Document p2QMKGxmorJa2Xo50oxx7VNzj
AR226-2084
ktHtftW^.
DUPOOTPLUOROpaOOUCTS
WMHUimoMWona P 080X1217 PMlHEKOURe. WV 26102-1217
cc: DougAnton KenLau Chris Gueris Sara Joslin Jay Kennedy
Mark Loch QeneMathis Art Nelson Dave Rurak Janet Waters
January 15,1998
CW CRP 711-251 Geneva A4066
Parlin
Circleviile
WW, B-21 WW, B-168 Laurel Run 2E31
WW, B-168 CRP711
To:
C-a PACE Team
Rik Brandenburg
Bob Brown Bob Buck Bill Buxton Bob Cavanaugh RichChatten
Dave Bis
Vinci Felix
TonyFemandes Andy Feiring Cheiyl Fisher ManiGanti Dave Goehringer David Greene Ron Hemingway Hsu-Nan Huang Pete Huesmann Ming Hung Dave Jonnson MortKatz Gerry Kannedy MattKoenings
Steve Korzeniowskj Milan Kosanovich
DW CRP711/2220E
CW CRP713 CRP 713
CRP702 BMP 27-2234 CRP711
CRP702 ESL 328/231 B
WW.B168 ESL 269/200 CRP702 CRP702 Haskell 626A CW CRP702 E8L 293/204
WW,B168
Circleviile Haskeil314B
CRP 702 CW WW. B21T
Leo Lech
WW.B21
Bad MacFariane
BMP 17-1124-
Michio Maemori
Tokyo
Nevio MarinS
CW
Marianne Mars!
CRP702
Paul Mathur Bob Mattson NiallMcKee
WW.B168 WW, Bie8 CRP713
John Migliore
WW.B1
Jim Moore
Richmond
Charies Mulder
DW
Bruno MUZZ)
CW
Marcel van den Noort DW
Rob Ptnchot
CRP 711-2210
Tony Playtis Weiming Qiu
WW, B24 ESL328/308A
Jose Rodriguez-Parada ESL 328/262
Theo Schroots
Meyrin L-2243
Jan Stouffer Hiroshi Totsuka
WW.B168 8W
Ted Treat Rajeev Vaidya
WW.B22 CRP702
Paul Wljnands
DW
RogorZipfel
WW.B21
f
Froro
Qreg Chapman - Core Team Leader, C"8 Project
Meetina Notes and Charts for the
January 6 and 7,. 1998 PACE Team Meetinas
EID092868
EID092868
C-8 PACE Team Meetings
- 2-
January 1998
Contents
Contents...................--....--........".."--........................"......-"----"...."..""--...----.......2
Summary.................--............,..........--.............................. ,,,,.......,,...,,.... .......................2 Develop and Produce a C-8 Alternative...........................................................................4
Administrative..........................-- ,,...,...............,,....-..--...............-.----.......-- ................4 Commercialize Ruoroproducts Made Without C-8 ..........................................................5
Adm&iistrative..............,......................--.....-.......--..-- .........................,,.......-- ............5
High Solids TE-3313 with FS-62 TA.............................................................................5 1998 FS-62 TA Needs ........................................................................,.......................6
Di8pereion(PTPE)...............,............................,.....................................................7
FEP................................................................-..-...................................-.........8
08 PFA...............................-.......-.......................,..............................-...-..................9
FS-62 Supply Issues............................................--.....................................................9
PEP Tuning.....................,....,......,....,.........................................................................10
FEPSerhiwoiks Testing.............................................................................................11
FS-62 Regulatory Issues...........--..............................................--......--....................13
Manage Existing
Products and Processes............................,.....,.,.....,...................15
Administrative.............................................................................................................15 Dordrecht Works C-8 Project Status..........................................................................15 Washington Works C-8 Projects .............................,.,................,,,.,.....,.....................17 Recovered C-8 Productlon.........................................................................................18
Testing of Recovered 0-8 .,,,.,,..............................--...-----......................................18 WW C-8 Air & Surface sampling update...........,..-.......,.....,...........................,...........19
Industrial hygiene review of Jennifer Nichols C-8 sampling study by Playtis..........19 Concerns about personnel exposure on B-162 roof area.......................................20 Concerns about personnel exposure in the bead facility........................................22 Miscellaneous ...y......................,...,..............,.................................................,...,.......23 Steering Team ...;...r............................;,.................,,......,.,,..,,....,,.'..............,....,,......,,.....23
Administrative.............................................................................................................23 Risk analysis update ...............,.........,........................................................................24 Environmental Degradation of C-8.............................................................................24 3M Issues.................................................................................................................24 FEP Timing.................................................................,...,,,.........,..............................24
(1IP. BP.U..S...I.N..E...S..S...O...P..P...O...R..T..U...N..I..T..Y...A..N...D....S..T..R...A..T..E...G..Y........................................................24 .....................................................25
Path Forward...................................,.....,.....,.........,..........,............,..............................26 Appendix - C-8 Sampling Results...................-...,.................................,.....................,..^
Summary
3 batches of TE-3313 grade PTFE dispersion were produced at 50% solids using FS-
62. The batches ran well with good reaction that was 10-15 minutes shorter than normal
batches due to the higher initiator level producing standard maten'al but with an RDPS
g
on the low side of the specification.
8
st
o
EID092869
EID092869
C-8 PACE Team Meetings
-3-
January 1998
Significant plant tests (TA) with FS-62 will be required in 1998 to meet the commercialization schedule. In PTFE dispersion, a 7-10 batch campaign of the highsolids TE-3313 recipe is needed in 6/98. The material would be finished in a variety of products (G-108, T-30.30B, 313, etc.). Finishes would like to see a concurrent production of FEP and PFA dispersion batches using FS-62 along with the G-108 so they can qualify all together as a system. This supports the long term strategy of moving all dispersion products to a single polymerization recipe. Tuning for the Fibers conversion (33S) Is uncertain due to continued problems with their new spin matrix.
The most important PEP test is the 14 batch TEFLON 5100 campaign scheduled for
3/98. Line 3 will require an -10 batch campaign in 9/98 after the line starts up. For
dispersion, a single batch of a Q-1818 type recipe needs to be made around 6/98 to coincide with the Q-108 test This will be followed by TE-9519, G-493. and FEP 121 (each single batches). David Greene reported after the meeting that the 3/98 date for TEFLON 5100 is highly unlikely due to supply issues. Finishes will need a batch of PFA 350 grade dispersion around 6/98 to qualify with the G-108. A PFA 340 grade
dispersion for powder coating would follow around 9/98.
The PTFE TA consumed virtually all FS-62 at Washington Works. A raw material account for FS-62 which has been established, and an order 4.000 Ib of25% PS-62 is
being placed. Hie next order will be need eariy 3Q98.
A campaign of PEP Line 3 batches using FS-62 was completed in the semiworks to explore FS-62 concentration, KNOa loading, and purified FS-62. Two campaigns of FEP dispersion forCtrelevllle (TE-9519) and Finishes (G-1818) were also run which
established the MFR shift between C-8 and FS-62 batches to allow adjustment to the initiator schedule and showed that FS-62 can be used down to 60% of the C-8 level.
National chemical inventory issues must be satisfied before making or selling any
polymer in the particular country. In the US, FS-62 Is TSCA listed. In Japan, some of the components of FS-62 are listed, and Specialty Chemicals regulatory personnel will insure that it is satisfactorily listed. Specialty Chemicals is also working on the EINECS
listing of FS-62 for Europe.
Food contact requirements apply to only some end uses, but DuPont has traditionally not restricted any of the fluorocarbon resins from food contact. In the US (PDA 21 CFR 177.1550 Fluorocarbon articles & coatings), PTFE has already gone through extraction testing, but FEP has not. A low molecular weight, high comonomer resin such as TEFLON 5100 will be used as "worst case" and with tests for both dispersion and cube form. PDA testing will be conducted by an outside lab and take a few (3-6) months. The Japanese-equivalent (Pood Sanitation Law no. 233 & JHOSPA) will be easy to obtain after PDA approval since it recognizes PDA qualification. The European requirements (Framework Directive 89/109/EEC) are much more stringent and time consuming than PDA since FS-62 is not on a positive list. Cost and timing for Europe is uncertain but estimated at $300M to $500M and requiring multiple (three to five) years.
The Dordrecht Works dust eliminator appears to be functioning correctly after it was
modified to increase spray and then cleaned. Dordrecht has noted that Dyneon virgin
g
C-8 is water white while 3M, Miteni, and Dyneon recovered C-8 all have some
y
yellowish cast. The source and Impact are being investigated
g
-i
N*>
"
EID092870
EID092870
C-8 PACE Team Meetings
-4- .
January 1998
Both the first and second step of the Washington Works Reverse Osmosis System have been operating well for the past 3-4 months (since the October shutdown). This is attributed to deeiisased wax pluggage in the first stage and a very low pH (3-4) making
calcium more soluble in the second stage.
Washington Works has several 0-8 reduction projects in progress. The Pine Powder
Scrubber Filter Is authorized for a 6/98 startup. Both of the PEP scrubbers were
modified to allow fresh water to more spray nozzles which has increased C-8 recovery, and further improvements are expected once the water flow can be increased. Initial samples of the PPA scrubber shows that it is only 83-65% efficient A COD similar to
FEP's to increase water flows to reach design removal rates is in progress which is
expected to allow >90% OS recovery efficiency. A filtration facility for the FEP Effluent
Carbon Adsorbers was authorized as part of package 6 in 12/97 for a 8/98 startup
(coincident with PEP line 3 startup).
08 The quantity oT recovered (30%) Has grown from'l 1M IbTn 1992 to T3UM Tb in 1997
with a projection of 225M Ib in 1998.
08 Both unpurified recovered
from Washington Works and recovered C-8 from
Shimlzu Works purified by 3M were tested in a TEFLON 5100 recipe in the
Washington Works semiworks with little difference from the C-8 standard.
08 industrial hygiene concerns over air sample results at Washington Works are
discussed in the meeting note text. Actions are being taken In the B-162 roof area and the bead facility.
3M completed the analysis of the samples looking for decomposition products of C-8. The written report was disappointing In that it omitted reference to the most likely decomposition products (CyFisH), and the test accuracy was also lower than that reported by outside laboratories. Dave Eifis Is analyzing the data.
3M visited Washington Works on December 8 and 9 to cover routine supplier relations.
At this time, they presented a "business as usual" picture and tried to reassure DuPont that they would be able to meet our supply needs. Specialty Chemicals continues to see signs that 3M is shorting customers.
