 1993 and the mid-2000s. The 1993 data are used as a point of comparison because they formed the basis for the HAPs delisting decision and the 2003 through 2006 data were provided because they were compiled for ACC's previous petition prior to EPA's revision to the RfC and RfD. Because the Administrator determined in the HAPs delisting decision that releases of EGBE "may not reasonably be anticipated to cause any adverse effects" to human health or the environment (69 FR 69322), it is reasonable to expect that the same findings are justified in light of the substantial broadbased decrease in emissions since 1993, as shown in Table 5-1. In addition, Figure 5-1 shows the maximum reported emissions for Certain Glycol Ethers to the air by individual facilities for each year from 2000 through 2011. Note that the maximum facility air emissions have slowly declined over this time period. Those facilities that reported non-zero TRI emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers during 2009, 2010, and/or 2011 are the basis for the emission inventory used for evaluating potential inhalation exposures and risks (Section 6). This emission inventory includes 1,109 facilities that reported non-zero emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers during 2009, 1,149 facilities that reported non-zero emissions during 2010, and 1,099 facilities reporting non-zero emissions during 2011. 9 Facility-specific information on the percentage of Certain Glycol Ethers that is EGBE was requested for facilities evaluated in Steps B through Tier 3 34 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00047 6.0 INHALATION EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT AND RISK CHARACTERIZATION For the purposes of this petition, the exposure assessment and risk characterization related to EGBE has two specific objectives: (a) to determine whether emissions of EGBE to ambient air could result in air concentrations that may pose a risk for acute and/or chronic human health effects; and (b) to determine whether emissions of EGBE from clusters of facilities within a limited geographic area could result in air concentrations of EGBE that pose a risk for acute and/or chronic health effects, at or beyond facility boundaries. This introduction provides an overview of the approach and findings of these analyses, while subsequent subsections detail all aspects of the inhalation exposure assessment and risk characterization. The chronic (longer-term) and acute (short-term) exposure assessments were conducted for all facilities in the emissions inventory database developed as described in Section 5, in combination with a modified version of EPA's tiered modeling approach for assessing risks from stationary emission sources, which is described in A Tiered Modeling Approach for Assessing the Risks Due to Sources of Hazardous Air Pollutants (EPA 1992a). The tiered screening approach used in this petition follows the same general methodology used for the 2004 EGBE HAPs delisting decision; a methodology EPA reviewed, approved, and deemed as appropriate and conservative (in the sense that it overstates exposures). In brief, the tiered modeling approach involves performing analytical simulations (modeling) of air pollutant dispersion of emissions from stationary emission sources, given that measurement of long-term and short-term ambient concentrations of a pollutant in the vicinity of each source would be a prohibitively expensive task. The first modeling tier in this approach is designed to address the question of whether or not an emission source has the potential to result in EGBE air concentrations above the air concentrations of concern, and is performed using a table of lookup values that provides an estimate of the worst-case impact of the emission source being modeled. For this petition, the first tier (i.e., Tier 1) is preceded by two additional precursor screening steps (Steps A and B) designed to reduce the number of facilities for which additional site-specific data collection is required, through the use of conservative assumptions for parameters such as the proportion of certain glycol ether reported emissions that are EGBE, emission release height, and distance to nearest receptor. Facilities retained following these conservative, precursor screening steps are then subjected to the additional three tiers of the tiered modeling approach. In the tiered modeling approach, if predicted screening impacts at a given tier are less than the appropriate level(s) of concern, then no further modeling is needed in order to rule out the potential for adverse effects. Thus, facilities "screen out" of this tiered analysis only if their estimated maximum airborne concentrations of EGBE are determined not to pose a potential risk to human health. In the application of the tiered modeling approach in this petition, the exposure assessments performed for all facilities consistently employed conservative assumptions for emission-related parameters. The screening approach for evaluating chronic EGBE exposures estimated the worstcase annual average airborne EGBE concentrations associated with EGBE emissions from 35 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00048 individual facilities or clusters of facilities at or beyond the facility property boundaries, for comparison to the EGBE RfC of 1.6 mg/m3, in order to determine whether EGBE-emitting facilities pose a significant risk of adverse chronic human health effects. The analysis evaluated chronic exposures for all facilities that reported non-zero emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers to TRI in 2009, 2010, and/or 2011. The results of the tiered screening for chronic EGBE exposures demonstrated that maximum annual average EGBE concentrations at or beyond facility property boundaries, both for individual facilities and clusters of facilities emitting EGBE, are below the EGBE RfC, thus supporting a conclusion that emissions of EGBE do not result in a significant risk of chronic health effects. The primary outcomes of the chronic exposure emissions modeling, as described in detail in this section, is a demonstration that (a) no ambient air concentrations of EGBE in the United States are predicted to exceed the EGBE RfC of 1.6 mg/m3 and (b) the vast majority of EGBE air concentrations throughout the United States are well below that value. The first outcome is demonstrated through modeling performed for facilities that reported non-zero emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers in their TRI reports during 2009 through 2011: 1,109 facilities reporting Certain Glycol Ethers emissions for 2009; 1,149 facilities reporting Certain Glycol Ethers emissions for 2010; and 1,099 facilities reporting Certain Glycol Ethers emissions for 2011. The modeling demonstrated that long-term ambient air concentrations of EGBE at or beyond the fencelines of all these facilities are below 1.6 mg/m3. The conservatism of this conclusion is demonstrated in several ways. First, the modeled air concentration estimates in the initial modeling tiers (e.g. Tier 1) are based on a screening dispersion model. Screening dispersion models are intentionally designed to overestimate ambient air concentrations. Thus a facility that screens out in the earlier tiers does so based on a substantial overestimate of its EGBE ambient air concentrations. Second, when facilities that do not screen out at earlier tiers (e.g., Tier 1) are modeled in successive Tiers using increasingly realistic yet still conservative estimates, the results show substantial reductions in the predicted maximum EGBE concentrations compared to earlier modeling tiers, thus further demonstrating the conservatism of the conclusion that emissions of EGBE from even the highest emitting facilities and clusters of closely located facilities do not result in long-term ambient air concentrations of EGBE above the RfC. For example, up to an average 92% reduction in maximum predicted concentrations was realized in moving from Tier 1 modeling to Tier 2 modeling to Tier 3 modeling, and an average 99.3% reduction was realized in moving from Step A to Tier 3 modeling. Facilities predicted under Tier 1 modeling to have maximum annual average concentrations greater than 1.6 mg/m3 were predicted under Tiers 2 and 3 to have maximum annual average concentrations as low as 0.043 mg/m3. Because an EPA RfC for short-term exposures is not available, the tiered screening approach for evaluating potential acute EGBE exposures uses the estimated worst-case 1-hour average airborne EGBE concentrations combined with a MOE methodology frequently used by EPA in TRI delisting decisions, in cases where an EPA reference concentration for short-term exposures is not available. The results of the analysis indicated that maximum 1-hour average concentrations at or beyond facility property boundaries equate to a MOE in excess of 5 below 36 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00049 the NOAEL for all facilities evaluated, supporting a conclusion that acute effects from EGBE emissions are highly unlikely. For the acute exposure assessment for clusters of facilities (located within a small geographic area), the maximum 1-hour average concentrations at or beyond facility property boundaries for the clustered facilities equate to a MOE in excess of 4. As a further note on the conservatism in this analysis, the acute NOAEL on which the MOE is based is derived from 2-hour human exposure data that was not adjusted to the 1-hour concentration. If the MOE was adjusted to the 1-hour concentration, the MOE would increase by about 40%. 6.1 Overview of the Tiered Modeling Method for Assessing Risks from Air Exposures As described in Section 5, an emissions inventory of potential EGBE-emitting facilities was developed based on all facilities that reported non-zero emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers in their TRI reports for the 2009, 2010, and/or 2011 reporting years. For each facility reporting non-zero Certain Glycol Ethers emissions to EPA during these years, the potential for each facility's emissions to result in ambient air concentrations of EGBE above acute or chronic exposure concentrations of concern was evaluated using a conservative risk-based screening approach consistent with EPA's (1992a) guidance document, A Tiered Modeling Approach for Assessing the Risks Due to Sources of Hazardous Air Pollutants ("EPA's Tiered Modeling Guidance"). This guidance outlines EPA-approved procedures for assessing risks due to the atmospheric dispersion of emissions of pollutants from stationary sources. In brief, EPA's Tiered Modeling Guidance describes an approach that involves performing analytical simulations of air pollutant dispersion from stationary sources, given that measurement of long-term and short term ambient concentrations of a pollutant in the vicinity of each source would be a prohibitively expensive task. EPA's Tiered Modeling Guidance describes a three-tiered modeling approach, consisting of the following: Tier 1 - Lookup table Tier 2 - Screening air dispersion modeling Tier 3 - Detailed air dispersion modeling EPA's Tiered Modeling Guidance states that if predicted screening impacts at a given tier are less than the appropriate level(s) of concern, then no further (refined) modeling is indicated. However, if the predicted screening impacts are above any levels of concern, the guidance states that further (refined) analysis of these impacts at a higher tier would be performed (i.e. successive refined modeling tiers) to obtain more accurate (realistic) results. In EPA's Tiered Modeling Guidance, Tier 1 is designed to address the question of whether or not an emission source has the potential to cause a significant impact. Tier 1 37 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00050 screening uses lookup tables based on EPA's 1992h guidance, which are straightforward to use and require fairly limited input data. The values provided by the lookup table are the estimated worst-case air concentration associated with each emission source being modeled. Although EPA's (1992a) Tier 1 modeling step involves use of a lookup table that is straightforward to use and requires fairly limited input data, it requires more information than is available solely from TRI reports. As such, a more conservative and simpler two-step precursor screening procedure was developed for use prior to the Tier 1 screening step. The precursor procedure is designed to reduce the number of facilities for which additional data collection was required to perform the more refined Tier 1 screening. Thus, Step A of the two-step precursor screening procedure relies solely on data available from TRI submissions (i.e. total annual emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers), while Step B requires the total annual emissions data from TRI plus a small number of additional facility-specific parameters (though less than are required for Tier 1 screening). In instances where facility specific inputs were not available for Step B, conservative default assumptions for those parameters were used. Step A uses an "inverted" Tier 1 table (see Table 6-1) that was generated using the same methodology that was used to generate the inverted Tier 1 table used for the same purpose in the HAPs delisting petition (CMA 1997). The inverted Tier 1 table (Table 6-1) provides a threshold emission rate below which a facility is not predicted to exceed a specific ambient air concentration, based on an assumed release height and distance to fenceline. Highly conservative assumptions were used to generate the "inverted" Tier 1 table used in Step A, such as an assumption that all emissions (combined point and fugitive emissions) of Certain Glycol Ethers are assumed to be EGBE', and that all emissions are assumed to be released from a single point source with a release height of zero meters. In the HAPs delisting decision, EPA specifically approved this adaptation of EPA's modeling guidelines as ''reasonable" because it is based on "sound analytic principles" "and would tend to overestimate rather than underestimate maximum annual ambient average concentrations" (68 FR 65652, 65660 [EPA 2003]). The Step B precursor screening step uses a modified version of EPA's Tier 1 lookup table (the same lookup table used for the Tier 1 screening step), along with a small number of facility-specific parameters required to model the maximum impact from each facility. However, as described in Section 6.2.3, Step B is more conservative than the Tier 1 screening. For Step B highly conservative assumptions were applied for facilities for which existing facility-specific h Note that EPA's 2004 Community Air Screening How-To Manual (EPA 2004c) guidance also includes an analogous screening lookup table. However, an analysis of the 2004 lookup table using a subset of the highest emitting facilities evaluated as part of this petition, indicates that the 2004 screening lookup table is less conservative (predicts lower modeled concentrations) than the lookup table based on EPA's 1992 Tiered Modeling Guidance. As such, to maximize the conservatism of the tiered modeling approach used in this petition, a screening lookup table based on EPA's 1992 guidance lookup table is used, which is the same screening lookup table used for the same purpose in the HAPs delisting petition (CMA 1997). ' This assumption is considered conservative because EGBE comprises 52 percent (%) of the United States annual consumption of glycol ethers (SRI 2010). 38 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00051 information had been obtained for the 2007 EGBE TRI delisting petition, or was obtained from Step B survey responses received as part of this petition. For each of these facilities, very conservative assumptions were used with the lookup table, such as assuming that the combined point-source emissions for a facility were emitted from a single hypothetical stack, with a release height equal to the minimum stack height among all facility stacks, and the minimum distance to fenceline among all facility stacks. For all facilities without site-specific information for the required parameters, conservative default Step B input parameters were assumed, as described further below. The conservative nature of the Step A and Step B prescreening steps is designed to ensure that maximum EGBE concentrations in ambient air at/beyond the fenceline of facilities that screen out using this methodology will not exceed the applicable levels of concern for EGBE for both chronic and acute inhalation exposures. For those facilities that did not screen out from Step A and Step B, more refined screening for both acute and chronic exposures was performed using slightly modified versions of EPA's Tier 1 lookup table (identical to the Tier 1 table used for the EGBE HAPs delisting petition). The Tier 1 lookup tables (acute and chronic) require additional site-specific data not required for the Step B screening step. Thus, the maximum concentrations predicted by the Tier 1 lookup tables, more precisely estimate the short-term and long-term ambient concentrations of EGBE, compared to Step A and Step B. Those facilities for which the maximum Tier 1 predicted concentrations are below the applicable levels of concern for EGBE for acute or chronic inhalation exposures do not require further refined analysis. For the remaining facilities with predicted Tier 1 EGBE air concentrations above the acute or chronic concentrations of concern, more refined screening modeling was performed in the Tier 2 screening step using EPA's AERSCREEN v.11126. AERSCREEN is a screening-level air dispersion model designed to produce estimates of worstcase 1-hour concentrations for a single source, without the need for hourly meteorological data, and also includes conversion factors to estimate "worst-case" annual concentrations. If any facility with maximum predicted Tier 2 modeled EGBE concentrations in ambient air had exceeded the applicable levels of concern for EGBE for acute or chronic inhalation exposures, then the most refined and realistic analysis (Tier 3) using EPA's refined dispersion model AERMOD v.12060, would have been used. However, although all facilities screened out at Tier 2, in order to further test the conservatism of the screening procedure and to estimate the margin of safety provided by the screening procedure, a subset of facilities screening out at Tier 2 were nonetheless subjected to Tier 3 analysis as part of the sensitivity and uncertainty analysis discussed in Section 6.6. As discussed further in the remainder of this section, the exposure assessments performed for all facilities using EPA's tiered modeling approach consistently employed > For purposes of this petition, margin of safety is defined as the factor by which concentrations could increase while remaining below the short-term reference concentration (e.g., predicted concentration divided by the no adverse effects level). It is recognized that in other applications, margin of safety does not incorporate the uncertainty factors that are built into the IRIS RFC. 39 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00052 conservative estimates of emission-related parameters whenever data were incomplete. Details of the tiered methodology used to support this delisting petition and the resulting risks for estimated long-term and short-term exposures to potential EGBE-emitting facilities are described in further detail in Sections 6.2 through 6.5. 6.2 Step A and B Prescreening 6.2.1 Step A Prescreening Methodology Step A uses an "inverted" Tier 1 table, developed using the same methods used to develop the inverted Tier 1 table in the 1997 HAPs delisting petition (CMA 1997).k This inverted screening table provides annual EGBE emission thresholds (expressed as tpy) above which the annual average EGBE concentration would be predicted to exceed the RfC of 1.6 mg/m3. The Step A inverted Tier 1 table is shown in Table 6-1. The annual threshold emission levels listed in this table are computed by dividing the RfC by the normalized ambient concentrations in EPA's (1992a) Tier 1 table: Qthreshold = RfC [x/Q] Tier 1 Eqn. 3 where: Qthreshold = threshold emissions (tpy) RfC = Reference Concentration (expressed in micrograms per cubic meter or pg/m3), and [x/Q]Tier i = normalized ambient concentration in Tier 1 table (pg*nr3/tpy) The annual emission thresholds for the screening table are tabulated by source type, release height, and downwind distance.*1 For Step A, each facility's annual TRI combined stack and fugitive Certain Glycol Ethers emissions are conservatively used to represent each facility's total annual EGBE emissions. Consistent with the HAPs petition's (CMA 1997) inverted Tier 1 table screening, Step A assumed that all stack and fugitive emissions from a given facility exhaust from a single point source with an emission height of zero meters and a minimum distance to fenceline of 50 meters. Based on the EGBE RfC of 1.6 mg/m3, the corresponding threshold EGBE annual threshold emission rate for Step A screening is 4.9 tpy (Table 6-1). Based on these conservative assumptions regarding point-source releases, distances to fenceline, and percent of Certain Glycol Ethers that are EGBE, any facility emitting less than 4.9 tpy of Certain Glycol Ethers is predicted to have fenceline concentrations below the RfC. k The difference between the inverted Tier 1 table developed for the 1997 HAP delisting petition and the inverted Tier 1 table developed for this petition is that the former was derived based on the prior EGBE reference concentration of 13 mg/m3, while the Step A screening table for this petition is derived from the current RfC of 1.6 mg/m3 based on the 2010 IRIS assessment. 1 The emission source types in the screening table are identical to those listed in the Tier 1 lookup table. 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00053 6.2.2 Step A Results All facilities reporting non-zero Certain Glycol Ethers emissions during the 2009, 2010, and/or 2011 TRI reporting years were evaluated using Step A. Step A screens out facilities that emit Certain Glycol Ethers (combined point and fugitive emissions) less than the lowest emission threshold for a 50 meter fenceline distance (i.e., 4.9 tpy). The results of the Step A screening are summarized below and in Table 6-2: Of the 1,109 facilities that reported non-zero emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers to air in 2009, 824 (76%) screened out from further analysis based on Step A, leaving 260 facilities warranting further evaluation in Step B. Of the 1,149 facilities that reported non-zero emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers to air in 2010, 850 (76%) were screened out from further analysis based on Step A, leaving 273 facilities warranting further evaluation in Step B. Of the 1,099 facilities that reported non-zero emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers to air in 2011,823 (75%) were screened out from further analysis based on Step A, leaving 276 facilities warranting further evaluation in Step B. A detailed listing of each facility included in the Step A analysis is provided in Tables C1, C-2, and C-3 of Appendix C. For those facilities that reported total Certain Glycol Ethers emissions of more than the 4.9 tpy during 2009, 2010, and/or 2011, a more refined Step B screening evaluation was performed, as described below. 6.2.3 Step B Prescreening Methodology Step B uses the same lookup table used for the Tier 1 analysis, which is a modified version of EPA's Tier 1 lookup table (similar to the Tier 1 table used for the EGBE HAPs delisting petition), along with a small number of facility-specific parameters required to model the maximum impact from each facility111 - i.e. projected EGBE ambient air concentrations at or beyond the property boundary. Step B screening conservatively models all point-source emissions from a facility as if released from a single stack, and models fugitive releases as a single volume source, consistent with the EPA's Tier 1 screening process (EPA 1992a). The parameters required for Step B for each facility are 1. point and fugitive release heights for EGBE emissions sources at each facility; 2. distance from each EGBE emission source to fenceline; and 3. proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers emissions reported to TRI that is EGBE. The values assumed for each of these parameters were based on site-specific data or conservative default assumptions, as described in detail below. In addition, Step B was performed as a two-part process in order to reduce the number of facilities for which a survey was performed to collect additional site-specific information for this petition. m Facilities that closed after emissions were reported to the TRI were excluded from subsequent modeling tiers, given the inability to obtain site-specific data and the lack of current emissions from the facility. 41 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00054 in the first part of Step B, existing available facility-specific information was used to perform a Step B screening, when such information had been previously obtained for facilities as part of ACC's work on a previous version of the EGBE delisting petition that was prepared in 2007, prior to EPA's revision to the RfC and RfDn. For each facility, the combined point-source emissions were conservatively assumed to be released from a single stack with a release height equivalent to lowest release height among all of that facility's stacks, thereby maximizing calculated off-site concentrations of EGBE in ambient air. The combined maximum annual average concentration of EGBE in ambient air associated with each facility's point and fugitive emissions was calculated as follows: The greatest emission height in the table that is less than or equal to the minimum stack height for the facility's EGBE point sources (stacks) was selected from the modified Tier 1 Table (see Appendix D Table D-1). The greatest distance in the table that is less than or equal to the minimum distance between any facility stack and the property line was selected (regardless of whether it corresponded to the facility stack with the minimum height). If available, the site-specific percent of Certain Glycol Ethers emissions that are EGBE was applied to the point and fugitive source emission rates obtained from TRI. If not available, all TRI-reported Certain Glycol Ethers releases were assumed to be EGBE. The appropriate normalized maximum annual concentration for the stack (based on the selected release height and distance to property line) was identified and multiplied by the annual combined point-source EGBE emission rate (in tpy) to obtain the maximum annual average ambient air concentration estimate (in pg/m3) associated with EGBE point-source emission from the facility. The appropriate normalized maximum annual concentration for the fugitive emissions (using the default volume source parameters described below in combination with the minimum reported site-specific property line distance) was identified in the modified lookup table (Table D-1) and multiplied by the annual combined point-source EGBE emission rate (in tpy). This calculation provides the annual average ambient air concentration estimate (in pg/m3) associated with EGBE fugitive emissions from the facility. The cumulative annual average ambient air concentration estimate associated with each facility (in pg/m3) is conservatively calculated by adding the maximum predicted ambient air concentrations associated with the point-source emissions with the maximum predicted concentration associated with the fugitive emissions. For all facilities lacking site-specific data from the 2007 EGBE TRI delisting petition (numbers of facilities provided in Table 6-3), the following conservative default assumptions were used in the first part of the Step B screening: 11 Site-specific data had previously been compiled for certain facilities as part of the American Chemistry Council's petition submitted in 2007, prior to EPA's revision to the RfC and RfD for EGBE. 42 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00055 1. All TRI-reported Certain Glycol Ethers releases to air were assumed to be EGBE. 2. Point emissions were modeled as a 10 meter stack. 3. Fugitive emissions were modeled as a volume source with a lateral dimension of 10 meters and a release height of 3 meters. 4. The distance from each emission source (point or volume) to the nearest fenceline was assumed to be 50 meters. These Step B default parameter assumptions for stack and fugitive emissions are identical to those used in EPA's exposure assessment for ethylene glycol (EPA 1995b) and the EGBE HAP delisting petition (CMA 1997). The total maximum impact (maximum predicted ambient air concentration at or beyond the fenceline) for each facility lacking site-specific parameters was calculated based on these default assumptions, as the sum of stack and fugitive impacts derived from the modified EPA Tier 1 lookup table (see Appendix D Table D-1). At the conclusion of the first part of the Step B analysis, each facility's total maximum impact (maximum predicted ambient air concentration at or beyond the fenceline) was compared to the RfC for EGBE of 1.6 mg/m3. A survey was conducted for all facilities modeled using only default parameter assumptions for which the maximum predicted annual average concentration was above the RfC. The survey was intended to collect the site-specific information for use in the Step B screening. To increase responsiveness to the survey, the Can Manufacturers Institute (CMI) was enlisted to provide assistance with survey implementation for the CMI member facilities subject to this Step B screening. CMI identified contact names and addresses, distributed the Step B surveys to its member facilities, and provided survey follow up. Two facilities that were contacted as part of the Step B survey effort did not respond to the survey (^^^^^^^^nd For these two, facility-specific information was obtained from publically available sources to the extent that such information was publically available. In particular, EPA's National Emissions Inventory0 (NEI) database was used to obtain information on facility stack heights. EPA prepares the NEI every three years, largely relying on EPA emission estimates and emission model inputs provided by state, local, and tribal air agencies for sources in their jurisdictions. As the NEI is a comprehensive and detailed estimate of air emissions of criteria pollutants (including volatile organic compounds or VOCs) from all air emissions sources, NEI's stack information is a reasonable estimate of facility stack parameters for purposes of subjecting these facilities to Step B modeling. Because the NEI database does not contain information on distances between each stack and a facility's property boundary, this distance was estimated for each stack by measuring distances between facility structures in aerial imagery and property boundaries obtained from municipal tax assessors' databases. 0 http://www.epa.qov/ttn/chief/eiinformation.html. Data from both the 2005 and 2008 NEI datasets were queried for this petition. 43 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00056 Table C-4 in Appendix C summarizes all site-specific minimum stack height and distance to property line data obtained and used in the Step B screening analysis. Using these values, the maximum annual average concentration of EGBE in ambient air associated with each facility's point-source emissions was calculated described above. As described previously, for all other facilities lacking site-specific data for the required input parameters, the Step B default assumptions were used for stack and fugitive emissions. The total maximum impact for each facility was calculated as the sum of the facility's stack and fugitive impacts from the lookup table based on these assumptions, and then compared to the RfC for EGBE of 1.6 mg/m3. 6.2.4 Step B Results Based on the above assumptions, the modified Tier 1 lookup table was used to obtain maximum impacts associated with EGBE point and fugitive emissions. The total maximum impact for each facility was then calculated by summing stack and fugitive impacts, and the total impact was compared to EGBE's RfC of 1.6 mg/m3. The final results of the Step B screening are summarized below and in Table 6-3 and Appendix C (Table C-4): Of the 260 facilities that reported non-zero emissions Certain Glycol Ethers to air during 2009 and that did not screen out based on Step A, 245 (94%) screened out from further analysis at Step B, leaving 15 facilities warranting further evaluation in Tier 1. Of the 273 facilities that reported non-zero emissions Certain Glycol Ethers to air during 2010 and that did not screen out based on Step A, 258 (95%) screened out from further analysis based on Step B, leaving 15 facilities warranting further evaluation in Tier 1. Of the 276 facilities that reported non-zero emissions Certain Glycol Ethers to air in 2011 and did not screen out based on Step A, 262 (95%) screened out from further analysis based on Step B, leaving 14 facilities warranting further evaluation in Tier 1. For the 2009 TRI reporting year, one facility did not screen out at Step B, but was excluded from further analysis because it has since closed. Thus, it was not possible to obtain the site-specific data needed for more refined modeling. In any event, a facility that is not operating also would not emit Certain Glycol Ethers. This facility was the However, as discussed further in the uncertainty analysis (Section 6.6), if this facility was operating, it would be expected to screen out at the higher tiers based on the reported emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers when it was operating, as well as the demonstrated margin of safety provided by the analysis. 6.3 Chronic Inhalation Exposure Assessment for Individual Facilities 6.3.1 Tier 1 Screening for Individual Facilities 6.3.1.1 Tier 1 Methodology Tier 1 screening was performed based on the Tier 1 of EPA's Tiered Modeling Guidance (1992a) guidance using a slightly modified version of EPA's Tier 1 lookup table (Appendix D, Table D-1). This approach is also consistent with that used for the EGBE HAPs delisting petition 44 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00057 (and the same used for Step B in this petition). As with Step B, the Tier 1 analysis for chronic exposures accounts for both fugitive emissions and individual point-source (stack) EGBE emissions. However, Tier 1 screening methodology differs from the Step B screening analysis in that Tier 1 screening individually evaluates each EGBE-emitting stack at a facility and each stack's respective minimum distance to the fenceline (assuming all point-source emissions are emitted by the given stack); whereas, Step B conservatively evaluates a single hypothetical stack (assuming all point-source emissions are emitted by the given stack) using the minimum emission height and minimum distance to fenceline among all stacks at a given facility. In other words, the principle difference between Step B and Tier 1 is that Step B uses the minimum fenceline distance and stack height among all stacks at a facility, regardless of whether those values relate to the same stack. The other difference is that Tier 1 uses more site-specific information for the estimation of impacts from fugitive emissions (e.g, it uses the actual fenceline distance from fugitive sources rather than the minimum stack distance to represent fenceline distances from fugitive sources). The following site-specific information was required for Tier 1 modeling of each facility's EGBE emissions: The proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers emissions reported to TRI that is EGBE Annual emissions of EGBE (point and fugitive emissions) from each facility in tpy Height of the release point above ground in meters, for each point source Nearest distance to the property line in meters for point sources and fugitive sources Point-source emissions release heights and receptor distances were derived from facility-specific data obtained from facility survey responses. Those responses were collected as part of Step B. As with Step B, for facilities that did not provide facility-specific data, information was obtained from publically available sources to the extent relevant information was available (i.e. EPA's NEI, aerial imagery, and municipal tax assessors' information). Because nearly all facilities requiring Tier 1 modeling responded to the Step B survey, information from publically available sources was only needed for one facility in the Tier 1 screening for all three years of TRI data (2009-2011)-the facility in Virginia. The Tier 1 point-source contribution to each facility's maximum annual ambient air concentration of EGBE was determined for each stack at each facility using the following procedure: The facility's combined point-source EGBE emissions were assumed to be emitted from each stack evaluated at the facility. The greatest emission height in the table that is less than or equal to the stack height for the EGBE-emitting stack was selected from the modified Tier 1 Table (see Appendix D Table D-1). The greatest distance in the table that is less than or equal to the distance between this stack and the property line was selected. 45 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00058  The appropriate normalized maximum annual concentration for this stack (based on its release height and distance to fenceline) was selected and multiplied by the annual combined point-source EGBE emission rate (in tpy) to obtain the maximum annual average ambient air concentration estimate (in pg/m3) associated with EGBE pointsource emission from the facility. For Tier 1 screening, this procedure described above was performed for each EGBEemitting stack at a facility. Then, the maximum annual Tier 1 concentration among these individual stack analyses was conservatively selected to represent the maximum impact for facility point-source emissions of EGBE. Each facility's fugitive EGBE emissions were assumed to be represented by a single volume source with a lateral dimension of 10 meters and a release height of 3 meters, as was the case for Step B. These assumptions are identical to those used in EPA's exposure assessment for ethylene glycol (EPA 1995b) and the EGBE HAP delisting petition (CMA 1997). The distances to the nearest receptors for fugitive emissions were based on site-specific data from the survey responses or from measurements of the minimum distance from the fugitive source (facility building) to the property boundary based on aerial imagery. For each facility, the maximum Tier 1 modeled annual average concentration of EGBE in ambient air was conservatively assumed to be the sum of fugitive impact and worst-case stack impact for the facility. 6.3.1.2 Tier 1 Results for Individual Facilities For each facility, the maximum chronic EGBE exposure (impact) in ambient air at or beyond the property boundary was determined as described above, and the result was compared to the RfC of 1.6 mg/m3 by calculating the chronic Hazard Quotient (HQ)p. Those facilities, for which the Tier 1 modeling result was less than the RfC, screened out and did not undergo further analysis. As summarized below and further detailed in Table 6-4 and Appendix D, two of the facilities subjected to Tier 1 screened out at this step: For the 14 facilities reporting non-zero emissions Certain Glycol Ethers in 2009 that did not screen out in Step B, 2 screened out in the Tier 1 screening step, leaving 12 facilities for additional refined evaluation in Tier 2. For the 15 facilities reporting non-zero emissions Certain Glycol Ethers in 2010 that did not screen out in Step B, 2 screened out in the Tier 1 screening step, leaving 13 facilities for additional refined evaluation in Tier 2. For the 14 facilities reporting non-zero emissions Certain Glycol Ethers in 2011 that did not screen out in Step B, 3 screened out in the Tier 1 screening step, leaving 11 facilities for additional refined evaluation in Tier 2. For facilities subject to Tier 1 screening, the Tier 1 results were approximately 24% lower, on average, than Step B modeled impacts, with individual facility reductions (Step B to p The HQ is calculated as the ratio of the maximum estimated exposure concentration to the RfC. 46 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00059 Tier 1) in the maximum estimated EGBE exposure concentrations that ranged from 0% to approximately 70% (see Table 6-10). Few additional facilities screened out in the Tier 1 screening. This result is not unexpected given general similarities between the Step B and Tier 1 approaches (i.e. use of the same lookup table). As discussed above, the principle difference between Step B and Tier 1 for point source emissions is that Step B uses the minimum fenceline distances and stack heights, regardless of whether those values relate to the same emission source. Thus, small reductions from Step B to Tier 1 indicate that the worst-case hypothetical stack assumed for Step B had only slightly worse dispersion characteristics than the worst case individual stack selected from among each facility's actual EGBE emitting stacks. Large reductions in the modeled exposure concentration from Step B to Tier 1 indicated that the Step B hypothetical stack height and minimum distance to fenceline assumptions had worse dispersion characteristics than any actual stack at the facility, further demonstrating the conservativeness of the Step B approach, with respect to Tier 1. Those facilities that did not screen out with the Tier 1 analysis were subjected to more refined Tier 2 modeling using EPA's AERSCREEN air dispersion model, as discussed in the next subsection. 6.3.2 Tier 2 Screening for Individual Facilities Chronic exposure Tier 2 modeling was performed for each facility that did not screen out using the Tier 1 screening analysis. Tier 2 modeling was performed using EPA's recommended screening air dispersion model, AERSCREEN (EPA 2011a)q. AERSCREEN is designed to provide conservative estimates of ambient air concentrations. AERSCREEN requires additional facility-specific information beyond that which was required for the Tier 1 modeling. Specifically, the following facility-specific data is required for the Tier 2 modeling with AERSCREEN: (1) inside stack diameters; (2) exhaust velocities; (3) exit gas temperatures for all stack (point) releases; (4) extent of the facility property boundary; (5) building dimensions (used to parameterize fugitive EGBE emissions and evaluate the building downwash impacts for point sources); and (6) classification of the surrounding area as urban or rural. AERSCREEN also requires additional information related to land surface characteristics around each facility, as well as information on general meteorological characteristics for each site, which are used to generate the screening meteorological data applied with AERSCREEN. AERSCREEN models the worst-case 1-hour average ambient air concentration based on a closely spaced receptor grid around each facility, which extends outward a distance of 5,000 meters (16,404 feet) and assumes the AERSCREEN default receptor spacing (within this grid) of 25 meters (82 feet). To estimate the maximum (chronic) annual average EGBE ambient air concentrations, AERSCREEN applies a scaling factor of 0.1 to the model-generated maximum 1-hour average concentration output, in accordance with EPA's AERSCREEN qAERSCREEN is a screening-level air quality model based on AERMOD. AERSCREEN was implemented as the screening option in AERMOD, using a nonsequential meteorological data file representing a matrix of conditions, specifically worst-case meteorological conditions generated by the MAKEMET program. 47 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00060 guidance (EPA 2011). For each facility modeled using this approach, the Tier 2 AERSCREEN result represents the combined impact of point and fugitive EGBE emissions. Because AERSCREEN is limited to modeling a single emission source in each model run, point and fugitive sources for a facility were modeled separately in Tier 2. The maximum impact for the facility's total EGBE emissions (point and fugitive) was conservatively calculated as the sum of the maximum predicted AERSCREEN result for the point-source EGBE emissions combined with the maximum predicted AERSCREEN result for the facility's fugitive EGBE emissions. A detailed discussion of inputs required by AERSCREEN and the methodology used to perform the modeling is provided in the remainder of this section. The results of the Tier 2 Screening are provided in Section 6.3.2.5. 6.3.2.1 AERSCREEN Meteorological Inputs AERSCREEN modeling was carried out using simulated location-specific (worst-case) screening meteorological data generated by MAKEMET program version 09183 (EPA 201 la), using local temperature extremes and surface characteristics information. The screening meteorological data produced by MAKEMET is a location-specific matrix of meteorological conditions intended to be representative the meteorological possibilities for that geographic location. The screening meteorological data was generated for each facility subject to Tier 2 modeling using minimum and maximum ambient temperatures derived from historical daily temperature records at meteorological station closets to the facility, in the United States Historical Climatology Network. Extremes were determined using all historical records, spanning from 50 and over 100 years, depending on the station location. Site-specific surface characteristic data for the area around the facility were processed using United States Geological Survey National Land Cover Data (USGS) and EPA model AERSUFRACE (EPA 2008). Surface characteristics (albedo, Bowen ration and surface roughness) were provided in the form of seasonal 12 sector characteristics representative of a one kilometer (km) radius area centered at the facility. The remaining MAKEMET input parameters, such as minimum wind speed, anemometer height, and specified number of wind directions etc. used the default AERSCREEN values. 6.3.2.2 AERSCREEN Buildings and Receptor Location Inputs EGBE 1-hour modeled concentrations are calculated by AERSCREEN at specific locations within the user-specified grid. For the Tier 2 screening, the specified receptor grid for each facility extended outward from each facility's property line to a distance of 5,000 meters (16,404 feet). The AERSCREEN default receptor spacing (within this grid) of 25 meters (82 feet) was used for the entire grid. Property boundary information required for AERSCREEN modeling was obtained from Tier 2 survey responses, or was obtained from publically available sources, as described for Step B and Tier 1 screening. The property plans and images obtained from the local agencies were georeferenced by overlaying them onto an aerial image from Google Earth. For Tier 2 screening, the building dimensions, orientation, and distance to the property line were 48 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00061 determined using the Google Earth program. For buildings with multiple roof heights, each roof level was estimated using Google Earth's "Street View" feature and comparing the building height to a known height (e.g., a door). In the absence of a clear street view image, the height of the building's shadow was compared to that of a known shadow height such as that of a truck trailer or power line post, in order to estimate the building height. 6.3.2.3 AERSCREEN Elevation Data Inputs AERSCREEN requires a determination whether complex terrainr is present within 5 km of the facility being modeled. Aerial imagery with elevations was also used to make that determination. Only one facility subject to Tier 2 modeling was identified as having the potential for complex terrain--the in WV All remaining sites for which Tier 2 modeling was required are located in areas with relatively flat terrain. For the facility in WV, potential effects of complex terrain were evaluated in AERSCREEN by incorporating digital elevation data from the National Elevation Dataset (NED) (USGS; EPA 2009), at the resolution of 0.33 arc-second. For this facility, the results of the AERSCREEN modeling with terrain effects produced slightly lower annual average EGBE concentrations than if terrain effects were omitted. Consequently, complex terrain effects are not significant at the WV facility. Nonetheless, to be conservative, the slightly higher AERSCREEN results that excluded terrain effects were used to represent the Tier 2 modeling results for this facility. 6.3.2.4 AERSCREEN EGBE Point and Fugitive Source Inputs Tier 2 surveys were distributed to all facilities requiring Tier 2 modeling in order to collect the following facility-specific information: stack inside diameters, exit gas temperatures, building dimensions/configuration, and detailed information on the extent of the property boundary. As with the Step B/Tier 1 surveys, in order to increase responsiveness among the CMI-member facilities, CMI was enlisted to assist with survey distribution and follow up. Following survey data collection, facilities were categorized as either (1) facilities for which Tier 2 survey responses were received or (2) facilities for which Tier 2 survey information was not provided. For facilities that did not respond, the missing information was obtained from publically available sources, in the same manner as described above with respect to Step B and Tier 1 screening. Where required parameters were not available from either survey responses or publically available sources, default assumptions were used, as described further below. EGBE Point and Fugitive Emission Rates Stack and fugitive emission rates used for chronic exposure modeling in the model (in units of grams per second [gps]) were derived from annual Certain Glycol Ether emissions reported to TRI and the proportion of Certain Glycol Ether emissions that EGBE comprises (as r Complex terrain term refers to the setting where terrain features surrounding the facility, within a 5 km radius, exceed the stack height. 49 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00062 reported by each facility in their Tier 2 survey response). Where facilities did not provide this information, EGBE emissions were conservatively assumed to be 100% of the Certain Glycol Ether emissions reported to TRI. For evaluating chronic exposures, the EGBE emission rates used to model each point (stack) and volume source were developed from annual EGBE emissions for each facility, based on an assumption that facilities operate continuously. Based on survey responses received for facilities modeled during Tier 2 (surveys were received from 92% of facilities modeled during Tier 2), this assumption is reasonable. All respondents indicated that their facilities operated continuously throughout the year. EGBE Point-Source Parameters Separate AERSCREEN model runs were performed for each facility's stack emissions. In each model run, the facility's total EGBE point-source emissions were assumed to exhaust from a single stack. Sources of information for stack parameters used in Tier 2 modeling are discussed below. For the two facilities that did not provide Tier 2 survey responses (i.e., in VA and in Wl), information from the 2005 and 2008 NEI databases was used to estimate individual stack parameters. Based on the NEI database information, these facilities each reported VOC releases from a single stack at each facility. The NEI data provided the following stack parameters for these two facilities: stack height; stack inner diameter; exhaust temperature; and exit velocity. However, because the NEI database does not provide specific information on the location of the stacks at a facility, a sensitivity analysis was performed using AERSCREEN to determine the most conservative hypothetical stack location for the stack at each of these two facilities (i.e., the location that produced the highest modeled air concentration based on the stack parameters in the NEI database). First, to determine the likely location of the stack at each facility, aerial images were analyzed to first identify the section of each facility's building(s) that was most likely associated with process emissions (i.e., the portion of the building where stacks were visible). For point-sources (stacks), this analysis involved modeling a range of stack-to-property distances and stack-to-building configurations, including hypothetical stack locations that would be expected to result in higher modeled concentrations due to building downwash effects or proximity of the source to the property line. The worst-case stack location at each facility as determined in the sensitivity analyses was used for the final point-source AERSCREEN model run for these two facilities. For facilities that provided Tier 2 survey responses, AERSCREEN was used to model each facility's total point-source EGBE emissions. For each stack determined to emit or potentially emit EGBE at the facility, individual AERSCREEN model runs were performed. For each model run, the facility's combined EGBE stack emissions were assumed to exhaust from each stack independently. The AERSCREEN model run that resulted in the highest predicted annual average EGBE concentration for a facility was conservatively selected to represent the worst-case (maximum) predicted airborne EGBE concentration for all point-source EGBE emissions from that facility. 50 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00063 EGBE Fugitive Source Parameters For Tier 2, fugitive EGBE emissions were modeled as a single volume source, where the initial vertical dimension (ny) was derived from the facility's roof height and the initial horizontal dimension (nz) was derived from the building area, consistent with EPA guidance for selecting volume source parameters (EPA 1995d). The information provided by the facilities in Tier 2 survey indicates that fugitive EGBE emissions are released from rooftop vents on the portion of the building encompassing manufacturing operations. The release height of the volume source was therefore considered to be equivalent to each building's height. For facilities that did not respond to the Tier 2 survey and that had multiple buildings on site, aerial images were examined to identify likely production areas, based on presence of stacks, roof vents, etc. Fugitive emissions were assumed to be associated with those likely production areas. For all facilities (both with and without Tier 2 survey responses), volume sources were checked for the presence of an "exclusion zone condition" in AERSCREEN. Specifically, an exclusion zone condition applies if the distance between the volume center and closest property line (referred to as "PD") is less than or equal to 2.15 times the initial horizontal lateral dimension. In such cases, the volume source lateral dimension was reduced to ensure that the resulting nz was equal to (PD-1)/2.15. 6.3.2.5 Tier 2 Results For each facility in the three TRI emission data sets (2009, 2010, 2011 calendar years) subjected to Tier 2 screening, a facility's Tier 2 worst-case (maximum) predicted airborne EGBE concentration was compared to the EGBE RfC of 1.6 mg/m3. Facilities for which the worst-case Tier 2 concentration of EGBE in ambient air was less than the RfC screened out and required no further analysis. As summarized in Table 6-5 and detailed in Appendix D, all facilities screened out at Tier 2 because all worst-case EGBE airborne concentrations at or beyond the property boundaries were predicted to be below the EGBE RfC of 1.6 mg/m3. The results of the Tier 2 chronic exposure assessment are summarized below: For the 12 facilities retained for Tier 2 modeling based on 2009 emissions, the maximum predicted annual average concentration was 1.20 mg/m3 (i.e., 75% of the RfC). The minimum and average concentrations modeled for all facilities were 0.25 mg/m3 and 0.54 mg/m3 (corresponding to 15% and 33% of the RfC), respectively. For the 13 facilities retained for Tier 2 analysis based on 2010 emissions, the maximum predicted annual average concentration was 1.04 mg/m3 (i.e., 65% of the RfC). The minimum and average concentrations modeled for all facilities were 0.25 mg/m3 and 0.54 mg/m3 (corresponding to 15% and 33% of the RfC), respectively. For the 12 facilities retained for Tier 2 analysis based on 2011 emissions, the maximum predicted annual concentration was less than or equal to 1.16 mg/m3 (i.e., 73% of the RfC). The minimum and average concentrations modeled for all facilities were 0.24 mg/m3 and 0.51 mg/m3 (corresponding to 15% and 31% of the RfC), respectively. Of the facilities for which Tier 2 modeling was performed, the facility in MA produced the highest modeled chronic EGBE impacts for all three years, with a maximum 51 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00064 annual average EGBE concentration of 1.20 mg/m3 (i.e., 75% of the RfC), based on 2009 emissions data. Despite the use of very conservative assumptions and the inherent conservatism of the AERSCREEN model and screening meteorological data, the Tier 2 screening results demonstrate that EGBE emissions from individual facilities do not pose a significant risk of chronic health effects at or beyond the property boundaries for individual facilities. AERSCREEN model output files are provided in Appendix F. Although all facilities screened out at Tier 2, in order to further test the conservatism of the screening procedure and to estimate the margin of safety provided by the screening procedure, six facilities that had screened out in Tier 2 modeling were subjected to additional analysis using EPA's long-term Tier 3 analysis. This analysis is described in Section 6.6, which discusses an analysis of uncertainty and conservatism of assumptions used to model chronic exposures from individual facilities. 6.4 Chronic Inhalation Exposure Assessment for Clusters of Facilities The preceding analysis focused on potential risks associated with exposures to emissions from individual facilities. In the event that several emitting facilities are located within a limited geographic area, local residents may be exposed to the combined emissions from clusters of facilities. Therefore, the potential for chronic EGBE ambient air impacts from clusters of facilities was also evaluated as part of this petition. Zip codes were selected as the geographic area used in this analysis, which evaluated potential chronic EGBE concentrations in ambient air from facilities located within all zip codes containing at least two facilities reporting non-zero emissions of Certain Glycol Ether emissions to TRI in 2009, 2010, and 2011. For the reasons described in greater detail below (Section 6.5.3), the zip code approach used in this petition is more conservative than the zip code/census tract approach used by Dolinoy and Miranda (2004). In addition, the method used for this facility cluster evaluation is similar to, but more refined than use of the metropolitan areas for the cluster evaluation used in the HAP delisting petition, a methodology EPA reviewed and accepted as appropriate and conservative that metropolitan area cluster evaluation as part of the HAPs delisting decision (68 FR 65653). 6.4.1 Facility Cluster Evaluation Tiered Screening Methodology A conservative tiered modeling approach was also used to evaluate potential chronic airborne EGBE concentrations in ambient air from clusters of proximate facilities. The methodology used is analogous to the tiered modeling approach applied to individual facilities (see Sections 6.2 and 6.3), as discussed further below. 6.4.2 Step A Screening (Cluster Evaluation) For the facility cluster evaluation, Step A was used to prescreen the inventory of all facilities that reported non-zero emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers to TRI for the 2009, 2010 and 2011 reporting years. Any zip code that contained at least two facilities reporting emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers during these three years was retained for evaluation in Step A. As with 52 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00065 the Step A screening performed on individual facilities, each facility's annual TRI combined stack and fugitive Certain Glycol Ethers emissions were conservatively combined and used to represent the facility's total annual EGBE emissions. This approach differs from that employed by Dolinoy and Miranda (2004) in their evaluation of TRI-reported and potential non-TRI-reported emissions, but is a more conservative and appropriate basis for screening the clusters of facilities throughout the United States. Dolinoy and Miranda (2004) evaluated different spatial scales for estimating exposures to glycol ethers by modeling potential air concentrations at specific locations. Their approach took into account the relative distances to each source and the dispersion that occurs over those distances. They concluded that, for the purposes of determining spatially explicit exposure patterns, finer-grained resolution (e.g., census blocks) modeling revealed potential localized exposure hot-spots that are not apparent when modeling at higher resolution (e.g., zip codes). The screening approach in this petition, however, is not spatially explicit and combines facilities over geographic areas and treats them as a single source. Therefore, this approach does not account for air dispersion that occurs between facility boundaries. In addition, pooling facilities from larger geographic areas (i.e., zip codes rather than census blocks) captures more facilities within a single unit, and thus is considered more conservative than use of the potentially smaller subset of facilities when using smaller geographic areas. In the facility cluster evaluation, Step A used the same "inverted" Tier 1 table described in Section 6.2.1. The inverted Tier 1 table provides annual EGBE emission thresholds (expressed as tpy) above which the annual average EGBE concentration would be predicted to exceed the RfC of 1.6 mg/m3. Stack and fugitive emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers from all facilities in the same zip code were summed, and treated as if exhausted from a single point source with an emission height of zero meters and a minimum distance to fenceline of 50 meters. Based on the EGBE RfC of 1.6 mg/m3, the corresponding threshold EGBE annual threshold emission rate for Step A screening is 4.9 tpy. Consistent with the Step A screening for individual facilities, any zip code for which the combined EGBE (point and fugitive) exceeded 4.9 tpy, was retained for further refined analysis. The number of zip codes containing more than one facility reporting Certain Glycol Ether emissions was 158 in 2009, 164 in 2010, and 159 in 2011 (Table 6-6). The greatest number of facilities within a single zip code was 6 (zip code 60007, Elk Grove Village, IL). These zip codes were subjected to the Step A screening, with the following results: Of the 158 zip codes subjected to Step A screening for the 2009 TRI reporting year, 58 had cumulative emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers (assumed to be 100% EGBE) greater than 4.9 tpy; Of the 164 zip codes subjected to Step A screening for the 2010 TRI reporting year, 62 had cumulative emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers (assumed to be 100% EGBE) greater than 4.9 tpy; and Of the 159 zip codes subjected to Step A screening for the 2011 TRI reporting year, 65 had cumulative emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers (assumed to be 100% EGBE) greater than 4.9 tpy. 53 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00066 Those zip codes with combined emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers above 4.9 tpy underwent Step B screening, as discussed below. 6.4.3 Step B Screening (Cluster Evaluation) The purpose of the Step B screening for facility clusters is to provide an initial assessment of chronic exposures for geographic areas (zip codes) that contain more than one facility emitting EGBE (or potentially emitting EGBE--i.e., reported TRI emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers). This screening consisted of two components. The first component included zip codes where emissions were dominated by a single facility. The second component included the remaining zip codes, where emissions were more evenly distributed across multiple facilities. In order to identify the clusters dominated by one facility, the Certain Glycol Ethers emissions from the top reporting facility were compared to the cumulative Certain Glycol Ethers emissions for the zip code. If the percentage of cumulative emissions from one facility was at least 90% of the total, the zip code was evaluated as part of the first component of the Step B screen (i.e., dominated by a single facility). Any zip code for which the percentage of emissions from a single facility was less than 90% of the total was evaluated as part of the second component of the Step B screening. For those zip codes evaluated under the first component of the facility cluster Step B screening, the maximum impacts from the individual facility Step B screening (Section 6.2.4 and Appendix C, Table C-4) for each facility in the zip code were compared to the RfC of 1.6 mg/m3. If the maximum annual average EGBE concentration among all facilities in the zip code was less than 90% of the RfC, the zip code screened out and no further analysis was required. The cumulative zip code emissions from those zip codes that did not screen out at this point were compared to a threshold emissions level derived from the inverted Tier 1 lookup table developed for the Step A screening (Table 6-1). The threshold emissions level was determined based on the following assumptions, consistent with the Step B screening for individual facilities (Section 6.2.3): 1. All air emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers were assumed to be EGBE. 2. All air emissions in the zip code were assumed to be released from a single point source that was 10 meters high and 50 meters from the fenceline. 3. Fugitive emissions were combined with point-source emissions. Based on these conservative assumptions, the threshold emissions rate that would correspond to the RfC is 75.8 tpy (Table 6-1). Zip codes with cumulative emissions greater than 75.8 tpy were retained for more refined facility cluster evaluation. The screening results from this first analysis are summarized below: Based on the 2009 TRI inventory of facilities emitting Certain Glycol Ethers, 31 of the 58 zip codes that did not screen out at Step A contained one facility that represented more than 90% of the Certain Glycol Ethers emissions released in that zip code. The estimated maximum annual average EGBE concentrations for all 31 zip codes were less than 90% of the RfC. Thus, 54 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00067 none of the 31 zip codes were retained for the more refined Tier 1 analysis based on 2009 TRI data. Based on the 2010 TRI inventory of facilities emitting Certain Glycol Ethers, 30 of the 62 zip codes that did not screen out at Step A contained one facility that represented more than 90% of the Certain Glycol Ethers emissions released in that zip code. The estimated maximum annual average EGBE concentrations for 29 of these zip codes were less than 90% of the RfC. Thus, one of these zip codes (i.e., 27320 in Reidsville, NC), was retained for the more refined Tier 1 analysis based on 2010 TRI data. Based on the 2011 TRI inventory of facilities emitting Certain Glycol Ethers, 30 of the 64 zip codes that did not screen out at Step A contained one facility that represented more than 90% of the Certain Glycol Ethers emissions released in that zip code. The estimated maximum annual average EGBE concentrations for 29 of these zip codes were less than 90% of the RfC. Thus, one of these zip codes (i.e., 27320 in Reidsville, NC), was retained for the more refined Tier 1 analysis based on 2011 TRI data. The second component of the Step B facility cluster evaluation evaluated all remaining zip codes that contain at least two facilities emitting EGBE (or potentially emitting EGBE--i.e., reported TRI emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers) and were not included in the preceding analysis. This second component of Step B was conducted for the following zip codes: (1) 24 zip codes for the 2009 TRI emission inventory; (2) 26 zip codes for the 2010 TRI emission inventory; and (3) 31 zip codes for the 2011 emission TRI inventory). The cumulative EGBE emissions (sum of the EGBE emissions for the TRI-reporting facilities in the zip code) for each zip code were compared to the threshold emissions level of 75.8 tpy, described above. Based on these conservative assumptions, the majority of zip codes evaluated in the second component of Step B screened out. Those retained are shown in Table 6-7 and summarized below: 21 of the 24 zip codes analyzed based on the 2009 TRI emission inventory screened out at Step B. The three zip codes retained for more refined modeling were 60609 in Chicago, IL; 45840 in Findlay, OH; and 26062 in Weirton, WV. 22 of 26 zip codes analyzed based on the 2010 TRI emission inventory screened out at Step B. The four zip codes retained for more refined modeling were 60609 in Chicago, IL; 45840 in Findlay, OH; 46350 in La Porte, IN; and 26062 in Weirton, WV. 29 of 31 zip codes zip codes analyzed based on the 2011 TRI emission inventory screened out at Step B. The two zip codes retained for more refined modeling were 45840 in Findlay, OH and 26062 in Weirton, WV. Combining the results from the two component analyses of the Step B screening, a total of five unique zip codes required further refined modeling in the Tier 2 screening using AERSCREEN to determine if long-term EGBE exposures resulting from EGBE emissions from clusters of facilities in these zip codes exceed the RfC, when less conservative assumptions are used. This included three zip codes based on the 2009 TRI data, five zip codes for 2010, and three zip codes for 2011. 55 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00068 6.4.4 Tier 2 Screening (Cluster Evaluation) Because the initial Tier 1 lookup table for point sources does not lend itself for use in screening clusters of sources beyond the initial Step B screening step described in the previous section, Tier 1 analysis was not conducted as part of the cluster evaluation. As such, the five zip codes that did not screen out during Step B (cluster evaluation) were subjected to Tier 2 modeling instead. The Tier 2 modeling for the facility clusters was carried out using the same general approach used for the Tier 2 AERSCREEN modeling of individual facilities described in Section 6.3, with some minor differences discussed below. AERSCREEN modeling of each facility within the five zip codes was performed using location-specific screening meteorological data generated by MAKEMET. However, while local meteorological inputs into the MAKEMET (e.g., temperature extremes) were identical for all facilities within the zip code, surface characteristic inputs were unique for each facility and were therefore based on the land cover characteristics of a 1-km radius area surrounding the individual facility. All individual facilities within the five zip codes were modeled assuming flat terrain5 and using the same receptor grid configuration described in Section 6.3. As with the Tier 2 modeling of individual facilities, AERSCREEN 1-hour concentration results were converted to maximum annual average (chronic) impacts for comparison to the RfC, by multiplying the 1-hour average values by the scaling factor of 0.1`. As with the Tier 2 analysis for individual facilities, the facility cluster evaluation included facilities that provided Tier 2 survey responses and those that did not. Of the 12 facilities included in the facility cluster evaluation, 7 provided Tier 2 survey responses and 5 did not. For facilities that provided Tier 2 survey responses, source parameterization and AERSCREEN modeling of each facility was carried out in the same manner as described in Section 6.3.2 for individual facilities. Modeling was based on facility-specific information provided in the survey response, including actual stack parameters (stack height, diameter, temperature, and exit velocity), building dimensions, property boundary information and urban or rural setting designation. Five facilities (one in each of these five zip codes) did not provide Tier 2 survey responses. For these facilities, point and fugitive emission source parameter inputs required for Tier 2 modeling were derived from publically available sources. Where the NEI database provided information on stack parameters, a sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the worst-case stack-to-building configuration and stack-to-fenceline distance, in the same manner s As discussed in Section 6.2.3.2, with the exception of one facility in WV, all other facilities subject to Tier 2 modeling were located in areas of relatively flat terrain. For the facility in WV, the potential effects for complex terrain were evaluated in AERSCREEN by incorporating digital elevation data. For this facility, the results of the AERSCREEN modeling with terrain effects produced slightly lower annual average EGBE concentrations than if terrain effects were omitted. Consequently, complex terrain effects are not significant at this facility. Nonetheless, to be conservative, the slightly higher AERSCREEN results that excluded terrain effects were used to represent the Tier 2 modeling results for this facility. ' To estimate the maximum (chronic) annual average EGBE ambient air concentrations, AERSCREEN applies a scaling factor of 0.1 to the model-generated maximum 1-hour average concentration output, in accordance with EPA's AERSCREEN guidance (EPA 2011) 56 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00069 described in Section 6.3.2. A summary of the treatment of NEI stack data for these facilities is provided below: For two facilities, in OH and in NC, the NEI database provided information on a single stack at each facility. For these, stack parameters from the NEI database were used for the Tier 2 modeling, and the most conservative location for the single stack was determined through a sensitivity analysis performed in the same manner described for the Tier 2 screening for individual facilities (see Section 6.3.2). For two other facilities, in IL and in ^^^^|lN, the NEI database provided information on multiple stacks at each facility (e.g., NEI provides information on 20 stacks for ^^|). For these facilities, the sensitivity analysis was simplified by selecting the most conservative combination of stack parameters among all stacks for which parameters were provided (i.e. conservative, from the perspective of resulting in the highest modeled annual average EGBE concentration). In other words, the hypothetical stack used in the Tier 2 modeling for that facility would have the height of the shortest NEI reported stacks, the exhaust temperature of the coolest stack, and the smallest diameter and the lowest velocity among all NEI stacks reported for the facility. This practice yields a hypothetical stack with the most conservative combined assumptions (more conservative than any of the individual stacks), and thus approximates the worst possible dispersion scenario for point-source emissions. The most conservative location for this hypothetical stack was determined through a sensitivity analysis performed in the same manner described for the Tier 2 screening for individual facilities. For the fifth facility (i.e., in WV) lacking a survey response, the NEI database included no information on stack parameters. For this facility, all point-source releases were therefore very conservatively modeled as fugitive emissions for the Tier 2 modeling (i.e. both point and fugitive emission rates were combined and modeled as a single volume source centered on the presumed production area of the facility building). Fugitive emissions at each facility were modeled as a volume source, with modeling input parameters developed in the same manner as described in Section 6.3.2. The maximum modeled chronic impact for each facility in the zip code was calculated as the sum of the modeled maximum concentration from the volume source and the worst-case stack. The maximum annual average air concentration for the entire zip code was calculated as the sum of the maximum impacts from each of the modeled facilities within the zip code (calculated using AERSCREEN in the same manner as described in Section 6.3.2). The individual facility maximum impacts were summed, regardless of where these maximum impacts occurred--i.e. for each facility modeled, the maximum impact for that facility may not occur at the same receptor location as the other facilities. The Tier 2 results of the maximum chronic (annual average) impacts for each cluster (zip code) are presented in Table 6-8 and modeling output files for the Tier 2 modeling are provided in Appendix F. 57 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00070 As shown in Table 6-8 for all three inventories (2009, 2010, and 2011), projected worstcase annual average EGBE concentrations at or beyond the property line for all five zip codes were appreciably below the RfC of 1.6 mg/m3, as summarized below: Based on 2009 TRI emissions of facilities emitting Certain Glycol Ethers, the predicted maximum annual average concentration across all five zip codes modeled using Tier 2 was 0.91 mg/m3 (i.e., 57% of the RfC). The minimum and average results for the five zip codes were 0.26 mg/m3 and 0.52 mg/m3, respectively (corresponding to 16% and 32% of the RfC, respectively). Based on 2010 TRI emissions of facilities emitting Certain Glycol Ethers, the maximum annual average concentration across all five zip codes modeled using Tier 2 was 1.16 mg/m3 (i.e., 73% of the RfC). The minimum and average results for the five zip codes were 0.27 mg/m3 and 0.58 mg/m3 respectively (corresponding to 17% and 36% of the RfC, respectively). Based on 2011 TRI emissions of facilities emitting Certain Glycol Ethers, the maximum annual average concentration across all five zip codes modeled using Tier 2 was 0.74 mg/m3 (i.e., 47% of the RfC). The minimum and average results for the five zip codes were 0.26 mg/m3 and 0.49 mg/m3 respectively (corresponding to 16% and 31% of the RfC, respectively). Tier 2 modeling of the zip codes based on 2009, 2010, and 2011 TRI data indicated that the Chicago IL zip code (facility cluster) yielded the highest predicted chronic EGBE impact for all years evaluated, with a maximum calculated maximum annual average concentration of 1.16 mg/m3 (i.e., 73% of the RfC) based on 2010 emissions. Section 6.5 provides an analysis of uncertainty and conservatism of assumptions used in modeling chronic exposures from clusters of EGBE-emitting facilities. 6.5 Uncertainty Analysis Based on the results of the tiered modeling approach for individual facilities and clusters of facilities presented in Sections 6.2 through 6.4 of this petition, the maximum annual average emissions of EGBE are not predicted to exceed the RfC for EGBE. Thus, even under highly conservative assumptions, EGBE emissions from facilities in the U.S. do not pose a risk to populations living around the facilities. Nonetheless, to further demonstrate the margin of safety for this conclusion, all facilities and zip code clusters screened out at Tier 2 modeling were subjected to more refined modeling using AERMOD (Tier 3). In addition, the conservatism of assumptions made during each of the steps of the tiered analysis is discussed in further detail in this uncertainty analysis, and generally would apply to both the chronic and acute tiered modeling, although for the acute exposure assessment additional discussion of uncertainty is provided in the acute MOE assessment found in Section 6.6.3. 58 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00071 6.5.1 Conservatism of Step A through Tier 2 In several ways, Step A and Step B provide a more conservative screening approach than EPA's long-term Tier 1 analysis: In Step A, all reported Certain Glycol Ethers emissions were assumed to be EGBE, even though EGBE represents only about 52% of the market share (SRI 2010). In Steps A and B, all stack emissions were conservatively assumed to exhaust from one stack. In Step A, all emissions data were initially evaluated as if they are emitted through a single stack with a release height of 0 meters with a distance to fenceline of 50 meters. This scenario is not likely to occur often, if at all. The conservatism of the default assumption of a 0-meter emissions source height was evaluated based on the sitespecific data provided by the facilities. The minimum release height reported is just over 3 meters. Furthermore, if the Step A screening is based on a release height of 2 meters and a distance to fence line of 10 meters, the screening threshold is 8.6 tpy (Table 6-1), 75% higher than the screening emission threshold used in our analysis. The Tier 1 screening analysis also affords significant conservatism in the treatment of point and fugitive emission sources of EGBE: For Tier 1 screening, all point-source emissions are conservatively assumed to be released from a single stack from the list of all stacks onsite that could possibly release EGBE. The single stack selected was the one that yields the maximum potential fenceline concentration, regardless of whether it is the stack from which the majority of the EGBE is actually released. For Tier 1 screening, all fugitive emissions are assumed to be released from a single fugitive source, wherein the distance to fenceline was determined by the minimum distance from the edge of the fugitive source to the property boundary. Conservatism of the Tier 2 analysis is also present on several levels. It is inherent in the use of a screening-level model such as AERSCREEN, and in the use of screening meteorology used by the model. Conservatism is also provided by the selection of parameters used for the Tier 2 modeling of each facility's point and fugitive EGBE emissions, and in the methodology used to calculate the combined point and fugitive impacts for each facility. These various levels of conservatism in the Tier 2 analysis are discussed in more detail in the remainder of this section. Screening air quality models such as AERSCREEN are conservative by design, and are intended to provide the means for performing a prescreening analysis prior to engaging in full scale modeling using models such as AERMOD/AERMET (EPA 2012, 2004d). AERSCREEN's conservatism stems from the following key model characteristics and assumptions: The use of screening meteorological data in AERSCREEN (generated by MAKEMET) is designed to include the worst-case meteorological extremes for a given geographic location, including the least favorable dispersion conditions, which would be expected to produce the highest modeled ambient air concentrations (impacts). These most extreme 59 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00072 combinations of meteorological parameters in the screening meteorological dataset would rarely if ever occur in actual meteorological data and thus represent a level of conservativeness in the AERSCREEN modeling. The screening meteorological data is a theoretical sequence of meteorological hourly conditions that AERSCREEN uses to predict the maximum 1-hour average concentration at each prescribed location. As discussed above, for purposes of evaluating maximum predicted long-term air concentrations in the Tier 2 modeling, this maximum 1-hour result is scaled by 0.1 to approximate a maximum annual average air concentration. The resulting maximum annual average result is therefore based on a worst-case meteorological hour. This practice is far more conservative than the approach used in AERMOD, which employs actual meteorological data to calculate an annual average result from all meteorological hours. While AERSCREEN uses the same algorithms as the full-scale dispersion model AERMOD, AERSCREEN employs certain conservative assumptions not used in AERMOD modeling. For instance, information on the closest distance between the source and the fenceline is treated conservatively in AERSCREEN, which uniformly assumes this distance for all directions from the emission source. AERMOD instead allows that the property boundary be defined realistically at varying distances to the source in different directions. In addition to the built in conservatism of the AERSCREEN model, the assumptions used in modeling point-source emissions at each facility provides an additional level of conservatism in Tier 2 modeling, as summarized below: As with the very conservative Step A screening, stack impacts were modeled as if each facility's total stack emissions were emitted from the single stack that produced the worst-case results, even though point-source emissions would actually be distributed across multiple stacks (providing greater dispersion). AERSCREEN is capable of modeling only one source at the time. As such, for multiple emission sources such as those modeled for this petition, the combined contribution of all sources at a facility are conservatively calculated as the sum of maximum results from the individual emission source model runs. In almost all circumstances, this practice would overestimate the result achieved by modeling all emission sources simultaneously. In addition to the conservatism of the assumptions and methods used in the Tier 2 modeling of individual facilities, the facility cluster evaluation also incorporated the following additional conservative elements: Each of the five zip codes (clusters) modeled using the Tier 2 methodology included one facility for which a Tier 2 survey response was not received. For these facilities, highly conservative assumptions were used to model facility EGBE emissions. Specifically, point-source emission for each of these facilities were conservatively modeled using the least favorable stack location (based on a sensitivity analysis of predicted AERSCREEN results) and the most conservative combination of stack parameters reported to the NEI. 60 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00073 In addition, all Certain Glycol Ether reported air emissions from these facilities were conservatively assumed to be 100% EGBE. As an additional source of "spatial" conservatism in the AERSCREEN modeled results for each cluster, the cumulative impacts from multiple facilities in each zip code modeled were calculated as the sum of the maximum predicted impact from each facility at or beyond the property boundary, regardless of the specific (receptor) location that this impact was determined by the model to occur. Given that the receptor location of maximum impact for each facility is invariably closely located to the facility boundary, and distances between individual facilities in certain clusters are as much as 1,500 meters, the estimated maximum cumulative impact for each cluster was almost certainly overestimated. And finally, in addition to the spatial conservatism resulting from summing each facility impacts irrespective of the receptor location at which they occurred, a "temporal" conservatism is also present in the Tier 2 application of AERSCREEN for modeling facility clusters. AERSCREEN calculates a worst-case result for each facility emission source, which is based on the worst-case meteorological hour in the screening meteorological data set. This worst-case meteorological hour is likely to differ from emission source to emission source at a facility as well as from facility to facility. As such, the summing of maximum impacts across facilities introduces a level of temporal conservatism that almost certainly overestimates the maximum cumulative impact for each cluster. Even though all individual facilities and facility clusters (zip codes) with non-zero Certain Glycol Ether emissions reported to TRI for 2009, 2010, and 2011 screened out at the conservative Tier 2 modeling step (i.e. the maximum annual average EGBE air concentrations at/beyond facility boundaries were below the RfC), in order to further demonstrate the margin of safety afforded in the tiered modeling approach, Tier 3 modeling using the EPA-approved refined air dispersion model AERMOD was performed, as discussed below. 6.5.2 Tier 3 Modeling (Individual Facilities) As a further demonstration of the conservatism of the tiered modeling approach for individual facilities, and to provide further evidence of the "margin of safety" afforded for all facilities that screened out at Step A, Step B, Tier 1, or Tier 2, six facilities were modeled using EPA's regulatory AERMOD (EPA 2004d, EPA 2012) and AERMET (EPA 2004f, EPA 2011 b) system (i.e., Tier 3 of the tiered modeling approach). These six facilities all previously screened out at Tier 2 based on their 2009, 2010, and 2011 TRI emissions and were also facilities that provided detailed information in Tier 2 survey responses. They included the three individual facilities that had the highest Tier 2 modeled maximum annual average EGBE concentrations in in WA. and in SC); two additional facilities that were also part of the Tier 2 facility cluster evaluations, and which were top emitters within their respective zip codes in WV, in IL); and 61 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00074 one additional facility that reported the maximum annual emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers in the TRI from 2009 through 2011 in NC). The six facilities subjected to Tier 3 modeling were also among the top 4% of emitters among all facilities reporting Certain Glycol Ethers emissions in their TRI reports for 2009 through 2011 (see Appendix B Tables B-1 through B-3). For each of these facilities, EGBE comprised between 85% and 100% of each facility's Certain Glycol Ether reported emissions. Tier 3 modeling using AERMOD is the most refined analysis step, and is consistent with EPA's Tiered Modeling Guidelines (EPA 1992a). The Tier 3 analysis was conducted with the AERMOD model (v.12345, EPA 2012) in accordance with EPA's Guideline on Air Quality Models (40 CFR Part 51 Appendix W), EPA's tiered modeling guidelines (EPA 1992a), the AERMOD User Guide (EPA 2004d), and the AERMOD Implementation Guide (EPA 2009). Compared to Tier 2 modeling, Tier 3 modeling with AERMOD provides more realistic (yet still conservative) estimates of projected impacts of EGBE emission at locations at or beyond each facility's fenceline. The principle refinements afforded by AERMOD over AERSCREEN are summarized below, and discussed in more detail in the remainder of this section: The Tier 3 AERMOD modeling uses actual meteorological data from the closest weather station, rather than the artificially generated screening meteorological data sets used with AERSCREEN. Tier 3 modeling takes into account the variability of the actual property boundary, rather than using a single distance between each emission source and the property boundary, as is assumed for AERSCREEN. This refinement allows a more realistic treatment of dispersion effects between a stack and receptors. The Tier 3 modeling incorporates the distribution of EGBE emissions across stacks at a facility, rather than assuming that all stack emissions of EGBE occur from a single stack (with the worst stack location assumed). Tier 3 modeling with AERMOD permits simultaneous modeling of multiple emission sources, which yields collective impacts from all sources for each receptor location. Tier 3 modeling with AERMOD modeling allows for the direct calculation of long-term averages for predicted air concentrations through use of multi-year meteorological data sets. The use of representative meteorological data processed using AERMET provides more realistic estimates of predicted impacts under actual atmospheric dispersion conditions characteristic of the geographic setting at each facility. The AERMOD modeling for each location was performed using five years of recent representative meteorological data (2006 through 2010 calendar years), from the meteorological stations closest to each facility. Meteorological data were processed using EPA's AERMET v. 11059 (EPA 2004f, EPA 2011b) meteorological preprocessor. The use of five years of hourly meteorological data ensures that AERMOD modeling results incorporate expected interyear meteorological variability at each location, while capturing the occasional short-term extreme meteorological conditions. The use of actual meteorological measurements in sequence also allows for the modeling of long-term 62 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00075 (chronic) concentrations directly, without needing to estimate them empirically by scaling 1-hour (short-term) impacts, as was required when using AERSCREEN. Finally, AERMOD's capability to model multiple sources in a single run allows that the combined impacts from multiple sources within a facility, or those from multiple facilities in a given domain be estimated more realistically than by simply superimposing their maxima as it was done in the Tier 2 screening. The Tier 3 AERMOD modeling used Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) geographic coordinates for all emission sources, buildings and receptor locations modeled. NED terrain elevation data from USGS with resolution at 0.33 arc-second were used to incorporate elevation information foremission sources and receptor locations. Offsite concentrations were calculated at specified receptor locations within a nested receptor grid and along each facility's property boundary. Property boundary receptors were spaced at 25 meter intervals. Offsite receptors were spaced at 50 meters in the Cartesian receptor grid out to a distance of 350 meters from the facility. A second coarser receptor grid with spacing of 100 meters was used for distances between 350 meters up to 2 km from each facility; 500 meter receptor spacing was used for receptors at distances from 2 km to 5 km from the approximate center of each facility. While the Tier 3 modeling for all six facilities relied on the same individual stack and volume source parameters used for Tier 2 modeling, the Tier 3 modeling also considered the distribution of EGBE emissions among the different stacks at a given facility, which was a level of refinement not considered in the Tier 2 screening. For one of the six facilities evaluated using Tier 3 modeling (the facility located in MA), the distribution of EGBE emissions between stacks was not provided. For this facility, stack emissions were assumed to be equally distributed among facility stacks for the Tier 3 modeling. As discussed above, the Tier 3 modeling used five years of actual meteorological data. The AERMOD modeling was performed independently for each year, resulting in predicted maximum annual average concentrations at each receptor for each year of meteorological data. The maximum predicted annual average concentration for each receptor location was then conservatively calculated as the highest of the five modeled annual average concentrations for a given receptor. Results of the chronic (annual average) Tier 3 AERMOD modeling results for individual facilities is provided in Table 6-9 and model output files are provided in Appendix F. As shown in Table 6-9: Based on 2009 emissions, the maximum Tier 3 result among the six facilities was 0.269 mg/m3, for the facility in WA, which represents less than 17% of the RfC. Based on 2010 emissions, the maximum Tier 3 result among the six facilities was 0.253 mg/m3, again for the facility in WA, which represents less than 16% of the RfC. Based on 2011 emissions, the maximum Tier 3 result among the six facilities was 0.256 mg/m3, for the facility in MA, which represents less than 16% of the RfC. These results indicate that, with the more refined and realistic (yet still conservative) assumptions used in the Tier 3 modeling, chronic exposures to EGBE for the highest emitting facilities are well below the RfC. 63 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00076 6.5.3 Tier 3 Modeling (Clusters of Facilities) As a further demonstration of the conservatism of the tiered modeling approach for clusters of facilities, Tier 3 modeling was performed for facility clusters in two zip codes: (1) 60609 in Chicago, IL, which had the highest cumulative Tier 2 impact among the five zip codes evaluated in Tier 2; and (2) 26062 in Weirton, WV, the zip code evaluated in Tier 2 that contained the largest number of individual facilities (i.e., five) reporting emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers to TRI in a single zip code. Tier 3 modeling for the facility cluster evaluation was performed with AERMOD using the same general methodology used for the Tier 3 modeling of individual facilities described in Section 6.5.2. Specifically, the AERMOD modeling for each facility relied on five years of representative meteorological data, with location information (UTM coordinates) and elevation data for all emission sources and buildings. Worst-case impacts from EGBE emissions at each facility were modeled for all receptor locations at or beyond each facility's property boundary using the same receptor grid spacing specified in Section 6.5.2. The principle difference between Tier 3 modeling of individual facilities (Section 6.5.2) and the Tier 3 modeling of facility clusters is that for facility cluster modeling, all modeled facilities were modeled simultaneously in AERMOD, and thus the cumulative impact from all facilities was calculated by AERMOD simultaneously. Results of the chronic (annual average) Tier 3 AERMOD modeling of the two zip codes is provided in Table 6-8 (model output files are provided in Appendix F), and briefly summarized below: Zip Code 60609 in Chicago, IL - The maximum Tier 3 impact for this zip code was 0.11 mg/m3 (2009 emissions), 0.18 mg/m3 (2010 emissions), and 0.14 mg/m3 (2011 emissions) corresponding to 7%, 12%, and 9% of the RfC, respectively. Zip Code 26062 in Weirton, WV - The maximum Tier 3 impact for this zip code was 0.16 mg/m3 (2009 emissions), 0.16 mg/m3 (2010 emissions), and 0.15 mg/m3 (2011 emissions) corresponding to 10% of the RfC, in each year. Predicted worst-case EGBE air concentrations for all modeled clusters based on 2009, 2010, and 2011 emissions averaged 0.15 mg/m3, or 10% of the RfC. As these cluster analysis results demonstrate, even when considering the collective impacts of clusters of facilities in a zip code, and conservatively assuming the worst-case meteorological data year, the maximum annual average concentration of EGBE for all clusters modeled is predicted to be well below the RfC. The predicted worst-case clusters impacts were less than the highest individual facility impacts presented in Section 6.5.2. This outcome reflects the fact that none of the individual facilities with the highest individual impacts are located in zip codes considered in the facility cluster evaluation (i.e. none were located in zip codes that contained more than one facility reporting emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers to the TRI during 2009, 2010, or 2011). 64 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00077 6.5.4 Conservatism of the Tiered Modeling Approach In total, the potential for facility emissions of EGBE to result in chronic exposures greater than the RfC was evaluated for all United States facilities reporting non-zero emissions of Certain Glycol Ether to TRI during 2009 (1,109 facilities), 2010 (1,149 facilities), and 2011 (1,099 facilities). The magnitude of conservatism (and margin of safety) built into the tiered modeling approach can be clearly demonstrated by comparing the reduction in maximum long-term modeled impacts between the lowest (most conservative) tier to the highest (most refined) modeling tiers. This reduction was demonstrated for the subset of individual facilities evaluated in all five tiers of the tiered modeling approach (Step A through Tier 3), the results of which are summarized below: In comparing initial (Step A and B) screening results to the results of the chronic exposure Tier 1,2, and 3 analyses of high-emitting facilities, the maximum annual average concentrations decreased by an average of 84% when the same facility was evaluated first under Step Au and then under Step B. For the individual facilities subject to Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 modeling, the reduction in maximum predicted annual average concentrations in moving from Step B to Tier 1 averaged 24%. The reduction in the maximum predicted annual average concentrations in moving from Tier 1 to Tier 2 averaged 80% (based on 2009, 2010, and 2011 TRI emissions). The reduction observed in moving from Tier 2 to Tier 3 averaged 70% (Table 6-10). Thus, the cumulative conservatism of evaluating facilities using Step A, relative to Tier 3, averaged 99%. These results demonstrated that for the highest emitting facilities, the modeled maximum annual average ambient concentrations resulting from Tier 3 modeling were consistently at least two orders of magnitude lower than the most conservative (Step A) screen applied, providing a significant margin of safety for those facilities screening out at lower tiers of modeling (Table 6 10). This tiered modeling approach also indicates a significant margin of safety even when considering possible year to year variability of EGBE emissions from facilities. As a demonstration of this margin of safety, consider that even the facility with the highest Tier 3 result of 0.269 mg/m3 facility in ^^|Washington based on its 2009 emissions) was well below (i.e., 17% of) the RfC. A gross estimate of range for overall interyear variability of EGBE emissions might be expected to generally follow the overall United States EGBE consumption trend, which is shown in Figure 2-1 (SRI 2010). As illustrated in this figure, United States total EGBE consumption peaked in approximately 2005, and has steadily declined since then. The calculated ratio of United States total EGBE consumption in 2005 u Although impacts were not explicitly calculated for the Step A screening, they were calculated for the comparison in Table 6-10 by using the EPA tier 1 lookup table and the conservative Step A assumptions (EGBE is 100% of Certain Glycol Ether emissions, all air emissions are released from a single point source with a stack height of 0 meters and a fenceline distance of 50 meters). 65 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00078 versus 2009 is 1.3 (i.e., consumption was 30% higher in 2005 than in 2009). By comparison, the margin of safety (ratio) for the RfC compared to the maximum Tier 3 result is 5.9. The results of this analysis support the conclusion that the tiered modeling approach provides a sufficient margin of safety that encompasses reasonable interyear variability in facility EGBE emissions. A second analysis was conducted to further demonstrate that the margin of safety indicated by the tiered modeling is sufficient to account for interyear variability in facility EGBE emissions overtime. This analysis considered the historical changes in the reported total Certain Glycol Ether emissions for all 13 facilities that were subject to Tier 2 modeling. Tier 3 modeling performed for 6 of these high emitting facilities indicated that the highest Tier 3 chronic impact was 0.269 mg/m3, which represented only 17% of the RfC. This equates to a ratio (margin of safety) between the RfC and the worst-case Tier 3 impact of 5.9. For purposes of comparison, a review of the historical Certain Glycol Ether emissions reported for these six facilities (see Table 6-11) between 2000 and 2011 was used to calculate the ratio between the peak (highest) emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers and the emissions reported during 2009, 2010, and 2011 (i.e. the years for which emissions were evaluated using the tiered modeling approach). These ratios also provide a reasonable representation of the expected maximum interyear variability in chronic impacts for each facility. The calculated ratios ranged from 1.1 to 2.3, indicating that the interyear variability that is less than the calculated margin of safety (i.e., 5.9) between the RfC and the worst-case Tier 3 modeled result. Similarly, this analysis can be extended to the eight other high emitting facilities modeled using the Tier 2 methodology. For these facilities, the calculated maximum ratios between peak year and 2009-2011 Certain Glycol Ether emissions ranged from 1.0 and 4.1, again demonstrating that interyear variability remains within the margin of safety demonstrated with the conservative Tier 3 modeling. Thus, it is highly unlikely that any facilities would have exceeded the RfC for EGBE even during each facility's peak emission years. This analysis further supports the conclusion that the tiered modeling approach provides a sufficient margin of safety that encompasses reasonable interyear variability in facility EGBE emissions. This analysis conservatively assumed that historical EGBE emissions represent the same fraction of Certain Glycol Ether emissions as in recent years (2009-2011). Finally, the same conclusion of a sufficient margin of safety is also reached by examining trends in maximum TRI-reported Certain Glycol Ether emissions from any facility for each reporting year from 2000 to 2011 (see Figure 5-1). As shown in this figure, there has been remarkably little variability in the Certain Glycol Ether emissions from the highest emitting facilities over the past decade. Further, this variability is well within the margin of safety indicated by the ratio (5.9) between the 2009 Tier 3 modeled worst-case result and the RfC. Consistent with EPA's conclusion in the HAPs delisting decision, the use of maximum annual average concentrations in each of the models significantly overstates the likely exposure levels of the actual exposed population (68 FR 65653): The use of the maximum annual average ambient concentration for each emission source to characterize the exposed population provides a conservative approach to 66 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00079 chronic exposure modeling. Furthermore, based on our experience, we judge that a refined exposure assessment estimating exposures for actual people living near these facilities would result in maximum individual exposures significantly lower than the maximum annual average ambient approach. Given the likely proximity of inhabitable areas and the variability of human activity patterns over an annualized time period, it is our expectation that actual maximum individual exposure would be at least a factor of 2 less than predicted by the models. In conclusion, the maximum long-term exposures of persons in the vicinity of EGBEemitting facilities are likely to be far below the estimates generated by the screening and modeling approach employed in this petition. Despite that considerable conservatism, these estimates were determined to pose a negligible risk for chronic health effects to the populations around the facilities that emit EGBE. 6.6 Acute Exposure Margin of Exposure (MOE) Assessment As previously discussed, in the absence of an EPA Acute Exposure Guideline Level (AEGL) or other RfC for acute effects, the tiered screening approach for evaluating potential acute EGBE exposures uses a MOE methodology, which is frequently used by EPA in TRI delisting decisions in cases where an EPA RfC for short-term exposures is not available. The remainder of this section outlines the methodology and results of the acute exposure and MOE assessment of the potential short-term exposures to EGBE from individual facilities and clusters of facilities. As discussed in Section 3.2.1.1, due to the relatively low sensitivity of human red blood cells to the hemolytic effects of EGBE, acute health effects are not expected to result from short-term ambient concentrations near EGBE-emitting facilities, and acute effects evaluations for EGBE have identified nonsystemic eye and upper respiratory tract irritation as the critical effect. Based on controlled studies of human volunteers, the lowest short-term concentration at which such irritation effects have been reported is 550 mg/m3 (Carpenter 1956), and no irritation effects have been observed from exposure to 97 mg/m3 for two hours during light physical exercise (Johanson et al., 1986). These acute air concentrations of concern are much higher than the predicted maximum annual average (chronic) air concentrations of EGBE estimated in Sections 6.3 through 6.5. In fact, the worst-case Tier 2 modeled chronic air concentrations for individual facilities and clusters of facilities were below these acute air concentrations of concern by factors of > 3,000 and > 500, respectively. Acute concentrations (typically evaluated based on maximum 1-hour averages) estimated using EPA tiered modeling are generally expected to be higher than chronic estimates (maximum annual averages) using the same modeling approaches. However, acute modeled concentrations that are 500 to 3,000 times greater than chronic results are highly unlikely. In addition, a comparison of Tier 2 modeled chronic air concentrations to acute concentration of concern (i.e. the NOAEL) itself does not likely reflect the full margin of safety as the NOAEL is based on a 2-hour exposure duration, while acute tiered-modeling results are 67 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00080 based on a 1-hour average. A 1-hour-equivalent NOAEL would be 137 mg/m3 (CalEPA 1999), over 40% higher. There is, therefore, a convincing basis to conclude that adverse acute effects from EGBE releases in the vicinity of emitting sources are unlikely. To confirm this conclusion, a tiered screening analysis based on EPA's tiered modeling approach for short-term exposures to HAPs (EPA 1992a) was conducted for the 15 TRI facilities that did not screen out from Steps A & B of the chronic exposures assessment in Section 6.2. An additional tiered screening evaluation of potential short-term EGBE exposures was also conducted on the five zip codes evaluated in Section 6.3.1. 6.6.1 Acute Exposure Assessment for Individual Facilities The tiered analysis used for short-term exposures is similar to the methodology presented for long-term exposures in Section 6.2, except that rather than modeling the maximum annual average concentrations of EGBE, the short-term modeling estimates maximum 1-hour concentrations of EGBE. The sections below describe the acute Tier 1 through Tier 2 screening methodology and results. As all individual facilities screened out at the Tier 2 step, no further refined modeling was required. However, Tier 3 modeling was performed as part of the margin of safety analysis used for the acute exposure assessment. 6.6.1.1 Tiered Modeling Methodology for Acute Exposures (Individual Facilities) Tier 1 screening for acute exposures was performed for all 15 facilities that did not screen out at Step B chronic exposure screening. These facilities were among the top 6% of all facilities in terms of the mass of Certain Glycol Ether air emissions reported to TRI for the 2009, 2010, and 2011 (see Appendix B). These facilities also reported that EGBE made up at least 85% of all Certain Glycol Ethers used at each facility. Because these facilities represent the highest Certain Glycol Ether emitting facilities and because EGBE is the dominant or only glycol ether used at these facilities, these facilities offer a reasonable approximation of "worst-case" facilities. A Tier 1 lookup table (Table E-1 of Appendix E) again was used to determine maximum acute (1-hour average) emissions based on distance to fenceline and stack height, consistent with EPA's Tiered Modeling Guidance (EPA 1992a). For the acute Tier 1 analysis, the short term EGBE emissions rates (in gps) were calculated from facility annual EGBE emissions, based on the conservative assumption that EGBE releases occurred during a typical 40 hour work week for 50 weeks per year. These short-term emission rates were used in combination with the short-term Tier 1 lookup table to determine the maximum point and fugitive 1-hour average (acute) concentrations (EPA 1992a), consistent with the method described for chronic exposure Tier 1 analysis (see Section 6.3.1). Facility total EGBE point-source releases (in gps) were conservatively assumed to be emitted from each individual stack, and the maximum short-term concentration from the Tier 1 short-term lookup table for the individual stacks was conservatively selected to represent the maximum point-source-related impact for the entire facility. Fugitive emissions were modeled as a volume source with a release height of 0 meters 68 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00081 and a lateral dimension of 10 meters. The release height of 0 meters is more conservative than the default release height used in the long-term Tier 1 analysis (3 meters), which was based on a modified version of EPA's Tier 1 table. This more conservative practice was adopted for consistency with the EGBE HAP delisting petition (CMA 1997). As such, the short-term exposure analysis for this petition uses an unmodified version of EPA's short-term Tier 1 lookup table (1992a). For the Tier 1 analysis, the maximum acute impact for each facility was derived from the sum of each facility's worst-case acute point and fugitive EGBE impacts, consistent with the chronic Tier 1 modeling (see Section 6.3.1). Acute exposure Tier 2 modeling was performed for all 13 facilities that did not screen out using the Tier 1 acute screening analysis. As with the chronic exposure Tier 2 modeling for individual facilities, the Tier 2 acute exposure modeling used AERSCREEN (EPA 2011a), which is designed to provide conservative estimates of ambient air concentrations. The same facility-specific inputs for point and fugitive sources used for the chronic Tier 2 modeling were used for the acute Tier 2 modeling. However, the acute exposure analysis uses AERSCREEN's worst-case 1-hour average ambient air concentration results. Tier 3 modeling of short-term exposures was carried out using the same general methodology employed in long-term Tier 3 modeling for longer-term exposures (Section 6.5.2). The same dispersion model (AERMOD) and site-specific meteorological data were used to model the same six individual facilities modeled with AERMOD in Section 6.5.2. These six facilities include the top three ranked facilities from Tier 2 acute analysis, two dominant emitters in the top three ranked clusters in Tier 2 acute facility cluster evaluation, and the facility reporting the largest emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers in the TRI from 2009 through 2011. Tier 3 modeling of short-term impacts was performed using the same source parameterization (assuming realistic emission distribution among stacks). The conservatism associated with AERMOD modeling is discussed in Section 6.5.4. 6.6.1.2 Acute Tiered Modeling Results (Individual Facilities) The results from the short-term Tier 1 through Tier 3 modeling are presented in Appendix E. At the most conservative screening level (Tier 1), all but 2 of the 15 facilities had predicted maximum 1-hour concentrations above the NOAEL for acute irritation effects, 97 mg/m3. The facility in Virginia had the highest predicted 1-hour Tier 1 concentrations (1,760 mg/m3 in 2010) from all three years of TRI datav (2009, 2010, and 2011). Predicted 1-hour Tier 1 point-source and fugitive air concentrations are presented in Table 6-12. With the incorporation of site-specific data and more realistic accounting of stack emissions in Tier 2 and Tier 3 modeling, the predicted maximum 1-hour concentrations at all 13 remaining modeled facilities were significantly lower, as expected. The facility with the highest short-term Tier 2 concentration based on 2009-2011 TRI data the facility in Massachusetts, which had a maximum short- v Concentrations presented are the sum of the combined maximum predicted 1-hour concentrations, at or beyond the fenceline, for fugitive/volume source emissions and point-source emissions. 69 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00082 term concentration of 52.41 mg/m3 (54% of the NOAEL) based on 2009 TRI data (see Appendix E Table E-4). The maximum predicted 1-hour concentration for the short-term Tier 3 modeling for this facility was 15.24 mg/m3 in 2009, 13.24 mg/m3 in 2010, and 14.82 mg/m3 in 2011 (see Appendix E Table E-6). These concentrations represent less than 15% of the acute NOAEL. The Tier 3 results, presented in Table E-6 (Appendix E), show that maximum 1-hour concentrations of EGBE at all six facilities are far below the acute NOAEL with an average predicted facility impact over the three years (i.e., less than 10% of the acute NOAEL. 6.6.2 Acute Exposure Assessment for Clusters of Facilities 6.6.2.1 Tiered Modeling Methodology for Acute Exposures (Clusters of Facilities) Modeling the combined short-term impacts from multiple facilities within the same zip code was carried out using the same approach used in long-term facility cluster modeling. The five zip code areas that did not screen out in Step B were subjected to Tier 2 modeling. Short term Tier 2 impacts from the five zip codes were estimated using the same screening meteorological data developed for long-term analysis and AERSCREEN model. As discussed further in Section 6.6.3, short-term emission rates were estimated using the conservative assumption that facilities operate for only 40 hours per week and only 50 weeks per year. This assumption is likely to overestimate the short-term emission rates because the high emitting facilities are CMI members and CMI reported that member facilities typically operate those manufacturing processes that use EGBE continuously and year-round. All five zip codes screened out at Tier 2. Nonetheless, Tier 3 modeling was conducted as part of the margin of safety analysis of acute exposures associated with clusters of facilities. Of the three clusters with highest estimated Tier 2 impacts, two zip codes with sufficient sitespecific data were selected for Tier 3 modeling. Tier 3 modeling of short-term impacts for two of the five zip codes for which sufficient site-specific data was available was performed using AERMOD and the same type of site-specific meteorological data developed for long-term analysis. As with short-term modeling of individual facilities, Tier 2 and Tier 3 modeling was used the same average annual emission rates originally developed and used in long-term Tier 2 and Tier 3 cluster modeling. As discussed in Section 6.3.1.3, conservative Tier 2 treatment of stack emissions assumes that total EGBE stack emissions from a facility are released from a single stack. More realistic parameterization of stack emissions in Tier 3 accounts for actual breakdown and proportioning of EGBE emissions among the different stacks at a facility (see Section 6.4.1). Maximum acute Tier 2 and Tier 3 impacts from clustered facilities were estimated following the same methodology used for long-term analysis (Sections 6.4.4 and 6.5.3). Maximum acute Tier 2 impacts for individual facilities were obtained by conservatively summing the maximum impacts for the separate volume and the worst-case stack scenarios, and the maximum cumulative impact for the entire cluster estimated by summing the maximum impacts from all individual facilities within the same zip code (irrespective of the specific receptor 70 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00083 location that each facility's maximum impacts occurred). In Tier 3, the maximum combined impact from multiple sources within a facility and the multiple facilities within a cluster were modeled using AERMOD. As discussed previously, AERMOD allows for the simultaneous modeling (in a single model execution) of all facilities in the cluster, as well as the modeled emission sources at each facility. 6.6.2.2 Acute Exposure Tiered Modeling Results (Clusters of Facilities) Acute EGBE impacts from Tier 2 and Tier 3 cluster modeling are presented in Table 6 13. The highest short-term Tier 2 concentration based on TRI emission data from 2009 to 2011 was 50.9 mg/m3 (for zip code 60609, Chicago IL in 2010). The maximum predicted 1-hour concentration for the short-term Tier 3 modeling for this same cluster was 14.0 mg/m3, 23.5 mg/m3, and 18.5 mg/m3 for 2009, 2010, and 2011, respectively. The highest of these concentrations represents less than 24% of the acute NOAEL. 6.6.3 Acute Margin of Exposure (MOE) Assessment The MOE approach used to evaluate the risk of potential acute irritation effects associated with short-term exposures to EGBE is consistent with previous TRI listing decisions (e.g., MEK, EPA 1998a; MIBK, EPA 1999c). The MOE was calculated as the ratio of the NOAEL for acute irritation effects, 97 mg/m3, to the estimated short-term exposure level in the vicinity of EGBE-emitting facilities. The MOEs for the predicted 1-hour maximum concentrations for the 13 high-emitting facilities subjected to Tier 2 modeling, and the 6 facilities subjected to Tier 3 modeling, are presented in Table 6-14. In each case that EPA applied the MOE approach in TRI listing decisions, EPA identified a numerical level below which the MOE "is associated with a concern for toxic effects." This level is generally expressed as the product of the applicable uncertainty and modifying factors uncertainty factors that the Agency considers for noncancer toxic effects. A MOE greater than this level "would generally indicate a low level of concern," whereas a MOE less than the level "is judged to be of concern" (MIBK, EPA 1999c). In the case of EGBE's acute irritation effects, the MOE determination is based on a NOAEL derived from human data. There is accordingly no need to apply uncertainty factors for interspecies extrapolation, or for LOAEL-to-NOAEL extrapolation. An intraspecies uncertainty factor of 10 has often been used to account for potentially susceptible subpopulations in EPA TRI and other program precedents. Although the minimum MOE among facilities subjected to the most sophisticated and realistic modeling ranges from 5 to 46 (Table 6-14), the level of concern is even lower than the MOE analysis indicates for several reasons. The Standard Operating Procedures for EPA's AEGL program (NRC 2001) allow for interspecies uncertainty factors below 10 in some circumstances, and suggest that an intraspecies uncertainty factor of 3 is appropriate for substances for which only one or a small number of nonsystemic effects have been documented. As discussed in Section 3 EGBE's systemic toxic effects are secondary to hemolysis; 71 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00084  because of the relative insensitivity of humans to EGBE's hemolytic effects, and because investigation of potentially sensitive subgroups have consistently failed to reveal increased susceptibility, hemolytic effects--and other systemic effects--are not expected to occur from short-term exposures near emitting facilities; and nonsystemic eye and upper respiratory irritation is the sole acute health effect that has been associated with short-term exposures, and this effect is unlikely to depend substantially on metabolic, pharmacokinetic or other systemic factors that introduce variability into responses across the exposed human population. Second, as observed above, the NOAEL for EGBE's acute irritation effects is based on a 2-hour exposure duration, and a 1-hour-equivalent NOAEL would be 137 mg/m3 (CalEPA 1999), over 40% higher. Taken together, these two considerations effectively reduce the MOE concern level from 10 to about 2, a more than a factor of two below the lowest MOE derived from the reasonable worst-case short-term exposure assessment summarized above (Table 6-14). Accordingly, there is a persuasive basis for concluding that there is a low level of concern for acute health effects from EGBE facility emissions. Finally, short-term emission rates were estimated using the conservative assumption that facilities operate for only 40 hours per week and only 50 weeks per year. This assumption is likely to overestimate the short-term emission rates because the high emitting facilities are CMI members and CMI reported that member facilities typically operate those manufacturing processes that use EGBE continuously, with little variability year-round. Therefore, actual hourly emission rates could be as much as four orders of magnitude lower than those used in the acute assessment." 6.7 Risk Characterization Conclusions for Potential EGBE Inhalation Exposures None of the facilities that reported non-zero emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers to the air to TRI during the 2009, 2010, and 2011 reporting years were is associated with maximum annual average concentrations of EGBE at or above the current IRIS RfC. By subjecting facilities to the more refined long-term Tier 1,2, and/or 3 analyses in accordance with EPA's (1992a) Tiered Modeling Guidance, this petition has demonstrated that there exists at least a six-fold margin of safety as a result of the conservative screening procedure employed, not including the additional margin of safety built into the RfC value itself (see Section 3.1.3). Additionally, it was demonstrated that EGBE exposures at or above the RfC are not expected to result from emissions from multiple facilities within a limited geographic area (for this analysis, within the same zip code). Finally, screening of a subset of facilities with some of the highest annual EGBE emissions reported to TRI during 2009, 2010, and 2011 demonstrated that short term EGBE exposures near facilities reporting Certain Glycol Ethers emissions are also highly unlikely to be associated sufficient to have resulted in any acute health effects. w Continuous operations assume more than 4.3 times more hours of operations (and emissions) over the course of the year than the 40 hours per week, 50 weeks per year assumption (8,736 hours vs. 2,000 hours). 72 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00085 7.0 SURFACE WATER EXPOSURES AND RISKS Although the 2009, 2010, and 2011 TRI data and the emissions inventory (Appendix B) indicate that releases to air far exceed releases to all other environmental media combined, chronic health effects posed by direct releases to water and partitioning to water were also evaluated. As previously discussed, EGBE (CAS 111-76-2) possesses physical characteristics that indicate a propensity to remain dissolved in water or to be transported to the water column. As detailed in Section 3.1, EGBE is readily biodegradable (Price et al. 1974, as cited in ATSDR 1998) and has a relatively short residence time in the environment. Its half-life in both surface water and soil ranges from 7 days to 4 weeks, while its half-life in groundwater is 14 days to 8 weeks, and its half-life in the atmosphere is approximately 3.3 to 33 hours (Howard et al. 1991, as cited in ATSDR 1998). EGBE is highly mobile in soil and is unlikely to partition from the water column to organic matter contained in sediments or suspended solids (Swann et al. 1983). The volatilization of EGBE from surface water and moist soil is slow (Lyman et al. 1982, as cited in ATSDR 1998). HSDB (http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov) reports that an estimated BCF of 3 was calculated for EGBE, concluding that the potential for bioconcentration in aquatic organisms is low. In summary, EGBE is miscible in water and has low overall volatility, a limited tendency to bind to soil and low lipophilicity and thus low bioaccumulation potential. These characteristics indicate that the majority of EGBE in soil is in the more mobile soil water phase rather than the solid phase (Section 8.2.2). Thus, EGBE released to soil would be expected to readily move via surface runoff to surface water. In light of the fate and transport behaviors of EGBE, this section evaluates potential risks associated with human exposures to EGBE in surface water. The same methodologies reviewed and conducted by EPA in the HAPs delisting matter are employed here, with updates to reflect surface water concentrations based on 2009, 2010, and 2011 TRI release data, the most recent version of the Mackay fugacity model (EQC v2.02; CEMC 2003), the IRIS RfD, and current EPA (2004b) guidance for dermal risk assessment. Conservative exposure assumptions were used to determine potential for adverse effects associated with reasonable maximum exposure (RME) scenarios. 7.1 Exposure Profiles Because this evaluation is meant to apply broadly to any surface water body used for recreational and/or potable water (i.e., residential) purposes, all assumptions employed are purposefully generic and conservative. As such, this profile describes RME scenarios, likely representing at most a very small proportion of the overall United States population. The bases for all assumptions presented below are further detailed in Section 7.3. Under the recreational scenario, three age groups (young children 1 through 5 years of age, older children 6 through 12 years of age, and adolescents/adults over 12 years of age) were assumed to swim and play in and around a lake, pond, stream, or river containing an estimated upper bound EGBE concentration of 0.000376 mg/L (i.e., the exposure point concentration). While playing and swimming in the water body, recreators were assumed to 73 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00086 contact EGBE dermally and through incidental ingestion of surface water. Under the residential scenario, the same three age groups were assumed to live at a house supplied with tap water containing the same exposure point concentration of EGBE. Individuals were assumed to contact EGBE in tap water through drinking water consumption and through dermal contact while showering and bathing. The exposure point concentration of EGBE in surface water was developed using the Mackay III distributional model (EQC v2.02; CEMC 2003), based on 2010 TRI data on discharges to air, land, and water, as detailed in Section 8.2.2. In brief, it was assumed that all emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers to air, soil, and surface water throughout the United States (as reported in the 2010 TRI reports; www.epa.gov/triexplorer) are EGBE.X It was further assumed that all emissions are concentrated into a 100,000 square kilometer (km2) area (approximately the size of Ohio), which is the Mackay model's default unit area (CEMC 2003). Because emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers to all media were greater in 2010 than in 2009 or 2011, the predicted surface water EGBE concentration using 2010 TRI data (0.000198 mg/L) was greater than the predicted surface water concentration based on 2009 and 2011 data (0.000190 mg/L and 0.000193 mg/L). Therefore, the water concentration based on the 20010 TRI data was used as the more conservative estimate of the upper bound concentration of EGBE in surface water. The implications of increases in EGBE releases in the future are qualitatively addressed in the Section 9. 7.2 Exposure Equations Potential dermal and ingestion exposures were modeled based on the average daily intake (ADI), expressed in units of mg/kg BW-day, consistent with EPA (1989, 2004b) risk assessment guidance. The equations for estimating ADI for each exposure pathway are presented below. Definitions of variables that remain constant across pathways are provided for the first pathway only. Parameters that are unique to a pathway are defined for that specific pathway. While the equation listed below for the ingestion pathway is identical to that used in the HAPs petition (CMA 1997), the equation listed below for the dermal pathway is updated to reflect current EPA (2004b) guidance for dermal risk assessment and consequently differs from that used in the HAPs petition. Ingestion of Drinking Water/Incidental Ingestion of Surface Water: Eqn. 4 ADI (mg/kg BW-day) = Cw x IRW x EF x ED x A0 x (1/BW) x (1/AT) where: Cw = Concentration of EGBE in water (mg/L) IRW = Ingestion rate (L/day) x Releases to air were defined as those reported via On-Site Fugitive Air Emissions and On-Site Point Source Air Emissions. Releases to surface water were defined as those reported as On-Site Surface Water Discharges and releases to soil were defined as those reported as On-Site and Off-Site Land Treatment and Other Land Disposal. 74 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00087 EF = Exposure frequency (days/year) ED = Exposure duration (years) A0 = Oral absorption factor (unitless) BW = Body weight (kg) AT = Averaging time (days) Dermal Contact with Tap Water/Surface Water While Bathing, Showering, or Swimming: Eqn. 5 ADI (mg/kg BW-day) = DAeVent x EV x ED x EF x SA x (1/BW) x (1/AT) where: DAevent = Absorbed dose per event (mg/cm2-event) EV = Event frequency (events/day) SA = Skin surface area exposed (square centimeters or cm2) 7.3 Exposure Assumptions Calculation of ADI for the two pathways identified above requires the selection of exposure parameter values that reflect assumptions regarding individual behavior that results in contact with EGBE in surface water. All exposure factor values are listed in Tables 7-1 through 7-4 and are further described below. In all cases, exposure factor values were selected with the objective of describing RME scenarios (i.e., using assumptions that are consistently conservative in the sense that they significantly overstate the exposures likely to be experienced by the general population). Chemical concentration in water (Cw) - The assumed concentration of EGBE in surface water, 0.000198 mg/L, is estimated by applying Mackay's fugacity model to 2010 TRI data on releases of Certain Glycol Ethers to land, air, and water (assuming that EGBE comprises 100% of this chemical group), as further described in Section 8.2.2. For the HAPs petition, the assumed concentration of EGBE in surface water was 0.13 mg/L. Given the stronger technical basis for the value applied in this petition, it is likely more appropriate than that used for the HAPs petition. That said, Section 7.4 explores the effect that the value used in the HAPs petition has on predicted risks. Ingestion rate (IR) - Water IR values for both drinking water and incidental events while swimming from EPA (1989) risk assessment guidance were employed in this analysis. EPA (1989) reports a drinking water IR (IRW) of 2 L/day for adults and older children. Young children are reported to drink 1 L/day of drinking water. For incidental ingestion of water while swimming, EPA (1989) reports IRs of 0.13 L/day for all three age groups. The same values were employed in the HAPs petition. Exposure frequency (EF) - Consistent with EPA (1989) risk assessment guidance, a 350 day/year EF was used for residential exposures for all age groups, assuming that individuals vacation away from home a total of 15 days/year. For recreational exposures, it was conservatively estimated that a warm climate that would permit swimming nine months/year. Therefore, adults and young children were assumed to swim once per 75 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00088 week, while older children were assumed to swim three times per week, yielding exposure frequencies of 36 and 108 days/year, respectively. For a cooler climate, these exposure frequencies could also represent a 4.5 month swimming season, in which adults and young children swim twice per week and older children swim six times per week. The same values were employed in the HAPs petition. Exposure duration (ED) - For both recreational and residential exposures, the ED was assumed to be 30 years broken down into 5 years as a young child, 7 years as an older child, and 18 years as an adolescent and adult. This assumption is similar to EPA (1989) risk assessment guidance and is consistent with the HAPs petition. Oral absorption factor (A0) - It was conservatively assumed that 100% of the EGBE ingested is absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract. This assumption was employed in the HAPs petition. Body weight (BW) - EPA (1989) risk assessment guidance provides age-specific BWs of 70 kg, 30 kg, and 15 kg for adults and adolescents, older children, and young children, respectively. Although slightly higher (and therefore less conservative) BWs are offered in more recent EPA (1997b) guidance, the values first proposed by EPA (1989) were employed in this analysis for consistency with most other risk assessments and to ensure the conservatism of the overall assessment. The same values were employed in the HAPs petition. Averaging time (AT) - The AT for noncarcinogens represents the length of time between the first and last exposure, in days. Hence, the ATs for adults and adolescents, older children, and young children were set equal to 6,570 days, 2,555 days, and 1,825 days, respectively. The same values were employed in the HAPs petition. Event frequency (EV) - Consistent with EPA (2004b) dermal risk assessment guidance, it was assumed that residents take one shower or bath daily. Although residents may occasionally take two showers per day, they may also occasionally go without showering for a day or shower at places other than their residence. Thus, on average, this assumption is reasonable and conservative. Recreators are assumed to swim or wade three times each day that they visit recreational water bodies. When the HAPs petition was prepared, EPA guidance for dermal risk assessment did not require characterization of EV. Skin surface area exposed (SA) - Age-specific skin surface areas were derived from EPA (1997b) exposure assessment guidance. Surface areas of 23,000 cm2, 12,914 cm2, and 7,446 cm2 are reported as upper percentile values for adults and adolescents, older children, and young children, respectively. These values are consistent with more recent EPA (2004b) guidance. It was assumed that 100% of the body contacts water during swimming, showering, and bathing. Skin surface areas applied in the HAPs petition were based on older EPA (1989) guidance and were slightly lower (i.e., less conservative) than those listed above. The HAPs petition employed surface areas of 20,900 cm2, 12,349 cm2, and 7,252 cm2for adults, older children, and young children, respectively. Absorbed Dose (DAfiVent) - Exhibit B-3 of EPA's (2004b) current dermal risk assessment guidelines lists a calculated value of 1.8E-6 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2)event for the absorbed dose of EGBE via dermal contact with water (listed in the exhibit as butoxyethanol-2), assuming a chemical concentration of 1 mg/L in water. Thus, the 76 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00089 value of DAevent employed in this risk assessment was 3.6 x10-10 mg/cm2-event, which is the product of the estimated concentration in water (0.000198 mg/L) and the default value listed in Exhibit B-3 (1.8 x 10~6 mg/cm2-event). When the HAPs petition was prepared, EPA guidance for dermal risk assessment did not require characterization of DAevent. 7.4 Results and Conclusions The exposure factor values were entered into the exposure equations listed above to yield ADIs for each exposure scenario, as presented in Tables 7-1 through 7-4. The ADIs were then divided by the IRIS RfD of 0.1 mg/kg BW-day (EPA 2010), to yield pathway-specific hazard quotients (HQs). Pathway-specific HQs were then summed to yield cumulative hazard indices, presented in Table 7-5. All HQs are several orders of magnitude below 1, the benchmark of acceptable hazard specified in the National Contingency Plan (EPA 1990a). Because the ADIs estimated here represent RME levels, it is likely that the ADIs and HQs in Table 7-5 represent significant overstatements of exposures and potential health risks for the vast majority of the United States population. Thus, adverse health effects are not anticipated to result from either recreational or residential exposures to EGBE in surface water. As shown in Table 7-6, there are three main differences between the methods employed in the HAPs petition and in this petition to evaluate dermal and ingestion exposures from EGBE in surface water. First, both the underlying data (i.e., 1993 vs. 2010 TRi release data) and the model used to estimate the concentration of EGBE in surface water differ, such that the HAPs petition employed an exposure point concentration of 0.13 mg/L, while this petition uses a value of 0.00020 mg/L, a value that is 650-fold lower. Because the lower value is based on the latest release data and the current version of Mackay's fugacity model, it is expected to be the more accurate value. Nonetheless, the impact of assuming that surface water contains 0.13 mg/L on overall hazard estimates is evident by simply multiplying the maximum HQ shown in Table 7-5 (i.e., 0.0001) by 650, which yields a theoretical HQ of 0.08. Because this value is also well below 1, the assumed exposure point concentration does not affect the overall conclusions of this risk assessment. The second main difference between the surface water hazards calculated in the HAPs petition and in this petition relates to the RfD. In 1997, EPA had not yet completed work on the IRIS RfD, and accordingly the draft interim value of 3 mg/kg BW-day under review at that time was employed in the 1997 HAPs petition. Thus, the final IRIS RfD of 0.1 mg/kg BW-day employed in this petition has a stronger scientific basis and is 30-fold more conservative than that used in the HAPs petition. Third, in 1997, the equation typically used to estimate dermal dose differed from that now recommended by EPA (2004b) dermal exposure guidelines. However, given the much greater influence of the ingestion pathway over the dermal pathway in terms of the cumulative hazard, the change in approach to dermal risk assessment has minimal effect on overall conclusions regarding risk. Nonetheless, the method employed was updated to reflect the strongest technical basis and current regulatory practice. 