Document pgjMRokaEw3vmVxKEXEKv5Ba

Message From: Sent: To: CC: Subject: Jones, Enesta [/0=EXCHANGELABS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=65B8E6C6E5CA4A7A9AE85D98A4C8EEDB-EJONES02] 7/19/2017 3:28:58 PM Mary Laura Mohammad I Ex. 6 Press [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=FxcMnge'A'amihisifafive'Grdup (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=b293283291dc44eOb5dlc36be9281d8a-Press] RE: Article about CHP Hi Laura, Thanks for reaching out, to ensure accuracy. Please see our edit below. "CHP currently represents approximately 8 percent of U.S. generating capacity compared to over 30 percent in countries such as Denmark, Finland and the Netherlands. Its use in the U.S. has been limited, particularly in recent years, by a host of market and non-market barriers. Nevertheless, the outlook for increased use of CHP is bright -- policymakers at the federal and state level are beginning to recognize the potential benefits of CHP and the role it could play in providing clean, reliable, cost-effective energy services to industry and businesses," according to the EPA. "A number of states have developed innovative approaches to increase the deployment of CHP to the benefit of users, utilities and ratepayers. CHP is being looked at as a productive investment by some companies facing significant costs to upgrade outdated coal and oil-fired boilers. In addition, CHP can provide a cost-effective source of highly-efficient new generating capacity," the EPA says. "Finally, the economics of CHP are improving excellent as a result of the changing outlook in the long-term supply and price of North American natural gas -- a preferred fuel for many CHP applications," says the EPA. Enesta Jones U.S. EPA Office of Media Relations ...Qffic.e:._2Q2256.4J.78.73.___ i Ex. 6 i ' . V I T . ------------C V C T t S 'W C T i ; 1 -------------- "The root of all joy is gratefulness." From: Mary Laura Mohammad [i Ex. 6 1 Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 9:45 AW J To: Jones, Enesta <Jones.Enesta@epa.gov> Subject: Article about CHP Hi Enesta, I'm working on a package for Butane-Propane News about CHP technology, and I came across a very helpful 5year-old EPA report on the subject. I wanted to check in with you and see if parts of it are still accurate, particularly the parts about going forward. Could you help? Below is the report and the elements I'd like to pull from it. Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 13 ED 002061 00029135-00001 https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/201507/documents/combined heat and power a clean energy solution.pdf "CHP currently represents approximately 8 percent of U.S. generating capacity compared to over 30 percent in countries such as Denmark, Finland and the Netherlands. Its use in the U.S. has been limited, particularly in recent years, by a host of market and non-market barriers. Nevertheless, the outlook for increased use of CHP is bright -- policymakers at the federal and state level are beginning to recognize the potential benefits of CHP and the role it could play in providing clean, reliable, cost-effective energy services to industry and businesses," according to the EPA. "A number of states have developed innovative approaches to increase the deployment of CHP to the benefit of users, utilities and ratepayers. CHP is being looked at as a productive investment by some companies facing significant costs to upgrade outdated coal and oil-fired boilers. In addition, CHP can provide a cost-effective source of highly-efficient new generating capacity," the EPA says. "Finally, the economics of CHP are improving as a result of the changing outlook in the long-term supply and price of North American natural gas -- a preferred fuel for many CHP applications," says the EPA. Thanks so much, Laura Mohammad Ex. 6 ! Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 13 ED 002061 00029135-00002