Develop and Produce a C-8 Alternative
Administrative
The next meeting will be held at 8:00 am on March 4,1998, via an audio conference
between the Experimental Station 328/221 (originator), and Washington Works B21 downstairs conference room (863-3615). Chambers Works can be included if desired. Topics for the next meeting will include:
" FS-62 impurities and purification Update on alternative surfactant scouting
B1D09287-1
EID092871
C-8 PACE Team Meetings
-5-
January 1998
Commercialize Ruorooroducts Mad Without C-8
Adininistratfve
The January 7 meeting was attended by Bill Buxton, Bob Cavanaugh, Greg Chapman, and Leo Lech. The meeting agenda is shown below.
CBiyercialize JFluoroproducts Made Mithout C*8
The masting Mill ba held at 1:00 pro on January 7, 1998 in CRP 702-1242
(contact is Koenings) with an audio connection to MM (821 Downstairs Small CR @ 863-3615, contact is Chapman).
Time
Topic
Leader
1:00-1:05 1:05-1:20 I 1:20-1:40 1:40-1:55
1:55-2!00
Opening
PTFE TA's with PS-62 - December high solids TE.3313 test Future test schedule - FS-62 needs
Update on Regulatory Testing Needs FEP Issues -Plant Tests -Line 3 -Semiworks FEP Line 3
-Semiworks FEP Dispersion Path forward items
with
FS-62
Chapman
Lech chapman Chapman Buxton chapman
Chapman
The next meeting will be held at 1:00 pm on February 4,1998 In CRP 702-1242 (contact is Koenings) with an audio connection to WW (B21 Downstairs Small @ 863-
3615, contact is Chapman). Topics for the next meeting will include:
TSL evaluation of December high solids TE-3313 test with PS-62 - Cavanaugh FEP Semiworks Testing - Line 3 recipe -Chapman FEP Semiworks Testing - Dispersion - Chapman Update on TA schedule for FS-62 - Chapman
See path forward list at the end of this note for a list of all path forward items, responsible individual, completion dates, and status.
High Solids TE-3313 With FS-62 TA
Leo Lech reported that TA T-4687 had successfully produced 3 batches of TE-3313
grade PTFE dispersion at 50% solids using FS-62. The TA had some initial problems
with interlocks that caused two aborted batches. The software dumps the surfactant
-,
tank when the batch aborts, and so this TA used up virtually alt of the PS-62 at
R
Washington Works,
g
EED092872
S1
UJ
EID092872
08 PACE Team Meetings
- 6-
January 1998
The batehes ran well with good reaction profiles and a 55-60 minute reaction time. This is 10-15 minutes shorter than normal batches due to the higher initiator level The raw dispersion had standard properties although the RDPS was a little on the tow side. Leo felt the RDPS could be raised by adjusting the recipe. The conductivity was slightlyelevated versus normal TC-3313 but similar to high solids C-8 batches.
The area Is engaged in a mini-PHA to allow a permanent change to the weigh tank interlocks which will allow routine production of high solids batches. This is expected to be in place within three to six months.
TA T- 4687 50% Solids TE-3313 with PS-62
Fine Powder TA Schedule
Goals: Increase solids to 50% and replace C-8 with FS-62
Two aborted batches due to software/interlock issues
Three batches successfully produced
Consumed virtually all FS-62 at WW
The reaction profiles took good.
The raw dispersion quality was standard
=> RDPS was on the low end of the spec. => Can be improved through future recipe adjustments
First two batches concentrated per standard procedure. => Went as expected =^ In spec for pH and solids
Third batch (double concentration) had problems with concentration
=> Insufficient Triton = Easy to correct
1996 FS-62 TA Needs
1998 will be a time of increased testing of material made with FS-62, and the test calendar will be full as illustrated by the following chart. Due to Finishes' need to qualify .systems which include PTFE, PEP, and PFA dispersion, we will need to schedule tests in all three areas at approximately the same time (6/98).
EID092873
EID092873
C-8 PACE Team Meetings
-7-
January 1998
1094 2QS4 3094 4094 1095 2QBS 3QBS 4035 1QS6 ZQS613Q96 4036 1097 2087 3Q97 4037 1098 2098 3QSB 4U38
TFE D'iaip
93/" Moa
S-3313
1
1
1
,,.
5
MO
4 25%
'EPCuba
WIW
1
CFS100
^a,,,,
waStp
3-493 TB.-W19
3-1819 epiao
'FADis p
'PA 340 'FA3SB
Baifcie onnula a Imm TB-a 13 hasarrow
,
1
7 1 -
1
1
i
1
1
|
t
"
1
i
14 10
1
i
1 1
i i
1
Dispersion (PTFE)
The next logical step in the PTFE dispersion conversion is to do a 7-10 batch campaign of the high-solids TE-3313 recipe in 6/98. The material would be finished in a variety of products (G-108, T-30,30B, 313, etc.). Finishes would like to see a concurrent production of FEP and PFA dispersion batches using P8-62 along with the G-108 so they can qualify all togettier as a system.
The long term strategy would be to move all dispersion products to a single polymerization recipe. This would probably be built off of the high solids TE-3313 with FS-62. Timing for the Fibers conversion (33S) is uncertain due to continued problems with their new spin matrix. They will be making an ~1 M to run in late January with T-30 and then a full scale prototype run in March. Conversion to an recipe that uses PS-62 will not be considered until after the spin matrix issues are solved.
EID092874
EID092874
C"8 PACE Team Meetings
-8-
January 1998
I Proposed PTFE Dispersion TA Schedule for 1998
G-108
, Single batch in 2Q98
|* Single batch in 4098
Need to coordinate with PEP and PFA dispersion
! Try to move towards using high solids TE-3313 base recipe TE-3313 (combined with high solids work)
7-10 batches in 6/98 finished as: - G-108 - T-30
; - SOB
- 313
Begin commercial production (25% of sales) in 4Q98
33>S
Assuming spin matrix is solved, 3 batches in 9/98 Try to move towards using high solids TE-3313 base recipe
PEP
The most Important test is the 14 batch TEFLON 5100 campaign scheduled for 3/98.
Line 3 will require an -10 batch campaign in 9/98 after the line starts up. For
dispersion, a single batch of a G-1818 type recipe needs to be made around 6/98 to coincide with the G-108 test. This wilt be followed by T&-9519, G-493, and FEP 121 (each single batches). David Greene reported after the meeting that the 3/98 date for TEFLON 5100 is highly unlikely due to supply issues (see FEP Timing on page 10).
EID092875
EID092875
0-8 PACE Team Meetings
- 9-
January 19$8
Proposed FEP TA Schedule for 1998
TEFLON 5100
I* 14 batch campaign 3/98 (assumes 5 days of inventory)
Line 3 10 batch campaign 9/98
FEP 121
Single batch in 11/98
TE-9519 {CircteviHe Dispersion)
Single batch in 9/98
G-493
Single batch in 10/98
G-1818 (or equivalent)
Single batch in 6/98 coordinated with G-108 TA
PFA
Finishes will need a batch of PFA 350 grade dispersion around 6/98 to qualify with the G-108. A'PFA 340 grade dispersion for powder coating would follow around 9/96.
FS-62 Supply Issues
Greg Chapman reported that the PTFE dispersion TA had consumed virtually all FS-62 at Washington Works. Greg has been working with Jack Miller to set up a raw material account for FS-62 which has been established under cost code 021073, Greg will order 4,000 Ib of 25% FS-62 this week. The next order will be need eariy 3Q98 based on the demand load shown in the following chart.
EDD092876
EID092876
C-8 PACE Team Meetings
-10-
January 1998
Fs-e?2 Nee<ds
FS-62 Inventory
TE-3313 TA consumed virtually alt PS-62 atWW. Only a few gallons in R&D and some heeIs in the FEPTBSA addition
tank.
Raw material account (021073) set up at Washing!on Works for FS-62. Will order 1000 Ib (Al basis) this? week whrich will m eet needs until 9/98
Next FS-62 order early 3Q98
FS-62 Needs
Identification
Family
Date
FS-62 Required (Ib Al basis)
Semiworks
All
5100-14 batch campaign
FEP
TE-3313" 10 batch campaign (includes G-108)
PTPE
G-1818
FEP
PFA 350 Disp (for Finishes)
PFA
FEP Line 3-10 batch campaign
TE-9519 (CirctevHIe Disp)
FEP FEP
TE-3313 3-5 batch campaign PTFE (to be finished as 33-S & G-108)
G-493
FEP
FEP 121
FEP
-
3/98 6/98
6/98 6/98 9/98 9/98 2H98
10/98 11/98
5 Ib/month
300 Ib 200 Ib
60 Ib 50 Ib 200 Ib 60 Ib 100lb
60 Ib 60 Ib
PFA 340 Disp (for Finishes)
PFA
4Q98
50 Ib
TE-3313 Commercial Production PTPE
4Q98
500 Ib
FEP Timfng Greg Chapman covered the semiworks batches. See FEP Semiworks Testing on page 11.
EID092877
EID092877
08 PACE Team Meetings
-11-
January 1998
David Greene reported that the 14 batch campaign ofTEPLON 5100 with FS-62 on the existing lines which had been delayed until March 1998 will probably be delayed even further due to the supply situation. The criteria for the test is to have at least a five day supply of 5100 going into a polykettte cleaning. He did not see any problem in fittingdispersion tests In before any polykettte cleaning.
FEP Timing
Plant Tests - Line 1 & 2
14 batches of TEFLON 5100
Supply is a critical issue
s^ Needs to be sellable material => Precondition of 5 days supply of TEFLON 5100
' Next window is March 1998 ; TMA in draft form
Une 3
Parallel qualification after start up Chapman to do COD so existing TBSA addition facilities can be tied into
Une3
FEP Seniiworks Testing
QTBQChapman completed a campaign of FEP Line 3 batches using FS-62. These were a duplicate of the recipes used by Aten for a wire line run except for surfactant. The tests explored FS-82 concentration, KNOa loading, and purified FS-62. The batches ran well. Batch time was slightly longer and MFR higher, but these can be corrected with minor recipe changes. There were slight differences in copolymer content, but these can be explained by batch time. The RDPS with FS-62 was also smaller. Greg is doing additional work to understand how to increase RDPS.
Qreg-also completed two campaigns of FEP dispersion for Circleville (TE-9519) and Finishes (G-1818). He wilt finish and send to Mort Katz and Pete Huesmann respectively. During the campaign, he was able to establish the MPR shift between C-8 and FS-62 batches to allow adjustment to the initiator schedule. He also noted a difference in laser RDPS measurements between R&D and the release lab. He was able to run FS-62 down to 60% of the C-8 level.