77 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00090 In conclusion, the three main changes to the approach employed to calculate surface water hazards reflect the most recent emissions data, and advances in knowledge and practice related to fugacity modeling, EGBE toxicity, and dermal risk assessment. While these updates are certainly appropriate for generating more realistic estimates of potential hazards, they do not substantially change the overall conclusions of the assessment that predicted ingestion/dermal hazards (as measured by HQs) are well below 1 regardless of the combination of assumptions employed. Indeed, the maximum surface water HQ predicted in the HAPs petition was 0.007, while the maximum value predicted in this petition is 0.0001 (Table 7-6). 78 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00091 8.0 ECOLOGICAL RISKS A series of ERAs has been prepared for EGBE (CAS 111-76-2), including several ERAs prepared in the HAPs delisting proceeding. All have concluded that EGBE is not expected to cause significant adverse environmental effects. Nevertheless, an updated ERA was performed as part of this petition to account for changes in emissions rates since the mid-1990s, as well as to incorporate more recent ecotoxicological information. The ERAs conducted for the HAPs delisting petition are summarized below, followed by a detailed description of the updated ERA developed to support this petition. 8.1 HAPs Delisting Ecological Risk Assessments Several ERAs were conducted for EGBE in connection with EPA's review of the petition to remove EGBE from the CAA HAPs list. The first was prepared on behalf of the Panel as part of the HAPs delisting petition (CMA 1997). EPA's Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards then retained the Cadmus Group to prepare Tier 1 and Tier 2 ERAs. The Tier 1 ERA (Cadmus 2000b) employed extremely conservative point estimates of exposure and effects, while somewhat less conservative assumptions were used for the Tier 2 ERA (Cadmus 2000a). While the same general approach was employed in all three ERAs, specific assumptions varied. Nonetheless, the Panel and the EPA Tier 2 ERAs concluded that EGBE is not expected to cause significant adverse ecological effects, and the Agency ultimately made the same finding when it removed EGBE from the CAA HAPs list. The HAPs ERAs for EGBE are summarized below. 8.1.1 The Panel's ERA Based on a review of the ecotoxicological literature and an evaluation of the relative sensitivities to EGBE by many receptors, the Panel's HAPs ERA (CMA 1997) evaluated two assessment endpoints: (1) sustainability of aquatic plant communities and (2) sustainability of small mammal populations. The Panel's HAPs assessment used the Mackay Level III model to calculate the distribution of EGBE in air, water, and soil based on 1996 TRI national emissions. EGBE releases into the 100,000 km2 area contained within the Mackay model were estimated by assuming that EGBE represents 50% of all Certain Glycol Ethers releases reported nationally as (1) point and fugitive air emissions; (2) releases directly to surface water; (3) releases to publicly owned treatment works (POTWs); (4) onsite land releases; and (5) transfers off site for disposal. The 1996 releases to air, water, and soil used in the Panel's HAPs analysis are listed in Table 8-1. The Mackay model predicted that the majority of EGBE released to air is deposited to soil and water, while EGBE released to water and soil tends to remain in those media. The overall persistence of EGBE in the environment was estimated to be 19 days and losses were largely attributed to advection and reactions (e.g., degradation). Application of the Mackay Level 79 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00092 Ill model predicted concentrations of EGBE in air, water, and soil (at equilibrium), as shown in Table 8-2. The predicted equilibrium water concentration (0.00135 mg/L) was used to evaluate exposure of aquatic plants to EGBE. Exposure of small mammals to EGBE was estimated based on EPA's (1993a) exposure equations for deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus), considering direct ingestion of soil, water, and food, resulting in an EGBE dose of 0.203 mg/kg BW-day for small mammals. An aquatic TRV was derived from the lowest relevant toxicity value available for aquatic plants--a 125 mg/L acute no observed effect concentration (NOEC) for growth rate inhibition in green algae (Dow 1988, Table 3-2). An uncertainty factor of 100 was applied to adjust the acute NOEC to be representative of chronic effects, because no data were available to clarify the potential difference in effects between acute and chronic exposures. Therefore, the Panel's HAPs assessment (CMA 1997) employed a TRV of 1.25 mg/L for evaluating risk to aquatic plants. In the absence of any available studies of EGBE toxicity in wildlife, the small mammal TRV was derived from the 91-day drinking water study in female Fischer rats, which was also used in the IRIS assessment that was available at that time (EPA 1999a) to develop the human oral RfD for EGBE. The chronic LOAEL for this study was 59 mg/kg BW-day (Appendix A-2).y The rat chronic LOAEL was divided by a uncertainty factor of three to adjust for the absence of a NOAEL, to derive a TRV of 20 mg/kg BW-day for small mammals (CMA 1997). Dividing the surface water concentration predicted by Mackay Level III modeling (0.00135 mg/L) by the aquatic TRV (1.25 mg/L) yielded an HQ of 0.0012. For small mammals, the predicted dose of 0.203 mg/kg BW-day was divided by the TRV of 20 mg/kg BW-day, to yield an HQ of 0.01. HQs less than 1.0 indicate that ecological effects are unlikely to occur. Thus, the Panel's HAPs assessment (CMA 1997) concluded that EGBE was unlikely to pose significant ecological risk under current or future uses. 8.1.2 EPA ERAS The EPA HAPs ERAs (Cadmus 2000a, b) narrowed the assessment endpoints selected by CMA (1997) to some degree, selecting the following receptors for their analysis: (1) aquatic microorganisms in waters receiving atmospheric emissions of EGBE from nearby large sources and (2) small mammals with home ranges located immediately downwind of large sources of EGBE emissions. These endpoints are inherently more conservative than those employed by the earlier Panel assessment because they focus on those organisms that are in the immediate vicinity of EGBE emissions. EPA employed a tiered approach, wherein the first tier of analysis was intentionally very conservative. The Tier 1 ERA was not designed to generate a definitive y The chronic LOAEL used to calculate the RfD differs slightly form the published LOAEL in the original study (82 mg/kg BW-day; NTP 1993) and presented in Appendix A-2 because IRIS (EPA 1999a) used water consumption rates and female body weights measured during the last week of exposure to calculate dose. 80 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00093 conclusion regarding potential ecological risks. Rather, it was intended to screen out those scenarios that clearly do not present concern. 8.1.3 Tier 1 ERA EPA's application of the Mackay model differed somewhat from that used in the Panel's HAPs analysis. In particular, for Tier 1, EPA used the Level I Mackay model to determine the equilibrium distribution of EGBE in a model environment with 1,000 kg of EGBE emitted to the air. The Level I model does not account for any advection or degradation reaction losses of EGBE, and it predicted that more than 99% of the EGBE released to the model environment partitioned to water. The predicted air concentration was 0.000000423 mg/m3, the predicted water concentration was 0.000497 mg/L, and the predicted soil concentration was 0.000024 mg/kg (Cadmus 2000b). Because the assumed EGBE release rate used in the EPA Tier 1 assessment (1,000 kg) is arbitrary and unrelated to actual releases, the exposure concentrations were scaled as a function of both the distribution of EGBE determined from the Level I Mackay model and the predicted maximum annual average concentration of EGBE from the highest emitter in the 1993 TRI. The predicted maximum annual average concentration (0.327 mg/m3) was 773,050 times greater than the air concentration (4.23 x 10"7 mg/m3) predicted by the Level I Mackay model using the arbitrary release of 1,000 kg. The predicted water and soil concentrations were converted to concentrations that would be in equilibrium with the maximum annual average concentration at or beyond the fenceline, by multiplying each Mackay Level I modeled concentration by 773,050. This assumption is unrealistically high by a very large margin because maximum annual average air concentrations were calculated by assuming no interchange between EGBE in air, soil, or water. The Mackay model indicates that EGBE preferentially partitions to soil and water from air, which would dramatically lower maximum annual average concentrations at or beyond the fenceline. This assumption is also unrealistic because it does not account for the effect of dilution of air concentrations over time or space. The concentrations used in the EPA Tier 1 assessment (Cadmus 2000b) are presented in Table 8-2. The equilibrium water concentration listed in Table 8-2 was used to evaluate exposure of aquatic microorganisms to EGBE. For small mammals, EPA's Tier 1 ERA used the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) rather than the deer mouse, because the vole's diet has a higher proportion of plants and thus would likely have higher exposures to EGBE (Cadmus 2000b). In addition to dietary and drinking water pathways, the inhalation pathway for small mammals was evaluated. Exposure factor values and the dose equation were drawn from EPA (1993a) wildlife exposure assessment guidance, resulting in an estimated dose of 163.8 mg/kg BW-day for the meadow vole. The lowest relevant toxicity value identified in the EPA Tier 1 assessment (Cadmus 2000b) for aquatic microorganisms was for the protozoan Endosiphon sulcatum, which experienced inhibition of cell multiplication following a 72-hour acute exposure to 91 mg/L. An acute-to-chronic uncertainty factor of 100 was applied to derive a TRV of 0.91 mg/L for aquatic 81 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00094 microorganisms. For small mammals, the EPA Tier 1 assessment adopted the same TRV developed by the Panel, 20 mg/kg BW-day. The resulting Tier 1 HQ for aquatic microorganisms was 422, while the Tier 1 HQ for small mammals was 8.2. Therefore, EPA concluded that additional ecological evaluation for both receptors was warranted and proceeded with a Tier 2 ERA. 8.1.4 Tier 2 ERA The EPA Tier 2 ERA (Cadmus 2000a) evaluated the same assessment endpoints and pathways considered in the Tier 1 ERA; however, several of the unrealistic assumptions used in the Tier 1 assessment were replaced with more plausible estimates of exposure and effects. The Mackay Level III model was used to determine the equilibrium distribution of EGBE in a model environment with 1,000 kilograms per hour (kg/hr) of EGBE emitted to the air. Because advection and degradation reactions are accounted for in the Level III model, the predicted equilibrium concentrations were considerably lower than the Tier 1 model predictions. The predicted air concentration was 5.89 x 10'5 mg/m3, the predicted water concentration was 6.56 x 10`4 mg/L, and the predicted soil concentration was 1.19 x 10'2 mg/kg (Cadmus 2000a). Because the assumed release rate (1,000 kg/hr) was arbitrary, it was again necessary to scale the predicted concentration based on the maximum annual average concentration predicted from the 1993 TRI (0.327 mg/m3). The resulting concentrations, listed in Table 8-2, were used in the Tier 2 exposure assessment. A water concentration of 3.64 mg/L (Table 8-2) was used to evaluate exposure of aquatic microorganisms to EGBE. The exposure model for the meadow vole (EPA 1993a) was used to estimate small mammal exposure to EGBE, yielding an estimated dose of 2.15 mg/kg BW-day. For the Tier 2 effects assessment, EPA applied an acute-to-chronic uncertainty factor of 10 to the lowest relevant toxicity value of 91 mg/L, yielding a TRV of 9.1 mg/L for aquatic microorganisms. For small mammals, the same TRV (20 mg/kg BW-day) used in the Panel ERA and EPA's Tier 1 ERA was also applied in the Tier 2 ERA. The Tier 2 HQ for aquatic microorganisms was 0.40 and the Tier 2 HQ for small mammals was 0.11. Because both HQs were less than 1, the ERA conducted on behalf of EPA concluded that ecological risks due to exposure to EGBE are unlikely (Cadmus 2000a). When EPA evaluated these results in the HAPs delisting determination, it found the water concentration of 3.64 mg/L predicted in the Tier 2 ERA to be a "worst-case estimate" that would not be approached in communities near EGBEemitting facilities, "because numerous variables were not taken into consideration that, if considered, were likely to reduce estimates of EGBE in water" (68 FR 65653 [EPA 2003]). 8.2 Updated ERA For this petition, the previous HAPs ERAs were updated to reflect more realistic assumptions related to EGBE fate and transport in environmental media, current data on EGBE releases, and recent publications on EGBE ecotoxicity. 82 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00095 8.2.1 Problem Formulation The assessment endpoints selected for this ERA were (1) sustainability of aquatic populations and communities and (2) sustainability of small terrestrial mammal populations. As detailed below in the effects assessment, because the aquatic organism TRV was selected based on the most sensitive aquatic species tested, the first assessment endpoint is considered protective of all types of aquatic organisms. Thus, it is not necessary to limit this endpoint to aquatic plants (as had been done in the Panel's HAPs assessment [CMA 1997]) or aquatic microorganisms (as had been done in the EPA HAPs ERAs [Cadmus 2000a,b]). As in the previous ERAs, the selected assessment endpoints were evaluated based on HQs, which are equal to the ratio of the estimated exposure concentration (or dose) to the TRV. As in the EPA HAPs analyses, this ERA used meadow voles to represent small terrestrial mammals, given their expected higher exposures compared to other small mammal species. The same pathways used in the previous ERAs were also used in this analysis. Therefore, aquatic organism exposure was evaluated based on estimated surface water concentrations, and small terrestrial mammal exposure was evaluated based on the same exposure model used by the EPA HAPs analyses, considering the exposure pathways of inhalation and direct ingestion of soil, water, and food. 8.2.2 Exposure Assessment The Mackay Level III fugacity model (EQC v2.02; CEMC 2003) was used to estimate the distribution of EGBE in air, water, and soils based on 2009, 2010, and 2011 TRI release data. Four types of releases of Certain Glycol Ethers were applied to the model: (1) point and fugitive air emissions; (2) releases directly to surface water; (3) onsite land treatment and other land releases; and (4) transfers off site for land treatment and other land disposal. These reported releases were used to estimate national release rates (in kg/hr) to air, water, and soil. Although EGBE comprises less than 50% of all ethylene glycol ethers consumed in the United States (SRI 2010), it was conservatively assumed to make up 100% of Certain Glycol Ethers reported by TRI as released in 2009, 2010, and 2011. National release rates from 2009, 2010, and 2011 were used to model the distribution of EGBE in air, water, and soil within the modeled area (100,000 km2). That is, it was assumed that all Certain Glycol Ethers released nationwide in 2009, 2010, and 2011 were actually EGBE and were actually released within an area the size of the state of Ohio. While these assumptions are clearly conservative, because they are not arbitrary (i.e., they are based on actual release data), they require substantially less extrapolation and therefore introduce considerably less uncertainty compared to those applied in the EPA ERAs. Table 8-1 lists the 2009, 2010, and 2011 release rates used in the model. With the exception of the updated release rates, input parameter values used in the Level III model (Table 8-3) were consistent with those used by EPA (Cadmus 2000a). The predicted air, water, and soil concentrations based on 2009, 2010, and 2011 release rates are presented in Table 8-2. Because the equilibrium air, surface water, and soil concentrations were highest in 2010, all ecological risk assessment calculations were conducted based on the 2010 TRI release data. 83 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00096 The predicted equilibrium water concentration (1.98 x 10~4 mg/L) of EGBE was used to evaluate exposure of aquatic organisms. Exposure of small terrestrial mammals to EGBE was estimated based on inhalation and direct ingestion of soil, water, and plants using the same total daily intake (TDI) equation and input values used by EPA (Cadmus 2000a) for meadow voles: Eqn. 6 TDIU {Ca IRa 3) (C,, IRW) IRdiet /* ) where: Ca = concentration of EGBE in air (mg/m3) IRa = inhalation rate (cubic meters per kilogram body weight per day or m3/kg BW-day) Cw = concentration of EGBE in water (mg/L) IRw = water ingestion rate (kilograms per kilogram body weight per day or kg/kg BW-day) IRdiet = total food ingestion rate (kg/kg BW-day) Ci = concentration of EGBE in diet item i (mg/kg) Pi = proportion of diet made up by diet item i (unitless) In this equation, consistent with EPA (1993a) wildlife exposure assessment guidance and EPA's HAPs ERA for EGBE (Cadmus 2000a), the inhalation rate was multiplied by three to account for the inhalation rates derived in the laboratory, rather than from field metabolic rates. EPA (1993a) guidance recommends adjusting inhalation rates upwards by a factor of two to three to estimate rates expected in the wild. The values used for each of these parameters are presented in Table 8-4. The resulting EGBE dose for small terrestrial mammals is predicted to be 0.029 mg/kg BW-day. 8.2.3 Effects Assessment The toxicity data compiled for aquatic organisms in Table 3-2 were reviewed to determine whether the TRVs used in the HAPs ERAs warrant updating. Because aquatic toxicity data are available for a variety of aquatic species representing a range of taxa and trophic levels (Table 3-2), a species sensitivity distribution approach was used for the aquatic organism effects assessment. The species sensitivity distribution approach can be used when toxicity values for the same endpoint (i.e., mortality) are available for a range of species. The advantage of this approach is that it incorporates all available toxicity data rather than relying on a single critical study. It is not possible, however, to use a species sensitivity distribution approach for the terrestrial mammalian effects assessment, because the available laboratory mammal toxicity data cover many different endpoints, but only a few species. Therefore, this assessment relies on the same TRV approach to assess potential risks to terrestrial mammals as used in the Panel and EPA HAPs ERAs. The following two subsections further detail the effects assessments for aquatic organisms and terrestrial mammals. 84 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00097 8.2.3.1 Aquatic Species Effects Assessment Acute toxicity tests have been conducted on a variety of aquatic species (Table 3-2). Therefore, rather than relying on a single critical study, a species sensitivity distribution approach is used to assess potential effects to all aquatic organisms. Species sensitivity distributions have been used in previous ERAs (Solomon et al. 1996, Hall et al. 1998), they are included in the EPA guidance for ERAs (EPA 1998b), are implicit in EPA's derivation of ambient water quality criteria (Stephan et al. 1985, Fisher and Burton 2003), and they are the focus of a book reviewing their use in ecotoxicology in North America and Europe (Posthuma et al. 2002). In short, the approach is well tested and well accepted by the scientific and regulatory communities alike. Species sensitivity distributions incorporate toxicity data from all species tested for similar endpoints (e.g., LC50 findings) into a distribution showing the percent of organisms that are affected at various chemical concentrations. The distribution of toxicity values can then be easily compared to environmental concentrations to determine the percent of species likely to be affected at the observed or predicted environmental concentrations. Acute species sensitivity distributions were compiled from the aquatic vertebrate and invertebrate values presented in Table 3-2. For consistency across species, the following rules were adapted from EPA guidance on calculating ambient water quality criteria (Stephan et al. 1985) for selecting toxicity values to incorporate into the acute species sensitivity distribution: Endpoint - Only LC50 determinations were included. Exposure duration - With one exception, values derived from 96-hour exposures were preferred for most species. Per Stephan et al. (1985), 48-hour exposures were preferred for Daphnia sp. If values derived from 96-hour exposures were not available for a given species, 72-hour or 48-hour exposures were used. Species weighting - Rather than using the geometric mean of multiple acute values for a given species to obtain a species mean acute value (in accordance with Stephan et al. 1985), each acceptable acute value for a species was retained as a discrete point in the distribution. Acute values were then weighted by the number of tests per species to account for intraspecies variability, using methods described by Duboudin etal. (2004b). Chronic toxicity values were available for seven species of aquatic vertebrates and invertebrates (Table 3-2) and the lowest chronic value (7.2 mg/L, rotifer) was greater than the lowest acute value (5.4 mg/L, grass shrimp). As discussed in Section 3.3 above, questions have been raised about the validity of the toxicity finding in the grass shrimp. Because the species sensitivity distribution generated from the chronic toxicity data incorporated fewer species and did not include values for the most sensitive species from the acute data, a more conservative approach was used to generate a chronic species sensitivity distribution, as follows. Duboudin et al. (2004a) present a method for extrapolating chronic species sensitivity distributions for chemicals with limited chronic toxicity data by using the acute species sensitivity distributions for vertebrates and invertebrates (Figure 8-1). The acute species sensitivity distributions are used to calculate means and standard deviations for chronic vertebrate and 85 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00098 invertebrate species sensitivity distributions, based on empirical relationships between the acute and chronic toxicity distributions for 25 representative chemicals (Duboudin et al. 2004a). The calculated chronic distribution means and standard deviations for vertebrate and invertebrate species are then used to calculate chronic values from each of the acute toxicity values, thus populating the chronic species sensitivity distributions for vertebrates and invertebrates (Table 8-5). The calculated vertebrate and invertebrate chronic toxicity values are then combined with any algae or microbe toxicity data that might be available for the chemical, in order to generate a chronic species sensitivity distribution representative of all aquatic organisms (Duboudin et al. 2004a). The vertebrate and invertebrate acute species sensitivity distributions and the chronic species sensitivity distribution for all aquatic organisms for EGBE are presented in Figure 8-2. The chronic species sensitivity distribution was used to assess effects to aquatic organisms by using the distribution to determine the EGBE surface water concentration that is predicted to protect at least 80% of aquatic organisms. Because the acute to chronic distribution relationship was established using LCso findings for acute values and NOECs for chronic values (Duboudin et al. 2004a), the calculated chronic values for aquatic organisms (Table 8-5) represent predicted NOECs following chronic exposures. Therefore, the 80th percentile of the calculated chronic species sensitivity distribution represents the concentration at which no chronic effects (e.g., growth or reproduction) occur in at least 80% of the species tested. The 80th percentile of the no effect distribution was selected for this assessment based on a review of regulatory precedents to establish minimum acceptable ecological effect levels for remedial decisions at hazardous waste sites (Suter et al. 1995). Twenty percent was determined to be the minimum detectable effect level in the chronic and subchronic toxicity tests and field-based bioassessment protocols that are typically used to detect effects in ecological endpoints (Suter et al. 1995). One advantage of the species sensitivity distribution approach, however, is that any percentile can be readily identified and used, depending upon the degree of protection preferred. For example, ambient water quality criteria are derived based on the 95th percentile of the acute effect distribution (Stephan et al. 1985, Fisher and Burton 2003), while the 90th percentile of chronic effect distributions has been used in several ERAs (Klaine et al. 1996, Solomon et al. 1996, Hall et al. 1998). The 80th percentile of the no effect chronic distribution is 8.7 mg/L (Figure 8-2). While this value is used to evaluate risks to aquatic organisms in Section 8.2.4, the effect of using the 90th and 95th percentiles is also discussed. 8.2.3.2 Mammalian Effects Assessment Several EGBE toxicity studies in laboratory mammals have been released since the last compilation of toxicity values (ATSDR 1998), but few provide relevant endpoints for ERA (Appendix A-2). As discussed above, due to its low Kow and relatively short atmospheric half-life, EGBE released into the environment partitions into surface water (Section 8.1.2, Table 8-3). Therefore, laboratory mammal toxicity studies focusing on inhalation, injection, or in vitro routes of exposure do not represent environmental exposure to EGBE for small mammals. The results from three drinking water studies have been published since the ATSDR (1998) compilation was issued (Appendix A-2). One is an acute toxicity study on F344 rats where a LOAEL for 86 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00099 histopathological effects of 250 mg/kg BW-day is reported after two to four doses (Nyska et al. 2003); the second is from a single dose mortality study with guinea pigs where an LD50 of 1,414 mg/kg BW is reported (Gingell et al. 1998); and the third is from a multigenerational chronic study with mice where the LOAEL for mortality, growth, and reproductive effects was 10,000 mg/kg BW-day (Lamb et al. 1997). The first two acute studies do not provide an appropriate representation of environmental exposures to EGBE and all three studies present toxicity values much greater than the toxicity value that is the basis for EPA's RfD. In addition, none of the other oral exposure studies (e.g., oral gavage) provide a more sensitive toxicity value than the basis for the RfD (Appendix A-2). Therefore, this assessment uses the same small mammal TRV (20 mg/kg BW-day) applied in the previous HAPs ERAs. However, in light of the Lamb et al. (1997) study, this TRV is certainly conservative. 8.2.4 Risk Characterization HQs were calculated to evaluate ecological risks using the equation below: Eqn. 7 Exposure HQ /TRV Based on 80th percentile, the HQ for aquatic organisms is 0.00002, indicating that they are not likely to be at risk from the highly conservative EGBE exposure scenario presented above. Based on the 95th and 90th percentiles, the HQs for aquatic organisms are 0.00005 and 0.00009, respectively. Similarly, the HQ for small mammals was 0.001, indicating that they also are not likely to be at risk, even under the conservative assumptions used in this exposure scenario. Both calculations reflect a high margin of safety because the HQs are much less than 1. For example, surface water concentrations would have to be more than 10,000 times higher than was predicted using the Mackay Level III model in order for exposures to approach the 80th percentile of the chronic species sensitivity distribution for aquatic organisms. Similarly, the dose to small mammals would have to be 300 times higher in order for exposures to approach the mammalian TRV. The many conservative assumptions used to determine EGBE distribution, toxicity, and exposure further contribute to the margin of safety provided by this ERA. For example, in the Level III Mackay model, the total 2010 national emission rates for Certain Glycol Ethers were applied to a default model area approximately the size of the state of Ohio. Although the equilibrium distributions based on the 2009 and 2011 national emissions were also modeled, the equilibrium concentrations from the 2010 were used in the ERA because they were the highest from the three most recent years. In addition, the modeled area is 100,000 km2 (Mackay et al. 1992) which is approximately 1.3% of the size of the continental United States. Because the modeled area is based on a default value, the modeled concentrations are expected to overestimate actual ambient concentrations, by up to three orders of magnitude. 87 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00100 In addition, although EGBE makes up only about half of the ethylene glycol ethers consumed in the United States, all releases of Certain Glycol Ethers in the TRI were conservatively assumed to be EGBE. Thus, the ERA was based on the conservative assumption that EGBE consumption is two-fold higher than most recent data suggest (SRI 2010).. Uncertainty is also potentially contributed to this analysis through the selected TRVs. The 80th percentile from the calculated chronic species sensitivity distribution was used for the aquatic organism TRV in this assessment. Although the 80th percentile of the no effect distribution is believed to be the most appropriate effect level for evaluating population and community level effects, it is worth noting that using the 95th percentile (2.3 mg/L) or the 90th percentile (4.2 mg/L) would only slightly increase the HQ for aquatic organisms. In addition, because the Duboudin et al. (2004a) method for extrapolating chronic species sensitivity distributions from acute distributions is still being evaluated for a variety of chemicals, it is worth noting that the TRV derived from the 80th percentile of the chronic species sensitivity distribution in this analysis is generally comparable to the TRVs used in the HAPs ERAs: 1.25 mg/L (CMA 1997), 0.91 mg/L (Cadmus 2000b), and 9.1 mg/L (Cadmus 2000a). Aquatic HQs calculated using the TRVs employed by the Panel (CMA 1997) and in EPA's Tier 1 and 2 assessments (Cadmus 2000a,b) would be 0.0002, 0.0002, and 0.00002, respectively. Therefore, using any of the TRVs from the previous ERAs would not significantly change the HQ for aquatic organisms calculated above. 8.3 Conclusions Potential ecological risks posed by EGBE are the subject of three separate ERAs--the Panel's HAPs ERA (CMA 1997), EPA's HAPs ERA (Cadmus 2000a, b; EPA 2003, 2004a), and the analysis presented in this petition. Each assessment is consistent with EPA modeling and exposure assessment guidance and founded on highly conservative assumptions about EGBE distribution, toxicity, and exposure. The findings of all three assessments support the conclusion that EGBE does not meet the ecotoxicity listing criteria in Section 313(d)(2)(C). The Panel's HAPs analysis found no evidence of risk to aquatic plants or small terrestrial mammals from EGBE using national emissions data from the 1996 TRI when glycol ether emissions were almost double their current levels. The EPA HAPs analyses used what the Agency has called "worst-case" assumptions about EGBE mixing in the environment downwind of the facility with the highest glycol ether emissions in the country, but nevertheless found no evidence of risk to aquatic microorganisms and small terrestrial mammals. The updated assessment presented in this petition blends the most scientifically sound methods and assumptions from the previous analyses with updated emissions and ecotoxicological data and the more conservative assumption that EGBE represents 100% of reported releases of Certain Glycol Ethers. Like its predecessors, this ERA finds no evidence of adverse effects in aquatic organisms or small mammals from facility releases of EGBE. The margins of safety associated with the HQs generated in this ERA are sufficiently large to ensure that adjustments to individual input values (such as those related to the concentration of EGBE in surface water and the TRV) will not 88 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00101 change the conclusion of this ERA that EGBE is not expected to cause significant adverse environmental effects. 89 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00102 9.0 SUMMARY AND RATIONALE FOR DELISTING EGBE The case for removing EGBE (CAS 111-76-2) from the EPCRA TRI reporting list is straightforward and compelling. The available scientific data indicate that EGBE poses a low potential for adverse human health and environmental effects, thus making an exposure assessment appropriate under EPA's interpretation of the TRI listing criteria in Section 313(d)(2) of EPCRA. This petition uses essentially the same protective health and environmental criteria and is consistent with the conservative exposure assessment methods that formed the basis of the Agency's HAPs delisting decision. Because emissions of EGBE are about half the levels evaluated in the HAPs delisting decision, EPA's HAPs findings that EGBE releases may not reasonably be anticipated to cause any adverse effects to the human health or the environment have an even stronger basis in the context of this petition. In addition, the policies and goals of the TRI program would be well served by deleting EGBE from the EPCRA Section 313 reporting list. EPA's policy of ensuring consistency with other Agency decisions should be highly influential here, particularly in light of the confusion-- and the concomitant potential for misdirected community priorities--that currently exists because EGBE has been found not to be "hazardous" under the CAA but remains on the EPCRA list of chemicals deemed to be "toxic" based on essentially identical statutory criteria. In this instance, misdirected local priorities can have real environmental consequences. Because EGBE is an effective cosolvent for water-based coatings, inks, and similar products, removing it from the TRI list would eliminate the disincentive that currently exists under EPCRA to its use in formulations that have substantial VOC-reduction benefits as compared to many other solvents. 9.1 Delisting EGBE Is Fully Consistent with EPCRA's TRI Listing Criteria as Interpreted by EPA Section 313(d) of EPCRA calls for the delisting of a chemical where "there is not sufficient evidence to establish" that the chemical "is known to cause or can reasonably be anticipated to cause" any of three types of effects: (A) significant adverse acute human health effects; (B) (i) cancer or teratogenic effects, or (ii) serious or irreversible reproductive dysfunctions, neurological disorders, heritable genetic mutations, or other chronic health effects; or (C) a significant adverse effect on the environment of sufficient seriousness, in the judgment of the Administrator, to warrant reporting under EPCRA. As EPA has interpreted these criteria (59 FR 61432 [EPA 1994a]), exposure may be considered for chronic human health and environmental effects if a substance exhibits "low to moderately low toxicity based on a hazard assessment," so that "unrealistic exposures would be necessary for it to pose a risk to communities." As detailed in the qualitative hazard evaluation presented in Section 3 above and summarized in Table 9-1, EGBE's potential to cause adverse 90 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00103 human health or environmental effects is appropriately assessed as low under EPA's hazard assessment criteria for TRI listing determinations. With respect to potential adverse chronic human health effects, EPA has determined that hemolysis is the critical effect, and that prevention of hemolysis will protect against any other systemic effect potentially associated with EGBE exposure (Section 3.2). The scientific data show, moreover, that humans are resistant to the hemolytic effects of EGBE (Section 3.2.1.3). The PBPK model used in the IRIS assessment (Corley et al. 1994) predicts that, even in humans exposed continuously by inhalation to an EGBE-saturated atmosphere, maximum blood concentrations of EGBE's toxic metabolite (BAA) would be well below the level needed to produce hemolysis in humans (Udden 2002, EPA 2010). Likewise, even minor prehemolytic effects are not expected to occur in humans from ingestion exposures in excess of 500 mg/kg BW-day. Such inhalation and ingestion doses are not realistically expected to occur in the vicinity of EGBE-emitting facilities, where empirical and modeling-based estimates of air and surface water concentrations are many orders of magnitude below such exposures. (See Section 3.4.1 and Table 9-1). EGBE's potential to cause significant adverse ecological effects is likewise appropriately evaluated as low under EPA's TRI hazard assessment criteria and past listing decisions. EGBE exhibits low potential for persistence or bioaccumulation (Section 3.1). Consistent with the findings of a series of ecotoxicity reviews of EGBE (WHO 1998, 2010, Staples 1998, Devillers et al. 2002, Environment Canada 2002, INERIS 2006), EPA concluded in the HAPs delisting rulemaking that EGBE causes only "very minor" effects that "are unlikely to be ecologically significant" (68 Fed. Reg. 65657 [EPA 2003]). In addition to the absence of any impacts on ecosystems, the scientific data indicate that EGBE's limited adverse effects on aquatic organisms occur only at what EPA's TRI listing criteria consider to be high exposures, meaning that EGBE is properly evaluated as a low-toxicity chemical in terms of potential environmental effects (see Sections 3.3 and 3.4.2; Table 9-1). Because EGBE "is of low toxicity and unrealistic exposures would be necessary for it to pose a risk to communities," EPA's interpretation of EPCRA's TRI listing criteria calls for the consideration of exposures in determining whether to grant this petition and delist EGBE (59 FR 61442 [EPA 2004a]). Potential human and environmental exposures to EGBE were studied intensively by EPA in the HAPs rulemaking. There, EPA stated it was "confident" that "the results are more likely to overestimate rather than underestimate true exposures and risks" and, accordingly, determined that "the potential for adverse human health and environmental effects to occur from projected exposures is sufficiently low to provide reasonable assurance that such adverse effects will not occur" (68 Fed. Reg. 65660 [EPA 2003]). As summarized in Table 9-2, there is an even stronger basis for making this finding here. Specifically, the general approach and specific assumptions employed in the exposure assessment presented here (Sections 4 through 8) are consistent with those that the Administrator's HAPs delisting decision found to be appropriate and conservative. EPA determined in the HAPs delisting proceeding (68 FR 65651-52) that the EPCRA TRI database "provide[s] a reasonable representation of... EGBE emissions" and "an adequate basis for 91 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00104 dispersion modeling and ... exposure assessment." Accordingly, nationwide exposure potential is assessed in Section 5 by developing an inventory of Certain Glycol Ether releases using 2009, 2010, and 2011 TRI data, applying the assumption, in the absence of facility-specific information to the contrary, that EGBE represents 100% of reported glycol ether releases. More importantly, because this petition is based on current TRI data showing that emissions have declined by more than half from the 1993 TRI data used in the HAPs delisting rulemaking, predicted exposures have fallen substantially from the levels EPA evaluated in the HAPs context. As described in Section 6, every EGBE-emitting facility listed in the TRI database has been subjected to a screening process very similar to that used in the HAPs proceeding to determine whether any facility has the potential to have maximum annual average concentrations of EGBE greater than the IRIS RfC of 1.6 mg/m3 at or beyond the fenceline. Despite the highly conservative assumptions used in the screening, no EGBE-emitting facility was found to have potential maximum exposures above the RfC. AERMOD modeling conducted to test the conservatism of the screening step predicts that the maximum annual average concentrations are likely to be approximately two orders of magnitude below the RfC (see Section 6.5). Similarly, potential cumulative impacts from clusters of smaller sources are separately evaluated in Sections 6.4 and 6.5 using a methodology more conservative than that used in the HAPs proceeding, and the results show predicted maximum annual average concentrations of EGBE resulting from clusters of smaller sources within the same zip code are well below the RfC. The key findings of the facility and cluster assessments appear in Table 9-2. In addition to screening facilities for long-term exposures to EGBE, we also evaluated the potential for short-term exposures near EGBE-emitting facilities to cause acute human health effects, viz., eye and upper respiratory tract irritation, which has been identified as the critical effect for short-term exposures. As discussed in Section 3.2.1.1, above, because of the relatively high insensitivity of human red blood cells to the hemolytic effects of EGBE, the lowest short-term exposure level at which such irritation effects have been reported is 550 mg/m3, and no irritation effects have been observed at 97 mg/m3. These concentrations are higher than the maximum annual average concentrations estimated above based on EPA modeling guidelines by factors of >3,000 and >500, respectively. There is, accordingly, a convincing basis to conclude that adverse acute effects from EGBE facility releases is unlikely. Nevertheless, six high-emitting facilities offering a reasonable approximation of "worst-case" acute exposures were screened using EPA's short-term modeling methods for HAPs (EPA 1992a). The results were evaluated against the NOAEL of 97 mg/m3 in a MOE analysis. Predicted maximum 1-hour concentrations at or beyond the fencelines of all six facilities screened were far below the NOAEL based on Tier 2 and 3 modeling, with Tier 3 MOEs ranging from 25 to 198. These results, presented in Section 6.6 and summarized in Table 9-2, are more than adequate to support a finding that EPCRA's acute effects delisting criterion is met, because the NOAEL is derived from human data meaning, in accordance with EPA TRI listing decisions, that MOEs above 10 "indicate a low level of concern" for potential acute effects. As developed in Section 92 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00105 6.4, several additional considerations suggest strongly that the potential for acute effects is far lower than the MOE analysis indicates. This petition also evaluates the potential for chronic health effects posed by human contact with EGBE in surface water, based on essentially the same conservative assumptions and models that EPA used in the HAPs evaluation, with updates to reflect: the estimated surface water concentration based on 2009, 2010, and 2011 TRI data, the current RfD, and changes in EPA (2004b) guidance for dermal risk assessment. As developed in Section 7, the worst-case dose--for residents that consume and bathe in impacted water year-round for 30 years--was estimated to be 0.00001 mg/kg BW-day. Dividing the dose by the RfD yields an HQ of 0.0001 (see Table 9-2). To assess potential adverse environmental effects, Section 8 builds on the three ERAs conducted in the HAPs proceeding by applying 2009, 2010, and 2011 TRI data to the Mackay Level III fugacity model to yield updated estimates of the maximum surface water concentration. Applying an updated TRV for aquatic organisms identified in a supplemental review of the ecotoxicity literature for EGBE, the ERA presented in this petition predicts HQs of 0.00002 for aquatic organisms and 0.001 for small mammals. (See Table 9-2.) The results of these assessments show that estimated EGBE exposures in the vicinity of emitting facilities anywhere in the United States are well below the IRIS RfC and RfD for inhalation and dermal/ingestion exposures as well as appropriate ecological TRVs. All HQs generated by the exposure assessments developed for this petition are well below 1.0 and even lower than the HQs that led EPA to find in the HAPs delisting proceeding that releases of EGBE may not reasonably be anticipated to cause adverse human health or environmental effects. Because this petition uses assessment methods consistent with those EPA found appropriate and conservative in the HAPs case, there is an even stronger basis for making the same determination here. 9.2 Substantial Conservatism is Incorporated into Every Primary Element of the Toxicological, Exposure, and Ecological Assessments Presented in this Petition The HQs estimated in this petition are overstated by at least three to five orders of magnitude because of the substantial conservatism built into every principal part of HHRA and ERA presented here, as summarized in Table 9-3 and discussed below. 9.2.1 IRIS Reference Values In general, IRIS reference values are conservative criteria establishing a "daily exposure to the human population, including sensitive subgroups, that is likely to be without an appreciable risk of deleterious effects during a lifetime" (EPA 2010). As discussed in Section 4.2 above and summarized in Table 9-3, the specific IRIS RfC and RfD values that EPA derived for EGBE should provide ample protection against acute human health effects and reflect several significant elements of conservatism that likely render them significantly lower than necessary to protect against chronic health effects. 93 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00106 First, both the RfC and RfD were based on hemolytic effects in rats and, although the available data indicate that humans are 100 times less sensitive to the hemolytic effects of EGBE (see Section 3.2.1.3), the IRIS assessment uses interspecies uncertainty factors of 1 (ingestion) and 3 (inhalation) in deriving the reference values. The IRIS values therefore may reflect an additional safety margin of 100 to 300, and the available scientific data suggest that they may be far below exposure levels that would be fully protective of human health (EPA 2010). Second, both the RfC and RfD incorporate an intraspecies uncertainty factor of 10 (EPA 2010). This factor is probably unnecessarily high by a factor of 3 to 10, because investigations of population groups that might be expected to show increased sensitivity to hemolytic effects of EGBE (including the young, the old, and individuals with sickle cell anemia or hereditary spherocytosis) do not show increased susceptibility. Third, although the RfC is developed to be protective of continuous exposures over a human lifetime, the air concentrations that are compared to the RfC in the analysis are maximum predicted annual average concentrations. Concentrations averaged over a 70-year lifetime would be expected to be considerably lower than maximum annual averages, although the degree of conservatism contributed by this assumption cannot be quantified. Finally, although the 2010 IRIS assessment finds "limited" evidence of potential carcinogenicity from rodent studies, subsequent mechanistic studies have led EPA to conclude that, even if the limited tumor findings in rodents are relevant to humans, the current RfC and RfD provide adequate protection against any such risk. Therefore, any uncertainties relating to the limited animal carcinogenicity data evaluated in the IRIS assessment have been eliminated and should not be significant considerations in an up-to-date assessment of human health risks. 9.2.2 Exposure Assessments As developed in Sections 5, 6, and 7 of this petition and as summarized in Table 9-3, the models and assumptions used in the human inhalation and surface water exposure assessments presented in this petition reflect several significant elements of conservatism. First, the inventory developed here (Section 5) assumes that all releases of Certain Glycol Ethers reported in the TRI database are EGBE, unless facility-specific information to the contrary is available. Because EGBE comprises 52% of United States annual consumption of glycol ethers (SRI 2010), the inventory's assumption that all releases of Certain Glycol Ether are EGBE (in the absence of facility-specific information to the contrary) generally overstates EGBE releases by a factor of two. Second, the chronic screening approach used in this petition (Section 6) predicts maximum annual average concentrations of EGBE for every emitting facility in the United States required to file Form R reports under TRI. Similarly, the acute screening approach predicts the maximum 1-hour average concentration of EGBE at facility fencelines. As EPA observed in the HAPs proceeding, the "use of the maximum annual average ambient concentration for each emission source to characterize the exposed population provides a conservative approach to chronic exposure modeling" and "[g]iven the likely proximity of inhabitable areas and the 94 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00107 variability of human activity patterns over an annualized time period, it is our expectation that actual maximum individual exposure would be at least a factor of 2 less than predicted by the models" (68 FR 65653 [EPA 2003]). Third, the conservatism built into the screening procedure is evident when a subset of those facilities that screened out at Step B was subjected to Tier 1,2, and/or 3 analyses. On average, the maximum annual average concentrations decreased by 99.3% when the same facility that was first evaluated under Step A was subsequently evaluated under Tier 3. That is, the maximum predicted annual average concentration generated under the more robust Tier 3 modeling was more than two orders of magnitude lower than that generated by the most conservative Step A screen. The Step B screen yielded maximum predicted annual average concentrations that were, on average, more than 26-fold higher than those generated using Tier 3 modeling. Fourth, our assessment of potential acute health effects, based on (1) the NOAEL of 97 mg/m3 derived from human data and (2) the estimated reasonable worst-case estimated maximum hourly average concentration, resulted in acute MOEs of over 5. An MOE above 5 is protective because the NOAEL is based on human data, EPA AEGL guidance calls for an interspecies uncertainty factor from 3 to 10 for nonsystemic irritation effects, and an appropriate time-adjustment would support an estimated 1 -hr NOAEL of 137 mg/m3, over 40% higher that the value used in the MOE derivation. Fifth, EPA found that the modeling and assumptions used to assess ingestion and dermal exposures arising from EGBE in surface water levels were conservative and the maximum exposure estimates developed using the Agency's model, shown in Table 7-5, represents a worst-case exposure scenario (68 FR 65653-54). In addition, exposure point concentrations in surface water were calculated by assuming that 100% of releases of Certain Glycol Ethers to all media were EGBE and were concentrated into 100,000 km2. In reality, because EGBE represents 52% of the market share of ethylene glycol ethers, actual releases of EGBE are likely overestimated by two-fold. Because the 100,000 km2 unit area represents 1.3% of the total land area of the United States, actual concentrations may be overestimated by up to two orders of magnitude. 9.2.3 Ecological Risk Assessment The ERAs previously conducted in the HAPs delisting proceeding and the updated ERA prepared for this petition conclude that EGBE concentrations are three or more orders of magnitude lower than highly protective levels of ecotoxicological concern (Section 8). In addition, EPA noted in the HAPs delisting decision that the TRVs used in the ERA "were derived from very minor effects which were unlikely to be ecologically significant" (68 FR 65657 [EPA 2003]). As noted above, the exposure point concentrations in surface water are likely overestimated by up to 150-fold, due to the assumptions that 100% of releases of Certain Glycol Ethers to all media are EGBE and are concentrated into 100,000 km2 (an area that is approximately 1.3% of the area of the United States). Conservative exposure assumptions 95 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00108 applied to the TDI calculation for small mammals are consistent with those employed in EPA's HAPs ERAs. Conservatism is also contributed by the TRVs for aquatic species (based on the most sensitive organism tested), and small mammals (based on the same underlying study used to generate the RfD, which may be too low by a factor of 50 to 100). Finally, as EPA found in the HAPs delisting decision, the evaluation of relatively nonsevere effects on individual organisms rather than effects that are likely to be ecologically significant at more complex levels of organization (population, community, ecosystem) contributes substantial conservatism to the ERA. As summarized in Table 9-3, the above considerations, taken together, indicate that the already low HQs derived in Sections 6 through 8 and summarized in Table 9-2 may overstate potential chronic health and environmental risks of EGBE releases by as much as two to five orders of magnitude. Accordingly, the toxicity, exposure, and ecotoxicity assessments presented in this petition support an even higher level of confidence than EPA expressed in the HAPs delisting decision for the conclusion that there is "reasonable assurance" that "adverse human health and environmental effects" from EGBE facility emissions "will not occur." 9.3 In Light of the HAPs Delisting Decision, EPA's Policy of Ensuring Consistency with Other Agency Decisions Supports Removal of EGBE from the TRI Reporting List EPA has emphasized the need to ensure that TRI listing decisions are consistent with "other EPA decisions on the same chemical, to the extent that such decisions relate to the same basic criteria for human health and the environment" (52 FR 5481 [EPA 1987a]). A policy of maintaining consistency across different environmental programs has long been in place at EPA, because it is essential to maintain the Agency's credibility as a scientific and regulatory body. But it has special significance here because, as developed below, the conclusion that EGBE should be removed from the TRI reporting list follows directly from the findings the Administrator made recently in the HAPs delisting. CAA Section 112 calls for the removal of substances from the HAPs list where EPA finds that "there is adequate data on the health and environmental effects of the substance to determine that... the substance may not reasonably be anticipated to cause any adverse effects to the human health or adverse environmental effects." By its plain language, Section 112 places a higher burden on delisting decisions than does EPCRA Section 313. EPCRA calls for delisting where "there is not sufficient evidence to establish" that a chemical "can reasonably be anticipated to cause" the designated health and environmental effects. Section 112, in contrast, requires more than a finding that the data are "not sufficient" to establish the stated health and environmental findings. Section 112 requires "adequate data" "to determine that... the substance may not reasonably be anticipated to cause" adverse health or environmental effects. Moreover, Section 112 requires a showing that a substance may not reasonably be anticipated to cause "any adverse effects to the human health." The CAA finding clearly encompasses the EPCRA human health delisting criteria in Section 313(d)(2)(A) & (B), which are limited to the specific health effects mentioned in the statute. Likewise, Section 112 requires 96 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00109 a demonstration that the substance to be delisted may not reasonably be anticipated to cause "adverse environmental effects," a test that is at least as broad, if not broader, than EPCRA Section 313(d)(2)(C), which refers to "a significant adverse effect on the environment of sufficient seriousness ... to warrant reporting under this section." In short, the Administrator's finding under Section 112 that EGBE "may not reasonably be anticipated to cause any adverse effects to the human health" or "adverse environmental effects" should be given at least heavy weight in applying the EPCRA delisting criteria to this petition unless, of course, significant changes in the relevant scientific and other data indicate that potential adverse human health and ecological risks are significantly greater than EPA found in 2004. This petition demonstrates that any such risks are far lower. As demonstrated above, this petition is based on essentially the same exposure assessment methodology and ecological criteria that formed the basis for EPA's HAPs findings. The only significant differences between the scientific and factual record the Agency evaluated in the HAPs proceeding and the demonstrations made here are updates to human health criteria and use of the most recent TRI data available. Despite (i.e., 1%) growth in consumption since 1990 (SRI 2010), EGBE emissions have declined significantly as compared to the 1993 TRI data considered in the HAPs case, principally as a result of VOC emission control regulations and other environmental programs. Although the toxicity criteria have changed due to refinement of the data and modeling procedures used by EPA in deriving its RfD and RfC, as shown in Table 9-3, these criteria incorporate substantial levels of conservatism. Furthermore, the greater stringency in the toxicity criteria is more than balanced by the reduction in emissions and resultant human exposure such that predicted risks have decreased since the HAPs evaluation. The human and environmental exposures conservatively estimated here are significantly lower than those EPA found appropriate to delist EGBE under Section 112. Consequently, EPA's determinations in the HAPs delisting proceeding, that EGBE releases "may not reasonably be anticipated to cause any adverse effects to the human health" or "adverse environmental effects," have an even stronger scientific and factual basis in the context of this petition under EPCRA. Further, the concurrent increase in consumption (+1%) and decrease in emissions (-70%) since 1993 suggests that the scientific basis for these findings would not be undermined even if current consumption and emission patterns of EGBE are taken into account. 9.4 Removing EGBE from the TRI Would Promote the Local Risk Management and Pollution Prevention Objectives of EPCRA The purposes of EPCRA are to "to inform persons about releases of toxic chemicals to the environment; to assist governmental agencies, researchers, and other persons in the conduct of research and data gathering; [and] to aid in the development of appropriate regulations, guidelines, and standards" (42 U.S.C. 11023(h)). Thus, the EPA TRI website (http://www.epa.gov/tri/whatis.htm) describes the objectives of the program as follows: One of Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)'s primary purposes is to inform citizens of toxic chemical 97 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00110 releases in their areas. EPCRA Section 313 requires EPA and the States to collect data annually on releases and transfers of certain toxic chemicals from industrial facilities and make the data available to the public through the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI)..... The goal of the Toxics Release Inventory Program is to provide communities with information about toxic chemical releases and waste management activities and to support informed decision making at all levels by industry, government, non-governmental organizations, and the public. EPA has indicated elsewhere (59 FR 61443) that "[b]y listing chemicals that present a hazard and providing TRI data on these chemicals to the public, EPA allows the public to make the determination as to whether there is a risk in their community." As this passage indicates, the dissemination of accurate information on "chemicals that present a hazard" is critical to the success of the TRI program. An inventory that includes nonhazardous chemicals, particularly high-volume chemicals like EGBE, undermines the statutory goals by diverting the attention and resources of the public, regulatory officials, and researchers away from facilities and chemicals that should be the focus of local risk management and pollution prevention programs. These considerations are significant in the case of EGBE. Many EGBE-using facilities, particularly can manufacturing plants, do not release reportable quantities of other TRI chemicals, including other chemicals in the "Certain Glycol Ethers" category. Nevertheless, as long as EGBE remains on the TRI, many of these facilities will continue to routinely appear on local and regional lists of "top toxics emitters" even though EPA has found that EGBE releases may not reasonably be anticipated to cause adverse human health or environmental effects. The contradictory signals that EPA is sending to local communities are confusing, undermine the credibility of the TRI program as a reliable source of information on toxic releases, and unfairly brand some EGBE-using facilities as major sources of "toxics." VOC control considerations also support the delisting of EGBE from the TRI. Although it is now settled that EGBE's status as a VOC is not a sufficient basis for keeping it on the TRI reporting list,z facilities emitting EGBE remain subject to national and state/local emissions reporting and control programs under the ozone attainment provisions of Title I of the CAA. In fact, when EPA removed EGBE from the CAA HAPs list, it emphasized that it "will continue to be ... regulated under EPA's criteria pollutant (ozone) program (69 FR 69321 [EPA 2004a]).aa Accordingly, removal of EGBE from the TRI reporting list should not adversely affect ozone attainment programs under Title I of the CAA. Delisting EGBE may assist in achieving objectives of Title I. VOC emission control has long been a bedrock of EPA's ozone attainment strategy, particularly in consumer and z American Chemistry Council v. Whitman, 406 F.3d 738, 742 (D.C. Cir. 2005). aaEPA also indicated in the same passage that EGBE would continue to be listed on the TRI, but at that time the Agency continued to adhere to the position, since reversed on judicial review, that EGBE's status as a VOC is an adequate basis for listing on the TRI. 98 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00111 commercial products (EPA 1995, 2007). Although EGBE is a VOC, its physical characteristics support its use as a cosolvent for water-based formulations in many consumer and commercial coating products. In some applications, the switch to waterborne solvent formulations may reduce solvent content from up to 80% of the formulation to as little as 2% to 10%. EPA has often recognized that waterborne formulation, where commercially feasible, can contribute significantly to the ozone attainment objectives of the CAA. As recently as July 2007, the Agency emphasized that "water-based coatings are an environmentally friendly technology that we do not want to be lost as an option to manufacturers" (72 FR 38966 [EPA 2007]). EPA also has acknowledged that "it is important that manufacturers retain as much flexibility as possible" in developing reformulations that reduce the ozone-forming potential of their products while continuing to "meet the performance specifications required" (ibid.). The Agency has recognized, accordingly, the need to avoid regulatory measures that needlessly discourage manufacturers from using "environmentally friendly technologies" or unintentionally encourage the public, local regulators and manufacturers to use other solvents that may be toxic or highly reactive compounds that actually generate more ozone (ibid.). As mentioned above, the primary goal of the TRI program, as EPA has put it, is to "empower" citizens and local regulators to "hold companies accountable" for releases of toxic chemicals, and to "make informed decisions about how toxic chemicals are to be managed." Maintaining EGBE on the TRI, particularly after the Agency has concluded that facility releases are not hazardous to human health or the environment, invites confusion and the concomitant potential for local decisions that actually impede the ozone attainment goals of Title I of the CAA. Conversely, removing EGBE from the TRI would eliminate an existing impediment to the replacement of solvent-based products with EGBE/water-based solvents with the potential to significantly lower overall VOC emissions. In short, as long as EGBE remains on the TRI, the Inventory cannot achieve its fundamental objective of providing accurate information that will enable business, regulators and the public to make environmentally sound decisions. Significantly, the possibility of future increases in EGBE consumption--whether as a continuation of current favorable trends in favor of water-based solvents as a result of the removal of EGBE from the TRI reporting list or for other reasons--would not cast doubt, now or in the future, on the conclusion that facility releases of EGBE may not reasonably be anticipated to cause any adverse human health or adverse environmental effects. As discussed in Section 2.5, VOC emission limits, together with other potential factors such as corporate product stewardship programs, are likely responsible for the substantial (about 70%) reduction in EGBE emissions since the mid-1990s even while annual consumption increased through the 1990s and early 2000s (Figure 2-1). More recently, the national consumption of EGBE has stabilized and even declined. These factors keep to a minimum the potential for increased community exposures to EGBE in the future even if production or consumption rise in response to its removal from the TRI reporting list or for other reasons. In any case, the substantial conservatism built into very significant element of the toxicological, exposure, and ecological assessments presented in this petition--as measured by the two-to-five orders of magnitude overstatements in the HQs presented in Tables 9-2 and 9-3 above, render theoretical any 99 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00112 concern that future increases in EGBE production or consumption might justify a reevaluation of the determination that facility releases of EGBE may not reasonably be anticipated to cause any adverse human health or adverse environmental effects. In conclusion, removing EGBE from the TRI reporting list is called for under the listing criteria of EPCRA Section 313(d)(2) as interpreted by EPA, is necessary to ensure consistency with other EPA programs (particularly the HAPs program), and would promote the objectives of the statute by encouraging increased use of a chemical with demonstrated environmental benefits without interfering with other federal or local environmental programs and policies. Accordingly, the Panel respectfully requests that the Administrator grant this petition and remove EGBE from the TRI reporting list. 100 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00113 10.0 REFERENCES ACGIH. 1991. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. Sixth Edition. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH. 162-163. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) ACGIH. 2003. 2-Butoxyethanol. In: Documentation of the TLVs and BEIs with Other Worldwide Occupational Exposure Values, 2004 CD-ROM. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, Ohio. ACGIH. 2012. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, Ohio. Amoore, J.E. and E. Hautala. 1983. Odor as an aid to chemical safety: Odor thresholds compared with threshold limit values and volatilities for 214 industrial chemicals in air and water dilution. J. Appl. Toxicol. 3(6):272-289. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) Assessment Technologies, Inc. 1996. Ethylene Glycol mono-Butyl Ether (EGBE): An Environmental Risk Assessment - Final Report. Fairfax. VA. December 4. ASTER. 1995. ASTER (Assessment Tools for the Evaluation of Risk) Ecotoxicity Profile: Ethanol, 2-Butoxy. Duluth, MN: Environmental Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency. February 17, 1995. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) Atkinson, R. 1987. A structure-activity relationship for the estimation of rate constants for the gas-phase reactions of OH radicals with organic-compounds. Intern. J. Chem. Kin. 19(9):799-828. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) ATSDR. 1998. Toxicological Profile for 2-Butoxyethanol and 2-Butoxyethanol Acetate. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Atlanta, Georgia. August. Bartnik, F.G., A.K. Reddy, G. Klecak, V. Zimmermann, J.J. Hostynek, and K. Kunstler. 1987. Percutaneous absorption, metabolism, and hemolytic activity of n-butoxyethanol. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 8:59-70. Boatman, R.J. 2004. Review of studies concerning the tumorigenicity of 2-butoxyethanol in B6C3F1 and its relevance for human risk assessment. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 7(5):385-398. Cadmus. 2000a. A Tier II Ecological Risk Assessment for Air Emission of Ethylene Glycol Butyl Ether. March 13, 2000, Prepared by The Cadmus Group, Inc. for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality and Planning Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711. Cadmus. 2000b. Ecological Risk Assessment for Ethylene Glycol Butyl Ether to Address the Clean Air Act Section 112(b) Petition Submitted by the Chemical Manufacturers Association to Delist this Substance. Revised February 15th, 2000, Prepared by The Cadmus Group, Inc. for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality and Planning Standards. Research Triangle Park, NC 27711. CalEPA. 1999. Determination of Acute Reference Exposure Levels for Airborne Toxicants. California Environmental Protection Agency, office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. March, http://www.oehha.ca.qov/air/pdf/acuterel.pdf 101 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00114 Carpenter, C.P., U.C. Pozzani, C.S. Weil, J.H. Nair, ill, G.A. Keck, and H.F. Smyth, Jr. 1956. The toxicity of butyl cellosolve solvent. AMA Arch. Ind. Health 14:114-131. CEMC. 2003. Fugacity-Based EQC Equilibrium Criterion Model. Version 2.02. Canadian Environmental Modeling Center. Trent University. Peterborough, Ontario. May. http://www.trentu.ca/cemc/models/EQC2.html CIBA-GEIGY 1976 (table 3-2) CIR. 1996. Final report on the safety assessment of butoxyethanol. J. Am. Coll. Toxicol. 15:462 526 Clayson, D.B., F. Iverson, E.A. Nera, and E. Lok. 1990. The significance of induced forestomach tumors. Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 30:441-463. Clayson, D.B., F. Iverson, E.A. Nera, and E. Lok. 1991. Early indicators of potential neoplasia produced in the rat forestomach by non-genotoxic agents: the importance of induced cellular proliferation. Mutat. Res. 248:321-331. CMA. 1996. Petition of the Chemical Manufacturers Association Ketones Panel to Delist Methyl Ethyl Ketone Under Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-toKnow Act of 1986. Prepared by the Chemical Manufacturers Association for submittal to the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. CMA. 1997. Petition of the Chemical Manufacturers Association Ethylene Glycol Ethers Panel to Remove Ethylene Glycol Butyl Ether from the List of Hazardous Air Pollutants under Section 112(b) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. Prepared by the Chemical Manufacturers Association for submittal to the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Cogliano, V., Y. Grosse, R. Baan, K. Straif, B. Secretan, F. El Ghissassi. 2004. Advice on formaldehyde and glycol ethers. The Lancet Oncology. 5:528. Corley, R.A., G.A. Bormett, B.l. Ghanayem. 1994. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetics of 2butoxyethanol and its major metabolite, 2-butoxyacetic acid, in rats and humans. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 129:61-79. (As cited in EPA 1999a.) Corley, R.A., D.A. Marham, C. Banks, P. Delorme, A. Masterman, and J.M. Houlel. 1997. Physiologically based pharmacookinetics and the dermal absorption of 2-butoxyethanol vapor by humans. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 39:120-130 (As cited in EPA 2010) Corley, R.A., D.M. Grant, E. Farris, KK Weitz, J.J. Soelberg, KD. Thrall, and T.S. Poet. 2005. Determination of age and gender differences in biochemical processes affecting the disposition of 2-butoxyethanol and its metabolites in mice and rats to improve PBPK modeling. Toxicol. Let. 156:127-161. Corthals, S. M., L. M. Kamendulis, J. E. Klaunig. 2006. Mechanisms of 2-butoxyethanol-induced hemangiosarcomas. Toxicol Sci 92(2):378-86. Dartsch, P.C., S. Hildenbrand, W. Gforer, R. Kimmel, and F.W. Schmahl. 1999. Cytotoxic effects of 2-butoxythanol in vitro are related to butoxyacetaldehyde, an intermediate oxidation product. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 7:135-142. Deisinger, P.J., and R.J. Boatman. 2004. In vivo metabolism and kinetics of ethylene glycol monobutyl ether and its metabolites, 2-butoxyacetaldehyde and 2-butoxyacetic acid as measured in blood, liver and forestomach in mice. Xenobiotica 34 (7):675-685. Devillers, J., A. Chezeau, V. Poulson, E. Thybaud. 2003. Effects of ethylene glycol ethers on the reproduction of Ceriodaphnia dubia. Chemosphere. 50:373-376. 102 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00115 Devillers, J., A. Chezeau, E. Thybaud, V. Poulsen, J.M. Porcher, L. Graff, P. Vasseur, F. Mouchet, V. Ferrier, F. Quiniou. 2002. Ecotoxicity of ethylene glycol monobutyl ether and its acetate. Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods 12:255-263. Dill, J.A., K.M. Lee, D.J. Bates, D.J. Anderson, R.E. Johnson, B.J. Chou, L.T. Burke, and J.H. Roycroft. 1998. Toxicokinetics of inhaled 2-butoxyethanol and its major metabolite, 2butoxyacetic acid, in F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 153:227-242. Dolinoy, D.C. and M.L. Miranda. 2004. GIS Modeling of Air Toxics Releases from TRI-Reporting and Non-TRI-Reporting Facilities: Impacts for Environmental Justice. Environmental Health Perspectives 112(17): 1717-1724. DOT. 1990. Hazardous materials and special provisions. Department of Transportation. Code of Federal Regulations. 49 CFR 172.101. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) Dow. 1988. DOWANOL EB Glycol Ether: Evaluation of Toxicity to the Green Algae, Selenastrum capricornutum printz. The Dow Chemical Company, Mammalian and Environmental Toxicology Research Laboratory. June 21. Dow. 1993. The Glycol Ethers Handbook. Dow Chemical Co. Midland Ml. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) Duboudin C, Ciffroy P and Magaud H. 2004a. Acute-to-chronic species sensitivity distribution extrapolation. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 23:1774-1785. Duboudin C, Ciffroy P and Magaud H. 2004b. Effects of data manipulation and statistical methods on species sensitivity distributions. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 23:489-499. ECETOC. 1994. Special Report No.7 -- Butoxyethanol Criteria Document Including a Supplement for 2-Butoxyethyl Acetate. European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals, Brussels, Belgium. ECETOC. 2005. The Toxicology of Glycol Ethers and its Relevance to Man. Technical Report 64. European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals, Brussels, Belgium. Eisenreich, S.J., B.B. Looney, and J.D. Thornton. 1981. Airborne organic contaminants in the Great Lakes ecosystem. Environ. Sci. Technol. 15 (1):30 38. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) Environment Canada and Health Canada. 2002. Priority Substances List Assessment Report, 2Butoxyethanol.(http://www.hc-sc.qc.ca/ewh-semt/alt formats/hecssesc/pdf/pubs/contaminants/ps!2-lsp2/' butoxyethanol/2 butoxyethanol e.pdf). EPA. 1971. Tolerance range for agriculture products. United States Environmental protection Agency. 40 CFR 180.1001. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) EPA. 1977. List of chemicals produced by affected facilities. 40 CFR 60.489. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) EPA. 1982. Preliminary Assessment Information Manufacturers Report. 40 CFR 712.30. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) EPA. 1984. Acute toxicity studies on Wellaid 31. Study submitted to the US Environmental Protection Agency by Amoco Corporation. (As cited in WHO 1998; 2010) 103 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00116 EPA. 1986a. Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC. September 24. 51 FR 33993 34003. EPA. 1986b. Substances subject to all provisions of health and safety data report. 40 CFR 716.120. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) EPA. 1987a. Statement of Policy and Guidance Regarding Petitions Under Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986. Federal Register Vol. 52, pp. 3479-3483. EPA. 1987b. Bulk Organic Chemical. 40 CFR 414 Subpart G. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) EPA. 1988. Toxic Chemical Release Reporting; Community Right-to-Know; Titanium Dioxide. Federal Register June 20, 1998, Volume 53, pp. 23108-23112. EPA. 1989. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A), Interim Final. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC. EPA/540/1-89/002. December. EPA. 1990a. National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan. 40 CFR Chapter 1, Subchapter J, Part 300. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (http://www.epa.qov/oilspill/pdfs/40cfr300. pdf) EPA. 1990b. Chemicals Affected by Subpart NNN. 40 CFR 60.667. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) EPA. 1992a. A Tiered Modeling Approach for Assessing the Risks due to Sources of Hazardous Air Pollutants. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality, Planning and Standards. Research Triangle Park, N.C. EPA-450/4-92-001. EPA. 1992b. Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry Chemicals. 40 CFR 63.106. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) EPA. 1992c. Hazard Assessment Guidelines for Listing Chemicals on the Toxic Release Inventory. Revised Draft, May 26, 1992. EPA. 1993a. Wildlife Exposure Factors Handbook: Volume 1. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C. EPA/600/R-93/187a. EPA. 1993b. Exemptions from the Requirement of a Tolerance. Chemicals affected by standards of performance for volatile organic compound emissions from synthetic organic chemical manufacturing industry reactor process. 40 CFR 60.707. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) EPA. 1994a. Addition of Certain Chemicals; Toxic Chemical Release Reporting; Community Right-to-Know; Final Rule. Federal Register Vol. 59. pp. 61432-61485. EPA. 1994b. Glycol Ethers Category; Toxic Chemical Release Reporting; Community Right-toKnow. Federal Register Vol. 59. pp. 34386-34391. EPA. 1995a. Butyl Benzyl Phthalate; Toxic Chemical Release Reporting; Community Right-toKnow. Federal Register February 17, 1995, Volume 60, pp. 9299-9301. EPA. 1995b. Expanded Exposure Assessment for Ethylene Glycol in Response to Delisting Petition. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Washington, DC. June. 104 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00117 EPA 1995c. Study of volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Consumer and Commercial Products: Report to Congress. United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA453-R-94-066-A, Washington, DC. June. EPA. 1995d. User's Guide for the industrial Source Complex (ISC3) Dispersion Models, Volume I - User Instructions, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis Division, Research Triangle Park, NC. EPA-454/B-95-003a, September 1995. EPA. 1996a. Proposed Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC. EPA/600/P92/003C. April. 61 FR 17960-18011. EPA. 1996b. Diethyl Phthalate; Toxic Chemical Release Reporting; Community Right-to-Know. Federal Register July 29, 1996, Volume 61, Number 146, pp. 39356-39359. EPA. 1996c. Di-(2-ethylhexyl) Adipate; Toxic Chemical Release Reporting; Community Right-toKnow. Federal Register July 31, 1996, Volume 61, Number 148, pp. 39891-39894. EPA. 1997a. Ethylene Glycol; Toxic Chemical Release Reporting; Community Right-to-Know. Federal Register May 7, 1997, Volume 63, Number 88, pp. 24919-24924. EPA. 1997b. Exposure Factors Handbook, Volume I - General Factors. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC. EPA/600/P-95/002Fa. August. EPA. 1998a. Methyl Ethyl Ketone; Toxic Chemical Release Reporting; Community Right-toKnow. Federal Register March 30, 1998, Volume 63, Number 60, pp. 15195-15200. EPA. 1998b. Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC, USA. April. EPA/630/R-95/002F. EPA. 1999a. Toxicological Review of Ethylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether (EGBE) (CASRN 111-76-2) In Support of Summary information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). US. Environmental Protection Agency. October. http://www.epa.gov/iris/toxreviews/0500-tr.pdf EPA. 1999b. Ethylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether (EGBE) (2-Butoxyethanol) (CASRN 111-76-2). United States Environmental Protection Agency, Integrated Risk Information System. http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0500.htm EPA. 1999c. Methyl Isobutyl Ketone; Toxic Chemical Release Reporting; Community Right-toKnow. Federal Register February 23, 1999, Volume 64, Number 35, pp. 8769-8774. EPA. 1999d. Acetonitrile; Community Right-to-Know Toxic Chemical Release Reporting. 64 Federal Register March 5, 1999, Volume 64, Number 43, pp. 10597-10604. EPA. 2003. List of Hazardous Air Pollutants, Proposed Rule. Federal Register November 21, 2003, Volume 68, Number 225, pp. 65648-65663. http://www.epa.gov/fedrqstr/EPAAIR/2003/November/Day-21Za28787.htm . EPA. 2004a. Petition to Delist of Ethylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether, Final Rule. Federal Register November 29, 2004, Volume 69, Number 228, pp. 69320-69325. http://www.epa.qov/fedrqstr/EPA-AIR/2004/November/Day-29/a26071 .htm . EPA. 2004b. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment), Final. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Superfund Remediation and 105 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00118 Technology Innovation, Washington, DC. EPA/540/R/99/005. OSWER 9285.7-02EP, PB99-963312. July. EPA. 2004c. Community Air Screening How-to-Manual. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. EPA 744-B-04-001. EPA. 2004d. AMS/EPA Regulatory Model - AERMOD. Version 04300. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division, Research Triangle Park, NC. October. http://www.epa.qov/scram001/dispersion prefrec.htm#aermod EPA. 2004e. User's Guide for the AMS/EPA Regulatory Model - AERMOD. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division, Research Triangle Park, NC. October. EPA. 2004f. Addendum - User's Guide for the AMS/EPA Regulatory Model - AERMOD. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division, Research Triangle Park, NC. EPA-454/B03-001. September. EPA 2004g. User's Guide for the AERMOD Meteorological Preprocessor (AERMET). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division, Research Triangle Park, NC. EPA-454/B03-002. November. EPA. 2005a. An Evaluation of the Human Carcinogenic Potential of Ethylene Glycol Butyl Ether. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA 600/R-04/123. EPA. 2005b. AERMOD Implementation Guide. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division, Research Triangle Park, NC. September. EPA. 2006. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS); Request for Chemical Substance Nominations for 2007 Program. Federal Register December 22, 2006, Volume 71, Number 246, pp. 77017-77019. http://www.epa.gov/fedrqstr/EPAESEARCH/2006/December/Dav-22/r21970.pdf. EPA. 2007. National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for Aerosol Coatings; Proposed Rule. Federal Register July 16, 2007, Volume 72, Number 135, pp. 38952 38991. EPA. 2008. AERSURFACE User's Guide. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Assessment Division, Air Quality Modeling Group, Research Triangle Park, NC. EPA-454/B-08-001, January 2008. EPA. 2009. AERMOD Implementation Guide, AERMOD Implementation Workgroup, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Assessment Division, Research Triangle Park, NC. Last Revised: March 19., 2009. EPA. 2010. Ethylene glycol monobutyl ether (EGBE) (2-Butoxyethanol) (CASRN 111-76-2). U.S. Environmental Protection agency. Integrated Risk Information System. http://222.epa.qov/iris/subst/0500.htm EPA. 201 la. AERSCREEN User's Guide. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Assessment Division, Air Quality Modeling Group, Research Triangle Park, NC. EPA-454/B-11-011, March. 106 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00119 EPA. 2011b. User's Guide for the AERMOD Meteorological Preprocessor (AERMET). Addendum. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Assessment Division, Air Quality Modeling Group, Research Triangle Park, NC. EPA-454/B-11-011, February. EPA. 2012. User's Guide for the AMS/EPA Regulatory Model - AERMOD. Addendum. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Assessment Division, Research Triangle Park, NC. EPA-454/B-03-001, December. Fisher, D.J., and D.T. Burton. 2003. Comparison of two U.S. Environmental Protection Agency species sensitivity distribution methods for calculating ecological risk criteria. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 9 (3):675-690. Foster, J. R. 2000. EGBE (Ethylene Glycol Butyl Ether, EGBE): The Proposed Mode of Action in the Induction of Hemangiosarcomas in Male Mouse Liver and Its Significance for Man. Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom: Central Toxicology Laboratory, Alderley Park; report no: Ctl/r/1465. (As cited in EPA 2005a.) Ghanayem, B.l. and C.A. Sullivan. 1993. Assessment of haemolytic activity of 2-butoxyethanol and its major metabolite, butoxyacetic acid, in various mammals including humans. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 12(4):305-311. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) Ghanayem, B.I., P.C. Blair, M.B. Thompson, et al. 1987. Effect of age on the toxicity and metabolism of ethylene glycol monobutyl ether (2-butoxyethanol) in rats. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 91:222-234. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) Ghanayem, B.I., P.H. Long, S.M. Ward, B. Chanas, M. Nyska, and A. Nyska. 2001. Hemolytic anemia, thrombosis, and infarction in male and female F344 rats following gavage exposure to 2-butoxyethanol. Ex. Toxic Pathol 53:97-105. Ghanayem, B.I., S.M. Ward, B. Chanas, and A. Nyska. 2000. Comparison of the acute hematotoxicity of 2-butoxyethanol in male and female F344 rats. Human and Experimental Toxicology 19:185-192. Gingell, R., R.J. Boatman, and S. Lewis. 1998. Acute toxicity of ethylene glycol mono-n-butyl ether in the guinea pig. Food and Chemical Toxicology 36:825-829. Green, T., A. Toghill, R. Lee, R. Moore, and J. Foster. 2000. The development of forestomach tumours in the mouse following exposure to 2-butoxyethanol by inhalation: Studies on the mode of action and relevance to humans. Toxicology 180:257-273. Gualtieri, J.F., L. DeBoer, C.R. Harris, and R. Corley. 1995. Repeated ingestion of 2butoxyethanol: Case report and literature review. J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. 41:57-62. Hall, L.W. Jr, M.C. Scott, and W.D. Killen. 1998. Ecological risk assessment of copper and cadmium in surface waters of Chesapeake Bay watershed. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 17 (6): 1172-1189. Harrison, P.T.C. 1992. Propionic acid and the phenomenon of rodent forestomach tumorigenesis: a review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 30:333-340. Hoflack, J.C., M.J. Durand, G.G. Poirier, A. Maul, and P. Vasseur. 1997. Alteration in methylmethanesulfonate-induced poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation by 2-butoxyethanol in Syrian hamster embro cells. Carcinogenesis 18 (12):2333-2338. Howard, P.H. 1993. Handbook of Environmental Fate and Exposure Data; Vol. IV. Chelsea, Ml: Lewis Publishers. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) 107 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00120 Howard, P.H., R.S. Boethling, W.F. Jarvis, W.M. Meylan, and E.M. Michalenko. 1991. Handbook of Environmental Degradation Rates. Lewis Publishers Inc., Chelsea, Ml. HSDB. 1997. Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine, National Toxicology Program (via TOXNET), Bethesda, MD. October. (As cited in ATSDR 1999.) HSDB. 2005. Ethylene Glycol Mono-N-Butyl Ether. Hazardous Substances Data Bank, National Library of Medicine. National Institutes of Health. National Toxicology Program (via TOXNET http://toxnet.nlm.nih.qov). IARC. 2004. Recent Meetings; Volume 88: Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-ferf-Butoxy-2propanol 2-9 June 2004. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France (http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Meetinqs/vol88.php). IARC. 2006. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Volume 88: Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and l-fert-Butoxy-2-propanol. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France. December 2006. Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI). 1985. Ethylene glycol butyl ether and butoxyacetic acid: their effects on erythrocyte fragility in four species. Study No. WV 0062. NTIS Report No. OTS0521233. As cited in CIR (1996). INERIS. 2005. European Union Risk Assessment Report: 2-butoxyethanol. Draft. Institut Nationel de I'Environnement Industriel et des Risques. Verneuil-en-Halatte, France. INERIS. 2006. 2-Butoxyethanol (EGBE). Part I - Environment. Summary Risk Assessment Report. Institut Nationel de I'Environnement Industriel et des Risques. Verneuil-enHalatte, France. IPCS. 1997. SIDS Initial Assessment Report for 6th SIAM, 2-Butoxyethanol. International Programme on Chemical Safety, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland http://www.inchem.Org/documents/sids/sids/111762.pdf. Johanson G, Kronborg H, Naslund PH, Nordquist MB. 1986. Toxicokinetics of inhaled 2butoxyethanol (ethylene glycol monobutyl ether) in man. Scand J Work Environ Health 12:594-602. Johanson, G., I. Michel, D. Norback, et al. 1989. Biological monitoring of exposure to ethylene glycol ethers. Arch Toxicol (Suppl 13): 108-1 11. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) Klaine, S.J., G.P. Cobb, R.L. Dickerson, K.R. Dixon, R.J. Kendall, E.E. Smith, and K.R. Solomon. 1996. An ecological risk assessment for the use of the biocide, dibromonitrilopropionamide (DBNPA), in industrial cooling systems. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 15(1 ):21 -30. Koshkaryev, A., G. Barshtein, A. Nyska, N. Ezov, T. Levin-Harrus, S. Shabat, M. Nyska, M. Redlich, F. Tsipia, and S. Yedgar. 2003. 2-butoxyethanol enhances the adherence of red blood cells. Archive Toxicology 77:465-469. Kroes, R. and P.W. Wester. 1986. Forestomach carcinogens: Possible mechanisms of action. Food Chem. Toxicol. 24:1083-1089. Lamb, J.C., D.K. Gulati, L.M. Hommel, and K.B. Poonacha. 1997. Ethylene glycol monobutyl ether. Environmental Health Perspectives 105 (supplemental 7. Long, P.H., R.R. Maronpot, B.l. Ghanayem, J.H. Roycroft, and A. Nyska. 2000. Dental pulp infarction in female rats following inhalation exposure to 2-butoxyethanol. Toxicologic Pathology 28 (2):246-252. 108 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00121 Lyman, W.J., W.F. Reehl, and D.H. Rosenblatt. 1982. Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 4-9, 5-4, 6-3, 15-16. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) Mackay, D., S. Paterson, W.Y. Shiu. 1992. Generic models for evaluating the regional fate of chemicals. Chemosphere. 24:695-717. Marsden, C. and S. Mann, eds. 1963. Solvents Guide. New York, NY: Interscience Publishers, 111-112. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) Maryland. 1985. Maryland Industrial Survey. Bethesda, MD. Merck. 1989. The Merck Index: An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals. Rahway, NJ: Merck & Co., Inc. 1566. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) NICNAS. 1996. Summary Report: 2-Butoxyethanol in Cleaning Products: Priority Existing Chemical No. 6. National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme, Commonwealth of Australia, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra. 35 pp. NIOSH. 1983. The Glycol Ethers, with Particular Reference to 2-Methoxyethanol and 2Ethoxyethanol: Evidence of Adverse Reproductive Effects. Current Intelligence Bulletin No. 39. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH. PB 84-155142. May. NIOSH. 1990. Criteria for a recommended standard: Occupational exposure to ethylene glycol monobutyl ether and ethylene glycol monobutyl ether acetate. Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. NTIS No. PB91 -173369. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) NIOSH. 2001. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards & Other Databases. Cincinnati, OH: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institutes for Occupational Safety and Health. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2001-145 (CD-OM). August. NPCA. 1997. National Paint and Coatings Association. http:/www.paint.org/value.htm. January 1. (As cited in SRI 2004.) NTP. 1993. Ethylene glycol ethers, 2-ethoxyethanol, 2-butoxyethanol administered in drinking water to F344/N rats and B6C3FI mice. NTP toxicity report series no. 26. National Toxicology Program, National Institutes of Health, Public Health Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH publication 93-3349. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) NTP. 2000. Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of 2-Butoxyethanol (CAS no. 111-76-2) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Inhalation Studies). National Toxicology Program, Washington, DC. NTP technical report series no. 484. http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/htdocs/LT rptsZtr484.pdf. NRC. 2001. Standing Operating Procedures for Developing Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Chemicals. Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. Nyska, A., C.R. Moomaw, N. Ezov, S. Shabat, T. Levin-Harrus, M. Nyska, M. Redlich, M. Mittelman, S. Yedgar, and J. Foley. 2003. Ocular expression of vascular cell adhesion 109 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00122 molecule (VCAM-1) in 2-butoxyethanol-induced hemolysis and thrombosis in female rats. Ex. Toxic Pathol 55:231-236. Nyska, A., R.R. Maronpot, P.H. Long, J.H. Roycroft, J.R. Hailey, G.S. Travlos, and B.l. Ghanayem. 1999. Disseminated thrombosis and bone infarction in female rats following inhalation exposure to 2-butoxyethanol. Toxicologic Pathology 27 (3):287-294. OECD. 1997. Screening Information Dataset (SIDS) initial assessment report on 2 butoxyethanol. 6th SIDS Initial Assessment Meeting. Paris, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. OSHA. 1974. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 29 CFR 1910.100. (As cited in ATSDR 1998) OSHA. 1990. 2-Butoxyethanol (Butyl Cellosolve), 2-Butoxyethyl Acetate (Butyl Cellosolve Acetate), Method 83. Salt Lake City, Utah: Organic Methods Evaluation Branch. OSHA Analytical Laboratory, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (As cited in ATSDR 1998) Park, J., L.M. Kamendulis, J.E. Klaunig. 2002a. Effects of 2-Butoxyethanol on Hepatic Oxidative Damage. Toxicol. Lett. 126: 19-29. (As cited in EPA 2005a) Park, J., L.M. Kamendulis, J.E. Klaunig. 2002b. Mechanisms of 2-butoxyethanol carcinogenicity: studies on Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cell transformation. Toxicol. Sci. 68: 43-50. (As cited in EPA 2005a) Poet, T.S., J.J. Soelberg, K.K. Weitz, T.J. Mast, R.A. Miller, B.D. Thrall, and R.A. Corley. 2003. Mode of action and pharmacokinetic studies of 2-butoxyethanol in the mouse with an emphasis on forestomach dosimetry. Toxicological Sciences 71:176-189. Posthuma, L., G.W. Suter II, and T.P. Traas. 2002. Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA. Price, K.S., G.T. Waggy, and R.A. Conway. 1974. Brine shrimp bioassay and seawater BOD of petrochemicals. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 46:63-77. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) Riddick, J.A. and W.B. Bunger, ed. 1970. Organic solvents. New York, NY: Wiley-lnterscience, 471,862-863. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) Rowe, V.K. and M.A. Wolf. 1982. Derivatives of gylcols. in: Patty's industrial hygiene and toxicology. 3rd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons. 2C: 3909-3911,3931-3939. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) Sawant, S.D., P.G. Doucet, W. Slob, B.L. Blaylock, and H.M. Mehendale. 1999. Experimental mathematical validation of a novel concept of extended 2-butoxyethanol autoprotection. International Journal of Toxicology 18:307-316. Siesky, A. M., L.M. Kamendulis, J.E. Klaunig. 2002. Hepatic effects of 2-butoxyethanol in rodents. Toxicol. Sci. 70: 252-260. (As cited in EPA 2005a.) Singh, P., B. Morris, S. Zhao, and B.L. Blaylock. 2002. Suppression of the contact hypersensitivity response following topical exposure to 2-butoxyethanol in female BALB/c mice. International Journal of Toxicology 21:107-115. Singh, P., S. Zhao, and B.L. Blaylock. 2001. Topical Exposure to 2-butoxyethanol alters immune responses in female BALB/c mice. International Journal of Toxicology 20:383-390. Solomon, K.R., D.B. Baker, P. Richards, K.R. Dixon, S.J. Klaine, T.W. La Point, R.J. Kendall, C.P. Weisskopf, J.M. Giddings, J.P. Giesy, L.W. Hall Jr, and W.M. Williams. 1996. 110 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00123 Ecological risk assessment of atrazine in North American surface waters. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 15 (1):31-76. SRI. 2004. Chemical Economics Handbook Marketing Research Report: Glycol Ethers. Prepared by H. Chinn, U. Lochner, and K. Yagi for SRI Consulting. July. 663.5000 A SRI. 2010. Chemical Economics Handbook Marketing Research Report: Glycol Ethers. Prepared by H. Chinn, T. Kaelin, J. Liu, and H. Mori for SRI Consulting. November. 663.5000 A. Staples, C.A., R.J. Boatman, and M.L. Cano. 1998. Ethylene glycol ethers: An environmental risk assessment. Chemosphere 36 (7): 1585-1613. Stephan, C.E., D.l. Mount, D.J. Hansen, J.H. Gentile, G.A. Chapman, and W.A. Brungs. 1985. Guidelines for Deriving Numerical National Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and Their Uses. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development. Duluth, MN, USA. PB85-227049. Suter, G.W. II, B.W. Cornaby, C.T. Hadden, R.N. Hull, M. Stack, and F.A. Zafran. 1995. An approach for balancing health and ecological risks at hazardous waste sites. Risk Analysis 15 (2):221-231. Swann, R.L., D.A. Laskowski, P.J. McCall, K. Vanderkuy, and H.J. Dishburger. 1983. A rapid method for the estimation of the environmental parameters octanol water partitioncoefficient, soil sorption constant, water to air ratio, and water solubility. Res. Rev. 85:16-28. Tuazon, E.C., S.M. Aschmann, and R. Atkinson. 1998. Products of the gas-phase reactions of the OH radicals with 1-methoxy-2-propanol and 2-butoxyethanol. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32(21): 3336-3345. (As cited in INERIS 2005) Udden M.M 1994. Hemolysis and deformability of erythrocytes exposed to butoxyacetic acid, a metabolite of 2-butoxyethanol: II Resistance in red blood cells from humans with potential susceptibility. J Appl Toxicol, 14: 97-102. Udden, M.M. 2000. Rat erythrocyte morphological changes after gavage dosing with 2butoxyethanol: A comparison with the in vitro effects of butoxyacetic acid on rat and human erythrocytes. J. Appl. Toxicol. 20:381-387. Udden, M.M. 2002. In vitro sub-hemolytic effects of butoxyacetic acid on human and rat erythrocytes. Toxicological Sciences 69:258-264. Weast, R.C., ed. 1975. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 55th edition. Cleveland, OH: CRC Press, Inc., C-290. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) Weast, R.C., ed. 1989. The CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 70th edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Inc. C-266. (As cited in ATSDR 1998.) WHO. 1998. Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 10: 2-butoxyethanol. World Health Organization. Geneva. WHO. 2005. Selected Alkoxyethanols 2-Butoxyethanal. Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 67. World Health Organization. Geneva. WHO. 2010. Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 67: Selected alkoxyethanols. World Health Organization. Geneva. Ill 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00124 TABLES 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00125 Table ES-1, Key Findings of the Qualitative Hazard Evaluation Toxicity Endpoint Acute Toxicity Summary Evaluation and Principal Reference Primary acute effects in humans are eye and nasal irritation at levels >500 mg/m 3 (Carpenter 1956); no irritation was found at current occupational exposure limits - 97 mg/m 3 (Johansen 1986). Facility fenceline and environmental concentrations are far lower. Chronic Toxicity Carcinogenicity Mutagenicity Releases of EGBE "may not reasonably be anticipated to cause any adverse effects to human health" (EPA, 69 FR 69322). "Limited" evidence of carcinogenicity in animals; the human carcinogenic potential of EGBE cannot be determined (IARC 2006). Because nonlinear, nongenotoxic modes of action are likely responsible for the tumors observed in rodent studies, the IRIS RfD and RfC are adequately protective of any possible carcinogenic effects in humans (EPA Cancer Evaluation [EPA 2005a]). Not expected to be mutagenic or clastogenic. (EPA 2010) Developmental Toxicity Reproductive Toxicity Immunotoxicity Other Chronic Toxicity A "minimal" LOAEL for developmental effects = 700 mg/kg-day based on a very slight decrease in pup weight (EPA 2010). 700 and 1,300 mg/kg-day are considered to be NOAEL and LOAEL, respectively, for both maternal and reproductive effects (EPA 2010). Not immunotoxic (EPA 2010) Continuous inhalation exposure to an EGBE-saturated atmosphere expected to result in maximum blood concentrations of EGBE's toxic metabolite (BAA) well below the level needed to produce hemolysis in humans (Udden 2002, EPA 2010). Environmental Toxicity Persistence Bioaccumulation Terrestrial Mammals and Birds EGBE causes only "very minor" effects that "are unlikely to be ecologically significant" (EPA 2003 [68 Fed. Reg. 65657]) Readily biodegradable Half-life = 1-4 weeks in water and soil Bioconcentration factor = 3 Octanol-water partition coefficient (Log Kow) = 0.8 (ATSDR 1998) (HSDB 1997) No Data [Section 3.3, below] Acute Aquatic Toxicity Chronic Aquatic Toxicity Most sensitive credible LC50 = 89 mg/L Most LC50 values > 1000 mg/L Most sensitive EC50 = 164 mg/L Most sensitive LOAEL = 7.2 mg/L MostLOAELs > 100 mg/L EGBE: ethylene glycol monobutyl ether EPA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency IRIS: Integrated risk information system LOAEL: lowest observed adverse effect level mg/kg-day: milligrams per kilogram body weight per day mg/L: milligrams per liter mg/m3: milligrams per cubic meter NOAEL: no observed adverse effect level (Section 3.3, below) (Section 3.3, below) 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00126 Table ES-2, Key Findings of the Exposure and Risk Assessments Human Inhalation Exposures Chronic Maximum Annual Average Concentration (MAAC) RfC Hazard Quotient (chronic) Acute Maximum Hourly Average Concentration (MHAC) HAPs Petition (1993 TRI Release Data) This Petition (2009-2011 TRI Release Data) 0.327 mg/m3, based on Tier 3 All facilities screened out prior to chronic Tier 2 and 3 (ISCST3) air dispersion modeling for analyses. For subset of facilities that screened out in Tier the maximum impact facility. 2, Tier 3 modeling was conducted to test the conservatism of this assessment found a predicted MAAC using Tier 3 (AERMOD) of 0.27 mg/m 3 based on 2009, 2010, and 2011 data. 13 mg/m3 0.02 1.6 mg/m3 <0.2 n/a For a subset of the highest emitting facilities, tiered modeling of acute exposures found a predicted MHAC using Tier 3 (AERMOD) of 3.9 mg/m3 based on the 2009, 2010, and 2011 data. NOAEL (Irritation Based on Human Data) Margin of Exposure Human Dermal and Ingestion Exposures Maximum Exposure RfD Hazard Quotient Ecological Risk Small Mammals Maximum Exposure Toxicity Reference Value Hazard Quotient Aquatic Organisms Maximum Exposure TRV Hazard Quotient n/a n/a 0.02 mg/kg BW-day 3 mg/kg BW-day 0.007 (from Cadmus 2000a) 2.15 mg/kg BW-day 20 mg/kg BW-day 0.11 (from Cadmus 2000a) 3.64 mg/L 9.1 mg/L 0.4 97 mg/m3 > 25 0.00001 mg/kg BW-day 0.1 mg/kg BW-day 0.0001 0.029 mg/kg BW-day 20 mg/kg BW-day 0.001 0.00019 mg/L 8.7 mg/L 0.00002 MAAC: maximum annual average concentration mg/kg BW-day: milligrams per kilogram body weight per day mg/L: milligrams per liter mg/m3: milligrams per cubic meter RfC: IRIS reference concentration RfD: IRIS reference dose TRV: toxicity reference value 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00127 Table ES-3. Sources of Uncertainty and Conservatism Section Source of Uncertainty Likely Effect on Outcome 3.0 Hazard Assessment Humans are at least 100 times less sensitive than rats to hemolytic RfD may be 100-fold overly conservative. RfC may be 300-fold overly effects of EGBE. While a stand default interspecies UFs of 10 was not conservative. Thus, HQs may be overestimated by a factor of 100 to 300. used - RfD uses UF of 1 and RfC uses UF of 3 - the actual interspecies factor is approximately 0.01. Intraspecies UF of 10 is probably overly conservative. A number of RfD and RfC may be overstated by an additional factor of 3 to 10. studies have found no evidence of increased susceptibility to hemolysis among sensitive subpopulations. IARC (2006) concluded that the carcinogenicity of EGBE to humans cannot be determined and EPA (2010) concluded that carcinogenic effects from EGBE are not likely to occur in humans in the absence of critical noncancer effects. EPA (2005) concluded that the RfD and RfC are adequately protective of carcinogenic effects in humans, if any. Thus, question of carcinogenicity does not affect petition outcome. 5.0 Emissions Inventory TRI only lists releases of Certain Glycol Ethers. In the absence of specific data for EGBE releases, assumed all Certain Glycol Ethers releases were EGBE. Because EGBE represents 52% of market share of ethylene glycol ethers (SRI 2010), actual releases of EGBE may be overestimated 2-fold, on average. TRI data are self-reported using a variety of methods. Individual facility Actual releases of Certain Glycol Ethers by facilities may be greater than or data vary considerably in certainty. less than those reported on TRI. No evidence of systematic under- reporting. 6.0 Screening of Airborne Concentrations a. Chronic Step A assumed 100% of reported releases to air were exhausted through a single point 0 m high and 50 m from fence line. Resultant threshold rate (4.9 tpy) more conservative than that associated with 2 m high emission point located 10 m from fenceline (8.6 tpy), which encompasses virtually all facilities in inventory for which stack configuration data are available. Maximum annual average concentrations predicted under Step A were up to 250-fold higher than those predicted using Tier 3 dispersion modeling. Thus, HQs predicted using Step A overestimated by 85-250 times. Tier 2 employed site-specific data on emission rates, stack and fugitive HQs predicted using Tier 2 overestimated by 2 times or more. source physical parameters, and property boundaries. The maximum MAAC under Tier 2 was 1.2 mg/m3, as compared to maximum MAAC under Tier 3 of 0.3 mg/m3. Tier 2 results differed from Tier 3 results for the same facilities by factors of 1.2 to 6.7. Modeled maximum annual average concentration is highly conservative estimate of exposure over a lifetime. Per EPA, actual maximum annual average concentrations are 2-fold lower than modeled values. Comparison of an annual average concentration to an RfC designed to be protective over a lifetime substantially overstates risk by an unknown margin. DEGREE OF CONSERVA TISM ASSOCIA TED WITH CHRONIC HUMAN INHALA TION HAZARDS b. Acute f50 to 1001 x (3 to 101 x 2 x (2 to 85t x ? = 600 to 170.000 or more The acute MOE based on the NOAEL of 97 mg/m3 and the estimated reasonable worst-case estimated MHAC is approximately 18 mg/m3. Because the NOAEL is derived from human data, per EPA TRI precedents MOEs >10 "indicate a low level of concern" for acute effects associated with EGBE facility releases. An MOE above 5 is protective because EPA AEGL guidance calls for an interspecies uncertainty factor from 3-10 for non-systemic irritation effects, and an appropriate time-adjustment would supporta 1 -hr NOAEL of 137 mg/m3. 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production Page 1 of 2 ED 001523 00008282-00128 Table ES-3. Sources of Uncertainty and Conservatism Section Source of Uncertainty 7.0 Surface Water Exposures and Risks Likely Effect on Outcome Exposure point concentrations in surface water calcuiated by assuming Because EGBE represents 52% of consumption of ethyiene glycol ethers that 100% of U.S. releases of Certain Glycol Ethers to all media are (SRI 2010), actual releases of EGBE may be overestimated 2-fold, on EGBE and are concentrated into an area the size of the state of Ohio. average. Because 100,000 km2 represents 1.3% of total land area of U.S., actual concentrations of EGBE may be overestimated 77-foid. Exposure assumptions (350 day/yr, 70 years, all water contacted contains EGBE) DEGREE OF CONSERVA TISM ASSOCIA TED WITH HUMAN DERMAL AND INGESTION HAZARDS 8.0 Ecological Risk Assessment Actual exposure intensity likely to be considerably lower, but degree of conservatism cannot be quantified. (50 to 1OOt x (3 to 1Ot x 2 x 77 x ? = 23.100 to 154.000 or more Exposure point concentrations in surface water calculated by assuming As previously noted, actual releases of EGBE may be overestimated 2-fold: that 100% of U.S. releases of Certain Glycol Ethers to all media are on average, and actual concentrations of EGBE may be overestimated 77EGBE and are concentrated into an area the size of the state of Ohio. fold. Conservative exposure assumptions for small mammals (inhalation rate, ingestion rate, bioaccumulation factor) consistent with Cadmus (2000a) Actual exposure intensity likely to be considerably lower, but degree of conservatism cannot be quantified. TRV for aquatic organisms based on most sensitive species tested, Although actual sensitivity of other aquatic organisms to EGBE may be which may not be representative of aquatic community present in most considerably lower, degree of conservatism cannot be quantified. U.S. water bodies. TRV for small mammals is based on same underlying data used to derive RfD, Thus, small mammal TRV shares same uncertainties as listed above with respect to Section 3.0. TRV may be 50 to 1,000-foid overly conservative due to UFs. HQs focused on what EPA calls "very minor" effects on individual organisms, rather than effects that are likely to be ecologically significant. Although individual organisms are likely to be substantially more sensitive than populations, communities, or ecosystems, degree of conservatism cannot be quantified. DEGREE OF CONSERVA TISM ASSOCIA TED WITH RISKS TO AQUA TIC ORGANISMS DEGREE OF CONSERVA TISM ASSOCIA TED WITH RISKS TO SMALL MAMMALS 2 x 77 x ? = 154 or more 2 x 77 x (50 to 1.0001 x ? = 7.700 to 154.000 or more EGBE: ethylene glycol monobutyl ether EPA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency FR: Federal Register HQ: hazard quotient IARC: international Agency for Research on Cancer IRIS: integrated Risk Information Service krn^: square kilometer m: meter MAAC: Maximum annual average concentration mg/m'3: milligrams per cubic meter RfC: reference concentration RfD: reference dose tpy: tons per year TRi: Toxics Release inventory TRV: toxicity reference value UF: uncertainty factor 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 2 of 2 ED 001523 00008282-00129 Table 2-1. Regulatory Standards and Guidelines Applicable to EGBE Media Agency Description NATIONAL Information References a Regulations: Air EPA OAQPS List of Chemicals Produced by Affected Facilities Yes 40 CFR 60.489, EPA 1977 EPA OAQPS Chemicals Affected by Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Emissions from Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry Distillation Operations Yes 40 CFR 60.667, EPA 1990b EPA OAQPS Chemicals Affected by Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry Reactor Processes Yes 40 CFR 60.707, EPA 1993b EPA OAQPS Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry Chemicals Yes 40 CFR 63 Table 1 to Subpart F, EPA 1992b OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit (TWA)b 50 ppm (240 mg/m3) skin c 29 CFR 1910.100, OSHA 1974 Water EPAOW Effluent Guidelines and Standards - Organic Chemicals, Plastics, and Synthetic Fibers - Bulk Organic Chemicals Yes 40 CFR 414, subpart G, EPA 1987b Other EPA OPPTS EPA OPPTS Guidelines: Air ACGIH OSHA NIOSH NIOSH Tolerance Range for Agriculture Products Substance Subject to All Provisions of Health and Safety Data Reporting Conditionally Exempted from Tolerance 40 CFR 180.920, EPA 1971 Yes 40 CFR 716.120, EPA 1986b TLV-TWA for Occupational Exposure d Permissible Exposure Limit - TWA for Occupational Exposure d Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health (IDLH) Recommended Exposure Limit for Occupational Exposure (TWA)e 20 ppm (97 mg/m3) ACGIH 2012 50 ppm 29 CFR 1910.1000 (240 mg/m3) skin b 700 ppm (3,383 NIOSH 2001 mg/m3) 5 ppm (24 mg/m3) NIOSH 1990 skin b STATE Regulations and Guidelines: Air AZ AZ Ambient Air Quality Guidelines (24 hours) AZ AZ Ambient Air Quality Guidelines (1 hour) CA Inhalation Reference Level (1 hour) CT Hazard Limit Value (8 hours) Hazard Limit Value (30 minutes) 0.9 mg/m3 3.6 mg/m3 14 mg/m3 2.4 mg/m3 12 mg/m3 http://www.az deq.qov/environ/air/d ownload/modelinq.pdf CalEPA 1999 Reg. of CT State Agencies, Section 22a-174-29 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 1 of 2 ED 001523 00008282-00130 Media Air Agency ND Table 2-1. Regulatory Standards and Guidelines Applicable to EGBE Description NATIONAL Guideline Concentration (8 hours) Information References a 1.9 mg/m3 http://www. ndhealth.aov/AQ/Toxic s/North%20Dakota%2QAir%2QTox ics%2QPolicv.pdf TX Effects Screening Level (1 hour) TX Effects Screening Level (Annual) 0.21 mg/m3 3.7 mg/m3 http://www.tcea.texas.qov/toxicoIo qy/esl/list main.html#esl 1 a. As cited in ATSDR 1998 b. Time-weighted average concentrations that must not be exceeded during any 8-hour work shift of a 40-hour week c. Skin designation that there is a potential for dermal absorption and that skin exposure should be prevented through the use of gloves, coveralls, goggles, and other appropriate equipment. d. ACGIH TLV-TWA is a time-weighted averaged concentration for an 8-hour workday and a 40-hour workweek. e. Recommended exposure limit is a time-weighted average concentration for up to a 10-hour workday during a 40-hour work week. ACGIH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists EGBE: ethylene glycol monobutyl ether EPA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency mg/nt3: milligrams per cubic meter NIOSH: Naitonal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health OAQPS: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards OPPTS: Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxic Substances OSHA: Occupational Safety and Health Administration OW: Office of Water ppm: parts per million TLV: Threshold Limit Value TWA: Time Weighted Average 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 2 of 2 ED 001523 00008282-00131 Property Table 3-1. Physical and Chemical Properties of EGBE information Referencea Molecular weight 118.17 Merck 1989 Color colorless Marsden and Mann 1963 Physical state Melting point Boiling point liquid -70 C -75 C 171 C at 760 mm Hg 50 C at 4 mm Hg Merck 1989 HSDB 1997 ASTER 1995 Weast 1975 Weast 1989 Density at 20 C Odor Odor threshold Air Water Solubility Water at 25 C Organic solvent(s) Partition coefficients Log Kow Log Koc Bioconcentration factor Log BCF Vapor pressure At 20 C At 25 C 0.9019 g/mL Faint odor Mild ethereal odor Merck 1989 Marsden and Mann 1963 ACGIH 1991 0.10 ppm (v/v) 0.4 ppm (v/v) No data Amoore and Hautala 1983 OSHA 1990 Soluble in all proportions Riddick and Bunger 1970, Weast 1975 Miscible with alcohol, ether Weast 1975 Soluble in most organic solvents Merck 1989 0.83 0.84 1.83 (calculated) 1.79 (calculated) HSDB 1997 ASTER 1995 HSDB 1997, Lyman et al. 1982 ASTER 1995 0.40 (calculated) HSDB 1997, Lyman etal. 1982 0.76 mm Hg 0.88 mmHg HSDB 1997 Dow 1993 Henry's law constant 2.08 x 10'8 (calculated) Howard 1993, HSDB 1997 (atm-m3/mol) Vapor-phase rate constant for reaction with photochemically produced hydroxy radicals Atmospheric half-life at 25 C and 5 x 5.44 x 10"6 (calculated) 1.96 x 10'11 cm3/molecule-second at 25 C (estimated) 17 hours (calculated) ASTER 1995 Atkinson 1987 HSDB 1997 105 hydroxyl radicals/m3 Autoignition temperature Flashpoint Flammability Explosive limits 238 C HSDB 1997 244 C Marsden and Mann 1963, OSHA 1990 60C (closed cup) Merck 1989 62C (closed cup) HSDB 1997 69C (open cup) OSHA 1990 74C (open cup) Marsden and Mann 1963 May be ignited by heat, sparks or HSDB 1997 open flame 1.1% (lower); 10.1% (upper) OSHA 1990 a. All references are as cited in ATSDR 1998 ASTER: Assessment Tools for the Evaluation of Risk ATSDR: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry BCF: bioconcentration factor C: degrees Celsius EGBE: ethylene glycol monobutyl ether HSDB: Hazardous Substance Data Bank Koc: organic carbon partition coefficient Kow: octanol-water partition coefficient OSHA: Occupational Safety and Health Administration 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00132 Scientific Name Fish Fundulus heteroclitus Cyprinodon variegatus Cyprinodon variegatus Cyprinodon variegatus Cyprinodon variegatus Lepomis macrochirus Lepomis macrochirus Lepomis macrochirus Lepomis macrochirus Leuciscus idus melanotus Leuciscus idus melanotus Leuciscus idus melanotus Leuciscus idus melanotus Leuciscus idus melanotus Leuciscus idus melanotus Leuciscus idus melanotus Menidia beryllina Carassius auratus Carassius auratus Oncorhynchus mykiss Oncorhynchus mykiss Pimephales promelas Notropus atherinoides Invertebrates Palaemonetes pugio Crassostrea virginica Crassostrea virginica Crassostrea virginica Crassostrea virginica Penaeus setiferus Penaeus setiferus Common Name Effect mummichog mortality sheepshead minnow mortality sheepshead minnow mortality sheepshead minnow mortality sheepshead minnow mortality bluegill mortality bluegil! mortality bluegill mortality bluegill golden ide mortality mortality golden ide mortality golden ide golden ide mortality mortality golden ide golden ide mortality mortality golden ide inland silverside goldfish goldfish rainbow trout rainbow trout mortality mortality mortality mortality mortality mortality fathead minnow emerald shiner mortality mortality grass shrimp oyster oyster oyster oyster white shrimp white shrimp mortality mortality mortality mortality mortality mortality mortality Table 3-2. Aquatic Ecotoxicity Data for EGBE Endpoint Duration EGBE Concentration (mg/L) ACUTE EXPOSURES WHO 1998; 2005 Staples et al. 1998 Devi Hers et al. 2002 EC and HC 2002 INERIS 2005 Toxicity Review Source Citation LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC00 LC00 LC50 LC100 LC50 LC100 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 96 hr 96 hr 72 hr 48 hr 24 hr 96 hr 96 hr 24 hr 96 hr 48 hr 48 hr 48 hr 48 hr 48 hr 48 hr 48 hr 96 hr 24 hr 24 hr 96 hr 96 hr 96 hr 72 hr 6.7 116 121 126 149 127 1490 2950 2950 1170 1350 1395 1490 1575 1620 1880 1250 1650 1700 1700 >1000 2137 >500 X X Biospherics 1981 A X X MBA 1984 A X MBA 1984 X MBA 1984 X X OECD 1997 X X CIBA-GEIGY 1976 A X X Neely 1984 X X X Dawson et al. 1977 A X X Neely 1984 X X Junke and Ludemann 1978 X X Junke and Ludemann 1978 X X Junke and Ludemann 1978 X X Junke and Ludemann 1978 X X X Junke and Ludemann 1978 X X Junke and Ludemann 1978 X X CMA 1994 A X X X X Dawson et al. 1977 X X Verschueren 1983 X X X X Birdie 1979 X Environment Canada 1997 X X Devillers et al. 2002 X X X Dow 1979 X X Dill 1995 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 96 hr 96 hr 72 hr 48 hr 24 hr 96 hr 96 hr 5.4 X 89 X 114 160 181 117 130 X X X Biospherics 1981 A X X EPA 1984 X MBA 1984 X MBA 1984 X MBA 1984 X Welchem Inc. 1984 A OECD 1997 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 1 of 3 ED 001523 00008282-00133 Scientific Name Penaeus setiferus Penaeus setiferus Crangon crangon Crangon crangon Crangon crangon Hydra vulgaris Daphnia magna Daphnia magna Daphnia magna Daphnia magna Daphnia magna Daphnia magna Daphnia magna Daphnia magna Daphnia magna Artemia salina Amphibian Xenopus laevis Fish Brachydanio rerio Poecilia reticulata Invertebrates Brachionus calyciflorus Brachionus calyciflorus Brachionus calyciflorus Daphnia magna Daphnia magna Daphnia magna Daphnia magna Ceriodaphnia dubia Crassostrea gigas Crassostrea gigas Table 3-2. Aquatic Ecotoxicity Data for EGBE Toxicity Review Source WHO 1998; 2005 Staples et al. 1998 D evillers et al. 2002 EC and HC 2002 INERIS 2005 Common Name Effect Endpoint Duration EGBE Concentration (mg/L) Citation white shrimp white shrimp brown shrimp brown shrimp brown shrimp coeienterate water flea water flea water flea water flea water flea water flea water flea water flea water flea brine shrimp mortality mortality mortality mortality mortality mortality mortality mortality mortality immobilization mortality mortality mortality mortality mortality mortality LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC00 EC00 EC50 LC50 LC50 LC100 EC 100 LC50 LC50 72 hr 48 hr 96 hr 48 hr 96 hr 72 hr 48 hr 24 hr 24 hr 48 hr 24 hr 24 hr 24 hr 24 hr 24 hr 24 hr 147 173 550 600 698 690 835 1140 1283 1600 1698 1720 2500 2500 5000 1000 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X CHRONIC/INTERMEDIATE EXPOSURES MBA 1984 MBA 1984 Verschueren 1983 Verschueren 1983 X Blackman 1974 A X Bowden et al. 1995 X Dow 1979 X Bringmann and Kuhn 1977 X Bringmann and Kuhn 1982 X Devillers et al. 2002 X Bringmann and Kuhn 1982 X Bringmann and Kuhn 1977 X Bringmann and Kuhn 1977 X Bringmann and Kuhn 1982 X CMA 1994 A Price et al. 1974 African clawed frog mortality LOEC zebrafish guppy mortality mortality LOEC LC50 rotifer rotifer rotifer water flea water flea water flea water flea water flea Japanese oyster Japanese oyster reproduction reproduction reproduction reproduction reproduction reproduction reproduction reproduction development development EC10 EC20 EC50 NOEC EC10 EC20 EC50 EC10 NOEC LOEC 12 d 21 d 7 day 48 hr 48 hr 48 hr 21 d 21 d 21 d 21 d 7 d 24 hr 24 hr 2000 >100 982 7.2 14.3 164 100 134 175 297 134.9 100 1000 X X X X X X X X X X X Devillers et al. 2002 X European Union 2005 X Koenemann 1981 X Devillers et al. 2002 X Devillers et al. 2002 X Devillers et al. 2002 X Devillers et al. 2002 X European Union 2005 X European Union 2005 X European Union 2005 X Devillers et al. 2003 Devillers et al. 2002 Devillers et al. 2002 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 2 of 3 ED 001523 00008282-00134 WHO 1998; 2005 Staples et al. 1998 D evillers et al. 2002 EC and HC 2002 INERIS 2005 Scientific Name Common Name Effect Table 3-2. Aquatic Ecotoxicity Data for EGBE Endpoint Duration EGBE Concentration (mg/L) Toxicity Review Source Citation Algae, Bacteria, Protozoans Microcystis aeruginosa Entosiphon sulcatum Seienastrum capricornutum Seienastrum capricornutum Seienastrum capricornutum Uronema parduczi Pseudomonas putida Scenedesmus quadricaudata Chilomonas parmecium Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata cyanobacterium protozoan green alga green alga green alga protozoan bacterium green alga protozoan algae algae algae algae algae growth LOEC growth LOEC growth NOEC growth LOEC growth EC50 growth EC05 growth LOEC growth LOEC growth EC05 growth (biomass NOEC growth (rate) NOEC growth EC50 growth EC50 growth EC50 8 day 72 hr 7 day 7 day 7 day 48 hr 16 hr 7 day 48 hr 72 hr 72 hr 72 hr 72 hr 24 hr 35 91 125 250 >1000 463 700 900 911 88.2 286 944 1840 4183 A. Ecotoxicity values did not meet data quality requirements for inclusion in other risk assessments (INERIS 2005) EC: Environment Canada EC00: effect concentration for 0 percent of organisms tested EC05: effect concentration for 5 percent of organisms tested EC10: effect concentration for 10 percent of organisms tested EC100: effect concentration for 100 percent of organisms tested EC20: effect concentration for 20 percent of organisms tested EC50: median effect concentration EGBE: ethylene giycol monobutyi ether HC: Health Canada INERIS: National Institute for Industrial Environment and Risks (France) LC00: lethal concentration for 0 percent of organisms tested LC100: lethal concentration for 100 percent of organisms tested LC50: median lethal concentration LOEC: lowest observed effect concentration NOEC: no observed effect concentration WHO: World Health Organization X X X X X Bringmann and Kuhn 1980a X X X X Bringmann and Kuhn 1980a X X X Dow 1988 X X Dow 1988 X X X Dow 1988 X X X X Bringmann and Kuhn 1980b X X X X Bringmann and Kuhn 1980a X X X X Bringmann and Kuhn 1980a X X X X Bringmann and Kuhn 1980b X Devillers et al. 2002 X X Devillers et al. 2002 X Devillers et al. 2002 X Devillers et al. 2002 Escher et al. 2008 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 3 of 3 ED 001523 00008282-00135 Table 5-1. Comparison of Glycol Ether TRI-Reported Releases from 1993 through 2011 Information Number of Facilities Reporting GE Emissions to Any Media Number of Facilities Reporting Non-zero GE Emissions to Any Media Total GE Releases (All Facilities) (tpy) CO CD CD v~ 2,251 2,036 24,106 Maximum GE Release per Facility (tpy) 375 95th Percentile Release per Facility (tpy) 57 50th Percentile Release per Facility (tpy) 1.9 Average Release per Facility (tpy) 12 % Releases to Air (All Facilities) 97% Average % Released to Air (by Facility) 92% Total GE Releases to Air (All Facilities) (tpy) 23,448 2003 1,913 1,459 12,463 196 44 1.4 8.5 94% 89% 11,699 2004 1,850 1,423 11,774 347 39 1.2 8.3 93% 89% 10,942 2005 1,793 1,372 10,924 495 35 1.0 8.0 89% 89% 9,699 2006 1,740 1,247 10,148 396 36 1.3 8.1 90% 89% 9,101 2008 1,579 1,198 8,353 393 29 0.9 7.0 87% 87% 7,282 2009 1,478 1,109 7,015 293 31 0.7 6.3 90% 88% 6,285 2010 1,510 1,149 7,434 365 29 0.6 6.5 88% 88% 6,541 Maximum GE Release to Air per Facility (tpy) 375 196 176 187 179 167 172 189 2011 1,492 % Change (1993-2011) -34% 1,099 -46% 7,229 361 27 0.5 6.0 87% 88% 6,304 173 -70% -4% -53% -73% -49% -10% -4% -73% -54% 95th Percentile Release to Air per Facility (tpy) 50th Percentile Release to Air per Facility (tpy) Average Release to Air per Facility (tpy) 56 41 37 35 1.5 0.86 0.75 0.75 12 8.0 7.7 7.2 35 0.88 7.4 28 31 28 21 0.55 0.49 0.43 0.13 6.2 5.8 5.8 5.2 -63% -91% -55% Source: www.epa.gov/tri a. 1993 TRI data are included because they were the basis for the Hazardous Air Pollutants petition (CMA 1997) GE: Certain Glycol Ethers tpy: tons per year TRI: Toxic Release Inventory 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00136 Source Type Area (10 m) Area (20 m) Area (30 m) Point Point Point Point Point Point Point Table 6-1. Screening Table Showing Threshold Emissions (tpy) for the Reference Concentration of 1.6 mg/m3 Release Height (m) 0 0 0 0 2 5 10 20 35 50 10 m 1.7 3.1 4.6 0.3 8.6 16.6 57.8 232 708 1,441 30 m 5.3 8.7 12.2 2.0 11.3 21.4 65.6 354 708 1,455 Receptor Distance 50 m 9.8 15.0 20.2 4.9a 11.9 30.9 75.8b 354 1,416 1,441 100 m 24.7 33.5 42.8 16.5 22.0 58.8 117.6 421 1,441 3,412 200 m 69.0 83.8 99.4 55.0 60.6 108.1 223 656 1,782 3,783 500 m 289 317 349.3 263 268 309 556 1,509 3,628 6,324 a. Preliminary emission rate used in the Step A screening (Table 6-2) b. Preliminary emission rate used in the Step A screening of the cluster analysis m: meter(s) tpy: tons per year threshold = RfC / [P/Qfrier 1 WHERE: = threshold threshold emissions (tpy) RfC = Reference Concentration (expressed in pg/m3), and [P/Q]Tjer i = normalized ambient concentration in Tier 1 (USEPA 1992c) lookup table (pgxm'3/tpy) 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00137 Table 6-2. Number of Facilities with Total TRI-Reported Air Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers Relative to 4.9 tpy (Step A) Classification Less than 4.9 tpy Equal to or Greater than 4.9 tpy Total Percent of Total Less than 4.9 tpy No. Facilities (2009) 824 260 1,084 76% tpy: tons per year Emissions Data Source: Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) No. Facilities (2010) 850 273 1,123 76% No. Facilities (2011) 823 276 1,099 75% 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00138 Table 6-3. Number of Facilities with Total Air Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers Greater than Site-Specific Screening ValuesfStep B) Classification Complete Site-Specific Data Received Partial Site-Specific Data Received Default Assumptions Used Total 2009 Number of Facilities Screened Number Screened Ouf Number Retained 35 21 14 4 4 0 221 220 1 260 245 15 Number of Facilities Screened 34 2010 Number Screened Out 20 Number Retained 14 4 3 1 235 235 0 273 258 15 Number of Facilities Screened 31 2011 Number Screened Out 18 Number Retained 13 4 3 1 241 241 0 276 262 14 a. All facilities retained for additional screening following Step A in any of the 3 years were subjected to Step B screening. Note that one facility retained from the 2009 TRI (Aurora Casket) was not subjected to additional Tier 1 screening because it is no longer operational. Emissions Data Source: Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Note: Site-specific data employed: 1) Minimum stack release height (meters) 2) Minimum distance to property fenceline (meters) 3) Percent of certain glycol ethers released as ethylene glycol monobutyl ether (EGBE) 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00139 Table 6-4. Long-Term (Chronic Exposure) Tier 1 Modeling Results Source Type 2009 TRI Maximum Annuai Tier 1 EGBE Cone. (pg/m3) 2010 TRI Long-Term HQ (combined) Maximum Annuai Tier 1 EGBE Cone. (pg/m3) 2011 TRI Long-Term HQ (combined) Maximum Annuai Tier 1 EGBE Cone. (pg/m3) Long-Term HQ (combined) Point 3654.7 3 Volume 589.5 3176.1 512.3 2 3553.4 3 573.2 Point 104.4 0.4 87.5 Volume 498.5 535.1 0.4 74.7 0.4 623.5 Point 2852.4 2 Volume 651.8 3056.1 688.0 2 2954.3 2 675.9 Point 1753.1 2 1665.4 2 1598.8 2 Volume 1526.5 1450.2 1392.2 Point 2885.0 2 3158.4 3 2214.1 2 Volume 971.0 1070.7 882.0 Point 2268.3 2 2275.3 2 2099.0 2 Volume 521.7 523.3 482.6 Point 1049.7 1 1364.6 1 1469.6 1 Volume 718.4 413.1 431.0 Point 2743.0 2 2743.0 2 2848.5 2 Volume 884.5 902.5 920.6 Point 1329.8 1 Volume 451.3 1354.2 1 463.9 1298.8 1 440.1 Point 47.4 0.5 46.0 0.5 49.8 0.6 Volume 823.6 799.2 865.6 Point 1833.0 2 1919.7 2 1998.5 2 Volume 725.5 761.0 789.3 Point 1342.4 1 Volume 515.3 1395.9 1 536.8 691.5 0.6 246.4 Point 1253.3 1 1171.5 1 1185.5 1 Volume 608.1 568.4 575.2 Point 2068.4 2 1953.6 2 1950.4 1 Volume 475.7 449.3 448.6 Point 1177.4 1 1336.4 1 1100.4 1 Volume 579.7 659.1 542.7 Hazard quotient (HQ) equals the sum of the maximum annuai average concentration for fugitive/volume source emissions and point source emissions, at or beyond the fe EGBE: ethylene glycol monobutyi ether HQ: hazard quotient RfC: reference concentration TRI: Toxics Release inventory pg/m3: micrograms per cubic meter Bold text indicates an HQ greater than 1 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00140 Table 6-5, Long-Term (Chronic Exposure) Tier 2 Modeling Results (2009, 2010, and 2011 TRI Data) 2009 TRI 2010 TRI 2011 TRI City Zip State Code Maximum Predicted Annual Concentration (mg/m3)a Chronic HQ (combined fugitive and point) Maximum Predicted Annual Concentration (mg/m3)a Chronic HQ (combined fugitive and point) Maximum Predicted Annual Concentration (mg/m3)1 Chronic HQ (combined fugitive and point) Lawrence MA 01843 1.20 0.7 1.04 0.6 1.16 0.7 Williamsburg VA 23185 0.54 0.3 0.58 0.4 0.56 0.4 Weirton WV 26062 0.28 0.2 0.26 0.2 0.25 0.2 Winston-Salem NC 27107 0.36 0.2 0.40 0.2 0.29 0.2 Bishopville SC 29010 0.89 0.6 0.89 0.6 0.83 0.5 Columbus OH 43213 0.46 0.3 0.56 0.3 0.60 0.4 Findlay OH 45840 0.28 0.2 0.28 0.2 0.29 0.2 La Porte IN 46350 0.25 0.2 0.25 0.2 0.24 0.1 Owatonna MN 55060 0.30 0.2 0.32 0.2 0.33 0.2 Chicago IL 60609 0.57 0.4 0.59 0.4 0.29 0.2 Bradley IL 60915 0.28 0.2 0.26 0.2 0.27 0.2 Kent WA 98032 1.08 0.7 1.02 0.6 1.02 0.6 Olympia WA 98501 0.47 0.3 0.54 0.3 0.44 0.3 *: Rexam Chicago facility was screened out from further analysis for the 2011 data following Step B. a. Concentrations include point and voiume/fugitive source emissions. For point sources, the result for the individual stack at the facility with the maximum predicted concentration is shown at that HQ: hazard quotient. Maximum Predicted Annual Concentrations/RfC mg/m3: milligrams per cubic meter RfC: Reference concentration (1.6 mg/m3) TRI: Toxics Release Inventory 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00141 Table 6-6. ZIP Codes with More than One Facility Reporting Air Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers to the TRI in 2009 through 2011 ZIP 00985 01843 01950 02021 07001 07036 07105 12866 16148 16323 17331 17402 17601 17603 19067 19605 19904 26062 27261 27320 27409 27703 28273 29605 29644 29730 30043 30062 30253 30260 32254 32837 33760 35064 35234 35401 37355 38024 38109 38113 38118 38606 38654 39272 40210 42101 43015 43207 43537 43607 43612 City Carolina Lawrence Newbury port Canton Avenel Linden Newark Saratoga Springs Hermitage Franklin Hanover York Lancaster Lancaster Morrisville Reading Dover Weirton High Point Reidsville Greensboro Durham Charlotte Greenville Fountain Inn Rock Hill Lawrenceville Marietta Me Donough Morrow Jacksonville Orlando Clearwater Fairfield Birmingham Tuscaloosa Manchester Dyersburg Memphis Memphis Memphis Batesville Olive Branch Jackson Louisville Bowling Green Delaware Columbus Maumee Toledo Toledo State Puerto Rico Massachusetts Massachusetts Massachusetts New Jersey New Jersey New Jersey New York Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Delaware West Virginia North Carolina North Carolina North Carolina North Carolina North Carolina South Carolina South Carolina South Carolina Georgia Georgia Georgia Georgia Florida Florida Florida Alabama Alabama Alabama Tennessee Tennessee Tennessee Tennessee Tennessee Mississippi Mississippi Mississippi Kentucky Kentucky Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Number of Facilities 2009 2 2 NA 2 2 2 NA 2 NA 2 2 NA 2 2 2 2 2 5 3 2 2 2 4 NA 2 2 2 2 2 2 NA NA 2 2 2 3 NA 2 NA 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2010 2 2 NA 2 2 NA NA NA 2 2 2 2 2 NA NA 2 2 5 2 2 2 2 3 NA 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 NA 2 NA 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2011 2 NA 2 2 2 NA 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 NA 2 2 2 5 NA 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 NA 2 NA NA 2 NA 2 2 NA 2 NA 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 3 Total Reported Emissions (tpy) 2009 2010 2011 30.2 27.7 24.3 72.2 62.7 NA NA NA 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.4 1.2 1.3 1.2 0.0 NA NA NA NA 0.3 24.2 NA 23.1 NA 2.3 2.4 11.4 11.9 8.7 37.4 37.7 33.3 NA 1.2 1.1 12.8 11.5 17.0 1.7 NA NA 0.4 NA 1.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 6.5 4.0 2.6 149.5 132.2 110.1 0.8 0.3 NA 77.1 94.6 102.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 5.6 6.6 0.2 2.3 2.7 3.0 NA NA 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.9 2.3 2.7 0.4 0.4 0.5 8.8 20.5 20.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 NA 35.0 25.6 NA 2.0 1.6 0.5 0.4 NA 3.7 3.6 2.7 11.6 10.3 NA 0.8 0.9 NA NA 20.6 34.6 6.4 1.5 NA NA 0.1 0.0 7.1 3.4 1.8 0.0 NA NA 29.5 25.7 26.0 92.2 NA NA 18.7 15.0 15.4 1.7 1.9 4.1 1.0 1.1 1.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.8 1.0 1.0 11.3 17.2 16.8 12.5 15.4 29.3 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 1 of 4 ED 001523 00008282-00142 Table 6-6. ZIP Codes with More than One Facility Reporting Air Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers to the TRI in 2009 through 2011 ZIP 43615 44062 44077 44087 44109 44483 45036 45365 45840 46135 46225 46320 46350 46540 46705 46721 47331 47905 47933 48091 48121 48174 48184 48192 48211 48220 48312 48341 48359 53014 53027 53051 53066 53095 53154 53177 53223 53224 53913 54143 54220 60007 60090 60174 60178 60410 60411 60426 60439 60455 60501 City Toledo Middlefield Painesville Twinsburg Cleveland Warren Lebanon Sidney Findlay Greencastle Indianapolis Hammond La Porte Middlebury Ashley Butler Connersville Lafayette Crawfordsville Warren Dearborn Romulus Wayne Wyandotte Detroit Ferndale Sterling Heights Pontiac Lake Orion Chilton Hartford Menomonee Falls Oconomowoc West Bend Oak Creek Sturtevant Milwaukee Milwaukee Baraboo Marinette Manitowoc Elk Grove Village Wheeling Saint Charles Sycamore Channahon Chicago Heights Harvey Lemont Bridgeview Bedford Park State Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Indiana Indiana Indiana Indiana Indiana Indiana Indiana Indiana Indiana Indiana Michigan Michigan Michigan Michigan Michigan Michigan Michigan Michigan Michigan Michigan Wisconsin Wisconsin Wisconsin Wisconsin Wisconsin Wisconsin Wisconsin Wisconsin Wisconsin Wisconsin Wisconsin Wisconsin Illinois Illinois Illinois Illinois Illinois Illinois Illinois Illinois Illinois Illinois Number of Facilities 2009 2 NA 2 2 2 2 NA 2 2 2 2 2 2 NA NA 2 2 3 2 3 3 NA 2 2 2 2 2 2 NA NA 2 3 NA 2 2 2 2 3 NA 2 NA 6 2 2 NA 2 2 2 2 2 2 2010 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 NA 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 NA NA NA 2 4 NA 2 3 2 2 3 NA NA NA 6 2 2 2 NA 2 2 2 2 NA 2011 2 NA 2 2 2 2 NA 2 2 2 NA 2 2 2 NA NA 2 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 NA 2 2 2 4 2 2 3 3 NA 3 2 NA 2 6 2 2 2 NA 2 2 2 2 NA Total Reported Emissions (tpy) 2009 2010 2011 1.1 1.0 1.2 NA 0.2 NA 0.3 0.8 1.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 21.7 19.4 22.3 NA 3.8 NA 15.8 17.7 24.0 177.3 177.4 182.0 3.2 NA 6.9 0.0 0.1 NA 6.0 6.3 5.9 72.0 76.1 72.4 NA 4.0 6.1 NA 10.1 NA 31.0 29.8 NA 0.1 0.1 0.1 23.3 37.7 32.3 23.7 26.1 28.2 7.0 6.2 9.4 88.8 66.5 66.2 NA 0.2 0.2 8.6 11.6 6.2 2.4 3.1 3.1 4.1 3.6 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.2 1.7 5.0 3.5 NA NA NA NA 4.0 NA NA 11.5 23.2 21.7 20.6 5.8 5.5 6.1 NA NA 7.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 15.9 46.0 54.2 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.3 NA 51.7 47.4 44.4 NA NA 30.1 3.2 NA NA NA NA 2.6 8.4 12.3 9.9 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.4 1.4 1.3 NA 10.6 7.4 0.0 NA NA 31.5 37.6 36.2 16.2 25.9 7.