EBD092878
EID092878
C-8 PACE Team Meetings
12 -
January 1998
Semiworks FEP samples
Lmejjgatches complete
Recipe Duplicate o( Aten's recipss except far tha use of FS-62 Instead of C-8 = 5 batches at vaiying F8-62 level 00% to 70% of C-8 level) a 3 batehM at 50% of C.8 level with othar modification => FS-62 purified using (1) NI-UOH and HNCb and no added KNOa (2) KOH and HNOa and no added KNOa s 50% C-B level with additional KNOa
All except for 30% of C-8 level had reasonable coagulum
Rate was slightly slower than G-8
= 123-178 minutes for FS-62 vs. 113 -133 minutes for the C-8 batches in Atan's campaign
B*22 L-RDPS was tower than C-8 (0.14 micron avg. vs. 0.18 micron)
MFR higher
= Consistent with othBr FS-62 mns B Easy to correct with modified Initiator schedule
MWDI slightly higher
Slight differences in copolymer incorporation
= Slightly lower HFP Incoiporatlon
Slightly MghsrPEVEIncoipofation
TE-9519batchescomplete (2 campaigns)
' RectpBT " ' => 33% solids (3500 Ib batch) f Pressure control with a non-linear (1.5 exponent) profile
First campaign showed: -> Semiworks requires higher C-8 level = TherBia an MFR shift (romC-8 to FS-62 = Sl^tOy high HFP)
o L-ROPS difference between plant lab and R&D
Second campaign showed: => Can pradlet MFR sNft tram C-8 to FS-62 FS-62 can ba run at about 60% erf C-8 level
=> Split addition does not help = Uke C-fl, FS-62 wilt require an increase In CPU to go to higher solids = 7 ROPS
G1818
Polymerized and ready to formulate based on "current" G-1818 (3500 Ib batch with pressure control)
Will rerun in semlworks once plant recipe Is finalized_____
EID092879
EID092879
C-8 PACE Team Meetings
-13-
January 1998
PEP Cepflynuo utthom CTA
^^]M'^
,
.-"-.'I'l^---'1:-;.-
* rapTMTAamw)
,
-
trti,W(g|MM4
(.((us
& bjmbraI(;inc&) '-" ("(""^^("A'."^.; ~----l*t(Fa'lMT*(cnI>B
.
^::-,:g^.:: : .
" - - tftir(Sin*BnfSI(l|iM--l
'
' ; .
'*
A^'. /,'. --
--tir(8iiliiilie<ll)
OJOM
1
-. ......
- -.'--.-..
.
- .-I:-,. .. :
^- .-..;-.: ^A -
--.:.";-!.*"-'"^,y<t^.'rt,-tv-..'.';'.-.,^-':-;";
.
:
.-..
'
.
-
;
'
.
.
,;.; -"..
^^^-- '
.
;
.
'
.''-' ...-.-^b*-'-^r^'u'it^-'.'* <* ;'l^-.i ,-- --r.- 'i. -;tf- -ir
^^^ ^;.- '^ ,. :,:
::: ;.;^;;;-. :;;,..-
,,,::-^-?,..;.,^,:^..-'^ ..-.;...- -;f :- h;.--?""""" .---'.,^-'--f-S-
^
'"-"
"-
'
' y^r,(sMnjE ;.1'.<UM
"-- "
".--"-.-^-,'"s^^^--.^^^.--<","'^--^ -^' ..'. OW3B-
.
" ,--
';
k- .." - ',-"".
.-:'^^-^' -
-)-
.' .
'"" . , A.-
'
.-.
. .
.-;';'"''*',
^ "'
.
<1-^
'
' . . . . .7^t&OStlJB&<n
B'.BmfcH
"
t
.
'
. .
0
5
10
li
a
:
"TO
FS-2 Regulatory Issues Bill Buxton reported on the issues surrounding regulatory approval of polymer made with FS-62. He separated the discussion between national chemical inventory issues and food contact and covered the US, Japan, and Europe for each National chemical inventory issues must be satisfied before making or selling any polymer in the particular country. In the US, FS-62 IsTSCA listed. In Japan, some of the components of FS-62 are listed, but there is some uncertainty about whether FS-62 which Is a mixture of isomers, acid, and Ni-U salts is covered. Bob Buck wilt work with Specialty Chemicals regulatory personnel to insure that it is satisfactorily listed. Specialty Chemicals is working on the EINECS listing of FS-62 for Europe. Food contact requirements apply to only some end uses, but DuPont has traditionally not restricted any of the fluorocarbon resins from food contact. In the US (PDA 21 CFR 177.1550 Fluorocarbon articles & coatings), PTFE has already gone through extraction testing, but FEP has not. Buxton recommends using a low molecular weight, high
EID092880
EID092880
C-8 PACE Team Meetings
-14 -
January 1998
comonomer resin such as TEFLON 5100 as "worst case" and testing both dispersion and cube form (flake is not needed as it is no worse than dispersion and not use in large volumes). PDA testing will be conducted by an outside lab and take a few (3-6) months. The Japanese equivalent (Food Sanitation Law no. 233 & JHOSPA) will bs easy to obtain after PDA approval since it recognizes FOA qualification. The European requirements (Framework Directive 89/109/EEC) are much more stringent and time consuming than PDA since FS-62 is not on a positive list. Buxton recommends assembling a dossier after PDA extraction completed. Cost and timing for Europe is uncertain but estimated at $300M to $500M and requiring multiple (three to five) years.
Regulatory Status of FS-62
(as of December 1997)
National Chemical Inventories:
USA: TSCA - clear for commercial use (SPEC filed FS-62 reaction mixture).
Japan: MITl - not clear Nagato Fujii (DKK) reports only two FS-62 ingredients of are registered. Kavsy Dastur (SPEC) says others not registered, (request SPEC to file).
Europe: EINECS not clear
(requested SPEC to file).
Food Contact Status:
US: FDA 21 CFR 177.1550 Fluorocarbon articles & coatings
verify low molecular weight TFE/HFP/PEVE copolymer (like 5100 resin and dispersion) will meet regulation.
(submit four sets 150 sq. in. samples for extraction testing by outside lab per regulation).
Japan: Food Sanitation Law no. 233 & JHOSPA (standards)
JHOSPA approval can be based on FDA qualification. (file with JHOSPA after FDA qualification).
Europe: Framework Directive 89/109/EEC
FS-62 is not on positive list.
--------i (consider assembling dossier, after FDA extraction completed).
a
8
EID092881
g
^a i
EID092881
C-8 PACE Team Meetings
-15 -
January 1998
Manage Existing C-8 Products and
Administrative
The January 8,1998 meeting was attended by Rik Brandenburg, Greg Chapman, John
Migliore, Jack Offenberger, Rob PInchot, Tony Playtfe and Roger Zipfel. The meeting agenda was:
Manage Existing C-8 Products anfLProcesses
The meeting Mill be held at 8:00 am on January 8, 1998 in CRP 702.1242
(contact is Pinchot) with an audio connection to MW (B21 Downstairs Snail CR 9 863-3615, contact is Chapman) and Rik Brandenburg at DM (947.1648).
Time
Topic
Leader
8:00-8:05 8:05-8:20 8:20-8:35 8:35-8:40 8:40-8:55
8:55-9:00
Opening
Chapman
DM. C-8 Project Status & Learnings WH C-8 Project Status & Learnings
Brandenburg
Zipfel
Recovered C-8 Testing
Zipfel
Jennifer Nichols Study
" Report back on previous studies
Playtis
- Xssues Mith moving smoking area
Offenburger
Status of to do items
Chapman
Path forward items_________________Chapman
The next meeting will be held on February 5,1998, at 8:00 am via audio conference between CRP 702-1242 (contact Is PInchot), WW (B21 Downstairs Small @ 863-3615, contact is Chapman), and Rik Brandenburg's office (947-1648).
Topics for the next meeting will include:
Dordrecht Works C-8 Project Status - Brandenburg Washington Works C-8 Project Status - Zipfel Testing of DW recovered C-8 - Zipfel
See the path forward list at end of this note for a list of all outstanding path forward items, responsible individuals, completion dates, and status.
Dordrecht Works C-9 Project Status
Rik Brandenburg reported that the Dordrecht Works dust eliminator was found to be plugged (high pressure drop) due to inhomogeneous water spray in which only the front candles were getting a full spray. Extra sprays were added so each of the 12 candles was sprayed by two nozzles, but the pressure drop was still too high after the shutdown due to blinding from prior operations. Dordrecht Works developed a special in-place
BID092882
s
g .
o
a
<^>
EID092882
-8 PAOE Team Meetings
16-
January 1998
rinsing procedure which appears to have solved the problem with six days of stable operation-
RSkalso reported that Dyneon virgin C-8 has always been water white white 3M and
Miteni product has some yellowish cast to ft. The Dyneon recovered C-8 from FEP also shows some of the same yellow cast Rik and Roger Zipfel will work to identifythe color former and determine if this helps us understand if tills might impact our ability to make
ultra-high molecular weight homopolymers.
Rfe also discussed concerns about the impact that F8-62 might have on PEP HHT oven
rate in lightof recent capacity programs and 08 recovery efforts. Qreg Chapman
reported that a 14 batch TA Is scheduled forTEPLON 5100 at Washington Works in
March. This test should provide solid data on the advantages and disadvantages in the process (including HHT rate). FS-62 will probably not be as much of a HHT penalty as TBSA was; however, he feels it is important to get the data from the plant test before drawing any conclusions either way. The issue is probably not as imminent at Dordrecht Works as at Washington Works due to regulatory (particularly food contact) issues which will probably take three to Five years. Greg also reported that FS-62 was also being driven not just as a SHE issue but also from a cost and supply standpoint in
(sgp.
The blood samples from TEFLON homopolymers E shift Is being analyzed for C-8. Duplicates have been sent to the US for a cross check. These results will determine if
additional shifts need to be sampled.
C-8 PACE MEETING 8-JAN-98 DORDRECHT ITEMS
DWITEM2: YELLOW DISCOLORATION W C-8
t. PTFESCRUBBERDUST ELIMINATOR RINSED: NOW RtlMNINO STASIS roRCDAYS AT 125 inm WCHIESSUREDROP.
2. MUSTlDBMnFY YELLOW DISCOLORATION IN C-8 SOLUTION (VIRGIN AND RECOVERED)
3. IS CHANGE TO FS-62 IN FEP JUSTBPIED IN UGHT OF OVEN CAPACITY PROBLEMS AND EMISSION REDUCTION MEASURES ALREADY IN PLACE 7
3M AND MUENI VIRGIN: YELLOW DYNEON VIRGIN: WATER WHITE DYNEON R.C8 FROM HEP: YELLOW
JAPANESE SUGGEST TESTING AT 400 NM.