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 8.4 9.5 8.5 0.5 NA NA 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 2 of 4 ED 001523 00008282-00143 Table 6-6. ZIP Codes with More than One Facility Reporting Air Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers to the TRI in 2009 through 2011 ZIP 60510 60517 60608 60609 60623 60632 60633 60803 61104 61265 62040 62201 63043 63077 63111 63147 64116 65708 65712 66106 67219 68701 70560 70765 70776 70805 72315 72764 72764 73036 74063 74075 74601 75006 75041 75149 75165 75501 75604 75662 75901 76011 76063 77041 77051 77303 77478 77507 77571 77630 77651 City Batavia Woodridge Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Alsip Rockford Moline Granite City Sauget Maryland Heights Saint Clair Saint Louis Saint Louis North Kansas City Monett Mount Vernon Kansas City Wichita Norfolk New Iberia Plaquemine Saint Gabriel Baton Rouge Blytheville Springdale Springdale El Reno Sand Springs Stillwater Ponca City Carrollton Garland Mesquite Waxahachie Texarkana Longview Kilgore Lufkin Arlington Mansfield Houston Houston Conroe Sugar Land Pasadena La Porte Orange Port Neches State Illinois Illinois Illinois Illinois Illinois Illinois Illinois Illinois Illinois Illinois Illinois Illinois Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Kansas Kansas Nebraska Louisiana Louisiana Louisiana Louisiana Arizona Arizona Arkansas Oklahoma Oklahoma Oklahoma Oklahoma Texas Texas Texas Texas Texas Texas Texas Texas Texas Texas Texas Texas Texas Texas Texas Texas Texas Texas Number of Facilities 2009 3 2 2 2 3 NA 2 NA 2 2 NA NA 2 2 2 2 3 NA 2 2 NA 2 NA 2 2 2 NA NA 2 NA NA 2 2 2 3 NA 4 2 NA NA 2 2 NA 2 2 2 NA 5 2 NA NA 2010 3 NA 2 2 3 2 2 NA NA 2 2 2 NA 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 NA 2 NA NA 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 NA 2 NA NA 2 2 2 NA 2 2 2 NA 5 2 2 2 2011 3 NA 2 2 3 2 2 2 NA 2 2 2 NA 2 NA 2 3 NA NA 2 2 2 2 NA NA 2 2 2 NA 2 2 2 NA 3 4 2 NA NA 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 5 NA 2 2 Total Reported Emissions (tpy) 2009 2010 2011 0.8 1.1 2.2 0.0 NA NA 9.9 14.4 3.4 91.1 111.1 67.1 24.7 48.0 46.1 NA 6.6 8.9 1.1 1.6 1.2 NA NA 19.0 1.2 NA NA 1.7 1.6 1.6 NA 6.0 5.8 NA 0.0 0.0 2.1 NA NA 0.3 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.2 NA 0.3 0.3 0.3 4.8 2.9 2.9 NA 11.2 NA 12.8 11.7 NA 0.2 0.2 0.2 NA 6.1 5.9 11.5 10.4 10.4 NA 1.6 1.9 0.6 1.9 NA 0.5 NA NA 0.4 0.8 0.1 NA NA 12.0 NA NA 12.1 12.9 10.0 NA NA 7.8 7.7 NA 0.2 0.1 4.9 2.3 3.5 24.0 20.6 NA 3.2 2.3 2.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 NA NA 2.0 0.7 0.1 NA 0.6 NA NA NA NA 52.5 NA 0.1 0.1 2.2 2.3 1.8 4.7 1.5 3.4 NA NA 0.6 1.8 1.3 1.4 1.1 1.0 0.8 18.9 18.8 49.7 NA NA 31.5 8.8 10.5 8.3 4.8 2.1 NA NA 0.3 0.3 NA 0.3 0.2 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 3 of 4 ED 001523 00008282-00144 Table 6-6. ZIP Codes with More than One Facility Reporting Air Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers to the TRI in 2009 through 2011 ZIP 80216 80550 85043 90670 90810 91311 91730 92335 92704 93308 94533 95824 97203 97210 98108 City Denver Windsor Phoenix Santa Fe Springs Carson Chatsworth Rancho Cucamonga Fontana Santa Ana Bakersfield Fairfield Sacramento Portland Portland Seattle State Colorado Colorado Arizona California California California California California California California California California Oregon Oregon Washington Number of Facilities 2009 2 2 2 5 2 3 2 2 2 NA 4 NA 2 NA 2 2010 2 2 NA 5 2 3 3 2 NA 2 4 NA 2 2 2 2011 NA 2 NA 5 2 3 3 2 NA NA 4 2 2 NA 2 Total Reported Emissions (tpy) 2009 2010 2011 0.0 0.0 NA 57.5 55.0 54.3 39.8 NA NA 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.3 0.4 0.4 54.6 44.4 29.0 0.4 1.4 1.3 2.0 1.0 0.4 0.0 NA NA NA 0.0 NA 45.7 29.0 30.8 NA NA 5.2 3.5 4.1 3.2 NA 0.1 NA 3.0 0.2 0.2 tpy: tons per year NA: no releases reported TRI: toxics release inventory 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production Page 4 of 4 ED 001523 00008282-00145 Table 6-7. ZIP Codes and Facilities Identified for Dispersion Modeling Following Step B Screening City Chicago Chicago State IL IL Findlay OH Findlay OH La Porte IN La Porte IN Weirton WV Weirton WV Weirton WV Weirton WV Weirton WV Reidsville NC Reidsville NC ZIP 60609 60609 45840 45840 46350 46350 26062 26062 26062 26062 26062 27320 27320 Total Air (tpy) 2009 TRI 2010 TRI 2011 TRI 26 43 34 65 68 33 91 111 67 23 22 22 155 155 161 177 177 182 5 8 7 67 68 65 72 76 72 2 2 0.4 37 23 13 101 96 92 6 4 149 77 0.05 77 7 4 132 95 0.05 95 3 2 109 102 0.05 102 closed in September 2011 and has not reopened. b. Zip code included because although 1 facility accounted for more than 90% of emissions, the conservative screening level was within 10% of the RfC. Note: TRI Data are based on reported emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers, assuming that those are 100% ethylene glycol monobutyl ether. Gray shading indicates zip codes that screened out from further analysis based on this screening. Cumulative RfC: reference concentration (1.6 mg/m3) tpy: tons per year TRI: Toxic Release Inventory 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00146 Table 6-8. Results of Chronic Tier 2 & 3 Modeling for Facility Clusters Zip Codes 2009 Chicago, IL 60609 Findlay, OH 45840 La Porte, IN 46350 Weirton, WV 26062 Reidsville, NC 27320 2010 Chicago, IL 60609 Findlay, OH 45840 La Porte, IN 46350 Weirton, WV 26062 Reidsville, NC 27320 2011 Chicago, IL 60609 Findlay, OH 45840 La Porte, IN 46350 Weirton, WV 26062 Reidsville, NC 27320 T2 AERMOD Modeling Result (Screening Met Data) Chronic Exposure (mg/m3) Chronic MOEa 0.91 Out 0.45 Out 0.26 Out 0.41 Out 0.57 Out 1.16 Out 0.45 Out 0.27 Out 0.32 Out 0.70 Out 0.74 Out 0.45 Out 0.26 Out 0.26 Out 0.74 Out T3 AERMOD Modeling (SiteSpecific Met Data) Chronic Exposure (mg/m3) Chronic MOEa 0.11 15 - - -- - 0.16 10 - - 0.18 9 - - - - 0.16 10 - - 0.14 11 - - - - 0.15 10 - - Basis: 2009, 2010, and 2011 TRI data a. Chronic exposure results are compared to the Reference Concentration (RfC) of 1.6 mg/m3. "Out" indicates the facility was screened out (concentration does not exceed the RfC) and "Retain" indicates the facility was not screened out. b. The chronic MOE is determined by dividing the RfC by the estimated exposure concentration. It represents the factor by which the estimated exposure would have to increase to equal the RfC. --: Zip code not subjected to sensitivity analysis using Tier 3 modeling. mg/m3: milligrams per cubic meter MOE: margin of exposure 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00147 Table 6-9. Uncertainty Analysis Long-Term (Chronic Exposure) Tier 3 Modeling for Selected Facilities (2009, 2010, and 2011 TRI Data) Facility Name City State Zip Code Lawrence MA Kent WA 01843 98032 Bishopville SC 29010 Weirton Winston Salem Chicago WV 26062 NC 27107 IL 60609 2009 TRI AERMOD Maximum Predicted Annual Average Concentration Chronic HQ (combined fugitive and point) (Mg/m3) 2010 TRI AERMOD Maximum Predicted Annual Average Concentration (M9/m3) Chronic HQ (combined fugitive and point) 2011 TRI AERMOD Maximum Predicted Annual Average Concentration (Mg/m3) Chronic HQ (combined fugitive and point) 261.9 0.2 228.7 0.1 255.9 0.2 269.4 0.2 253.4 0.2 253.0 0.2 153.1 0.1 149.4 0.09 137.8 0.09 158.1 0.1 158.1 0.10 151.8 0.09 157.4 0.1 172.8 0.11 128.4 0.08 85.3 0.05 87.7 0.05 43.0 0.03 HQ: hazard quotient. Maximum Predicted Annual Concentrations/RfC gg/m3: micrograms per cubic meter RfC: Reference concentration (1,600 gg/m3) TRI: Toxics Release Inventory Modeling results based on 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI data 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00148 Table 6-10. Comparison of Concentrations Using the Tiered Modeling Approach 2011 Tiered Modeling Results (mg/m3) Step A impact3 22.8 Step B Impact13 4.19 Tier 1 impact 4.13 Tier 2 impact 1.16 Tier 3 impact 0.26 Change in Maximum impact Step A to Step B to Step B Tier 1 -82% -2% Tier 1 to Tier 2 -72% Tier 2 to Step A to Tier Tier 3 3 -78.0% -98.9% 15.7 1.90 0.70 0.08 -88% -63% -89% 56.2 3.93 3.63 0.56 - -93% -8% -84% -- -- 30.0 6.01 2.99 0.25 0.15 -80% -50% -92% -40.1% -99.5% 44.3 3.10 3.10 0.29 0.13 -93% 0% -91% -55.7% -99.7% 29.0 3.81 2.58 0.83 0.14 -87% -32% -68% -83.3% -99.5% 26.7 2.18 1.90 0.60 - -92% -13% -68% -- -- 52.2 3.77 3.77 0.29 - -93% 0% -92% -- -- 21.3 1.79 1.74 0.24 - -92% -3% -86% -- -- 8.4 3.11 0.92 0.14 - -63% -71% -85% -- -- 41.5 3.14 2.79 0.33 - -92% -11% -88% -- -- 10.8 1.47 0.94 0.29 0.043 -86% -36.3% -69% -85.2% -99.6% 21.1 3.01 1.76 0.27 - -86% -41% -85% -- -- 27.0 3.54 2.40 1.02 0.25 -87% -32% -57% -75.2% -99.1% 20.8 1.71 1.64 0.44 - -92% -4% -73% -- -- Note: The 2011 TRI data are shown here for illustrative purposes. The percent changes in predicated concentrations are similar using 2009 and 2010 TRI data. a. Step A impacts calculated based on Tier 1 lookup table assuming all air emissions are from point sourece, stack height is 0 m, receptor distance is 10 m, and all Certain Glycol Ether emissions are EGBE. m: meter mg/m3: milligrams per cubic meter TRI: Toxics Release Inventory 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00149 2000 127,7 174,5 205,0 79.5 98.0 89.5 65.0 25.0 75.5 95.8 76,5 81.0 136.6 81,2 11.1 Table 6-11, Total TRI Air Emissions (Fugitive and Point-Source Air) by Year for Selected Facilities 2001 125.2 170.5 189.0 85.5 86.0 105,5 75.5 41.5 78.0 108,8 73.8 125,2 164.3 72.5 10.0 2002 125.1 167.0 178.5 85.5 89.4 103.2 73.5 31.5 99.5 108.3 72.0 80.4 169.8 56.0 4.8 2003 124.4 130.5 171.0 89.5 80.0 91.5 61.5 107,0 77.0 104.9 70.4 53.7 185.1 65.0 7.7 TRI Total Air Emissions (tpy) 2004 2005 2006 2007 105.4 124.2 103.6 76.4 118.5 130.0 130.0 154.0 164.5 144.5 143.5 179.5 82.4 98,4 96.0 78.6 55.3 18.7 25.5 24.9 91.5 96.0 91.8 56.4 40.0 57.8 39.3 33.9 103.9 75.9 91.1 101.1 80.5 108.2 80.4 59.0 97.6 89.8 102.0 90.0 76.2 70.3 71.1 68.5 48.4 68.0 89.0 92.3 84.8 123.8 179.0 172.4 62.0 58.0 63.5 65.8 7.7 2.5 NR NR 2008 70.9 153.5 167.0 68.0 23.5 74.4 34.2 106.2 105.0 103.0 68.4 61.5 147.5 61.5 7.4 2009 70.0 154.5 167.0 68.6 24.5 72.2 68.4 101.1 117.1 96.5 65.4 88.0 172.2 67.0 40.4 2010 76.5 155.0 178.5 64.1 23.8 62.7 77,7 96.1 122.6 96.8 68.0 83.1 188.8 68.4 42.4 2011 82.0 160.5 173.0 64.8 25.8 70.2 64.0 92.2 127,6 89.3 33.2 82.9 136.2 65.4 48,3 Factor by Which Max 2000 2011 Emissions Exceed Recent TRI Emissions 2009 2010 2011 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.5 4.0 4.1 3.8 1.5 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 2.3 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.1 1.0 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 Max Tier 3 Impacts (mg/m3)a - - - - - 0.262 - 0.158 - 0.153 0.088 0.269 0.330 - - Note: All emissions are for Certain Glycol Ethers as reported in the TRI Bold indicates the year with the maximum reported Certain Glycol Ether emissions in the TRI from 2000-2011. a. Maximum long-term Tier 3 impact from 2009, 2010, and 2011 (Table 6-8) Max: Maximum NR: not reported TRI: Toxics Release Inventory tpy: tons per year ~: Tier 3 modeling of facility emissions not conducted in this petition. 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00150 Table 6-12. Short-Term (Acute Exposure) Tier 1 Modeling Results 2009 TRI 2010 TRI 2011 TRI Source Type Maximum 1Hour Average Tier 1 EGBE Cone, (pg/m3) Short-Term HQ (combined) Maximum 1Hour Average Tier 1 EGBE Cone, (pg/m3) Short-Term HQ (combined) Maximum 1Hour Average Tier 1 EGBE Cone, (pg/m3) Short-Term HQ (combined) Point 1674648.6 18 Volume 25839.6 1455360.1 22455.8 1628244.9 15 17 25123.6 Point 4575.2 3835.5 3274.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 Volume 21848.5 23455.4 27327.9 Point 1614548.3 1729873.2 1672210.7 17 18 18 Volume 28567.5 30154.6 29625.6 Point 153263.2 145599.8 139775.7 2 2 2 Volume 66907.0 63561.5 61019.1 Point 126797.7 2 Volume 42558.5 138811.6 2 46926.7 97310.1 1 38656.2 Point 781664.4 784081.0 723321.2 8 8 8 Volume 22865.5 22936.6 21153.3 Point 516703.7 671714.9 723385.2 6 7 8 Volume 31488.0 18105.6 18892.8 Point 602446.2 602446.2 625617.2 7 7 7 Volume 38766.6 39557.8 40348.9 Point 625779.2 637261.3 611214.0 7 7 7 Volume 19778.9 20332.7 19289.9 Point 2071.7 2010.6 2177.7 0.4 0.4 0.4 Volume 36099.6 35030.0 37941.4 Point 373793.1 391475.5 407543.5 4 4 5 Volume 31796.9 33353.0 34594.6 Point 487099.1 506509.5 250922.0 5 5 3 Volume 22587.1 23527.5 10798.1 Point 364345.2 340549.6 344624.2 4 4 4 Volume 26654.8 24914.5 25212.3 Point 884003.8 834954.6 833594.9 9 9 9 Volume 20850.7 19693.1 19661.5 Point 185857.0 210964.4 173700.7 2 2 2 Volume 25408.8 28888.5 23785.3 Hazard quotient (HQ) equals the sum of the maximum annual average concentration for fugitive/volume source emissions and point source emissions, at or beyond the fe EGBE: ethylene glycol monobutyi ether HQ: hazard quotient RfC: reference concentration TRI: Toxics Release inventory pg/m3: micrograms per cubic meter 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00151 Table 6-13. Results of Acute Tier 2 & 3 Modeling for Facility Clusters Zip Code and Facilities 2009 Chicago, IL 60609 Findlay, OH 45840 La Porte, IN 46350 Weirton, WV 26062 Reidsville, NC 27320 2010 Chicago, IL 60609 Findlay, OH 45840 La Porte, IN 46350 Weirton, WV 26062 Reidsville, NC 27320 2011 Chicago, IL 60609 Findlay, OH 45840 La Porte, IN 46350 Weirton, WV 26062 Reidsville, NC 27320 T2 AERMOD M odeling Result (Screening Met Data) T3 AERMOD Modeling (SiteSpecific Met Data) Acute Exposure (mg/m3) Acute MOEa Acute Exposure (mg/m3) Acute MOEa 39.7 Out 14.0 7 19.7 Out - - 11.4 Out - - 18.4 Out 8.25 12 24.9 Out - - 50.9 Out 23.5 4 19.6 Out - - 12.0 Out - - 16.0 Out 7.84 12 30.6 Out ~ - 32.4 Out 18.5 5 19.7 Out ~ ~ 11.4 Out - - 13.5 Out 7.52 13 32.6 Out - - Basis: 2009, 2010, and 2011 TRI data a. Acute exposure results are compared to the no observed adverse effects level (NOAEL) of 97 mg/m3. "Out'1 indicates the facility was screened out (concentration does not exceed the NOAEL) and "Retain" indicates the facility was not screened out. b. The acute MOE is determined by dividing the NOAEL by the estimated exposure concentration. It represents the factor by which the estimated exposure would have to increase to equal the NOAEL. -- : Zip code not subjected to sensitivity analysis using Tier 3 modeling. mg/m3: milligrams per cubic meter MOE: margin of exposure 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00152 Table 6-14. Results of Short-Term Tier 2 & 3 Modeling and Acute MOE Analysis for Selected High Emitting Facilities City State Zip Columbus OH 43213 Findlay OH 45840 Williamsburg VA 23185 Bradley IL 60915 Olympia WA 98501 Lawrence MA 01843 Weirton WV 26062 Owatonna MN 55060 Bishopville SC 29010 Chicago IL 60609 Kent WA 98032 Winston Salem NC 27107 LaPorte IN 46350 Tier 2 Maximum 1-Hr Concentration (mg/m3)a 19.99 12.10 23.80 12.39 20.76 52.41 12.16 13.23 39.05 24.75 47.46 15.36 10.76 2009 Acute Tier 3 Maximum 1-Hr Concentration MOEb (mg/m3)a 4.9 - 8.0 - 4.1 - 7.8 - 4.7 - 1.9 15.24 8.0 8.24 7.3 - 2.5 9.06 3.9 4.16 2.0 7.66 6.3 16.71 9.0 - Acute MOEb - - - - - 6.4 12 - 11 23 13 5.8 - Tier 2 Maximum 1-Hr Concentration (mg/m3)a 24.42 12.19 25.47 11.58 23.56 45.54 11.55 13.86 39.17 25.74 44.83 16.85 10.97 2010 Tier 3 Maximum 1-Hr Acute Concentration MOEb (mg/m3)a 4.0 - 8.0 - 3.8 - 8.4 ~ 4.1 - 2.1 13.24 8.4 7.83 7.0 ~ 2.5 9.09 3.8 4.33 2.2 7.23 5.8 18.31 8.8 - Basis: 2009, 2010, and 2011 TRI data a. Concentrations are the sum of the predicted maximum 1-hour concentration for (i) fugitive/volume source emissions and (ii) point source emissions, at or beyond the fence line. b. To calculate the MOE, the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for irritation in humans of 97 mg/m3 is divided by the concentration from combined fugitive/volume and point source emissions. Facility not subjected to sensitivity analysis using Tier 3 modeling. mg/m3: milligrams per cubic meter MOE: margin of exposure Acute MOEb - - - ~ - 7.3 12 ~ 11 22 13 5.3 - Tier 2 Maximum 1-Hr Concentration (mg/m3)a 26.26 12.58 24.65 11.72 19.40 50.95 11.09 14.42 36.13 12.69 44.76 12.32 10.51 2011 Acute Tier 3 Maximum 1-Hr Concentration MOEb (mg/m3)a 3.7 - 7.7 - 3.9 - 8.3 ~ 5.0 - 1.9 14.82 8.7 7.52 6.7 - 2.7 8.38 7.6 2.12 2.2 7.22 7.9 13.126 9.2 - Acute MOEb - - - ~ 6.5 13 - 12 46 13 7.4 - 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00153 Table 7-1. Hazards from Surface Water Exposure to EGBE Residential Scenario: Ingestion of EGBE in Drinking Water Hypothetical adolescent and adult (12+ years) Chemical Cw Cone, in Water (mg/L) IR Ingestion Rate (L/day) EF ED Ao BW Exposure Exposure Oral Body Frequency Duration Abs. Factor Weight (days/year) (years) (unitless) (kg) EGBE 0.00020 2 350 18 1.0 70 AT Averaging Time (days) 6,570 ADI Average Daily Intake (mg/kg-day) RfD Reference Dose (mg/kg-day) HQ Hazard Quotient (unitless) 0.00001 0.1 0.00005 Hypothetical child (6-12 years) Chemical Cw Cone, in Water (mg/L) IR Ingestion Rate (L/day) EF ED Ao BW Exposure Exposure Oral Body Frequency Duration Abs. Factor Weight (days/year) (years) (unitless) (kg) EGBE 0.00020 2 350 7 1.0 30 AT Averaging Time (days) 2,555 ADI Average Daily Intake (mg/kg-day) RfD Reference Dose (mg/kg-day) HQ Hazard Quotient (unitless) 0.00001 0.1 0.0001 Hypothetical young child (1-5 years) Chemical Cw Cone, in Water (mg/L) IR Ingestion Rate (L/day) EF ED Ao BW Exposure Exposure Oral Body Frequency Duration Abs. Factor Weight (days/year) (years) (unitless) (kg) EGBE 0.00020 1 350 5 1.0 15 AT Averaging Time (days) 1,825 ADI Average Daily Intake (mg/kg-day) RfD Reference Dose (mg/kg-day) HQ Hazard Quotient (unitless) 0.00001 0.1 0.0001 ADI = Cw x IR x EF x ED x Ao x (1/BW) x (1/AT) HQ = ADI/RfD EGBE: ethylene glycol monobutyl ether 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00154 Table 7-2. Hazards from Surface Water Exposure to EGBE Residential Scenario: Dermal Contact with EGBE While Bathing and Showering Hypothetical adolescent and adult (12+ years) DAevent SA EV EF ED Absorbed Skin Surface Event Exposure Exposure Chemical Dose Area Exposed Frequency Frequency Duration (mg/cm2-event; (cm2) (events/day) (days/year) (years) BW Body Weight (kg) AT Averaging Time (days) ADI Average Daily Intake (mg/kg-day) RfD Reference Dose (mg/kg-day) HQ Hazard Quotient (unitless) EGBE 3.6E-10 23,000 1 350 18 70 6,570 0.0000001 0.1 0.000001 Hypothetical child (6-12 years) DAevent SA EV EF ED Chemical Absorbed Skin Surface Event Exposure Exposure Dose Area Exposed Frequency Frequency Duration (mg/cm2-event; (cm2) (events/day) (days/year) (years) EGBE 3.6E-10 12,914 1 350 7 BW Body Weight (kg) AT Averaging Time (days) ADI Average Daily Intake (mg/kg-day) RfD Reference Dose (mg/kg-day) 30 2,555 0.0000001 0.1 HQ Hazard Quotient (unitless) 0.000001 Hypothetical young child (1-5 years) DAevent SA EV EF ED Chemical Absorbed Skin Surface Event Exposure Exposure Dose Area Exposed Frequency Frequency Duration (mg/cm2-event; (cm2) (events/day) (days/year) (years) EGBE 3.6E-10 7,446 1 350 5 BW Body Weight (kg) AT Averaging Time (days) 15 1,825 ADI RfD Average Reference Daily Intake Dose (mg/kg-day) (mg/kg-day) 0.0000002 0.1 HQ Hazard Quotient (unitless) 0.000002 ADI = DAevent x SA x EV x EF x ED x (1/BW) x (1/AT) HQ = ADI/RfD EGBE: ethylene glycol monobutyl ether 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00155 Table 7-3. Hazards from Surface Water Exposure to EGBE Recreational Scenario: Incidental Ingestion of EGBE in Surface Water While Swimming Hypothetical adolescent and adult (12+ years) Chemical Cw Cone, in Water (mg/L) IR Ingestion Rate (L/day) EF ED Exposure Exposure Frequency Duration (days/year) (years) Ao BW AT Oral Body Averaging Abs. Factor Weight Time (unitless) (kg) (days) ADI RfD Average Reference Daily Intake Dose (mg/kg-day) (mg/kg-day) HQ Hazard Quotient (unitless) EGBE 0.00020 0.13 36 18 1.0 70 6,570 0.00000004 0.1 0.0000004 Hypothetical child (6-12 years) Chemical Cw Cone, in Water (mg/L) IR Ingestion Rate (L/day) EF ED Exposure Exposure Frequency Duration (days/year) (years) Ao BW AT Oral Body Averaging Abs. Factor Weight Time (unitless) (kg) (days) ADI RfD Average Reference Daily Intake Dose (mg/kg-day) (mg/kg-day) HQ Hazard Quotient (unitless) EGBE 0.00020 0.13 108 7 1.0 30 2,555 0.0000003 0.1 0.000003 Hypothetical young child (1-5 years) Chemical EGBE Cw Cone, in Water (mg/L) 0.00020 IR Ingestion Rate EF ED Ao BW AT Exposure Exposure Oral Body Averaging Frequency Duration Abs. Factor Weight Time ADI Average Daily Intake RfD Reference Dose Hazard (L/day) (days/year) (years) (unitless) (kg) (days) (mg/kg-day) (mg/kg-day) (unitless) 0.13 36 5 1.0 15 1,825 0.0000002 0.1 0.0000017 ADI = Cw x IR x EF x ED x Ao x (1/BW) x (1/AT) HQ = ADI/RfD EGBE: ethylene glycol monobutyl ether 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00156 Table 7-4. Hazards from Surface Water Exposure to EGBE Recreational Scenario: Dermal Contact with EGBE in Surface Water While Swimming Hypothetical adolescent and adult (12+ years) Chemical DAevent SA EV EF ED Absorbed Skin Surface Event Exposure Exposure Dose Area Exposed Frequency Frequency Duration (mg/cm2-event) (cm2) (events/day) (days/year) (years) EGBE 3.6E-10 23,000 3 36 18 BW AT Body Averaging Weight Time (kg) (days) 70 6,570 ADI Average Daily Intake (mg/kg-day) 3.5E-08 RfD Reference Dose (mg/kg-day) HQ Hazard Quotient (unitless) 0.1 0.0000003 Hypothetical child (6-12 years) Chemical DAevent SA EV EF ED Absorbed Skin Surface Event Exposure Exposure Dose Area Exposed Frequency Frequency Duration (mg/cm2-event) (cm2) (events/day) (days/year) (years) EGBE 3.6E-10 12,914 3 108 7 BW AT Body Averaging Weight Time (kg) (days) 30 2,555 ADI Average Daily Intake (mg/kg-day) 1.4E-07 RfD Reference Dose (mg/kg-day) HQ Hazard Quotient (unitless) 0.1 0.0000014 Hypothetical young child (1-5 years) Chemical DAevent SA EV EF ED Absorbed Skin Surface Event Exposure Exposure Dose Area Exposed Frequency Frequency Duration (mg/cm2-event) (cm2) (events/day) (days/year) (years) EGBE 3.6E-10 7,446 3 36 5 BW AT Body Averaging Weight Time (kg) (days) 15 1,825 ADI Average Daily Intake (mg/kg-day) 5.3E-08 RfD Reference Dose Hazard (mg/kg-day) (unitless) 0.1 0.0000005 ADI = DAevent x SA x EV x EF x ED x (1/BW) x (1/AT) HQ = ADI/RfD EGBE: ethylene glycol monobutyl ether 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00157 Table 7-5. Summary of Hazards from Surface Water Exposures to EGBE Scenario Age Group Residential Adolescent and adult (12+ years) Child (6-12 years) Young Child (1-5 years) 30-year lifetime Pathway Ingestion Dermal Contact 0.00005 0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.000001 0.000001 0.000002 0.000004 Hazard Quotient 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 Recreational Adolescent and adult (12+ years) Child (6-12 years) Young Child (1-5 years) 30-year lifetime 0.0000004 0.000003 0.000002 0.00000 0.0000003 0.000001 0.0000005 0.000002 0.000001 0.00000 0.000002 0.00001 Note: Hazard quotients less than 1 indicate that average daily intake is less than the reference dose and that negligible health effects are anticipated. EGBE: ethylene glycol monobutyl ether 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00158 Table 7-6. Comparison of Hazards from Surface Water Exposures Predicted in HAPs Petition and This Petition Maximum Exposed Individual Concentration of EGBE in Water (mg/L) Predicted Ingestion Dose (mg/kg BW-day) Predicted Dermal Dose (mg/kg BW-day) Cumulative Predicted Dose (mg/kg BW-day) HAPs Petition Resident 0.13 0.02 0.00004 0.02 This Petition Resident 0.00020 0.00001 0.0000002 0.00001 Reference Dose (mg/kg BW-day) 3 0.1 Maximum Hazard Quotient 0.007 0.0001 EGBE: ethylene glycol monobutyl ether mg/L: milligrams per liter mg/kg BW-day: milligrams per kilogram body weight per day 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00159 Table 8-1. EGBE Emissions Rates Used in Level III Mackay Distribution Model (kg/hr) Receiving Media Air Soil Water CMA 1997 a 1,047 18 292 Updated Analysis with 2009 TRI datab 651 1.2 3 Updated Analysis with 2010 TRI datab 679 0.8 3 Updated Analysis with 2011 TRI databc 653 1.0 5 a. CMA (1997) assumed 50 percent of Certain Glycol Ethers emitted was EGBE, based on 1996 TRI data. b. These analyses assume 100 percent of Certain Glycol Ethers emitted were EGBE. c. The emissions rates for 2011 are based on the preliminary 2011 TRI data, as acquired on September 12, 2012. Air releases consisted of reported releases to "On-site Fugitive Air" and "On-site Point Source Air" Soil releases consisted of reported releases to onsite and offsite "Land Treatment" and "Other Land Disposal" Water releases consisted of reported releases to "On-site Surface Water Discharges." EGBE: ethylene glycol monobutyl ether kg/hr: kilograms per hour TRI: Toxics Release Inventory 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00160 Table 8-2, Modeled EGBE Exposure Concentrations Used in This and Previous Ecological Risk Assessments Environmental Media CMA 1997 a Cadmus 2000b Tier 1 b Cadmus 2000a Tier 2 c Updated Analysis 2009 TRI d Updated Analysis 2010 TRI d Updated Analysis 2011 TRI de Units Percent of Total EGBE (2011 TRI)' Air 6.20E-05 3.27E-01 3.27E-01 3.82E-05 3.98E-05 3.83E-05 mg/m3 2 Surface water 1.40E-03 3.84E+02 3.64E+00 1.90E-04 1.98E-04 1.93E-04 mg/L 18 Soil 1.30E-02 1.86E+01 7.00E-02 6.26E-03 6.53E-03 6.28E-03 mg/kg 80 a. The Level III Mackay model was used to determine equilibrium concentrations of EGBE in model environment receiving all national EGBE emissions from the 1996 TRI and assuming that 50 percent of all Certain Glycol Ethers are EGBE. b. The Level I Mackay model was used to determine the equilibrium distribution of EGBE in the model environment (Cadmus 2000b). Concentrations were then scaled to the predicted worst-case fenceline concentration, based on CMA (1997) (Confidential Facility 25). c. EQC Level III was used to determine the equilibrium distribution of EGBE in the model environment (Cadmus 2000a). Concentrations were scaled to same fenoeline concentration as in Cadmus (2000b). d. EQC Level III was used to determine the equilibrium concentrations of EGBE in model environment receiving all national emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers from TRI, assuming that all Certain Glycol Ethers are EGBE. e. The emissions rates for 2011 are based on the preliminary 2011 TRI data, as acquired on September 12, 2012. f. Percent of the total EGBE in each pool at equilibrium. Based on the modeled environment in EQC. EGBE: ethylene glycol monobutyl ether TRI: Toxics Release Inventory mg/m3: milligrams per cubic meter mg/L: milligrams per liter mg/kg: milligrams per kilogram 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00161 Table 8-3. EQC Level III Input Parameter Values EGBE-Specific Input Parameters Value Units Source Molecular weight Melting point Water solubility3 Henry's law constant Vapor pressure3 Log Kow Reaction half lives Air Water Soil Sediment EQC Model Parameters Total surface area Land surface area Water surface area Atmosphere depth Water depth Soil depth Sediment depth Organic carbon content Suspended solids Soil Sediment 118.17 -75 5.67E+06 2.1 IE-03 101.32 0.83 16 209 408 1872 a. values apply to the chemical at 20C EGBE: ethylene glycol monobutyl ether EQC: Equilibrium Criteria Model g/m3: grams per cubic meter g/mol: grams per mole km2: square kilometers m: meter Pa-m3/mol: Pascal cubic meters per mole g/mol C g/m3 Pa-m3/mol Pa unitless hr hr hr hr Value 100,000 90,000 10,000 1,000 20 0.2 0.05 20% 2% 4% Merck 1989 ASTER 1995 Calculated Howard 1993, HSDB 1997 HSDB 1997 HSDB 1997 PBT Profiler Ver. 1.301 PBT Profiler Ver. 1.301 PBT Profiler Ver. 1.301 PBT Profiler Ver. 1.301 Units km2 km2 km2 m m m m unitless unitless unitless 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00162 Table 8-4. Exposure Assumptions for Small Mammals Variable Ca IRa Cw IRW l^diet c, P, TDI Definition Concentration of EGBE in air Inhalation rate Concentration of EGBE in water Water ingestion rate Food ingestion rate Concentration of EGBE Soil (Cs) Plants (Cp) Proportion of Diet Soil (Ps) Plants (Pp) Total Daily Intake Value 3.98E-05 1.2 1.98E-04 0.21 0.35 6.53E-03 8.4E-02 0.02 0.98 0.029 Units mg/m3 m3/kg BW-day mg/L kg/kg BW-day kg/kg BW-day mg/kg mg/kg unitless unitless mg/kg BW-day a. Based on 2010 Toxics Release Inventory data b. where: TDiziCzmz 3)C (C -mn )- mdiet (C I P ) EGBE: ethylene glycol monobutyl ether mg/m3: milligrams f m3/kg BW-day: cubic meter per kilogram body weight per day mg/L: milligrams per liter kg/kg BW-day: kilograms per kilogram body weight per day mg/kg: milligrams per kilogram mg/kg BW-day: milligrams per kilogram body weight per day Source Table 8-2a EPA 1993a Table 8-2a EPA 1993a EPA 1993a Table 8-2a Cp-- Bv x Cs Cadmus 2000a Cadmus 2000a Calculated6 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00163 Table 8-5, Chronic Species Sensitivity Distribution Calculations for EGBE Group Fish Fish Fish Fish Fish Fish Fish Fish Fish Fish Fish Fish Fish Fish Fish Species Endpoint a Duration LC50 (mg/L) mummichog sheepshead minnow bluegil! emerald shiner rainbow trout inland silverside golden ide bluegill golden ide goldfish rainbow trout goldfish golden ide fathead minnow bluegill LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 96 hr 96 hr 96 hr 72 hr 96 hr 96 hr 48 hr 96 hr 48 hr 24 hr 96 hr 24 hr 48 hr 96 hr 96 hr 6.7 116 127 500 1000 1250 1395 1490 1575 1650 1700 1700 1880 2137 2950 LC50 (log) 0.826 2.064 2.104 2.699 3.000 3.097 3.145 3.173 3.197 3.217 3.230 3.230 3.274 3.330 3.470 Calculated Distribution Calc CV (log)b -0.159 0.761 0.790 1.232 1.456 1.528 1.563 1.584 1.602 1.617 1.627 1.627 1.659 1.701 1.805 Calc CV (mg/L) b 0.7 5.8 6.2 17.1 28.6 33.7 36.6 38.4 40.0 41.4 42.4 42.4 45.6 50.2 63.8 Rank among all CVs 1 3 4 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 16 18 20 23 Percent Protected 99.3 90.6 86.3 76.3 71.9 69.8 61.2 59.7 58.3 56.8 54.7 54.7 50.4 46.8 36.0 Mean vertebrate (weighted) 524.3 2.720 1.247 17.7 Standard deviation (weighted) 6.2 0.794 0.59 3.9 Invertebrate Invertebrate Invertebrate Invertebrate Invertebrate Invertebrate Invertebrate Invertebrate Invertebrate grass shrimp oyster white shrimp white shrimp brown shrimp coelenterate brown shrimp water flea water flea LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 LC50 EC50 96 hr 96 hr 96 hr 96 hr 96 hr 72 hr 96 hr 48 hr 48 hr 5.4 89 117 130 550 690 698 835 1600 0.732 1.949 2.068 2.114 2.740 2.839 2.844 2.922 3.204 0.093 1.052 1.146 1.182 1.676 1.753 1.757 1.818 2.041 1.2 11.3 14.0 15.2 47.4 56.6 57.2 65.8 109.9 2 95.0 5 84.9 6 80.6 7 78.4 19 48.9 21 42.4 22 38.1 24 34.5 26 28.1 Mean invertebrate acute (weighted) 175.6 2.244 1.285 19.3 Standard deviation (weighted) 6.7 0.825 0.65 4.5 Algae/microbes cyanobacterium LOEC 8 day na na 1.544 35 Algae/microbes protozoan LOEC 72 hr na na 1.959 91 Algae/microbes green alga LOEC 7 day na na 2.398 250 Algae/microbes algae NOEC 72 hr na na 2.456 286 Algae/microbes protozoan EC05 48 hr na na 2.666 463 Algae/microbes bacterium LOEC 16 hr na na 2.845 700 Algae/microbes green alga LOEC 7 day na na 2.954 900 Algae/microbes protozoan EC05 48 hr na na 2.960 911 a. All algae endpoints are growth b. Algae/microbe chronic values are as reported in the literature; they are not calculated CV: chronic value EC05: concentration at which 5% of the population was affected EC50: median effect concentration EGBE: ethylene glycol monobutyl ether LC50: median lethal concentration LOEC: lowest observed effect concentration mg/L: milligrams of EGBE per liter of water na: not available/applicable NOEC: no observed effect concentration 11 65.5 25 32.4 27 25.9 28 21.6 29 17.3 30 12.9 31 8.6 32 4.3 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00164 Toxicity Endpoint 1. Acute Toxicity Table 9-1. Key Findings of the Qualitative Hazard Evaluation Summary Evaluation and Principal Reference Primary acute effects in humans are eye and nasal irritation at levels >500 mg/m3 (Carpenter 1956); no irritation was found at current occupational exposure limits - 97 mg/m3 (Johansen 1986). Facility fenceline and environmental concentrations are far lower. 2. Chronic Toxicity a. Carcinogenicity b. Mutagenicity c. Developmental Toxicity d. Reproductive Toxicity e. Immunotoxicity f. Other Chronic Toxicity Releases of EGBE "may not reasonably be anticipated to cause any adverse effects to human health" (EPA, 69 FR 69322). "Limited" evidence of carcinogenicity in animals; the human carcinogenic potential of EGBE cannot be determined (IARC 2006). Because nonlinear, nongenotoxic modes of action are likely responsible for the tumors observed in rodent studies, the IRIS RfD and RfC are adequately protective of any possible carcinogenic effects in humans. (EPA Cancer Evaluation [EPA 2005a]) Not expected to be mutagenic or clastogenic. (EPA 2010) A "minimal" LOAEL for developmental effects = 700 mg/kg-day based on a very slight decrease in pup weight. (EPA 2010) 700 and 1,300 mg/kg-day are considered to be NOAEL and LOAEL, respectively, for both maternal and reproductive effects. (EPA 2010) Not immunotoxic. (IRIS) Continuous inhalation exposure to an EGBE-saturated atmosphere expected to result in maximum blood concentrations of EGBE's toxic metabolite (BAA) well below the level needed to produce hemolysis in humans. (Udden 2002, EPA 2010) 3. Environmental Toxicity a. Persistence b. Bioaccumulation c. Terrestrial Mammals and Birds EGBE causes only "very minor" effects that "are unlikely to be ecologically significant" (EPA 2003 [68 Fed. Reg. 65657]) Readily biodegradable Half-life = 1-4 weeks in water and soil Bioconcentration factor = 3 Octanol-water partition coefficient (Log Kow) = 0.8 No Data. [Section 3.3, below] (ATSDR 1998) (HSDB 1997) 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 1 of 2 ED 001523 00008282-00165 Table 9-1. Key Findings of the Qualitative Hazard Evaluation Toxicity Endpoint d. Acute Aquatic Toxicity e. Chronic Aquatic Toxicity Summary Evaluation and Principal Reference Most sensitive credible LC50 = 89 mg/L (Section 3.3, below) Most LC50 values > 1000 mg/L Most sensitive EC50 = 164 mg/L (Section 3.3, below) Most sensitive LOAEL = 7.2 mg/L Most LOAELs > 100 mg/L EGBE: ethylene glycol monobutyl ether EPA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency LOAEL: lowest observed adverse effect level mg/kg: milligrams per kilogram mg/kg-day: milligrams per kilogram body weight per day mg/L: milligrams per liter mg/m 3: milligrams per cubic meter NOAEL: no observed adverse effect level RfC: reference concentration RfD: reference dose 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production Page 2 of 2 ED 001523 00008282-00166 Table 9-2, Key Findings of the Exposure and Risk Assessments 1, Human Inhalation Exposures a. Chronic Maximum Annual Average Concentration (MAAC) HAPs Petition (1993 TRI Release Data) This Petition (2009-2011 TRI Release Data) 0.327 mg/m3, based on Tier 3 All facilities screened out prior to chronic Tier 2 and 3 (ISCST3) air dispersion modeling for analyses. For subset of facilities that screened out in the maximum impact facility. Tier 2, Tier 3 modeling was conducted to test the conservatism of this assessment found a predicted MAAC using Tier 3 (AERMOD) of 0.27 mg/m3 based on 2009, 2010, and 2011 data. RfC Hazard Quotient (chronic) b. Acute Maximum Hourly Average Concentration (MHAC) NOAEL (Irritation Based on Human Data) 13 mg/m3 0.02 n/a n/a 1.6 mg/m3 <0.2 For a subset of the highest emitting facilities, tiered modeling of acute exposures found a predicted MHAC using Tier 3 (AERMOD) of 3.9 mg/m3 based on the 2009, 2010, and 2011 data. 97 mg/m3 Margin of Exposure 2, Human Dermal and Ingestion Exposures Maximum Exposure RfD Hazard Quotient 3, Ecological Risk a. Small Mammals Maximum Exposure Toxicity Reference Value Hazard Quotient b. Aquatic Organisms Maximum Exposure Toxicity Reference Value Hazard Quotient n/a 0.02 mg/kg BW-day 3 mg/kg BW-day 0.007 (from Cadmus 2000a) 2.15 mg/kg BW-day 20 mg/kg BW-day 0.11 (from Cadmus 2000a) 3.64 mg/L 9.1 mg/L 0.4 mg/kg BW-day: milligrams per kilogram body weight per day mg/L: milligrams per liter mg/m3: milligrams per cubic meter RfC: IRIS reference concentration RfD: IRIS reference dose TRV: toxicity reference value >25 0.00001 mg/kg BW-day 0.1 mg/kg BW-day 0.0001 0.029 mg/kg BW-day 20 mg/kg BW-day 0.001 0.0002 mg/L 8.7 mg/L 0.00002 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00167 Table 9-3, Sources of Uncertainty and Conservatism Section Source of Uncertainty Likely Effect on Outcome 3.0 Hazard Assessment Humans are at least 100 times less sensitive than rats to hemolytic RfD may be 100-fold overly conservative. RfC may be effects of EGBE. While a stand default interspecies UFs of 10 was 300-fold overly conservative. Thus, HQs may be not used - RfD uses UF of 1 and RfC uses UF of 3 - the actual overestimated by a factor of 100 to 300. interspecies factor is approximately 0.01. Intraspecies UF of 10 is probably overly conservative. A number of RfD and RfC may be overstated by an additional factor studies have found no evidence of increased susceptibility to of 3 to 10. hemolysis among sensitive subpopulations. IARC (2006) concluded that the carcinogenicity of EGBE to humans EPA (2005) concluded that the RfD and RfC are cannot be determined and EPA (2010) concluded that carcinogenic adequately protective of carcinogenic effects in effects from EGBE are not likely to occur in humans in the absence humans, if any. Thus, question of carcinogenicity of critical noncancer effects. does not affect petition outcome. 5.0 Emissions Inventory TRI only lists releases of Certain Glycol Ethers. In the absence of Because EGBE represents 52% of market share of specific data for EGBE releases, assumed all Certain Glycol Ethers ethylene glycol ethers (SRI 2010), actual releases of releases were EGBE. EGBE may be overestimated 2-fold, on average. TRI data are self-reported using a variety of methods. Individual facility data vary considerably in certainty. Actual releases of Certain Glycol Ethers by facilities may be greater than or less than those reported on TRI. No evidence of systematic under-reporting. 6,0 Screening of Airborne Concentrations a. Chronic Step A assumed 100% of reported releases to air were exhausted Maximum annual average concentrations predicted through a single point 0 m high and 50 m from fence line. Resultant under Step A were up to 250-fold higher than those threshold rate (4.9 tpy) more conservative than that associated with predicted using Tier 3 dispersion modeling. Thus, 2 m high emission point located 10 m from fenoeline (8.6 tpy), HQs predicted using Step A overestimated by 85-250 which encompasses virtually all facilities in inventory for which times. stack configuration data are available. Tier 2 employed site-specific data on emission rates, stack and HQs predicted using Tier 2 overestimated by 2 times fugitive source physical parameters, and property boundaries. The or more. maximum MAAC under Tier 2 was 1.2 mg/m3, as compared to maximum MAAC under Tier 3 of 0.3 mg/m3. Tier 2 results differed from Tier 3 results for the same facilities by factors of 1.2 to 6.7. Modeled maximum annual average concentration is highly conservative estimate of exposure over a lifetime. Per EPA, actual maximum annual average concentrations are 2-fold lower than modeled values. Comparison of an annual average concentration to an RfC designed to be protective over a lifetime substantially overstates risk by an unknown margin. DEGREE OF CONSERVATISM ASSOCIATED WITH CHRONIC (50 to 100) x (3 to 10) x 2 x (2 to 85) x ? = 600 to HUMAN INHALA TION HAZARDS170.000 or more * 18 b. Acute The acute MOE based on the NOAEL of 97 mg/m3 and the An MOE above 5 js protectiVe because EPA AEGL estimated reasonable worst-case estimated MHAC is approximately guidance og||s for an interspecies uncertainty factor 18 mg/m . Because the NOAEL is derived from human data, per from 3.10 for non-systemic irritation effects, and an EPA TRI precedents MOEs >10 "indicate a low level of concern" for appropriate time-adjustment would support a 1-hr acute effects associated with EGBE facility releases. NOAEL of 137 mg/m3 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 1 of 2 ED 001523 00008282-00168 Table 9-3, Sources of Uncertainty and Conservatism Section Source of Uncertainty Likely Effect on Outcome 7,0 Surface Water Exposures and Risks Exposure point concentrations in surface water calculated by assuming that 100% of U.S. releases of Certain Glycol Ethers to all media are EGBE and are concentrated into an area the size of the state of Ohio. Because EGBE represents 52% of consumption of ethylene glycol ethers (SRI 2010), actual releases of EGBE may be overestimated 2-fold, on average. Because 100,000 km2 represents 1.3% of total land area of U.S., actual concentrations of EGBE may be overestimated 77-fold. Exposure assumptions (350 day/yr, 70 years, all water contacted contains EGBE) DEGREE OF CONSERVATISM ASSOCIATED WITH HUMAN DERMAL AND INGESTION HAZARDS Actual exposure intensity likely to be considerably lower, but degree of conservatism cannot be quantified. (50 to 1001 x 13 to 101 x 2 x 77 x ? = 23.100 to 154.000 or more 8,0 Ecological Risk Assessment Exposure point concentrations in surface water calculated by Actual releases of EGBE may be overestimated 2-fold, assuming that 100% of U.S. releases of Certain Glycol Ethers to all on average, and actual concentrations of EGBE may media are EGBE and are concentrated into an area the size of the be overestimated 77-fold. state of Ohio. Conservative exposure assumptions for small mammals (inhalation Actual exposure intensity likely to be considerably rate, ingestion rate, bioaccumulation factor) consistent with lower, but degree of conservatism cannot be Cadmus (2000a) quantified. TRV for aquatic organisms based on most sensitive species tested, Although actual sensitivity of other aquatic organisms which may not be representative of aquatic community present in to EGBE may be considerably lower, degree of most U.S. water bodies conservatism cannot be quantified. TRV for small mammals is based on same underlying data used to TRV may be 50 to 1,000-fold overly conservative due derive RfD. Thus, small mammal TRV shares same uncertainties to UFs. as listed above with respect to Section 3.0. HQs focused on what EPA calls "very minor" effects on individual organisms, rather than effects that are likely to be ecologically significant. Although individual organisms are likely to be substantially more sensitive than populations, communities, or ecosystems, degree of conservatism cannot be quantified. DEGREE OF CONSERVATISM ASSOCIATED WITH RISKS TO 2 x 77 x ? = 154 or more AQUATIC ORGANISMS DEGREE OF CONSERVATISM ASSOCIATED WITH RISKS TO 2x11 x 150 to 1.0001 x ? = 7.700 to 154.000 or more SMALL MAMMALS EGBE: ethylene glycol monobutyl ether FR: Federal Register HQ: hazard quotient IRIS: Integrated Risk Information Service km2: square kilometer m: meter mg/m3: milligrams per cubic meter RfC: reference concentration RfD: reference dose tpy: tons per year TRI: Toxics Release Inventory TRV: toxicity reference value UF: uncertainty factor EPA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 2 of 2 ED 001523 00008282-00169 FIGURES 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00170 ----Consumption --Production Source: SRI 2010 Year Annual Production and Consumption of EGBE in the United States (1970-2009) Figure 2-1 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00171 Source: Toxics Release Inventory tpy: tons per year Year Maximum Individual Facility Annual Certain Glycol Ether Releases to Air (2000 - 2011) Figure 5-1 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00172 pc, M A = mean chronic or acute value, respectively c, A = standard deviation of chronic and acute distribution, respectively Aquatic Organism Species Sensitivity Distribution Approach Figure 8-1 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00173 * Includes observed chronic values for algae and microbes and calculated chronic values for vertebrates and invertebrates (Duboudin et al. 2004a) Aquatic Organism Species Sensitivity Distributions for EGBE Figure 8-2 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00174 APPENDIX A Toxicity Values in Laboratory Mammals 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00175 APPENDIX A-1 Toxicity Values in Laboratory Mammals from ATSDR 1998 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00176 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE a rveyro Species/ figure (strain) Exposure/ duration/ frequency ACUTE EXPOSURE Death 1 Rat (NS) 1-6 d 2-9 hr/d 2 Rat 3d (Sherman) 7 hr/d 3 Rat 4 hr (Fischer- 344) 4 Rat (SpragueDawley) 1 d 6.5 -7hr 5 Rat 6 hr (Fischer- 344) 6 Mouse 7 hr (Swiss) 7 Rabbit (albino) 1-2d 7 hr/d 8 Rabbit (New Zealand) Gd 6-18 6 hr/d Systemic 9 Human 4-8 hr i 10 Human 2 hr Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-1. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Inhalation System NOAEL (PPm) Less serious (ppm) LOAEL Serious (ppm) 375 (death of 11 /13 males and 23/23 females after 7 hrs) 432 F (15/15 died) 486 M (LCso) 450 F (LCso) 250 F (2/3 died) 438 M (2/4 died) 700 (LCso) 400-411 M (25-100% death) 200 F (4/24 died) Resp Cardio Gastro Hemato Ocular Resp Cardio 98 195 M . 195 98 20 M 20 M 113 (nasal irritation, slight increase in nasal mucus discharge) 98 F (emesis) 113 (ocular irritation) Reference Carpenter et al. 1956 Carpenter et al. 1956 Dodd et al. 1983 Nelson et al. 1984 ro I m> Sabourin et al. i 1992a m n Tm1 Werner et al. O 1943a CO Dow 1986 Tyl et al. 1984 Carpenter et al. 1956 Johanson et al. 1986a 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00177 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-1. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - inhalation (continued) a Key to figure Species/ (strain) 11 Rat (NS) Exposure/ duration/ frequency 2-8 hr System Hemato NOAEL (ppm) Renal 12 Rat (NS) 9 d 7 hr/d 13 Rat 4 hr (NS) 14 Rat 4 hr (Fischer- 344) Hemato Hemato Resp Renal 32 F 523 202 LOAEL Less serious (ppm) Serious (ppm) Reference 432 F (slight cloudy swelling of convoluted tubules in 2 hrs) 432 F (hemolysis in 2 hrs; hemoglobinuria in 3 hrs; hemin crystals in urine in 4 hrs) Carpenter et al. 1956 200 F (50% decrease in Carpenter et al. erythrocyte count and 25% 1956 decrease in HGB level) 62 F (significant osmotic fragility of RBCs) 867 (rapid and shallow breathing) Carpenter et al. ro 523 (red discharge around 1956 X m> Dodd et al. 1983 q X m~n T| urogenital area and bladder q [hematuria]; enlarged O) kidneys) \ 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production I 00 ED 001523 00008282-00178 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Key to Exposure/ figure ff'ecief/ tduration/ (strain) frequency 15 Rat 9d (Fischer- 344) 5 d/wk 6 hr/d 16 Rat (Alpk/Ap) 17 Rat (SpragueDawley) 18 Rat (SpragueDawley) 19 Rat (SpragueDawley) 3 hr 4 d 7 hr/d Gd 7-15 7 hr/d i 1 d 6.5 -7 hr Table 2-1. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Inhalation (continued) System Resp Hemato NOAEL (ppm) 86 M 245 F 20 Less serious (ppm) LOAEL 245 M (audible respiration and nasal discharge) Hepatic Renal Ocular Bd Wt Renal 86 M 20 F 86 245 86 M 20 F 245 M (increased liver weights of about 5.4%) 86 F (increased liver weights of about 4.5%) 245 (transient red-stained urine [hematuria]) 245 M (13% decrease in body weight gain) 86 F (10% decrease in body weight gain) Serious (ppm) 86 M (HGB decreased 5%, significant increases in MCVof 11%) 86 F (HGB decreased 8%, MCHC decreased 18%, significant increases in MCVof 17%) 800 M (hematuria) Bd Wt 57-58 M Renal 150 F (slight hematuria) Renal Dermal 250 F (necrotic tail tip) 250 F (hematuria) Reference Doddetal. 1983 r X >rm- H X m T| Tm| O H CO Doe 1984 Dow 1972 Nelson etal. 1984 Nelson et al. 1984 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00179 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-1. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Inhalation (continued) "figure SPecies/ (strain) Exposure/ duration/ frequency 20 Rat 6 hr (Fischer- 344) 21 Rat Gd 6-15 (Fischer- 344) 6 hr/d System Hemato Resp Hemato Hepatic Renal Dermal Ocular Bd Wt Other NOAEL (ppm) 50 F 50 b F 200 F 50 F 100 F 50 F 50 F 100 F 22 Mouse (NS) 23 Mouse (SwissWebster) 24 Gn Pig (NS) 25 Rabbit (NS) 7 hr 10 min 8 hr 7 hr i Hemato Resp Hemato Hemato 665 M Less serious (ppm) LOAEL 100 F (perinasal encrustation) 200 F (necrosis of the tail tip, stained fur) 25 F (periocular wetness) 100F (13% reduction in food consumption) 200 F (14% reduction in water consumption) 100 (increased osmotic fragility) 153M (20% decrease in respiratory rate) 125 (increased osmotic fragility of RBCs) Serious (ppm) 438 M (hemoglobinuria) Reference Sabourin et al. 1992a Tyletal. 1984 100 F (reduced RBC and MCHC; increased MCH and MCV) 100 F (hematuria) 100 F (29% decrease in body weight gain) Carpenter et al. 1956 Kane etal. 1980 Carpenter et al. 1956 Carpenter et al. 1956 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00180 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Key to3 _ Species/ figure (strain) 26 Rabbit (albino) Exposure/ duration/ frequency 1-2d 7 hr/d Table 2-1. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Inhalation (continued) System Resp NOAEL (ppm) Gastro Hepatic Less serious (ppm) LOAEL 400- M (mottled livers in 411 surviving animals) Serious (ppm) Reference 400-411 M (congestion of lungs and Dow 1986 turbinates, nasal discharge) 400-411 M (hemorrhagic gastric ulcers) Renal Ocular 27 Rabbit (New Zealand) Gd 6-18 6 hr/d Resp Hemato Hepatic Renal Dermal Ocular Bd Wt Immunological/Lymphoreticular 28 Rat Gd 6-15 (Fischer- 344) 6 hr/d Neurological t 29 Human 4-8 hr 30 Rat 4 hr (Fischer- 344) 100 F 50 F 200 F 50 F 100 F 50 F 100 F 100 F 98 202 400- M (ocular discharge, 411 yellowing of sclerae) 200 F (perinasal wetness and discharge) 100F (increased hemoglobin and hematocrit) 200 F (stained fur) 100 F (periocular wetness) 200 F (9.7% reduction in maternal body weight) 400-411 M (darkened kidneys in surviving animals, hematuria) 100 F (hematuria) 200 F (20-24% increase in absolute and relative maternal spleen weights) 98 (headache) 113 M (disagreeable metallic taste) 523 (loss of coordination) N x Tyletal. 1984 m > H X m Tl m o --i Tyletal. 1984 i Carpenter et al. 1956 Dodd et al. 1983 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED_001523_00008282-00181 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-1. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Inhalation (continued) Key to3 _ Species/ figure (strain) 31 Dog (Beagle) 32 Rabbit (albino) Exposure/ duration/ frequency 1-5 d 7 hr/d 1-2 d 7 hr/d Reproductive 33 Rat Gd 6-15 (Fischer- 344) 6 hr/d System NOAEL (ppm) 100 F Less serious (ppm) 400-411 M (salivation) LOAEL 34 Rabbit (New Zealand) Gd 6-18 6 hr/d Developmental 35 Rat (SpragueDawley) Gd 7-15 7 hr/d 36 Rat Gd 6-15 (Fischer- 344) 6 hr/d 37 Rabbit (New Zealand) Gd 6-18 6 hr/d 100 200 50 100 (retarded skeletal ossification) 100 200 (22% reduction in gravid uterine weight, reduced ossification in fetuses) Serious (ppm) Reference Dow 1986 400- M (poor coordination of 411 extremities and loss of equilibrium) Dow 1986 200 F (50% decrease in viable Tyl et al. 1984 implants & in live fetuses per litter; 8-fold increase in nonviable implants; reduced maternal gravid JO uterine weight) X m > 200 F (14% decrease in total Tyl et al. 1984 x implants; 20% decrease in m viable implants) "n OTml o! Nelson et al. 1984 Tyl et al. 1984 Tyl et al. 1984 INTERMEDIATE EXPOSURE Death 38 Rat (Sherman) 30 d 5 d/wk 7 hr/d 39 Mouse 30 d (C3H) 432 M (12/15 died) 314 F (15/15 died) 376 M (2/10 died) i Carpenter et al. 1956 Carpenter et al. 1956 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00182 Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Key to3 figure pec.ief' (strain) Exposure/ ,duration/ frequency 40 Gn Pig (NS) 30 d 5 d/wk 7 hr/d Systemic 41 Rat (Sherman) 30 d 5 d/wk 7 hr/d 42 Rat 13 wk (Fischer- 344) 5 d/wk 6 hr/d 43 Mouse (C3H) 30-90 c( 7 hr/d Table 2-1. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Inhalation (continued) System NOAEL (ppm) Less serious (ppm) LOAEL Serious (ppm) 376 M (1 /10 died) Reference Carpenter et al. 1956 Resp Gastro Hemato Hepatic Renal Bd Wt Resp Cardio Hemato 203 203 54 54 203 77 77 25 c Musc/skel Hepatic Renal Endocr Bd Wt Hemato Hepatic Renal Bd Wt 77 77 77 77 77 100 M 400 M 200 M 54 (erythrocyte fragility) 107 (unspecified increase in liver weight) 107 (unspecified increase in kidney weight) 432 M (congestion & hemorrhage 314 F of the lungs) 432 M (congestion of the 314 F abdominal viscera) 203 (hemoglobinuria) Carpenter et al. 1956 Dodd et al. 1983 77 (5%-13% decrease in RBC, in both sexes; 4% decrease in HGB; 11 % increase in MCH, females) 100M (increased erythrocyte osmotic fragility) 200 M (unspecified increase (p<0.05) in liver weights) 400 M (unspecified decrease (p<0.05) in body weights) Carpenter et al. 1956 ro X m > x m n OTml C/> i croo 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00183 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-1. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Inhalation (continued) Key to3 _ Species/ figure (strain) Exposure/ duration/ frequency System NOAEL (ppm) Less serious (ppm) LOAEL Serious (ppm) Reference 44 Gn Pig (NS) 30 d 5 d/wk 7 hr/d Resp Hemato Hepatic Renal Bd Wt 203 M 494 M 494 M 107 M 495 M 376 M (lung congestion) 203 M (unspecified increase (p<0.05) in kidney weight) Carpenter et al. 1956 45 Dog 31 d (Hybrid) Resp Hemato Ocular 200 200 (slight capillary engorgement or breakdown in the lungs) 200 F (RBC osmotic fragility increased slightly; slight decrease in RBC count and hemoglobin level) Carpenter et al. 1956 ro 200 M (increased osmotic fragility of RBCs and 100% Im> increased leukocyte counts) m TTm|| 3 46 Dog 90 d (Terrier) Hemato 100 (decreased hematocrit in male, transitory doubling of the leukocyte count midway into the 90-day exposure in both sexes) Carpenter et al. 1956 f i ro 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00184 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-1. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Inhalation (continued) Key to3 _ Species/ flgure (strain) 47 Dog (NS) Exposure/ duration/ frequency 12 wk 5 d/wk 7 hr/d System Resp Cardio Gastro Hemato NOAEL (ppm) 415 415 Hepatic Renal Ocular Immunological/Lymphoreticular Rat 13 wk (Fischer- 344) 5 d/wk 6 hr/d Neurological Rat 13 wk (Fischer- 344) 5 d/wk 6 hr/d Reproductive Rat 13 wk (Fischer-344) 5 d/wk 6 hr/d 415 415 77 77 77 M Less serious (ppm) LOAEL 415 (slightly increased nasal secretions) 415 (decreased Hgb, hematocrit; hypochromia, polychromatophilia, and microcytosis) 415 (slight increased secretions in the eyes) Serious (ppm) CHRONIC EXPOSURE Systemic Human 1-6 yr Hemato Hepatic Renal 0.6 M 0.75 M 0.75 M Reference Werner et al. 1943b N> Im> Dodd et al. 1983 m 7} ~mOHn CO Dodd et al. 1983 Dodd et al. 1983 Haufroid et al. 1997 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00185 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL-ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Key to figure fPecies/ (strain) Exposure/ duration/ frequency Table 2-1. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Inhalation (continued) System NOAEL (ppm) Less serious (ppm) LOAEL Serious (ppm) Reference "The number corresponds to entries in Figure 2-1. Differences in levels of health effects and cancer effects between males and females are not indicated in Figure 2-1. Where such differences exist, only the levels of effect for the most sensitive gender are presented. bUsed to derive an acute inhalation minimal risk level (MRL) of 6.0 ppm. Concentration converted to an equivalent concentration in humans, and divided by an uncertainty factor of 9 (3 for extrapolation from animals to humans and 3 for human variability). For further details, see MRL worksheets in Appendix A. "Used to derive an intermediate inhalation MRL of 3.0 ppm. Concentration converted to an equivalent concentration in humans, and divided by an uncertainty factor of 9 (3 for extrapolation from animals to humans and 3 for human variability). For further details, see MRL worksheets in Appendix A. dUsed to derive a chronic inhalation MRL of 0.2 ppm. Concentration divided by an uncertainty factor of 3 for human variability. Hematocrit significantly [p=0.03] decreased to 43.9%, MCHC significantly [p=0.02] increased to 33.6 g/dL. Changes in hematocrit and MCHC were within the range of normal clinical values and therefore were considered NOAELs. These effects were consistent with hemolysis seen in animal studies and may be an early indicator of potential adverse effects in humans. For further details, see MRL worksheets in ! Appendix A. I m> Bd Wt = body weight; Cardio = cardiovascular; d = day(s); Endocr = endocrine; F = female; Gastro = gastrointestinal; Gd = gestational day; Gn Pig = guinea pig; Hemato = H hematological; HGB = hemoglobin; hr = hour(s); LCS0 = lethal concentration; 50% kill; LOAEL = lowest-observable-adverse-effect level; M = male; MCH = mean corpuscular m hemoglobin; MCHC = mean corpuscular concentration; MCV = mean corpuscular volume; min = minute(s); Musc/skel = musculoskeletal; NOAEL = no-observable-adverse-effect t] level; NS = not specified; RBC = red blood cell; Resp = respiratory; wk = week(s). o 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production i ED 001523 00008282-00186 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral . Key to figure Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency (Strain) (Specific Route) System ACUTE EXPOSURE Death 1 Rat once (Wistar, (G) Sherman, - Carworth- Wistar) NOAEL (mg/kg/day) ------------------------Less Serious (mg/kg/day) LOAEL Serious (mg/kg/day) 530- (LDso) 3000 Reference Carpenter et al. 1956 2 Rat (NS) NS (GW) 3 Rat once (Fischer-344) (G) 4 Rat 13 d (Crl:COBS 5 d/wk CD (SD)BR) (G) 500 (death in 3/5 animals) 2000 F (2/3 died) 443 M (death in 1/10) Dow 1959 x m> Dow 1981 I OHm Eastman Kodak CO 1983; Krasavage 1986 5 Rat NS (CD) (G) 6 Rat NS (NS) 7 Rat Gd 11-13 (Fischer-344) (GW) 1746 M (LDso) 1480 (LDso) 150 F (1/9 died 24 hrs after exposure) Eastman Kodak 1988 Nelson et al. 1984 i NTP 1989 oo> 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00187 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) Key toa figure Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency (Strain) (Specific Route) System 8 Rat (Wistar) once (G) NOAEL (mg/kg/day) Less Serious (mg/kg/day) L0AEL Serious (mg/kg/day) 1590 M (LDso) Reference Olin 1976 9 Rat 2d (Fischer-344) (GW) 200 M (death in 1/6) Smialowicz et al. 1992 10 Rat (Wistar) once (GW) 11 Rat (Wistar) once (G) 12 Mouse (NS) once 13 Mouse NS (Charles (G) River, COBS, CD-I) 14 Mouse (CD-I) Gd6-13 (GW) 1 15 Mouse 2wk (Swiss CD-I) (W) 1480 M (LDso) 2417 (LDso) 1230 M (LDso) 1519 M (LDso) Smyth et al. 1941 im> Union Carbide 1980b x m mO Carpenter et al. 1956 Eastman Kodak 1988 1180 F (death in 4/35 pregnant Hardin et al. 1987; mice and 6/15 nonpregnant Schuler et al. 1984 mice) 12750 (death in 2/8 males, 5/8 females) Heindel et al. 1990 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00188 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) Key toa figure Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency (Strain) (Specific Route) System NOAEL (mg/kg/day) Less Serious (mg/kg/day) LOAEL Serious (mg/kg/day) 16 Mouse (CD-I) Gd 8-14 Ix/d (G) 1500 F (death in 3/6) 17 Gn Pig (NS) once (G) 1200 (LDso) Reference Wier et al. 1987 Carpenter et al. 1956 18 Gn Pig (Hartley) once (GW) 19 Rabbit (NS) once Systemic Human once (IN) Resp Cardio Hemato Hepatic Renal t Metab 650 M (slight albuminuria) 1414 (LD50) 320-370 M (LDso) Shepard 1994b ho Xm > Carpenter et al. x m 1956 mO C/> 650 M (diffuse pulmonary edema) 650 M (hypotension, tachycardia, sinusal rhythm) 650 M (low prothrombin time, nonhemolytic anemia, thrombopenia) 650 M (abnormal liver function) Bauer et al. 1992 650 M (metabolic acidosis and hypoxemia with lactic j acidosis) oN>> 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00189 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency (Strain) (Specific Route) System NOAEL (mg/kg/day) Less Serious (mg/kg/day) LOAEL Serious (mg/kg/day) Reference 21 Human once (IN) Resp Cardio Hemato Renal Ocular Metab 391 F (obstructive respiration) Gijsenbergh et al. 1989 391 F (low blood pressure) 391 F (decreased hemoglobin from 11.9 to 8.9 g/dL) 391 F (hematuria) 391 F (isocoric light reactive mydriasis) 391 F (marked metabolic acidosis) 22 Human 2x 23 Human once (IN) Hepatic Metab Resp Cardio Hemato Hepatic Renal Metab 467 F 467 F 1006M (increased serum ALT, AST, bilirubin; only after first exposure) 1006 M (significant acid-base disturbance) 467 F (poor ventilation) Gualtieri et al. 1995 ^ > x t| m w RambourgSchepens et al. 1988 467 F (hemoglobinuria, progressive erythropenia) 467 F (increased serum creatinine, oxaluria) 467 F (metabolic acidosis, hypokalaemia) , O) CO 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00190 Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) a Key to figure Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency (Strain) (Specific Route) System NOAEL (mg/kg/day) Less Serious (mg/kg/day) LOAEL Serious (mg/kg/day) Reference Rat (Wistar, Sherman, CarworthWistar) once (G) Resp Hemato Hepatic 530 (congested or hemorrhagic lungs) 3000 M (hemoglobinuria) 1500 F Carpenter et al. 1956 530 (mottled livers) Renal Dermal 530 (rough coat) 530 (severely congested kidneys) Rat once (Fischer- 344) (GW) Rat NS (NS) (GW) Hemato 8.6 M Renal Resp 1000 F 252 2000 F (rapid, shallow breathing) 126 M (hemolysis, hemoglobinuria) Corley et al. 1994 m > I m Dow 1959 mO <n 500 (hematuria) Rat once (Fischer- 344) (G) t Rat once (Fischer- 344) (GW) Dermal Ocular Bd Wt Other Hemato 500 F 1000 F 2000 F 1000 F (rough hair coats; necrosis of tail) 2000 F (palpebral closure) 130 F (staining in perineal region) 250 M (hemolysis) Dow 1981 Ghanayem and Sullivan 1993 o> 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00191 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) Key toa figure Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency (Strain) (Speclfjc Route) System NOAEL (mg/kg/day) Less Serious (mg/kg/day) LOAEL Serious (mg/kg/day) Reference 29 Rat once (Fischer-344) (GW) Hemato Hepatic Renal 125 M 32 b M (hemoglobinuria) 250 M (focal coagulative necrosis of hepatocytes, 1/6) 125 M (hemoglobin casts in proximal tubules) Ghanayem et al. 1987a 30 Rat once (Fischer-344) (GW) Hemato Hepatic Renal 500 M (increase in free Ghanayem et al. hemoglobin in the plasma, 1987b hemoglobinuria, hemolysis) ro 500 M (coagulative necrosis and x hemosiderin deposition in m> hepatocytes and Kupffer qi cells) m 500 M (intracytoplasmic hemoglobin and hemoglobin mOH casts in the proximal CO tubules) 31 Rat once (Fischer-344) (GW) Hemato 125 M (increase in free Ghanayem et al. hemoglobin in the plasma, 1987b hemoglobinuria, hemolysis) 32 Rat once (Fischer-344) (GW) Hemato 125 M (increased HCT, PCV, and MCV followed by decline with hemolysis) Ghanayem et al. 1990b O) cn 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00192 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) a Key to figure Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency (Strain) (Specific Route) System NOAEL (mg/kg/day) LOAEL ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------- Less Serious Serious oSSUlf) 33 Rat 1-12 d (Fischer-344) Ix/d (GW) Hemato Hepatic 125M (time-dependent changes in liver weight: declined 10% on days 3 and 6, increased 5% on day 12) 125 M (hemolytic anemia) Ghanayem et al. 1992 34 Rat 4 d (Fischer- 344) (GW) Hemato Hepatic Renal Bd Wt 500 M 500 M 500M (15.8% increase in relative liver weights after day 1 recovery) 1000M (12.4% increase in relative kidney weight after day 1 recovery) 500 M (reduction of 23% in RBC, Grant et al. 1985 11 % in HGB, increase of r 24% in MCV, 600% in im reticulocyte counts and > 16% in MCH; marrow x hyperplasia) om --I <*> 1000 M (13.4% reduction in body weight gain after day 1 recovery and 26% reduction in body weight gain at day 4 recovery) 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00193 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) Key toa figure Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency (Strain) (Specific Route) System NOAEL (mg/kg/day) Less Serious (mg/kg/day) LOAEL Serious (mg/kg/day) Reference 35 Rat Gd 9-11 (Fischer-344) (GW) Resp 300 F 600 F (dyspnea) NTP1989 Hemato 150 F (increased reticulocytes, MCV, MCH and platelet count, decreased RBC, HGB, HOT, and MCHC) Hepatic 150 F 300 F (27.1% decreased absolute liver weight [Gd 12]) Renal 300F 600 F (urethral bleeding [hematuria]) ro Dermal 300 F 600 F (pale coloration, not x further described) m> Ocular 300F 600 F (chromodacryorrhea) i Bd Wt 150 F (gestational weight gain m Other 150 F (reduced food and water decreased 34.7% [Gd 12]) onmH intake) CO 300 F 600 F (dehydration, cold to touch) i 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00194 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) a Key to Species/ Exposure/ Duration/ Frequency System NOAEL (mg/kg/day) Less Serious (mg/kg/day) LOAEL Serious (mg/kg/day) Reference 36 Rat Gd 11-13 Resp 300 F 600 F (dyspnea) NTP1989 (Fischer- 344) (GW) Hemato 150 F (increased reticulocytes, MCV, MCH and platelet count, decreased RBC, HGB, HCT and MCHC) Hepatic 150 F 300 F (11.5% decreased absolute liver weight [Gd 14]) Renal 300 F 600 F (urethral bleeding [hematuria]) Dermal Ocular 300 F 300 F 600 F (pale coloration, not further described) 600 F (chromodacryorrhea) xm>r--~I Bd Wt 150 F (gestational weight gain X m Other decreased 28.9% [Gd 14]) m 150 F (reduced food and water intake) M 300 F 600 F (dehydration, cold to touch) I 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00195 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) a Key to figure Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency (Strain) {SpecifjC Route) System NOAEL (mg/kg/day) Less Serious (mg/kg/day) LOAEL Serious (mg/kg/day) Reference 37 Rat Gd 9-11 Hemato 30 F 100 F (reduced RBC, HOT and NTP 1989 (Fischer- 344) (GW) HGB, increased reticulocytes, WBC, platelet count, MCV and MCH) Hepatic 100 F 200 F (decreased absolute maternal liver weights: 11.1% [Gd 20], 15.5% [Gd 12]) Renal 200 F Bd Wt 100 F 200 F (gestational weight gain N> Other 100 F 200 F (decreased food and decreased 35.3% (Gd 20]) Xm > water intake) m T| 38 Rat Gd 11-13 (Fischer-344) (GW) Hemato 30 F 100 F (reduced RBC, HCT and HGB, increased NTP 1989 OH(f) reticulocytes, WBC, platelet count, MCV and MCH) Hepatic 100 F 300 F (decreased 11.8% [Gd 14] absolute maternal liver weights) Renal Bd Wt 300 F 100 F 300 F (gestational weight gain decreased 20.4 % [Gd 20]) Other 100 F 300 F (decreased food and water consumption) i 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00196 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) Key to Species/ Exposure/ Duration/ Frequency System NOAEL (mg/kg/day) Less Serious (mg/kg/day) LOAEL Serious (mg/kg/day) Reference 39 Rat (F344/N) 2 wk (W) Resp 346 M 265 F NTP 1993 Cardio 346 M 265 F Hepatic 346 M 265 F Renal 346 M 265 F Bd Wt 346 M 203 F 265 F (11 % decreased final body weight, 32% decrease in body weight gain) x Other 174 M 242 M (14.1% decreased water m> consumption) 102 F 152 F (16.3% decreased water x m consumption) Qm M 40 Rat (Wistar) once (G) Gastro Musc/skel 1310M 1310M 2560 M (very red small intestine) 2560M (flaccid) Olin 1976 Hepatic Renal 670 M 670 M 1310M (very dark liver) 1310M (dark kidneys in 3/10, enlarged in 4/10) 2560 M (blood in bladder [hematuria]) Dermal 670 M 1310M (piloerection) l O 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00197 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) Key toa tigure Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency (Strain) (Specific Route) System NOAEL (mg/kg/day) Less Serious (mg/kg/day) LOAEL Serious (mg/kg/day) 41 Rat (Wistar) once (G) Gastro Hepatic Renal Endocr Other 1127 1127 1127 1127 2255 2255 2255 1127 (dark liver) (red kidneys) (red adrenals) (bloody saliva in 1 animal) 2255 (distended stomach, liquid & gas-filled; blood in intestines) Reference Union Carbide 1980b 42 Mouse (CD-I) Gd 6-13 Ix/d (GW) Bd Wt 43 Mouse 2 wk (Swiss CD-I) (W) Bd Wt Other 6375 637 1275 (unspecified decrease in fluid intake) 1180 F (80% decrease in body weight gain) 12750 M (31% weight loss) Hardin etal. 1987; Schuler et al. 1984 xm> mn Heindel et al. 1990 Om co 44 Mouse (B6C3F1) 2 wk (W) f Resp Cardio Hepatic Renal Bd Wt Other 627 M 1364 F 627 M 1364 F 627 M 1367 F 627 M 1364 F 627 M 1364 F 210 M 370 M (dehydration in 3/5) 150 F (26.5% decreased water consumption) NTP 1993 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00198 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) Key toa figure Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency (Strain) (Specific Route) System NOAEL (mg/kg/day) Less Serious (mg/kg/day) LOAEL Serious (mg/kg/day) 45 Mouse (CD-I) Gd 8-14 (G) Resp Bd Wt 1000 F 1500 F 1500 F (abnormal breathing) 2000 F (unspecified decrease in maternal weight gain) 46 Mouse (CD-I) Gd 8-14 Ix/d (G) Bd Wt 650 F 1000 F (unspecified decrease in maternal weight gain) 47 Gn Pig (Hartley) once (GW) Hemato 250 M 48 Gn Pig once Gastro 500 (Hartley) (GW) Bd Wt 1000 1000 (moderate to mild necrosis and hemorrhage of the gastric mucosa in 1/5 males and 1/5 females) Immunological/Lymphoreticular 49 Rat once (Fischer-344) (GW) 63 M 125M (significant increase (110-150%) in relative spleen weight) 50 Rat once (Fischer-344) (GW) 500 M (>220% increase in relative spleen weight due to trapped RBCs) Reference Wier et al. 1987 Wieret al. 1987 Ghanayem and Sullivan 1993 Shepard 1994b Ghanayem et al. 1987a i Ghanayem et al. 1987b 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00199 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) Exposure/ a Duration/ Key to Species/ Frequency figure (Strain) (Specific Route) System N0AEL (mg/kg/day) LOAEL -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------------- Less Serious Serious (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) Reference 51 Rat once (Fischer-344) (GW) 125M (relative spleen weight 145-170% of control) Ghanayem et al. 1987b 52 Rat 1-12 d (Fischer-344) Ix/d (GW) 53 Rat 4 d (Fischer-344) (GW) 54 Rat Gd 9-11 (Fischer-344) (GW) 55 Rat Gd 11-13 (Fischer-344) (GW) 56 Rat Gd 9-11 (Fischer-344) (GW) 57 Rat Gd 11-13 (Fischer-344) (GW) 125 M (increase of about 62% in spleen weight after 6 days, decline of about 45% during days 6-12) 500 M (87% increase in relative spleen weight on day 1, extramedullary hematopoiesis) 150F (increased absolute spleen weight [13.5% Gd 20; 54.8% Gd 12]) 150 F (increased absolute spleen weights [27.1% Gd 20; 67.7% Gd 14]) 30 F 100F (increased absolute spleen weight [11.8% Gd 20; 43.9% Gd 12]) 30 F 100 F (increased absolute spleen weight [17.5% Gd 20; 44.4% Gd 14]) Ghanayem et al. 1992 Grant et al. 1985 ! xm> I m m NTP 1989 NTP 1989 NTP 1989 NTP 1989 I CO 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00200 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) Key toa figure Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency (Strain) (Specific Route) System 58 Mouse (B6C3F1) 2 wk (W) NOAEL (mg/kg/day) 210 M 1364 F LOAEL Less Serious (mg/kg/day) 370M (decreased 38.3% absolute thymus weight, 38.9% relative thymus weight) Serious (mg/kg/day) Reference NTP1993 Neurological 59 Human once (IN) 391 F (coma) Gijsenbergh et al. 1989 60 Human once (IN) 467 F (coma) RambourgSchepens et al. 1988 61 Rat (Wistar, Sherman, CarworthWistar) once 530 (sluggishness, prostration, Carpenter et al. narcosis) 1956 62 Rat (NS) NS (GW) 63 Rat once , (Fischer- 344) (G) 64 Rat (Crl:COBS CD (SD)BR) 1-3 d (G) 252 (drowsiness) 1000F 2000 F (lethargy) 222 M 443 M (lethargy after 1st dose) Dow 1959 Dow 1981 Eastman Kodak 1983; Krasavage 1986 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00201 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) Exposure/ Key toa Species/ Frequency figure (Strain) (Specific Route) System NOAEL (mg/kg/day) Less Serious (mg/kg/day) LOAEL Serious (mg/kg/day) 65 Rat Gd 9-11 (Fischer- 344) (GW) 300 F 600 F (lethargy) Reference NTP1989 66 Rat Gd 11-13 (Fischer-344) (GW) 300 F 600 F (lethargy) NTP 1989 67 Rat (Wistar) once (G) 68 Rat (SpragueDawley) once (GW) 69 Rat (Wistar) once (G) 70 Mouse (CD-I) Gd 8-14 Ix/d (G) 71 Gn Pig (Hartley) once (GW) 670 M 1310M (lethargy, piloerection) 500 F (ataxia, piloerection) 1127 2255 (sluggish, unsteady gait) Olin 1976 im Sivarao and > Mehendale 1995 i m m 5M Union Carbide 1980b 1000 F 1500 F (lethargy, failure to right) Wieret al. 1987 500 (slight weakness directly after dosing) 1000 (moderate to severe weakness and prostration directly after dosing) Shepard 1994b 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00202 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) Key toa figure Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency (Strain) (Specific Route) System NOAEL (mg/kg/day) Less Serious (mg/kg/day) LOAEL Serious (mg/kg/day) Reproductive 72 Rat once (Fischer- 344) (GW) 500 M Reference Ghanayem et al. 1987a 73 Rat 4 d (Fischer-344) (GW) 1000M Grant et al. 1985 74 Rat Gd 11-13 (Fischer-344) (GW) 75 Rat Gd 9-11 (Fischer-344) (GW) 76 Rat Gd 11-13 (Fischer-344) (GW) 77 Rat (F344/N) 2 wk (W) 78 Mouse (CD-I) Gd 6-13 Ix/d (GW) 300 F 100F 100 F 346 M 600 F (vaginal bleeding) NTP1989 ro Xm > x 200 F (increased resorptions, NTP1989 m implantation loss, vaginal bleeding) mOH CD 300 F (increased resorptions, implantation loss, vaginal bleeding) NTP1989 NTP 1993 1180 F (19% decrease in incidence Hardin et al. 1987; of viable litters) Schuler et al. 1984 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00203 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) Exposure/ Key toa Species/ Frequency figure (Strain) (Specific Route) System NOAEL (mg/kg/day) Less Serious (mg/kg/day) LOAEL Serious (mg/kg/day) 79 Mouse (CD-I) Gd 8-14 (G) 650 F 1000 F (increased incidence of resorptions) Reference Wieretal. 1987 Developmental 80 Rat Gd 9-11 (Fischer- 344) (GW) 150F 300 F (decreased fetal weight) NTP1989 81 Rat Gd 11-13 (Fischer-344) (GW) 82 Rat Gd 9-11 (Fischer- 344) (GW) 83 Rat Gd 11-13 (Fischer- 344) (GW) 84 Mouse (CD-I) Gd 8-14 Ix/d (G) 300 F 200 600 F (decreased fetal body weight, decreased gravid uterine weight) 300 NTP 1989 xm > i NTP 1989 m w3 NTP 1989 650 1000 (cleft palate in 1/5 litters) Wier et al. 1987 51 I7rv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523_00008282-00204 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) a Key to figure Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency (Strain) (Specific Route) System INTERMEDIATE EXPOSURE NOAEL (mg/kg/day) Less Serious (mg/kg/day) LOAEL Serious (mg/kg/day) Death 85 Rat 23 d (Crl:COBS 5 d/wk CD (SD)BR) (G) 885 M (death in 1/9) 86 Mouse 21 wk (Swiss CD-I) (W) 1300 F (death in 6/20) 87 Mouse (JCL-ICR) 5 wk 5 d/wk (GO or GW) Systemic 88 Rat 90 d (Sherman) (F) Resp Hemato Hepatic Renal BdWt 1540 1540 76 310 310 2000 M (5/5 dead) 310 1540 1540 (unspecified increase in relative liver weight) (unspecified increase in relative kidney weight) (unspecified decrease in body weight gain) Reference Eastman Kodak 1983; Krasavage 1986 Heindel et al. 1990 Nagano et al. 1979, m> 1984 i mmTml 3 CO Carpenter et al. 1956 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00205 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) Key toa figure Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency (Strain) (Specific Route) System NOAEL (mg/kg/day) Less Serious (mg/kg/day) LOAEL Serious (mg/kg/day) Reference 89 Rat 6 wk (CrhCOBS 5 d/wk CD (SD)BR) (G) Resp Cardio Gastro Hemato 885 M 885 M Hepatic 222 M Renal 222 M Endocr Ocular Bd Wt 885 M 885 M 443 M Other 443 M 222 M (mild hyperkeratosis and acanthosis in stomach) 443 M (focal hemosiderin deposition, 30% increase in serum alkaline phosphatase activity) 443 M (focal hemosiderin deposition in the proximal convoluted tubules) 885M (7-12% decreased body weight gain in the presence of reduced feed consumption) 885M (12-31% reduced feed consumption during days 0-20) Eastman Kodak 1983; Krasavage 1986 222 M (12% decreased RBC count, 7% decreased HGB, 6% increased MCH, hemoglobinuria) m > x m m (f) i CO 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00206 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) Key toa figure Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency (Strain) (Specific Route) System NOAEL (mg/kg/day) Less Serious (mg/kg/day) LOAEL Serious (mg/kg/day) 90 Rat 21 d (Sprague- (W) Dawley) Hepatic Renal Bd Wt Other 506 M 444 F 506 M 444 F 506 M 444 F 180 M 204 F 506 M (12% decreased water consumption) 444 F (31% decreased water consumption) Reference Exon et al. 1991 to ml> x m mo co ! 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production i o00 ED 001523 00008282-00207 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) Key to" figure Species/ (Strain) Exposure/ Duration/ Frequency (Specific Route) System NOAEL (mg/kg/day) Less Serious (mg/kg/day) LOAEL Serious (mg/kg/day) Reference 91 Rat (F344/N) 13 wk (W) Resp 452 M 470 F 1NTP 1993 Cardio 452 M 470 F Gastro 367 M 363 F 452 M (diarrhea) 470 F (diarrhea) Hemato 129 M 281 M (decreased RBC, mild anemia) 82 F (decreased RBC, HCT, HGB) Musc/skel 452 M 470 F xm Hepatic 69c M (hepatocellular > 82 F alteration-cells that x stained eosinophilic and lacked cytoplasmic granularity) om Renal 69 M (moderate increase in blood urea nitrogen) 82 F (decreased urine volune, possibly due to dehydration) Endocr 452 M 470 F Dermal 452 M 470 F Ocular 452 M BdWt 470 F 281 M 304 F 367 M (mean body weight gains decreased 12.5%) 452 M (24% decrease in body weight gain) 363 F (12% decreased final body weight and 32.5% decrease in body weight gain) Other 69 M 129M (water consumption decreased 12.1%) 82 F 151 F (water consumption decreased 17.6%) 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00208 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) Exposure/ Key toa Species/ Frequency figure (Strain) (Specific Route) System NOAEL (mg/kg/day) Less Serious (mg/kg/day) LOAEL Serious (mg/kg/day) 92 Rat (F344/N) 60 d (W) Bd Wt 234 M 443 M (13% decrease in mean body weight gain) Reference NTP 1993 Rat 91-93 d (DW albino) (F) Resp 919 M 976 F Cardio 919 M 976 F Gastro 919 M ro 976 F xm Hepatic 188 M 919 M (25% increase in relative > liver weight) x 222 F 976 F (27% increase in relative m Renal 188 M liver weight) 919 M (18% increase in relative mO 05 kidney weight) 222 F 976 F (23% increase in relative kidney weight) Endocr Bd Wt 919 M 976 F 28 M 222 F 188M (body weight 91-7% less than controls over the course of the study) 919 M (body weight gain 53% lower than controls) 976 F (body weight gain 45% lower than controls) Other 28 M 188 M (food intake 18% lower than controls) i 222 F 976 F (food intake 23% lower I than controls) 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00209 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) a Key to figure Exposure/ LOAEL Duration/-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Species/ Frequency N0AEL Less Serious Serious (Strain) (Specific Route) System (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) 94 Mouse 25 wk (Swiss CD-I) (W) Hepatic Renal Bd Wt Other 1300 1300 M 1300 (13-22% increase in kidney weight) 1300 F (10% decrease in terminal body weight) 700 (unspecified low water consumption) 95 Mouse 14 wk (Swiss CD-I) (W) Hepatic Renal 700 M Bd Wt 700 700 (6-9% increase in absolute liver weight) 700 F (22% increase in absolute kidney/adrenal weight) Reference Heindel et al. 1990 to Heindel et al. 1990 i m > I "TmT|1 3w 96 Mouse (JCL-ICR) 5wk 5 d/wk (G) Hemato 500 M (decrease in RBC count) Nagano et al. 1979, 1984 { i 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00210 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) a Key to figure Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency (Strain) (Specific Route) System NOAEL (mg/kg/day) Less Serious (mg/kg/day) LOAEL Serious (mg/kg/day) Reference 97 Mouse 13wk Resp 694 M NTP 1993 (B6C3F1) (W) 1306 F Cardio 694 M 1306 F Gastro 694M 1306 F Musc/skel 694 M 1306 F Hepatic 694M 1306 F Renal 694M 1306 F Endocr 694M m> 1306 F qi Dermal 694M m Tl Ocular 1306 F 694M TmoHI 1306 F CO Bd Wt 223M 370 F 553M (18.5% decreased body weight gain) 676 F (26.1% decreased mean body weight gain; 10% decreased mean final body weight) Immunological/Lymphoreticular Rat 6 wk (CrLCOBS 5 d/wk CD (SD)BR) (G) 222 M 443M (enlarged, dark spleen in 3/9, 57% increase in spleen weight) i Eastman Kodak 1983; Krasavage 1986 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00211 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) Key toa figure Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency (Strain) (Specific Route) System NOAEL (mg/kg/day) Less Serious (mg/kg/day) LOAEL Serious (mg/kg/day) 99 Rat (SpragueDawley) 21 d (W) 506 M 444 F Rat (F344/N) 13 Wk (W) 69 M 82 F 129M (increased hemosiderin 151 F pigmentation in spleen) 101 Mouse (B6C3F1) 13wk (W) 694 M 1306 F Neurological 102 Rat 6wk (Crl:COBS 5 d/wk CD (SD)BR) (G) 222 M 103 Rat (F344/N) 13 wk (W) 452 M 470 F 104 Mouse (B6C3F1) 13wk (W) 694 M 1306 F Reproductive 105 Rat 6 wk (CrhCOBS 5 d/wk CD (SD)BR) (G) 885 M Reference Exon et al. 1991 NTP 1993 NTP 1993 JO X m> x m Eastman Kodak m 1983; Krasavage o 1986 go NTP 1993 NTP1993 i Eastman Kodak 1983; Krasavage 1986 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00212 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) Key toa figure Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency (Strain) (Specific Route) System NOAEL (mg/kg/day) Less Serious (mg/kg/day) LOAEL Serious (mg/kg/day) 106 Rat (SpragueDawley) 21 d (W) 506 M Reference Exon et al. 1991 107 Rat (F344/N) 13 wk (W) 129 M 304 F 281M (11.3% decreased sperm concentration) 363 F (altered estrous cycle) NTP 1993 108 Rat (F344/N) 60 d (W) 109 Mouse 21 wk (Swiss CD-I) (W) 110 Mouse 25 wk (Swiss CD-I) (W) 443 M 700 1300 (21 % decrease in litters/pair, 51 % decrease in pups/litter) NTP 1993 ro x m> x Heindel et al. 1990 rn om to 1300 F (58% decrease in fertility, 66% decrease in live pups per litter; altered estrous cycle) Heindel et al. 1990 111 Mouse 14 wk (Swiss CD-I) (W) i 112 Mouse (JCL-ICR) 5 wk 5 d/wk (G) 700 1000 M Heindel et al. 1990 i Nagano et al. 1979, 1984 0o>0 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00213 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-3. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Oral (continued) Exposure/ Key toa Species/ Frequency figure (Strain) (Specific Route) System 113 Mouse (B6C3F1) 13 wk (W) NOAEL (mg/kg/day) 694 M 1306 F Less Serious (mg/kg/day) L0AEL Serious (mg/kg/day) Reference NTP 1993 Developmental 114 Mouse 21 wk (Swiss CD-I) (W) 700 (decrease in live pup weight) Heindel et al. 1990 115 Mouse 14 wk 700 (Swiss CD-I) (W) Heindel et al. 1990 ho Im > m-n aThe number corresponds to entries in Figure 2-3. Differences in levels of health effects and cancer effects between males and females are not indicated in Figure 2-3. Where such differences exist, only the levels of effect for the most sensitive gender are presented. To-mHl 0) bUsed to derive an acute oral minimal risk level (MRL) of 0.4 mg/kg/day; dose divided by an uncertainty factor of 90 (10 for use of a LOAEL, 3 for extrapolation from animals to humans, and 3 for human variability). For further details, see MRL worksheets in Appendix A. "Used to derive an intermediate oral MRL of 0.07 mg/kg/day; dose divided by an uncertainty factor of 1,000 (10 for use of a LOAEL, 10 for extrapolation from animals to humans, and 10 for human variability). For further details, see MRL worksheets in Appendix A. Bd Wt = body weight; Cardio = cardiovascular; d = day(s); Endocr = endocrine; F = female; (G) = gavage; Gastro = gastrointestinal; Gd = gestational day; Gn Pig = guinea pig; (GO) = gavage in oil; (GW) = gavage in water; HOT = hematocrit; Hemato = hematological; HGB = hemoglobin; (IN) = ingestion; LD50 = lethal dose, 50% kill; LOAEL = lowest-observable-adverse-effect level; M = male; MCH = mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC = mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; MCV = mean corpuscular volume; Metab = metabolic; Musc/skel = musculoskeletal; NOAEL = no-observable-adverse-effect level; NS = not specified; PCV = packed cell volume; RBC = red blood cell; Resp = respiratory; (W) = water; WBC = white blood cell; wk = week(s); x = times. i 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00214 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-6. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Dermal Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency/ (Strain) (Specific Route) ystem NOAEL Less Serious LOAEL Serious ACUTE EXPOSURE Death Rat 4 hr (NS) 2273 F (LDso) mg/kg Reference Carpenter and Condra 1961 Rat (SpragueDawley) Gd 7-16 4x/d 1.4 mL/d F (death in 10/11) Hardin et al. 1984 Gn Pig (NS) Rabbit (New Zealand) Rabbit (NS) once 24 hr 24 h 2.0 mL (13/20 died within 1 week) Wahlberg and Boman 1979 N> 406- M (LDso) 1804 mg/kg 220 (LDso) mg/kg . Xm Carpenter et al. > 1956 x Dow 1959 mTmoH*n1 CO Rabbit 8 hr (New Zealand) 72 F (death in 2/6 on day 5) mg/kg 99 F (LDso) mg/kg Duprat and Gradiskl 1979 Rabbit (NS) Rabbit (New Zealand) Rabbit (New Zealand) NS 24 hr | 24 hr 435 (LDso) mg/kg 2000 (10/10 animals died) mg/kg 580 mg/kg (LDso) Eastman Kodak 1988 Olin 1976 i Olin 1976 126 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00215 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-6. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Dermal (continued) Exposure/ LOAEL Species/ Frequency/ (Strain) (Specific Route) System NOAEL Less Serious Serious Rabbit (New Zealand) once 6 hr 638 M (LDso) mg/kg 568 F (LDso) mg/kg Reference Union Carbide 1980a Systemic Human 4-8 hr Ocular 98 ppm 113 ppm (ocular irritation) Human 24-72 hr Dermal 0.2 mL 10% Human 2 hr Dermal 100% M (drying of the skin, reduction in skinfold thickness and volume of exposed fingers) Carpenter et al. 1956 ro CMA 1992; Greenspan et al. Im > 1995 m Johanson et al. Tml 1988 Rat (Wistar) once Hemato 200 F mg/kg 260 F (hemolysis, hemoglobinuria) Bartnik et al. 1987 mg/kg Rat (SpragueDawley) Gd 7-16 4x/d Rat (SpragueDawley) i Gd 7-16 4x/d Hemato Dermal Bd Wt 1.4 mL/d F (necrosis of tail; rough coat) 0.48 F (16% decrease in body mL/d weight gain days 5-12; 13% decrease in body weight gain days 5-17) 1.4 mL/d F (burgundy-colored urine [hemoglobinuria]) Hardin et al. 1984 i Hardin et al. 1984 I7rv1fl06 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523_00008282-00216 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-6. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Dermal (continued) Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency/ (Strain) (Specific Route) ystem NOAEL Less Serious LOAEL Serious Rat Gd 6-15 (Fischer- 344) 6 hr/d Ocular 25 ppm F (periocular wetness) Reference Tyletal. 1984 Gn Pig (NS) Rabbit (New Zealand) once 24 hr Rabbit (New Zealand) Rabbit (NS) 3 min 24 h Bd Wt 0.5 mL Hemato Hepatic Renal Hemato Dermal Ocular Bd Wt 505 M (increased erythrocyte mg/kg osmotic fragility) 406 M (hemoglobinuria) mg/kg 406 M (pale liver) mg/kg 406 M (congested kidneys) mg/kg Wahlberg and Boman 1979 Carpenter et al. 1956 Xm > mti Carpenter et al. 1956 Om 0) 200 mg/kg (moderate skin irritation) 200 mg/kg (slight initial weight loss) 100% (moderate conjunctival irritation; corneal injury) Dow 1959 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production 00 ED 001523 00008282-00217 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-6. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Dermal (continued) Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency/ (Strain) (Specific Route) System NOAEL Less Serious LOAEL Serious Reference Rabbit 8 hr (New Zealand) Resp Hemato Hepatic Renal Rabbit (New Zealand) Rabbit (New Zealand) once 24 hr i Dermal Other Ocular Gastro 500 mg/kg Musc/ske Hepatic 500 mg/kg Renal 250 mg/kg Ocular 250 mg/kg 72 F (congestion, thickening mg/kg of alveolar walls) 72 F (necrosis of epidermis mg/kg and dermis) 0.1 mL of 10% (mild eye irritation) Duprat and Gradiski 1979 72 mg/kg F (hemoglobinuria) 72 mg/kg F (congestion in liver, necrosis and steatosis) 72 mg/kg F (enlarged kidneys with hemoglobinuric nephrosis and interstitial reaction) 72 mg/kg F (hypothermia) 0.1 mL (severe eye irritation) of 100% 1000 (very dark areas in small mg/kg intestine) r X m > x Kennah et al. 1989a m 3O) Olin 1976 1000 mg/kg 250 mg/kg 500 mg/kg 500 mg/kg (flaccid muscle tone) (discolored liver) (blood In urine and bladder [hematuria], discolored kidney) (yellow cornea) Rabbit (New Zealand) once or 4 hr Dermal Ocular 0.5 mL (moderate skin irritation) 0.1 mL (severe eye irritation) Rohm and Haas 1983 129 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00218 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-6. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Dermal (continued) Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency/ (Strain) (Specific Route) bystem NOAEL LOAEL -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Less Serious Serious Rabbit (New Zealand) Gd 6-18 6 hr/d Ocular 50 ppm F 100 ppm F (periocular wetness) Reference Tyl et al. 1984 Rabbit (New Zealand) 11 d 9 x 1 mL/d Hemato 180 M mg/kg/d 361 M (transient hemoglobinuria) mg/kg/d Union Carbide 1980a 6 hr/d 180 F 361 F (reduced mean mg/kg/d mg/kg/d erythrocyte counts, hemoglobin, MCHC; increased MCH) ro Hepatic 361 xm mg/kg/d > Renal 90 F mg/kg/d 180 F (blood in urine [hematuria]) mg/kg/d x m Dermal 18 (erythema) m mg/kg/d 90) Ocular 361 M mg/kg/d Bd Wt 361 M mg/kg/d 180 F 361 F (121% decrease in weight mg/kg/d mg/kg/d gain on day 3) i 130 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00219 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-6. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Dermal (continued) Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency/ (Strain) (Specific Route) System NOAEL Less Serious LOAEL Serious Reference Rabbit (New Zealand) once 6 hr Gastro Hemato Hepatic Renal 451 mg/kg 451 mg/kg 902 mg/kg (reddened stomach; females: reddened intestines) 902 mg/kg (mottled with pocked surface) Endocr Dermal Ocular Other 451 M mg/kg 902 F mg/kg 451 mg/kg 451 mg/kg 451 mg/kg (reddened adrenals) (erythema; females: slight necrosis at application site) 902 mg/kg (yellowed peritoneal fat) 451 F (hemoglobinuria) mg/kg Union Carbide 1980a 451 mg/kg (hematuria; enlarged, dark kidneys; male survivors had pocked surface) 902 M (grey iris) mg/kg Rabbit (New Zealand) 11 d 9 x 1 ml_/d 6 hr/d Renal i Dermal 271 mg/kg/d 271 mg/kg/d (tubular vacuolization [4/6] degeneration [6/6] hyperplasia [3/6], glomerular adhesions [4/6], interstitial nephritis [3/6], hemoglobinuric nephrosis) (necrosis) Union Carbide 1980a r Xm>rI--~I mn m O c--\ 0 CO 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00220 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-6. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Dermal (continued) Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency/ (Strain) (Specific Route) System NOAEL Less Serious LOAEL Serious Reference Rabbit (New Zealand) 24 hr Rabbit (NS) Rabbit (New Zealand) once 4 hr Resp 451 M (orange-red lungs) mg/kg Union Carbide 1980b Gastro 451 M (orange peritonea, intestines) mg/kg Hepatic 451 M (orange-red liver) mg/kg Renal 451 M (dark red kidneys, hematuria) mg/kg Dermal 451 M 902 M (erythema, necrosis) mg/kg mg/kg Ocular 451 M mg/kg 902 M (iritis in 2/4) mx mg/kg > Ocular Dermal 0.5 mL 5% 0.5 mL 15% (moderate corneal injury) 0.5 mL (irritant) X Union Carbide m 1980b m q 05 Zissu 1995 Rabbit (New Zealand) 24 hr Dermal 0.5 mL (severe irritant) Zissu 1995 Immunological/Lymphoreticular Human 24-72 hr 1 0.2 mL 10% CMA 1992; Greenspan et al. 1995 Rabbit (New Zealand) 24 hr 406 M (engorged spleen) mg/kg Carpenter et al. 1956 132 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00221 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-6. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Dermal (continued) Exposure/ Species/ Frequency/ (Strain) (Specific Route) ys*em NOAEL Less Serious LOAEL Serious Reference Rabbit 8 hr (New Zealand) 72 mg/kg F (enlarged spleens filled with Duprat and erythrocytes, white atrophic Gradiski 1979 pulp) Rabbit (New Zealand) once 6 hr 902 M mg/kg 451 F mg/kg 902 F (enlarged spleen) mg/kg Union Carbide 1980a Rabbit (New Zealand) once Neurological Rat (SpragueDawley) Gd 7-16 4x/d 451 M (dark spleens) Union Carbide mg/kg 1980b xm > 5x m"T1 ~n 1.4 mL/d F (ataxia; moderate to marked Hardin et al. 1984 mOH inactivity) CO Rabbit 8 hr (New Zealand) 72 mg/kg F (prostration, narcosis prior Duprat and to death) Gradiski 1979 Rabbit (New Zealand) Rabbit (New Zealand) 24 hr once i 6 hr 1000 mg/kg 902 M mg/kg 451 F mg/kg 2000 (anorexia, no spontaneous Olin 1976 mg/kg movement) Union Carbide 1980a 902 F (nystagmus, convulsions) mg/kg 133 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00222 Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-6. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Dermal (continued) Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency/ _ (Strain) (Specific Route) ^ NOAEL LOAEL ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Less Serious Serious Developmental Rat (SpragueDawley) Gd 7-16 4x/d 0.48 mL/d INTERMEDIATE EXPOSURE Systemic Rabbit (New Zealand) 90 d 5 d/wk 6 hr/d Resp Cardio Gastro 150 mg/kg 150 mg/kg 150 mg/kg Hemato Musc/ske Hepatic Renal Endocr Dermal 150 mg/kg 150 mg/kg 150 mg/kg 150 mg/kg 150 mg/kg i Ocular Bd Wt 150 mg/kg 150 mg/kg 10 mg/kg (slight to moderate erythema and edema) 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Reference Hardin et al. 1984 CMA1983 N> Xm Xq omTTm--CO|li i ED 001523 00008282-00223 134 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE 2-BUTOXYETHANOL AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE Appendix A. Mammalian Toxicity Values from ATSDR 1998 Table 2-6. Levels of Significant Exposure to 2-Butoxyethanol - Dermal (continued) Exposure/ Duration/ Species/ Frequency/ (Strain) (Specific Route) y NOAEL LOAEL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Less Serious Serious Immunological/Lymphoreticular Rabbit (New Zealand) 90 d 5 d/wk 6 hr/d 150 mg/kg Neurological Rabbit (New Zealand) 90 d 5 d/wk 6 hr/d 150 mg/kg Reproductive Rabbit (New Zealand) 90 d 5 d/wk 6 hr/d 50 mg/kg M 150 F mg/kg 150 M (5.2% increase in relative mg/kg testes weight) Reference CMA 1983 CMA 1983 ro I m> m*n CMA 1983 mTI oH0) Bd Wt = body weight; d = day(s); Endocr = endocrine; F = female; Gastro = gastrointestinal; Gd = gestation day; Gn Pig = guinea pig; Hemato = hematological; hr = hour(s); LD50 = lethal dose, 50% kill; LOAEL = lowest-observable-adverse-effect level; M = male; MCH = mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC = mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; min = minute(s); Musc/skel = rpusculoskeletal; NOAEL = no-observable-adverse-effect level; NS = not specified; Resp = respiratory; wk = week(s); x = times 135 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00224 APPENDIX A-2 Toxicity Values in Laboratory Mammals Published After 1998 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00225 Test Organism Exposure Exposure Route Duration Appendix A-2. Mammalian EGBE Toxicity Data Published Since 1998 Effect Measurement Endpoint Effects Notes EGBE Concentra tion Units Reference Additional notes BALB/c mice BALB/c mice BALB/c mice F344 rats Syrian hamster Syrian hamster Opossum B6C3F1 mice Dermal 1 dose Dermal 1 dose Dermal 4 days In vitro In vitro <3 hrs In vitro 7 hr In vitro 24 hr Inhalation 6 hr ACUTE EXPOSURES Other sublethal NOEC Immune system response Other sublethal LOEC Immune system response Other sublethal LOAEL Immune system response Other sublethal other Hemolytic effects Other sublethal other Other sublethal NOAEL Inhibition of pADPr synthesis Cellular transformation induction 1 4 500 11.8 591 2364 Mortality EC50 Other sublethal LOAEL Cell viability Forestomach lesions 1000 250 mg/ear Singh et al. 2002 mg/ear Singh et al. 2002 mg/kg day Singh et al. 2001 mg/L Udden 2002 mg/L Hoflack et al. 1997 Significant response depended on timing of dose relative to immune-system challenge with oxazalone. Significant response depended on timing of dose relative to immune-system challenge with oxazalone. Possible T-cell immunity suppression, lowest concentration with significant difference from control Sub-hemolytic concentrations of 2-BAA for rats compared with human RBCs (100 times greater) Suspected precursor to genotoxicity in synergy with other compounds (methylmethanesulfate) mg/L mg/L Park et al. 2002b Dartsch et al. 1999 EGBE toxicity in liver may be from iron released by hemolysis Toxic effects only observed with EGBE stored for 3 months and was due to 2-BAA (an EGBE degradate) ppm Green et al. 2002 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00226 Test Organism guinea pig B6C3F1 mice guinea pig F344 rats guinea pig B6C3F1 mice B6C3F1 mice B6C3F1 mice B6C3F1 mice F344 rats Exposure Exposure Route Duration Appendix A-2. Mammalian EGBE Toxicity Data Published Since 1998 Effect Measurement Endpoint Effects Notes EGBE Concentra tion Units Reference Inhalation 1 hr Injection 1 dose Mortality NOEC Other sublethal LOAEL Forestomach lesions Injection 1 dose Oral - dw 2-4 days Oral - dw 1 dose Mortality NOAEL Other sublethal LOAEL Mortality LD50 Histopatholog y Oral gavage 4 days Other sublethal LOAEL Forestomach lesions Oral gavage 4 days Mortality LOAEL Oral gavage 7 days Oral gavage 1 dose Other sublethal LOAEL Other sublethal other Hepatic stress EGBE metabolism and distribution Oral gavage 1 dose Other sublethal LOAEL Hemolytic effects 633 10 2000 250 1414 400 400 450 ppm mg/kg bw Gingell et al. 1998 Green et al. 2002 mg/kg bw mg/kg bw-day mg/kg bw Gingell et al. 1998 Nyska et al. 2003 Gingell et al. 1998 mg/kg bw-day Poet et al. 2003 mg/kg bw-day Poet et al. 2003 mg/kg bw-day Park et al. 2002a mg/kg Deisinger et al. 600 bw 2004 mg/kg 125 bw Udden 2000 Additional notes Max vapor concentrations able to maintain. No mortalities/signs of toxicity for 14 days. LD50 test with no mortalities or other symptoms displayed after 14 days of monitoring Hemolysis and thrombosis Minimal to mild forestomach epithelial hyperplasia. No stats presented. Mortality attributed to dosing method, not necessarily to actual EGBE dose Significant decrease in vitamin E, increase in oxidative DNA damage Mice monitored for 90 minutes, toxicity not reported or monitored for Morphological changes in erythrocytes w/in 30 minutes of dose, persists > 4 hours 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00227 Test Organism F344 rats F344 rats F344 rats Exposure Route Oral gavage Oral gavage Oral gavage Exposure Duration 2-4 days 1-3 days 1 dose Appendix A-2. Mammalian EGBE Toxicity Data Published Since 1998 Effect Measurement Endpoint Effects Notes EGBE Concentra tion Units Reference Other sublethal LOEC Other sublethal LOAEL Other sublethal LOAEL Increased adherence of RBCs to extracellular matrix Acute regenerative hemolytic anemia Various hemotologic parameters mg/kg Koshkaryev et al. 250 bw-day 2003 mg/kg Ghanayem et al. 250 bw-day 2001 mg/kg Ghanayem et al. 250 bw 2000 Additional notes 2, 3, and 4 doses tested. All showed a response. Greatest was in the 2 dose group. Significant morphological changes in erythrocytes Erythrocyte swelling, increase in MCV, increased spleen/body weight ratio F344 rats Oral gavage Sprague Dawley rats Oral gavage Sprague Dawley rats Oral gavage Histopatholog 3 days Other sublethal LOAEL y 250 1-4 doses Mortality NOEC 500 1-4 doses Mortality LOEC 1500 CHRONIC EXPOSURES B6C3F1 Hemolytic mice Inhalation 14 wk Other sublethal LOEC effects 31.2 Hepatic lesions and B6C3F1 forestomach mice Inhalation 2 years Other sublethal LOAEL effects 62.5 mg/kg Nyska et al. bw-day 1999a mg/kg Sawant et al. bw-day 1999 mg/kg Sawant et al. bw-day 1999 ppm NTP 2000 ppm Boatman et al. 2004 Ocular thrombosis and retinal degeneration Dose concentration and timing varied, mortality rates depended on dose timing Dose concentration and timing varied, mortality rates depended on dose timing Significant changes in female hematology at all doses in both 14 wk/2 yr study. Min 2 yr dose = 62.5 ppm Significant increase in cell pigmentation, ulcers, and eptithelial hyperplasia (Tables 1,2) 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00228 Test Organism Exposure Exposure Route Duration Appendix A-2. Mammalian EGBE Toxicity Data Published Since 1998 Effect Measurement Endpoint Effects Notes EGBE Concentra tion Units Reference Additional notes B6C3F1 mice B6C3F1 mice B6C3F1 mice Inhalation 2 years Mortality Inhalation 14 wk Growth Inhalation 2 years Mortality NOEC NOEC LOEC B6C3F1 mice B6C3F1 mice F344 rats F344 rats Inhalation 14 wk Growth LOEC Inhalation 18 mo Mortality NOEC Inhalation 2 years Other sublethal LOEC Inhalation 13 wks Other sublethal LOEC Elimination kinetics study, no mortality observed Hemolytic effects (e.g., anemia) Histopatholog y F344 rats Inhalation 2 years Growth F344 rats Inhalation 18 mo Mortality NOEC NOEC Elimination kinetics study, no mortality observed 62.5 ppm NTP 2000 62.5 ppm NTP 2000 125 ppm NTP 2000 125 ppm NTP 2000 Male mortality significantly affected, no change in female mortality in any dose (Table 15) No significant effects on body weight in 14 wk test (male or female) Significant increase in male mortality in 2 yr test (Table 15) Body weight gains for males significantly less than control in 14 wk study. Less obvious in 2 yr study. Max blood concentration = 6.27 ug/g (males) and 12.96 ug/g 250 ppm Dilletal. 1998 (females) 31.2 ppm NTP 2000 Significant changes in female hematology parameters at all doses (Table 3) Long et al. 2000, Histopathological effects Nyska et al. observed in all groups tested 32 ppm 1999b (but not in controls) 62.5 ppm NTP 2000 No obvious difference in weights in males or females from controls (Tables 7,8) Max blood concentration = 4.22 ug/g (males) and 3.16 ug/g 125 ppm Dilletal. 1998 (females) 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00229 Test Organism F344 rats F344 rats F344 rats F344 rats F344 rats Swiss CD-I mice Swiss CD-I mice B6C3F1 mice B6C3F1 mice F344 rats Appendix A-2. Mammalian EGBE Toxicity Data Published Since 1998 Exposure Exposure Route Duration Effect Measurement Endpoint Effects Notes EGBE Concentra tion Units Reference Additional notes Inhalation 13 wks Immobilization NOEC Moribund Inhalation 2 years Mortality NOEC Inhalation 2 years Growth LOEC Inhalation 13 wks Immobilization LOEC Inhalation 2 years Mortality LOEC Oral - dw Oral - dw 2 generation s 2 generation s M, R, G M, R, G NOEC LOEC Moribund Slight reproductive effects in 2nd generation Statistically significant effects Oral gavage Oral gavage < 90 days Other sublethal LOAEL Hemolytic and hepatic effects < 90 days Mortality NOAEL Oral gavage < 90 days Other sublethal LOAEL Hemolytic and hepatic effects Long et al. 2000, No moribund individuals Nyska et al. reported in any test groups 125 ppm 1999b below 125 ppm 125 ppm NTP 2000 No mortality increase in 2 year test with 125 ppm as max concentration 125 ppm NTP 2000 Females in this dose tended to be smaller, no stats presented (Table 8) 1 of 10 individuals moribund Long et al. 2000, before end of experiment, half of Nyska et al. individuals from max group, no 250 ppm 1999b stats on mortality 250 ppm NTP 2000 Moribund females (10%) during a 14 week exposure test 5000 10000 225 900 225 mg/L Lamb et al 1997 Concentrations tested: 0.5%, 1%, and 2% of drinking water mg/L mg/kg bw mg/kg bw mg/kg bw Lamb et al 1997 Siesky et al. 2002 Siesky et al. 2002 Siesky et al. 2002 Concentrations tested: 0.5%, 1%, and 2% of drinking water Increased hemolysis, hepatic effects, possible DNA synthesis effects. No mortality at any dose No mortality reported at any doses after 90 days Increased hemolysis, hepatic effects, possible DNA synthesis effects. No mortality at any dose 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00230 Appendix A-2. Mammalian EGBE Toxicity Data Published Since 1998 Test Organism F344 rats Exposure Exposure Route Duration Effect Measurement Oral gavage < 90 days Mortality Endpoint NOAEL Effects Notes EGBE Concentra tion 450 Units mg/kg bw Reference Additional notes No mortality reported at any Siesky et al. 2002 doses after 90 days 2-BAA: 2-butoxyacetaldehyde DNA: deoxyribonucleic acid Dw: drinking water EC50: median effect concentration LD50: median lethal dose LOAEL: lowest observed adverse effect level LOEC: lowest observed effect concentration M, R, G: mortality, growth, reproduction MCV: mean corpuscular volume NOAEL: no observed adverse effect level NOEC: no observed effect concentration NTP: National Toxicology Program pADPr: poly adenosine diphosphate-ribose RBC: red blood cells 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00231 APPENDIX B Emissions Inventory 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00232 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address EQ DETROIT INC REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE: WINSTON SALEM PLANT 1923 FREDERICK 4000 OLD MILWAUKEE LN City DETROIT WINSTON-SALEM State Michigan North Carolina Zip Code 48211 27107 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 28.312 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 2.8215 143.9285 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 2.8215 172.2405 0 0 290.634 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 293.4555 172.2405 BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAIN ER CORP 8935 POCAHONTAS TRAIL JAMES Rl WILLIAMSBURG BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAIN ER CORP 12340 TOWNSHIP RD 99 E FINDLAY SANYO SOLAR (USA) LLC 970 E 236TH ST CARSON REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE: FREMONT PLANT 2145 CEDAR FREMONT CROWN FOOD PACKAGING 2929 W BRIDGE ST OWATONNA AURORA CASKET CO INC 10944 MARSH RD AURORA CROWN CORK & SEAL CO (USA) INC CROWN CLOSURE DIV 3011 BIRCH DR WEIRTON Virginia Ohio California Ohio Minnesota Indiana West Virginia 23185 45840 90745 43420 55060 47001 26062 27 24.5 0.0005 17.873 29.3115 0.0025 37.8575 140 130 8.4815 102.208 87.749 107.624 63.288 167 154.5 8.482 120.081 117.0605 107.6265 101.1455 0 0 0 167 0 0 0 154.5 0 0 135.175 143.657 0 0 0 120.081 0 0 0 117.0605 0 0 0 107.6265 0 0 0 101.1455 REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE: BISHOPVILLESC FACILITY 609 COUSAR ST BISHOPVILLE South Carolina 29010 14.4695 81.994 96.4635 0 0 0 96.4635 REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE: EVA STREET ST PAUL MN 139 EVA ST SAINT PAUL Minnesota 55107 14.029 79.4975 93.5265 0 0 0 93.5265 FORD MOTOR CO DEARBORN TRUCK PLANT REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO OLIVE BRANCH FACILITY REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO KENTWA FACILITY BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING BMW MANUFACTURING CO LLC BALL CONTAINER LLC COLUMBUS CAN PLANT CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO LONGVIEW FACILITY REXAM BEVERAGECAN CO RE : CHICAGO PLANT METAL CONTAINER CORP - JACKSONVILLECAN PLANT 3001 MILLER RD 10800 MARINA DR 1220 N SECOND AVE 1900 BARNES ST GLEN & SHEPARD ST 1400 HWY 101 S 350 MCCORMICK BLVD 1035 E NORTH ST 1202 FONES RD 300 N FAIL RD 1001 FISHER RD 1101 W43RDST 1100 N ELLIS RD METAL CONTAINER CORPORTION - WINDSOR CAN PLANT 1201 METAL CONTAINER CT WHIRLPOOL CORP MARION D IVISION 1300 MARION-AGOSTA RD DEARBORN OLIVE BRANCH KENT REIDSVILLE LAWRENCE GREER COLUMBUS BRADLEY OLYMPIA LA PORTE LONGVIEW CHICAGO JACKSONVILLE Michigan 48121 Mississippi 38654 Washington 98032 North Carolina 27320 Massachusetts 01843 South Carolina 29651 Ohio 43213 Illinois 60915 Washington 98501 Indiana 46350 Texas 75604 Illinois 60609 Florida 32254 WINDSOR Colorado 80550 MARION Ohio 43302 3.8 19.6495 13.1945 12 18.0445 3.543 20 17.1385 17.083 12.5 17.6895 13.6425 6.8885 15.125 0.05 85 68.4395 74.7675 65 54.133 67.089 50 51.416 51.3325 54.5 49.29 51.733 54.5515 42.379 55.751 88.8 88.089 87.962 77 72.1775 70.632 70 68.5545 68.4155 67 66.9795 65.3755 61.44 57.504 55.801 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88.8 0 88.089 0 87.962 0 77 0 72.1775 0 70.632 0 70 0 68.5545 0 68.4155 0 67 0 66.9795 0 65.3755 0 61.44 0 57.504 0 55.801 Page 1 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00233 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO CHATSWORTH FACILITY 20730 PRAIRIE ST CHATSWORTH SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP 1400 PLOVER RD PO BOX 97 PLOVER BALL CONTAINER LLC ROME CAN PLANT 110MCC DR ROME REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE: WHITEHOUSE PLANT 10444WATERVILLE WHITEHOUSE METAL CONTAINER CORP - NEWBURGH CAN PLANT 130 BREUNIG RD NEW WINDSOR HONDA OF AMERICA MANUFACTURING INC 24000 HONDA PKY MARYSVILLE CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING 620 N 4TH ST WORLAND METAL CONTAINER CORP - ARNOLD CAN PLANT 42 TENBROOK INDUSTRIAL PARK ARNOLD BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP 8500 W TOWER AVE MILWAUKEE FORD MOTOR COMPANY-KANSASCITY ASSEMBLY PLANT 8121 EUS HWY 69 CLAYCOMO California Wisconsin Georgia Ohio New York Ohio Wyoming Missouri Wisconsin Missouri Zip Code 91311 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 14.307 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 40.3275 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 54.6345 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 54.6345 54467 10.75 40 50.75 0 0 0 50.75 30161 34.5 15 49.5 0 0 0 49.5 43571 16.48 31.601 48.081 0 0 0 48.081 12553 12.0965 34.362 46.4585 0 0 0 46.4585 43040 10.078 34.795 44.873 0 0 0.21 45.083 82401 11.1305 33.391 44.5215 0 0 0 44.5215 63010 17.1215 27.065 44.1865 0 0 0 44.1865 53224 35.5 7 42.5 0 0 0 42.5 64119 2.25 39.5 41.75 0 0 0.0125 41.7625 RR DONNELLEY REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO PHOENIX FACILITY ROCKY MOUNTAIN METAL CONTAINER CHRYSLER ST LOUIS NORTH ASSEMBLY PLANT NEW UNITED MOTOR MANUFACTURING INC BALL METAL FOOD CONTAINER CORP WHIRLPOOL CORP - CLYDE DIV GM TRUCK GROUP FLINT ASSEMBLY PLANT VAN SLYKE COMPLEX BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING CROWN FOOD PACKAGING BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE'.OKLAHOMACITY PLANT 2347 KRATZER RD HARRISONBURG 211 N 51 ST AVE PHOENIX 17755 W32ND AVE GOLDEN 1050 DODGE DR FENTON 45500 FREMONT BLVD MAIL STOP If FREMONT 3010 BIRCH DR WEIRTON 119 BIRDSEYEST CLYDE G-3100 VAN SLYKE RD FLINT Virginia Arizona Colorado Missouri California West Virginia Ohio Michigan 22802 85043 80401 63026 94538 26062 43410 48551 501 N SIXTH ST 2501 N FRAZIER ST 8801 CITATION RD 500 CRENSHAW BLVD 3400 S COUNCIL RD MONTICELLO CONROE BALTIMORE TORRANCE OKLAHOMA CITY Indiana Texas Maryland California Oklahoma 47960 77305 21221 90503 73179 36.14 5.2365 30.5 5.5 29.686 25.5 1.0635 0.29 26 29.291 8.4905 31 5.032 4.277 34.4115 6 32 7.438 11.5 34.295 35.5 10 4.775 25.471 2.65 28.5175 40.417 39.648 36.5 37.5 37.124 37 35.3585 35.79 36 34.066 33.9615 33.65 33.5495 0 0 0 40.417 0 0 0 39.648 0 0 2.4 38.9 0 0 0.0045 37.5045 0 0 0 37.124 0 0 0 37 0 0 1.0645 36.423 0 0 0.23 36.02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 34.066 0 33.9615 0 33.65 0 33.5495 FORD MOTOR CO KENTUCKY TRUCK PLANT NISSAN NA INC SMYRNA MANUFACTURING PLANT 3001 CHAMBERLAIN LN 983 NISSAN DR LOUISVILLE SMYRNA Kentucky Tennessee 40241 37167 0.9 1.379 32.5 31.939 33.4 33.318 0 0 0.13 33.53 0 0 0 33.318 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 2 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00234 Facility Name METAL CONTAINER CORP- MIRA LOMACAN PLANT GREIF PACKAGING LLC CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP CHICAGO HEIGHTS STEEL THERMA-TRUCORP SENECA FOODS CORP CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING HONDA OF AMERICA MANUFACTURING INC EFCO CORP BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP NISSAN NORTH AMERICA INC CANTON MS CHRYSLER JEFFERSON NORTH ASSEMBLY PLANT FLINT HILLS RESOURCES LP - WEST PLANT NYW REALTY LLC/ HANOVER EDSAL MANUFACTURING CO INC AVX CORP MYRTLE BEACH CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING SAPA EXTRUSIONS INC MAGNA STEYR NORTH AMERICA AIR SYSTEM COMPONENTS LP MOBIL CHEMICAL CO WHIRLPOOL CORP FINDLAY DIV SB FOOT TANNING CO CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING SUBARU OF INDIANA AUTOMOTIVE INC BATESVILLE MANUFACTURING INC Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address 10980 INLAND AVE City MIRALOMA State California Zip Code 91752 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 29.0325 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 3.7525 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 32.785 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 32.785 7425 INDUSTRIAL RD FLORENCE Kentucky 41042 1.3765 26.154 27.5305 0 0 4.7335 32.264 12910 JESS PIRTLE BLVD SUGAR LAND Texas 77478 27.9735 4.196 32.1695 0 0 0 32.1695 2400 HUNTINGTON DR FAIRFIELD California 94533 12.5 19 31.5 0 0 0 31.5 4525 INDIANA ST GOLDEN Colorado 80403 21 10.5 31.5 0 0 0 31.5 211 EMAIN ST CHICAGO HEIGHTS Illinois 60411 6.2785 25.113 31.3915 0 0 0 31.3915 601 RE JONES RD BUTLER Indiana 46721 0 31.029 31.029 0 0 0 31.029 801 SAUK AVE BARABOO Wisconsin 53913 0 29.8385 29.8385 0 0 1.0045 30.843 380 CALLE FABRIL ST KM 126 PR-3, i CAROLINA Puerto Rico 00985 7.531 22.5935 30.1245 0 0 30.1245 11000 STATE RT 347 EAST LIBERTY Ohio 43319 1.95 27.5 29.45 0 0 0.11 29.56 1000 COUNTY RD MONETT Missouri 65708 1.1695 28.0645 29.234 0 0 0 29.234 4700 WHITEWAY DR TAMPA Florida 33617 11.5 15.5 27 0 0 0 27 300 NISSAN DR CANTON Mississippi 39046 2.0275 24.5915 26.619 0 0 0 26.619 2101 CONNORAVE DETROIT Michigan 48215 6.5 20 26.5 0 0 0.002 26.502 2825SUNTIDE RD CORPUS CHRISTI Texas 78410 0.055 0 0.055 0 0 26.2985 26.3535 500 E MIDDLE ST HANOVER Pennsylvania 17331 0 25.986 25.986 0 0 25.986 4400 S PACKER CHICAGO Illinois 60609 0 25.7385 25.7385 0 0 0 25.7385 801 17TH AVES MYRTLE BEACH South Carolina 29577 7.2445 2.136 9.3805 0.0005 0 15.955 25.336 195 CROWN RD BATESVILLE Mississippi 38606 22.54 2.711 25.251 0 0 0 25.251 1501 ST JAMES ST LA CROSSE Wisconsin 54603 22.8145 1.711 24.5255 0 0 0 24.5255 2500 ALUMAX RD YANKTON South Dakota 57078 0 24.4475 24.4475 0 0 0 24.4475 3800 STICKNEYAVE TOLEDO Ohio 43608 2.95 21 23.95 0 0 0 23.95 900 DARR PARK DR PONCA CITY Oklahoma 74601 0.2435 23.6125 23.856 0 0 0 23.856 41501 WOLVERINE RD SHAWNEE Oklahoma 74804 0.375 23 23.375 0 0 0.0025 23.3775 4901 N MAIN ST FINDLAY Ohio 45840 2.2845 20.562 22.8465 0 0 0 22.8465 805 BENCH ST REDWING Minnesota 55066 0 22.8265 22.8265 0 0 0 22.8265 100 EVANS ROW CHERAW South Carolina 29520 19.606 2.5155 22.1215 0 0 0 22.1215 5500 STATE RD 38E LAFAYETTE Indiana 47905 0.22 21.9 22.12 0 0 0 22.12 175 MONOGARD DR MANCHESTER Tennessee 37355 1.088 20.6735 21.7615 0 0 0.0075 21.769 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 3 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00235 Facility Name MEMO PASADENA INC PPG INDUSTRIES OHIO INC - DELAWARE BWAY CORP BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP SPECTRUM METAL FINISHING DEXTER CHASSIS GROUP PLANT 55 ROLL COATER INC BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP GM SPRING HILL MANUFACTURING OLDCASTLE BUILDING ENVELOPE TEXAS FACILITY UNION CARBIDE CORP SEADRIFT PLANT HONDA MANUFACTURING OF ALABAMA LLC NUCOR VULCRAFT GROUP GRAPELAND DIV PPG INDUSTRIES INC-OAK CREEK NORTH COAST CONTAINER CORP TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING INDIANA INC ALLIED TUBE & CONDUIT CORP NOVELIS CORP METAL INDUSTRIES INC - BUSHNELL BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE GROUP - EVERETT AIR SYSTEM COMPONENTS LP HAMMER PACKAGING CORP SD WARREN CO SEIDEL TANNING CORP HART & COOLEY INC PELLA CORP BALL CONTAINER LLC ALCOA INC - WARRICK OPERATIONS LA DARLING CO- PIGGOTTAR FACILITY Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address 3000 N S ST City PASADENA State Texas Zip Code 77503 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 12.6555 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 8.0295 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 20.685 0 0 0.89 Total Emissions (tpy) 21.575 760 PITTSBURGH DR DELAWARE Ohio 43015 0.057 0 0.057 0 0 19.714 19.771 1601 VALDOSTA HWY HOMERVILLE Georgia 31634 19.247 0.3615 19.6085 0 0 0 19.6085 1001 N FM 3083 E CONROE Texas 77303 14 4.6 18.6 0 0 0 18.6 535 BEV RD YOUNGSTOWN Ohio 44512 0.37 18.05 18.42 0 0 0 18.42 501 S MILLER DR WHITE PIGEON Michigan 49099 0 18.265 18.265 0 0 0.0985 18.3635 1950 E MAIN ST GREENFIELD Indiana 46140 0.033 18.318 18.351 0 0 0 18.351 11 ADAMS RD SARATOGA SPRING New York 12866 3.3 15 18.3 0 0 0 18.3 100 SATURN PKWY MAIL DROP 371 - SPRING HILL Tennessee 37174 0.175 18 18.175 0 0 0 18.175 803 AIRPORT RD TERRELL Texas 75160 2.7755 14.8745 17.65 0 0 0 17.65 7501 N HWY 185 SEADRIFT Texas 77983 13.899 3.1365 17.0355 0 0 0.027 17.0625 1800 HONDA DR LINCOLN Alabama 35096 0.198 16.555 16.753 0 0 0 16.753 175 COUNTY RD 2345 GRAPELAND Texas 75844 0.15 16.287 16.437 0 0 0 16.437 10800S 13TH ST OAK CREEK Wisconsin 53154 15.48 0.374 15.854 0 0 0.424 16.278 8806 CRANE AVE CLEVELAND Ohio 44105 0 16.0815 16.0815 0 0 0 16.0815 4000 TULIP TREE DR PRINCETON Indiana 47670 9.7535 6.3155 16.069 0 0 0 16.069 16100S LATHROP AVE HARVEY Illinois 60426 10.022 5.9115 15.9335 0 0 0 15.9335 390 GRISWOLD ST NE WARREN Ohio 44483 4.657 11.265 15.922 0 0 0 15.922 400 W WALKER AVE BUSHNELL Florida 33513 0.0765 15.742 15.8185 0 0 0 15.8185 3003 W CASINO RD EVERETT Washington 98204 1.6 14 15.6 0 0.0075 0 15.6075 3301 N MAIN ST TARBORO North Carolina 27886 0.155 14.7635 14.9185 0 0 0.2665 15.185 200 LUCIUS GORDON DR WEST HENRIETTA New York 14586 0 15.118 15.118 0 0 0 15.118 89 CUMBERLAND ST WESTBROOK Maine 04098 0.0015 15 15.0015 0.055 0 0 15.0565 1306 EMEINECKE AVE MILWAUKEE Wisconsin 53212 0 14.8525 14.8525 0 0 0 14.8525 4910 MOORES MILL RD HUNTSVILLE Alabama 35811 0.852 13.4005 14.2525 0 0 0.598 14.8505 102 MAIN ST PELLA Iowa 50219 0.125 14.444 14.569 0 0 0 14.569 105 E BLACKHAWK DR FORT ATKINSON Wisconsin 53538 3.55 11 14.55 0 0 0 14.55 HWYS 66 & 61 NEWBURGH Indiana 47629 0 14.5275 14.5275 0 0 0 14.5275 HWY 49 S PIGGOTT Arkansas 72454 0.167 14.203 14.37 0 0 0 14.37 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 4 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00236 Facility Name MPM SILICONES LLC PROFESSIONAL DISPOSABLES INTERNATIONAL INC JOHNSON WELDED PRODUCTS INC REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO FAIRFIELD PLANT EASTMAN CHEMICAL CO TEXAS OPERATIONS MUELLER CO CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING ALSTOM POWER INC PLATE FORMED PRODUCTS DIV PRECOAT METALS GENERAL MOTORS CORP LORDSTOWN COMPLEX KNAPHEIDE MANUFACTURING CO BEMIS MANUFACTURING CO PLANT B BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP BALL METAL BEVERAGECONTAINER CORP CAN CORP OF AMERICA 1NC SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAI NER CORP AUTOALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL INC BEDFORD MATERIALS CO INC HUNTSMAN PETROCHEMICAL LLC PORT NECHES PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS GUAD/GRAPHICSINC FORD LOUISVILLE ASSEMBLY MERCEDES-BENZ US INTERNATIONAL INC MODINE MANUFACTURINGCO INC M&B HANGERS CROWN FOOD PACKAGING TOKICO (USA) INC NUCOR CORP VULCRAFT/NUCORCOLD FINISH DIV AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INC Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address 3500 S STATE RT 2 TWO NICE-PAKPARK 625 S EDGEWOOD AVE 2433 CROCKER CIR 300 KODAK BLVD 956 INDUSTRIAL BLVD 400 N WALNUT ST 911 W MAIN ST 1095 MENDELL DAVIS DR 2300 HALLOCK-YOUNG RD 1848 WESTPHALIA STRASSE 300 MILL ST 95 BALLARD RD 6600 WILL ROGERS BLVD 326 JUNE AVE 305 W N ST 91-320 KOMOHANAST 1 INTERNATIONAL DR 7676 ALLEGHENY RD 6001 HWY 366 1900 W SUMNER ST 2000 FERN VALLEY RD 1 MERCEDESDR 551 TAPP RD 1313 PKWY DR SE 1650 BROADWAY 301 MAYDERD 1601 W OMAHA AVE 1629 VANDERBILT RD City State FRIENDLY West Virginia ORANGEBURG New York URBANA Ohio FAIRFIELD California LONGVIEW Texas ALBERTVILLE Alabama CRAWFORDSVILLE Indiana CHATTANOOGA Tennessee JACKSON Mississippi LORDSTOWN Ohio QUINCY Illinois SHEBOYGAN FALLS Wisconsin MIDDLETOWN New York FORT WORTH Texas BLANDON Pennsylvania MOUNT VERNON Missouri KAPOLEI Hawaii FLAT ROCK Michigan MANNS CHOICE Pennsylvania PORTNECHES Texas Zip Code 26146 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 2.2045 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.005 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 2.2095 9.3265 0 2.805 Total Emissions (tpy) 14.341 10962 0.043 0.133 0.176 0 0 14 14.176 43078 0 14.069 14.069 0 0 0 14.069 94533 5.4755 8.5055 13.981 0 0 0 13.981 75602 12 1.8 13.8 0 0.001 0 13.801 35950 6.892 6.892 13.784 0 0 0 13.784 47933 10.035 3.7435 13.7785 0 0 0 13.7785 37402 13.7535 0 13.7535 0 0 0 13.7535 39272 12.341 1.283 13.624 0 0 0 13.624 44481 12 0.22 12.22 0 0 1.15 13.37 62305 0.131 12.98 13.111 0 0 13.111 53085 0 13.105 13.105 0 0 0 13.105 10940 6 7 13 0 0 0 13 76140 5.5 7.5 13 0 0 0 13 19510 3.168 9.601 12.769 0 0 0 12.769 65712 2.621 10.1265 12.7475 0 0 0 12.7475 96707 2.2 10.5 12.7 0 0 0 12.7 48134 0.0025 12.5975 12.6 0 0 0 12.6 15550 1.2505 11.3215 12.572 0 0 0 12.572 77651 0.079 0 0.079 0 0 12.4175 12.4965 HARTFORD LOUISVILLE VANCE HARRODSBURG LEEDS HANOVER BEREA NORFOLK BIRMINGHAM Wisconsin Kentucky Alabama Kentucky Alabama Pennsylvania Kentucky Nebraska Alabama 53027 40213 35490 40330 35094 17331 40403 68701 35234 12 0.125 2.3115 1.202 2.399 2.852 0.245 0.8 11.1405 0.4 12 9.8975 10.817 9.596 8.5555 11.058 10.5 0.159 12.4 12.125 12.209 12.019 11.995 11.4075 11.303 11.3 11.2995 0 0 0 12.4 0 0 0.13 12.255 0 0 0 12.209 0 0 0 12.019 0 0 0 11.995 0 0 0 11.4075 0 0 0.0005 11.3035 0 0 0 11.3 0 0 0 11.2995 Page 5 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00237 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address MEADWESTVACO CONSUMER PACKAGING GROUP LLC 7411 OAKWOOD ST CROWN FOOD PACKAGING 5201 ENTERPRISE BLVD AMERICAN TRIM LLC 1501 W MICHIGAN ST GEA BPO LLC 301 N CURRY PIKE HEXION SPECIALTY CHEMICALS INC 2525 S COMBEE RD GERSTENSLAGERCO 1425 E BOWMAN ST BROAN-NUTONE LLC 926 W STATE ST POWER PARTNERS INC 200 NEWTON BRIDGE RD VESTAL MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISES INC 177 INDUSTRIAL PARK RD FRANKLIN INVESTMENTCORP 600 ATLANTIC AVE TRI VU LCRAFT OF NEW YORK INC 5362 RAILROAD ST CECO DOOR PRODUCTS 9159 TELECOM DR INGERSOLL-RANDCO STEELCRAFT DIV 9017 BLUE ASH RD MEYER STEEL DRUM INC 2000 SKILBOURN AVE BALL AEROSOL & SPECIALTY CONTAINER INC 1717 GIFFORD RD CARDONE INDUSTRIES 5660 RISING SUN AVE KAWNEER CO INC 600 KAWNEER DR MAYFLOWER VEHICLE SYSTEMS INC NORWALK FACILITY 55 N GARFIELD ST YKKAP AMERICAINC RR DONNELLEYCRAWFORDSVILLE BERENFIELDCONTAINERS SW LTD COOK COMPOSITES & POLYMERS CO KEYMARKCORP OF FLORIDA LAKESIDE LITHOGRAPHY LLC PENN COLOR INC NUCOR VULCRAFT GROUP SAINT JOE DIV RINECO ROYAL MOULDINGS LTD; MARION VIRGINIA 332 FIRETOWER RD 1009 SLOAN ST 3300 N HUTCHINSON ST 340 RAILROAD ST 2540 KNIGHTS STATION RD 1600S LAFLIN ST 2755 BERGEY RD 6610 COUNTY RD 60 1007 VULCAN RD- HASKELL 135 BEAR CREEK RD City MEBANE State North Carolina Zip Code 27302 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 11.2585 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 11.2585 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 11.2585 TOLEDO SIDNEY BLOOMINGTON LAKELAND WOOSTER HARTFORD ATHENS SWEETWATER FRANKLIN CHEMUNG MILAN CINCINNATI CHICAGO ELGIN PHILADELPHIA SPRINGDALE NORWALK Ohio Ohio Indiana Florida Ohio Wisconsin Georgia Tennessee Pennsylvania New York Tennessee Ohio Illinois Illinois Pennsylvania Arkansas Ohio 43612 45365 47404 33801 44691 53027 30607 37874 16323 14825 38358 45242 60623 60120 19120 72764 44857 2.806 0 0 9.3205 0.325 0.1135 0 10.7105 10.7 4.5235 5.289 2.5475 1.1265 1.65 1.987 4.781 0 8.409 11.167 11.046 0.0195 10.512 10.6365 10.75 0 0 5.7985 5.289 7.9325 9.112 8.5 8.1175 5.2985 10 11.215 11.167 11.046 9.34 10.837 10.75 10.75 10.7105 10.7 10.322 10.578 10.48 10.2385 10.15 10.1045 10.0795 10 0 0 0 11.215 0 0 0 11.167 0 0 0 11.046 0 0 1.686 11.026 0 0 0.004 10.841 0 0 0 10.75 0 0 0 10.75 0 0 0 10.7105 0 0 0 10.7 0 0 0.2615 10.5835 0 0 0 10.578 0 0 0 10.48 0 0 0 10.2385 0 0 0 10.15 0 0 0 10.1045 0 0 0 10.0795 0 0 0 10 DUBLIN Georgia CRAWFORDSVILLE Indiana WHITE HALL Arkansas SAUKVILLE Wisconsin LAKELAND Florida CHICAGO Illinois HATFIELD Pennsylvania SAINT JOE Indiana BENTON Arkansas MARION Virginia 31021 47933 71602 53080 33810 60608 19440 46785 72015 24354 9.541 5.107 0 0.7885 0.4925 1 0.2255 4.2105 0.0495 0.3835 0.351 4.785 9.8915 0.0595 9.355 8.75 0.479 1.6955 0 9.1695 9.892 9.892 9.8915 0.848 9.8475 9.75 0.7045 5.906 0.0495 9.553 0 0 0 9.892 0 0 0 9.892 0 0 0 9.8915 0 0 9.0035 9.8515 0 0 0 9.8475 0 0 0 9.75 0 0 9.0065 9.711 0 0 3.7695 9.6755 0 0 9.6 9.6495 0 0 0 9.553 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 6 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00238 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City HEWLETT-PACKARD CARiBE BV SITE HWY 110 N KM 5.1 AGUADILLA 3MCO-GU1N 6675 US HWY 43 GUIN STANLEY WORKS HAND TOOLS DIV 600 MYRTLE ST NEW BRITAIN CIRCLE GRAPHICS INC 120 9TH AVE LONGMONT NUCOR CORP VULCRAFT DIV 1501 W DARLINGTON ST FLORENCE EPCO EXTRUSION PAINTING CO 413 MCCLURG RD BOARDMAN QUAD/GRAPHICS INC N63W23075 STATE HWY 74 ATTN: E SUSSEX HALLSTAR CO ESTER SOLUTIONS FACILITY 5851 W 73RD ST BEDFORD PARK SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP 2115 SW LOWER LAKE RD SAINT JOSEPH KUBIN-NICHOLSONCORP 8448 N 87TH ST MILWAUKEE SILGAN CAN CO 2120 NC HWYN UNIT A MAXTON SILGAN CAN CO 12-773 STRT 110 NAPOLEON SQUARE D CO 1601 MERCER RD LEXINGTON HESS PRINT SOLUTIONS 3765SUNNYBROOKRD BRIMFIELD CROWN AEROSOL PACKAGING 3737 E EXCHANGE AVE AURORA SILGAN CONTAINERS MANAUFACTURINGCORP 520 W 2ND ST OCONOMOWOC GENERAL MOTORS LANSING DELTA TOWNSHIP 8175 MILLETT HWY LANSING TOPPAN INTERAMERICAINC 1131 HWY 155 S MC DONOUGH SILGAN WHITE CAP CORP 2201 W MARYLAND ST EVANSVILLE TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURINGTEX AS INC 1 LONE STAR PASS SAN ANTONIO FORD MOTOR COMPANY-WAYNE ASSEMBLY 37625 MICHIGAN AVE WAYNE MAYTAG CORP CLEVELANDCOOKING PRODUCTS PLANT 1 740 KING EDWARD AVE SE CLEVELAND State Puerto Rico Zip Code 00605 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.125 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 9.405 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 9.53 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 9.53 Alabama 35563 0.001 9.5 9.501 0 0 0 9.501 Connecticut 06052 0.946 8.514 9.46 0 0 0 9.46 Colorado 80501 3.05 1.9 4.95 0 0 4.5 9.45 South Carolina 29501 8.525 0.9115 9.4365 0 0 0 9.4365 Ohio 44512 0.8375 8.375 9.2125 0 0 0 9.2125 Wisconsin 53089 8.275 0.925 9.2 0 0 0 9.2 Illinois 60638 1.134 0.1295 1.2635 0 0 7.931 9.1945 Missouri 64504 6.299 2.891 9.19 0 0 0 9.19 Wisconsin 53224 9.148 0 9.148 0 0 0 9.148 North Carolina 28364 2.965 6.16 9.125 0 0 0 9.125 Ohio 43545 2.438 6.571 9.009 0 0 0 9.009 Kentucky 40511 0 9.0085 9.0085 0 0 0 9.0085 Ohio 44240 9 0 9 0 0 0 9 Illinois 60504 7.8805 0.991 8.8715 0 0 0 8.8715 Wisconsin 53066 1.75 7.05 8.8 0 0 0 8.8 Michigan 48917 0.23 8.5 8.73 0 0 0.0105 8.7405 Georgia 30253 0 8.7 8.7 0 0 0 8.7 Indiana 47710 1.9 6.75 8.65 0 0 0 8.65 Texas 78264 5.2135 3.4115 8.625 0 0 0 8.625 Michigan 48184 0.085 8.5 8.585 0 0 0 8.585 Tennessee 37311 0 8.5585 8.5585 0 0 0 8.5585 RR DONNELLEY & SONS CO SIGNODE BERENFIELD CONTAINERS INC GM ORION ASSEMBLY CENTER MASTERBRAND CABINETS INC SILGAN CAN CO BERENFIELD CONTAINERS INC MASON 1145 CONWELLAVE 7701 W 71 ST ST 31 RAILROAD ST 4555GIDDINGS RD 217 SOAK ST 500 NW LOOP 286 SUITE 101 1229 CASTLE DR WILLARD BRIDGEVIEW CLARENDON ORION ARTHUR PARIS MASON Ohio Illinois Pennsylvania Michigan Illinois Texas Ohio 44890 60455 16313 48359 61911 75460 45040 6.0815 0.85 0.0755 6.5 0 4.945 0.375 2.366 7.55 8.2925 0.8 8.25 3.217 7.508 8.4475 8.4 8.368 7.3 8.25 8.162 7.883 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.05 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.4475 0 8.4 0 8.368 0 8.35 0 8.25 0 8.162 0 7.883 Page 7 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00239 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name NOV DOWNHOLE TOOLS CASPER Address 778 C1R DR City CASPER State Wyoming Zip Code 82601 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0 0 0 7.857 Total Emissions (tpy) 7.857 LA-Z-BOY TENNESSEE 500 WALNUT GROVE RD DAYTON Tennessee 37321 0 7.823 7.823 0 0 0 7.823 DECORATIVE PANELS INTERNATIONA L GREIF PACKAGING LLC 2900 HILL AVE 2400 COOPER AVE TOLEDO MERCED Ohio California 43607 95348 7.5945 6.4965 0.0135 1.0605 7.608 7.557 0 0 0 0 0 7.608 0 7.557 GM TRUCK GROUP FORT WAYNE ASSEMBLY 12200 LAFAYETTE CENTER RD ROANOKE Indiana 46783 0.475 7 7.475 0 0 0 7.475 WHITING DOOR MANUFACTURINGCORP 113 CEDAR ST AKRON New York 14001 0 7.4105 7.4105 0 0 0 7.4105 HOWARD FINISHING LLC SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP 32565 DEQUINDRE 135 NATIONAL RD MADISON HEIGHTS Michigan EDISON New Jersey 48071 08817 0.0025 6 7.3555 1.35 7.358 7.35 0 0 0 0 0 7.358 0 7.35 BWAY CORP 3200 SKILBOURN AVE CHICAGO Illinois 60623 4.3655 2.886 7.2515 0 0 0 7.2515 SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP 1416 1NDIANHEAD DR MENOMONIE Wisconsin 54751 1.45 5.8 7.25 0 0 0 7.25 NASHV1LLEWIRE PRODUCTS 1604 COUNTY HOSPITAL RD NASHVILLE Tennessee 37218 0.7 6.5 7.2 0 0 0 7.2 CHICAGO STEEL CONTAINER CORP 1846 SKILBOURN AVE CHICAGO Illinois 60623 1.3 5.89 7.19 0 0 0 7.19 DOW CHEMICAL CO FREEPORT FACILITY BENJAMIN MOORE & CO JOHNSTOWN 2301 N BRAZOS PORT BLVD BUILDIN FREEPORT UNION AVE EXTENSION JOHNSTOWN Texas New York 77541 12095 0.1645 0.014 0.0035 0 0.168 0.014 3.2305 0 0 3.7895 7.188 0 7.1215 7.1355 SHIELDCOATTECHNOLOGIES INC (DBA CYBERSHIELD OF 2602 SPENCE ST TEXAS) LUFKIN Texas 75904 7.1205 0 7.1205 0 0 0 7.1205 WIX FILTRATION CORP - ALLEN PLANT 2900 NW BLVD GASTONIA North Carolina 28052 0.0025 7.1 7.1025 0 0 0 7.1025 RR DONNELLEY LANCASTER WEST 1375 HARRISBURG PIKE LANCASTER Pennsylvania 17601 6.6515 0.445 7.0965 0 0 0 7.0965 N UCOR CORP VU LCRAFT Dl V GREIF PACKAGING LLC 7205 GAULT AVE N 6000 JEFFERSON HWY FORT PAYNE NEW ORLEANS Alabama Louisiana 35967 70123 5.101 2.673 1.822 4.1805 6.923 6.8535 0 0 0 0 0 6.923 0 6.8535 SONOCO PHOENIX - PRESIDENTS ISLAND 2755 HARBOR AVE MEMPHIS Tennessee 38113 0 6.841 6.841 0 0 0 6.841 AFTON CHEMICAL CORP ACME FINISHING CO INC 725 CANNON BRIDGE RD 1595 E OAKTON ST ORANGEBURG South Carolina 29115 ELK GROVE VILLAGi Illinois 60007 3.179 1.359 0.526 5.435 3.705 6.794 0.247 0 0 2.8645 6.8165 0 0 6.794 EQUISTAR CHEMICALS BAYPORT CHEMICALS PLANT 5761 UNDERWOOD RD PASADENA Texas 77507 6.753 0.0095 6.7625 0 0 0 6.7625 COLOR COMMUNICATIONS INC CHRYSLER WARREN TRUCK ASSEMBLY PLANT (PART) 4242 W FILLMORE 21500 MOUND RD CHICAGO WARREN Illinois Michigan 60624 48091 1.419 6 5.3145 0.7 6.7335 6.7 0 0 0 6.7335 0 0 0.0055 6.7055 IMPRESS USA INC BERENFIELDCONTAINERS SE LTD GMVM-LANSING GRAND RIVER ASSEMBLY 936 BARRACUDA ST TERMINAL ISLAND California 90731 12180 UNIVERSITY CITY BLVD HARRISBURG North Carolina 28075 920 TOWNSEND ST MAIL CODE: 489 LANSING Michigan 48921 6.15 0 3.55 0.55 6.6745 3.1 6.7 6.6745 6.65 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.7 0 6.6745 0 6.65 Page 8 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00240 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address KITZiNGER COOPERAGE CORP ARMSTRONG HARDWOOD FLOORING CO HIRSH INDUSTRIES INC WORLDCOLOR- DYERSBURGDIV ESCO CORP JOHN DEERE HARVESTER WORKS EAST MOLINE AKZO NOBEL SURFACE CHEMISTRY LLC QUEBECOR WORLD DIRECT-PETTY PACKAGING DYNAMICS INC BAGCRAFT/PAPERCON DIV 2529 E NORWICH AVE 565 HARTCO DR 1525 MCKEE RD 2030 SYLVAN RD 9098 EASTSIDE DR EXT 110013TH AVE 15200 ALMEDARD 420 W INDUSTRIAL AVE 3400 BAGCRAFT BLVD City State SAINT FRANCIS Wisconsin ONEIDA Tennessee DOVER Delaware DYERSBURG Tennessee NEWTON Mississippi EAST MOLINE Illinois HOUSTON Texas EFFINGHAM Illinois BAXTER SPRINGS Kansas Zip Code 53235 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 6.6085 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 6.6085 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 6.6085 37841 0 6.568 6.568 0 0 0 6.568 19904 0.0025 6.5135 6.516 0 0 0 6.516 38024 6.2595 0.111 6.3705 0 0 0 6.3705 39345 6.312 0 6.312 0 0 6.312 61244 0.3145 5.9755 6.29 0 0 0 6.29 77053 0.626 0.116 0.742 0 0 5.4675 6.2095 62401 6.155 0 6.155 0 0 0 6.155 66713 0 6.15 6.15 0 0 0 6.15 GMTG - SHREVEPORT ASSEMBLY SENECA FOODS CORP CAN PLANT NOVOLYTE TECHNOLOGIES CARRY-ON TRAILER CORP SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP METOKOTECORP PLANT 15 ELECTROPRIME INC QUAD/GRAPHICS INC FIBERMARK NORTH AMERICA INC BRADFORD WHITE CORP TECNOCAP LLC VON HOFFMANN GRAPHICS INC U.S. AIR FORCE TINKER AFB OK HUNTER DOUGLAS TUPELO CENTER CROWN FOOD PACKAGING RR DONNELLEY LANCASTER EAST ROLL COATER INC CNH AMERICA LLC NAVISTAR INC HUSQVARNA CONSUMER OUTDOOR PRODUCTS 7600 GENERAL MOTORS BLVD 3709 MILL ST 111 W IRENE RD 1965 HWY 30 2501165TH ST 312 SAVANNAH 63 DIXIE HWY 56 DUPLAINVILLERD 5492 BOSTWICK ST 200 LAFAYETTE ST 2100 GRISWOLD NE 1005 COMMERCIAL DR 7701 ARNOLD ST SUITE 204 RT 2 LEE INDUSTRIAL PARK E 851 E MAPLE ST 216 GREENFIELD RD 4502 FREEDOM WAY 1930 DES MOINES AVE 6125 URBANA RD 172 OLD ELLOREERD SHREVEPORT Louisiana 71129 MARION New York 14505 ZACHARY Louisiana 70791 MISSOURI VALLEY Iowa 51555 HAMMOND Indiana 46320 CEDAR FALLS Iowa 50613 ROSSFORD Ohio 43460 SARATOGA SPRING New York 12866 LOWVILLE New York 13367 MIDDLEVILLE Michigan 49333 WARREN Ohio 44483 OWENSVILLE Missouri 65066 TINKER AFB Oklahoma 73145 SHANNON Mississippi 38868 WINTER GARDEN Florida 34787 LANCASTER Pennsylvania 17601 WEIRTON West Virginia 26062 BURLINGTON Iowa 52601 SPRINGFIELD Ohio 45502 ORANGEBURG South Carolina 29116 0.105 0 4.7 0 0 0 0 5.575 0.0595 0 2.074 4.147 1.6 0.274 1.3385 5.319 0 0.175 0.6 0.115 6 6.103 0.445 6.013 6 5.991 5.952 0.325 5.8 5.837 3.7205 1.6345 4.15 5.4825 4.4155 0.3725 5.684 5.5 5 5.525 6.105 6.103 5.145 6.013 6 5.991 5.952 5.9 5.8595 5.837 5.7945 5.7815 5.75 5.7565 5.754 5.6915 5.684 5.675 5.6 5.64 0 0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.015 0 0 0 6.105 0 0 6.103 0 0 6.095 0 0 6.013 0 0 6 0 0 5.991 0 0 5.952 0 0 5.9 0 0 5.8595 0 0 5.837 0 0 5.7945 0 0 5.7815 0 0.0165 5.7665 0 0 5.7565 0 0 5.754 0 0 5.6915 0 0 5.684 0 0 5.675 0 0.0305 5.6455 0 0 5.64 Page 9 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00241 Facility Name PRECOAT METALS LOGAN ALUMINUM INC PPG INDUSTRIES,INC-SPRINGDALECOMPLEX GREIF PACKAGING LLC USS - CLAIRTON WORKS CREEINC TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING KENTUCKY INC PRIME TANNING CO - HARTLAND NAZDAR SHAWNEE BALL METAL FOOD CONTAINER CORP 3M CO - CORDOVA OWENS CORNING VETROTEX LLC NEW MILLENNIUM BUILDING SYSTEMS MID CONTINENT CABINETRY AVERY DENNISON - IBMD LENOIR GREIF PACKAGING LLC SILGANCAN CO ENKE! AMERICA INC WORTHINGTON CYLINDERSWISCONSI N LLC METAL COATERS MISSISSIPPI MEDALLION CABINETRY INC PRECOAT METALS TRAD NA INC AGY AIKEN LLC GREENWICH INDUSTRIES LP CLARIN DIV ROLL COATER ALCOA HOME EXTERIORS INC SCHAEFFER MANUFACTURING ASHLEY INDUSTRIAL MOLDING INC Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City 25 NORTHGATE INDUSTRIAL DR USHWY431 N 125 COLFAX ST 4300W130TH ST 400 STATE ST 4600SILICON DR 1001 CHERRY BLOSSOM WAY 9 MAIN ST 8501 HEDGE LN TERRACE 300 W GREGER RD 22614 RT 84 N 4837 HWY 81 S 100 DIUGUIDS LN 67 E 2ND ST N 950 GERMAN ST 10850 STRANG RD 6200 FRANKLIN BLVD SUITE #100 2900 W INWOOD DR 300 E BREED ST 951 PRISOCK RD 180 INDUSTRIAL BLVD 16402 JACINTOPORT BLVD 210 BILL BRYAN BLVD 2556 WAGENER RD 927 N SHORE DR 858 E HUPP RD 2615 CAMPBELL RD 102 BARTON ST 310 S WABASH GRANITE CITY RUSSELLVILLE SPRINGDALE ALSIP CLAIRTON DURHAM GEORGETOWN HARTLAND SHAWNEE OAKDALE CORDOVA STARR SALEM COTTONWOOD LENOIR LA PORTE SACRAMENTO COLUMBUS CHILTON JACKSON WACONIA HOUSTON HOPKINSVILLE AIKEN LAKE BLUFF LA PORTE SIDNEY SAINT LOUIS ASHLEY State Illinois Zip Code 62040 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 4.4645 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 1.0945 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 5.559 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 5.559 Kentucky 42276 0.0475 5.4965 5.544 0 0 0 5.544 Pennsylvania 15144 5.4805 0.0435 5.524 0 0 0 5.524 Illinois 60803 1.5795 3.93 5.5095 0 0 0 5.5095 Pennsylvania 15025 5.5 0 5.5 0 0 0 5.5 North Carolina 27703 1.34 4.1565 5.4965 0 0 0 5.4965 Kentucky 40324 0.125 5.35 5.475 0 0 0 5.475 Maine 04943 0.1085 5.3265 5.435 0 0 0 5.435 Kansas 66227 1.623 3.7875 5.4105 0 0 0 5.4105 California 95361 0.75 4.65 5.4 0 0 0 5.4 Illinois 61242 0.27 0.0385 0.3085 5.05 0 4.44089E-16 5.3585 South Carolina 29684 0.5355 4.819 5.3545 0 0 0 5.3545 Virginia 24153 5.296 0 5.296 0 0 0 5.296 Minnesota 56229 0.5285 4.758 5.2865 0 0 0 5.2865 North Carolina 28645 3.73 1.556 5.286 0 0 0 5.286 Texas 77571 4.1335 0.085 4.2185 0 0 1.063 5.2815 California 95824 4.864 0.407 5.271 0 0 0 5.271 Indiana 47201 0 5.25 5.25 0 0 0.012 5.262 Wisconsin 53014 0.9375 4.3205 5.258 0 0 0 5.258 Mississippi 39272 0 5.1255 5.1255 0 0 0 5.1255 Minnesota 55387 0 5.0815 5.0815 0 0 0 5.0815 Texas 77015 4.8145 0.2605 5.075 0 0 0 5.075 Kentucky 42240 0.004 5.066 5.07 0 0 0 5.07 South Carolina 29801 2.9835 0.8965 3.88 0 1.183 0 5.063 Illinois 60044 0.0505 5.0075 5.058 0 0 0 5.058 Indiana 46350 0.0025 5.0255 5.028 0 0 0 5.028 Ohio 45365 0.6675 3.95 4.6175 0 0 0.3 4.9175 Missouri 63104 4.8465 0 4.8465 0 0 0 4.8465 Indiana 46705 0.475 4.35 4.825 0 0 0 4.825 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 10 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00242 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name US ARMY LAKE CITY ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT INX DIGITAL INK CO NAHAN PRINTING INC AAP ST MARYS CORP ZURN INDUSTRIES LLC DUPONT PONTCHARTRAIN WORKS ARVINMERITOR HEAVY VEHICLE SYSTEMS LLC OMG AMERICAS SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS MT VERNON LLC GENERAL MOTORS WENTZVILLE ASSEMBLY RUSK1NCO ALLIANCE INDUSTRIES WAUPACA GENIE INDUSTRIES SOUTH CAMPUS ENDICOTT INTERCONNECT TECHNOLOGIES INC BROWN PRINTING CO BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP BATESVILLE MANUFACTURING INC SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP GREIF PACKAGING LLC SEQUA COATINGS CORP-PRECOAT M ETALS DIV R R DONNELLEY & SONS CO DANVILLE DIV BROWN PRINTING CO SILGAN CONTAINER MANUFACTURING CORP QUEBECOR WORLD CLARIANT CORP - MOUNT HOLLY WEST PLANT VAN CAN CO WORLDCOLOR STILLWATER (WAS QUEBECOR WORLD STILLWATER DIV) PRO LINE PRINTING ARLINGTON ALERIS ROLLED PRODUCTS INC Address City State INTERSECTION OF MO HWYS 7 & 78 INDEPENDENCE Missouri Zip Code 64051 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 1.3775 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 3.349 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 4.7265 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 4.7265 405 INDUSTRIAL WAY DIXON California 95620 4.7155 0 4.7155 0 0 0 4.7155 7000 SAUKVIEWDR SAINT CLOUD Minnesota 56303 4.577 0.132 4.709 0 0 0 4.709 1100 MCKINLEY RD SAINT MARYS Ohio 45885 0.031 4.6575 4.6885 0 0 0 4.6885 1301 RASPBERRY ST ERIE Pennsylvania 16502 4.674 0 4.674 0 0 0 4.674 586 HWY 44 LA PLACE Louisiana 70068 0.005 0 0.005 0 0 4.596 4.601 801 RAILROAD AVE YORK South Carolina 29745 0.001 4.5785 4.5795 0 0 0 4.5795 TWO MILE RUN RD FRANKLIN Pennsylvania 16323 0.025 0.634 0.659 0 0 3.8855 4.5445 1 LEXAN LN MOUNTVERNON Indiana 47620 2.7 1.7 4.4 0.125 0 0 4.525 1500 ERT A WENTZVI LLE Missouri 63385 0.85 3.65 4.5 0 0 0 4.5 HWY 27 N GENEVA Alabama 36340 0.027 4.4635 4.4905 0 0 0 4.4905 N 2467 VAUGHAN RD WAUPACA Wisconsin 54981 0.447 4.0215 4.4685 0 0 0 4.4685 18700 NE65TH ST REDMOND Washington 98052 0.125 4.29 4.415 0 0 0 4.415 1093 CLARK ST ENDICOTT New York 13760 0.25 4.1155 4.3655 0.031 0 0 4.3965 2300 BROWN AVE WASECA Minnesota 56093 4.2665 0.057 4.3235 0 0 0 4.3235 1800 REYNOLDS AVE KANSAS CITY Missouri 64120 4.15 0.09 4.24 0 0 0 4.24 310 CROWN RD BATESVILLE Mississippi 38606 0.6345 3.5955 4.23 0 0 0 4.23 N90 W14600 COMMERCE DR MENOMONEE FALLS Wisconsin 53051 0 4.2 4.2 0 0 0 4.2 695 LOUIS DR WARMINSTER Pennsylvania 18974 0.4005 0.65 1.0505 0 0 3.144 4.1945 US HWY 12 AT RT 249 PORTAGE Indiana 46368 0.2925 3.8895 4.182 0 0 0 4.182 JOHN HILL BAILEY INDL PARK HWY DANVILLE Kentucky 40422 3.8845 0.272 4.1565 0 0 0 4.1565 11595 MCCONNELL RD WOODSTOCK Illinois 60098 4.035 0.09 4.125 0 0 0 4.125 3250 PATTERSON RD RIVERBANK California 95367 0.218 3.8875 4.1055 0 0 0 4.1055 8649 HACKS CROSS RD OLIVE BRANCH Mississippi 38654 0.375 3.722 4.097 0 0 4.097 625 E CATAWBA AVE MOUNT HOLLY North Carolina 28120 0 0.0545 0.0545 0 3.48 0.534 4.0685 10837 ETIWANDA AVE FONTANA California 92337 3.5 0.55 4.05 0 0 0 4.05 100 W AIRPORT RD STILLWATER Oklahoma 74075 3.517 0.4105 3.9275 0 0 0 3.9275 401 N GREAT SWPKWY 1372 KY HWY 1957 ARLINGTON LEWISPORT Texas Kentucky 76011 42351 3.8005 0.125 0.125 3.6985 3.9255 3.8235 0 0 0 0 0 3.9255 0 3.8235 Page 11 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00243 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State NESTLE PURINA PETCARE RR DONNELLEY LOS ANGELES MANUFACTURING BROWN PRINTING CO INLAND LABELS MARKETING PHOENIX CONTAINER INC BETCO CORP FUJIFILM NORTH AMERICA CORP FORD MOTOR CO TWIN CITIES ASSEMBLY PLANT AVERY DENNISON INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIV BATESVILLE MAN UFACTURINGI NO -DOLL PLANT KODAK COLORADO DIV MERIXCORP SCHWAN'S GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN - SALINA KS BWAY CORP BWAY PACKAGING DIV APOLLO COLORS INC TTM PRINTED CIRCUIT GROUP - S TAFFORD DIV BON L MANUFACTUR1NGCO PONTIAC ASSEMBLYCENTER WORLDCOLOR LEBANON DIV QUEBECOR WORLD INC WINCHESTER VIRGINIA AK STEEL CORP - ZANESVI LLE WORKS SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO KAWASAKI MOTORS MANUFACTURING CORP USA SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP TYCO FIRE SUPPRESSION & BUILDING PRODUCTS CROWN FOOD PACKAGING ST CHARLES OPERATIONS (TAFT/STAR) UNION CARBIDE CORP CROWN EQUIPMENT CORP SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP 1000 HAMILTON RD WEIRTON West Virginia 19681 PACIFIC GATEWAY DR TORRANCE California 668 GRAVEL PIKE EAST GREENVILLE Pennsylvania 2009 W AVE S LA CROSSE Wisconsin 1202 AIRPORT RD NORTH BRUNSWICK New Jersey 1001 BROWN AVE TOLEDO Ohio 20W14THAVE NORTH KANSAS CIT Missouri 966 S MISSISSIPPI RIVER BLVD SAINT PAUL Minnesota 17700 FOLTZ PKWY STRONGSVILLE Ohio 1000 E PEARL ST BATESVILLE Indiana 9952 EASTMAN PARK DR WINDSOR Colorado 1521 POPLAR LN FOREST GROVE Oregon 3019 SCAN LAN SALINA Kansas 8200 BROADWELL RD CINCINNATI Ohio 1550 MOUND RD ROCKDALE Illinois 4 OLD MONSON RD STAFFORD Connecticut 508 W WILSON ST KENTLAND Indiana 2100S OPDYKE RD PONTIAC Michigan 760 FUJITEC DR LEBANON Ohio 160 CENTURY LN STONEWALL INDU A/INCHESTER Virginia 1724 LINDEN AVE ZANESVILLE Ohio 2150W SAND LAKE RD ORLANDO Florida 6600 NW 27TH ST LINCOLN Nebraska 8673 LYONS-MARENGORD LYONS New York 1 STANTON ST MARINETTE Wisconsin 10200 N LOMBARD ST PORTLAND Oregon 355 LA HWY 3142 (GATE 1) TAFT Louisiana 2600 E STATE RD 240 400 N 15TH ST GREENCASTLE ROCHELLE Indiana Illinois Zip Code 26062 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.993 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 2.809 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 3.802 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 3.802 90502 3.706 0.0865 3.7925 0 0 0 3.7925 18041 3.6115 0.125 3.7365 0 0 0.006 3.7425 54601 3.7245 0 3.7245 0 0 0 3.7245 08902 1.4665 2.21 3.6765 0 0 0 3.6765 43607 3.674 0 3.674 0 0 0 3.674 64116 0 3.547 3.547 0 0 0 3.547 55116 0.41 3 3.41 0 0 0.13 3.54 44149 0.4595 3.0755 3.535 0 0 0 3.535 47006 0.175 3.329 3.504 0 0 0 3.504 80551 0 0 0 3.486 0 0 3.486 97116 0.0895 3.3955 3.485 0 0 0 3.485 67401 0 3.4845 3.4845 0 0 0 3.4845 45244 3.1135 0.3665 3.48 0 0 0 3.48 60436 0 0 0 0 0 3.469 3.469 06075 0 3.403 3.403 0 0 0 3.403 47951 0.33 3.05 3.38 0 0 0.005 3.385 48341 0.335 3.05 3.385 0 0 0 3.385 45036 2.938 0.438 3.376 0 0 0 3.376 22603 3.202 0.1495 3.3515 0 0 0 3.3515 43701 0 2.45 2.45 0 0 0.9 3.35 32809 0 0.0015 0.0015 0 0 3.3465 3.348 68524 0.3235 2.8725 3.196 0 0 0.125 3.321 14489 0.6 2.7 3.3 0 0 0 3.3 54143 0.0065 3.189 3.1955 0 0 0 3.1955 97203 1.191 1.9725 3.1635 0 0 0 3.1635 70057 0.62 0.925 1.545 1.565 0 0.0005 3.1105 46135 61068 0 1.8115 3.104 1.26 3.104 3.0715 0 0 0 0 0 3.104 0 3.0715 Page 12 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00244 Facility Name 3MCO- MENOMONIE MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP DISC GRAPHICS DOW CHEMICAL CO PPG INDUSTRIES ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES ACCESS BUSINESS GROUP LLC ITW DYMON MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS INC SAPAEXTRUDER INC U.S. AIR FORCE ROBINS AFB GA PRECOAT METALS VERTIS COMMUNICATIONS MAUSER CORP MOTOR CASTINGS CO CURTIS METAL FINISHING CO TITAN COATINGS INC BALL METAL FOOD CONTAINER CORP MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS INC 3M CO-HUTCHINSON MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA INC GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO. AKRON TECHNICAL CENTER WORLDCOLOR ATGLEN RR DONNELLEY STRASBURG DIV RHODIA INC CENTRIA BON L MANUFACTURING CO MISSION KLEENSWEEP PRODUCTS INC SOLIANT LLC GREIF INDUSTRIAL PACKAGING^ SERVICES Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address 1425 STOKKEPKWY 2778 SE SIDE HWY 10 GILPIN AVE 1790 BUILDING 1020 OLYMPIC DR 7575 FULTON ST E 805 E OLD 56 HWY 9651 WESTOVER HILLS BLVD 2905 OLD OAKWOOD RD 775 MACON ST BUILDING 1555 3399 DAVEY ALLISON BLVD 4051 FONDORF DR 14 CONVERY BLVD 1323S65TH 6645 SIMS DR 2025 EXCHANGE PL 1200 S CRUTCHER ST 3725 N FIRST ST 905/915 ADAMS ST SE 5101 21ST ST 200 S. MARTHA AVE City State MENOMONIE Wisconsin ELKTON Virginia HAUPPAUGE New York MIDLAND Michigan BATAVIA Illinois ADA Michigan OLATHE Kansas SAN ANTONIO Texas GAINESVILLE Georgia ROBINS AFB Georgia HUEYTOWN Alabama COLUMBUS Ohio WOODBRIDGE New Jersey MILWAUKEE Wisconsin STERLING HEIGHTS Michigan BESSEMER Alabama SPRINGDALE Arkansas SAN JOSE California HUTCHINSON Minnesota TUSCALOOSA Alabama AKRON Ohio Zip Code 54751 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0 0 0 3.05 Total Emissions (tpy) 3.05 22827 0.705 0.805 1.51 1.465 0 0 2.975 11788 0.7425 2.2275 2.97 0 0 0 2.97 48667 2.65 0.045 2.695 0.0035 0 0.256 2.9545 60510 0 0.52 0.52 0 0 2.431 2.951 49355 2.815 0.132 2.947 0 0 0 2.947 66061 0.8825 2.059 2.9415 0 0 0 2.9415 78251 0 2.9395 2.9395 0 0 0 2.9395 30504 0 2.926 2.926 0 0 0 2.926 31098 1.597 0.93 2.527 0 0 0.382 2.909 35023 2.209 0.6895 2.8985 0 0 0 2.8985 43228 2.579 0.301 2.88 0 0 0 2.88 07095 0.023 2.854 2.877 0 0 0 2.877 53214 0 1.466 1.466 0 0 1.3885 2.8545 48313 2.039 0.813 2.852 0 0 0 2.852 35023 2.85 0 2.85 0 0 0 2.85 72764 0.015 2.8 2.815 0 0 0 2.815 95134 2.785 0 2.785 0 0 0 2.785 55350 0 2.767 2.767 0 0 0 2.767 35401 0.004 0.006 0.01 0 0 2.737 2.747 44309 0 0 0 0 0 2.7435 2.7435 4581 LOWER VALLEY RD ONE SHENANDOAH VALLEY DR 2ND ST & BLUEBALL AVE 530 N SECOND ST HWY 53 BONNELLRD 2434 BIRKDALE ST 1872 HWY 9 BY PASS W 7604 RAILROAD AVE ATGLEN STRASBURG MARCUS HOOK CAMBRIDGE CARTHAGE LOS ANGELES LANCASTER WINFIELD Pennsylvania 19310 Virginia 22657 Pennsylvania 19061 Ohio 43725 Tennessee 37030 California 90031 South Carolina 29721 Kansas 67156 2.5835 2.6 0.161 1.3625 0.9755 2.6 0.566 0.255 0.1205 0.1 0.0005 1.289 1.2295 0 1.995 2.2955 2.704 2.7 0.1615 2.6515 2.205 2.6 2.561 2.5505 0 0 0 2.704 0 0 0.0025 2.7025 0 0 2.492 2.6535 0 0 0 2.6515 0 0.36 0.037 2.602 0 0 2.6 0 0 0 2.561 0 0 0 2.5505 Page 13 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00245 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City KNS COMPANYS INC 475 RANDY RD CAROL STREAM BRILLION IRON WORKS INC 200 PARKAVE BRILLION TEXAS FINISHING CO 1801 SURVEYOR BLVD CARROLLTON WORLDCOLOR 451 INTERNATIONAL BLVD CLARKSVILLE BRUNSWICK CORP MERCURY MARINE DIV W6250 PIONEER RD FOND DU LAC DENSO MANUFACTURINGTENNESSEE INC 1720,1725,1755 ROBERT C JACKSO MARYVILLE MASTER GUARD CORP 1200E8TH ST VEEDERSBURG SANFORDLP 1 PENCIL ST SHELBYVILLE ABC COMPOUNDING CO INC 6970 JONESBORO RD MORROW ROPPECORP 1602 N UNION ST FOSTORIA AMERICAN COLOR GRAPHICS INC 215 N ZARFOSS DR YORK SUN CHEMICAL CORP 2445 PRODUCTION DR SAINT CHARLES 3M CO - BROWNWOOD 4501 HWY 377 S BROWNWOOD KIK (HOUSTON) INC 2921 CORDER ST HOUSTON SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 130 A FRONTAGE RD LEXINGTON KAWNEERCOINC 2785 MCCRACKEN RD HERNANDO AMERICAN COLOR GRAPHICS - LUFKIN 3001 ATKINSON DR LUFKIN CENTURY INDUSTRIAL COATINGS 1 NC HWY 69 S JACKSONVILLE LEHIGH PRESS CADILLAC (DBA LEHIGH DIRECT DIVISION) 1900S25TH AVE BROADVIEW State Illinois Zip Code 60188 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.5035 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 2.015 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 2.5185 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 2.5185 Wisconsin 54110 2.0315 0.3605 2.392 0 0 0.125 2.517 Texas 75006 0 2.4885 2.4885 0 0 0 2.4885 Tennessee 37040 2.35 0.12 2.47 0 0 0 2.47 Wisconsin 54935 0.2425 2.1815 2.424 0 0 0 2.424 Tennesee 37801 0 2.3935 2.3935 0 0 2.3935 Indiana 47987 0.024 2.349 2.373 0.0025 0.0025 0 2.3775 Tennessee 37160 0.125 2.226 2.351 0.0025 0 0 2.3535 Georgia 30260 0.0025 0.375 0.3775 0.0025 0 1.964 2.344 Ohio 44830 0.125 2.2045 2.3295 0 0 0 2.3295 Pennsylvania 17404 2.073 0.2395 2.3125 0 0 0 2.3125 Illinois 60174 0.299 1.9925 2.2915 0 0 0 2.2915 Texas 76801 0.065 2.2 2.265 0 0 0.007 2.272 Texas 77054 2.265 0 2.265 0 0 2.265 South Carolina 29073 0 2.216 2.216 0 0 0 2.216 Mississippi 38632 0.2475 1.9595 2.207 0 0 0 2.207 Texas 75901 2.009 0.172 2.181 0 0 0 2.181 Texas 75766 0.089 1.69 1.779 0 0 0.357 2.136 Illinois 60153 1.9755 0.1495 2.125 0 0 0 2.125 MACDERMID PRINTING SOLUTIONS UNION CARBIDE CORP SOUTH CHARLESTON FACILITY THREE RIVERS ALUMINUM CO NCP COATINGS INC PRECOAT METALS VERTIS COMMUNICATIONS DUPONTYERKES PLANT TORO CO CADON PLATING CO WORLD COLOR PRESS 260 S PACIFIC ST 437 MACCORKLEAVE SW 71 PROGRESS AVE 225 FORT ST 4301 S SPRING AVE 10911 GRANITE ST 3115 RIVER RD 200SIMEAVE 371511TH ST 50 JOHN HANCOCKRD SAN MARCOS California 92078 SOUTH CHARLESTC West Virginia 25303 CRANBERRYTOWN Pennsylvania 16066 NILES Michigan 49120 SAINT LOUIS Missouri 63116 CHARLOTTE North Carolina 28273 BUFFALO New York 14207 TOMAH Wisconsin 54660 WYANDOTTE Michigan 48192 TAUNTON Massachusetts 02780 0 2.058 0.2195 2.1075 0.57 1.841 0.039 0 1.121 1.605 2.122 0.0595 1.8905 0 1.523 0.215 2.014 2.0475 0.915 0.032 2.122 2.1175 2.11 2.1075 2.093 2.056 2.053 2.0475 2.036 1.637 0 0.0005 2.1225 0 0 0 2.1175 0 0 0 2.11 0 0 0 2.1075 0 0 0 2.093 0 0 0 2.056 0 0 0 2.053 0 0 0 2.0475 0 0 0 2.036 0 0 0.3745 2.0115 Page 14 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00246 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City AVX CORP CONWAY 2875 HWY 501 E CONWAY SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP 2200 WILBUR AVE ANTIOCH STEELSCAPEINC 7001 ALLISON-BONNETMEMORIALE FAIRFIELD BASF CORP - CLEAR LAKE PLANT 11200 BAY AREA BLVD PASADENA BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANEGROUP NORTH BOEING FIELD (PART) RR DONNELLEY PINEVILLE 7500 E MARGINAL WAY S 10519 INDUSTRIAL DR SEATTLE PINEVILLE State South Carolina Zip Code 29526 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.888 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 1.085 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 1.973 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 1.973 California 94509 0 1.9645 1.9645 0 0 0 1.9645 Alabama 35064 0.0045 1.9495 1.954 0 0 0 1.954 Texas 77507 1.95 0.0005 1.9505 0 0 0 1.9505 Washington 98108 0.1155 1.8345 1.95 0 0 0 1.95 North Carolina 28134 1.85 0.098 1.948 0 0 0 1.948 THIRD COAST PACKAGING INC PEARLAND NOV TUBOSCOPE NAVASOTA TYSON FRESH MEATS INC TREND OFFSET PRINTING SERVICES INC WARREN UNILUBE INC HYUNDAI MOTOR MANUFACTURING ALABAMA LLC PRIOR COATED METALS KEYMARKCORP BUCKEYE INTERNATIONAL INC AMERICAN COLOR GRAPHICS HANNASTEELCORP DUPONT CHAMBERS WORKS ASTRO COATINGS INC IMPRESS USA INC EASTMAN KODAK CO EASTMAN BUSINESS PARK CUMMINS POWER GENERATION NOV TUBOSCOPE WEST LITTLE YORK COATING TTM TECHNOLOGIES INC FORD MOTOR CO - OHIO ASSEMBLY PLANT LION COPOLYMER LLC REICHHOLDINC J&M MANUFACTURING CO INC RR DONNELLEY 1871 MYKAWA PEARLAND Texas 9574 FM 1227 NAVASOTA Texas HWY 66 E& FARM RD1912 AMARILLO Texas 3791 CATALINA ST LOS ALAMITOS California 1200S8TH ST WEST MEMPHIS Arkansas 700 HYUNDAI BLVD MONTGOMERY Alabama 2233 26TH ST SW ALLENTOWN Pennsylvania 1188 CAYADUTTA ST RT 334 FONDA New York 2700 WAGNER PL MARYLAND HEIGHT Missouri 810 E S ST MARENGO Iowa 3812 COMMERCE AVE FAIRFIELD Alabama RT 130 DEEPWATER New Jersey 27 MAIN ST STRUTHERS Ohio 3030 BIRCH DR HALF MOON INDUS! WEIRTON West Virginia 1669 LAKE AVE ROCHESTER New York 1400 73RD AVENE FRIDLEY Minnesota 12100W LITTLE YORKRD HOUSTON Texas 710N 600W LOGAN Utah 650 MILLER RD AVON LAKE Ohio 5955 SCENIC HWY BATON ROUGE Louisiana 425 S PACE BLVD PENSACOLA Florida 284 RAILROAD ST FORT RECOVERY Ohio 100 QUALITY CT CHARLESTOWN Indiana 77581 77868 79187 90720 72301 36105 18103 12068 63043 52301 35064 08023 44471 26062 14652 55432 77041 84321 44012 70805 32502 45846 47111 0 0.8325 0.07 1.8 1.9085 1.2395 1.305 0.007 0.125 1.669 0.6905 0.139 0.65 0.006 0.001 0.09 0.0535 0.12 1.65 0 0.1065 0 1.6325 0 0.31 0 0.125 0.007 0.66 0.581 1.8765 1.7515 0.1985 1.027 0.001 1.15 1.8125 0.0165 1.7 1.41 1.079 0.12 0 1.628 1.7285 0.076 0 1.1425 0.07 1.925 1.9155 1.8995 1.886 1.8835 1.8765 1.8675 1.7175 0.14 1.8 1.8185 0.0175 1.79 1.4635 1.199 1.77 0 1.7345 1.7285 1.7085 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.628 0 0 1.2285 0 0 0 0 0.0015 0 0 0 0 0 1.86 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.942 0.7975 0.0025 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1435 0.09 0.0195 0 0.5685 0 0.323 0.5835 0 1.75 0 0 0 1.942 1.94 1.9325 1.925 1.9155 1.8995 1.886 1.8835 1.8765 1.8675 1.861 1.858 1.8195 1.8185 1.8145 1.79 1.7865 1.7825 1.77 1.7515 1.7345 1.7285 1.7085 Page 15 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00247 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE GROUP - RENTON GMC TRUCK GROUP ARLINGTON ASSEMBLY PLANT PRO LINE PRINTING / RR DONNELLEY TRELLEBORG COATED SYSTEMS US INC / GRACE ADVANCED MATERIALS EASTMAN CHEMICAL CO TENNESSEE OPERATIONS RR DONNELLEY VON HOFFMANN CORP COMPLEMENTARY COATINGS CORP CHRYSLER STERLING HEIGHTS ASSEMBLY PLANT COLOR CORP OF AMERICA U S CHEMICAL U.S. AIR FORCE OGDEN AIR LOGISTICS CENTER AKZONOBEL AEROSPACE COAT! NGS ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR nOAT!Mr;.q BENCHMARK ENERGY PRODUCTS LLC IVC INDUSTRIAL COATINGS INC VAN EX INC SAPA INC COATINGS DIVSION VEYANCE TECHNOLOGIES INC ARANDELLCORP WHEELING CORRUGATING CO - BEECH BOTTOM PLANT 8TH & LOGAN AVE N 2525 E ABRAMS ST 365 PARRCIR 715 RAILROAD AVE & HWY 74 100 EASTMAN RD 321 WILSON DR 308 OLD COUNTY RD 38111 VAN DYKE 1630 W HILL ST 316 HART ST 7274WARDLEIGH DR 1 E WATER ST 901 N GREENWOOD AVE 4113 W INDUSTRIAL AVE 2245-50 VALLEY AVE 1700 S SHAWNEE ST 5325 NE SKYPORTWAY 2701 W OMAHA AVE N82 W13118 LEON RD 2481 RIVER RD City RENTON State Washington Zip Code 98055 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.697 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 1.0065 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 1.7035 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 1.7035 ARLINGTON Texas 76010 0.5 1.2 1.7 0 0 0 1.7 RENO Nevada 89512 1.5035 0.1755 1.679 0 0 0 1.679 RUTHERFORDTON North Carolina 28139 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 1.5385 1.6635 KINGSPORT Tennessee JEFFERSON CITY Missouri EDGEWATER Florida STERLING HEIGHTS Michigan LOUISVILLE Kentucky WATERTOWN Wisconsin HILLAFB Utah WAUKEGAN Illinois KANKAKEE Illinois MIDLAND Texas INDIANAPOLIS Indiana MOUNT VERNON Illinois PORTLAND Oregon NORFOLK Nebraska MENOMONEE FALLS Wisconsin WELLSBURG West Virginia 37662 65109 32132 48312 40210 53094 84056 60085 60901 79703 46218 62864 97218 68701 53051 26070 0.5725 1.6195 1.639 0.9 0 0 0.8625 0.775 0.9585 0.125 0.2955 0 1.0905 0.0615 1.418 0 0.825 0.038 0 0.7 1.59 0 0.69 0.7765 0.545 1.3725 1.183 1.467 0.376 0.183 0.033 1.45 1.3975 1.6575 1.639 1.6 1.59 0 1.5525 1.5515 1.5035 1.4975 1.4785 1.467 1.4665 0.2445 1.451 1.45 0.262 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.6595 0 0 1.6575 0 0 1.639 0 0 1.6 0 0 1.59 0 1.5605 1.5605 0 0 1.5525 0 0 1.5515 0 0 1.5035 0 0 1.4975 0 0 1.4785 0 0 1.467 0 0 1.4665 0 1.208 1.4525 0 0 1.451 0 0 1.45 ZEPINC CARDINAL ALUMINUM CO PLAN T 3 GREIF INDUSTRIAL PACKAGING & SERVICES LLC DECOSTAR INDUSTRIES INC ALERIS ROLLED PRODUCTS INC MITSUBISHI MOTORS NORTH AMERICA INC GATES CORP - CHARLESTON BRENNTAG SOUTHWEST INC HOUS TON 1310 SEABOARD INDUSTRIAL BLVD ATLANTA 4005 OAKLAWN DR LOUISVILLE 8250 ALMERIAAVE FONTANA 1 DECOMA DR CARROLLTON 1 REYNOLDS RD ASHVILLE 100 N MITSUBISHI MOTORWAY NORMAL 1300 S PLANT RD CHARLESTON 14826 HOOPER RD HOUSTON Georgia Kentucky California Georgia Ohio Illinois Missouri Texas 30318 40219 92335 30117 43103 61761 63834 77047 0.1435 0.05 0.1915 0.125 0.668 1.41 0.0795 0.02 0.287 1.3855 1.2415 1.307 0.748 0.0035 0.119 0.0175 0.4305 1.4355 1.433 1.432 1.416 1.4135 0.1985 0.0375 0.1235 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.8565 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.027 0 0 0 0 0 1.2095 1.3675 1.4375 1.4355 1.433 1.432 1.416 1.4135 1.408 1.405 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 16 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00248 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name CAMACO COLUMBUS MANUFACTURING ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS TAIYO AMERICA INC WW HENRY UNIVAR USA INC MORRISVILLE BRANCH JOHN DEERE SEEDING & CYLINDER CROWN AEROSOL PACKAGING BRENNTAG SOUTHWEST INC LANC ASTER GM MLCG FAIRFAX ASSEMBLY ARR-MAZ CUSTOM CHEMICALS SILGAN WHITE CAP CORP AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INC ARMSTRONGWORLD INDUSTRIES LANCASTER PLANT GENERAL MOTORS MLCG DETROIT-HAMTRAMCKASSEM BLY CENTER CHEMCOATINC PPG ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES EAST POINT PARKER HANNIFIN TECH SEAL DIV DAIMLERCHRYSLERCORP TOLEDO ASSEMBLY PLANT Address City State 1851 E32NDAVE 372 CLEVELAND ST COLUMBUS ROCHESTER Nebraska Pennsylvania 2675 ANTLER DR CARSON CITY 150 MOONEY DR BOURBON NAIS 200 DEAN SI EVERS PL MORRISVILLE 501 RIVER DR MOLINE 4TH ST& PARKAVE FARIBAULT 704 E WINTERGREEN RD LANCASTER 3201 FAIRFAX TRAFFICWAY KANSAS CITY 4800 STATE RD 60 E MULBERRY 350 JAYCEE DR VALMONTINDUSTR HAZLETON 1313 WINDSOR AVE COLUMBUS 1067 DILLERVILLE RD LANCASTER 2500 E GENERAL MOTORS BLVD DETROIT Nevada Illinois Pennsylvania Illinois Minnesota Texas Kansas Florida Pennsylvania Ohio Pennsylvania Michigan 2790 CANFIELDS LN 1377 OAKLEIGH DR 2600 WILCO BLVD 4000 STICKNEYAVE MONTOURSVILLE Pennsylvania EAST POINT Georgia WILSON North Carolina TOLEDO Ohio Zip Code 68601 15074 89701 60914 19067 61265 55021 75134 66115 33860 18201 43211 17603 48211 17754 30344 27893 43612 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 1.4005 0.53 0.8595 0.005 1.3725 0.002 0 0.877 0.0175 0.0175 0.0625 0.7 0.7545 0.8895 1.15 0.7885 0 0.0025 1.353 0.4725 0.0175 1.3 1.2505 0.6 0.5455 0.4005 0.14 0.125 0.001 0 0.355 0 0.791 0 0.9 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 1.4005 1.3895 0 0 0 0 0 1.4005 0 1.3895 0.7935 1.3725 0.0045 1.353 1.3495 0.035 1.3175 1.313 1.3 1.3 1.29 1.29 0 0 0.584 1.3775 0 0 0 1.3725 0 0 1.363 1.3675 0 0 0 1.353 0 0 0 1.3495 0 0 1.3 1.335 0 0 0 1.3175 0 0 1.313 0 0 0 1.3 0 0 0 1.3 0 0 0 1.29 0 0 0 1.29 0.125 0.792 0 1.255 0 0 1.158 1.283 0 0 0.478 1.27 0 0 1.2605 1.2605 0 0 0.0025 1.2575 SHEBOYGAN PAINT CO RR DONNELLEY & SONS CO CONSOLIDATED SYSTEMS 1NC CHRYSLER BELVIDERE ASSEMBLY PLANT DURA COAT PRODUCTS INC CLEVELAND STEEL CONTAINER- Nl LES CCL CONTAINER AEROSOL DIV CATERPILLAR INC GFX INTERNATIONAL BEHRPROCESSCORP 608 CANAL ST 60 SECURITY DR 650 ROSEWOOD DR 3000 W CHRYSLER DR 26655 PEOPLES RD 115 ERIE ST ONE LLODIO DR 3701 STATE RD 26 E 333 BARRON BLVD 3400 W GARRY AVE CEDARTOWN AVON COLUMBIA BELVIDERE MADISON NILES HERMITAGE LAFAYETTE GRAYSLAKE SANTA ANA Georgia 30125 Connecticut 06001 South Carolina 29201 Illinois 61008 Alabama 35756 Ohio 44446 Pennsylvania 16148 Indiana 47905 Illinois 60030 California 92704 0.687 1.2045 0 0.12 1.2145 0.0025 0.0935 0.0475 0 0.0035 0.554 0.028 1.23 1.1 0.0025 1.202 1.0955 1.1275 0.79 0.0055 1.241 1.2325 1.23 1.22 1.217 1.2045 1.189 1.175 0.79 0.009 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.139 0 0 0 0.0055 0 0 0 0 0.378 0 1.241 1.2325 1.23 1.2255 1.217 1.2045 1.189 1.175 1.168 1.148 Page 17 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00249 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address W1NSLOW-BROWNING INC 215 BROWNSVILLE AVE CHEMTURACORP - TAFT PLANT 471 HWY3142 J L CLARK INC 923 23RD AVE PRECOAT METALS 6754 SANTA BARBARA CT HARCROS CHEMICALS INC 5200 SPEAKER RD NICHOLS ALUMINUM ALABAMA INC 2001 HWY 20 W SONY ELECTRONICS INC 4275 W MAIN ST GENTEK BUILDING PRODUCTS 11 CRAGWOOD RD OHIO ART CO ONETOY ST RED SPOT WESTLAND INC 550 S EDWIN ST TRELLEBORG OFFSHORE US RANKIN ROAD FACILITY 1902 RANKIN RD INCHEMCORP 800 CEL-RIVER RD HUNTSMAN PETROCHEMICAL LLC 3892 US HWY 90 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC 12201 SWFWYMS600 TESORO REFINING & MARKETING CO - MANDAN REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE City LIBERTY KILLONA ROCKFORD ELKRIDGE KANSAS CITY DECATUR DOTHAN AVENEL BRYAN WESTLAND HOUSTON ROCK HILL DAYTON STAFFORD MANDAN State Indiana Zip Code 47353 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 1.148 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 1.148 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 1.148 Louisiana 70066 0.105 1.0405 1.1455 0 0 0 1.1455 Illinois 61104 0.304 0.8415 1.1455 0 0 0 1.1455 Maryland 21075 0 1.1415 1.1415 0 0 0 1.1415 Kansas 66106 0.0175 0.07 0.0875 0.0005 0.002 1.05 1.14 Alabama 35601 0.913 0.2245 1.1375 0 0 0 1.1375 Alabama 36305 0 0 0 0 0 1.137 1.137 New Jersey 07001 0.2 0.9335 1.1335 0 0 0 1.1335 Ohio 43506 0.8965 0.2295 1.126 0 0 0 1.126 Michigan 48186 0.628 0.483 1.111 0 0 0 1.111 Texas 77073 1.1105 0 1.1105 0 0 0 1.1105 South Carolina 29730 0.125 0.125 0.25 0 0 0.8545 1.1045 Texas 77535 0.001 0 0.001 0 0 1.1025 1.1035 Texas 77477 0.0025 0.125 0.1275 0 0 0.975 1.1025 North Dakota 58554 1.1 0.0005 1.1005 0 0 0 1.1005 CANFIELD METAL COATING CORP BEAULIEU OF AMERICA PLANT 560-MODEL COOK COMPOSITES & POLYMERSCO ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS POLYMERIC IMAGING INC CELLU TISSUE/CITYFOREST LLC COMBE PRODUCTS INC CANBERRA CORP NEXTEER AUTOMOTIVE CORP SPRAYLAT CORP CA AKZONOBELCOATINGS INC ROLL COATER INC RED SPOT PAINT & VARNISH CO INC 460 W MAIN ST 950 RIVERBEND RD 1415 STEELE AVE SW 701 SHILOH RD CANFIELD DALTON GRAND RAPIDS GARLAND Ohio Georgia Michigan Texas 117 E 14THAVE NORTH KANSAS CIT Missouri 1215WORDEN AVE E LADYSMITH Wisconsin EL DUQUE INDUSTRIAL PARK RD 97 NAGUABO Puerto Rico 3610 HOLLAND-SYLVANIARD TOLEDO Ohio 3900 HOLLAND RD SAGINAW Michigan 3465 S LA CIENAGA BLVD LOS ANGELES California 120 FRANKLIN RD PONTIAC Michigan 2604 RIVER RD HAWESVILLE Kentucky 1016 E COLUMBIA ST EVANSVILLE Indiana 44406 30721 49507 75042 64116 54848 00718 43615 48601 90016 48341 42348 47711 0 1.1 1.1 0 0 1.0865 1.0865 0 0.7325 0.3525 1.085 0 0.644 0.4405 1.0845 0 0 1.0705 1.0705 0 0 0 0 1.07 0 0 0 0 0.675 0.375 1.05 0 0.1045 0.9385 1.043 0 0.52 0.52 1.04 0 0.105 0.026 0.131 0 0 1.032 1.032 0 0.6065 0.416 1.0225 0 0 0 1.1 0 0 1.0865 0 0 1.085 0 0 1.0845 0 0 1.0705 0 0 1.07 0 1.053 1.053 0 0 1.05 0 0 1.043 0 0 1.04 0 0.901 1.032 0 0 1.032 0 0 1.0225 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 18 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00250 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address STAR BUILDING SYSTEMS 151 JUDGE DON LEWIS RD BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE GROUP PLANT 2 (PART) 7755 E MARGINAL WAY S City State ELIZABETHTON SEATTLE Tennessee Washington Zip Code 37643 98108 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 0.9965 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 1.019 0.0125 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 1.019 0 0 0 1.009 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 1.019 1.009 HYDRITE CHEMICAL CO ARMSTRONGWORLD INDUSTRIES INC VERSO PAPER HOLDINGS LLC TTM TECH NOLOGIES-SANTACLARA COOK COMPOSITES & POLYMERSCO IVC SOUTH HADCO (SANMINA) CORP - OWEGO DIV WATSON STANDARD CO (NEVILLE ISLAND PLANT) MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS SYNDICATE SYSTEMS INC B-WAY PACKAGING INC BEHR PROCESS CORP ALLENTOWN EVONIKDEGUSSA CORP TIPPECANOE LABORATORIES 114 N MAIN ST COTTAGE GROVE Wisconsin 4115 N PERKINS RD STILLWATER Oklahoma ANDROSCOGGIN MILL RILEY RD JAY Maine 407 MATHEW ST SANTA CLARA California 2434 HOLMES RD HOUSTON Texas 875 PROGRESS CENTER AVE LAWRENCEVILLE Georgia 1200 TAYLOR RD OWEGO New York 2895 GRAND AVE NEVILLE ISLAND Pennsylvania 4350 S BELTWOOD PKWY DALLAS Texas 402 N MAIN ST MIDDLEBURY Indiana 6 LITHO RD TRENTON New Jersey z: 1 h Z L_Ul _J 7529 MORRIS CT BLDG 500 W PARK Pennsylvania 1650 LILLY RD LAFAYETTE Indiana 53527 74075 04239 95050 77051 30043 13827 15225 75244 46540 08648 18106 47909 0 0.3885 0.0125 0 0.9225 0.185 0.009 0.8975 0 0 0.085 0.021 0.7 1 0.6095 0 0.9555 0.004 0.739 0.8935 0.0125 0.9005 0.8555 0.763 0.0355 0.125 1 0.998 0.0125 0.9555 0.9265 0.924 0.9025 0.91 0.9005 0.8555 0.848 0.0565 0.825 0 0 0.967 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.769 0 0 0 0.001 0 0 0 0.014 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.998 0.9805 0.9555 0.9265 0.924 0.9165 0.91 0.9005 0.8555 0.848 0.8255 0.825 SPRAYLAT CORP IL NJT ENTERPRISES LLC STEEL DYNAMICS INC ICL-IP AMERICA INC FLINT HILLS RESOURCES LP COMPLEMENTARY COATINGS CORP BERRYMAN PRODUCTS INC 1C OF OKLAHOMA LLC GENERAL MOTORS LLC BOWLING GREEN ASSEMBLY PLANT METALS USA BUILDING PRODUCTS SUN CHEMICAL CORP VISTA PAINT CORP UNITED PAINT & CHEMICAL 1701 E 122-ND ST 42400 MERRILL RD 5134 LOOP RD 11636 HUNTINGTON 13775 CLARK RD 4701 O'DONNELL ST 3800 E RANDOL MILL RD 2322 N MINGO RD 600 CORVETTE DR 227 S TOWN E BLVD 1380 FORD RD 2020 E ORANGETHORPE AVE 24671 TELEGRAPH RD CHICAGO Illinois STERLING HEIGHTS Michigan JEFFERSONVILLE Indiana GALLIPOLIS FERRY West Virginia ROSEMOUNT Minnesota BALTIMORE Maryland ARLINGTON Texas TULSA Oklahoma BOWLING GREEN Kentucky 60633 48314 47130 25515 55068 21224 76011 74116 42101 MESQUITE MAUMEE FULLERTON SOUTHFIELD Texas Ohio California Michigan 75149 43537 92831 48034 0.041 0 0 0.0635 0.8 0.8 0.8 0 0.135 0.391 0.114 0.673 0.7525 0.777 0.8135 0.8125 0.1585 0 0 0 0.8 0.65 0.391 0.6455 0 0 0.818 0.8135 0.8125 0.222 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.785 0.782 0.7595 0.673 0.7525 0 0 0 0.103 0.0025 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.32667E-17 0 0 0 0 0.007 0 0 0.084 0 0.818 0.8135 0.8125 0.805 0.8025 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.792 0.782 0.7595 0.757 0.7525 Page 19 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00251 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name DELEET MERCHANDISING TEXAS TILE MANUFACTURING LLC HB FULLER LONGABERGERCO KAWNEER CO INC HUNT REFINING CO A CORP RYCOLINE PRODUCTS LLC VEYANCE TECHNOLOGIES INC MARCUS PAINT CO WESTERN EXTRUSIONS CORP ELEMENTIS SPECIALTIES SPARTAN CHEMICAL CO INC KAWNEER CO INC CLEVELAND STEEL CONTAINER - PE OTONE FACILITY WEST PENN OIL CO, INC130130 TERNIUM USA INC SONOCO PRODUCTS CO FERRO GLASS & COLOR CORP BJ CHEMICAL SERVICES FINISHES UNLIMITED INC VANGUARD PAINTS & FINISHES INC SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION INC SAINT GABRIEL FACILITY SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP CRYSTAL FINISHING SYSTEMS INC HERCULES INC KENEDYTEXAS BASF CORP CENTRIA TRINKOTE INDUSTRIAL FINISHES INC ALERIS ROLLED PRODUCTS INC Address 26 BLANCHARD ST 1705 NOLIVER 12110HARLANDDR NE 5565 RAIDERS RD 7200 DOE AVE 1855 FAIRLAWN RD 5540 NW HWY 400 N GOODYEAR RD 235 E MARKET ST 1735 SANDY LAKE RD 400 CLAREMONT AVE 1110 SPARTAN DR 500E12TH ST 117 E LINCOLN ST 2305 MARKET ST EXT 2500 RON BEAN BLVD 1854 CENTRAL FLORIDA PKWY W WYLIE AVE 707 N LEECH 482 WHEELER RD 1409 GREENE ST 3905 HWY 75 City State NEWARK New Jersey HOUSTON Texas COVINGTON Georgia FRAZEYSBURG Ohio VISALIA California TUSCALOOSA Alabama CHICAGO Illinois MOUNT PLEASANT Iowa LOUISVILLE Kentucky CARROLLTON Texas JERSEY CITY New Jersey MAUMEE Ohio BLOOMSBURG Pennsylvania PEOTONE Illinois WARREN Pennsylvania SHREVEPORT Louisiana ORLANDO Florida WASHINGTON Pennsylvania HOBBS New Mexico SUGAR GROVE Illinois MARIETTA Ohio SAINT GABRIEL Louisiana Zip Code 07105 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.375 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.375 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0.75 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 0.75 77007 0.001 0.748 0.749 0 0 0 0.749 30014 0.386 0.275 0.661 0 0.0765 0 0.7375 43822 0.2325 0.214 0.4465 0 0 0.288 0.7345 93291 0.5005 0.225 0.7255 0 0 0 0.7255 35401 0.7205 0 0.7205 0 0 0 0.7205 60630 0.108 0.6115 0.7195 0 0 0 0.7195 52641 0.0005 0 0.0005 0 0 0.7075 0.708 40202 0.7 0.0025 0.7025 0 0 0 0.7025 75006 0.125 0.5735 0.6985 0.0025 0 0 0.701 07304 0.2 0.5 0.7 0 0 0 0.7 43537 0.0675 0 0.0675 0 0 0.6325 0.7 17815 0.117 0.579 0.696 0 0 0 0.696 60468 0.008 0.6865 0.6945 0 0 0 0.6945 16365 0.6945 0 0.6945 0 0 0 0.6945 71115 0.0165 0.674 0.6905 0 0 0 0.6905 32837 0.385 0.292 0.677 0 0 0 0.677 15301 0.1255 0.548 0.6735 0 0 0 0.6735 88240 0.0065 0.0015 0.008 0 0 0.663 0.671 60554 0.3325 0.3325 0.665 0 0 0 0.665 45750 0.648 0 0.648 0 0 0.648 70776 0.249 0.201 0.45 0.0005 0 0.1965 0.647 12130 LYNN AVE S SAVAGE 2608 ROSS AVE SCHOFIELD ONE MILL ST KENEDY 1175 MARTIN ST GREENVILLE 500 PERTH DR NEW ECONOMY BUS AMBRIDGE 1800 PARK PL AVE FORT WORTH 3321 DURHAM RD ROXBORO Minnesota 55378 Wisconsin 54476 Texas 78119 Ohio 45331 Pennsylvania 15003 Texas 76110 North Carolina 27573 0 0 0.602 0.12 0 0 0.0025 0.642 0.6405 0.033 0.13 0.635 0.628 0.624 0.642 0.6405 0.635 0.25 0.635 0.628 0.6265 0 0 0 0.642 0 0 0 0.6405 0 0 0 0.635 0 0 0.385 0.635 0 0 0 0.635 0 0 0 0.628 0 0 0 0.6265 Page 20 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00252 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name CHROMASOURCEINC MULTICIRCUITS TCI COATINGS INC BRENNTAG SOUTHWEST INC ST GABRIEL GREIF INDUSTRIAL PACKAGING & SERVICES LLC ROCKTENN CO ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CLEVELAND STEEL CONTAINER CORP - STREETSBORO PLANT BECKER SPECIALTY CORP COMPLEX CHEMICALS CO INC NICHOLS ALUMINUM DAVENPORT SUPERIOR OIL CO INC RECLAIMED ENERGY DIV SOUTHERN CLAY PRODUCTS INC ALUMAX MILL PRODUCTS INC CHRYSLER GROUP LLC STERLING STAMPING PLANT (PART) HB FULLER CO BRADLEY COATINGS GROU P HOVENSALLC FLINT GROUP NORTH AMERICA CORP GLASS COATINGS & CONCEPTS NAPCO INC LEVLAD ARROW GROUP INDUSTRIES INC RADIATOR SPECIALTY CO NB COATINGS INC DUBOIS CHEMICALS INC FORREST PAINT CO LOCKHEED MARTIN AERONAUTICS CO Address 2433 S CR 600 E 2301 UNIVERSAL ST 4501 BRADLEY ST 7200 HWY 74 10700 STRANG RD 2301 S 21 ST ST 8500 S WILLOW SPRINGS RD 10048 AURORA-HUDSON RD City State COLUMBIACITY Indiana OSHKOSH Wisconsin LUBBOCK Texas SAINT GABRIEL Louisiana LA PORTE Texas CLINTON Iowa WILLOW SPRINGS Illinois STREETSBORO Ohio Zip Code 46725 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.621 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0.621 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 0.621 54903 0.619 0 0.619 0 0 0 0.619 79415 0.616 0 0.616 0 0 0 0.616 70776 0.0075 0.008 0.0155 0 0 0.6 0.6155 77571 0.595 0.0025 0.5975 0 0 0 0.5975 52732 0 0.585 0.585 0 0 0.0025 0.5875 60480 0.538 0.048 0.586 0 0 0 0.586 44241 0.006 0.5735 0.5795 0 0 0 0.5795 15310 ARROW BLVD FONTANA California MADISON PARISH INDUSTRIAL PARI TALLULAH Louisiana 1725 ROCKINGHAM RD DAVENPORT Iowa 1500 WESTERN AVE CONNERSVILLE Indiana 1335S13TH ST LOUISVILLE Kentucky 300 ALUMAX DR TEXARKANA Texas 35777 VAN DYKE STERLING HEIGHTS Michigan 92335 71282 52802 47331 40210 75501 48312 0.0285 0.3 0.159 0.041 0.0025 0 0.55 0.55 0.2 0.408 0.025 0.125 0.5505 0 0.5785 0.5 0.567 0.066 0.1275 0.5505 0.55 0.072 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.425 0 0 0.5785 0.572 0.567 0.566 0.555 0.5505 0.55 4440 MALSBARY RD 608 W CRAWFORD AVE 1 ESTATE HOPE 104 NATIONAL DR 300 LAWTON AVE 125 MCFANNRD 9200 MASON AVE 1 THIRD AVE 600 RADIATOR RD 2701 E 170TH ST 3630 E KEMPER RD 1011 MCKINLEY ST 1011 LOCKHEED WAY MZ 6607 BLUE ASH CONNELLSVILLE CHRISTIANSTED ANNISTON MONROE VALENCIA CHATSWORTH HASKELL INDIAN TRAIL LANSING SHARONVILLE EUGENE PALMDALE Ohio 45242 Pennsylvania 15425 Virgin Islands 00820 Alabama 36207 Ohio 45050 Pennsylvania 16059 California 91311 New Jersey 07420 North Carolina 28079 Illinois 60438 Ohio 45241 Oregon 97402 California 93599 0.545 0.389 0.351 0.265 0.5245 0.48 0.0005 0.0025 0.161 0.315 0 0.206 0.0715 0.0015 0 0 0.265 0.002 0.0445 0 0.219 0 0.08 0 0.307 0.431 0.5465 0.389 0.351 0.53 0.5265 0.5245 0.0005 0.2215 0.161 0.395 0 0.513 0.5025 0 0 0.1805 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5465 0 0.157 0.546 0 0 0.5315 0 0 0.53 0 0 0.5265 0 0 0.5245 0 0.5235 0.524 0 0.3005 0.522 0 0.36 0.521 0 0.119 0.514 0 0.513 0.513 0 0 0.513 0 0.005 0.5075 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 21 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00253 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address INEOS OXIDE A DIV OF INEOS AMERICAS LLC 21255AHWY 1 S PPG INDUSTRIES ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES 1886 LYNNBURYWOODS RD BRIGHTSMITH LLC 120 ENTERPRISEAVE CLARIANT CORP MARTIN PLANT 788 CHERT QUARRY RD STEELSCAPE 222 W KALAMA RIVER RD PPG INDUSTRIES INC 500 PITTSBURGH AVE ARCADIA INC 3225 E WASHINGTON BLVD SILBONDCORP 9901 SAND CREEK HWY RUST-OLEUM CORP 810595TH ST SC JOHNSON & SON INC WAXDALE FACILITY 831116TH ST DERRICK CORP 3350 UNION RD HEXION SPECIALTY CHEMICALS INC 8600 W 71 ST ST EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL BATON ROUGE CHEMICAL PLANT 4999 SCENIC HWY BECKER SPECIALTY CORP 2500 DELTA LN TTM TECHNOLOGIES INC 234 CASHMANDR PARKER HANNIFIN 400 S ST ENGIN EERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS 1 NC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS UNIVAR USA INC SALEM BRANCH 90 CARSON RD COLONIAL RD SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 2802 W MILLER RD SNAP-ONTOOLS MANUFACTURING CO 2600 US HWY 18 E SKF SEALING SOLUTIONS 900 N STATE ST IVC INDUSTRIAL COATINGS INC 550-560 W CENTENNIAL BLVD UNIVERSAL CHEMICALS^ COATINGS INC 1124 ELMHURST RD DUPONT MOUNT CLEMENS PLANT 400 GROESBECK HWY NAZDAR CHICAGO 1087 N N BRANCH ST APOLLO CHEMICAL 2001 WILLOW SPRINGS LN ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC KNOXVILLE SITE 730 DALE AVE PFI INC 9215 SANTA FE SPRINGS RD City PLAQUEMINE State Louisiana Zip Code 70765 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.4805 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.0255 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0.506 0 0 0.0005 Total Emissions (tpy) 0.5065 DOVER Delaware 19904 0.0025 0.0025 0.005 0 0 0.5 0.505 MORRISVILLE Pennsylvania 19067 0.1025 0.2435 0.346 0 0.1585 0.5045 MARTIN South Carolina 29836 0.125 0.0025 0.1275 0.375 0 0 0.5025 KALAMA Washington 98625 0.003 0.4995 0.5025 0 0 0 0.5025 MCCARRAN Nevada 89434 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0.3775 0.5025 VERNON California 90023 0.125 0.375 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 WESTON Michigan 49289 0.125 0.375 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 PLEASANT PRAIRIE Wisconsin 53158 0.125 0.375 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 STURTEVANT Wisconsin 53177 0.125 0.375 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 CHEEKTOWAGA New York 14225 0 0.4975 0.4975 0 0 0 0.4975 BEDFORD PARK Illinois 60501 0 0.4925 0.4925 0 0 0.4925 BATON ROUGE Louisiana 70805 0.245 0.0015 0.2465 0.245 0 0 0.4915 ELK GROVE VILLAG Illinois CHIPPEWA FALLS Wisconsin MC COOK Nebraska BIRMINGHAM Alabama 60007 54729 69001 35215 0.005 0 0 0.125 0.485 0.4895 0 0.36 0.49 0.4895 0 0.485 0 0 0.49 0 0 0 0.4895 0 0 0.486 0.486 0 0 0 0.485 SALEM Massachusetts 01970 GARLAND Texas 75041 ALGONA Iowa 50511 ELGIN Illinois 60123 CASA GRANDE Arizona 85222 ELK GROVE VILLAG Illinois 60007 MOUNT CLEMENS Michigan 48043 CHICAGO Illinois 60622 BURLINGTON North Carolina 27215 KNOXVILLE Tennessee 37921 SANTA FE SPRINGS California 90670 0.001 0.003 0.0055 0 0.091 0 0.0005 0.131 0.14 0.002 0.42 0.001 0.0315 0.465 0 0.3635 0.4505 0.449 0.3055 0 0.0005 0 0.002 0.0345 0.4705 0 0.4545 0.4505 0.4495 0.4365 0.14 0.0025 0.42 0 0 0.4775 0.4795 0 0 0.4405 0.475 0 0 0.0025 0.473 0 0 0.463 0.463 0 0 0 0.454 0 0 0 0.4505 0 0 0 0.4495 0 0 0 0.4365 0 0 0.2955 0.4355 0 0 0.431 0.4335 0 0 0 0.42 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 22 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00254 Facility Name SILGAN WHITE CAP CORP STANDARD PAINTS INC MUTI-PACK LLC UNITED STATES ALUMINUM CORP AMERIMAX HOME PRODUCTS INC STP PRODUCTS MANUFACTURINGCO DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS AMERICAN METALS CORP FORBO ADHESIVES LLC ROLLEX CORP GSP MARKETING TECHNOLOGIES NALCO CO TULSA PLANT 102 EXXONMOBIL REFINING & SUPPLY BATON ROUGE REFINERY BASF CORP INTERNATIONAL PAINT LLC TYSON FRESH MEATS INC JOSLIN IL FIBROCHEM LLC TOWER PRODUCTS INC RODDA PAINT CO QUEST CHEMICAL CORP PARISER INDUSTRIES INC HILLYARD INDUSTRIES INC SIKA CORP SIKA SARNAFIL DIV NASCOTE INDUSTRIES MASCO RETAIL CABINET GROUP LLC FULLER BRUSH CO WATSON LABORATORIES INC UTAH SHERWIN-WILLIAMS AUTOMOTIVE FINISHES CORP Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address 1701 WILLIAMSBURG PIKE 940 S 6TH AVE 8372 N STEVEN RD 200 SINGLETON DR 450 RICHARDSON DR 477 LEXINGTON AVE 5111 E36TH ST N 1000 CROCKER RD 7440 W DUPONT RD 800 CHASE AVE 5400 140TH AVEN 6717 S 61STW AVE 4045 SCENIC HWY City State RICHMOND Indiana MANSFIELD Texas MILWAUKEE Wisconsin WAXAHACH1E Texas LANCASTER Pennsylvania PAINESVILLE Ohio TULSA Oklahoma WESTLAKE Ohio MORRIS Illinois ELK GROVE VILLAG Illinois CLEARWATER Florida TULSA Oklahoma BATON ROUGE Louisiana Zip Code 47375 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.055 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.3625 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0.4175 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 0.4175 76063 0 0.3865 0.3865 0 0 0.03 0.4165 53223 0.415 0 0.415 0 0 0 0.415 75165 0.3775 0.03 0.4075 0 0 0 0.4075 17603 0.0115 0.3905 0.402 0 0 0 0.402 44077 0.298 0 0.298 0 0 0.102 0.4 74115 0.008 0.3895 0.3975 0 0 0 0.3975 44145 0 0.3955 0.3955 0 0 0 0.3955 60450 0.3905 0 0.3905 0 0 0 0.3905 60007 0 0.387 0.387 0 0 0 0.387 33760 0.384 0 0.384 0 0 0 0.384 74131 0.0015 0.006 0.0075 0 0 0.375 0.3825 70805 0.175 0.001 0.176 0.205 0 2.77556E-17 0.381 1609 BIDDLE AVE 6001 ANTOINE DR HWY 92 & 1-88 28424 38TH AVE N 1804 KIMBERLY PARK DR 2703 FREEMANSBURGAVE 6123 N MARINE DR 12255 FM 529 91 MICHIGAN AVE 402 N 3TH ST 100 DAN RD 18310 ENTERPRISE AVE 423 HOPEWELL RD ONE FULLERWAY 575, 577, 579CH1PETAWAY 395 BOGGS LN - S WYANDOTTE HOUSTON HILLSDALE DALTON EASTON PORTLAND HOUSTON PATERSON SAINT JOSEPH CANTON NASHVILLE WAVERLY GREAT BEND SALT LAKE CITY RICHMOND Michigan 48192 Texas 77091 Illinois 61257 Georgia 30720 Pennsylvania 18045 Oregon 97203 Texas 77041 New Jersey 07503 Missouri 64501 Massachusetts 02021 Illinois 62263 Ohio 45690 Kansas 67530 Utah 84108 Kentucky 40475 0.375 0.0025 0.0125 0.125 0.375 0.373 0.375 0.375 0.334 0 0.1275 0.0055 0.1185 0.353 0.32 0.0025 0.375 0.0025 0 0 0.002 0 0 0.0335 0.366 0.2375 0.3525 0.237 0 0.03 0.3775 0.3775 0.015 0.125 0.375 0.375 0.375 0.375 0.3675 0.366 0.365 0.358 0.3555 0.353 0.35 0 0 0.115 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.005 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.24 0.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0005 0 0 0 0 0.3775 0.3775 0.375 0.375 0.375 0.375 0.375 0.375 0.3675 0.366 0.3655 0.358 0.3555 0.353 0.35 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 23 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00255 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS NELCO PRODUCTS INC ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC HERITAGE-WTI INC ROLL COATER INC ENERGIZER BATTERY MANUFACTURING INC ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS HB FULLER PACKAGING CORP OF AMERICA COUNCE MILL KIK-SOCALINC ENTHONE INC PILOT CHEMICAL CO METAL COATERS OF CALIFORNIA INC PPG INDUSTRIES OHIO INC (CL) ET PRODUCTS CO INC DUCKBACK PRODUCTS SIERRA CORP SUMTER COATINGS INC LINETEC CERTIFIED ENAMELING INC CROWN CORK & SEAL CO (USA) INC CROWN CLOSURES DIV PPG ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES INC CELLO PROFESSIONAL PRODUCTS FORD MOTOR CO CHICAGO ASSEMBLY Address 1717 ENGLISH RD 1107 E KIMBERLY 5400 23RD AVE 200 RT 413 1250 ST GEORGE ST 5888 E COUNTY RD 180 75 SWANTON RD 3300 BALL ST 411 N DARLING 1647 ENGLISH RD 10500 INDUSTRIAL AVE HWY 57 9028 DICE RD 350 FRONTAGE RD 11623 N HOUSTON ROSSLYN RD 9133 CENTER AVE 3800 W 143 ST 747 DOUGLAS RD 2644 HEGAN LN 11400 W47TH ST 2410 HWY 15S 725 S 75TH AVE 3342 EMERY ST 940 MILL PARK DR 400 S 13TH ST 1354 OLD POST RD 12600 S TORRENCE AVE City HIGH POINT State North Carolina Zip Code 27261 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.0635 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.2855 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0.349 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 0.349 ANAHEIM MOLINE California Illinois 92801 61265 BRISTOL Pennsylvania EAST LIVERPOOL Ohio BLYTHEVILLE Arkansas SAINT ALBANS Vermont BIRMINGHAM Alabama FREMONT Michigan 19007 43920 72315 05478 35234 49412 0.027 0.207 0.0645 0.005 0 0.0025 0.2985 0.31 0.321 0.134 0.2015 0 0.334 0.1715 0.034 0.0175 0.348 0.341 0.266 0.005 0.334 0.174 0.3325 0.3275 0 0 0 0 0 0.348 0 0.341 0 0 0.074 0.34 0 0 0.3295 0.3345 0 0 0 0.334 0 0 0.159 0.333 0 0 0 0.3325 0 0 0 0.3275 HIGH POINT North Carolina 27261 0.0635 0.2635 0.327 0 0 0 0.327 ROSEVILLE California 95678 COUNCE Tennessee 38326 SANTA FE SPRINGS California 90670 WEST HAVEN Connecticut 06516 HOUSTON Texas 77086 RANCHO CUCAMON California 91730 CLEVELAND Ohio 44111 BREMEN Indiana 46506 CHICO California 95928 MINNETONKA Minnesota 55343 SUMTER South Carolina 29150 WAUSAU Wisconsin 54401 LOS ANGELES California 90023 LANCASTER Ohio 43130 LOUISVILLE Kentucky HAVRE DE GRACE Maryland CHICAGO Illinois 40203 21078 60633 0.008 0.0205 0.3255 0.006 0.31 0.0285 0.001 0 0.298 0.2975 0.0625 0.0205 0 0 0 0.2795 0.28 0.2585 0 0 0.307 0.0005 0.2825 0.303 0.3 0 0 0.1895 0.2755 0.2905 0.2905 0.2895 0.0015 0 0.2665 0.0205 0.3255 0.313 0.3105 0.311 0.304 0.3 0.298 0.2975 0.252 0.296 0.2905 0.2905 0.2895 0.281 0.28 0 0.305 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.73472E-17 0 0.0005 0.0005 0 0 0 0 0 0.0455 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3265 0.3255 0.3255 0.3135 0.311 0.311 0.304 0.3 0.298 0.2975 0.2975 0.296 0.2905 0.2905 0.2895 0.281 0.28 Page 24 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00256 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address SERIGRAPH INC VIDEOJET TECHNOLOGIES INC QUANTUM MARKETING INC FUCHS LUBRICANTS CO-CORPORATE OFFICE HELEN,INC DBA ENVIRONMENTAL COATINGS,INC SEQUA COATINGS CORP PRECOAT METALS DIV OLDCASTLE BUILDING ENVELOPETENNESSEE FACILITY 3801 E DECORAH RD 1855 ESTES AVE 3606 CRAFTSMAN BLVD 17050 SLATHROP AVE 6450 HANNA LAKE AVE SE 3500 WALNUT ST 920 POTTERTOWN RD HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR CO OPERATIONS INC ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO GATES CORP HEXION SPECIALTY CHEMICALS INC SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CHASE PRODUCTS CO MOC PRODUCTS CO INC BF GOODRICH TIRE MANUFACTURING BACHMAN SERVICES INC ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO MISCO PRODUCTS CORP YENKIN-MAJESTIC PAINT CORPORAT ION QUANTUM COATINGS INC HONDA MANUFACTURING OF INDIANA LLC MALCO PRODUCTS INC UNIVAR USA INC BERKELEY CHEMICAL SPECIALISTS & DEVELOPMENT INC EQUILON CARSON TERMINAL PREMIER INK SYSTEMS INC PROCLEAN OF ARIZONA INC UNIVAR USA INC METRO BLVD 1425 EDEN RD 395 JAMES AVE 630 US HWY 150 E 400 E COTTAGE PL 180CANALST 2315 CLIFTON AVE 2727 GARDNER RD 12306 MONTAGUE ST 18906 US 24 E 2220 S PROSPECT 350 ROOSEVELT AVE 1048 STINSON DR 1920 LEONARD AVE 1337 N WOOD BRANCH DR 2755 N MICHIGAN AVE 361 FAIRVIEWAVE 8925 SEEGER INDUSTRIAL DR 9733 MEADOR RD 20945 S WILMINGTON AVE 10420 N STATE ST 4315 W VAN BUREN 2646 METRO BLVD City State WEST BEND Wisconsin ELK GROVE VILLAG Illinois LAKELAND Florida HARVEY Illinois CALEDONIA Michigan MC KEESPORT Pennsylvania MIDWAY Tennessee Zip Code 53095 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.0455 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.234 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0.2795 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 0.2795 60007 0 0.275 0.275 0 0 0 0.275 33803 0.272 0 0.272 0 0 0 0.272 60426 0.2675 0 0.2675 0 0 0 0.2675 49316 0.2 0.065 0.265 0 0 0 0.265 15132 0.2105 0.0535 0.264 0 0 0 0.264 37809 0 0.2615 0.2615 0 0 0 0.2615 YORK Pennsylvania 17402 SAINT PAUL Minnesota 55102 GALESBURG Illinois 61401 CARPENTERSVILLE Illinois 60110 TERRE HAUTE Indiana 47808 NASHVILLE Tennessee 37209 BROADVIEW Illinois 60155 PACOIMA California 91331 WOODBURN Indiana 46797 OKLAHOMA CITY Oklahoma 73129 CARTERET New Jersey 07008 READING Pennsylvania 19605 COLUMBUS Ohio 43219 CHARLOTTE North Carolina 28273 GREENSBURG Indiana 47240 BARBERTON Ohio 44203 BERKELEY Missouri 63134 CONROE Texas 77303 CARSON California 90810 HARRISON Ohio 45030 PHOENIX Arizona 85043 MARYLAND HEIGHT Missouri 63043 0.2365 0.248 0 0.0645 0.0165 0.2435 0.0015 0.125 0.0025 0.125 0.229 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0 0.125 0.024 0.0115 0 0.194 0.042 0.0105 0.252 0.0025 0.125 0.125 0.023 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0 0.125 0.125 0.2605 0.2595 0 0.2585 0.0585 0.254 0.2535 0.1275 0.1275 0.25 0.252 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.125 0.125 0.25 0 0 0 0.2605 0 0 0 0.2595 0 0 0.259 0.259 0 0 0 0.2585 0 0 0.196 0.2545 0 0 0 0.254 0 0 0.2535 0 0 0.125 0.2525 0 0 0.125 0.2525 0 0 0.0025 0.2525 0 0 0 0.252 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0.125 0.25 0 0 0.125 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 Page 25 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00257 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name BERGQUIST CO RE1CHHOLD1NC CPJ TECHNOLOGIES ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO EFI / INKWARE FLINT GROUP NORTH AMERICA ATMI MATERIALS LTD CAR PRODUCTS INC ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/AVALSPAR COATINGS WARREN STAMPING PLANT (PART) METAL COATERS OF GEORGIA CLEARWATER INTERNATIONAL LLC COSMETIC LABORATORIES OF AMERICA FLUID ROUTING SOLUTIONS PERMA-PIPEOIL & GAS MARY KAY INC INTERNATIONAL EXTRUSION CORP TEXAS COLWELL INC ACTEGA KELSTARINC GUARDIAN AUTOMOTIVE - MOREHEAD PLANT ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO CHAMPION TECHNOLOGIES INC RHODIA INC ROCKLINE INDUSTRIES FIRST AMERICAN RESOURCESCO SASOL NORTH AMERICA INC LAKE CHARLES CHEMICAL COMPLEX RUDD CO INC ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CURTIS METAL FINISHING CO Address 301 WASHINGTON ST 249 ST LOUIS AVE 200 TANNER DR 1610 E HIGHLAND RD 189 WAUKEWAN ST 4675 W PARK DR 706 HOUSTON CLINTON DR 630 BEAULIEU ST 347 CENTRAL AVE City State CANNON FALLS Minnesota Zip Code 55009 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.125 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.125 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0.25 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 0.25 VALLEY PARK Missouri 63088 0.125 0.125 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 TAYLORS South Carolina 29687 0.125 0.125 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 TWINSBURG Ohio 44087 0.229 0.019 0.248 0 0 0 0.248 MEREDITH New Hampshire 03253 0 0.0635 0.0635 0 0 0.1835 0.247 ATLANTA Georgia 30339 0.12 0.12 0.24 0 0 0 0.24 BURNET Texas 78611 0.051 0.0005 0.0515 0 0 0.1885 0.24 HOLYOKE Massachusetts 01040 0.236 0 0.236 0 0 0 0.236 BOWLING GREEN Kentucky 42101 0.1285 0.1045 0.233 0 0 0 0.233 22800 MOUND RD WARREN 1150 MARIETTA INDUSTRIAL DR NE MARIETTA 4420 S FLORES ELMENDORF 20245 SUNBURST ST CHATSWORTH 1921 N BROAD ST LEXINGTON 5008-11 CURTIS LN NEW IBERIA 1330 REGAL ROW DALLAS 202 SINGLETON DR WAXAHACHIE 231 S PROGRESS DR E KENDALLVILLE 1050 TAYLORS LN CINNAMINSON 200 GUARDIAN AVE MOREHEAD 4550 NE EXPRESSWAY DORAVILLE 3303 HWY 135 N KILGORE 577 BANKHEAD HWY WINDER 1113 MARYLANDAVE SHEBOYGAN 2030 RIVERVIEW INDUSTRIAL DR MABLETON 2201 OLD SPANISH TRAIL WESTLAKE Michigan Georgia Texas California Tennessee Louisiana Texas Texas Indiana New Jersey Kentucky Georgia Texas Georgia Wisconsin Georgia Louisiana 48091 30062 78112 91311 38351 70560 75247 75165 46755 08077 40351 30340 75662 30680 53081 30126 70669 0.23 0.003 0.0005 0 0 0.22 0.0005 0 0.19 0.0015 0 0.1555 0.194 0.16 0.193 0 0.124 0 0.225 0.002 0.002 0 0 0 0.2115 0.02 0.005 0.203 0.047 0.002 0.0335 0 0.191 0.0645 0.23 0.228 0.0025 0.002 0 0.22 0.0005 0.2115 0.21 0.0065 0.203 0.2025 0.196 0.1935 0.193 0.191 0.1885 0 0 0 0.23 0 0 0 0.228 0 0 0.225 0.2275 0 0 0.225 0.227 0 0 0.225 0.225 0 0 0 0.22 0 0 0.214 0.2145 0 0 0 0.2115 0 0 0 0.21 0 0 0.2 0.2065 0 0 0 0.203 0 0 0 0.2025 0 0 0 0.196 0 0 0 0.1935 0 0 0 0.193 0 0 0 0.191 0 0 0 0.1885 1141 NW50TH ST 7710 POLK ST 9917 N ALPINE SEATTLE Washington SAINT LOUIS Missouri MACHESNEY PARK Illinois 98107 63111 61115 0.175 0.1845 0.1325 0.0125 0.0015 0.053 0.1875 0.186 0.1855 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1875 0 0.186 0 0.1855 Page 26 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00258 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name TRITECH COATINGS CORP ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO GARLAND TX JAMESTOWN COATING TECHNOLOGIES NALCO CO PLANT 106 ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS ASHLAND INC - CHANDLER PLAZEINC ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO BYK USA INC DUPONT FRONT ROYAL PLANT SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO ANCHOR PAINT MANUFACTURING CO INC JOHNSONDIVERSEYINC BEHR PROCESS CORP - CHICAGO ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS SONOCO FLEXIBLE PACKAGING STOUSE INC DUPONT FORT MADISON PLANT WARREN OIL CO - NC HENTZEN COATINGS,INC BATAVIA FACILITY ROHM & HAAS ELECTRONIC MATERIA LS LLC BAKER PETROLITE CORP SUPERIOR SOLVENTS & CHEMICALS TNEMEC CO INC PPG INDUSTRIES OHIO INC CIRCLEVILLE OH MT ELLIOTT TOOL & DIE MANUFACTURING (PART) DYCO PAINTS INC MID-STATES PAINT & CHEMICAL CO Address 1378 KINGSLANDAVE 3101 WOOD DR 108 MAIN ST 7701 US HWY 90A 1991 S WHEELING RD City PAGEDALE GARLAND JAMESTOWN SUGAR LAND WHEELING State Missouri Texas Pennsylvania Texas Illinois Zip Code 63133 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.1585 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.0235 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0.182 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 0.182 75041 0.151 0.031 0.182 0 0 0 0.182 16134 0.1795 0 0.1795 0 0 0 0.1795 77478 0 0 0 0 0 0.1795 0.1795 60090 0.0635 0.1135 0.177 0 0 0 0.177 6839 W CHICAGO ST 113BOLTE LN 11109 S CHOCTAW DR 524 S CHERRY ST 7961 WINCHESTER RD 1891 DUFFY RD 6707E14TH ST 831116TH ST 270 STATE ST 188 SIDE TRACK DR CHANDLER Arizona 85226 SAINT CLAIR Missouri 63077 BATON ROUGE Louisiana 70815 WALLINGFORD Connecticut 06492 FRONT ROYAL Virginia 22630 FERNLEY Nevada 89408 TULSA Oklahoma 74112 STURTEVANT Wisconsin 53177 CHICAGO HEIGHTS Illinois 60411 STATESVILLE North Carolina 28625 6502 S US HWY 31 N EDINBURGH Indiana 46124 300 NEW CENTURY PKWY NEW CENTURY Kansas 66031 801 -35TH ST FORT MADISON Iowa 52627 2340 US 301 N DUNN North Carolina 28335 1500 LATH EM ST BATAVIA Illinois 60510 455 FOREST ST MARLBOROUGH Massachusetts 01752 9100W21ST ST SAND SPRINGS Oklahoma 74063 320 NORTHPOINTE DR FAIRFIELD Ohio 45014 123W23RD AVE NORTH KANSAS CIT Missouri 64116 559 PITTSBURGH RD CIRCLEVILLE Ohio 43113 3675 E OUTER DR DETROIT Michigan 48234 5850 ULMERTON RD CLEARWATER Florida 33760 9315WATSON INDUSTRIAL PARK CRESTWOOD Missouri 63126 0.149 0.1745 0.1625 0.17 0.0005 0.0005 0.167 0.0255 0.048 0.0635 0 0.154 0 0.1525 0.151 0.0025 0.103 0.0365 0 0.0345 0.145 0 0.1415 0.028 0 0.0105 0.003 0.1675 0.002 0 0.01 0.0815 0.0925 0.1545 0 0.135 0.0005 0 0.0025 0.0295 0 0.1465 0.111 0 0.142 0 0.177 0.1745 0.173 0.173 0.168 0.0025 0.167 0.0355 0.1295 0.156 0.1545 0.154 0.135 0.153 0.151 0.005 0.1325 0.0365 0.1465 0.1455 0.145 0.142 0.1415 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0275 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.165 0 0.124 0 0 0 0 0.0185 0 0 0.144 0.0145 0.11 0 0 0 0 0 0.177 0.1745 0.173 0.173 0.168 0.1675 0.167 0.1595 0.157 0.156 0.1545 0.154 0.1535 0.153 0.151 0.149 0.147 0.1465 0.1465 0.1455 0.145 0.142 0.1415 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 27 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00259 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name DOW CHEMICAL CO - LOUISIANA OPERATIONS Address 21255 LA HWY 1 S City PLAQUEMINE State Louisiana Zip Code 70765 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.139 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0.139 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 0.139 ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION 2351 CHANNELAVE MEMPHIS Tennessee 38113 0.1225 0.012 0.1345 0 0 0 0.1345 AMREPINC 990 INDUSTRIAL PARK DR MARIETTA Georgia 30062 0.0435 0.088 0.1315 0 0 0 0.1315 ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS 3050 HANFORD DR LEBANON Pennsylvania 17046 0.0635 0.068 0.1315 0 0 0 0.1315 NALCO CO - ODESSA PLANT 114 12205W COUNTY RD 125 ODESSA Texas 79765 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0.006 0.131 VARN INTERNATIONAL 1333 N KIRK RD BATAVIA Illinois 60510 0.125 0.0025 0.1275 0.0025 0 0 0.13 WATSON STANDARD CO HARWICK PLANT 616 HITE RD HARWICK Pennsylvania 15049 0.1165 0.011 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 POWER SERVICE PRODUCTS INC 513 PEASTERHWY WEATHERFORD Texas 76086 0.0025 0.125 0.1275 0 0 0.1275 BASF CORP 3455 SOUTHPORT RD SPARTANBURG South Carolina 29302 0.125 0.0025 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 PERMATEX SOLON 6875 PARKLAND BLVD SOLON Ohio 44139 0.0025 0.125 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 CONOCOPHILLIPS PONCA CITY REFINERY 1000 SPINE ST PONCA CITY Oklahoma 74601 0.0025 0.125 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 CONOCOPH1LLIPS OKLAHOMA CITY PRODUCTS TERMINAL 4600NE10TH ST OKLAHOMACITY Oklahoma 73117 0.0025 0.125 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 GEORGES COYNECHEMICALCO INC 3015 STATE RD CROYDON Pennsylvania 19021 0.125 0.0025 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 TAKASAGO INTERNATIONAL CORP (USA) 267 UNION ST NORTHVALE New Jersey 07647 0.125 0.0025 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 BRYCE CO LLC 4505 OLD LAMAR AVE MEMPHIS Tennessee 38118 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0.125 0.1275 CHEMICALS INC 12321 HATCHERVILLERD BAYTOWN Texas 77520 0.125 0.0025 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 COASTAL CHEMICAL CO LLC 3520 VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD ABBEVILLE Louisiana 70510 0.125 0.0025 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 OAKLEY INC 1 ICON FOOTHILL RANCH California 92610 0.0025 0.125 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 GE WATER & PROCESS TECHNOLOGIES ORANGE FACILITY 3901 WILLIAMS DR ORANGE Texas 77630 0.125 0.0025 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 BRENNTAG GREAT LAKES LLC RESEARCH SOLVENTS & CHEMICALS INC RESEARCH SOLVENTS & CHEMICALS INC UNITED LABORATORIES INC RR STREET & CO INC NICCAUSAINC ELANTAS PDG INC HARCROS CHEMICALS INC ACTON TECHNOLOGIES INC 14765W BOBOLINKAVE 402 INDUSTRIAL PARK DR 133 BAIN DR 320 37TH AVE 2353 S BLUE ISLAND AVE 1044 S NELSON RD 5200 N SECOND ST 4606NEWWDR 100 THOMPSON ST MENOMONEE FALLS Wisconsin 53051 PELHAM Alabama 35124 LA VERGNE Tennessee 37086 SAINT CHARLES Illinois 60174 CHICAGO Illinois 60608 FOUNTAIN INN South Carolina 29644 SAINT LOUIS Missouri 63147 PASADENA Texas 77507 PITTSTON Pennsylvania 18640 0.0025 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0345 0.125 0.125 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.0035 0 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.038 0.125 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.085 0 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1255 0.125 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 28 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00260 Facility Name AKCROS CHEMICALS INC MAGNABLEND1NC LIQUID PLANT KALCOR COATINGS CO DANLIN INDUSTRIESCORP UNIVAR USA INC DALLAS DAN MORTON FACILITY TYSON FRESH MEATS INC NOV TUBOSCOPE HOLMES ROAD SICPA SECURINK CORP TRANS CHEMICAL INC JASPER RUBBER PRODUCTS INC CLEANING SYSTEMS INC CHEMETALL US INC CERAM-TRAZ CORP CERAMIC INDL COATINGS (DBA) COLUMBIA PAINT CORP INX INTERNATIONAL INK CO W M BARR & CO GOLD EAGLE CO AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INC ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING INC KEYSTONE ANILINE CORP CAROLINA SOLVENTS 1NC ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO AEP INDUSTRIES INC ALLEGHENY PETROLEUM PRODUCTS CO ACCURATE DISPERSIONS SUPERIOR SOLVENTS & CHEMICALS US MARINE CORPS AIR STATION YUMA TECHNICAL CHEMICAL CO Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address 500 JERSEY AVE 100 W STERRETT RD 37721 STEVENS BLVD 23737 HWY 47 3636 DAN MORTON DR HWY 50 W 2811 HOLMES RD 8000 RESEARCH WAY 419 EDE SOTO AVE 1010 FIRST AVE 1997 AMERICAN BLVD 13177 HURON RIVER DR 325 HWY 81 641 JACKSON AVE 1000 MAPLE AVE 2105 CHANNEL AVE 4400 S KILDARE AVE 1431 PROGRESSAVE 1260 JAMES L HART PKWY 2165 HWY 292 2274 1ST STSE 4185 ALGONQUIN PKWY 3930 GLENWOOD DR 1201 SPINE HILL RD 999 AIRBRAKE AVE 192W155TH ST 4211 BRAMERS LN AVE3E 3327 PIPELINE RD City State NEW BRUNSWICK New Jersey Zip Code 08901 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.125 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0.125 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 0.125 WAXAHACHIE Texas 75165 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 WILLOUGHBY Ohio 44094 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 THOMAS Oklahoma 73669 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 DALLAS Texas 75236 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 HOLCOMB Kansas 67851 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 HOUSTON Texas 77051 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 SPRINGFIELD Virginia 22153 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 SAINT LOUIS Missouri 63147 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 JASPER Indiana 47546 0 0 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 DE PERE Wisconsin 54115 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 ROMULUS Michigan 48174 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 OSSEO Minnesota 55369 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0.125 HUNTINGTON West Virginia 25704 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 HOMEWOOD Illinois 60430 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 MEMPHIS Tennessee 38113 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 CHICAGO Illinois 60632 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 HIGH POINT North Carolina 27261 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 YPSILANTI Michigan 48197 0.124 0 0.124 0 0 0 0.124 INMAN South Carolina 29349 0.0615 0.0615 0.123 0 0 0 0.123 HICKORY North Carolina 28602 0.116 0.0025 0.1185 0.0025 0 0 0.121 LOUISVILLE Kentucky 40211 0.1145 0.0065 0.121 0 0 0 0.121 CHARLOTTE North Carolina 28208 0.082 0.036 0.118 0 0 0 0.118 GRIFFIN Georgia 30224 0.0025 0.115 0.1175 0 0 0 0.1175 WILMERDING Pennsylvania 15148 0.0235 0.093 0.1165 0 0 0 0.1165 SOUTH HOLLAND Illinois 60473 0.088 0.028 0.116 0 0 0 0.116 LOUISVILLE Kentucky 40216 0.004 0 0.004 0 0 0.111 0.115 YUMA Arizona 85369 0.096 0.0185 0.1145 0 0 0 0.1145 CLEBURNE Texas 76033 0.1135 0 0.1135 0 0 0.1135 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 29 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00261 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address ARDEX LABORATORIES INC 2050 BYBERRY RD ASHLAND INC - EVENDALE 2788 GLENDALE-MILFORDRD SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 2121 NEW WORLD DR SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 1025 HOWARD ST 3M CO - NEVADA 2120 E AUSTIN BLVD DELTA LABORATORIES INC 3710 COUNTY RD 326 W SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 636 E 40TH ST SUPERIOR OIL CO INC 400 W REGENT ST FRAZEE INDUSTRIES 6625 MIRAMAR RD HENKELCORP 23343 SHERWOOD AVE CENTRAL MOTOR WHEEL OF AMERICA (DBA CMWA) 125WHEAT DR ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO 2461 CROCKER CIR STEELSCAPEINC RANCHO 11200 ARROW RT ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO 20915 S WILMINGTON AVE MRCG-KRAFTMAID P3 150 GRAND VALLEY AVE UN1VAR USA INC HAMILTON BRANCH 12 STAN DEN DR GROTTOES PLASTICS PLANT 149 GRAND CAVERNS DR CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC LANGLEY PLANT 403 CARLINE RD ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO 200NE181ST ST CE BRADLEY LABORATORIES INC 55 BENNETT DR MULTI-COLOR CORP 2281 S US 31 ATHEA LABORATORIES INC 7855 N FAULKNER RD BRENNTAG PACIFIC INC 10747 PATTERSON PL DIC IMAGING PRODUCTS USA LLC 7335S10TH ST NORTHERN COATINGS & CHEMICAL CO INC 705 6TH AVE CCI MANUFACTURING IL CORP 15550 CANAL BANK RD UNION TANK CAR ALEXANDRIA MANUFACTURING FACILITY 6325 HWY 1 N CHAMPION TECHNOLOGIES INC ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION 350 CENTAURUS RD 400 MAIN ST City PHILADELPHIA State Pennsylvania Zip Code 19116 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.1125 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0.1125 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 0.1125 EVENDALE Ohio 45241 0.0805 0.032 0.1125 0 0 0 0.1125 COLUMBUS Ohio 43207 0.0085 0.0065 0.015 0 0 0.097 0.112 GREENSBORO North Carolina 27403 0.053 0.057 0.11 0 0 0.001 0.111 NEVADA Missouri 64772 0.01 0.1 0.11 0 0 0 0.11 OCALA Florida 34475 0.1085 0.0005 0.109 0 0 0 0.109 HOLLAND Michigan 49423 0.1045 0.0015 0.106 0 0 0 0.106 INDIANAPOLIS Indiana 46225 0.0045 0 0.0045 0 0 0.0995 0.104 SAN DIEGO California 92121 0 0.103 0.103 0 0 0 0.103 WARREN Michigan 48091 0.044 0.044 0.088 0 0 0.015 0.103 PARIS Kentucky 40361 0 0.103 0.103 0 0 0.103 FAIRFIELD California 94533 0.1015 0.001 0.1025 0 0 0 0.1025 RANCHO CUCAMON California 91730 0.0035 0.0975 0.101 0 0 0 0.101 CARSON California 90810 0.0925 0.0055 0.098 0 0 0 0.098 ORWELL Ohio 44076 0.002 0.0775 0.0795 0 0 0.0175 0.097 HAMILTON Ohio 45015 0.007 0.02 0.027 0 0 0.0685 0.0955 GROTTOES Virginia 24441 0.022 0.0375 0.0595 0.004 0 0.03 0.0935 LANGLEY South Carolina 29834 0.0835 0.01 0.0935 0 0 0 0.0935 MIAMI Florida 33162 0.075 0.018 0.093 0 0 0 0.093 BRATTLEBORO Vermont 05301 0.093 0 0.093 0 0 0 0.093 SCOTTSBURG Indiana 47170 0 0.091 0.091 0 0 0 0.091 MILWAUKEE Wisconsin 53224 0.0905 0 0.0905 0 0 0 0.0905 SANTA FE SPRINGS California 90670 0.081 0.0065 0.0875 0 0 0 0.0875 OAK CREEK Wisconsin 53154 0.0085 0.0775 0.086 0 0 0 0.086 MENOMINEE Michigan 49858 0.085 0 0.085 0 0 0 0.085 LEMONT Illinois 60439 0 0.0835 0.0835 0 0 0 0.0835 ALEXANDRIA Louisiana 71303 0.004 0.0795 0.0835 0 0 0 0.0835 CORPUS CHRISTI Texas 78405 TEWKSBURY Massachusetts 01876 0.0805 0.076 0.002 0.006 0.0825 0.082 0 0 0 0 0 0.0825 0 0.082 Page 30 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00262 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name THIRD COAST PACKAGING INC FRIENDSWOOD BERNER CHEESE CORP CHAMPION TECHNOLOGIES INC BUZZ! UNICEM USA - GREENCASTLE PLANT KEY POLYMER TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC AVERY DENNISON PFD ECOLAB LUBRIZOL ARCH CHEMICALS INC PLAZEINC ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO AKZO NOBEL COATINGS1NC MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP CHEMICAL SOLVENTS JENNINGS ROAD FACILITY CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING CO LAMBERTI USA INC WHARTON CHEMICAL COMPLEX SPRAYLATCORP ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS Address 18410W CLOVER LN City State FRIENDSWOOD Texas Zip Code 77549 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0 0 0 0.0815 Total Emissions (tpy) 0.0815 2034 E FACTORY RD DAKOTA Illinois 61018 0 0 0 0 0 0.0805 0.0805 1100 HUGHIE LONG RD CRESSON Texas 76035 0.0795 0.0005 0.08 0 0 0 0.08 3301 S COUNTY RD 150 W GREENCASTLE Indiana 46135 0.0155 0.064 0.0795 0 0 0 0.0795 17 SHEPARD ST LAWRENCE INDUS' LAWRENCE Massachusetts 01843 0 0.0165 0.0165 0 0 0.063 0.0795 13500 N CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY DALLAS Texas 75243 0 0.0795 0.0795 0 0 0 0.0795 650 W67TH AVE SCHERERVILLE Indiana 46375 0.0545 0.025 0.0795 0 0 0 0.0795 18383 E RAILROAD ST CITY OF INDUSTRY California 91748 0.018 0.061 0.079 0 0 0 0.079 9550 W 55TH ST MC COOK Illinois 60525 0 0.078 0.078 0 0 0.078 HWY 933 BRANDENBURG Kentucky 40108 0.02 0.058 0.078 0 0 0 0.078 105 BOLTE LN SAINT CLAIR Missouri 63077 0.078 0 0.078 0 0 0 0.078 5420 SPEAKER RD KANSAS CITY Kansas 66106 0.069 0.0085 0.0775 0 0 0 0.0775 1000 INDUSTRIAL PARK DR CLINTON Mississippi 39056 0.0765 0 0.0765 0 0 0 0.0765 101 FAIRVIEWAVE PITTSBURGH Pennsylvania 15238 0.064 0.0125 0.0765 0 0 0 0.0765 3751 JENNINGS RD CLEVELAND Ohio 44109 0.069 0.003 0.072 0 0 0.0025 0.0745 2600 HUNTINGTON DR FAIRFIELD California 94533 0.074 0.0005 0.0745 0 0 0 0.0745 HWY 59 AT COUNTY RD 212 HUNGERFORD Texas 77448 0.0115 0 0.0115 0.021 0 0.042 0.0745 716 S COLUMBUSAVE MOUNT VERNON New York 10550 0.0035 0.0705 0.074 0 0 0 0.074 2000 WESTHALL ST PITTSBURGH Pennsylvania 15233 0.063 0.0105 0.0735 0 0 0 0.0735 AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INC BOEHRINGERINGELHEIM CHEMICALS INC VEYANCE TECHNOLOGIES INC VEOLIA ES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LLC PORT ARTHUR FACILITY ADCO CLEANING PRODUCTS LLC WARSAW CHEMICAL CO INC ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS GENERAL DYNAMICS ORDNANCE & TACTICAL SYSTEMS GARLAND 1660 CROSS STSE SALEM 2820 N NORMANDY RD PETERSBURG 4021 N 56TH ST LINCOLN HWY 73, 35 MILES W OF TAYLOR BA PORT ARTHUR 900 W MAIN ST 390 ARGONNERD 901 W UNION ST SEDALIA WARSAW MONTEBELLO 1200 N GLEN BROOK GARLAND Oregon Virginia Nebraska Texas Missouri Indiana California Texas 97302 23805 68504 77640 65301 46580 90640 75040 0.043 0.009 0 0.071 0.0235 0.048 0.0635 0.003 0.03 0.0635 0 0 0.0475 0.022 0.0065 0 0.073 0.0725 0 0.071 0.071 0.07 0.07 0.003 0 0 0 0.073 0 0 0 0.0725 0 0 0.072 0.072 0 0 0 0.071 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.071 0 0.07 0 0.07 0 0 0.064 0.067 Page 31 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00263 Facility Name CARDINAL INDUSTRIAL FINISHES MINUTEMAN INTERNATIONAL MULTI-CLEAN DIV UNIVAR USA INC INDIANAPOLIS WEST BRANCH KARCHER NORTH AMERICA- PROCHEM ICI PAINTS PUERTO RICO INC COOK COMPOSITES & POLYMERS C O MRCG-KRAFTMAID PI BRENNTAG SOUTHEAST INC CONOCOPH1LLIPSCO EAST ST LOUIS TERMINAL CONTINENTAL CEMENT CO LLC ECOLABINC COGNIS CORP MAULDIN PLANT GRAPHIC CONTROLS LLC UNIVAR USA INC ABC COMPOUNDINGCO OF TEXAS INC HANNA STEEL CORP DYSTAR LP NORTHERN LABS INC WEST DRIVE BARTON SOLVENTS INC BETTENDORF WHITFORD CORP AMERICAN COATINGS INC NORMAN FOX & CO KAY CHEMICAL CO ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO FRANKLIN INTERNATIONAL RECKITT BENCKISER INOAC PACKAGINGGROUP ECOLAB INC CORSICANA TECHNOLOGIES INC Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address 1329 POTREROAVE City State SOUTH EL MONTE California Zip Code 91733 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.048 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.018 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0.066 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 0.066 600 CARDIGAN RD SHOREVIEW Minnesota 55126 0.063 0.0025 0.0655 0 0 0 0.0655 5850W82NDST INDIANAPOLIS Indiana 46268 0.003 0.0085 0.0115 0 0 0.0515 0.063 325 S PRICE RD CHANDLER Arizona 85224 0.0625 0 0.0625 0 0 0 0.0625 65 INFANTERIAKM 134 CAROLINA Puerto Rico 00985 0.0615 0 0.0615 0 0 0 0.0615 13511 MAIN ST LEMONT Illinois 60439 0.017 0.044 0.061 0 0 0 0.061 16052 INDUSTRIAL PKWY MIDDLEFIELD Ohio 44062 0 0.0485 0.0485 0 0 0.0105 0.059 2000 E PETTIGREW ST DURHAM North Carolina 27703 0.043 0.015 0.058 0 0 0 0.058 3300 MISSISSIPPI AVE CAHOKIA Illinois 62206 0 0.0575 0.0575 0 0 0 0.0575 10107 HWY 79 HANNIBAL Missouri 63401 0.057 0 0.057 0 0 0 0.057 261 HWY 155 S MC DONOUGH Georgia 30253 0.0185 0.0385 0.057 0 0 0.057 1520 OLD STAGE RD MAULDIN South Carolina 29662 0.0465 0.0105 0.057 0 0 0 0.057 400 EXCHANGE ST BUFFALO New York 14204 0.054 0 0.054 0 0 0 0.054 7050W71STST BEDFORD PARK Illinois 60499 0.0285 0.025 0.0535 0 0 0 0.0535 1102 AVE J E GRAND PRAIRIE Texas 75050 0.0025 0.051 0.0535 0 0 0 0.0535 220 HANNA DR PEKIN Illinois 61554 0.0035 0.0495 0.053 0 0 0 0.053 209 WATLINGTON INDUSTRIAL DR REIDSVILLE North Carolina 27320 0.035 0.015 0.05 0 0 0 0.05 5800 W DR MANITOWOC Wisconsin 54220 0.049 0 0.049 0 0 0 0.049 204 36TH ST BETTENDORF Iowa 52722 0.0115 0.0375 0.049 0 0 0 0.049 47 PARKAVE ELVERSON Pennsylvania 19520 0.046 0.0025 0.0485 0 0 0 0.0485 10625 MAHAFFEY RD TOMBALL Texas 77375 0.013 0.0355 0.0485 0 0 0 0.0485 5511 S BOYLE AVE VERNON California 90058 0.0025 0.046 0.0485 0 0 0.0485 8300 CAPITAL DR GREENSBORO North Carolina 27409 0.0095 0.0385 0.048 0 0 0 0.048 5125W HANNA AVE TAMPA Florida 33634 0.0015 0.0455 0.047 0 0 0 0.047 2020BRUCKST COLUMBUS Ohio 43207 0.0045 0.0425 0.047 0 0 0 0.047 799 RT 206 & HILLSBOROUGH RD HILLSBOROUGH New Jersey 08844 0.045 0.001 0.046 0 0 0 0.046 901 NUTTER DR BARDSTOWN Kentucky 40004 0 0.044 0.044 0 0 0 0.044 3001 CHANNAHON RD JOLIET Illinois 60436 0.0305 0.0125 0.043 0 0 0 0.043 2733 E HWY 31 CORSICANA Texas 75109 0.0065 0.018 0.0245 0 0 0.018 0.0425 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 32 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00264 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name KBP COILCOATERS INC ENTHONEINC FORD MOTOR CO MICHIGAN ASSEMBLY PLANT RECTICEL INTERIORS NORTH AMERICA LLC BIOLAB INC BARTON SOLVENTS INC WICHITA BARTON SOLVENTS INC KANSAS CITY SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO CLEAN HARBORS EL DORADO LLC ECOLAB EXCEL-POLYMERSLLC AIR PRODUCTS PERFORMANCE MANUFACTURING INC ECOLAB INC HUNTSMAN ADVANCED MATERIALS AMERICAS INC ETHOX CHEMICALS LLC RICHARDSAPEXINC GIANT CEMENT CO BRENNTAG NORTHEAST INC LUBRIZOLCORP RANBAR ELECTRICAL MATERIALS INC DUPONT PARLIN PLANT BARTON SOLVENTS INC WEST BEND 3M CO - KNOXVILLE SI GROUP INC UNIVAR USA INC - INDIANAPOLIS MACDERMIDINC MEADWESTVACO SOUTH CAROLINA LLC CARBOLINECO ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION Address 3600 E 44TH AVE City DENVER State Colorado Zip Code 80216 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.042 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0.042 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 0.042 9809 INDUSTRIAL DR BRIDGEVIEW Illinois 60455 0.004 0.0375 0.0415 0 0 0 0.0415 38303 MICHIGAN AVE WAYNE Michigan 48184 0.0405 0 0.0405 0 0 0 0.0405 1420 INDUSTRIAL PARK DR TUSCALOOSA Alabama 35401 0.0005 0.039 0.0395 0 0 0 0.0395 1735 DOGWOOD DR CONYERS Georgia 30012 0.039 0 0.039 0 0 0 0.039 201 S CEDAR VALLEY CENTER Kansas 67147 0.008 0.031 0.039 0 0 0 0.039 901 S 66TH TERRACE KANSAS CITY Kansas 66111 0.008 0.031 0.039 0 0 0 0.039 630 E 13TH ANDOVER Kansas 67002 0.0285 0.01 0.0385 0 0 0 0.0385 309 AMERICAN CIR UNION EL DORADO Arkansas 71730 0.037 0 0.037 0 0 0.0005 0.0375 383 N HIGH ST HEBRON Ohio 43025 0.0265 0.0105 0.037 0 0 0 0.037 HWY 353 S PO BOX 377 JONESBOROUGH Tennessee 37659 0 0.0365 0.0365 0 0 0 0.0365 337 VINCENT DR MILTON Wisconsin 53563 0.0025 0.0335 0.036 0 0 0 0.036 942 BAKER RD MARTINSBURG West Virginia 25405 0.022 0.0135 0.0355 0 0 0 0.0355 555 HUNTSMAN RD MC INTOSH Alabama 36553 0.0125 0.023 0.0355 0 0 0 0.0355 1801 PERIMETER RD GREENVILLE South Carolina 29605 0.0025 0.0325 0.035 0 0 0 0.035 4202-24 MAIN ST PHILADELPHIA Pennsylvania 19127 0.025 0 0.025 0 0 0.0095 0.0345 HWY 453 & 1-26 (654 JUDGE ST) HARLEYVILLE South Carolina 29448 0.0015 0.0005 0.002 0 0 0.032 0.034 81 WHULLERLN READING Pennsylvania 19605 0.0185 0.015 0.0335 0 0 0 0.0335 29400 LAKELAND BLVD WICKLIFFE Ohio 44092 0.033 0 0.033 0 0 0 0.033 RTE 993 ONE MILE W OF RTE 130 MANOR Pennsylvania 15665 0 0.023 0.023 0 0 0.01 0.033 CHEESEQUAKERD PARLIN New Jersey 08859 0.004 0.028 0.032 0 0 0 0.032 800 RAILWAY WEST BEND Wisconsin 53095 0.005 0.0265 0.0315 0 0 0 0.0315 3406 E PLEASANT KNOXVILLE Iowa 50138 0 0.0315 0.0315 0 0 0 0.0315 1000 MAIN ST ROTTERDAM JUNCJ New York 12150 0.009 0.0145 0.0235 0.007 0 0 0.0305 7425 E 30TH ST INDIANAPOLIS Indiana 46219 0.008 0.0225 0.0305 0 0 0 0.0305 1221 FARROW AVE FERNDALE Michigan 48220 0.0135 0.015 0.0285 0 0 0 0.0285 400 CROSBY RD DERIDDER Louisiana 70634 0.0025 0.0255 0.028 0 0 0 0.028 900 OPELOUSAS ST LAKE CHARLES Louisiana 70601 0 0.028 0.028 0 0 0 0.028 2011 TURNER ST LANSING Michigan 48906 0.025 0.0025 0.0275 0 0 0 0.0275 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 33 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00265 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name KEMIRA WATER SOLUTIONS INC UNIVAR USA INC - TOLEDO SOUTH BRANCH ECOLABINC VEOLIA ES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LLC AMPHENOL APC INC CLEARWATER INTERNATIONAL LLC BARTON SOLVENTS INC DES MOINES HOLLY OAK CHEMICAL INC PROCTER & GAMBLE HAIR CARE LLC EXCEL POLYMERS LLC ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO FORD MOTOR CO DEARBORN TOOL & DIE PLANT BASF CORP UNIVAR USA INC NORCROSS FACILITY ECOLAB INC VALERO THREE RIVERS REFINERY BARTON SOLVENTS INC COUNCIL BLUFFS UNIVAR USA INC - TOLEDO BRANCH PRIDE SOLVENTS & CHEMICAL CO OF NEW JERSEY DAUBERT CHEMICAL CO KWAL-HOWELLS INC (DBA KWAL PAINT INC) U.S. POLYMERSACCUREZLLC 3M CO-SPRINGFIELD UNIVAR USA INC 68TH ST GAGE PRODUCTS CO VALSPAR REFINISH FISHER SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL MTN DIAGNOSTICS PLANT Address 1 CYANAMIDRD City MOBILE State Alabama Zip Code 36614 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.013 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.0125 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0.0255 0 0 0.0015 Total Emissions (tpy) 0.027 4051 SAVE TOLEDO Ohio 43615 0.009 0.0175 0.0265 0 0 0 0.0265 2305SHERWIN ST GARLAND Texas 75041 0.0145 0.012 0.0265 0 0 0 0.0265 125 FACTORYLN MIDDLESEX New Jersey 08846 0.0125 0.0135 0.026 0 0 0 0.026 91 NORTHEASTERN BLVD NASHUA New Hampshire 03062 0.0025 0.0235 0.026 0 0 0 0.026 100 INDUSTRIAL DR (BLDG 180,150, LEETSDALE Pennsylvania 15056 0.0015 0 0.0015 0 0 0.0245 0.026 1970 NE BROADWAY DES MOINES Iowa 50313 0.003 0.023 0.026 0 0 0 0.026 101 CASE ST FOUNTAIN INN South Carolina 29644 0.025 0 0.025 0 0 0 0.025 2200 LOWER MUSCATINE RD IOWA CITY Iowa 52240 0.005 0.01 0.015 0 0 0.01 0.025 150 S CONNELL AVE DYERSBURG Tennessee 38024 0 0.0245 0.0245 0 0 0 0.0245 8901 OLD GALVESTON RD HOUSTON Texas 77034 0.0055 0.019 0.0245 0 0 0 0.0245 113 STAGE COACH TRAIL GREENSBORO North Carolina 27409 0.004 0.0205 0.0245 0 0 0 0.0245 11700 S COTTAGE GROVE CHICAGO Illinois 60628 0 0 0 0 0 0.024 0.024 3001 MILLER RD DEARBORN Michigan 48121 0.001 0 0.001 0 0 0.0225 0.0235 1 JAMES ST BELVIDERE New Jersey 07823 0 0.02 0.02 0 0 0.0035 0.0235 2145 SKYLANDCT NORCROSS Georgia 30071 0.011 0.0125 0.0235 0 0 0 0.0235 640LENFEST RD SAN JOSE California 95133 0.0135 0.0095 0.023 0 0 0 0.023 301 LEROY ST THREE RIVERS Texas 78071 0.023 0 0.023 0 0 0 0.023 2135 9TH AVE COUNCIL BLUFFS Iowa 51502 0.0015 0.0215 0.023 0 0 0 0.023 30450 TRACY RD WALBRIDGE Ohio 43465 0.003 0.0195 0.0225 0 0 0 0.0225 211 RANDOLPH AVE AVENEL New Jersey 07001 0.0055 0.017 0.0225 0 0 0 0.0225 4700 S CENTRAL AVE CHICAGO Illinois 60638 0.0095 0.0125 0.022 0 0 0 0.022 2430 ALBERT BROADFOOT ST BONHAM Texas 75418 0 0.0185 0.0185 0 0.0025 0.021 300 E PRIMM ST SAINT LOUIS Missouri 63111 0.0085 0.003 0.0115 0 0 0.009 0.0205 3211 E CHESTNUT EXPY SPRINGFIELD Missouri 65802 0 0.02 0.02 0 0 0 0.02 8500 W 68 TH ST BEDFORD PARK Illinois 60501 0.01 0.0095 0.0195 0 0 0 0.0195 625 WANDA AVE FERNDALE Michigan 48220 0 0.0195 0.0195 0 0 0 0.0195 210 CROSBY ST PICAYUNE Mississippi 39466 0 0.019 0.019 0 0 0 0.019 8365 VALLEY PIKE MIDDLETOWN Virginia 22645 0 0.019 0.019 0 0 0 0.019 Page 34 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00266 Facility Name ZEP COMMERCIAL STEEL DYNAMICS INC TRANSTAR AUTOBODY TECHNOLOGIES ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO BLENTECH CORP ARLON INC ADHESIVES & FILMS DIV HENKEL CHEMDESIGN PRODUCTS INC MONSANTO CO SH ERWIN-WILLIAMS CO PRIDE SOLVENT & CHEMICAL CO OF NY INC SIMONIZUSAINC BRULIN CORP EVONIKDEGUSSACORP UNIVAR USA INC HUBBARD-HALLINC GOODWIN CO HENKELCORP SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO PRC-DESOTO INTERNATIONAL INC BERRIDGE MANUFACTURING CO BUCKLEY OIL CO CHEMOLCO INC HYDRITE CHEMICAL CO TRUE VALUE MANUFACTURING DAVIES IMPERIAL COATINGS INC UNIVAR USA INC SANTA FE SPRINGS HENKEL ONTARIO BENJAMIN MOORE & CO PELL CITY 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address 350 JOE FRANK HARRIS PKWY 4500 COUNTY RD 59 2040 HEISERMAN DR 1842 ENTERPRISE PKWY 1305 RYE ST 2811 S HARBOR BLVD 14351 HWY 221 2 STANTON ST 2500 WIGGINS RD 6795 S MAIN ST 6 LONG ISLAND AVE 201 BOSTON TURNPIKE 2920 DR ANDREW J BROWN AVE 4201 DEGUSSARD 2600 S GARFIELD AVE 563 S LEONARD ST 700 PROGRESS CENTER AVE 421 LONDON RD 2325 HOLLINS FERRY RD 11601 UNITED ST 6515 FRATT RD 1809 ROCK ISLAND ST 2300 RANDOLPHAVE 2545 BOND ST 201 JANDUS RD 1275 STATE ST 13900 CARMEN1TA RD 1496 E FRANCIS ST 109 BAMBERG DR City State Zip Code EMERSON Georgia 30137 BUTLER Indiana 46721 BRIGHTON Michigan 48114 TWINSBURG Ohio 44087 HOUSTON Texas 77029 SANTA ANA California 92704 ENOREE South Carolina 29335 MARINETTE Wisconsin 54143 MUSCATINE Iowa 52761 MORROW Georgia 30260 HOLTSVILLE New York 11742 BOLTON Connecticut 06043 INDIANAPOLIS Indiana 46205 THEODORE Alabama 36582 COMMERCE California 90040 WATERBURY Connecticut 06708 LAWRENCEVILLE Georgia 30043 DELAWARE Ohio 43015 BALTIMORE Maryland 21230 MOJAVE California 93501 SAN ANTONIO Texas 78218 DALLAS Texas 75207 GREENSBORO North Carolina 27406 UNIVERSITY PARK Illinois 60466 CARY Illinois 60013 HAMMOND Indiana 46320 SANTA FE SPRINGS California 90670 ONTARIO California 91761 PELL CITY Alabama 35125 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.019 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0.019 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 0.019 0 0.0185 0.0185 0 0 0 0.0185 0.009 0.009 0.018 0 0 0 0.0175 0.0025 0.0145 0.017 0 0 0 0.017 0.0125 0.0015 0.014 0 0 0.0025 0.0165 0 0.0165 0.0165 0 0 0 0.0165 0.0005 0.0145 0.015 0 0 0 0.015 0.006 0.0085 0.0145 0 0 0 0.0145 0.0135 0.001 0.0145 0 0 0 0.0145 0.004 0.0105 0.0145 0 0 0 0.0145 0.0035 0.0105 0.014 0 0 0 0.014 0.0125 0.001 0.0135 0 0 0 0.013 0.003 0.0095 0.0125 0 0 0 0.0125 0.012 0.0005 0.0125 0 0 0 0.0125 0.011 0.0015 0.0125 0 0 0 0.0125 0.0005 0.0115 0.012 0 0 0 0.012 0.011 0.0005 0.0115 0 0 0 0.0115 0.005 0.0065 0.0115 0 0 0 0.0115 0.0065 0.004 0.0105 0 0 0 0.0105 0.004 0.006 0.01 0 0 0 0.01 0 0.01 0.01 0 0 0 0.01 0.0075 0.0025 0.01 0 0 0 0.01 0 0.0095 0.0095 0 0 0 0.0095 0 0.0095 0.0095 0 0 0 0.0095 0.0025 0.007 0.0095 0 0 0 0.0095 0.0095 0 0.0095 0 0 0 0.0095 0.003 0.0065 0.0095 0 0 0 0.0095 0.0015 0.0075 0.009 0 0 0 0.009 0.0085 0 0.0085 0 0 0 0.0085 Page 35 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00267 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address GEORGiA-PACIFICCHEMICALSLLC SHERWiN-WILLIAMSCO CRODA1NC TARR ACQUISITION LLC INTERSTATE CHEMICAL CO INC DSM DESOTECH INC NEW DAWN MANUFACTURING CO RUSTOLEUMCORP 3M COTTAGE GROVE CENTER SHERWIN-WILLIAMSCO DYNALOY LLC LUBRIZOLCORP PAINESVIL LE PLANT SCOT LABORATORIES CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING CO CUSTOM CHEMICAL FORMULATORS HENKELCORP UNIVAR USA INC - SAN JOSE DOW CHEMICAL JOLIET SITE KEYSTONE CEMENT CO PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING CO ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS AROMATIC TECHNOLOGIES INC CALLAHAN CH EMICAL CO ACTEGA RADCUREINC INDEPENDENTS INC US ECOLOGY TEXAS INC CUSTOM SYNTHESIS LLC WORWAG COATINGS LLC NA CR BRANDS INC 1429 E LUFKIN AVE 26300 FARGO AVE 315 CHERRY LN 2429 N BORTHWICK AVE 23247 W EAMES ST 1101 HWY 27 S 16001 TRADE ZONE AVE 7850 OHIO RIVER RD 10746 INNOVATION RD 12401 INDUSTRIAL BLVD 6445 OLIVIA LN 155 FREEDOM RD 16841 PARKCIR DR 17 LAKE MIRROR RD 8707 MILLERGROVE DR 923 MAULDIN RD 2256 JUNCTION AVE 26332 S FRONTAGE RD W RT 329 1900 KANSAS AVE 546 W ABBOTT ST 130 INDUSTRIAL PKWY 200 INDUSTRIAL AVE 5 MANSARDCT 14705 S AVALON BLVD 3277 COUNTY RD 69 1704 DENVER RD 3420 KOSSUTH ST 141 VENTURE BLVD City LUFKIN State Texas Zip Code 75901 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.008 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.0005 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0.0085 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 0.0085 BEDFORD HEIGHTS Ohio 44146 0.0005 0.0015 0.002 0 0 0.0065 0.0085 NEWCASTLE Delaware 19720 0.0075 0.0005 0.008 0 0 0 0.008 PORTLAND Oregon 97227 0.008 0 0.008 0 0 0 0.008 CHANNAHON Illinois 60410 0.0025 0.0055 0.008 0 0 0 0.0075 STANLEY North Carolina 28164 0 0.0075 0.0075 0 0 0 0.0075 UPPER MARLBORO Maryland 20774 0.0075 0 0.0075 0 0 0 0.0075 LESAGE West Virginia 25537 0.0025 0.005 0.0075 0 0 0 0.0075 COTTAGE GROVE Minnesota 55016 0 0.002 0.002 0 0 0.0055 0.0075 VICTORVILLE California 92392 0.0035 0.004 0.0075 0 0 0 0.0075 INDIANAPOLIS Indiana 46226 0.0015 0.006 0.0075 0 0 0 0.0075 PAINESVILLE Ohio 44077 0.0065 0.001 0.0075 0 0 0 0.0075 CHAGRIN FALLS Ohio 44023 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0.0025 0.0025 0.0075 FOREST PARK Georgia 30297 0.0035 0.0035 0.007 0 0 0.0005 0.0075 SANTA FE SPRINGS California 90670 0.007 0 0.007 0 0 0 0.007 CALHOUN Georgia 30701 0 0.0065 0.0065 0 0 0 0.0065 SAN JOSE California 95131 0.003 0.0035 0.0065 0 0 0 0.0065 CHANNAHON Illinois 60410 0 0.0065 0.0065 0 0 0 0.0065 BATH Pennsylvania 18014 0 0.0065 0.0065 0 0 0 0.0065 KANSAS CITY Kansas 66105 0.006 0 0.006 0 0 0 0.006 INDIANAPOLIS Indiana 46225 0 0.006 0.006 0 0 0 0.006 SOMERVILLE New Jersey 08876 RIDGEFIELD PARK New Jersey 07660 WAYNE New Jersey 07470 GARDENA California 90248 ROBSTOWN Texas 78380 ANDERSON South Carolina 29625 LAFAYETTE Indiana 47905 SPARTANBURG South Carolina 29306 0.0055 0.003 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0055 0.0055 0.005 0.005 0.0025 0.005 0.005 0.005 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0055 0 0.0055 0 0.005 0 0.005 0 0.005 0 0.005 0 0.005 0 0.005 Page 36 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00268 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name CENTRAL SOLUTIONS INC UNIVAR USA INC LAKEVILLE CAR CARE PACKAGING LLC SHIELD PACKAGING CO INC GOODWIN CO CP INC INTEL CORP - RONLER ACRES CAMPUS BRAIN POWER INC SARTOMERCOINC CHAMPION PACKAGING & DISTRIBUTING INC INTEL CORP SARTOMERCOINC ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS KING INDUSTRIES INC COGNIS CORP - CHARLOTT E PLANT OMNIUM CALLAHAN CHEMICAL CO UNIVAR USA INC HOUSTON PENRAY COMPANIES INC ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC CARESTREAM HEALTH COLORADO BAKER PETROLITE BAYPORT FACILITY PENRAY COMPANIES INC BAKER PETROLITE DYNASOLINC NORLITE CORP FORD MOTOR CO DEARBORN DIVERSIFIED MANUFACTURING Address City 401 FUNSTON RD KANSAS CITY 21675 HAMBURG AVE LAKEVILLE 1910 S STATE AVE INDIANAPOLIS 50 OXFORD AVE DUDLEY 12361 MONARCH ST GARDEN GROVE 196 S WATER CONNERSVILLE 2501 NW229TH ST HILLSBORO 4470 SW 74TH AVE MIAMI 601 TIGHTSQUEEZE INDUSTRIAL RE CHATHAM 1840 INTERNATIONALE PKWY WOODRIDGE 4500 S DOBSON RD MAIL STOP: OO CHANDLER 610 S BOLMAR ST WEST CHESTER FREEPORT CENTER BUILDING 12 P< CLEARFIELD 1215 NELSON BLVD ROCKFORD State Kansas Zip Code 66115 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0 0 0.005 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 0.005 Minnesota 55044 0.0025 0.0025 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 Indiana 46203 0.0005 0.0045 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 Massachusetts 01571 0.0025 0.0025 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 California 92841 0.0045 0.0005 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 Indiana 47331 0.0025 0.0025 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 Oregon 97124 0.0025 0.0025 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 Florida 33155 0.0025 0.0025 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 Virginia 24531 0.0025 0.0025 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 Illinois 60517 0.0025 0.0025 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 Arizona 85248 0.0025 0.0025 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 Pennsylvania 19382 0.0025 0.0025 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 Utah 84016 0.0015 0.003 0.0045 0 0 0 0.0045 Illinois 61104 0 0.0045 0.0045 0 0 0 0.0045 SCIENCE RD NORWALK Connecticut 06852 3300WESTINGHOUSE BLVD CHARLOTTE North Carolina 28273 1280 IMPERIAL RD HAMPTON Iowa 50441 18 INDUSTRIAL RD WALPOLE Massachusetts 02081 777 BRISBANEST HOUSTON Texas 77061 1801 ESTES AVE ELK GROVE VILLAGI Illinois 60007 5501 E SLAUSON AVE CITY OF COMMERCE California 90040 2000 HOWARD SMITH AVEWC42 WINDSOR Colorado 80550 13200 BAYPARKRD PASADENA Texas 77507 440 DENNISTON CT WHEELING Illinois 60090 5135 BOYLAN ST BAKERSFIELD California 93308 330 PINE ST CANTON Massachusetts 02021 628 S SARATOGA ST COHOES New York 12047 3001 MILLER RD DEARBORN Michigan 48121 0.002 0.002 0.004 0 0 0.004 0 0.004 0 0 0.0025 0.0015 0.004 0 0 0.002 0.0015 0.0035 0 0 0.0035 0 0.0035 0 0 0.0005 0.0005 0.001 0.0025 0 0.003 0.0005 0.0035 0 0 0.0035 0 0.0035 0 0 0.0035 0 0.0035 0 0 0.0005 0.0005 0.001 0.0025 0 0.0025 0.0005 0.003 0 0 0.003 0 0.003 0 0 0.003 0 0.003 0 0 0.003 0 0.003 0 0 0 0.004 0 0.004 0 0.004 0 0.0035 0 0.0035 0 0.0035 0 0.0035 0 0.0035 0 0.0035 0 0.0035 0 0.003 0 0.003 0 0.003 0 0.003 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 37 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00269 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name CALLAHAN CHEMICAL CO BAKER PETROLiTE CORP HEXION SPECIALTY CHEMICALS INC MAINTEXINC CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC ECP INC WOODRIDGE UNIVAR USA INC MEMPHIS CR BRANDS INC MAHONING PAINT CORP UNION SPECIALTIES INC UNIVAR USA INC DENVER SINCLAIR WYOMING REFINING CO ATOTECH USA FINGER LAKES CHEMICAL INC MALLINCKRODT BAKER 1NC CHEMTEX LABORATORIES INC WYNNEWOOD REFINING CO BASF CORP CONOCOPHILLIPSCO TREMLEY POINT TERMINAL CONOCOPHILLIPS MT VERNON PRODUCTS TERMINAL NIACET CORP MAGNABLENDINC-CENTRAL PLANT INTEL CORP HERCULES INC MILPORT ENTERPRISES INC DELTA HOUSTON ASTRO CHEMICALS INC DUPONT EKC TECHNOLOGY DOBER CHEMICAL CORP Address BROAD ST & FILMOREAVE City PALMYRA State New Jersey Zip Code 08065 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.0015 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.0015 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0.003 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 0.003 16950 WALLISVILLE RD HOUSTON Texas 77049 0.0005 0.002 0.0025 0 0 0.0005 0.003 2801 LYNWOOD RD LYNWOOD California 90262 0.0005 0.0025 0.003 0 0 0 0.003 13300 E NELSON AVE CITY OF INDUSTRY California 91746 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 2247SHWY71 KIMBALL Nebraska 69145 0.002 0.0005 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 11210 KATHERINE'S CROSSING SUI' WOODRIDGE Illinois 60517 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 3909 OUTLAND RD MEMPHIS Tennessee 38118 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 230 OLD CONVERSE RD SPARTANBURG South Carolina 29307 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 653 JONES ST YOUNGSTOWN Ohio 44502 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0.0025 3 MALCOLM HOYT DR NEWBURYPORT Massachusetts 01950 0.0005 0.002 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 4300 HOLLY ST DENVER Colorado 80216 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 100 E LINCOLN AVE SINCLAIR Wyoming 82334 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 1750 OVERVIEW DR ROCK HILL South Carolina 29730 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 418-424 ST PAUL ST ROCHESTER New York 14605 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 600 N BROAD ST PHILLIPSBURG New Jersey 08865 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 2725 ARMENTROUT DR CONCORD North Carolina 28025 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 906 S POWELL WYNNEWOOD Oklahoma 73098 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 100 INDUSTRIAL BLVD SEAFORD Delaware 19973 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 FOOT OF S WOOD AVE LINDEN New Jersey 07036 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 15138 HWY 96 MOUNT VERNON Missouri 65712 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 400 47TH ST NIAGARA FALLS New York 14304 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 1601 W HWY 287 BYPASS WAXAHACH1E Texas 75165 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0.0025 4100 SARA RD MS RR5-491 RIO RANCHO New Mexico 87124 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 1111 HERCULES RD HOPEWELL Virginia 23860 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 2829 S 5TH CT MILWAUKEE Wisconsin 53207 0 0.002 0.002 0 0 0 0.002 334 TIDAL RD DEER PARK Texas 77536 0.0015 0 0.0015 0 0 0.0005 0.002 126 MEMORIAL DR SPRINGFIELD Massachusetts 01104 0.0015 0.0005 0.002 0 0 0 0.002 2520 BARRINGTON CT HAYWARD California 94545 0.0005 0.0015 0.002 0 0 0 0.002 14461 WAVERLY AVE MIDLOTHIAN Illinois 60445 0.002 0 0.002 0 0 0 0.002 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 38 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00270 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 3260 GOODYEAR BLVD UNIVAR USA INC- CINCINNATI OH BRANCH 4600 DUES DR KELLY-MOORE PAINT CO INC 1015 COMMERCIAL ST HYDRITE CHEMICAL CO 7300 W BRADLEY RD FUJIFILM HUNT CHEMICALS USA INC 900 CARNEGIE ST CLEAN HARBORS ARAGONITE LLC 11600 N APTUS RD CHEMICAL SOLVENTS 1NC-DENISON FACILITY 1010 OLD DENNISON AVE BAKER PETROL1TE-RAYNE FACILITY 135 INDUSTRIAL DR FIRST SOURCE WORLDWIDE LLC MILWAUKEE 11725 W FAIRVIEW AVE BUCKMAN LABORATORIES INC 1256 N MCLEAN BLVD SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 404 E MALLORY AVE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 10136 MAGNOLIA DR VOLTAIX LLC 197 MEISTER AVE NALCO CO 3901 TERRY ST HONEYWELL-PRESTONE PRODUCTS CORP 250 HALLS MILL RD BRENNTAG SOUTHEAST INC 11750 FRUEHAUFDR PPG ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS 6804 ENTERPRISE DR SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 1200 SYLVAN ST DSM NEORESINS INC 3110 W ST RD 28 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 14 INDUSTRIAL PARK MEADWESTVACO SC LLC CHARLESTON CHEMICAL PLANT 5598 VIRGINIA AVE NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COATINGS INC DBA NICOAT INC 1600 GLENLAKE AVE LANCO MANUFACTURING CORP ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS IFF AUGUSTA LTD SOL1TE LLC HENTZEN COATINGS,INC RIKER PRODUCTS INC URBAPONTE #5 5060 83RD ST 3005 INTERNATIONAL BLVD RT 652 6937 W MILL RD 4901 STICKNEYAVE City UNION CITY State Tennessee Zip Code 38261 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.0005 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0.0005 0.0015 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 0.002 CINCINNATI Ohio 45246 0.001 0.001 0.002 0 0 0 0.002 SAN CARLOS California 94070 0 0.0015 0.0015 0 0 0 0.0015 MILWAUKEE Wisconsin 53223 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0 0 0 0.0015 ROLLING MEADOWE Illinois 60008 0.0015 0.0005 0.002 0 0 0 0.0015 GRANTSVILLE Utah 84029 0 0 0 0 0 0.0015 0.0015 CLEVELAND Ohio 44109 0.0015 0 0.0015 0 0 0 0.0015 RAYNE Louisiana 70578 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0 0 0 0.0015 MILWAUKEE Wisconsin 53226 0.001 0 0.001 0 0 0.0005 0.0015 MEMPHIS Tennessee 38108 0 0.0015 0.0015 0 0 0 0.0015 MEMPHIS Tennessee 38109 0.0005 0.0005 0.001 0 0 0 0.001 OLIVE BRANCH Mississippi 38654 0.0005 0.0005 0.001 0 0 0 0.001 BRANCHBURG New Jersey 08876 0 0.001 0.001 0 0 0 0.001 TEXARKANA Texas 75501 0 0.001 0.001 0 0 0 0.001 FREEHOLD New Jersey 07728 0.001 0 0.001 0 0 0 0.001 CHARLOTTE North Carolina 28273 0.0005 0.0005 0.001 0 0 0 0.001 LOUISVILLE Kentucky 40214 0 0.001 0.001 0 0 0 0.001 LINDEN New Jersey 07036 0.0005 0 0.0005 0 0 0.0005 0.001 FRANKFORT Indiana 46041 0.001 0 0.001 0 0 0 0.001 FLORA Illinois 62839 0 0.0005 0.0005 0 0 0 0.0005 NORTH CHARLESTC South Carolina 29406 0 0.0005 0.0005 0 0 0 0.0005 ITASCA Illinois 60143 0.0005 0 0.0005 0 0 0 0.0005 SAN LORENZO SACRAMENTO AUGUSTA ARVONIA MILWAUKEE TOLEDO Puerto Rico California Georgia Virginia Wisconsin Ohio 00754 95826 30906 23004 53218 43612 0 0 0 0 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.001 0.001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0005 0 0.0005 0 0.0005 0 0.0005 0 0.0005 0 0.0005 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 39 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00271 Table B-1. 2009 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State CLARIANT CORP CLEAR LAKE PLANT 9502 BAYPORT BLVD - ETOX UNIT PASADENA LAMBERTI SYNTHESIS USA INC 4001 N HAWTHORNE ST CHATTANOOGA a. Releases to Surface Water reported as "On-Site Releases to Surface Water." b. Releases to Soil is the sum of reported releases to onsite and offsite releases to land treatment and other land disposal. c. Releases to other media include reported releases to onsite and offsite groundwater and landfills, tpy: tons per year Texas Tennessee Zip Code 77507 37406 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.0005 0.0005 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0 0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c 0.0005 0 0 0 0.0005 0 0 0 Total Emissions (tpy) 0.0005 0.0005 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 40 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00272 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State Zip Code EQ DETROIT INC 1923 FREDERICK DETROIT REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE: WINSTON SALEM PLANT 4000 OLD MILWAUKEE LN WINSTON-SALEM Michigan 48211 North Carolina 27107 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 31.218 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 1.8155 157.5655 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 1.8155 0 363.538 365.3535 188.7835 0 0 0 188.7835 BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP 8935 POCAHONTAS TRAIL J WILLIAMSBURG Virginia 23185 28.5 150 178.5 0 0 0 178.5 SANYO SOLAR (USA) LLC 970 E 236TH ST CARSON California 90745 0.0005 7.184275 7.184775 0 168.4595129 175.6442879 BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP 12340 TOWNSHIP RD 99 E FINDLAY Ohio 45840 25 130 155 0 0 155 CROWN FOOD PACKAGING 2929 W BRIDGE ST OWATONNA Minnesota 55060 30.746 91.9 122.646 0 0 122.646 REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE: FREMONT PLANT 2145 CEDAR FREMONT Ohio 43420 15.931 90.3915 106.3225 0 0 0 106.3225 REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE: BISHOPVILLESC FACILITY 609 COUSAR ST BISHOPVILLE South Carolina 29010 14.5145 82.2475 96.762 0 0 0 96.762 CROWN CORK & SEAL CO (USA) INC CROWN CLOSURE 3011 BIRCH DR WEIRTON West Virginia 26062 35.9645 60.1235 96.088 0 0 0 96.088 DIV BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP 1900 BARNES ST REIDSVILLE North Carolina 27320 14.5 80 94.5 0 0 0 94.5 BMWMANUFACTURINGCO LLC 1400 HWY 101 S GREER South Carolina 29651 1.8155 89.397 91.2125 0 0 91.2125 REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE: EVA STREET ST PAUL MN 139 EVA ST SAINT PAUL Minnesota 55107 13.4245 76.0735 89.498 0 0 0 89.498 REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO KENTWA FACILITY 1220 N SECOND AVE KENT Washington 98032 12.462 70.619 83.081 0 0 0 83.081 CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING 1202 FONES RD OLYMPIA Washington 98501 19.4225 58.267 77.6895 0 0 0 77.6895 REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO OLIVE BRANCH FACILITY 10800 MARINA DR OLIVE BRANCH Mississippi 38654 20.551 56.273 76.824 0 0 0 76.824 BALL CONTAINER LLC COLUMBUS CAN PLANT 350 MCCORMICK BLVD COLUMBUS Ohio 43213 11.5 65 76.5 0 0 0 76.5 SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP 300 N FAIL RD LA PORTE Indiana 46350 12.85 55.5 68.35 0 0 0 68.35 AURORA CASKET CO INC 10944 MARSH RD AURORA Indiana 47001 0 68.17917 68.17917 0 0 0 68.17917 REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE : CHICAGO PLANT 1101 W43RD ST CHICAGO Illinois 60609 14.2105 53.7945 68.005 0 0 0 68.005 REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE: WHITEHOUSE PLANT 10444 WATERVILLE WHITEHOUSE Ohio 43571 23.1975 44.6385 67.836 0 0 0 67.836 FORD MOTOR CO DEARBORN TRUCK PLANT 3001 MILLER RD DEARBORN Michigan 48121 1.5 65 66.5 0 0 66.5 CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING 1035 E NORTH ST BRADLEY Illinois 60915 16.0195 48.058 64.0775 0 0 0 64.0775 CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING GLEN & SHEPARD ST LAWRENCE Massachusetts 01843 15.6815 47.0445 62.726 0 0 0 62.726 REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO LONGVIEW FACILITY 1001 FISHER RD LONGVIEW Texas 75604 14.4385 43.014 57.4525 0 0 0 57.4525 WHIRLPOOL CORP MARION D IVISION 1300 MARION-AGOSTA RD MARION Ohio 43302 0.05 57.1625 57.2125 0 0 57.2125 BALL CONTAINER LLC ROME CAN PLANT 110MCC DR ROME Georgia 30161 33.5 22 55.5 0 0 0 55.5 METAL CONTAINER CORPORTION - WINDSOR CAN PLANT 1201 METAL CONTAINER C" WINDSOR Colorado 80550 14.9135 40.085 54.9985 0 0 54.9985 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 1 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00273 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address FORD MOTOR COMPANY-KANSASCITY ASSEMBLY PLANT 8121 EUS HWY 69 City CLAYCOMO State Missouri Zip Code 64119 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 1.5 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 50 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 51.5 0 0.013 51.513 CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING 620 N 4TH ST WORLAND Wyoming 82401 12.782 38.346 51.128 0 0 0 51.128 HONDA OF AMERICA MANUFACTURING INC 11000 STATE RT 347 EAST LIBERTY Ohio 43319 2.2 45 47.2 0 0.191 47.391 METAL CONTAINER CORP - ARNOLD CAN PLANT 42 TENBROOK INDUSTRIAL ARNOLD Missouri 63010 17.9475 28.3695 46.317 0 0 46.317 BWAY CORP 1601 VALDOSTA HWY HOMERVILLE Georgia 31634 37.053 8.9105 45.9635 0 0 0 45.9635 MEMO PASADENA INC 3000 N S ST PASADENA Texas 77503 12.77 8.793 21.563 0 0 23.7725 45.3355 REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO CHATSWORTH FACILITY 20730 PRAIRIE ST CHATSWORTH California 91311 8.9005 35.513 44.4135 0 0 0 44.4135 EDSAL MANUFACTURING CO INC 4400 S PACKER CHICAGO Illinois 60609 0 43.1447 43.1447 0 0 43.1447 HONDA OF AMERICA MANUFACTURING INC 24000 HONDA PKY MARYSVILLE Ohio 43040 3.8 38.5 42.3 0 0.2335 42.5335 RR DONNELLEY 2347 KRATZER RD HARRISONBURG Virginia 22802 38.798 3.5855 42.3835 0 0 42.3835 METAL CONTAINER CORP - NEWBURGH CAN PLANT 130 BREUNIG RD NEW WINDSOR New York 12553 11.4875 30.7785 42.266 0 0 42.266 REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO PHOENIX FACILITY 211 N 51 STAVE PHOENIX Arizona 85043 5.2035 32.9575 38.161 0 0 0 38.161 BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP 8500 W TOWER AVE MILWAUKEE Wisconsin 53224 29 9 38 0 0 38 MAGNA STEYR NORTH AMERICA 3800 STICKNEYAVE TOLEDO Ohio 43608 4.65 33 37.65 0 0 37.65 CHICAGO HEIGHTS STEEL 211 E MAIN ST CHICAGO HEIGHTS Illinois 60411 7.496 29.984 37.48 0 0 0 37.48 ROCKY MOUNTAIN METAL CONTAINER 17755 W32ND AVE GOLDEN Colorado 80401 29.5 6 35.5 0 0 1.9 37.4 CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING 2501 N FRAZIER ST CONROE Texas 77305 30.8465 5.0285 35.875 0 0 0 35.875 SUBARU OF INDIANA AUTOMOTIVE INC 5500 STATE RD 38E LAFAYETTE Indiana 47905 0.355 35.335 35.69 0 0 35.69 CHRYSLERJEFFERSON NORTH ASSEMBLYPLANT 2101 CONNORAVE DETROIT Michigan 48215 4.1 31.5 35.6 0 0.003 35.603 NISSAN NA INC SMYRNA MANUFACTURING PLANT 983 NISSAN DR SMYRNA Tennessee 37167 1.307 34.2725 35.5795 0 0 0 35.5795 FORD MOTOR CO KENTUCKY TRUCK PLANT 3001 CHAMBERLAIN LN LOUISVILLE Kentucky 40241 2.4 33 35.4 0 0.13 35.53 GREIF PACKAGING LLC 7425 INDUSTRIAL RD FLORENCE Kentucky 41042 1.7475 33.1985 34.946 0 0.5 35.446 SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP 1400 PLOVER RD PO BOX 9 PLOVER Wisconsin 54467 7.6 27.75 35.35 0 0 0 35.35 METAL CONTAINER CORP - JACKSONVILLE CAN PLANT 1100 N ELLIS RD JACKSONVILLE Florida 32254 6.952 28.0305 34.9825 0 0 34.9825 CROWN FOOD PACKAGING 8801 CITATION RD BALTIMORE Maryland 21221 8.5165 25.5495 34.066 0 0 34.066 CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING 12910 JESS PIRTLE BLVD SUGAR LAND Texas 77478 28.1175 4.2175 32.335 0 0 0 32.335 METAL CONTAINER CORP- MIRA LOMACAN PLANT 10980 IN LAN DAVE MIRA LOMA California 91752 28.5415 3.7115 32.253 0 0 32.253 BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP 500 CRENSHAW BLVD TORRANCE California 90503 29 3 32 0 0 0 32 BERENFIELD CONTAINERSSE LTD 12180 UNIVERSITY CITY BL' HARRISBURG North Carolina 28075 0 31.510045 31.510045 0 0 0 31.510045 SENECA FOODS CORP 801 SAUK AVE BARABOO Wisconsin 53913 0 30.575 30.575 0 0 0.855 31.43 Page 2 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00274 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City THERMA-TRU CORP 601 RE JONES RD BUTLER BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAiNER CORP 4525 INDIANA ST GOLDEN BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAi NER CORP 501 N SIXTH ST MONTICELLO HUNTSMAN PETROCHEMICAL LLC PORT NECHES PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS 6001 HWY 366 PORT NECHES CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING 380 CALLE FABRIL ST KM 1; CAROLINA SB FOOT TANNING CO 805 BENCH ST REDWING PPG INDUSTRIES INC-OAK CREEK 10800S13TH ST OAK CREEK DEXTER CHASSIS GROUP PLANT 55 501 S MILLER DR WHITE PIGEON MERCEDES-BENZ US INTERNATIONAL INC 1 MERCEDES DR VANCE INGERSOLL-RANDCO STEELCRAFT DIV 9017 BLUE ASH RD CINCINNATI ALLIED TUBE & CONDUIT CORP 16100 SLATHROPAVE HARVEY BWAY CORP 3200 S KILBOURN AVE CHICAGO GM TRUCK GROUP FLINT ASSEMBLY PLANT VAN SLYKE COMPLEX WHIRLPOOL CORP - CLYDE DIV G-3100 VAN SLYKE RD 119 BIRDSEYEST FLINT CLYDE ROLL COATER INC 1950 E MAIN ST GREENFIELD NYW REALTY LLC/ HANOVER 500 E MIDDLE ST HANOVER TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING INDIANA INC 4000 TULIP TREE DR PRINCETON CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING 100 EVANS ROW CHERAW BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAI NER CORP 4700 WHITEWAY DR TAMPA HONDA MANUFACTURING OF ALABAMA LLC 1800 HONDA DR LINCOLN CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING 1501 ST JAMES ST LA CROSSE GENERAL MOTORS LANSING DELTA TOWNSHIP 8175 MILLETT HWY LANSING SD WARREN CO 89 CUMBERLANDST WESTBROOK GREIF PACKAGING LLC 4300W130TH ST ALSIP BALL METAL FOOD CONTAINER CORP 3010 BIRCH DR WEIRTON CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING 195 CROWN RD BATESVILLE WHIRLPOOL CORP FINDLAY DIV 4901 N MAIN ST FINDLAY AVX CORP MYRTLE BEACH 801 17TH AVES MYRTLE BEACH MOBIL CHEMICAL CO 41501 WOLVERINE RD SHAWNEE State Indiana Colorado Indiana Texas Zip Code 46721 80403 47960 77651 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 29.7775 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 29.7775 0 0 0 29.7775 19.5 9.5 29 0 0 0 29 12.5 16 28.5 0 0 0 28.5 0.141 0 0.141 0 0 27.6245 27.7655 Puerto Rico 00985 6.91 20.7295 27.6395 0 0 0 27.6395 Minnesota 55066 0 27.586 27.586 0 0 27.586 Wisconsin 53154 25.224 0.407 25.631 0 0 1.208 26.839 Michigan 49099 0 26.3225 26.3225 0 0 0.1285 26.451 Alabama 35490 0.366025 25.58058 25.946605 0 0 0 25.946605 Ohio 45242 5.6855 19.8995 25.585 0 0 0 25.585 Illinois 60426 16.0515 9.4675 25.519 0 0 0 25.519 Illinois 60623 6.818275 18.679745 25.49802 0 3.55271 E-15 25.49802 Michigan 48551 0.45 24.5 24.95 0 0 0.26 25.21 Ohio 43410 Indiana 46140 Pennsylvania 17331 Indiana 47670 South Carolina 29520 Florida 33617 Alabama 35096 Wisconsin 54603 Michigan 48917 Maine 04098 Illinois 60803 West Virginia 26062 Mississippi 38606 Ohio 45840 South Carolina 29577 Oklahoma 74804 0.718 0 0 10.3485 21.398 9 0.4995 22.1385 0.5 0.0025 1.99 14.5 19.5525 2.2375 3.3725 0.375 22.64 24.2775 24.2 13.83 2.7455 15 23.484 1.6605 23 23.5 21.267 8 2.933 20.1375 2.492 21.5 23.358 24.2775 24.2 24.1785 24.1435 24 23.9835 23.799 23.5 23.5025 23.257 22.5 22.4855 22.375 5.8645 21.875 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0835 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.2415 24.5995 0 0 24.2775 0 0 24.2 0 0 24.1785 0 0 24.1435 0 0 24 0 23.9835 0 0 23.799 0.1415 23.6415 0 0 23.586 0 0 23.257 0 0 22.5 0 0 22.4855 0 22.375 0 16.405 22.2695 0.0025 21.8775 Page 3 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00275 Facility Name AMES TRUE TEMPER INC NORTH COAST CONTAINER CORP BALL CONTAINER LLC AIR SYSTEM COMPONENTS LP PELLA CORP BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP MID-AMERICA STEEL DRUM CO IN C BATESVILLE MANUFACTURING INC CECO DOOR PRODUCTS BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP WAYNE DISPOSAL INC CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING HALLSTAR CO ESTER SOLUTIONS FACILITY BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP THOMAS BUILT BUSES INC UNION CARBIDE CORP SEADRIFT PLANT AIR SYSTEM COMPONENTS LP NASHVILLEWIRE PRODUCTS ALSTOM POWER INC PLATE FORMED PRODUCTS DIV OLDCASTLE BUILDING ENVELOPETEXAS FACILITY SPECTRUM METAL FINISHING TOKICO (USA) INC AGY AIKEN LLC SEIDEL TANNING CORP METAL INDUSTRIES INC - BUSHNELL EASTMAN CHEMICAL CO TEXAS OPERATIONS NEW UNITED MOTOR MANUFACTURING INC MPM SILICONES LLC USS - CLAIRTON WORKS LAKESIDE LITHOGRAPHY LLC Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State Zip Code 1500 S CAMERON ST HARRISBURG PENNSYLVANl 17104 8806 CRANE AVE CLEVELAND Ohio 44105 105 E BLACKHAWK DR FORT ATKINSON Wisconsin 53538 900 DARR PARK DR PONCA CITY Oklahoma 74601 102 MAIN ST PELLA Iowa 50219 11 ADAMS RD SARATOGA SPRING New York 12866 8570 S CHICAGO RD OAK CREEK WISCONSIN 53154 175 MONOGARD DR MANCHESTER Tennessee 37355 9159 TELECOM DR MILAN Tennessee 38358 2400 HUNTINGTON DR FAIRFIELD California 94533 49350 N 1-94 SERVICE DR BELLEVILLE MICHIGAN 48111 400 N WALNUT ST CRAWFORDSVILLE Indiana 47933 5851 W 73RD ST BEDFORD PARK Illinois 60638 1001 NFM 3083 E CONROE Texas 77303 715 W FAIRFIELD RD HIGH POINT NORTH CAROL 27263 7501 N HWY 185 SEADRIFT Texas 77983 3301 N MAIN ST TARBORO North Carolina 27886 1604 COUNTY HOSPITAL RE NASHVILLE Tennessee 37218 911 W MAIN ST CHATTANOOGA Tennessee 37402 803 AIRPORT RD TERRELL Texas 75160 535 BEV RD YOUNGSTOWN Ohio 44512 301 MAYDERD BEREA Kentucky 40403 2556WAGENER RD AIKEN South Carolina 29801 1306 EMEINECKE AVE MILWAUKEE Wisconsin 53212 400 W WALKER AVE BUSHNELL Florida 33513 300 KODAK BLVD LONGVIEW Texas 75602 45500 FREMONT BLVD MAIL FREMONT California 94538 3500 S STATE RT 2 FRIENDLY West Virginia 26146 400 STATE ST CLAIRTON Pennsylvania 15025 1600 S LAFLIN ST CHICAGO Illinois 60608 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 1.082 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 20.557 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 21.639 0 0 0 21.639 0 21.231 21.231 0 0 0 21.231 3.85 17 20.85 0 0 0 20.85 0.209 20.4325 20.6415 0 0 20.6415 0.125 20.2705 20.3955 0 0 0 20.3955 3.35 17 20.35 0 0 0 20.35 0 20.3365 20.3365 0 0 20.3365 1.0165 19.309 20.3255 0 0.0045 20.33 10.0825 10.0825 20.165 0 0 0 20.165 7.5 12 19.5 0 0 0 19.5 0 0.004 0.004 0 0 19.082 19.086 13.8125 5.1575 18.97 0 0 0 18.97 1.167 0.1455 1.3125 0 17.3205 18.633 14 4.55 18.55 0 0 0 18.55 0 17.92 17.92 0 0 0 17.92 13.946 3.5265 17.4725 0 0 0.064 17.5365 0.1745 16.585 16.7595 0 0.3225 17.082 1.7 15 16.7 0 0 16.7 16.67 0 16.67 0 0 0 16.67 3.2115 13.386 16.5975 0 0 0 16.5975 0.33 16.2 16.53 0 0 0.01 16.54 0.341 16.1255 16.4665 0 0 0 16.4665 10.0075 3.102 13.1095 0 3.3325 16.442 0 15.463 15.463 0 0 0 15.463 0.075 14.7885 14.8635 0 0 0 14.8635 12.052 2.5015 14.5535 0 0.0205 0 14.574 14.564 0 14.564 0 0 14.564 2.193 0.0035 2.1965 9.7605 0 2.571 14.528 14.5 0 14.5 0 0 0 14.5 1.125 13.15 14.275 0 0 0 14.275 Page 4 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00276 Facility Name HART & COOLEY INC JOHNSON WELDED PRODUCTS INC BEDFORD MATERIALS CO INC BALL METAL BEVERAGECONTAINER CORP QUAD/GRAPHICS INC BEMIS MANUFACTURING CO PLANT B SILGAN WHITE CAP CORP CROWN FOOD PACKAGING GERSTENSLAGERCO ROYAL MOULDINGS LTD; MARION VIRGINIA TOPPAN INTERAMERICAINC M&B HANGERS KNAPHEIDE MANUFACTURING CO CROWN FOOD PACKAGING NUCOR VULCRAFT GROUP GRAPELANDDIV BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAI NER CORP PENN COLOR INC FLINT HILLS RESOURCES LP - WEST PLANT DECORATIVE PANELS INTERNATIONA L L A DARLING CO - PIGGOTT AR FACILITY TRI VULCRAFT OF NEW YORK INC BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAI NER CORP 3MCO-GUIN TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING KENTUCKY INC AMERICAN TRIM LLC KEYMARKCORP OF FLORIDA VESTAL MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISES INC GM TRUCK GROUP FORT WAYNE ASSEMBLY NOVELIS CORP BERENFIELDCONTAINERS INC MASON Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State Zip Code 4910 MOORES MILL RD HUNTSVILLE Alabama 35811 625 S EDGEWOOD AVE URBANA Ohio 43078 7676 ALLEGHENY RD MANNS CHOICE Pennsylvania 15550 95 BALLARD RD MIDDLETOWN New York 10940 1900W SUMNER ST HARTFORD Wisconsin 53027 300 MILL ST SHEBOYGAN FALLS Wisconsin 53085 2201 W MARYLAND ST EVANSVILLE Indiana 47710 5201 ENTERPRISE BLVD TOLEDO Ohio 43612 1425 E BOWMAN ST WOOSTER Ohio 44691 135 BEAR CREEK RD MARION Virginia 24354 1131 HWY 155 S MC DONOUGH Georgia 30253 1313PKWYDR SE LEEDS Alabama 35094 1848 WESTPHALIA STRASS QUINCY Illinois 62305 1650 BROADWAY HANOVER Pennsylvania 17331 175 COUNTY RD 2345 GRAPELAND Texas 75844 6600 WILL ROGERS BLVD FORT WORTH Texas 76140 2755 BERGEY RD HATFIELD Pennsylvania 19440 2825 SUNTIDE RD CORPUS CHRISTI Texas 78410 2900 HILL AVE TOLEDO Ohio 43607 HWY 49 S PIGGOTT Arkansas 72454 5362 RAILROAD ST CHEMUNG New York 14825 91-320 KOMOHANA ST KAPOLEI Hawaii 96707 6675 US HWY 43 GUIN Alabama 35563 1001 CHERRY BLOSSOM W/ GEORGETOWN Kentucky 40324 1501 W MICHIGAN ST SIDNEY Ohio 45365 2540 KNIGHTS STATION RD LAKELAND Florida 33810 177 INDUSTRIAL PARK RD SWEETWATER Tennessee 37874 12200 LAFAYETTE CENTER ROANOKE Indiana 46783 390 GRISWOLD ST NE WARREN Ohio 44483 1229 CASTLE DR MASON Ohio 45040 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.8045 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 12.8325 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 13.637 0 0.564 14.201 0 14.1725 14.1725 0 0 0 14.1725 1.403 12.701 14.104 0 0 0 14.104 6.5 7.5 14 0 0 0 14 13.5 0.435 13.935 0 0 13.935 0 13.9125 13.9125 0 0 13.9125 11.15 2.75 13.9 0 0 0 13.9 3.457 10.3605 13.8175 0 0 0 13.8175 0.4135 13.3765 13.79 0 0.0045 13.7945 0.6885 13.076 13.7645 0 0 0 13.7645 0 13.7 13.7 0 0 0 13.7 2.732 10.929 13.661 0 0 13.661 0.175 13.4385 13.6135 0 0 13.6135 3.382 10.1465 13.5285 0 0 13.5285 0.174 13.333 13.507 0 0 0 13.507 5.5 8 13.5 0 0 0 13.5 0.176 0.058 0.234 0 0 13.2355 13.4695 0.0075 0 0.0075 0 0 13.38 13.3875 13.32944 0 13.32944 0 0 13.32944 0.152 13.158 13.31 0 0 13.31 5.101 7.1315 12.2325 0 0 0.666 12.8985 2.3 10.5 12.8 0 0 0 12.8 0.001 12.75 12.751 0 0 0 12.751 0.375 12.302 12.677 0 0 12.677 0 12.659 12.659 0 0 0 12.659 0.619 11.7595 12.3785 0 0 0 12.3785 12.168 0 12.168 0 0 12.168 0.65 11.5 12.15 0 0 12.15 3.543 8.579 12.122 0 0 0 12.122 0.125 11.6705 11.7955 0 0 0 11.7955 Page 5 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00277 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State Zip Code HOWARD FINISHING LLC 32565 DEQUINDRE MADISON HEIGHTS Michigan 48071 SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURINGCORP 305 WN ST MOUNTVERNON Missouri 65712 FRANKLIN INVESTMENT CORP 600 ATLANTIC AVE FRANKLIN Pennsylvania 16323 CHICAGO STEEL CONTAINER CORP 1846S KILBOURN AVE CHICAGO Illinois 60623 MEYER STEEL DRUM INC 2000 SKILBOURN AVE CHICAGO Illinois 60623 RINECO 1007 VULCAN RD- HASKELL BENTON Arkansas 72015 CARRY-ON TRAILER CORP 101 JOE HARVEY ST LAVONIA GEORGIA 30553 SHAMROCKTECHNOLOGIES FOOT OF PACIFIC ST NEWARK NEW JERSEY 07114 FORD MOTOR COMPANY-WAYNE ASSEMBLY 37625 MICHIGAN AVE WAYNE Michigan 48184 PRECOAT METALS 1095 MENDELL DAVIS DR JACKSON Mississippi 39272 BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE GROUP - EVERETT 3003 W CASINO RD EVERETT Washington 98204 PHOENIX COLOR CORP 18249 PHOENIX DR HAGERSTOWN MARYLAND 21742 GEABPO LLC 301 N CURRY PIKE BLOOMINGTON Indiana 47404 PROFESSIONAL DISPOSABLES INTERNATIONAL INC TWO NICE-PAK PARK ORANGEBURG New York 10962 TRILLA ST LOUIS CORP 2391 CASSENS DR FENTON MISSOURI 63026 CARRY-ON TRAILER CORP 931 INDUSTRIAL BLVD MEXIA TEXAS 76667 MAVERICK TUBE LLC DBA TENARISCONROE 699 FM 3083 CONROE TEXAS 77301 ACME FINISHING CO INC 1595 E OAKTON ST ELK GROVE VILLAG Illinois 60007 STATE INDUSTRIES INC 500 TENNESSEE WALTZ PK ASHLAND CITY TENNESSEE 37015 ANDERSON TULLY LUMBER CO WALTERSVILLE LUMBER 1725 N WASHINGTON ST VICKSBURG MILL MISSISSIPPI 39181 3M CO - CORDOVA 22614 RT 84 N CORDOVA Illinois 61242 NUCOR CORP VULCRAFT/NUCOR COLD FINISH DIV 1601 W OMAHA AVE NORFOLK Nebraska 68701 SILGAN CAN CO 2120 NO HWY N UNIT A MAXTON North Carolina 28364 SYCAMORE SYSTEMS LLC 449 N CALIFORNIA ST SYCAMORE ILLINOIS 60178 ASHLEY INDUSTRIAL MOLDING INC 31 OS WABASH ASHLEY Indiana 46705 BERENFIELD CONTAINERS SW LTD 3300 N HUTCHINSON ST WHITE HALL Arkansas 71602 STANLEY WORKS HAND TOOLS DIV 600 MYRTLE ST NEW BRITAIN Connecticut 06052 SILGAN CONTAINERS MANAUFACTURINGCORP 520 W 2ND ST OCONOMOWOC Wisconsin 53066 RR DONNELLEY & SONS CO 1145 CONWELLAVE WILLARD Ohio 44890 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.0025 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 11.751 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 11.7535 0 0 0 11.7535 2.35 9.327 11.677 0 0 0 11.677 11.6 0 11.6 0 0 11.6 1.453 9.7415 11.1945 0 0 0.25 11.4445 1.247 10.09 11.337 0 0 11.337 0.0495 0 0.0495 0 0 11.25 11.2995 0 11.244 11.244 0 0 0 11.244 0 0 0 0 11.1435 11.1435 0.125 11 11.125 0 0 11.125 10.083 0.9495 11.0325 0 0 0 11.0325 2 9 11 0 0.0175 11.0175 11 0 11 0 0 0 11 0 11 11 0 0 0 11 0.10232 0.032815 0.135135 0 10.8205 10.955635 1.59594 8.216745 9.812685 0 0 1.13675 10.949435 0 10.7145 10.7145 0 0 0 10.7145 0.423225 10.1492388 10.5724638 0 0 0 10.5724638 2.089 8.356 10.445 0 0 0 10.445 0.104 10.3115 10.4155 0 0 0 10.4155 10.4095 0 10.4095 0 0 10.4095 0.7 0.065 0.765 9.5 0.26 10 10.26 0 3.2155 6.97 10.1855 0 0 10.144 10.144 0 1.05 9.05 10.1 0 0 10.0855 10.0855 0 0.997 8.972 9.969 0 1.65 8.3 9.95 0 7.5445 2.3705 9.915 0 0 5.55112E-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.265 10.26 10.1855 10.144 10.1 10.0855 9.969 9.95 9.915 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 6 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00278 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INC 1629 VANDERBILT RD BIRMINGHAM CAN CORP OF AMERICA INC 326 JUNE AVE BLANDON NUCOR CORP VULCRAFT DIV 1501 W DARLINGTON ST FLORENCE SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS INC NUCOR CORP VULCRAFT DIV 130 A FRONTAGE RD 7205 GAULT AVE N LEXINGTON FORT PAYNE YKKAP AMERICA INC 332 FIRETOWER RD DUBLIN QUAD/GRAPHICS INC N63 W23075 STATE HWY 74 SUSSEX SIGNODE SQUARE D CO 7701 W 71 ST ST 1601 MERCER RD BRIDGEVIEW LEXINGTON NUCOR VULCRAFT GROUP SAINT JOE DIV 6610 COUNTY RD 60 SAINT JOE REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO FAIRFIELD PLANT KUBIN-NICHOLSON CORP 2433 CROCKER CIR 8448 N 87TH ST FAIRFIELD MILWAUKEE NATIONAL COATINGS INC 604 US HWY 150 E GALESBURG SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURINGCORP 2115 SW LOWER LAKE RD SAINT JOSEPH GREIF PACKAGINGLLC 6000 JEFFERSON HWY NEW ORLEANS ALLIANCE INDUSTRIES WAU PACA N 2467 VAUGHAN RD WAUPACA COOK COMPOSITES & POLYMERS CO 340 RAILROAD ST SAUKVILLE LA-Z-BOYTENNESSEE ESCO CORP 500 WALN UT GROVE RD 9098 EASTSIDE DR EXT DAYTON NEWTON HEXION SPECIALTY CHEMICALS INC 2525 S COMBEE RD LAKELAND CNN AMERICA LLC WHITING DOOR MANUFACTURINGCORP 600 E PEORIA ST 113 CEDAR ST GOODFIELD AKRON CIRCLE GRAPHICS INC 120 9TH AVE LONGMONT BALL AEROSOL & SPECIALTY CONTAINER INC 1717 GIFFORD RD ELGIN SILGAN CAN CO DOW CHEMICAL CO FREEPORT FACILITY 12-773 ST RT 110 NAPOLEON 2301 N BRAZOSPORT BLVD FREEPORT SHIELDCOATTECHNOLOGIES INC (DBA CYBERSHIELD OF 2602 SPENCE ST TEXAS) LUFKIN KAWNEERCOINC 600 KAWNEER DR SPRINGDALE AM GENERAL LLC 13200 MCKINLEY HWY MISHAWAKA State Zip Code Alabama 35234 Pennsylvania 19510 South Carolina 29501 South Carolina 29073 Alabama 35967 Georgia 31021 Wisconsin 53089 Illinois 60455 Kentucky 40511 Indiana 46785 California 94533 Wisconsin 53224 ILLINOIS 61401 Missouri 64504 Louisiana 70123 Wisconsin 54981 Wisconsin 53080 Tennessee 37321 Mississippi 39345 Florida 33801 ILLINOIS 61742 New York 14001 Colorado 80501 Illinois 60120 Ohio 43545 Texas 77541 Texas 75904 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 9.755 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.14 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 9.895 0 0 0 9.895 2.6565 7.2325 9.889 0 0 0 9.889 8.9355 0.8415 9.777 0 0 0 9.777 0 9.7255 9.7255 0 0 0 9.7255 6.1415 3.55 9.6915 0 0 0 9.6915 9.3205 0.2955 9.616 0 0 0 9.616 8.62 0.975 9.595 0 0 9.595 0.95 8.55 9.5 0 0 0 9.5 0 9.4845 9.4845 0 0 9.4845 3.5585 2.813 6.3715 0 3.0555 9.427 5.4255 3.9445 9.37 0 0 0 9.37 9.296 0 9.296 0 0 9.296 9.247 0 9.247 0 0 0 9.247 5.4375 3.5775 9.015 0 0 0 9.015 3.396 5.312 8.708 0 0 0 8.708 0.8605 7.7445 8.605 0 0 0 8.605 0.866 0.336 1.202 0 0 7.374 8.576 0 8.57306025 8.57306025 0 0 0 8.57306025 8.5565 0 8.5565 0 0 0 8.5565 8.39 0.0045 8.3945 0 0 0.0655 8.46 0.125 8.3055 8.4305 0 0 8.4305 0 8.413 8.413 0 0 0 8.413 3 1.85 4.85 0 0 3.54 8.39 0.85 7.5 8.35 0 0 0 8.35 2.3235 6.014 8.3375 0 0 0 8.3375 0.4605 0.003 0.4635 2.7385 0 5.1075 8.3095 8.303 0 8.303 0 0 0 8.303 Arkansas INDIANA 72764 46545 3.3635 4.8495 8.213 0 0 0 8.213 0 8.1875 8.1875 0 0 0 8.1875 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 7 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00279 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address CNH AMERICA LLC 1930 DES MOINES AVE SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL ARKANSAS LLC 1901 EBORICKDR City BURLINGTON FAYETTEVILLE State Iowa ARKANSAS Zip Code 52601 72701 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.175 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 8 0 7.3 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 8.175 0 0 8.175 7.3 0 0.64 7.94 SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP CROWN AEROSOL PACKAGING CARRY-ON TRAILER CORP BROAN-NUTONE LLC ROLL COATER VON HOFFMANN GRAPHICS INC GMVM-LANSINGGRAND RIVER ASSEMBLY GREIF INDUSTRIAL PACKAGING& SERVICES HUTCHENS INDUSTRIES INC MANSFIELD FACILITY 3MCO- MENOMONIE CARRY-ON TRAILER CORP AKZO NOBEL SURFACE CHEMISTRY LLC ELECTROPRIME INC DEXTER AXLE EQUISTAR CHEMICALS BAYPORT CHEMICALS PLANT MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA INC U.S. AIR FORCE TINKER AFB OK NAHAN PRINTING INC CHRYSLER BELVIDERE ASSEMBLY PLANT TECNOCAP LLC AFTON CHEMICAL CORP GENERAL MOTORS WENTZVILLE ASSEMBLY GENERAL MOTORS CORP LORDSTOWN COMPLEX ROLL COATER INC WIX FILTRATION CORP - ALLEN PLANT ALCOA INC - WARRICK OPERATIONS RR DONNELLEY CRAWFORDSVILLE 1416 INDIANHEAD DR MENOMONIE Wisconsin 54751 3737 E EXCHANGE AVE AURORA Illinois 60504 1965 HWY 30 MISSOURI VALLEY Iowa 51555 926 W STATE ST HARTFORD Wisconsin 53027 858 E HUPP RD LA PORTE Indiana 46350 1005 COMMERCIAL DR OWENSVILLE Missouri 65066 920 TOWNSEND ST MAIL CC LANSING Michigan 48921 7604 RAILROAD AVE WINFIELD Kansas 67156 898 E COMMERCIAL MANSFIELD MISSOURI 65704 1425 STOKKE PKWY MENOMONIE Wisconsin 54751 5300 WESTMORELAND RD WINNEMUCCA NEVADA 89445 15200 ALMEDARD HOUSTON Texas 77053 63 DIXIE HWY ROSSFORD Ohio 43460 500 SE 27TH EL RENO OKLAHOMA 73036 5761 UNDERWOOD RD PASADENA Texas 77507 5101 21ST ST TUSCALOOSA Alabama 35401 7701 ARNOLD ST SUITE 204 TINKER A F B Oklahoma 73145 7000 SAUKVIEWDR SAINT CLOUD Minnesota 56303 3000 W CHRYSLER DR BELVIDERE Illinois 61008 2100 GRISWOLD NE WARREN Ohio 44483 725 CANNON BRIDGE RD ORANGEBURG South Carolina 29115 1500 ERT A WENTZVI LLE Missouri 63385 2300 HALLOCK-YOUNG RD LORDSTOWN Ohio 44481 4502 FREEDOM WAY WEIRTON West Virginia 26062 2900 NW BLVD GASTONIA North Carolina 28052 HWYS 66 & 61 NEWBURGH Indiana 47629 1009 SLOAN ST CRAWFORDSVILLE Indiana 47933 1.6 7.0285 0 0.1135 0 6.5635 3.45 0.7535 0 0 0 0.445 0 0 6.7145 0.003 1.3 7.061195 0.8 1.5755 2.813 1.25 3.15 0 0.0025 0 6.805 6.25 0.808 7.834 7.6235 7.7325 1.1015 4.1 6.7795 7.505 0 7.4985 0.145 7.4105 7.409 0.689 0.004 6 0.276025 6.5 5.7295 0.6965 6 0.75 7.2295 7.2 7 0.3175 7.85 7.8365 7.834 7.737 7.7325 7.665 7.55 7.533 7.505 0 7.4985 0.59 7.4105 7.409 7.4035 0.007 7.3 7.33722 7.3 7.305 3.5095 7.25 3.9 7.2295 7.2025 7 7.1225 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0 0 0 0.14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0195 0 0 0 0 7.5 0 0 0 6.845 0 0 0 0 0 7.35 0 0.05 0 8.88178E-16 0.0075 0 0 0 3.479 0 3.35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.85 7.8365 7.834 7.737 7.7325 7.665 7.5695 7.533 7.505 7.5 7.4985 7.435 7.4105 7.409 7.4035 7.357 7.35 7.33722 7.3075 7.305 7.2885 7.25 7.25 7.2295 7.2025 7.14 7.1225 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 8 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00280 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State Zip Code KITZINGER COOPERAGE CORP 2529 E NORWICH AVE SAINT FRANCIS Wisconsin 53235 JOHN DEERE DES MOINES WORKS 825 SWIRVINEDALE DR ANKENY IOWA 50023 AVERY DENNISON - IBMD LENOIR 950 GERMAN ST LENOIR North Carolina 28645 BRIGHTSMITH LLC 120 ENTERPRISE AVE MORRISVILLE Pennsylvania 19067 SILGANCAN CO 500 NW LOOP 286 SUITE 10 PARIS Texas 75460 ENKEI AMERICA INC 2900 W INWOOD DR COLUMBUS Indiana 47201 CARDONE INDUSTRIES 5660 RISING SUN AVE PHILADELPHIA Pennsylvania 19120 MAUSER CORP 14 CONVERT BLVD WOODBRIDGE New Jersey 07095 HAMMER PACKAGING CORP 200 LUCIUS GORDON DR WEST HENRIETTA New York 14586 BRIGGS & STRATTON YARD POWER PRODUCTS MCDONOUGH OPERATIONS 535 MACON RD MC DONOUGH GEORGIA 30253 SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL ARKANSAS LLC 1301 N DIXIELAND RD ROGERS ARKANSAS 72756 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 0 5.725 0.06 4.034 0 1.367 0.0585 0 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 7.09505 7.0485 1.3205 0.205 2.919 6.95 5.5745 6.772 6.7935 6.7395 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 7.09505 0 0 7.09505 7.0485 0 0 0 7.0485 7.0455 0 0 0 7.0455 0.265 0 0 6.7285 6.9935 6.953 0 0 0 6.953 6.95 0 0 0 6.95 6.9415 0 0 0 6.9415 6.8305 0 0 0 6.8305 6.7935 0 0 6.7935 6.7395 0 0 6.7395 0.0025 6.7325 6.735 0 0 6.735 AAP ST MARYS CORP 1100 MCKINLEY RD SAINT MARYS Ohio 45885 0.0245 6.707 6.7315 0 0 0 6.7315 BERENFIELDCONTAINERS INC 31 RAILROAD ST CLARENDON Pennsylvania 16313 0.073365 6.65362 6.726985 0 0 0 6.726985 SENECA FOODS CORP CAN PLANT 3709 MILL ST MARION New York 14505 0 6.6935 6.6935 0 0 0 6.6935 RR DONNELLEY LANCASTER EAST 216 GREENFIELD RD LANCASTER Pennsylvania 17601 6.2035 0.434 6.6375 0 0 6.6375 CREE INC 4600 SILICON DR DURHAM North Carolina 27703 0 6.601 6.601 0 0 6.601 HUSQVARNACONSUMER OUTDOOR PRODUCTS 172 OLD ELLOREERD ORANGEBURG South Carolina 29116 0.1325 6.4275 6.56 0 0 6.56 OWENS CORNING VETROTEX LLC 4837 HWY 81 S STARR South Carolina 29684 0.656 5.903 6.559 0 0 0 6.559 WHEELING MACHINE PRODUCTS DIV PINE BLUFF 5411 INDUSTRIAL DR S PINE BLUFF ARKANSAS 71602 6.5 0 6.5 0 0 0 6.5 SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURIN G CORP 3591 MAPLE DR FORT DODGE IOWA 50501 0.00028 6.4915 6.49178 0 0 6.49178 SKOLNIK INDUSTRIES 4900 SK1LBOURN AVE CHICAGO ILLINOIS 60632 0.65 5.8 6.45 0 0 6.45 NISSAN NORTH AMERICA INC CANTON MS 300 NISSAN DR CANTON Mississippi 39046 2.534 3.8215 6.3555 0 0 0 6.3555 SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURINGCORP 2501165TH ST HAMMOND Indiana 46320 0 6.331 6.331 0 0 0 6.331 SAPA EXTRUSIONS INC 2500 ALUMAX RD YANKTON South Dakota 57078 0 6.31004485 6.31004485 0 0 0 6.31004485 BRADFORD WHITE CORP 200 LAFAYETTE ST MIDDLEVILLE Michigan 49333 0 6.2995 6.2995 0 0 0 6.2995 MAYTAG CORP CLEVELANDCOOKING PRODUCTS PLANT 740 KING EDWARD AVE SE CLEVELAND 1 Tennessee 37311 0 6.25 6.25 0 0 0 6.25 EFCO CORP 1000 COUNTY RD MONETT Missouri 65708 0.958 5.2355 6.1935 0 0 0 6.1935 HUNTER DOUGLASTUPELOCENTER RT 2 LEE INDUSTRIAL PARI1 SHANNON Mississippi 38868 0.2935 5.870515 6.164015 0 0 0 6.164015 Page 9 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00281 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name NAVISTAR INC SI LOAN CAN CO THE COLEMAN CO INC AK STEEL CORP - ZANESVI LLE WORKS BOBCAT CO (MELROE) PACKAGING DYNAMICS INC BAGCRAFT/PAPERCON DIV Address City State Zip Code 6125 URBANA RD SPRINGFIELD Ohio 45502 6200 FRANKLIN BLVD SUITE SACRAMENTO California 95824 3600 N HYDRAULIC WICHITA KANSAS 67219 1724 LINDEN AVE ZANESVILLE Ohio 43701 210 1ST AVENE GWINNER NORTH DAKOT 58040 3400 BAGCRAFT BLVD BAXTER SPRINGS Kansas 66713 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.6 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 5.5 5.1925 0.8925 0.001 6.05 0 4.7 0 5.964 5.9425 0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 6.1 0.02 0 0.032 6.152 6.085 0 0 6.085 6.051 0 0 0 6.051 4.7 0 0 1.35 6.05 5.964 0 0 5.964 5.9425 0 0 5.9425 CHRYSLERWARREN TRUCK ASSEMBLY PLANT (PART) 21500 MOUND RD WARREN Michigan 48091 5.5 0.415 5.915 0 0.0095 5.9245 QUEBECOR WORLD INC WINCHESTER VIRGINIA GREIF PACKAGING LLC SCHAEFFER MANUFACTURING WORTHINGTON CYLINDERSWISCONSI N LLC SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP TTM TECH NOLOGIES INC NAZDAR SHAWNEE ALCOA HOME EXTERIORS INC TACO INC-CRANSTON METOKOTE CORP PLANT 15 INX DIGITAL INK CO NOVOLYTE TECHNOLOGIES PRECOAT METALS DUPONT PONTCHARTRAIN WORKS SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP KNS COMPANYS INC LOGAN ALUMINUM INC DU PONT ELECTRONICS MICROCIRCU ITS INDUSTRIES LTD NOV TUBOSCOPE NAVASOTA AJAX METAL PROCESSING INC FI BERMARK NORTH AMERICA 1NC PPG INDUSTRIES,INC-SPRINGDALECOMPLEX 160 CENTURY LN STONEW* WINCHESTER 2400 COOPER AVE MERCED 102 BARTON ST SAINT LOUIS 300 E BREED ST CHILTON 400 N 15TH ST ROCHELLE 710 N 600W LOGAN 8501 HEDGE LN TERRACE SHAWNEE 2615 CAMPBELL RD SIDNEY 1160 CRANSTON ST CRANSTON 312 SAVANNAH CEDAR FALLS 405 INDUSTRIAL WAY DIXON 111 W IRENE RD ZACHARY 25 NORTHGATE INDUSTRIA GRANITE CITY 586 HWY 44 LA PLACE 135 NATIONAL RD EDISON 475 RANDY RD CAROL STREAM US HWY 431 N RUSSELLVILLE HWY 686 KM 23 MANATI 9574 FM 1227 4651 BELLEVUE AVE 5492 BOSTWICK ST 125 COLFAX ST NAVASOTA DETROIT LOWVILLE SPRINGDALE Virginia 22603 California 95348 Missouri 63104 Wisconsin 53014 Illinois 61068 Utah 84321 Kansas 66227 Ohio 45365 RHODE ISLANE 02920 Iowa 50613 California 95620 Louisiana 70791 Illinois 62040 Louisiana 70068 New Jersey 08817 Illinois 60188 Kentucky 42276 PUERTO RICO 00674 Texas MICHIGAN New York Pennsylvania 77868 48207 13367 15144 5.48138 4.5705 5.84243 0.8835 4.3695 0.432 1.7235 0.8075 0.0575 0 5.621 5.05 4.516 0.006 4.45 1.099 0.0355 0 4.911 0 0.083 5.2425 0.2558 1.2955 0 4.948 1.4365 3.888 4.0215 4.225 5.662 5.66847 0 0.495 1.0955 0 1.1 4.397 5.3625 0.0725 0.48 5.384 5.2795 0.062 5.73718 5.866 5.84243 5.8315 5.806 4.32 5.745 5.0325 5.7195 5.66847 5.621 5.545 5.6115 0.006 5.55 5.496 5.398 0.0725 5.391 5.384 5.3625 5.3045 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.075 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.166475 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.484 0 0 0.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.601 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.3235 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.903655 5.866 5.84243 5.8315 5.806 5.804 5.745 5.7325 5.7195 5.66847 5.621 5.62 5.6115 5.607 5.55 5.496 5.398 5.396 5.391 5.384 5.3625 5.3045 Page 10 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00282 Facility Name BATESVULE MANUFACTURING INC -DOLL PLANT AUTOALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL INC ARMSTRONG HARDWOOD FLOORING CO US ARMY LAKE CITY ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT RUSKINCO PELLA CORP CARROLL OPERATIONS GREIF PACKAGING LLC HYDRO ALUMINUM NORTH AMERICA INC RR DONNELLEY LANCASTER WEST PRECOAT METALS PHOENIX CONTAINER INC SILGAN CONTAINER MANUFACTURING CORP FORD MOTOR CO TWIN CITIES ASSEMBLY PLANT CROWN AEROSOL PACKAGING HYUNDAI MOTOR MANUFACTURING ALABAMA LLC COLOR COMMUNICATIONS INC PRECOAT METALS PRIME TANNING CO - HARTLAND RR DONNELLEY-WETMORE PLANT VOLVO TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA R R DONNELLEY & SONS CO DANVILLE DIV NESTLE PURINA PETCARE IMPRESS USA INC BROWN PRINTING CO CURTIS METAL FINISHING CO ARVINMERITOR HEAVY VEHICLE SYSTEMS LLC ENDICOTT INTERCONNECT TECHNOLOGIES INC WORLDCOLOR MERIX CORP INLAND LABELS MARKETING Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State Zip Code 1000 E PEARL ST BATESVILLE Indiana 47006 1 INTERNATIONAL DR FLAT ROCK Michigan 48134 565 HARTCO DR ONEIDA Tennessee 37841 INTERSECTION OF MO HV\A INDEPENDENCE Missouri 64051 HWY 27 N GENEVA Alabama 36340 1750 E US HWY 30 E CARROLL IOWA 51401 695 LOUIS DR WARMINSTER Pennsylvania 18974 808 COUNTY RD MONETT MISSOURI 65708 1375 HARRISBURG PIKE LANCASTER Pennsylvania 17601 16402 JACINTOPORT BLVD HOUSTON Texas 77015 1202 AIRPORT RD NORTH BRUNSWICK New Jersey 08902 3250 PATTERSON RD RIVERBANK California 95367 966 S MISSISSIPPI RIVER Bl SAINT PAUL Minnesota 55116 4TH STS PARKAVE FARIBAULT Minnesota 55021 700 HYUNDAI BLVD MONTGOMERY Alabama 36105 4242 W FILLMORE CHICAGO Illinois 60624 4301 S SPRING AVE SAINT LOUIS Missouri 63116 9 MAIN ST HARTLAND Maine 04943 1645 W SAM HOUSTON PKV HOUSTON TEXAS 77043 4881 COUGAR TRAIL RD DUBLIN VIRGINIA 24084 JOHN HILL BAILEY INDL PAI DANVILLE Kentucky 40422 1000 HAMILTON RD WEIRTON West Virginia 26062 936 BARRACUDAST TERMINAL ISLAND California 90731 2300 BROWN AVE WASECA Minnesota 56093 6645 SIMS DR STERLING HEIGHTS Michigan 48313 801 RAILROAD AVE YORK South Carolina 29745 1093 CLARK ST ENDICOTT New York 13760 451 INTERNATIONAL BLVD CLARKSVILLE Tennessee 37040 1521 POPLAR LN FOREST GROVE Oregon 97116 2009 WAVES LA CROSSE Wisconsin 54601 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.265 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 5.032 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 5.297 0 0 0 5.297 0.48 4.8 5.28 0 0 5.28 0 5.22175 5.22175 0 0 0 5.22175 1.302 3.864 5.166 0 0 0 5.166 0.019 5.0965 5.1155 0 0 0 5.1155 0 5.05 5.05 0 0 5.05 2.1455 1.451 3.5965 0 0 1.4455 5.042 0.252 4.7845 5.0365 0 0 0 5.0365 4.5877 0.272 4.8597 0 0 4.8597 4.5625 0.2525 4.815 0 0 0 4.815 1.871 2.902 4.773 0 0 0 4.773 0.2825 4.4455 4.728 0 0 0 4.728 0.39 4.2 4.59 0 0.13 4.72 3.029 1.6865 4.7155 0 0 0 4.7155 2.7715 1.9425 4.714 0 0 4.714 0.81 3.84 4.65 0 0 4.65 1.073 3.5665 4.6395 0 0 0 4.6395 0.0915 4.4955 4.587 0 0 0 4.587 4.5675 0.011 4.5785 0 0 4.5785 2.15 2.4 4.55 0 0 0 4.55 4.208 0.2945 4.5025 0 0 0 4.5025 1.2665 3.2185 4.485 0 0 0 4.485 4.1 0.375 4.475 0 0 0 4.475 4.4155 0.0585 4.474 0 0 4.474 3.19 1.2715 4.4615 0 0 4.4615 0.001 4.4215 4.4225 0 0 0 4.4225 0.25 4.1155 4.3655 0.032 0 0 4.3975 3.7745 0.612 4.3865 0 0 4.3865 0.0835 4.1895 4.273 0 0 4.273 2.0245 2.209 4.2335 0 0 0 4.2335 Page 11 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00283 Facility Name SAPA EXTRUDER INC CARRY-ON TRAILER CORP GENIE INDUSTRIES SOUTH CAMPUS SEQUA COATINGS CORP-PRECOATM ETALS DIV BROWN PRINTING CO METAL COATERS MISSISSIPPI BALL METAL FOOD CONTAINER CORP HIRSH INDUSTRIES INC SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP BETCO CORP QUEBECORWORLD DIRECT-PETTY MAGNA MIRRORS CORP - NEWAYGO GMTG - SHREVEPORT ASSEMBLY VAN CAN CO CROWN FOOD PACKAGING TAIYO AMERICA INC BROWN PRINTING CO RR DONNELLEY & SONS CO BRILLION IRON WORKS INC OMG AMERICAS TITAN COATINGS INC TTM PRINTED CIRCUIT GROUP - S TAFFORD DIV TORO CO ALERIS ROLLED PRODUCTS INC AVERY DENNISON INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIV RADIATOR SPECIALTY CO CENTURY INDUSTRIAL COATINGS 1 NC SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP GM SPRING HILL MANUFACTURING QUAD/GRAPH ICS INC Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State Zip Code 2905 OLD OAKWOOD RD GAINESVILLE Georgia 30504 159 1NDUSTRIAL PARK RD MONTROSS VIRGINIA 22520 18700 NE65TH ST REDMOND Washington 98052 US HWY 12ATRT 249 PORTAGE Indiana 46368 11595 MCCONNELL RD WOODSTOCK Illinois 60098 951 PRISOCKRD JACKSON Mississippi 39272 300 WGREGER RD OAKDALE California 95361 1525 MCKEE RD DOVER Delaware 19904 N90 W14600 COMMERCE DF MENOMONEE FALLS Wisconsin 53051 1001 BROWN AVE TOLEDO Ohio 43607 420 W INDUSTRIAL AVE EFFINGHAM Illinois 62401 700 S PARK DR NEWAYGO MICHIGAN 49337 7600 GEN ERAL MOTORS BL SHREVEPORT Louisiana 71129 10837 ETIWANDA AVE FONTANA California 92337 10200 N LOMBARD ST PORTLAND Oregon 97203 2675 ANTLER DR CARSON CITY Nevada 89701 668 GRAVEL PIKE EAST GREENVILLE Pennsylvania 18041 6821 E COUNTY RD 1100N MATTOON ILLINOIS 61938 200 PARK AVE BRILLION Wisconsin 54110 TWO MILE RUN RD FRANKLIN Pennsylvania 16323 2025 EXCHANGE PL BESSEMER Alabama 35023 4 OLD MONSON RD STAFFORD Connecticut 06075 200SIMEAVE TOMAH Wisconsin 54660 1372 KY HWY 1957 LEWISPORT Kentucky 42351 17700 FOLTZ PKWY STRONGSVILLE Ohio 44149 600 RADIATOR RD INDIAN TRAIL North Carolina 28079 HWY 69 S JACKSONVILLE Texas 75766 8673 LYONS-MARENGO RD LYONS New York 14489 100 SATURN PKWY MAIL DF SPRING HILL Tennessee 37174 555 S 108TH ST WEST ALLIS WISCONSIN 53214 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 4.226 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 4.226 0 0 0 4.226 0 4.1765 4.1765 0 0 0 4.1765 0.23425 3.9122 4.14645 0 0 4.14645 0.284 3.8295 4.1135 0 0 0 4.1135 3.915 0.09 4.005 0 0 4.005 0 3.9925 3.9925 0 0 0 3.9925 0.134 3.85 3.984 0 0 0 3.984 0.0025 3.9815 3.984 0 0 3.984 0 3.95 3.95 0 0 0 3.95 3.885 0 3.885 0 0 3.885 3.43 0.4 3.83 0 0 3.83 1.1175 2.689 3.8065 0 0 0 3.8065 0.095 3.65 3.745 0 0 0 3.745 3.2 0.5 3.7 0 0 0 3.7 1.583 2.0475 3.6305 0 0 0 3.6305 0.005 1.29 1.295 0 0 2.3295 3.6245 3.423 0.1185 3.5415 0 0 0.0075 3.549 3.2385 0.2265 3.465 0 0 0 3.465 2.4496 0.85945 3.30905 0 0.125 3.43405 0.025 0.259 0.284 0 0 3.143 3.427 3.42 0 3.42 0 0 0 3.42 0 3.3675 3.3675 0 0 3.3675 0 3.331 3.331 0 0 3.331 0.125 3.1985 3.3235 0 0 0 3.3235 0.431 2.885 3.316 0 0 0 3.316 2.1845 0 2.1845 0 0 1.13 3.3145 0.074 1.4035 1.4775 0 0 1.8115 3.289 0.5625 2.7 3.2625 0 0 0 3.2625 0.0065 3.25 3.2565 0 0 3.2565 3.17 0.085 3.255 0 0 3.255 Page 12 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00284 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City BATESViLLE MANUFACTURING INC 310 CROWN RD BATESVILLE PRECOAT METALS 3399 DAVEY ALLISON BLVD HUEYTOWN MIDDLEBURY HARDWOOD PRODUCTS 101 JOAN DR MIDDLEBURY WORLDCOLOR LEBANON DiV 760 FUJITEC DR LEBANON CADON PLATING CO 371511TH ST WYANDOTTE SONOCO PHOENIX - PRESIDENTS ISLAND 2755 HARBOR AVE MEMPHIS RR DONNELLEY STRASBURG DIV ONE SHENANDOAH VALLD STRASBURG BASF CORP - CLEAR LAKE PLANT 11200 BAY AREA BLVD PASADENA KAWASAKI MOTORS MANUFACTURING CORP USA 6600 NW 27TH ST LINCOLN SPRAYLAT CORP CA 3465 S LA CIENAGA BLVD LOS ANGELES U.S. AIR FORCE ROBINS AFB GA 775 MACON ST BUILDING If ROBINS AFB RR DONNELLEY LOS ANGELES MANUFACTURING 19681 PACIFIC GATEWAY D TORRANCE JELD-WEN 600 JELD-WEN RD CRAIGSVILLE BENJAMIN MOORE & CO JOHNSTOWN UNION AVE EXTENSION JOHNSTOWN ST CHARLES OPERATIONS (TAFT/STAR) UNION CARBIDE 355 LA HWY 3142 (GATE 1) TAFT CORP VERTIS COMMUNICATIONS 4051 FONDORFDR COLUMBUS DOW CHEMICAL CO 1790 BUILDING MIDLAND QUAD/GRAPHICS INC N11896 HWY 175 PO BOX 27 LOMIRA TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURiNGTEX AS INC 1 LONE STAR PASS SAN ANTONIO GM MLCG FAIRFAX ASSEMBLY 3201 FAIRFAX TRAFFICWA'j KANSAS CITY SOLIANT LLC 1872 HWY 9 BYPASS W LANCASTER KIA MOTORS MANUFACTURING OF GEORGIA 7777 KIA PKWY WEST POINT APOLLO COLORS INC 1550 MOUND RD ROCKDALE VERTIS COMMUNICATIONS 10911 GRANITE ST CHARLOTTE ABC COMPOUNDING CO INC 6970 JONESBORO RD MORROW ITW DYMON 805 E OLD 56 HWY OLATHE FORD MOTOR CO - OHIO ASSEMBLY PLANT 650 MILLER RD AVON LAKE ARR-MAZ CUSTOM CHEMICALS 4800 STATE RD 60 E MULBERRY BON L MANUFACTURINGCO HWY 53 BONNELL RD CARTHAGE DERRICK CORP 3350 UNION RD CHEEKTOWAGA State Zip Code Mississippi 38606 Alabama 35023 INDIANA 46540 Ohio 45036 Michigan 48192 Tennessee 38113 Virginia 22657 Texas 77507 Nebraska 68524 California 90016 Georgia 31098 California 90502 WEST VIRGINIA 26205 New York 12095 Louisiana 70057 Ohio 43228 Michigan 48667 WISCONSIN 53048 Texas 78264 Kansas 66115 South Carolina 29721 GEORGIA 31833 Illinois 60436 North Carolina 28273 Georgia 30260 Kansas 66061 Ohio 44012 Florida 33860 Tennessee 37030 New York 14225 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.488 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 2.7645 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 3.2525 0 0 0 3.2525 2.5065 0.725 3.2315 0 0 0 3.2315 0 3.2215 3.2215 0 0 0 3.2215 3.1125 0.0735 3.186 0 0 3.186 1.6414 1.495375 3.136775 0 0 0 3.136775 0 3.122 3.122 0 0 0 3.122 2.95 0.15 3.1 0 0.0025 3.1025 3.0356 0.043567767 3.079167767 0 0 3.079167767 0.2995 2.6515 2.951 0 0.125 3.076 1.5375 1.5375 3.075 0 0 3.075 2.4135 0.379 2.7925 0 0 0.2715 3.064 2.9545 0.069 3.0235 0 0 3.0235 0.1395 2.882 3.0215 0 0 3.0215 0.0148 0.000011 0.014811 0 0 2.9644 2.979211 0.2455 1.21 1.4555 1.485 0 0 2.9405 2.5835 2.75 2.5685 2.39455575 0.032 0.554 0.0525 0 2.3815 0.0025 0.7835 2.4 0.101 0.5795 0 0.301 0.1 0.2745 0.42551085 2.75 2.204 2.694 0 0.276 0.375 1.8285 0.195 2.4835 1.6995 2.58 2.8845 2.85 2.843 2.8200666 2.782 2.758 2.7465 0 2.6575 0.3775 2.612 2.595 2.5845 2.279 2.58 0 0.0015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2945 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.705 0 2.2555 0 0 0 0.007 0 2.8845 2.8515 2.843 2.8200666 2.782 2.758 2.7465 2.705 2.6575 2.6355 2.612 2.595 2.5845 2.5805 2.58 Page 13 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00285 Facility Name TYCO FIRE SUPPRESSION & BUILDING PRODUCTS 1C OF OKLAHOMA LLC BWAY CORP BWAY PACKAGING DIV BRUNSWICK CORP MERCURY MARINE DIV ACCESS BUSINESS GROUP LLC MISSION KLEENSWEEP PRODUCTS INC ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC POWER PARTNERS INC AMERICAN COLOR GRAPHICS CENTRIA CUMMINS POWER GENERATION HEWLETT-PACKARD CAR!BE BV SITE MOTOR CASTINGS CO VERTIS INC RNS SPRINGFIELD DIV CADMUS SPECIALTY PUBLICATIONS ROPPECORP CCL CONTAINER AEROSOL DIV AMERICAN COLOR GRAPHICS - LUFKIN IVC SOUTH NCP COATINGS INC DENSO MANUFACTURINGTENNESSEE INC 3M CO - HUTCHINSON SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS MT VERNON LLC HONDA MANUFACTURING OF INDIANA LLC GATES CORP GREIF PACKAGING LLC VAN EX INC RED SPOT WESTLAND INC BENCHMARK ENERGY PRODUCTS LLC VERTIS Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State Zip Code 1 STANTON ST MARINETTE Wisconsin 54143 2322 N MINGO RD TULSA Oklahoma 74116 8200 BROADWELL RD CINCINNATI Ohio 45244 W6250 PIONEER RD FOND DU LAC Wisconsin 54935 7575 FULTON ST E ADA Michigan 49355 2434 BIRKDALEST LOS ANGELES California 90031 200 RT 413 BRISTOL Pennsylvania 19007 200 NEWTON BRIDGE RD ATHENS Georgia 30607 810 E S ST MARENGO Iowa 52301 530 N SECOND ST CAMBRIDGE Ohio 43725 1400 73RD AVENE FRIDLEY Minnesota 55432 HWY 110 N KM 5.1 AGUADILLA Puerto Rico 00605 1323S65TH MILWAUKEE Wisconsin 53214 245 BENTON DR EAST LONGMEADO^ MASSACHUSE 01028 2901 BYRDHILL RD RICHMOND VIRGINIA 23228 1602 N UNION ST FOSTORIA Ohio 44830 ONE LLODIO DR HERMITAGE Pennsylvania 16148 3001 ATKINSON DR LUFKIN Texas 75901 875 PROGRESS CENTER A\ LAWRENCEVILLE Georgia 30043 225 FORT ST NILES Michigan 49120 1720,1725,1755 ROBERT C MARYVILLE Tennesee 37801 905/915 ADAMS STSE HUTCHINSON Minnesota 55350 1 LEXAN LN MOUNTVERNON Indiana 47620 2755 N MICHIGAN AVE GREENSBURG Indiana 47240 1450 MONTANA RD IOLA KANSAS 66749 10850 STRANG RD LA PORTE Texas 77571 1700 S SHAWNEE ST MOUNT VERNON Illinois 62864 550 S EDWIN ST WESTLAND Michigan 48186 4113 W INDUSTRIAL AVE MIDLAND Texas 79703 7619 DOANE DR MANASSAS VIRGINIA 20109 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.0035 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 2.555 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 2.5585 0 0 2.5585 0 2.55 2.55 0 0 2.55 1.65079 0.8941 2.54489 0 0 2.54489 0.2525 2.271 2.5235 0 0 2.5235 2.3755 0.128 2.5035 0 0 2.5035 2.5 0 2.5 0 0 2.5 0.05715 0.19785 0.255 0 0 2.214 2.469 0 2.4385 2.4385 0 0 2.4385 2.2715 0.1575 2.429 0 0 2.429 1.209 1.2115 2.4205 0 0 0 2.4205 0.12 2.3 2.42 0 0 2.42 0.125 2.248 2.373 0 0 0 2.373 0 1.159 1.159 0 0 1.213 2.372 2.311 0.0535 2.3645 0 0 0 2.3645 2.242785 0.104675 2.34746 0 0 2.34746 0.125 2.22 2.345 0 0 2.345 0.1835 2.1485 2.332 0 0 0 2.332 2.2015 0.1025 2.304 0 0 2.304 0.4575 1.8305 2.288 0 0 2.288 2.275 0 2.275 0 0 0 2.275 0 2.2585 2.2585 0 0 0 2.2585 0 2.2255 2.2255 0 0 0 2.2255 1.3 0.8 2.1 0.125 0 0 2.225 1.7 0.5 2.2 0 0 0.0025 2.2025 0 0.0023 0.0023 0 0 2.1605 2.1628 1.6775 0.462 2.1395 0 0 2.1395 0 2.1145 2.1145 0 0 2.1145 1.192 0.912 2.104 0 0 0 2.104 0.191 1.912 2.103 0 0 2.103 1.9855 0.065 2.0505 0 0 2.0505 Page 14 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00286 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City BRENNTAG SOUTHWEST INC LANC ASTER 704 E WINTERGREEN RD LANCASTER HANNA STEEL CORP 3812 COMMERCE AVE FAIRFIELD SAPA INC COATINGS DIVSION 5325 NE SKYPORTWAY PORTLAND CLEVELAND STEEL CONTAINER- Nl LES 115 ERIE ST NILES WORLD COLOR PRESS 50 JOHN HANCOCKRD TAUNTON DUPONT YERKES PLANT 3115 RIVER RD BUFFALO CLEVELAND STEEL CONTAINER CORP 350 MILL ST QUAKERTOWN KEYMARKCORP 1188 CAYADUTTA ST RT 33' FONDA ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR 901 N GREENWOOD AVE KANKAKEE COATINGS PPG INDUSTRIES ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES 1020 OLYMPIC DR BATAVIA ZEPINC 1310 SEABOARD INDUSTRY ATLANTA ASTRO COATINGS INC 27 MAIN ST STRUTHERS FORD LOUISVILLE ASSEMBLY 2000 FERN VALLEY RD LOUISVILLE REICHHOLD INC 425 S PACE BLVD PENSACOLA VERTIS COMMUNICATIONS 4646 S GRADY AVE TAMPA CONSOLIDATED SYSTEMS INC 650 ROSEWOOD DR COLUMBIA SC JOHNSON & SON INC WAXDALE FACILITY 831116TH ST STURTEVANT GATES CORP - CHARLESTON 1300 S PLANT RD CHARLESTON WARREN UNILUBE INC 1200S8TH ST WEST MEMPHIS IMPRESS USA INC 3030 BIRCH DR HALF MOOh WEIRTON DURA COAT PRODUCTS INC 26655 PEOPLES RD MADISON AKZONOBEL AEROSPACE COATINGS 1 E WATER ST WAUKEGAN GENERAL MOTORS MLCG DETROIT-HAMTRAMCKASSEM 2500 E GENERAL MOTORS! DETROIT BLY CENTER PRO LINE PRINTING / RR DONNELLEY 365 PARR CIR RENO EASTMAN CHEMICAL CO TENNESSEE OPERATIONS 100 EASTMAN RD KINGSPORT BALL METAL FOOD CONTAINER CORP 1200 S CRUTCHER ST SPRINGDALE COLOR CORP OF AMERICA 1630 W HILL ST LOUISVILLE RHODIA INC 2ND ST & BLUEBALL AVE MARCUS HOOK CAMACO COLUMBUS MANUFACTURING 1851 E32NDAVE COLUMBUS State Zip Code Texas 75134 Alabama 35064 Oregon 97218 Ohio 44446 Massachusetts 02780 New York 14207 PENNSYLVANIA 18951 New York 12068 Illinois 60901 Illinois 60510 Georgia 30318 Ohio 44471 Kentucky 40213 Florida 32502 FLORIDA 33611 South Carolina 29201 Wisconsin 53177 Missouri 63834 Arkansas 72301 West Virginia 26062 Alabama 35756 Illinois 60085 Michigan 48211 Nevada 89512 Tennessee 37662 Arkansas 72764 Kentucky 40210 Pennsylvania 19061 Nebraska 68601 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.0225 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.02 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.0425 0 0 2 2.0425 0.77 1.1105 1.8805 0 0 0.16 2.0405 1.6348493 0.38930365 2.02415295 0 0 0 2.02415295 0.0025 2.0185 2.021 0 0 0 2.021 1.605 0.032 1.637 0 0 0.3745 2.0115 0.753 1.2515 2.0045 0 0 0 2.0045 0.0145 1.9805 1.995 0 0 0 1.995 0.007 1.9795 1.9865 0 0 0 1.9865 0.8285 1.155 1.9835 0 0 0 1.9835 0 0.117 0.5915 0.215 0.169 1.7675 0 0.125 0 1.892 0.0065 1.64203 0.916 1.6 0.786 0.2185 1.3605 1.6 1.7665 0.165 1.925 0.375 0.0056 0.007 1.8665 0.21697 0.918 0.19 0.786 0.3355 1.952 1.815 1.9355 1.9325 1.925 0.5 0.0056 1.899 1.873 1.859 1.834 1.79 0 0.078 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.178 1.547 0 0 0.13 0 0 0 0 0 1.425 0 1.8995 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.027 1.964 1.9605 1.952 1.945 1.9355 1.9325 1.925 1.925 1.9051 1.899 1.873 1.859 1.834 1.817 1.759 0.8855 0.09 0.009 0.201 0 0.041 0.8405 1.7 1.756 0.0005 1.753 1.8 1.726 1.79 1.765 0.2015 1.753 0 0.0675 0 0 0 0 0 1.8 0 0.002 1.7955 0 0 1.79 0 0 1.765 1.562 1.7635 0 1.753 Page 15 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00287 Facility Name RR DONNELLEY PINEViLLE STEELSCAPEINC SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURINGCORP FUJiFILM NORTH AMERICA CORP US CHEMICAL EASTMAN KODAK CO EASTMAN BUSINESS PARK DAIMLERCHRYSLERCORP TOLEDO ASSEMBLY PLANT Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State Zip Code 10519 INDUSTRIAL DR PINEVILLE North Carolina 28134 7001 ALLISON-BONNETME(\ FAIRFIELD Alabama 35064 2200 WILBUR AVE ANTIOCH California 94509 20W14TH AVE NORTH KANSAS CIT Missouri 64116 316 HART ST WATERTOWN Wisconsin 53094 1669 LAKE AVE ROCHESTER New York 14652 4000 STICKNEYAVE TOLEDO Ohio 43612 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 1.6305 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.0865 0.003895 1.709215 0 1.7065 0 1.683 0.00011 0.00003 0.001 0.0035 0.50765 1.1 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 1.717 0 0 1.717 1.71311 0 0 0 1.71311 1.7065 0 0 0 1.7065 1.683 0 0 0 1.683 0.00014 0 1.6775 1.67764 0.0045 1.19 0 0.438 1.6325 1.60765 0 0 0.0025 1.61015 STP PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING CO 477 LEXINGTON AVE PAINESVILLE Ohio 44077 HUNTSMAN PETROCHEMICAL LLC RR DONNELLEY VON HOFFMANN CORP 5451 JEFFERSON CHEMICA CONROE 321 WILSON DR JEFFERSON CITY Texas Missouri 77301 65109 J L CLARK INC 923 23RD AVE ROCKFORD Illinois 61104 DOW CHEMICAL CO - LOUISIANA OPERATIONS WORLDCOLOR- DYERSBURGDIV 21255 LAHWY 1 S 2030 SYLVAN RD PLAQUEMINE DYERSBURG Louisiana Tennessee 70765 38024 RANBAR ELECTRICAL MATERIALS INC RTE 993 ONE MILE W OF R1 MANOR Pennsylvania 15665 SILGAN WHITE CAP CORP TEXAS FINISHING CO 350 JAYCEE DR VALMONT1 HAZLETON 1801 SURVEYOR BLVD CARROLLTON Pennsylvania 18201 Texas 75006 CARESTREAM HEALTH COLORADO 2000 HOWARD SMITH AVE\ WINDSOR Colorado 80550 CHRYSLER STERLING HEIGHTS ASSEMBLY PLANT 38111 VAN DYKE STERLING HEIGHTS Michigan 48312 WORLDCOLOR STILLWATER (WAS QUEBECOR WORLD - 100 W AIRPORT RD STILLWATER DIV) STILLWATER Oklahoma 74075 THIRD COAST PACKAGING INC PEARLAND RR DONNELLEY 1871 MYKAWA 100 QUALITY CT PEARLAND CHARLESTOWN Texas Indiana 77581 47111 BAYOU COS INC 5200 CURTIS LN NEW IBERIA LOUISIANA 70560 NICHOLS ALUMINUM ALABAMA INC GMC TRUCK GROUP ARLINGTON ASSEMBLY PLANT 2001 HWY 20 W 2525 E ABRAMS ST DECATUR ARLINGTON Alabama Texas 35601 76010 CARDINAL ALUMINUMCO PLAN T 3 4005 OAKLAWN DR LOUISVILLE Kentucky 40219 WHEELING CORRUGATING CO - BEECH BOTTOM PLANT 2481 RIVER RD WELLSBURG West Virginia 26070 0.81 0 1.534445 0.26 1.538 1.4305 0 0.75 0 0.002 0.55 1.2965 0 1.362 1.4245 1.135 0.36 0.0485 0 0 0 0.03795 1.2795 0 0.0985 0.006 0.75 1.4565 0 0.9 0.1515 0 0.0635 0 0.279 1.05 1.354 1.4 0.81 0 1.572395 1.5395 1.538 1.529 0.006 1.5 1.4565 0.002 1.45 1.448 0 1.4255 1.4245 1.414 1.41 1.4025 1.