DYNEON VIRGIN GOOD FOR HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT RESINS
DWITEMI:
Dust Eliminator
plugged September 1997 (400 nun WC) found cause inhomogeneous spray waiter
distribution
added individual sprays for each candle still high dP after annual shutdown
special in-place rinsing of each candle dP seems stable at appr. 125 mm WC
DW ITEMS FEP OVEN CAPACITY VS FS-62
HHT OVEN ALREADY LIMITING POR510&-N.
WILL BE UMTTED FOR OTHER TYPES SOON
FS-62 AGGRAVATES PROBLEM C-8 REMOVAL PROGRAMS IN FEP LESS JUSTIFICATION TO USE FS-62 IN FEP.
EID092883
EID092883
C"8 PACE Team Meetings
17-
January'1998
Washington Works 0-8 Projects
Roger Zipfel reported that the No. 2 Reverse Osmosis System has been operating well for the past 3-4 months (since the October shutdown) when previous life was often only a few weeks. The pH has been very low (3-4) making calcium more soluble. He is investigating increasing the surface area or the 2nd stage and evaluating alternative
membranes.
The Washington Works No. 1 Reverse Osmosis (RO) unit has also been operating well with 6 months of continuous operation without any problems due to wax pluggage. One section is being analyzed to better understand the wax build up. A small COD is planned to add deep-bed filtration to remove wax from the Fine Powder scrubber.
Basic data and authorization are complete for the Rne Powder Scrubber Filter. The design is similar to the Dordrecht Works filter, and it will be reviewed by Dordrecht Works. Startup is scheduled for 6/98. This will reduce C-8 emissions by 12M Ib/yr.
Both of the FEP scrubbers have been modified (12/97) to allow fresh water to more spray nozzles. This was in response to TA learnings. The unit is currently water flow limited, but the change has increased C-8 recovery, and further improvements are expected once the water flow can be increased.
Initial samples of the PFA scrubber shows that it is only 53-65% efficient. A COD to increase water flows to reach design removal rates is in progress. This Is similar to the modifications to the FEP scrubbers mentioned above, but it was slowed down to February 1998 based on cash conservation. The modifications are expected to allow >90% C-8 recovery efficiency.
The FEP Effluent Carbon Adsorbers are currently off tine due to high solids in effluent waters. The filtration facility design is complete and was authorized as part of package 6 in 12/97. tit has a projected 8/98 startup (coincident with FEP line 3 startup). The scope involves a one segment automatic pressure filter with filter aid (calcined rice hulls) that will also modify the pH to >5. The filter aid will result in a waste volume of -100M Ib/yr to the landfill that is <10% FEP.
WW C"8 Recovery Status
Reverse Osmosis Conceniraiion Status Fine Powder Scrubber Filler - * Authorized 12/97 - Start-up 6/98 FEPSttubben - * ModiCioiiions made 12/97 - Efficiency impioved - data in lab PFASenibber - * Initial samples show efficiency as 53-65% - * Modifications scheduled 2/98
_
FEP Effluent Solids Removal
Basic Data Complete Authorization 12/97 Scope
- * Auto Pressure Filter - * Need filter aid
Start-up 8/98
ED3092884 '
EID092884
C-8 PACE Team Meetings
-18-
January 1998
Recovered C-8 Production
Roger ZIpfel presented the following chart which shows the increase in recovered C-8 volumes. The quantity of C-8 recovered (20%) has grown from 11M Ib in 1992 to 130M Ib in 1Q97 with a projection of 22SM Ib in 1998.
Pounds Recovered per year
1902 1993 1994 1995 1996 199T 1998
Testing of Recovered C-8 Roger Zipfel reported that both unpurified recovered C-8 from Washington Works and recovered C-8 from Shimizu Works purified by 3M were tested in a TEFLON 5100 recipe in the Washington Works semiworks. AH values looked fairly standard except for some of the comonomer incorporation results which seemed slightly low but might just toe normal process variability. The unpurified recovered C-8 will be tested again when the Dordrecht Works recovered C-8 purified by Dyneon arrives.
HD092885
EID092885
C-8 PACE Team Meetings
19
January 1998
Sdi^ksteisv^Mr
OEDS^ssW
BfchND
B&hTirre-nirt GtegJim-garB MFR-1
MT^ MT^
i"l"i"l
W E RJSnfaonB
rtiriiSLHsW91teB3% Qfcr
ErdQapB-OEr GXH-1811 GOO+3BE5
W^SSB
Qrtid
13?'
300 iac8
33 36
083 Q-Bt 053 VtttB
0 w SB
FS^'HBB Qrftd
1S
630 3S.
2531 347 Q73 Q191
oa
Wte
0 W SB
^1327
MyFCCW
137 W 1885 19C5
337 Q747 Q19B 049 vtite
0 138 90
RPiaSB R3B9?[Hr
135
55
B76 37
0693 Q18B C@B
vtte
0
MB
9t
ffi^iaDS RBSSOBET
139 SIO 13SB
1389 36 QS% 0181
OS wte
0 136 0
MW 08 A/r & Surface sampling update
This section covers three topics:
1. Industrial hygiene review of Jennifer Ntehols C-8 sampling study by Playtis
2. Concerns about personnel exposure on B-162 roof area 3. Concerns about personnel exposure in the bead facility. Both air and wipe sample results are in the appendix at the end of this note.
Industrial hygiene review of Jennifer NIchois C-8 sampling study by Playtis
Tony Playtis reported on the Jennifer Ntehols C-8 campling results study. The purpose of the program was to answer questions raised by the 1996 analysis of C-8 jobs which was prompted by the 1995 blood data. A secondary purpose was to do wipe sampling as requested by Fran Mulherin & John Migliore. Most of this sampling was in locations not included in the routine industrial hygiene monitoring program, since we were looking for previously overlooked routes of C-8 exposure. Most blood levels measured In 1995 were explainable by known job exposures. Two exceptions were: 1) Granular polykettle operators (too high), and 2) PP dryer operators (too low).
Tony reported the following key observations:
EID092886
EID092886
C-8 PACE Team Meetings
-20-
January 1998
Wipe Samples-Comparable to 1980's results. Higher in Homopolymers than in Copolymers, due to prevailing winds. Higher on surfaces that are undisturbed. Higher indoors, since the roof gets cleaned by weather. Might explain granular polykettle operator blood levels. Might be significant fraction of allowable daily dose of 100 ug, but this is speculation.
Control Room Samples - Usually very low, but with infrequent high spikes. Granular polykettle control room has higher spikes. Might be significant, but need more data.
Roof Samples - Air filters on HVAC systems do important work. Smoking area could be a problem.
He saw the following continuous improvement opportunities for 1997-98:
Filters on C-8 exhaust.
Work rules for the Wax Room and Bead Dryer Room.
Improvements in fine powder dryers.
Smoking area closure.
Additional follow-up monitoring.
Concerns about personnel exposure on B-162 roof area
The group then discussed the path forward items from the study (see the following chart for current status). The key point of discussion was personnel exposure on the B162 roof area. Tony Playtis agreed to run the B-162 roof samples through LOGAN, but with that many samples above the action limit, he felt we will need to take action (i.e. move the smoking area). In addition, with the PPE requirements for construction workers around the C-8 scrubber, there was concern that we should investigate whether an administrative procedure Is required around roof access in general. This area Is used by FP/Dispersion, Granular, and monomer operators on a routine basis, and so it becomes a BTO issue rather than just one area. The proposed course of action was:
1. Playtis runs existing samples through LOGAN and recommends whether any action is required.
^ St. If action Is required, Mattson will convene appropriate personnel to investigate roof
p3
access, moving smoking area, etc. Playtis will be the subject matter expert, but
decision on how to implement (relocate smoking area. limit access time through
^
administrative procedure, change PPE requirements, etc.) becomes an operations
w
issue.
After the meeting. Tony ran the samples through Logan and made the following report:
EID092887
EID092887
08 PAC Team Meetings
-21
January 1998
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
Date:
Proms
Oept:
Tel NO:
09-Jan-1998 02:19pm ANTHONY J. [TONY] PLAYTIS
PLAYTIS POLYMERS 8HE&EA
304-863.2228
TO: Gregory A Chapman
( CHAPMABA )
CO: CC:
IGC:
GC;
Roger J. Zipfel
ROBERT P. PINCHOT JACK OFFENBER6ER
ROBERT R. MATTSON
( ZIPFEL ) ( PINCHORF ) ( OFFEMBJL ) ( MATTSORR )
Subject: RE: C-8 Exposure on B-162 Roof
I ran LOGAN and got the following pronouncement froin the computer;
"THIS EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT REQUIRES THAT MORE SAMPLES BE TAKEN.
Continue sampling, add the new data to this data and rerun LOGAN."
I'll talk to Becky about getting this done. Meanwhile, the limited
amount of time that someone spends in the smoking area can serve as an informal administrative control.
] As to the question of general roof access, my understanding is that irooftop work is infrequent and not of long duration. If there are exceptions to this, or if there is any nonroutine work that Mill involve
long times on the roof, we need to examine those situations individually
and decide what'to do, jus't as was done with the exhaust filter project.
However, if the BTO prefers to simply require a respirator for any
rooftop stay longer that a half hour, that would be fine too.
Based on these results, the course of action will be to take additional samples and hold
off on any major changes to administrative policy until the data warrants it
BID092888
EID092888
C-8 PACE Team Meetings
-22-
January 1998
Path forward from G-8 Sampling at Washington Works
tarn
^a i
Mialvffls ot iBctiote'&a samBBna ciBlBa
zuwelDDfomnt lor data entty
Unm data entered
AnalyzaData
RBsponBltHe CQltlpl6tfQR
l-'W-at , Dan
Status
3AG 1RM SAG
mw foitiDtoto
srtaw iWnteta
3/26/97 Camptele
jQflliliBnhi
Step change down
on 7/30/97-Sao IQW PACE
? Insure properPPE is wed In tha FP/Dteo. Wax Room
"9 WIWMWamosuM Ms. liem Bianularinaraatente haul IniDleniBnt short-tami msaBurBs (RxHalt, etc;.),.....