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.4505 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.772 0 1.5735 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.4975 0 0 0 0 1.73472E-18 0 0 0 0 1.431 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.582 1.5735 1.572395 1.5395 1.538 1.529 1.5035 1.5 1.4565 1.4525 1.45 1.448 1.431 1.4255 1.4245 1.414 1.41 1.4025 1.4 OHIO ART CO PRO LINE PRINTING ARLINGTON ONETOY ST 401 N GREAT SWPKWY BRYAN ARLINGTON Ohio Texas 43506 76011 0.944 0.444 1.388 0 0 0 1.388 1.25 0.125 1.375 0 0 1.375 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 16 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00288 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State Zip Code ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS GFX INTERNATIONAL 372 CLEVELAND ST 333 BARRON BLVD ROCHESTER GRAYSLAKE Pennsylvania 15074 Illinois 60030 HUNTSMAN PETROCHEMICALLLC 3892 US HWY 90 DAYTON Texas 77535 CHROMASOURCEINC 2433 S CR 600 E COLUMBIA CITY Indiana 46725 VEYANCE TECHNOLOGIES INC 400 N GOODYEAR RD MOUNT PLEASANT Iowa 52641 SHEBOYGAN PAINT CO 608 CANAL ST CEDARTOWN Georgia 30125 COOK COMPOSITES & POLYMERSCO 1415 STEELE AVESW GRAND RAPIDS Michigan 49507 ICL-IP AMERICA INC 11636 HUNTINGTON GALLIPOLIS FERRY West Virginia 25515 RR DONNELLEY & SONS CO 60 SECURITY DR AVON Connecticut 06001 MASCO RETAIL CABINET GROUP LLC 423 HOPEWELL RD WAVERLY Ohio 45690 CLEVELAND STEEL CONTAINER - PE OTONE FACILITY 117 E LINCOLN ST PEOTONE Illinois 60468 CATERPILLAR INC 3701 STATE RD 26 E LAFAYETTE Indiana 47905 LION COPOLYMER LLC 5955 SCENIC HWY BATON ROUGE Louisiana 70805 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO. AKRON TECHNICAL CENTER GENTEK BUILDING PRODUCTS 200 S. MARTHA AVE 11 CRAGWOOD RD AKRON AVENEL Ohio 44309 New Jersey 07001 SUN CHEMICAL CORP 2445 PRODUCTION DR SAINT CHARLES Illinois 60174 PPG ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES EAST POINT 1377 OAKLEIGH DR EAST POINT Georgia 30344 AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INC 1313 Wl N DSOR AVE COLUMBUS Ohio 43211 SPIRALKOTE FLEXIBLE PACKAGING 1200 CENTRAL FLORIDA PK ORLANDO FLORIDA 32837 SPRAYLAT CORP IL 1701 E122-NDST CHICAGO Illinois 60633 KIK (HOUSTON) INC 2921 CORDER ST HOUSTON Texas 77054 CP CONVERTERS INC 15 GRUMBACHERRD YORK PENNSYLVANIA 17402 RED SPOT PAINT & VARNISH CO INC 1016 E COLUMBIA ST EVANSVILLE Indiana 47711 JOHN DEERE SEEDING & CYLINDER 501 RIVER DR MOLINE Illinois 61265 VEYANCE TECHNOLOGIES INC 2701 W OMAHA AVE NORFOLK Nebraska 68701 BJ CHEMICAL SERVICES 707 N LEECH HOBBS New Mexico 88240 ARANDELLCORP N82 W13118 LEON RD MENOMONEE FALLS Wisconsin 53051 CHEMCOATINC 2790 CANFIELDS LN MONTOURSVILLE Pennsylvania 17754 WW HENRY 150 MOONEY DR BOURBONNAIS Illinois 60914 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.523 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.8515 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 1.3745 0 0 0 1.3745 0 0.001 0 0.0005 0.635 1.061 0.005715 1.258 0.0055 0.053 0.04 0 0 0.82 0.001 1.338 0 0.677 0.251 0.344885 0.0295 1.1675 1.214 1.2155 0 0 0.82 0.002 1.338 0.0005 1.312 1.312 0.3506 1.2875 1.173 1.267 1.2555 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.9545 0 0 0 0 0.0015 0 0.55 0 1.368 0 0 1.3175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1105 0 0 0 0 0 1.25 0 1.25 1.37 1.37 1.338 1.318 1.312 1.312 1.3051 1.2875 1.2835 1.267 1.2555 1.2515 1.25 0.122 1.126 1.248 0 0 0 1.248 0.185 1.049 1.234 0 0 0 1.234 0 0.691 0.691 0 0 0.541 1.232 0.7885 0.4365 1.225 0 0 0 1.225 0 1.2105 1.2105 0 0 0 1.2105 0.06 1.141 1.201 0 0 0 1.201 1.19 0 1.19 0 0 1.19 1.17007 0 1.17007 0 0 0 1.17007 0.6865 0.4695 1.156 0 0 0 1.156 0 1.15 1.15 0 0 0 1.15 0.03668 0.108535 0.145215 0 0 1.000835 1.14605 0.014 0.00335 0.01735 0 1.12405 1.1414 1.094 0.0255 1.1195 0 0 0 1.1195 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0.986 1.111 1.1105 0 1.1105 0 0 0 1.1105 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 17 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00289 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State Zip Code DUBOIS CHEMICALS INC 3630 E KEMPER RD SHARONVILLE Ohio 45241 BEAULIEU OF AMERICA PLANT 560-MODEL 950 RIVERBENDRD DALTON Georgia 30721 TESORO REFINING & MARKETING CO - MANDAN REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE MANDAN North Dakota 58554 IVC INDUSTRIAL COATINGS INC 2245-50 VALLEY AVE INDIANAPOLIS Indiana 46218 VANGUARD PAINTS & FINISHES INC 1409 GREENEST MARIETTA Ohio 45750 WINSLOW-BROWNING INC 215 BROWNSVILLE AVE LIBERTY Indiana 47353 ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR 701 SHILOH RD COATINGS GENERAL DYNAMICS ORDNANCE & TACTICAL SYSTEMS 1200 N GLEN BROOK GARLAND POLYMERIC IMAGING INC 117 E 14TH AVE GARLAND Texas GARLAND Texas NORTH KANSAS CIT Missouri 75042 75040 64116 3M CO - BROWNWOOD 4501 HWY 377 S BROWNWOOD Texas 76801 HB FULLER 12110HARLANDDR NE COVINGTON Georgia 30014 COMPLEMENTARY COATINGS CORP 4701 O'DONNELL ST BALTIMORE Maryland 21224 UNITED PAINT & CHEMICAL 24671 TELEGRAPH RD SOUTHFIELD Michigan 48034 COOK COMPOSITES & POLYMERS CO 2434 HOLMES RD HOUSTON Texas 77051 TTM TECHNOLOGIES INC 234 CASHMAN DR CHIPPEWA FALLS Wisconsin 54729 GENERAL MOTORS LLC BOWLING GREEN ASSEMBLY PLANT 600 CORVETTE DR BOWLING GREEN Kentucky 42101 TTM TECHNOLOGIES-SANTACLARA 407 MATHEW ST SANTA CLARA California 95050 NICHOLS ALUMINUM DAVENPORT 1725 ROCKINGHAM RD DAVENPORT Iowa 52802 THREE RIVERS ALUMINUM CO 71 PROGRESSAVE CRANBERRY TOWN Pennsylvania 16066 LEVLAD 9200 MASON AVE CHATSWORTH California 91311 SONY ELECTRONICS INC 4275 W MAIN ST DOTHAN Alabama 36305 CANBERRA CORP 3610 HOLLAND-SYLVANIAR TOLEDO Ohio 43615 PPG INDUSTRIES OHIO INC (CL) 3800 W 143 ST CLEVELAND Ohio 44111 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC 12201 SWFWY MS600 STAFFORD Texas 77477 B-WAY PACKAGING INC 6 LITHO RD TRENTON New Jersey 08648 GATES CORP 1650 ROWE PKWY POPLAR BLUFF MISSOURI 63901 WESTERN METAL DECORATING CO 8875 INDUSTRIAL AVE RANCHO CUCAMON CALIFORNIA 91730 HILLYARD INDUSTRIES INC 402 N 3TH ST SAINT JOSEPH Missouri 64501 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 0 1.1 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0 1.1095 0.0005 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0 0 i.ii 1.11 1.1095 0 0 1.1095 1.1005 0 0 0 1.1005 0.21965 0.87855 1.0982 0 0 0 1.0982 1.078 0 1.078 0 0 0 1.078 1.077 0 1.077 0 0 0 1.077 0.5915 0.4765 1.068 0 0 1.068 0.002985 0.000005 0.00299 0 0 1.06475 1.06774 0 1.0665 1.0665 0 0 0 1.0665 0.0435 1 1.0435 0 0 0.006 1.0495 0.5815 0.2815 0.863 0 0.1855 1.0485 1.029 0 1.029 0 0 0 1.029 1.023 0 1.023 0 0 0 1.023 1.013 0.006 1.019 0 0 0 1.019 0 1.002 1.002 0 0 1.002 0.1 0.9 1 0 0 1 0 0.9985 0.9985 0 0 0.9985 0.2795 0.717 0.9965 0 0 0.9965 0.3575 0.637 0.9945 0 0 0 0.9945 0.000185 0 0.000185 0 0.9875 0.987685 0 0 0 0 0 0.983 0.983 0.6 0.375 0.975 0 0 0.975 0.4135 0.554 0.9675 0 0 0 0.9675 0.0025 0.125 0.1275 0 0 0.825 0.9525 0.095 0.857 0.952 0 0 0 0.952 0 0.0005 0.0005 0 0 0.948 0.9485 0.55 0.375 0.925 0 0 0 0.925 0.3575 0.563 0.9205 0 0 0.9205 Page 18 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00290 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State Zip Code U.S. POLYMERSACCUREZLLC 300 E PRIMM ST SAINT LOUIS Missouri 63111 FORBO ADH ESIVES LLC 7440 W DUPONT RD MORRIS Illinois 60450 NAPCO INC 125 MCFANNRD VALENCIA Pennsylvania 16059 CRYSTAL FINISHING SYSTEMS INC 2608 ROSSAVE SCHOFIELD Wisconsin 54476 HUNT REFINING CO A CORP 1855 FAIRLAWN RD TUSCALOOSA Alabama 35401 POLARTEC LLC 46 STAFFORD ST LAWRENCE MASSACHUSE 1841 SUN CHEMICAL CORP 1380 FORD RD MAUMEE Ohio 43537 EXXONMOBILCHEMICAL BATON ROUGE CHEMICAL PLANT HOVENSALLC 4999 SCENIC HWY 1 ESTATE HOPE BATON ROUGE Louisiana 70805 CHRISTIANSTED Virgin Islands 00820 FINISHES UNLIMITED INC 482 WHEELER RD SUGAR GROVE Illinois 60554 UNIVAR USA INC HOUSTON FM 529 11235 FM 529 HOUSTON TEXAS 77041 UNIVERSAL CHEMICALS^ COATINGS INC 1124 ELMHURST RD ELK GROVE VILLAG Illinois 60007 ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC 4115 N PERKINS RD STILLWATER Oklahoma 74075 BRENNTAG SOUTHWEST INC HOUS TON 14826 HOOPER RD HOUSTON Texas 77047 MITSUBISHI MOTORS NORTH AMERICA INC 100 N MITSUBISHI MOTORV NORMAL Illinois 61761 CROWN CORK & SEAL CO (USA) INC CROWN CLOSURES 940 MILL PARK DR DIV DPIX LLC 1635 AEROPLAZA DR LANCASTER Ohio 43130 COLORADO SPRING COLORADO 80916 SONOCO PRODUCTS CO 1854 CENTRAL FLORIDA PK ORLANDO Florida 32837 NEXTEER AUTOMOTIVE CORP 3900 HOLLAND RD SAGINAW Michigan 48601 FIVE STAR COATINGS GROUP 36616 89TH ST TWIN LAKES WISCONSIN 53181 PEORIA DISPOSAL CO #1 4349 W SOUTHPORT RD PEORIA Illinois 61615 TRELLEBORG OFFSHORE US RANKIN ROAD FACILITY 1902 RANKIN RD HOUSTON Texas 77073 SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURINGCORP 12130 LYNNAVES SAVAGE Minnesota 55378 KAWNEER CO INC 500E12TH ST BLOOMSBURG Pennsylvania 17815 ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO GARLAND TX 3101 WOOD DR GARLAND Texas 75041 TCI COATINGS INC 4501 BRADLEY ST LUBBOCK Texas 79415 STEEL DYNAMICS INC 5134 LOOP RD JEFFERSONVILLE Indiana 47130 WORWAG COATINGS LLC NA 3420 KOSSUTH ST LAFAYETTE Indiana 47905 ROHM & HAAS ELECTRONIC MATERIA LS LLC 455 FOREST ST MARLBOROUGH Massachusetts 01752 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.0045 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.0025 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.007 0 0.8995 0.9065 0.896 0 0.896 0 0 0.896 0.817 0.076 0.893 0 0 0 0.893 0 0.89296195 0.89296195 0 0 0 0.89296195 0.8905 0 0.8905 0 0 0 0.8905 0.89 0 0.89 0 0 0.89 0.133 0.7545 0.8875 0 0 0 0.8875 0.6 0 0.6 0.285 0 1.11022E-16 0.885 0.702 0.438 0.375 0 0.33403 0.0125 0.843 0 0 0.438 0.5 0.8735 0.52419 0.0125 0.0055 0.8195 0.702 0.876 0.875 0.8735 0.85822 0.025 0.8485 0.8195 0.1805 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.8825 0 0.876 0 0 0.875 0 0 0.8735 0 0 0.85822 0 0.83 0.855 0 0 0.8485 0 0 0.8195 0.3395 0.59 0.08 0 0.7925 0.785 0 0.1305 0.152 0.7665 0 0.6285 0.0025 0.1355 0.22 0.72 0.798 0 0 0.785 0.645 0.035 0 0.763 0.125 0.0025 0.475 0.81 0.8 0.798 0.7925 0.785 0.785 0.7755 0.187 0.7665 0.763 0.7535 0.005 0 0 0 0 0.0005 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3375 0 0 0 0 0 1.11022E-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5845 0 0 0 0 0 0.7465 0.8125 0.81 0.8 0.798 0.793 0.785 0.785 0.7755 0.7715 0.7665 0.763 0.7535 0.7515 Page 19 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00291 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State Zip Code RUST-OLEUM CORP BASF CORP PARKER HANNIFIN SYNDICATE SYSTEMS INC MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP KODAK COLORADO DIV UNIVAR USA INC ROMULUS BRANCH MARCUS PAINT CO SUPERIOR OIL CO INC RECLAIMED ENERGY DIV GREIF INDUSTRIAL PACKAGING & SERVICES LLC WATSON STANDARD CO HARWICK PLANT WESTERN EXTRUSIONS CORP WEST PENN OIL CO, INC130130 LOCKHEED MARTIN AERONAUTICS CO TEXAS TILE MANUFACTURING LLC NALCO CO PLANT 106 SASOL NORTH AMERICA INC LAKE CHARLES CHEMICAL COMPLEX METALS USA BUILDING PRODUCTS KAWNEER CO INC BASF CORP ROLL COATER INC PRECOAT METALS STEELSCAPE TRINKOTE INDUSTRIAL FINISHES INC TRELLEBORG COATED SYSTEMS US INC / GRACE ADVANCED MATERIALS SANFORD LP LIQUID MANUFACTURING & TECHNOLOGY CENTER FLINT GROUP NORTH AMERICA CORP RYCOLINE PRODUCTS LLC 8105 95TH ST PLEASANT PRAIRIE Wisconsin 53158 1175 MARTIN ST GREENVILLE Ohio 45331 400 S ST MC COOK Nebraska 69001 402 N MAIN ST MIDDLEBURY Indiana 46540 2778 SE SIDE HWY ELKTON Virginia 22827 9952 EASTMAN PARK DR WINDSOR Colorado 80551 13395 HURON RIVER DR ROMULUS Michigan 48174 235 E MARKET ST LOUISVILLE Kentucky 40202 1500 WESTERN AVE CONNERSVILLE Indiana 47331 8250 ALMERIA AVE FONTANA California 92335 616 HITE RD HARWICK Pennsylvania 15049 1735 SANDY LAKE RD CARROLLTON Texas 75006 2305 MARKET ST EXT WARREN Pennsylvania 16365 1011 LOCKHEED WAY MZ 6( PALMDALE California 93599 1705 N OLIVER HOUSTON Texas 77007 7701 US HWY 90A SUGAR LAND Texas 77478 2201 OLD SPANISH TRAIL WESTLAKE Louisiana 70669 227 S TOWN E BLVD MESQUITE Texas 75149 7200 DOE AVE VISALIA California 93291 361 SHEEP PASTURE RD EAST SETAUKET NEW YORK 11733 5888 E COUNTY RD 180 BLYTHEVILLE Arkansas 72315 6754 SANTA BARBARA CT ELKRIDGE Maryland 21075 222 W KALAMA RIVER RD KALAMA Washington 98625 1800 PARK PL AVE FORT WORTH Texas 76110 715 RAILROAD AVE & HWY RUTHERFORDTON North Carolina 28139 831 VOLUNTEER PKWY MANCHESTER TENNESSEE 37355 2675 HENKLE DR 5540 NW HWY LEBANON CHICAGO Ohio Illinois 45036 60630 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.375 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.375 0.095 0.155 0 0 0 0.733 0.21 0.17 0 0 0.0105 0.0275 0.705 0.0025 0.05 0.025 0.06325 0.6398 0.5685 0.125 0.125 0.565 0.678 0 0.069 0.445 0.001 0.671 0 0 0.547 0.1215 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.75 0 0 0 0.75 0.25 0 0 0.5 0.75 0 0 0 0.741685 0.741685 0.733 0 0 0 0.733 0.38 0.335 0 0.015 0.73 0 0.7255 0 0 0.7255 0.038 0 0.6745 0.7125 0.7075 0 0 0 0.7075 0.075 0 0 0.632 0.707 0.70305 0 0 0 0.70305 0.6935 0 0 0 0.6935 0.69 0.0025 0 1.11022E-16 0.6925 0.678 0 0 0.678 0.514 0 0.163 0.677 0.672 0 0 0.672 0 0 0.669 0.669 0.6685 0 0 0 0.6685 0.332 0.331 0.663 0 0 0 0.663 0.049 0.609 0.658 0 0 0 0.658 0.008 0 0.008 0 0 0.65 0.658 0 0.6505 0.6505 0 0 0 0.6505 0 0.634 0.634 0 0 0 0.634 0.003865 0.62815 0.632015 0 0 0 0.632015 0 0.628 0.628 0 0 0 0.628 0 0.00625 0.00625 0 0 0.6215 0.62775 0.125 0.125 0.25 0.0025 0.375 0 0.6275 0.604 0.004 0.608 0 0 0 0.608 0.091 0.5155 0.6065 0 0 0 0.6065 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 20 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00292 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State Zip Code GLASS COATINGS & CONCEPTS 300 LAWTON AVE MONROE Ohio 45050 ALER1S ROLLED PRODUCTS INC 1 REYNOLDS RD ASHVILLE Ohio 43103 ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS 1 NC D/B/A VALSPAR 90 CARSON RD COATINGS CELLU TISSUE/C1TYFOREST LLC 1215 WORDEN AVE E BIRMINGHAM LADYSMITH Alabama Wisconsin 35215 54848 ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION 8500 S WILLOW SPRINGS R WILLOW SPRINGS Illinois 60480 ROLL COATER INC 2604 RIVER RD HAWESVILLE Kentucky 42348 DIAMONDVOGEL PAINTS 5111 E36TH ST N TULSA Oklahoma 74115 HERCULES INC KENEDY TEXAS ONE MILL ST KENEDY Texas 78119 COMPLEX CHEMICALS CO INC MADISON PARISH INDUSTR TALLULAH Louisiana 71282 PRIOR COATED METALS 2233 26TH ST SW ALLENTOWN Pennsylvania 18103 DUCKBACK PRODUCTS 2644 HEGAN LN CHICO California 95928 KLINGER PAINT CO INC 5555 Wl LLOW CREEK DR S\ CEDAR RAPIDS IOWA 52404 CLARIANT CORP - MOUNT HOLLY WEST PLANT 625 E CATAWBA AVE MOUNT HOLLY North Carolina 28120 SOUTHERN CLAY PRODUCTS INC 1335S13TH ST LOUISVILLE Kentucky 40210 FLINT HILLS RESOURCES LP 13775 CLARK RD ROSEMOUNT Minnesota 55068 HYDRITE CHEMICAL CO 114 N MAIN ST COTTAGE GROVE Wisconsin 53527 REICHHOLDINC 249 ST LOUIS AVE VALLEY PARK Missouri 63088 DUPONT FORT MADISON PLANT 801 -35TH ST FORT MADISON Iowa 52627 SPARTAN CHEMICAL CO INC 1110 SPARTAN DR MAUMEE Ohio 43537 CENTRIA 500 PERTH DR NEW ECONC AMBRIDGE Pennsylvania 15003 PARISER INDUSTRIES INC 91 MICHIGAN AVE PATERSON New Jersey 07503 APOLLO CHEMICAL 2001 WILLOW SPRINGS LN BURLINGTON North Carolina 27215 MARY KAY INC 1330 REGAL ROW DALLAS Texas 75247 DUPONT MOUNT CLEMENS PLANT 400 GROESBECK HWY MOUNT CLEMENS Michigan 48043 MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS INC 9651 WESTOVER HILLS BL\ SAN ANTONIO Texas 78251 ALERIS ROLLED PRODUCTS INC 3321 DURHAM RD ROXBORO North Carolina 27573 ARROW GROUP INDUSTRIES INC 1 THIRD AVE HASKELL New Jersey 07420 PLAZEINC 105 BOLTE LN SAINT CLAIR Missouri 63077 TERNIUM USA INC 2500 RON BEAN BLVD SHREVEPORT Louisiana 71115 CLARIANT CORP MARTIN PLANT 788 CHERT QUARRY RD MARTIN South Carolina 29836 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.5905 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.002 0.119 0.4695 0.217 0.3715 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.5925 0 0 0.5925 0.5885 0 0 0 0.5885 0.5885 0 0 0 0.5885 0 0.536 0 0.0115 0.09493 0.3 0 0.5605 0.559 0 0.0025 0.55 0 0.261075 0 0.0675 0 0.5275 0.230495 0.00026 0.0025 0 0.0025 0.0025 0.509 0.0125 0.125 0 0.05 0.58 0.568 0.03923 0.225 0.568 0 0.00084 0.0555 0.125 0 0.55 0.2888 0.544 0 0.5315 0 0.000002 0 0.524 0.517 0.5105 0.1925 0 0.496 0.0025 0 0.586 0.58 0.5795 0.13416 0.525 0.568 0.5605 0.55984 0.0555 0.1275 0.55 0.55 0.549875 0.544 0.0675 0.5315 0.5275 0.230497 0.00026 0.5265 0.517 0.513 0.195 0.509 0.5085 0.1275 0.5865 0 0 0 0 0.0515 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.375 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.44255 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.425 0 0 0 0 5E-05 0 0 0.4645 0 0 0 0.296825 0.5265 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3165 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5865 0.586 0.58 0.5795 0.57671 0.5765 0.568 0.5605 0.55984 0.5555 0.5525 0.55 0.55 0.549925 0.544 0.532 0.5315 0.5275 0.527322 0.52676 0.5265 0.517 0.513 0.5115 0.509 0.5085 0.5025 Page 21 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00293 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City ARCADIA INC SILBONDCORP FERRO GLASS & COLOR CORP EVON1K DEGUSSA CORP TIPPECANOE LABORATORIES 3225 E WASHINGTON BLVD VERNON 9901 SAND CREEK HWY WESTON W WYLIE AVE WASHINGTON 1650 LILLY RD LAFAYETTE State Zip Code California 90023 Michigan 49289 Pennsylvania 15301 Indiana 47909 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.125 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.375 0.375 0.125 0.125 0.375 0.375 0.125 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.5 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 FORMULA CORP 4432CSTNE AUBURN BEHR PROCESS CORP ALLENTOWN 7529 MORRIS CT BLDG 500 ALLENTOWN TRAD NA INC 210 BILL BRYAN BLVD HOPKINSVILLE CLEAN HARBORS EL DORADO LLC 309 AMERICAN CIR UNION EL DORADO FULLER BRUSH CO ONE FULLER WAY GREAT BEND TYSON FRESH MEATS INC HWY 35/IBP AVE DAKOTA CITY NAZDAR CHICAGO 1087 N N BRANCH ST CHICAGO SNAP-ON TOOLS MANUFACTURINGCO 2600 US HWY 18 E ALGONA ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR 5400 23RD AVE COATINGS SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 2802 W MILLER RD MOLINE GARLAND CLEVELAND STEEL CONTAINER CORP - STREETSBORO PLANT 10048 AURORA-HUDSON R[ STREETSBORO WASHINGTON 98002 Pennsylvania 18106 Kentucky 42240 Arkansas 71730 Kansas 67530 NEBRASKA 68731 Illinois 60622 Iowa 50511 Illinois 61265 Texas Ohio 75041 44241 ROCKTENN CO HEXION SPECIALTY CHEMICALS INC VISTA PAINT CORP UNIVAR USA INC SALEM BRANCH SOUTHWEST DISTRIBUTING CO FORREST PAINT CO SEYMOUR OF SYCAMORE INC NB COATINGS INC PFI INC RODDA PAINT CO NELCO PRODUCTS INC ELEMENTIS SPECIALTIES NASCOTE INDUSTRIES 2301 S 21 ST ST CLINTON Iowa 52732 8600 W 71 ST ST BEDFORD PARK Illinois 60501 2020 E ORANGETHORPE A\ FULLERTON California 92831 COLONIAL RD SALEM Massachusetts 01970 539 S DREW ST MESA Arizona 85210 1011 MCKINLEY ST EUGENE Oregon 97402 917 CROSBY AVE SYCAMORE ILLINOIS 60178 2701 E 170TH ST LANSING Illinois 60438 9215 SANTA FE SPRINGS Ri SANTA FE SPRINGS California 90670 6123 N MARINE DR PORTLAND Oregon 97203 1107 E KIMBERLY ANAHEIM California 92801 400 CLAREMONT AVE JERSEY CITY New Jersey 07304 18310 ENTERPRISEAVE NASHVILLE Illinois 62263 0.125 0.0066 0 0 0.161 0.005 0.142 0.0055 0.207 0.0025 0.0045 0 0 0.4065 0.001 0.0005 0.1755 0.3785 0.4065 0.43 0.427 0.033 0.1125 0.149425 0 0.0113 0.48455 0.0098 0.3215 0.005 0.3315 0.465 0.263 0.0275 0.4635 0.466 0.458 0 0.001 0 0.2615 0.0555 0.00175 0 0.0025 0.395 0.3155 0.278235 0.125 0.0179 0.48455 0.0098 0.4825 0.01 0.4735 0.4705 0.47 0.03 0.468 0.466 0.458 0.4065 0.002 0.0005 0.437 0.434 0.40825 0.43 0.4295 0.428 0.428 0.42766 0 0 0 0 0 0.245 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.482 0 0.2205 0 0 0.375 0 0 0.474515 0 8.67362E-18 0 0.0025 0 0 0.439 0 0 0 0 0 0.0405 0 0.4405 0 0.442 0 0 0 0 0 0.0235 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.4999 0.48455 0.484315 0.4825 0.4755 0.4735 0.473 0.47 0.469 0.468 0.466 0.458 0.447 0.4425 0.4425 0.437 0.434 0.43175 0.43 0.4295 0.428 0.428 0.42766 Page 22 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00294 Facility Name ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION GEMINI COATINGS INC BEHR PROCESS CORP - CHICAGO MAGNABLEND INC-CENTRAL PLANT BRADLEY COATINGS GROUP ROLLEX CORP NALCO CO TU LSA PLANT 102 INCH EM CORP SIKA CORP SIKA SARNAFIL DIV IMS ENGINEERED PRODUCTS LLC ZSCH1MMER& SCHWARZ INTERNATIONAL PAINT LLC QU EST CHEMICAL CORP TOWER PRODUCTS INC PATRIOT PAINT LLC BRYCE CO LLC JASPER RUBBER PRODUCTS INC MARCH EM TECH NOLOGIES LLC FUCHS LUBRICANTS CO-CORPORATE OFFICE FLINT GROUP NORTH AMERICA CORP METAL COATERS OF CALIFORNIA INC TYSON FRESH MEATS INC JOSLIN IL MIDWEST METAL COATINGS IVC INDUSTRIAL COATINGS INC AKZONOBELCOATINGS INC COMBE PRODUCTS INC CELLO PROFESSIONAL PRODUCTS EXXONMOBIL REFINING & SUPPLY BATON ROUGE REFINERY FORD MOTOR CO CHICAGO ASSEMBLY Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State Zip Code 3300 BALL ST BIRMINGHAM Alabama 35234 2300 HOLLOWAY DR EL RENO OKLAHOMA 73036 270 STATE ST CHICAGO HEIGHTS Illinois 60411 1601 W HWY 287 BYPASS WAXAHACHIE Texas 75165 608 W CRAWFORD AVE CONNELLSVILLE Pennsylvania 15425 800 CHASEAVE ELK GROVE VILLAG Illinois 60007 6717 S 61STW AVE TULSA Oklahoma 74131 800 CEL-RIVER RD ROCK HILL South Carolina 29730 100 DAN RD CANTON Massachusetts 02021 ONE INNOVATION DR DES PLAINES ILLINOIS 60016 70 GA HWY 22 W MILLEDGEVILLE GEORGIA 31061 6001 ANTOINE DR HOUSTON Texas 77091 12255 FM 529 HOUSTON Texas 77041 2703 FREEMANSBURGAVE EASTON Pennsylvania 18045 304 S BLAINE PIKE PORTLAND INDIANA 47371 450 S BENTON ST SEARCY ARKANSAS 72143 1010 FIRST AVE JASPER Indiana 47546 20851 S SANTA FE AVE LONG BEACH California 90810 17050 SLATHROP AVE HARVEY Illinois 60426 104 NATIONAL DR ANNISTON Alabama 36207 9133 CENTER AVE RANCHO CUCAMON California 91730 HWY 92 & 1-88 28424 38TH A HILLSDALE Illinois 61257 9 KONZEN CT GRANITE CITY ILLINOIS 62040 1825 E NATIONAL AVE BRAZIL INDIANA 47834 120 FRAN KLIN RD PONTIAC Michigan 48341 EL DUQUE INDUSTRIAL PAF NAGUABO Puerto Rico 00718 1354 OLD POST RD HAVRE DE GRACE Maryland 21078 4045 SCENIC HWY BATON ROUGE Louisiana 70805 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.3735 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.048 0.4005 0.0025 0.0291 0.0496 0.0025 0 0.28171 0 0 0.3955 0 0 0.0025 0.125 0 0.3895 0.0025 0.375 0.0025 0.375 0.0025 0.375 0.375 0 0.375 0 0.375 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0 0.3715 0 0.185 0.185 0.033515 0.33515 0.015 0.0025 0.3 0.067 0.07321 0.29284 0.0915 0.0075 0 0 0.3525 0.0015 0.16 0.0015 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.4215 0 0 0.4215 0.403 0.0025 0 0 0.4055 0.0787 0 0.326 0 0.4047 0.0025 0 0.4 0.4025 0.28171 0 0 0.11381 0.39552 0.3955 0 0 0.3955 0 0 0 0.3935 0.3935 0.1275 0 0.264 0.3915 0.3895 0 0 0 0.3895 0.3775 0 0.0025 0.38 0.3775 0 0 0.3775 0.3775 0 0 0 0.3775 0.375 0 0 0 0.375 0.375 0 0 0.375 0.375 0 0 0 0.375 0.25 0 0 0.125 0.375 0 0 0.375 0.375 0 0 0.375 0.375 0.3715 0 0 0 0.3715 0.37 0 0 0.37 0.368665 0 0 5.55112E-17 0.368665 0.0175 0.11 0.03 0.21 0.3675 0.367 0 0 0 0.367 0.36605 0 0 5.55112E-17 0.36605 0.099 0 0.2635 0.3625 0 0 0.3615 0.3615 0.354 0 0 0.354 0.1615 0.19 0 0 0.3515 12600 S TORRENCE AVE CHICAGO Illinois 60633 0.35 0 0.35 0 0 0.35 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 23 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00295 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO LONGABERGERCO INEOS OXIDE A DIV OF INEOS AMERICAS LLC QUEST SPECIALTY COATINGS LLC MENOMONEEFALLS Address City State Zip Code 180 CANALST TERRE HAUTE Indiana 5565 RAIDERS RD FRAZEYSBURG Ohio 21255AHWY 1 S PLAQUEMINE Louisiana N92W14701 ANTHONY AVE MENOMONEE FALLS WISCONSIN 47808 43822 70765 53051 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.0235 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.06 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.0835 0 0 0.2665 0.35 0.2105 0.01425 0.22475 0 0 0.125 0.34975 0.318275 0.02926 0.347535 0 0 5.55112E-17 0.347535 0.3475 0 0.3475 0 0 0 0.3475 INX INTERNATIONAL INK CO 1000 MAPLE AVE HOMEWOOD Illinois 60430 PACKAGING CORP OF AMERICACOUNCE MILL HWY 57 COUNCE Tennessee 38326 DIVERSIFIED COATING SYSTEMS INC 309 ECHELON RD GREENVILLE SOUTh SOUTH CAROL 29605 SIERRA CORP 11400W 47TH ST MINNETONKA Minnesota 55343 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS AUTOMOTIVE FINISHES CORP 395 BOGGS LN - S RICHMOND Kentucky 40475 BECKER SPECIALTY CORP 2500 DELTA LN ELK GROVE VILLAGI Illinois 60007 AMER1MAX HOME PRODUCTS INC 450 RICHARDSON DR LANCASTER Pennsylvania 17603 ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR 411 N DARLING COATINGS FREMONT Michigan 49412 GATES CORP 630 US HWY 150 E GALESBURG Illinois 61401 ENGLERTINC 1200 AM BOY AVE PERTH AMBOY NEW JERSEY 08861 ENERGIZER BATTERY MANUFACTURING INC 75 SWANTON RD SAINT ALBANS Vermont 05478 AMERIMAX COATED PRODUCTS 215 PHILLIPS324 RD HELENA ARKANSAS 72342 CURTIS METAL FINISHING CO 9917 N ALPINE MACHESNEY PARK Illinois 61115 LINETEC 725 S 75TH AVE WAUSAU Wisconsin 54401 FORD MOTOR CO MICHIGAN ASSEMBLY PLANT 38303 MICHIGAN AVE WAYNE Michigan 48184 ET PRODUCTS CO INC 747 DOUGLAS RD BREMEN Indiana 46506 AMERICAN METALS CORP 1000 CROCKER RD WESTLAKE Ohio 44145 MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS INC 3725 N FIRST ST SAN JOSE California 95134 ATMI MATERIALS LTD 706 HOUSTON CLINTON DR BURNET Texas 78611 MUTI-PACK LLC 8372 N STEVEN RD MILWAUKEE Wisconsin 53223 VIDEOJET TECHNOLOGIES INC 1855 ESTES AVE ELK GROVE VILLAGI Illinois 60007 TRITECH COATINGS CORP 1378 KINGSLANDAVE PAGEDALE Missouri 63133 ENTHONEINC 350 FRONTAGE RD WEST HAVEN Connecticut 06516 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 2150 W SAND LAKE RD ORLANDO Florida 32809 SUMTER COATINGS INC 2410 HWY 15S SUMTER South Carolina 29150 0.00566 0.0215 0.0035 0.336 0.3175 0.0275 0.0095 0.31 0 0.1315 0.0025 0 0.22 0.0205 0.0015 0 0 0 0.050745 0.29 0 0.194 0.005595 0 0.058 0 0 0.334 0 0.0185 0.3075 0.323 0.021 0 0.187 0.157 0.30835 0.0875 0.2815 0.3 0.3 0.296 0.295 0.000765 0 0.287 0.0925 0.279675 0.002 0.1755 0.00566 0.0215 0.3375 0.336 0.336 0.335 0.3325 0.331 0 0.3185 0.1595 0.30835 0.3075 0.302 0.3015 0.3 0.296 0.295 0.05151 0.29 0.287 0.2865 0.28527 0.002 0.2335 0 0.32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3395 0 2.08167E-17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.329 0 0 0.157 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.23997 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2765 0 0.0425 0.34516 0.3415 0.3375 0.336 0.336 0.335 0.3325 0.331 0.329 0.3185 0.3165 0.30835 0.3075 0.302 0.3015 0.3 0.296 0.295 0.29148 0.29 0.287 0.2865 0.28527 0.2785 0.276 Page 24 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00296 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State Zip Code SPRAYLATCORP 716 S COLUMBUSAVE MOUNTVERNON New York 10550 INTEL CORP 4100 SARA RD MS RR5-491 RIO RANCHO New Mexico 87124 STANDARD PAINTS INC 940 S 6TH AVE MANSFIELD Texas 76063 QUANTUM MARKETING INC 3606 CRAFTSMAN BLVD LAKELAND Florida 33803 PPG ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES INC 400S13TH ST LOUISVILLE Kentucky 40203 SERIGRAPH INC 3801 E DECORAH RD WEST BEND Wisconsin 53095 HENKEL CORP 23343 SHERWOOD AVE WARREN Michigan 48091 IVC INDUSTRIAL COATINGS INC 550-560 W CENTENNIAL BL\ CASA GRANDE Arizona 85222 MASCO RETAIL CABINET GROUP SAYRE PENNSYLVANIA 217LAMOKARD PLANT ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO 395 JAMES AVE SAYRE SAINT PAUL PENNSYLVANIA 18840 Minnesota 55102 ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO 350 ROOSEVELT AVE CARTERET New Jersey 07008 HENTZEN COATINGS,INC BATAVIA FACILITY 1500 LATH EM ST BATAVIA Illinois 60510 PPG INDUSTRIES ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES 1886 LYNNBURY WOODS RI DOVER Delaware 19904 BACHMAN SERVICES INC 2220 S PROSPECT OKLAHOMA CITY Oklahoma 73129 BF GOODRICH TIRE MANUFACTURING 18906 US 24 E WOODBURN Indiana 46797 MOC PRODUCTS CO INC 12306 MONTAGUE ST PACOIMA California 91331 ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO 1610 E HIGHLAND RD TWINSBURG Ohio 44087 RESEARCH SOLVENTS & CHEMICALS INC 402 INDUSTRIAL PARK DR PELHAM Alabama 35124 MISCO PRODUCTS CORP 1048STINSON DR READING Pennsylvania 19605 METAL COATERS OF GEORGIA 1150 MARIETTA INDUSTRIA MARIETTA Georgia 30062 MAGNI INDUSTRIES INC 10250 TOEBBEN DR INDEPENDENCE KENTUCKY 41051 KEYSTONE ANILINE CORP 2165 HWY 292 INMAN South Carolina 29349 EQUILON CARSON TERMINAL 20945 S WILMINGTON AVE CARSON California 90810 CHEMICAL SPECIALISTS & DEVELOPMENT INC 9733 MEADOR RD CONROE Texas 77303 BECKER SPECIALTY CORP 15310 ARROW BLVD FONTANA California 92335 YENKIN-MAJESTIC PAINT CORPORAT ION 1920 LEONARD AVE COLUMBUS Ohio 43219 MALCO PRODUCTS INC 361 FAIRVIEWAVE BARBERTON Ohio 44203 HEXION SPECIALTY CHEMICALS INC 400 E COTTAGE PL CARPENTERSVILLE Illinois 60110 PREMIER INK SYSTEMS INC 10420 N STATE ST HARRISON Ohio 45030 BRYCE CO LLC 4505 OLD LAMAR AVE MEMPHIS Tennessee 38118 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.0135 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.2605 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.274 0 0 0.274 0.0025 0.2705 0.273 0 0 0.273 0 0.239 0.239 0 0 0.03 0.269 0.268 0 0.268 0 0 0.268 0 0.2655 0.2655 0 0.0015 0.267 0.0325 0.232 0.2645 0 0 0.2645 0.125 0.125 0.25 0 0.0125 0.2625 0.0520125 0.20805 0.2600625 0 0 0.2600625 0 0.26 0.26 0 0 0.26 0.2475 0.012 0.2595 0 0 0 0.2595 0.2305 0.029 0.2595 0 0 0.2595 0.23381 0.025645 0.259455 0 0 0 0.259455 0.0025 0.0025 0.005 0 0.25 0.255 0.125 0.125 0.25 0 0 0.0025 0.2525 0.0025 0.125 0.1275 0 0 0.125 0.2525 0.125 0.0025 0.1275 0 0 0.125 0.2525 0.2295 0.021 0.2505 0 0 0 0.2505 0.125 0.125 0.25 0 0 0.25 0.125 0.125 0.25 0 0 0.25 0.0035 0.2465 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0.125 0.125 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0.125 0.125 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0.125 0.125 0.25 0 0 0.25 0.125 0.125 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0.125 0.125 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0.125 0.125 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0.125 0.125 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0.025 0.221 0.246 0 0 0.004 0.25 0.125 0 0.125 0 0.125 0.25 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0.125 0.25 Page 25 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00297 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State Zip Code AMERICAN COLORS INC DISPERSION PLANT SANDUSKY OHIO DUPONT FAYETTEVILLE PLANT 1110 EDGEWATER AVE 22828 NC HWY 87 W SANDUSKY FAYETTEVILLE OHIO 44870 NORTH CAROL 28306 CAR PRODUCTS INC 630 BEAULIEU ST HOLYOKE Massachusetts 01040 WORLDCOLOR ATGLEN 4581 LOWER VALLEY RD ATGLEN Pennsylvania 19310 KIK-SOCALINC 9028 DICE RD SANTA FE SPRINGS California 90670 BERGQUIST CO 301 WASHINGTON ST CANNON FALLS Minnesota 55009 DYCO PAINTS INC 5850 ULMERTON RD CLEARWATER Florida 33760 SUN CHEMICAL CORP 3301 HUNTING PARKAVE PHILADELPHIA Pennsylvania 19132 CHEMTURACORP - TAFT PLANT 471 HWY 3142 KILLONA Louisiana 70066 CHRYSLER GROUP LLC STERLING STAMPING PLANT (PART) PPG INDUSTRIES OHIO INC CIRCLEVILLE OH 35777 VAN DYKE 559 PITTSBURGH RD STERLING HEIGHTS Michigan CIRCLEVILLE Ohio 48312 43113 CERTIFIED ENAMELING INC 3342 EMERY ST LOS ANGELES California 90023 ACTEGA KELSTARINC 1050 TAYLORS LN CINNAMINSON New Jersey 08077 PERMA-PIPEOIL & GAS 5008-11 CURTIS LN NEW IBERIA Louisiana 70560 RHODIA INC 577 BANKHEAD HWY WINDER Georgia 30680 COLWELL INC 231 S PROGRESS DR E KENDALLVILLE Indiana 46755 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION INC SAINT GABRIEL FACILITY 3905 HWY 75 SAINT GABRIEL Louisiana 70776 ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO 4550 NE EXPRESSWAY DORAVILLE Georgia 30340 FLINT GROUP NORTH AMERICA 4675 W PARK DR ATLANTA Georgia 30339 WARREN OIL CO - NC 2340 US 301 N DUNN North Carolina 28335 BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE GROUP - RENTON 8TH & LOGAN AVE N RENTON Washington 98055 UNION CARBIDE CORP SOUTH CHARLESTON FACILITY 437 MACCORKLE AVE SW SOUTH CHARLESTC West Virginia 25303 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.125 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.125 0 0 0.125 0.25 0.247 0 0.247 0 0 0 0.247 0.238 0 0.238 0 0 0.238 0.2285 0.0095 0.238 0 0 0 0.238 0.2365 0 0.2365 0 0 0.2365 0.069 0.167 0.236 0 0 0 0.236 0 0.236 0.236 0 0 0 0.236 0.035 0.199 0.234 0 0 0 0.234 0.069 0.163 0.232 0 0 0 0.232 0.228 0 0.228 0 0 0 0.228 0.055 0.171 0.226 0 0 0 0.226 0.0025 0.22 0.2225 0 0 0.2225 0.003 0.0085 0.0115 0 0 0.211 0.2225 0.22 0 0.22 0 0 0.22 0.16 0.056 0.216 0 0 0.216 0.195 0.02 0.215 0 0 0 0.215 0.106 0.1065 0.2125 0 0 0 0.2125 0.158 0.0535 0.2115 0 0 0.2115 0.105 0.105 0.21 0 0 0 0.21 0.2075 0.0005 0.208 0 0 0 0.208 0.086 0.1115 0.1975 0 0.0075 0.205 0.139 0.0655 0.2045 0 0 0.2045 FIRST AMERICAN RESOURCES CO 2030 RIVERVIEW1NDUSTRI. MABLETON BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE GROUP NORTH BOEING 7500 E MARGINAL WAY S FIELD (PART) RUDD CO INC 1141 NW50TH ST SEATTLE SEATTLE UNIVERSAL CHEMICALS & COATINGS INC 1975 FOX LN ELGIN INTEL CORP - RONLER ACRES CAMPUS 2501 NW229TH ST HILLSBORO Georgia Washington 30126 98108 Washington ILLINOIS Oregon 98107 60123 97124 0 0.059 0.185 0 0.0025 0.203 0.1005 0.0125 0.196 0.19 0.203 0.1595 0.1975 0.196 0.1925 0 0 0.04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.203 0 0.1995 0 0.1975 0 0.196 0 0.1925 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 26 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00298 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State Zip Code U.S. NAVY NAVAL AIR STATION JACKSONVILLE 6500 ROOSEVELT BLVD BU JACKSONVILLE HADCO (SANMINA) CORP - OWEGO DIV 1200 TAYLOR RD OWEGO ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR 1991 S WHEELING RD COATINGS WHEELING FLORIDA New York Illinois 32212 13827 60090 QUAD GRAPHICS NASHVILLE 2947 BRICK CHURCH PIKE NASHVILLE TENNESSEE 37207 LAMBERTI USA INC WHARTON CHEMICAL COMPLEX HWY 59 AT COUNTY RD 212 HUNGERFORD Texas 77448 SILGAN WHITE CAP CORP 1701 WILLIAMSBURG PIKE RICHMOND Indiana 47375 BYK USA INC 524 S CHERRY ST WALLINGFORD Connecticut 06492 ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO 11109 S CHOCTAW DR BATON ROUGE Louisiana 70815 CHAMPION TECHNOLOGIES INC 115 PROCTOR ODESSA Texas 79762 ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION 7710 POLK ST SAINT LOUIS Missouri 63111 KAY CHEMICAL CO 8300 CAPITAL DR GREENSBORO North Carolina 27409 AMREPINC 990 INDUSTRIAL PARK DR MARIETTA Georgia 30062 SUPERIOR SOLVENTS & CHEMICALS 320 NORTHPOINTE DR FAIRFIELD Ohio 45014 ANCHOR PAINT MANUFACTURING CO INC 6707E14TH ST TULSA Oklahoma 74112 ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR 1717 ENGLISH RD COATINGS HIGH POINT North Carolina 27261 INTEL CORP 4500 S DOBSON RD MAIL S' CHANDLER Arizona 85248 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 1891 DUFFY RD FERNLEY Nevada 89408 SUPERIOR SOLVENTS & CHEMICALS 4211 BRAMERS LN LOUISVILLE Kentucky 40216 PLAZEINC 113BOLTE LN SAINT CLAIR Missouri 63077 BAKER PETROLITE CORP 9100W21ST ST SAND SPRINGS Oklahoma 74063 MID-STATES PAINT & CHEMICAL CO 9315 WATSON INDUSTRIAL 3RESTWOOD Missouri 63126 SONOCO FLEXIBLE PACKAGING 6502 S US HWY 31 N EDINBURGH Indiana 46124 CENTRAL MOTOR WHEEL OF AMERICA (DBA CMWA) 125 WHEAT DR PARIS Kentucky 40361 GOJO INDUSTRIES INC 3783 STATE RD CUYAHOGA FALLS OHIO 44223 CHASE PRODUCTS CO 2727 GARDNER RD BROADVIEW Illinois 60155 DAVIS-FROSTINC 3420 CANDLER'S MOUNTAIN LYNCHBURG VIRGINIA 24506 BLENTECH CORP 1305 RYE ST HOUSTON Texas 77029 ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR 3050 HANFORD DR COATINGS LEBANON Pennsylvania 17046 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.07 0.0045 0.0635 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.045 0.1725 0.1165 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.115 0.05 0 0.025 0.19 0.177 0 0.0109 0.1879 0.18 0 0 0.18 0.1585 0.0405 0.05 0.17 0.1625 0.1615 0.1685 0.0075 0.054 0.02254 0.16 0.0635 0.0185 0 0.125 0.004 0.011 0.008 0 0.1575 0.1085 0 0 0.0965 0.0025 0.0005 0.0045 0.152 0.123525 0.151 0 0 0.0015 0.0005 0.1415 0.0125 0.0635 0.154 0.002 0 0 0.013275 0 0.14951 0.1475 0.0001295 0.145 0 0.0025 0.0725 0.177 0.0405 0.175 0.174 0.1735 0.1695 0.1685 0.165 0.1625 0.02254 0.16 0.16 0.1565 0.0025 0.0045 0.152 0.1368 0.151 0.14951 0.1475 0.0016295 0.1455 0.1415 0.015 0.136 0 0.0455 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0905 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.138295 0 0 0 0.177 0.1765 0.175 0.174 0.1735 0.1695 0.1685 0.165 0.1625 0.160835 0.16 0.16 0 0.1565 0 0.152 0.1545 0 0.147585 0.152085 0 0 0.152 0 0.014705 0.151505 0 0.151 0 0 0.14951 0 0 0.1475 0.1442 0.1458295 0 0 0.1455 0 0 0.1415 0 0.125 0.14 0 0 0.136 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 27 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00299 Facility Name ISP SYNTHETIC ELASTOMERS LP ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION POWER SERVICE PRODUCTS INC UNITED LABORATORIES INC RESEARCH SOLVENTS & CHEMICALS INC PERMATEX SOLON ONESOURCE COIL COATERS OAKLEY INC N1CCA USA INC WESTERN TUBE & CONDUIT CORP BRENNTAG GREAT LAKES LLC RR STREET & CO INC BASF CORP GE WATER & PROCESS TECHNOLOGIES ORANGE FACILITY CHEMICALS INC COASTAL CHEMICAL CO LLC DELTA HOUSTON ELANTAS PDG INC ELECTRO PLATE CIRCUITRY INC JOHNSON BRYCE INC ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO WEBB CHEMICAL SERVICE CORP CERAM-TRAZCORP CERAMIC INDL COATINGS (DBA) COLUMBIA PAINT CORP CLEANING SYSTEMS INC CHEMETALLUS INC EXXONMOBIL OIL CORP - TORRANCE REFINERY BERRYMAN PRODUCTS INC AMERICAN JETWAY CORP AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INC Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State Zip Code 1615 MAIN ST PORT NECHES TEXAS 77651 2351 CHANNEL AVE MEMPHIS Tennessee 38113 513 PEASTER HWY WEATHERFORD Texas 76086 320 37TH AVE SAINT CHARLES Illinois 60174 133 BAIN DR LAVERGNE Tennessee 37086 6875 PARKLAND BLVD SOLON Ohio 44139 5110 140TH AVE CLEARWATER FLORIDA 33760 1 ICON FOOTHILL RANCH California 92610 1044 S NELSON RD FOUNTAIN INN South Carolina 29644 2001 E DOMINGUEZ ST LONG BEACH CALIFORNIA 90810 14765W BOBOLINKAVE MENOMONEE FALLS Wisconsin 53051 2353 S BLUE ISLAND AVE CHICAGO Illinois 60608 3455 SOUTH PORT RD SPARTANBURG South Carolina 29302 3901 WILLIAMS DR ORANGE Texas 77630 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.132 0.1215 0.0085 0.125 0.0025 0.125 0.0025 0.125 0.0025 0.0025 0.125 0.0025 0.125 0.0025 0.125 0.0025 0.125 0.0025 0.125 0.0025 0.125 0.0025 0.125 0.125 0.0025 0.125 0.0025 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.132 0 0 0 0.132 0.13 0 0 0 0.13 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 0.1275 0 0 0.1275 0.1275 0 0 0.1275 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 0.1275 0 0 0.1275 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 0.1275 0 0 0.1275 0.1275 0 0 0.1275 12321 HATCHERVILLERD BAYTOWN Texas 77520 3520 VETERANS MEMORIAL ABBEVILLE 334 TIDAL RD DEER PARK Louisiana Texas 70510 77536 5200 N SECOND ST SAINT LOUIS Missouri 63147 1430 CENTURY DR CARROLLTON TEXAS 75006 276SPKWYW 3930 GLENWOOD DR MEMPHIS CHARLOTTE TENNESSEE 38109 North Carolina 28208 2708 JARMAN MUSKEGON HEIGHT MICHIGAN 49444 325 HWY 81 OSSEO Minnesota 55369 641 JACKSON AVE 1997 AMERICAN BLVD HUNTINGTON DE PERE West Virginia Wisconsin 25704 54115 13177 HURON RIVER DR ROMULUS Michigan 48174 3700 W 190TH ST 3800 ERANDOL MILL RD TORRANCE ARLINGTON CALIFORNIA 90509 Texas 76011 34136 MYRTLE WAYNE MICHIGAN 48184 1431 PROGRESSAVE HIGH POINT North Carolina 27261 0.125 0.0025 0.1275 0 0 0.1275 0.125 0.0025 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 0.125 0.0025 0.1275 0 0 0.1275 0.0025 0.125 0.1275 0 0 0.1275 0.0025 0.125 0.1275 0 0 0.1275 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0.125 0.1275 0.083 0.0425 0.1255 0 0 0 0.1255 0.08 0 0.08 0 0.0455 0.1255 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0.125 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0.125 0 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0.125 0 0.125 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 Page 28 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00300 Facility Name GOLD KEY PROCESSING INC ACTON TECH NOLOGIES INC GOLD EAGLE CO AKCROS CHEMICALS INC WM BARR & CO INC INVISTA SARL - ORANGE SITE KALCOR COATINGS CO MAGNABLENDINC LIQUID PLANT MAINTEXINC NORTHERN COATINGS & CHEMICAL CO INC PPG INDUSTRIES INC SICPA SECURINK CORP TNEMEC CO INC TRANS CHEMICAL INC TYSON FRESH MEATS INC DANLIN INDUSTRIES CORP HERCULES INC FLUID ROUTING SOLUTIONS WATSON LABORATORIES INC UTAH TECH NICAL CHEMICAL CO CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC LANGLEY PLANT AEP INDUSTRIES INC ASHLAND INC - EVENDALE FRAZEE INDUSTRIES ARDEX LABORATORIES INC STOUSEINC SUPERIOR OIL CO INC PILOT CHEMICAL CO ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING INC VEYANCE TECHNOLOGIES INC 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State Zip Code 14910 MADISON RD MIDDLEFIELD OHIO 44062 100 THOMPSON ST PITTSTON Pennsylvania 18640 4400 S KILDARE AVE CHICAGO Illinois 60632 500 JERSEY AVE NEW BRUNSWICK New Jersey 08901 2170 BUOY ST MEMPHIS TENNESSEE 38113 3055AFM 1006 ORANGE TEXAS 77630 37721 STEVENS BLVD WILLOUGHBY Ohio 44094 100 W STERRETT RD WAXAHACHIE Texas 75165 13300 E NELSON AVE CITY OF INDUSTRY California 91746 705 6TH AVE MENOMINEE Michigan 49858 500 PITTSBURGH AVE MCCARRAN Nevada 89434 8000 RESEARCH WAY SPRINGFIELD Virginia 22153 123W23RD AVE NORTH KANSAS CIT Missouri 64116 419 EDE SOTO AVE SAINT LOUIS Missouri 63147 HWY 50 W HOLCOMB Kansas 67851 23737 HWY 47 THOMAS Oklahoma 73669 1111 HERCULESRD HOPEWELL Virginia 23860 1921 N BROAD ST LEXINGTON Tennessee 38351 575, 577, 579CH1PETAWAY SALT LAKE CITY Utah 84108 3327 PIPELINE RD CLEBURNE Texas 76033 403 CARLINE RD LANGLEY South Carolina 29834 1201 S PINE HILL RD GRIFFIN Georgia 30224 2788 GLENDALE-MILFORDF EVENDALE Ohio 45241 6625 MIRAMAR RD SAN DIEGO California 92121 2050 BYBERRY RD PHILADELPHIA Pennsylvania 19116 300 NEW CENTURY PKWY NEW CENTURY Kansas 66031 400 W REGENT ST INDIANAPOLIS Indiana 46225 11623 N HOUSTON ROSSLV HOUSTON Texas 77086 1260 JAMES L HART PKWY YPS1LANTI Michigan 48197 4021 N 56TH ST LINCOLN Nebraska 68504 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.125 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0.125 0 0.125 0.125 0 0.125 0 0.125 0 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0.125 0 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0 0.124456 0 0.123 0 0.1075 0.0155 0.00275 0.12 0.0815 0.04 0 0.12 0.119 0 0.118 0 0.007465 0 0.11 0.0005 0.11 0 7.5E-09 2.5E-09 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0.125 0 0 0.125 0.125 0.124456 0 0 0.124456 0.123 0 0 0.123 0.123 0 0 0.123 0.12275 0 0 0.12275 0.1215 0 0 0.1215 0.12 0 0 0 0.12 0.119 0 0 0.119 0.118 0 0 0.118 0.007465 0 0 0.107 0.114465 0.1105 0 0 0.0005 0.111 0.11 0 0 0 0.11 0.00000001 0 0.10956147 0.10956148 Page 29 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00301 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State Zip Code TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC 13500 N CENTRAL EXPRESS DALLAS Texas 75243 DELTA LABORATORIES INC 3710 COUNTY RD 326 W OCALA Florida 34475 ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS CAROLINA SOLVENTS INC 347 CENTRAL AVE 2274 1ST ST SE BOWLING GREEN Kentucky 42101 HICKORY North Carolina 28602 SKF SEALING SOLUTIONS 900 N STATE ST ELGIN Illinois 60123 CHAMPION TECHNOLOGIES INC 350CENTAURUS RD CORPUS CHRISTI Texas 78405 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 636 E 40TH ST HOLLAND Michigan 49423 ACCURATE DISPERSIONS 192W155TH ST SOUTH HOLLAND Illinois 60473 CCI MANUFACTURING IL CORP 15550 CANAL BANK RD LEMONT Illinois 60439 ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO 200 NE 181 ST ST MIAMI Florida 33162 TWINCO ROMAX 3100W MILL RD MILWAUKEE WISCONSIN 53209 ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO 20915 S WILMINGTON AVE CARSON California 90810 ARCH CHEMICALS INC HWY 933 BRANDENBURG Kentucky 40108 BUZZ! UNICEM USA - GREENCASTLE PLANT 3301 S COUNTY RD150W GREENCASTLE Indiana 46135 BRENNTAG PACIFIC INC 10747 PATTERSON PL SANTA FE SPRINGS California 90670 HARCROS CHEMICALS INC 5200 SPEAKER RD KANSAS CITY Kansas 66106 CE BRADLEY LABORATORIES INC 55 BENNETT DR BRATTLEBORO Vermont 05301 OLDCASTLE BUILDING ENVELOPETENNESSEE FACILITY 920 POTTERTOWN RD MIDWAY Tennessee 37809 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 0.108 0.065 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.1095 0.0005 0.043 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.1095 0 0 0 0.1095 0.1085 0 0 0 0.1085 0.108 0 0 0 0.108 0.1015 0 0.05455 0.1045 0.0825 0 0.0755 0.0995 0.0905 0.042 0.0225 0.0955 0.0245 0.0985 0 0.0025 0 0.0016 0.0015 0.021 0.1035 0.0265 0.00116 0.0095 0.058 0.0775 0.0045 0.0725 0 0.0945 0.104 0 0.05615 0.106 0.1035 0.1035 0.102 0.10066 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.097 0.0985 0.0945 0.0025 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0005 0 0 0 0 0.1065 0 0.1065 0.1065 0 0.05 0.10615 0 0 0.106 0 0.1035 0 0 0.1035 0 0.102 0 0.10066 0 0.1 0 0 0.1 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.002 0.0995 0 0 0.0985 0 0 0.0945 ALLEGHENY PETROLEUM PRODUCTS CO SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO CPJ TECHNOLOGIES TNEMEC CO INC STEELSCAPEINC RANCHO ATHEA LABORATORIES INC COSMETIC LABORATORIES OF AMERICA MRCG-KRAFTMAIDP3 ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INC 999 AIRBRAKE AVE WILMERDING Pennsylvania 15148 0.019 0.0755 0.0945 0 0 0 0.0945 1025 HOWARD ST GREENSBORO North Carolina 27403 0.0065 0.0145 0.021 0 0.0725 0.0935 200 TANNER DR TAYLORS South Carolina 29687 0.034 0.058 0.092 0 0 0.092 2300 EDGEWATER AVE BALTIMORE Maryland 21222 0 0.09 0.09 0 0 0 0.09 11200 ARROW RT RANCHO CUCAMON California 91730 0.0031 0.086845 0.089945 0 0 0 0.089945 7855 N FAULKNER RD MILWAUKEE Wisconsin 53224 0.08874 0.00006 0.0888 0 0 0.0888 20245 SUNBURST ST CHATSWORTH California 91311 0 0.002 0.002 0 0.085 0.087 150 GRAND VALLEY AVE ORWELL Ohio 44076 0 0.069 0.069 0 0 0.0175 0.0865 2461 CROCKER CIR FAIRFIELD California 94533 0.0845 0.001 0.0855 0 0 0 0.0855 5420 SPEAKER RD KANSAS CITY Kansas 66106 0.0755 0.0085 0.084 0 0 0 0.084 1000 INDUSTRIAL PARK DR CLINTON Mississippi 39056 0.082 0 0.082 0 0 0 0.082 Page 30 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00302 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State Zip Code ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION 400 MAIN ST TEWKSBURY Massachusetts 01876 MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP 101 FAIRVIEWAVE PITTSBURGH Pennsylvania 15238 ICI PAINTS PUERTO RICO INC 65 INFANTERIA KM 134 CAROLINA Puerto Rico 00985 CORSICANA TECHNOLOGIES INC 2733EHWY31 CORSICANA Texas 75109 CHEMICAL SOLVENTS JENNINGS ROAD FACILITY 3751 JENNINGS RD CLEVELAND Ohio 44109 IMPERIAL PAINT CO INC 2526 NW YEON AVE PORTLAND OREGON 97210 AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INC 1660 CROSS ST SE SALEM Oregon 97302 WH1TFORD CORP 47 PARK AVE ELVERSON Pennsylvania 19520 CHAMPION TECHNOLOGIES INC 304 IDA RD BROUSSARD Louisiana 70518 PPG INDUSTRIES OHIO INC - DELAWARE 760 PITTSBURGH DR DELAWARE Ohio 43015 WARSAW CHEMICAL CO INC 390 ARGONNERD WARSAW Indiana 46580 LUBRIZOL 9550 W 55TH ST MC COOK Illinois 60525 CARDINAL INDUSTRIAL FINISHES 1329 POTREROAVE SOUTH EL MONTE California 91733 ADCO CLEANING PRODUCTS LLC 900 W MAIN ST SEDALIA Missouri 65301 ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR 901 W UNION ST COATINGS MONTEBELLO California 90640 MRCG-KRAFTMAID PI 16052 INDUSTRIAL PKWY MIDDLEFIELD Ohio 44062 KEY POLYMER 17 SHEPARD ST LAWRENC1 LAWRENCE Massachusetts 01843 VEOLIA ES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LLC 125 FACTORYLN MIDDLESEX New Jersey 08846 WARREN STAMPING PLANT (PART) 22800 MOUND RD WARREN Michigan 48091 KARCHER NORTH AMERICA- PROCHEM 325 S PRICE RD CHANDLER Arizona 85224 ABC COMPOUNDINGCO OF TEXAS INC 1102 AVE J E GRAND PRAIRIE Texas 75050 AMPHENOL APC INC 91 NORTHEASTERN BLVD NASHUA New Hampshire 03062 MINUTEMAN INTERNATIONAL MULTI-CLEAN DIV 600 CARDIGAN RD SHOREVIEW Minnesota 55126 ECOLAB INC 3001 CHANNAHON RD JOLIET Illinois 60436 CHEVRON PRODUCTS CO PASCAGOULAREFINERY 250 INDUSTRIAL RD PASCAGOULA MISSISSIPPI 39581 UNIVAR USA INC 2600 S GARFIELD AVE COMMERCE California 90040 CLEVELAND STEEL CONTAINER- KILGORE 5005 ELDER LAKE RD KILGORE TEXAS 75662 HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR CO OPERATIONS INC 1425 EDEN RD YORK Pennsylvania 17402 3M CO - NEVADA 2120 E AUSTIN BLVD NEVADA Missouri 64772 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.075 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.0045 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.0795 0 0 0 0.0795 0.0565 0.021 0.0775 0 0 0 0.0775 0.050405 0.02682 0.077225 0 0 0 0.077225 0.01949 0.05759 0.07708 0 0 6.7015E-05 0.077147015 0.071 0.00296 0.07396 0 0 0.0025 0.07646 0 0.076 0.076 0 0 0.076 0.045 0.02915 0.07415 0 0 0.07415 0.069255 0.003645 0.0729 0 0 1.38778E-17 0.0729 0.071 0.001 0.072 0 0 0 0.072 0.0695 0.00006 0.06956 0 0 0.06956 0.0465 0.0225 0.069 0 0 0.069 0 0.067 0.067 0 0 0 0.067 0.0475 0.0195 0.067 0 0 0.067 0.022 0.0445 0.0665 0 0 0 0.0665 0.0635 0.002 0.0655 0 0 0 0.0655 0 0.0555 0.0555 0 0 0.01 0.0655 0 0.01365 0.01365 0 0.0507 0.06435 0.045 0.0145 0.0595 0 0.001 0.0605 0.06 0 0.06 0 0 0 0.06 0.0595 0 0.0595 0 0 0.0595 0.0025 0.0565 0.059 0 0 0 0.059 0.0025 0.0549235 0.0574235 0 0 0.0574235 0.0545 0.0025 0.057 0 0 0.057 0.044 0.013 0.057 0 0 0.057 0.055 0 0.055 0 0 0 0.055 0.0505 0.004 0.0545 0 0 0 0.0545 0.0025 0.052 0.0545 0 0 0 0.0545 0.02725 0.0271 0.05435 0 0 0.05435 0.004 0.05 0.054 0 0 0.054 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 31 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00303 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State Zip Code UNIVAR USA INC - TOLEDO BRANCH CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING CO ROCKLINE INDUSTRIES FRANKLIN INTERNATIONAL ECOLABINC ECOLABINC NEWMAN TECHNOLOGY INC HANNA STEEL CORP BENJAMIN MOORE & CO PELL CITY DYSTAR LP CONOCOPHILLIPS OKLAHOMA CITY PRODUCTS TERMINAL 30450 TRACY RD WALBRIDGE 2600 HUNTINGTON DR FAIRFIELD 1113 MARYLAND AVE SHEBOYGAN 2020 BRUCKST COLUMBUS 942 BAKER RD MARTI NSBURG 261 HWY 155 S MC DONOUGH 100 CAIRNS RD MANSFIELD 220 HANNA DR PEKIN 109 BAMBERG DR PELL CITY 209 WATLINGTON INDUSTR REIDSVILLE 4600NE10TH ST OKLAHOMACITY Ohio 43465 California 94533 Wisconsin 53081 Ohio 43207 West Virginia 25405 Georgia 30253 OHIO 44903 Illinois 61554 Alabama 35125 North Carolina 27320 Oklahoma 73117 CHAMPION TECHNOLOGIES INC 3130 FM 521 FRESNO Texas 77545 VALERO REFINING CO - TENNESSEE LLC 2385 RIVERPORT RD MEMPHIS TENNESSEE 38109 AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS INC 412 N MAIN ST CALVERT CITY Kentucky 42029 BARTON SOLVENTS INC BETTENDORF 204 36TH ST BETTENDORF Iowa 52722 UNIVAR USA INC HAMILTON BRANCH 12 STANDEN DR HAMILTON Ohio 45015 EXCEL-POLYMERSLLC HWY 353 S PO BOX 377 JONESBOROUGH Tennessee 37659 GRAPHIC CONTROLS LLC 400 EXCHANGE ST BUFFALO New York 14204 ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR 546 W ABBOTT ST COATINGS INDIANAPOLIS Indiana 46225 LUBRIZOLCORP 29400 LAKELAND BLVD WICKLIFFE Ohio 44092 RECKITT BENCKISER 799 RT 206 & HILLSBOROUC HILLSBOROUGH New Jersey 08844 BRENNTAG SOUTHEAST INC 2000 E PETTIGREW ST DURHAM North Carolina 27703 WATSON STANDARD CO (NEVILLE ISLAND PLANT) 2895 GRAND AVE NEVILLE ISLAND Pennsylvania 15225 UNIVAR USA INC DALLAS DAN MORTON FACILITY 3636 DAN MORTON DR DALLAS Texas 75236 HARCROS CHEMICALS INC 4606NEWWDR PASADENA Texas 77507 CUSTOM SYNTHESIS LLC 1704 DENVER RD ANDERSON South Carolina 29625 ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO 5125W HANNA AVE TAMPA Florida 33634 BARTON SOLVENTS INC KANSAS CITY 901 S 66TH TERRACE KANSAS CITY Kansas 66111 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 630 E 13TH ANDOVER Kansas 67002 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.017 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.0365 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.0535 0 0 0.0535 0.053 0.0005 0.0535 0 0 0.0535 0.0535 0 0.0535 0 0 0.0535 0.0055 0.048 0.0535 0 0 0.0535 0.0385 0.0145 0.053 0 0 0.053 0.0155 0.037 0.0525 0 0 0.0525 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0.049 0.0515 0.0025 0.04811 0.05061 0 0 0 0.05061 0.04945 0.00055 0.05 0 0 0 0.05 0.035 0.015 0.05 0 0 0.05 0.0025 0.0475 0.05 0 0 0.05 0.0495 0.0495 0 0.0115 0.013 0 0.048 0 0.0455 0.0445 0.028 0.038 0.0165 0.015 0.0025 0.0015 0.009 0.0315 0.0001 0 0.049 0.0375 0.036 0.0485 0 0.0465 0 0.001 0.016 0.006 0.027 0.0255 0.04 0.0405 0.0325 0.0095 0.0496 0.0495 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.0485 0.048 0.0465 0.0455 0.0455 0.044 0.044 0.0435 0.0405 0.0425 0.042 0.0415 0.041 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0496 0 0.0495 0 0.049 0 0.049 0 0.049 0 0.0485 0 0.048 0 0.0465 0 0.0455 0 0.0455 0 0.044 0 0.044 0 0.0435 0 0.043 0 0.0425 0 0.042 0 0.0415 0 0.041 Page 32 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00304 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City BRENNTAG SOUTHWEST INC SAND SPRINGS 206 E MORROW RD SAND SPRINGS RECTICEL INTERIORS NORTH AMERICA LLC 1420 INDUSTRIAL PARK DR TUSCALOOSA ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR 2000 WESTHALL ST COATINGS PITTSBURGH AIR PRODUCTS PERFORMANCE MANUFACTURING INC 337 VINCENT DR MILTON State Zip Code Oklahoma 74063 Alabama 35401 Pennsylvania 15233 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.02 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.02 0.0005 0.0395 0.032 0.0075 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.04 0 0 0 0.04 0.04 0 0 0 0.04 0.0395 0 0 0 0.0395 Wisconsin 53563 0.0025 0.037 0.0395 0 0 0.0395 BIOLAB INC HUNTSMAN ADVANCED MATERIALS AMERICAS INC BASF CORP CLEARWATER INTERNATIONAL LLC RICHARDSAPEXINC KEMIRA WATER SOLUTIONS INC CONOCOPHILLIPSCO EAST ST LOUIS TERMINAL CONTINENTAL CEMENT CO LLC SI GROUP INC BRENNTAG NORTHEAST INC UNIVAR USA INC BERKELEY VEOLIA ES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LLC TRANSTAR AUTOBODY TECHNOLOGIES VALSPAR REFINISH DUPONT PARLIN PLANT ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION AMERICAN COATINGS INC COOK COMPOSITES & POLYMERS C O BERNER CHEESE CORP GEORGIA-PACIFIC CHEMICALS LLC ECOLAB VERSO PAPER BUCKSPORTMILL BARTON SOLVENTS INC DES MOINES KWAL-HOWELLS INC (DBA KWAL PAINT INC) SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 1735 DOGWOOD DR CONYERS Georgia 30012 555 HUNTSMAN RD MC INTOSH Alabama 36553 100 INDUSTRIAL BLVD SEAFORD Delaware 19973 100 INDUSTRIAL DR (BLDG LEETSDALE Pennsylvania 15056 4202-24 MAIN ST PHILADELPHIA Pennsylvania 19127 1 CYANAMIDRD MOBILE Alabama 36614 3300 MISSISSIPPI AVE CAHOKIA Illinois 62206 10107 HWY 79 HANNIBAL Missouri 63401 1000 MAIN ST ROTTERDAM JUNC1 New York 12150 81 WHULLERLN READING Pennsylvania 19605 8925 SEEGER INDUSTRIAL 1 BERKELEY Missouri 63134 7 MOBILE AVE SAUGET ILLINOIS 62201 2040 HEISERMAN DR BRIGHTON Michigan 48114 210 CROSBY ST PICAYUNE Mississippi 39466 CHEESEQUAKERD PARLIN New Jersey 08859 2011 TURNER ST LANSING Michigan 48906 10625 MAHAFFEYRD TOMBALL Texas 77375 13511 MAIN ST LEMONT Illinois 60439 2034 E FACTORY RD DAKOTA Illinois 61018 1429 E LUFKIN AVE LUFKIN Texas 75901 18383 E RAILROAD ST CITY OF INDUSTRY California 91748 RIVER RD BUCKSPORT MAINE 4416 1970 NE BROADWAY DES MOINES Iowa 50313 2430 ALBERT BROADFOOT BONHAM Texas 75418 113 STAGE COACH TRAIL GREENSBORO North Carolina 27409 0.03915 0.0125 0.0025 0 0.02673425 0.013 0 0.0351 0 0.01975 0.0295 0.0015 0.016435 0 0.004 0.026 0.0085 0.0075 0 0.0285 0.015 0.0003 0.004 0 0.0045 0 0.0263 0 0 0 0.0235 0.0355 0.000025 0.0245 0.014 0.0035 0.0015 0.01611 0.0315 0.027 0.005 0.022 0.0225 0 0.001 0.0145 0 0.025 0.029 0.024 0.03915 0.0388 0.0025 0 0.02673425 0.0365 0.0355 0.035125 0.0245 0.03375 0.033 0.003 0.032545 0.0315 0.031 0.031 0.0305 0.03 0 0.0295 0.0295 0.0003 0.029 0.029 0.0285 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0095 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.018 0 0 0 0 0 0.03915 0 0.0388 0.036 0.0385 0.038 0.038 0.0103555 0.03708975 0 0.0365 0 0 0.0355 0 0 0.035125 0 0 0.034 0 0 0.03375 0 0 0.033 0 0.03 0.033 0 0 0.032545 0 0 0.0315 0 0 0.031 0 0.031 0 0 0.0305 0 0 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.0295 0 0.0295 0.0112 0.0295 0 0 0.029 0 0 0.029 0 0 0.0285 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 33 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00305 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name BARTON SOLVENTS INC WEST BEND ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO VEOLIA ES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LLC PORT ARTHUR FACILITY DIC IMAGING PRODUCTS USA LLC NORTHERN LABS INC WEST DRIVE SUN CHEMICALCORP BARTON SOLVENTS INC COUNCIL BLUFFS VALERO THREE RIVERS REFINERY BARTON SOLVENTS INC WICHITA DAUBERT CHEMICAL CO ARLON INC ADHESIVES & FILMS DIV KBP COIL COATERS INC GAGE PRODUCTS CO PROCTER & GAMBLE HAIR CARE LLC SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO BASF CORP HERITAGE-WTI INC EXCEL POLYMERSLLC 3M CO-SPRINGFIELD AFTON CHEMICAL CORP PRIDE SOLVENTS & CHEMICAL CO OF NEW JERSEY UNIVAR USA INC - TOLEDO SOUTH BRANCH ECOLABINC STEEL DYNAMICS INC UNIVAR USA INC JACKSONVILLE FA CILITY ZEP COMMERCIAL TAKASAGO1NTERNATIONAL CORP (USA) SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO DAVIES IMPERIAL COATINGS INC SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO Address City State 800 RAILWAY WEST BEND 8901 OLD GALVESTON RD HOUSTON HWY 73,35 MILES W OF TA PORT ARTHUR Wisconsin Texas Texas 7335S10TH ST OAK CREEK Wisconsin 5800 W DR MANITOWOC Wisconsin 135 W LAKE ST NORTHLAKE ILLINOIS 2135 9TH AVE COUNCIL BLUFFS Iowa 301 LEROY ST THREE RIVERS Texas 201 S CEDAR VALLEY CENTER Kansas 4700 S CENTRAL AVE CHICAGO Illinois 2811 S HARBOR BLVD SANTA ANA California 3600 E 44TH AVE DENVER Colorado 625 WAN DA AVE FERNDALE Michigan 2200 LOWER MUSCATINE R IOWA CITY Iowa 11700 S COTTAGE GROVE CHICAGO Illinois 1 JAMESST BELVIDERE New Jersey 1250 ST GEORGE ST EAST LIVERPOOL Ohio 14330 KINSMAN RD BURTON OHIO 3211 E CHESTNUT EXPY SPRINGFIELD Missouri 501 MONSANTO AVE SAUGET ILLINOIS 211 RANDOLPH AVE AVENEL New Jersey 4051 SAVE TOLEDO Ohio 2305 SHERWIN ST GARLAND Texas 4500 COUNTY RD 59 BUTLER Indiana 155 ELLIS RD S JACKSONVILLE Florida 350 JOE FRANK HARRIS PK EMERSON Georgia 267 UNION ST NORTHVALE New Jersey 6795 S MAIN ST MORROW Georgia 1275 STATE ST HAMMOND Indiana 2121 NEW WORLD DR COLUMBUS Ohio Zip Code 53095 77034 77640 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.0015 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.0265 0.0055 0.022 0.026735 0.00006 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.028 0 0 0 0.028 0.0275 0 0 0.0275 0.026795 0 0 3.46945E-18 0.026795 53154 0.0025 0.0235 0.026 0 0 0 0.026 54220 0.025225 0 0.025225 0 0 0.025225 60164 0.0035 0.021 0.0245 0 0 0 0.0245 51502 0.0015 0.0215 0.023 0 0 0.023 78071 0.023 0 0.023 0 0 0 0.023 67147 0.01 0.013 0.023 0 0 0 0.023 60638 0.009615 0.013335 0.02295 0 0 0 0.02295 92704 0 0.0225 0.0225 0 0 0 0.0225 80216 0 0.0225 0.0225 0 0 0 0.0225 48220 0 0.0215 0.0215 0 0 0 0.0215 52240 0.0065 0.01 0.0165 0 0.005 0.0215 60628 0 0 0 0 0 0.0215 0.0215 07823 0 0.02 0.02 0 0 0.001 0.021 43920 0.005 0.000065 0.005065 0 0.0155 0.020565 44021 0 0.02 0.02 0 0 0 0.02 65802 0 0.02 0.02 0 0 0 0.02 62201 0.005 0.015 0.02 0 0 0.02 07001 0.005 0.015 0.02 0 0 0 0.02 43615 0.009 0.01 0.019 0 0 0.019 75041 0.0085 0.01 0.0185 0 0 0.0185 46721 0 0.0185 0.0185 0 0 0 0.0185 32254 0.0145 0.0035 0.018 0 0 0 0.018 30137 0 0.018 0.018 0 0 0 0.018 07647 0.017325 0.000295 0.01762 0 0 0.01762 30260 0.005 0.0125 0.0175 0 0 0 0.0175 46320 0.0175 0 0.0175 0 0 0.0175 43207 0.009 0.0085 0.0175 0 0 0 0.0175 Page 34 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00306 Facility Name UNIVAR USA INC HENKELCORP RUST-OLEUM CORP IN MD AVERY DENNISON PFD HOLLY OAK CHEMICAL INC ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO PRIDE SOLVENT & CHEMICAL CO OF NY INC ETHOX CHEMICALS LLC UNIVAR USA INC - INDIANAPOLIS SIMONIZUSA INC MEADWESTVACO SOUTH CAROLINA LLC COGNISCORP MAULDIN PLANT INTERSTATE CHEMICAL CO INC EXCEL POLYMERS LLC PRC-DESOTO INTERNATIONAL INC CARBOLINECO JOHNSONDIVERSEYINC UNIVAR USA INC TAMPA FACILITY PLASTI-KOTE INC GOODWIN CO VARN INTERNATIONAL TRUE VALUE MANUFACTURING UNIVAR USA INC - SAN JOSE EVONIKDEGUSSACORP BERRIDGE MANUFACTURING CO CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTALSERVICES INC BUCKLEY OIL CO CHEMOLCOINC HYDRITE CHEMICAL CO HENKELCORP Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State Zip Code 21600 DRAKE RD STRONGSVILLE Ohio 44136 421 LONDON RD DELAWARE Ohio 43015 16410 INDUSTRIAL LN WILLIAMSPORT MARYLAND 21795 650 W67TH AVE SCHERERVILLE Indiana 46375 101 CASE ST FOUNTAIN INN South Carolina 29644 1842 ENTERPRISE PKWY TWINSBURG Ohio 44087 6 LONG ISLAND AVE HOLTSVILLE New York 11742 1801 PERIMETER RD GREENVILLE South Carolina 29605 7425 E 30TH ST INDIANAPOLIS Indiana 46219 201 BOSTON TURNPIKE BOLTON Connecticut 06043 400 CROSBY RD DERIDDER Louisiana 70634 1520 OLD STAGE RD MAULDIN South Carolina 29662 2797 FREEDLANDRD HERMITAGE PENNSYLVANl 16148 150 S CONNELL AVE DYERSBURG Tennessee 38024 11601 UNITED ST MOJAVE California 93501 900 OPELOUSASST LAKE CHARLES Louisiana 70601 831116TH ST STURTEVANT Wisconsin 53177 6049 OLD41AHWY TAMPA Florida 33619 1000 LAKE RD MEDINA OHIO 44258 700 PROGRESS CENTER A\ LAWRENCEVILLE Georgia 30043 1333 N KIRK RD BATAVIA Illinois 60510 201 JANDUS RD CARY Illinois 60013 2256 JUNCTION AVE SAN JOSE California 95131 4201 DEGUSSARD THEODORE Alabama 36582 6515 FRATT RD SAN ANTONIO Texas 78218 2247SHWY71 KIMBALL Nebraska 69145 1809 ROCK ISLAND ST DALLAS Texas 75207 2300 RANDOLPH AVE GREENSBORO North Carolina 27406 2545 BOND ST UNIVERSITY PARK Illinois 60466 923 MAULDIN RD CALHOUN Georgia 30701 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.0085 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.009 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.0175 0 0 0.0175 0 0.0165 0.0165 0 0 0.0165 0.0085 0.008 0.0165 0 0 0 0.0165 0.015 0.001 0.016 0 0 0 0.016 0.0153 0 0.0153 0 0 0.0153 0.002 0.013 0.015 0 0 0 0.015 0.0035 0.011 0.0145 0 0 0 0.0145 0.0025 0.012 0.0145 0 0 0.0145 0.0035 0.011 0.0145 0 0 0.0145 0.0135 0.001 0.0145 0 0 0.0145 0 0.0145 0.0145 0 0 0 0.0145 0.006 0.008 0.014 0 0 0.014 0.003 0.011 0.014 0 0 0.014 0 0.0135 0.0135 0 0 0 0.0135 0.006 0.0075 0.0135 0 0 0 0.0135 0 0.0135 0.0135 0 0 0 0.0135 0.001385 0.00943 0.010815 0 0.0025 0.013315 0.005 0.008 0.013 0 0 0.013 0 0.0125 0.0125 0 0 0 0.0125 0.012 0.0005 0.0125 0 0 0.0125 0.0075 0.0025 0.01 0.0025 0 0 0.0125 0.0025 0.00963 0.01213 0 0 0 0.01213 0.002 0.0095 0.0115 0 0 0 0.0115 0.011 0.0005 0.0115 0 0 0 0.0115 0 0.01 0.01 0 0 0 0.01 0.0065 0.0035 0.01 0 0 0 0.01 0.0075 0.0025 0.01 0 0 0 0.01 0 0.009535 0.009535 0 0 0.009535 0 0.0095 0.0095 0 0 0 0.0095 0 0.0095 0.0095 0 0 0.0095 Page 35 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00307 Facility Name SH ERWiN-WI LL1AMS CO SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO DSM DESOTECHINC MULTI-COLOR CORP MARATHON PETROLEUM CO LLC FERRO CORP WALTON HILLS OPERATIONS CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING CO MALLINCKRODT BAKER 1NC US DOD USAF JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State Zip Code 2325 HOLLINS FERRY RD BALTIMORE Maryland 21230 26300 FARGO AVE BEDFORD HEIGHTS Ohio 44146 1101 HWY 27 S STANLEY North Carolina 28164 2281 S US 31 SCOTTSBURG Indiana 47170 50210TH STS TEXAS CITY Texas 77590 7050 KRICK RD WALTON HILLS OHIO 44146 17 LAKE MIRROR RD FOREST PARK Georgia 30297 600 N BROAD ST PHILLIPSBURG New Jersey 08865 6326 ARCTIC WARRIOR DR ELMENDORFAFB ALASKA 99506 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.004 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.0055 0.0005 0.0015 0 0.0093 0 0.008625 0 0.0085 0.0035 0.0005 0.003985 0.003985 0.0075 0 0.005 0.0025 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.0095 0 0 0.0095 0.002 0 0 0.0075 0.0095 0.0093 0 0 0 0.0093 0.008625 0 0 0.008625 0.0085 0 0 0 0.0085 0.004 0 0.0045 0.0085 0.00797 0 0 0.00797 0.0075 0 0 0 0.0075 0.0075 0 0 0 0.0075 RUSTOLEUMCORP INTERSTATE CHEMICAL CO INC DYNALOY LLC BASF CORP NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COATINGS INC DBA NICOAT INC 7850 OHIO RIVER RD 23247 WEAMES ST 6445 OLIVIA LN 1609 BIDDLE AVE 1600 GLEN LAKE AVE LESAGE CHANNAHON INDIANAPOLIS WYANDOTTE ITASCA West Virginia 25537 Illinois 60410 Indiana 46226 Michigan 48192 Illinois 60143 0.0025 0.002 0.0015 0.0025 0.0005 0.005 0.0055 0.006 0.0025 0 0.0075 0.0075 0.0075 0.005 0.0005 0 0 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0075 0 0.0075 0 0.0075 0 0.0075 0 0.007 0.0075 BRULIN CORP FORD MOTOR CO DEARBORN DIVERSIFIED MANUFACTURING MARATHON PETROLEUM CO LLC - SPEEDWAY IN TERMINAL HONEYWELL-PRESTONE PRODUCTS CORP LANCO MANUFACTURING CORP NEW DAWN MANUFACTURING CO UNIVAR USA INC NORCROSSFACILITY SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO VERSO PAPER HOLDINGS LLC PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURINGCO BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA WHITING CONOCOCPHILLIPSCO WICHITA TERMINAL CALLAHAN CHEMICAL CO GOODWIN CO 2920 DR ANDREW J BROWf INDIANAPOLIS 3001 MILLER RD DEARBORN 1304OLIN AVE INDIANAPOLIS Indiana Michigan Indiana 46205 48121 46222 250 HALLS MILL RD FREEHOLD New Jersey URBAPONTE#5 SAN LORENZO Puerto Rico 16001 TRADE ZONE AVE UPPER MARLBORO Maryland 2145 SKY LAND CT NORCROSS Georgia 12401 INDUSTRIAL BLVD VICTORVILLE California ANDROSCOGGIN MILL RILE JAY Maine 1900 KANSAS AVE KANSAS CITY Kansas 2815 INDIANAPOLIS BLVD WHITING Indiana 2400 E 37TH ST N WICHITA KANSAS 200 INDUSTRIAL AVE RIDGEFIELD PARK New Jersey 12361 MONARCH ST GARDEN GROVE California 07728 00754 20774 30071 92392 04239 66105 46394 67219 07660 92841 0.0030875 0.007 0.007 0.0035 0.0068 0.006732805 0.003 0.003 0.0025 0.005915 0.006 0 0.003 0.005 0.00417 0 0 0.0072575 0.007 0.007 0.0035 0.00004 0 0.0035 0.0035 0 0.00018 0 0.0059 0.0025 0.0005 0.007 0.00684 0.006732805 0.0065 0.0065 0.0025 0.006095 0.006 0.0059 0.0055 0.0055 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0035 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0072575 0 0.007 0 0.007 0 0 0.007 0 0.00684 0 0.006732805 0 0.0065 0 0 0.0065 0.0005 0.0065 0 0.006095 0 0 0.006 0 0 0.0059 0 0.0055 0 0.0055 Page 36 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00308 Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State Zip Code HUBBARD-HALLINC 563 S LEONARD ST WATERBURY Connecticut 06708 LUBRIZOLCORP PAiNESVILLE PLANT 155 FREEDOM RD PAINESVILLE Ohio 44077 UNIVAR USA INC - BUNOLA BRANC H 328 BUNOLA RIVER RD BUNOLA Pennsylvania 15020 ENTHONEINC 9809 INDUSTRIAL DR BRIDGEVIEW Illinois 60455 GE WATER & PROCESS TECHNOLOGIES 333 S LOMBARD RD ADDISON ILLINOIS 60101 SHIELD PACKAGING CO INC 50 OXFORD AVE DUDLEY Massachusetts 01571 SARTOMERCO INC 601 TIGHTSQUEEZE INDUS CHATHAM Virginia 24531 UNIVAR USA INC LAKEVILLE 21675 HAMBURG AVE LAKEVILLE Minnesota 55044 PVS NOLWOOD CHEMICALS INC 9000 HUBBELLAVE DETROIT MICHIGAN 48228 INTERNATIONAL PAINT LLC 640 N ROCKY RIVER DR BEREA OHIO 44017 INDEPENDENTS INC 14705 S AVALON BLVD GARDENA California 90248 GE WATER & PROCESS TECHNOLOGIES 2118 REISER AVE SE NEW PHILADELPHIA OHIO 44663 SARTOMERCO INC 610 S BOLMARST WEST CHESTER Pennsylvania 19382 FORD MOTOR CO DEARBORN TOOL & DIE PLANT 3001 MILLER RD DEARBORN Michigan 48121 CR BRANDS INC 141 VENTUREBLVD SPARTANBURG South Carolina 29306 CP INC 196 S WATER CONNERSVILLE Indiana 47331 BRAIN POWER INC 4470 SW 74TH AVE MIAMI Florida 33155 ACTEGA RADCURE INC 5 MANSARD CT WAYNE New Jersey 07470 GE WATER & PROCESS TECHNOLOGIES - BAKERSFIELD 3050 PEGASUS RD BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA 93308 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.0005 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.005 0.0045 0.001 0.0025 0.003 0.00053 0.004765 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.005 0 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.0055 0 0 0.0055 0.0055 0 0 0.0055 0.0055 0 0 0 0.0055 0.005295 0 0 0 0.005295 0.005 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0.005 BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE GROUP PLANT 2 (PART) 7755 E MARGINAL WAY S SEATTLE Washington 98108 CENTRAL SOLUTIONS INC 401 FUNSTON RD BAKER PETROLITE BAYPORT FACILITY 13200 BAY PARK RD EDCO PRODUCTS INC 8700 EXCELSIOR BLVD MEADWESTVACO SC LLC CHARLESTON CHEMICAL PLANT 5598 VIRGINIA AVE KANSAS CITY Kansas 66115 PASADENA Texas 77507 HOPKINS MINNESOTA 55343 NORTH CHARLESTC South Carolina 29406 0.001 0 0.0045 0 0.004475 0 0 0.000135 0.0045 0.000025 0.001 0 0.004635 0.0045 0.0045 0 0.004 0 0.005 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.005 0 0.005 0 0.004635 0 0.0045 0 0.0045 LAFARGE MIDWEST INC (INCLD SYSTECH ENVIRONMENTAL) COGNIS CORP - CHARLOTT E PLANT OMNIUM CUSTOM CHEMICAL FORMULATORS 1400 S CEMENT RD FREDONIA KANSAS 66736 3300 WESTINGHOUSE BLVE CHARLOTTE North Carolina 28273 1280 IMPERIAL RD HAMPTON Iowa 50441 8707 MILLERGROVE DR SANTA FE SPRINGS California 90670 0.0045 0 0.0045 0 0 0 0.0045 0.0045 0 0.0045 0 0 0.0045 0.0015 0.0025 0.004 0 0 0 0.004 0.004 0 0.004 0 0 0.004 Page 37 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00309 Facility Name CHEMTEX LABORATORiESINC ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION NORLITE CORP PENRAY COMPANIES INC PENRAY COMPANIES INC BAKER PETROLITE UNIVAR USA INC DENVER VOGEL PAINT & WAX CO INC UNIVAR USA INC- CINCINNATI OH BRANCH SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 3M COTTAGE GROVE CENTER UNIVAR USA INC CONOCOPHILLiPS MT VERNON PRODUCTS TERMINAL MACDERMIDINC CONOCOPHILLIPS PONCA CITY REFINERY ASTRO CHEMICALS INC UNION SPECIALTIES INC PPG ARCHITECURAL COATINGS HOUSTON CONOCOPHILLIPSCO TREMLEY POINT TERMINAL ECP INC WOODRIDGE MILPORT ENTERPRISES INC BRAINERD CHEMICAL CO INC DOBER CHEMICAL CORP NOV TUBOSCOPE HOLMES ROAD FINGER LAKESCHEMICAL INC ATOTECH USA KEYSTONE CEMENT CO NIACET CORP BIOLAB INC CR BRANDS INC Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address 2725 ARMENTROUT DR 3701 RIVER RD 628 S SARATOGA ST 1801 ESTES AVE 440 DENNISTON CT 5135 BOYLAN ST 4300 HOLLY ST 1020 ALBANY PL SE 4600 DUES DR 404 E MALLORY AVE 10746 INNOVATION RD 3950 NW YEON AVE 15138 HWY 96 City State Zip Code CONCORD North Carolina 28025 TONAWANDA New York 14150 COHOES New York 12047 ELK GROVE VILLAG Illinois 60007 WHEELING Illinois 60090 BAKERSFIELD California 93308 DENVER Colorado 80216 ORANGE CITY Iowa 51041 CINCINNATI Ohio 45246 MEMPHIS Tennessee 38109 COTTAGE GROVE Minnesota 55016 PORTLAND Oregon 97210 MOUNTVERNON Missouri 65712 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.004 0.001 0.003525 0.0005 0.0005 0.003025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0015 0.001 0 0.002 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0 0.003 0.000255 0.0005 0.0005 0.000435 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.002 0.003 0.001 0.00296 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.004 0 0 0.004 0.004 0 0 0.004 0.00378 0 0 0 0.00378 0.001 0.0025 0 0.0035 0.001 0.0025 0 0.0035 0.00346 0 0 0 0.00346 0.003 0 0 0 0.003 0.003 0 0 0 0.003 0.003 0 0 0 0.003 0.003 0 0 0 0.003 0.003 0 0 0 0.003 0.003 0 0 0 0.003 0.00296 0 0 0 0.00296 1221 FARROW AVE FERNDALE Michigan 48220 0.00131 0.00144 0.00275 0 0 0.00275 1000 S PINE ST PONCA CITY Oklahoma 74601 0.0025 0.00016 0.00266 0 0 0 0.00266 126 MEMORIAL DR SPRINGFIELD Massachusetts 01104 0.002 0.0005 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 3 MALCOLM HOYT DR NEWBURYPORT Massachusetts 01950 0.0005 0.002 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 3530 LANG RD HOUSTON Texas 77092 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 FOOT OF S WOOD AVE LINDEN New Jersey 07036 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 11210 KATHERINE'S CROSS WOODRIDGE Illinois 60517 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0.0025 2829 S 5TH CT MILWAUKEE Wisconsin 53207 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0.0025 1200 N PEORIA TULSA OKLAHOMA 74147 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0.0025 14461 WAVERLY AVE MIDLOTHIAN Illinois 60445 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0.0025 2811 HOLMES RD HOUSTON Texas 77051 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 418-424 ST PAUL ST ROCHESTER New York 14605 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0.0025 1750 OVERVIEW DR ROCK HILL South Carolina 29730 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 RT 329 BATH Pennsylvania 18014 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 400 47TH ST NIAGARA FALLS New York 14304 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 101 S PARKER DR ASHLEY INDIANA 46705 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 230 OLD CONVERSE RD SPARTANBURG South Carolina 29307 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0.0025 Page 38 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00310 Facility Name WYNNEWOOD REFINING CO CHEMICAL SOLVENTS INC-DENISON FACILITY BAKER PETROLITE CORP KING INDUSTRIES INC CLARIANT CORP CLEAR LAKE PLANT HENTZEN COATINGS,INC DYNASOL INC UNIVAR USA INC SANTA FE SPRINGS DUPONT EKC TECHNOLOGY CALLAHAN CH EM ICAL CO ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO CRODAINC TARR ACQUISITION LLC BAKER PETROLITE-RAYNE FACILITY VOLTAIX LLC GIANT CEMENT CO BUCKMAN LABORATORIES INC KELLY-MOORE PAINT CO INC HYDRITE CHEMICAL CO NALCO CO - ODESSA PLANT 114 PPG ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS FUJIFILM HUNT CHEMICALS USA INC FIRST SOURCE WORLDWIDE LLC MILWAUKEE MANN DISTRIBUTION SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO MONSANTO CO CLEAN HARBORS DEER PARK LLC BRENNTAG SOUTHEAST INC BENJAMIN MOORE & CO - NEWARK LAFARGE NA (INCLUDING SYSTECH ENV CORP) Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State Zip Code 906 S POWELL WYNNEWOOD Oklahoma 73098 1010 OLD DENNISON AVE CLEVELAND Ohio 44109 16950 WALLISVILLE RD HOUSTON Texas 77049 SCIENCE RD NORWALK Connecticut 06852 9502 BAYPORT BLVD - ETO. PASADENA Texas 77507 6937 W MILL RD MILWAUKEE Wisconsin 53218 330 PINE ST CANTON Massachusetts 02021 13900CARMEN1TARD SANTA FE SPRINGS California 90670 2520 BARRINGTON CT HAYWARD California 94545 18 INDUSTRIAL RD WALPOLE Massachusetts 02081 FREEPORT CENTER BUILDI CLEARFIELD Utah 84016 315 CHERRY LN NEWCASTLE Delaware 19720 2429 N BORTHWICK AVE PORTLAND Oregon 97227 135 INDUSTRIAL DR RAYNE Louisiana 70578 197 MEISTER AVE BRANCHBURG New Jersey 08876 HWY 453 & 1-26 (654 JUDGE HARLEYVILLE South Carolina 29448 1256 N MCLEAN BLVD MEMPHIS Tennessee 38108 1015 COMMERCIAL ST SAN CARLOS California 94070 7300 W BRADLEY RD MILWAUKEE Wisconsin 53223 12205 W COUNTY RD 125 ODESSA Texas 79765 6804 ENTERPRISE DR LOUISVILLE Kentucky 40214 900 CARNEGIE ST ROLLING MEADOWE Illinois 60008 11725W FAIRVIEWAVE MILWAUKEE Wisconsin 53226 3134 POST RD WARWICK Rhode Island 02886 14 INDUSTRIAL PARK FLORA Illinois 62839 2500 WIGGINS RD MUSCATINE Iowa 52761 2027 INDEPENDENCE PKW LA PORTE TEXAS 77571 11750 FRUEHAUF DR CHARLOTTE North Carolina 28273 134 LISTER AVE NEWARK New Jersey 07105 11435 COUNTY RD 176 PAULDING OHIO 45879 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.0025 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 0.0003495 0.002085 0.0024345 0 0 0 0.0024345 0.00125 0.00115 0.0024 0 0 0.0024 0.0023 0 0.0023 0 0 0.0023 0.000875 0.00131 0.002185 0 0 0 0.002185 0.00215 0 0.00215 0 0 0.00215 0.001 0.001 0.002 0 0 0 0.002 0.0005 0.0015 0.002 0 0 0.002 0.0015 0.0005 0.002 0 0 0 0.002 0.0005 0.0015 0.002 0 0 0 0.002 0.001405 0.0005 0.001905 0 0 0.001905 0.001825 0 0.001825 0 0 0 0.001825 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0 0 0.0015 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0 0 0 0.0015 0.001 0.0005 0.0015 0 0 0 0.0015 0 0.0015 0.0015 0 0 0.0015 0 0.0015 0.0015 0 0 0 0.0015 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0 0 0.0015 0 0 0 0 0 0.0015 0.0015 0 0.0008 0.0008 0 0 0.0005 0.0013 0.00105 0.0002 0.00125 0 0 0.00125 0.0011 0.00015 0.00125 0 0 0.00125 0.00112 0 0.00112 0 0 0.00112 0.0005 0.0005 0.001 0 0 0 0.001 0 0.001 0.001 0 0 0 0.001 0.001 0 0.001 0 0 0 0.001 0.0005 0.0005 0.001 0 0 0 0.001 0.001 0 0.001 0 0 0 0.001 0 0.001 0.001 0 0 0 0.001 Page 39 of 40 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00311 Facility Name OMNOVA SOLUTIONS INC NALCO CO MARWICK STANDARD DISTRIBUTION CORP NALCO CO - EVANSVILLE PLANT 108 SURPASS CHEMICAL CO INC NALCO CO PARKER HANNIFIN TECH SEAL DIV LAMBERTI SYNTHESIS USA INC CHEMETALLUS INC IFF AUGUSTA LTD RIKER PRODUCTS INC BAKER PETROLITE KILGORE BLEND PLANT EMERALD SERVICES INC NALCO CO AIR PRODUCTS PERFORMANCE MANUFACTURING INC Table B-2. 2010 Emissions inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City 1455 J A COCHRAN BY-PAS CHESTER 3901 TERRY ST TEXARKANA 60 S SEIBERLING ST AKRON 4900 E YELLOWSTONE HW EVANSVILLE 1254 BROADWAY ALBANY 812 RENAUD DR SCOTT 2600WILCO BLVD WILSON 4001 N HAWTHORNE ST CHATTANOOGA 1610 CLARA ST JACKSON 3005 INTERNATIONAL BLVD AUGUSTA 4901 STICKNEYAVE TOLEDO 806 PALUXYST KILGORE 1825 E ALEXANDERAVE TACOMA 125 NALCO WAY/RT 65 ELLWOOD CITY 474W19THST RESERVE State Zip Code South Carolina 29706 Texas 75501 Ohio 44305 WYOMING 82636 New York 12204 Louisiana 70583 North Carolina 27893 Tennessee 37406 Michigan 49203 Georgia 30906 Ohio 43612 Texas 75662 Washington 98421 Pennsylvania 16117 Louisiana 70084 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.00075 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.00002 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases to Surface Total Releases Total Releases to Other Media Total Emissions Water (tpy)a to Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c (tpy) 0.00077 0 0 0.00077 0 0.0005 0.0005 0 0 0.0005 0.0005 0 0.0005 0 0 0 0.0005 0 0 0 0 0 0.0005 0.0005 0.000485 0 0.000485 0 0 0.000485 0.000011 0.0003275 0.0003385 0 0 0 0.0003385 0 0.00029 0.00029 0 0 0 0.00029 0.0002205 0 0.0002205 0 0 0 0.0002205 0.0000441 0.0001213 0.0001654 0 0 0 0.0001654 0 0.000085 0.000085 0 0 0 0.000085 0.000082 0 0.000082 0 0 0 0.000082 0.0000212 0.0000595 0.0000807 0 0 0 0.0000807 0 0.000005 0.000005 0 0 0.00005 0.000055 0.0000028 0.000009 0.0000118 0 0 0 0.0000118 0 0.000002 0.000002 0 0 0.000002 a. Releases to Surface Water reported as "On-Site Releases to Surface Water." b. Releases to Soil is the sum of reported releases to onsite and offsite releases to land treatment and other land disposal. c. Releases to other media include reported releases to onsite and offsite groundwater and landfills, tpy: tons per year 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 40 of 40 ED 001523 00008282-00312 Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State EQ DETROIT INC 1923 FREDERICK DETROIT Ml BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORF 8935 POCAHONTAS TRAIL WILLIAMSBURG VA BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORF 12340 TOWNSHIP RD 99 E FINDLAY OH BMW MANUFACTURING CO LLC 1400 HWY 101 S GREER SC REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE: WINSTON SALEM PLANT CROWN FOOD PACKAGING 4000 OLD MILWAUKEE LN WINSTON-SALEM NC 2929 W BRIDGE ST OWATONNA MN REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE: FREMONT PLANT 2145 CEDAR FREMONT OH BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP 1900 BARNES ST REIDSVILLE NC FLINT HILLS RESOURCES CORPUS CHRISTI LLC WEST PLANT CROWN CORK & SEAL CO (USA) INC CROWN CLOSURE DIV REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE: BISHOPVILLE SC FACILITY REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE: KENT WA FACILITY 2825 SUNTIDE RD 3011 BIRCH DR 609 COUSAR ST 1220 N SECOND AVE CORPUS CHRISTI TX WEIRTON wv BISHOPVILLE sc KENT WA REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE: OLIVE BRANCH FACILITY BALL CONTAINER LLC - COLUMBUS CAN PLANT 10800 MARINA DR OLIVE BRANCH MS 350 MCCORMICK BLVD COLUMBUS OH REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE: EVA STREET ST PAUL MN REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE: WHITEHOUSE PLANT 139 EVA ST 10444 WATERV1LLE SAINT PAUL MN WHITEHOUSE OH CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING GLEN & SHEPARD ST LAWRENCE MA FORD MOTOR CO DEARBORN TRUCK PLANT PPG INDUSTRIES INC-OAK CREEK 3001 MILLER RD 10800 S 13TH ST DEARBORN Ml OAK CREEK Wl SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP 300 N FAIL RD LA PORTE IN CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING 1035 E N ST BRADLEY IL CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING 1202 FONESRD OLYMPIA WA FORD MOTOR COMPANY-KANSAS CITY ASSEMBLY 8121 E U.S. HWY 69 CLAYCOMO MO PLANT CHRYSLER JEFFERSON NORTH ASSEMBLY PLANT 2101 CONNOR AVE DETROIT Ml METAL CONTAINER CORPORTION - WINDSOR CAN 1201 METAL CONTAINER C WINDSOR CO CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING 620 N 4TH ST WORLAND WY REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE: LONGVIEW FACILITY 1001 FISHER RD LONGVIEW TX Zip Code 48211 23185 45840 29651 27107 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 1.778 28 145 25.5 135 2.4745 150.0455 25.716 110.457 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpyf Total Emissions (tpy) 1.778 0 358.8295 360.6075 173 0 0 0 173 160.5 0 0 160.5 152.52 0 0 152.52 136.173 0 0 0.441 136.614 55060 43420 27320 78409 26062 29010 98032 38654 31.8905 19.034 17 0.1435 34.526 13.386 12.442 18.811 95.672 107.921 85 0 57.7185 75.874 70.504 63.4835 127.5625 126.955 102 0.1435 92.2445 89.26 82.946 82.2945 0 0 127.5625 0 0 0 126.955 0 0 0 102 0 0 97.9 98.0435 0 0 0 92.2445 0 0 0.2515 89.5115 0 0 0 82.946 0 0 0.1425 82.437 43213 55107 43571 01843 48121 53154 46350 60915 98501 64119 12 11.8215 24.8555 17.5445 1.15 35.178 12.191 16.211 15.9915 1.55 70 66.994 51.4725 52.633 65 0.402 53.2315 48.633 47.975 55 82 78.8155 76.328 70.1775 66.15 35.58 65.4225 64.844 63.9665 56.55 0 0 0 0 0 82 0 78.8155 0 0 0.301 76.629 0 0 0 70.1775 0 0 66.15 0 0 30.2865 65.8665 0 0 65.4225 0 0 0 64.844 0 0 0 63.9665 0 0.0185 56.5685 48215 80550 82401 75604 6 14.5265 13.335 4.823 50 39.731 40.0055 47.662 56 54.2575 53.3405 52.485 0 0.0225 56.0225 0 0 54.2575 0 0 0 53.3405 0 0 0 52.485 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 1 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00313 Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State WHIRLPOOL CORF MARION DIV RR DONNELLEY HUNTSMAN PETROCHEMICAL LLC PORT NECHES CArii ITV BALL CONTAINER LLC ROME CAN PLANT FORD MOTOR CO KENTUCKY TRUCK PLANT METAL CONTAINER CORP - ARNOLD CAN PLANT REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE: PHOENIX FACILITY USS- CLAIRTON PLANT METAL CONTAINER CORP - NEWBURGH CAN PLANT HONDA OF AMERICA MANUFACTURING INC HONDA OF AMERICA MANUFACTURING INC GREIF PACKAGING LLC CHICAGO HEIGHTS STEEL S D WARREN CO BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP ROCKY MOUNTAIN METAL CONTAINER CROWN FOOD PACKAGING BATESVILLE MANUFACTURING INC EDSAL MANUFACTURING CO INC REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE : CHICAGO PLANT BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP INGERSOLL-RAND CO STEELCRAFT DIV CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING METAL CONTAINER CORP - MIRA LOMA CAN PLANT NISSAN NA INC SMYRNA MANUFACTURING PLANT SUBARU OF INDIANA AUTOMOTIVE INC REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE: CHATSWORTH FACILITY MERCEDES-BENZ US INTERNATIONAL INC 1300 MARION-AGOSTA RD MARION OH 2347 KRATZER RD HARRISONBURG VA 6001 HWY 366 PORT NECHES TX 110 BALL DR ROME GA 3001 CHAMBERLAIN LN LOUISVILLE KY 42 TENBROOK INDUSTRIAL ARNOLD MO 211 N 51AVE PHOENIX AZ 400 STATE ST CLAIRTON PA 130 BREUNIG RD NEW WINDSOR NY 24000 HONDA PKWY MARYSVILLE OH 11000 STATE RT 347 EAST LIBERTY OH 7425 INDUSTRIAL RD FLORENCE KY 211 E MAIN ST CHICAGO HEIGHTS IL 89 CUMBERLAND ST WESTBROOK ME 8500 W TOWER AVE MILWAUKEE Wl 17755 W32NDAVE GOLDEN CO 8801 CITATION RD BALTIMORE MD 175 MONOGARD DR MANCHESTER TN 4400 S PACKER CHICAGO IL 1101 W43RDST CHICAGO IL 501 N SIXTH ST MONTICELLO IN 9017 BLUE ASH RD CINCINNATI OH 2501 N FRAZIER ST CONROE TX 4525 INDIANA ST GOLDEN CO 12910 JESS PIRTLE BLVD SUGAR LAND TX 10980 INLAND AVE MIRA LOMA CA 983 NISSAN DR SMYRNA TN 5500 STATE RD 38E LAFAYETTE IN 20730 PRAIRIE ST CHATSWORTH CA 1 MERCEDES DR VANCE AL Zip Code 43302 22802 77651 30161 40241 63010 85043 15025 12553 43040 43319 41042 60411 04098 53224 80401 21221 37355 60609 60609 47960 45242 77303 80403 77478 91752 37167 47905 91311 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.05 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 51.411 45.2035 3.061 0.11 0 31 13.5 3.25 41 16.3535 25.671 5.7315 36.1725 41 0 11.0015 29.428 2.7 37.5 2.3 36 3.4725 31.252 7.172 28.6875 0.00391 35.2055 27.5 7.5 26.5 7 8.637 25.911 1.709 32.4675 0 33.9425 6.522 26.6495 14.5 18.5 7.5 25 27.5695 4.4945 20 11.5 27.381 4.107 27.5195 3.656 0.02302895 30.7183514 0.295 29.34 6.4125 22.592 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 51.461 0 0 51.461 48.2645 0 0 48.2645 0.11 0 0 46.92 47.03 44.5 0 0 0 44.5 44.25 0 0.13 44.38 42.0245 0 0 42.0245 41.904 0 0 0 41.904 41 0 0 0 41 40.4295 0 0 40.4295 40.2 0 0.213 40.413 38.3 0 0.1495 38.4495 34.7245 0 2.166 36.8905 35.8595 0 0 0 35.8595 35.20941 0.125 0 0 35.33441 35 0 0 35 33.5 0 0 1.4 34.9 34.548 0 0 34.548 34.1765 0 0.0045 34.181 33.9425 0 0 33.9425 33.1715 0 0 0.0805 33.252 33 0 0 0 33 32.5 0 0 0 32.5 32.064 0 0 0 32.064 31.5 0 0 0 31.5 31.488 0 0 0 31.488 31.1755 0 0 31.1755 30.74138035 0 0 0 30.74138035 29.635 0 0 29.635 29.0045 0 0 0 29.0045 35490 0.501 27.801 28.302 0 0 0 28.302 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 2 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00314 Facility Name NEW YORK WIRE ARKEMA COATING RESINS AMES TRUE TEMPER INC SENECA FOODS CORF GM LLC POWERTRAIN FLINT ENGINE OPERATIONS CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING METAL CONTAINER CORP - JACKSONVILLE CAN PLANT HONDA MANUFACTURING OF ALABAMA LLC GENERAL MOTORS LANSING DELTA TOWNSHIP THERMA-TRU CORP SB FOOT TANNING CO CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING MEMC PASADENA INC ALSTOM POWER INC CHATTANOOGA BOILERS CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING BWAY CORP CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING MAVERICK TUBE LLC DBA TENARISCONROE CROWN BEVERAGE PACKAGING WHIRLPOOL CORP FINDLAY DIV BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP SAF-HOLLAND USA INC JOHN DEERE DES MOINES WORKS ALCOA INC - WARRICK OPERATIONS BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANES - EVERETT AIR SYSTEM COMPONENTS LP AGY AIKEN LLC PELLA CORP ITW SEXTON INC BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address 500 E MIDDLE ST 340 RAILROAD ST 1500 S CAMERON ST 801 SAUKAVE 2100 BRISTOL RD 1501 ST JAMES ST 1100 N ELLIS RD City State HANOVER PA SAUKVILLE Wl HARRISBURG PA BARABOO Wl FLINT Ml LACROSSE Wl JACKSONVILLE FL Zip Code 17331 53080 17104 53913 48552 54603 32254 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 28.0405 0.6965 0.204 1.381 26.2385 0 25.711 0.6855 25.5 23.9785 1.7985 6.4585 19.1565 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 28.0405 0 0 0 28.0405 0.9005 0 0 27.0115 27.912 27.6195 0 0 0 27.6195 25.711 0 0 0.823 26.534 26.1855 0 0 0.255 26.4405 25.777 0 0 0 25.777 25.615 0 0 25.615 1800 HONDA DR LINCOLN AL 8175 MILLETT HWY LANSING Ml 601 RE JONES RD BUTLER IN 805 BENCH ST RED WING MN 380 CALLE FABRIL ST KM 1 CAROLINA PR 3000 N S ST PASADENA TX 1119 RIVERFRONT PKWY CHATTANOOGA TN 100 EVANS ROW CHERAW SC 3200 S KILBOURN AVE CHICAGO IL 195 CROWN RD BATESVILLE MS 699 F.M. 3083 CONROE TX 400 N WALNUT ST CRAWFORDSVILLE IN 4901 N MAIN ST FINDLAY OH 2400 HUNTINGTON DR FAIRFIELD CA 101S ELM WARRENTON MO 825 SW IRVINEDALE DR ANKENY IA HWYS 66 & 61 NEWBURGH IN 3003 W CASINO RD EVERETT WA 900 DARR PARK DR PONCA CITY OK 2556 WAGENER RD AIKEN SC 102 MAIN ST PELLA IA 3101 SEXTON RD DECATUR AL 11 ADAMS RD SARATOGA SPRING NY 35096 48917 46721 55066 00985 77503 37402 29520 60623 38606 77301 47933 45840 94533 63383 50023 47629 98204 74601 29801 50219 35603 12866 0.4995 0.55 0 0 6.0485 15.043 23.9355 21.161 7.24545 19.269 0.95633545 15.725 2.1509 9 18.5495 0 0 3.45 0.2025 12.247 0.125 0.96278 3.25 24.7705 24 24.3635 24.362 18.1455 8.7685 0 2.715 15.749 2.8905 5.98814565 5.872 19.3581 12.5 2.93 21.1695 8.5 17 19.677 2.269 19.3945 18.29282 16 25.27 24.55 24.3635 24.362 24.194 23.8115 23.9355 23.876 22.99445 22.1595 6.9444811 21.597 21.509 21.5 21.4795 21.1695 8.5 20.45 19.8795 14.516 19.5195 19.2556 19.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.185 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.27 0 24.55 0 0 24.3635 0 24.362 0 0 24.194 0 0.19505 24.00655 0 0 23.9355 0 0 23.876 0 22.99445 0 0 22.1595 0 14.96 21.9044811 0 0 21.597 0 21.509 0 0 21.5 0 0 21.4795 0 21.1695 0 12.2 20.885 0.0095 20.4595 0 19.8795 5.2685 19.7845 0 0 19.5195 0 0 19.2556 0 0 19.25 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 3 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00315 Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State MOBIL CHEMICAL CO 41501 WOLVERINE RD SHAWNEE OK GREIF PACKAGING LLC 4300 W 130TH ST ALSIP IL MID-AMERICA STEEL DRUM CO IN C 8570 S CHICAGO RD OAK CREEK Wl NASHVILLE WIRE PRODUCTS 1604 COUNTY HOSPITAL R NASHVILLE TN TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING INDIANA INC 4000 TULIP TREE DR PRINCETON IN UNION CARBIDE CORP SEADRIFT PLANT 7501 N HWY 185 SEADRIFT TX BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP 95 BALLARD RD MIDDLETOWN NY CARRY-ON TRAILER CORP 101 JOE HARVEY ST LAVONIA GA NORTH COAST CONTAINER CORP 8806 CRANE AVE CLEVELAND OH BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP 1001 N FM 3083 E CONROE TX BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP 4700 WHITEWAY DR TAMPA FL PENN COLOR INC 2755 BERGEY RD HATFIELD PA MAVERICK TUBE LLC 4950 N COUNTY RD 967 BLYTHEVILLE AR AIR SYSTEM COMPONENTS LP 3301 N MAIN ST TARBORO NC CECO DOOR PRODUCTS 9159 TELECOM DR MILAN TN CNH AMERICA LLC 600 E PEORIA ST GOODFIELD IL BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP 500 CRENSHAW BLVD TORRANCE CA KUKA TOLEDO PRODUCTION OPERATIONS 3770 STICKNEY AVE TOLEDO OH DEXTER CHASSIS GROUP PLANT 55 501 S MILLER DR WHITE PIGEON Ml THE KNAPHEIDE MANUFACTURING CO 1848 WESTPHALIA STRASS QUINCY IL THOMAS BUILT BUSES INC 715 W FAIRFIELD RD HIGH POINT NC MPM SILICONES LLC 3500 S STATE RT 2 FRIENDLY wv NOVOLYTE PERFORMANCE MATERIALS 111 W IRENE RD ZACHARY LA AVX CORP MYRTLE BEACH 801 17TH AVES MYRTLE BEACH SC SILGAN WHITE CAP CORP 2201 W MARYLAND ST EVANSVILLE IN EASTMAN CHEMICAL CO TEXAS OPERATIONS 300 KODAK BLVD LONGVIEW TX OLDCASTLE BUILDING ENVELOPE - TEXAS FACILITY 803 AIRPORT RD TERRELL TX GM TRUCK GROUP FORT WAYNE ASSEMBLY 12200 LAFAYETTE CENTER ROANOKE IN NOVELIS CORP 390 GRISWOLD ST NE WARREN OH HITACHI AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS AMERICAS INC- 301 MAYDE RD BEREA KY BEREA KY Zip Code 74804 60803 53154 37218 47670 77983 10940 30553 44105 77303 33617 19440 72315 27886 38358 61742 90503 43612 49099 62305 27263 26146 70791 29577 47710 75602 75160 46783 44483 40403 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.375 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 18.7 4.1295 14.601 0 18.578 16.5 1.85 12.595 5.374 14.188 3.478 8 9.5 0 17.346 0 17.316 13 4.15 8 9 2.951 0.065805 11.16161105 0 0.172 16.3515 8.377 8.377 1.6725 15.0505 16 0.65 2.0510995 14.5 0 16.1035 0.141 15.94 0 15.9935 2.1935 0.0035 4.75 0.605 1.6645 1.028 11.6705 3.742 12.262 3.0575 0 15.309 0.7 14.5 4.568 10.398 0.0675 14.7307 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 19.075 0 0.0025 19.0775 18.7305 0 0 0 18.7305 18.578 0 0 18.578 18.35 0 0 18.35 17.969 0 0 0 17.969 17.666 0.0875 0 0.097 17.8505 17.5 0 0 0 17.5 17.346 0 0 0 17.346 17.316 0 0 0 17.316 17.15 0 0 0 17.15 17 0 0 0 17 3.016805 0 0 13.952 16.968805 11.16161105 0 0 5.775 16.93661105 16.5235 0 0.324 16.8475 16.754 0 0 0 16.754 16.723 0 0 16.723 16.65 0 0 0 16.65 16.5510995 0 0 0.034 16.5850995 16.1035 0 0 0.08 16.1835 16.081 0 0 16.081 15.9935 0 0 0 15.9935 2.197 10.845 0 2.922 15.964 5.355 10.6 0 0 15.955 2.6925 0 0 12.8455 15.538 15.4125 0 0 0 15.4125 15.3195 0 0 0 15.3195 15.309 0 0 0 15.309 15.2 0 0 15.2 14.966 0 0 0 14.966 14.7982 0 0 0 14.7982 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 4 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00316 Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State BEDFORD MATERIALS CO INC ANDERSON TULLY LUMBER CO WALTERSVILLE LUMBER MILL SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURIN G CORF M&B HANGERS ARTIFLEX MANUFACTURING LLC GERSTCO DIV WOOSTER BALL METAL FOOD CONTAINER CORP GRAPHIC PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL INC DECORATIVE PANELS INTERNATIONA L VESTAL MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISES INC SIGNCRAFT SCREEN PRINT HALLSTAR CO ESTER SOLUTIONS FACILITY SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL ARKANSAS i i r QUAD/GRAPH ICS INC RUSKIN CO BEMIS MANUFACTURING CO PLANT B SILGAN CAN CO CROWN FOOD PACKAGING BERENFIELD CONTAINERS INC MASON CLEAN HARBORS LONE MOUNTAIN LLC LONE MOUNTAIN FACILITY 3M CO-GUIN BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP NUCOR VULCRAFT GROUP SAINT JOE DIV AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INC HOWARD FINISHING LLC MEYER STEEL DRUM INC NUCOR CORP VULCRAFT DIV NUCOR VULCRAFT GROUP - GRAPELAND DIV PLY GEM BALL CONTAINER LLC 7676 ALLEGHENY RD MANNS CHOICE PA 1725 N WASHINGTON ST VICKSBURG MS 3591 MAPLE DR 1313 PKWY DR SE 1425 E BOWMAN ST FORT DODGE IA LEEDS AL WOOSTER OH 3010 BIRCH DR WEIRTON WV 10300 ROBERTS BLVD FORT SMITH AR 2900 HILL AVE TOLEDO OH 177 INDUSTRIAL PARK RD SWEETWATER TN 100 A.J.HARLE DR GALENA IL 5851 W 73RD ST BEDFORD PARK IL 1301 N DIXIELAND RD ROGERS AR N61 W23044 HARRY'S WAY SUSSEX Wl HWY 27 N GENEVA AL 300 MILL ST SHEBOYGAN FALLS Wl 12-773 ST RT 110 NAPOLEON OH 5201 ENTERPRISE BLVD TOLEDO OH 1229 CASTLE DR MASON OH 5 MILES E& 1 MILE N OF Jl WAYNOKA OK 6675 US HWY 43 GUIN AL 6600 WILL ROGERS BLVD FORT WORTH TX 6610 COUNTY RD 60 SAINT JOE IN 1629 VANDERBILT RD BIRMINGHAM AL 32565 DEQUINDRE MADISON HEIGHTS Ml 2000 S KILBOURN AVE CHICAGO IL 1501 W DARLINGTON ST FLORENCE SC 175 COUNTY RD 2345 GRAPELAND TX 2615 CAMPBELL RD SIDNEY OH 105 E BLACKHAWK DR FORT ATKINSON Wl Zip Code 15550 39181 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 1.4135 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 12.7915 14.1275 0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 14.205 0 0 0 14.205 14.1275 0 0 14.1275 50501 0.002535 13.684 13.686535 0 35094 2.6945 10.7775 13.472 0 44691 0.401 12.9615 13.3625 0 0 0 0.0075 13.686535 13.472 13.37 26062 72916 43607 37874 61036 60638 72756 53089 36340 53085 43545 43612 45040 73860 35563 76140 46785 35234 48071 60623 29501 75844 45365 53538 9.95 0 13.1175 13.094 12.185 1.1705 0.0025 11.55 0.0565 0 5.3645 3.1835 0.125 0.00125 0.001 5.5 2.877 12.1875 0.0025 1.3505 10.9885 4.282 0.705 3.45 3.3 13.2445 0.023 0 0 0.1565 12.8805 1.3 12.7365 12.7415 7.366 9.541 12.564 0.0004 12.5 7 5.354 0.175 12.358 10.927 1.255 7.922 11.45 8.5 13.25 13.2445 13.1405 13.094 12.185 1.327 12.883 12.85 12.793 12.7415 12.7305 12.7245 12.689 0.00165 12.501 12.5 8.231 12.3625 12.3605 12.2775 12.2435 12.204 12.155 11.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.841 11.6165 1.77636E-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.5485 0 0 0 0 4.2115 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.25 13.2445 13.1405 13.094 13.026 12.9435 12.8855 12.85 12.793 12.7415 12.7305 12.7245 12.689 12.55015 12.501 12.5 12.4425 12.3625 12.3605 12.2775 12.2435 12.204 12.155 11.95 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 5 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00317 Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State AMERICAN TRIM LLC 1501 W MICHIGAN ST SIDNEY OH QUAD/GRAPHICS INC 1900 W SUMNER ST HARTFORD Wl SHAMROCK TECHNOLOGIES INC FOOT OF PACIFIC ST NEWARK NJ WHITING DOOR MANUFACTURING CORF 113 CEDAR ST AKRON NY CNH AMERICA LLC 1930 DES MOINES AVE BURLINGTON IA CHRYSLER BELVIDERE ASSEMBLY PLANT 3000 W CHRYSLER DR BELVIDERE IL TOPPAN INTERAMERICA INC 1131 HWY 155 S MC DONOUGH GA VULCRAFT OF NEW YORK INC 5362 RAILROAD ST CHEMUNG NY SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP 400 N 15TH ST ROCHELLE IL SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL ARKANSAS LLC 1901 EBORICKDR FAYETTEVILLE AR VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA CHATTANOOGA 8001 VOLKSWAGEN DR CHATTANOOGA TN OPERATIONS LLC BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORP 91-320 KOMOHANAST KAPOLEI HI TRADEBE TREATMENT & RECYCLING LLC 4343 KENNEDY AVE EAST CHICAGO IN PRECOAT METALS 1095 MENDELL DAVIS DR JACKSON MS CHICAGO STEEL CONTAINER CORP 1846 SKILBOURN AVE CHICAGO IL TRILLA ST LOUIS CORP 2391 CASSENS DR FENTON MO METAL INDUSTRIES INC - BUSHNELL 400 W WALKER AVE BUSHNELL FL STANLEY WORKS HAND TOOLS DIV 600 MYRTLE ST NEW BRITAIN CT TYSON FRESH MEATS INC 5000 N FM 1912 AMARILLO TX PROFESSIONAL DISPOSABLES INTERNATIONAL INC TWO NICE-PAK PARK ORANGEBURG NY ALLIANCE INDUSTRIES WAUPACA N 2467 VAUGHAN RD WAUPACA Wl TRELLEBORG OFFSHORE US RANKIN ROAD FACILITY 1902 RANKIN RD HOUSTON TX NUCOR CORP - VULCRAFT/NUCOR COLD FINISH DIV 1601 W OMAHA AVE NORFOLK NE THE DIAL CORP A SUBSIDIARY OF HENKEL CONSUMER GOODS KAWNEER CO INC 6901 MCKISSOCKAVE SAINT LOUIS MO 600 KAWNEER DR SPRINGDALE AR TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING TEX AS INC 1 LONE STAR PASS SAN ANTONIO TX SILGAN CAN CO 2120 NC HWY N UNIT A MAXTON NC KITZINGER COOPERAGE CORP 2529 E NORWICH AVE SAINT FRANCIS Wl NISSAN NORTH AMERICA INC CANTON MS 300 NISSAN DR CANTON MS Zip Code 45365 53027 07114 14001 52601 61008 30253 14825 61068 72701 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 11.892 11.5 0.35 0 0 0 11.6965 0.18 11 1.15 10 0 11.15 4.005 6.4505 7.265 3.78 0 10.9685 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 11.892 0 0 0 11.892 11.85 0 0 11.85 0 0 11.718 11.718 11.6965 0 0 0 11.6965 11.18 0 0 11.18 11.15 0 0.0095 11.1595 11.15 0 0 0 11.15 10.4555 0 0 0.61 11.0655 11.045 0 0 0 11.045 10.9685 0 0.0625 11.031 37416 96707 46312 39272 60623 63026 33513 06052 79108 10962 54981 77073 68701 63147 72764 78264 28364 53235 39046 0 11.0214265 11.0214265 1.95 0.4655 9.879 0.898 1.3775 0.0765 1.055 0.02 0.097675 1.0415 0.5125 0.25 0.081 9 0 1.0255 9.9355 8.2505 10.621 9.4965 0 0.03133 9.3735 0 10 0.081 10.95 0.4655 10.9045 10.8335 9.628 10.6975 10.5515 0.02 0.129005 10.415 0.5125 10.25 0.162 4.094 6.8057207 3.112 0 7.6025 5.9025 3.13111505 6.6775 9.7653 2.0095 9.9965 9.93683575 9.7895 9.7653 9.612 0 0 0 11.0214265 0 0 0 10.95 0 0.02 10.45 10.9355 0 0 0 10.9045 0 0 0.0535 10.887 0 0 1.2326 10.8606 0 0 0 10.6975 0 0 10.5515 0 0.72 9.74 10.48 0 10.329 10.458005 0 0 0 10.415 0 0 9.7895 10.302 0 0 10.25 0 10.0435 10.2055 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.9965 0 9.93683575 0 9.7895 0 9.7653 0 9.612 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 6 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00318 Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State ESCO CORP 9098 EASTSIDE DR EXT. NEWTON MS DOW CHEMICAL CO FREEPORT FACILITY 2301 N BRAZOSPORT BLVE FREEPORT TX GREIF PACKAGING LLC 6000 JEFFERSON HWY NEW ORLEANS LA STATE INDUSTRIES INC 500 TENNESSEE WALTZ PL ASHLAND CITY TN YKK AP AM ERICA INC 1229 HWY 441 N BYPASS DUBLIN GA TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING KENTUCKY INC 1001 CHERRY BLOSSOM V\ GEORGETOWN KY KUBIN-NICHOLSON CORP 8448 N 87TH ST MILWAUKEE W1 ENVIRITE OF OHIO INC 2050 CENTRAL AVE SE CANTON OH REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO RE: FAIRFIELD PLANT 2433 CROCKER C1R FAIRFIELD CA GREIF INDUSTRIAL PACKAGING & SERVICES 7604 RAILROAD AVE WINFIELD KS SQUARE D CO 1601 MERCER RD LEXINGTON KY RR DONNELLEY LANCASTER WEST 1375 HARRISBURG PIKE LANCASTER PA GENERAL MOTORS WENTZVILLE ASSEMBLY 1500 E RT A WENTZVILLE MO BRIGGS & STRATTON POWER PRODUCTS MCDONOUGH OPERATIONS KEYMARKCORP OF FLORIDA 535 MACON RD MC DONOUGH GA 2540 KNIGHTS STATION RE LAKELAND FL SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP 2115 SW LOWER LAKE RD SAINT JOSEPH MO ROYAL MOULDINGS LTD; MARION VIRGINIA 135 BEAR CREEK RD MARION VA MAUSER CORP 14 CONVERT BLVD WOODBRIDGE NJ KNSCOS INC 475 RANDY RD CAROL STREAM IL SKOLNIK INDUSTRIES 4900 S KILBOURN AVE CHICAGO IL ACME FINISHING CO INC 1595 E OAKTON ST ELK GROVE VILLAG L BROAN-NUTONE LLC 926 W STATE ST HARTFORD W1 RR DONNELLEY & SONS CO 1145 CONWELLAVE WILLARD OH CHRYSLER WARREN TRUCK ASSEMBLY PLANT (PART) 21500 MOUND RD WARREN Ml GRAPHIC PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL INC 1500 N PITCHER ST KALAMAZOO Ml HART & COOLEY INC 4910 MOORES MILL RD HUNTSVILLE AL BERENFIELD CONTAINERS SW LTD 3300 N HUTCHINSON ST WHITE HALL AR CIRCLE GRAPHICS INC 120 9TH AVE LONGMONT CO 3M CO-MENOMONIE 1425 STOKKE PKWY MENOMONIE Wl PHOENIX COLOR CORP 18249 PHOENIX DR HAGERSTOWN MD Zip Code 39345 77541 70123 37015 31021 40324 53224 44707 94533 67156 40511 17601 63385 30253 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 9.578 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0 0.0135 0.0015 1.433 8.1215 0.094 9.3135 9.0285 0.3635 0.1875 9.1995 9.352 0 0 0 5.29 3.871 2.086 7.0235 0.098 8.994 8.509 0.57335 1.05 8 0 9.043 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 9.578 0 0 0 9.578 0.015 4.191 0 5.3525 9.5585 9.5545 0 0 0 9.5545 9.4075 0 0 0 9.4075 9.392 0 0 0 9.392 9.387 0 0 9.387 9.352 0 0 9.352 0 0 0 9.1835 9.1835 9.161 0 0 0 9.161 9.1095 0 0 0 9.1095 9.092 0 0 9.092 9.08235 0 0 9.08235 9.05 0 0 9.05 9.043 0 0 9.043 33810 64504 24354 07095 60188 60632 60007 53027 44890 48091 49007 35811 71602 80501 54751 21742 0.45 5.2455 0.4475 0.076 1.76171 0.9 1.758 0.1135 6.8885 8.5 0.007 0.5875 0 3.3 0 8.5 8.549 3.728 8.496 8.8005 7.04684 7.9 7.032 8.666 1.856 0.155 8.593 7.9375 8.5085 1.7 0 0 8.999 8.9735 8.9435 8.8765 8.80855 8.8 8.79 8.7795 8.7445 8.655 8.6 8.525 8.5085 5 0 8.5 0 0 0 8.999 0 0 0 8.9735 0 0 0 8.9435 0 0 0 8.8765 0 0 8.80855 0 0 0 8.8 0 0 0 8.79 0 0 8.7795 0 0 8.7445 0 0.013 8.668 0 0 0 8.6 0 0.004 8.529 0 0 0 8.5085 0 0 3.505 8.505 0 0 8.5 8.5 0 0 0 8.5 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 7 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00319 Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State FRANKLIN INVESTMENT CORF MOMENT1VE SPECIALTY CHEMICALS INC SIGNODE HAMMER PACKAGING CORP RR DONNELLEY LANCASTER EAST PRECOAT METALS ELECTROPRIME INC SILGAN CONTAINER MANUFACTURING CORP BWAY CORP SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP GREIF PACKAGING LLC SUPERPAC INC DEXTER AXLE AAP ST MARYS CORP AJAX METAL PROCESSING INC TTM TECHNOLOGIES INC TECNOCAP LLC NATIONAL COATINGS INC DUPONT PONTCHARTRAIN WORKS FORD MOTOR CO TWIN CITIES ASSEMBLY PLANT GM LORDSTOWN COMPLEX BRADFORD WHITE CORP QUAD GRAPHICS NASHVILLE PRECOAT METALS AK STEEL CORP - ZANESVI LLE WORKS ALLIED TUBE & CONDUIT CORP BROWN PRINTING CO CROWN EQUIPMENT CORP SYCAMORE SYSTEMS LLC TEKNOR APEX TENNESSEE CO (AKA HAYWOOD CO) 600 ATLANTIC AVE FRANKLIN PA 2525 S COMBEE RD LAKELAND FL 7701 W71ST ST BRIDGEVIEW IL 200 LUCIUS GORDON DR WEST HENRIETTA NY 216 GREENFIELD RD LANCASTER PA 1950 E MAIN ST GREENFIELD IN 63 DIXIE HWY ROSSFORD OH 3250 PATTERSON RD RIVERBANK CA 1601 VALDOSTA HWY HOMERVILLE GA 1416 INDIANHEAD DR MENOMONIE Wl 695 LOUIS DR WARMINSTER PA 1220 INDUSTRIAL BLVD SOUTHAMPTON PA 500 SE 27TH EL RENO OK 1100 MCKINLEY RD SAINT MARYS OH 4651 BELLEVUE AVE DETROIT Ml 710 N 600 W LOGAN UT 2100 GRISWOLD NE WARREN OH 604 US HWY 150 E GALESBURG IL 586 HWY 44 LA PLACE LA 966 S MISSISSIPPI RIVER B SAINT PAUL MN 2300 HALLOCK-YOUNG RD LORDSTOWN OH 200 LAFAYETTE ST MIDDLEVILLE Ml 2947 BRICK CHURCH PIKE NASHVILLE TN 858 E HUPP RD LA PORTE IN 1724 LINDEN AVE ZANESVILLE OH 16100 SLATHROP AVE HARVEY IL 2300 BROWN AVE WASECA MN 2600 E STATE RD 240 GREENCASTLE IN 449 N CALIFORNIA ST SYCAMORE IL 751 DUPREE ST BROWNSVILLE TN Zip Code 16323 33801 60455 14586 17601 46140 43460 95367 31634 54751 18974 18966 73036 45885 48207 84321 44483 61401 70068 55116 44481 49333 37207 46350 43701 60426 56093 46135 60178 38012 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 8.5 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0 8.357 0.0005 0.85 7.5 0 8.2645 7.417 0.519 0.026 7.817 0 7.819 0.5925 7.217 5.993215 1.811395 1.55 6.2 3.072 2.956 0.038 7.5475 0 7.514 0.011 7.491 0 7.4295 0.585 5.266 1.5575 5.8075 7.3525 0 0.0075 0 0.08 7 3.95 1.05 0 7.1365 6.36 0.742 0.02 6.915 0 6 4.3175 2.5465 6.6725 0.089 1.351405 5.405605 0 6.722 0 6.669 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 8.5 0 0 8.5 8.3575 0 0 0 8.3575 8.35 0 0 0 8.35 8.2645 0 0 8.2645 7.936 0 0 7.936 7.843 0 0 0 7.843 7.819 0 0 7.819 7.8095 0 0 0 7.8095 7.80461 0 0 0 7.80461 7.75 0 0 0 7.75 6.028 0 0 1.6735 7.7015 7.5855 0 0 7.5855 7.514 0 0 0 7.514 7.502 0 0 0 7.502 7.4295 0 0 0 7.4295 5.851 0 1.5185 7.3695 7.365 0 0 0 7.365 7.3525 0 0 0 7.3525 0.0075 0 0 7.2925 7.3 7.08 0 0.13 7.21 5 0 2.2 7.2 7.1365 0 0 0 7.1365 7.102 0 0 7.102 6.935 0 0 0 6.935 6 0 0 0.9 6.9 6.864 0 0 0 6.864 6.7615 0 0 6.7615 6.75701 0 8.88178E-16 6.75701 6.722 0 0 0 6.722 6.669 0 0.0475 6.7165 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 8 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00320 Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State SILGAN CAN CO 500 NW LOOP 286 SUITE 1 ( PARIS TX RR DONNELLEY CRAWFORDSVILLE 1009 SLOAN ST CRAWFORDSVILLE IN HUSQVARNA CONSUMER OUTDOOR PRODUCTS 172 OLD ELLOREE RD ORANGEBURG SC CAN CORF OF AMERICA INC 326 JUNE AVE BLANDON PA LA-Z-BOY TENNESSEE 500 WALNUT GROVE RD DAYTON TN SNAP-ON TOOLS MANUFACTURING CO 2600 US HWY 18 E ALGONA IA GEA BPO LLC 301 N CURRY PIKE BLOOMINGTON IN SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP 520 W 2ND ST OCONOMOWOC Wl DUPONT CHAMBERS WORKS RT 130 DEEPWATER NJ SCHAEFFER MANUFACTURING 102 BARTON ST SAINT LOUIS MO NUCOR CORP VULCRAFT DIV 7205 GAULT AVE N FORT PAYNE AL NORTHLAND ALUMINUM PRODUCTS 1 NC 5005 COUNTY RD 25 MINNEAPOLIS MN AMERICAN FINISHING RESOURCES INC 476 CLAY ST CHILTON Wl BROWN PRINTING CO 11595 MCCONNELL RD WOODSTOCK IL MAYTAG CORP CLEVELAND COOKING PRODUCTS 740 KING EDWARD AVE SE CLEVELAND TN PLANT 1 AKZO NOBEL SURFACE CHEMISTRY LLC 15200 ALMEDA RD HOUSTON TX DU PONT ELECTRONICS MICROCIRCU ITS INDUSTRIES HWY 686 KM 2.3 MANATI PR LTD (PART) CURTIS METAL FINISHING CO 6645 SIMS DR STERLING HEIGHTS Ml HUNTER DOUGLAS TUPELO CENTER RT. 2 LEE INDUSTRIAL PAF SHANNON MS 3M CO - CORDOVA 22614 RT 84 N CORDOVA IL FORD MOTOR CO MICHIGAN ASSEMBLY PLANT 38303 MICHIGAN AVE WAYNE Ml WHEELING MACHINE PRODUCTS DIV PINE BLUFF 5411 INDUSTRIAL DR S PINE BLUFF AR ASHLEY INDUSTRIAL MOLDING INC 310 S WABASH ASHLEY IN ENKEI AMERICA INC 2900 W INWOOD DR COLUMBUS IN WIX FILTRATION CORP - ALLEN PLANT 2900 NW BLVD GASTONIA NC SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP 2501165TH ST HAMMOND IN THE COLEMAN CO INC 3600 N HYDRAULIC WICHITA KS NAHAN PRINTING INC 7000 SAUKVIEW DR SAINT CLOUD MN QG PRINTING II CORP 4708 KRUEGER DR JONESBORO AR Zip Code 75460 47933 29116 19510 37321 50511 47404 53066 08023 63104 35967 55416 53014 60098 37311 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 3.412 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 3.2385 6.3135 0.2945 0.1325 6.4715 1.6585 4.938 0 6.58324085 0.0015 0.119 0 6.5 1.3 5.175 0.092 0.0695 6.34465 0 3.6825 2.66 0 6.3187 6.272 0 6.125 0.14 0 6.264 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 6.6505 0 0 0 6.6505 6.608 0 0 6.608 6.604 0 0 6.604 6.5965 0 0 0 6.5965 6.58324085 0 0 0 6.58324085 0.1205 0 6.395 6.5155 6.5 0 0 0 6.5 6.475 0 0 0 6.475 0.1615 5.9625 0 0.3305 6.4545 6.34465 0 0.0225 6.36715 6.3425 0 0 0 6.3425 6.3187 0 0 0 6.3187 6.272 0 0 6.272 6.265 0 0 6.265 6.264 0 0 0 6.264 77053 00674 0.045 0 0.129 0 0.174 0 0 0 6.0785 6.2525 0 0 6.21 6.21 48313 38868 61242 48184 71602 46705 47201 28052 46320 67219 56303 72401 4.411 0.2925 0.434 0.065 6 0.6 0 0.0025 0 0.001 5.67614 3.55 1.758 5.864 0.18 6 0 5.4 6 5.95 5.873 5.857 0.180825 2.3 6.169 6.1565 0.614 6.065 6 6 6 5.9525 5.873 5.858 5.856965 5.85 0 0 0 5.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.169 0 6.1565 0 6.114 0 6.065 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 5.9525 0 5.873 0 5.858 0 5.856965 0 5.85 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 9 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00321 Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State PPG INDUSTRIES,1NC-SPR1NGDALE COMPLEX 125 COLFAX ST SPRINGDALE PA GMVM-LANSING GRAND RIVER ASSEMBLY 920 TOWNSEND ST MAIL C LANSING Ml CROWN AEROSOL PACKAGING 3737 E EXCHANGE AVE AURORA IL AVERY DENNISON RBIS LENOIR 950 GERMAN ST LENOIR NC TACO INC - CRANSTON 1160 CRANSTON ST CRANSTON R! PELLA CORP CARROLL OPERATIONS 1750 E US HWY 30 E CARROLL IA GREIF PACKAGING LLC 10850 STRANG RD LA PORTE TX JOHN DEERE HORICON WORKS-DT 300 N VINE ST HORICON Wl CARRY-ON TRAILER CORP 1965 HWY 30 MISSOURI VALLEY IA L A DARLING CO - PIGGOTT AR FACILITY HWY 49 S PIGGOTT AR TORO CO 200 SIMEAVE TO MAH Wl SENECA FOODS CORP CAN PLANT 3709 MILL ST MARION NY COLOR COMMUNICATIONS INC 4242 W FILLMORE CHICAGO IL MIDDLEBURY HARDWOOD PRODUCTS 101 JOAN DR MIDDLEBURY IN SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS MT VERNON LLC 1 LEXAN LN MOUNT VERNON IN QUAD/GRAPHICS INC N11896 HWY 175 PO BOX 2 LOMIRA Wl BATESVILLE MANUFACTURING INC -DOLL PLANT 1000 E PEARL ST BATESVILLE IN BERENFIELD CONTAINERS SE LTD 12180 UNIVERSITY CITY BL HARRISBURG NC GATES CORP 1450 MONTANA RD IOLA KS KOHLER CO 2000 N 5TH ST UNION CITY TN DUNBARTON CORP REDIFRAME DIV 1101 TECHNOLOGY DR DOTHAN AL WORTHINGTON CYLINDERS WISCONSI N LLC 300 E BREED ST CHILTON Wl PRECOAT METALS 25 NORTHGATE INDUSTRIE GRANITE CITY IL POWER PARTNERS INC 200 NEWTON BRIDGE RD ATHENS GA EQUISTAR CHEMICALS BAYPORT CHEMICALS PLANT 5761 UNDERWOOD RD PASADENA TX CROWN FOOD PACKAGING 1650 BROADWAY HANOVER PA PRECOAT METALS 2604 RIVER RD HAWESVILLE KY US DOD USAF TINKER AFB 72 CEG/CEA 7535 FIFTH S7 TINKER AFB OK COORSTEK 2449 RIVERSIDE PKWY GRAND JUNCTION CO VON HOFFMANN GRAPHICS INC 1005 COMMERCIAL DR OWENSVILLE MO Zip Code 15144 48921 60504 28645 02920 51401 77571 53032 51555 72454 54660 14505 60624 46540 47620 53048 47006 28075 66749 38261 36303 53014 62040 30607 77507 17331 42348 73145 81505 65066 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 5.754 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.0585 2.6 3.2 5.0525 0.717 4.668 1.066 0.058 5.6685 0 5.5825 4.47095 0.5371 0 5.5 0 5.464 0.073 5.3855 0 5.426 0 5.423 1.05 4.35 0 5.3965 3.2 2.05 4.836 0.5315 0.2675 5.085 0 5.351 0 0.00295 0.5345 4.8125 0 5.3 0.2495 5.020885 4.232 1.0355 0 5.246 5.0705 0.168 1.3065 3.92 0.007 5.211 1.9 3.2 0.0025 4.84 3.703 1.3745 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 5.8125 0 0 0 5.8125 5.8 0 0 5.8 5.7695 0 0 0 5.7695 5.734 0 0 0 5.734 5.7265 0 0 0 5.7265 5.5825 0 0 5.5825 5.00805 0 0.566795 5.574845 5.5 0 0 5.5 5.464 0 0 0 5.464 5.4585 0 0 5.4585 5.426 0 0 5.426 5.423 0 0 5.423 5.4 0 0 5.4 5.3965 0 0 0 5.3965 5.25 0.125 0 0 5.375 5.3675 0 0 5.3675 5.3525 0 0 0 5.3525 5.351 0 0 0 5.351 0.00295 0 0 5.3455 5.34845 5.347 0 0 5.347 5.3 0 0 0 5.3 5.270385 0 0 0 5.270385 5.2675 0 0 0 5.2675 5.246 0 0 5.246 5.2385 0 0 5.2385 5.2265 0 0 5.2265 5.218 0 0 0 5.218 5.1 0 0 0.065 5.165 4.8425 0 0.25 0 5.0925 5.0775 0 0 5.0775 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 10 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00322 Facility Name SILGAN CAN CO CARRY-ON TRAILER CORF HESS PRINT SOLUTIONS VALMONT INDUSTRIES INC VAUGHAN-BASSETT FURNITURE CO GALAX SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP KIA MOTORS MANUFACTURING OF GEORGIA LOGAN ALUMINUM INC SEQUA COATINGS CORP-PRECOAT M ETALS DIV ARVINMERITOR HEAVY VEHICLE SYSTEMS LLC AUTOALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL INC OWENS CORNING VETROTEX LLC - ANDERSON SC TEREX WASHINGTON SOUTH CAMPUS ARMSTRONG HARDWOOD FLOORING CO RR DONNELLEY-WETMORE PLANT PRECOAT METALS CARDONE INDUSTRIES METAL COATERS SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP FIBERMARK NORTH AMERICA INC BERENFIELD CONTAINERS INC RR DONNELLEY BARABOO DIV ENDICOTT INTERCONNECT TECHNOLOGIES INC INX DIGITAL INK CO TCI COATINGS INC CHRYSLER STERLING HEIGHTS ASSEMBLY PLANT (PART) SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP MASTERBRAND CABINETS INC QG LLC WINCHESTER VIRGINIA ARDAGH METAL PACKAGING USA INC Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State 6200 FRANKLIN BLVD SUIT SACRAMENTO CA 5300 WESTMORELAND RD WINNEMUCCA NV 3765 SUNNYBROOK RD BRIMFIELD OH 7002 N 288TH ST VALLEY NE 300 E GRAYSON ST GALAX VA 135 NATIONAL RD EDISON NJ 7777 KIA PKWY WEST POINT GA US HWY 431 N RUSSELLVILLE KY US HWY 12 AT RT 249 PORTAGE IN 801 RAILROAD AVE YORK SC 1 INTERNATIONAL DR FLAT ROCK Ml 4837 HWY 81 S STARR SC 18700 NE65TH ST REDMOND WA 565 HARTCO DR ONEIDA TN 1645 W SAM HOUSTON PK\ HOUSTON TX 16402 JACINTOPORT BLVD HOUSTON TX 5660 RISING SUN AVE PHILADELPHIA PA 951 PRISOCK RD JACKSON MS 1400 PLOVER RD PLOVER Wl 5492 BOSTWICK ST LOWV1LLE NY 31 RAILROAD ST CLARENDON PA 1300 SAUK AVE BARABOO Wl 1093 CLARK ST ENDICOTT NY 405 INDUSTRIAL WAY DIXON CA 4501 BRADLEY ST LUBBOCK TX 38111 VAN DYKE STERLING HEIGHTS Ml Zip Code 95824 89445 44240 68064 24333 08817 31833 42276 46368 29745 48134 29684 98052 37841 77043 77015 19120 39272 54467 13367 16313 53913 13760 95620 79415 48312 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 4.432 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.6065 0 5.0015 5 0 5 0 0.74943095 4.2467754 4.02 0.975 0.0525 4.912 0.035 4.9145 0.572 4.328 0.001 4.893 0.2 4.65 0.479 4.3105 0.1114 4.6565 0 4.7345 4.6345 0.092 4.407 0.245 0.8115 3.8385 0 4.4805 1.31 3.16 0.091 4.3535 0.132025 4.29749 4.1785 0.2435 0.25 4.1155 4.3915 0 4.36875 0 0.49 3.85 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 5.0385 0 0 5.0385 5.0015 0 0 0 5.0015 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 5 4.99620635 0 0 0 4.99620635 4.995 0 0 0 4.995 4.9645 0 0 4.9645 4.9495 0 0 0 4.9495 4.9 0 0 0 4.9 4.894 0 0 0 4.894 4.85 0 0 4.85 4.7895 0 0 0 4.7895 4.7679 0 0 4.7679 4.7345 0 0 4.7345 4.7265 0 0 4.7265 4.652 0 0 0 4.652 4.65 0 0 0 4.65 4.4805 0 0 0 4.4805 4.47 0 0 0 4.47 4.4445 0 0 4.4445 4.429515 0 0 8.88178E-16 4.429515 4.422 0 0 4.422 4.3655 0.029 0 0 4.3945 4.3915 0 0 0 4.3915 4.36875 0 0 4.36875 4.34 0 0 4.34 N90 W14600 COMMERCE D MENOMONEE FALL Wl 1002 EISENHOWER DR N GOSHEN IN 160 CENTURY LN STONEW WINCHESTER VA 936 BARRACUDA ST TERMINAL ISLAND CA 53051 46526 22603 90731 0 0.0035 3.8727 3.8 4.2 4.1895 0.180725 0.375 4.2 4.193 4.053425 4.175 0 0 0 4.2 0 0 0.0065 4.1995 0 0 0.126 4.179425 0 0 0 4.175 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 11 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00323 Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State R R DONNELLEY & SONS CO DANVILLE DIV ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC INLAND LABEL & MARKETING SC JOHNSON & SON INC WAXDALE FACILITY HYUNDAI MOTOR MANUFACTURING ALABAMA LLC US ARMY LAKE CITY ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT CROWN AEROSOL PACKAGING CLEVELAND STEEL CONTAINER CORP RRD MAPLE GROVE SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP THIRD COAST TERMINALS PEARLAND PRO LINE PRINTING ARLINGTON TTM PRINTED CIRCUIT GROUP - S TAFFORD DIV CARRY-ON TRAILER CORP QUAD/GRAPHICS INC NAVISTAR INC AFTON CHEMICAL CORP BATESVILLE MANUFACTURING INC BENCHMARK ENERGY PRODUCTS LLC OMG AMERICAS BETCO CORP NAZDAR SHAWNEE VIASYSTEMS CORP TITAN COATINGS INC AUTOMOTIVE COMPONENTS HOLDINGS LLC SALINE PLANT BALL METAL FOOD CONTAINER CORP QUAD/GRAPHICS INC MOTOR CASTINGS CO GM MLCG FAIRFAX ASSEMBLY FORD MOTOR CO - OHIO ASSEMBLY PLANT 3201 LEBANON RD DANVILLE KY 200 RT 413 BRISTOL PA 2009 W AVE S LACROSSE Wl 8311 16TH ST STURTEVANT Wl 700 HYUNDAI BLVD MONTGOMERY AL INTERSECTION OF MO HW INDEPENDENCE MO 4TH ST & PARK AVE FARIBAULT MN 350 MILL ST QUAKERTOWN PA 7401 KILMER LN MAPLE GROVE MN 8673 LYONS-MARENGO RD LYONS NY 1871 MYKAWA PEARLAND TX 401 N GREAT SW PKWY ARLINGTON TX 4 OLD MONSON RD STAFFORD CT 159 INDUSTRIAL PARK RD MONTROSS VA 56 DUPLA1NVILLE RD SARATOGA SPRING NY 6125 URBANARD SPRINGFIELD OH 725 CANNON BRIDGE RD ORANGEBURG SC 310 CROWN RD BATESVILLE MS 4113 W INDUSTRIAL AVE MIDLAND TX TWO MILE RUN RD FRANKLIN PA 1001 BROWN AVE TOLEDO OH 8501 HEDGE LN TERRACE SHAWNEE KS 1521 POPLAR LN FOREST GROVE OR 2025 EXCHANGE PL BESSEMER AL 7700 MICHIGAN AVE SALINE Ml 300 W GREGER RD OAKDALE CA 555S108TH ST WEST ALLIS Wl 1323S65TH MILWAUKEE Wl 3201 FAIRFAX TRAFFICWA KANSAS CITY KS 650 MILLER RD AVON LAKE OH Zip Code 40422 19007 54601 53177 36105 64051 55021 18951 55369 14489 77581 76011 06075 22520 12866 45502 29115 38606 79703 16323 43607 66227 97116 35023 48176 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 3.8985 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.273 0.0519 0.1905 2.2045 1.9285 0.125 0.375 2.6025 1.506 1.579 2.516 2.6265 1.4625 0.035 4.04 3.9335 0.1045 0.7275 3.3065 0 0 3.088685 0.17821 0 3.9505 0 3.925 3.68 0.1875 0.415 3.4 2.813 0.488 0.5695 3.2265 0.344 3.4415 0.025 0.223 3.69 0 1.0955 2.556 0.0675 3.58 3.59 0 0.06 3.5 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 4.1715 0 0 0 4.1715 0.2424 0 0 3.9055 4.1479 4.133 0 0 0 4.133 0.5 0 3.628795 4.128795 4.1085 0 0 4.1085 4.095 0 0 0 4.095 4.089 0 0 0 4.089 4.075 0 0 0 4.075 4.038 0 0 4.038 4.034 0 0 0 4.034 0 0 0 3.9915 3.9915 3.266895 0 0.701975 0 3.96887 3.9505 0 0 3.9505 3.925 0 0 0 3.925 3.8675 0 0 0 3.8675 3.815 0.014 0 0.02 3.849 3.301 0.0405 0 0.4705 3.812 3.796 0 0 0 3.796 3.7855 0 0 3.7855 0.248 0 0 3.4725 3.7205 3.69 0 0 3.69 3.6515 0 0 0 3.6515 3.6475 0 0 3.6475 3.59 0 0 0 3.59 3.56 0 0 0 3.56 95361 53214 53214 66115 44012 0.152 3.41 0 0.1 0.395 3.4 0.095 1.5915 3.35 3 3.552 3.505 1.5915 3.45 3.395 0 0 0 3.552 0 0 3.505 0 0 1.894 3.4855 0 0 3.45 0 0.0035 3.3985 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 12 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00324 Facility Name BROWN PRINTING CO RHODIA INC SPRAYLAT CORP CA PRECOAT METALS LAKESIDE LITHOGRAPHY LLC AVERY DENNISON HEWLETT-PACKARD CARIBE BV SITE QUAD GRAPHICS TAUNTON RETAIL RR DONNELLEY STRASBURG DIV BRILLiON IRON WORKS INC CADON PLATING CO ABC COMPOUNDING CO INC CLEAR LAKE CHEMICALS LLC CENTURY INDUSTRIAL COATINGS 1 NC CLEVELAND STEEL CONTAINER - Nl LES MEADWESTVACO CONSUMER PACKAGING GROUP i i n UNIVAR USA INC - BUNOLA BRANCH ARR-MAZ CUSTOM CHEMICALS IVC INDUSTRIAL COATINGS INC ROPPE CORP VAN CAN CO VANEX INC CROWN FOOD PACKAGING CENTRIA RED SPOT WESTLAND INC CLEVELAND STEEL CONTAINER CORP STREETSBORO PLANT ALERIS ROLLED PRODUCTS INC IVC SOUTH MAGNA MIRRORS CORP - NEWAYGO ASTRO COATINGS INC Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State 668 GRAVEL PIKE EAST GREENVILLE PA 2ND ST & BLUEBALL AVE MARCUS HOOK PA 3465 S LA CIENAGA BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 4301 S SPRING AVE SAINT LOUIS MO 1600 S LAFLIN ST CHICAGO IL 17700 FOLTZ INDUSTRIAL 1 STRONGSVILLE OH HWY 110 N KM 5.1 AGUADILLA PR 50 JOHN HANCOCKRD TAUNTON MA ONE SHENANDOAH VALLE STRASBURG VA 200 PARK AVE BRILLION Wl 371511TH ST WYANDOTTE Ml 6970 JONESBORO RD MORROW GA 11200 BAY AREA BLVD PASADENA TX HWY 69 S JACKSONVILLE TX 115 ERIE ST NILES OH 7411 OAKWOOD ST MEBANE NC 328 BUNOLA RIVER RD BUNOLA PA 4800 STATE RD 60 E MULBERRY FL 1825 E NATIONAL AVE BRAZIL IN 1602 N UNION ST FOSTORIA OH 10837 ETIWANDA AVE FONTANA CA 1700 S SHAWNEE ST MOUNT VERNON IL 10200 N LOMBARD ST PORTLAND OR 530 N SECOND ST CAMBRIDGE OH 550 S EDWIN ST WESTLAND Ml 10048 AURORA-HUDSON R STREETSBORO OH Zip Code 18041 19061 90016 63116 60608 44149 00605 02780 22657 54110 48192 30260 77507 75766 44446 27302 15020 33860 47834 44830 92337 62864 97203 43725 48186 44241 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 3.2665 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.1135 0.1915 0.0005 1.679 1.679 0.926 2.429 2.65 0.6 0.422 2.824 0 3.2155 1.91685 0.04475 3.1 0.04 2.13095 0.8037 1.708 1.41 0.0025 0.375 3.0356 0.00095 0.085 1.611 0.0025 2.988 2.9255 0 0.125 0.0025 0.1415 2.76 0.577852 2.311408 0.125 2.7255 2.45 0.375 0 2.818 1.2615 1.4975 1.411 1.335 1.226 1.4995 0.0025 2.715 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 3.38 0 0.0075 4.44089E-16 3.3875 0.192 0 3.167 3.359 3.358 0 0 3.358 3.355 0 0 0 3.355 3.25 0 0 0 3.25 3.246 0 0 3.246 3.2155 0 0 3.2155 1.9616 0 0 1.24606 3.20766 3.14 0 0.011 3.151 2.93465 0 0.21095 3.1456 3.118 0 0 0 3.118 0.3775 0.0025 0 2.6855 3.0655 3.03655 0 4.44089E-16 3.03655 1.696 0 0 1.3035 2.9995 2.9905 0 0 0 2.9905 2.9255 0 0 2.9255 0.1275 0 0 2.786 2.9135 2.9015 0 0 2.9015 2.88926 0 0 4.44089E-16 2.88926 2.8505 0 0 2.8505 2.825 0 0 0 2.825 2.818 0 0 2.818 2.759 0 0 0 2.759 2.746 0 0 0 2.746 2.7255 0 0 0 2.7255 2.7175 0 0 0 2.7175 1372 KY HWY 1957 LEWISPORT KY 875 PROGRESS CENTER A LAWRENCEVILLE GA 700 S PARK DR NEWAYGO Ml 27 MAIN ST STRUTHERS OH 42351 30043 49337 44471 0.125 0.538 1.4755 0.5225 2.571 2.1515 1.1975 2.1285 2.696 2.6895 2.673 2.651 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.696 0 2.6895 0 2.673 0 2.651 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 13 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00325 Facility Name 1C OF OKLAHOMA LLC AKZONOBEL HIRSH INDUSTRIES INC PRECOAT METALS RADIATOR SPECIALTY CO PRECOAT METALS ROBROY INDUSTRIES TEXAS LP NORTHERN LABS INC WEST DRIVE GMTG - SHREVEPORT ASSEMBLY INTERNATIONAL PAPER PINE HILL MILL QG LLC RR DONNELLEY LOS ANGELES MANUFACTURING VERTIS COMMUNICATIONS CCL CONTAINER AEROSOL DIV SAPA EXTRUSIONS INC CUMMINS POWER GENERATION QUAD/GRAPHICS INC SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC APOLLO COLORS INC SAPA EXTRUDER INC PPG INDUSTRIES ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES ST CHARLES OPERATIONS (TAFT/STAR) UNION CARBIDE CORP HANNA STEEL CORP THE DOW CHEMICAL CO DUPONT TOWANDA PLANT HONDA MANUFACTURING OF INDIANA LLC COLOR CORP OF AMERICA BRENNTAG SOUTHWEST INC LANC ASTER KAY AUTOMOTIVE GRAPHICS MAGNABLEND INC- LIQUID PLANT Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City 2322 N MINGO RD TULSA 1872 HWY 9 BYPASS W LANCASTER 1525 MCKEE RD DOVER 4502 FREEDOM WAY WEIRTON 600 RADIATOR RD INDIAN TRAIL 3399 DAVEY ALLISON BLVC HUEYTOWN 1100 US HWY 271 S GILMER 5800 W DR MANITOWOC 7600 GENERAL MOTORS B SHREVEPORT 7600 HWY 10W PINE HILL 420 W INDUSTRIAL AVE EFFINGHAM 19681 PACIFIC GATEWAY [ TORRANCE 4051 FONDORF DR COLUMBUS ONE LLODIO DR HERMITAGE 2500 ALUMAX RD YANKTON 1400 73RD AVE NE FRIDLEY 100 DUPLAINVILLE RD THE ROCK 1990 SANDIFER BLVD SENECA 1550 MOUND RD ROCKDALE 2905 OLD OAKWOOD RD GAINESVILLE 1020 OLYMPIC DR BATAVIA 355 LA HWY 3142 (GATE 1) TAFT State OK SC DE wv NC AL TX Wl LA AL IL CA OH PA SD MN GA SC IL GA IL LA Zip Code 74116 29720 19904 26062 28079 35023 75644 54220 71129 36769 62401 90502 43228 16148 57078 55432 30285 29678 60436 30504 60510 70057 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 2.65 0.4955 2.148 0.0025 2.633 0 2.6315 0.146 0 2.041 0.5505 0 0.041 1.0045 1.5835 0.125 2.45 0.058 0 2.19 0.255 2.3775 0.0555 2.1765 0.2535 0.19 2.2265 0 2.4011901 0.12 2.28 2.285 0.11 0 2.35 0 0 0 2.317 0 0.821 0.6 1.07 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 2.65 0 0 2.65 2.6435 0 0 2.6435 2.6355 0 0 2.6355 2.6315 0 0 0 2.6315 0.146 0 0 2.4785 2.6245 2.5915 0 0 0 2.5915 0.041 0 2.55 2.591 2.588 0 0 2.588 2.575 0 0 0 2.575 0.058 2.4305 2.70617E-16 2.4885 2.445 0 0 2.445 2.433 0 0 2.433 2.43 0 0 0 2.43 2.4165 0 0 0 2.4165 2.4011901 0 0 0 2.4011901 2.4 0 0 2.4 2.395 0 0 0 2.395 2.35 0 0.0345 2.3845 0 0 2.3445 2.3445 2.317 0 0 0 2.317 0.821 0 0 1.491 2.312 1.67 0.64 0 0 2.31 3812 COMMERCE AVE FAIRFIELD AL 1790 BUILDING MIDLAND Ml 192 PATTERSON BLVD TOWANDA PA 2755 N MICHIGAN AVE GREENSBURG IN 1630 W HILL ST LOUISVILLE KY 704 E WINTERGREEN RD LANCASTER TX 57 KAY INDUSTRIAL DR LAKE ORION Ml 100 W STERRETT RD WAXAHACHIE TX 35064 48667 18848 47240 40210 75134 48359 75165 0.9095 2.2 0.252 1.785 0.009 0.0225 0 0.125 1.201 0.09 2.0365 0.497 2.2185 0.025 2.2135 0 2.1105 2.29 2.2885 2.282 2.2275 0.0475 2.2135 0.125 0 0.0035 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.189 2.2995 0 0.0025 2.296 0 0 2.2885 0 0.0025 2.2845 0 0 2.2275 0 2.175 2.2225 0 0 2.2135 0 2.0785 2.2035 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 14 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00326 Facility Name VERTIS NCP COATINGS INC AMERICAN COLOR GRAPHICS DERRICK CORP BALL METAL FOOD CONTAINER CORP RR DONNELLEY & SONS CO KEYMARK CORP RR DONNELLEY BON L MANUFACTURING CO BWAY CORP NEXTEER AUTOMOTIVE CORP VERTIS COMMUNICATIONS GM ORION ASSEMBLY CENTER SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP CONSOLIDATED SYSTEMS INC QG LLC (WAS WORLDCOLOR STILLWATER) DURA COAT PRODUCTS INC ITW DYMON CANFIELD METAL COATING CORP VERTIS COMMUNICATIONS ACCESS BUSINESS GROUP LLC VEYANCE TECHNOLOGIES INC CATERPILLAR INC VANGUARD PAINTS & FINISHES INC SENOX CORP RR DONNELLEY / PINEVILLE CAMACO COLUMBUS MANUFACTURING OHIO ART CO STEEL DYNAMICS INC DUPONT YERKES PLANT Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State 7619 DOANE DR MANASSAS VA 225 FORT ST NILES Ml 810 ESST MARENGO IA 3350 UNION RD CHEEKTOWAGA NY 1200 S CRUTCHER ST SPRINGDALE AR 6821 E COUNTY RD 1100 N MATTOON IL 1188 CAYADUTTA ST RT 3c FONDA NY 100 QUALITY CT CHARLESTOWN IN HWY 53 BONNELL RD CARTHAGE TN 1202 AIRPORT RD NORTH BRUNSWICf NJ 3900 HOLLAND RD SAGINAW Ml 10911 GRANITE ST CHARLOTTE NC 4555 GIDDINGS RD LAKE ORION Ml 2200 WILBUR AVE ANTIOCH CA 650 ROSEWOOD DR COLUMBIA SC 100 W AIRPORT RD STILLWATER OK 26655 PEOPLES RD MADISON AL 805 E OLD 56 HWY OLATHE KS 460 W MAIN ST CANFIELD OH 4646 S GRADY AVE TAMPA FL 7575 FULTON ST E ADA Ml 2701 W OMAHA AVE NORFOLK NE 3701 STATE RD 26 E LAFAYETTE IN 1409 GREENEST MARIETTA OH 227 S TOWN E BLVD MESQUITE TX 10519 INDUSTRIAL DR PINEVILLE NC 1851 E32NDAVE COLUMBUS NE ONE TOY ST BRYAN OH 5134 LOOP RD JEFFERSONVILLE IN 3115 RIVER RD BUFFALO NY Zip Code 20109 49120 52301 14225 72764 61938 12068 47111 37030 08902 48601 28273 48359 94509 29201 74075 35756 66061 44406 33611 49355 68701 47905 45750 75149 28134 68601 43506 47130 14207 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 2.1285 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.0695 2.1685 0 2.02 0.1395 0 2.1335 0.23 1.9 1.9725 0.138 0 2.105 1.955 0.148 0.644 1.229 0.8015 1.2945 0.2085 1.875 1.8595 0.215 0.9 0.85 0 2.067 0 2.0475 1.8275 0.213 1.75171 0.28554 0.6005 1.4015 0 2 1.818 0.1695 1.8935 0.092 0.037085 0.10976 0.1205 1.8545 1.965 0 0.9865 0.9765 1.8475 0.098 0 1.94 1.1855 0.6985 0 1.87 0.5085 1.354 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 2.198 0 0 2.198 2.1685 0 0 0 2.1685 2.1595 0 0 2.1595 2.1335 0 0 0 2.1335 2.13 0 0 0 2.13 2.1105 0 0 0 2.1105 2.105 0.00012 0 0 2.10512 2.103 0 0 2.103 1.873 0 0.214 0.013 2.1 2.096 0 0 0 2.096 2.0835 0 0 2.0835 2.0745 0 0 0 2.0745 1.75 0 0.32 2.07 2.067 0 0 0 2.067 2.0475 0 0 0 2.0475 2.0405 0 0 0 2.0405 2.03725 0 0 0 2.03725 2.002 0 0 0 2.002 2 0 0 0 2 1.9875 0 0 0 1.9875 1.9855 0 0 1.9855 0.146845 0 0 1.829935 1.97678 1.975 0 0 0 1.975 1.965 0 0 1.965 1.963 0 0 0 1.963 1.9455 0 0 1.9455 1.94 0 0 1.94 1.884 0 0 0 1.884 1.87 0 0 0 1.87 1.8625 0 0 0 1.8625 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 15 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00327 Facility Name BALL AEROSOL & SPECIALTY CONTAINER INC CARESTREAM HEALTH COLORADO RR DONNELLEY / VON HOFFMANN CORF SILGAN WHITE CAP CORP ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS STP PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING CO REICHHOLD INC AMERICAN COLOR GRAPHICS - LUFKIN GFX INTERNATIONAL BUCKEYE INTERNATIONAL INC WISMARQ CORP DIVERSEY INC SAPA INC - COATINGS DIVSION SONOCO PRODUCTS CO - PRESIDENTS ISLAND EFCO CORP HUNTSMAN PETROCHEMICAL LLC FUJIFILM NORTH AMERICA CORP TEXAS FINISHING CO GATES CORP BWAY CORP BWAY PACKAGING DIV 3M CO-HUTCHINSON NESTLE PURINA PETCARE RR DONNELLEY & SONS CO GATES CORP - CHARLESTON LION COPOLYMER LLC FUJIFILM MANUFACTURING USA INC CRYSTAL FINISHING SYSTEMS INC INDEPENDENT CAN CO MISSION KLEENSWEEP PRODUCTS INC BAYOU COS INC Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State 1717 GIFFORD RD ELGIN IL 2000 HOWARD SMITH AVE WINDSOR CO 321 WILSON DR JEFFERSON CITY MO 350 JAYCEE DR VALMONT HAZLETON PA 901 N GREENWOOD AVE KANKAKEE IL Zip Code 60120 80550 65109 18201 60901 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.438 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 1.4 0.0015 0 1.78179 0.04407 0.779 1.0335 0.7475 1.054 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 1.838 0 0 0 1.838 0.0015 1.8295 0 5.68122E-17 1.831 1.82586 0 0 1.82586 1.8125 0 0 0 1.8125 1.8015 0 0 0 1.8015 477 LEXINGTON AVE PAINESVILLE OH 425 S PACE BLVD PENSACOLA FL 3001 ATKINSON DR LUFKIN TX 333 BARRON BLVD GRAYSLAKE IL 2700 WAGNER PL MARYLAND HEIGHT MO 11440 W ADDISON AVE FRANKLIN PARK IL 316 HART ST WATERTOWN Wl 5325 NE SKYPORT WAY PORTLAND OR 2755 HARBOR AVE MEMPHIS TN 1000 COUNTY RD MONETT MO 3892 US HWY 90 DAYTON TX 20W14THAVE NORTH KANSAS Cl' MO 1801 SURVEYOR BLVD CARROLLTON TX 1650 ROWE PKWY POPLAR BLUFF MO 8200 BROADWELL RD CINCINNATI OH 905/915 ADAMS ST SE HUTCHINSON MN 1000 HAMILTON RD WEIRTON WV 60 SECURITY DR AVON CT 1300 S PLANT RD CHARLESTON MO 5955 SCENIC HWY BATON ROUGE LA 211 PUCKETTS FERRY RD GREENWOOD SC 2608 ROSS AVE SCHOFIELD Wl 1300 BRASS MILL RD BELCAMP MD 2434 BIRKDALE ST LOS ANGELES CA 5200 CURTIS LN NEW IBERIA LA 44077 32502 75901 60030 63043 60131 53094 97218 38113 65708 77535 64116 75006 63901 45244 55350 26062 06001 63834 70805 29649 54476 21017 90031 70560 1.0615 0.1375 1.6675 0 0.125 0 0.00009 1.46070735 0 1.11 0 0 0 0 0.88529 0 0.3935 1.54 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 1.5 0 1.632 0.078 1.075 1.6145 1.7385 0.00003 0.251972 1.7065 0.586 0.001 1.677 1.676 0.001 0.72807 1.585 1.1835 0.0365 0.00555 0 1.56 1.5361434 1.52745 0 0 1.0615 1.7695 1.7455 1.075 1.7395 1.7385 0.00012 1.71267935 1.7065 1.696 0.001 1.677 1.676 0.001 1.61336 1.585 1.577 1.5765 0.00555 0 1.56 1.5361434 1.52745 1.5 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.7195 1.781 0 1.7695 0 1.7455 0.67 1.745 0 1.7395 0 0 1.7385 1.716 1.71612 0 2.22045E-16 1.71267935 0 0 1.7065 0 0 1.696 0 1.6905 1.6915 0 0 1.677 0 1.676 0 1.6725 1.6735 0 1.61336 0 0 1.585 0 0 1.577 0 0 1.5765 0 1.565 1.57055 0 1.5625 1.565 0 1.56 0 0 1.5361434 0 0 1.52745 0 1.5 0 0 1.5 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 16 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00328 Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State EASTMAN CHEMICAL CO TENNESSEE OPERATIONS DENSO MANUFACTURING TENNESSEE INC TAIYO AMERICA INC BRIGHTSMITH LLC CHROMASOURCEINC RANBAR ELECTRICAL MATERIALS INC DECOSTAR INDUSTRIES INC SONY CHEMICALS COPORATION OF AMERICA J L CLARK INC AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INC INCHEM CORP ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC HENTZEN COATINGS,INC BATAVIA FACILITY CARDINAL ALUMINUM CO PLAN T 3 FIVE STAR COATINGS GROUP RG STEEL WHEELING LLC BEECH BOTTOM PLANT TRINKOTE INDUSTRIAL FINISHES INC ARANDELL CORP CATALYST OILFIELD SERVICES LLC DUBOIS CHEMICALS INC SHEBOYGAN PAINT CO ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS KELLEY TECHNICAL COATINGS INC WW HENRY ICL-IP AMERICA INC GMC TRUCK GROUP ARLINGTON ASSEMBLY PLANT BRUNSWICK CORP MERCURY MARINE DIV KMCO CROSBY PLANT WINSLOW-BROWNING INC WARREN UNILUBE INC 100 EASTMAN RD KINGSPORT TN 1720, 1725, 1755 ROBERT C MARYVILLE TN 2675 ANTLER DR CARSON CITY NV 120 ENTERPRISE AVE MORRISVILLE PA 2433 S CR 600 E COLUMBIA CITY IN 408 MANOR-HARRISON Cll HARRISON CITY PA 1 DECOMA DR CARROLLTON GA 215 SATELLITE BLVD NE SI SUWANEE GA 923 23RD AVE ROCKFORD IL 1313 WINDSOR AVE COLUMBUS OH 800 CEL-RIVER RD ROCK HILL SC 4115 N PERKINS RD STILLWATER OK 1500 LATHEM ST BATAVIA IL 4005 OAKLAWN DR LOUISVILLE KY 36616 89TH ST TWIN LAKES Wl 2481 RIVER RD WELLSBURG wv 1800 PARK PL AVE FORT WORTH TX N82 W13118 LEON RD MENOMONEE FALL Wl 11999 E HWY 158 GARDENDALE TX 3630 E KEMPER RD SHARONVILLE OH 608 CANAL ST CEDARTOWN GA 372 CLEVELAND ST ROCHESTER PA 1401 S 15TH ST 150 MOONEY DR 11636 HUNTINGTON 2525 E ABRAMS ST W6250 PIONEER RD 16503 RAMSEY RD 215 BROWNSVILLE AVE 1200 S8TH ST LOUISVILLE KY BOURBONNAIS IL GALLIPOLIS FERRY WV ARLINGTON TX FOND DU LAC Wl CROSBY TX LIBERTY IN WEST MEMPHIS AR Zip Code 37662 37801 89701 19067 46725 15636 30117 30024 61104 43211 29730 74075 60510 40219 53181 26070 76110 53051 79758 45241 30125 15074 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.8315 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.5765 0 1.489 0.005 1.1285 0.317 1 0 1.453 0 0.0065 0.125 1.31 0 0 0.216 1.2005 0.9105 0.5055 0.025 0.1875 0.566 0.8445 1.2675 0.141 0.0485 1.354 0 1.4 0 1.4 0 1.37545 1.324 0.031 1.35 0 0 0 0.692 0.6285 0.517 0.7965 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 1.408 0.087 0 0.001 1.496 1.489 0 0 0 1.489 1.1335 0 0 0.3465 1.48 1.317 0 0 0.161 1.478 1.453 0 0 0 1.453 0.0065 0 0 1.444 1.4505 1.435 0 0 0 1.435 0 0 0 1.418 1.418 1.4165 0 0 0 1.4165 1.416 0 0 0 1.416 0.2125 0 1.2005 1.413 1.4105 0 0 0 1.4105 1.4085 0 0 0 1.4085 1.4025 0 0 1.4025 1.4 0 0 0 1.4 1.4 0 0 0 1.4 1.37545 0 0 0 1.37545 1.355 0 0 0 1.355 1.35 0 0 1.35 0 0 1.329 1.329 1.3205 0 0 0 1.3205 1.3135 0 0 0 1.3135 40210 60914 25515 76010 54935 77532 47353 72301 1.3 1.299 0.017145 0.37 0.127 0.125 1.2345 1.2195 0 0 0.356 0.9 1.143 0.125 0 0.0045 1.3 1.299 0.373145 1.27 1.27 0.25 1.2345 1.224 0 0 0.8975 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.55112E-17 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1.3 1.299 1.270645 1.27 1.27 1.25 1.2345 1.224 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 17 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00329 Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State VEOL1A ES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LLC PORT ARTHUR HWY 73, 3.5 MILES W OF T> PORT ARTHUR TX SUN CHEMICAL CORP 2445 PRODUCTION DR SAINT CHARLES IL NICHOLS ALUMINUM ALABAMA INC 2001 HWY 20 W DECATUR AL RYCOLINE PRODUCTS LLC 5540 NW HWY CHICAGO IL ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS MOMENTIVE SPECIALTY CHEMICALS INC 701 SHILOH RD 8600 W 71 ST ST GARLAND TX BEDFORD PARK IL LOCKHEED MARTIN AERONAUTICS CO 1011 LOCKHEED WAY MZ C PALMDALE CA GENTEK BUILDING PRODUCTS 11 CRAGWOOD RD AVENEL NJ CANBERRA CORP 3610 N HOLLAN D-SYLVAN1 > TOLEDO OH HILLYARD INDUSTRIES INC 402 N 3TH ST SAINT JOSEPH MO WISMARQ VALENCIA LLC 125 MCFANN RD VALENCIA PA CROWN CORK & SEAL CO (USA) INC CROWN CLOSURES DIV CELLU TISSUE/CITYFOREST LLC 940 MILL PARK DR LANCASTER OH 1215 WORDEN AVE E LADYSMITH Wl GENERAL MOTORS GM VA DETROIT-HAMTRAMCK ASSEMBLY CENTER POLYMERIC IMAGING INC 2500 E GENERAL MOTORS DETROIT Ml 117E14THAVE NORTH KANSAS CL MO JOHN DEERE SEEDING & CYLINDER 501 RIVER DR MOLINE IL TESORO REFINING & MARKETING CO - MANDAN REFINERY RED SPOT PAINT & VARNISH CO INC 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE MANDAN ND 1016 E COLUMBIA ST EVANSVILLE IN PPG INDUSTRIES OHIO INC (CL) 3800 W 143 ST CLEVELAND OH PPG ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES EAST POINT 1377 OAKLEIGH DR EAST POINT GA MITSUBISHI MOTORS NORTH AMERICA INC 100 N MITSUBISHI MOTOR\ NORMAL IL CP CONVERTERS INC 15 GRUMBACHER RD YORK PA TTM TECHNOLOGIES-SANTA CLARA 407 MATHEW ST SANTA CLARA CA POLARTEC LLC 46 STAFFORD ST LAWRENCE MA AKZONOBEL AEROSPACE COATINGS 1 E WATER ST WAUKEGAN IL SUN CHEMICAL CORP 1380 FORD RD MAUMEE OH UNITED PAINT & CHEMICAL 24671 TELEGRAPH RD SOUTHFIELD Ml INTEL CORP - RONLER ACRES CAMPUS 2501 NW229TH ST HILLSBORO OR SPIRALKOTE FLEXIBLE PACKAGING 1200 CENTRAL FLORIDA Pi ORLANDO FL Zip Code 77640 60174 35601 60630 75042 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.01137 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.000025 0.1815 1.027 0.9685 0.2385 0.179 1.015 0.701 0.477 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 0.011395 0 0 1.2015 1.212895 1.2085 0 0 0 1.2085 1.207 0 0 1.207 1.194 0 0 0 1.194 1.178 0 0 1.178 60501 93599 07001 43615 64501 16059 43130 0.202 0.0475 0.1105 0.75 0.41 1.0195 0 0.966 0.4305 1.0205 0.375 0.7075 0.095 1.1105 1.168 0.478 1.131 1.125 1.1175 1.1145 1.1105 0 0 0 1.168 0 0.6769 1.1549 0 0 0 1.131 0 0 1.125 0 0 1.1175 0 0 0 1.1145 0 0 0 1.1105 54848 48211 0 0.85 0 0.21 0 1.06 1.092 0 0 0.0315 1.092 1.0915 64116 61265 58554 0 0 1.05 1.0535 1 0.0005 1.0535 1 1.0505 0 0 0 1.0535 0 0 0.052 1.052 0 0 0 1.0505 47711 44111 30344 61761 17402 95050 01841 60085 43537 48034 97124 32837 0.621 0.3955 0.0025 1.0115 1.01857 0 0.998 0.491 0.145 0.9615 0.0025 0 0.426 0.647 0.459 0.01 0 1.0005 0 0.493 0.821 0 0.95 0.941 1.047 1.0425 0.4615 1.0215 1.01857 1.0005 0.998 0.984 0.966 0.9615 0.9525 0.941 0 0 0 1.047 0 0 0 1.0425 0 0 0.5645 1.026 0 0 0 1.0215 0 0 0 1.01857 0 0 1.0005 0 0 0.998 0 0 0 0.984 0 0 0 0.966 0 0 0 0.9615 0 0 0.9525 0 0 0 0.941 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 18 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00330 Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State HUNT REFINING CO A CORF 1855 FAIR LAWN RD TUSCALOOSA AL PARKER HANNIFIN 400 S ST MC COOK NE COMPLEMENTARY COATINGS CORP 4701 O'DONNELL ST BALTIMORE MD 3M CO - BROWNWOOD 4501 HWY 377 S BROWNWOOD TX FINISHES UNLIMITED INC 482 WHEELER RD SUGAR GROVE IL WESTERN METAL DECORATING CO 8875 INDUSTRIAL AVE RANCHO CUCAMOh CA PRECOAT METALS 5888 E COUNTY RD 180 BLYTHEVILLE AR LEVLAD 9200 MASON AVE CHATSWORTH CA PARISER INDUSTRIES INC 91 MICHIGAN AVE PATERSON NJ CURTIS METAL FINISHING CO 9917 N ALPINE MACHESNEY PARK IL GREIF PACKAGING LLC 2400 COOPER AVE MERCED CA GENERAL MOTORS LLC BOWLING GREEN ASSEMBLY PLANT CCP COMPOSITES US 600 CORVETTE DR 2434 HOLMES RD BOWLING GREEN KY HOUSTON TX ALCOA COMMERCIAL WINDOWS LLC (DBA TRACO) 71 PROGRESS AVE CRANBERRY TOWN PA TTM TECHNOLOGIES INC 234 CASHMAN DR CHIPPEWA FALLS Wl KAWNEER CO INC 7200 DOE AVE VISALIA CA WATSON STANDARD CO (NEVILLE ISLAND PLANT) 2895 GRAND AVE PITTSBURGH PA CHAMPION TECHNOLOGIES INC 115 PROCTOR ODESSA TX NICHOLS ALUMINUM DAVENPORT 1725 ROCKINGHAM RD DAVENPORT IA SPECTRUM METAL FINISHING 535 BEV RD YOUNGSTOWN OH UNIVAR USA INC HOUSTON FM 529 11235 FM 529 HOUSTON TX RUST-OLEUM CORP 8105 95TH ST PLEASANT PRAIRIE Wl STEELSCAPE 222 W KALAMA RIVER RD KALAMA WA ZEP INC 1310 SEABOARD INDUSTRI ATLANTA GA GLASS COATINGS & CONCEPTS 300 LAWTON AVE MONROE OH BASF CORP 1175 MARTIN ST GREENVILLE OH SYNDICATE SYSTEMS INC 402 N MAIN ST MIDDLEBURY IN CHRYSLER GROUP LLC STERLING STAMPING PLANT (PART) SPARTAN CHEMICAL CO INC 35777 VAN DYKE 1110 SPARTAN DR STERLING HEIGHTS Ml MAUMEE OH WORWAG COATINGS LLC NORTH AMERICA 3420 KOSSUTH ST LAFAYETTE IN Zip Code 35401 69001 21224 76801 60554 91730 72315 91311 07503 61115 95348 42101 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.932 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0 0 0 0.9215 0 0.06 0.85 0.4455 0.4455 0.5 0.375 0 0.874 0.00017 0 0.845 0 0.594 0.237 0.174 0.652 0.165 0.65 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 0.932 0 0 0.932 0 0 0 0.9275 0.9275 0.9215 0 0 0 0.9215 0.91 0 0 0.007 0.917 0.891 0 0 0.891 0.875 0 0 0 0.875 0.874 0 0 0 0.874 0.00017 0 0.8475 0.84767 0.845 0 0 0.845 0.831 0 0 0.831 0.826 0 0 0 0.826 0.815 0 0 0.815 77051 16066 54729 93291 15225 79762 52802 44512 77041 53158 98625 30318 45050 45331 46540 48312 0.8 0.032 0 0.054 0.6695 0.2845 0.217 0.4 0.375 0.375 0.00447 0.104 0.7245 0.085 0 0.7 0.0026 0.7645 0.793 0.7295 0.1055 0.0085 0.556 0.35 0.375 0.375 0.731035 0.138 0.0025 0.135 0.712 0 0.8026 0.7965 0.793 0.7835 0.775 0.293 0.773 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.735505 0.242 0.727 0.22 0.712 0.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0705 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.8026 0 0 0.7965 0 0.793 0 0 0.7835 0 0 0.775 0 0.4805 0.7735 0 0.773 0 0.002 0.752 0 0.75 0 0 0.75 0 0 0.735505 0.4195 0.732 0 0.727 0 0.5 0.72 0 0 0.712 0 0 0.7 43537 47905 0.0675 0.5495 0 0.125 0.0675 0.6745 0 0.608 0.6755 0 0 0 0.6745 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 19 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00331 Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS TERNIUM USA INC UNIVERSAL CHEMICALS & COATINGS INC VISTA PAINT CORP SONOCO PRODUCTS CO QUESTVAPCO CORP DPIX LLC SEYMOUR OF SYCAMORE INC COMMERCIAL MERCHANDISING CORP B-WAY PACKAGING INC PRECOAT METALS SPRAYLAT CORP IL COMPLEX CHEMICALS CO INC BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE GROUP - RENTON FORD MOTOR CO CHICAGO ASSEMBLY FLINT GROUP NORTH AMERICA CORP ROCKTENN CO WESTERN EXTRUSIONS CORP SUPERIOR OIL CO INC RECLAIMED ENERGY DIV STEELSCAPE INC WISMARQ CORP NEXEO SOLUTIONS LLC CORSICANA TECHNOLOGIES INC ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS DUPONT MOUNT CLEMENS PLANT SILGAN CONTAINERS MANUFACTURING CORP TRELLEBORG COATED SYSTEMS US INC / GRACE A n\/A Mf'Pn MATCPIAi Q CENTRIA PRIOR COATED METALS SIMONIZ USA INC 5111 E36TH ST N TULSA OK 2500 RON BEAN BLVD SHREVEPORT LA 1124 ELMHURST RD ELK GROVE VILLAG L 2020 E ORANGETHORPE A FULLERTON CA 1854 CENTRAL FLORIDA Pi ORLANDO FL 12255 FM 529 HOUSTON TX 1635 AEROPLAZADR COLORADO SPRINC CO 917 CROSBY AVE SYCAMORE IL 1337 J WOOD BRANCH DR CHARLOTTE NC 6 LITHO RD TRENTON NJ 6754 SANTA BARBARA CT ELKRIDGE MD 1701 E 122-NDST CHICAGO IL MADISON PARISH INDUSTI TALLULAH LA 737 LOGAN AVE N RENTON WA 12600 S TORRENCE AVE CHICAGO IL 2675 HENKLE DR LEBANON OH 2301 S 21 ST ST CLINTON IA 1735 SANDY LAKE RD CARROLLTON TX 1500 WESTERN AVE CONNERSVILLE IN 7001 ALLISON-BONNET ME FAIRFIELD AL 930 ARMOUR RD OCONOMOWOC Wl 8500 S WILLOW SPRINGS F WILLOW SPRINGS IL 2733 E HWY 31 CORSICANA TX 5400 23RD AVE MOLINE IL 400 GROESBECK HWY MOUNT CLEMENS Ml 12130 LYNN AVE S SAVAGE MN 715 RAILROAD AVE & HWY 3UTHERFORDTON NC 500 PERTH DR NEW ECON AMBRIDGE PA 2233 26TH ST SW ALLENTOWN PA 201 BOSTON TURNPIKE BOLTON CT Zip Code 74115 71115 60007 92831 32837 77041 80916 60178 28273 08648 21075 60633 71282 98055 60633 45036 52732 75006 47331 35064 53066 60480 75109 61265 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.658 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.0135 0.0205 0.65 0 0.6585 0.6185 0 0.4935 0.1645 0.65 0 0.4635 0.1855 0.585 0.0635 0.32 0.32 0.063 0.568 0 0.628695 0.0315 0.595 0.375 0.125 0.462 0.115 0.49 0.125 0.604 0.004 0.097 0.5095 0.125 0.477 0.0725 0.0015 0.003895 0.59948 0 0.599 0.541 0.0485 0.044 0.0025 0.207 0.3685 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 0.6715 0 0 0 0.6715 0.6705 0 0 0 0.6705 0.6585 0 0 0.6585 0.6185 0 0 0.0395 0.658 0.658 0 0 0 0.658 0.65 0 0 0 0.65 0.649 0 0 0 0.649 0.6485 0 0 0 0.6485 0.64 0 0 0 0.64 0.631 0 0 0 0.631 0.628695 0 0 0 0.628695 0.6265 0 0 0 0.6265 0.5 0.125 0 0.625 0.577 0 0.039 0.616 0.615 0 0 0.615 0.608 0 0 0 0.608 0.6065 0 0 0.6065 0.602 0.0025 1.11022E-16 0.6045 0.074 0 0 0.530225 0.604225 0.603375 0 0 0 0.603375 0.599 0 0 0 0.599 0.5895 0 0 0 0.5895 0.0465 0 0 0.54 0.5865 0.5755 0 0 0 0.5755 48043 55378 28139 15003 18103 06043 0.0025 0 0 0 0 0.0185 0.5725 0.575 0.0055 0.559 0.5515 0.001 0.575 0.575 0.0055 0.559 0.5515 0.0195 0 0 0 0.575 0 0 0 0.575 0 0 0.5645 0.57 0 0 0 0.559 0 0 0 0.5515 0 0 0.528 0.5475 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 20 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00332 Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State SOUTHERN CLAY PRODUCTS INC 1335S13TH ST LOUISVILLE KY ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS 1 NC D/B/A 90 CARSON RD BIRMINGHAM AL SOUTHWEST DISTRIBUTING CO 539 S DREW ST MESA AZ HYDRITE CHEMICAL CO 114 N MAIN ST COTTAGE GROVE Wl MARY KAY INC 1330 REGAL ROW DALLAS TX VEYANCE TECHNOLOGIES INC 400 N GOODYEAR RD MOUNT PLEASANT IA MARCUS PAINT CO 235 E MARKET ST LOUISVILLE KY CLEVELAND STEEL CONTAINER - PE OTONE FACILITY 117 E LINCOLN ST PEOTONE IL NALCO CO TULSA PLANT 102 6717 S 61 ST WAVE TULSA OK REICHHOLD INC 249 ST LOUIS AVE VALLEY PARK MO BRADLEY COATINGS GROUP 608 W CRAWFORD AVE CONNELLSVILLE PA NALCO CO 812 RENAUD DR SCOTT LA MIDWEST METAL COATINGS 9 KONZEN CT GRANITE CITY IL BASF CORP 361 SHEEP PASTURE RD EAST SETAUKET NY KAWNEER CO INC 500 E 12TH ST BLOOMSBURG PA CLARIANT CORP MARTIN PLANT 788 CHERT QUARRY RD MARTIN SC FERRO CORP 251 W WYLIE AVE WASHINGTON PA CHEMICAL SPECIALISTS & DEVELOPMENT INC 9733 MEADOR RD CONROE TX ARKEMA INC 1415 STEELE AVE SW GRAND RAPIDS Ml FORMULA CORP 4432 C ST NE AUBURN WA SASOL NORTH AMERICA INC LAKE CHARLES CHEMICAL COMPLEX ALERIS ROLLED PRODUCTS INC 2201 OLD SPANISH TRAIL WESTLAKE LA 3321 DURHAM RD ROXBORO NC QG LLC 4581 LOWER VALLEY RD ATGLEN PA WARREN STAMPING PLANT (PART) 22800 MOUND RD WARREN Ml SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 2802 W MILLER RD GARLAND TX KELLEY TECHNICAL COATINGS INC 1445S15TH ST LOUISVILLE KY FORREST PAINT CO 1011 MCKINLEY ST EUGENE OR ARDAGH METAL PACKAGING USA INC 3030 BIRCH DR HALF MOO WEIRTON wv RODDA PAINT CO 6123 N MARINE DR PORTLAND OR ENGLERTINC 1200 AMBOY AVE PERTH AMBOY NJ Zip Code 40210 35215 85210 53527 75247 52641 40202 60468 74131 63088 15425 70583 62040 11733 17815 29836 15301 77303 49507 98002 70669 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.0025 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.125 0.2075 0.331 0.006 0 0.07 0.46 0.00026 0 0.0005 0 0.52 0.0025 0.0065 0.5115 0.000435 0.00335 0.256615 0.25603 0.364595 0 0.000325 0.0005335 0.412 0.098 0.008 0 0.3415 0.164 0.125 0.0025 0.125 0.375 0.125 0.375 0.375 0.125 0.125 0 0.3395 0.151 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 0.1275 0 0.4175 0.545 0.5385 0 0 0 0.5385 0.006 0 0 0.53 0.536 0.53 0 0 0 0.53 0.00026 0 0.5265 0.52676 0.0005 0 0.522 0.5225 0.5225 0 0 0 0.5225 0.518 0 0 0 0.518 0.003785 0 0 0.512 0.515785 0.512645 0 5E-06 0.51265 0.364595 0 0 0.147295 0.51189 0.0008585 0 0 0.51 0.5108585 0.51 0 0 0 0.51 0.008 0 0 0.5 0.508 0.5055 0 0 0 0.5055 0.1275 0.375 0 0 0.5025 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 0.125 0 0.375 0.5 0.4905 0 0 0 0.4905 27573 19310 48091 75041 40210 97402 26062 97203 08861 0.0025 0.457 0.46 0.003 0.445 0.1785 0.0695 0.442 0.1825 0.4795 0.013 0 0.025 0.0025 0.2665 0.375 0 0.2595 0.482 0.47 0.46 0.028 0.4475 0.445 0.4445 0.442 0.442 0 0 0 0.482 0 0 0 0.47 0 0 0 0.46 0 0 0.421 0.449 0 0 0 0.4475 0 0 0.445 0 0 0 0.4445 0 0 0 0.442 0 0 0 0.442 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 21 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00333 Facility Name ARROW SHED LLC SPRAYLAT CORF SSKA CORF SIKA SARNAFiL DiV WEST PENN OIL COJNC130130 POOR USA INC PACKAGING CORP OF AMERICA COUNCE MILL DUCKBACK PRODUCTS NB COATINGS INC WEBB CHEMICAL SERVICE CORP INTEL CORP NAZDAR CHICAGO BASF CORP SEWELL PRODUCTS OF FLORIDA LLC THE DOW CHEMICAL CO - LOUISIANA OPERATIONS PERMA-PIPE OIL & GAS AMERICAN METALS CORP DIVERSIFIED COATING SYSTEMS INC VAN CAN CO SPECTRUM CUBIC INC 3M CO - NEVADA INEOS AMERICAS LLC INEOS OXIDE DIV WISCONSIN ALUMINUM FOUNDRY CO INC METAL COATERS BASF CORP EURAMAX INTERNATIONAL INC NASCOTE INDUSTRIES ALERIS ROLLED PRODUCTS INC ZSCHIMMER & SCHWARZ SANFORD LP LIQUID MANUFACTURING & TECHNOLOGY CENTER Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State 1 THIRD AVE HASKELL NJ 716 S COLUMBUS AVE MOUNT VERNON NY 100 DAN RD CANTON MA 2305 MARKET ST EXT. WARREN PA 400 E COTTAGE AVE CARPENTERSVILLE L HWY 57 COUNCE TN 2644 HEGAN LN CHICO CA 2701 E 170TH ST LANSING IL 2708 JARMAN MUSKEGON HEIGH" Ml 4100 SARA RD M/S RR5-49' RIO RANCHO NM 1087 N N BRANCH ST CHICAGO IL 100 INDUSTRIAL BLVD SEAFORD DE 909 MAGNOLIA AVE AUBURNDALE FL 21255 LA HWY 1 S PLAQUEMINE LA 5008-11 CURTIS LN NEW IBERIA LA 1000 CROCKER RD WESTLAKE OH 309 ECHELON RD GREENVILLE SC 1226 S MANUFACTURERS I TRENTON TN 13 MCCONNELL ST SW GRAND RAPIDS Ml 2120 E AUSTIN BLVD NEVADA MO 21255A HWY 1 S PLAQUEMINE LA 838 S 16TH ST MANITOWOC Wl 9133 CENTER AVE RANCHO CUCAMOh CA 1609 BIDDLE AVE WYANDOTTE Ml 450 RICHARDSON DR LANCASTER PA 18310 ENTERPRISE AVE NASHVILLE IL 1 REYNOLDS RD ASHVILLE OH 70 GA HWY 22 W MILLEDGEVILLE GA 831 VOLUNTEER PKWY MANCHESTER TN Zip Code 07420 10550 02021 16365 60110 38326 95928 60438 49444 87124 60622 19973 33823 70764 70560 44145 29605 38382 49503 64772 70765 54220 91730 48192 17603 62263 43103 31061 37355 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.0025 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.166 0.0215 0.412 0 0.433 0.4305 0 0.008 0.4215 0.025 0 0.4186 0 0.4055 0 0.2605 0 0.0025 0.405 0.1215 0.2835 0.0025 0 0.398 0 0.396 0 0.395 0 0 0.391 0.078 0.309 0.003815 0.3815 0.0185 0.3665 0.195 0.19 0.348 0.036 0 0.03505 0.03486 0.34859 0.0025 0.0025 0.01 0.371 0.132475 0.24667 0.0355 0.3435 0.0025 0.375 0.0025 0.375 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 0.1685 0 0 0.2685 0.437 0.4335 0 0 0.4335 0.433 0 0 0 0.433 0.4305 0 0 0.4305 0.4295 0 0 0 0.4295 0.025 0.395 0 0.0025 0.4225 0.4186 0 0 0 0.4186 0.4055 0 0 0.008 0.4135 0.2605 0 0.148 0.4085 0.4075 0 0 0.4075 0.405 0 0 0 0.405 0.0025 0 0.3985 0.401 0.398 0 0 0.398 0.396 0 0 0 0.396 0.395 0 0 0 0.395 0.391 0 0 0 0.391 0.387 0 0 0 0.387 0.385315 0 0 0 0.385315 0.385 0 0 0 0.385 0.385 0 0 0.385 0.384 0 0 0 0.384 0.03505 0 0.34875 0.3838 0.38345 0 0 0 0.38345 0.005 0.0025 0.375 0.3825 0.381 0 0 0 0.381 0.379145 0 0 0 0.379145 0.379 0 0 0 0.379 0.3775 0 0 0 0.3775 0.3775 0 0 0 0.3775 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 22 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00334 Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State QUEST SPECIALTY COATINGS LLC - MENOMONEE FALLS PATRIOT PAINT LLC N92W14701 ANTHONY AVE MENOMONEE FALL Wl 304 S BLAINE PIKE PORTLAND IN CHEMICAL SOLVENTS JENNINGS ROAD FACILITY 3751 JENNINGS RD CLEVELAND OH JASPER RUBBER PRODUCTS INC 1010 FIRST AVE JASPER IN TOWER PRODUCTS INC 2703 FREEMANSBURG AVE EASTON PA HB FULLER CO 7440 W DUPONT RD MORRIS IL FULLER BRUSH CO ONE FULLER WAY GREAT BEND KS LINETEC 725 S 75TH AVE WAUSAU Wl ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS NALCO CO PLANT 106 347 CENTRAL AVE 7701 US HWY90A BOWLING GREEN KY SUGAR LAND TX PFI INC 9215 SANTA FE SPRINGS R SANTA FE SPRINGS CA NELCO PRODUCTS INC 1107 E KIMBERLY ANAHEIM CA COMBE PRODUCTS INC EL DUQUE INDUSTRIAL PA NAGUABO PR BEHR PROCESS CORP - CHICAGO 270 STATE ST CHICAGO HEIGHTS IL DUPONT FORT MADISON PLANT 801 - 35TH ST FORT MADISON IA UNIVAR USA INC SALEM BRANCH COLONIAL RD SALEM MA CELLO PROFESSIONAL PRODUCTS 1354 OLD POST RD HAVRE DE GRACE MD SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 395 BOGGS LN - S RICHMOND KY CHEMGUARD INC 204 S 6TH AVE MANSFIELD TX EVONIK DEGUSSA CORP TIPPECANOE LABORATORIES 1650 LILLY RD LAFAYETTE IN ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS 411 N DARLING FREMONT Ml FUCHS LUBRICANTS CO-CORPORATE OFFICE 17050 S LATH ROP AVE HARVEY IL BEHR PROCESS CORP ATLANTA 130 DECLARATION DR MC DONOUGH GA ENERGIZER BATTERY MANUFACTURING INC 75 SWANTON RD SAINT ALBANS VT CHEMCOAT INC 2790 CANFIELDS LN MONTOURSVILLE PA CNH AMERICA LLC 2701 OAKES RD STURTEVANT Wl ACTEGA KELSTAR INC 1050 TAYLORS LN CINNAMINSON NJ EASTMAN KODAK CO EASTMAN BUSINESS PARK 1669 LAKE AVE ROCHESTER NY AKZONOBEL COATINGS INC 120 FRANKLIN RD PONTIAC Ml Zip Code 53051 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.375 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 0.375 0 0 0 0.375 47371 44109 47546 18045 60450 67530 54401 42101 77478 90670 92801 00718 60411 52627 01970 21078 40475 76063 47909 49412 0.375 0.125 0 0.375 0.3745 0.1245 0.0205 0.1285 0.0552903 0.369 0.028 0 0.32265 0 0.001 0.3425 0.321 0.2265 0.235 0.31 0 0.125 0 0 0 0.2485 0.3515 0.2415 0.000065 0 0.3355 0 0.00325 0.357 0.001 0.0015 0.021 0.1105 0.096 0.0195 0.375 0.25 0 0.375 0.3745 0.373 0.372 0.37 0.0553553 0.369 0.3635 0 0.3259 0.357 0.002 0.344 0.342 0.337 0.331 0.3295 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.002 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0335 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.125 0.375 0 0 0 0 0 0.375 0.375 0.375 0.375 0.3745 0.373 0.372 0.37 0.31436 0 0 0.3615 0 0 0.352 0 0.002 0 0 0 0.3697153 0.369 0.3635 0.3615 0.3594 0.357 0.354 0.344 0.344 0.339 0.331 0.3295 60426 30253 05478 17754 53177 08077 14652 48341 0.329 0.299 0.0025 0.0025 0.317 0.0025 0 0.0485 0 0.00155 0.1595 0 0 0.0075 0.0035 0.012 0.329 0.30055 0.162 0.0025 0.317 0.01 0.0035 0.0605 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0315 0 0 0.0235 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1615 0.3155 0 0.3 0.2735 0.245 0.329 0.32405 0.3235 0.318 0.317 0.31 0.3085 0.3055 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 23 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00335 Facility Name SIERRA CORF PPG EUCLID PRETREATMENT & SPECIALTY HADCO (SANMINA) CORP - OWEGO DIV HARCROS CHEMICALS INC METAL COATERS LONGABERGER CO HENKEL CORP SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO TMS MANUFACTURING ATMI MATERIALS LTD RUST-OLEUM CORP IN MD STANDARD PAINTS INC VIDEOJET TECHNOLOGIES INC COLWELL INC MACDERMID PRINTING SOLUTIONS NEXEO SOLUTIONS LLC IVC INDUSTRIAL COATINGS INC SUMTER COATINGS INC GATES CORP ELPACO COATINGS CORP GOJO INDUSTRIES INC K1K-SOCAL INC NEXEO SOLUTIONS LLC CARTERET TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC MOC PRODUCTS CO INC WR MEADOWS INC BACHMAN SERVICES INC GE WATER & PROCESS TECHNOLOGIES ORANGE FACILITY CONTINENTAL CEMENT CO LLC PPG INDUSTRIES ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State 11400 W47TH ST MINNETONKA MN 23000 ST CLAIR AVE EUCLID OH 1200 TAYLOR RD OWEGO NY 5200 SPEAKER RD KANSAS CITY KS 1150 MARIETTA INDUSTRIE MARIETTA GA 5565 RAIDERS RD FRAZEYSBURG OH 23343 SHERWOOD AVE WARREN Ml 180 CANAL ST TERRE HAUTE IN 3555 W 123RD ST ALSIP IL 706 HOUSTON CLINTON DF BURNET TX 16410 INDUSTRIAL LN WILLIAMSPORT MD 940 S 6TH AVE MANSFIELD TX 1855 ESTES AVE ELK GROVE VILLAG L 231 S PROGRESS DR E KENDALLVILLE IN 260 S PACIFIC ST SAN MARCOS CA 395 JAMES AVE SAINT PAUL MN 550-560 W CENTENNIAL BL CASA GRANDE AZ 2410 HWY 15S SUMTER SC 630 US HWY 150 E GALESBURG IL 1378 K1NGSLAND AVE PAGEDALE MO 3783 STATE RD CUYAHOGA FALLS OH 9028 DICE RD SANTA FE SPRINGS CA 350 ROOSEVELT AVE CARTERET NJ 12201 SW FWY MS600 STAFFORD TX 12306 MONTAGUE ST PACOIMA CA 300 INDUSTRIAL DR HAMPSHIRE IL 2220 S PROSPECT OKLAHOMA CITY OK 3901 WILLIAMS DR ORANGE TX Zip Code 55343 44117 13827 66106 30062 43822 48091 47808 60803 78611 21795 76063 60007 46755 92078 55102 85122 29150 61401 63133 44223 90670 07008 77477 91331 60140 73129 77630 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.3015 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0 0 0 0.0105 0.1445 0.014 0.125 0.004 0.287 0.164 0 0.125 0.125 0.018 0.0455 0.213 0.071 0.050735 0.000655 0.108 0.163 0 0.22855 0 0.269 0.23 0.038 0 0.2615 0.248 0.0135 0.052032 0.208128 0.0545 0.1655 0 0 0.1845 0.074 0.0035 0.000287 0.255 0 0.2295 0.0245 0.0025 0.125 0.125 0.0025 0.2525 0 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.0025 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 0.3015 0 0 0 0.3015 0 0 0 0.2995 0.2995 0.155 0 0.1439 0.2989 0.139 0.0025 0.1525 0.294 0.291 0 0 0 0.291 0.164 0 0 0.125 0.289 0.25 0 0.0385 0.2885 0.0635 0 0 0.222 0.2855 0.284 0 0 0 0.284 0.05139 0 0 0.22084 0.27223 0.271 0 0 0 0.271 0.22855 0 0 0.042 0.27055 0.269 0 0 0 0.269 0.268 0 0 0 0.268 0.2615 0 0.000435 0.261935 0.2615 0 0 0 0.2615 0.26016 0 5.55112E-17 0.26016 0.22 0 0 0.04 0.26 0 0 0.259 0.259 0.2585 0 0 0.2585 0.003787 0 0.2545 0.258287 0.255 0 0 0.255 0.254 0 0 0 0.254 0.1275 0 0 0.125 0.2525 0.1275 0 0 0.125 0.2525 0.2525 0 0 0.2525 0.25 0 0 0.0025 0.2525 0.1275 0 0.125 0.2525 10107 HWY 79 HANNIBAL 1886 LYNNBURY WOODS R DOVER MO 63401 DE 19904 0.125 0.0025 0.0025 0 0.1275 0.0025 0 0 0.125 0.2525 0 0.25 0.2525 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 24 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00336 Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State WATSON STANDARD CO MARWICK PLANT 616 HITE RD HARWICK PA QUANTUM COATINGS INC 1337 N WOOD BRANCH DR CHARLOTTE NC MISCO PRODUCTS CORP 1048 STINSON DR READING PA MALCO PRODUCTS INC 361 FAIRVIEW AVE BARBERTON OH KEYSTONE ANILINE CORP 2165 HWY 292 INMAN SC EQUILON CARSON TERMINAL 20945 S WILMINGTON AVE CARSON CA PREMIER INK SYSTEMS INC 10420 N STATE ST HARRISON OH DELEET MERCHANDISING 26 BLANCHARD ST NEWARK NJ CERAM TRAZ CORP CERAMIC INDL COATINGS 325 HWY 81 OSSEO MN BECKER SPECIALTY CORP 15310 ARROW BLVD FONTANA CA UNIVAR USA INC STRONGSVILLE BRANCH 21600 DRAKE RD STRONGSVILLE OH ARCADIA INC 3225 E WASHINGTON BLVE VERNON CA UNIVAR USA INC HOUSTON 111 BRISBANE ST HOUSTON TX SILBOND CORP 9901 SAND CREEK HWY WESTON Ml YENKIN-MAJESTIC PAINT CORPORAT ION 1920 LEONARD AVE COLUMBUS OH UNIVAR USA INC DALLAS DAN MORTON FACILITY 3636 DAN MORTON DR DALLAS TX UNIVAR USA INC HAMILTON BRANCH 12 STANDEN DR HAMILTON OH POWER SERVICE PRODUCTS INC 513 PEASTER HWY WEATHERFORD TX BERGQUIST CO 301 WASHINGTON ST W CANNON FALLS MN NEXEO SOLUTIONS LLC TWINSBURG HIGHLAND 1610 E HIGHLAND RD TWINSBURG OH AMREP INC 990 INDUSTRIAL PARK DR MARIETTA GA ARLON INC ADHESIVES & FILMS DIV 2811 S HARBOR BLVD SANTA ANA CA NEXEO SOLUTIONS LLC DORAVILLE 4550 NE EXPRESSWAY DORAVILLE GA GEMINI COATINGS INC 2300 HOLLOWAY DR EL RENO OK ROLLEX CORP 800 CHASE AVE ELK GROVE VILLAG L INTEL CORP 4500 S DOBSON RD MAIL S CHANDLER AZ DAVIS-FROST INC 3420 CANDLER'S MOUNTAI LYNCHBURG VA LAMBERTI USA INC - WHARTON CHEMICAL COMPLEX HWY 59 AT COUNTY RD 21 HUNGERFORD TX HENKEL CORP 923 MAULDIN RD CALHOUN GA SERIGRAPH INC 3801 E DECORAH RD WEST BEND Wl Zip Code 15049 28273 19605 44203 29349 90810 45030 07105 55369 92335 44136 90058 77061 49289 43219 75236 45015 76086 55009 44087 30062 92704 30340 73036 60007 85248 24506 77448 30701 53095 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.229 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.0215 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.078 0.171 0.2285 0.0195 0.129 0.115 0.132 0.1045 0.159 0.0695 0.219 0.0025 0 0.2235 0.0025 0.22 0.221 0 0.0495 0 0 0.0065 0.028 0.178 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 0.2505 0 0 0 0.2505 0.25 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0 0.25 0.125 0 0.125 0.25 0.25 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0.249 0 0 0 0.249 0.248 0 0 0 0.248 0.244 0 0 0 0.244 0.2365 0 0 0 0.2365 0.2285 0 0 0 0.2285 0.2215 0.0025 0 0 0.224 0.2235 0 0 0.2235 0.2225 0 0 0.2225 0.221 0 0 0 0.221 0.0495 0.055 0 0.11 0.2145 0.0065 0 0.205 0.2115 0.206 0 0 0.206 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 25 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00337 Facility Name RUDD CO INC NOVTUBOSCOPE NAVASOTA SONOCO FLEXIBLE PACKAGING SUN CHEMICAL CORP SILGAN WHITE CAP CORP JAMESTOWN COATING TECHNOLOGIES RHODIA INC CAR PRODUCTS INC WM BARR & CO INC FIRST AMERICAN RESOURCES CO NEXEO SOLUTIONS LLC GALATA CHEMICALS LLC - GALATA TAFT FACILITY NEXEO SOLUTIONS LLC ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC (DBA VALSPAR COATINGS) MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS INC ELEMENTIS SPECIALTIES GREIF INDUSTRIAL PACKAGING & SERVICES LLC NORTHERN COATINGS & CHEMICAL CO INC CERTIFIED ENAMELING INC PPG ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES INC PPG INDUSTRIES OHIO INC CIRCLEVILLE OH 3M CO - MEDINA ITW PROFESSIONAL AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCTS BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE GROUP NORTH BOEING FIELD (PART) ENTHONEINC SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO SUPERIOR SOLVENTS & CHEMICALS ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS AMERIMAX COATED PRODUCTS Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City 1141 NW50TH ST SEATTLE 9574 FM 1227 NAVASOTA 6502 S US HWY 31 EDINBURGH 3301 HUNTING PARKAVE PHILADELPHIA 1701 WILLIAMSBURG PIKE RICHMOND 108 MAIN ST JAMESTOWN 577 BANKHEAD HWY WINDER 630 BEAULIEU ST HOLYOKE 2170 BUOY ST MEMPHIS z O l-- _LU 1 <CD 2030 RIVERVIEW INDUSTRI 7710 POLK ST SAINT LOUIS 471 HWY 3142 HAHNVILLE 3101 WOOD DR GARLAND 1717 W ENGLISH RD HIGH POINT State WA TX IN PA IN PA GA MA TN GA MO LA TX NC Zip Code 98107 77868 46124 19132 47375 16134 30680 01040 38113 30126 63111 70057 75041 27261 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.1925 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.0125 0.106895 0.09767 0 0.2045 0.0305 0.174 0.118 0.084 0.201 0 0.16 0.0385 0.196 0 0.0025 0.125 0 0.195 0.186 0.0085 0.0345 0.159 0.152 0.039 0.0635 0.1255 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 0.205 0 0 0 0.205 0.204565 0 0 0 0.204565 0.2045 0 0 0 0.2045 0.2045 0 0 0 0.2045 0.202 0 0 0 0.202 0.201 0 0 0 0.201 0.1985 0 0 0.1985 0.196 0 0 0.196 0.1275 0 0 0.068 0.1955 0.195 0 0 0.195 0.1945 0 0 0 0.1945 0.1935 0 0 0 0.1935 0.191 0 0 0 0.191 0.189 0 0 0 0.189 9651 WESTOVER HILLS BL' SAN ANTONIO TX 400 CLAREMONT AVE JERSEY CITY NJ 8250 ALMERIA AVE FONTANA CA 705 6TH AVE MENOMINEE Ml 3342 EMERY ST LOS ANGELES CA 400 S 13TH ST LOUISVILLE KY 559 PITTSBURGH RD CIRCLEVILLE OH 1030 LAKE RD MEDINA OH 3606 CRAFTSMAN BLVD LAKELAND FL 7500 E MARGINAL WAY S SEATTLE WA 9809 INDUSTRIAL DR BRIDGEVIEW IL 2150 W SAND LAKE RD ORLANDO FL 320 NORTHPOINTE DR FAIRFIELD OH 1991 S WHEELING RD WHEELING IL 78251 07304 92335 49858 90023 40203 43113 44256 33803 98108 60455 32809 45014 60090 0 0.0625 0.01655 0.18 0.0025 0 0.0555 0.0365 0.163 0.0445 0.0438 0 0.004085 0.0635 0.188 0.1215 0.16525 0 0.1765 0.1765 0.122 0.1315 0 0.098 0.11826 0.0015 0 0.0925 0.188 0.184 0.1818 0.18 0.179 0.1765 0.1775 0.168 0.163 0.1425 0.16206 0.0015 0.004085 0.156 0 0 0 0.188 0 0 0 0.184 0 0 0 0.1818 0 0 0 0.18 0 0 0.179 0 0.0015 0.178 0 0 0 0.1775 0 0 0 0.168 0 0 0 0.163 0 0.0205 0.163 0 0 0 0.16206 0 0 0.1575 0.159 0 0 0.151945 0.15603 0 0 0.156 215 PHILLIPS 324 RD HELENA AR 72342 0 0.154 0.154 0 0 0 0.154 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 26 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00338 Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State BYK USA iNC 524 S CHERRY ST WALLINGFORD CT SUPERIOR OIL CO INC 400 W REGENT ST INDIANAPOLIS IN FRAZEE INDUSTRIES 6625 MIRAMAR RD SAN DIEGO CA WR MEADOWS OF ARIZONA INC 4220 S SARIVAL RD GOODYEAR AZ BLENTECH CORF 1305 RYE ST HOUSTON TX STOUSE INC 300 NEW CENTURY PKWY NEW CENTURY KS NEXEO SOLUTIONS LLC 2011 TURNER ST LANSING Ml ENTHONE INC 350 FRONTAGE RD WEST HAVEN CT UNION CARBIDE CORP SOUTH CHARLESTON FACILITY 437 MACCORKLE AVE SW SOUTH CHARLESTC wv NEXEO SOLUTIONS LLC 3930 GLENWOOD DR CHARLOTTE NC MEADWESTVACO SOUTH CAROLINA LLC 400 CROSBY RD DERIDDER LA BJ CHEMICAL SERVICES 707 N LEECH HOBBS NM SKF SEALING SOLUTIONS 900 N STATE ST ELGIN IL ACCURATE DISPERSIONS 192 W 155TH ST SOUTH HOLLAND IL WARREN OIL CO - NC 2340 US 301 N DUNN NC ARDEX LABORATORIES INC 2050 BYBERRY RD PHILADELPHIA PA SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC SAINT GABRIEL FACILITY 3905 HWY 75 SAINT GABRIEL LA MID-STATES PAINT & CHEMICAL CO 9315 WATSON INDUSTRIAL CRESTWOOD MO ISP SYNTHETIC ELASTOMERS LP 1615 MAIN ST PORTNECHES TX BF GOODRICH TIRE MANUFACTURING 18906 US 24 E WOODBURN IN CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC LANGLEY PLANT 403 CARLINE RD LANGLEY SC BASF CORP 3455 SOUTHPORT RD SPARTANBURG SC BRENNTAG GREAT LAKES LLC 14765 W BOBOLINK AVE MENOMONEE FALL Wl CLEANING SYSTEMS INC 1997 AMERICAN BLVD DE PERE Wl COASTAL CHEMICAL CO LLC 3520 VETERANS MEMORIA ABBEVILLE LA US DOD DFSP SAN PEDRO 3171 N GAFFEY ST SAN PEDRO CA N1CCA USA INC 1044 S NELSON RD FOUNTAIN INN SC OAKLEY INC 1 ICON FOOTHILL RANCH CA PERMATEX SOLON 6875 PARKLAND BLVD SOLON OH RR STREET & CO INC 2353 S BLUE ISLAND AVE CHICAGO IL Zip Code 06492 46225 92121 85338 77029 66031 48906 06516 25303 28208 70634 88240 60123 60473 28335 19116 70776 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.15 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.004 0.007065 0 0 0.1517 0.1515 0 0.0125 0.01 0.1475 0 0.11 0.036 0.00284 0.142075 0.0745 0.0695 0.085 0.055 0.05 0.09 0.01 0.001905 0 0 0.103 0.0305 0.137 0.0005 0.1365 0 0.0685 0.0645 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 0.154 0 0 0.154 0.007065 0 0 0.14669 0.153755 0.1517 0 0 0 0.1517 0.1515 0 0 0.1515 0.0225 0 0.125 0.1475 0.1475 0 0 0.1475 0.146 0 0 0 0.146 0.144915 0 0 0 0.144915 0.144 0 0 0.144 0.14 0 0 0 0.14 0.14 0 0 0 0.14 0.011905 0 0.127845 0.13975 0 0 0 0.139 0.139 0.1335 0 0.0045 0.138 0.1375 0 0 0 0.1375 0.1365 0 0 0.1365 0.133 0.0005 0 0 0.1335 63126 77651 46797 29834 29302 53051 54115 70510 90731 29644 92610 44139 60608 0.1325 0 0.0025 0.12 0.125 0.0025 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0 0.132 0.0025 0.009 0.0025 0.125 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.1325 0.132 0.005 0.129 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0 0 0.1325 0 0 0 0.132 0 0 0.125 0.13 0 0 0.129 0 0 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 0 0 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 0 0 0.1275 0 0 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 0 0 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 27 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00339 Facility Name UNITED LABORATORIES INC INTERNATIONAL PAINT LLC COSMETIC LABORATORIES OF AMERICA SACRAMENTO- CAMPBELL SOUP SUPPLY CO MICHELMAN INC FLUID ROUTING SOLUTIONS INC MAINTEXINC PPG INDUSTRIES INC CHEMETALL US INC SICPA SECURINK CORP TNEMEC CO INC TNEMEC CO INC KALCOR COATINGS CO TYSON FRESH MEATS INC SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS INC CREEINC DANLIN INDUSTRIES CORP GAGE PRODUCTS CO GOLD EAGLE CO COLUMBIA PAINT CORP BERRYMAN PRODUCTS INC TRANS CHEMICAL INC AVON AUTOMOTIVE PLANT 1 AKCROS CHEMICALS INC AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INC INVISTA SARL - ORANGE SITE AMERICAN JETWAY CORP ARCH CHEMICALS INC HOLCIM (US) INC HOLLY HILL PLANT ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State 320 37TH AVE SAINT CHARLES IL 6001 ANTOINE DR HOUSTON TX 20245 SUNBURST ST CHATSWORTH CA 6200 FRANKLIN BLVD SACRAMENTO CA 9080 SHELL RD CINCINNATI OH 1921 N BROAD ST LEXINGTON TN 13300 E NELSON AVE CITY OF INDUSTRY CA 500 PITTSBURGH AVE MCCARRAN NV 13177 HURON RIVER DR ROMULUS Ml 8000 RESEARCH WAY SPRINGFIELD VA 2300 EDGEWATER AVE BALTIMORE MD 123 W23RD AVE NORTH KANSAS CF MO 37721 STEVENS BLVD WILLOUGHBY OH HWY 50 W HOLCOMB KS 130 A FRONTAGE RD LEXINGTON SC 4600 SILICON DR DURHAM NC 23737 HWY 47 THOMAS OK 625 WANDA AVE FERNDALE Ml 4400 S KILDARE AVE CHICAGO IL 641 JACKSON AVE HUNTINGTON WV 3800 E RANDOL MILL RD ARLINGTON TX 419 E DESOTO AVE SAINT LOUIS MO 603 W 7TH ST CADILLAC Ml 500 JERSEY AVE NEW BRUNSWICK NJ 1431 PROGRESS AVE HIGH POINT NC 3055AFM 1006 ORANGE TX 34136 MYRTLE WAYNE Ml HWY 933 BRANDENBURG KY 200 SAFETY ST / HWY 453 HOLLY HILL SC 3050 HANFORD DR LEBANON PA Zip Code 60174 77091 91311 95824 45236 38351 91746 89434 48174 22153 21222 64116 44094 67851 29073 27703 73669 48220 60632 25704 76011 63147 49601 08901 27260 77630 48184 40108 29059 17046 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.125 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.0025 0.0025 0.125 0 0.002 0.125 0 0 0 0 0 0.125 0 0 0.125 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0.125 0 0.125 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0.125 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0.125 0 0.125 0 0.125 0 0.125 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0.065 0.059 0.0045 0.118 0.0635 0.059 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 0.1275 0 0 0 0.1275 0.002 0 0.125 0.127 0.125 0 0 0.125 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0.125 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.125 0 0 0 0.125 0.124 0 0 0 0.124 0.1225 0 0 0 0.1225 0.1225 0 0 0 0.1225 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 28 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00340 Facility Name EXXONMOBIL REFINING & SUPPLY BATON ROUGE REFINERY AEP INDUSTRIES INC BUZZI UNICEM USA - GREENCASTLE PLANT AMPHENOL APC INC ANCHOR PAINT MANUFACTURING CO INC CCI MANUFACTURING IL CORP TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC 3M COTTAGE GROVE CENTER MEADWESTVACO SC LLC CHARLESTON CHEMICAL CHASE PRODUCTS CO TECHNICAL CHEMICAL CO NEXEO SOLUTIONS LLC - EVENDALE CPJ TECHNOLOGIES DELTA LABORATORIES INC KEMIRA WATER SOLUTIONS INC PILOT CHEMICAL CO SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO BENJAMIN MOORE & CO PELL CITY NEXEO SOLUTIONS LLC MIAMI HERCULES INC KENEDY TEXAS NEXEO SOLUTIONS LLC CARSON ROCKLINE INDUSTRIES CAROLINA SOLVENTS INC AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INC ROHM & HAAS ELECTRONIC MATERIA LS LLC TWINCO ROMAX WATSON LABORATORIES INC STEELSCAPE INC RANCHO MRCG-KRAFTMAID P3 PLASTI-KOTE INC Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address 4045 SCENIC HWY City BATON ROUGE State LA Zip Code 70805 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.055 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.0015 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 0.0565 0.065 0 0 0.1215 1201 SPINE HILL RD GRIFFIN GA 3301 S COUNTY RD 150 W GREENCASTLE IN 91 NORTHEASTERN BLVD NASHUA NH 6707 E 14TH ST TULSA OK 15550 CANAL BANK RD LEMONT IL 13500 N CENTRAL EXPRES DALLAS TX 10746 INNOVATION RD COTTAGE GROVE MN 5598 VIRGINIA AVE NORTH CHARLESTC SC 2727 GARDNER RD BROADVIEW IL 3327 PIPELINE RD CLEBURNE TX 2788 GLENDALE-MILFORD EVENDALE OH 200 TANNER DR TAYLORS SC 3710 W COUNTY RD 326 OCALA FL 1 CYANAMID RD MOBILE AL 11623 N HOUSTON ROSSL' HOUSTON TX 636 E 40TH ST HOLLAND Ml 109 BAMBERG DR PELL CITY AL 200 NE 181 ST ST MIAMI FL ONE MILL ST KENEDY TX 20915 S WILMINGTON AVE CARSON CA 1113 MARYLAND AVE SHEBOYGAN Wl 2274 1ST ST SE HICKORY NC 1000 INDUSTRIAL PARK DF CLINTON MS 455 FOREST ST MARLBOROUGH MA 3100 W MILL RD MILWAUKEE Wl 575, 577, 579 CHIPETA WA> SALT LAKE CITY UT 11200 ARROW RT RANCHO CUCAMOh CA 150 GRAND VALLEY AVE ORWELL OH 1000 LAKE RD MEDINA OH 30224 46135 03062 74112 60439 75243 55016 29406 60155 76033 45241 29687 34475 36610 77086 49423 35125 33162 78119 90810 53081 28602 39056 01752 53209 84108 91730 44076 44258 0.00275 0.027 0.0025 0.1155 0 0 0.0005 0.111 0.0005 0.1095 0.08 0.0395 0.107 0.018 0.105 0.1045 0.1038 0.0755 0.06448 0.0905 0.0995 0.092 0.0945 0.0025 0.0885 0.09024 0.00313 0.0055 0.0635 0.1165 0.092 0.1157165 0 0.115 0.114 0.1115 0.00018 0.1105 0 0.028 0.0685 0 0.0885 0.001 0.0015 0.00045 0.0265 0.0364755 0.0095 0 0.0025 0 0.0025 0.002 0 0.084505 0.0645 0.023 0.11925 0.119 0.1182165 0.1155 0.115 0.114 0.112 0.11118 0.111 0.1095 0.108 0.108 0.107 0.1065 0.106 0.106 0.10425 0.102 0.1009555 0.1 0.0995 0.0945 0.0945 0.005 0.0905 0.09024 0.087635 0.07 0.0865 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0005 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0025 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0855 0 0 0 1.38778E-17 0 0.0175 0 0 0.11925 0.119 0.1182165 0.1155 0.115 0.114 0.112 0.11118 0.111 0.1095 0.108 0.108 0.107 0.1065 0.1065 0.106 0.10425 0.102 0.1009555 0.1 0.0995 0.097 0.0945 0.0905 0.0905 0.09024 0.087635 0.0875 0.0865 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 29 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00341 Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State NEXEO SOLUTIONS LLC 5420 SPEAKER RD KANSAS CITY KS CE BRADLEY LABORATORIES INC 55 BENNETT DR BRATTLEBORO VT OLDCASTLE BUILDING ENVELOPE - TENNESSEE FACILITY NEXEO SOLUTIONS LLC 920 POTTERTOWN RD MIDWAY TN 400 MAIN ST TEWKSBURY MA EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL BATON ROUGE CHEMICAL PLANT 4999 SCENIC HWY BATON ROUGE LA AKZO NOBEL PAINTS PUERTO RICO LLC 65TH INFANTRY AVE KM. 1 CAROLINA PR ATHEA LABORATORIES INC 7855 N FAULKNER RD MILWAUKEE Wl UNIVAR USA INC ROMULUS BRANCH 13395 HURON RIVER DR ROMULUS Ml SOUTH FLORIDA MATERIALS CORP DBA VECENERGY- 1200 SE 32ND ST PORT EVERGLADES LUBRIZOL 9550 W 55TH ST FT LAUDERDALE FL MC COOK IL SUPERIOR SOLVENTS & CHEMICALS 4211 BRAMERS LN LOUISVILLE KY PPG INDUSTRIES OHIO INC - DELAWARE 760 PITTSBURGH DR DELAWARE OH PROCTER & GAMBLE HAIR CARE LLC 2200 LOWER MUSCATINE F IOWA CITY IA MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP 101 FAIRVIEW AVE PITTSBURGH PA PLAZE INC 105 BOLTE LN SAINT CLAIR MO WHITFORD CORP 47 PARK AVE ELVERSON PA KARCHER NORTH AMERICA PROCHEM 325 S PRICE RD CHANDLER AZ IMPERIAL PAINT CO INC 2526 NWYEONAVE PORTLAND OR NEXEO SOLUTIONS LLC FAIRFIELD 2461 CROCKER CIR FAIRFIELD CA VALVOLINE 720 VAIDEN DR HERNANDO MS MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS INC 3725 N FIRST ST SAN JOSE CA VEOLIA ES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LLC 125 FACTORY LN MIDDLESEX NJ ADCO CLEANING PRODUCTS LLC 900 W MAIN ST SEDALIA MO ABC COMPOUNDING CO OF TEXAS INC 1102 AVE J E GRAND PRAIRIE TX KAY CHEMICAL CO 8300 CAPITAL DR GREENSBORO NC CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING CO 2600 HUNTINGTON DR FAIRFIELD CA NPA COATINGS INC 11120 BEREA RD CLEVELAND OH MINUTEMAN INTERNATIONAL MULTI-CLEAN DIV 600 CARDIGAN RD SHOREVIEW MN FRANKLIN INTERNATIONAL 2020 BRUCK ST COLUMBUS OH Zip Code 66106 05301 37809 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.078 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.008 0.0845 0 0 0.0845 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 0.086 0 0 0 0.086 0.0845 0 0 0 0.0845 0.0845 0 0 0 0.0845 01876 70805 0.0755 0.0075 0.083 0 0 0.032 0 0.032 0.05 0 0 0.083 0 0.082 00985 53224 48174 33316 0.047 0.0816 0.034 0.078 0.034845 0.00006 0.0465 0 0.081845 0.08166 0.0805 0.078 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.081845 0 0.08166 0 0.0805 0 0.078 60525 40216 43015 52240 15238 63077 19520 85224 97210 94533 38632 95134 08846 65301 75050 27409 94533 44102 55126 43207 0 0.0035 0.03892 0.0205 0.0515 0.066 0.062295 0.0655 0 0.0615 0.017 0 0.045 0.0195 0.0025 0.011 0.0585 0 0.056 0.0055 0.0745 0 0.0298 0.009 0.0155 0 0.00328 0 0.0635 0.001 0.0445 0.0615 0.0145 0.041 0.0575 0.0485 0.0005 0.0585 0.0025 0.052 0.0745 0.0035 0.06872 0.0295 0.067 0.066 0.065575 0.0655 0.0635 0.0625 0.0615 0.0615 0.0595 0.0605 0.06 0.0595 0.059 0.0585 0.0585 0.0575 0 0 0.0745 0 0 0.066175 0.069675 0 0 0.06872 0 0.0375 0.067 0 0 0 0.067 0 0 0 0.066 0 0 0 0.065575 0 0 0.0655 0 0 0.0635 0 0 0 0.0625 0 0 0.0615 0 0 0 0.0615 0 0.001 0.0605 0 0 0 0.0605 0 0 0 0.06 0 0 0.0595 0 0 0.059 0 0 0 0.0585 0 0 0.0585 0 0 0.0575 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 30 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00342 Facility Name MRCG-KRAFTMAID PI ECOLAB INC ECOLAB INC CLEVELAND STEEL CONTAINER - KILGORE HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR CO OPERATIONS INC RECKITT BENCKISER VALSPAR SAMUEL CABOT DIV CONOCOPHILLIPS PONCA CITY REFINERY AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INC HUNTSMAN ADVANCED MATERIALS AMERICAS INC ECOLAB INC SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO UNIVAR USA INC - TOLEDO SOUTH BRANCH CONOCOPHILLIPS OKLAHOMA CITY PRODUCTS TERMINAL DYSTAR LP HENKEL CORP CUSTOM SYNTHESIS LLC BARTON SOLVENTS INC BETTENDORF SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING INC BRENNTAG SOUTHEAST INC DIC IMAGING PRODUCTS USA LLC GRAPHIC CONTROLS LLC ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS CHAMPION TECHNOLOGIES INC BRENNTAG PACIFIC INC CHAMPION TECHNOLOGIES INC ECOLAB INC ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC D/B/A VALSPAR COATINGS Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State 16052 INDUSTRIAL PKWY MIDDLEFIELD OH 942 BAKER RD MARTINSBURG wv 18383 E RAILROAD ST CITY OF INDUSTRY CA 5005 ELDER LAKE RD KILGORE TX 1425 EDEN RD YORK PA 799 RT 206 & HILLSBOROU HILLSBOROUGH NJ 100 HALE ST NEWBURYPORT MA 1000 S PINE ST PONCA CITY OK 1660 CROSS ST SE SALEM OR 555 HUNTSMAN RD MC INTOSH AL 3001 CHANNAHON RD JOLIET IL 630 E 13TH ANDOVER KS 4051 S AVE TOLEDO OH 4700 NE 10TH ST OKLAHOMA CITY OK Zip Code 44062 25405 91748 75662 17402 08844 01950 74602 97302 36553 60436 67002 43615 73117 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.047 0.0415 0.0145 0.0195 0.0355 0.0025 0.052 0.007 0.0475 0.0445 0.01 0.0505 0.002 0.0025 0.0495 0.0275 0.0244 0.0146 0.03655 0.0375 0.013 0.036 0.0145 0.01 0.0405 0.0025 0.0475 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 0.047 0 0 0.01 0.057 0.056 0 0 0.056 0.055 0 0 0.055 0.0545 0 0 0 0.0545 0.0545 0 0 0.0545 0.0545 0 0 0.0545 0.0525 0 0 0 0.0525 0.052 0 0 0 0.052 0.0519 0 0 0.0519 0.05115 0 0 0.05115 0.0505 0 0 0.0505 0.0505 0 0 0 0.0505 0.0505 0 0 0.0505 0.05 0 0 0.05 209 WATLINGTON INDUSTF REIDSVILLE NC 137 FOLLY MILL RD SEABROOK NH 1704 DENVER RD ANDERSON SC 204 36TH ST BETTENDORF IA 113 STAGE COACH TRAIL GREENSBORO NC 1260 JAMES L HART PKWY YPSILANTI Ml 2000 E PETTIGREW ST DURHAM NC 7335S10TH ST OAK CREEK Wl 400 EXCHANGE ST BUFFALO NY 901 W UNION ST MONTEBELLO CA 27320 03874 29625 52722 27409 48197 27703 53154 14204 90640 0.035 0.0025 0.0025 0.0115 0.015 0.0485 0.029 0.0045 0.046 0.037 0.015 0.04705 0.047 0.0375 0.034 0 0.017 0.0415 0 0.007 0.05 0.04955 0.0495 0.049 0.049 0.0485 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.044 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.05 0 0.04955 0 0.0495 0 0.049 0 0.049 0 0.0485 0 0.046 0 0.046 0 0.046 0 0.044 3130 FM 521 10747 PATTERSON PL 1816 S JACKSON ST 261 HWY 155 S 2000 WESTHALL ST FRESNO TX SANTA FE SPRINGS CA MAGNOLIA AR MC DONOUGH GA PITTSBURGH PA 77545 90670 71753 30253 15233 0.043 0.038 0.042 0.0075 0.0315 0 0.0045 0.00005 0.0335 0.009 0.043 0.0425 0.04205 0.041 0.0405 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.043 0 0.0425 0 0.04205 0 0.041 0 0.0405 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 31 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00343 Facility Name VALERO THREE RIVERS REFINERY BIOLAB INC HANNA STEEL CORF CONOCOPH1LLIPS CO EAST ST LOUIS TERMINAL BRENNTAG SOUTHWEST INC SAND SPRINGS LUBRIZOL CORP CHAMPION TECHNOLOGIES INC HARCROS CHEMICALS INC KWAL-HOWELLS INC (DBA KWAL PAINT INC) BARTON SOLVENTS INC DES MOINES BARTON SOLVENTS INC KANSAS CITY BRENNTAG NORTHEAST INC GEORGIA-PACIFIC CHEMICALS LLC DAUBERT CHEMICAL CO SI GROUP INC NEXEO SOLUTIONS LLC TAMPA BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE GROUP PLANT 2 (PART) NEXEO SOLUTIONS LLC HOUSTON HENKEL CORP BAKER PETROLITE CORP VALERO REFINING CO - TENNESSEE LLC UNIVAR USA INC MORRISVILLE BRANCH ARKEMA COATINGS & RESINS RICHARDSAPEX INC HEXPOL COMPOUNDING BURTON RUBBER PROCESSING BARTON SOLVENTS INC WEST BEND SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO TYCO FIRE SUPPRESSION & BUILDING PRODUCTS BRENNTAG SOUTHWEST INC LONG VIEW Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State 301 LEROY ST THREE RIVERS TX 1735 DOGWOOD DR CONYERS GA 220 HANNA DR PEKIN IL 3300 MISSISSIPPI AVE CAHOKIA IL 206 E MORROW RD SAND SPRINGS OK 29400 LAKELAND BLVD WICKLIFFE OH 710 MARVIN A SMITH BLVD LONGVIEW TX 4606 NEW W DR PASADENA TX 2430 ALBERT BROADFOOT BONHAM TX 1970 NE BROADWAY DES MOINES IA 901 S 66TH TERRACE KANSAS CITY KS 81 WHULLER LN READING PA 1429 E LUFKIN AVE LUFKIN TX 4700 S CENTRAL AVE CHICAGO IL 1000 MAIN ST ROTTERDAM JUNC' NY 5125 W HANNA AVE TAMPA FL 7755 E MARGINAL WAY S SEATTLE WA Zip Code 78071 30012 61554 62206 74063 44092 75662 77507 75418 50313 66111 19605 75901 60638 12150 33634 98108 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.0395 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0 0.03915 0 0.0025 0.0355 0 0.036 0.0175 0.02 0.0365 0 0.035 0.0015 0.0125 0.0215 0 0.0355 0.0065 0.029 0.01 0.025 0.0177 0.0172 0.032 0.002 0.01723 0.015975 0 0.02354 0.0015 0.0315 0.0305 0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 0.0395 0 0 0 0.0395 0.03915 0 0 0 0.03915 0.038 0 0 0 0.038 0.036 0 0.002 0 0.038 0.0375 0 0 0 0.0375 0.0365 0 0 0 0.0365 0.0365 0 0 0 0.0365 0.034 0 0.0025 0 0.0365 0.0355 0 0 0 0.0355 0.0355 0 0 0 0.0355 0.035 0 0 0 0.035 0.0349 0 0 0 0.0349 0.034 0 0 0.034 0.033205 0 0 0 0.033205 0.02354 0.0095 0 0 0.03304 0.033 0 0 0 0.033 0.0305 0 0.0025 3.46945E-18 0.033 8901 OLD GALVESTON RD HOUSTON TX 421 LONDON RD DELAWARE OH 9100 W21ST ST SAND SPRINGS OK 2385 RIVERPORT RD MEMPHIS TN 200 DEAN S1EVERS PL MORRISVILLE PA 13511 MAIN ST LEMONT IL 4202-24 MAIN ST PHILADELPHIA PA HWY 353 S JONESBOROUGH TN 77034 43015 74063 38109 19067 60439 19127 37659 0.005 0 0.01406 0.03 0.0135 0.0075 0.021111 0 0.0265 0.031 0.00076 0 0.0165 0.0225 0 0.0275 0.0315 0.031 0.01482 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.021111 0.0275 0 0 0 0.0315 0 0 0.031 0 0 0.01577 0.03059 0 0 0 0.03 0 0 0 0.03 0 0 0 0.03 0 0.0080495 0.0291605 0 0 0 0.0275 800 RAIL WAY 1025 HOWARD ST 1 STANTON ST 610 FISHER RD WEST BEND Wl GREENSBORO NC MARINETTE Wl LONGVIEW TX 53095 27403 54143 75604 0.0025 0.0055 0.002595 0.014 0.024 0.021 0.02347 0.012 0.0265 0.0265 0.026065 0.026 0 0 0 0.0265 0 0 0.0265 0 3.46945E-18 0.026065 0 0 0.026 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 32 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00344 Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State PLAZE INC 1000 INTEGRAM DR PACIFIC MO BARTON SOLVENTS INC COUNCIL BLUFFS 2135 9TH AVE COUNCIL BLUFFS IA SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 2121 NEW WORLD DR COLUMBUS OH SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 11700 S COTTAGE GROVE CHICAGO IL ECOLAB INC 2305 SHERWIN ST GARLAND TX HERITAGE-WTI INC 1250 ST GEORGE ST EAST LIVERPOOL OH 3M CO-SPRINGFIELD 3211 E CHESTNUT EXPY SPRINGFIELD MO AFTON CHEMICAL CORP 501 MONSANTO AVE SAUGET IL EXXONMOBIL OIL CORP - TORRANCE REFINERY 3700 W 190TH ST TORRANCE CA PRIDE SOLVENTS & CHEMICAL CO OF NEW JERSEY 211 RANDOLPH AVE AVENEL NJ HEXPOL COMPOUNDING BURTON RUBBER PROCESSING BARTON SOLVENTS INC WICHITA 14330 KINSMAN RD 201 S CEDAR BURTON OH VALLEY CENTER KS UNIVAR USA INC JACKSONVILLE FACILITY 155 ELLIS RDS JACKSONVILLE FL ZEP COMMERCIAL 350 JOE FRANK HARRIS PH EMERSON GA VALSPAR REFINISH 210 CROSBY ST PICAYUNE MS VEOLIA ES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LLC 7 MOBILE AVE SAUGET IL BENJAMIN MOORE & CO JOHNSTOWN UNION AVE EXTENSION JOHNSTOWN NY VEYANCE TECHNOLOGIES INC 4021 N 56TH ST LINCOLN NE PRC-DESOTO INTERNATIONAL INC 11601 UNITED ST MOJAVE CA PLAZE INC 113 BOLTE LN SAINT CLAIR MO DUPONT PARLIN PLANT CHEESEQUAKERD PARLIN NJ CLEARWATER INTERNATIONAL LLC 100 INDUSTRIAL DR (BLDG LEETSDALE PA Z TECHNOLOGIES CORP 26500 CAPITOL AVE REDFORD Ml SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 6795 S MAIN ST MORROW GA TOYO INK AMERICA LLC 2400 N HARVEY MITCHELL 3RYAN TX INTERSTATE CHEMICAL CO INC 2797 FREEDLAND RD HERMITAGE PA RUSTOLEUM CORP 7850 OHIO RIVER RD LESAGE WV AIR PRODUCTS PERFORMANCE MANUFACTURING INC 337 VINCENT DR MILTON Wl DAVIES IMPERIAL COATINGS INC 1275 STATE ST HAMMOND IN VARN INTERNATIONAL 1333 N KIRK RD BATAVIA IL Zip Code 63069 51502 43207 60628 75041 43920 65802 62201 90509 07001 44021 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.025 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0 0.0015 0.0215 0.008 0.0135 0 0 0.0105 0.01 0.00495 0.00006 0 0.02 0.005 0.015 0.02 0 0.005 0.0145 0 0.0195 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 0.025 0 0 0 0.025 0.023 0 0 0 0.023 0.0215 0 0 0 0.0215 0 0 0 0.0215 0.0215 0.0205 0 0 0.0205 0.00501 0 0.015 0.02001 0.02 0 0 0 0.02 0.02 0 0 0.02 0.02 0 0 0.02 0.0195 0 0 0 0.0195 0.0195 0 0 0 0.0195 67147 32254 30137 39466 62201 12095 68504 93501 63077 08859 15056 48239 30260 77807 16148 25537 53563 46320 60510 0.01 0.015 0 0 0.0015 0.01885 0.00000135 0.0075 0.016 0.002 0.006 0 0.004 0.005 0.003 0.001 0.0025 0.013 0.008 0.0095 0.0045 0.019 0.019 0.002 0.0000175 0.00000005 0.0085 0 0.0135 0.000085 0.0125 0.0105 0.009 0.011 0.0125 0.011 0 0.0025 0.0195 0.0195 0.019 0.019 0.0035 0.0188675 0.0000014 0.016 0.016 0.0155 0.006085 0.0125 0.0145 0.014 0.014 0.0135 0.0135 0.013 0.0105 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0025 0 0 0.0195 0 0 0.0195 0 0 0.019 0 0 0.019 0 0.0155 0.019 0 0 0.0188675 0.0179517 0.0179531 0 0 0.016 0 0 0.016 0 0 0.0155 0.0092 0.015285 0 0.0025 0.015 0 0 0.0145 0 0 0.014 0 0.014 0 0 0.0135 0 0.0135 0 0.013 0 0 0.013 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 33 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00345 Facility Name GOODWIN CO PRIDE SOLVENT & CHEMICAL CO OF NY INC SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO NEXEO SOLUTIONS LLC TWINSBURG ENTERPRISE DSM DESOTECH INC RESEARCH SOLUTIONS GROUP INC TRUE VALUE MANUFACTURING DUPONT FRONT ROYAL PLANT SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO HYDRITE CHEMICAL CO GIANT CEMENT CO FERRO CORP WALTON HILLS OPERATIONS TAKASAGO INTERNATIONAL CORP (USA) VOGEL PAINT & WAX CO INC HOLLY OAK CHEMICAL INC SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO UNIVAR USA INC NORCROSS FACILI TY HUBBARD-HALL INC CARBOLINE CO ETHOX CHEMICALS LLC BUCKLEY OIL CO UNIVAR USA INC BERRIDGE MANUFACTURING CO GACO WESTERN CHEMOL CO INC INTERSTATE CHEMICAL CO INC CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC UNIVAR USA INC NEW BERLIN FORD MOTOR CO DEARBORN TOOL & DIE PLANT VERSO PAPER HOLDINGS LLC Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State 700 PROGRESS CENTER A LAWRENCEVILLE GA 6 LONG ISLAND AVE HOLTSVILLE NY 2325 HOLLINS FERRY RD BALTIMORE MD 1842 ENTERPRISE PKWY TWINSBURG OH 1101 HWY 27 S STANLEY NC 133 BAIN DR LAVERGNE TN 201 JANDUS RD CARY IL 7961 WINCHESTER RD FRONT ROYAL VA 26300 FARGO AVE BEDFORD HEIGHTS OH 2545 BOND ST UNIVERSITY PARK IL HWY 453 & 1-26 (654 JUDGE HARLEYVILLE SC 7050 KRICK RD WALTON HILLS OH 267 UNION ST NORTHVALE NJ 1020 ALBANY PL SE ORANGE CITY IA 101 CASE ST FOUNTAIN INN SC 12401 INDUSTRIAL BLVD VICTORVILLE CA 2145 SKYLAND CT NORCROSS GA 563 S LEONARD ST WATERBURY CT 900 OPELOUSAS ST LAKE CHARLES LA 1801 PERIMETER RD GREENVILLE SC 1809 ROCK ISLAND ST DALLAS TX 7050 W 71 ST ST BEDFORD PARK IL 6515 FRATT RD SAN ANTONIO TX 1245 CHAPMAN DR WAUKESHA Wl 2300 RANDOLPH AVE GREENSBORO NC 23247 WEAMES ST CHANNAHON IL 2247 S HWY 71 KIMBALL NE 2400 S 170TH ST NEW BERLIN Wl 3001 MILLER RD DEARBORN Ml ANDROSCOGGIN MILL RILE JAY ME Zip Code 30043 11742 21230 44087 28164 37086 60013 22630 44146 60466 29448 44146 07647 51041 29644 92392 30071 06708 70601 29605 75207 60499 78218 53186 27406 60410 69145 53151 48121 04239 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.01091 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.002 0.003 0.0095 0.0015 0.0105 0.002 0.0095 0 0.0112 0.0003 0.01087 0.0025 0.0085 0.001 0.01 0.0005 0.0015 0 0.011 0.001 0.001 0.0035 0.0005 0.01 0.0005 0.0025 0.008 0.010345 0 0.0045 0.0055 0.0035 0.006 0.0005 0.009 0 0.0095 0.0025 0.0065 0.007 0.002 0.00472 0.00415 0 0.0085 0.0085 0 0 0.00812 0.002 0.0055 0.005 0.0025 0.00505 0.00197 0.007 0 0.0025 0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 0.01291 0 0 0.01291 0.0125 0 0 0 0.0125 0.012 0 0 0 0.012 0.0115 0 0 0 0.0115 0.0112 0 0 0 0.0112 0.01117 0 0 0.01117 0.011 0 0 0 0.011 0.011 0 0 0 0.011 0.002 0 0 0.009 0.011 0.011 0 0 0 0.011 0.002 0 0 0.0085 0.0105 0.004 0 0.0065 0.0105 0.0105 0 0 0.0105 0.0105 0 0 0 0.0105 0.010345 0 0 0.010345 0.01 0 0 0 0.01 0.0095 0 0 0.0095 0.0095 0 0 0.0095 0.0095 0 0 0 0.0095 0.009 0 0 0.009 0.009 0 0 0 0.009 0.00887 0 0 0 0.00887 0.0085 0 0 0 0.0085 0.0085 0 0 0 0.0085 0.00812 0 0 0.00812 0.0075 0 0 0.0075 0.0075 0 0 0 0.0075 0.00702 0 0 0 0.00702 0.007 0 0 0.007 0.0025 0.0035 0 0.0005 0.0065 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 34 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00346 Facility Name PROCTER & GAMBLE CO GPDF UNIVAR USA INC TAMPA FACILITY UNIVAR USA INC DORAVILLE FACILITY SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO PPG ARCHITECURAL COATINGS HOUSTON IGM RESINS CHARLOTTE CONOCOCPHILLIPS CO WICHITA TERMINAL BRULIN CORP PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING CO NEW DAWN MANUFACTURING CO UNIVAR USA INC JAMESTOWN FACILITY UNIVAR USA INC KING INDUSTRIES INC LANCO MANUFACTURING CORP DIVERSEYINC - WAXDALE FACILITY CHEMTEX LABORATORIES INC OMNIUM CALLAHAN CHEMICAL CO INTERNATIONAL PAINT LLC CENTRAL SOLUTIONS INC SARTOMER USA LLC ANDERSON DEVELOPMENT CO CUSTOM CHEMICAL FORMULATORS INC GE WATER & PROCESS TECHNOLOGIES CR BRANDS INC ACTON TECHNOLOGIES INC CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING CO GE WATER & PROCESS TECHNOLOGIES C P INC INDEPENDENT INK INC Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State 5348 VINE ST CINCINNATI OH 6049 OLD 41A HWY TAMPA FL 1 ALCHEMY PL DORAVILLE GA 404 E MALLORY AVE MEMPHIS TN 3530 LANG RD HOUSTON TX 3300 WESTINGHOUSE BLV CHARLOTTE NC 2400 E 37TH ST N WICHITA KS 2920 DR ANDREW J BROW INDIANAPOLIS IN 1900 KANSAS AVE KANSAS CITY KS 16001 TRADE ZONE AVE UPPER MARLBORO MD 108 OAKDALE RD JAMESTOWN NC 2600 S GARFIELD AVE COMMERCE CA SCIENCE RD NORWALK CT URB.APONTE #5 SAN LORENZO PR 8311 16TH ST STURTEVANT Wl 2725 ARMENTROUT DR CONCORD NC 1280 IMPERIAL RD HAMPTON IA 200 INDUSTRIAL AVE RIDGEFIELD PARK NJ 640 N ROCKY RIVER DR BEREA OH 401 FUNSTON RD KANSAS CITY KS 601 TIGHTSQUEEZE INDUS CHATHAM VA 1415 E MICHIGAN ST ADRIAN Ml 8707 MILLERGROVE DR SANTA FE SPRINGS CA 333 S LOMBARD RD ADDISON IL 141 VENTURE BLVD SPARTANBURG SC 100 THOMPSON ST PITTSTON PA 17 LAKE MIRROR RD FOREST PARK GA 2118 REISER AVE SE NEW PHILADELPHIA OH 196 S WATER CONNERSVILLE IN 14705 S AVALON BLVD GARDENA CA Zip Code 45217 33619 30362 38109 77092 28273 67219 46205 66105 20774 27282 90040 06852 00754 53177 28025 50441 07660 44017 66115 24531 49221 90670 60101 29306 18640 30297 44663 47331 90248 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.0065 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0 0.002 0.0045 0.003 0.0035 0.002 0.0045 0.0025 0.004 0.0065 0 0 0.00648 0.002642 0.003495 0.005905 0.000205 0.0060048 0 0.003 0.003 0.006 0 0.0031 0.00275 0.0056 0.00003 0.00025 0.005285 0.0055 0 0.002 0.0035 0.0025 0.003 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.005 0 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.005 0 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 0.0065 0 0 0 0.0065 0.0065 0 0 0 0.0065 0.0065 0 0 0.0065 0.0065 0 0 0 0.0065 0.0065 0 0 0 0.0065 0.0065 0 0 0.0065 0.00648 0 0 0 0.00648 0.006137 0 0 0.006137 0.00611 0 0 0.00611 0.0060048 0 0 0.0060048 0.006 0 0 0.006 0.006 0 0 0 0.006 0.00585 0 0 0.00585 0.00563 0 0 0.00563 0.005535 0 0 0.005535 0.0055 0 0 0.0055 0.0055 0 0 0 0.0055 0.0055 0 0 0 0.0055 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 0 0 0.005 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0.005 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 35 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00347 Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State OAK1TE PRODUCTS INC (AKA CHEMETALL OAK1TE) 16961 KNOTT AVE LA MIRADA CA PVS NOLWOOD CHEMICALS INC 9000 HUBBELL AVE DETROIT Ml SARTOMER USA LLC 610 S BOLMAR ST WEST CHESTER PA GOODWIN CO 12361 MONARCH ST GARDEN GROVE CA BRAIN POWER INC 4470 SW 74TH AVE MIAMI FL REICHHOLD INC - AZUSA PLANT 237 S MOTOR AVE AZUSA CA EDCO PRODUCTS INC 8700 EXCELSIOR BLVD HOPKINS MN EVONIK DEGUSSA CORP 4201 DEGUSSA RD THEODORE AL LUBRIZOL CORP PAINESVIL LE PLANT 155 FREEDOM RD PAINESVILLE OH RESEARCH SOLUTIONS GROUP INC 402 INDUSTRIAL PARK DR PELHAM AL TRANSTAR AUTOBODY TECHNOLOGIES 2040 HEISERMAN DR BRIGHTON Ml PRESTONE PRODUCTS CORP 250 HALLS MILL RD FREEHOLD NJ MACDERMID INC 1221 FARROW AVE FERNDALE Ml UNIVAR USA INC SANTA FE SPRINGS 13900 CARMEN1TA RD SANTA FE SPRINGS CA PENRAYCOS INC 1801 ESTES AVE ELK GROVE VILLAG L SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 14 INDUSTRIAL PARK FLORA IL BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM CHEMICALS INC 2820 N NORMANDY DR PETERSBURG VA CLARIANT CORP CLEAR LAKE PLANT 9502 BAYPORT BLVD - ETC PASADENA TX HENTZEN COATINGS,INC 6937 W MILL RD MILWAUKEE Wl SUN CHEMICAL CORP 135 W LAKE ST NORTHLAKE IL AVANTOR PERFORMANCE MATERIALS 600 N BROAD ST PHILLIPSBURG NJ CONOCOPHILLIPS MT VERNON PRODUCTS TERMINAL 15138 HWY 96 MOUNT VERNON MO BRAINERD CHEMICAL CO INC 1200 N PEORIA TULSA OK ECP INC WOODRIDGE 11210 KATHERINE'S CROSI WOODRIDGE IL WYNNEWOOD REFINING CO 906 S POWELL WYNNEWOOD OK US DOD DFSP VERONA 5449 W MAIN ST VERONA NY UNION SPECIALTIES INC 3 MALCOLM HOYT DR NEWBURYPORT MA RENESSENZ LLC JACKSONVILLE 601 CRESTWOOD ST JACKSONVILLE FL NOV TUBOSCOPE HOLMES ROAD 2811 HOLMES RD HOUSTON TX NIACET CORP 400 47TH ST NIAGARA FALLS NY Zip Code 90638 48228 19382 92841 33155 91702 55343 36582 44077 35124 48114 07728 48220 90670 60007 62839 23805 77507 53218 60164 08865 65712 74147 60517 73098 13478 01950 32208 77051 14304 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.0025 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.004 0.001 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0 0.0045 0.004 0.0005 0.004 0.0005 0.00241 0.00184 0.00211 0.00207 0.002 0.002 0.00178 0.00196 0.0005 0.003 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.002 0.0015 0.002 0.0031 0 0.00125 0.00185 0.0005 0.0025 0.003 0 0 0.003 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0.0005 0.002 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 0.005 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0.005 0.005 0 0 0 0.005 0.0045 0 0 0 0.0045 0.0045 0 0 0 0.0045 0.0045 0 0 0.0045 0.00425 0 0 0 0.00425 0.00418 0 0 0 0.00418 0.004 0 0 0 0.004 0.00374 0 0 0.00374 0.0035 0 0 0 0.0035 0.001 0.0025 0 0.0035 0.0035 0 0 0 0.0035 0.0035 0 0 0 0.0035 0.0031 0 0 0.0031 0.0031 0 0 0 0.0031 0.003 0 0 0 0.003 0.003 0 0 0 0.003 0.003 0 0 0 0.003 0.0025 0 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 36 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00348 Facility Name KEYSTONE CEMENT CO HERCULES INC HARWICK STANDARD DISTRIBUTION CORF ABRITE CO FINGER LAKES CHEMICAL INC ATOTECH USA DUPONT EKC TECHNOLOGY CR BRANDS INC CHEMICAL SOLVENTS INC-DENISON FACILITY BRENNTAG SOUTHEAST INC FISHER SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL MTN DIAGNOSTICS PLANT ASTRO CHEMICALS INC CALLAHAN CHEMICAL CO FORD MOTOR CO DEARBORN DIVERSIFIED MANUFACTURING INTERCOASTAL PAINT CO INC MARATHON PETROLEUM CO - SPEEDWAY IN TCPMIMAl GENERAL DYNAMICS ORDNANCE & TACTICAL SYSTEMS GARLAND UNIVAR USA INC - TOLEDO BRANCH VOLTAIX LLC ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC PENRAYCOS INC HYDRITE CHEMICAL CO ENGINEERED POLYMER SOLUTIONS INC BUCKMAN LABORATORIES INC DYNASOL INC BENJAMIN MOORE & CO - NEWARK BENJAMIN MOORE & CO - DALLAS NORLITE CORP CRODAINC Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Address City State RT 329 BATH PA 1111 HERCULES RD HOPEWELL VA 60 S SEIBERLING ST AKRON OH 3217 WOOD DR GARLAND TX 418-424 ST PAUL ST ROCHESTER NY 1750 OVERVIEW DR ROCK HILL SC 2520 BARRINGTON CT HAYWARD CA 230 OLD CONVERSE RD SPARTANBURG SC 1010 OLD DENISON AVE CLEVELAND OH 11750 FRUEHAUF DR CHARLOTTE NC 8365 VALLEY PIKE MIDDLETOWN VA Zip Code 18014 23860 44305 75041 14605 29730 94545 29307 44109 28273 22645 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.0025 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0.0005 0.002 0.0025 0 0.0025 0 0.001 0.0015 0 0.0025 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 0.0025 0 0 0 0.0025 126 MEMORIAL DR 18 INDUSTRIAL RD 3001 MILLER RD 14029 W HARDY 1304 OLIN AVE 1200 N GLENBROOK 30450 TRACY RD 197 MEISTER AVE 2401 E PRATT BLVD 440 DENNISTON CT 7300 W BRADLEY RD 5501 E SLAUSON AVE 1256 N MCLEAN BLVD 330 PINE ST 134 LISTER AVE 700 W KEARNEY 628 S SARATOGA ST 315 CHERRY LN SPRINGFIELD MA WALPOLE MA DEARBORN Ml HOUSTON TX INDIANAPOLIS IN GARLAND TX WALBRIDGE OH BRANCHBURG NJ ELK GROVE VILLAG L WHEELING IL MILWAUKEE Wl CITY OF COMMERC CA MEMPHIS TN CANTON MA NEWARK NJ MESQUITE TX COHOES NY NEW CASTLE DE 01104 02081 48121 77060 46222 75040 43465 08876 60007 60090 53223 90040 38108 02021 07105 75149 12047 19720 0.0015 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.00199 0.001005 0.0005 0 0.0005 0.0005 0 0 0.00145 0.00135 0.001315 0.00108 0.000645 0.0005 0.001 0 0 0 0.000005 0.000885 0.001 0.0015 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0.0015 0 0 0.000012 0.000205 0.0005 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001995 0.00189 0.0015 0.0015 0.001 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.00145 0.00135 0.001327 0.001285 0.001145 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0005 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.33681E-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001995 0.00189 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.00145 0.00135 0.001327 0.001285 0.001145 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 37 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00349 Table B-3. 2011 Emissions Inventory: Non-Zero Certain Glycol Ether Reported Releases Facility Name Address City State FUJIFILM HUNT CHEMICALS USA INC 900 CARNEGIE ST ROLLING MEADOW? IL MANN DISTRIBUTION 3134 POST RD WARWICK Rl SINCLAIR WYOMING REFINING CO 100 E LINCOLN AVE SINCLAIR WY SDC TECHNOLOGIES INC 45 PARKER IRVINE CA OMNOVA SOLUTIONS INC 1455 J A COCHRAN BY-PAS CHESTER SC RIKER PRODUCTS INC 4901 STICKNEY AVE TOLEDO OH PPG ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS 6804 ENTERPRISE DR LOUISVILLE KY LAMBERTI SYNTHESIS USA INC 4001 N HAWTHORNE ST CHATTANOOGA TN BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA WHITING 2815 INDIANAPOLIS BLVD WHITING IN NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COATINGS INC DBA NICOAT 1600 GLENLAKE AVE ITASCA IL NALCO CO 3901 TERRY ST TEXARKANA TX BAKER PETROLITE-RAYNE FACILITY 135 INDUSTRIAL DR RAYNE LA IFF AUGUSTA LTD 3005 INTERNATIONAL BLVE AUGUSTA GA PARKER HANNIFIN TECH SEAL DIV 2600 WILCO BLVD WILSON NC GLIDDEN CO 1900 N JOSEY LN CARROLLTON TX BAKER PETROLITE KILGORE BLEND PLANT 806 PALUXY ST KILGORE TX BAKER PETROLITE CORP 16950 WALLISVILLE RD HOUSTON TX CHEMETALL US INC 1610 CLARA ST JACKSON Ml BAKER PETROLITE BAYPORT FACILI TY 13200 BAYPARK RD PASADENA TX MULTI-COLOR CORP 2281 S US 31 SCOTTSBURG IN NALCO CO 125 NALCO WAY/RT 65 ELLWOOD CITY PA EMERALD SERVICES INC 1825 E ALEXANDER AVE TACOMA WA AIR PRODUCTS PERFORMANCE MANUFACTURING INC 474W19TH ST RESERVE LA Zip Code 60008 02886 82334 92618 29706 43612 40214 37406 46394 60143 75501 70578 30906 27893 75006 75662 77049 49203 77507 47170 16117 98421 70084 Onsite Point Source Emissions (tpy) 0.00095 Onsite Fugitive Emissions (tpy) 0.00017 0.001055 0 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.000955 0.000025 0.000945 0 0 0.0007 0.0005255 0 0.0005 0 0.0005 0 0 0.0005 0 0.0005 0 0.0004385 0 0.000405 0 0.000285 0.0001935 0.000079 0.000048 0.000171 0.0000441 0.0001213 0 0.0001595 0 0.000156929 0.00000224 0.00007 0 0.00001 0 0.0000025 Total Air Emissions (tpy) Total Releases Total Total Releases to Surface Releases to to Other Media Water (tpy)a Soil (tpy)b (tpy)c Total Emissions (tpy) 0.00112 0 2.1684E-19 0.00112 0.001055 0 0 0.001055 0.001 0 0 0 0.001 0.001 0 0 0 0.001 0.00098 0 0 0.00098 0.000945 0 0 0 0.000945 0.0007 0 0 0 0.0007 0.0005255 0 0 0 0.0005255 0.0005 0 0 0 0.0005 0.0005 0 0 0 0.0005 0.0005 0 0 0.0005 0.0005 0 0 0.0005 0.0004385 0 0 0 0.0004385 0.000405 0 0 0.000405 0.000285 0 0 0 0.000285 0.0002725 0 0 0 0.0002725 0.000219 0 0 0 0.000219 0.0001654 0 0 0 0.0001654 0.0001595 0 0 0 0.0001595 0.000156929 0 0 0.000156929 0.00007224 0 0 0 0.00007224 0.00001 0 0 0.00002 0.00003 0.0000025 0 0 0.0000025 a. Releases to Surface Water reported as "On-Site Releases to Surface Water" b. Releases to Soil is the sum of reported releases to onsite and offsite releases to land treatment and other land disposal. c. Releases to other media include reported releases to on-site and offsite groundwater and landfills, tpy: tons per year 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 38 of 38 ED 001523 00008282-00350 APPENDIX C Outcome of Screening Procedure for Long-Term Exposures 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00351 Table C-1. Comparisons of 2009 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy City WINSTON-SALEM WILLIAMSBURG FINDLAY FREMONT OWATONNA AURORA WEIRTON BISHOPVILLE SAINT PAUL DEARBORN OLIVE BRANCH KENT REIDSVILLE LAWRENCE GREER COLUMBUS BRADLEY OLYMPIA LA PORTE LONGVIEW CHICAGO JACKSONVILLE WINDSOR MARION CHATSWORTH PLOVER ROME WHITEHOUSE NEW WINDSOR MARYSVILLE WORLAND ARNOLD MILWAUKEE CLAYCOMO HARRISONBURG PHOENIX FENTON FREMONT WEIRTON GOLDEN MONTICELLO FLINT CLYDE CONROE BALTIMORE TORRANCE OKLAHOMA CITY LOUISVILLE SMYRNA MIRA LOMA SUGAR LAND FAIRFIELD GOLDEN CHICAGO HEIGHTS BUTLER CAROLINA BARABOO EAST LIBERTY MONETT FLORENCE TAMPA CANTON DETROIT HANOVER CHICAGO BATESVILLE LA CROSSE YANKTON TOLEDO PONCA CITY SHAWNEE State North Carolina Virginia Ohio Ohio Minnesota Indiana West Virginia South Carolina Minnesota Michigan Mississippi Washington North Carolina Massachusetts South Carolina Ohio Illinois Washington Indiana Texas Illinois Florida Colorado Ohio California Wisconsin Georgia Ohio New York Ohio Wyoming Missouri Wisconsin Missouri Virginia Arizona Missouri California West Virginia Colorado Indiana Michigan Ohio Texas Maryland California Oklahoma Kentucky Tennessee California Texas California Colorado Illinois Indiana Puerto Rico Wisconsin Ohio Missouri Kentucky Florida Mississippi Michigan Pennsylvania Illinois Mississippi Wisconsin South Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oklahoma Zip Code 27107 23185 45840 43420 55060 47001 26062 29010 55107 48121 38654 98032 27320 01843 29651 43213 60915 98501 46350 75604 60609 32254 80550 43302 91311 54467 30161 43571 12553 43040 82401 63010 53224 64119 22802 85043 63026 94538 26062 80401 47960 48551 2009 Air Emissions (tpy) 172.2405 167 154.5 120.081 117.0605 107.6265 101.1455 96.4635 93.5265 88.8 88.089 87.962 77 72.1775 70.632 70 68.5545 68.4155 67 66.9795 65.3755 61.44 57.504 55.801 54.6345 50.75 49.5 48.081 46.4585 44.873 44.5215 44.1865 42.5 41.75 40.417 39.648 37.5 37.124 37 36.5 36 35.79 43410 77305 21221 90503 73179 40241 37167 91752 77478 94533 80403 60411 46721 00985 53913 43319 65708 41042 33617 39046 48215 17331 60609 38606 54603 57078 43608 74601 74804 35.3585 34.066 33.9615 33.65 33.5495 33.4 33.318 32.785 32.1695 31.5 31.5 31.3915 31.029 30.1245 29.8385 29.45 29.234 27.5305 27 26.619 26.5 25.986 25.7385 25.251 24.5255 24.4475 23.95 23.856 23.375 Outcome Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Page 1 of 16 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00352 Table C-1. Comparisons of 2009 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy Facility Name City FINDLAY RED WING CHERAW LAFAYETTE MANCHESTER PASADENA HOMERVILLE CONROE YOUNGSTOWN GREENFIELD SARATOGA SPRINGS WHITE PIGEON SPRING HILL TERRELL SEADRIFT LINCOLN GRAPELAND CLEVELAND PRINCETON HARVEY WARREN OAK CREEK BUSHNELL EVERETT WEST HENRIETTA WESTBROOK TARBORO MILWAUKEE PELLA FORT ATKINSON NEWBURGH PIGGOTT HUNTSVILLE URBANA FAIRFIELD LONGVIEW ALBERTVILLE CRAWFORDSVILLE CHATTANOOGA JACKSON QUINCY SHEBOYGAN FALLS MIDDLETOWN FORT WORTH BLANDON MOUNT VERNON KAPOLEI FLAT ROCK MANNS CHOICE HARTFORD LORDSTOWN VANCE LOUISVILLE HARRODSBURG LEEDS HANOVER BEREA NORFOLK BIRMINGHAM MEBANE TOLEDO SIDNEY BLOOMINGTON WOOSTER HARTFORD ATHENS SWEETWATER FRANKLIN MILAN CINCINNATI CHEMUNG CHICAGO Page 2 of 16 State Ohio Minnesota South Carolina Indiana Tennessee Texas Georgia Texas Ohio Indiana New York Michigan Tennessee Texas Texas Alabama Texas Ohio Indiana Illinois Ohio Wisconsin Florida Washington New York Maine North Carolina Wisconsin Iowa Wisconsin Indiana Arkansas Alabama Ohio California Texas Alabama Indiana Tennessee Mississippi Illinois Wisconsin New York Texas Pennsylvania Missouri Hawaii Michigan Pennsylvania Wisconsin Ohio Alabama Kentucky Kentucky Alabama Pennsylvania Kentucky Nebraska Alabama North Carolina Ohio Ohio Indiana Ohio Wisconsin Georgia Tennessee Pennsylvania Tennessee Ohio New York Illinois Zip Code 45840 55066 29520 47905 37355 77503 31634 77303 44512 46140 12866 49099 37174 75160 77983 35096 75844 44105 47670 60426 44483 53154 33513 98204 14586 04098 27886 53212 50219 53538 47629 72454 35811 43078 94533 75602 35950 47933 37402 39272 62305 53085 10940 76140 19510 65712 96707 48134 15550 53027 44481 35490 40213 40330 35094 17331 40403 68701 35234 27302 43612 45365 47404 44691 53027 30607 37874 16323 38358 45242 14825 60623 2009 Air Emissions (tpy) 22.8465 22.8265 22.1215 22.12 21.7615 20.685 19.6085 18.6 18.42 18.351 18.3 18.265 18.175 17.65 17.0355 16.753 16.437 16.0815 16.069 15.9335 15.922 15.854 15.8185 15.6 15.118 15.0015 14.9185 14.8525 14.569 14.55 14.5275 14.37 14.2525 14.069 13.981 13.8 13.784 13.7785 13.7535 13.624 13.111 13.105 13 13 12.769 12.7475 12.7 12.6 12.572 12.4 12.22 12.209 12.125 12.019 11.995 11.4075 11.303 11.3 11.2995 11.2585 11.215 11.167 11.046 10.837 10.75 10.75 10.7105 10.7 10.578 10.48 10.322 10.2385 Outcome Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00353 Table C-1. Comparisons of 2009 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy City ELGIN PHILADELPHIA SPRINGDALE NORWALK DUBLIN CRAWFORDSVILLE WHITE HALL LAKELAND CHICAGO MARION AGUADILLA GUIN NEW BRITAIN FLORENCE MYRTLE BEACH LAKELAND BOARDMAN SUSSEX SAINT JOSEPH MILWAUKEE MAXTON NAPOLEON LEXINGTON BRIMFIELD AURORA OCONOMOWOC LANSING MC DONOUGH EVANSVILLE SAN ANTONIO WAYNE CLEVELAND CARSON WILLARD BRIDGEVIEW CLARENDON ARTHUR PARIS MASON DAYTON TOLEDO MERCED ROANOKE AKRON MADISON HEIGHTS EDISON ORION CHICAGO MENOMONIE NASHVILLE CHICAGO LUFKIN State Illinois Pennsylvania Arkansas Ohio Georgia Indiana Arkansas Florida Illinois Virginia Puerto Rico Alabama Connecticut South Carolina South Carolina Florida Ohio Wisconsin Missouri Wisconsin North Carolina Ohio Kentucky Ohio Illinois Wisconsin Michigan Georgia Indiana Texas Michigan Tennessee California Ohio Illinois Pennsylvania Illinois Texas Ohio Tennessee Ohio California Indiana New York Michigan New Jersey Michigan Illinois Wisconsin Tennessee Illinois Texas Zip Code 60120 19120 72764 44857 31021 47933 71602 33810 60608 24354 00605 35563 06052 29501 29577 33801 44512 53089 64504 53224 28364 43545 40511 44240 60504 53066 48917 30253 47710 78264 48184 37311 90745 44890 60455 16313 61911 75460 45040 37321 43607 95348 46783 14001 48071 08817 48359 60623 54751 37218 60623 75904 2009 Air Emissions (tpy) 10.15 10.1045 10.0795 10 9.892 9.892 9.8915 9.8475 9.75 9.553 9.53 9.501 9.46 9.4365 9.3805 9.34 9.2125 9.2 9.19 9.148 9.125 9.009 9.0085 9 8.8715 8.8 8.73 8.7 8.65 8.625 8.585 8.5585 8.482 8.4475 8.4 8.368 8.25 8.162 7.883 7.823 7.608 7.557 7.475 7.4105 7.358 7.35 7.3 7.2515 7.25 7.2 7.19 7.1205 Outcome Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain GASTONIA LANCASTER FORT PAYNE NEW ORLEANS MEMPHIS ELK GROVE VILLAGE PASADENA CHICAGO WARREN TERMINAL ISLAND HARRISBURG LANSING SAINT FRANCIS ONEIDA DOVER DYERSBURG NEWTON EAST MOLINE EFFINGHAM North Carolina Pennsylvania Alabama Louisiana Tennessee Illinois Texas Illinois Michigan California North Carolina Michigan Wisconsin Tennessee Delaware Tennessee Mississippi Illinois Illinois 28052 17601 35967 70123 38113 60007 77507 60624 48091 90731 28075 48921 53235 37841 19904 38024 39345 61244 62401 7.1025 7.0965 6.923 6.8535 6.841 6.794 6.7625 6.7335 6.7 6.7 6.6745 6.65 6.6085 6.568 6.516 6.3705 6.312 6.29 6.155 Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Page 3 of 16 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00354 Table C-1. Comparisons of 2009 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy Facility Name City BAXTER SPRINGS SHREVEPORT MARION MISSOURI VALLEY HAMMOND CEDAR FALLS ROSSFORD SAINT JOE SARATOGA SPRINGS LOWVILLE M1DDLEVILLE WARREN OWENSVILLE SHANNON WINTER GARDEN TINKER AFB LANCASTER WEIRTON BURLINGTON ORANGEBURG SPRINGFIELD GRANITE CITY RUSSELLVILLE SPRINGDALE ALSIP CLAIRTON DURHAM GEORGETOWN HARTLAND SHAWNEE OAKDALE STARR SALEM COTTONWOOD LENOIR SACRAMENTO CHILTON COLUMBUS ZACHARY JACKSON WACONIA HOUSTON HOPKINSVILLE LAKE BLUFF LA PORTE LONGMONT SAINT LOUIS ASHLEY INDEPENDENCE DIXON SAINT CLOUD SAINT MARYS ERIE SIDNEY YORK WENTZVILLE GENEVA WAUPACA REDMOND MOUNT VERNON ENDICOTT WASECA KANSAS CITY BATESVILLE LA PORTE MENOMONEE FALLS PORTAGE DANVILLE WOODSTOCK RIVERBANK OLIVE BRANCH FONTANA Page 4 of 16 State Kansas Louisiana New York Iowa Indiana Iowa Ohio Indiana New York New York Michigan Ohio Missouri Mississippi Florida Oklahoma Pennsylvania West Virginia Iowa South Carolina Ohio Illinois Kentucky Pennsylvania Illinois Pennsylvania North Carolina Kentucky Maine Kansas California South Carolina Virginia Minnesota North Carolina California Wisconsin Indiana Louisiana Mississippi Minnesota Texas Kentucky Illinois Indiana Colorado Missouri Indiana Missouri California Minnesota Ohio Pennsylvania Ohio South Carolina Missouri Alabama Wisconsin Washington Indiana New York Minnesota Missouri Mississippi Texas Wisconsin Indiana Kentucky Illinois California Mississippi California Zip Code 66713 71129 14505 51555 46320 50613 43460 46785 12866 13367 49333 44483 65066 38868 34787 73145 17601 26062 52601 29116 45502 62040 42276 15144 60803 15025 27703 40324 04943 66227 95361 29684 24153 56229 28645 95824 53014 47201 70791 39272 55387 77015 42240 60044 46350 80501 63104 46705 64051 95620 56303 45885 16502 45365 29745 63385 36340 54981 98052 47620 13760 56093 64120 38606 77571 53051 46368 40422 60098 95367 38654 92337 2009 Air Emissions (tpy) 6.15 6.105 6.103 6.013 6 5.991 5.952 5.906 5.9 5.8595 5.837 5.7945 5.7815 5.7565 5.754 5.75 5.6915 5.684 5.675 5.64 5.6 5.559 5.544 5.524 5.5095 5.5 5.4965 5.475 5.435 5.4105 5.4 5.3545 5.296 5.2865 5.286 5.271 5.258 5.25 5.145 5.1255 5.0815 5.075 5.07 5.058 5.028 4.95 4.8465 4.825 4.7265 4.7155 4.709 4.6885 4.674 4.6175 4.5795 4.5 4.4905 4.4685 4.415 4.4 4.3655 4.3235 4.24 4.23 4.2185 4.2 4.182 4.1565 4.125 4.1055 4.097 4.05 Outcome Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00355 Table C-1. Comparisons of 2009 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy City STILLWATER State Oklahoma Zip Code 74075 2009 Air Emissions (tpy) 3.9275 Outcome Screened Out ARLINGTON AIKEN LEWISPORT WEIRTON TORRANCE EAST GREENVILLE LA CROSSE ORANGEBURG NORTH BRUNSWICK TOLEDO NORTH KANSAS CITY STRONGSVILLE BATESVILLE FOREST GROVE SALINA CINCINNATI SAINT PAUL STAFFORD PONTIAC KENTLAND LEBANON WINCHESTER LYONS LINCOLN MARINETTE PORTLAND GREENCASTLE ROCHELLE HAUPPAUGE ADA OLATHE SAN ANTONIO GAINESVILLE HUEYTOWN COLUMBUS WOODBRIDGE STERLING HEIGHTS BESSEMER DETROIT SPRINGDALE SAN JOSE HUTCHINSON ATGLEN STRASBURG MIDLAND CAMBRIDGE LOS ANGELES LANCASTER WINFIELD ROBINS AFB CAROL STREAM CARROLLTON CLARKSVILLE ZANESVILLE FOND DU LAC MARYVILLE BRILLION VEEDERSBURG SHELBYVILLE FOSTORIA YORK SAINT CHARLES BROWNWOOD HOUSTON LEXINGTON FRIENDLY HERNANDO CARTHAGE LUFKIN BROADVIEW Texas South Carolina Kentucky West Virginia California Pennsylvania Wisconsin South Carolina New Jersey Ohio Missouri Ohio Indiana Oregon Kansas Ohio Minnesota Connecticut Michigan Indiana Ohio Virginia New York Nebraska Wisconsin Oregon Indiana Illinois New York Michigan Kansas Texas Georgia Alabama Ohio New Jersey Michigan Alabama Michigan Arkansas California Minnesota Pennsylvania Virginia Michigan Ohio California South Carolina Kansas Georgia Illinois Texas Tennessee Ohio Wisconsin Tennesee Wisconsin Indiana Tennessee Ohio Pennsylvania Illinois Texas Texas South Carolina West Virginia Mississippi Tennessee Texas Illinois 76011 29801 42351 26062 90502 18041 54601 29115 08902 43607 64116 44149 47006 97116 67401 45244 55116 06075 48341 47951 45036 22603 14489 68524 54143 97203 46135 61068 11788 49355 66061 78251 30504 35023 43228 07095 48313 35023 48211 72764 95134 55350 19310 22657 48667 43725 90031 29721 67156 31098 60188 75006 37040 43701 54935 37801 54110 47987 37160 44830 17404 60174 76801 77054 29073 26146 38632 37030 75901 60153 3.9255 3.88 3.8235 3.802 3.7925 3.7365 3.7245 3.705 3.6765 3.674 3.547 3.535 3.504 3.485 3.4845 3.48 3.41 3.403 3.385 3.38 3.376 3.3515 3.3 3.196 3.1955 3.1635 3.104 3.0715 2.97 2.947 2.9415 2.9395 2.926 2.8985 2.88 2.877 2.852 2.85 2.8215 2.815 2.785 2.767 2.704 2.7 2.695 2.6515 2.6 2.561 2.5505 2.527 2.5185 2.4885 2.47 2.45 2.424 2.3935 2.392 2.373 2.351 2.3295 2.3125 2.2915 2.265 2.265 2.216 2.2095 2.207 2.205 2.181 2.125 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Page 5 of 16 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00356 Table C-1. Comparisons of 2009 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy City State SAN MARCOS SOUTH CHARLESTON CRANBERRY TOWNSHIP NILES SAINT LOUIS CHARLOTTE BUFFALO TOMAH WYANDOTTE CONWAY ANTIOCH FAIRFIELD PASADENA SEATTLE California West Virginia Pennsylvania Michigan Missouri North Carolina New York Wisconsin Michigan South Carolina California Alabama Texas Washington Zip Code 92078 25303 16066 49120 63116 28273 14207 54660 48192 29526 94509 35064 77507 98108 2009 Air Emissions (tpy) 2.122 2.1175 2.11 2.1075 2.093 2.056 2.053 2.0475 2.036 1.973 1.9645 1.954 1.9505 1.95 Outcome Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out PINEVILLE LOS ALAMITOS WEST MEMPHIS MONTGOMERY ALLENTOWN FONDA MARYLAND HEIGHTS MARENGO WEIRTON STRUTHERS FRIDLEY JACKSONVILLE AVON LAKE PENSACOLA FORT RECOVERY FAIRFIELD CHARLESTOWN RENTON ARLINGTON RENO JEFFERSON CITY EDGEWATER TAUNTON STERLING HEIGHTS LOUISVILLE HILL AFB WAUKEGAN TAFT North Carolina California Arkansas Alabama Pennsylvania New York Missouri Iowa West Virginia Ohio Minnesota Texas Ohio Florida Ohio Alabama Indiana Washington Texas Nevada Missouri Florida Massachusetts Michigan Kentucky Utah Illinois Louisiana 28134 90720 72301 36105 18103 12068 63043 52301 26062 44471 55432 75766 44012 32502 45846 35064 47111 98055 76010 89512 65109 32132 02780 48312 40210 84056 60085 70057 1.948 1.925 1.9155 1.8995 1.886 1.8835 1.8765 1.8675 1.8185 1.8 1.79 1.779 1.77 1.7345 1.7285 1.7175 1.7085 1.7035 1.7 1.679 1.6575 1.639 1.637 1.6 1.59 1.5525 1.5515 1.545 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out ELKTON KANKAKEE Virginia Illinois 22827 60901 1.51 1.5035 Screened Out Screened Out MIDLAND INDIANAPOLIS MOUNT VERNON PORTLAND MILWAUKEE HOUSTON MENOMONEE FALLS WELLSBURG LOUISVILLE FONTANA CARROLLTON ASHVILLE NORMAL COLUMBUS KINGSPORT ROCHESTER Texas Indiana Illinois Oregon Wisconsin Texas Wisconsin West Virginia Kentucky California Georgia Ohio Illinois Nebraska Tennessee Pennsylvania 79703 46218 62864 97218 53214 77041 53051 26070 40219 92335 30117 43103 61761 68601 37662 15074 1.4975 1.4785 1.467 1.4665 1.466 1.4635 1.451 1.45 1.4355 1.433 1.432 1.416 1.4135 1.4005 1.3975 1.3895 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out BOURBONNAIS MOLINE FARIBAULT KANSAS CITY MULBERRY HAZLETON COLUMBUS LANCASTER Illinois Illinois Minnesota Kansas Florida Pennsylvania Ohio Pennsylvania 60914 61265 55021 66115 33860 18201 43211 17603 1.3725 1.353 1.3495 1.3175 1.313 1.3 1.3 1.29 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Page 6 of 16 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00357 Table C-1. Comparisons of 2009 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy City DETROIT BEDFORD PARK TOLEDO CEDARTOWN AVON COLUMBIA BELVIDERE MADISON NILES LOGAN HERMITAGE LAFAYETTE LIBERTY ROCKFORD KILLONA NAVASOTA ELKRIDGE DECATUR AVENEL BRYAN WESTLAND HOUSTON MANDAN CANFIELD DALTON GRAND RAPIDS GARLAND NORTH KANSAS CITY WARMINSTER TOLEDO SAGINAW LOS ANGELES HAWESVILLE EVANSVILLE ELIZABETHTON SEATTLE COTTAGE GROVE STILLWATER SANTA CLARA HOUSTON LAWRENCEVILLE NEVILLE ISLAND OWEGO DALLAS MIDDLEBURY SAUKVILLE TRENTON LAFAYETTE CHICAGO STERLING HEIGHTS JEFFERSONVILLE ROSEMOUNT BALTIMORE ARLINGTON TULSA CARSON CITY EAST POINT GRAYSLAKE BOWLING GREEN MESQUITE MAUMEE SOUTHFIELD NEWARK HOUSTON HOUSTON VISALIA TUSCALOOSA CHICAGO HATFIELD LOUISVILLE State Michigan Illinois Ohio Georgia Connecticut South Carolina Illinois Alabama Ohio Utah Pennsylvania Indiana Indiana Illinois Louisiana Texas Maryland Alabama New Jersey Ohio Michigan Texas North Dakota Ohio Georgia Michigan Texas Missouri Pennsylvania Ohio Michigan California Kentucky Indiana Tennessee Washington Wisconsin Oklahoma California Texas Georgia Pennsylvania New York Texas Indiana Wisconsin New Jersey Indiana Illinois Michigan Indiana Minnesota Maryland Texas Oklahoma Nevada Georgia Illinois Kentucky Texas Ohio Michigan New Jersey Texas Texas California Alabama Illinois Pennsylvania Kentucky Zip Code 48211 2009 Air Emissions (tpy) 1.29 Outcome Screened Out 60638 43612 30125 06001 29201 61008 35756 44446 84321 16148 47905 47353 61104 70066 77868 21075 35601 07001 43506 48186 77073 58554 44406 30721 49507 75042 1.2635 1.255 1.241 1.2325 1.23 1.22 1.217 1.2045 1.199 1.189 1.175 1.148 1.1455 1.1455 1.1425 1.1415 1.1375 1.1335 1.126 1.111 1.1105 1.1005 1.1 1.0865 1.085 1.0845 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 64116 18974 43615 48601 90016 42348 47711 37643 98108 53527 74075 95050 77051 30043 15225 13827 75244 46540 53080 08648 47909 60633 48314 47130 55068 21224 76011 74116 89701 30344 60030 42101 75149 43537 48034 07105 77007 77053 93291 35401 60630 19440 40202 1.0705 1.0505 1.05 1.043 1.04 1.032 1.0225 1.019 1.009 1 0.998 0.9555 0.9265 0.924 0.91 0.9025 0.9005 0.8555 0.848 0.848 0.825 0.818 0.8135 0.8125 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7935 0.792 0.79 0.785 0.782 0.7595 0.7525 0.75 0.749 0.742 0.7255 0.7205 0.7195 0.7045 0.7025 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Page 7 of 16 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00358 Table C-1. Comparisons of 2009 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy City JERSEY CITY CARROLLTON BLOOMSBURG PEOTONE WARREN SHREVEPORT ORLANDO WASHINGTON FULLERTON SUGAR GROVE COVINGTON FRANKLIN MARIETTA SAVAGE SCHOFIELD KENEDY AMBRIDGE FORT WORTH ROXBORO COLUMBIA CITY OSHKOSH LUBBOCK LA PORTE WILLOWSPRINGS CLINTON STREETSBORO FONTANA DAVENPORT TEXARKANA STERLING HEIGHTS BLUE ASH ANNISTON MONROE VALENCIA BATAVIA EUGENE PLAQUEMINE PALMDALE KALAMA TALLULAH STURTEVANT PLEASANT PRAIRIE WESTON VERNON CHEEKTOWAGA BEDFORD PARK ELK GROVE VILLAGE CHIPPEWA FALLS BIRMINGHAM ALGONA CASA GRANDE ELK GROVE VILLAGE SAINT GABRIEL MOUNT CLEMENS FRAZEYSBURG CHICAGO ATLANTA SANTA FE SPRINGS RICHMOND MILWAUKEE WAXAHACHIE LANCASTER TULSA WESTLAKE LANSING MORRIS CONNELLSVILLE ELK GROVE VILLAGE MANSFIELD CLEARWATER State New Jersey Texas Pennsylvania Illinois Pennsylvania Louisiana Florida Pennsylvania California Illinois Georgia Pennsylvania Ohio Minnesota Wisconsin Texas Pennsylvania Texas North Carolina Indiana Wisconsin Texas Texas Illinois Iowa Ohio California Iowa Texas Michigan Ohio Alabama Ohio Pennsylvania Illinois Oregon Louisiana California Washington Louisiana Wisconsin Wisconsin Michigan California New York Illinois Illinois Wisconsin Alabama Iowa Arizona Illinois Louisiana Michigan Ohio Illinois Georgia California Indiana Wisconsin Texas Pennsylvania Oklahoma Ohio Illinois Illinois Pennsylvania Illinois Texas Florida Zip Code 07304 75006 17815 60468 16365 71115 32837 15301 92831 60554 30014 16323 45750 55378 54476 78119 15003 76110 27573 46725 54903 79415 77571 60480 52732 44241 2009 Air Emissions (tpy) 0.7 0.6985 0.696 0.6945 0.6945 0.6905 0.677 0.6735 0.673 0.665 0.661 0.659 0.648 0.642 0.6405 0.635 0.635 0.628 0.6265 0.621 0.619 0.616 0.5975 0.586 0.585 0.5795 Outcome Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 92335 52802 75501 48312 45242 36207 45050 16059 60510 97402 70765 93599 98625 71282 53177 53158 49289 90023 14225 60501 60007 54729 35215 0.5785 0.567 0.5505 0.55 0.5465 0.53 0.5265 0.5245 0.52 0.513 0.506 0.5025 0.5025 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4975 0.4925 0.49 0.4895 0.485 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 50511 85222 60007 70776 48043 43822 60622 30318 90670 47375 53223 75165 17603 74115 44145 60438 60450 15425 60007 76063 33760 0.4705 0.4545 0.4505 0.45 0.4495 0.4465 0.4365 0.4305 0.42 0.4175 0.415 0.4075 0.402 0.3975 0.3955 0.395 0.3905 0.389 0.387 0.3865 0.384 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Page 8 of 16 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00359 Table C-1. Comparisons of 2009 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy City MORROW WYANDOTTE HOUSTON EASTON PORTLAND HOUSTON PATERSON SAINT JOSEPH CANTON NASHVILLE WAVERLY GREAT BEND SALT LAKE CITY CHRISTIANSTED RICHMOND HIGH POINT State Georgia Michigan Texas Pennsylvania Oregon Texas New Jersey Missouri Massachusetts Illinois Ohio Kansas Utah Virgin Islands Kentucky North Carolina Zip Code 30260 48192 77091 18045 97203 77041 07503 64501 02021 62263 45690 67530 84108 00820 40475 27261 2009 Air Emissions (tpy) 0.3775 0.3775 0.3775 0.375 0.375 0.375 0.375 0.3675 0.366 0.365 0.358 0.3555 0.353 0.351 0.35 0.349 Outcome Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out ANAHEIM MORRISVILLE MOLINE California Pennsylvania Illinois 92801 19067 61265 0.348 0.346 0.341 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out BLYTHEVILLE BIRMINGHAM FREMONT Arkansas Alabama Michigan 72315 35234 49412 0.334 0.3325 0.3275 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out HIGH POINT North Carolina 27261 0.327 Screened Out SANTA FE SPRINGS WEST HAVEN RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSTON CORDOVA CLEVELAND BREMEN PAINESVILLE CHICO MINNETONKA WAUSAU LOS ANGELES LANCASTER LOUISVILLE HAVRE DE GRACE CHICAGO WEST BEND ELK GROVE VILLAGE LAKELAND HARVEY ROSEVILLE BRISTOL CALEDONIA MC KEESPORT MIDWAY YORK SAINT PAUL CARPENTERSVILLE NASHVILLE BROADVIEW SUMTER CARTERET ROCK HILL GREENVILLE OKLAHOMA CITY VALLEY PARK CANNON FALLS READING TAYLORS CARSON CONROE BERKELEY BARBERTON GREENSBURG CHARLOTTE California Connecticut California Texas Illinois Ohio Indiana Ohio California Minnesota Wisconsin California Ohio Kentucky Maryland Illinois Wisconsin Illinois Florida Illinois California Pennsylvania Michigan Pennsylvania Tennessee Pennsylvania Minnesota Illinois Tennessee Illinois South Carolina New Jersey South Carolina Ohio Oklahoma Missouri Minnesota Pennsylvania South Carolina California Texas Missouri Ohio Indiana North Carolina 90670 06516 91730 77086 61242 44111 46506 44077 95928 55343 54401 90023 43130 40203 21078 60633 53095 60007 33803 60426 95678 19007 49316 15132 37809 17402 55102 60110 37209 60155 29150 07008 29730 45331 73129 63088 55009 19605 29687 90810 77303 63134 44203 47240 28273 0.3255 0.313 0.311 0.3105 0.3085 0.304 0.3 0.298 0.298 0.2975 0.296 0.2905 0.2905 0.2895 0.281 0.28 0.2795 0.275 0.272 0.2675 0.2665 0.266 0.265 0.264 0.2615 0.2605 0.2595 0.2585 0.254 0.2535 0.252 0.252 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Page 9 of 16 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00360 Table C-1. Comparisons of 2009 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy City COLUMBUS MARYLAND HEIGHTS TWINSBURG BATON ROUGE NORFOLK ATLANTA HOLYOKE BOWLING GREEN State Ohio Missouri Ohio Louisiana Nebraska Georgia Massachusetts Kentucky Zip Code 43219 63043 44087 70805 68701 30339 01040 42101 2009 Air Emissions (tpy) 0.25 0.25 0.248 0.2465 0.2445 0.24 0.236 0.233 Outcome Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out WARREN MARIETTA GALLIPOLIS FERRY HASKELL NEW IBERIA WAXAHACHIE KENDALLVILLE MOREHEAD DORAVILLE CHARLESTON KILGORE WINDER SHEBOYGAN MABLETON WESTLAKE Michigan Georgia West Virginia New Jersey Louisiana Texas Indiana Kentucky Georgia Missouri Texas Georgia Wisconsin Georgia Louisiana 48091 30062 25515 07420 70560 75165 46755 40351 30340 63834 75662 30680 53081 30126 70669 0.23 0.228 0.222 0.2215 0.22 0.2115 0.21 0.203 0.2025 0.1985 0.196 0.1935 0.193 0.191 0.1885 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out SEATTLE SAINT LOUIS MACHESNEY PARK GARLAND PAGEDALE JAMESTOWN WHEELING Washington Missouri Illinois Texas Missouri Pennsylvania Illinois 98107 63111 61115 75041 63133 16134 60090 0.1875 0.186 0.1855 0.182 0.182 0.1795 0.177 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out CHANDLER ORANGEBURG BATON ROUGE SAINT CLAIR SAINT ALBANS WALLINGFORD BATON ROUGE FREEPORT FRONT ROYAL TULSA MARCUS HOOK INDIAN TRAIL STATESVILLE Arizona New York Louisiana Missouri Vermont Connecticut Louisiana Texas Virginia Oklahoma Pennsylvania North Carolina North Carolina 85226 10962 70805 63077 05478 06492 70815 77541 22630 74112 19061 28079 28625 0.177 0.176 0.176 0.1745 0.174 0.173 0.173 0.168 0.168 0.167 0.1615 0.161 0.156 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out EDINBURGH NEW CENTURY DUNN BATAVIA NORTH KANSAS CITY CIRCLEVILLE DETROIT CLEARWATER CRESTWOOD DEEPWATER BURLINGTON PLAQUEMINE FORT MADISON MEMPHIS SAND SPRINGS MARIETTA LEBANON Indiana Kansas North Carolina Illinois Missouri Ohio Michigan Florida Missouri New Jersey North Carolina Louisiana Iowa Tennessee Oklahoma Georgia Pennsylvania 46124 66031 28335 60510 64116 43113 48234 33760 63126 08023 27215 70765 52627 38113 74063 30062 17046 0.1545 0.154 0.153 0.151 0.1465 0.1455 0.145 0.142 0.1415 0.14 0.14 0.139 0.135 0.1345 0.1325 0.1315 0.1315 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out PONTIAC CHICAGO HEIGHTS STAFFORD LOUISVILLE MARTIN PACOIMA WOODBURN Michigan Illinois Texas Kentucky South Carolina California Indiana 48341 60411 77477 40210 29836 91331 46797 0.131 0.1295 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Page 10 of 16 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00361 Table C-1. Comparisons of 2009 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy City BATAVIA CHICAGO SAINT CHARLES SAINT LOUIS LAVERGNE PELHAM MENOMONEE FALLS ORANGE FOOTHILL RANCH FOUNTAIN INN BAYTOWN WEATHERFORD SPARTANBURG SOLON PONCA CITY OKLAHOMA CITY ABBEVILLE NORTHVALE HARWICK CROYDON RUTHERFORDTON State Illinois Illinois Illinois Missouri Tennessee Alabama Wisconsin Texas California South Carolina Texas Texas South Carolina Ohio Oklahoma Oklahoma Louisiana New Jersey Pennsylvania Pennsylvania North Carolina Zip Code 60510 60608 60174 63147 37086 35124 53051 77630 92610 29644 77520 76086 29302 44139 74601 73117 70510 07647 15049 19021 28139 2009 Air Emissions (tpy) 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.125 Outcome Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out MONTOURSVILLE MCCARRAN DALTON PHOENIX HARRISON ODESSA HIGH POINT CHICAGO MEMPHIS HOMEWOOD HUNTINGTON OSSEO SPRINGFIELD DE PERE ROMULUS HOUSTON PITTSTON NEW BRUNSWICK WAXAHACHIE WILLOUGHBY THOMAS DALLAS HOLCOMB SAINT LOUIS YPSILANTI INMAN LOUISVILLE HICKORY CHARLOTTE GRIFFIN WILMERDING SOUTH HOLLAND YUMA CLEBURNE PHILADELPHIA EVENDALE GREENSBORO NEVADA OCALA HOLLAND SAN DIEGO PARIS FAIRFIELD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CARSON LANGLEY MIAMI BRATTLEBORO SCOTTSBURG MILWAUKEE Pennsylvania Nevada Georgia Arizona Ohio Texas North Carolina Illinois Tennessee Illinois West Virginia Minnesota Virginia Wisconsin Michigan Texas Pennsylvania New Jersey Texas Ohio Oklahoma Texas Kansas Missouri Michigan South Carolina Kentucky North Carolina North Carolina Georgia Pennsylvania Illinois Arizona Texas Pennsylvania Ohio North Carolina Missouri Florida Michigan California Kentucky California California California South Carolina Florida Vermont Indiana Wisconsin 17754 89434 30720 85043 45030 79765 27261 60632 38113 60430 25704 55369 22153 54115 48174 77051 18640 08901 75165 44094 73669 75236 67851 63147 48197 29349 40211 28602 28208 30224 15148 60473 85369 76033 19116 45241 27403 64772 34475 49423 92121 40361 94533 91730 90810 29834 33162 05301 47170 53224 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.124 0.123 0.121 0.1185 0.118 0.1175 0.1165 0.116 0.1145 0.1135 0.1125 0.1125 0.11 0.11 0.109 0.106 0.103 0.103 0.1025 0.101 0.098 0.0935 0.093 0.093 0.091 0.0905 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Page 11 of 16 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00362 Table C-1. Comparisons of 2009 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy City WARREN KANSAS CITY SANTA FE SPRINGS OAK CREEK MENOMINEE LEMONT ALEXANDRIA CORPUS CHRISTI TEWKSBURY CRESSON ORWELL GREENCASTLE SCHERERVILLE DALLAS PORTNECHES State Michigan Kansas California Wisconsin Michigan Illinois Louisiana Texas Massachusetts Texas Ohio Indiana Indiana Texas Texas Zip Code 48091 66106 90670 53154 49858 60439 71303 78405 01876 76035 44076 46135 46375 75243 77651 2009 Air Emissions (tpy) 0.088 0.0875 0.0875 0.086 0.085 0.0835 0.0835 0.0825 0.082 0.08 0.0795 0.0795 0.0795 0.0795 0.079 Outcome Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out CITY OF INDUSTRY MC COOK BRANDENBURG SAINT CLAIR KANSAS CITY CLINTON PITTSBURGH FAIRFIELD MOUNT VERNON PITTSBURGH California Illinois Kentucky Missouri Kansas Mississippi Pennsylvania California New York Pennsylvania 91748 60525 40108 63077 66106 39056 15238 94533 10550 15233 0.079 0.078 0.078 0.078 0.0775 0.0765 0.0765 0.0745 0.074 0.0735 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out SALEM PETERSBURG CLEVELAND PORT ARTHUR Oregon Virginia Ohio Texas 97302 23805 44109 77640 0.073 0.0725 0.072 0.071 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out SEDALIA AMARILLO WARSAW MONTEBELLO Missouri Texas Indiana California 65301 79187 46580 90640 0.071 0.07 0.07 0.07 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out MAUMEE CONNERSVILLE SOUTH EL MONTE SHOREVIEW MEREDITH CHANDLER CAROLINA LEMONT GROTTOES TERRE HAUTE DURHAM CAHOKIA DELAWARE HANNIBAL MC DONOUGH MAULDIN ALLENTOWN CORPUS CHRISTI MOUNT HOLLY BUFFALO BEDFORD PARK GRAND PRAIRIE PEKIN BURNET REIDSVILLE BENTON MANITOWOC BETTENDORF MIDDLEFIELD VERNON ELVERSON TOMBALL GREENSBORO TAMPA COLUMBUS Ohio Indiana California Minnesota New Hampshire Arizona Puerto Rico Illinois Virginia Indiana North Carolina Illinois Ohio Missouri Georgia South Carolina Pennsylvania Texas North Carolina New York Illinois Texas Illinois Texas North Carolina Arkansas Wisconsin Iowa Ohio California Pennsylvania Texas North Carolina Florida Ohio 43537 47331 91733 55126 03253 85224 00985 60439 24441 47808 27703 62206 43015 63401 30253 29662 18106 78410 28120 14204 60499 75050 61554 78611 27320 72015 54220 52722 44062 90058 19520 77375 27409 33634 43207 0.0675 0.066 0.066 0.0655 0.0635 0.0625 0.0615 0.061 0.0595 0.0585 0.058 0.0575 0.057 0.057 0.057 0.057 0.0565 0.055 0.0545 0.054 0.0535 0.0535 0.053 0.0515 0.05 0.0495 0.049 0.049 0.0485 0.0485 0.0485 0.0485 0.048 0.047 0.047 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Page 12 of 16 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00363 Table C-1. Comparisons of 2009 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy City State HILLSBOROUGH BARDSTOWN JOLIET DENVER BRIDGEVIEW WAYNE TUSCALOOSA CONYERS VALLEY CENTER KANSAS CITY ANDOVER PASADENA HOUSTON EL DORADO HEBRON FAIRFIELD JONESBOROUGH MILTON STURTEVANT MARTINSBURG MC INTOSH LANCASTER GREENVILLE GARLAND READING WICKLIFFE PARLIN WEST BEND KNOXVILLE INDIANAPOLIS FERNDALE DERIDDER LAKE CHARLES LANSING HAMILTON GARLAND TOLEDO DES MOINES MIDDLESEX NASHUA MOBILE PHILADELPHIA FOUNTAIN INN CORSICANA DYERSBURG HOUSTON GREENSBORO ROTTERDAM JUNCTION NORCROSS MANOR COUNCIL BLUFFS SAN JOSE THREE RIVERS AVENEL WALBRIDGE CHICAGO COUNCE BELVIDERE SPRINGFIELD BEDFORD PARK FERNDALE PICAYUNE MIDDLETOWN New Jersey Kentucky Illinois Colorado Illinois Michigan Alabama Georgia Kansas Kansas Kansas Texas Texas Arkansas Ohio Ohio Tennessee Wisconsin Wisconsin West Virginia Alabama Texas South Carolina Texas Pennsylvania Ohio New Jersey Wisconsin Iowa Indiana Michigan Louisiana Louisiana Michigan Ohio Texas Ohio Iowa New Jersey New Hampshire Alabama Pennsylvania South Carolina Texas Tennessee Texas North Carolina New York Georgia Pennsylvania Iowa California Texas New Jersey Ohio Illinois Tennessee New Jersey Missouri Illinois Michigan Mississippi Virginia Zip Code 08844 40004 60436 80216 60455 48184 35401 30012 67147 66111 67002 77507 77047 71730 43025 45014 37659 53563 53177 25405 36553 75134 29605 75041 19605 44092 08859 53095 50138 46219 48220 70634 70601 48906 45015 75041 43615 50313 08846 03062 36614 19127 29644 75109 38024 77034 27409 12150 30071 15665 51502 95133 78071 07001 43465 60638 38326 07823 65802 60501 48220 39466 22645 2009 Air Emissions (tpy) 0.046 0.044 0.043 0.042 0.0415 0.0405 0.0395 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.0385 0.038 0.0375 0.037 0.037 0.0365 0.0365 0.036 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.035 0.035 0.0345 0.0335 0.033 0.032 0.0315 0.0315 0.0305 0.0285 0.028 0.028 0.0275 0.027 0.0265 0.0265 0.026 0.026 0.026 0.0255 0.025 0.025 0.0245 0.0245 0.0245 0.0245 0.0235 0.0235 0.023 0.023 0.023 0.023 0.0225 0.0225 0.022 0.0205 0.02 0.02 0.0195 0.0195 0.019 0.019 Outcome Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out EMERSON BONHAM BUTLER BRIGHTON ROCHESTER TWINSBURG LAWRENCE SANTA ANA Georgia Texas Indiana Michigan New York Ohio Massachusetts California 30137 75418 46721 48114 14652 44087 01843 92704 0.019 0.0185 0.0185 0.018 0.0175 0.017 0.0165 0.0165 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Page 13 of 16 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00364 Table C-1. Comparisons of 2009 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy City SAINT GABRIEL HILLSDALE COLUMBUS IOWA CITY ENOREE MARINETTE MUSCATINE MORROW JOHNSTOWN HOUSTON HOLTSVILLE BOLTON JAY INDIANAPOLIS THEODORE COMMERCE WATERBURY HUNGERFORD INDIANAPOLIS SAINT LOUIS LAWRENCEVILLE DELAWARE BALTIMORE TUSCALOOSA MOJAVE SAN ANTONIO DALLAS GREENSBORO UNIVERSITY PARK CARY HAMMOND SANTA FE SPRINGS SANTA ANA ONTARIO PELL CITY LUFKIN HOBBS NEWCASTLE PORTLAND CHANNAHON TULSA STANLEY UPPER MARLBORO LESAGE VICTORVILLE INDIANAPOLIS PAINESVILLE FOREST PARK SANTA FE SPRINGS CINNAMINSON CHANNAHON CALHOUN SAN JOSE BATH KANSAS CITY INDIANAPOLIS State Louisiana Illinois Ohio Iowa South Carolina Wisconsin Iowa Georgia New York Texas New York Connecticut Maine Indiana Alabama California Connecticut Texas Indiana Missouri Georgia Ohio Maryland Alabama California Texas Texas North Carolina Illinois Illinois Indiana California California California Alabama Texas New Mexico Delaware Oregon Illinois Oklahoma North Carolina Maryland West Virginia California Indiana Ohio Georgia California New Jersey Illinois Georgia California Pennsylvania Kansas Indiana Zip Code 70776 61257 43207 52240 29335 54143 52761 30260 12095 77029 11742 06043 04239 46205 36582 90040 06708 77448 46268 63111 30043 43015 21230 35401 93501 78218 75207 27406 60466 60013 46320 90670 92704 91761 35125 75901 88240 19720 97227 60410 74131 28164 20774 25537 92392 46226 44077 30297 90670 08077 60410 30701 95131 18014 66105 46225 2009 Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0155 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.0145 0.0145 0.0145 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.0135 0.0125 0.0125 0.0125 0.0125 0.012 0.0115 0.0115 0.0115 0.0115 0.0115 0.0105 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.0095 0.0095 0.0095 0.0095 0.0095 0.009 0.009 0.0085 0.0085 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.0075 0.0075 0.0075 0.0075 0.0075 0.0075 0.0075 0.007 0.007 0.0065 0.0065 0.0065 0.0065 0.0065 0.006 0.006 Outcome Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out SOMERVILLE RIDGEFIELD PARK LA PLACE DOVER EAST LIVERPOOL MARLBOROUGH WOODRIDGE CHATHAM LAKEVILLE MIAMI WEST CHESTER HILLSBORO CONNERSVILLE GARDEN GROVE CHANDLER New Jersey New Jersey Louisiana Delaware Ohio Massachusetts Illinois Virginia Minnesota Florida Pennsylvania Oregon Indiana California Arizona 08876 07660 70068 19904 43920 01752 60517 24531 55044 33155 19382 97124 47331 92841 85248 0.0055 0.0055 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Page 14 of 16 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00365 Table C-1. Comparisons of 2009 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy City INDIANAPOLIS GARDENA ANDERSON SPARTANBURG DUDLEY WAYNE LAFAYETTE MORRISVILLE INDIANAPOLIS CLEARFIELD ROCKFORD LOUISVILLE HAMPTON CHARLOTTE NORWALK HOUSTON WALPOLE CITY OF COMMERCE WINDSOR PASADENA GARLAND BAKERSFIELD COHOES DEARBORN PALMYRA LYNWOOD CANTON KNOXVILLE ELMENDORF FERNLEY MEMPHIS CHAGRIN FALLS ROBSTOWN HOUSTON ROCHESTER MEMPHIS NIAGARA FALLS HOPEWELL LINDEN SEAFORD CITY OF INDUSTRY PHILLIPSBURG RIO RANCHO ROCK HILL SINCLAIR DENVER NEWBURYPORT YOUNGSTOWN SPARTANBURG WAXAHACH1E WYNNEWOOD MOUNT VERNON CONCORD WOODRIDGE KIMBALL SALEM CHATSWORTH HARLEYVILLE BEDFORD HEIGHTS COTTAGE GROVE MIDLOTHIAN MILWAUKEE HAYWARD CINCINNATI SPRINGFIELD ROLLING MEADOWS ORLANDO LEETSDALE DEER PARK MEMPHIS State Indiana California South Carolina South Carolina Massachusetts New Jersey Indiana Pennsylvania Indiana Utah Illinois Kentucky Iowa North Carolina Connecticut Texas Massachusetts California Colorado Texas Texas California New York Michigan New Jersey California Massachusetts Tennessee Texas Nevada Tennessee Ohio Texas Texas New York Tennessee New York Virginia New Jersey Delaware California New Jersey New Mexico South Carolina Wyoming Colorado Massachusetts Ohio South Carolina Texas Oklahoma Missouri North Carolina Illinois Nebraska Massachusetts California South Carolina Ohio Minnesota Illinois Wisconsin California Ohio Massachusetts Illinois Florida Pennsylvania Texas Tennessee Zip Code 46203 90248 29625 29306 01571 07470 47905 19067 46225 84016 61104 2009 Air Emissions (tpy) 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.0045 0.0045 0.0045 0.0045 Outcome Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 40216 50441 28273 06852 77061 02081 90040 80550 77507 75040 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.0035 0.0035 0.0035 0.0035 0.0035 0.003 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 93308 12047 48121 08065 90262 02021 37921 78112 89408 38118 44023 78380 77049 14605 38118 14304 23860 07036 19973 91746 08865 87124 29730 82334 80216 01950 44502 29307 75165 73098 65712 28025 60517 69145 01970 91311 29448 44146 55016 60445 53207 94545 45246 01104 60008 32809 15056 77536 38108 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Page 15 of 16 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00366 Table C-1. Comparisons of 2009 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy Facility Name City MILWAUKEE SAN CARLOS CLEVELAND RAYNE DAYTON DEARBORN WHEELING ELK GROVE VILLAGE MILWAUKEE FRANKFORT OLIVE BRANCH MEMPHIS BRANCHBURG TEXARKANA FREEHOLD CHARLOTTE LOUISVILLE MILWAUKEE TOLEDO MOUNT PLEASANT CHATSWORTH DALLAS UNION CITY LINDEN PASADENA ITASCA AUGUSTA SACRAMENTO State Wisconsin California Ohio Louisiana Texas Michigan Illinois Illinois Wisconsin Indiana Mississippi Tennessee New Jersey Texas New Jersey North Carolina Kentucky Wisconsin Ohio Iowa California Texas Tennessee New Jersey Texas Illinois Georgia California Zip Code 53223 94070 44109 70578 77535 48121 60090 60007 53226 46041 38654 38109 08876 75501 07728 28273 40214 53218 43612 52641 91311 75247 38261 07036 77507 60143 30906 95826 2009 Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 Outcome Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out FLORA SAN LORENZO NORTH CHARLESTON ARVONIA CHATTANOOGA Illinois Puerto Rico South Carolina Virginia Tennessee 62839 00754 29406 23004 37406 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out tpy: tons per year 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 16 of 16 ED 001523 00008282-00367 Table C-2. Comparisons of 2010 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy City WINSTON-SALEM WILLIAMSBURG FINDLAY OWATONNA FREMONT BISHOPVILLE WEIRTON REIDSVILLE GREER SAINT PAUL KENT OLYMPIA OLIVE BRANCH COLUMBUS LA PORTE AURORA CHICAGO WHITEHOUSE DEARBORN BRADLEY LAWRENCE LONGVIEW MARION ROME WINDSOR CLAYCOMO WORLAND EAST LIBERTY ARNOLD HOMERVILLE CHATSWORTH CHICAGO HARRISONBURG MARYSVILLE NEW WINDSOR PHOENIX MILWAUKEE TOLEDO CHICAGO HEIGHTS CONROE LAFAYETTE DETROIT SMYRNA GOLDEN LOUISVILLE PLOVER JACKSONVILLE FLORENCE BALTIMORE SUGAR LAND MIRA LOMA TORRANCE HARRISBURG BARABOO BUTLER GOLDEN MONTICELLO CAROLINA REDWING WHITE PIGEON VANCE OAK CREEK CINCINNATI State North Carolina Virginia Ohio Minnesota Ohio South Carolina West Virginia North Carolina South Carolina Minnesota Washington Washington Mississippi Ohio Indiana Indiana Illinois Ohio Michigan Illinois Massachusetts Texas Ohio Georgia Colorado Missouri Wyoming Ohio Missouri Georgia California Illinois Virginia Ohio New York Arizona Wisconsin Ohio Illinois Texas Indiana Michigan Tennessee Colorado Kentucky Wisconsin Florida Kentucky Maryland Texas California California North Carolina Wisconsin Indiana Colorado Indiana Puerto Rico Minnesota Michigan Alabama Wisconsin Ohio Page 1 of 18 Zip Code 27107 2010 Air Emissions (tpy) 188.7835 23185 45840 55060 43420 29010 178.5 155 122.646 106.3225 96.762 26062 96.088 27320 29651 55107 94.5 91.2125 89.498 98032 98501 38654 83.081 77.6895 76.824 43213 46350 47001 60609 43571 76.5 68.35 68.17917 68.005 67.836 48121 60915 01843 75604 43302 30161 80550 66.5 64.0775 62.726 57.4525 57.2125 55.5 54.9985 64119 51.5 82401 43319 63010 31634 91311 51.128 47.2 46.317 45.9635 44.4135 60609 22802 43040 12553 85043 53224 43608 60411 77305 47905 48215 37167 80401 40241 54467 32254 43.1447 42.3835 42.3 42.266 38.161 38 37.65 37.48 35.875 35.69 35.6 35.5795 35.5 35.4 35.35 34.9825 41042 21221 77478 91752 90503 28075 53913 46721 80403 47960 00985 55066 49099 35490 53154 45242 34.946 34.066 32.335 32.253 32 31.510045 30.575 29.7775 29 28.5 27.6395 27.586 26.3225 25.946605 25.631 25.585 Outcome Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00368 Table C-2. Comparisons of 2010 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy Facility Name City HARVEY CHICAGO FLINT GREENFIELD HANOVER PRINCETON CHERAW TAMPA LINCOLN LA CROSSE WESTBROOK LANSING CLYDE ALSIP WEIRTON BATESVILLE FINDLAY SHAWNEE HARRISBURG PASADENA CLEVELAND FORT ATKINSON PONCA CITY PELLA SARATOGA SPRINGS OAK CREEK MANCHESTER MILAN FAIRFIELD CRAWFORDSVILLE CONROE HIGH POINT SEADRIFT TARBORO NASHVILLE CHATTANOOGA TERRELL YOUNGSTOWN BEREA MILWAUKEE BUSHNELL FREMONT LONGVIEW CLAIRTON CHICAGO URBANA MANNS CHOICE MIDDLETOWN HARTFORD SHEBOYGAN FALLS EVANSVILLE TOLEDO WOOSTER MARION MC DONOUGH LEEDS HUNTSVILLE QUINCY HANOVER GRAPELAND FORT WORTH TOLEDO PIGGOTT AIKEN KAPOLEI GU1N GEORGETOWN SIDNEY LAKELAND CHEMUNG State Illinois Illinois Michigan Zip Code 60426 60623 48551 2010 Air Emissions (tpy) 25.519 25.49802 24.95 Indiana Pennsylvania Indiana South Carolina Florida Alabama Wisconsin Maine Michigan Ohio Illinois West Virginia Mississippi Ohio Oklahoma PENNSYLVANIA Texas Ohio Wisconsin Oklahoma Iowa New York WISCONSIN Tennessee Tennessee California Indiana Texas NORTH CAROLINA Texas North Carolina Tennessee Tennessee 46140 17331 47670 29520 33617 35096 54603 04098 48917 43410 60803 26062 38606 45840 74804 17104 77503 44105 53538 74601 50219 12866 53154 37355 38358 94533 47933 77303 27263 77983 27886 37218 37402 24.2775 24.2 24.1785 24.1435 24 23.9835 23.799 23.5025 23.5 23.358 23.257 22.5 22.4855 22.375 21.875 21.639 21.563 21.231 20.85 20.6415 20.3955 20.35 20.3365 20.3255 20.165 19.5 18.97 18.55 17.92 17.4725 16.7595 16.7 16.67 Texas Ohio Kentucky Wisconsin Florida California Texas Pennsylvania Illinois Ohio Pennsylvania New York Wisconsin Wisconsin Indiana Ohio Ohio Virginia Georgia Alabama Alabama Illinois Pennsylvania Texas Texas Ohio Arkansas South Carolina Hawaii Alabama Kentucky Ohio Florida New York 75160 44512 40403 53212 33513 94538 75602 15025 60608 43078 15550 10940 53027 53085 47710 43612 44691 24354 30253 35094 35811 62305 17331 75844 76140 43607 72454 29801 96707 35563 40324 45365 33810 14825 16.5975 16.53 16.4665 15.463 14.8635 14.564 14.5535 14.5 14.275 14.1725 14.104 14 13.935 13.9125 13.9 13.8175 13.79 13.7645 13.7 13.661 13.637 13.6135 13.5285 13.507 13.5 13.32944 13.31 13.1095 12.8 12.751 12.677 12.659 12.3785 12.2325 Outcome Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Page 2 of 18 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00369 Table C-2. Comparisons of 2010 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy City SWEETWATER ROANOKE WARREN MASON MADISON HEIGHTS MOUNT VERNON FRANKLIN CHICAGO LAVONIA CHICAGO WAYNE JACKSON EVERETT HAGERSTOWN BLOOMINGTON MEXIA CONROE ELK GROVE VILLAGE ASHLAND CITY VICKSBURG NORFOLK MAXTON SYCAMORE ASHLEY WHITE HALL NEW BRITAIN OCONOMOWOC WILLARD BIRMINGHAM BLANDON FENTON FLORENCE LEXINGTON FORT PAYNE DUBLIN SUSSEX BRIDGEVIEW LEXINGTON FAIRFIELD MILWAUKEE GALESBURG SAINT JOSEPH NEW ORLEANS WAUPACA DAYTON NEWTON GOODFIELD AKRON LAKELAND ELGIN NAPOLEON LUFKIN SPRINGDALE MISHAWAKA BURLINGTON MENOMONIE AURORA MISSOURI VALLEY HARTFORD LA PORTE OWENSVILLE LANSING WINFIELD MANSFIELD WINNEMUCCA ROSSFORD EL RENO PASADENA SAINT CLOUD State Tennessee Indiana Ohio Ohio Michigan Missouri Pennsylvania Illinois GEORGIA Illinois Michigan Mississippi Washington MARYLAND Indiana TEXAS TEXAS Illinois TENNESSEE MISSISSIPPI Nebraska North Carolina ILLINOIS Indiana Arkansas Connecticut Wisconsin Ohio Alabama Pennsylvania MISSOURI South Carolina South Carolina Alabama Georgia Wisconsin Illinois Kentucky California Wisconsin ILLINOIS Missouri Louisiana Wisconsin Tennessee Mississippi ILLINOIS New York Florida Illinois Ohio Texas Arkansas INDIANA Iowa Wisconsin Illinois Iowa Wisconsin Indiana Missouri Michigan Kansas MISSOURI NEVADA Ohio OKLAHOMA Texas Minnesota Page 3 of 18 Zip Code 37874 46783 44483 45040 48071 65712 16323 60623 30553 60623 48184 39272 98204 21742 47404 76667 77301 60007 37015 39181 2010 Air Emissions (tpy) 12.168 12.15 12.122 11.7955 11.7535 11.677 11.6 11.337 11.244 11.1945 11.125 11.0325 11 11 11 10.7145 10.5724638 10.445 10.4155 10.4095 68701 28364 60178 46705 71602 06052 53066 44890 35234 19510 63026 29501 29073 35967 31021 53089 60455 40511 94533 53224 61401 64504 70123 54981 37321 39345 61742 14001 33801 60120 43545 75904 10.26 10.1855 10.144 10.1 10.0855 9.969 9.95 9.915 9.895 9.889 9.812685 9.777 9.7255 9.6915 9.616 9.595 9.5 9.4845 9.37 9.296 9.247 9.015 8.708 8.605 8.57306025 8.5565 8.4305 8.413 8.3945 8.35 8.3375 8.303 72764 46545 52601 54751 60504 51555 53027 46350 65066 48921 67156 65704 89445 43460 73036 77507 8.213 8.1875 8.175 7.85 7.8365 7.834 7.737 7.7325 7.665 7.55 7.533 7.505 7.4985 7.4105 7.409 7.4035 56303 7.33722 Outcome Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00370 Table C-2. Comparisons of 2010 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy City WARREN FAYETTEVILLE TINKER AFB BELV1DERE WENTZViLLE WEIRTON GASTONIA CARSON CRAWFORDSViLLE SAINT FRANCIS ANKENY LENOIR NEWBURGH PARIS COLUMBUS PHILADELPHIA WOODBRIDGE WEST HENRIETTA MC DONOUGH ROGERS SAINT MARYS CLARENDON MARION LANCASTER DURHAM ORANGEBURG STARR PINE BLUFF FORT DODGE CHICAGO SAINT JOE CANTON HAMMOND YANKTON MIDDLEVILLE CLEVELAND MONETT SHANNON SPRINGFIELD SACRAMENTO WICHITA GWINNER BAXTER SPRINGS WARREN MERCED MYRTLE BEACH SAINT LOUIS CHILTON ROCHELLE SHAWNEE WINCHESTER CRANSTON CEDAR FALLS DIXON GRANITE CITY EDISON ZACHARY CAROL STREAM RUSSELLVILLE NAVASOTA DETROIT LOWVILLE SPRINGDALE BATESVILLE FLAT ROCK ONEIDA State Ohio ARKANSAS Oklahoma Illinois Missouri West Virginia North Carolina California Indiana Wisconsin IOWA North Carolina Indiana Texas Indiana Pennsylvania New Jersey New York GEORGIA ARKANSAS Ohio Pennsylvania New York Pennsylvania North Carolina South Carolina South Carolina ARKANSAS IOWA ILLINOIS Indiana Mississippi Indiana South Dakota Michigan Tennessee Missouri Mississippi Ohio California KANSAS NORTH DAKOTA Kansas Michigan California South Carolina Missouri Wisconsin Illinois Kansas Virginia RHODE ISLAND Iowa California Illinois New Jersey Louisiana Illinois Kentucky Texas MICHIGAN New York Pennsylvania Indiana Michigan Tennessee Zip Code 44483 72701 2010 Air Emissions (tpy) 7.305 7.3 73145 61008 63385 26062 28052 90745 47933 53235 50023 28645 47629 75460 47201 19120 07095 14586 30253 7.3 7.3 7.25 7.2295 7.2025 7.184775 7.1225 7.09505 7.0485 7.0455 7 6.953 6.95 6.9415 6.8305 6.7935 6.7395 72756 6.735 45885 16313 14505 17601 27703 29116 29684 71602 50501 60632 46785 39046 46320 57078 49333 37311 6.7315 6.726985 6.6935 6.6375 6.601 6.56 6.559 6.5 6.49178 6.45 6.3715 6.3555 6.331 6.31004485 6.2995 6.25 65708 38868 45502 95824 67219 58040 66713 6.1935 6.164015 6.1 6.085 6.051 5.964 5.9425 48091 5.915 95348 29577 63104 53014 61068 66227 22603 02920 50613 95620 62040 08817 70791 60188 42276 77868 48207 13367 15144 47006 48134 37841 5.866 5.8645 5.84243 5.8315 5.806 5.745 5.73718 5.7195 5.66847 5.621 5.6115 5.55 5.545 5.496 5.398 5.391 5.384 5.3625 5.3045 5.297 5.28 5.22175 Outcome Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Page 4 of 18 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00371 Table C-2. Comparisons of 2010 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy Facility Name City State INDEPENDENCE GENEVA CARROLL MONETT SIDNEY LANCASTER LONGMONT HOUSTON NORTH BRUNSWICK RIVERBANK FARIBAULT MONTGOMERY ZANESVILLE CHICAGO SAINT LOUIS SAINT PAUL HARTLAND HOUSTON DUBLIN DANVILLE WEIRTON TERMINAL ISLAND WASECA STERLING HEIGHTS YORK CLARKSVILLE ENDICOTT LOGAN FOREST GROVE LA CROSSE GAINESVILLE MONTROSS REDMOND PORTAGE WOODSTOCK JACKSON DOVER OAKDALE MENOMONEE FALLS LORDSTOWN TOLEDO EFFINGHAM NEWAYGO SHREVEPORT FONTANA PORTLAND WARMINSTER EAST GREENVILLE ORANGEBURG MATTOON BESSEMER STAFFORD TOMAH LEWISPORT STRONGSVILLE BRILLION LYONS SPRING HILL WEST ALLIS BATESVILLE HUEYTOWN MIDDLEBURY LEBANON WYANDOTTE MEMPHIS STRASBURG PASADENA LOS ANGELES TORRANCE CRAIGSVILLE LINCOLN COLUMBUS Missouri Alabama IOWA MISSOURI Ohio Pennsylvania Colorado Texas New Jersey California Minnesota Alabama Ohio Illinois Missouri Minnesota Maine TEXAS VIRGINIA Kentucky West Virginia California Minnesota Michigan South Carolina Tennessee New York Utah Oregon Wisconsin Georgia VIRGINIA Washington Indiana Illinois Mississippi Delaware California Wisconsin Ohio Ohio Illinois MICHIGAN Louisiana California Oregon Pennsylvania Pennsylvania South Carolina ILLINOIS Alabama Connecticut Wisconsin Kentucky Ohio Wisconsin New York Tennessee WISCONSIN Mississippi Alabama INDIANA Ohio Michigan Tennessee Virginia Texas California California WEST VIRGINIA Nebraska Ohio Page 5 of 18 Zip Code 64051 36340 51401 65708 45365 17601 80501 77015 08902 95367 55021 36105 43701 60624 63116 55116 04943 77043 24084 40422 26062 90731 56093 48313 29745 37040 13760 84321 97116 54601 30504 22520 98052 46368 60098 39272 19904 95361 53051 44481 43607 62401 49337 71129 92337 97203 18974 18041 29115 61938 35023 06075 54660 42351 44149 54110 14489 37174 53214 38606 35023 46540 45036 48192 38113 22657 77507 90016 90502 26205 68524 43228 2010 Air Emissions (tpy) Outcome 5.166 5.1155 5.05 5.0365 5.0325 4.8597 4.85 4.815 4.773 4.728 4.7155 4.714 4.7 4.65 4.6395 4.59 4.587 4.5785 4.55 4.5025 4.485 4.475 4.474 4.4615 4.4225 4.3865 4.3655 4.32 4.273 4.2335 4.226 4.1765 4.14645 4.1135 4.005 3.9925 3.984 3.984 3.95 3.9 3.885 3.83 3.8065 3.745 3.7 3.6305 3.5965 3.5415 3.5095 3.465 3.42 3.3675 3.331 3.3235 3.316 3.30905 3.2625 3.2565 3.255 3.2525 3.2315 3.2215 3.186 3.136775 3.122 3.1 3.079167767 3.075 3.0235 3.0215 2.951 2.8845 Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00372 Table C-2. Comparisons of 2010 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy Facility Name City MIDLAND LOMIRA SAN ANTONIO ROBINS AFB KANSAS CITY LANCASTER WEST POINT CHARLOTTE OLATHE AVON LAKE MULBERRY CHEEKTOWAGA MARINETTE TULSA CINCINNATI FOND DU LAC ADA LOS ANGELES ATHENS MARENGO CAMBRIDGE FRIDLEY AGUADILLA EAST LONGMEADOW RICHMOND FOSTORIA HERMITAGE LUFKIN LAWRENCEVILLE CARTHAGE NILES MARYVILLE HUTCHINSON GREENSBURG FRIENDLY INDIAN TRAIL LA PORTE MOUNT VERNON WESTLAND MIDLAND MOUNT VERNON MANASSAS PORTLAND NILES BUFFALO QUAKERTOWN FONDA KANKAKEE STRUTHERS PENSACOLA TAMPA COLUMBIA WEST MEMPHIS FAIRFIELD WEIRTON MADISON WAUKEGAN DETROIT LOUISVILLE RENO DETROIT SPRINGDALE LOUISVILLE COLUMBUS KINGSPORT PINEVILLE FAIRFIELD ANTIOCH NORTH KANSAS CITY TAUNTON State Michigan WISCONSIN Texas Georgia Kansas South Carolina GEORGIA North Carolina Kansas Ohio Florida New York Wisconsin Oklahoma Ohio Wisconsin Michigan California Georgia Iowa Ohio Minnesota Puerto Rico MASSACHUSETTS VIRGINIA Ohio Pennsylvania Texas Georgia Tennessee Michigan Tennesee Minnesota Indiana West Virginia North Carolina Texas Illinois Michigan Texas Indiana VIRGINIA Oregon Ohio New York PENNSYLVANIA New York Illinois Zip Code 48667 53048 78264 31098 66115 29721 31833 28273 66061 44012 33860 14225 54143 74116 45244 54935 49355 90031 30607 52301 43725 55432 00605 01028 23228 44830 16148 75901 30043 37030 49120 37801 55350 47240 26146 28079 77571 62864 48186 79703 47620 20109 97218 44446 14207 18951 12068 60901 2010 Air Emissions (tpy) Outcome 2.85 2.843 2.8200666 2.7925 2.782 2.758 2.7465 2.6575 2.612 2.595 2.5845 2.58 2.5585 2.55 2.54489 2.5235 2.5035 2.5 2.4385 2.429 2.4205 2.42 2.373 2.3645 2.34746 2.345 2.332 2.304 2.288 2.279 2.275 2.2585 2.2255 2.2 2.1965 2.1845 2.1395 2.1145 2.104 2.103 2.1 2.0505 2.02415295 2.021 2.0045 1.995 1.9865 1.9835 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Ohio Florida FLORIDA South Carolina Arkansas Alabama West Virginia Alabama Illinois Michigan Kentucky Nevada Michigan 44471 32502 33611 29201 72301 35064 26062 35756 60085 48211 40213 89512 48211 1.952 1.9355 1.9325 1.925 1.899 1.8805 1.873 1.859 1.834 1.8155 1.815 1.8 1.79 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Arkansas Kentucky Nebraska Tennessee North Carolina Alabama California Missouri Massachusetts 72764 40210 68601 37662 28134 35064 94509 64116 02780 1.79 1.765 1.753 1.726 1.717 1.71311 1.7065 1.683 1.637 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Page 6 of 18 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00373 Table C-2. Comparisons of 2010 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy Facility Name City State TOLEDO Ohio JEFFERSON CITY ROCKFORD PLAQUEM1NE DYERSBURG HAZLETON JACKSONVILLE CARROLLTON TAFT Missouri Illinois Louisiana Tennessee Pennsylvania Texas Texas Louisiana STERLING HEIGHTS STILLWATER Michigan Oklahoma CHARLESTOWN NEW IBERIA DECATUR ARLINGTON LOUISVILLE WELLSBURG Indiana LOUISIANA Alabama Texas Kentucky West Virginia BRYAN ARLINGTON ROCHESTER Ohio Texas Pennsylvania COLUMBIA CITY BEDFORD PARK CEDARTOWN GRAND RAPIDS CARSON CITY AVON PEOTONE Indiana Illinois Georgia Michigan Nevada Connecticut Illinois LAFAYETTE AVENEL SAINT CHARLES COLUMBUS ORLANDO SAUKVILLE CHICAGO HOUSTON WAVERLY YORK MILWAUKEE EVANSVILLE MOLINE MENOMONEE FALLS BOURBONNAIS DALTON MANDAN Indiana New Jersey Illinois Ohio FLORIDA Wisconsin Illinois Texas Ohio PENNSYLVANIA Wisconsin Indiana Illinois Wisconsin Illinois Georgia North Dakota INDIANAPOLIS MARIETTA LIBERTY GARLAND Indiana Ohio Indiana Texas NORTH KANSAS CITY BROWNWOOD BALTIMORE SOUTHFIELD HOUSTON CHIPPEWA FALLS BOWLING GREEN Missouri Texas Maryland Michigan Texas Wisconsin Kentucky SANTA CLARA DAVENPORT CRANBERRY TOWNSHIP TOLEDO CLEVELAND TRENTON RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAINT JOSEPH MORRIS California Iowa Pennsylvania Ohio Ohio New Jersey CALIFORNIA Missouri Illinois Page 7 of 18 Zip Code 43612 2010 Air Emissions (tpy) Outcome 1.60765 Screened Out 65109 61104 70765 38024 18201 75766 75006 70057 1.572395 1.5395 1.538 1.529 1.5 1.4775 1.4565 1.4555 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 48312 74075 1.45 1.448 Screened Out Screened Out 47111 70560 35601 76010 40219 26070 1.4255 1.4245 1.414 1.41 1.4025 1.4 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 43506 76011 15074 1.388 1.375 1.3745 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 46725 60638 30125 49507 89701 06001 60468 1.338 1.3125 1.312 1.312 1.295 1.2875 1.267 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 47905 07001 60174 43211 32837 53080 60633 77054 45690 17402 53214 47711 61265 53051 60914 30721 58554 1.2555 1.248 1.234 1.225 1.2105 1.202 1.201 1.19 1.173 1.17007 1.159 1.156 1.15 1.1195 1.1105 1.1095 1.1005 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 46218 45750 47353 75042 1.0982 1.078 1.077 1.068 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 64116 76801 21224 48034 77051 54729 42101 1.0665 1.0435 1.029 1.023 1.019 1.002 1 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 95050 52802 16066 43615 44111 08648 91730 64501 60450 0.9985 0.9965 0.9945 0.975 0.9675 0.952 0.925 0.9205 0.896 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00374 Table C-2. Comparisons of 2010 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy City VALENCIA SCHOFIELD TUSCALOOSA LAWRENCE MAUMEE SUGAR GROVE HOUSTON ELK GROVE VILLAGE COVINGTON STILLWATER NORMAL GRAYSLAKE LANCASTER PAINESVILLE ORLANDO SAGINAW TWIN LAKES PEORIA BATAVIA HOUSTON SAVAGE BLOOMSBURG LUBBOCK CORDOVA JEFFERSONVILLE LAFAYETTE PLEASANT PRAIRIE MIDDLEBURY LOUISVILLE FONTANA CHRISTIANSTED HARWICK EAST POINT CARROLLTON WARREN HOUSTON WESTLAKE MESQUITE VISALIA BLYTHEVILLE ELKRIDGE KALAMA FORT WORTH LEBANON CHICAGO BATON ROUGE MONROE HOUSTON BIRMINGHAM ASHVILLE WILLOWSPRINGS HAWESVILLE TULSA ALLENTOWN CHICO CEDAR RAPIDS COTTAGE GROVE ROSEMOUNT VALLEY PARK FORT MADISON AMBRIDGE PATERSON MOUNT CLEMENS TALLULAH SAN ANTONIO PALMDALE ROXBORO State Pennsylvania Wisconsin Alabama MASSACHUSETTS Ohio Illinois TEXAS Illinois Georgia Oklahoma Illinois Illinois Ohio Zip Code 16059 54476 35401 1841 43537 60554 77041 60007 30014 74075 61761 60030 43130 2010 Air Emissions (tpy) Outcome 0.893 0.89296195 0.8905 0.89 0.8875 0.876 0.875 0.8735 0.863 0.85822 0.8485 0.82 0.8195 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Ohio Florida Michigan WISCONSIN Illinois Illinois Texas 44077 32837 48601 53181 61615 60510 77073 0.81 0.81 0.8 0.798 0.7925 0.786 0.785 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Minnesota Pennsylvania Texas Illinois Indiana Indiana Wisconsin Indiana Kentucky California Virgin Islands Pennsylvania Georgia Texas Pennsylvania Texas Louisiana 55378 17815 79415 61242 47130 47905 53158 46540 40202 92335 00820 15049 30344 75006 16365 77007 70669 0.785 0.7755 0.7665 0.765 0.763 0.7535 0.75 0.733 0.7075 0.70305 0.702 0.6935 0.691 0.69 0.678 0.672 0.6685 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Texas California Arkansas Maryland Washington Texas Ohio Illinois Louisiana 75149 93291 72315 21075 98625 76110 45036 60630 70805 0.663 0.658 0.6505 0.634 0.632015 0.628 0.608 0.6065 0.6 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Ohio Texas Alabama 45050 77053 35215 0.5925 0.59 0.5885 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Ohio Illinois Kentucky Oklahoma Pennsylvania California IOWA Wisconsin Minnesota Missouri Iowa Pennsylvania New Jersey Michigan Louisiana Texas California North Carolina 43103 60480 42348 74115 18103 95928 52404 53527 55068 63088 52627 15003 07503 48043 71282 78251 93599 27573 0.5885 0.586 0.58 0.5795 0.568 0.5605 0.55984 0.55 0.55 0.549875 0.544 0.5315 0.5275 0.5265 0.525 0.517 0.514 0.513 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Page 8 of 18 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00375 Table C-2. Comparisons of 2010 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy City SAINT CLAIR SHREVEPORT STURTEVANT WESTON WASHINGTON LAFAYETTE VERNON HOPKINSVILLE GREAT BEND COLORADO SPRINGS CHICAGO ALGONA MOLINE STREETSBORO CLINTON FREEPORT BEDFORD PARK EUGENE SYCAMORE SANTA FE SPRINGS PORTLAND ANAHEIM JERSEY CITY NASHVILLE BIRMINGHAM LANSING FULLERTON EL RENO ELK GROVE VILLAGE CANTON ELKTON MORROW DES PLAINES MILLEDGEVILLE HOUSTON EASTON HOUSTON PORTLAND HARVEY ANNISTON RANCHO CUCAMONGA GRANITE CITY BRAZIL HAVRE DE GRACE GALLIPOLIS FERRY CHICAGO PLAQUEMINE MENOMONEE FALLS GREENVILLE SOUTH MINNETONKA RICHMOND ATLANTA ELK GROVE VILLAGE LANCASTER FREMONT PERTH AMBOY HELENA MACHESNEY PARK WAUSAU WAYNE BREMEN WESTLAKE SAN JOSE MILWAUKEE ELK GROVE VILLAGE PAGEDALE WEST HAVEN State Missouri Louisiana Wisconsin Michigan Pennsylvania Indiana Zip Code 63077 71115 53177 49289 15301 47909 2010 Air Emissions (tpy) Outcome 0.509 0.5085 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out California Kentucky Kansas COLORADO Illinois Iowa Illinois 90023 42240 67530 80916 60622 50511 61265 0.5 0.48455 0.4825 0.475 0.4735 0.4705 0.47 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Ohio 44241 0.468 Screened Out Iowa Texas Illinois Oregon ILLINOIS California Oregon California New Jersey Illinois Alabama Illinois California OKLAHOMA Illinois Massachusetts Virginia Georgia ILLINOIS GEORGIA Texas Pennsylvania Texas INDIANA Illinois Alabama California ILLINOIS INDIANA Maryland West Virginia Illinois Louisiana WISCONSIN 52732 77541 60501 97402 60178 90670 97203 92801 07304 62263 35234 60438 92831 73036 60007 02021 22827 30260 60016 31061 77091 18045 77041 47371 60426 36207 91730 62040 47834 21078 25515 60633 70765 53051 0.466 0.4635 0.458 0.437 0.434 0.43 0.4295 0.428 0.428 0.42766 0.4215 0.40825 0.4065 0.403 0.3955 0.3895 0.38 0.3775 0.3775 0.3775 0.3775 0.375 0.375 0.375 0.3715 0.37 0.368665 0.367 0.36605 0.354 0.3506 0.35 0.347535 0.3475 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out SOUTH CAROLINA Minnesota Kentucky Georgia Illinois Pennsylvania Michigan 29605 55343 40475 30318 60007 17603 49412 0.3375 0.336 0.336 0.3355 0.335 0.3325 0.331 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out NEW JERSEY ARKANSAS Illinois Wisconsin Michigan Indiana Ohio California Wisconsin Illinois Missouri Connecticut 08861 72342 61115 54401 48184 46506 44145 95134 53223 60007 63133 06516 0.3185 0.30835 0.3075 0.302 0.3015 0.3 0.296 0.295 0.29 0.287 0.2865 0.28527 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Page 9 of 18 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00376 Table C-2. Comparisons of 2010 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy City FRANKLIN CONNELLSVILLE MOUNT VERNON RIO RANCHO LAKELAND LOUISVILLE MORRISVILLE WEST BEND CASA GRANDE SAYRE SAINT PAUL CARTERET BATAVIA BRISTOL TWINSBURG GREENVILLE MANCHESTER SEARCY WARREN OKLAHOMA CITY COLUMBUS PELHAM READING MARIETTA BARBERTON INDEPENDENCE INMAN CARSON CONROE FONTANA FAYETTEVILLE CARPENTERSVILLE MANSFIELD ATGLEN HOLYOKE SANTA FE SPRINGS CLEARWATER CANNON FALLS HATFIELD PHILADELPHIA SUMTER KILLONA BURLINGTON STERLING HEIGHTS CIRCLEVILLE FRAZEYSBURG LOS ANGELES NEW IBERIA WINDER KENDALLVILLE SAINT GABRIEL DORAVILLE ATLANTA DUNN SOUTH CHARLESTON MABLETON MARCUS HOOK RENTON SEATTLE ELGIN HASKELL HILLSBORO GARLAND WHEELING OWEGO NASHVILLE State Pennsylvania Pennsylvania New York New Mexico Florida Kentucky Pennsylvania Wisconsin Arizona PENNSYLVANIA Zip Code 16323 15425 10550 87124 33803 40203 19067 53095 85222 18840 2010 Air Emissions (tpy) Outcome 0.284 0.28171 0.274 0.273 0.268 0.2655 0.265 0.2645 0.2600625 0.26 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Minnesota New Jersey Illinois Pennsylvania Ohio Ohio TENNESSEE 55102 07008 60510 19007 44087 45331 37355 0.2595 0.2595 0.259455 0.255 0.2505 0.25 0.25 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out ARKANSAS Michigan Oklahoma Ohio Alabama Pennsylvania Georgia Ohio KENTUCKY South Carolina California Texas California NORTH CAROLINA Illinois Texas Pennsylvania Massachusetts California Florida Minnesota Pennsylvania Pennsylvania South Carolina Louisiana North Carolina Michigan 72143 48091 73129 43219 35124 19605 30062 44203 41051 29349 90810 77303 92335 28306 60110 76063 19310 01040 90670 33760 55009 19440 19132 29150 70066 27215 48312 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.247 0.246 0.239 0.238 0.238 0.2365 0.236 0.236 0.234 0.234 0.2335 0.232 0.230497 0.228 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Ohio Ohio California Louisiana Georgia Indiana Louisiana 43113 43822 90023 70560 30680 46755 70776 0.226 0.22475 0.2225 0.22 0.216 0.215 0.2125 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Georgia Georgia North Carolina West Virginia 30340 30339 28335 25303 0.2115 0.21 0.208 0.2045 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Georgia Pennsylvania Washington Washington ILLINOIS New Jersey Oregon Texas Illinois 30126 19061 98055 98107 60123 07420 97124 75041 60090 0.203 0.2015 0.1975 0.1975 0.196 0.195 0.1925 0.187 0.18 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out New York TENNESSEE 13827 37207 0.177 0.177 Screened Out Screened Out Page 10 of 18 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00377 Table C-2. Comparisons of 2010 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy Facility Name City State RICHMOND WALLINGFORD BATON ROUGE ODESSA SAINT LOUIS GREENSBORO MARIETTA BATON ROUGE Indiana Connecticut Louisiana Texas Missouri North Carolina Georgia Louisiana HIGH POINT North Carolina TULSA SAINT ALBANS SEATTLE Oklahoma Vermont Washington CHANDLER SAINT CLAIR CRESTWOOD EDINBURGH PARIS Arizona Missouri Missouri Indiana Kentucky BROADVIEW NORFOLK LYNCHBURG PORTNECHES Illinois Nebraska VIRGINIA Texas SAND SPRINGS LEBANON Oklahoma Pennsylvania ORANGEBURG KENEDY PORTNECHES MEMPHIS STAFFORD LOUISVILLE MARTIN ROCK HILL PACOIMA WOODBURN LONG BEACH SAINT CHARLES CHICAGO LAVERGNE WEATHERFORD SOLON CLEARWATER FOOTHILL RANCH FOUNTAIN INN ORANGE New York Texas TEXAS Tennessee Texas Kentucky South Carolina South Carolina California Indiana CALIFORNIA Illinois Illinois Tennessee Texas Ohio FLORIDA California South Carolina Texas CARROLLTON SAINT LOUIS DEER PARK ABBEVILLE BAYTOWN MENOMONEE FALLS SPARTANBURG CHARLOTTE MONTOURSVILLE AUBURN HARRISON MEMPHIS SANDUSKY TEXAS Missouri Texas Louisiana Texas Wisconsin South Carolina North Carolina Pennsylvania WASHINGTON Ohio Tennessee OHIO MEMPHIS HOLCOMB SAINT LOUIS NORTH KANSAS CITY SPRINGFIELD MCCARRAN MENOMINEE CITY OF INDUSTRY WAXAHACHIE TENNESSEE Kansas Missouri Missouri Virginia Nevada Michigan California Texas Page 11 of 18 Zip Code 47375 06492 70815 79762 63111 27409 30062 70805 2010 Air Emissions (tpy) Outcome 0.175 0.174 0.1735 0.1695 0.1685 0.165 0.1625 0.1615 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 27261 0.16 Screened Out 74112 05478 98108 0.16 0.1595 0.1595 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 85248 63077 63126 46124 40361 0.1565 0.152 0.151 0.14951 0.1475 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 60155 68701 24506 77651 0.1455 0.145215 0.1415 0.141 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 74063 17046 0.1368 0.136 Screened Out Screened Out 10962 78119 77651 38113 77477 40210 29836 29730 91331 46797 90810 60174 60608 37086 76086 44139 33760 92610 29644 77630 0.135135 0.13416 0.132 0.13 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 75006 63147 77536 70510 77520 53051 29302 28208 17754 98002 45030 38118 44870 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1275 0.1255 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 38113 67851 63147 64116 22153 89434 49858 91746 75165 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00378 Table C-2. Comparisons of 2010 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy Facility Name City WILLOUGHBY ORANGE HOPEWELL MIDDLEFiELD CHICAGO TORRANCE THOMAS HUNTINGTON DE PERE ROMULUS OSSEO ARLINGTON WAYNE HIGH POINT NEW BRUNSWICK PITTSTON SALT LAKE CITY CLEBURNE LANGLEY GRIFFIN EVENDALE SAN DIEGO PHILADELPHIA NEW CENTURY JACKSONVILLE HOUSTON YPSILANTI DALLAS OCALA BOWLING GREEN HOLLAND HICKORY LEMONT SOUTH HOLLAND MIAMI MILWAUKEE GREENCASTLE SANTA FE SPRINGS CARSON BRANDENBURG PONTIAC BRATTLEBORO KANSAS CITY MIDWAY WLMERDING TAYLORS BALTIMORE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MILWAUKEE FAIRFIELD KANSAS CITY TERRE HAUTE CLINTON MUSKEGON HEIGHTS TEWKSBURY CHICAGO HEIGHTS PITTSBURGH CAROLINA CORSICANA PORTLAND CONNERSVILLE SALEM CLEVELAND ELVERSON MANATI BROUSSARD DELAWARE ORWELL State Ohio TEXAS Virginia OHIO Illinois CALIFORNIA Oklahoma West Virginia Wsconsin Michigan Minnesota Texas MICHIGAN North Carolina New Jersey Pennsylvania Utah Texas South Carolina Georgia Ohio California Pennsylvania Kansas FLORIDA Texas Michigan Texas Florida Kentucky Michigan North Carolina Illinois Illinois Florida WISCONSIN Indiana California California Kentucky Michigan Vermont Kansas Tennessee Pennsylvania South Carolina Maryland California Wsconsin California Kansas Indiana Mississippi MICHIGAN Massachusetts Illinois Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Texas OREGON Indiana Oregon Ohio Pennsylvania PUERTO RICO Louisiana Ohio Ohio Zip Code 44094 77630 23860 44062 60632 90509 73669 25704 54115 48174 55369 2010 Air Emissions (tpy) Outcome 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 76011 48184 27261 08901 18640 84108 76033 29834 30224 45241 92121 19116 66031 32212 77086 48197 75243 34475 42101 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.124456 0.123 0.123 0.12275 0.1215 0.12 0.119 0.118 0.115 0.1105 0.11 0.1095 0.1085 0.108 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 49423 28602 60439 60473 33162 53209 46135 90670 90810 40108 48341 05301 66106 37809 0.106 0.104 0.1035 0.1035 0.102 0.10066 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.099 0.0985 0.097 0.0945 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 15148 29687 21222 91730 53224 94533 66106 47808 39056 49444 01876 60411 15238 00985 75109 97210 47331 97302 44109 19520 00674 0.0945 0.092 0.09 0.089945 0.0888 0.0855 0.084 0.0835 0.082 0.08 0.0795 0.0787 0.0775 0.077225 0.07708 0.076 0.075 0.07415 0.07396 0.0729 0.0725 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 70518 43015 44076 0.072 0.06956 0.069 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Page 12 of 18 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00379 Table C-2. Comparisons of 2010 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy City WARSAW MAUMEE MC COOK SOUTH EL MONTE SEDAL1A MONTEBELLO WARREN MIDDLESEX CHANDLER GRAND PRAIRIE NASHUA SHOREVIEW JOLIET CORPUS CHRISTI MOUNT HOLLY MIDDLEFIELD PASCAGOULA COMMERCE KILGORE YORK NEVADA WALBRIDGE SHEBOYGAN COLUMBUS FAIRFIELD MARTINSBURG MC DONOUGH BURNET PEKIN REIDSVILLE OKLAHOMA CITY PELL CITY FRESNO BENTON MEMPHIS HAMILTON BETTENDORF CALVERT CITY JONESBOROUGH BUFFALO INDIANAPOLIS HILLSBOROUGH WICKLIFFE NEVILLE ISLAND DURHAM DALLAS LANCASTER ANDERSON TAMPA KANSAS CITY ANDOVER HUNGERFORD PASADENA TUSCALOOSA SAND SPRINGS PITTSBURGH MILTON CONYERS MC INTOSH ROMULUS MOBILE CAHOKIA HANNIBAL READING BERKELEY BRIGHTON PICAYUNE State Indiana Ohio Illinois California Missouri California Michigan New Jersey Arizona Texas New Hampshire Minnesota Illinois Texas North Carolina Ohio MISSISSIPPI California TEXAS Pennsylvania Missouri Ohio Wisconsin Ohio California West Virginia Georgia Texas Illinois North Carolina Oklahoma Alabama Texas Arkansas TENNESSEE Ohio Iowa Kentucky Tennessee New York Indiana New Jersey Ohio Pennsylvania North Carolina Texas Texas South Carolina Florida Kansas Kansas Texas Texas Alabama Oklahoma Pennsylvania Wisconsin Georgia Alabama Michigan Alabama Illinois Missouri Pennsylvania Missouri Michigan Mississippi Zip Code 46580 43537 60525 91733 65301 90640 2010 Air Emissions (tpy) Outcome 0.069 0.0675 0.067 0.067 0.0665 0.0655 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 48091 08846 85224 75050 03062 55126 60436 78405 28120 44062 39581 90040 75662 17402 64772 43465 53081 43207 94533 25405 30253 78611 61554 27320 73117 0.06 0.0595 0.0595 0.059 0.0574235 0.057 0.057 0.05615 0.0555 0.0555 0.055 0.0545 0.0545 0.05435 0.054 0.0535 0.0535 0.0535 0.0535 0.053 0.0525 0.05151 0.05061 0.05 0.05 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 35125 77545 72015 38109 45015 52722 42029 37659 14204 46225 0.05 0.0496 0.0495 0.0495 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.0485 0.048 0.0465 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 08844 44092 15225 27703 75236 75134 29625 33634 66111 67002 77448 77507 35401 74063 15233 0.0455 0.0455 0.044 0.044 0.0435 0.0425 0.0425 0.042 0.0415 0.041 0.0405 0.0405 0.04 0.04 0.0395 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 53563 0.0395 Screened Out 30012 36553 48174 36614 62206 63401 19605 63134 48114 39466 0.03915 0.0388 0.038 0.0365 0.0355 0.035125 0.03375 0.033 0.032545 0.0315 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Page 13 of 18 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00380 Table C-2. Comparisons of 2010 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy City State PARLiN LANSING TOMBALL GARLAND LEMONT LUFKIN CITY OF INDUSTRY BONHAM DES MOINES GREENSBORO WEST BEND HOUSTON PORT ARTHUR New Jersey Michigan Texas Texas Illinois Texas California Texas Iowa North Carolina Wisconsin Texas Texas PHILADELPHIA OAK CREEK MANITOWOC HOUSTON ROTTERDAM JUNCTION NORTH LAKE THREE RIVERS VALLEY CENTER COUNCIL BLUFFS CHICAGO FAIRFIELD DENVER SANTA ANA COUNCE FERNDALE GREENSBORO BELVIDERE AVENEL BURTON SAUGET SPRINGFIELD TOLEDO BUTLER GARLAND EMERSON JACKSONVILLE ALLENTOWN NORTHVALE HILLSDALE STRONGSVILLE MORROW COLUMBUS HAMMOND HOBBS IOWA CITY WILLIAMSPORT DELAWARE SCHERERVILLE FOUNTAIN INN HOUSTON TWINSBURG JOHNSTOWN INDIANAPOLIS BOLTON HOLTSVILLE DERIDDER GREENVILLE HERMITAGE MAULDIN LAWRENCE MOJAVE DYERSBURG LAKE CHARLES TAMPA MEDINA LAWRENCEVILLE CARY CINNAMINSON Pennsylvania Wisconsin Wisconsin Texas New York ILLINOIS Texas Kansas Iowa Illinois Ohio Colorado California Tennessee Michigan North Carolina New Jersey New Jersey OHIO ILLINOIS Missouri Ohio Indiana Texas Georgia Florida Pennsylvania New Jersey Illinois Ohio Georgia Ohio Indiana New Mexico Iowa MARYLAND Ohio Indiana South Carolina Texas Ohio New York Indiana Connecticut New York Louisiana South Carolina PENNSYLVANIA South Carolina Massachusetts California Tennessee Louisiana Florida OHIO Georgia Illinois New Jersey Page 14 of 18 Zip Code 08859 48906 77375 75041 60439 75901 91748 75418 50313 27409 53095 77034 77640 2010 Air Emissions (tpy) Outcome 0.031 0.031 0.0305 0.03 0.03 0.0295 0.0295 0.029 0.029 0.0285 0.028 0.0275 0.026795 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 19127 53154 54220 77047 12150 60164 78071 67147 51502 60638 45014 80216 92704 38326 48220 27403 07823 07001 44021 62201 65802 43615 46721 75041 30137 32254 18106 07647 61257 44136 30260 43207 46320 88240 52240 21795 43015 46375 29644 77029 44087 12095 46219 06043 11742 70634 29605 16148 29662 01843 93501 38024 70601 33619 44258 30043 60013 08077 0.02673425 0.026 0.025225 0.025 0.0245 0.0245 0.023 0.023 0.023 0.02295 0.02254 0.0225 0.0225 0.0215 0.0215 0.021 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.019 0.0185 0.0185 0.018 0.018 0.0179 0.01762 0.0175 0.0175 0.0175 0.0175 0.0175 0.01735 0.0165 0.0165 0.0165 0.016 0.0153 0.015 0.015 0.014811 0.0145 0.0145 0.0145 0.0145 0.0145 0.014 0.014 0.01365 0.0135 0.0135 0.0135 0.013 0.0125 0.0125 0.01213 0.0115 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00381 Table C-2. Comparisons of 2010 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy City SAN JOSE THEODORE STURTEVANT DAKOTA CITY BATAVIA KIMBALL DALLAS SAN ANTONIO EL DORADO GREENSBORO BALTIMORE UNIVERSITY PARK CALHOUN STANLEY SCOTTSBURG TEXAS CITY EAST SETAUKET FOREST PARK CORPUS CHRISTI ELMENDORF AFB LESAGE PHILLIPSBURG CHANNAHON INDIANAPOLIS INDIANAPOLIS INDIANAPOLIS TUSCALOOSA SAINT LOUIS INDIANAPOLIS FREEHOLD DEARBORN SAN LORENZO UPPER MARLBORO NORCROSS VICTORVILLE RUTHERFORDTON KANSAS CITY LA PLACE MANOR WHITING WICHITA HOMEWOOD CHARLESTON BUNOLA PAINESVILLE WATERBURY GARDEN GROVE RIDGEFIELD PARK BRIDGEVIEW EAST LIVERPOOL MARLBOROUGH DOVER WYANDOTTE LAKEVILLE DUDLEY WEST CHESTER CHATHAM DETROIT BEREA GARDENA BAKERSFIELD NEW PHILADELPHIA ADDISON DEARBORN SPARTANBURG CONNERSVILLE MIAMI State California Alabama Wisconsin NEBRASKA Illinois Nebraska Texas Texas Arkansas North Carolina Maryland Illinois Georgia North Carolina Indiana Texas NEW YORK Georgia Texas ALASKA West Virginia New Jersey Illinois Indiana Indiana Indiana Alabama Missouri Indiana New Jersey Michigan Puerto Rico Maryland Georgia California North Carolina Kansas Louisiana Pennsylvania Indiana KANSAS Illinois Missouri Pennsylvania Ohio Connecticut California New Jersey Illinois Ohio Massachusetts Delaware Michigan Minnesota Massachusetts Pennsylvania Virginia MICHIGAN OHIO California CALIFORNIA OHIO ILLINOIS Michigan South Carolina Indiana Florida Zip Code 95131 36582 53177 68731 60510 69145 75207 78218 71730 27406 21230 60466 30701 28164 47170 77590 11733 30297 78410 99506 2010 Air Emissions (tpy) Outcome 0.0115 0.0115 0.010815 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.0098 0.009535 0.0095 0.0095 0.0095 0.0093 0.008625 0.0085 0.008 0.00797 0.0075 0.0075 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 25537 08865 60410 46226 46225 46205 35401 63111 46222 0.0075 0.0075 0.0075 0.0075 0.007465 0.0072575 0.007 0.007 0.007 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 07728 48121 0.007 0.007 Screened Out Screened Out 00754 20774 30071 92392 28139 0.00684 0.006732805 0.0065 0.0065 0.00625 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 66105 70068 15665 46394 67219 60430 63834 15020 44077 06708 92841 07660 60455 43920 01752 19904 48192 55044 01571 19382 24531 48228 44017 90248 93308 0.006095 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.0059 0.00566 0.0056 0.0055 0.0055 0.0055 0.0055 0.0055 0.005295 0.005065 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 44663 60101 48121 29306 47331 33155 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Page 15 of 18 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00382 Table C-2. Comparisons of 2010 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy Facility Name City WAYNE PASADENA ROCHESTER LOUISVILLE NORTH CHARLESTON FREDON1A CHARLOTTE HOPKINS BELLEVILLE WALTON HILLS HAMPTON SANTA FE SPRINGS CONCORD TONAWANDA COHOES BAKERSFIELD SAUGET ORANGE CITY CINCINNATI DENVER PORTLAND MEMPHIS COTTAGE GROVE GARLAND MOUNT VERNON FERNDALE PONCA CITY WAXAHACHIE FERNLEY MEMPHIS MANSFIELD SEAFORD JAY WYNNEWOOD NEWBURYPORT HOUSTON HOUSTON NIAGARA FALLS MILWAUKEE BATH ROCHESTER WOODRIDGE MIDLOTHIAN SPARTANBURG LINDEN CLEVELAND TULSA ASHLEY ROCK HILL SPRINGFIELD HOUSTON NORWALK IOLA PASADENA MILWAUKEE CANTON WINDSOR DAYTON SALEM ORLANDO CHATSWORTH BEDFORD HEIGHTS SANTA FE SPRINGS HAYWARD WALPOLE CLEARFIELD NEWCASTLE PORTLAND State New Jersey Texas New York Kentucky South Carolina KANSAS North Carolina MINNESOTA MICHIGAN OHIO Iowa California North Carolina New York New York California ILLINOIS Iowa Ohio Colorado Oregon Tennessee Minnesota Texas Missouri Michigan Oklahoma Texas Nevada TENNESSEE OHIO Delaware Maine Oklahoma Massachusetts Texas Texas New York Wisconsin Pennsylvania New York Illinois Illinois South Carolina New Jersey Ohio OKLAHOMA INDIANA South Carolina Massachusetts Texas Connecticut KANSAS Texas Wisconsin Massachusetts Colorado Texas Massachusetts Florida California Ohio California California Massachusetts Utah Delaware Oregon Zip Code 07470 77507 14652 40216 29406 2010 Air Emissions (tpy) Outcome 0.005 0.004635 0.0045 0.0045 0.0045 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 66736 0.0045 Screened Out 28273 55343 48111 44146 50441 90670 28025 14150 12047 93308 62201 51041 45246 80216 97210 38109 55016 75040 0.0045 0.0045 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.00378 0.00346 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.00299 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 65712 0.00296 Screened Out 48220 74601 75165 89408 38109 44903 19973 04239 73098 01950 77092 77051 14304 53207 18014 14605 60517 60445 29307 07036 44109 74147 46705 29730 01104 77049 06852 66749 77507 53218 02021 80550 77535 01970 32809 91311 44146 90670 94545 02081 84016 19720 97227 0.00275 0.00266 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0024345 0.0024 0.0023 0.0023 0.002185 0.00215 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001905 0.001825 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Page 16 of 18 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00383 Table C-2. Comparisons of 2010 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy Facility Name City CUYAHOGA FALLS BRANCHBURG SAN CARLOS MILWAUKEE HARLEYViLLE MEMPHIS RAYNE ROLLING MEADOWS MILWAUKEE WARWICK SEATTLE ELK GROVE VILLAGE WHEELING FLORA MUSCATINE PAULDING LA PORTE CHARLOTTE NEWARK LOUISVILLE CHESTER MOUNT PLEASANT POPLAR BLUFF MESA ITASCA TEXARKANA AKRON ALBANY SCOTT BUCKSPORT WILSON DALLAS CHATTANOOGA CHATSWORTH JACKSON WATERTOWN AUGUSTA TOLEDO KILGORE ELLWOOD CITY TACOMA RESERVE LINCOLN State OHIO New Jersey California Wisconsin South Carolina Tennessee Louisiana