^clement tonn-tann measures (siafactant addMon system)
--j Work wtthHaHav to mcwa 81622nd floor snicking area
l^
U>
uz
1RM
4097
4087 4088 1QSB
;omctet9
nProflress laveloplnti scopa
4old
teed additional air swales
5 InElaiieitiir en FP dryer C-flvant
RJZ
May-98
Baste data comnlelB PnilectAulhorlzed
6 InBiTO proper rnalnterianca Is cBrfomiBd an FP dryer as noted Saa Write Up In IncKfant tnvasUBBUon PDL 970015
flacked throuoh CAR
7 Sat standard In the BTO to (Kit vear dolhas contaminated with d'saerafon (or oBiBfC-B containing mataifals)
RF1M
1Q98
Addloaudtlomt.
8 Resolve exposure potential associated with drainingot FP bbnd lank & eoaa ffltera (automatedvahre?)
9 Insura proper PPE la used lor changing air titters with' amptia3tsontheroo(o1B162.
ji:omjz
JLO
3QS8
Amy Brown salting up team
Complete
Currant PPE acceptable. Root cauw wffl be addressBd by FP dryer liter {Item S)
1C Manaoa C-B exposure ootentia) In vicinltv of C-8 scrubber Understand C-a exposure potential en 8162 roof &
9Ufr(3undino|ureBs
RJZ
4088
Instituta appropriate adminislrattva controls. & PPE
RRM/BJZ 1Q9B
Cofflplete asff"-
Root causa will be addressed by FPatyairffltBr (items)
rPE recpjiwiiofits lor contttucltofldBttirnlntd
Construction-complete Operations - walling adiiltlonat
Tafcci additional air samples to complatB mapping
AJP/BSD
"
11 Compara Nfchols'data Wtti previous data (particularlyblood AJP"
NotNaedad Root causa wffl bo addressed by ppdnwrimeriitemn
Dec-97 Completa Soft 1/38 PACE meeting notes
'
12 Take wtaa samples In FEPdtan loom.
BSD
Dec-91 Cornploto See I/SB PACEmeetinn notes
13 It&aisgolngtaconh-nuBlobousedtnFEP.InvesllgatB endneerinqcontrolaonC^SIevato.
By Loch
4088
Mold
TBD attar FMSteelt
14 Evaluate Nichcit' data and nKornmand additional sampling needs
BSO
Dac-97 Complete
Additional B162 roof samples near smoking area only ones
nGGu6u
Concerns about personnel exposure In the bead facility.
The bead oven room had an area sample result of 47.86 mpb while the ovens were operating (AEL is 0.56 mpb). Due to this high reading, Becky Szacket Dines retrieved all of the 1997 results from bead. This showed other area samples in the same area of 0.96 mpb and 0.83 mpb. All personal samples (4) were below the control limit (0.13, 0.02,0.18. and 0.08 mpb). This is a controlled area where operators are not permitted in the room while the ovens are operating. The frequency of sampling has been
EID092889
EID092889
C-8 PACE Team Meetings
-23'
January 1998
increased from 90 days to 30 days, but no other changes have been made. The team agreed that thte was the appropriate action.
Miscellaneous
John Migllore mentioned that Power and Services at Washington Works has decided against using the old Lubeck wells for process and domestic water; therefore, there is no concern about treatment forth low but detectable levels of C-8 in the water.
Steering Team
Administrative
The January 8,1998 meeting was attended by Bob Buck, Bill Buxton, Greg Chapman, Matt Koenings, Steve Korzeniowski, Rob Pinchot and Roger Zipfel. The meeting
agenda was:
S^eerj^nq Team
The meeting Mill be held on January 8, 1998 at 1:00 pm via audio
conference between CRP 702-1242 (originating site) and Washington works 821 downstairs conference room (863-3615). Other sites need to
provide a phone number* to Matt Koenings.
Time
Topic
Leader
1:00-1 05 Opening
chapman
1:05-1 15 Update on Sub-team meetings
Chapman
1:15-1 20 Risk analysis update
Kennedy
1:20-1 25 FEP Tim-ing
Chapman
1S25-1 30 --Environmental Degradation of c-a "
1S30-1 35 3M issues
Zipfel All
1;35-1 40 PS-62 Issues
- Order
Chapman
- EINECS Listing
Buck
1:40-1 55 1:55-2 oo
Prep for IPP
Chapman
Path forwarditems_________________Chapman
The next meeting will be held on February 5,1998, at 1:00 pm via audio conference between CRP 702-1242 (originating site), Washington Works B21 downstairs conference room (863-3615). Topics for the next meeting will include:
Risk Analysis Update - Kennedy Regulatory status of PS-62 - Buck
.
FEP FS-62 Timing" Greene/Chapman
See the path forward list at end of this note for a list of all outstanding path forward items, responsible individuals, completion dates, and status.
EID092890
EID092890
C-8 PACE Team Meetings
- 24 -
January 1998
Risk analysis update
No report.
environmental Degradation of C-8 .
Roger Zipfel reported that 3M had sent us a report on the analysis of the samples looking for decomposition products of C-8. The written report omitted reference to the most likely decomposition products (CyFisH), but verbal communications had indicated that there were no decomposition products. Their reported test accuracy Is also lower than that reported by outside laboratories. Roger will follow up with 3M to get written confirmation of the level of decomposition products and understand why their analytical methods were not more sensitive. Dave ElKs analyzed the data, and it indicates that C-8 is disappearing faster than the current understanding of water flow. He is revising the model at this time.
3M Issues
Greg Chapman reported that 3M visited Washington Works on December 8 and 9 to cover routine supplier relations. At this time. they presented a "business as usual" picture and tried to reassure DuPont that they would be able to meet our supply needs. Matt Koenings reported the assurances of continued supply was probably due to our having forced them to do this to meet our contract. At this meeting, 3M handed Roger Zipfel a copy of his low toxiclty FS-62 patent signaling that they were aware of our work in this arena. Steve KorzeniowskI and Bob Buck reported that Specialty Chemicals continues to see signs that 3M is shorting customers. Bob indicated that 3M is also shorting perfluorcarbon customers and increasing prices on these product and indicated that we should keep Peter Chen aware of 3M activities.
FEP Timing
See PEP Timing on page 5.
!PP
The team discussed responsibility for the IPP. Greg will coordinate and write the report and have responsibility for sections I, IV, and V. Matt has already provided input on section II. Roger will help with section III.
EID092891
EID092891
C-8 PACE Team Meetings
- 25 -
January 1998
Prep for IPP
Schedule
Phase II Revlew/IPP on Feb. 6
issue IPP 1/30
First Draft 1/12
Initial input by 1/51--/. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. Background. Product Strategy And Project Objectives B. Summary Of Business Opportunity And Strategy
C. Product And Technical Overview D. Commercial Manufacturing Overview E. Program Schedule And Staffing and Resources F. Financial Summary G. Major Issues, Risks, Impacts And Assumptions H. Deviations from PACE Guidelines
\II. BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY AND STRATEGY
A. Opportunity Definition & Program Fit B. Competitive Overview C. Market and Product Strategy D. Technology and Production Strategy E. Risks ana Assumptions III. PRODUCT/PROCESS SPECIFICATION SUMMARY A. Product/Process Description And Application B. Summary Of Key Product Goals C. Major Technical Risks And Assumptions IV. PROGRAM SCHEDULE, STAFFING & RESOURCES A. Program Plan Overview B. Core Team Diagram C. Detailed Program Plans for Next Phase
TECHNOLOGY; Technical Service
TECHNOLOGY: Research & Development. Plant Technical MANUFACTURING/OPERATIONS
MARKETING: Product Group MARKETING: Marketing & Development SALES
D. Project Capital Resource Requirements E. Phase III Schedule V. FINANCIAL SUMMARY A. Financial Parameters(See Financial Model Input Sheet) B. Cash Flow and Earning Statement Financial Spreadsheet Analysis
G. Document Assumptions Used For Analyses____________
EID092892
EID092892
C-8 PACE Team Meetings
26-
January 1998
Path Forward
ttern
Develop and Produce a 08 Alternative
Commercialize Fiuoroproducts Made Without C-8
Develop test to determine residual suifactant as a function of
time, temperature, and thickness. Applyto FS-62 Titrate H4-CB batch to see if any ol the surtactant is lost during
polymerization.
Understand the lot to lot variabilityof FS-S2 and which tots were used for each sample. Make TE-9519 with FS-62 (or evaluation at Ciroteville Evaluate FS-62 based G559 with and without post added-
surfactant.
Produce Q1018 with FS-62 to the semiwoite
Begin dialog with Gone on T-30 made with an alternate surfactant
Outline testing for regulatory approval of polymer made with FS62 in US and Europe.
Review 5100 TMA using FS-62
Evaluate FEP inventory and determine when the 5100 TA using FS-62 can be run
Manage Existing C-8 Products and Processes
Schedule industrial hygiene review for Shimizu Works
Update CEP to reflect FEP carbon absorbers not coming on line untB7/98.
Discuss with WW water team not using old Lubeck wells for domestic water without proper treatment
Responsible
Chapman Treat Treat/Zipfel Chapman Huesmann/ Cavanaugh/ Chapman Chapman Femandes Buxton Buxton Gresne/FEPS&OP
Pinchot Zipfei MigBore
Date
6/87 0/97 7/87 7/97
7/97 12/97 11/97 12/87 3W?
4098 1/98
W8
Status
Hold Drop No findings Complete se See notes See notes See notes
Timing chang Not being pu
t^ozozra
C-8 PACE Team Meetings
.27-
Identify color fonnBrlhat is not in Oyneon virgin 08 Note on reviewing 08 exposure on B-162 roof
Run B162 roof C-8 air samples through L06AN
Convene group to implement appropriate actions around B-162
roof 08 aif samptes
Steering Team
Determine patent strategy for FS-62 low toxidty in fluoropolymerization
January 1998
Brandenbupg/Zipfel Chapman Playtis Mattson
3/98 1/98 1/98 Hold
Koenings, Korzeniowski, Tocker
10/97
Determine if 3M will share technology on recovered 08 purificationit they are not Interested In continuingto purify08.
Get written confinnation of fhe level of decompositionproducts from 3M and understand why their analyticalmethods were not more sensitive.
Chapman Zipfel
1/98 2/98
Complete Complete Waiting on results
Koenings s their is no c exploit the Marilee Ma check pate further disc
2
swwza
08 PACE Team Meetings
28-
January 1998
Appendix C-8 SampHng Results
Postion
PEP Oven Control Room, Position z N. Offices Root HVAC
Baad Own Boom
FEP Oven Control Room. Position 1 FP&D Autoclave Control Room Intake FP FinishingOlyer Operator Wax Room 1WAC Intake Wax Room HVAC Intake Gianmar polykfltBBiControl Room Gianular Polyketfla Control Room PEP Oven Control Room. Position 2 Wax Room HVAC Intake Wax Room MVAC intake BgaBOvanRoom FP&D Autoclave Control Room Intake FP&D Autoclave Control Room Intake Bead Oven Room FP Finishing(Diyei) Control Room Wax RaomHVAC Intake Wax Room FP&D Autoclave Control Room Intake FEP Polykotte Control Room, Position 1 FEP ExttudBf Control Room Monomer Control Room HVAC Intaka B162 2nd Level Outslda .Smoking Area Wax Room Wax Room Wax Room Wax Room Monomsr Control Room HVAC Intake #3 Slab Drop White In Use Wax Room wax Room Monomer Control Room HVAC Intake FP FInlshmg^Onrer)Control Room B162 2nd Level Outside Smoking Area FP&D Autodave Control Room Intake FEP PolykatflB Control Room, Position 1 Wax Room B162 2nd Level Outside Smoking Area FP Finishing Dryer Operator Wax Room HVAO Intake S3 Slab Drop While In Use t-ep Oven Control Room, Position 2 0162 2nd Level Outside Smoking Area
Sample # PayroB*
(rcpa3i) (TM0045) TCP603 (TCP231) (TM0045) (TTF102/08PI) (TM0045) (TM0045) (TTF060) (1TP060) (TCP231) (IM0045) " (moo4s) Tcpsoa (TM004S) (TM0045) TCP603 (TTF031) (rM0045) (TTF028) (TM0045) (rcp2is (TCP26B) (TM0048) (TM0048) (TTF02B) (TTPoaa) (TtFTOB)"" (TTF028) (TM004S)
(TCP237) (TTF029) (TTFW) [TM0045) (TTF031) (TM0048) (TM0045) (TCP215) (TtF028) (TM0048) (TTPIOZ/OSPI) (TM0045) (TCP237) (TCP231) (TM0046)
4872 4382
Date
08TO7/97 Q7/1G/97 10/21/37 07/17/97 07/25/97 07/14/97 07/29/97
0704/97 07/09/97 07/29/S7
07/iaw
wissas/t 07/23/97 03/27/98 07/24/97
worn
WIWW
07/21/87 sriasist 07/23/87 07/23/97 08/04/97 07/28/97 07/29/97 07/09/87 07/24/87 07/21/97 08/04/97 07/11/87 07/24/87 orissist 07/W97 07/2S/97 srissSr missa/sr 07/11/97 08/05/97 07/29/97 07/22W Q7/1(87 07/25/97 07/21/97 08/08/97 07/29/97 07/2S/97
Result Wind/Morning Wind/Afternoon Weather Root (mpb)
Sidled
S
----NNE---- Clear
Spilled
S
8W
Clear V
47.88 451
230
2.43 2.17
2.13 1.91
1.80 1.SS
-nr l"
1.08
NE
------NE------ Clear
3
E
Cloudy
S S e S N6
SW1""111
^
, ,,..,.,^
S
NWS
N
NE NWS
W
Clear Y Rain Y Rain Clear Clear Cloudy Y Cloudy Y
0.96 O.S6 0.94 0.83 0.76 0.69 0.52 0.61 0.48 0.45 0.45 0.43
-53S-
0.42
o^r
0.40 0.39 0.37 0.37 0.36 0.34 0.33 0.32 0,30 0.29 0.28 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.25 0.25 0.23
8
S
Rain
S
N
Clear
NE
NE
Clear
S
E
Cloudy Y
S
---^s-- Cloudy
S
w
Cloudy
S
' "SS6"
Sionny
N
NS
Cloudy
S
--------^-------- Clear Y
''"E"""1""""
NW
Ram Y
S
S
Rain
NE
NE
Clear
S
SS6
Stonny
S
S
Clear
S
S
Rain Y
S S S S S
SSE 5 SW
S
SW
E E W S
SSE
N
NWS SW
Clear Cloudy Cloudy y Cloudy Clear Y Clear % Clear Cloudy Clear Y
N6
NE
dear Y
,
S
M
Clear
S
6
Cloudy Y
EID092895
EID092895
C-8 PACE Team Meetings
29-
Januaryl998
B162 and Lavsi Outside SmoWng Area FEP Oven Control Room, PasiBao2 Flap FolytcfitllftControl Room* Position 1 B162 2nd Level OulslEls Smohintf Area N-OfftoBS Root HVAC
FEP Ovsn control Room. PosiDon 1 FP&D Autoclave Control Room Intake Wax Room HVAC Intake Bead Oven Room FEP Oven Control Room, Position 2 PP FinishingOryw Operator B162 2nd Level Outside smoking Area F8P Oven Control Room, Position 1 Monomer Control Roam HVAC Intata? PEP Oven Control Room. Position 2 FP Finishing Dryer Operator Monomer Control Ftoom HVAC Intake B1B2 2nd Level Outside Smoking Area
N.OfflcaaRootHVAO P/8 FEP 6&1 Mech^Shuyown N-Oifl'eas Roof HVAC
Bead Oven Room Monomer Controi Room N.0fflcas Roof HVAC A/8 FEP Slab Racks C-8 Recovery Operator FEP Oven Control Room. PosHton 1 FEP PdykatBa Control Room. PoslBon 2 FP Finishing (Dryer) Control Room Granular Polykettte Control Boom Monomer Control Room HVAC Intake N. Offices Roof HVAC N.OBICBS Roof HVAC FEP Oven Control Room. Position 1 A/SC2 Initiator Platform
Bead Ovan Room PEPOven Control Room, Position Z FP Finishing (Diyei) Control Room FEP Oven Control Room. Position 1 FEP Oven Control Room, Position 2 FEP Oven Control Room, Position 2 Mommar Control Room HVAC Intake N.Officas Root HVAC B1S2 2nd Level Outside Smoking Area C-8 Recovery Operator FEP Ovan Control Room, Position 1 FP Finishing (Dryer) Control Room FP nnlshina Dryer Operator FP Finishing Dryer Operator
Wax Room
(TM0048)
"S-spasi)
(TCP215)
07/23/97 08/OB/97 08/07/37
0.23 -----S------ --" "W" -
--^-- """W' 053
023
S
NNE
(TMOOW)
o7ffi4/asr &22
S
S
(TM0045) (TCP231) ""(ilmooo)
(TM004S)
maaw wasisi
'WiSsisf
oa/os/97
0,52
S
0.19
N
"o.nr '"sfi
0.19
SSE
E
------y---
NWS
----ggg----
rcsfeaahW Contact 03/27/97 0.18
CTCP231)
miiw 0.18
NE
(ITFUSaW) 4824 07/2S/97 0.18
^
NE
[TM004a)
vriSMSf 0.17
NE
NE
(TCFM1) [TMOWS)
070319/7 07/22/97
017
0.17
S
N
SW
------^S----
(TCP231)
07/16/97 0.16
NE
E
(TTFTOaoaPI) 10203 08/08/97 0.18
CTM004S) (TM0048) (TM004$ COPOLYMERS (TM004S)
snssm 0.16
8
VTaam "o3T
3W
WIS\W OM 1 te
9/97-11/97 "g^S"
OTO4/B7 "ssr
S
'w" """ NWS NE
S
TCP803/18PJ 10159 07/11W 013
(TM0100) (TM004S)
08/05/97 07/11/87
0.13 0.13
SSE 3
SSE --------g------
COPOLYMERS
9W-11/97 0.12
(TTPOBB/OBPM)
07/17/97 ~5W
NE
NE
(TCP231) (TCP216) (TTP081)
.CrrNlao) ~
07/30(97 08/04/87 07/30(97 07/11/97
0.12
"CisT
0.11 0.11
S
S
--g-- 3
3SW
"""8SE
ssw
S
tTM0045)
07/21/97 0.11
NE
NE
(TM0045)
OW23C97 0.11
3
W
(rM0046) (rCP231)
07/OB(W 0.10
E
NW
07/14/87 0.09 ----^----
NE
COPOLYMERS
W97-11/97 0.08
TCP603/18PJ Contract 07/09/37 0.08
(TCP231J
07/17/87 0.08
ME
(twtel)
07/2S/97 0.08
8
(TCP231)
07/16/97 0.07
NE
(TCP231)
07/3107 OW
S
(rCP231)
07/2807 0.07
N
NE E
6 '"
NNW N5
(TM004S) (TM004S)
08/05/97 07/22(97
0.07 0.07
SSE SW
SSE NWS
(TM0048) (TTF088/06PM)
fTGP231)
08/07/97 08/05/97 07/18/97
0.08 0.06 0.06
8
NNE
SSE
SSE
NE
------^------
(nFu31)
07/11/97 0.06
8
S
(TTPIOS/oaPI) 10214 08/12/97 0.06
(TTF102/08PI) 10177 08/06/97 0.06
(TTF028)
07/09/97 0.06
E
NW
Cloudy y Clear Ctear Rain Y Cloudy y Cloudy ChHidy Claar v
Clear v Clear Ctcwoy f
.