Illinois Wisconsin Rhode Island Washington Illinois Illinois Illinois Iowa OHIO TEXAS North Carolina New Jersey Kentucky South Carolina Iowa MISSOURI Arizona Illinois Texas Ohio New York Louisiana MAINE North Carolina Texas Tennessee California Michigan Wisconsin Georgia Ohio Texas Pennsylvania Washington Louisiana Nebraska Zip Code 44223 08876 94070 53223 29448 38108 70578 60008 53226 02886 98108 2010 Air Emissions (tpy) Outcome 0.0016295 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.00125 0.00125 0.00112 0.001 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 60007 60090 62839 52761 45879 77571 28273 07105 40214 29706 52641 63901 85210 60143 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.0008 0.00077 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 75501 44305 12204 70583 4416 27893 75247 37406 91311 49203 53094 30906 43612 75662 16117 98421 70084 0.0005 0.0005 0.000485 0.0003385 0.0003 0.00029 0.00026 0.0002205 0.000185 0.0001654 0.00014 0.000085 0.000082 0.0000807 0.0000118 0.000005 0.000002 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 68504 0.00000001 Screened Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 17 of 18 ED 001523 00008282-00384 Table C-2. Comparisons of 2010 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tpy Facility Name City State Zip Code 2010 Air Emissions (tpy) Outcome tpy: tons per year 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 18 of 18 ED 001523 00008282-00385 Table C-3. Comparisons of 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tp Address 1202 FONES RD 3003 W CASINO RD City OLYMPIA EVERETT State WA WA Zip Code 98501 98204 2011 Air Emissions (tpy) 63.9665 20.45 1220 N SECOND AVE KENT WA 98032 82.946 91-320 KOMOHANA ST KAPOLEI HI 96707 10.95 6200 FRANKLIN BLVD SUITE #100 SACRAMENTO 3250 PATTERSON RD RIVERBANK CA 95824 5.0385 CA 95367 7.8095 2433 CROCKER C1R FAIRFIELD CA 94533 9.161 2400 HUNTINGTON DR FAIRFIELD CA 94533 21.5 10980 INLAND AVE MIRA LOMA CA 91752 31.1755 20730 PRAIRIE ST CHATSWORTH CA 91311 29.0045 500 CRENSHAW BLVD TORRANCE CA 90503 16.65 5300 WESTMORELAND RD 211 N 51 AVE WINNEMUCCA PHOENIX NV 89445 5.0015 AZ 85043 41.904 710 N 600W 620 N 4TH ST 1201 METAL CONTAINER CT LOGAN WORLAND WINDSOR UT 84321 5.851 WY 82401 53.3405 CO 80550 54.2575 120 9TH AVE 4525 INDIANA ST LONGMONT GOLDEN CO 80501 CO 80403 5 31.5 17755 W32ND AVE 1 LONE STAR PASS GOLDEN SAN ANTONIO CO 80401 33.5 TX 78264 9.93683575 7501 N HWY 185 10850 STRANG RD 5761 UNDERWOOD RD SEADRIFT LA PORTE PASADENA TX 77983 17.666 TX 77571 5.00805 TX 77507 5.2385 3000 N S ST 12910 JESS PIRTLE BLVD 2501 N FRAZIER ST 1001 N FM 3083 E PASADENA SUGAR LAND CONROE CONROE TX 77503 23.8115 TX 77478 31.488 TX 77303 32.064 TX 77303 17.15 699 F.M. 3083 CONROE TX 77301 6.9444811 6600 WILL ROGERS BLVD FORT WORTH TX 76140 12.5 175 COUNTY RD 2345 GRAPELAND TX 75844 12.204 300 KODAK BLVD LONGVIEW TX 75602 15.3195 1001 FISHER RD LONGVIEW TX 75604 52.485 500 NW LOOP 286 SUITE 101 803 AIRPORT RD PARIS TERRELL TX 75460 6.6505 TX 75160 15.309 41501 WOLVERINE RD 900 DARR PARK DR 72 CEG/CEA 7535 FIFTH ST 500 SE 27TH 10300 ROBERTS BLVD SHAWNEE PONCA CITY TINKER AFB EL RENO FORT SMITH OK 74804 19.075 OK 74601 19.8795 OK 73145 5.1 OK 73036 7.514 AR 72916 13.2445 600 KAWNEER DR 1301 N DIXIELAND RD SPRINGDALE ROGERS AR 72764 9.9965 AR 72756 12.883 1901 E BORICKDR FAYETTEVILLE AR 72701 10.9685 HWY 49 S 4708 KRUEGER DR 4950 N COUNTY RD 967 5411 INDUSTRIAL DR S PIGGOTT JONESBORO BLYTHEVILLE PINE BLUFF AR 72454 5.4585 AR 72401 5.85 AR 72315 11.16161105 AR 71602 6 3300 N HUTCHINSON ST 111 WIRENE RD 6000 JEFFERSON HWY 1601 W OMAHA AVE WHITE HALL ZACHARY NEW ORLEANS NORFOLK AR 71602 8.5085 LA 70791 5.355 LA 70123 9.5545 NE 68701 10.25 7002 N 288TH ST 3600 N HYDRAULIC VALLEY WICHITA NE 68064 5 KS 67219 5.858 Outcome Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 1 of 19 ED 001523 00008282-00386 Table C-3. Comparisons of 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tp Address 7604 RAILROAD AVE City WINFIELD State KS Zip Code 67156 2011 Air Emissions ftpy) 9.1095 1005 COMMERCIAL DR 2115 SW LOWER LAKE RD OWENSVILLE SAINT JOSEPH MO 65066 5.0775 MO 64504 8.9735 8121 EU.S. HWY 69 CLAYCOMO MO 64119 56.55 1500 ERT A WENTZVILLE MO 63385 9.05 101S ELM 102 BARTON ST 2391 CASSENS DR 42 TENBROOK INDUSTRIAL PARK WARRENTON SAINT LOUIS FENTON ARNOLD MO 63383 21.4795 MO 63104 6.34465 MO 63026 9.628 MO 63010 42.0245 1848 WESTPHALIA STRASSE 25 NORTHGATE INDUSTRIAL DR 600 E PEORIA ST 604 US HWY 150 E 400 N 15TH ST QUINCY GRANITE CITY GOODFIELD GALESBURG ROCHELLE IL 62305 16.081 IL 62040 5.2675 IL 61742 16.723 IL 61401 7.3525 IL 61068 11.045 100 A.J. HARLE DR 3000 W CHRYSLER DR 1035 EN ST 4300 W 130TH ST 4900 S KILBOURN AVE 4242 W FILLMORE 2000 S KILBOURN AVE 3200 S KILBOURN AVE 1846 S KILBOURN AVE 1101 W43RD ST GALENA BELVIDERE BRADLEY ALSIP CHICAGO CHICAGO CHICAGO CHICAGO CHICAGO CHICAGO IL 61036 12.185 IL 61008 11.15 IL 60915 64.844 IL 60803 18.7305 IL 60632 8.8 IL 60624 5.4 IL 60623 12.2775 IL 60623 22.99445 IL 60623 10.8335 IL 60609 33.1715 4400 S PACKER CHICAGO IL 3737 E EXCHANGE AVE AURORA IL 7701 W71ST ST BRIDGEVIEW IL 16100 S LATHROP AVE HARVEY IL 211 E MAIN ST CHICAGO HEIGHTS IL 475 RANDY RD CAROL STREAM IL 449 N CALIFORNIA ST SYCAMORE IL 11595 MCCONNELL RD WOODSTOCK IL 1595 E OAKTON ST ELK GROVE VILLAGE IL 7000 SAUKVIEW DR SAINT CLOUD MN 2300 BROWN AVE WASECA MN 5005 COUNTY RD 25 MINNEAPOLIS MN 966 S MISSISSIPPI RIVER BLVD SAINT PAUL MN 60609 60504 60455 60426 60411 60188 60178 60098 60007 56303 56093 55416 55116 33.9425 5.7695 8.35 6.864 35.8595 8.80855 6.722 6.265 8.79 5.856965 6.7615 6.3187 7.08 139 EVA ST SAINT PAUL MN 55107 78.8155 805 BENCH ST 2929 W BRIDGE ST N 2467 VAUGHAN RD 1416 INDIANHEAD DR REDWING OWATONNA WAUPACA MENOMONIE MN 55066 24.362 MN 55060 127.5625 Wl 54981 10.415 Wl 54751 7.75 200 SIMEAVE 1501 ST JAMES ST 801 SAUK AVE 105 E BLACKHAWK DR 8500 W TOWER AVE TOMAH LA CROSSE BARABOO FORT ATKINSON MILWAUKEE Wl 54660 5.426 Wl 54603 25.777 Wl 53913 25.711 Wl 53538 11.95 Wl 53224 35 8448 N 87TH ST MILWAUKEE Wl 2529 E NORWICH AVE SAINT FRANCIS Wl 10800 SI 3TH ST OAK CREEK Wl 8570 S CHICAGO RD OAK CREEK Wl N61 W23044 HARRY'S WAY ATTN: SUSSEX Wl ENVIRONMENTAL 300 MILL ST SHEBOYGAN FALLS Wl 520 W 2ND ST OCONOMOWOC Wl 53224 53235 53154 53154 53089 53085 53066 9.352 9.7653 35.58 18.578 12.85 12.7415 6.475 N11896 HWY 175 PO BOX 2718 300 N VINE ST 1900 W SUMNER ST 926 W STATE ST 300 E BREED ST LOMIRA HORICON HARTFORD HARTFORD CHILTON Wl 53048 5.3675 Wl 53032 5.5 Wl 53027 11.85 Wl 53027 8.7795 Wl 53014 5.270385 476 CLAY ST 1930 DES MOINES AVE 1965 HWY 30 1750 E US HWY 30 E CHILTON Wl BURLINGTON IA MISSOURI VALLEY IA CARROLL IA 53014 52601 51555 51401 6.272 11.18 5.464 5.5825 Outcome Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 2 of 19 ED 001523 00008282-00387 Table C-3. Comparisons of 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tp Address 3591 MAPLE DR City FORT DODGE State IA Zip Code 50501 2011 Air Emissions ftpy) 13.686535 Outcome Retain 102 MAIN ST 825 SW1RVINEDALE DR 200 LAFAYETTE ST 501 S MILLER DR 1500 N PITCHER ST PELLA ANKENY MIDDLEVILLE WHITE PIGEON KALAMAZOO IA 50219 19.5195 Retain IA 50023 21.1695 Retain Ml 49333 7.1365 Retain Ml 49099 16.1035 Retain Ml 49007 8.6 Retain 920 TOWNSEND ST MAIL CODE: 489-066-600 8175 MILLETT HWY LANSING LANSING Ml 48921 5.8 Ml 48917 24.55 Retain Retain 2100 BRISTOL RD FLINT Ml 48552 26.1855 Retain 2101 CONNOR AVE DETROIT Ml 48215 56 Retain 4651 BELLEVUE AVE 38303 MICHIGAN AVE DETROIT WAYNE Ml 48207 7.4295 Retain Ml 48184 6.065 Retain 3001 MILLER RD DEARBORN Ml 48121 66.15 Retain 21500 MOUND RD WARREN Ml 48091 8.655 Retain 6645 SIMS DR 32565 DEQUINDRE 501 N SIXTH ST STERLING HEIGHTS Ml MADISON HEIGHTS Ml MONTICELLO IN 48313 48071 47960 6.169 12.3605 33 Retain Retain Retain 1009 SLOAN ST 400 N WALNUT ST 5500 STATE RD 38E 2201 W MARYLAND ST 4000 TULIP TREE DR CRAWFORDSVILLE IN CRAWFORDSVILLE IN LAFAYETTE IN EVANSVILLE IN PRINCETON IN 47933 47933 47905 47710 47670 6.608 21.597 29.635 15.4125 17.969 Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain HWYS 66 & 61 1 LEXAN LN NEWBURGH MOUNT VERNON IN 47629 8.5 IN 47620 5.25 Retain Retain 310 S WABASH 301 N CURRY PIKE 2900 W INWOOD DR 1000 E PEARL ST ASHLEY BLOOMINGTON COLUMBUS BATESVILLE IN 46705 6 Retain IN 47404 6.5 Retain IN 47201 6 Retain IN 47006 5.3525 Retain 6610 COUNTY RD 60 12200 LAFAYETTE CENTER RD SAINT JOE ROANOKE IN 46785 8.231 IN 46783 15.2 Retain Retain 601 RE JONES RD 101 JOAN DR US HWY 12 AT RT 249 BUTLER MIDDLEBURY PORTAGE IN 46721 24.3635 Retain IN 46540 5.3965 Retain IN 46368 4.9 Screened Out 300 N FAIL RD LA PORTE IN 46350 65.4225 Retain 858 E HUPP RD 2501 165THST LA PORTE HAMMOND IN 46350 6.935 Retain IN 46320 5.873 Retain 1950 E MAIN ST 2600 E STATE RD 240 1100 MCKINLEY RD 4901 N MAIN ST 12340 TOWN SH1P RD 99 E GREENFIELD GREENCASTLE SAINT MARYS FINDLAY FINDLAY IN 46140 7.843 Retain IN 46135 6.75701 Retain OH 45885 7.502 Retain OH 45840 21.509 Retain OH 45840 160.5 Retain 1501 W MICHIGAN ST 2615 CAMPBELL RD 9017 BLUE ASH RD 1229 CASTLE DR 1145 CONWELL AVE 1425 E BOWMAN ST SIDNEY SIDNEY CINCINNATI MASON WILLARD WOOSTER OH 45365 11.892 Retain OH 45365 12.155 Retain OH 45242 32.5 Retain OH 45040 12.689 Retain OH 44890 8.7445 Retain OH 44691 13.3625 Retain 390 GRISWOLD ST NE 2100 GRISWOLD NE 2300 HALLOCK-YOUNG RD 3765 SUNNYBROOK RD 8806 CRANE AVE 1724 LINDEN AVE 5201 ENTERPRISE BLVD 3770 STICKNEY AVE WARREN WARREN LORDSTOWN BRIMFIELD CLEVELAND ZANESVILLE TOLEDO TOLEDO OH 44483 14.966 Retain OH 44483 7.365 Retain OH 44481 5 Retain OH 44240 5 Retain OH 44105 17.316 Retain OH 43701 6 Retain OH 43612 12.7245 Retain OH 43612 16.5510995 Retain 2900 HILL AVE 10444 WATERVILLE TOLEDO WHITEHOUSE OH 43607 13.1405 Retain OH 43571 76.328 Retain 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 3 of 19 ED 001523 00008282-00388 Table C-3. Comparisons of 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tp Address 12-773 STRT 110 63 DIXIE HWY 2145 CEDAR City NAPOLEON ROSSFORD FREMONT State OH OH OH Zip Code 43545 43460 43420 2011 Air Emissions ftpy) 12.7305 7.819 126.955 11000 STATE RT 347 EAST LIBERTY OH 43319 38.3 1300 MARION-AGOSTA RD 350 MCCORMICK BLVD MARION COLUMBUS OH 43302 51.461 OH 43213 82 24000 HONDA PKWY MARYSVILLE OH 43040 40.2 2604 RIVER RD US HWY 431 N 7425 INDUSTRIAL RD 1601 MERCER RD 301 MAYDE RD HAWESVILLE RUSSELLVILLE FLORENCE LEXINGTON BEREA KY 42348 5.218 KY 42276 4.9495 KY 41042 34.7245 KY 40511 9.092 KY 40403 14.7982 1001 CHERRY BLOSSOM WAY GEORGETOWN KY 40324 9.387 3001 CHAMBERLAIN LN LOUISVILLE KY 40241 44.25 9098 EASTSIDE DR EXT. 1095 MENDELL DAVIS DR 1725 N WASHINGTON ST NEWTON JACKSON VICKSBURG MS 39345 9.578 MS 39272 10.9045 MS 39181 14.1275 300 NISSAN DR RT. 2 LEE INDUSTRIAL PARK E 10800 MARINA DR CANTON SHANNON OLIVE BRANCH MS 39046 9.612 MS 38868 6.1565 MS 38654 82.2945 195 CROWN RD 9159 TELECOM DR 2000 N 5TH ST 751 DUPREE ST BATESVILLE MILAN UNION CITY BROWNSVILLE MS 38606 22.1595 TN 38358 16.754 TN 38261 5.347 TN 38012 6.669 177 INDUSTRIAL PARK RD SWEETWATER TN 37874 13.094 8001 VOLKSWAGEN DR CHATTANOOGA TN 37416 11.0214265 1119 RIVERFRONT PKWY CHATTANOOGA TN 37402 23.9355 175 MONOGARD DR 500 WALNUT GROVE RD 740 KING EDWARD AVE SE MANCHESTER DAYTON CLEVELAND TN 37355 34.1765 TN 37321 6.58324085 TN 37311 6.264 1604 COUNTY HOSPITAL RD 2947 BRICK CHURCH PIKE 983 NISSAN DR NASHVILLE NASHVILLE SMYRNA TN 37218 18.35 TN 37207 7.102 TN 37167 30.74138035 500 TENNESSEE WALTZ PKWY HWY 27 N 1101 TECHNOLOGY DR 7205 GAULT AVE N 4910 MOORES MILL RD 3101 SEXTON RD 6675 US HWY 43 1 MERCEDES DR 1629 VANDERBILT RD 1800 HONDA DR ASHLAND CITY GENEVA DOTHAN FORT PAYNE HUNTSVILLE DECATUR GUIN VANCE BIRMINGHAM LINCOLN TN 37015 9.4075 AL 36340 12.793 AL 36303 5.3 AL 35967 6.3425 AL 35811 8.525 AL 35603 19.2556 AL 35563 12.501 AL 35490 28.302 AL 35234 12.3625 AL 35096 25.27 1313 PKWY DR SE 2540 KNIGHTS STATION RD 2525 S COMBEE RD 4700 WHITEWAY DR LEEDS LAKELAND LAKELAND TAMPA AL 35094 13.472 FL 33810 8.999 FL 33801 8.3575 FL 33617 17 400 W WALKER AVE 1100 N ELLIS RD BUSHNELL JACKSONVILLE FL 33513 10.6975 FL 32254 25.615 7777 KIA PKWY WEST POINT GA 31833 4.9645 1601 VALDOSTA HWY 1229 HWY 441 N BYPASS 200 NEWTON BRIDGE RD 101 JOE HARVEY ST 1131 HWY 155 S 535 MACON RD HOMERVILLE DUBLIN ATHENS LAVONIA MC DONOUGH MC DONOUGH GA 31634 7.80461 GA 31021 9.392 GA 30607 5.246 GA 30553 17.346 GA 30253 11.15 GA 30253 9.043 110 BALL DR 2556 WAGENER RD ROME AIKEN GA 30161 44.5 SC 29801 14.516 Outcome Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 4 of 19 ED 001523 00008282-00389 Table C-3. Comparisons of 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tp Address 1400 HWY 101 S 100 EVANS ROW 1501 W DARLINGTON ST 172 OLD ELLOREE RD City GREER CHERAW FLORENCE ORANGEBURG State SC SC sc sc Zip Code 29651 29520 29501 29116 2011 Air Emissions ftpy) 152.52 23.876 12.2435 6.604 Outcome Retain Retain Retain Retain 609 COUSAR ST BISHOPVILLE sc 29010 89.26 Retain 950 GERMAN ST 2120 NO HWY N UNIT A 12180 UNIVERSITY CITY BLVD 2900 NW BLVD 3301 N MAIN ST 1900 BARNES ST LENOIR MAXTON HARRISBURG GASTONIA TARBORO REIDSVILLE NO 28645 5.734 Retain NO 28364 9.7895 Retain NO 28075 5.351 Retain NO 28052 5.9525 Retain NO 27886 16.5235 Retain NO 27320 102 Retain 715 W FAIRFIELD RD 4000 OLD MILWAUKEE LN HIGH POINT WINSTON-SALEM NO 27263 15.9935 Retain NO 27107 136.173 Retain 3011 BIRCH DR WEIRTON WV 26062 92.2445 Retain 3010 BIRCH DR 135 BEAR CREEK RD 300 E GRAYSON ST WEIRTON MARION GALAX WV 26062 13.25 Retain VA 24354 8.9435 Retain VA 24333 4.99620635 Retain 8935 POCAHONTAS TRAIL JAMES RIVER COMMERCE CENTER 2347 KRATZER RD 18249 PHOENIX DR 8801 CITATION RD 326 JUNE AVE 695 LOUIS DR 1220 INDUSTRIAL BLVD 216 GREENFIELD RD 1375 HARRISBURG PIKE 500 E MIDDLE ST 1650 BROADWAY 1500 S CAMERON ST 600 ATLANTIC AVE 7676 ALLEGHENY RD 125 COLFAX ST WILLIAMSBURG HARRISONBURG HAGERSTOWN BALTIMORE BLANDON WARMINSTER SOUTHAMPTON LANCASTER LANCASTER HANOVER HANOVER HARRISBURG FRANKLIN MANNS CHOICE SPRINGDALE VA 23185 173 Retain VA 22802 48.2645 Retain MD 21742 8.5 Retain MD 21221 34.548 Retain PA 19510 6.5965 Retain PA 18974 6.028 Retain PA 18966 7.5855 Retain PA 17601 7.936 Retain PA 17601 9.08235 Retain PA 17331 28.0405 Retain PA 17331 5.2265 Retain PA 17104 27.6195 Retain PA 16323 8.5 Retain PA 15550 14.205 Retain PA 15144 5.8125 Retain 400 STATE ST 5362 RAILROAD ST 200 LUCIUS GORDON DR 3709 MILL ST 113 CEDAR ST 11 ADAMS RD CLAIRTON PA CHEMUNG NY WEST HENRIETTA NY MARION NY AKRON NY SARATOGA SPRINGS NY 15025 14825 14586 14505 14001 12866 41 10.4555 8.2645 5.423 11.6965 19.25 Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain 130 BREUNIG RD NEW WINDSOR NY 12553 40.4295 Retain 95 BALLARD RD MIDDLETOWN NY 10940 17.5 Retain 135 NATIONAL RD EDISON NJ 08817 4.995 Retain 14 CONVERT BLVD WOODBRIDGE NJ 07095 8.8765 Retain 600 MYRTLE ST NEW BRITAIN CT 06052 10.5515 Retain 89 CUMBERLAND ST WESTBROOK ME 04098 35.20941 Retain 1160 CRANSTON ST CRANSTON Rl 02920 5.7265 Retain GLEN & SHEPARD ST LAWRENCE MA 01843 70.1775 Retain 380 CALLE FABRIL ST KM 126 PR-3, CAROLINA PR 00985 24.194 Retain PR INDUSTRIAL PARK 3211 E CHESTNUT EXPY SPRINGFIELD MO 65802 0.02 Screened Out 261 HWY 155 S MC DONOUGH GA 30253 0.041 Screened Out 2811 S HARBOR BLVD SANTA ANA CA 92704 0.2365 Screened Out 2701 OAKES RD STURTEVANT Wl 53177 0.317 Screened Out 22614 RT 84 N CORDOVA IL 61242 0.614 Screened Out 4501 HWY 377 S BROWNWOOD TX 76801 0.91 Screened Out 905/915 ADAMS ST SE HUTCHINSON MN 55350 1.585 Screened Out 1030 LAKE RD MEDINA OH 44256 0.168 Screened Out 2120 E AUSTIN BLVD NEVADA MO 64772 0.385 Screened Out 10746 INNOVATION RD COTTAGE GROVE MN 55016 0.112 Screened Out 3217 WOOD DR GARLAND TX 75041 0.0025 Screened Out 6970 JONESBORO RD MORROW GA 30260 0.3775 Screened Out 1102 AVE J E GRAND PRAIRIE TX 75050 0.06 Screened Out 7575 FULTON ST E ADA Ml 49355 1.9855 Screened Out 192W155TH ST SOUTH HOLLAND IL 60473 0.1335 Screened Out 1050 TAYLORS LN C1NNAMINSON NJ 08077 0.01 Screened Out 100 THOMPSON ST PITTSTON PA 18640 0.005 Screened Out 900 WMAIN ST SEDALIA MO 65301 0.0605 Screened Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 5 of 19 ED 001523 00008282-00390 Table C-3. Comparisons of 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tp Address 1201 SPINE HILL RD 501 MONSANTO AVE 725 CANNON BRIDGE RD 474W19TH ST City GRIFFIN SAUGET ORANGEBURG RESERVE State GA IL SC LA Zip Code 30224 62201 29115 70084 2011 Air Emissions (tpy) 0.11925 0.02 3.301 0.0000025 Outcome Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 337 VINCENT DR MILTON Wl 53563 0.0135 Screened Out 500 JERSEY AVE 1660 CROSS STSE 1000 INDUSTRIAL PARK DR 1431 PROGRESS AVE 1313 WINDSOR AVE 65TH INFANTRY AVE KM. 13.4 15200 ALMEDARD 1872 HWY 9 BYPASS W 1 E WATER ST 120 FRANKLIN RD 71 PROGRESS AVE NEW BRUNSWICK NJ SALEM OR CLINTON MS HIGH POINT NO COLUMBUS OH CAROLINA PR HOUSTON TX LANCASTER SC WAUKEGAN IL PONTIAC Ml CRANBERRY TOWNS PA 08901 97302 39056 27260 43211 00985 77053 29720 60085 48341 16066 0.125 0.0519 0.0945 0.125 1.416 0.081845 0.174 2.6435 0.984 0.0605 0.7965 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 1 REYNOLDS RD 3321 DURHAM RD 1372 KY HWY 1957 810 E S ST 3001 ATKINSON DR 34136 MYRTLE 1000 CROCKER RD 215 PHILLIPS 324 RD 91 NORTHEASTERN BLVD 990 INDUSTRIAL PARK DR 6707 E 14TH ST 1415 E MICHIGAN ST N82W13118 LEON RD 3225 E WASHINGTON BLVD HWY 933 3030 BIRCH DR HALF MOON INDUSTRIAL PARK 936 BARRACUDA ST 2050 BYBERRY RD 340 RAILROAD ST 13511 MAIN ST 1415 STEELE AVE SW 565 HARTCO DR 4115 N PERKINS RD 4800 STATE RD 60 E 1 THIRD AVE 801 RAILROAD AVE ASHVILLE OH ROXBORO NO LEWISPORT KY MARENGO IA LUFKIN TX WAYNE Ml WESTLAKE OH HELENA AR NASHUA NH MARIETTA GA TULSA OK ADRIAN Ml MENOMONEE FALLS Wl VERNON CA BRANDENBURG KY WEIRTON WV TERMINAL ISLAND CA PHILADELPHIA PA SAUKVILLE Wl LEMONT IL GRAND RAPIDS Ml ONEIDA TN STILLWATER OK MULBERRY FL HASKELL NJ YORK SC 43103 27573 42351 52301 75901 48184 44145 72342 03062 30062 74112 49221 53051 90058 40108 26062 90731 19116 53080 60439 49507 37841 74075 33860 07420 29745 0.379 0.482 2.696 2.1595 1.7455 0.125 0.391 0.154 0.1182165 0.244 0.1155 0.005 1.355 0.25 0.124 0.4445 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 4.175 0.1365 0.9005 0.03 0.5 4.7345 1.4105 2.9015 0.1685 4.894 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 126 MEMORIAL DR 27 MAIN ST 7855 N FAULKNER RD 706 HOUSTON CLINTON DR 1750 OVERVIEW DR 1 INTERNATIONAL DR 7700 MICHIGAN AVE SPRINGFIELD STRUTHERS MILWAUKEE BURNET ROCK HILL FLAT ROCK SALINE MA 01104 0.002 Screened Out OH 44471 2.651 Screened Out Wl 53224 0.08166 Screened Out TX 78611 0.05139 Screened Out SC 29730 0.0025 Screened Out Ml 48134 4.85 Screened Out Ml 48176 3.56 Screened Out 600 N BROAD ST 17700 FOLTZ INDUSTRIAL PKWY 603 W 7TH ST 801 17TH AVES 2220 S PROSPECT 13200 BAYPARK RD 16950 WALLISVILLE RD 9100 W 21 ST ST 806 PALUXY ST PHILLIPSBURG STRONGSVILLE CADILLAC MYRTLE BEACH OKLAHOMA CITY PASADENA HOUSTON SAND SPRINGS KILGORE NJ 08865 0.003 Screened Out OH 44149 3.246 Screened Out Ml 49601 0.125 Screened Out SC 29577 2.6925 Screened Out OK 73129 0.25 Screened Out TX 77507 0.0001595 Screened Out TX 77049 0.000219 Screened Out OK 74063 0.01482 Screened Out TX 75662 0.0002725 Screened Out 135 INDUSTRIAL DR 1717 GIFFORD RD RAYNE ELGIN LA 70578 0.0005 Screened Out IL 60120 1.838 Screened Out 1200 S CRUTCHER ST 300WGREGER RD 204 36TH ST 2135 9TH AVE 1970 NE BROADWAY 901 S 66TH TERRACE 800 RAILWAY 201 S CEDAR 100 INDUSTRIAL BLVD 1609 BIDDLE AVE SPRINGDALE AR 72764 2.13 Screened Out OAKDALE CA 95361 3.552 Screened Out BETTENDORF IA 52722 0.049 Screened Out COUNCIL BLUFFS IA 51502 0.023 Screened Out DES MOINES IA 50313 0.0355 Screened Out KANSAS CITY KS 66111 0.035 Screened Out WEST BEND Wl 53095 0.0265 Screened Out VALLEY CENTER KS 67147 0.0195 Screened Out SEAFORD DE 19973 0.0025 Screened Out WYANDOTTE Ml 48192 0.005 Screened Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 6 of 19 ED 001523 00008282-00391 Table C-3. Comparisons of 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tp Address 361 SHEEP PASTURE RD 3455 SOUTHPORT RD 1175 MARTIN ST 310 CROWN RD 5200 CURTIS LN 15310 ARROW BLVD 270 STATE ST 130 DECLARATION DR 4113 W INDUSTRIAL AVE 700WKEARNEY 134 LISTER AVE UNION AVE EXTENSION 109 BAMBERG DR 31 RAILROAD ST 301 WASHINGTON STW 6515 FRATT RD 3800 E RANDOL MILL RD 1001 BROWN AVE 18906 US 24 E 1735 DOGWOOD DR 707 N LEECH 1305 RYE ST 2820 N NORMANDY DR 737 LOGAN AVE N City EAST SETAUKET SPARTANBURG GREENVILLE BATESVILLE NEW IBERIA FONTANA CHICAGO HEIGHTS MC DONOUGH MIDLAND MESQUITE NEWARK JOHNSTOWN PELL CITY CLARENDON CANNON FALLS SAN ANTONIO ARLINGTON TOLEDO WOODBURN CONYERS HOBBS HOUSTON PETERSBURG RENTON State NY SC OH MS LA CA 1L GA TX TX NJ NY AL PA MN TX TX OH IN GA NM TX VA WA Zip Code 11733 29302 45331 38606 70560 92335 60411 30253 79703 75149 07105 12095 35125 16313 55009 78218 76011 43607 46797 30012 88240 77029 23805 98055 2011 Air Emissions (tpy) 0.008 0.1275 0.22 3.796 1.5 0.25 0.3259 0.30055 3.7855 0.001327 0.00135 0.0188675 0.10425 4.429515 0.249 0.0085 0.125 3.69 0.005 0.03915 0.011905 0.0225 0.0035 0.577 Outcome Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 7500 E MARGINAL WAY S SEATTLE WA 98108 0.1425 Screened Out 7755 E MARGINAL WAY S SEATTLE WA 98108 0.0305 Screened Out HWY 53 BONNELL RD 2815 INDIANAPOLIS BLVD 608 W CRAWFORD AVE 4470 SW 74TH AVE 1200 N PEORIA 14765 W BOBOLINK AVE 81 WHULLER LN 10747 PATTERSON PL 11750 FRUEHAUF DR 2000 E PETTIGREW ST 704 E WINTERGREEN RD 610 FISHER RD 206 E MORROW RD CARTHAGE TN WHITING IN CONNELLSVILLE PA MIAMI FL TULSA OK MENOMONEE FALLS Wl READING PA SANTA FE SPRINGS CA CHARLOTTE NO DURHAM NO LANCASTER TX LONGVIEW TX SAND SPRINGS OK 37030 46394 15425 33155 74147 53051 19605 90670 28273 27703 75134 75604 74063 1.873 0.0005 0.364595 0.005 0.0025 0.1275 0.0349 0.0425 0.0025 0.046 0.0475 0.026 0.0375 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 120 ENTERPRISE AVE MORRISVILLE PA 200 PARK AVE BRILLION Wl 668 GRAVEL PIKE EAST GREENVILLE PA 2920 DR ANDREW J BROWN AVE INDIANAPOLIS IN W6250 PIONEER RD FOND DU LAC Wl 19067 54110 18041 46205 54935 1.317 2.93465 3.38 0.006137 1.27 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 2700 WAGNER PL 1809 ROCK ISLAND ST 1256 N MCLEAN BLVD 3301 S COUNTY RD 150W MARYLAND HEIGHTS MO DALLAS TX MEMPHIS TN GREENCASTLE IN 63043 75207 38108 46135 1.7395 0.009 0.0015 0.119 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 1202 AIRPORT RD NORTH BRUNSWICK NJ 8200 BROADWELL RD CINCINNATI OH 6 LITHO RD TRENTON NJ 524 S CHERRY ST WALLINGFORD CT 196 S WATER CONNERSVILLE IN 371511TH ST WYANDOTTE Ml 18 INDUSTRIAL RD WALPOLE MA 200 INDUSTRIAL AVE RIDGEFIELD PARK NJ 1851 E32NDAVE COLUMBUS NE 3610 N HOLLAND-SYLVANIA RD TOLEDO OH 460 W MAIN ST CANFIELD OH 630 BEAULIEU ST HOLYOKE MA 900 OPELOUSAS ST LAKE CHARLES LA 4005 OAKLAWN DR LOUISVILLE KY 5660 RISING SUN AVE PHILADELPHIA PA 2000 HOWARD SMITH AVE W C42 WINDSOR CO 2274 1ST ST SE HICKORY NO 159 INDUSTRIAL PARK RD MONTROSS VA 11999 E HWY 158 GARDENDALE TX 3701 STATE RD 26 E LAFAYETTE IN 15550 CANAL BANK RD LEMONT IL ONE LLODIO DR HERMITAGE PA 2434 HOLMES RD HOUSTON TX 55 BENNETT DR BRATTLEBORO VT 08902 45244 08648 06492 47331 48192 02081 07660 68601 43615 44406 01040 70601 40219 19120 80550 28602 22520 79758 47905 60439 16148 77051 05301 2.096 1.61336 0.631 0.154 0.005 3.118 0.002 0.0055 1.94 1.125 2 0.196 0.0095 1.4025 4.65 0.0015 0.0945 3.925 1.35 1.975 0.115 2.4165 0.8026 0.0845 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 7 of 19 ED 001523 00008282-00392 Table C-3. Comparisons of 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tp Address 1354 OLD POST RD 500 PERTH DR NEW ECONOMY BUSINESS PARK 530 N SECOND ST HWY 69 S 325 HWY 81 City HAVRE DE GRACE AMBRIDGE CAMBRIDGE JACKSONVILLE OSSEO State MD PA OH TX MN Zip Code 21078 15003 43725 75766 55369 2011 Air Emissions (tpy) 0.344 0.559 Outcome Screened Out Screened Out 2.746 1.696 0.25 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 3342 EMERY ST 710 MARVIN A SMITH BLVD 1816 S JACKSON ST 3130 FM 521 115 PROCTOR 2727 GARDNER RD 2790 CANFIELDS LN 1610 CLARA ST 13177 HURON RIVER DR 204 S 6TH AVE 1010 OLD DENISON AVE LOS ANGELES LONGVIEW MAGNOLIA FRESNO ODESSA BROADVIEW MONTOURSVILLE JACKSON ROMULUS MANSFIELD CLEVELAND CA 90023 0.179 Screened Out TX 75662 0.0365 Screened Out AR 71753 0.04205 Screened Out TX 77545 0.043 Screened Out TX 79762 0.293 Screened Out IL 60155 0.111 Screened Out PA 17754 0.0025 Screened Out Ml 49203 0.0001654 Screened Out Ml 48174 0.125 Screened Out TX 76063 0.337 Screened Out OH 44109 0.0025 Screened Out 3751 JENNINGS RD CLEVELAND OH 44109 0.25 Screened Out 9733 MEADOR RD CONROE TX 77303 0.5 Screened Out 2300 RANDOLPH AVE 2725 ARMENTROUT DR 2433 S OR 600 E 35777 VAN DYKE GREENSBORO NO CONCORD NO COLUMBIA CITY IN STERLING HEIGHTS Ml 27406 28025 46725 48312 0.00812 0.0055 1.453 0.7 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 38111 VAN DYKE STERLING HEIGHTS Ml 48312 4.34 Screened Out 9502 BAYPORT BLVD - ETOX UNIT PASADENA 788 CHERT QUARRY RD MARTIN 2247 S HWY 71 KIMBALL TX 77507 0.0031 Screened Out SC 29836 0.1275 Screened Out NE 69145 0.0075 Screened Out 5 MILES E & 1 MILE N OF JUNCTION WAYNOKA US HWYS 412 & 281 1997 AMERICAN BLVD DE PERE 11200 BAY AREA BLVD PASADENA 100 INDUSTRIAL DR (BLDG 180, LEETSDALE 150, & 76) 5005 ELDER LAKE RD KILGORE OK 73860 0.00165 Screened Out Wl 54115 0.1275 Screened Out TX 77507 3.03655 Screened Out PA 15056 0.006085 Screened Out TX 75662 0.0545 Screened Out 115 ERIE ST 117 E LINCOLN ST NILES PEOTONE OH 44446 2.9905 Screened Out IL 60468 0.518 Screened Out 350 MILL ST 10048 AURORA-HUDSON RD QUAKERTOWN STREETSBORO PA 18951 4.075 Screened Out OH 44241 2.7175 Screened Out 17 LAKE MIRROR RD FOREST PARK GA 30297 0.005 Screened Out 2600 HUNTINGTON DR FAIRFIELD CA 94533 0.059 Screened Out 3520 VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD ABBEVILLE 1630 W HILL ST LOUISVILLE 641 JACKSON AVE HUNTINGTON 231 S PROGRESS DR E KENDALLVILLE 1337 J WOOD BRANCH DR CHARLOTTE 4701 O'DONNELL ST BALTIMORE MADISON PARISH INDUSTRIAL TALLULAH PARK 177 COMPLEX CHEMICAL RD LA 70510 0.1275 Screened Out KY 40210 2.2275 Screened Out WV 25704 0.125 Screened Out IN 46755 0.268 Screened Out NO 28273 0.64 Screened Out MD 21224 0.9215 Screened Out LA 71282 0.5 Screened Out 2400 E 37TH ST N WICHITA KS 67219 0.00648 Screened Out 3300 MISSISSIPPI AVE CAHOKIA IL 62206 0.036 Screened Out 15138 HWY 96 MOUNT VERNON MO 65712 0.003 Screened Out 4700NE10TH ST OKLAHOMA CITY OK 73117 0.05 Screened Out 1000 SPINE ST 650 ROSEWOOD DR 10107 HWY 79 2449 RIVERSIDE PKWY 2733 E HWY 31 20245 SUNBURST ST 15 GRUMBACHER RD 200 TANNER DR 230 OLD CONVERSE RD PONCA CITY OK 74602 0.052 Screened Out COLUMBIA SC 29201 2.0475 Screened Out HANNIBAL MO 63401 0.1275 Screened Out GRAND JUNCTION CO 81505 4.8425 Screened Out CORSICANA TX 75109 0.0465 Screened Out CHATSWORTH CA 91311 0.002 Screened Out YORK PA 17402 1.01857 Screened Out TAYLORS SC 29687 0.108 Screened Out SPARTANBURG SC 29307 0.0025 Screened Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 8 of 19 ED 001523 00008282-00393 Table C-3. Comparisons of 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tp Address 141 VENTURE BLVD 4600 SILICON DR 315 CHERRY LN 4TH ST & PARK AVE 940 MILL PARK DR City SPARTANBURG DURHAM NEWCASTLE FARIBAULT LANCASTER State SC NC DE MN OH Zip Code 29306 27703 19720 55021 43130 2011 Air Emissions (tpy) 0.005 0.125 0.001145 4.089 1.1105 Outcome Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 10200 N LOMBARD ST PORTLAND OR 2608 ROSS AVE SCHOFIELD Wl 1400 73RD AVENE FRIDLEY MN 9917 N ALPINE MACHESNEY PARK IL 8707 MILLERGROVE DR SANTA FE SPRINGS CA 1704 DENVER RD ANDERSON SC 403 CARLINE RD LANGLEY SC 23737 HWY 47 THOMAS OK 4700 S CENTRAL AVE CHICAGO IL 1275 STATE ST HAMMOND IN 3420 CANDLER'S MOUNTAIN RD LYNCHBURG VA 1 DECOMA DR CARROLLTON GA 26 BLANCHARD ST NEWARK NJ 3710 W COUNTY RD 326 OCALA FL 1720, 1725, 1755 ROBERT C MARYVILLE TN JACKSON DR 3350 UNION RD CHEEKTOWAGA NY 5111 E36TH ST N TULSA OK 7335 S 10TH ST OAK CREEK Wl 316 HART ST WATERTOWN Wl 8311 16THST STURTEVANT Wl 309 ECHELON RD GREENVILLE sc 2301 N BRAZOSPORT BLVD FREEPORT TX 1635 AEROPLAZA DR COLORADO SPRINGS CO 1101 HWY 27 S STANLEY NC 2644 HEGAN LN CHICO CA RT 130 DEEPWATER NJ 2520 BARRINGTON CT HAYWARD CA 801 -35TH ST FORT MADISON IA 7961 WINCHESTER RD FRONT ROYAL VA 400 GROESBECK HWY MOUNT CLEMENS Ml CHEESEQUAKE RD PARLIN NJ 586 HWY 44 LA PLACE LA 192 PATTERSON BLVD TOWANDA PA 3115 RIVER RD BUFFALO NY 26655 PEOPLES RD MADISON AL 330 PINE ST CANTON MA 209 WATLINGTON INDUSTRIAL DR REIDSVILLE NC 97203 54476 55432 61115 90670 29625 29834 73669 60638 46320 24506 30117 07105 34475 37801 14225 74115 53154 53094 53177 29605 77541 80916 28164 95928 08023 94545 52627 22630 48043 08859 70068 18848 14207 35756 02021 27320 2.759 1.5361434 2.4 0.831 0.005 0.0495 0.129 0.125 0.033205 0.013 0.221 1.435 0.25 0.107 1.489 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 2.1335 0.6715 0.046 0.00012 0.005535 0.387 0.015 0.649 0.0112 0.4186 0.1615 0.0025 0.357 0.011 0.575 0.0155 0.0075 2.2885 1.8625 2.03725 0.00145 0.05 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 100 EASTMAN RD KINGSPORT TN 37662 1.408 Screened Out 1669 LAKE AVE ROCHESTER NY 14652 0.0035 Screened Out 2305 SHERWIN ST GARLAND TX 3001 CHANNAHON RD JOLIET IL 18383 E RAILROAD ST CITY OF INDUSTRY CA 942 BAKER RD MARTINSBURG WV 11210 KATHERINE'S CROSSING WOODRIDGE IL SUITE 100 8700 EXCELSIOR BLVD HOPKINS MN 1000 COUNTY RD MONETT MO 1260 JAMES L HART PKWY YPSILANTI Ml 400 CLAREMONT AVE JERSEY CITY NJ 1378 KINGSLANDAVE PAGEDALE MO 1825 E ALEXANDER AVE TACOMA WA 1093 CLARK ST ENDICOTT NY 75041 60436 91748 25405 60517 55343 65708 48197 07304 63133 98421 13760 0.0205 0.0505 0.055 0.056 0.0025 0.0045 1.696 0.0485 0.184 0.2585 0.00001 4.3655 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 75 SWANTON RD SAINT ALBANS VT 05478 0.162 Screened Out 90 CARSON RD BIRMINGHAM AL 35215 0.5385 Screened Out 5501 E SLAUSON AVE 1717WENGLISH RD CITY OF COMMERCE CA HIGH POINT NC 90040 27261 0.0015 0.189 Screened Out Screened Out 2000 WESTHALL ST PITTSBURGH PA 15233 0.0405 Screened Out 901 W UNION ST MONTEBELLO CA 90640 0.044 Screened Out 3050 HANFORD DR LEBANON PA 17046 0.1225 Screened Out 1991 S WHEELING RD WHEELING IL 60090 0.156 Screened Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 9 of 19 ED 001523 00008282-00394 Table C-3. Comparisons of 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tp Address 411 N DARLING City FREMONT State Ml Zip Code 49412 2011 Air Emissions (tpy) 0.3295 Outcome Screened Out 347 CENTRAL AVE BOWLING GREEN KY 42101 0.37 Screened Out 5400 23RD AVE MOLINE IL 61265 0.5755 Screened Out 701 SHILOH RD GARLAND TX 75042 1.178 Screened Out 372 CLEVELAND ST ROCHESTER PA 15074 1.3135 Screened Out 901 N GREENWOOD AVE KANKAKEE IL 60901 1.8015 Screened Out 1200 AMBOY AVE 350 FRONTAGE RD 9809 INDUSTRIAL DR 1923 FREDERICK 20945 S WILMINGTON AVE 1801 PERIMETER RD 450 RICHARDSON DR 4201 DEGUSSA RD 1650 LILLY RD PERTH AMBOY WEST HAVEN BRIDGEVIEW DETROIT CARSON GREENVILLE LANCASTER THEODORE LAFAYETTE NJ 08861 0.442 Screened Out CT 06516 0.144915 Screened Out IL 60455 0.16206 Screened Out Ml 48211 1.778 Screened Out CA 90810 0.25 Screened Out SC 29605 0.009 Screened Out PA 17603 0.381 Screened Out AL 36582 0.0045 Screened Out IN 47909 0.331 Screened Out 4999 SCENIC HWY BATON ROUGE LA 70805 0.032 Screened Out 3700 W 190TH ST TORRANCE CA 90509 0.02 Screened Out 4045 SCENIC HWY BATON ROUGE LA 70805 0.0565 Screened Out 251 WWYLIE AVE 7050 KRICK RD WASHINGTON WALTON HILLS PA 15301 0.5 Screened Out OH 44146 0.004 Screened Out 5492 BOSTWICK ST 418-424 ST PAUL ST 482 WHEELER RD 2030 RIVERVIEW INDUSTRIAL DR 8365 VALLEY PIKE LOWVILLE ROCHESTER SUGAR GROVE MABLETON MIDDLETOWN NY 13367 4.4445 Screened Out NY 14605 0.0025 Screened Out IL 60554 0.891 Screened Out GA 30126 0.195 Screened Out VA 22645 0.0025 Screened Out 36616 89TH ST 2675 HENKLE DR 2825 SUNTIDE RD TWIN LAKES LEBANON CORPUS CHRISTI Wl 53181 1.4 Screened Out OH 45036 0.608 Screened Out TX 78409 0.1435 Screened Out 650 MILLER RD AVON LAKE OH 44012 3.395 Screened Out 12600 S TORRENCE AVE 3001 MILLER RD CHICAGO DEARBORN IL 60633 0.615 Screened Out Ml 48121 0.002 Screened Out 3001 MILLER RD DEARBORN Ml 48121 0.007 Screened Out 4432 C ST NE 1011 MCKINLEY ST 2020 BRUCK ST 6625 MIRAMAR RD 17050 S LATHROPAVE AUBURN EUGENE COLUMBUS SAN DIEGO HARVEY WA 98002 0.125 Screened Out OR 97402 0.445 Screened Out OH 43207 0.0575 Screened Out CA 92121 0.1517 Screened Out IL 60426 0.329 Screened Out 900 CARNEGIE ST 211 PUCKETTS FERRY RD 20W14TH AVE ONE FULLER WAY 1245 CHAPMAN DR 625 WANDA AVE 471 HWY 3142 ROLLING MEADOWS IL GREENWOOD SC NORTH KANSAS CITY MO GREAT BEND KS WAUKESHA Wl FERNDALE Ml HAHNVILLE LA 60008 29649 64116 67530 53186 48220 70057 0.00112 1.56 1.677 0.373 0.0085 0.125 0.1935 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 1650 ROWEPKWY 1450 MONTANA RD 1300 S PLANT RD 333 S LOMBARD RD 2118 REISER AVE SE 3901 WILLIAMS DR POPLAR BLUFF MO IOLA KS CHARLESTON MO ADDISON IL NEW PHILADELPHIA OH ORANGE TX 63901 66749 63834 60101 44663 77630 0.001 0.00295 0.00555 0.005 0.005 0.1275 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 2300 HOLLOWAY DR 1200 N GLENBROOK EL RENO GARLAND OK 73036 0.2215 Screened Out TX 75040 0.001995 Screened Out 2500 E GENERAL MOTORS BLVD DETROIT Ml 48211 1.06 Screened Out 600 CORVETTE DR BOWLING GREEN KY 42101 0.815 Screened Out 11 CRAGWOOD RD 1429 E LUFKIN AVE AVENEL LUFKIN NJ 07001 1.131 Screened Out TX 75901 0.034 Screened Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 10 of 19 ED 001523 00008282-00395 Table C-3. Comparisons of 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tp Address 333 BARRON BLVD HWY 453 & 1-26 (654 JUDGE ST) 300 LAWTON AVE 1900 N JOSEY LN 3201 FAIRFAX TRAFFICWAY 4555 GIDDINGS RD 2525 E ABRAMS ST City GRAYSLAKE HARLEYVILLE MONROE CARROLLTON KANSAS CITY LAKE ORION ARLINGTON State IL SC OH TX KS Ml TX Zip Code 60030 29448 45050 75006 66115 48359 76010 2011 Air Emissions (tpy) 1.075 0.002 0.727 0.000285 3.45 1.75 1.27 Outcome Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 7600 GENERAL MOTORS BLVD SHREVEPORT LA 3783 STATE RD CUYAHOGA FALLS OH 4400 S KILDARE AVE CHICAGO IL 12361 MONARCH ST GARDEN GROVE CA 700 PROGRESS CENTER AVE LAWRENCEVILLE GA 400 EXCHANGE ST BUFFALO NY 8250 ALMERIA AVE FONTANA CA 71129 44223 60632 92841 30043 14204 92335 2.575 0.003787 0.125 0.005 0.01291 0.046 0.1818 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 2400 COOPER AVE 1200 TAYLOR RD 5851 W73RD ST MERCED OWEGO BEDFORD PARK CA 95348 0.826 Screened Out NY 13827 0.155 Screened Out IL 60638 1.327 Screened Out 220 HANNA DR 3812 COMMERCE AVE 4606 NEWWDR 5200 SPEAKER RD 1425 EDEN RD PEKIN FAIRFIELD PASADENA KANSAS CITY YORK IL 61554 0.038 Screened Out AL 35064 2.1105 Screened Out TX 77507 0.034 Screened Out KS 66106 0.139 Screened Out PA 17402 0.0545 Screened Out 60 S SEIBERLING ST AKRON OH 44305 0.0025 Screened Out 7440 W DUPONT RD 923 MAULDIN RD 421 LONDON RD 137 FOLLY MILL RD 23343 SHERWOOD AVE 6937 W MILL RD 1500 LATH EM ST MORRIS CALHOUN DELAWARE SEABROOK WARREN MILWAUKEE BATAVIA IL 60450 0.3745 Screened Out GA 30701 0.0065 Screened Out OH 43015 0.031 Screened Out NH 03874 0.04955 Screened Out Mi 48091 0.25 Screened Out Wl 53218 0.0031 Screened Out IL 60510 1.4085 Screened Out 1111 HERCULES RD ONE MILL ST 1250 ST GEORGE ST HWY 110 N KM 5.1 14330 KINSMAN RD HOPEWELL VA 23860 0.0025 Screened Out KENEDY TX 78119 0.1009555 Screened Out EAST LIVERPOOL OH 43920 0.00501 Screened Out AGUADILLA PR 00605 3.2155 Screened Out BURTON OH 44021 0.0195 Screened Out HWY 353 S JONESBOROUGH TN 37659 0.0275 Screened Out 402 N 3TH ST 1525 MCKEE RD 200 SAFETY ST / HWY 453 101 CASE ST 2755 N MICHIGAN AVE 563 S LEONARD ST 1855 FAIRLAWN RD 555 HUNTSMAN RD SAINT JOSEPH DOVER HOLLY HILL FOUNTAIN INN GREENSBURG WATERBURY TUSCALOOSA MC INTOSH MO 64501 1.1175 Screened Out DE 19904 2.6355 Screened Out SC 29059 0.1225 Screened Out SC 29644 0.010345 Screened Out IN 47240 2.282 Screened Out CT 06708 0.0095 Screened Out AL 35401 0.932 Screened Out AL 36553 0.05115 Screened Out 3892 US HWY 90 6001 HWY 366 DAYTON PORTNECHES TX 77535 0.001 Screened Out TX 77651 0.11 Screened Out 7300 W BRADLEY RD 2545 BOND ST 114 N MAIN ST 700 HYUNDAI BLVD MILWAUKEE WI UNIVERSITY PARK IL COTTAGE GROVE Wl MONTGOMERY AL 53223 60466 53527 36105 0.0015 0.011 0.53 4.1085 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 2322 N MINGO RD TULSA OK 11636 HUNTINGTON GALLIPOLIS FERRY wv 3005 INTERNATIONAL BLVD AUGUSTA GA 3300 WESTINGHOUSE BLVD CHARLOTTE NO 2526 NWYEON AVE PORTLAND OR 800 CEL-RIVER RD ROCK HILL SC 1300 BRASS MILL RD BELCAMP MD 14705 S AVALON BLVD GARDENA CA 21255A HWY 1 S PLAOUEMINE LA 2009 WAVES LA CROSSE Wl 4500 S DOBSON RD MAIL STOP: CHANDLER AZ 004-005 4100 SARA RD M/S RR5-491 RIO RANCHO NM 2501 NW229TH ST HILLSBORO OR 14029 W HARDY HOUSTON TX 640 N ROCKY RIVER DR BEREA OH 6001 ANTOINE DR HOUSTON TX 74116 25515 30906 28273 97210 29730 21017 90248 70765 54601 85248 87124 97124 77060 44017 77091 2.65 0.373145 0.0004385 0.0065 0.0635 0.2125 1.52745 0.005 0.384 4.133 0.2225 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 0.4075 0.9525 0.002 0.005 0.1275 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 11 of 19 ED 001523 00008282-00396 Table C-3. Comparisons of 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tp Address 7600 HWY 10W 23247 WEAMES ST 2797 FREEDLAND RD 3055A FM 1006 405 INDUSTRIAL WAY 1615 MAIN ST 805 E OLD 56 HWY 3606 CRAFTSMAN BLVD City PINE HILL CHANNAHON HERMITAGE ORANGE DIXON PORTNECHES OLATHE LAKELAND State AL IL PA TX CA TX KS FL Zip Code 36769 60410 16148 77630 95620 77651 66061 33803 2011 Air Emissions (tpy) 0.058 0.0075 0.014 0.125 4.3915 0.132 2.002 0.163 Outcome Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 550-560 W CENTENNIAL BLVD CASA GRANDE AZ 1825 E NATIONAL AVE BRAZIL IN 875 PROGRESS CENTER AVE LAWRENCEVILLE GA 923 23RD AVE ROCKFORD IL 108 MAIN ST JAMESTOWN PA 501 RIVER DR MOLINE IL 37721 STEVENS BLVD WILLOUGHBY OH 325 S PRICE RD CHANDLER AZ 500E12TH ST BLOOMSBURG PA 7200 DOE AVE VISALIA CA 57 KAY INDUSTRIAL DR LAKE ORION Ml 8300 CAPITAL DR GREENSBORO NO 1445 S 15TH ST LOUISVILLE KY 1401 S 15TH ST LOUISVILLE KY 1 CYANAMID RD MOBILE AL 1188 CAYADUTTA ST RT 334 FONDA NY 2165 HWY 292 INMAN SC RT 329 BATH PA 9028 DICE RD SANTA FE SPRINGS CA SCIENCE RD NORWALK CT 16503 RAMSEY RD CROSBY TX 2430 ALBERT BROADFOOT ST BONHAM TX 85122 47834 30043 61104 16134 61265 44094 85224 17815 93291 48359 27409 40210 40210 36610 12068 29349 18014 90670 06852 77532 75418 0.26016 2.88926 2.6895 1.4165 0.201 1 0.125 0.0655 0.5055 0.7835 2.2135 0.0595 0.4475 1.3 0.1065 2.105 0.25 0.0025 0.255 0.00585 0.25 0.0355 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 1600S LAFLIN ST 4001 N HAWTHORNE ST HWY 59 AT COUNTY RD 212 CHICAGO CHATTANOOGA HUNGERFORD IL 60608 3.25 Screened Out TN 37406 0.0005255 Screened Out TX 77448 0.0495 Screened Out URB.APONTE #5 SAN LORENZO PR 9200 MASON AVE CHATSWORTH CA 725 S 75TH AVE WAUSAU Wl 1011 LOCKHEED WAY MZ 0824 PALMDALE CA 5565 RAIDERS RD FRAZEYSBURG OH 9550 W 55TH ST MC COOK IL 29400 LAKELAND BLVD WICKLIFFE OH 155 FREEDOM RD PAINESVILLE OH 1221 FARROW AVE FERNDALE Ml 260 S PACIFIC ST SAN MARCOS CA 700 S PARK DR NEWAYGO Ml 100WSTERRETT RD WAXAHACH1E TX 13300 E NELSON AVE CITY OF INDUSTRY CA 361 FAIRVIEWAVE BARBERTON OH 3134 POST RD WARWICK Rl 1304 OLIN AVE INDIANAPOLIS IN 00754 91311 54401 93599 43822 60525 44092 44077 48220 92078 49337 75165 91746 44203 02886 46222 0.00563 0.00017 0.372 0.478 0.164 0.0745 0.0365 0.0045 0.00374 0.2615 2.673 0.125 0.125 0.25 0.001055 0.002 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 235 E MARKET ST 1330 REGAL ROW 1002 EISENHOWER DR N 101 FAIRVIEWAVE 3725 N FIRST ST 9651 WESTOVER HILLS BLVD 7411 OAKWOOD ST LOUISVILLE DALLAS GOSHEN PITTSBURGH SAN JOSE SAN ANTONIO MEBANE KY 40202 0.5225 Screened Out TX 75247 0.00026 Screened Out IN 46526 4.193 Screened Out PA 15238 0.067 Screened Out CA 95134 0.0615 Screened Out TX 78251 0.188 Screened Out NO 27302 2.9255 Screened Out 5598 VIRGINIA AVE NORTH CHARLESTOr SC 29406 0.11118 Screened Out 400 CROSBY RD DERIDDER LA 1150 MARIETTA INDUSTRIAL DR MARIETTA GA NE 9133 CENTER AVE RANCHO CUCAMONC CA 951 PRISOCK RD JACKSON MS 9315 WATSON INDUSTRIAL PARK CRESTWOOD MO 9 KONZEN CT GRANITE CITY IL 600 CARDIGAN RD SHOREVIEW MN 70634 30062 91730 39272 63126 62040 55126 0.14 0.291 0.38345 4.4805 0.1325 0.51 0.0585 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 1048 STINSON DR 2434 BIRKDALE ST 100 N MITSUBISHI MOTORWAY 12306 MONTAGUE ST 8600 W 71 ST ST 1323S65TH READING LOS ANGELES NORMAL PACOIMA BEDFORD PARK MILWAUKEE PA 19605 0.25 Screened Out CA 90031 1.5 Screened Out IL 61761 1.0215 Screened Out CA 91331 0.1275 Screened Out IL 60501 1.168 Screened Out Wl 53214 1.5915 Screened Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 12 of 19 ED 001523 00008282-00397 Table C-3. Comparisons of 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tp Address 3500 S STATE RT 2 16052 INDUSTRIAL PKWY 150 GRAND VALLEY AVE 2281 S US 31 125 NALCO WAY/RT 65 3901 TERRY ST 812 RENAUD DR 7701 US HWY 90A 6717 S 61 ST WAVE 18310 ENTERPRISE AVE 1600 GLENLAKE AVE City FRIENDLY MIDDLEFIELD ORWELL SCOTTSBURG ELLWOOD CITY TEXARKANA SCOTT SUGAR LAND TULSA NASHVILLE ITASCA State WV OH OH IN PA TX LA TX OK IL IL Zip Code 26146 44062 44076 47170 16117 75501 70583 77478 74131 62263 60143 2011 Air Emissions (tpy) 2.197 0.047 0.07 0.000156929 0.00007224 0.0005 0.0008585 0.0553553 0.003785 0.379145 0.0005 Outcome Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 6125 URBANA RD SPRINGFIELD OH 1087 NN BRANCH ST CHICAGO IL 8501 HEDGE LN TERRACE SHAWNEE KS 2701 E 170TH ST LANSING IL 225 FORT ST NILES Ml 1107 E KIMBERLY ANAHEIM CA 1000 HAMILTON RD WEIRTON WV 16001 TRADE ZONE AVE UPPER MARLBORO MD 400 MAIN ST TEWKSBURY MA 5420 SPEAKER RD KANSAS CITY KS 3930 GLENWOOD DR CHARLOTTE NC 2011 TURNER ST LANSING Ml 3101 WOOD DR GARLAND TX 7710 POLK ST SAINT LOUIS MO 395 JAMES AVE SAINT PAUL MN 8500 S WILLOW SPRINGS RD WILLOWSPRINGS IL 2788 GLENDALE-MILFORD RD EVENDALE OH 20915 S WILMINGTON AVE CARSON CA 350 ROOSEVELT AVE CARTERET NJ 4550 NE EXPRESSWAY DORAVILLE GA 2461 CROCKER CIR FAIRFIELD CA 8901 OLD GALVESTON RD HOUSTON TX 200 NE 181 ST ST MIAMI FL 5125 W HANNA AVE TAMPA FL 1842 ENTERPRISE PKWY TWINSBURG OH 45502 60622 66227 60438 49120 92801 26062 20774 01876 66106 28208 48906 75041 63111 55102 60480 45241 90810 07008 30340 94533 77034 33162 33634 44087 3.815 0.405 3.6515 0.4055 2.1685 0.3635 1.577 0.0060048 0.083 0.086 0.14 0.146 0.191 0.1945 0.2615 0.5895 0.108 0.1 0.254 0.2285 0.0625 0.0315 0.102 0.033 0.0115 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 1610 E HIGHLAND RD TWINSBURG OH 44087 0.248 Screened Out 3900 HOLLAND RD 400 47TH ST 1044 S NELSON RD 2001 HWY 20 W 1725 ROCKINGHAM RD 628 S SARATOGA ST 705 6TH AVE SAGINAW NIAGARA FALLS FOUNTAIN INN DECATUR DAVENPORT COHOES MENOMINEE Ml 48601 2.0835 Screened Out NY 14304 0.0025 Screened Out SC 29644 0.1275 Screened Out AL 35601 1.207 Screened Out IA 52802 0.773 Screened Out NY 12047 0.001285 Screened Out Ml 49858 0.18 Screened Out 5800 W DR 2811 HOLMES RD 9574 FM 1227 11120 BEREA RD 16961 KNOTT AVE MANITOWOC HOUSTON NAVASOTA CLEVELAND LA MIRADA Wl 54220 2.588 Screened Out TX 77051 0.0025 Screened Out TX 77868 0.204565 Screened Out OH 44102 0.0585 Screened Out CA 90638 0.005 Screened Out 1 ICON ONE TOY ST 920 POTTERTOWN RD FOOTHILL RANCH CA 92610 0.1275 Screened Out BRYAN OH 43506 1.884 Screened Out MIDWAY TN 37809 0.0845 Screened Out TWO MILE RUN RD 1280 IMPERIAL RD 1455 J A COCHRAN BY-PASS 4837 HWY 81 S FRANKLIN HAMPTON CHESTER STARR PA 16323 0.248 Screened Out IA 50441 0.0055 Screened Out SC 29706 0.00098 Screened Out sc 29684 4.7895 Screened Out HWY 57 COUNCE TN 38326 0.025 Screened Out 91 MICHIGAN AVE PATERSON NJ 2600 WILCO BLVD WILSON NC 304 S BLAINE PIKE PORTLAND IN 400 E COTTAGE AVE CARPENTERSVILLE IL 2755 BERGEY RD HATFIELD PA 1801 ESTES AVE ELK GROVE VILLAGE IL 440 DENNISTON CT WHEELING IL 5008-11 CURTIS LN NEW IBERIA LA 6875 PARKLAND BLVD SOLON OH 9215 SANTA FE SPRINGS RD SANTA FE SPRINGS CA 11623 N HOUSTON ROSSLYN RD HOUSTON TX 1000 LAKE RD MEDINA OH 113BOLTE LN SAINT CLAIR MO 07503 27893 47371 60110 19440 60007 60090 70560 44139 90670 77086 44258 63077 0.845 0.000405 0.375 0.4295 3.016805 0.001 0.001 0.395 0.1275 0.369 0.106 0.0865 0.016 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 13 of 19 ED 001523 00008282-00398 Table C-3. Comparisons of 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tp Address 1000 INTEGRAM DR 105 BOLTE LN 46 STAFFORD ST 117 E 14TH AVE 513 PEASTER HWY 6804 ENTERPRISE DR 1377 OAKLE1GH DR City PACIFIC SAINT CLAIR LAWRENCE NORTH KANSAS CITY WEATHERFORD LOUISVILLE EAST POINT State MO MO MA MO TX KY GA Zip Code 63069 63077 01841 64116 76086 40214 30344 2011 Air Emissions (tpy) 0.025 0.066 0.998 1.0535 0.25 0.0007 0.4615 Outcome Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 400 S 13TH ST 3530 LANG RD LOUISVILLE HOUSTON KY 40203 0.1765 Screened Out TX 77092 0.0065 Screened Out 1886 LYNNBURY WOODS RD DOVER DE 19904 0.0025 Screened Out 1020 OLYMPIC DR BATAVIA IL 60510 0.821 Screened Out 500 PITTSBURGH AVE 760 PITTSBURGH DR 3800 W 143 ST 559 PITTSBURGH RD MCCARRAN DELAWARE CLEVELAND CIRCLEVILLE NV 89434 0.125 Screened Out OH 43015 0.06872 Screened Out OH 44111 1.0425 Screened Out OH 43113 0.1775 Screened Out 11601 UNITED ST 6754 SANTA BARBARA CT 5888 E COUNTY RD 180 3399 DAVEY ALLISON BLVD 4502 FREEDOM WAY 4301 S SPRING AVE 16402 JACINTOPORT BLVD 10420 N STATE ST 250 HALLS MILL RD 6 LONG ISLAND AVE MOJAVE ELKRIDGE BLYTHEVILLE HUEYTOWN WEIRTON SAINT LOUIS HOUSTON HARRISON FREEHOLD HOLTSVILLE CA 93501 0.016 Screened Out MD 21075 0.628695 Screened Out AR 72315 0.874 Screened Out AL 35023 2.5915 Screened Out WV 26062 2.6315 Screened Out MO 63116 3.355 Screened Out TX 77015 4.652 Screened Out OH 45030 0.125 Screened Out NJ 07728 0.004 Screened Out NY 11742 0.0125 Screened Out 211 RANDOLPH AVE AVENEL NJ 07001 0.0195 Screened Out 2233 26TH ST SW 401 N GREAT SWPKWY 5348 VINE ST 2200 LOWER MUSCATINE RD 1900 KANSAS AVE ALLENTOWN ARLINGTON CINCINNATI IOWA CITY KANSAS CITY PA 18103 0.5515 Screened Out TX 76011 3.266895 Screened Out OH 45217 0.0065 Screened Out IA 52240 0.0295 Screened Out KS 66105 0.00611 Screened Out TWO NICE-PAK PARK ORANGEBURG NY 10962 0.129005 Screened Out 9000 HUBBELL AVE 4581 LOWER VALLEY RD 420 W INDUSTRIAL AVE 100 W AIRPORT RD DETROIT ATGLEN EFFINGHAM STILLWATER Ml 48228 0.005 Screened Out PA 19310 0.47 Screened Out IL 62401 2.445 Screened Out OK 74075 2.0405 Screened Out 160 CENTURY LN STONEWALL WINCHESTER VA INDUSTRIAL PARK 50 JOHN HANCOCKRD TAUNTON MA 100 DUPLAINVILLE RD THE ROCK GA 555 S 108TH ST WEST ALLIS Wl 56 DUPLAINVILLE RD SARATOGA SPRINGS NY 1337 N WOOD BRANCH DR CHARLOTTE NO N92W14701 ANTHONY AVE MENOMONEE FALLS Wl 22603 02780 30285 53214 12866 28273 53051 4.053425 1.9616 2.395 3.505 3.8675 0.25 0.375 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 12255 FM 529 3201 LEBANON RD HOUSTON DANVILLE TX 77041 0.65 Screened Out KY 40422 4.1715 Screened Out 600 RADIATOR RD 408 MANOR-HARRISON CITY RD 799 RT 206 & HILLSBOROUGH RD INDIAN TRAIL HARRISON CITY HILLSBOROUGH NO 28079 0.146 Screened Out PA 15636 0.0065 Screened Out NJ 08844 0.0545 Screened Out 1016 E COLUMBIA ST 550 S EDWIN ST 249 ST LOUIS AVE 425 S PACE BLVD 237 S MOTOR AVE 601 CRESTWOOD ST 402 INDUSTRIAL PARK DR 133 BAIN DR 2481 RIVER RD EVANSVILLE WESTLAND VALLEY PARK PENSACOLA AZUSA JACKSONVILLE PELHAM LAVERGNE WELLSBURG IN 47711 1.047 Screened Out Ml 48186 2.7255 Screened Out MO 63088 0.512645 Screened Out FL 32502 1.7695 Screened Out CA 91702 0.005 Screened Out FL 32208 0.0025 Screened Out AL 35124 0.00425 Screened Out TN 37086 0.01117 Screened Out WV 26070 1.4 Screened Out 2ND ST & BLUEBALLAVE 577 BANKHEAD HWY 4202-24 MAIN ST 4901 STICKNEY AVE 1100 US HWY 271 S 2301 S 21 ST ST MARCUS HOOK WINDER PHILADELPHIA TOLEDO GILMER CLINTON PA 19061 0.192 Screened Out GA 30680 0.1985 Screened Out PA 19127 0.021111 Screened Out OH 43612 0.000945 Screened Out TX 75644 0.041 Screened Out IA 52732 0.6065 Screened Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 14 of 19 ED 001523 00008282-00399 Facility Name Table C-3. Comparisons of 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tp Address 1113 MARYLAND AVE 6123 N MARINE DR 2401 E PRATT BLVD 200 RT 413 455 FOREST ST City SHEBOYGAN PORTLAND ELK GROVE VILLAGE BRISTOL MARLBOROUGH State Wi OR IL PA MA Zip Code 53081 97203 60007 19007 01752 2011 Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0995 0.442 0.0015 0.2424 0.005 Outcome Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 800 CHASE AVE 1602 N UNION ST 100 QUALITY CT 60 SECURITY DR 6821 E COUNTY RD 1100 N 10519 INDUSTRIAL DR 321 WILSON DR 1300 SAUK AVE 19681 PACIFIC GATEWAY DR ELK GROVE VILLAGE IL FOSTORIA OH CHARLESTOWN IN AVON CT MATTOON IL PINEVILLE NO JEFFERSON CITY MO BARABOO WI TORRANCE CA 60007 44830 47111 06001 61938 28134 65109 53913 90502 0.2235 2.8505 2.103 1.5765 2.1105 1.9455 1.82586 4.422 2.433 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out ONE SHENANDOAH VALLEY DR STRASBURG VA 1645 W SAM HOUSTON PKWY N HOUSTON TX 2353 S BLUE ISLAND AVE CHICAGO IL 7401 KILMER LN MAPLE GROVE MN 1141 NW50TH ST SEATTLE WA 7850 OHIO RIVER RD LESAGE WV 8105 95TH ST PLEASANT PRAIRIE WI 16410 INDUSTRIAL LN WILLIAMSPORT MD 5540 NW HWY CHICAGO IL 6200 FRANKLIN BLVD SACRAMENTO CA 22657 77043 60608 55369 98107 25537 53158 21795 60630 95824 3.14 4.7265 0.1275 4.038 0.205 0.0135 0.75 0.271 1.194 0.125 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 130 A FRONTAGE RD 831 VOLUNTEER PKWY LEXINGTON MANCHESTER SC 29073 0.125 Screened Out TN 37355 0.3775 Screened Out 2905 OLD OAKWOOD RD 2500 ALUMAX RD 5325 NE SKYPORT WAY 601 TIGHTSQUEEZE INDUSTRIAL RD 610 S BOLMAR ST 2201 OLD SPANISH TRAIL GAINESVILLE YANKTON PORTLAND CHATHAM WESTCHESTER WESTLAKE GA 30504 2.317 Screened Out SD 57078 2.4011901 Screened Out OR 97218 1.71267935 Screened Out VA 24531 0.005 Screened Out PA 19382 0.005 Screened Out LA 70669 0.4905 Screened Out 8311 16THST STURTEVANT WI 53177 0.5 Screened Out 1990 SANDIFER BLVD 45 PARKER 227 S TOWN E BLVD 3801 E DECORAH RD 909 MAGNOLIA AVE 917 CROSBY AVE 608 CANAL ST 2150 W SAND LAKE RD 26300 FARGO AVE 14 INDUSTRIAL PARK 404 E MALLORY AVE 12401 INDUSTRIAL BLVD 2325 HOLLINS FERRY RD 6795 S MAIN ST 2121 NEW WORLD DR 1025 HOWARD ST 2802 W MILLER RD 113 STAGE COACH TRAIL 630 E13TH 180 CANAL ST 636 E 40TH ST 395 BOGGS LN - S 1000 MAIN ST 8000 RESEARCH WAY 11400W47TH ST 100 DAN RD 9901 SAND CREEK HWY 12130 LYNN AVE S SENECA SC IRVINE CA MESQUITE TX WEST BEND WI AUBURNDALE FL SYCAMORE IL CEDARTOWN GA ORLANDO FL BEDFORD HEIGHTS OH FLORA IL MEMPHIS TN VICTORVILLE CA BALTIMORE MD MORROW GA COLUMBUS OH GREENSBORO NO GARLAND TX GREENSBORO NO ANDOVER KS TERRE HAUTE IN HOLLAND MI RICHMOND KY ROTTERDAM JUNCTt NY SPRINGFIELD VA MINNETONKA MN CANTON MA WESTON Ml SAVAGE MN 29678 92618 75149 53095 33823 60178 30125 32809 44146 62839 38109 92392 21230 30260 43207 27403 75041 27409 67002 47808 49423 40475 12150 22153 55343 02021 49289 55378 2.35 0.001 1.963 0.206 0.398 0.6485 1.3205 0.0015 0.002 0.0035 0.0065 0.01 0.012 0.0145 0.0215 0.0265 0.028 0.049 0.0505 0.0635 0.106 0.342 0.02354 0.125 0.3015 0.433 0.25 0.575 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 2200 WILBUR AVE ANTIOCH CA 94509 2.067 Screened Out 8673 LYONS-MARENGO RD LYONS NY 14489 4.034 Screened Out N90 W14600 COMMERCE DR MENOMONEE FALLS WI 53051 4.2 Screened Out 1400 PLOVER RD PLOVER WI 54467 4.47 Screened Out 1701 WILLIAMSBURG PIKE RICHMOND IN 47375 0.202 Screened Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 15 of 19 ED 001523 00008282-00400 Table C-3. Comparisons of 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tp Address 350 JAYCEE DR VALMONT INDUSTRIAL PARK 201 BOSTON TURNPIKE 100 E LINCOLN AVE 2600 US HWY18E 6502 S US HWY 31 1854 CENTRAL FLORIDA PKWY 2755 HARBOR AVE City HAZLETON BOLTON SINCLAIR ALGONA EDINBURGH ORLANDO MEMPHIS State PA CT WY IA IN FL TN Zip Code 18201 06043 82334 50511 46124 32837 38113 2011 Air Emissions (tpy) 1.8125 Outcome Screened Out 0.0195 0.001 0.1205 0.2045 0.658 1.7065 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 1200 SE 32ND ST FT LAUDERDALE FL 33316 0.078 Screened Out 1335S 13TH ST 539 S DREW ST 1110 SPARTAN DR 13 MCCONNELL ST SW 535 BEV RD 1200 CENTRAL FLORIDA PKWY 716 S COLUMBUS AVE 3465 S LA CIENAGA BLVD 1701 E 122-NDST 355 LA HWY 3142 (GATE 1) LOUISVILLE MESA MAUMEE GRAND RAPIDS YOUNGSTOWN ORLANDO MOUNT VERNON LOS ANGELES CHICAGO TAFT KY 40210 0.1275 Screened Out AZ 85210 0.006 Screened Out OH 43537 0.0675 Screened Out Ml 49503 0.385 Screened Out OH 44512 0.75 Screened Out FL 32837 0.941 Screened Out NY 10550 0.4335 Screened Out CA 90016 3.358 Screened Out IL 60633 0.6265 Screened Out LA 70057 1.67 Screened Out 940 S 6TH AVE MANSFIELD TX 5134 LOOP RD JEFFERSONVILLE IN 222 W KALAMA RIVER RD KALAMA WA 7001 ALLISON-BONNET MEMORIAL FAIRFIELD AL D 11200 ARROW RT RANCHO CUCAMONC CA 300 NEW CENTURY PKWY NEW CENTURY KS 477 LEXINGTON AVE PAINESVILLE OH 2410 HWY 15S SUMTER SC 135 W LAKE ST NORTH LAKE IL 3301 HUNTING PARK AVE PHILADELPHIA PA 1380 FORD RD MAUMEE OH 2445 PRODUCTION DR SAINT CHARLES IL 400 W REGENT ST INDIANAPOLIS IN 1500 WESTERN AVE CONNERSVILLE IN 76063 47130 98625 35064 91730 66031 44077 29150 60164 19132 43537 60174 46225 47331 0.22855 1.87 0.735505 0.603375 0.087635 0.1475 1.0615 0.22 0.003 0.2045 0.966 1.2085 0.007065 0.074 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 4211 BRAMERS LN 320 NORTHPOINTE DR 402 N MAIN ST 3905 HWY 75 LOUISVILLE FAIRFIELD MIDDLEBURY SAINT GABRIEL KY 40216 0.0035 Screened Out OH 45014 0.004085 Screened Out IN 46540 0.712 Screened Out LA 70776 0.133 Screened Out 2675 ANTLER DR 267 UNION ST 4501 BRADLEY ST 3327 PIPELINE RD 18700 NE65TH ST 2500 RON BEAN BLVD 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE CARSON CITY NORTHVALE LUBBOCK CLEBURNE REDMOND SHREVEPORT MANDAN NV 89701 1.1335 Screened Out NJ 07647 0.0105 Screened Out TX 79415 4.36875 Screened Out TX 76033 0.1095 Screened Out WA 98052 4.7679 Screened Out LA 71115 0.6705 Screened Out ND 58554 1.0505 Screened Out 1801 SURVEYOR BLVD 13500 N CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY 12201 SWFWY MS600 6901 MCKISSOCKAVE CARROLLTON DALLAS STAFFORD SAINT LOUIS TX 75006 1.676 Screened Out TX 75243 0.114 Screened Out TX 77477 0.1275 Screened Out MO 63147 0.162 Screened Out 1790 BUILDING 21255 LA HWY 1 S MIDLAND PLAQUEMINE Ml 48667 2.29 Screened Out LA 70764 0.396 Screened Out 2025 EXCHANGE PL BESSEMER AL 3555 W 123RD ST ALSIP IL 2300 EDGEWATER AVE BALTIMORE MD 123W23RD AVE NORTH KANSAS CITY MO 2703 FREEMANSBURG AVE EASTON PA 2400 N HARVEY MITCHELL PKWY BRYAN TX 4343 KENNEDY AVE EAST CHICAGO IN 419 EDE SOTO AVE SAINT LOUIS MO 2040 HEISERMAN DR BRIGHTON Ml 715 RAILROAD AVE & HWY 74 RUTHERFORDTON NO 35023 60803 21222 64116 18045 77807 46312 63147 48114 28139 3.59 0.284 0.125 0.125 0.375 0.014 0.4655 0.125 0.00418 0.0055 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 1902 RAN KIN RD HOUSTON TX 77073 0.5125 Screened Out 1800 PARK PL AVE 201 JANDUS RD 4 OLD MONSON RD FORT WORTH CARY STAFFORD TX 76110 1.37545 Screened Out IL 60013 0.011 Screened Out CT 06075 3.9505 Screened Out 234 CASHMAN DR 407 MATHEW ST CHIPPEWA FALLS Wl 54729 0.793 Screened Out SANTA CLARA CA 95050 1.0005 Screened Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 16 of 19 ED 001523 00008282-00401 Table C-3. Comparisons of 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tp Address 3100 WMILL RD 1 STANTON ST City MILWAUKEE MARINETTE State Wl Wl Zip Code 53209 54143 2011 Air Emissions ftpy) 0.0905 0.026065 Outcome Screened Out Screened Out 5000 N FM 1912 HWY 50 W 437 MACCORKLE AVE SW AMARILLO TX HOLCOMB KS SOUTH CHARLESTON WV 79108 67851 25303 0.02 0.125 0.144 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 3 MALCOLM HOYT DR 320 37TH AVE 24671 TELEGRAPH RD 2600 S GARFIELD AVE 7050 W 71 ST ST 4051 S AVE NEWBURYPORT SAINT CHARLES SOUTHFIELD COMMERCE BEDFORD PARK TOLEDO MA 01950 0.0025 Screened Out IL 60174 0.1275 Screened Out Ml 48034 0.9615 Screened Out CA 90040 0.006 Screened Out IL 60499 0.00887 Screened Out OH 43615 0.0505 Screened Out 328 BUNOLA RIVER RD COLONIAL RD 30450 TRACY RD 3636 DAN MORTON DR BUNOLA SALEM WALBRIDGE DALLAS PA 15020 0.1275 Screened Out MA 01970 0.002 Screened Out OH 43465 0.00189 Screened Out TX 75236 0.25 Screened Out 1 ALCHEMY PL DORAVILLE GA 12 STANDEN DR HAMILTON OH 111 BRISBANE ST HOUSTON TX 11235 FM 529 HOUSTON TX 155 ELLIS RD S JACKSONVILLE FL 108 OAKDALE RD JAMESTOWN NO 200 DEAN SIEVERS PL MORRISVILLE PA 2400 S 170TH ST NEW BERLIN Wl 2145 SKYLAND CT NORCROSS GA 13395 HURON RIVER DR ROMULUS Ml 13900 CARMEN1TARD SANTA FE SPRINGS CA 21600 DRAKE RD STRONGSVILLE OH 6049 OLD 41A HWY TAMPA FL 1124 ELMHURST RD ELK GROVE VILLAGE IL INTERSECTION OF MO HWYS 7 & INDEPENDENCE MO 78 3171 NGAFFEYST SAN PEDRO CA 5449 W MAIN ST VERONA NY 2385 RIVERPORT RD MEMPHIS TN 301 LEROY ST THREE RIVERS TX 210 CROSBY ST PICAYUNE MS 100 HALE ST NEWBURYPORT MA 720 VAIDEN DR HERNANDO MS 1226 S MANUFACTURERS ROW TRENTON TN 10837 ETIWANDA AVE FONTANA CA 1700 S SHAWNEE ST MOUNT VERNON IL 1409 GREENEST MARIETTA OH 1333 N KIRK RD BATAVIA IL 7 MOBILE AVE SAUGET IL 125 FACTORY LN MIDDLESEX NJ HWY 73, 3.5 MILES W OF TAYLOR PORT ARTHUR TX BAYOU ANDROSCOGGIN MILL RILEY RD JAY ME 7619 DOANE DR MANASSAS VA 4646 S GRADY AVE TAMPA FL 10911 GRANITE ST CHARLOTTE NO 4051 FONDORF DR COLUMBUS OH 4021 N 56TH ST LINCOLN NE 400 N GOODYEAR RD MOUNT PLEASANT IA 2701 W OMAHA AVE NORFOLK NE 1521 POPLAR LN FOREST GROVE OR 1855 ESTES AVE ELK GROVE VILLAGE IL 2020 E ORANGETHORPE AVE FULLERTON CA 1020 ALBANY PLSE ORANGE CITY IA 197 MEISTER AVE BRANCHBURG NJ 150 MOONEY DR BOURBONNAIS IL 2340 US 301 N DUNN NO 22800 MOUND RD WARREN Ml 1200S8TH ST WEST MEMPHIS AR 575, 577, 579 CHIPETA WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 2895 GRAND AVE PITTSBURGH PA 30362 45015 77061 77041 32254 27282 19067 53151 30071 48174 90670 44136 33619 60007 64051 90731 13478 38109 78071 39466 01950 38632 38382 92337 62864 45750 60510 62201 08846 77640 04239 20109 33611 28273 43228 68504 52641 68701 97116 60007 92831 51041 08876 60914 28335 48091 72301 84108 15225 0.0065 0.25 0.25 0.75 0.0195 0.006 0.03 0.00702 0.0095 0.0805 0.0035 0.25 0.0065 0.6585 4.095 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 0.1275 0.0025 0.03 0.0395 0.019 0.0525 0.0615 0.385315 2.825 2.818 1.965 0.0105 0.0035 0.0595 0.011395 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 0.0025 2.198 1.9875 2.0745 2.43 0.0000014 0.0005 0.146845 3.6475 0.269 0.6185 0.0105 0.0015 1.299 0.1375 0.46 1.224 0.09024 0.775 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 616 HITE RD 2708 JARMAN 2305 MARKET ST EXT. 1735 SANDY LAKE RD 8875 INDUSTRIAL AVE 47 PARK AVE 215 BROWNSVILLE AVE HARWICK PA MUSKEGON HEIGHTS Ml WARREN PA CARROLLTON TX RANCHO CUCAMONC CA ELVERSON PA LIBERTY IN 15049 49444 16365 75006 91730 19520 47353 0.2505 0.2605 0.4305 0.602 0.875 0.065575 1.2345 Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 17 of 19 ED 001523 00008282-00402 Facility Name Table C-3. Comparisons of 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tp Address 838 S 16TH ST 930 ARMOUR RD 11440 W ADDISON AVE 125 MCFANNRD 2170 BUOY ST 3420 KOSSUTH ST City MANITOWOC OCONOMOWOC FRANKLIN PARK VALENCIA MEMPHIS LAFAYETTE State Wl Wl IL PA TN IN Zip Code 54220 53066 60131 16059 38113 47905 2011 Air Emissions (tpy) 0.03505 0.599 1.7385 1.1145 0.1275 0.6745 Outcome Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out Screened Out 300 INDUSTRIAL DR HAMPSHIRE 4220 S SARIVAL RD GOODYEAR 906 S POWELL WYNNEWOOD 1920 LEONARD AVE COLUMBUS 26500 CAPITOL AVE REDFORD 350 JOE FRANK HARRIS PKWY EMERSON 1310 SEABOARD INDUSTRIAL BLVD ATLANTA IL 60140 0.2525 Screened Out AZ 85338 0.1515 Screened Out OK 73098 0.0025 Screened Out OH 43219 0.25 Screened Out Ml 48239 0.0125 Screened Out GA 30137 0.019 Screened Out GA 30318 0.242 Screened Out 70 GA HWY 22 W MILLEDGEVILLE GA 31061 0.3775 Screened Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 18 of 19 ED 001523 00008282-00403 Facility Name Table C-3. Comparisons of 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to the Step A Screening Value of 4.9 tp Address 2011 Air City State Zip Code Emissions (tpy) Outcome tpy: tons per year 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 19 of 19 ED 001523 00008282-00404 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City AGUADILLA State PR Completed Survey N Zip Code 00605 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.1 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 9.4 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 9.5 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.1 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 2.2 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 2.4 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 3.2 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 3.2 CAROLINA MANATI PR N 00985 7.5 PR N 00674 NR 22.6 30.1 6.9 NR NR 0.0 20.7 27.6 6.0 18.1 24.2 0.1 0.1 NR NR NR CHRISTIANSTED V Isl N 00820 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.7 0.0 0.7 NR NR NR EAST MA N 01028 NR NR NR 2.3 0.1 2.4 NR NR NR LONGMEADOW DUDLEY MA N 01571 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR LAWRENCE MA N 01841 NR NR NR 0.9 0.0 0.9 1.0 0.0 1.0 LAWRENCE MA N 01843 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR LAWRENCE MA Y 01843 18.0 54.1 72.2 15.7 47.0 62.7 17.5 52.6 70.2 NEWBURYPORT MA N 01950 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.1 0.0 0.1 WARWICK Rl N 02886 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CRANSTON Rl N 02920 NR NR NR 0.1 5.7 5.7 0.1 5.7 5.7 MEREDITH NH N 03253 0.0 0.1 0.1 NR NR NR NR NR NR SEABROOK NH N 03874 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 WESTBROOK ME N 04098 0.0 15.0 15.0 0.0 23.5 23.5 0.0 35.2 35.2 BUCKSPORT HARTLAND ME N ME N 4416 NR 04943 0.1 NR NR 0.0 5.3 5.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 4.5 4.6 NR NR NR NEW BRITAIN CT N 06052 0.9 8.5 9.5 1.0 9.0 10.0 1.1 9.5 10.6 LINDEN NJ N 07036 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR LINDEN NJ N 07036 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR WOODBRIDGE NJ N 07095 0.0 2.9 2.9 0.1 6.8 6.8 0.1 8.8 8.9 NEWARK NEWARK NJ N 07105 NR NJ N 07105 0.4 NR NR 0.0 0.4 0.8 NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR 0.1 0.1 0.3 WAYNE NJ N 07470 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR BELVIDERE NJ N 07823 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR DEEPWATER NJ N 08023 0.1 0.0 0.1 NR NR NR 0.1 0.1 0.2 PALMYRA NJ N 08065 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR EDISON NJ N 08817 6.0 1.4 7.4 4.5 1.1 5.6 4.0 1.0 5.0 PERTH AMBOY NJ N 08861 NR SOMERVILLE NJ N 08876 0.0 MIDDLETOWN NY Y 10940 6.0 NR NR 0.1 0.0 0.0 NR 7.0 13.0 6.5 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 NR NR NR NR NR 7.5 14.0 8.0 9.5 17.5 EAST SETAUKET NY N 11733 NR HAUPPAUGE NY N 11788 0.7 ALBANY NY N 12204 NR NR NR 0.0 2.2 3.0 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR Page 1 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00405 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City NEW WINDSOR State NY Completed Survey Y Zip Code 12553 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 12.1 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 34.4 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 46.5 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 11.5 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 30.8 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 42.3 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 11.0 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 29.4 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 40.4 SARATOGA SPRINGS SARATOGA SPRINGS LOWVILLE VERONA AKRON NY Y 12866 3.3 NY N 12866 5.6 NY N 13367 0.1 NY N 13478 NR NY N 14001 0.0 15.0 18.3 3.4 0.3 5.9 NR 5.8 5.9 0.1 NR NR NR 7.4 7.4 0.0 17.0 20.4 3.3 16.0 19.3 NR NR 3.7 0.2 3.9 5.3 5.4 0.1 4.4 4.4 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.4 8.4 0.0 11.7 11.7 TONAWANDA NY N 14150 NR MARION NY N 14505 0.0 WEST HENRIETTA NY N 14586 0.0 NR NR 0.0 6.1 6.1 0.0 15.1 15.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 6.7 6.7 0.0 5.4 5.4 6.8 6.8 0.0 8.3 8.3 CHEMUNG BUNOLA NY N 14825 4.5 PA N 15020 NR 5.8 10.3 5.1 NR NR 0.0 7.1 12.2 4.0 6.5 10.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 CLAIRTON PA N 15025 5.5 0.0 5.5 14.5 0.0 14.5 41.0 0.0 41.0 LEETSDALE PA N 15056 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 MC KEESPORT PA N 15132 0.2 0.1 0.3 NR NR NR NR NR NR SPRINGDALE PA N 15144 5.5 0.0 5.5 5.2 0.1 5.3 5.8 0.1 5.8 WILMERDING PA N 15148 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 NR NR NR MANNS CHOICE PA N 15550 1.3 ELLWOOD CITY PA N 16117 NR JAMESTOWN PA N 16134 0.2 11.3 12.6 1.4 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.2 NR 12.7 14.1 1.4 12.8 14.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR 0.2 0.0 0.2 HERMITAGE PA N 16148 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CLARENDON PA N 16313 0.1 8.3 8.4 0.1 6.7 6.7 0.1 4.3 4.4 FRANKLIN PA N 16323 10.7 0.0 10.7 11.6 0.0 11.6 8.5 0.0 8.5 ERIE PA N 16502 4.7 0.0 4.7 NR NR NR NR NR NR HARRISBURG PA N 17104 NR NR NR 1.1 20.6 21.6 1.4 26.2 27.6 HANOVER PA N 17331 2.9 8.6 11.4 3.4 10.1 13.5 1.3 3.9 5.2 HANOVER PA N 17331 0.0 26.0 26.0 0.0 24.2 24.2 0.0 28.0 28.0 YORK PA N 17404 2.1 0.2 2.3 NR NR NR NR NR NR YORK PA N 17402 NR NR NR 1.2 0.0 1.2 1.0 0.0 1.0 LANCASTER PA N 17601 6.7 0.4 7.1 4.6 0.3 4.9 8.5 0.6 9.1 LANCASTER PA N 17601 5.3 0.4 5.7 6.2 0.4 6.6 7.4 0.5 7.9 Page 2 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00406 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City LANCASTER State PA Completed Survey N Zip Code 17603 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.9 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 0.4 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 1.3 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) NR 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) NR Total Air Emissions (tpy) NR Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) NR 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) NR Total Air Emissions (tpy) NR ALLENTOWN PA N 18106 0.0 SAYRE PA N 18840 NR 0.0 0.1 0.0 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 0.3 0.3 NR NR NR TOWAN DA PA N 18848 NR QUAKE RTOWN PA N 18951 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 NR NR 0.3 2.0 2.3 2.0 2.0 0.0 4.0 4.1 SOUTHAMPTON PA N 18966 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 7.5 7.6 WARMINSTER PA N 18974 0.4 0.7 1.1 2.1 1.5 3.6 3.1 3.0 6.0 CROYDON PA N 19021 0.1 0.0 0.1 NR NR NR NR NR NR MORRISVILLE PA N 19067 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 PHILADELPHIA PA N PHILADELPHIA PA N BLANDON PA N DOVER DE N BELCAMP MD N BALTIMORE MD N BALTIMORE MD N WILLIAMSPORT MD N HAGERSTOWN MD N MANASSAS VA N MONTROSS VA N WINCHESTER VA N FRONT ROYAL VA N MIDDLETOWN VA N 19120 2.0 19132 NR 19510 3.2 19904 0.0 21017 NR 21221 8.5 21222 NR 21795 NR 21742 NR 20109 NR 22520 NR 22603 3.2 22630 0.0 22645 0.0 8.1 10.1 1.4 NR NR 0.0 9.6 12.8 2.7 6.5 6.5 0.0 NR NR NR 25.5 34.0 8.5 NR NR 0.0 NR NR 0.0 NR NR 11.0 NR NR 2.0 NR NR 0.0 0.1 3.4 5.5 0.2 0.2 NR 0.0 0.0 NR 5.6 0.2 7.2 4.0 NR 25.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 4.2 0.3 NR NR 6.9 0.2 9.9 4.0 NR 34.1 0.1 0.0 11.0 2.1 4.2 5.7 NR NR 0.8 3.8 4.7 0.0 0.2 0.2 1.7 4.9 6.6 0.0 2.6 2.6 0.0 1.5 1.5 8.6 25.9 34.5 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 8.5 0.0 8.5 2.1 0.1 2.2 0.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 0.2 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HARRISONBURG VA Y 22802 36.1 4.3 40.4 38.8 3.6 42.4 45.2 3.1 48.3 ELKTON VI N 22827 0.7 0.8 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.4 NR NR NR ARVONIA VI N 23004 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR WILLIAMSBURG VA Y 23185 27.0 140.0 167.0 28.5 150.0 178.5 28.0 145.0 173.0 RICHMOND VI N 23228 NR NR NR 2.2 0.1 2.3 NR NR NR PETERSBURG VA N 23805 0.0 0.1 0.1 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 DUBLIN VI N 24084 NR NR NR 2.2 2.4 4.6 NR NR NR Page 3 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00407 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City SALEM State VI Completed Survey N Zip Code 24153 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 5.3 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 5.3 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) NR 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) NR Total Air Emissions (tpy) NR Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) NR 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) NR Total Air Emissions (tpy) NR GALAX VA N 24333 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.7 4.2 5.0 MARION VA N 24354 0.4 9.2 9.6 0.7 13.1 13.8 0.4 8.5 8.9 GROTTOES VI N 24441 0.0 0.0 0.1 NR NR NR NR NR NR LYNCHBURG VA N 24506 NR NR NR 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 WEIRTON WV N 26062 25.5 11.5 37.0 14.5 8.0 22.5 10.0 3.3 13.3 WEIRTON WV Y 26062 37.9 63.3 101.1 36.0 60.1 96.1 34.5 57.7 92.2 WEIRTON WV N CRAIGSVILLE WV N WINSTON-SALEM NC Y 26062 26205 27107 0.0 NR 28.3 5.7 NR 143.9 5.7 NR 172.2 0.0 0.1 31.2 7.2 2.9 157.6 7.2 3.0 188.8 0.0 NR 25.7 2.6 NR 110.5 2.6 NR 136.2 BURLINGTON NC N 27215 0.1 HIGH POINT NC N 27261 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 NR 0.0 0.2 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR HIGH POINT NC N 27263 NR JAMESTOWN NC N 27282 NR NR NR 0.0 17.9 17.9 0.0 16.0 16.0 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 MEBANE NC N 27302 11.3 0.0 11.3 NR NR NR 2.9 0.0 2.9 REIDSVILLE NC Y 27320 12.0 65.0 77.0 14.5 80.0 94.5 17.0 85.0 102.0 DURHAM TARBORO WILSON GASTONIA NC N NC N NC N NC N 27703 1.3 27886 0.2 27893 NR 28052 0.0 4.2 5.5 0.0 14.8 14.9 0.2 NR NR 0.0 7.1 7.1 0.0 6.6 6.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 16.6 16.8 0.2 16.4 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.2 7.2 0.0 6.0 6.0 HARRISBURG NC N MOUNT HOLLY NC N 28075 0.0 28120 0.0 6.7 6.7 0.0 31.5 31.5 0.0 5.4 5.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 NR NR NR CHARLOTTE CHARLOTTE NC N NC N 28273 0.1 28273 NR 0.1 0.3 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.1 0.1 0.3 NR NR 0.3 0.3 0.6 FAYETTEVILLE NC N 28306 NR MAXTON NC N 28364 3.0 LENOIR NC N 28645 3.7 NR NR 0.2 6.2 9.1 3.2 1.6 5.3 5.7 0.0 0.2 NR NR NR 7.0 10.2 3.1 6.7 9.8 1.3 7.0 4.7 1.1 5.7 Page 4 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00408 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City STATESVILLE State NC Completed Survey N Zip Code 28625 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.1 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 0.1 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 0.2 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) NR 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) NR Total Air Emissions (tpy) NR Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) NR 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) NR Total Air Emissions (tpy) NR BISHOPVILLE SC Y 29010 14.5 82.0 96.5 14.5 82.2 96.8 13.4 75.9 89.3 HOLLY HILL SC N 29059 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.1 0.1 LEXINGTON SC N 29073 0.0 2.2 2.2 0.0 9.7 9.7 0.0 0.1 0.1 ORANGEBURG SC N 29116 0.1 5.5 5.6 0.1 6.4 6.6 0.1 6.5 6.6 ENOREE SC N 29335 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR FLORENCE sc N 29501 8.5 0.9 9.4 8.9 0.8 9.8 11.0 1.3 12.2 CHERAW sc N 29520 19.6 2.5 22.1 21.4 2.7 24.1 21.2 2.7 23.9 CONWAY sc N 29526 0.9 1.1 2.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR MYRTLE BEACH sc Y 29577 7.2 2.1 9.4 3.4 2.5 5.9 1.7 1.0 2.7 GREENVILLE sc N 29605 NR NR NR 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.4 STARR sc N 29684 0.5 4.8 5.4 0.7 5.9 6.6 0.5 4.3 4.8 GREENWOOD sc N 29649 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 1.6 1.6 GREER sc Y MAULDIN sc N SENECA sc N CHESTER sc N AIKEN sc N CARROLLTON GA N ROME GA Y 29651 3.5 29662 0.0 29678 NR 29706 NR 29801 3.0 30117 0.1 30161 34.5 67.1 70.6 1.8 0.0 0.1 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.9 3.9 10.0 1.3 1.4 NR 15.0 49.5 33.5 89.4 0.0 NR 0.0 3.1 NR 22.0 91.2 0.0 NR 0.0 13.1 NR 55.5 2.5 NR 0.0 0.0 12.2 0.1 31.0 150.0 NR 2.4 0.0 2.3 1.3 13.5 152.5 NR 2.4 0.0 14.5 1.4 44.5 COVINGTON GA N 30014 0.4 0.3 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.9 NR NR NR MCDONOUGH GA N 30253 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.3 0.0 0.3 MCDONOUGH GA N 30253 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 NR NR NR MCDONOUGH GA N 30253 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 MC DONOUGH GA N 30253 NR NR NR 0.0 6.7 6.7 0.0 9.0 9.0 MC DONOUGH GA N 30253 0.0 8.7 8.7 0.0 THE ROCK GA N 30285 NR NR NR NR ATLANTA GA N 30339 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 DORAVILLE GA N 30362 NR NR NR NR LAVONIA ATHENS GA N 30553 NR GA N 30607 0.0 NR NR 0.0 10.8 10.8 0.0 Page 5 of 50 13.7 13.7 0.0 11.2 11.2 NR NR 2.3 0.1 2.4 0.1 0.2 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.2 11.2 0.0 17.3 17.3 2.4 2.4 0.0 5.2 5.2 ED 001523 00008282-00409 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City DALTON State GA Completed Survey N Zip Code 30721 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) l.i Total Air Emissions (tpy) l.i Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) l.i Total Air Emissions (tpy) l.i Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) NR 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) NR Total Air Emissions (tpy) NR DALTON GA N 30720 0.1 0.0 0.1 NR NR NR NR NR NR DUBLIN GA N 31021 9.5 0.4 9.9 9.3 0.3 9.6 9.0 0.4 9.4 MILLEDGEVILLE GA N 31061 NR NR NR 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.4 ROBINS AFB GA N 31098 1.6 0.9 2.5 2.4 0.4 2.8 NR NR NR HOMERVILLE GA N 31634 19.2 0.4 19.6 37.1 8.9 46.0 6.0 1.8 7.8 WEST POINT GA N 31833 NR NR NR 0.1 2.7 2.7 0.1 4.9 5.0 EDGEWATER FL N 32132 1.6 0.0 1.6 NR NR NR NR NR NR JACKSONVILLE FL N 32254 6.9 54.6 61.4 7.0 28.0 35.0 6.5 19.2 25.6 JACKSONVILLE FL N 32208 NR JACKSONVILLE FL N 32212 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.1 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 NR NR NR JACKSONVILLE FL N 32254 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WINTER GARDEN FL N 34787 1.3 ORLANDO FL N 32837 NR FT LAUDERDALE FL N 33316 NR 4.4 5.8 NR NR NR 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 1.2 1.2 0.0 0.9 0.9 NR NR 0.1 0.0 0.1 BUSHNELL FL N 33513 0.1 15.7 15.8 0.1 TAMPA FL N 33617 11.5 15.5 27.0 9.0 TAMPA FL N 33619 NR TAMPA FL N 33611 NR CLEARWATER FL N 33760 0.4 1 AKFI AND LAKELAND FI N 33801 9.3 FL N 33810 0.5 AUBURNDALE FL N 33823 NR NR NR 0.0 NR NR 1.8 0.0 0.4 NR 0.0 9.3 8.4 9.4 9.8 0.6 NR NR NR CLEARWATER FL N 33760 NR CLEARWATER FL N 33760 0.0 LEEDS AL N 35094 2.4 LINCOLN AL N 35096 0.2 NR NR 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 9.6 12.0 2.7 16.6 16.8 0.5 BIRMINGHAM AL N 35234 11.1 BIRMINGHAM AL N 35234 0.3 0.2 11.3 9.8 0.0 0.3 0.4 Page 6 of 50 14.8 15.0 0.0 0.2 NR 0.0 11.8 NR 0.1 0.2 10.9 23.5 0.1 0.0 14.9 24.0 0.0 1.9 NR 8.4 12.4 NR 0.1 0.2 13.7 24.0 9.9 0.4 0.1 8.0 0.0 1.8 NR 8.4 0.5 0.4 NR NR 2.7 0.5 12.2 NR 10.6 9.0 0.0 0.2 NR 0.0 8.5 0.0 NR NR 10.8 24.8 0.2 NR 10.7 17.0 0.0 2.0 NR 8.4 9.0 0.4 NR NR 13.5 25.3 12.4 NR ED 001523 00008282-00410 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City TUSCALOOSA TUSCALOOSA State AL AL Completed Survey N N Zip Code 35401 35401 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 0.0 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 0.0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 0.0 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 0.0 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 0.0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 0.0 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) NR NR 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) NR NR Total Air Emissions (tpy) NR NR VANCE AL N 35490 2.3 9.9 12.2 0.4 25.6 25.9 0.5 27.8 28.3 GUIN AL N 35563 0.0 GUIN AL N 35563 NR DECATUR AL N 35603 NR HUNTSVILLE AL N 35811 0.9 ALBERTVILLE AL N 35950 6.9 FORT PAYNE AL N 35967 5.1 ANNISTON AL N 36207 0.3 9.5 9.5 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR 13.4 14.3 0.8 6.9 13.8 NR 1.8 6.9 6.1 0.3 0.5 0.2 12.8 12.8 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 12.5 12.5 NR NR 1.0 18.3 19.3 12.8 13.6 0.6 7.9 8.5 NR NR NR NR NR 3.6 9.7 3.7 2.7 6.3 0.2 0.4 NR NR NR DOTHAN AL N 36303 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 5.3 5.3 GENEVA PINE HILL AL N 36340 0.0 4.5 4.5 0.0 5.1 5.1 0.1 12.7 12.8 AL N 36769 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.1 0.0 0.1 ASHLAND CITY TN N 37015 NR CLARKSVILLE TN N 37040 2.4 SHELBYVILLE TN N 37160 0.1 SMYRNA TN N 37167 1.4 NR NR 0.1 0.1 2.5 3.8 2.2 2.4 NR 31.9 33.3 1.3 10.3 10.4 0.1 9.3 9.4 0.6 4.4 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 34.3 35.6 0.0 30.7 30.7 SPRING HILL NASHVILLE NASHVILLE NASHVILLE CLEVELAND TN N 37174 0.2 TN N 37207 NR TN N 37209 0.2 TN N 37218 0.7 TN N 37311 0.0 18.0 18.2 0.0 NR NR 0.2 0.0 0.3 NR 6.5 7.2 1.7 8.6 8.6 0.0 3.3 3.3 NR NR NR 0.0 0.2 6.4 0.7 7.1 NR NR NR NR NR 15.0 16.7 16.5 1.9 18.4 6.3 6.3 0.0 6.3 6.3 DAYTON TN N 37321 0.0 MANCHESTER TN N 37355 1.1 MANCHESTER TN N 37355 NR 7.8 7.8 0.0 20.7 21.8 1.0 NR NR 0.1 8.6 8.6 0.0 6.6 6.6 19.3 20.3 1.7 32.5 34.2 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.4 CHATTANOOGA TN N 37402 13.8 0.0 13.8 16.7 0.0 16.7 23.9 0.0 23.9 CHATTANOOGA TN N 37416 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 11.0 11.0 ELIZABETHTON TN N 37643 0.0 1.0 1.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR Page 7 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00411 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City ONEIDA State TN Completed Survey N Zip Code 37841 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 6.6 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 6.6 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 5.2 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 5.2 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 4.7 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 4.7 SWEETWATER TN N 37874 10.7 0.0 10.7 12.2 0.0 12.2 13.1 0.0 13.1 KNOXVILLE TN N 37921 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR BROWNSVILLE TN N 38012 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 6.7 6.7 DYERSBURG DYERSBURG MEMPHIS MEMPHIS TN N 38024 0.0 TN N 38024 6.3 TN N 38109 NR TN N 38109 NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 6.4 1.4 NR NR 0.0 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 0.1 1.5 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MEMPHIS MEMPHIS TN N 38113 0.1 TN N 38113 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 6.8 6.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 NR NR NR 3.1 3.1 0.0 1.7 1.7 MEMPHIS TN N MEMPHIS TN N MEMPHIS TN N MEMPHIS TN N UNION CITY TN N UNION CITY TN N MILAN TN N TRENTON TN N BATESVILLE MS N HERNANDO MS N HERNANDO MS N OLIVE BRANCH MS Y 38113 38118 38118 38113 38261 38261 38358 38382 38606 38632 38632 38654 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR 0.0 NR 5.3 NR 22.5 0.2 NR 19.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 NR 0.0 NR 5.3 NR 2.7 2.0 NR 68.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 NR 0.0 NR 10.6 NR 25.3 2.2 NR 88.1 NR 0.0 NR 0.0 NR NR 10.1 NR 19.6 NR NR 20.6 NR 0.1 NR 0.1 NR NR 10.1 NR 2.9 NR NR 56.3 NR 0.1 NR 0.1 NR NR 20.2 NR 22.5 NR NR 76.8 NR NR NR 0.0 NR 0.5 8.4 0.0 19.3 NR 0.0 18.8 NR NR NR 0.1 NR 4.8 8.4 0.4 2.9 NR 0.0 63.5 NR NR NR 0.1 NR 5.3 16.8 0.4 22.2 NR 0.1 82.3 OLIVE BRANCH MS N OLIVE BRANCH MS N SHANNON MS N CANTON MS N 38654 0.4 38654 0.0 38868 0.3 39046 2.0 3.7 4.1 NR 0.0 0.0 NR 5.5 5.8 0.3 24.6 26.6 2.5 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 5.9 6.2 0.3 5.9 6.2 3.8 6.4 7.6 2.0 9.6 VICKSBURG MS N 39181 NR NR NR 10.4 0.0 10.4 14.1 0.0 14.1 JACKSON MS N 39272 0.0 5.1 5.1 0.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.5 4.5 JACKSON MS N 39272 12.3 1.3 13.6 10.1 0.9 11.0 9.9 1.0 10.9 NEWTON MS N 39345 6.3 0.0 6.3 8.6 0.0 8.6 9.6 0.0 9.6 PASCAGOULA MS N 39581 NR NR NR 0.1 0.0 0.1 NR NR NR Page 8 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00412 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City BARDSTOWN LOUISVILLE LOUISVILLE LOUISVILLE LOUISVILLE LOUISVILLE State KY KY KY KY KY KY Completed Survey N N N N N Y Zip Code 40004 40210 40211 40213 40210 40241 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 NR 0.1 0.1 NR 0.9 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 NR 0.0 12.0 NR 32.5 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 NR 0.1 12.1 NR 33.4 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) NR NR NR 0.2 NR 2.4 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) NR NR NR 1.6 NR 33.0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) NR NR NR 1.8 NR 35.4 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) NR 0.4 NR NR 1.3 3.3 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) NR 0.0 NR NR 0.0 41.0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) NR 0.4 NR NR 1.3 44.3 GEORGETOWN KY N 40324 0.1 5.4 5.5 0.4 12.3 12.7 0.2 9.2 9.4 HARRODSBURG KY N 40330 1.2 MOREHEAD KY N 40351 0.0 10.8 12.0 NR 0.2 0.2 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR PARIS KY N 40361 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 NR NR NR BEREA KY N 40403 0.2 11.1 11.3 0.3 16.1 16.5 0.1 14.7 14.8 LEXINGTON KY N 40511 0.0 9.0 9.0 0.0 FLORENCE KY N 41042 1.4 26.2 27.5 1.7 INDEPENDENCE KY N 41051 NR NR NR 0.1 CALVERT CITY KY N 42029 NR NR NR 0.0 HOPKINSVILLE KY N 42240 0.0 5.1 5.1 0.0 RUSSELLVILLE KY N 42276 0.0 5.5 5.5 0.0 HAWESVILLE KY N 42348 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 HEBRON OH N 43025 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR MARYSVILLE OH N 43040 10.1 34.8 44.9 3.8 9.5 9.5 0.1 9.0 9.1 33.2 34.9 3.5 31.3 34.7 0.1 0.3 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 0.5 0.5 NR NR NR 5.4 5.4 0.0 4.9 4.9 0.6 0.6 0.0 5.2 5.2 NR NR NR NR NR 38.5 42.3 2.7 37.5 40.2 URBANA COLUMBUS OH N 43078 0.0 14.1 14.1 0.0 14.2 14.2 NR NR NR OH Y 43213 20.0 50.0 70.0 11.5 65.0 76.5 12.0 70.0 82.0 MARION OH Y 43302 0.1 55.8 55.8 0.1 57.2 57.2 0.1 51.4 51.5 EAST LIBERTY OH N 43319 2.0 27.5 29.5 2.2 45.0 47.2 2.3 36.0 38.3 CLYDE FREMONT OH N 43410 1.1 34.3 35.4 0.7 22.6 23.4 NR NR NR OH Y 43420 17.9 102.2 120.1 15.9 90.4 106.3 19.0 107.9 127.0 ROSSFORD OH N NAPOLEON OH N WHITE HOUSE OH Y 43460 43545 43571 0.0 2.4 16.5 6.0 6.6 31.6 6.0 9.0 48.1 0.0 2.3 23.2 7.4 6.0 44.6 7.4 8.3 67.8 0.0 5.4 24.9 7.8 7.4 51.5 7.8 12.7 76.3 Page 9 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00413 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City TOLEDO State OH Completed Survey N Zip Code 43607 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 7.6 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 7.6 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 13.3 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 13.3 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 13.1 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 13.1 TOLEDO TOLEDO OH N 43608 3.0 OH N 43612 0.4 21.0 24.0 4.7 0.9 1.3 0.5 33.0 37.7 NR NR NR 1.1 1.6 2.1 14.5 16.6 TOLEDO ZANESVILLE OH N 43612 2.8 OH N 43701 0.0 8.4 11.2 3.5 2.5 2.5 0.0 10.4 13.8 3.2 4.7 4.7 0.0 9.5 12.7 6.0 6.0 BEREA OH N 44017 NR BURTON OH N 44021 NR CHAGRIN FALLS OH N 44023 0.0 MIDDLEFIELD OH N 44062 NR CLEVELAND OH N 44105 0.0 CLEVELAND OH N 44102 NR STRONGSVILLE OH N 44136 NR WALTON HILLS OH N 44146 NR NR NR 0.0 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 0.1 16.1 16.1 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.1 NR NR NR 21.2 21.2 0.0 17.3 17.3 NR NR 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CUYAHOGA FALLS OH N 44223 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BRIMFIELD MEDINA MEDINA AKRON OH N 44240 9.0 OH N 44258 NR OH N 44256 NR OH N 44305 NR 0.0 9.0 NR NR NR 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 NR NR 5.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 NR NR 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CANFIELD OH N 44406 0.0 1.1 1.1 NR NR NR 0.0 2.0 2.0 LORDSTOWN OH N 44481 12.0 0.2 12.2 3.2 0.8 3.9 4.0 1.1 5.0 WARREN OH N 44483 2.1 WARREN OH N 44483 4.7 YOUNGSTOWN OH N 44502 0.0 BOARDMAN OH N 44512 0.8 YOUNGSTOWN OH N 44512 0.4 NEW OH N 44663 NR PHILADELPHIA WOOSTER OH N 44691 0.3 3.7 5.8 1.6 11.3 15.9 3.5 0.0 0.0 NR 8.4 9.2 NR 18.1 18.4 0.3 NR NR 0.0 10.5 10.8 0.4 5.7 7.3 1.6 5.8 7.4 8.6 12.1 4.6 10.4 15.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 16.2 16.5 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.4 13.8 0.4 13.0 13.4 NORWALK OH N 44857 0.0 10.0 10.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR SANDUSKY OH N 44870 NR NR NR 0.1 0.0 0.1 NR NR NR Page 10 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00414 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City WILLARD MANSFIELD LEBANON State OH OH OH Completed Survey N N N Zip Code 44890 44903 45036 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 6.1 NR NR 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 2.4 NR NR Total Air Emissions (tpy) 8.4 NR NR Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 7.5 0.0 0.6 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 2.4 0.0 0.0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 9.9 0.0 0.6 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 6.9 NR 0.6 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 1.9 NR 0.0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 8.7 NR 0.6 LEBANON MASON OH N 45036 2.9 OH N 45040 0.4 0.4 3.4 3.1 0.1 3.2 NR NR NR 7.5 7.9 0.1 11.7 11.8 0.1 12.6 12.7 CINCINNATI BLUE ASH CINCINNATI OH N 45217 NR OH N 45242 0.5 OH N 45242 2.5 NR NR NR 0.0 0.5 NR 7.9 10.5 5.7 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR 19.9 25.6 7.5 25.0 32.5 CINCINNATI OH N 45246 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR SIDNEY OH N 45365 0.7 SIDNEY OH N 45365 0.0 SPRINGFIELD OH N 45502 0.6 WAVERLY OH N 45690 0.0 4.0 4.6 0.8 11.2 11.2 0.0 5.0 5.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.0 4.2 5.0 0.7 11.5 12.2 12.7 12.7 0.0 11.9 11.9 5.5 6.1 0.4 3.4 3.8 1.2 1.2 NR NR NR FINDLAY OH Y 45840 24.5 130.0 154.5 25.0 130.0 155.0 25.5 135.0 160.5 FINDLAY OH N 45840 2.3 FORT RECOVERY OH N 45846 0.0 PAULDING OH N 45879 NR 20.6 22.8 2.2 1.7 1.7 NR NR NR 0.0 20.1 22.4 2.2 19.4 21.5 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR SAINT MARYS OH N 45885 0.0 4.7 4.7 0.0 6.7 6.7 0.0 7.5 7.5 FRANKFORT IN N 46041 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR GREENCASTLE IN N 46135 0.0 3.1 3.1 NR NR NR 1.4 5.4 6.8 GREENFIELD IN N 46140 0.0 18.3 18.4 0.0 24.3 24.3 0.0 7.8 7.8 INDIANAPOLIS IN N 46203 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR INDIANAPOLIS IN N 46218 0.3 1.2 1.5 0.2 0.9 1.1 NR NR NR INDIANAPOLIS IN N 46219 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR INDIANAPOLIS IN N 46222 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 INDIANAPOLIS IN N 46225 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR INDIANAPOLIS IN N 46226 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR INDIANAPOLIS IN N 46268 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR EAST CHICAGO IN N 46312 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.5 0.0 0.5 Page 11 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00415 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City HAMMOND State IN Completed Survey N Zip Code 46320 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 6.0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 6.0 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 6.3 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 6.3 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 5.9 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 5.9 LA PORTE LA PORTE IN N 46350 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 7.7 7.7 0.0 6.9 6.9 IN Y 46350 12.5 54.5 67.0 12.9 55.5 68.4 12.2 53.2 65.4 SCHERERVILLE IN N 46375 0.1 WHITING IN N 46394 NR 0.0 0.1 0.0 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BREMEN IN N 46506 0.0 GOSHEN IN N 46526 NR MIDDLEBURY IN N 46540 NR 0.3 0.3 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.3 0.3 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 4.2 4.2 3.2 3.2 0.0 5.4 5.4 MISHAWAKA IN N 46545 NR WARSAW IN N 46580 0.0 ASHLEY IN N 46705 NR BUTLER IN N 46721 0.0 BUTLER IN N 46721 0.0 ROANOKE IN N 46783 0.5 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.0 31.0 0.0 7.0 7.5 0.7 8.2 8.2 NR NR NR 0.0 0.1 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 29.8 29.8 0.0 24.4 24.4 11.5 12.2 0.7 14.5 15.2 SAINT JOE IN N 46785 4.2 1.7 5.9 3.6 2.8 6.4 2.9 5.4 8.2 AURORA BATESVILLE IN N 47001 0.0 107.6 107.6 0.0 68.2 68.2 NR NR NR IN N 47006 0.2 3.3 3.5 0.3 5.0 5.3 0.3 5.1 5.4 COLUMBUS IN N 47201 0.0 5.3 5.3 0.0 7.0 7.0 0.0 6.0 6.0 PORTLAND IN N 47371 NR NR NR 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.4 BLOOMINGTON IN N 47404 0.0 11.0 11.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 0.0 6.5 6.5 ASHLEY IN N 46705 0.5 4.4 4.8 1.1 9.1 10.1 0.6 5.4 6.0 MOUNT VERNON IN N 47620 2.7 1.7 4.4 1.3 0.8 2.1 3.2 2.1 5.3 NEWBURGH IN N 47629 0.0 14.5 14.5 0.0 7.0 7.0 0.0 8.5 8.5 PRINCETON IN N 47670 9.8 6.3 16.1 10.3 13.8 24.2 12.6 5.4 18.0 EVANSVILLE BRAZIL LAFAYETTE IN N 47710 1.9 IN N 47834 NR IN N 47905 0.2 6.8 NR 21.9 8.7 NR 22.1 11.2 0.1 0.4 2.8 0.3 35.3 13.9 0.4 35.7 11.7 0.6 0.3 3.7 2.3 29.3 15.4 2.9 29.6 CRAWFORDSVILLE IN N 47933 10.0 3.7 13.8 13.8 5.2 19.0 15.7 5.9 21.6 Page 12 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00416 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City State CRAWFORDSVILLE IN Completed Survey N Zip Code 47933 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 5.1 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 4.8 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 9.9 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 6.8 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 0.3 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 7.1 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 6.3 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 0.3 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 6.6 KENTLAND IN N 47951 0.3 3.1 3.4 NR NR NR NR NR NR MONTI CELLO IN N 47960 26.0 10.0 36.0 12.5 16.0 28.5 14.5 18.5 33.0 VEEDERSBURG IN N 47987 0.0 LAKE ORION Ml N 48359 6.5 LAKE ORION Ml N 48359 NR PONTIAC Ml N 48341 0.3 MADISON Ml N 48071 0.0 HEIGHTS STERLING HEIGHTS Ml N 48313 2.0 2.3 2.4 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.8 7.3 NR NR NR 0.9 0.9 1.8 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 2.2 2.2 3.1 3.4 NR NR NR NR NR NR 7.4 7.4 0.0 11.8 11.8 0.0 12.4 12.4 0.8 2.9 3.2 1.3 4.5 4.4 1.8 6.2 STERLING HEIGHTS Ml N 48314 0.0 0.8 0.8 NR NR NR NR NR NR WARREN Ml N 48091 6.0 0.7 6.7 5.5 0.4 5.9 8.5 0.2 8.7 BELLEVILLE DEARBORN Ml N 48111 NR Ml Y 48121 3.8 NR NR 0.0 85.0 88.8 1.5 0.0 65.0 0.0 66.5 NR NR NR 1.2 65.0 66.2 FLAT ROCK Ml N 48134 0.0 12.6 12.6 0.5 4.8 5.3 0.2 4.7 4.9 ROMULUS Ml N 48174 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 SALINE Ml N 48176 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.1 3.5 3.6 WAYNE Ml N 48184 0.1 8.5 8.6 0.1 11.0 11.1 NR NR NR WAYNE Ml N 48184 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.1 6.0 6.1 WAYNE DETROIT DETROIT Ml N 48184 NR Ml N 48207 NR Ml N 48215 6.5 NR NR 0.1 NR NR 0.0 20.0 26.5 4.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 5.4 5.4 0.0 7.4 7.4 31.5 35.6 6.0 50.0 56.0 DETROIT REDFORD DETROIT Ml N 48228 NR Ml N 48239 NR Ml N 48234 0.1 NR NR 0.0 NR NR NR 0.0 0.1 NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR FLINT Ml N 48552 0.3 35.5 35.8 0.5 24.5 25.0 0.7 25.5 26.2 Page 13 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00417 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City LANSING State Ml Completed Survey N Zip Code 48917 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.2 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 8.5 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 8.7 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.5 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 23.0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 23.5 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.6 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 24.0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 24.6 LANSING Ml N 48921 3.6 3.1 6.7 3.5 4.1 7.6 2.6 3.2 5.8 KALAMAZOO Ml N 49007 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 8.6 8.6 WHITE PIGEON Ml N 49099 0.0 JACKSON Ml N 49203 NR ADRIAN Ml N 49221 NR CALEDONIA Ml N 49316 0.2 18.3 18.3 0.0 NR NR 0.0 NR NR NR 0.1 0.3 NR 26.3 26.3 0.0 16.1 16.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR MIDDLEVILLE Ml N 49333 0.0 NEWAYGO Ml N 49337 NR 5.8 5.8 0.0 NR NR 1.1 6.3 6.3 0.0 7.1 7.1 2.7 3.8 1.5 1.2 2.7 MUSKEGON Ml N 49444 NR HEIGHTS GRAND RAPIDS Ml N 49503 NR CADILLAC Ml N 49601 NR ANKENY IA N 50023 NR KNOXVILLE IA N 50138 0.0 PELLA IA N 50219 0.1 FORT DODGE IA N 50501 NR NR NR 0.1 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR 14.4 14.6 0.1 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.3 NR NR 0.0 0.4 0.4 NR NR 0.1 0.0 0.1 7.0 7.0 0.0 21.2 21.2 NR NR NR NR NR 20.3 20.4 0.1 19.4 19.5 6.5 6.5 0.0 13.7 13.7 CEDAR FALLS IA N 50613 0.0 ORANGE CITY IA N 51041 NR CARROLL IA N 51401 NR 6.0 6.0 0.0 NR NR 0.0 NR NR 0.0 5.7 5.7 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.1 5.1 0.0 5.6 5.6 MISSOURI VALLEY IA N 51555 0.0 6.0 6.0 0.0 7.8 7.8 0.0 5.5 5.5 CEDAR RAPIDS IA N 52404 NR BURLINGTON IA N 52601 0.2 MUSCATINE IA N 52761 0.0 CHILTON Wl N 53014 NR NR NR 0.6 5.5 5.7 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 0.0 0.6 NR NR NR 8.0 8.2 0.2 11.0 11.2 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR 6.3 0.0 6.3 CHILTON Wl N 53014 0.9 4.3 5.3 0.9 4.9 5.8 0.2 5.0 5.3 HARTFORD HARTFORD HORICON LOMIRA Wl N 53027 0.1 10.6 10.8 0.1 7.6 7.7 0.1 8.7 8.8 Wl N 53027 12.0 0.4 12.4 13.5 0.4 13.9 11.5 0.4 11.9 Wl N 53032 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 5.5 5.5 Wl N 53048 NR NR NR 2.6 0.3 2.8 4.8 0.5 5.4 Page 14 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00418 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City MENOMONEE FALLS OCONOMOWOC State Wl Completed Survey N Zip Code 53051 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) NR 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) NR Total Air Emissions (tpy) NR Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.3 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 0.3 Wl N 53066 1.8 7.1 8.8 1.7 8.3 10.0 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.4 1.3 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 5.2 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 0.4 6.5 OCONOMOWOC Wl N 53066 NR SHEBOYGAN FALLS Wl N 53085 0.0 NR NR NR 13.1 13.1 0.0 NR NR 0.0 0.6 0.6 13.9 13.9 0.0 12.7 12.7 SUSSEX Wl N 53089 8.3 WATERTOWN Wl N 53094 NR NEW BERLIN Wl N 53151 NR OAK CREEK Wl N 53154 NR 0.9 9.2 8.6 1.0 9.6 11.6 1.3 12.9 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR 0.0 20.3 20.3 0.0 18.6 18.6 OAK CREEK Wl N 53154 15.5 0.4 15.9 25.2 0.4 25.6 35.2 0.4 35.6 TWIN LAKES Wl N 53181 NR NR NR 0.0 0.8 0.8 0.0 1.4 1.4 WAUKESHA Wl N 53186 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 SAINT FRANCIS Wl N 53235 0.0 6.6 6.6 0.0 7.1 7.1 0.0 9.8 9.8 MILWAUKEE Wl N 53207 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR MILWAUKEE Wl N 53209 NR NR NR 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 MILWAUKEE Wl N 53212 0.0 14.9 14.9 0.0 15.5 15.5 NR NR NR WEST ALLIS Wl N 53214 NR NR NR 3.2 0.1 3.3 3.4 0.1 3.5 MILWAUKEE Wl N 53223 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.3 NR NR NR MILWAUKEE Wl N 53224 9.1 0.0 9.1 9.3 0.0 9.3 9.4 0.0 9.4 MILWAUKEE Wl N 53224 35.5 7.0 42.5 29.0 9.0 38.0 27.5 7.5 35.0 MILWAUKEE Wl N 53226 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR STURTEVANT Wl N 53177 NR FORT ATKINSON Wl N 53538 3.6 BARABOO Wl N 53913 NR BARABOO Wl N 53913 0.0 MARINETTE Wl N 54143 0.0 MANITOWOC Wl N 54220 NR NR NR NR 11.0 14.6 3.9 NR NR NR 29.8 29.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.3 0.0 0.3 17.0 20.9 3.5 8.5 12.0 NR NR 4.2 0.2 4.4 30.6 30.6 0.0 25.7 25.7 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 PLOVER Wl Y 54467 10.8 40.0 50.8 7.6 27.8 35.4 1.3 3.2 4.5 LA CROSSE Wl Y 54603 22.8 TO MAH Wl N 54660 0.0 TOMAH Wl N 54660 NR MENOMONIE Wl N 54751 1.5 1.7 24.5 22.1 2.0 2.0 0.0 NR NR NR 5.8 7.3 1.6 1.7 23.8 24.0 1.8 25.8 3.3 3.3 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 5.4 5.4 6.3 7.9 1.6 6.2 7.8 OSHKOSH Wl N 54903 0.6 0.0 0.6 NR NR NR NR NR NR Page 15 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00419 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City WAUPACA LAKEVILLE OWATONNA REDWING SAINT PAUL State Wl MN MN MN MN Completed Survey N N Y N Y Zip Code 54981 55044 55060 55066 55107 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.4 0.0 29.3 0.0 14.0 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 4.0 0.0 87.7 22.8 79.5 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 4.5 0.0 117.1 22.8 93.5 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.9 0.0 30.7 0.0 13.4 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 7.7 0.0 91.9 27.6 76.1 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 8.6 0.0 122.6 27.6 89.5 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 1.0 NR 31.9 0.0 11.8 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 9.4 NR 95.7 24.4 67.0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 10.4 NR 127.6 24.4 78.8 SAINT PAUL MN N 55116 0.4 3.0 3.4 0.4 4.2 4.6 0.1 7.0 7.1 ROSEMOUNT MN N HOPKINS MN N MAPLE GROVE MN N WACONIA MN N MINNEAPOLIS MN N 55068 0.8 55343 NR 55369 NR 55387 0.0 55416 NR 0.0 0.8 0.6 NR NR 0.0 NR NR NR 5.1 5.1 NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.6 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR 3.9 0.1 4.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 6.3 6.3 WASECA MN N COTTONWOOD MN N SAINT CLOUD MN N YANKTON SD N GWINNER ND N ELK GROVE IL N VILLAGE ELK GROVE IL N VILLAGE ELK GROVE IL N VILLAGE DES PLAINES IL N LAKE BLUFF IL N 56093 4.3 56229 0.5 56303 4.6 57078 0.0 58040 NR 60007 1.4 60007 NR 60007 0.0 60016 NR 60044 0.1 0.1 4.3 4.4 4.8 5.3 NR 0.1 4.7 7.1 24.4 24.4 0.0 NR NR 0.0 5.4 6.8 2.1 NR NR NR 0.5 0.5 0.0 NR NR 0.0 5.0 5.1 NR 0.1 4.5 6.7 0.1 6.8 NR NR NR NR NR 0.3 7.3 5.7 0.2 5.9 6.3 6.3 0.0 2.4 2.4 6.0 6.0 NR NR NR 8.4 10.4 1.8 7.0 8.8 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 NR NR NR 0.4 0.4 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR WOODSTOCK IL N 60098 4.0 ADDISON IL N 60101 NR 0.1 4.1 3.9 NR NR 0.0 0.1 4.0 6.1 0.1 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ELGIN IL N 60120 1.7 8.5 10.2 0.9 7.5 8.4 0.4 1.4 1.8 ELGIN IL N 60123 NR NR NR 0.0 0.2 0.2 NR NR NR FRANKLIN PARK IL N 60131 NR HAMPSHIRE IL N 60140 NR BROADVIEW IL N 60153 2.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.1 2.1 NR NR NR 0.0 1.7 1.7 NR NR 0.3 0.0 0.3 NR NR NR NR NR NORTHLAKE SYCAMORE IL N 60164 NR IL N 60178 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR 0.0 10.1 10.1 0.0 6.7 6.7 Page 16 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00420 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City State SYCAMORE IL CAROL STREAM IL ALSIP IL CHANNAHON IL CHICAGO HEIGHTS IL Completed Survey N N N N N Zip Code 60178 60188 60803 60410 60411 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) NR 0.5 NR 0.0 6.3 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) NR 2.0 NR 0.0 25.1 Total Air Emissions (tpy) NR 2.5 NR 0.0 31.4 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.4 1.1 NR NR 7.5 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 0.1 4.4 NR NR 30.0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 0.4 5.5 NR NR 37.5 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.6 1.8 0.2 NR 7.2 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 0.1 7.0 0.1 NR 28.7 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 0.6 8.8 0.3 NR 35.9 HARVEY IL N 60426 10.0 5.9 15.9 16.1 9.5 25.5 4.3 2.5 6.9 HOMEWOOD IL N 60430 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR MIDLOTHIAN IL N 60445 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR BRIDGEVIEW IL N 60455 0.9 7.6 8.4 1.0 8.6 9.5 0.9 7.5 8.4 BEDFORD PARK IL N 60499 0.0 0.0 0.1 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 BEDFORD PARK IL N 60501 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR AURORA IL N 60504 7.9 1.0 8.9 7.0 0.8 7.8 5.1 0.7 5.8 WOODRIDGE IL N 60517 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR CHICAGO CHICAGO CHICAGO IL N 60608 1.0 8.8 9.8 1.1 13.2 14.3 2.7 0.6 3.3 IL N 60609 0.0 25.7 25.7 0.0 43.1 43.1 0.0 33.9 33.9 IL Y 60609 13.6 51.7 65.4 14.2 53.8 68.0 6.5 26.6 33.2 CHICAGO CHICAGO CHICAGO CHICAGO CHICAGO ALSIP BRADLEY BELVIDERE IL N 60623 1.3 5.9 7.2 1.5 9.7 11.2 0.9 9.9 10.8 IL N 60623 4.4 2.9 7.3 6.8 18.7 25.5 7.2 15.7 23.0 IL N 60623 1.1 9.1 10.2 1.2 10.1 11.3 1.4 10.9 12.3 IL N 60624 1.4 5.3 6.7 0.8 3.8 4.7 1.1 4.4 5.4 IL N 60632 NR NR NR 0.7 5.8 6.5 0.9 7.9 8.8 IL N 60803 1.6 3.9 5.5 2.0 21.3 23.3 4.1 14.6 18.7 IL Y 60915 17.1 51.4 68.6 16.0 48.1 64.1 16.2 48.6 64.8 IL N 61008 0.1 1.1 1.2 0.8 6.5 7.3 1.2 10.0 11.2 GALENA ROCHELLE IL N 61036 NR IL N 61068 1.8 NR NR NR 1.3 3.1 4.4 NR NR 12.2 0.0 12.2 1.4 5.8 7.3 3.8 11.0 ROCKFORD IL N 61104 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR CORDOVA IL N 61242 0.3 CORDOVA IL N 61242 NR EAST MOLINE IL N 61244 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.7 NR NR NR 6.0 6.3 NR 0.1 0.8 NR NR NR NR NR 0.4 0.2 0.6 NR NR NR NR NR HILLSDALE GALESBURG PEORIA GOODFIELD IL N 61257 0.0 IL N 61401 NR IL N 61615 NR IL N 61742 NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR 9.2 NR NR 0.8 NR NR 0.1 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 0.0 9.2 7.4 0.0 7.4 0.0 0.8 NR NR NR 8.3 8.4 NR NR NR Page 17 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00421 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City GOODFIELD ARTHUR MATTOON GRANITE CITY GRANITE CITY SAUGET SAUGET State IL IL IL IL IL IL IL Completed Survey N N N N N N N Zip Code 61742 61911 61938 62040 62040 62201 62201 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) NR 0.0 NR NR 4.5 NR NR 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) NR 8.3 NR NR 1.1 NR NR Total Air Emissions (tpy) NR 8.3 NR NR 5.6 NR NR Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) NR NR 3.2 0.3 4.5 0.0 0.0 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) NR NR 0.2 0.1 1.1 0.0 0.0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) NR NR 3.5 0.4 5.6 0.0 0.0 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 1.7 NR 2.0 0.4 4.2 0.0 0.0 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 15.1 NR 0.1 0.1 1.0 0.0 0.0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 16.7 NR 2.1 0.5 5.3 0.0 0.0 QUINCY EFFINGHAM ARNOLD IL N IL N MO Y 62305 62401 63010 0.1 6.2 17.1 13.0 0.0 27.1 13.1 6.2 44.2 0.2 3.4 17.9 13.4 0.4 28.4 13.6 3.8 46.3 0.1 2.2 16.4 15.9 0.3 25.7 16.1 2.4 42.0 FENTON FENTON MO N 63026 NR NR NR 1.6 8.2 9.8 1.4 8.3 9.6 MO N 63026 5.5 32.0 37.5 NR NR NR NR NR NR MARYLAND HEIGHTS MARYLAND HEIGHTS PACIFIC SAINT LOUIS SAINT LOUIS BERKELEY SAINT LOUIS SAINT LOUIS MO N MO N MO N MO N MO N MO N MO N MO N 63043 0.1 63043 0.1 63069 NR 63104 4.8 63111 0.0 63134 0.1 63147 0.0 63147 NR 0.1 0.3 NR 1.8 1.9 NR NR NR NR 0.0 4.8 5.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.1 1.6 1.7 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 6.3 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 0.1 0.1 NR NR NR NR NR 0.1 0.1 0.2 WARRENTON MO N WENTZVILLE MO N 63383 NR 63385 0.9 NR NR NR 3.7 4.5 1.3 NR NR 18.5 2.9 21.5 6.0 7.3 1.1 8.0 9.1 POPLAR BLUFF MO N INDEPENDENCE MO N 63901 NR 64051 1.4 NR NR 0.0 3.3 4.7 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 5.2 1.6 2.5 4.1 CLAYCOMO MO Y 64119 2.3 39.5 41.8 1.5 50.0 51.5 1.6 55.0 56.6 KANSAS CITY MO N 64120 4.2 0.1 4.2 NR NR NR NR NR NR SAINT JOSEPH MO N 64504 6.3 2.9 9.2 5.4 3.6 9.0 5.2 3.7 9.0 OWENSVILLE MO N 65066 4.1 1.6 5.8 6.6 1.1 7.7 3.7 1.4 5.1 MANSFIELD MO N 65704 NR NR NR 0.0 7.5 7.5 NR NR NR Page 18 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00422 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City MONETT MO NETT State MO MO Completed Survey Y N Zip Code 65708 65708 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 1.2 NR 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 28.1 NR Total Air Emissions (tpy) 29.2 NR Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 1.0 0.3 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 5.2 4.8 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 6.2 5.0 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) l.i NR 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 0.6 NR Total Air Emissions (tpy) 1.7 NR MOUNT VERNON MO N 65712 2.6 10.1 12.7 2.4 9.3 11.7 NR NR NR SPRINGFIELD MO N SPRINGFIELD MO N SHAWNEE KS N BAXTER SPRINGS KS N 65802 0.0 65802 NR 66227 1.6 66713 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 3.8 5.4 1.7 6.2 6.2 5.9 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 5.7 1.1 2.6 3.7 0.0 5.9 NR NR NR FREDONIA KS N 66736 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR IOLA WINFIELD KS N 66749 NR KS N 67156 0.3 NR NR 0.0 2.3 2.6 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.8 7.5 2.1 7.0 9.1 WICHITA WICHITA KS N 67219 NR KS N 67219 NR NR NR 0.0 6.1 6.1 0.0 5.9 5.9 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SALINA KS N 67401 0.0 3.5 3.5 NR NR NR NR NR NR VALLEY LINCOLN LINCOLN NE N 68064 NR NE N 68504 NR NE N 68524 0.3 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 2.9 3.2 0.3 NR NR 5.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 3.0 NR NR NR NORFOLK NE N 68701 0.8 10.5 11.3 0.3 10.0 10.3 0.3 10.0 10.3 DAKOTA CITY NE N 68731 NR RESERVE LA N 70084 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NEW ORLEANS LA N 70123 2.7 4.2 6.9 3.4 5.3 8.7 1.4 8.1 9.6 BROUSSARD LA N 70518 NR NR NR 0.1 0.0 0.1 NR NR NR NEW IBERIA LA N 70560 NR NR NR 1.4 0.0 1.4 1.5 0.0 1.5 SCOTT LA N 70583 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SAINT GABRIEL LA N 70776 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR ZACHARY LA N 70791 4.7 0.4 5.1 5.1 0.5 5.5 4.8 0.6 5.4 BATON ROUGE LA N 70815 0.2 SHREVEPORT LA N 71129 0.1 ALEXANDRIA LA N 71303 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 6.0 6.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 NR 0.0 0.2 NR NR NR 3.7 3.7 0.1 2.5 2.6 NR NR NR NR NR Page 19 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00423 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City WHITE HALL PINE BLUFF State AR AR Completed Survey N N Zip Code 71602 71602 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 NR 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 9.9 NR Total Air Emissions (tpy) 9.9 NR Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 6.5 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 10.1 0.0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 10.1 6.5 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 6.0 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 8.5 0.0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 8.5 6.0 EL DORADO AR N 71730 0.0 MAGNOLIA AR N 71753 NR BENTON AR N 72015 0.0 SEARCY AR N 72143 NR BLYTHEVILLE AR N 72315 NR HELENA AR N 72342 NR JONESBORO AR N 72401 NR PIGGOTT AR N 72454 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR 0.1 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 NR NR NR 14.2 14.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 0.1 0.3 NR NR NR NR NR 11.2 0.0 11.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.2 NR NR 3.6 2.3 5.9 13.2 13.3 0.1 5.4 5.5 FAYETTEVILLE AR N 72701 NR NR NR 0.0 7.3 7.3 0.0 11.0 11.0 ROGERS AR N 72756 NR NR NR 0.0 6.7 6.7 0.0 12.9 12.9 SPRINGDALE FORT SMITH AR N AR N 72764 4.8 72916 NR 5.3 10.1 3.4 NR NR NR 4.8 8.2 4.1 5.9 10.0 NR NR 0.0 13.2 13.2 EL RENO OK N 73036 NR NR NR 0.0 7.4 7.4 0.0 7.5 7.5 EL RENO OK N 73036 NR NR NR 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 TINKER AFB OK N 73145 1.6 4.2 5.8 1.3 6.0 7.3 1.9 3.2 5.1 OKLAHOMA CITY OK Y 73179 5.0 28.5 33.5 NR NR NR NR NR NR WAYNOKA OK N 73860 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 SAND SPRINGS OK N 74063 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TULSA OK N 74131 0.0 TULSA OK N 74147 NR PONCA CITY OK N 74601 0.2 SHAWNEE OK N 74804 0.4 CARROLLTON TX N 75006 NR CARROLLTON TX N 75006 NR GARLAND TX N 75041 NR MESQUITE TX N 75149 NR TERRELL TX N 75160 2.8 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 0.0 23.6 23.9 0.2 23.0 23.4 0.4 NR NR 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 14.9 17.7 3.2 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.4 20.6 0.2 19.7 19.9 21.5 21.9 0.4 18.7 19.1 0.1 0.1 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.4 16.6 0.0 15.3 15.3 WAXAHACHIE TX N 75165 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR WAXAHACHIE TX N 75165 0.4 0.0 0.4 NR NR NR NR NR NR Page 20 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00424 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City WAXAHACHIE State TX Completed Survey N Zip Code 75165 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 0.2 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 0.2 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) NR 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) NR Total Air Emissions (tpy) NR Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) NR 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) NR Total Air Emissions (tpy) NR DALLAS TX N 75244 0.0 0.9 0.9 NR NR NR NR NR NR PARIS TX N 75460 4.9 3.2 8.2 4.0 2.9 7.0 3.4 3.2 6.7 TEXARKANA TX N 75501 0.0 0.6 0.6 NR NR NR NR NR NR LONGVIEW TX N 75604 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 LONGVIEW TX Y 75604 17.7 49.3 67.0 14.4 43.0 57.5 4.8 47.7 52.5 LONGVIEW TX N 75602 12.0 1.8 13.8 12.1 2.5 14.6 12.3 3.1 15.3 GILMER KILGORE TX N 75644 NR TX N 75662 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 KILGORE LONGVIEW KILGORE TX N 75662 0.2 0.0 0.2 NR NR NR NR NR NR TX N 75662 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 TX N 75662 NR NR NR 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 GRAPELAND TX N 75844 0.2 16.3 16.4 0.2 13.3 13.5 4.3 7.9 12.2 LUFKIN TX N 75904 7.1 0.0 7.1 8.3 0.0 8.3 NR NR NR CRESSON TX N 76035 0.1 MANSFIELD TX N 76063 NR FORT WORTH TX N 76140 5.5 0.0 0.1 NR NR NR NR 7.5 13.0 5.5 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.2 0.1 0.3 8.0 13.5 5.5 7.0 12.5 MEXIA HOUSTON HOUSTON HOUSTON TX N 76667 NR TX N 77007 0.0 TX N 77015 4.8 TX N 77041 0.1 NR NR 0.0 10.7 10.7 NR NR NR 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.7 0.7 NR NR NR 0.3 5.1 4.6 0.3 4.8 4.4 0.2 4.7 1.4 1.5 NR NR NR NR NR NR HOUSTON TX N 77041 NR NR NR 0.4 0.5 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.8 HOUSTON HOUSTON TX N 77043 NR TX N 77047 0.0 NR NR 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.6 4.6 0.1 4.7 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR HOUSTON HOUSTON HOUSTON TX N 77054 2.3 TX N 77060 NR TX N 77092 NR 0.0 2.3 1.2 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 1.2 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Page 21 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00425 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City CONROE State TX Completed Survey N Zip Code 77301 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) NR 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) NR Total Air Emissions (tpy) NR Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.4 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 10.1 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 10.6 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 1.0 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 6.0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 6.9 CONROE TX N 77303 14.0 4.6 18.6 14.0 4.6 18.6 13.0 4.2 17.2 CONROE TX N 77303 29.3 4.8 34.1 30.8 5.0 35.9 27.6 4.5 32.1 TOM BALL TX N 77375 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR SUGAR LAND TX N 77478 28.0 4.2 32.2 28.1 4.2 32.3 27.4 4.1 31.5 SUGAR LAND TX N 77478 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.1 0.0 0.1 PASADENA TX N 77503 12.7 8.0 20.7 12.8 8.8 21.6 15.0 8.8 23.8 PASADENA TX N 77507 6.8 0.0 6.8 6.7 0.7 7.4 5.1 0.2 5.2 BAYTOWN CROSBY DEER PARK LA PORTE FRESNO LA PORTE LA PORTE TX N 77520 0.1 TX N 77532 NR TX N 77536 0.0 TX N 77571 NR TX N 77545 NR TX N 77571 4.1 TX N 77571 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.1 NR NR 0.0 NR NR 0.0 0.1 4.2 1.7 0.0 0.6 NR 0.0 0.1 NR NR NR NR NR 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.1 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 2.1 4.5 0.5 5.0 NR NR NR NR NR TEXAS CITY TX N 77590 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR ORANGE TX N 77630 NR NR NR 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 PORTNECHES TX N 77651 NR NR NR 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 BRYAN TX N 77807 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NAVASOTA TX N 77868 0.8 0.3 1.1 4.9 0.5 5.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 SEADRIFT TX N 77983 13.9 3.1 17.0 13.9 3.5 17.5 14.2 3.5 17.7 ELMENDORF TX N 78112 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR SAN ANTONIO TX N 78264 5.2 3.4 8.6 2.4 0.4 2.8 6.8 3.1 9.9 ROBSTOWN TX N 78380 0.0 CORPUS CHRISTI TX N 78405 0.1 AMARILLO TX N 79108 0.1 GARDENDALE TX N 79758 NR ODESSA TX N 79762 NR HOUSTON TX N 77061 0.0 ODESSA TX N 79765 0.0 DENVER CO N 80216 0.0 DENVER CO N 80216 0.0 GOLDEN CO N 80401 30.5 0.0 0.0 NR 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.2 0.0 0.0 NR 0.1 0.1 NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 36.5 29.5 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.1 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR 1.4 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.3 NR NR 0.1 0.1 0.3 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 6.0 35.5 26.5 7.0 33.5 Page 22 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00426 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City GOLDEN State CO Completed Survey N Zip Code 80403 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 21.0 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 10.5 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 31.5 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 19.5 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 9.5 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 29.0 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 20.0 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 11.5 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 31.5 LONGMONT WINDSOR CO N 80501 3.1 CO Y 80550 15.1 1.9 42.4 5.0 57.5 3.0 14.9 1.9 40.1 4.9 55.0 3.3 14.5 1.7 39.7 5.0 54.3 COLORADO CO N 80916 NR SPRINGS GRAND JUNCTION CO N 81505 NR NR NR 0.3 NR NR NR 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.6 NR NR 0.0 4.8 4.8 SINCLAIR WORLAND CLEARFIELD HILLAFB WY N WY N UT N UT N 82334 82401 84016 84056 0.0 11.1 0.0 0.9 0.0 33.4 0.0 0.7 0.0 44.5 0.0 1.6 NR 12.8 0.0 NR NR 38.3 0.0 NR NR 51.1 0.0 NR 0.0 13.3 NR NR 0.0 40.0 NR NR 0.0 53.3 NR NR LOGAN PHOENIX UT N 84321 0.1 AZ Y 85043 5.2 1.1 1.2 0.4 34.4 39.6 5.2 3.9 33.0 4.3 38.2 0.6 5.3 5.9 5.7 36.2 41.9 PHOENIX MESA CHANDLER GOODYEAR YUMA AZ N 85043 0.0 AZ N 85210 NR AZ N 85226 0.1 AZ N 85338 NR AZ N 85369 0.1 0.1 0.1 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 NR NR NR NR NR NR FERNLEY NV N 89408 0.0 WINNEMUCCA NV N 89445 NR RENO NV N 89512 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR 0.0 0.2 1.7 1.8 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 7.5 7.5 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 1.8 NR NR NR CITY OF COMMERCE VERNON LYNWOOD TORRANCE CA N 90040 0.0 CA N 90058 0.0 CA N 90262 0.0 CA N 90503 31.0 0.0 0.0 NR 0.0 0.0 NR 0.0 0.0 NR 2.7 33.7 29.0 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 3.0 32.0 16.0 0.7 16.7 TORRANCE CA N 90509 NR NR NR 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 LA MIRADA CA N 90638 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS ALAMITOS CA N 90720 1.8 0.1 1.9 NR NR NR NR NR NR TERMINAL ISLAND CA N 90731 6.2 0.6 6.7 4.1 0.4 4.5 3.8 0.4 4.2 Page 23 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00427 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City SAN PEDRO CARSON LONG BEACH CHATSWORTH State CA CA CA CA Completed Survey N N N Y Zip Code 90731 90745 90810 91311 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) NR 0.0 NR 14.3 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) NR 8.5 NR 40.3 Total Air Emissions (tpy) NR 8.5 NR 54.6 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) NR 0.0 0.0 8.9 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) NR 7.2 0.1 35.5 Total Air Emissions (tpy) NR 7.2 0.1 44.4 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 0.1 NR NR 6.4 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 0.0 NR NR 22.6 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 0.1 NR NR 29.0 AZUSA CA N 91702 NR RANCHO CA N 91730 NR CUCAMONGA SOUTH EL MONTE CA N 91733 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.9 0.0 0.1 NR NR NR MIRALOMA CA N 91752 29.0 3.8 32.8 28.5 3.7 32.3 27.5 3.7 31.2 ONTARIO CA N 91761 0.0 SAN MARCOS CA N 92078 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR 2.1 2.1 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.3 0.3 IRVINE SANTA ANA SANTA ANA CA N 92618 NR CA N 92704 0.0 CA N 92704 0.0 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR SANTA ANA CA N 92704 NR BAKERSFIELD CA N 93308 0.0 BAKERSFIELD CA N 93308 NR NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR NR 0.0 NR NR 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR SAN CARLOS CA N 94070 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FAIRFIELD CA N 94533 12.5 19.0 31.5 7.5 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR 12.0 19.5 9.0 12.5 21.5 FAIRFIELD CA Y 94533 5.5 8.5 14.0 5.4 3.9 9.4 5.3 3.9 9.2 FREMONT CA N 94538 29.7 7.4 37.1 14.6 0.0 14.6 NR NR NR SAN JOSE SAN JOSE MERCED OAKDALE CA N 95131 0.0 CA N 95133 0.0 CA N 95348 6.5 CA N 95361 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NR 1.1 7.6 4.6 4.7 5.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 1.3 5.9 0.2 0.7 0.8 3.9 4.0 0.2 3.4 3.6 RIVERBANK CA N 95367 0.2 3.9 4.1 0.3 4.4 4.7 0.6 7.2 7.8 DIXON CA N 95620 4.7 0.0 4.7 5.6 0.0 5.6 4.4 0.0 4.4 ROSEVILLE CA N 95678 0.0 0.3 0.3 NR NR NR NR NR NR SACRAMENTO CA N 95824 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.1 0.0 0.1 Page 24 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00428 Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City SACRAMENTO SACRAMENTO State CA CA Completed Survey N N Zip Code 95824 95826 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 4.9 0.0 2009 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 0.4 0.0 Total Air Emissions (tpy) 5.3 0.0 Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 5.2 NR 2010 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 0.9 NR Total Air Emissions (tpy) 6.1 NR Fugitive Air Emissions (tpy) 4.4 NR 2011 Point Source Air Emissions (tpy) 0.6 NR Total Air Emissions (tpy) 5.0 NR KAPOLEI HI N 96707 2.2 10.5 12.7 2.3 10.5 12.8 2.0 9.0 11.0 PORTLAND PORTLAND PORTLAND AUBURN KENT OR N OR N OR N WA N WA Y 97210 97210 97227 98002 98032 NR NR 0.0 NR 13.2 NR NR 0.0 NR 74.8 NR NR 0.0 NR 88.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 12.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 83.1 0.0 NR NR 0.1 12.4 0.1 NR NR 0.0 70.5 0.1 NR NR 0.1 82.9 EVERETT WA N 98204 1.6 14.0 15.6 2.0 9.0 11.0 3.5 17.0 20.5 TACOMA WA N OLYMPIA WA Y ELMENDORF AFB AK N 98421 98501 99506 NR 17.1 NR NR 51.3 NR NR 68.4 NR 0.0 19.4 0.0 0.0 58.3 0.0 0.0 77.7 0.0 0.0 16.0 NR 0.0 48.0 NR 0.0 64.0 NR 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 25 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00429 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City AGUADILLA CAROLINA MANATI CHRISTIANSTED EAST LONGMEADOW DUDLEY LAWRENCE LAWRENCE LAWRENCE NEWBURYPORT WARWICK CRANSTON MEREDITH SEABROOK WESTBROOK BUCKSPORT HARTLAND NEW BRITAIN LINDEN LINDEN WOODBRIDGE NEWARK NEWARK WAYNE BELVIDERE DEEPWATER PALMYRA EDISON PERTH AMBOY SOMERVILLE MIDDLETOWN EAST SETAUKET HAUPPAUGE ALBANY State Completed Survey PR N PR N PR N V Isl N MA N MA N MA N MA N MA Y MA N Rl N Rl N NH N NH N ME N ME N ME N CT N NJ N NJ N NJ N NJ N NJ N NJ N NJ N NJ N NJ N NJ N NJ N NJ N NY Y NY N NY N NY N Zip Code 00605 Minimum Release Height (tn) Default 00985 00674 Default Default 00820 01028 Default Default 01571 01841 01843 01843 01950 02886 02920 03253 03874 04098 4416 04943 06052 07036 Default Default Default 8.7 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 07036 07095 07105 07105 07470 07823 08023 08065 08817 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 08861 08876 10940 Default Default 15 11733 11788 12204 Default Default Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 34 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 122 Default Default Default Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE Default 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.20 Default 0.75 Default NR Default 0.01 Default NR Default Default Default 0.905 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 0.00 NR 0.00 4.31 NR NR NR 0.00 NR 0.32 NR 0.12 0.21 0.0001 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 0.00 0.06 NR 0.02 0.0001 0.0004 0.005 0.0001 0.25 Default NR Default 0.00 0.98 0.24 Default NR Default 0.07 Default NR 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.05 0.69 0.002 0.03 0.08 0.0001 0.03 0.0003 3.75 NR 0.00004 0.12 NR NR 0.50 0.00001 0.10 0.23 0.0001 NR 0.15 0.00004 NR 0.0001 0.0004 NR NR 0.18 0.01 NR 0.26 0.0003 NR 0.00002 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.07 0.60 NR NR NR NR 0.04 NR 4.19 0.0019 0.0000 0.12 NR 0.0011 0.74 NR NR 0.24 NR 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Retain Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Retain Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Retain Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.19 Out Out Out 0.00005 Out Out Out 0.01 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.0048 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.17 Out Out Out 0.01 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.32 Out Out Out 0.0003 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out Page 26 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00430 Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City NEW WINDSOR State Completed Survey NY Y SARATOGA SPRINGS SARATOGA SPRINGS LOWVILLE VERONA AKRON NY Y NY N NY N NY N NY N TONAWANDA NY N MARION NY N WEST HENRIETTA NY N CHEMUNG BUNOLA NY N PA N CLAIRTON PA N LEETSDALE PA N MC KEESPORT PA N SPRINGDALE PA N WILMERDING PA N MANNS CHOICE PA N ELLWOODCITY PA N JAMESTOWN PA N HERMITAGE PA N CLARENDON PA N FRANKLIN PA N ERIE PA N HARRISBURG PA N HANOVER PA N HANOVER PA N YORK PA N YORK PA N LANCASTER PA N LANCASTER PA N Zip Code 12553 Minimum Release Height (m) 12.192 12866 20 12866 Default 13367 13478 14001 Default Default Default 14150 14505 14586 Default Default Default 14825 15020 Default Default 15025 15056 15132 Default Default Default 15144 Default 15148 Default 15550 16117 16134 Default Default Default 16148 16313 16323 16502 17104 17331 17331 17404 17402 17601 17601 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) 73.152 66 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE 0.87 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 1.01 1 0.19 Default 0.21 Default 0.12 Default NR Default 0.16 Default NR Default 0.13 Default 0.32 Default 0.29 Default NR Default 0.20 Default 0.00 Default 0.01 Default 0.20 Default 0.003 Default 0.28 Default NR Default 0.01 Default NR Default 0.18 Default 0.39 Default 0.17 Default NR Default 0.28 Default 0.55 Default 0.08 Default NR Default 0.25 Default 0.20 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.93 0.20 NR 0.11 NR 0.18 0.0001 0.14 0.14 0.33 0.0002 0.52 NR NR 0.19 0.0023 0.32 0.0000 NR 0.0003 0.14 0.42 NR 0.47 0.34 0.51 NR 0.04 0.17 0.23 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.89 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out 0.19 Out Out Out 0.14 Out Out Out 0.10 Out Out Out 0.0001 Out Out Out 0.25 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.11 Out Out Out 0.17 Out Out Out 0.28 Out Out Out 0.0046 Out Out Out 1.48 Out Out Out 0.0002 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.21 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.32 Out Out Out 0.0000 Out Out Out 0.01 Out Out Out 0.0003 Out Out Out 0.10 Out Out Out 0.31 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.60 Out Out Out 0.13 Out Out Out 0.59 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.04 Out Out Out 0.32 Out Out Out 0.28 Out Out Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 27 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00431 Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City LANCASTER ALLENTOWN SAYRE TOWAN DA QUAKERTOWN SOUTHAMPTON WARMINSTER CROYDON MORRISVILLE PHILADELPHIA PHILADELPHIA BLANDON DOVER BELCAMP BALTIMORE BALTIMORE WILLIAMSPORT HAGERSTOWN MANASSAS MONTROSS WINCHESTER FRONT ROYAL MIDDLETOWN State Completed Survey PA N PA N PA N PA N PA N PA N PA N PA N PA N PA N PA N PA N DE N MD N MD N MD N MD N MD N VA N VA N VA N VA N VA N Zip Code 17603 Minimum Release Height (m) Default 18106 18840 Default Default 18848 18951 Default Default 18966 18974 19021 Default Default Default 19067 Default 19120 19132 19510 19904 21017 21221 21222 21795 21742 20109 22520 22603 22630 22645 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE Default 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.04 Default Default 0.002 NR Default NR Default NR Default Default Default NR 0.03 0.0046 Default 0.0001 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 0.24 NR 0.32 0.14 NR 0.84 NR NR NR NR NR 0.12 0.0036 0.0004 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) NR 0.0005 0.0055 NR 0.04 NR 0.11 NR NR 0.17 0.0055 0.25 0.08 NR 0.85 0.0019 0.0005 0.40 0.07 0.09 0.20 NR NR 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) NR NR NR 0.05 0.09 0.16 0.17 NR 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out 0.0008 Out Out Out 0.11 Out Out Out 0.0048 Out Out Out 0.16 Out Out Out 0.06 Out Out Out 0.03 Out Out Out 0.86 Out Out Out 0.0026 Out Out Out 0.01 Out Out Out 0.31 Out Out Out 0.08 Out Out Out 0.08 Out Out Out 0.14 Out Out Out 0.00 Out Out Out 0.00005 Out Out Out HARRISONBURG VA Y ELKTON VI N ARVONIA VI N WILLIAMSBURG VA Y RICHMOND VI N PETERSBURG VA N DUBLIN VI N 22802 22827 23004 23185 23228 23805 24084 11.2 Default Default 13.1318 Default Default Default 45 Default Default 96 Default Default Default Default 1.56 1.65 Default 0.04 0.01 Default 0.00001 NR 0.9656 3.79 4.05 Default NR 0.08 Default 0.002 NR Default NR 0.13 1.90 NR NR 3.93 NR 0.0001 NR Out Out Out Retain Out Out Out Retain Out Out Retain Out Out Out Retain Out Out Retain Out Out Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 28 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00432 Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City SALEM State Completed Survey VI N GALAX VA N MARION VA N GROTTOES LYNCHBURG WEIRTON VI N VA N WV N WEIRTON WV Y WEIRTON WV N CRAIGSVILLE WV N WINSTON-SALEM NC Y BURLINGTON NC N HIGH POINT NC N HIGH POINT NC N JAMESTOWN NC N MEBANE NC N REIDSVILLE NC Y DURHAM TARBORO WILSON GASTONIA NC N NC N NC N NC N HARRISBURG NC N MOUNT HOLLY NC N CHARLOTTE CHARLOTTE NC N NC N FAYETTEVILLE NC N MAXTON NC N LENOIR NC N Zip Code 24153 Minimum Release Height (m) Default 24333 Default 24354 Default 24441 24506 26062 Default Default Default 26062 11 26062 26205 27107 Default Default 14 27215 27261 Default Default 27263 27282 Default Default 27302 Default 27320 16 27703 27886 27893 28052 Default Default Default Default 28075 28120 Default Default 28273 28273 Default Default 28306 28364 28645 Default Default Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default Default Default Default Default Default 12 Default Default 75 Default Default Default Default Default 137 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE Default 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.19 Default NR Default 0.21 Default Default Default 0.0016 NR 1.16 1 6.59 Default 0.12 Default NR 0.95 3.86 Default Default 0.0051 0.01 Default NR Default NR Default 0.41 1 1.18 Default 0.14 Default 0.32 Default NR Default 0.15 Default Default 0.14 0.0011 Default 0.01 Default NR Default NR Default 0.24 Default 0.17 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) NR NR 0.30 NR 0.0051 0.69 6.26 0.15 0.07 4.23 0.01 NR 0.38 NR NR 1.45 0.14 0.36 0.0000 0.15 0.66 0.0012 NR NR 0.01 0.26 0.23 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) NR 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out 0.12 Out Out Out 0.20 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.01 Out Out Out 0.43 Out Out Out 6.01 0.06 NR 3.10 NR NR 0.34 0.0002 Retain Out Out Retain Out Out Out Out Retain Out Out Retain Out Out Out Out Retain Out Out Retain Out Out Out Out 0.11 Out Out Out 1.58 Out Out Out 0.0026 Out Out Out 0.35 Out Out Out 0.00 Out Out Out 0.13 Out Out Out 0.11 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.01 Out Out Out 0.02 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.25 Out Out Out 0.19 Out Out Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 29 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00433 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City STATESVILLE BISHOPVILLE HOLLY HILL LEXINGTON ORANGEBURG ENOREE FLORENCE CHE RAW CONWAY MYRTLE BEACH GREENVILLE STARR GREENWOOD GREER MAULDIN SENECA CHESTER AIKEN CARROLLTON ROME COVINGTON MCDONOUGH MCDONOUGH MCDONOUGH MCDONOUGH State Completed Survey NC N SC Y SC N SC N SC N SC N sc N sc N sc N sc Y sc N sc N sc N sc Y sc N sc N sc N sc N GA N GA Y GA N GA N GA N GA N GA N Zip Code 28625 Minimum Release Height (m) Default 29010 11.5824 29059 Default 29073 29116 Default Default 29335 29501 29520 29526 29577 29605 Default Default Default Default 5.5 Default 29684 29649 Default Default 29651 29662 29678 29706 29801 30117 30161 18.3 Default Default Default Default Default 12.192 30014 30253 30253 30253 30253 Default Default Default Default Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default 11 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 38.099998 Default Default Default 270 Default Default Default Default Default 54.864 Default Default Default Default Default Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE Default 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.00 0.9987 4.11 Default NR Default 0.05 Default 0.12 Default 0.00 Default 0.33 Default 0.76 Default 0.05 0.75 0.34 Default NR Default 0.12 Default NR 0.88 Default Default Default Default Default 0.86 0.47 0.0019 NR NR 0.13 0.03 1.34 Default Default Default Default Default 0.02 NR 0.0015 NR NR 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) NR 4.13 NR 0.21 0.14 NR 0.34 0.83 NR 0.24 0.0072 0.15 NR 0.59 0.0004 NR 0.00003 0.43 NR 1.44 0.03 NR 0.0013 NR 0.14 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) NR 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out 3.81 Retain Retain Retain 0.00 Out Out Out 0.00 Out Out Out 0.14 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.42 Out Out Out 0.82 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.11 Out Out Out 0.01 Out Out Out 0.11 Out Out Out 0.03 Out Out Out 0.98 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.05 Out Out Out 0.00004 Out Out Out 0.49 Out Out Out 0.03 Out Out Out 1.21 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.01 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.0010 Out Out Out 0.19 Out Out Out MCDONOUGH GA N THE ROCK GA N ATLANTA GA N DORAVILLE GA N LAVONIA ATHENS GA N GA N 30253 30285 30339 30362 30553 30607 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 0.18 0.29 0.24 Out Out Out NR NR 0.08 Out Out Out 0.01 0.0060 NR Out Out Out NR NR 0.0002 Out Out Out NR 0.24 0.37 Out Out Out 0.23 0.05 0.11 Out Out Out Page 30 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00434 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City DALTON DALTON DUBLIN MILLEDGEVILLE ROBINS AFB HOMERVILLE WEST POINT EDGEWATER JACKSONVILLE JACKSONVILLE JACKSONVILLE JACKSONVILLE WINTER GARDEN ORLANDO FT LAUDERDALE State Completed Survey GA N GA N GA N GA N GA N GA N GA N FL N FL N FL N FL N FL N FL N FL N FL N Zip Code 30721 Minimum Release Height (m) Default 30720 31021 31061 31098 31634 31833 Default Default Default Default Default Default 32132 Default 32254 Default 32208 32212 Default Default 32254 Default 34787 32837 33316 Default Default Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE Default 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.02 Default 0.00 Default 0.35 Default NR Default 0.08 Default 0.70 Default NR Default 0.06 Default 1.40 Default NR Default NR Default NR Default 0.14 Default NR Default NR 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.02 NR 0.34 0.01 0.10 1.53 0.06 NR 0.84 NR 0.00 0.00 NR 0.03 NR 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) NR NR 0.33 0.01 NR 0.25 0.11 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.64 Out Out Out 0.00 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.00 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.02 Out Out Out 0.00 Out Out Out BUSHNELL FL N 33513 Default TAMPA FL N 33617 Default TAMPA FL N 33619 Default TAMPA FL N 33611 Default CLEARWATER FL N 33760 Default 1 AKFI AND LAKELAND FI N 33801 Default FL N 33810 Default AUBURNDALE FL N 33823 Default CLEARWATER FL N 33760 Default CLEARWATER FL N 33760 Default LEEDS AL N 35094 Default LINCOLN AL N 35096 Default BIRMINGHAM AL N 35234 Default BIRMINGHAM AL N 35234 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 0.33 0.31 0.23 0.74 0.64 0.48 NR 0.00 0.00 NR 0.07 0.07 0.01 NR NR 0.34 0.30 0.30 0.22 0.27 0.20 NR NR 0.01 NR 0.0027 NR 0.003 0.0050 NR 0.29 0.33 0.32 0.36 0.51 0.54 0.41 0.36 0.44 0.01 0.01 NR Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Page 31 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00435 Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City TUSCALOOSA TUSCALOOSA VANCE GUIN GUIN DECATUR HUNTSVILLE ALBERTVILLE FORT PAYNE ANNISTON DOTHAN GENEVA PINE HILL ASHLAND CITY CLARKSVILLE SHELBYVILLE SMYRNA SPRING HILL NASHVILLE NASHVILLE NASHVILLE CLEVELAND DAYTON MANCHESTER MANCHESTER State Completed Survey AL N AL N AL N AL N AL N AL N AL N AL N AL N AL N AL N AL N AL N TN N TN N TN N TN N TN N TN N TN N TN N TN N TN N TN N TN N Zip Code 35401 35401 Minimum Release Height (m) Default Default 35490 Default 35563 35563 35603 35811 35950 35967 36207 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 36303 Default 36340 36769 Default Default 37015 37040 37160 37167 Default Default Default Default 37174 37207 37209 37218 37311 Default Default Default Default Default 37321 37355 37355 Default Default Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE Default Default 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.00 0.00 Default 0.29 Default 0.20 Default NR Default NR Default 0.31 Default 0.39 Default 0.22 Default 0.02 Default NR Default 0.10 Default NR Default NR Default 0.09 Default 0.05 Default 0.72 Default 0.39 Default NR Default 0.01 Default 0.16 Default 0.18 Default 0.17 Default 0.48 Default NR 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.27 NR NR 0.30 NR 0.30 0.01 NR 0.11 NR 0.22 0.15 NR 0.77 0.07 0.01 NR 0.38 0.13 0.18 0.44 0.01 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) NR NR 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out Out Out Out 0.60 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.26 Out Out Out 0.42 Out Out Out 0.19 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.19 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.11 Out Out Out 0.27 Out Out Out 0.00 Out Out Out 0.20 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.65 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.25 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.63 Out Out Out 0.13 Out Out Out 0.14 Out Out Out 0.75 Out Out Out 0.01 Out Out Out CHATTANOOGA TN N 37402 Default Default Default 0.50 0.60 0.86 Out Out Out CHATTANOOGA TN N 37416 Default Default Default NR NR 0.23 Out Out Out ELIZABETHTON TN N 37643 Default Default Default 0.02 NR NR Out Out Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 32 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00436 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City ONEIDA SWEETWATER KNOXVILLE BROWNSVILLE DYERSBURG DYERSBURG MEMPHIS MEMPHIS MEMPHIS MEMPHIS MEMPHIS MEMPHIS MEMPHIS MEMPHIS UNION CITY UNION CITY MILAN TRENTON BATESVILLE HERNANDO HERNANDO OLIVE BRANCH OLIVE BRANCH OLIVE BRANCH SHANNON CANTON VICKSBURG JACKSON JACKSON NEWTON PASCAGOULA State Completed Survey TN N TN N TN N TN N TN N TN N TN N TN N TN N TN N TN N TN N TN N TN N TN N TN N TN N TN N MS N MS N MS N MS Y MS N MS N MS N MS N MS N MS N MS N MS N MS N Zip Code 37841 Minimum Release Height (m) Default 37874 Default 37921 Default 38012 Default 38024 38024 38109 38109 Default Default Default Default 38113 38113 Default Default 38113 38118 38118 38113 38261 38261 38358 38382 38606 38632 38632 38654 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 12 38654 38654 38868 39046 Default Default Default Default 39181 Default 39272 39272 39345 39581 Default Default Default Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 100 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE Default 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.14 Default 0.39 Default 0.00 Default NR Default Default Default Default 0.0005 0.23 NR NR Default Default 0.005 0.14 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 0.95 0.0026 0.00005 0.0001 NR 0.00001 NR 0.30 NR 0.87 0.05 NR 1.35 Default 0.09 Default 0.00 Default 0.13 Default 0.59 Default NR Default 0.11 Default 0.47 Default 0.23 Default NR 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.11 0.44 NR NR 0.0003 0.05 0.00 0.002 0.005 0.07 NR 0.00 NR 0.0026 NR NR 0.58 NR 0.77 NR NR 1.22 NR NR 0.13 0.17 0.38 0.08 0.38 0.31 0.00 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.10 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out 0.47 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.14 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.00 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.04 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.0027 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.12 Out Out Out 0.48 Out Out Out 0.01 Out Out Out 0.76 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.00 Out Out Out 1.27 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.13 Out Out Out 0.32 Out Out Out 0.51 Out Out Out 0.09 Out Out Out 0.38 Out Out Out 0.35 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out Page 33 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00437 Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City BARDSTOWN LOUISVILLE LOUISVILLE LOUISVILLE LOUISVILLE LOUISVILLE GEORGETOWN HARRODSBURG MOREHEAD PARIS BEREA LEXINGTON FLORENCE INDEPENDENCE CALVERT CITY HOPKINSVILLE RUSSELLVILLE HAWESVILLE HEBRON MARYSVILLE URBANA COLUMBUS MARION EAST LIBERTY CLYDE FREMONT ROSSFORD NAPOLEON WHITEHOUSE State Completed Survey KY N KY N KY N KY N KY N KY Y KY N KY N KY N KY N KY N KY N KY N KY N KY N KY N KY N KY N OH N OH N OH N OH Y OH Y OH N OH N OH Y OH N OH N OH Y Zip Code 40004 40210 40211 40213 40210 40241 Minimum Release Height (m) Default Default Default Default Default Default 40324 Default 40330 40351 Default Default 40361 Default 40403 Default 40511 41042 41051 42029 42240 42276 42348 43025 43040 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 43078 43213 Default 13.52 43302 12.2 43319 Default 43410 43420 Default 20 43460 43545 43571 Default Default 15 Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 37 95 Default Default 55 Default Default 200 Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE Default Default Default Default Default 0.79 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.00 NR 0.00 0.26 NR 0.57 Default 0.12 Default Default 0.27 0.004 Default 0.00 Default 0.24 Default 0.19 Default 0.60 Default NR Default NR Default 0.11 Default 0.12 Default 0.02 Default 0.00 Default 1.10 Default 0.30 0.995 2.02 1 1.18 Default 0.65 Default 0.76 0.97 1.07 Default 0.13 Default 0.23 0.99 0.45 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) NR NR NR 0.04 NR 0.62 0.27 NR NR 0.003 0.35 0.20 0.76 0.01 0.001 0.01 0.11 0.01 NR 0.95 0.30 2.04 1.21 1.03 0.50 0.95 0.16 0.21 0.63 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) NR 0.02 NR NR 0.05 0.78 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out 0.20 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.31 Out Out Out 0.19 Out Out Out 0.78 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.10 Out Out Out 0.11 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.89 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 2.18 Retain Retain Retain 1.09 Out Out Out 0.84 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 1.14 Out Out Out 0.16 Out Out Out 0.35 Out Out Out 0.70 Out Out Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 34 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00438 Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City TOLEDO State Completed Survey OH N TOLEDO TOLEDO OH N OH N TOLEDO ZANESVILLE OH N OH N BEREA OH N BURTON OH N CHAGRIN FALLS OH N MIDDLE FIELD OH N CLEVELAND OH N CLEVELAND OH N STRONGSVILLE OH N WALTON HILLS OH N CUYAHOGA FALLS OH N BRIMFIELD MEDINA