Clear
Cloudy y Cloudy Y Clear 1r
Rain y
Clear Clear y
Clear Clear Stormy Clear Clear Ctear Y Cloudy Y Rain Y Clear
Clear Cloudy Clear Clear Cloudy Clear y Cloudy r Clear Y Clear Clear Clear
Rain
EID092896
EID092896
0-8 PACE Team Meetings
30-
January 1998
81B2 2nd Level CHrtsida Smoking Area FEP Extruder Control Room FEP Oven Control Room, Position 1 REP Poiykettta Control Room, Position 1 FP Finishing (Diyer) Control Room FP&D Autgslave Control Room Monoroar-Cotrtrol Ream FEP Exttud6tContre( Room FEP Extruder Control Room FEP Extruder Control Room FEP oven Control Room, Position 1 FEP PotyfcetBBControl Room, Position 2
FP&D Autoclave Control Room New FEP Control Room New FEP Control Room P/6 FEP PK Operator PS1 Oven Control Room, Position 1
re" Oven Control Room. Position 2
FEP PoIyteMa Control Room. Position 2 FP FtntstHna(Otyar) Control Room NawFEP Control Room P/s Day Poly Area Mechanic P/S Fine-POwderDiyarOp P/S Shift Mechanic A/S #2 Booster Pump Bead Oven Room BeadOven Room Bead Sweeeo Screener F6P Oven Contiol BOOB), Position 1 FEP Oven Control Boom, Positions FP Finishing (Diyer) Comiol Room FP6D Autoclave Control Room FP&D Autoclave Control Room PP&O Autoclave Control Room Monomer Control Room Monomer Control Room New FEP Control Room WS FEP General Day Meeh P/S PEP General Day Mech P/S FEP General Shift Mech Bead Laser Inspection Bead Oven Room FEP PolyketHe Control Room. Position -l FEP Poiykattle Canirol Room, Position 2 PEP Polykeltle Control Room, Position 2 FEP polyKeate Control Room, Position 2 FP Finishing (Dryer) Control Room FP&D Autoclave Control Room Monomer Contra! Room
(TM0048) (rcraea) CTOP231) (TX3P215)
(ITF031)
(TOWO) (TM0100) (TCP268) (rcpzaa) (TCP268) (TCSP231) (TCP215)
(rmal)
(TTF010)
(TCP^^O)
(TCP2BO) COPOLYMER8
frcpasi) tTCP231) (tOWS) (TTFasI) (TCpaam
Homopolymera tomopolymeis MONOMEH COPOI.YMER8 TCP603/1BPJ
tCP611/18PJ TcpaioneM
(rcp23i)
(TCP231)
nrpoal) (TrpOlO)
(TTFOtO) (TTF010) (TM0100) (TM0100) (TCP280) COPOLYMERS COPOLYM6RS COPOLYMERS TC;P6Tl/iaPJ TCP611 (TCP21S) (TCP215) (TCP215) (TCPalS) (TTFQ31) (TTF010) 0TVI0100)
Contract Contract ContfGCt
Contract
08/04/97 07/14/37 vaiwitsf 07/14/97 07/24/97
wnsr
missisi
07/1B/97 07/17/87 07/16/87 08/07/97 07/31/97 08/07/87
07/2S&7
07/2B/97 07/17ffl7
wsr-iW
snaiiST
Q8/04/B7 07/29/97 08/06/97 07/H/S7 W97-11/B?'
9/B7-11/B7
aw-n/w
9^7-11/67 07/13/57 04/08/97 67/09/97 08/04/97
OB/06/97
missis? 08/07/97 07/24/97 07/23/B7 07/25/87 WflSSW 07/16/97 9/97-11/97 9/97-11/97 9/97-11/97 03/27/97 03/27/97 oa/oa/97 07/30/97 07/18/97 07/17/37 07/10/97 07B/97 07/29/97
0.05 0.05 0.05
O.OS
0.08 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
"SST
0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03. 0.03 0.03 0.03 o.oa 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 001 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
S
NE S NE
IT
8 N
----^----
NE NE
S S S S N
NE
S S S
NE
S S SW S S S S NE
SSW
S
NE NE S
N S
SSE N6 SSE NE 8 5 NS NE NE E NNE ----NNW NNE E NS NE
NNW SSE
N SSE NE
SSE SSE NWS NNE
S W E W E
SW SSW NE NE SW NS
N
IStonny T"'
Clear Clear
Rain
Cloudy Clear Clear Clear
'dear
Clear Cloudy
Clear
Clear Stoimy Ctaar Clear Clear
Stormy Clear Cloudy Clear Rain Cloudy Cloudy Cloudy
dear
^
Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Cloudy Clear
^092897
EID092897
0-8 PACE Team Meetings
-31-
January 1998
New FEP Control Room New FEP Conliol Room P/S 'D'iqxaslonPackout P/S FEP ESI Mechanic P/S FEP Genoal Shm Mech Bead Oven Room
BeadQvanRoora A/SDiywCorrtrolRoom
fl/SDryar control Ftoom
A/S Graft PKtSontroi Room
A/SWaxRoom B162 2nd tavalOutsitiB Smoking Area C-a Recovery Operator c-a Recovery Operator FEP Extrodar Control Room FEP ExtnHer Conttol Room FEP Extnidar Control Room FEP extruder Control Room FEPExtnxtef Control Room PEP Extruder Coniro) Room FEP Oven Control Room. Position 1 FEP Oven Control Room. Position 2 FEP PolykatllaControl Room, Position FEP PotykottieControl Room. Position FEP PolykettteContra) Room, Position FEP PolyketHe Control Room. Position FEPPolykettte Cortrol Room, Position 1 Fep Priyketlls Control Room. Position FEP PolykntfleControl Room, Position 1 FEP PolyfcetHCaontrol Room, Position 1 FEP PolykatHBControl Room, Position FEP Polykattia Control Room. Position 2 FEP PolyketttoControl Room, Position 2 FEP Poly)t9ttl6 Connol Room, Position 2 FEP PelykeWe Control Room, Position 2 FEP Polykatfle Controi Room. Position 2 PEP PolykBtBBControl Room. Position 2 PEP PotyketttBControl Room. Position 2 FEP Polykettle Control Room, Position 2 FP.RnlsNng^Oryfi()ContBilRoom FP Finishing (Diyei) Control Room FP Finishing(Diyei) Controi Room FP Finishing (Dryer) Control Room FP Finishing(Dryer) Control Room FP Finishing (Dryer) Control Room FP Finishing(Dryer) Control Room FP Finishing Dryer Operator
FP FIrMshingDryer Operator FP FinishingDryer Operator FPftD Autoclave Control Room
(TCPZSQi "(^pas^"""-
COPOLYMEHS
COPOLYMERS
TCPStI
TCP8M
Homopolymgrs
Homopolynlws
Hemopo^nnis
Homopolyniere
(TMCKMa)
(TTF06B/OaPM)
(TTF06a/08PM)
(TCP268)
(rcpzsa)
(rcpaaa) (TCP288)
(ropasBj
(TCpaaa)
ffopsa^
(rcpsai) (TCP!216)
(rcpaN
(ropeis) (TCP2t5) (TCP21B>
acpais) ^CP^>'
(TOP21S)
(TCPZIS^
frcpzisji
(rcpas)
(TCP21B)
(TCP215)
(TCP215)
frcpas)
(Topais) (rcpais) fItF031>
tTTFOal)
(ffp081)
(TTF031)
(TTFIB1)
(TTF031)
rntoal) (TTFioa/oapi) frrFioaoapij
(TTFIOa/OSPI) (TTF010J
438S 4824 10008
07/30/97 0.01
3
07/1B/S7 0.01
NE
SSW N6
Clear Clear
9/g7.11W 0.01
awr-nw 0.01 W'1VSV 0.01
04^)8/97 0X10
loffiwsr 0.00
9/BM1/B7 0.00
m-iVm 0.00
907-11W 0.00
8^7-11/97 0.00
07/3(V97 0.00
8
S3W
Clear Y
08/08/97 0.00
SSW
SW
Clear
artae/sr 08/08/97
0.00 0.00
N6
SSW
NE ^ Clear
SW
Clear
08/06/97 0.00
S
SSE
Clear
08/04/97 0.00
8
SSE
Stoimy
WWW 0.00
S
NNW
Clear
07/30/97 0.00
S
-"ssr"
Clear
07/29/97 08/08/97 07/30/97
000
0.00
5
88W
N ------ggg------
Clear Gear
0.00 '--"-i---- SS^
Clear
08/13/97
WWST
0.00
000
8
SE
------8------ ------ggg------
Rain Rain
osioe/97 0.00
"s
8SB
Clear
07/31/87 0.00
S
NNW
Clear
07/30/97 07/28/97 07/1B/97 07/17/97
-6.10 0.00 0.00 0.00
S
SSW
--^-- NS
NE
NE
NE
------NE------
Clear Cloudy
Clear cisar
07/16/97 0.00
NE
OB/13/97 0.00
S
e.
Clear
SE
"RSSrT
08/12/97 08/08/97
0.00 0.00
S
8SW
SEE ------SW------
Rain Clear
Oa/07/97 08/06/97
0.00 0.00
S
NN6
Clear
S
------E---- Clear
07/28/97 07/16W
0.00 0.00
N
,,,, ^
NS
Cloudy
E
Clear
017/14/97 0.00
NE
NE
Claar
(W!3W o.oo"
S
SE
Rain
oa/iaay 0.00
SSE
E
08/08(97 0.00 --ssW--
SW
08/OS/97 Tor
SSE
SSE
OB/04/S7 0.00
S
SSE
Rain Clear Clear Stomy
07/31W 0.00
S
NNW
Clear
07/0affl7 0.00
E
NW
Rain
oa/12/g? (W12/B7
0.00 0.00
07/14/97 0.00
08/13/97 0.00
S
SE
Rain
EID092898
EID092898
C-8 PACE Team Meetings
-32-
PPSD Autoclave Control Room
FP&D Autoclave Control Room FP&D Autodava Control Room FP&D Autoclave Control Room FP&D AutodavBConlmi Room PP&D Autoctove Control Room FP&D Autoclava Contmt Room FP5D Autodava Control Room FP&O Autoclave Control Roam GramiSar Polykaaia Control Room Granular PolykeHle Control Room Granular PotyketlloContro) Room Granular PolykattfeControl Room Granular Polytettte Control Room Granular PdlyKeffle Control Room Granular PetytcetUaControl Room Granular PolykettB Control Room Granular PolykatUa Conlrol Room Granular PolytcettaControl Room Granular PolykettiB Control Room Granular PotykaWaControl Room Granular Potykotto Contro) Room Granular Potyhettia Control Room Granular PoiykstOBControl Room Monomer Control Room Monomer Control Room Monomer Control Room Monomer control Room Monomer Control Room Monomer Control Room Monomer Control Room Monomer Control Room Monomer Control Room New PEP Control Room
New FEP Control Room Nw FEP control Room New FEP Control Room New F6P Control Room New FEP Control Room New FEP Control Room P/S 0% Rec Op Chg Filtere P/S Day Poly E&l Mechanic P/S FEP Extruder Oparator P/S FEP Flake Packout Op P/S Fine Powder AC Op P/S Rris Powder Pactout P/S Wet Finishing Operator
crwno)
OTFOlO) (ITFOlO)
(nF10) (ITFOlO) (TTFIMO) (TTF010) """rnyKoj-"-
(rTF010) (TTFOK^ tlTF060) (HFoeo) (TTF060) (nvoeo) (rrFoeo) (rrFoeo) PTTFOCO) CTTF060) (nnFoeo) (nroeo) prpwtt) (rTpaeo) (TTFtMO)
(nF06^
(TTFOSO) (TO0100)
(rtKOIOQ)
(TM0100) (TM0100) tnmoloo) (TM0100)
(TM6^^
(TM0100) (TM0100) (TCP280) (Tcpaao) (rcpaao) (Tcpaao) (TOpaaO) (fcpeao) {TCP280) (Tcpaao)
hioniopolyiners
MomopolymBis COPOI.YMERS COPOLYMER8 HomopolyTTiers "lomopolytnerc COPOLYMERS
January 1998
flB/iafflr 0.00
SS6
E
Rain
08/0807 6a/osi7 08/04/67
0.00 6.00 0.00
SSW SSE
S
SW
--safe" T
SSE
Clear Clear Stormy
07/31/97 0.00
S
07/29/97 0.00
S
MNW
N
Clear "aiear-"
07/22/97 0.00
-wgW 0.00
SW NE li
NWS NE
Clear
WHVUSf 0.00
S
SW
Clear
07/09/97 0.00
E
NW
Rain
08/13/97 0.00
S
SE
Rain
08/12/97 000
SSE
E
0008/97 0.00 ----SSW----
SW
Rain Cl'saf
08/07/97 08/05/97 08/04/97
000
S
NNE
Clear
0.00 --386-- ------ggg------ Clear
0.00
S
SSE
Stormy
mmm 0.00
"df/aaSy" 0.00
S
NNW
Clear
N
------^g------ Ctoudy
07/25/97 0.00
S
07^24/87 0.00
8
E
Cloudy
8
Raln-
0703/97
07/21/97
-SfjW"
0.00
-53o-
0.00 04)0
S
--g^--
NE
8
W
NWS NE SW
Ctoudy Cloudy Clear
"Clear-
07/08/87 0.00
NE
NE
Clear
08/13/97 0.00
S
SE
oa/W 0.06
SSE
E
08/08/97 0.00 sW ""
SW
Rain Rain
blear
OB/07W7 0.00
S
NNE
Clear
08/0407 aoo"
S
SSE
Stormy
07/31/97 0.00
S
NNW
Clear
07fi4/97 600
S
07/22W 0.00
8W
O^i/97 0.00
NE
S 'r(WS
NE
Rain Cloudy Clear
OB/13/97
oa/iaa7
OB/Oa/97 OE/07/97
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
S SSE SSW
S'
SE
--e '
SW NN6
Rain Rain Clear Clear
08/06/97 0.00
S
SSE
Clear
08(04/97 0.00
S
SSE
Stormy
WWW 0.00
S
07/29/97 0.00
S
97-11/97 0.00
NNW
N
Clear
Clear ^r
9/87.11/97 0.00
9/97-11/97 0.00
9/B7-11/97 0.00
9/97-11/97 0.00
97-11W 0.00
9^7-11/97 0.00
03092899
EID092899
C-8 PACE Team Meetings
-33
January 1998
BSBI^^^a^EE^a
|8.<a3BmdMyi_g^^^
r|o"nrto""po' 'fwto"n"g-iTMh(ehH--it h--as.roo>n.l.b.i--s si--ttin--gon--It
AtoogtovestoragtboxInpflllBtiMrroom III FbroffiBnte(ooni Bd|3CQntol fucirttorro
OfyScmn Room on bkn switchbom d
InhlndAf padwit dispedlonana en tan supplycablnm
Rww^BMiaffiISS!|)oiywATO
imlnddeladgBofiMttmlblACpaitirftoAutodam lHim*^"-j^uitiiiJ-i-i]l'lllllilllllllllllllllM
^
.