MEDINA AKRON OH N OH N OH N OH N CANFIELD OH N LORDSTOWN OH N WARREN OH N WARREN OH N YOUNGSTOWN OH N BOARDMAN OH N YOUNGSTOWN OH N NEW OH N PHILADELPHIA WOOSTER OH N NORWALK OH N SANDUSKY OH N Zip Code 43607 Minimum Release Height (m) Default 43608 43612 Default Default 43612 43701 Default Default 44017 44021 44023 44062 44105 44102 44136 44146 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 44223 Default 44240 44258 44256 44305 Default Default Default Default 44406 44481 Default Default 44483 44483 44502 44512 44512 44663 Default Default Default Default Default Default 44691 Default 44857 Default 44870 Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE Default 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.27 Default 0.55 Default 0.03 Default 0.28 Default 0.05 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default NR NR 0.0001 NR 0.34 NR NR NR Default NR Default 0.33 Default NR Default NR Default NR Default 0.02 Default 0.44 Default 0.15 Default 0.41 Default 0.00 Default 0.21 Default 0.39 Default NR Default 0.23 Default 0.21 Default NR 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.48 0.86 0.04 0.34 0.10 0.0001 0.0004 NR 0.0045 0.45 NR 0.0005 0.0001 0.0001 NR 0.0003 NR 0.00002 NR 0.13 0.18 0.31 NR NR 0.35 0.0001 0.30 NR 0.0045 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.47 NR 0.38 0.32 0.13 0.0001 0.0004 NR NR 0.37 0.00 0.01 0.0001 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out 0.0001 Out Out Out 0.18 0.003 0.004 Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out 0.0001 Out Out Out 0.04 Out Out Out 0.16 Out Out Out 0.18 Out Out Out 0.38 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.02 Out Out Out 0.0001 Out Out Out 0.29 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 35 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00439 Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City WILLARD MANSFIELD LEBANON LEBANON MASON CINCINNATI BLUE ASH CINCINNATI CINCINNATI SIDNEY SIDNEY SPRINGFIELD WAVERLY FINDLAY FINDLAY FORT RECOVERY PAULDING SAINT MARYS FRANKFORT GREENCASTLE GREENFIELD INDIANAPOLIS INDIANAPOLIS INDIANAPOLIS INDIANAPOLIS INDIANAPOLIS INDIANAPOLIS INDIANAPOLIS EAST CHICAGO State Completed Survey OH N OH N OH N OH N OH N OH N OH N OH N OH N OH N OH N OH N OH N OH Y OH N OH N OH N OH N IN N IN N IN N IN N IN N IN N IN N IN N IN N IN N IN N Zip Code 44890 44903 45036 Minimum Release Height (m) Default Default Default 45036 45040 Default Default 45217 45242 45242 Default Default Default 45246 Default 45365 45365 45502 45690 Default Default Default Default 45840 14.1732 45840 45846 45879 Default Default Default 45885 46041 46135 46140 46203 46218 46219 46222 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 46225 Default 46226 46268 Default Default 46312 Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 89 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE Default Default Default 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.27 NR NR Default 0.12 Default 0.17 Default NR Default 0.02 Default 0.26 Default 0.00006 Default 0.11 Default 0.24 Default 0.13 Default 0.01 1 3.63 Default 0.52 Default 0.04 Default NR Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 0.10 0.00 0.07 0.39 0.0001 0.04 0.0008 NR Default 0.0001 Default Default 0.0002 0.0003 Default NR 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.32 0.00005 0.02 0.11 0.25 NR NR 0.63 0.0001 0.12 0.27 0.14 0.02 3.65 0.51 NR 0.00002 0.14 NR NR 0.51 NR 0.03 0.0004 0.0003 0.0010 0.00 NR NR 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.29 NR 0.02 NR 0.27 0.0002 NR 0.80 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.27 Out Out Out 0.25 Out Out Out 0.09 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 3.77 0.49 NR NR 0.16 NR 0.16 0.17 NR NR NR 0.0001 Retain Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Retain Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Retain Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.02 Out Out Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 36 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00440 Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City HAMMOND State Completed Survey IN N LA PORTE LA PORTE IN N IN Y SCHERERVILLE IN N WHITING IN N BREMEN IN N GOSHEN IN N MIDDLE BURY IN N MISHAWAKA IN N WARSAW IN N ASHLEY IN N BUTLER IN N BUTLER IN N ROANOKE IN N SAINT JOE IN N AURORA BATESVILLE IN N IN N COLUMBUS IN N PORTLAND IN N BLOOMINGTON IN N ASHLEY IN N MOUNT VERNON IN N NEWBURGH IN N PRINCETON IN N EVANSVILLE BRAZIL LAFAYETTE IN N IN N IN N CRAWFORDSVILLE IN N Zip Code 46320 Minimum Release Height (m) Default 46350 46350 Default 12.19 46375 46394 Default Default 46506 46526 46540 Default Default Default 46545 46580 46705 46721 46721 46783 Default Default Default Default Default Default 46785 Default 47001 47006 Default Default 47201 47371 47404 46705 47620 Default Default Default Default Default 47629 Default 47670 Default 47710 47834 47905 Default Default Default 47933 Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default Default 32.22 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE Default 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.13 Default 0.11 1 1.83 Default Default 0.002 NR Default Default Default 0.006 NR NR Default Default Default Default Default Default NR 0.002 NR 0.0004 0.65 0.16 Default 0.19 Default 2.27 Default 0.08 Default 0.11 Default NR Default 0.23 Default 0.11 Default 0.13 Default 0.31 Default 0.49 Default 0.21 Default NR Default 0.47 Default 0.44 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.13 0.16 1.87 0.0006 0.0002 0.006 NR 0.07 0.17 0.002 0.0001 0.0004 0.63 0.27 0.19 1.44 0.12 0.15 0.01 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.15 0.67 0.46 0.01 0.76 0.61 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.12 0.15 1.79 NR 0.00002 NR 0.09 0.11 NR NR NR NR 0.51 0.33 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Retain Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Retain Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Retain Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out 0.22 Out Out Out NR Retain Out Out 0.12 Out Out Out 0.13 Out Out Out 0.01 Out Out Out 0.14 Out Out Out 0.14 Out Out Out 0.16 Out Out Out 0.18 Out Out Out 0.57 Out Out Out 0.50 Out Out Out 0.07 Out Out Out 0.63 Out Out Out 0.69 Out Out Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 37 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00441 Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City State Completed Survey CRAWFORDSVILLE IN N KENTLAND IN N MONTICELLO IN N VEEDERSBURG IN N LAKE ORION Ml N LAKE ORION Ml N PONTIAC Ml N MADISON Ml N HEIGHTS STERLING HEIGHTS Ml N STERLING HEIGHTS Ml N WARREN Ml N BELLEVILLE DEARBORN Ml N Ml Y FLAT ROCK Ml N ROMULUS Ml N SALINE Ml N WAYNE Ml N WAYNE Ml N WAYNE DETROIT DETROIT Ml N Ml N Ml N DETROIT REDFORD DETROIT Ml N Ml N Ml N FLINT Ml N Zip Code 47933 Minimum Release Height (m) Default 47951 47960 Default Default 47987 48359 48359 48341 48071 Default Default Default Default Default 48313 Default 48314 Default 48091 Default 48111 48121 Default 21.32926829 48134 Default 48174 Default 48176 Default 48184 Default 48184 Default 48184 48207 48215 Default Default Default 48228 48239 48234 Default Default Default 48552 Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE Default 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.29 Default 0.08 Default 1.15 Default 0.05 Default 0.25 Default NR Default 0.08 Default 0.16 Default 0.09 Default 0.02 Default 0.23 Default NR 0.97 0.51 Default 0.27 Default NR Default NR Default 0.18 Default 0.00 Default NR Default NR Default 0.66 Default NR Default NR Default 0.01 Default 0.76 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.25 NR 0.79 NR NR NR NR 0.25 0.14 NR 0.21 0.0001 0.34 0.12 0.0010 NR 0.24 0.0064 0.005 0.11 0.81 0.0001 NR NR 0.53 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.23 NR 0.91 NR 0.05 0.05 NR 0.26 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out 0.20 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.31 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.33 Out Out Out 0.11 Out Out Out 0.0022 Out Out Out 0.08 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.13 Out Out Out 0.005 0.16 Out Out Out Out Out Out 1.27 Out Out Out 0.0001 Out Out Out 0.0003 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.56 Out Out Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 38 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00442 Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City LANSING State Completed Survey Ml N LANSING Ml N KALAMAZOO Ml N WHITE PIGEON Ml N JACKSON Ml N ADRIAN Ml N CALEDONIA Ml N MIDDLEVILLE Ml N NEWAYGO Ml N MUSKEGON Ml N HEIGHTS GRAND RAPIDS Ml N CADILLAC Ml N ANKENY IA N KNOXVILLE IA N PELLA IA N FORT DODGE IA N CEDAR FALLS IA N ORANGE CITY IA N CARROLL IA N MISSOURI VALLEY IA N CEDAR RAPIDS IA N BURLINGTON IA N MUSCATINE IA N CHILTON Wl N CHILTON Wl N HARTFORD HARTFORD HORICON LOMIRA Wl N Wl N Wl N Wl N Zip Code 48917 Minimum Release Height (tn) Default 48921 Default 49007 Default 49099 49203 49221 49316 Default Default Default Default 49333 49337 Default Default 49444 Default 49503 49601 50023 50138 50219 50501 Default Default Default Default Default Default 50613 51041 51401 Default Default Default 51555 Default 52404 52601 52761 53014 Default Default Default Default 53014 Default 53027 53027 53032 53048 Default Default Default Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE Default 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.19 Default 0.19 Default NR Default 0.39 Default NR Default NR Default 0.01 Default 0.12 Default NR Default NR Default NR Default NR Default NR Default 0.00 Default 0.31 Default NR Default 0.13 Default NR Default NR Default 0.13 Default NR Default 0.12 Default 0.00 Default NR Default 0.13 Default 0.23 Default 0.44 Default NR Default NR 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.50 0.21 NR 0.56 0.000004 NR NR 0.13 0.10 0.0029 NR NR 0.15 NR 0.43 0.14 0.12 0.00 0.11 0.17 0.02 0.18 0.00002 NR 0.14 0.16 0.50 NR 0.10 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.53 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out 0.16 Out Out Out 0.18 Out Out Out 0.34 Out Out Out 0.000004 Out Out Out 0.00014 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.15 Out Out Out 0.08 Out Out Out 0.01 Out Out Out 0.01 Out Out Out 0.0045 Out Out Out 0.45 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.41 Out Out Out 0.29 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.00 Out Out Out 0.12 Out Out Out 0.12 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.24 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.23 Out Out Out 0.11 Out Out Out 0.19 Out Out Out 0.42 Out Out Out 0.12 Out Out Out 0.19 Out Out Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 39 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00443 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City MENOMONEE FALLS OCONOMOWOC State Completed Survey Wl N Wl N OCONOMOWOC Wl N SHEBOYGAN FALLS Wl N SUSSEX Wl N WATERTOWN Wl N NEW BERLIN Wl N OAK CREEK Wl N OAK CREEK Wl N TWIN LAKES Wl N WAUKESHA Wl N SAINT FRANCIS Wl N MILWAUKEE Wl N MILWAUKEE Wl N MILWAUKEE Wl N WEST ALLIS Wl N MILWAUKEE Wl N MILWAUKEE Wl N MILWAUKEE Wl N MILWAUKEE Wl N STURTEVANT Wl N FORT ATKINSON Wl N BARABOO Wl N BARABOO Wl N MARINETTE Wl N MANITOWOC Wl N PLOVER Wl Y LA CROSSE Wl Y TOMAH Wl N TO MAH Wl N MENOMONIE Wl N OSHKOSH Wl N Zip Code 53051 Minimum Release Height (tn) Default 53066 Default 53066 53085 Default Default 53089 53094 53151 53154 Default Default Default Default 53154 53181 53186 53235 53207 53209 53212 53214 53223 53224 53224 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 53226 Default 53177 53538 53913 53913 54143 54220 Default Default Default Default Default Default 54467 11.28 54603 54660 54660 54751 13.716 Default Default Default 54903 Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 36.88 12 Default Default Default Default Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE Default 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) NR Default 0.21 Default NR Default 0.28 Default 0.32 Default NR Default NR Default NR Default 0.57 Default NR Default NR Default 0.14 Default 0.00 Default NR Default 0.31 Default NR Default 0.01 Default 0.33 Default 1.43 Default 0.00004 Default NR Default 0.36 Default NR Default 0.63 Default 0.00 Default NR 0.99 1.40 1 2.96 Default 0.04 Default NR Default 0.17 Default 0.02 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.01 0.23 NR 0.29 0.33 0.000005 NR 0.43 0.92 0.02 NR 0.15 0.00005 0.0036 0.33 0.12 0.01 0.34 1.24 0.00004 NR 0.50 NR 0.65 NR NR 0.97 2.87 0.07 NR 0.19 NR 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.01 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out 0.16 Out Out Out 0.01 Out Out Out 0.27 Out Out Out 0.44 Out Out Out 0.000004 Out Out Out 0.00022 Out Out Out 0.39 Out Out Out 1.28 Out Out Out 0.03 Out Out Out 0.00031 Out Out Out 0.21 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.0032 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.13 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.34 Out Out Out 1.15 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.01 Out Out Out 0.30 Out Out Out 0.16 Out Out Out 0.54 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.00074 Out Out Out 0.13 Out Out Out 3.11 Retain Retain Retain NR Out Out Out 0.11 Out Out Out 0.19 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out Page 40 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00444 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City WAUPACA LAKEVILLE OWATONNA REDWING SAINT PAUL SAINT PAUL ROSEMOUNT HOPKINS MAPLE GROVE WACONIA MINNEAPOLIS WASECA COTTONWOOD SAINT CLOUD YANKTON GWINNER ELK GROVE VILLAGE ELK GROVE VILLAGE ELK GROVE VILLAGE DES PLAINES LAKE BLUFF WOODSTOCK ADDISON ELGIN ELGIN FRANKLIN PARK HAMPSHIRE BROADVIEW NORTH LAKE SYCAMORE State Completed Survey Wl N MN N MN Y MN N MN Y MN N MN N MN N MN N MN N MN N MN N MN N MN N SD N ND N IL N IL N IL N IL N IL N IL N IL N IL N IL N IL N IL N IL N IL N IL N Zip Code 54981 55044 55060 55066 55107 Minimum Release Height (m) Default Default 17.98 Default 15 55116 Default 55068 55343 55369 55387 55416 Default Default Default Default Default 56093 56229 56303 57078 58040 60007 Default Default Default Default Default Default 60007 Default 60007 Default 60016 60044 Default Default 60098 60101 Default Default 60120 Default 60123 Default 60131 60140 60153 Default Default Default 60164 60178 Default Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default Default 70.7 Default 120 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE Default Default 0.99 Default 0.95 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.10 0.0001 2.88 0.48 1.36 Default 0.08 Default 0.03 Default NR Default NR Default 0.11 Default NR Default 0.16 Default 0.12 Default 0.17 Default 0.52 Default NR Default 0.16 Default NR Default 0.01 Default NR Default 0.11 Default 0.15 Default NR Default 0.24 Default NR Default NR Default NR Default 0.07 Default NR Default NR 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.19 0.0001 3.02 0.58 1.30 0.10 0.02 0.0001 NR NR NR 0.16 NR 0.26 0.13 0.13 0.25 NR 0.01 0.01 NR 0.14 0.0001 0.19 0.00 NR NR NR 0.0006 0.21 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.24 NR 3.14 0.51 1.15 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Retain Out Out Out Out Retain Out Out Out Out Retain Out Out 0.15 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.00009 Out Out Out 0.14 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.13 Out Out Out 0.24 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.21 Out Out Out 0.05 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.21 Out Out Out 0.00003 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.22 Out Out Out 0.0001 Out Out Out 0.05 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.04 Out Out Out 0.01 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.0001 Out Out Out 0.14 Out Out Out Page 41 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00445 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City State Completed Survey SYCAMORE IL N CAROL STREAM IL N ALSIP IL N CHANNAHON IL N CHICAGO HEIGHTS IL N HARVEY IL N HOMEWOOD IL N MIDLOTHIAN IL N BRIDGEVIEW IL N BEDFORD PARK IL N BEDFORD PARK IL N AURORA IL N WOODRIDGE IL N CHICAGO CHICAGO CHICAGO IL N IL N IL Y CHICAGO CHICAGO CHICAGO CHICAGO CHICAGO ALSIP BRADLEY BELVIDERE IL N IL N IL N IL N IL N IL N IL Y IL N GALENA ROCHELLE IL N IL N ROCKFORD IL N CORDOVA IL N CORDOVA IL N EAST MOLINE IL N HILLSDALE GALESBURG PEORIA GOODFIELD IL N IL N IL N IL N Zip Code 60178 60188 60803 60410 60411 Minimum Release Height (m) Default Default Default Default Default 60426 60430 60445 60455 60499 60501 60504 60517 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 60608 60609 60609 Default Default 12.192 60623 60623 60623 60624 60632 60803 60915 61008 Default Default Default Default Default Default 15.24 Default 61036 61068 Default Default 61104 Default 61242 61242 61244 Default Default Default 61257 61401 61615 61742 Default Default Default Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 19 Default Default Default Default Default Default 18.71 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE Default Default Default Default Default 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) NR 0.06 NR 0.0001 0.76 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 0.49 0.003 0.0001 0.19 0.002 0.0006 0.31 0.0001 Default 0.22 Default 0.54 0.9368 2.97 Default 0.17 Default 0.22 Default 0.23 Default 0.16 Default NR Default 0.14 0.88 3.18 Default 0.03 Default NR Default 0.09 Default 0.00 Default 0.01 Default NR Default 0.14 Default Default Default Default 0.0005 NR NR NR 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.01 0.13 NR NR 0.90 0.78 0.0002 0.0001 0.21 NR NR 0.27 NR 0.32 0.91 3.10 0.26 0.64 0.26 0.11 0.15 0.52 2.97 0.17 NR 0.19 NR 0.03 NR NR 0.0006 0.33 0.03 0.18 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.02 0.21 0.01 NR 0.86 0.21 NR NR 0.19 0.0003 NR 0.20 NR 0.11 0.72 1.47 0.24 0.59 0.28 0.13 0.20 0.46 3.01 0.25 0.44 0.34 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Retain Out Out Out Out Out Out Retain Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Retain Out Out Out Out Out Out Retain Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Retain Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.02 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.27 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out Page 42 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00446 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City GOODFIELD ARTHUR MATTOON GRANITE CITY GRANITE CITY SAUGET SAUGET QUINCY EFFINGHAM ARNOLD FENTON FENTON MARYLAND HEIGHTS MARYLAND HEIGHTS PACIFIC SAINT LOUIS SAINT LOUIS BERKELEY SAINT LOUIS SAINT LOUIS WARRENTON WENTZVILLE POPLAR BLUFF INDEPENDENCE CLAYCOMO KANSAS CITY SAINT JOSEPH OWENSVILLE MANSFIELD State Completed Survey IL N IL N IL N IL N IL N IL N IL N IL N IL N MO Y MO N MO N MO N MO N MO N MO N MO N MO N MO N MO N MO N MO N MO N MO N MO Y MO N MO N MO N MO N Zip Code 61742 61911 61938 62040 62040 62201 62201 Minimum Release Height (m) Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 62305 62401 63010 Default Default 12.192 63026 63026 Default Default 63043 Default 63043 Default 63069 63104 63111 63134 63147 63147 Default Default Default Default Default Default 63383 63385 Default Default 63901 64051 Default Default 64119 Default 64120 Default 64504 Default 65066 65704 Default Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 68.58 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Proportion of Certain Glycoi Ethers Used that are EGBE Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) NR 0.17 NR NR 0.18 NR NR Default 0.28 Default 0.22 0.8 0.95 Default NR Default 0.87 Default 0.01 Default 0.04 Default Default Default Default Default Default NR 0.18 0.0004 0.01 0.00 NR Default NR Default 0.11 Default NR Default 0.12 0.57 0.52 Default 0.15 Default 0.29 Default 0.18 Default NR 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) NR NR 0.12 0.01 0.19 0.0005 0.0001 0.29 0.13 1.00 0.23 NR NR NR NR 0.21 0.0002 0.0011 0.0027 NR NR 0.17 0.00001 0.13 0.63 NR 0.27 0.26 0.16 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.38 NR 0.07 0.02 0.17 0.0005 0.0001 0.34 0.08 0.91 0.22 NR 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.04 Out Out Out 0.0009 Out Out Out 0.23 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.0046 Out Out Out 0.73 Out Out Out 0.21 Out Out Out 0.00002 Out Out Out 0.11 Out Out Out 0.69 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.27 Out Out Out 0.16 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out Page 43 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00447 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City MO NETT MONETT MOUNT VERNON SPRINGFIELD SPRINGFIELD SHAWNEE BAXTER SPRINGS FREDONIA IOLA WINFIELD WICHITA WICHITA SAUNA VALLEY LINCOLN LINCOLN NORFOLK DAKOTA CITY RESERVE NEW ORLEANS BROUSSARD NEW IBERIA SCOTT SAINT GABRIEL ZACHARY BATON ROUGE SHREVEPORT ALEXANDRIA State Completed Survey MO Y MO N MO N MO N MO N KS N KS N KS N KS N KS N KS N KS N KS N NE N NE N NE N NE N NE N LA N LA N LA N LA N LA N LA N LA N LA N LA N LA N Zip Code 65708 65708 Minimum Release Height (m) 6.096 Default 65712 Default 65802 65802 66227 66713 Default Default Default Default 66736 Default 66749 67156 Default Default 67219 67219 Default Default 67401 Default 68064 68504 68524 Default Default Default 68701 Default 68731 70084 Default Default 70123 70518 70560 70583 70776 Default Default Default Default Default 70791 Default 70815 71129 71303 Default Default Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) 3.048 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Proportion of Certain Giycoi Ethers Used that are EGBE 0.11 Default 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.31 NR 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.07 0.11 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.02 NR 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out Out Out Out Default 0.31 0.28 NR Out Out Out Default Default Default Default 0.0004 0.0004 NR Out Out Out NR NR 0.0004 Out Out Out 0.14 0.15 0.09 Out Out Out 0.13 0.21 NR Out Out Out Default NR 0.0002 NR Out Out Out Default Default NR 0.00005 0.00006 Out Out Out 0.06 0.17 0.22 Out Out Out Default Default NR 0.13 0.12 Out Out Out NR 0.00012 0.00014 Out Out Out Default 0.07 NR NR Out Out Out Default Default Default NR NR 0.18 Out Out Out NR 0.0000000003 0.00000005 Out Out Out 0.07 0.07 NR Out Out Out Default 0.25 0.22 0.22 Out Out Out Default Default NR 0.00 NR Out Out Out NR 0.00000004 0.00000005 Out Out Out Default Default Default Default Default 0.18 0.23 0.22 Out Out Out NR 0.003 NR Out Out Out NR 0.05 0.05 Out Out Out NR 0.000007 0.000023 Out Out Out 0.00 NR NR Out Out Out Default 0.18 0.19 0.18 Out Out Out Default 0.01 0.01 NR Out Out Out Default 0.13 0.08 0.06 Out Out Out Default 0.00 NR NR Out Out Out Page 44 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00448 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City WHITE HALL PINE BLUFF EL DORADO MAGNOLIA BENTON SEARCY BLYTHEVILLE HELENA JONESBORO PIGGOTT FAYETTEVILLE ROGERS SPRINGDALE FORT SMITH EL RENO EL RENO TINKER AFB OKLAHOMA CITY WAYNOKA SAND SPRINGS TULSA TULSA PONCA CITY SHAWNEE CARROLLTON CARROLLTON GARLAND MESQUITE TERRELL WAXAHACHIE WAXAHACHIE State Completed Survey AR N AR N AR N AR N AR N AR N AR N AR N AR N AR N AR N AR N AR N AR N OK N OK N OK N OK Y OK N OK N OK N OK N OK N OK N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N Zip Code 71602 71602 Minimum Release Height (m) Default Default 71730 71753 72015 72143 72315 72342 72401 72454 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 72701 Default 72756 Default 72764 72916 Default Default 73036 73036 73145 73179 Default Default Default 13 73860 Default 74063 Default 74131 74147 74601 74804 75006 75006 75041 75149 75160 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 75165 Default 75165 Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 100 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 0.85 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.21 NR 0.00 NR 0.00 NR NR NR NR 0.31 NR NR 0.28 NR NR NR 0.15 0.44 NR NR 0.0002 NR 0.51 0.50 NR NR NR NR 0.41 0.00009 0.01 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.21 0.23 0.00021 NR 0.0018 0.01 NR 0.0065 NR 0.28 0.15 0.14 0.22 NR 0.16 0.01 0.17 NR NR 0.0011 NR 0.00005 0.44 0.47 0.00273 NR NR NR 0.40 0.00009 NR 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.18 0.22 NR 0.00152 NR NR 0.40 0.0032 0.18 0.12 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out 0.23 Out Out Out 0.27 Out Out Out 0.27 Out Out Out 0.28 Out Out Out 0.16 Out Out Out 0.01 Out Out Out 0.14 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.00005 Out Out Out 0.0011 Out Out Out 0.00009 Out Out Out 0.00005 Out Out Out 0.42 Out Out Out 0.41 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.000006 Out Out Out 0.00009 Out Out Out 0.00005 Out Out Out 0.32 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out Page 45 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00449 Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City WAXAHACHIE DALLAS PARIS TEXARKANA LONGVIEW LONGVIEW LONGVIEW GILMER KILGORE KILGORE LONGVIEW KILGORE GRAPELAND LUFKIN CRESSON MANSFIELD FORT WORTH MEXIA HOUSTON HOUSTON HOUSTON HOUSTON HOUSTON HOUSTON HOUSTON HOUSTON HOUSTON State Completed Survey TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX Y TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N Zip Code 75165 Minimum Release Height (m) Default 75244 75460 75501 75604 Default Default Default Default 75604 18 75602 Default 75644 75662 Default Default 75662 75662 75662 Default Default Default 75844 Default 75904 Default 76035 76063 76140 Default Default Default 76667 77007 77015 77041 Default Default Default Default 77041 Default 77043 77047 Default Default 77054 77060 77092 Default Default Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default Default Default Default Default 80 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE Default 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.0045 Default 0.02 Default 0.25 Default 0.01 Default NR 0.91 1.53 Default 0.47 Default NR Default NR Default 0.01 Default NR Default NR Default 0.35 Default 0.26 Default Default Default 0.0029 NR 0.36 Default NR Default 0.02 Default 0.18 Default 0.03 Default NR Default Default NR 0.0011 Default 0.08 Default NR Default NR 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) NR NR 0.21 NR NR 1.30 0.49 NR 0.0000020 NR NR 0.0012 0.29 0.30 NR NR 0.37 0.23 0.01 0.17 NR 0.02 0.17 0.0007 0.04 NR 0.0001 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) NR NR 0.19 NR 0.0008 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out 1.07 Out Out Out 0.51 Out Out Out 0.0009 Out Out Out 0.000009 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.00 Out Out Out 0.0012 Out Out Out 0.32 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.01 Out Out Out 0.35 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.16 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.02 Out Out Out 0.17 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.00 Out Out Out 0.0002 Out Out Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 46 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00450 Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City CONROE CONROE CONROE TOM BALL SUGAR LAND SUGAR LAND PASADENA PASADENA BAYTOWN CROSBY DEER PARK LA PORTE FRESNO LA PORTE LA PORTE TEXAS CITY ORANGE PORT NECHES BRYAN NAVASOTA SEADRIFT ELMENDORF SAN ANTONIO ROBSTOWN CORPUS CHRISTI AMARILLO GARDENDALE ODESSA HOUSTON ODESSA DENVER DENVER GOLDEN State Completed Survey TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N TX N CO N CO N CO N Zip Code 77301 Minimum Release Height (m) Default 77303 Default 77303 77375 77478 77478 77503 77507 Default Default Default Default Default Default 77520 77532 77536 77571 77545 77571 77571 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 77590 77630 77651 77807 77868 77983 Default Default Default Default Default Default 78112 78264 Default Default 78380 78405 79108 79758 79762 77061 79765 80216 80216 80401 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE Default 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) NR Default 0.60 Default Default Default Default Default Default 1.16 0.0012 1.10 NR 0.63 0.24 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 0.0046 NR 0.00005 NR NR 0.15 0.02 Default NR Default NR Default NR Default NR Default 0.04 Default 0.57 Default Default 0.00006 0.26 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 0.0001 0.0029 0.0025 NR NR 0.0001 0.0026 0.0009 0.0001 1.23 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.23 0.60 1.22 0.0008 1.10 NR 0.65 0.26 0.0046 NR 0.0046 0.00004 0.0018 0.07 NR 0.0002 0.0045 0.0028 NR 0.19 0.58 NR 0.10 NR 0.002 NR NR 0.01 NR NR 0.00047 0.00010 1.19 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.16 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out 0.56 Out Out Out 1.09 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 1.08 Out Out Out 0.0020 Out Out Out 0.73 Out Out Out 0.19 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.01 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.0016 Out Out Out 0.17 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.0026 Out Out Out 0.0028 Out Out Out 0.0004 Out Out Out 0.0059 Out Out Out 0.59 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.31 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.0007 Out Out Out 0.05 Out Out Out 0.01 Out Out Out 0.01 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 1.10 Out Out Out 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 47 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00451 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City GOLDEN State Completed Survey CO N LONGMONT WINDSOR CO N CO Y COLORADO CO N SPRINGS GRAND JUNCTION CO N SINCLAIR WORLAND CLEARFIELD HILLAFB WY N WY N UT N UT N LOGAN PHOENIX UT N AZ Y PHOENIX MESA CHANDLER GOODYEAR YUMA AZ N AZ N AZ N AZ N AZ N FERNLEY NV N WINNEMUCCA NV N RENO NV N CITY OF COMMERCE VERNON LYNWOOD TORRANCE CA N CA N CA N CA N TORRANCE CA N LA MIRADA CA N LOS ALAMITOS CA N TERMINAL ISLAND CA N Zip Code Minimum Release Height (m) 80403 Default 80501 80550 Default 14.224 80916 Default 81505 Default 82334 82401 84016 84056 Default Default Default Default 84321 85043 Default 14 85043 85210 85226 85338 85369 Default Default Default Default Default 89408 89445 89512 Default Default Default 90040 Default 90058 90262 90503 Default Default Default 90509 Default 90638 Default 90720 Default 90731 Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE Default 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.98 Default 61.8744 Default 0.85 0.15 1.22 Default Default NR Default Default NR Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 0.00005 1.11 0.00012 0.05 Default 30 Default 1 0.03 1.05 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 0.0026 NR 0.01 NR 0.0039 Default Default Default Default Default Default 0.00006 NR 0.06 Default Default 0.00012 Default Default Default Default Default Default 0.0011 0.0001 1.18 Default Default NR Default Default NR Default Default 0.07 Default Default 0.23 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.90 0.15 1.18 0.02 NR NR 1.27 0.00005 NR 0.10 1.01 NR 0.00002 NR NR NR 0.00006 0.16 0.06 NR NR NR 1.11 0.0045 NR NR 0.16 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.96 0.16 1.16 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out 0.02 Out Out Out 0.10 0.00 1.33 NR NR 0.13 1.11 NR 0.00022 NR 0.0055 NR NR 0.11 NR Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out 0.00003 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.59 Out Out Out 0.0007 Out Out Out 0.00014 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.15 Out Out Out Page 48 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00452 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City SAN PEDRO CARSON LONG BEACH CHATSWORTH State Completed Survey CA N CA N CA N CA Y AZUSA CA N RANCHO CA N CUCAMONGA SOUTH EL MONTE CA N MIRALOMA CA N ONTARIO CA N SAN MARCOS CA N IRVINE SANTA ANA SANTA ANA CA N CA N CA N SANTA ANA CA N BAKERSFIELD CA N BAKERSFIELD CA N SAN CARLOS CA N FAIRFIELD CA N FAIRFIELD CA Y FREMONT CA N SAN JOSE SAN JOSE MERCED OAKDALE CA N CA N CA N CA N RIVERBANK CA N DIXON CA N ROSEVILLE CA N SACRAMENTO CA N Zip Code Minimum Release Height (m) 90731 90745 90810 91311 Default Default Default 15 91702 91730 Default Default 91733 Default 91752 Default 91761 92078 Default Default 92618 92704 92704 Default Default Default 92704 93308 93308 Default Default Default 94070 94533 Default Default 94533 15 94538 Default 95131 95133 95348 95361 Default Default Default Default 95367 Default 95620 95678 95824 Default Default Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default Default Default 30 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 50 Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Default Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE Default Default Default 0.98 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) NR 0.18 NR 1.53 Default NR Default NR Default 0.0021 Default 1.13 Default Default 0.00021 0.04 Default Default Default NR 0.00 0.00035 Default Default Default NR 0.00010 NR Default Default 0.00003 0.85 0.98 0.37 Default 1.23 Default Default Default Default 0.0002 0.0007 0.26 0.13 Default 0.09 Default Default Default 0.17 0.0057 NR 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) NR 0.15 0.0027 1.20 NR 0.03 0.0021 1.11 NR NR NR NR 0.00047 NR 0.00012 0.00014 0.00003 0.52 0.27 0.53 0.0003 NR 0.19 0.09 0.10 0.20 NR NR 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.0046 NR NR 0.79 0.0001 0.03 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 1.07 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.0055 Out Out Out 0.00003 Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.01 NR Out Out Out Out Out Out NR Out Out Out NR Out Out Out 0.59 Out Out Out 0.27 Out Out Out NR NR NR 0.02 0.08 Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out 0.17 Out Out Out 0.16 NR Out Out Out Out Out Out 0.0045 Out Out Out Page 49 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00453 Table C-4. Comparisons of 2009, 2010 and 2011 TRI Air Emissions Data for Certain Glycol Ethers to Site Specific Screening Values (Step B) City SACRAMENTO SACRAMENTO KAPOLEI PORTLAND PORTLAND PORTLAND AUBURN KENT EVERETT TACOMA OLYMPIA ELMENDORF AFB State Completed Survey CA N CA N HI N OR N OR N OR N WA N WA Y WA N WA N WA Y AK N Zip Code Minimum Release Height (m) 95824 95826 Default Default 96707 Default 97210 97210 97227 98002 98032 Default Default Default Default 13.19784 98204 Default 98421 98501 99506 Default 12.8 Default Minimum Receptor Distance (m) Default Default Default Default Default Default Default 29 Default Default 44.63 Default Proportion of Certain Glycol Ethers Used that are EGBE Default Default 2009 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.18 0.000011 Default 0.30 Default Default Default Default 0.9987 NR NR 0.00029 NR 3.75 Default 0.35 Default 0.94 Default NR 1.83 NR 2010 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.21 NR 2011 Maximum Impact (mg/m3) 0.17 NR 2009 2010 2011 Outcome Outcome Outcome Out Out Out Out Out Out 0.30 0.00160 0.00009 0.00007 0.0045 3.54 0.26 0.00134 NR NR 0.0045 3.54 Out Out Out Out Out Retain Out Out Out Out Out Retain Out Out Out Out Out Retain 0.26 0.0000001 2.07 0.00023 0.48 0.0000002 1.71 NR Out Out Retain Out Out Out Retain Out Out Out Retain Out NR: no emissions reported Y: survey completed N: survey not completed tpy: tons per year Default: Because site-specific survey not completed, assumed point source type, emissions height of 5 m, distance to fenceline of 20 m and all repor mg/m3: concentration of EGBE in air (milligrams per cubic meter) at fenceline EGBE: ethylene glycol monobutyl ether m: meter TRI: Toxics Release inventory 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 50 of 50 ED 001523 00008282-00454 APPENDIX D Outcome of Long-Term Tiered Modeling in Support of Uncertainty Analysis 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00455 Table D-1. Tier 1 Table of Normalized Annual Concentrations (pg/m 3)/(tpy) Source Type Hejght(m) Length (m) Area (10 m) 0.00 10.00 Area (10 m)a 3.00 10.00 Area (20 m) 0.00 20.00 Area (30 m) 0.00 30.00 Volume Point Point Point Point Point Point Point 3a 10.00 0 _ 2 _ 5 _ 10 _ 20 - 35 - 50 - Normalized Maximum Annual Concentrations At or Beyond: 10 m 956 30 m 302.00 Receptor Distance 50 m 100 m 164.00 64.80 200 m 23.20 500 m 5.53 103 32.47 29.94 28.09 17.73 5.18 515 183.00 107.00 47.80 19.10 5.04 351 131.00 79.20 37.40 16.10 4.58 128 40.32 36.10 25.00 13.79 4.46 5410 792.00 325.00 96.70 29.10 6.08 187 142.00 135.00 72.80 26.40 5.96 96.20 74.60 51.80 27.20 14.80 5.18 27.70 24.40 21.10 13.60 7.17 2.88 6.91 4.52 4.52 3.80 2.44 1.06 2.26 2.26 1.13 1.11 0.90 0.44 1.11 1.10 1.11 0.47 0.42 0.25 a. Not included in EPA's Tier 1 table. Included in the EGBE HAPs Petition Table 4-2. These values are based on ratios of predicted SCREEN3 impacts for each receptor distance. The 10 m2 area source with the 0 m release height was used as the basis for the SCREEN3 predicted ratios. Ratios at the 10 m receptor distance were set equal to the ratios at the 30 m receptor distance. m: meter tpy: ton per year pg/m3: micrograms per cubic meter 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00456 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table D-2. Tier 1 Sensitivity Analysis Long-Term Modeling Parameters and Individual Source Results at Selected Facilities Source ID Release Height (m) Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 6 Stack 7 Stack 8 Stack 9 Fugitive Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 6 Stack 7 Stack 8 Stack 9 Stack 10 Stack 11 Stack 12 Stack 13 Stack 14 Stack 15 Stack 16 Stack 17 Stack 18 Stack 19 Stack 20 Stack 21 Stack 22 Stack 23 Fugitive Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 6 Stack 7 Stack 8 Stack 9 Stack 10 Stack 11 16.6 16.6 19.8 19.8 14.2 21.2 21.6 20.4 20.7 6.9 21.5 21.8 25.9 15.9 13.5 13.5 21.5 21.8 25.9 25.9 13.5 13.5 25.9 21.8 25.9 25.9 13.5 13.5 21.5 25.9 21.8 25.9 15.8 5.8 18.5 18.9 15.5 15.2 13.1 13.1 18.5 18.4 18.3 18.6 18.3 2009 2010 2011 Volume Source Length of Side (m) Distance to Nearest Receptor (m) Physical Fence (YIN) EPA Tier 1 Table: Normalized Maximum Annual Cone. (Hg/m3)/(tpy) Proportion EGBE of Certain Glycol Ethers TRI Emissions (tpy) Maximum Annual Tier 1 EGBE Cone. (Mg/m3) TRI Emissions (tpy) Maximum Annual Tier 1 EGBE Cone. (Mg/m3) TRI Emissions (tpy) Maximum Annual Tier 1 EGBE Cone. (Mg/m3) - 89 Y - 91 Y - 89 Y - 100 Y - 127 Y - 108 Y - 135 Y - 105 Y - 100 Y 10 84 Y - 58 N - 61 N - 62 N - 68 N - 57 N - 68 N - 65 N - 70 N - 69 N - 60 N - 68 N - 68 N - 59 N - 55 N - 52 N - 48 N - 58 N - 57 N - 37 N - 49 N - 45 N - 43 N - 53 N 10 50 N - 147 Y - 127 Y - 102 Y - 102 Y - 98 Y - 96 Y - 140 Y - 145 Y - 122 Y - 118 Y - 103 Y 21.10 21.10 21.10 13.60 13.60 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 36.10 4.52 4.52 4.52 21.10 21.10 21.10 4.52 4.52 4.52 4.52 21.10 21.10 4.52 4.52 4.52 4.52 21.10 21.10 4.52 4.52 4.52 4.52 21.10 36.10 13.60 13.60 13.60 13.60 21.10 21.10 13.60 13.60 13.60 13.60 13.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 24.5 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 20.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 2,743 2,743 2,743 1,768 1,768 494 494 494 494 884 225 225 225 1,050 1,050 1,050 225 225 225 225 1,050 1,050 225 225 225 225 1,050 1,050 225 225 225 225 1,050 718 1,839 1,839 1,839 1,839 2,852 2,852 1,839 1,839 1,839 1,839 1,839 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 25.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 11.5 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 2,743 2,743 2,743 1,768 1,768 494 494 494 494 903 292 292 292 1,365 1,365 1,365 292 292 292 292 1,365 1,365 292 292 292 292 1,365 1,365 292 292 292 292 1,365 413 1,970 1,970 1,970 1,970 3,056 3,056 1,970 1,970 1,970 1,970 1,970 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 25.5 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 12.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 2,848.50 2,848.50 2,848.50 1,836.00 1,836.00 513.00 513.00 513.00 513.00 920.58 314.82 314.82 314.82 1,469.62 1,469.62 1,469.62 314.82 314.82 314.82 314.82 1,469.62 1,469.62 314.82 314.82 314.82 314.82 1,469.62 1,469.62 314.82 314.82 314.82 314.82 1,469.62 431.05 1,904.16 1,904.16 1,904.16 1,904.16 2,954.25 2,954.25 1,904.16 1,904.16 1,904.16 1,904.16 1,904.16 Page 1 of 4 ED 001523 00008282-00457 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table D-2. Tier 1 Sensitivity Analysis Long-Term Modeling Parameters and Individual Source Results at Selected Facilities Source ID Stack 12 Stack 13 Stack 14 Stack 15 Stack 16 Stack 17 Stack 18 Stack 19 Fugitive Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 6 Stack 7 Fugitive Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 6 Stack 7 Stack 8 Stack 9 Stack 10 Stack 11 Stack 12 Fugitive Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Fugitive Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 5 Fugitive Stack 1 Stack 2 Fugitive Stack 1 Release Height (m) 18.3 18.3 18.5 15.5 15.5 17.9 17.9 17.9 6.8 18.3 15.2 15.2 18.3 15.2 15.2 18.3 3.4 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 2.8 14.3 16.8 12.8 12.8 5.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 5.0 11.0 17.0 4.3 15.2 2009 2010 2011 Volume Source Length of Side (m) 10 10 10 10 10 10 - Distance to Nearest Receptor (m) Physical Fence (YIN) EPA Tier 1 Table: Normalized Maximum Annual Cone. (Hg/m3)/(tpy) Proportion EGBE of Certain Glycol Ethers TRI Emissions (tpy) Maximum Annual Tier 1 EGBE Cone. (Mg/m3) TRI Emissions (tpy) 111 Y 121 Y 142 Y 106 Y 110 Y 136 Y 116 Y 114 Y 135 Y 18.71 N 18.71 N 24 N 24 N 37.92 N 32.99 N 37.92 N 43.67 N 38 N 41 N 39 N 40 N 34 N 42 N 60 N 64 N 46 N 62 N 63 N 50 N 75 N 44.63 N 55.57 N 63.77 N 72.24 N 69.36 N 70.7 N 81.66 N 98.33 N 104.03 N 78.13 N 102.8 N 12 N 15 N 31.36 N 22 Y 13.60 13.60 13.60 13.60 13.60 13.60 13.60 13.60 25.00 27.70 27.70 27.70 27.70 24.40 24.40 24.40 40.32 74.60 74.60 74.60 74.60 74.60 74.60 51.80 51.80 74.60 51.80 51.80 51.80 36.10 24.40 21.10 21.10 21.10 36.10 21.10 21.10 21.10 13.60 21.10 25.00 27.70 27.70 40.32 27.70 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 140.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 27.0 51.4 51.4 51.4 51.4 51.4 51.4 51.4 17.1 54.1 54.1 54.1 54.1 54.1 54.1 54.1 54.1 54.1 54.1 54.1 54.1 18.0 51.3 51.3 51.3 51.3 17.1 87.7 87.7 87.7 87.7 87.7 29.3 63.3 63.3 37.9 82.0 1,839 1,839 1,839 1,839 1,839 1,839 1,839 1,839 652 1,253 1,253 1,253 1,253 1,104 1,104 1,104 608 3,655 3,655 3,655 3,655 3,655 3,655 2,538 2,538 3,655 2,538 2,538 2,538 590 1,177 1,018 1,018 1,018 580 1,833 1,833 1,833 1,181 1,833 725 1,753 1,753 1,527 2,268 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 28.5 48.1 48.1 48.1 48.1 48.1 48.1 48.1 16.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 15.7 58.3 58.3 58.3 58.3 19.4 91.9 91.9 91.9 91.9 91.9 30.7 60.1 60.1 36.0 82.2 Maximum Annual Tier 1 EGBE Cone. (Mg/m3) 1,970 1,970 1,970 1,970 1,970 1,970 1,970 1,970 688 1,171 1,171 1,171 1,171 1,032 1,032 1,032 568 3,176 3,176 3,176 3,176 3,176 3,176 2,205 2,205 3,176 2,205 2,205 2,205 512 1,336 1,156 1,156 1,156 659 1,920 1,920 1,920 1,237 1,920 761 1,665 1,665 1,450 2,275 TRI Emissions (tpy) 145.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 28.0 48.6 48.6 48.6 48.6 48.6 48.6 48.6 16.2 52.6 52.6 52.6 52.6 52.6 52.6 52.6 52.6 52.6 52.6 52.6 52.6 17.5 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 16.0 95.7 95.7 95.7 95.7 95.7 31.9 57.7 57.7 34.5 75.9 Maximum Annual Tier 1 EGBE Cone. (Mg/m3) 1,904.16 1,904.16 1,904.16 1,904.16 1,904.16 1,904.16 1,904.16 1,904.16 675.92 1,185.48 1,185.48 1,185.48 1,185.48 1,044.25 1,044.25 1,044.25 575.23 3,553.41 3,553.41 3,553.41 3,553.41 3,553.41 3,553.41 2,467.38 2,467.38 3,553.41 2,467.38 2,467.38 2,467.38 573.20 1,100.35 951.54 951.54 951.54 542.67 1,998.49 1,998.49 1,998.49 1,288.13 1,998.49 789.29 1,598.80 1,598.80 1,392.18 2,098.98 Page 2 of 4 ED 001523 00008282-00458 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table D-2. Tier 1 Sensitivity Analysis Long-Term Modeling Parameters and Individual Source Results at Selected Facilities Source ID Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 6 Stack 7 Stack 8 Fugitive Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 6 Stack 7 Stack 8 Stack 9 Stack 10 Stack 11 Stack 12 Fugitive Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 7 Stack 8 Stack 9 Stack 10 Stack 11 Stack 12 Fugitive Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 6 Stack 7 Stack 8 Stack 9 Fugitive Stack 1 Fugitive Release Height (m) 15.5 11.6 14.0 14.0 15.2 15.2 15.2 5.0 14.6 14.6 16.6 14.6 13.5 14.2 13.2 13.7 15.2 15.3 15.3 15.3 3.7 12.2 12.2 13.4 13.4 13.4 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.8 12.2 12.2 3.0 13.1 12.6 13.2 12.2 12.8 13.7 14.0 14.0 15.2 4.3 13.7 3.0 2009 2010 2011 Volume Source Length of Side (m) Distance to Nearest Receptor (m) Physical Fence (YIN) EPA Tier 1 Table: Normalized Maximum Annual Cone. (Hg/m3)/(tpy) Proportion EGBE of Certain Glycol Ethers TRI Emissions (tpy) Maximum Annual Tier 1 EGBE Cone. (Mg/m3) TRI Emissions (tpy) Maximum Annual Tier 1 EGBE Cone. (Mg/m3) TRI Emissions (tpy) Maximum Annual Tier 1 EGBE Cone. (Mg/m3) - 43 Y - 13 Y - 16 Y - 19 Y - 11 Y - 18 Y - 23 Y 10 63 Y - 36 Y - 40 Y - 42 Y - 29 Y - 56 Y - 61 Y - 62 Y - 65 Y - 56 Y - 62 Y - 65 Y - 60 Y 10 64 Y - 37.8 N - 32.22 N - 41.76 N - 41.76 N - 45.11 N - 41.45 N - 32.61 N - 49.07 N - 53.95 N - 56.39 N - 44.2 N 10 59 N - 30 Y - 38 Y - 44 Y - 19 Y - 23 Y - 31 Y - 26 Y - 34 Y - 41 Y 10 46 Y - 12 N 10 70 N 24.40 27.70 27.70 27.70 27.70 27.70 27.70 36.10 24.40 24.40 24.40 27.70 21.10 21.10 21.10 21.10 21.10 21.10 21.10 21.10 36.10 24.40 24.40 24.40 24.40 24.40 24.40 24.40 24.40 21.10 21.10 24.40 36.10 24.40 24.40 24.40 27.70 27.70 24.40 27.70 24.40 24.40 40.32 27.70 36.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 82.0 82.0 82.0 82.0 82.0 82.0 82.0 14.5 74.8 74.8 74.8 74.8 74.8 74.8 74.8 74.8 74.8 74.8 74.8 74.8 13.2 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 12.5 51.7 51.7 51.7 51.7 51.7 51.7 51.7 51.7 51.7 13.6 1.7 22.8 1,998 2,268 2,268 2,268 2,268 2,268 2,268 522 1,822 1,822 1,822 2,068 1,576 1,576 1,576 1,576 1,576 1,576 1,576 1,576 476 1,330 1,330 1,330 1,330 1,330 1,330 1,330 1,330 1,150 1,150 1,330 451 1,183 1,183 1,183 1,342 1,342 1,183 1,342 1,183 1,183 515 47 824 82.2 82.2 82.2 82.2 82.2 82.2 82.2 14.5 70.6 70.6 70.6 70.6 70.6 70.6 70.6 70.6 70.6 70.6 70.6 70.6 12.5 55.5 55.5 55.5 55.5 55.5 55.5 55.5 55.5 55.5 55.5 55.5 12.9 53.8 53.8 53.8 53.8 53.8 53.8 53.8 53.8 53.8 14.2 1.7 22.1 2,004 2,275 2,275 2,275 2,275 2,275 2,275 523 1,721 1,721 1,721 1,954 1,488 1,488 1,488 1,488 1,488 1,488 1,488 1,488 449 1,354 1,354 1,354 1,354 1,354 1,354 1,354 1,354 1,171 1,171 1,354 464 1,230 1,230 1,230 1,396 1,396 1,230 1,396 1,230 1,230 537 46 799 75.9 75.9 75.9 75.9 75.9 75.9 75.9 13.4 70.5 70.5 70.5 70.5 70.5 70.5 70.5 70.5 70.5 70.5 70.5 70.5 12.4 53.2 53.2 53.2 53.2 53.2 53.2 53.2 53.2 53.2 53.2 53.2 12.2 26.6 26.6 26.6 26.6 26.6 26.6 26.6 26.6 26.6 6.5 1.8 24.0 1,848.92 2,098.98 2,098.98 2,098.98 2,098.98 2,098.98 2,098.98 482.62 1,718.06 1,718.06 1,718.06 1,950.42 1,485.70 1,485.70 1,485.70 1,485.70 1,485.70 1,485.70 1,485.70 1,485.70 448.59 1,298.85 1,298.85 1,298.85 1,298.85 1,298.85 1,298.85 1,298.85 1,298.85 1,123.18 1,123.18 1,298.85 440.11 609.15 609.15 609.15 691.54 691.54 609.15 691.54 609.15 609.15 246.36 49.82 865.65 Page 3 of 4 ED 001523 00008282-00459 Facility Name Table D-2. Tier 1 Sensitivity Analysis Long-Term Modeling Parameters and Individual Source Results at Selected Facilities Source ID Release Height (m) Point Fugitive Stacks 1-10 Fugitive 11.2 3.1 14.0 3.0 2009 2010 2011 Volume Source Length of Side (m) Distance to Nearest Receptor (m) Physical Fence (YIN) EPA Tier 1 Table: Normalized Maximum Annual Cone. (Hg/m3)/(tpy) Proportion EGBE of Certain Glycol Ethers TRI Emissions (tpy) Maximum Annual Tier 1 EGBE Cone. (Mg/m3) TRI Emissions (tpy) Maximum Annual Tier 1 EGBE Cone. (Mg/m3) TRI Emissions (tpy) Maximum Annual Tier 1 EGBE Cone. (Mg/m3) - 45 Unknown 24.40 10 210 Unknown 13.79 - 75 Unknown 21.10 10 91.7 Unknown 36.10 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 4.3 36.1 143.9 28.3 104 498 2,885 971 3.6 38.8 157.6 31.2 87 535 3,158 1,071 3.1 45.2 110.5 25.7 74.69 623.50 2,214.11 881.96 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production Page 4 of 4 ED 001523 00008282-00460 Table D-3. Tier 1 Sensitivity Analysis Long-Term Modeling Summary for Selected Facilities Source Type 2009 TRI Maximum Annual Tier 1 EGBE Cone. (pg/m3) Long-Term HQ (combined) 2010 TRI 2011 TRI Maximum Annual Tier 1 EGBE Cone. (pg/m3) Long-Term HQ (combined) Maximum Annual Tier 1 EGBE Cone. (pg/m3) Long-Term HQ (combined) Point 3654.7 3 Volume 589.5 3176.1 512.3 3553.4 2 3 573.2 Point 104.4 87.5 0.4 Volume 498.5 535.1 74.7 0.4 0.4 623.5 Point 2852.4 2 Volume 651.8 3056.1 688.0 2954.3 2 2 675.9 Point 1753.1 1665.4 1598.8 2 2 2 Volume 1526.5 1450.2 1392.2 Point 2885.0 3158.4 2214.1 2 3 2 Volume 971.0 1070.7 882.0 Point 2268.3 2275.3 2099.0 2 2 2 Volume 521.7 523.3 482.6 Point 1049.7 1 Volume 718.4 1364.6 1469.6 1 1 413.1 431.0 Point 2743.0 2743.0 2848.5 2 2 2 Volume 884.5 902.5 920.6 Point 1329.8 1 Volume 451.3 1354.2 1298.8 1 1 463.9 440.1 Point 47.4 46.0 49.8 0.5 0.5 0.6 Volume 823.6 799.2 865.6 Point 1833.0 1919.7 1998.5 2 2 2 Volume 725.5 761.0 789.3 Point 1342.4 1 Volume 515.3 1395.9 1 536.8 691.5 0.6 246.4 Point 1253.3 1 Volume 608.1 1171.5 1185.5 1 1 568.4 575.2 Point 2068.4 2 Volume 475.7 1953.6 449.3 1950.4 2 1 448.6 Point 1177.4 1 Volume 579.7 1336.4 1100.4 1 1 659.1 542.7 Hazard quotient (HQ) equals the sum of the maximum annual average concentration for fugitive/volume source emissions and point source emissions, at or beyond the fence line, is compared to an RfC for EGBE of 1,600 pg/m3. Bold text indicates an HQ greater than 1 EGBE: ethylene glycol monobutyl ether HQ: hazard quotient RfC: reference concentration TRI: Toxics Release inventory pg/m3: micrograms per cubic meter 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00461 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table D-4. Tier 2 Modeling Stack Parameters and Individual Source Results at Individual Facilities Stack Stack ID Stack 1 LI-IBO-Hot Stack 2 L1-ISS Stack 3 LI-POI-Hot Stack 4 L1-P02-Hot Stack 5 LI-PR-11 Stack 6 LI-PR-12 Stack 7 L2-IBO-Hot Stack 8 L2-ISS Stack 9 L2-P01-Hot Stack 10 L2-P02-Hot Stack 11 L2-PR-21 Stack 12 L2-PR-22 Stack 13 L3-IBO-Hot Stack 14 L3-ISS Stack 15 L3-P01-Hot Stack 16 L3-P02-Hot Stack 17 L3-PR-31 Stack 18 L3-PR-32 Stack 19 L4-BCO-Hot Stack 20 L4-IBO-Hot Stack 21 L4-ISS Stack 22 L4-PO-Hot Stack 23 L4-PR-41 Stack 1 B_P011 Stack 2 B_P012 Stack 3 B_P021 Stack 4 B_P022 Stack 5 BJBOII Stack 6 BJB021B Stack 7 BJB031 Stack 8 B_WC031 Stack 9 B_BH Stack 1 P02 Stack 2 P03 Stack 3 P04Z1 Stack 4 P04Z2 Alternative Release Stack Inside Stack Exit Stack Stack ID Height (m) Diameter (m) Gas Velocity Temperature (m/s) (K) 2009 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a POII P012 P021 P022 IBOII IB021-B IB031 WashCoat 0\ Baghouse S019 S006 S035 S036 2149 21.79 25.91 15.85 13.52 13.52 21.49 21.79 25.91 25.91 13.52 13.52 25.91 21.79 25.91 25.91 13.52 13.52 21.49 25.91 21.79 25.91 15.75 16.61 16.61 19.81 19.81 14.17 21.18 21.64 20.42 20.73 18.47 18.87 15.54 15.16 0.686 0.405 0.381 0.405 0.399 0.399 0.686 0.405 0.393 0.381 0.399 0.399 0.686 0.405 0.381 0.393 0.399 0.399 0.393 0.381 0.405 0.686 1.119 0.457 0.305 0.457 0.457 0.610 0.610 0.864 0.813 0.330 0.406 0.406 0.483 0.483 9.64 11.70 19.16 20.70 10.18 10.18 2.71 11.70 19.19 15.63 10.18 10.18 7.59 11.70 17.20 14.71 10.18 10.18 17.23 32.32 7.31 5.00 1.30 7.00 29.07 9.79 11.32 11.62 3.98 5.12 2.58 37.48 13.53 12.25 6.77 9.49 349.8 298.0 374.8 374.8 298.0 298.0 349.8 298.0 374.8 374.8 298.0 298.0 349.8 298.0 374.8 374.8 298.0 298.0 453.2 349.8 298.0 374.8 298.0 510.9 510.9 499.8 488.7 477.6 477.6 494.3 510.9 294.3 402.0 365.9 402.6 395.9 1.431 1.431 1.431 1.431 1.431 1.431 1.431 1.431 1.431 1.431 1.431 1.431 1.431 1.431 1.431 1.431 1.431 1.431 1.431 1.431 1.431 1.431 1.431 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.889 3.889 3.889 3.889 2010 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a 1.860 1.860 1.860 1.860 1.860 1.860 1.860 1.860 1.860 1.860 1.860 1.860 1.860 1.860 1.860 1.860 1.860 1.860 1.860 1.860 1.860 1.860 1.860 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 4.167 4.167 4.167 4.167 2011 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a Worst case annual average unit emission rate concentrationb (pg/m3) (1 g/s) 2.004 2.004 2.004 2.004 2.004 2.004 2.004 2.004 2.004 2.004 2.004 2.004 2.004 2.004 2.004 2.004 2.004 2.004 2.004 2.004 2.004 2.004 2.004 3.883 3.883 3.883 3.883 3.883 3.883 3.883 3.883 3.883 4.028 4.028 4.028 4.028 59.41 165.81 61.09 72.90 195.17 202.66 140.47 156.61 59.16 83.54 204.17 211.88 88.27 151.97 77.60 83.30 210.52 196.63 62.85 56.94 172.87 85.12 284.49 49.10 32.25 19.29 18.31 27.00 21.02 11.49 18.91 22.86 27.18 39.52 88.33 77.59 Page 1 of 4 ED 001523 00008282-00462 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table D-4. Tier 2 Modeling Stack Parameters and Individual Source Results at Individual Facilities Stack Stack ID Stack 5 P05Z1 Stack 6 P05Z2 Stack 7 IB02Z1 Stack 8 IB02Z2 Stack 9 IB03Z1 Stack 10 IB03Z2 Stack 11 IB04/5Z1 Stack 12 IB04/5Z2 Stack 13 IB04/5Z3 Stack 14 BCPOL2 Stack 15 BCPOL4Z1 Stack 16 BCPOL4Z2 Stack 17 ICEXH02 Stack 18 ICEXH03 Stack 19 ICEXH045 Stack 1 IBO Stack 2 Ross Stack 3 IBO Stack 4 Ross Stack 5 IBO Stack 6 Ross Stack 7 Ross Stack 1 IBO #1A Stack 2 IBO #2C Stack 3 LSM #1A Stack 4 LSM #2A Stack 1 LSM2 Stack 2 L1PO Stack 3 IBOI Stack 4 LSM1 Stack 5 L1V1 Stack 6 IB03 Stack 7 L3S Stack 8 L3VI Stack 9 IB04 Stack 10 L4S Alternative Release Stack Inside Stack Exit Stack Stack ID Height (m) Diameter (m) Gas Velocity Temperature (m/s) (K) 2009 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a S037 S038 S021 S020 son S010 S027 S028 S039 S016 S033 S034 S024 S023 S022 IBO (Can Lin Ross (Can Lir IBO (Can Lin Ross (Can Lir IBO (Can Lin Ross (Can Lir Ross (Can Lir 13.13 13.13 18.52 18.42 18.34 18.59 18.31 18.29 18.34 18.47 15.54 15.54 17.86 17.86 17.86 18.29 15.24 15.24 18.29 15.24 15.24 18.29 14.33 16.76 12.80 12.80 8.53 8.53 8.53 8.53 8.53 8.53 8.53 8.53 8.53 8.53 0.483 0.483 0.406 0.508 0.406 0.508 0.406 0.508 0.406 0.406 0.483 0.483 0.305 0.305 0.406 0.305 0.305 0.305 0.305 0.305 0.305 0.305 0.710 1.067 0.280 0.280 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 9.63 8.84 7.60 6.60 6.06 7.29 2.85 5.13 13.05 13.01 9.00 10.22 11.26 11.89 8.61 10.20 16.72 9.51 16.72 10.20 16.72 16.72 3.97 7.98 8.32 6.91 1.42 2.10 3.31 1.18 3.42 10.25 1.18 3.42 8.52 1.42 369.8 380.9 362.6 382.6 322.6 389.3 356.5 384.8 373.7 391.5 355.9 382.0 293.2 295.9 295.9 459.8 422.6 459.8 422.6 459.8 422.6 422.6 460.9 316.5 294.3 294.3 449.8 291.5 533.2 449.8 291.5 291.5 449.8 291.5 291.5 449.8 3.889 3.889 3.889 3.889 3.889 3.889 3.889 3.889 3.889 3.889 3.889 3.889 3.889 3.889 3.889 1.302 1.302 1.302 1.302 1.302 1.302 1.302 1.388 1.388 1.388 1.388 1.409 1.409 1.409 1.409 1.409 1.409 1.409 1.409 1.409 1.409 2010 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a 4.167 4.167 4.167 4.167 4.167 4.167 4.167 4.167 4.167 4.167 4.167 4.167 4.167 4.167 4.167 1.217 1.217 1.217 1.217 1.217 1.217 1.217 1.576 1.576 1.576 1.576 1.225 1.225 1.225 1.225 1.225 1.225 1.225 1.225 1.225 1.225 2011 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a Worst case annual average unit emission rate concentrationb (pg/m3) (1 g/s) 4.028 4.028 4.028 4.028 4.028 4.028 4.028 4.028 4.028 4.028 4.028 4.028 4.028 4.028 4.028 1.231 1.231 1.231 1.231 1.231 1.231 1.231 1.297 1.297 1.297 1.297 1.370 1.370 1.370 1.370 1.370 1.370 1.370 1.370 1.370 1.370 85.53 79.85 46.41 36.78 80.16 37.88 129.63 59.16 38.05 30.40 91.25 74.95 78.39 85.78 89.46 114.57 103.34 132.80 92.75 155.87 131.89 118.04 62.08 93.81 294.50 310.14 281.40 817.14 187.50 365.71 764.54 317.95 254.13 537.98 437.56 250.24 Page 2 of 4 ED 001523 00008282-00463 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table D-4. Tier 2 Modeling Stack Parameters and Individual Source Results at Individual Facilities Stack Stack ID Stack 11 L3PO Stack 12 IB02 Stack 1 TO-1 Stack 2 TO-2 Stack 1 EU-001 Stack 2 EU-003 Stack 3 EU-005 Stack 4 EU-007 Stack 5 EU-008 Stack 1 SV4 Stack 2 SV5 Stack 3 SV 6 Stack 4 SV 7 Stack 5 SV 8 Stack 6 SV9 Stack 7 SV10 Stack 8 SV11 Stack 1 REX_SV21 Stack 2 REX_SV22 Stack 3 REX_SV23 Stack 4 RED_SV31 Stack 5 REX_SV32 Stack 6 REX_SV33 Stack 7 REX_SV41 Stack 8 REX_SV42 Stack 9 REX_RTO Stack 1 SV7A Stack 2 SV7B Stack 3 SV7C Stack 4 SV7D Stack 5 SV8A Stack 6 SV8B Stack 7 SV8C Stack 8 SV8D Stack 9 SV9A Stack 10 SV9B Alternative Release Stack Inside Stack Exit Stack Stack ID Height (m) Diameter (m) Gas Velocity Temperature (m/s) (K) 2009 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a Printer Oven! Printer Oven! Inside Spray 1 Inside Spray 1 Inside Spray 1 Inside Bake C Inside Bake C Inside Bake C Printer Oven! Printer Oven! Base Coater 1 Inside Spray 1 Inside Spray 1 Inside Spray 1 Inside Bake C Inside Bake C Regenerative Printer Pin 0\ Printer Pin 0\ Printer Pin 0\ Printer Pin 0\ Inside Spray 1 Inside Spray 1 Inside Spray 1 Inside Spray 1 Inside Bake C Inside Bake C 8.53 8.53 11.00 17.00 17.98 17.98 17.98 17.98 17.98 15.24 15.54 11.58 14.02 14.02 15.24 15.24 15.24 13.11 12.65 13.17 12.19 12.80 13.72 14.02 14.02 15.24 14.63 14.63 16.61 14.63 13.50 14.17 13.20 13.72 15.24 15.33 0.457 0.457 1.219 0.597 0.311 0.311 0.311 0.311 0.311 0.457 0.396 0.610 0.610 0.610 0.762 0.762 0.762 0.396 0.396 0.396 1.097 1.189 0.914 0.762 0.823 1.158 0.558 0.558 0.914 0.610 0.838 0.838 0.850 0.838 0.762 0.762 3.42 3.68 16.17 13.49 31.08 18.65 18.65 31.08 31.08 6.10 6.10 3.96 3.96 3.96 4.88 4.88 4.88 9.58 9.57 9.57 2.50 2.13 3.59 8.07 6.92 7.61 4.83 4.83 1.80 4.04 2.14 2.14 2.08 2.14 3.62 3.62 291.5 533.2 659.2 773.2 310.9 394.3 394.3 449.8 449.8 422.0 422.0 294.3 294.3 294.3 422.0 422.0 422.0 366.5 366.5 366.5 294.3 294.3 294.3 449.8 449.8 488.7 422.0 444.3 397.0 399.8 299.8 299.8 299.8 299.8 358.2 360.9 1.409 1.409 1.821 1.821 2.499 2.499 2.499 2.499 2.499 2.356 2.356 2.356 2.356 2.356 2.356 2.356 2.356 1.394 1.394 1.394 1.394 1.394 1.394 1.394 1.394 1.394 2.148 2.148 2.148 2.148 2.148 2.148 2.148 2.148 2.148 2.148 2010 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a 1.225 1.225 1.730 1.730 2.617 2.617 2.617 2.617 2.617 2.363 2.363 2.363 2.363 2.363 2.363 2.363 2.363 1.450 1.450 1.450 1.450 1.450 1.450 1.450 1.450 1.450 2.029 2.029 2.029 2.029 2.029 2.029 2.029 2.029 2.029 2.029 2011 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a Worst case annual average unit emission rate concentrationb (pg/m3) (1 g/s) 1.370 1.370 1.660 1.660 2.725 2.725 2.725 2.725 2.725 2.180 2.180 2.180 2.180 2.180 2.180 2.180 2.180 0.718 0.718 0.718 0.718 0.718 0.718 0.718 0.718 0.718 2.026 2.026 2.026 2.026 2.026 2.026 2.026 2.026 2.026 2.026 533.91 151.60 19.68 33.64 93.44 82.12 80.28 55.63 52.29 98.65 102.13 363.01 295.01 294.17 59.82 60.45 59.70 165.67 175.24 190.89 321.15 376.82 305.07 71.92 69.03 42.09 129.19 153.09 152.01 131.78 472.44 413.91 481.59 453.99 167.40 152.46 Page 3 of 4 ED 001523 00008282-00464 Table D-4. Tier 2 Modeling Stack Parameters and Individual Source Results at Individual Facilities Stack Stack ID Alternative Release Stack Inside Stack Exit Stack Stack ID Height (m) Diameter (m) Gas Velocity Temperature (m/s) (K) 2009 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a Stack 11 SV9C Stack 12 SV9D Stack 1 Stackl Stack 2 Stack2 Stack 3 Stack3 Stack 4 Stack4 Stack 5 Stack5 Stack 1 C11 Stack 2 C12 Stack 3 Cl 3 Stack 4 C14 Stack 5 C15 Stack 6 C16 Stack 7 C21 Stack 8 C22 Stack 9 C23 Stack 10 C24 Stack 11 SI Stack 12 S2 Inside Bake C Inside Bake C LI Roll 1 L1Roll2 L1IS1 L1IS2 L1IS3 L1IS4 L2Roll1 L2RoN2 L2IS1 L2IS2 IS_1_Over_P IS_2_Over_F 15.33 15.33 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 15.80 15.80 17.11 17.11 17.11 17.11 15.80 15.80 16.46 16.78 16.00 16.13 0.762 0.762 6.096 6.096 6.096 6.096 6.096 0.719 0.719 0.905 0.905 0.905 0.914 0.719 0.719 0.799 0.799 0.695 0.362 3.62 3.62 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 17.42 7.37 5.13 5.13 12.32 10.78 17.42 7.37 9.42 18.85 12.44 45.87 366.5 360.9 394.3 394.3 394.3 394.3 394.3 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 294.3 294.3 2.148 2.148 3.933 3.933 3.933 3.933 3.933 1.568 1.568 1.568 1.568 1.568 1.568 1.568 1.568 1.568 1.568 1.568 1.568 a. All point EGBE emissions were conservatively assumed to exhaust through each stack for AERSCREEN modeling. The emission rate for each source is calculated from the TRI reported stack emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers as follows EGBE Emission Rate (g/s) = Stack TRI Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers (tpy) x % EGBE x 254 (conversion factor) + 8,760 (hrs/yr) The calculated emission rate assumes EGBE emissions occur continuously 8,760 hours per year. b. Worst case annual average unit emission rate concentration in (pg/m3) (Ig/s) assumes stack emission rate of 1 g/s. It is obtained by multiplying worst-case 1 -hr average unit emission rate concentration by a factor of 0.1, in accordancewith EPA's AERSCREEN guidance Tier 2 annual concentration for a stack is obtained by multiplying the unit emission rate concentration by Tier 2 stack emission rate (in g/s) for a given TRI year The maximum point source unit emission rate impact (considering all point sources for a facility) is shown in bolded text, g/s: grams per second K: degrees Kelvin m: meter m/s: meters per second pg/m3: micrograms per cubic meter tpy: ton per year TRI: Toxic Release Inventory 2010 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a 2.029 2.029 4.306 4.306 4.306 4.306 4.306 1.597 1.597 1.597 1.597 1.597 1.597 1.597 1.597 1.597 1.597 1.597 1.597 2011 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a Worst case annual average unit emission rate concentrationb (pg/m3) (Ig/s) 2.026 2.026 3.019 3.019 3.019 3.019 3.019 1.531 1.531 1.531 1.531 1.531 1.531 1.531 1.531 1.531 1.531 1.531 1.531 152.35 172.04 55.33 67.54 70.24 58.47 54.25 27.42 55.07 44.89 45.44 23.93 26.33 28.58 49.54 35.83 25.58 132.66 69.78 Page 4 of 4 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00465 Table D-5, Tier 2 Modeling Fugitive Volume Parameters and Results at Individual Facilities Source Type Volume Release Height (m) b Volume Intial Volume Intial Lateral Vertical Dimension (m) Dimension C (m)d 2009 TRI 2010 TRI Emission Rate Emission Rate <g/s)e <g/s)e 2011 TRI Emission Rate <g/s)e Worst case fugitive annual average unit emission rate concentration1 (pg/m3) (ig/s) Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume 12.420 12.420 14.630 7.315 10.670 6.096 9.144 10.670 10.670 9.144 7.925 7.000 12.192 22.790 11.230 13.730 19.850 24.820 27.300 14.120 30.710 28.840 20.930 24.550 27.240 20.698 5.777 5.780 6.805 3.402 4.962 2.835 4.253 4.962 4.962 4.253 3.686 3.250 5.670 0.572 0.705 0.750 0.434 0.462 0.470 1.089 0.835 0.416 0.368 0.379 0.774 0.360 0.32916 0.71917 0.79165 0.40553 0.52520 0.40825 1.03458 0.87561 0.41699 0.38295 0.35802 0.85314 0.36965 0.34347 0.73355 0.77776 0.41038 0.43242 0.45675 0.99320 0.90821 0.38457 0.17576 0.35745 0.70277 0.35069 86.09 131.53 52.37 184.57 93.98 95.61 198.76 82.09 87.58 108.26 129.65 111.01 104.77 a. Fugitive releases of EGBE are reported to occur through the building's roof vents in the production area of the facility building where stacks emitting EGBE are located. Fugitive emissions from the roof vents are modeled as a single volume source. b. The volume source release height is taken to be at the release height of fugitive emissions; it is set to be equal to the roof height of the process building c. Per EPA's AERMOD guidance, the volume source initial lateral dimension is taken to be the length of the side of the volume divided by 4.3. d. Per EPA's AERMOD guidance, the volume source initial vertical dimension is taken to be the height of the volume source (roof height) divided by 2.15. e. The emission rate for each source is calculated from the TRI reported fugitive emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers as folbws: EGBE Emission Rate (g/s) = Fugitive TRI Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers (tpy) x % EGBE x 254 (conversion factor) + 8,760 (hrs/yr) The calculated emission rate assumes EGBE emissions occur continuously 8,760 hours per year. f. Worst case annual average unit emission rate concentration in (pg/m3) (1 g/s) assumes fugitive emission rate of 1 g/s. Tier 2 annual concentration for a fugitive volume is obtained by multiplying the unit emission rate concentration by Tier 2 fugitive emission rate (in g/s) for a given TRI year g/s: grams per second hrs/yr: hours per year m: meter tpy: ton per year TRI: Toxic Release Inventory 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00466 Table D-6. Tier 2 Modeling Stack Parameters and Individual Source Results in Clusters Stack Stack ID Stack 1 Stack 1 Stack 1 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 6 Stack 7 Stack 8 Stack 9 Stackl Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 6 Stack 7 Stack 8 Stack 9 Stack 1 Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 6 Stack 7 Stack 8 Stack 9 Stack 10 Stack 11 Stack 12 Stack 1 Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 1 REX_SV21 REX_SV22 REX_SV23 RED SV31 REX_SV32 REX_SV33 REX_SV41 REX SV42 REX_RTO N/A B_P011 B_P012 B_P021 B P022 BJBOII BJB021B BJB031 B WC031 B_BH Stk_2 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C21 C22 C23 C24 SI S2 Stk_2 0001 TO-1 TO-2 0003 TO-1 TO-2 Coater #1 Coater #2 Coater #3 Coater #4 Alternative Stack ID Release Height (m) Stack Inside Diameter (m) Stack Exit Gas Velocity (m/s) Printer Oven Stack # 1 - SV 21 13.11 0.396 9.58 Printer Oven Stack # 2 - SV 22 12.65 0.396 9.57 Base Coater Pin Oven Stack # 3 - SV 23 13.17 0.396 9.57 Inside Spray Machines Bank 1 - SV 31 12.19 1.097 2.50 Inside Spray Machines Bank 2 - SV 32 12.80 1.189 2.13 inside Spray Machines Bank 2 - SV 33 13.72 0.914 3.59 Inside Bake Oven Stack #1 - SV 41 14.02 0.762 8.07 Inside Bake Oven Stack # 2 - SV 42 14.02 0.823 6.92 Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer Stack 15.24 1.158 7.61 3960*** 9.75 0.396 2.74 POII 16.61 0.457 7.00 P012 16.61 0.305 29.07 P021 19.81 0.457 9.79 P022 19.81 0.457 11.32 IBOII 14.17 0.610 11.62 IB021-B 21.18 0.610 3.98 IB031 21.64 0.864 5.12 WashCoat Oven31 20.42 0.813 2.58 Baghouse 8194**** 20.73 12.19 0.330 0.305 37.48 0.39 LIRolil 15.80 0.719 17.42 L1Roil2 15.80 0.719 7.37 L1IS1 17.11 0.905 5.13 L1IS2 17.11 0.905 5.13 L1IS3 17.11 0.905 12.32 L1IS4 17.11 0.914 10.78 L2ROII1 15.80 0.719 17.42 L2ROII2 15.80 0.719 7.37 L2IS1 16.46 0.799 9.42 L2IS2 16.78 0.799 18.85 IS_1_Over_Fug 16.00 0.695 12.44 IS 2 Over Fug 16.13 0.362 45.87 not used 9.14 0.914 3.23 0001 (Bldg 5G) 12.80 2.070 8.41 TO-1 (Bldg 5D) 11.58 1.220 7.80 TO-2 (Bldg 5D) 10.67 0.670 6.86 0003 (Bldg 5D) 10.05 0.640 1.66 11.00 1.219 16.17 17.00 0.597 13.49 12.50 0.610 31.01 14.33 0.610 9.15 12.50 0.457 22.27 12.19 0.457 15.45 No stack parameters available. All emissions (stack + fugitives) modeled as a volume Stack Temperature (K) 366.5 366.5 366.5 294.3 294.3 294.3 449.8 449.8 488.7 294.3 510.9 510.9 499.8 488.7 477.6 477.6 494.3 510.9 294.3 327.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 294.3 294.3 505.4 405.9 488.2 704.3 649.8 659.2 773.2 824.8 783.2 760.9 745.4 2009 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a 2010 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a 2011 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a 1.394 1.394 1.394 1.394 1.394 1.394 1.394 1.394 1.394 0.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 0.591 1.568 1.568 1.568 1.568 1.568 1.568 1.568 1.568 1.568 1.568 1.568 1.568 0.145 0.231 0.231 0.231 0.231 1.821 1.821 0.031 0.031 0.031 0.031 1.450 1.450 1.450 1.450 1.450 1.450 1.450 1.450 1.450 1.241 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 3.740 0.579 1.597 1.597 1.597 1.597 1.597 1.597 1.597 1.597 1.597 1.597 1.597 1.597 0.222 0.161 0.161 0.161 0.161 1.730 1.730 0.032 0.032 0.032 0.032 0.718 0.718 0.718 0.718 0.718 0.718 0.718 0.718 0.718 0.976 3.883 3.883 3.883 3.883 3.883 3.883 3.883 3.883 3.883 0.557 1.531 1.531 1.531 1.531 1.531 1.531 1.531 1.531 1.531 1.531 1.531 1.531 0.199 0.066 0.066 0.066 0.066 1.660 1.660 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 Worst case annual average unit emission rate concentration6 (pg/m3) (Ig/s) 165.67 175.24 190.89 321.15 376.82 305.07 71.92 69.03 42.09 460.83 49.10 32.25 19.29 18.31 27.00 21.02 11.49 18.91 22.86 287.86 27.42 55.07 44.89 45.44 23.93 26.33 28.58 49.54 35.83 25.58 132.66 69.78 101.81 15.46 31.62 46.93 92.82 19.68 33.64 17.65 31.19 23.90 26.08 Page 1 of 2 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00467 Table D-6. Tier 2 Modeling Stack Parameters and Individual Source Results in Clusters Stack Stack ID Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 6 Stack 7 Stack 8 Stack 9 Stack 10 Stack 11 Stack 12 Stack 1 POI P02 P03 IBOI IB02 IB03 Printer 1 Printer 2 Printer 3 Spray line 1 Spray line 2 Spray line 3 Stk 2 Alternative Stack ID Release Height (m) Stack Inside Diameter (m) 15.95 16.31 16.08 16.00 16.00 16.00 15.95 15.90 16.08 14.94 14.99 14.99 11.64 0.508 0.508 0.508 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.508 0.508 0.508 0.381 0.381 0.381 0.432 Stack Exit Gas Velocity (m/s) 4.32 4.28 6.14 12.15 7.11 13.17 0.50 0.50 0.50 6.39 7.28 8.74 5.44 Stack Temperature (K) 479.0 465.0 458.0 473.0 475.0 474.0 298.0 298.0 298.0 298.0 298.0 298.0 370.9 2009 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a 2010 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a 2011 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a 1.812 1.812 1.812 1.812 1.812 1.812 1.812 1.812 1.812 1.812 1.812 1.812 0.0004 2.230 2.230 2.230 2.230 2.230 2.230 2.230 2.230 2.230 2.230 2.230 2.230 0.0004 2.369 2.369 2.369 2.369 2.369 2.369 2.369 2.369 2.369 2.369 2.369 2.369 0.0004 Worst case annual average unit emission rate concentration6 (pg/m3) (Ig/s) 76.93 89.85 82.55 53.74 69.59 60.47 303.39 258.17 278.44 193.05 194.68 210.93 178.83 a. All point EGBE emissions were conservatively assumed to exhaust through each stack for AERSCREEN modeling. The emission rate for each source is calculated from the TRI reported stack emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers as follows: EGBE Emission Rate (g/s) = Stack TRi Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers (tpy) x % EGBEx 254 (conversion factor) * 8,760 (hrs/yr) The calculated emission rate assumes EGBE emissions occur continuously 8,760 hours per year. b. Worst case annual average unit emission rate concentration in (pg/m3) (Ig/s) assumes stack emission rate of 1 g/s. It is obtained by multiplying worst-case 1-hr average unit emission rate concentration by a factor of 0.1, in accordance with EPA's AERSCREEN guidance Tier 2 annual concentration for a stack is obtained by multiplying the unit emission rate concentration by Tier 2 stack emission rate (in g/s) for a given TRI year The maximum point source unit emission rate impact (considering all point sources for a facility) is shown in bolded text, g/s: grams per second K: degrees Kelvin m: meter m/s: meters per second pg/m3: micrograms per cubic meter tpy: ton per year TRi: Toxic Regulatory index 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 2 of 2 ED 001523 00008282-00468 Table D-7. Tier 2 Modeling Fugitive Volume Parameters and Results in Clusters Source Type Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Release Height (m) b Volume Intial Volume Intial Lateral Vertical Dimension (m)c Dimension (m) d 2009 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)e 2010 TRI Emission Rate <g/s)e 9.144 20.930 4.253 0.368 0.38295 No fugitive emissions reported to TRI. All reported emissions modeled as a stack release 12.420 11.230 5.780 0.705 0.71917 8.800 47.280 4.093 0.066 0.06437 12.192 20.698 5.670 0.360 0.36965 9.144 39.535 4.251 0.000 0.00000 7.315 19.900 3.402 0.338 0.19243 12.192 16.247 5.670 0.174 0.09913 9.144 14.120 4.253 1.089 1.03458 9.750 11.881 4.540 0.000 0.00011 9.144 16.000 4.250 0.164 0.20797 13.106 30.930 6.096 0.334 0.40419 10.000 9.698 4.651 0.001 0.00101 2011 TRI Emission Rate <g/s)e 0.17576 0.73355 0.06187 0.35069 0.00058 0.13205 0.06802 0.99320 0.00118 0.07570 0.47387 0.00101 Worst case fugitive annual average unit emission rate concentration* (pg/m3) <ig/s) 108.26 131.53 49.60 104.77 73.37 185.81 106.82 198.76 191.64 147.46 54.07 186.65 a. Fugitive releases of EGBE are reported to occur through the building's roof vents in the production area of the facility building where stacks emitting EGBE are located. Fugitive emissions from the roof vents are modeled as a single volume source. b. The volume source release height is taken to be at the release height of fugitive emissions; it is set to be equal to the roof height of the process building c. Per EPA's AERMOD guidance, the volume source initial lateral dimension is taken to be the length of the side of the volume divided by 4.3. d. Per EPA's AERMOD guidance, the volume source initial vertical dimension is taken to be the height of the volume source (roof height) divided by 2.15. e. The emission rate for each source is calculated from the TRI reported fugitive emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers as follows: EGBE Emission Rate (g/sj = Fugitive TRI Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers (tpy) x % EGBE x 254 (conversion factor) 8,760 (hrs/yr) The calculated emission rate assumes EGBE emissions occur continuously 8,760 hours per year. f. Worst case annual average unit emission rate concentration in (pg/m3) (Ig/s) assumes fugitive emission rate of 1 g/s. Tier 2 annual concentration for a fugitive volume is obtained by multiplying the unit emission rate concentration by Tier 2 fugitive emission rate (in g/s) for a given TRI year g. Ball Facility in Weirton has two distinct (physically separate) buildings associtaed with fugitive emissions which were modeled separately. Their emissions were estimated based on the breakdown of the total fugitive emissions provided by the faciltiy in Tier 2 Survey a signle volume (building) with worse dispersion characteristics g/s: grams per second hrs/yr: hours per year m: meter tpy: ton per year TRI: Toxic Release Inventory 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00469 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table D-8. Tier 3 Modeling Stack Parameters at Individual Facilities Stack Stack ID Stack 1 LSM2 Stack 2 L1PO Stack 3 IBOI Stack 4 LSM1 Stack 5 L1V1 Stack 6 IB03 Stack 7 L3S Stack 8 L3VI Stack 9 IB04 Stack 10 L4S Stack 11 L3PO Stack 12 IB02 Stack 1 S30 Stack 1 TO-1 Stack 2 TO-2 Stack 1 SV4 Stack 2 SV5 Stack 3 SV 6 Stack 4 SV 7 Stack 5 SV 8 Stack 6 SV9 Stack 7 SV10 Stack 8 SV11 Stack 1 REX_SV21 Stack 1 REX_SV22 Stack 1 REX_SV23 Stack 4 RED_SV31 Stack 5 REX_SV32 Stack 6 REX_SV33 Stack 7 REX_SV41 Stack 8 REX_SV42 Stack 9 REX_RTO Stack 1 SV7A Stack 2 SV7B Stack 3 SV7C Stack 4 SV7D Stack 5 SV8A Stack 6 SV8B Stack 7 SV8C Stack 8 SV8D Stack 9 SV9A Alternative Stack ID Printer Oven Stack # 1 - SV4 Printer Oven Stack # 2 - SV5 Inside Spray Machines Bank 1 - SV 6 Inside Spray Machines Bank 2 - SV 7 Inside Spray Machines Bank 3 - SV 8 Inside Bake Oven Stack # 1 - SV9 InsideBakeOven Stack # 2 - SV10 Inside Bake Oven Stack # 3 - SV11 Printer Oven Stack # 1 - SV 21 Printer Oven Stack # 2 - SV 22 Base Coater Pin Oven Stack # 3 - SV 23 Inside Spray Machines Bank 1 - SV 31 Inside Spray Machines Bank 2 - SV 32 Inside Spray Machines Bank 2 - SV 33 Inside Bake Oven Stack # 1 - SV 41 Inside Bake Oven Stack # 2 - SV 42 Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer Stack Printer Pin Oven Stack 1 - SV 7A Printer Pin Oven Stack 2 - SV 7B Printer Pin Oven Stack 3 - SV 7C Printer Pin Oven Stack 4 - SV 7D Inside Spray Machines Bank 1 - SV 8A Inside Spray Machines Bank 2 - SV 8B Inside Spray Machines Bank 3 - SV 8C Inside Spray Machines Bank 4 - SV 8D Inside Bake Oven Stack # 1 - SV 9A Release Height (m) Stack Inside Diameter (m) Stack Exit Gas Velocity (m/s) Stack Temperature 2009 TRI Emission Rate 2010 TRI Emission Rate 2011 TRI Emission Rate <K) <g/s)a <g/s)a <g/s)a 8.530 8.530 8.530 8.530 8.530 8.530 8.530 8.530 8.530 8.530 8.530 8.530 13.720 11.000 17.000 15.200 15.500 11.600 14.000 14.000 15.200 15.200 15.200 13.106 12.649 13.167 12.192 12.802 13.716 14.021 14.021 15.240 14.630 14.630 16.612 14.630 13.503 14.173 13.198 13.716 15.240 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.966 1.219 0.597 0.460 0.400 0.610 0.610 0.610 0.760 0.760 0.760 0.396 0.396 0.396 1.097 1.189 0.914 0.762 0.823 1.158 0.558 0.558 0.914 0.610 0.838 0.838 0.850 0.838 0.762 2.103 3.312 1.183 3.417 10.252 1.183 3.417 8.517 1.419 3.417 3.680 1.183 9.546 16.149 13.492 6.100 6.100 3.960 3.960 3.960 4.880 4.880 4.880 9.580 9.568 9.568 2.495 2.126 3.593 8.072 6.921 7.615 4.828 4.828 1.797 4.043 2.138 2.138 2.079 2.138 3.622 291.483 533.150 449.817 291.483 291.483 449.817 291.483 291.483 449.817 291.483 533.150 449.817 422.000 659.150 773.150 422.000 422.000 294.000 294.000 294.000 422.000 422.000 422.000 366.500 366.500 366.500 294.261 294.261 294.261 449.817 449.817 488.706 422.039 444.261 397.039 399.817 299.817 299.817 299.817 299.817 358.150 0.1174 0.1174 0.1174 0.1174 0.1174 0.1174 0.1174 0.1174 0.1174 0.1174 0.1174 0.1174 0.049 0.7724 1.0482 0.2197 0.2197 0.0958 0.0958 0.0958 0.5430 0.5430 0.5430 0.1446 0.1446 0.0014 0.0708 0.0708 0.0185 0.4020 0.4020 0.1395 0.1459 0.1459 0.1459 0.1459 0.0587 0.0587 0.0587 0.0587 0.3325 0.1021 0.1021 0.1021 0.1021 0.1021 0.1021 0.1021 0.1021 0.1021 0.1021 0.1021 0.1021 0.0454 0.7337 0.9958 0.2204 0.2204 0.0961 0.0961 0.0961 0.5447 0.5447 0.5447 0.1504 0.1504 0.0015 0.0736 0.0736 0.0192 0.4180 0.4180 0.1450 0.1378 0.1378 0.1378 0.1378 0.0554 0.0554 0.0554 0.0554 0.3140 0.1142 0.1142 0.1142 0.1142 0.1142 0.1142 0.1142 0.1142 0.1142 0.1142 0.1142 0.1142 0.0491 0.7044 0.9560 0.2033 0.2033 0.0886 0.0886 0.0886 0.5025 0.5025 0.5025 0.0745 0.0745 0.0007 0.0365 0.0365 0.0095 0.2071 0.2071 0.0718 0.1376 0.1376 0.1376 0.1376 0.0553 0.0553 0.0553 0.0553 0.3135 Page 1 of 2 ED 001523 00008282-00470 Table D-8. Tier 3 Modeling Stack Parameters at Individual Facilities Stack Stack ID Alternative Stack ID Stack 10 SV9B Stack 11 SV9C Stack 12 SV9D Stack 1 WS1 Stack 2 WS2 Stack 3 WS3 Stack 4 WS4 Stack 5 WS5 Inside Bake Oven Stack # 2 - SV 9B Inside Bake Oven Stack # 3 - SV 9C Inside Bake Oven Stack # 4 - SV 9D Release Height (m) Stack Inside Diameter (m) Stack Exit Gas Velocity (m/s) Stack Temperature 2009 TRI Emission Rate 2010 TRI Emission Rate 2011 TRI Emission Rate <K) <g/s)a <g/s)a <g/s)a 15.331 15.331 15.331 14.000 14.000 14.000 14.000 14.000 0.762 0.762 0.762 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 3.622 3.622 3.622 6.096 6.096 6.096 6.096 6.096 360.928 366.483 360.928 394.261 394.261 394.261 394.261 394.261 0.3325 0.3325 0.3325 3.9333 3.9333 3.9333 3.9333 3.9333 0.3140 0.3140 0.3140 4.3060 4.3060 4.3060 4.3060 4.3060 0.3135 0.3135 0.3135 3.0186 3.0186 3.0186 3.0186 3.0186 a. Individual stack emissions were based on total TRI Stack emissions and actual breakdown of EGBE emissions among individual stacks The emission rate for each source is calculated from the TRI reported stack emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers as follows: EGBE Emission Rate (g/s) = Stack TRI Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers (tpy) x % EGBE x 254 (conversion factor) 8,760 (hrs/yr) x Stack_fraction The calculated emission rate assumes EGBE emissions occur continuously 8,760 hours per year. Stack_fraction represents the percent of the total TRI stack emissions emitted through the individual stack g/s: grams per second K: degrees Kelvin m: meter m/s: meters per second pg/m3: micrograms per cubic meter tpy: ton per year TRI: Toxic Release Inventory 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 2 of 2 ED 001523 00008282-00471 Table D-9, Tier 3 Modeling Fugitive Volume Parameters and Results at Individual Facilities Source Type Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Release Height (m)b 6.096 9.144 10.668 9.144 7.920 7.000 Volume Intial Lateral Dimension (m)c Volume Intial Vertical Dimension (m) d 27.310 14.120 28.840 20.900 24.558 27.242 2.840 4.253 4.960 4.253 3.686 3.250 2009 TRI Emission Rate <g/s)e 2010 TRI 2011 TRI Emission Rate Emission Rate <g/s)e <g/s)e 0.470 1.089 0.416 0.368 0.379 0.774 0.40825 1.03458 0.41699 0.38295 0.35802 0.85314 0.45675 0.99320 0.38457 0.17576 0.35745 0.70277 a. Fugitive releases of EGBE are reported to occur through the building's roof vents in the production area of the facility building where stacks emitting EGBE are located. Fugitive emissions from the roof vents are modeled as a single volume source. b. The volume source release height is taken to be at the release height of fugitive emissions; it is set to be equal to the roof height of the process building c. Per EPA's AERMOD guidance, the volume source initial lateral dimension is taken to be the length of the side of the volume divided by 4.3. d. Per EPA's AERMOD guidance, the volume source initial vertical dimension is taken to be the height of the volume source (roof height) divided by 2.15. e. The emission rate for each source is calculated from the TRI reported fugitive emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers as folbws: EGBE Emission Rate (g/s) = Fugitive TRI Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers (tpy) x % EGBE x 254 (conversion factor) + 8,760 (hrs/yr) The calculated emission rate assumes EGBE emissions occur continuously 8,760 hours per year, g/s: grams per second hrs/yr: hours per year m: meter tpy: ton per year TRI: Toxic Release Inventory 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00472 Table D-10, Tier 3 Modeling Stack Parameters and Individual Source Results in Clusters Stack Stack ID Stack 1 Stack 1 Stack 1 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 6 Stack 7 Stack 8 Stack 9 Stackl Stack 1 Stack 1 Stack 1 Stack 4 Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 1 REX_SV21 REX_SV22 REX_SV23 RED_SV31 REX_SV32 REX_SV33 REX_SV41 REX_SV42 REX_RTO N/A BA5G_P1 BA5D_PT 1 BA5D_PT2 BA5D_P3 CR_PT01 CR_PT02 AR_PC1 AR_PC2 AR_PC3 AR_PC4 Alternative Stack ID Release Height Stack Inside (m) Diameter (m) Stack Exit Gas Velocity (m/s) Printer Oven Stack # 1 - SV 21 13.100 0.396 9.580 Printer Oven Stack # 2 - SV 22 12.649 0.396 9.568 Base Coater Pin Oven Stack # 3 - SV 23 13.167 0.396 9.568 Inside Spray Machines Bank 1 - SV 31 12.192 1.097 2.495 Inside Spray Machines Bank 2 - SV 32 12.802 1.189 2.126 Inside Spray Machines Bank 2 - SV 33 13.716 0.914 3.593 Inside Bake Oven Stack # 1 - SV 41 14.021 0.762 8.072 Inside Bake Oven Stack # 2 - SV 42 14.021 0.823 6.921 Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer Stack 15.240 1.158 7.615 3960*** 9.144 0.396 2.743 0001 (Bldg 5G) 12.802 2.070 8.414 TO-1 (Bidg 5D) 11.580 1.220 7.796 TO-2 (Bldg 5D) 10.670 0.670 6.860 0003 (Bldg 5D) 10.050 0.640 1.659 TO-1 11.000 1.219 16.149 TO-2 17.000 0.597 13.492 Coater #1 12.497 0.610 31.008 Coater #2 14.330 0.610 9.147 Coater #3 12.497 0.457 22.269 Coater #4 12.190 0.457 15.447 No stack parameters available. Ail emissions (stack + fugitives) modeled as a volume Stack Temperature (K) 366.500 366.500 366.500 294.261 294.261 294.261 449.817 449.817 488.706 294.260 405.930 488.150 704.300 649.800 659.150 773.150 824.820 783.150 760.930 745.370 2009 TRI Emission Rate <g/s)a 0.1446 0.1446 0.0014 0.0708 0.0708 0.0185 0.4020 0.4020 0.1395 0.7404 0.1278 0.0406 0.0203 0.0426 0.7724 1.0482 0.0084 0.0072 0.0066 0.0087 2010 TRI Emission Rate <g/s)a 0.1504 0.1504 0.0015 0.0736 0.0736 0.0192 0.4180 0.4180 0.1450 1.2411 0.0889 0.0282 0.0141 0.0296 0.7337 0.9958 0.0086 0.0074 0.0068 0.0089 2011 TRI Emission Rate <g/s)a 0.0745 0.0745 0.0007 0.0365 0.0365 0.0095 0.2071 0.2071 0.0718 0.9764 0.0367 0.0116 0.0058 0.0122 0.7044 0.9560 0.0017 0.0015 0.0014 0.0018 a. Individual stack emissions were based on total TRI Stack emissions and actual breakdown of EGBE emissions among individual stacks The emission rate for each source is calculated from the TRI reported stack emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers as follows: EGBE Emission Rate (g/s) = Stack TRI Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers (tpy) x % EGBE x 254 (conversion factor) + 8,760 (hrs/yr) x Stack_fraction The calculated emission rate assumes EGBE emissions occur continuously 8,760 hours per year. Stack_fraction represents the percent of the total TRI stack emissions emitted through the individual stack g/s: grams per second K: degrees Kelvin m: meter m/s: meters per second gg/m3: micrograms per cubic meter tpy: ton per year TRI: Toxic Release Inventory 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00473 Table D-11. Tier 3 Modeling Fugitive Volume Parameters and Results in Clusters Source Type Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Release Height (m)b Volume Intiai Lateral Dimension (m)c Volume Intiai Vertical Dimension (m)d 2009 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)e 9.144 20.900 4.253 0.368 No fugitive emissions reported to TRI. All reported emissions modeled as a stack release 7.315 19.900 3.402 0.338 12.192 16.247 5.670 0.174 9.144 14.120 4.253 1.089 9.750 11.881 4.540 0.000 9.144 26.700 4.250 0.164 2010 TRI Emission 2011 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)e Rate (g/s)e 0.38295 0.17576 0.19246 0.09914 1.03458 0.00011 0.20800 0.13205 0.06802 0.99320 0.00118 0.07570 a. Fugitive releases of EGBE are reported to occur through the building's roof vents in the production area of the facility building where stacks emitting EGBE are located. Fugitive emissions from the roof vents are modeled as a single volume source. b. The volume source release height is taken to be at the release height of fugitive emissions; it is set to be equal to the roof height of the process building c. Per EPA's AERMOD guidance, the volume source initial lateral dimension is taken to be the length of the side of the volume divided by 4.3. d. Per EPA's AERMOD guidance, the volume source initial vertical dimension is taken to be the height of the volume source (roof height) divided by 2.15. e. The emission rate for each source is calculated from the TRI reported fugitive emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers as follows: EGBE Emission Rate (g/s) = Fugitive TRI Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers (tpy) x % EGBEx 254 (conversion factor) * 8,760 (hrs/yr) The calculated emission rate assumes EGBE emissions occur continuously 8,760 hours per year, g. Ball Facility in Weirton has two distinct (physically separate) buildings associtaed with fugitive emissions which were modeled separately. Their emissions were estimated based on the breakdown of the total fugitive emissions provided by the faciitiy in Tier 2 Survey g/s: grams per second hrs/yr: hours per year m: meter tpy: ton per year TRi: Toxic Release Inventory 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00474 APPENDIX E Outcome of Short-Term Tiered Modeling 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00475 Table E-1. Tier 1 Table of Maximum Normalized 1-Hour Concentrations (pg/m 3)/(gps) Source Type Area (10 m) Area (10 m)a Area (20 m) Area (30 m) Volume Point Point Point Point Point Point Point Release Side Height (m) Length (m) Normalized Maximum 1-Hour Average Concentrations At or Beyond: 10 m 30 m Receptor Distance 50 m 100 m 200 m 500 m 0.00 10.00 332,000 105,000 57,000 22,500 8,070 1,920 3.00 10.00 35,825 11,294 10,415 9,771 6,168 1,802 0.00 20.00 179,000 63,600 37,200 16,600 6,620 1,750 0.00 30.00 122,000 45,400 27,500 13,000 5,590 1,590 3a 10.00 44,427 14,027 12,558 8,697 4,798 1,553 0 - 1,880,000 275,000 113,000 33,600 10,100 2,110 2 - 65,100 49,200 46,900 25,300 9,180 2,070 5 - 33,400 25,900 18,000 9,440 5,130 1,800 10 - 9,610 8,490 7,360 4,710 2,490 1,000 20 - 2,450 1,570 1,570 1,320 846 367 35 - 784 784 394 385 312 153 50 - 384 384 384 163 147 88 a. Not included in EPA's Tier 1 table. Included in the EGBE HAPs Petition Table 4-2. These values are based on ratios of predicted SCREEN3 impacts for each receptor distance. The 10 m2 area source with the 0 m release height was used as the basis for the SCREEN3 predicted ratios. Ratios at the 10 m receptor distance were set equal to the ratios at the 30 m receptor distance. m: meter gps: grams per second pg/m3: micrograms per cubic meter 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00476 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table E-2. Tier 1 Short-Term Modeling Parameters and Individual Source Results at Selected Facilities for Short-Term Exposures 2009 2010 2011 Source ID Release Height (m) Volume Distance Source Length to Nearest of Side (m) Receptor (m) Physical Fence (Y/N) Tier 1 Table: Normalized Maximum 1-Hour Average Proportion EGBE of Certain Glycol Ethers TRI Emissions Cone. (pg/m3)/(gps) (gps) Maximum 1Hour Average Tier 1 EGBE Cone, (pg/m3) TRI Emissions (gps) Maximum 1Hour Average Tier 1 EGBE Cone, (pg/m3) TRI Emissions (gps) Maximum 1Hour Average Tier 1 EGBE Cone, (pg/m3) Stack 1 16.6116 - Stack 2 16.6116 - Stack 3 19.812 - Stack 4 19.812 - Stack 5 14.1732 - Stack 6 21.1836 - Stack 7 21.6408 - Stack 8 20.4216 - Stack 9 20.7264 - Fugitive 6.911162791 10 Stack 1 21.49 - Stack 2 21.79 - Stack 3 25.91 - Stack 4 15.85 - Stack 5 13.52 - Stack 6 13.52 - Stack 7 21.49 - Stack 8 21.79 - Stack 9 25.91 - Stack 10 25.91 - Stack 11 13.52 - Stack 12 13.52 - Stack 13 25.91 - Stack 14 21.79 - Stack 15 25.91 - Stack 16 25.91 - Stack 17 13.52 - Stack 18 13.52 - Stack 19 21.49 - Stack 20 25.91 - Stack 21 21.79 - Stack 22 25.91 - Stack 23 15.75 - Fugitive 5.777023256 10 Stack 1 18.4658 - Stack 2 18.8722 - Stack 3 15.5448 - Stack 4 15.1638 - Stack 5 13.1318 - Stack 6 13.1318 - Stack 7 18.5166 - Stack 8 18.415 - Stack 9 18.3388 - Stack 10 18.5928 - Stack 11 18.3134 - Stack 12 18.288 - 89 Y 91 Y 89 Y 100 Y 127 Y 108 Y 135 Y 105 Y 100 Y 84 Y 58 N 61 N 62 N 68 N 57 N 68 N 65 N 70 N 69 N 60 N 68 N 68 N 59 N 55 N 52 N 48 N 58 N 57 N 37 N 49 N 45 N 43 N 53 N 50 N 147 Y 127 Y 102 Y 102 Y 98 Y 96 Y 140 Y 145 Y 122 Y 118 Y 103 Y 111 Y 7360.00 7360.00 7360.00 4710.00 4710.00 1320.00 1320.00 1320.00 1320.00 12558.23 1570.00 1570.00 1570.00 7360.00 7360.00 7360.00 1570.00 1570.00 1570.00 1570.00 7360.00 7360.00 1570.00 1570.00 1570.00 1570.00 7360.00 7360.00 1570.00 1570.00 1570.00 1570.00 7360.00 12558.23 4710.00 4710.00 4710.00 4710.00 7360.00 7360.00 4710.00 4710.00 4710.00 4710.00 4710.00 4710.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 3.1 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 2.5 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 120,555 120,555 120,555 77,148 77,148 21,621 21,621 21,621 21,621 38,767 9,841 9,841 9,841 46,135 46,135 46,135 9,841 9,841 9,841 9,841 46,135 46,135 9,841 9,841 9,841 9,841 46,135 46,135 9,841 9,841 9,841 9,841 46,135 31,488 80,225 80,225 80,225 80,225 125,362 125,362 80,225 80,225 80,225 80,225 80,225 80,225 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 3.1 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 1.4 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 120,555 120,555 120,555 77,148 77,148 21,621 21,621 21,621 21,621 39,558 12,794 12,794 12,794 59,976 59,976 59,976 12,794 12,794 12,794 12,794 59,976 59,976 12,794 12,794 12,794 12,794 59,976 59,976 12,794 12,794 12,794 12,794 59,976 18,106 85,955 85,955 85,955 85,955 134,317 134,317 85,955 85,955 85,955 85,955 85,955 85,955 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 3.2 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 1.5 18.3 18.3 18.3 18.3 18.3 18.3 18.3 18.3 18.3 18.3 18.3 18.3 125,191.49 125,191.49 125,191.49 80,115.75 80,115.75 22,452.82 22,452.82 22,452.82 22,452.82 40,348.92 13,777.93 13,777.93 13,777.93 64,589.53 64,589.53 64,589.53 13,777.93 13,777.93 13,777.93 13,777.93 64,589.53 64,589.53 13,777.93 13,777.93 13,777.93 13,777.93 64,589.53 64,589.53 13,777.93 13,777.93 13,777.93 13,777.93 64,589.53 18,892.79 83,090.12 83,090.12 83,090.12 83,090.12 129,839.34 129,839.34 83,090.12 83,090.12 83,090.12 83,090.12 83,090.12 83,090.12 Page 1 of 4 ED 001523 00008282-00477 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table E-2. Tier 1 Short-Term Modeling Parameters and Individual Source Results at Selected Facilities for Short-Term Exposures 2009 2010 2011 Source ID Release Height (m) Volume Source Length of Side (m) Distance to Nearest Receptor (m) Physical Fence (Y/N) Tier 1 Table: Normalized Maximum Proportion EGBE of 1-Hour Average Certain Glycol Ethers Cone. (pg/m3)/(gps) TRI Emissions (gps) Maximum 1Hour Average Tier 1 EGBE Cone, (pg/m3) TRI Emissions (gps) Maximum 1Hour Average Tier 1 EGBE Cone, (pg/m3) TRI Emissions (gps) Maximum 1Hour Average Tier 1 EGBE Cone, (pg/m3) Stack 13 18.3388 - Stack 14 18.4658 - Stack 15 15.5448 - Stack 16 15.5448 - Stack 17 17.8562 - Stack 18 17.8562 - Stack 19 17.8562 - Fugitive 6.804837209 10 Stack 1 18.29 - Stack 2 15.24 - Stack 3 15.24 - Stack 4 18.29 - Stack 5 15.24 - Stack 6 15.24 - Stack 7 18.29 - Fugitive 3.402418605 10 Stack 1 8.7 - Stack 2 8.7 - Stack 3 8.7 - Stack 4 8.7 - Stack 5 8.7 - Stack 6 8.7 - Stack 7 8.7 - Stack 8 8.7 - Stack 9 8.7 - Stack 10 8.7 - Stack 11 8.7 - Stack 12 8.7 - Fugitive 2.835348837 10 Stack 1 14.33 - Stack 2 16.76 - Stack 3 12.8 - Stack 4 12.8 - Fugitive 4.961860465 10 Stack 1 17.98 - Stack 2 17.98 - Stack 3 17.98 - Stack 4 17.98 - Stack 5 17.98 - Fugitive 4.961860465 10 Stack 1 11 - Stack 2 17 - Fugitive 4.253023256 10 Stack 1 15.24 - Stack 2 15.5448 - Stack 3 11.5824 - 121 Y 142 Y 106 Y 110 Y 136 Y 116 Y 114 Y 135 Y 18.71 N 18.71 N 24 N 24 N 37.92 N 32.99 N 37.92 N 43.67 N 38 N 41 N 39 N 40 N 34 N 42 N 60 N 64 N 46 N 62 N 63 N 50 N 75 N 44.63 N 55.57 N 63.77 N 72.24 N 69.36 N 70.7 N 81.66 N 98.33 N 104.03 N 78.13 N 102.8 N 12 N 15 N 31.36 N 22 Y 43 Y 13 Y 4710.00 4710.00 4710.00 4710.00 4710.00 4710.00 4710.00 8696.57 9610.00 9610.00 9610.00 9610.00 8490.00 8490.00 8490.00 14026.73 25900.00 25900.00 25900.00 25900.00 25900.00 25900.00 18000.00 18000.00 25900.00 18000.00 18000.00 18000.00 12558.23 8490.00 7360.00 7360.00 7360.00 12558.23 7360.00 7360.00 7360.00 4710.00 7360.00 8696.57 9610.00 9610.00 14026.73 9610.00 8490.00 9610.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 3.4 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 2.2 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 2.3 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 2.2 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 3.7 8.0 8.0 4.8 10.3 10.3 10.3 80,225 80,225 80,225 80,225 80,225 80,225 80,225 28,568 54,786 54,786 54,786 54,786 48,401 48,401 48,401 26,655 159,872 159,872 159,872 159,872 159,872 159,872 111,108 111,108 159,872 111,108 111,108 111,108 25,840 51,617 44,747 44,747 44,747 25,409 80,560 80,560 80,560 51,554 80,560 31,797 76,632 76,632 66,907 99,153 87,597 99,153 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 3.6 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 2.0 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 2.0 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 2.4 11.6 11.6 11.6 11.6 11.6 3.9 7.6 7.6 4.5 10.4 10.4 10.4 85,955 85,955 85,955 85,955 85,955 85,955 85,955 30,155 51,208 51,208 51,208 51,208 45,240 45,240 45,240 24,914 138,938 138,938 138,938 138,938 138,938 138,938 96,559 96,559 138,938 96,559 96,559 96,559 22,456 58,590 50,792 50,792 50,792 28,888 84,371 84,371 84,371 53,993 84,371 33,353 72,800 72,800 63,561 99,459 87,868 99,459 18.3 18.3 18.3 18.3 18.3 18.3 18.3 3.5 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 2.0 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 2.2 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 4.0 7.3 7.3 4.4 9.6 9.6 9.6 83,090.12 83,090.12 83,090.12 83,090.12 83,090.12 83,090.12 83,090.12 29,625.57 51,820.35 51,820.35 51,820.35 51,820.35 45,780.93 45,780.93 45,780.93 25,212.29 155,442.47 155,442.47 155,442.47 155,442.47 155,442.47 155,442.47 108,029.52 108,029.52 155,442.47 108,029.52 108,029.52 108,029.52 25,123.56 48,240.72 41,819.98 41,819.98 41,819.98 23,785.31 87,833.68 87,833.68 87,833.68 56,208.78 87,833.68 34,594.57 69,887.84 69,887.84 61,019.13 91,751.81 81,058.57 91,751.81 Page 2 of 4 ED 001523 00008282-00478 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table E-2. Tier 1 Short-Term Modeling Parameters and Individual Source Results at Selected Facilities for Short-Term Exposures 2009 2010 2011 Source ID Release Height (m) Volume Distance Source Length to Nearest of Side (m) Receptor (m) Physical Fence (Y/N) Tier 1 Table: Normalized Maximum 1-Hour Average Proportion EGBE of Certain Glycol Ethers TRI Emissions Cone. (pg/m3)/(gps) (gps) Maximum 1Hour Average Tier 1 EGBE Cone, (pg/m3) TRI Emissions (gps) Maximum 1Hour Average Tier 1 EGBE Cone, (pg/m3) TRI Emissions (gps) Maximum 1Hour Average Tier 1 EGBE Cone, (pg/m3) Stack 4 14.0208 - Stack 5 14.0208 - Stack 6 15.24 - Stack 7 15.24 - Stack 8 15.24 - Fugitive 4.961860465 10 Stack 1 14.6304 - Stack 2 14.6304 - Stack 3 16.6116 - Stack 4 14.6304 - Stack 5 13.50264 - Stack 6 14.1732 - Stack 7 13.19784 - Stack 8 13.716 - Stack 9 15.24 - Stack 10 15.33144 - Stack 11 15.33144 - Stack 12 15.33144 - Fugitive 3.685953488 10 Stack 1 12.19 - Stack 2 12.19 - Stack 3 13.41 - Stack 4 13.41 - Stack 5 13.41 - Stack 7 12.19 - Stack 8 12.19 - Stack 9 12.19 - Stack 10 12.8 - Stack 11 12.19 - Stack 12 12.19 - Fugitive 3 10 Stack 1 13.1064 - Stack 2 12.6492 - Stack 3 13.16736 - Stack 4 12.192 - Stack 5 12.8016 - Stack 6 13.716 - Stack 7 14.0208 - Stack 8 14.0208 - Stack 9 15.24 - Fugitive 4.253023256 10 Stack 1 13.716 - Fugitive 3 10 Point 11.17 - Fugitive 3.05 10 Stacks 1-10 14 - 16 19 11 18 23 63 36 40 42 29 56 61 62 65 56 62 65 60 64 37.8 32.22 41.76 41.76 45.11 41.45 32.61 49.07 53.95 56.39 44.2 59 30 38 44 19 23 31 26 34 41 46 12 70 45 210 75 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N Unknown Unknown Unknown 9610.00 9610.00 9610.00 9610.00 9610.00 12558.23 8490.00 8490.00 8490.00 9610.00 7360.00 7360.00 7360.00 7360.00 7360.00 7360.00 7360.00 7360.00 12558.23 8490.00 8490.00 8490.00 8490.00 8490.00 8490.00 8490.00 8490.00 7360.00 7360.00 8490.00 12558.23 8490.00 8490.00 8490.00 9610.00 9610.00 8490.00 9610.00 8490.00 8490.00 14026.73 9610.00 12558.23 8490.00 4798.11 7360.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3 1.8 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 1.7 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 1.6 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 1.7 0.2 2.9 0.5 4.6 18.1 99,153 99,153 99,153 99,153 99,153 22,865 79,876 79,876 79,876 90,414 69,245 69,245 69,245 69,245 69,245 69,245 69,245 69,245 20,851 58,300 58,300 58,300 58,300 58,300 58,300 58,300 58,300 50,540 50,540 58,300 19,779 51,842 51,842 51,842 58,681 58,681 51,842 58,681 51,842 51,842 22,587 2,072 36,100 4,575 21,848 126,798 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 1.8 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 1.6 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 1.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 1.8 0.2 2.8 0.5 4.9 19.9 99,459 99,459 99,459 99,459 99,459 22,937 75,444 75,444 75,444 85,397 65,403 65,403 65,403 65,403 65,403 65,403 65,403 65,403 19,693 59,370 59,370 59,370 59,370 59,370 59,370 59,370 59,370 51,468 51,468 59,370 20,333 53,908 53,908 53,908 61,020 61,020 53,908 61,020 53,908 53,908 23,528 2,011 35,030 3,835 23,455 138,812 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 1.7 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 1.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 1.5 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 0.8 0.2 3.0 0.4 5.7 13.9 91,751.81 91,751.81 91,751.81 91,751.81 91,751.81 21,153.27 75,321.63 75,321.63 75,321.63 85,258.05 65,296.49 65,296.49 65,296.49 65,296.49 65,296.49 65,296.49 65,296.49 65,296.49 19,661.51 56,942.90 56,942.90 56,942.90 56,942.90 56,942.90 56,942.90 56,942.90 56,942.90 49,363.93 49,363.93 56,942.90 19,289.95 26,705.88 26,705.88 26,705.88 30,228.91 30,228.91 26,705.88 30,228.91 26,705.88 26,705.88 10,798.10 2,177.69 37,941.43 3,274.42 27,327.85 97,310.09 Page 3 of 4 ED 001523 00008282-00479 Facility Name Table E-2. Tier 1 Short-Term Modeling Parameters and Individual Source Results at Selected Facilities for Short-Term Exposures 2009 2010 2011 Source ID Release Height (m) Volume Distance Source Length to Nearest of Side (m) Receptor (m) Physical Fence (Y/N) Tier 1 Table: Normalized Maximum 1-Hour Average Proportion EGBE of Certain Glycol Ethers TRI Emissions Cone. (pg/m3)/(gps) (gps) Maximum 1Hour Average Tier 1 EGBE Cone, (pg/m3) TRI Emissions (gps) Maximum 1Hour Average Tier 1 EGBE Cone, (pg/m3) TRI Emissions (gps) Maximum 1Hour Average Tier 1 EGBE Cone, (pg/m3) 3 10 91.7 Unknown 12558.23 0.95 3.6 42,558 3.9 46,927 3.2 38,656.16 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 4 of 4 ED 001523 00008282-00480 Table E-3. Tier 1 Short-Term Modeling Summary for Selected Facilities 2009 TRI 2010 TRI 2011 TRI Source Type Maximum 1Hour Average Tier 1 EGBE Cone, (pg/m3) Short-Term HQ (combined) Maximum 1Hour Average Tier 1 EGBE Cone, (pg/m3) Short-Term HQ (combined) Maximum 1Hour Average Tier 1 EGBE Cone, (pg/m3) Short-Term HQ (combined) Point 1674648.6 1455360.1 1628244.9 18 15 17 Volume 25839.6 22455.8 25123.6 Point 4575.2 3835.5 3274.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 Volume 21848.5 23455.4 27327.9 Point 1614548.3 17 1729873.2 18 1672210.7 18 Volume 28567.5 30154.6 29625.6 Point 153263.2 145599.8 139775.7 2 2 2 Volume 66907.0 63561.5 61019.1 Point 126797.7 138811.6 97310.1 2 2 1 Volume 42558.5 46926.7 38656.2 Point 781664.4 784081.0 723321.2 8 8 8 Volume 22865.5 22936.6 21153.3 Point 516703.7 671714.9 723385.2 6 7 8 Volume 31488.0 18105.6 18892.8 Point 602446.2 7 602446.2 7 625617.2 7 Volume 38766.6 39557.8 40348.9 Point 625779.2 637261.3 611214.0 7 7 7 Volume 19778.9 20332.7 19289.9 Point 2071.7 2010.6 2177.7 0.4 0.4 0.4 Volume 36099.6 35030.0 37941.4 Point 373793.1 391475.5 407543.5 4 4 5 Volume 31796.9 33353.0 34594.6 Point 487099.1 506509.5 250922.0 5 5 3 Volume 22587.1 23527.5 10798.1 Point 364345.2 4 340549.6 4 344624.2 4 Volume 26654.8 24914.5 25212.3 Point 884003.8 834954.6 833594.9 9 9 9 Volume 20850.7 19693.1 19661.5 Point 185857.0 210964.4 173700.7 2 2 2 Volume 25408.8 28888.5 23785.3 Hazard quotient (HQ) equais the sum of the maximum annuai average concentration for fugitive/volume source emissions and point source emissions, at or beyond the fence line, is compared to a NOAEL for EGBE of 97,000 pg/m3. EGBE: ethylene glycol monobutyi ether HQ: hazard quotient RfC: reference concentration TRI: Toxics Release Inventory pg/m3: micrograms per cubic meter Bold font indicates an HQ greatherthan 1. 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00481 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table E-4. Tier 2 Modeling Stack Parameters and Individual Source Results at Individual Facilities Stack Stack ID Stack 1 LI-IBO-Hot Stack 2 L1-ISS Stack 3 LI-POI-Hot Stack 4 L1-P02-Hot Stack 5 LI-PR-11 Stack 6 LI-PR-12 Stack 7 L2-IBO-Hot Stack 8 L2-ISS Stack 9 L2-P01-Hot Stack 10 L2-P02-Hot Stack 11 L2-PR-21 Stack 12 L2-PR-22 Stack 13 L3-IBO-Hot Stack 14 L3-ISS Stack 15 L3-P01-Hot Stack 16 L3-P02-Hot Stack 17 L3-PR-31 Stack 18 L3-PR-32 Stack 19 L4-BCO-Hot Stack 20 L4-IBO-Hot Stack 21 L4-ISS Stack 22 L4-PO-Hot Stack 23 L4-PR-41 Stack 1 B_P011 Stack 2 B_P012 Stack 3 B_P021 Stack 4 B_P022 Stack 5 BJBOII Stack 6 BJB021B Stack 7 BJB031 Stack 8 B_WC031 Stack 9 B_BH Stack 1 P02 Stack 2 P03 Stack 3 P04Z1 Stack 4 P04Z2 Alternative Stack ID Release Stack Inside Height (m) Diameter (m) Stack Exit Gas Velocity (m/s) Stack Temperature (K) 2009 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a POII P012 P021 P022 IBOII IB021-B IB031 WashCoat 0\ Baghouse S019 S006 S035 S036 2149 21.79 25.91 15.85 13.52 13.52 21.49 21.79 25.91 25.91 13.52 13.52 25.91 21.79 25.91 25.91 13.52 13.52 21.49 25.91 21.79 25.91 15.75 16.61 16.61 19.81 19.81 14.17 21.18 21.64 20.42 20.73 18.47 18.87 15.54 15.16 0.686 0.405 0.381 0.405 0.399 0.399 0.686 0.405 0.393 0.381 0.399 0.399 0.686 0.405 0.381 0.393 0.399 0.399 0.393 0.381 0.405 0.686 1.119 0.457 0.305 0.457 0.457 0.610 0.610 0.864 0.813 0.330 0.406 0.406 0.483 0.483 9.64 11.70 19.16 20.70 10.18 10.18 2.71 11.70 19.19 15.63 10.18 10.18 7.59 11.70 17.20 14.71 10.18 10.18 17.23 32.32 7.31 5.00 1.30 7.00 29.07 9.79 11.32 11.62 3.98 5.12 2.58 37.48 13.53 12.25 6.77 9.49 349.8 298.0 374.8 374.8 298.0 298.0 349.8 298.0 374.8 374.8 298.0 298.0 349.8 298.0 374.8 374.8 298.0 298.0 453.2 349.8 298.0 374.8 298.0 510.9 510.9 499.8 488.7 477.6 477.6 494.3 510.9 294.3 402.0 365.9 402.6 395.9 6.268 6.268 6.268 6.268 6.268 6.268 6.268 6.268 6.268 6.268 6.268 6.268 6.268 6.268 6.268 6.268 6.268 6.268 6.268 6.268 6.268 6.268 6.268 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 17.033 17.033 17.033 17.033 2010 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a 8.149 8.149 8.149 8.149 8.149 8.149 8.149 8.149 8.149 8.149 8.149 8.149 8.149 8.149 8.149 8.149 8.149 8.149 8.149 8.149 8.149 8.149 8.149 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 18.250 18.250 18.250 18.250 2011 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a Worst case annual average unit emission rate concentrationb (pg/m3) (Ig/s) 8.776 8.776 8.776 8.776 8.776 8.776 8.776 8.776 8.776 8.776 8.776 8.776 8.776 8.776 8.776 8.776 8.776 8.776 8.776 8.776 8.776 8.776 8.776 17.010 17.010 17.010 17.010 17.010 17.010 17.010 17.010 17.010 17.641 17.641 17.641 17.641 594.06 1658.08 610.95 728.96 1951.66 2026.61 1404.66 1566.07 591.61 835.39 2041.74 2118.85 882.72 1519.69 776.04 832.98 2105.18 1966.29 628.53 569.39 1728.75 851.15 2844.86 490.97 322.51 192.92 183.11 269.99 210.23 114.93 189.14 228.58 271.76 395.24 883.30 775.94 Page 1 of 4 ED 001523 00008282-00482 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table E-4. Tier 2 Modeling Stack Parameters and Individual Source Results at Individual Facilities Stack Stack ID Stack 5 P05Z1 Stack 6 P05Z2 Stack 7 IB02Z1 Stack 8 IB02Z2 Stack 9 IB03Z1 Stack 10 IB03Z2 Stack 11 IB04/5Z1 Stack 12 IB04/5Z2 Stack 13 IB04/5Z3 Stack 14 BCPOL2 Stack 15 BCPOL4Z1 Stack 16 BCPOL4Z2 Stack 17 ICEXH02 Stack 18 ICEXH03 Stack 19 ICEXH045 Stack 1 IBO Stack 2 Ross Stack 3 IBO Stack 4 Ross Stack 5 IBO Stack 6 Ross Stack 7 Ross Stack 1 IBO #1A Stack 2 IBO #2C Stack 3 LSM #1A Stack 4 LSM #2A Stack 1 LSM2 Stack 2 L1PO Stack 3 IBOI Stack 4 LSM1 Stack 5 L1V1 Stack 6 IB03 Stack 7 L3S Stack 8 L3VI Stack 9 IB04 Stack 10 L4S Alternative Stack ID Release Stack Inside Height (m) Diameter (m) Stack Exit Gas Velocity (m/s) Stack Temperature (K) 2009 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a S037 S038 S021 S020 son S010 S027 S028 S039 S016 S033 S034 S024 S023 S022 IBO (Can Lin Ross (Can Lir IBO (Can Lin Ross (Can Lir IBO (Can Lin Ross (Can Lir Ross (Can Lir 13.13 13.13 18.52 18.42 18.34 18.59 18.31 18.29 18.34 18.47 15.54 15.54 17.86 17.86 17.86 18.29 15.24 15.24 18.29 15.24 15.24 18.29 14.33 16.76 12.80 12.80 8.53 8.53 8.53 8.53 8.53 8.53 8.53 8.53 8.53 8.53 0.483 0.483 0.406 0.508 0.406 0.508 0.406 0.508 0.406 0.406 0.483 0.483 0.305 0.305 0.406 0.305 0.305 0.305 0.305 0.305 0.305 0.305 0.710 1.067 0.280 0.280 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 9.63 8.84 7.60 6.60 6.06 7.29 2.85 5.13 13.05 13.01 9.00 10.22 11.26 11.89 8.61 10.20 16.72 9.51 16.72 10.20 16.72 16.72 3.97 7.98 8.32 6.91 1.42 2.10 3.31 1.18 3.42 10.25 1.18 3.42 8.52 1.42 369.8 380.9 362.6 382.6 322.6 389.3 356.5 384.8 373.7 391.5 355.9 382.0 293.2 295.9 295.9 459.8 422.6 459.8 422.6 459.8 422.6 422.6 460.9 316.5 294.3 294.3 449.8 291.5 533.2 449.8 291.5 291.5 449.8 291.5 291.5 449.8 17.033 17.033 17.033 17.033 17.033 17.033 17.033 17.033 17.033 17.033 17.033 17.033 17.033 17.033 17.033 5.701 5.701 5.701 5.701 5.701 5.701 5.701 6.080 6.080 6.080 6.080 6.173 6.173 6.173 6.173 6.173 6.173 6.173 6.173 6.173 6.173 2010 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a 18.250 18.250 18.250 18.250 18.250 18.250 18.250 18.250 18.250 18.250 18.250 18.250 18.250 18.250 18.250 5.329 5.329 5.329 5.329 5.329 5.329 5.329 6.901 6.901 6.901 6.901 5.364 5.364 5.364 5.364 5.364 5.364 5.364 5.364 5.364 5.364 2011 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a Worst case annual average unit emission rate concentrationb (pg/m3) (1 g/s) 17.641 17.641 17.641 17.641 17.641 17.641 17.641 17.641 17.641 17.641 17.641 17.641 17.641 17.641 17.641 5.392 5.392 5.392 5.392 5.392 5.392 5.392 5.682 5.682 5.682 5.682 6.002 6.002 6.002 6.002 6.002 6.002 6.002 6.002 6.002 6.002 855.28 798.49 464.09 367.79 801.58 378.79 1296.25 591.59 380.54 304.05 912.54 749.49 783.91 857.76 894.58 1145.73 1033.43 1328.00 927.51 1558.72 1318.91 1180.43 620.78 938.12 2944.95 3101.38 2814.02 8171.36 1874.95 3657.09 7645.40 3179.53 2541.28 5379.82 4375.61 2502.39 Page 2 of 4 ED 001523 00008282-00483 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table E-4. Tier 2 Modeling Stack Parameters and Individual Source Results at Individual Facilities Stack Stack ID Stack 11 L3PO Stack 12 IB02 Stack 1 TO-1 Stack 2 TO-2 Stack 1 EU-001 Stack 2 EU-003 Stack 3 EU-005 Stack 4 EU-007 Stack 5 EU-008 Stack 1 SV4 Stack 2 SV5 Stack 3 SV 6 Stack 4 SV 7 Stack 5 SV 8 Stack 6 SV9 Stack 7 SV10 Stack 8 SV11 Stack 1 REX_SV21 Stack 2 REX_SV22 Stack 3 REX_SV23 Stack 4 RED_SV31 Stack 5 REX_SV32 Stack 6 REX_SV33 Stack 7 REX_SV41 Stack 8 REX_SV42 Stack 9 REX_RTO Stack 1 SV7A Stack 2 SV7B Stack 3 SV7C Stack 4 SV7D Stack 5 SV8A Stack 6 SV8B Stack 7 SV8C Stack 8 SV8D Stack 9 SV9A Stack 10 SV9B Alternative Stack ID Release Stack Inside Height (m) Diameter (m) Stack Exit Gas Velocity (m/s) Stack Temperature (K) 2009 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a Printer Oven! Printer Oven! Inside Spray 1 Inside Spray 1 Inside Spray 1 Inside Bake C Inside Bake C Inside Bake C Printer Oven! Printer Oven! Base Coater 1 Inside Spray 1 Inside Spray 1 Inside Spray 1 Inside Bake C Inside Bake C Regenerative Printer Pin 0\ Printer Pin 0\ Printer Pin 0\ Printer Pin 0\ Inside Spray 1 Inside Spray 1 Inside Spray 1 Inside Spray 1 Inside Bake C Inside Bake C 8.53 8.53 11.00 17.00 17.98 17.98 17.98 17.98 17.98 15.24 15.54 11.58 14.02 14.02 15.24 15.24 15.24 13.11 12.65 13.17 12.19 12.80 13.72 14.02 14.02 15.24 14.63 14.63 16.61 14.63 13.50 14.17 13.20 13.72 15.24 15.33 0.457 0.457 1.219 0.597 0.311 0.311 0.311 0.311 0.311 0.457 0.396 0.610 0.610 0.610 0.762 0.762 0.762 0.396 0.396 0.396 1.097 1.189 0.914 0.762 0.823 1.158 0.558 0.558 0.914 0.610 0.838 0.838 0.850 0.838 0.762 0.762 3.42 3.68 16.17 13.49 31.08 18.65 18.65 31.08 31.08 6.10 6.10 3.96 3.96 3.96 4.88 4.88 4.88 9.58 9.57 9.57 2.50 2.13 3.59 8.07 6.92 7.61 4.83 4.83 1.80 4.04 2.14 2.14 2.08 2.14 3.62 3.62 291.5 533.2 659.2 773.2 310.9 394.3 394.3 449.8 449.8 422.0 422.0 294.3 294.3 294.3 422.0 422.0 422.0 366.5 366.5 366.5 294.3 294.3 294.3 449.8 449.8 488.7 422.0 444.3 397.0 399.8 299.8 299.8 299.8 299.8 358.2 360.9 6.173 6.173 7.974 7.974 10.946 10.946 10.946 10.946 10.946 10.318 10.318 10.318 10.318 10.318 10.318 10.318 10.318 6.106 6.106 6.106 6.106 6.106 6.106 6.106 6.106 6.106 9.408 9.408 9.408 9.408 9.408 9.408 9.408 9.408 9.408 9.408 2010 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a 5.364 5.364 7.575 7.575 11.463 11.463 11.463 11.463 11.463 10.350 10.350 10.350 10.350 10.350 10.350 10.350 10.350 6.350 6.350 6.350 6.350 6.350 6.350 6.350 6.350 6.350 8.886 8.886 8.886 8.886 8.886 8.886 8.886 8.886 8.886 8.886 2011 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a Worst case annual average unit emission rate concentrationb (pg/m3) (1 g/s) 6.002 6.002 7.272 7.272 11.934 11.934 11.934 11.934 11.934 9.548 9.548 9.548 9.548 9.548 9.548 9.548 9.548 3.146 3.146 3.146 3.146 3.146 3.146 3.146 3.146 3.146 8.872 8.872 8.872 8.872 8.872 8.872 8.872 8.872 8.872 8.872 5339.13 1515.96 196.82 336.36 934.36 821.21 802.77 556.34 522.95 986.47 1021.25 3630.15 2950.11 2941.73 598.16 604.47 597.03 1656.67 1752.38 1908.85 3211.46 3768.25 3050.71 719.15 690.34 420.86 1291.94 1530.94 1520.13 1317.77 4724.42 4139.12 4815.86 4539.85 1674.02 1524.62 Page 3 of 4 ED 001523 00008282-00484 Table E-4. Tier 2 Modeling Stack Parameters and Individual Source Results at Individual Facilities Stack Stack ID Alternative Stack ID Release Stack Inside Height (m) Diameter (m) Stack Exit Gas Velocity (m/s) Stack Temperature (K) 2009 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a Stack 11 SV9C Stack 12 SV9D Stack 1 Stackl Stack 2 Stack2 Stack 3 Stack3 Stack 4 Stack4 Stack 5 Stack5 Stack 1 C11 Stack 2 C12 Stack 3 Cl 3 Stack 4 C14 Stack 5 C15 Stack 6 C16 Stack 7 C21 Stack 8 C22 Stack 9 C23 Stack 10 C24 Stack 11 SI Stack 12 S2 Inside Bake C Inside Bake C LI Roll 1 L1Roll2 L1IS1 L1IS2 L1IS3 L1IS4 L2Roll1 L2RoN2 L2IS1 L2IS2 IS_1_Over_P IS_2_Over_F 15.33 15.33 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 15.80 15.80 17.11 17.11 17.11 17.11 15.80 15.80 16.46 16.78 16.00 16.13 0.762 0.762 6.096 6.096 6.096 6.096 6.096 0.719 0.719 0.905 0.905 0.905 0.914 0.719 0.719 0.799 0.799 0.695 0.362 3.62 3.62 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 17.42 7.37 5.13 5.13 12.32 10.78 17.42 7.37 9.42 18.85 12.44 45.87 366.5 360.9 394.3 394.3 394.3 394.3 394.3 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 294.3 294.3 9.408 9.408 17.228 17.228 17.228 17.228 17.228 6.867 6.867 6.867 6.867 6.867 6.867 6.867 6.867 6.867 6.867 6.867 6.867 a. All point EGBE emissions were conservatively assumed to exhaust through each stack for AERSCREEN modeling. The emission rate for each source is calculated from the TRI reported stack emissions of Certain Giycol Ethers as follows EGBE Emission Rate (g/s) = Stack TRI Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers (tpy) x % EGBE x 254 (conversion factor) + 2,000 (hrs/yr) The calculated emission rate assumes the total annual EGBE emissions are relased over a period of 2,000 hours a year, which would correspond to a facility steadily emitting EGBE 40 hours a week, 50 weeks per year. b. Worst case 1 -hr average unit emission rate concentration in (pg/m3) (Ig/s) assumes stack emission rate of 1 g/s. It is used to calculate Tier 2 1 -hr concentration for a stack by multiplying the unit emission rate concentration by Tier2 stack emission rate (in g/s) for a given TRI year The maximum point source unit emission rate impact (considering all point sources for a facility) is shown in bolded text, g/s: grams per second K: degrees Kelvin m: meter m/s: meters per second pg/m3: micrograms per cubic meter tpy: ton per year TRI: Toxic Release Inventory 2010 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a 8.886 8.886 18.860 18.860 18.860 18.860 18.860 6.993 6.993 6.993 6.993 6.993 6.993 6.993 6.993 6.993 6.993 6.993 6.993 2011 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a Worst case annual average unit emission rate concentrationb (pg/m3) (Ig/s) 8.872 8.872 13.221 13.221 13.221 13.221 13.221 6.707 6.707 6.707 6.707 6.707 6.707 6.707 6.707 6.707 6.707 6.707 6.707 1523.51 1720.38 553.27 675.40 702.45 584.73 542.50 274.20 550.70 448.93 454.40 239.27 263.33 285.75 495.43 358.27 255.84 1326.56 697.82 Page 4 of 4 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00485 Table E-5, Tier 2 Modeling Fugitive Volume Parameters and Results at Individual Facilities Source Type Volume Release Height (m) b Volume Intial Volume Intial Lateral Vertical Dimension (m) Dimension C (m)d 2009 TRI 2010 TRI 2011 TRI Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate <g/s)e <g/s)e <g/s)e Worst case fugitive annual average unit emission rate concentration1 (pg/m3) (ig/s) Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume 12.420 12.420 14.630 7.315 10.670 6.096 9.144 10.670 10.670 9.144 7.925 7.000 12.192 22.790 11.230 13.730 19.850 24.820 27.300 14.120 30.710 28.840 20.930 24.550 27.240 20.698 5.777 5.780 6.805 3.402 4.962 2.835 4.253 4.962 4.962 4.253 3.686 3.250 5.670 2.507 3.087 3.285 1.900 2.023 2.058 4.770 3.656 1.821 1.610 1.660 3.389 1.575 1.44173 3.14995 3.46741 1.77621 2.30036 1.78813 4.53145 3.83519 1.82642 1.67733 1.56814 3.73673 1.61907 1.50441 3.21295 3.40658 1.79745 1.89400 2.00057 4.35020 3.97795 1.68442 0.76982 1.56563 3.07815 1.53604 860.89 1315.32 523.70 1845.69 939.75 956.11 1987.61 820.91 875.76 1082.62 1296.45 1110.14 1047.65 a. Fugitive releases of EGBE are reported to occur through the building's roof vents in the production area of the facility building where stacks emitting EGBE are located. Fugitive emissions from the roof vents are modeled as a single volume source. b. The volume source release height is taken to be at the release height of fugitive emissions; it is set to be equal to the roof height of the process building c. Per EPA's AERMOD guidance, the volume source initial lateral dimension is taken to be the length of the side of the volume divided by 4.3. d. Per EPA's AERMOD guidance, the volume source initial vertical dimension is taken to be the height of the volume source (roof height) divided by 2.15. e. The emission rate for each source is calculated from the TRI reported fugitive emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers as folbws: EGBE Emission Rate (g/s) = Fugitive TRI Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers (tpy) x % EGBE x 254 (conversion factor) + 2,000 (hrs/yr) The calculated emission rate assumes the total annual EGBE emissions are relased over a period of 2,000 hours a year, which would correspond to a facility steadily emitting EGBE 40 hours a week, 50 weeks per year. f. Worst case 1 -hr average unit emission rate concentration in (pg/m3) (1 g/s) assumes fugitive emission rate of 1 g/s. It is used to calculate Tier 2 1 -hr concentration for a fugitive volume by multiplying the unit emission rate concentratbn by Tier 2 fugitive emission rate (in g/s) for a given TRI year g/s: grams per second hrs/yr: hours per year m: meter gg/m3: micrograms per cubic meter tpy: ton per year TRI: Toxic Release Inventory 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00486 Table E-6. Tier 2 Modeling Stack Parameters and Individual Source Results in Clusters Stack Stack ID Stack 1 Stack 1 Stack 1 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 6 Stack 7 Stack 8 Stack 9 Stackl Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 6 Stack 7 Stack 8 Stack 9 Stack 1 Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 6 Stack 7 Stack 8 Stack 9 Stack 10 Stack 11 Stack 12 Stack 1 Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 1 REX_SV21 REX_SV22 REX_SV23 RED SV31 REX_SV32 REX_SV33 REX_SV41 REX SV42 REX_RTO N/A B_P011 B_P012 B_P021 B P022 BJBOII BJB021B BJB031 B WC031 B_BH Stk_2 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C21 C22 C23 C24 SI S2 Stk_2 0001 TO-1 TO-2 0003 TO-1 TO-2 Coater #1 Coater #2 Coater #3 Coater #4 Alternative Stack ID Release Height (m) Stack Inside Diameter (m) Stack Exit Gas Velocity (m/s) Printer Oven Stack # 1 - SV 21 13.11 0.396 9.58 Printer Oven Stack # 2 - SV 22 12.65 0.396 9.57 Base Coater Pin Oven Stack # 3 - SV 23 13.17 0.396 9.57 Inside Spray Machines Bank 1 - SV 31 12.19 1.097 2.50 Inside Spray Machines Bank 2 - SV 32 12.80 1.189 2.13 inside Spray Machines Bank 2 - SV 33 13.72 0.914 3.59 Inside Bake Oven Stack #1 - SV 41 14.02 0.762 8.07 Inside Bake Oven Stack # 2 - SV 42 14.02 0.823 6.92 Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer Stack 15.24 1.158 7.61 3960*** 9.75 0.396 2.74 POII 16.61 0.457 7.00 P012 16.61 0.305 29.07 P021 19.81 0.457 9.79 P022 19.81 0.457 11.32 IBOII 14.17 0.610 11.62 IB021-B 21.18 0.610 3.98 IB031 21.64 0.864 5.12 WashCoat Oven31 20.42 0.813 2.58 Baghouse 8194**** 20.73 12.19 0.330 0.305 37.48 0.39 LIRolil 15.80 0.719 17.42 L1Roil2 15.80 0.719 7.37 L1IS1 17.11 0.905 5.13 L1IS2 17.11 0.905 5.13 L1IS3 17.11 0.905 12.32 L1IS4 17.11 0.914 10.78 L2ROII1 15.80 0.719 17.42 L2ROII2 15.80 0.719 7.37 L2IS1 16.46 0.799 9.42 L2IS2 16.78 0.799 18.85 IS_1_Over_Fug 16.00 0.695 12.44 IS 2 Over Fug 16.13 0.362 45.87 not used 9.14 0.914 3.23 0001 (Bldg 5G) 12.80 2.070 8.41 TO-1 (Bldg 5D) 11.58 1.220 7.80 TO-2 (Bldg 5D) 10.67 0.670 6.86 0003 (Bldg 5D) 10.05 0.640 1.66 11.00 1.219 16.17 17.00 0.597 13.49 12.50 0.610 31.01 14.33 0.610 9.15 12.50 0.457 22.27 12.19 0.457 15.45 No stack parameters available. All emissions (stack + fugitives) modeled as a volume Stack Temperature (K) 366.5 366.5 366.5 294.3 294.3 294.3 449.8 449.8 488.7 294.3 510.9 510.9 499.8 488.7 477.6 477.6 494.3 510.9 294.3 327.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 477.6 294.3 294.3 505.4 405.9 488.2 704.3 649.8 659.2 773.2 824.8 783.2 760.9 745.4 2009 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a 2010 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a 2011 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a 6.106 6.106 6.106 6.106 6.106 6.106 6.106 6.106 6.106 3.243 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 2.591 6.867 6.867 6.867 6.867 6.867 6.867 6.867 6.867 6.867 6.867 6.867 6.867 0.633 1.013 1.013 1.013 1.013 7.974 7.974 0.135 0.135 0.135 0.135 6.350 6.350 6.350 6.350 6.350 6.350 6.350 6.350 6.350 5.436 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 16.380 2.537 6.993 6.993 6.993 6.993 6.993 6.993 6.993 6.993 6.993 6.993 6.993 6.993 0.974 0.705 0.705 0.705 0.705 7.575 7.575 0.139 0.139 0.139 0.139 3.146 3.146 3.146 3.146 3.146 3.146 3.146 3.146 3.146 4.277 17.010 17.010 17.010 17.010 17.010 17.010 17.010 17.010 17.010 2.439 6.707 6.707 6.707 6.707 6.707 6.707 6.707 6.707 6.707 6.707 6.707 6.707 0.871 0.291 0.291 0.291 0.291 7.272 7.272 0.028 0.028 0.028 0.028 Worst case annual average unit emission rate concentration6 (pg/m3) (Ig/s) 1656.67 1752.38 1908.85 3211.46 3768.25 3050.71 719.15 690.34 420.86 4608.31 490.97 322.51 192.92 183.11 269.99 210.23 114.93 189.14 228.58 2878.62 274.20 550.70 448.93 454.40 239.27 263.33 285.75 495.43 358.27 255.84 1326.56 697.82 1018.09 154.56 316.24 469.30 928.20 196.82 336.36 176.53 311.95 239.00 260.81 Page 1 of 2 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00487 Table E-6. Tier 2 Modeling Stack Parameters and Individual Source Results in Clusters Stack Stack ID Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 6 Stack 7 Stack 8 Stack 9 Stack 10 Stack 11 Stack 12 Stack 1 POI P02 P03 IBOI IB02 IB03 Printer 1 Printer 2 Printer 3 Spray line 1 Spray line 2 Spray line 3 Stk 2 Alternative Stack ID Release Height (m) Stack Inside Diameter (m) 15.95 16.31 16.08 16.00 16.00 16.00 15.95 15.90 16.08 14.94 14.99 14.99 11.64 0.508 0.508 0.508 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.508 0.508 0.508 0.381 0.381 0.381 0.432 Stack Exit Gas Velocity (m/s) 4.32 4.28 6.14 12.15 7.11 13.17 0.50 0.50 0.50 6.39 7.28 8.74 5.44 Stack Temperature (K) 479.0 465.0 458.0 473.0 475.0 474.0 298.0 298.0 298.0 298.0 298.0 298.0 370.9 2009 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a 2010 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a 2011 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)a 7.936 7.936 7.936 7.936 7.936 7.936 7.936 7.936 7.936 7.936 7.936 7.936 0.0019 9.767 9.767 9.767 9.767 9.767 9.767 9.767 9.767 9.767 9.767 9.767 9.767 0.0019 10.378 10.378 10.378 10.378 10.378 10.378 10.378 10.378 10.378 10.378 10.378 10.378 0.0019 Worst case annual average unit emission rate concentration6 (pg/m3) (Ig/s) 769.29 898.51 825.45 537.42 695.90 604.66 3033.94 2581.65 2784.36 1930.54 1946.81 2109.27 1788.26 a. All point EGBE emissions were conservatively assumed to exhaust through each stack for AERSCREEN modeling. The emission rate for each source is calculated from the TRI reported stack emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers as follows: EGBE Emission Rate (g/s) = Stack TRi Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers (tpy) x % EGBEx 254 (conversion factor) * 2,000 (hrs/yr) The calculated emission rate assumes the total annual EGBE emissions are relased over a period of 2,000 hours a year, which would correspond to a facility steadily emitting EGBE 40 hours a week, 50 weeks per year. b. Worst case 1 -hr average unit emission rate concentration in (pg/m3) (Ig/s) assumes stack emission rate of 1 g/s. It is used to calculate Tier 2 1 -hr concentration for a stack by multiplying the unit emission rate concentration by Tier 2 stack emission rate (in g/s) for a given TRI year The maximum point source unit emission rate impact (considering all point sources for a facility) is shown in bolded text, g/s: grams per second K: degrees Kelvin m: meter m/s: meters per second pg/m3: micrograms per cubic meter tpy: ton per year TRi: Toxic Release inventory 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 2 of 2 ED 001523 00008282-00488 Table E-7. Tier 2 Modeling Fugitive Volume Parameters and Results in Clusters Source Type Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Release Height (m) b Volume Intial Lateral Dimension (m)c Volume Intial Vertical Dimension (m) d 2009 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)e 2010 TRI Emission Rate <g/s)e 9.144 20.930 4.253 1.610 1.67733 No fugitive emissions reported to TRI. All reported emissions modeled as a stack release 12.420 11.230 5.780 3.087 3.14995 8.800 47.280 4.093 0.288 0.28192 12.192 20.698 5.670 1.575 1.61907 9.144 39.535 4.251 0.000 0.00000 7.315 19.900 3.402 1.482 0.84285 12.192 16.247 5.670 0.764 0.43420 9.144 14.120 4.253 4.770 4.53145 9.750 11.881 4.540 0.000 0.00048 9.144 16.000 4.250 0.716 0.91090 13.106 30.930 6.096 1.465 1.77033 10.000 9.698 4.651 0.004 0.00441 2011 TRI Emission Rate (g/sf 0.76982 3.21295 0.27101 1.53604 0.00252 0.57837 0.29795 4.35020 0.00517 0.33156 2.07556 0.00441 Worst case fugitive annual average unit emission rate concentration* (pg/m3) <ig/s) 1082.62 1315.32 495.99 1047.65 733.69 1858.10 1068.24 1987.61 1916.41 1474.64 540.72 1866.55 a. Fugitive releases of EGBE are reported to occur through the building's roof vents in the production area of the facility building where stacks emitting EGBE are located. Fugitive emissions from the roof vents are modeled as a single volume source. b. The volume source release height is taken to be at the release height of fugitive emissions; it is set to be equal to the roof height of the process building c. Per EPA's AERMOD guidance, the volume source initial lateral dimension is taken to be the length of the side of the volume divided by 4.3. d. Per EPA's AERMOD guidance, the volume source initial vertical dimension is taken to be the height of the volume source (roof height) divided by 2.15. e. The emission rate for each source is calculated from the TRI reported fugitive emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers as follows: EGBE Emission Rate (g/s) = Fugitive TRI Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers (tpy) x % EGBE x 254 (conversion factor) 2,000 (hrs/yr) The calculated emission rate assumes the total annual EGBE emissions are relased over a period of 2,000 hours a year, which would correspond to a facility steadily emitting EGBE 40 hours a week, 50 weeks per year. f. Worst case 1 -hr average unit emission rate concentration in (pg/m3) (Ig/s) assumes fugitive emission rate of 1 g/s. It is used to calculate Tier 2 1 -hr concentration for a fugitive volume by multiplying the unit emission rate concentration by Tier 2 fugitive emission rate (in g/s) for a given TRI year g. Ball Facility in Weirton has two distinct (physically separate) buildings associtaed with fugitive emissions which were modeled separately. Their emissions were estimated based on the breakdown of the total fugitive emissions provided by the faciitiy in Tier 2 Survey The maximum impact from fugitive sources for that facility is obtained by summing maximum impacts of the two volume sources, g/s: grams per second hrs/yr: hours per year m: meter tpy: ton per year TRI: Toxic Release Inventory 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00489 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Table E-8. Tier 3 Modeling Stack Parameters at Individual Facilities Stack Stack ID Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 6 Stack 7 Stack 8 Stack 9 Stack 10 Stack 11 Stack 12 Stack 1 Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 6 Stack 7 Stack 8 Stack 1 Stack 1 Stack 1 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 6 Stack 7 Stack 8 Stack 9 Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 6 Stack 7 Stack 8 Stack 9 LSM2 L1PO IBOI LSM1 L1V1 IB03 L3S L3VI IB04 L4S L3PO IB02 S30 TO-1 TO-2 SV4 SV5 SV 6 SV 7 SV 8 SV9 SV10 SV11 REX_SV21 REX_SV22 REX_SV23 RED_SV31 REX_SV32 REX_SV33 REX_SV41 REX_SV42 REX_RTO SV7A SV7B SV7C SV7D SV8A SV8B SV8C SV8D SV9A Alternative Stack ID Printer Oven Stack # 1 - SV4 Printer Oven Stack # 2 - SV5 Inside Spray Machines Bank 1 - SV 6 Inside Spray Machines Bank 2 - SV 7 Inside Spray Machines Bank 3 - SV 8 Inside Bake Oven Stack # 1 - SV9 InsideBakeOven Stack # 2 - SV10 Inside Bake Oven Stack # 3 - SV11 Printer Oven Stack # 1 - SV 21 Printer Oven Stack # 2 - SV 22 Base Coater Pin Oven Stack # 3 - SV 23 Inside Spray Machines Bank 1 - SV 31 Inside Spray Machines Bank 2 - SV 32 Inside Spray Machines Bank 2 - SV 33 Inside Bake Oven Stack # 1 - SV 41 Inside Bake Oven Stack # 2 - SV 42 Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer Stack Printer Pin Oven Stack 1 - SV 7A Printer Pin Oven Stack 2 - SV 7B Printer Pin Oven Stack 3 - SV 7C Printer Pin Oven Stack 4 - SV 7D Inside Spray Machines Bank 1 - SV 8A Inside Spray Machines Bank 2 - SV 8B Inside Spray Machines Bank 3 - SV 8C Inside Spray Machines Bank 4 - SV 8D Inside Bake Oven Stack # 1 - SV 9A Release Height (m) Stack Inside Diameter (m) Stack Exit Gas Velocity (m/s) Stack Temperature <K) 2009 TRI Emission Rate <g/s)a 2010 TRI Emission Rate <g/s)a 2011 TRI Emission Rate <g/s)a 8.530 8.530 8.530 8.530 8.530 8.530 8.530 8.530 8.530 8.530 8.530 8.530 13.720 11.000 17.000 15.200 15.500 11.600 14.000 14.000 15.200 15.200 15.200 13.106 12.649 13.167 12.192 12.802 13.716 14.021 14.021 15.240 14.630 14.630 16.612 14.630 13.503 14.173 13.198 13.716 15.240 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.966 1.219 0.597 0.460 0.400 0.610 0.610 0.610 0.760 0.760 0.760 0.396 0.396 0.396 1.097 1.189 0.914 0.762 0.823 1.158 0.558 0.558 0.914 0.610 0.838 0.838 0.850 0.838 0.762 2.103 3.312 1.183 3.417 10.252 1.183 3.417 8.517 1.419 3.417 3.680 1.183 9.546 16.149 13.492 6.100 6.100 3.960 3.960 3.960 4.880 4.880 4.880 9.580 9.568 9.568 2.495 2.126 3.593 8.072 6.921 7.615 4.828 4.828 1.797 4.043 2.138 2.138 2.079 2.138 3.622 291.483 533.150 449.817 291.483 291.483 449.817 291.483 291.483 449.817 291.483 533.150 449.817 422.000 659.150 773.150 422.000 422.000 294.000 294.000 294.000 422.000 422.000 422.000 366.500 366.500 366.500 294.261 294.261 294.261 449.817 449.817 488.706 422.039 444.261 397.039 399.817 299.817 299.817 299.817 299.817 358.150 0.5144 0.5144 0.5144 0.5144 0.5144 0.5144 0.5144 0.5144 0.5144 0.5144 0.5144 0.5144 0.216 3.3830 4.5912 0.9622 0.9622 0.4194 0.4194 0.4194 2.3783 2.3783 2.3783 0.6334 0.6334 0.0063 0.3099 0.3099 0.0809 1.7608 1.7608 0.6109 0.6390 0.6390 0.6390 0.6390 0.2569 0.2569 0.2569 0.2569 1.4562 0.4470 0.4470 0.4470 0.4470 0.4470 0.4470 0.4470 0.4470 0.4470 0.4470 0.4470 0.4470 0.1988 3.2138 4.3616 0.9652 0.9652 0.4207 0.4207 0.4207 2.3857 2.3857 2.3857 0.6586 0.6586 0.0065 0.3223 0.3223 0.0841 1.8310 1.8310 0.6352 0.6035 0.6035 0.6035 0.6035 0.2427 0.2427 0.2427 0.2427 1.3754 0.5001 0.5001 0.5001 0.5001 0.5001 0.5001 0.5001 0.5001 0.5001 0.5001 0.5001 0.5001 0.2153 3.0853 4.1871 0.8904 0.8904 0.3881 0.3881 0.3881 2.2008 2.2008 2.2008 0.3263 0.3263 0.0032 0.1597 0.1597 0.0417 0.9071 0.9071 0.3147 0.6025 0.6025 0.6025 0.6025 0.2423 0.2423 0.2423 0.2423 1.3732 Page 1 of 2 ED 001523 00008282-00490 Table E-8. Tier 3 Modeling Stack Parameters at Individual Facilities Stack Stack ID Alternative Stack ID Stack 10 SV9B Stack 11 SV9C Stack 12 SV9D Stack 1 WS1 Stack 2 WS2 Stack 3 WS3 Stack 4 WS4 Stack 5 WS5 Inside Bake Oven Stack # 2 - SV 9B Inside Bake Oven Stack # 3 - SV 9C Inside Bake Oven Stack # 4 - SV 9D Release Stack Inside Height (m) Diameter (m) Stack Exit Gas Velocity (m/s) Stack Temperature <K) 2009 TRI Emission Rate <g/s)a 2010 TRI Emission Rate <g/s)a 2011 TRI Emission Rate <g/s)a 15.331 15.331 15.331 14.000 14.000 14.000 14.000 14.000 0.762 0.762 0.762 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 3.622 3.622 3.622 6.096 6.096 6.096 6.096 6.096 360.928 366.483 360.928 394.261 394.261 394.261 394.261 394.261 1.4562 1.4562 1.4562 17.2280 17.2280 17.2280 17.2280 17.2280 1.3754 1.3754 1.3754 18.8603 18.8603 18.8603 18.8603 18.8603 1.3732 1.3732 1.3732 13.2215 13.2215 13.2215 13.2215 13.2215 a. Individual stack emissions were based on total TRI Stack emissions and actual breakdown of EGBE emissions among individual stacks The emission rate for each source is calculated from the TRI reported stack emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers as follows: EGBE Emission Rate (g/s) = Stack TRI Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers (tpy) x % EGBE x 254 (conversion factor) 2,000 (hrs/yr) x Stack_fraction The calculated emission rate assumes the total annual EGBE emissions are relased over a period of 2,000 hours a year, which would correspond to a facility steadily emitting EGBE 40 hours a week, 50 weeks per year. Stack_fraction represents the percent of the total TRI stack emissions emitted through the individual stack g/s: grams per second K: degrees Kelvin m: meter m/s: meters per second pg/m3: micrograms per cubic meter tpy: ton per year TRI: Toxic Release Inventory 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production Page 2 of 2 ED 001523 00008282-00491 Table E-9, Tier 3 Modeling Fugitive Volume Parameters and Results at Individual Facilities Source Type Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Release Height (m)b 6.096 9.144 10.668 9.144 7.920 7.000 Volume Intial Lateral Dimension (m)c Volume Intial Vertical Dimension (m) d 27.310 14.120 28.840 20.900 24.558 27.242 2.840 4.253 4.960 4.253 3.686 3.250 2009 TRI Emission Rate <g/s)e 2010 TRI 2011 TRI Emission Rate Emission Rate <g/s)e <g/s)e 2.058 4.770 1.821 1.610 1.660 3.389 1.78813 4.53145 1.82642 1.67733 1.56814 3.73675 2.00057 4.35020 1.68442 0.76982 1.56563 3.07813 a. Fugitive releases of EGBE are reported to occur through the building's roof vents in the production area of the facility building where stacks emitting EGBE are located. Fugitive emissions from the roof vents are modeled as a single volume source. b. The volume source release height is taken to be at the release height of fugitive emissions; it is set to be equal to the roof height of the process building c. Per EPA's AERMOD guidance, the volume source initial lateral dimension is taken to be the length of the side of the volume divided by 4.3. d. Per EPA's AERMOD guidance, the volume source initial vertical dimension is taken to be the height of the volume source (roof height) divided by 2.15. e. The emission rate for each source is calculated from the TRI reported fugitive emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers as folbws: EGBE Emission Rate (g/s) = Fugitive TRI Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers (tpy) x % EGBE x 254 (conversion factor) + 2,000 (hrs/yr) The calculated emission rate assumes the total annual EGBE emissions are relased over a period of 2,000 hours a year, which would correspond to a facility steadily emitting EGBE 40 hours a week, 50 weeks per year, g/s: grams per second hrs/yr: hours per year m: meter tpy: ton per year TRI: Toxic Release Inventory 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00492 Table E-10, Tier 3 Modeling Stack Parameters and Individual Source Results in Clusters Stack Stack ID Stack 1 Stack 1 Stack 1 Stack 4 Stack 5 Stack 6 Stack 7 Stack 8 Stack 9 Stackl Stack 1 Stack 1 Stack 1 Stack 4 Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4 Stack 1 REX_SV21 REX_SV22 REX_SV23 RED_SV31 REX_SV32 REX_SV33 REX_SV41 REX_SV42 REX_RTO N/A BA5G_P1 BA5D_PT 1 BA5D_PT2 BA5D_P3 CR_PT01 CR_PT02 AR_PC1 AR_PC2 AR_PC3 AR_PC4 Alternative Stack ID Release Height Stack Inside (m) Diameter (m) Stack Exit Gas Velocity (m/s) Printer Oven Stack # 1 - SV 21 13.100 0.396 9.580 Printer Oven Stack # 2 - SV 22 12.649 0.396 9.568 Base Coater Pin Oven Stack # 3 - SV 23 13.167 0.396 9.568 Inside Spray Machines Bank 1 - SV 31 12.192 1.097 2.495 Inside Spray Machines Bank 2 - SV 32 12.802 1.189 2.126 Inside Spray Machines Bank 2 - SV 33 13.716 0.914 3.593 Inside Bake Oven Stack # 1 - SV 41 14.021 0.762 8.072 Inside Bake Oven Stack # 2 - SV 42 14.021 0.823 6.921 Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer Stack 15.240 1.158 7.615 3960*** 9.144 0.396 2.743 0001 (Bldg 5G) 12.802 2.070 8.414 TO-1 (Bidg 5D) 11.580 1.220 7.796 TO-2 (Bldg 5D) 10.670 0.670 6.860 0003 (Bldg 5D) 10.050 0.640 1.659 TO-1 11.000 1.219 16.149 TO-2 17.000 0.597 13.492 Coater #1 12.497 0.610 31.008 Coater #2 14.330 0.610 9.147 Coater #3 12.497 0.457 22.269 Coater #4 12.190 0.457 15.447 No stack parameters available. All emissions (stack + fugitives) modeled as a volume Stack Temperature (K) 366.500 366.500 366.500 294.261 294.261 294.261 449.817 449.817 488.706 294.260 405.930 488.150 704.300 649.800 659.150 773.150 824.820 783.150 760.930 745.370 2009 TRI Emission Rate <g/s)a 0.6334 0.6334 0.0063 0.3099 0.3099 0.0809 1.7608 1.7608 0.6109 3.2430 0.5597 0.1777 0.0888 0.1866 3.3830 4.5912 0.0366 0.0314 0.0288 0.0379 2010 TRI Emission Rate <g/s)a 0.6586 0.6586 0.0065 0.3223 0.3223 0.0841 1.8310 1.8310 0.6352 5.4361 0.3894 0.1236 0.0618 0.1298 3.2138 4.3616 0.0377 0.0323 0.0297 0.0391 2011 TRI Emission Rate <g/s)a 0.3263 0.3263 0.0032 0.1597 0.1597 0.0417 0.9071 0.9071 0.3147 4.2767 0.1606 0.0510 0.0255 0.0535 3.0853 4.1871 0.0076 0.0065 0.0060 0.0078 a. Individual stack emissions were based on total TRI Stack emissions and actual breakdown of EGBE emissions among individual stacks The emission rate for each source is calculated from the TRI reported stack emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers as follows: EGBE Emission Rate (g/s) = Stack TRI Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers (tpy) x % EGBE x 254 (conversion factor) + 2,000 (hrs/yr) x Stack_fraction The calculated emission rate assumes the total annual EGBE emissions are relased over a period of 2,000 hours a year, which would correspond to a facility steadily emitting EGBE 40 hours a week, 50 weeks per year. Stack_fraction represents the percent of the total TRI stack emissions emitted through the individual stack g/s: grams per second K: degrees Kelvin m: meter m/s: meters per second gg/m3: micrograms per cubic meter TRI: Toxic Release Inventory 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00493 Table E-11. Tier 3 Modeling Fugitive Volume Parameters and Results in Clusters Source Type Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Release Height (m)b Volume Intiai Lateral Dimension (m)c Volume Intiai Vertical Dimension (m)d 2009 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)e 9.144 20.900 4.253 1.610 No fugitive emissions reported to TRI. All reported emissions modeled as a stack release 7.315 19.900 3.402 1.482 12.192 16.247 5.670 0.764 9.144 14.120 4.253 4.770 9.750 11.881 4.540 0.000 9.144 26.700 4.250 0.716 2010 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)e 1.67733 0.84296 0.43425 4.53145 0.00048 0.91104 2011 TRI Emission Rate (g/s)e 0.76982 0.57838 0.29793 4.35020 0.00517 0.33156 a. Fugitive releases of EGBE are reported to occur through the building's roof vents in the production area of the facility building where stacks emitting EGBE are located. Fugitive emissions from the roof vents are modeled as a single volume source. b. The volume source release height is taken to be at the release height of fugitive emissions; it is set to be equal to the roof height of the process building c. Per EPA's AERMOD guidance, the volume source initial lateral dimension is taken to be the length of the side of the volume divided by 4.3. d. Per EPA's AERMOD guidance, the volume source initial vertical dimension is taken to be the height of the volume source (roof height) divided by 2.15. e. The emission rate for each source is calculated from the TRI reported fugitive emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers as follows: EGBE Emission Rate (g/s) = Fugitive TRI Emissions of Certain Glycol Ethers (tpy) x % EGBEx 254 (conversion factor) * 2,000 (hrs/yr) The calculated emission rate assumes the total annual EGBE emissions are relased over a period of 2,000 hours a year, which would correspond to a facility steadily emitting EGBE 40 hours a week, 50 weeks per year, g. Ball Facility in Weirton has two distinct (physically separate) buildings associtaed with fugitive emissions which were modeled separately. Their emissions were estimated based on the breakdown of the total fugitive emissions provided by the faciitiy in Tier 2 Survey hrs/yr: hours per year m: meter tpy: ton per year TRI: Toxic Release Inventory 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00494 APPENDIX F Tier 2 and Tier 3 Modeling Output Files (CDROM) 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008282-00495