lll-miiiirn inniriiii in
Cflnttol Room HVAC
alongwistwan by3uDiyntriotn_tD_p_of_y_eU_ow_tm_a_th_in_g<^*r
29.3 INICOdlS
tec___________^___ lAtitoclav^o^tt(tentoil Room Jotnopof tan lilingc^iwtroiJaMyln^tWBen each 'C'MBy.
. : Homi>|KllBWi(8162J(RootAias
(oflbasaolthatiack. sld. a (. waxunit aidB)o(the FFDiyer
|aM>aroclaln|idert)uiodaxlist
| |Hanopo^im{B1|p6a^c)toutD(sp(irfllonAiea IIC(nitrolfian(lacrosstromsilaiiwalltlootwayo)n
|lopBttoMeMt
28.6 28.5
|ciaarPlasfcvs.
WoniBn'sLoimge
|antS3((Wi(tooftoBnoWfigaraa-onlopo(iiiicrowave26J
JNIcttOlB [NIdiols
FeP(Bl63) Areas
Waishousa
EP(B163)Areas
DIspetsicnPackoulAtsa
iom.ylyTnm|B182la) iTOMnqAtaa
P(B163)Arow ISUinMl
m(Bttto
SfeiwimitCaitKHteaffl^ IQmnAMi
.^l.CMRn
Po(ytalt!lConl!0(Room
FB>fBi^Are
^opolymais(Bt62) |N.6tema
IM^ HciniBlBM9
|BwAt raa
Ltinctitoom -MononiBr Conttol
JamopBhiMBiS|iBModAMa
tioniopolyiiws(8162) )M(mowiC)orntrol Room
|FePpl63)Ateas [B(K)erAea
8-123 BaadFacaS, FEP(B163l Areas
Oven Area
WBlohousaBlofigiBitinflroyndMS ^ M tep<tfbox for
8aMy ^88808 hflridBoldooyHDnifetinaroundflrofl-- (m(opo(daiWstMa9tlan(l&i.b8lwsnlha01spBrstai Pactoutpadandwashbaain
tpakitedWo2o6d.7| |Nlchols
28.5 iNlchds
on top <rfMrtribcMtftB hanch (In^lwBflnDlspefrionPaclwuiOTlOiyFlatePacltoijt iBBdtefltpsflcoftdBooc^fliitedBtthfli^Msvupst^i
,N^b
255
M lop of inonltMrtfar and (tromcfaot)oc(ontrol paMi |FEPOHi-top<)fgtewm9tal-log>
23A iNtetiijIa iSzalBfeiPftiMlZBW.NolB^
inlatdialilaBBiat Atoo raftiHOTtofIn brealroom Ttjiltlprfmiaiw^fe
Mfe onfall le^B to teti
oflolcoiTldorByMwomerCDntnilRaom-lastotllceon
99 |sratal3Din6Sl2/16a7Not9
Piaste
212 INlchols
!CeeBd
pS^MeMFB.a|Njab |paintBdMentasl| |Nldiols
on OTaliodqaa>b<ittoo<tnWax Room HVAC ontelnMalXhg
en tap of beigereWgaratnt
16.4 |Nldlols
16^ INlchols
on unaarelda ol lh N. qtScas HVAC unit htete on tapofmonitoi (undervenQin computoi/nronitonrKm s^SCTrttocofltrolaigft
ExttudeyControlRocni
IFEPQvens - lop ot tahaust (iay om )B
is-sTNttiote 1&3 lltetims
FahtedMslall15.2 INlchols
14.1 |S3aiiateOtaMiaia97Noa
13.8 ISatete Dines t2B<97Mote,
EID092900
EID092900
0-8 PACE Team Meetings
,34-
January 1998
FEP(B163)ABas ExtrudefAtea
^(61631 AlBte
raFB-ClMnROtim
HoniopolymeiS(S162R) oo!Area
loinopotvniBisfB1G2i SinokiroAfRs
FB'(B1E3)Areas
FluffArea
l-TankFann
lomo^rivrnBT1xB2
tomoootmuni B162
FinaPOMSMPaclwrtRoom
FB'(B163) Areas
Oven Area
ttffiOBOlBWB B162 FBfB163AlB
p[ PoMdBr PackoutlteaB
FinaPowdarPaclaiulRocni
OyuArea
PEP(B163A) reas FS> (8163)Areas
Second RiwPolykettIa Control ftoom Oven Arto
lanoin)tvniBts(B162) PolvketllBControl Room
FEP (8163)Anas
Owmtma.
lo-no<tvn^lB162) Fina Powder PactoutRoon FEP (8163)Areas
FEP(B163)Aa
Oven Area
a'(Bl63>AiBas
law Control Room
I.TaritFaim
M2
Honn)potyniera(B162P) olykoltiBControl Hotm
HZ
1-12 'EP(B163)AieW
Oven Area
Painted Mala) 135 Nywas
Atopbdihous&Kl
' Jetal
atweaeiKiolMonomarContrnI Room HVAC unit on top Metai
dsma! box undamealhotlanKfsdetr switch box
aillBcttdtaftiite erfdust in wmtwekihing 0.09351 Otams)
.
sniaBlituelAxutxteilaigsywbaxDnwaBarogidcsinw PaintedMelal
((cmbiBalirooni across ftCTnistiBtelw
M-TanltPann-toootbiealWniialfslatton
CfiUMrjmnpHniU^p^lm
WWJ.K .,-,
FH'OwB-teoot<lmst-ta
ontDpololdOvenConMIRoomAClOTSbdiMCtnitrol PaintedMetal Roomin frontot conveyor sysiam T<yP!B'Bto.WM'
T<]ltftKMlBaill>92 on tflpolstoragatahinatsalongback vraBaciwaftDm
MBttt iBBU
n.a iltate0in631316fl7 Note na. Nfchols
11A flchols SJ Michols
9.3 S2atat3DnB8l297KolB 9.0 izatelsD nee 1Z/1E/B7Hots 8.4 fthels 8.3 SatetsOhies 12/5/97 NotB
~
a-2 Nichite 8.0 7.8 VKIWSS
f*0 Sakats Dines 12/16/97 Note ea Siatats Okies 116/97No pj Siakate01nesl2n6ffl7Mo 6 NIdub
(itteen((f(omdoor)of control areaon topoi box that ssstosSw
6.1 Nfchote
VOOy
an bItB'ctieckscala'panelbox in4)atwBflnconayor systBrnand Oven d
Parted Metal 4.7 'IMHXS
on too olbladt coat rack Inside door
'AitedMeu 4.5 lchots
on UUa box on wall tn-batween Own 2 andtha old Ovsn PzlntgdUBtal 4.$ iicnoi*
Too otteoiDrtwmdcontrolbox
v8ndinsmachm on top ci(breathingair station 34 black box in-telyiBBn
, 0BneanilB<mB58lam
en topfrf nionltor AloffifidMdInii Wfill N. Tank Fann-too of meter B-tZofScabaNndliretnickB docHknob.asyou anter Control Room (roughly100CTl(2) area)
B-12 M. BolBV-soto on cattnat
B-l2looo((illnacabh9l FEPOvans-topotplaslk:st)lald-1&2
Nital Painted Metiil PalntadMBlal
Metal
4.S SMhalsDin69lZ/16rt7NO 4.1 NIdiols
2.S Nfchols
15 15 1:4-
1.1
Szatels Dines 12/5ffl7Nol iiakalsOnl93l2W97Nota ifchoto
0.7 SzakateDines 12/5/97 Note OS izahats Dines 12/5/97 Nota
03 Szakats Dines 12/5/97 Note
EID092901
EID092901
