Document o9g5OXkm01r5xV8J8Rm3y3kR7
3M MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, CORPORATE TOXICOLOGY Protocol for Study No. T-7132.2; ST-39
ph a r m a c o k in etic study of perfluo ro o ctane su lfo n a m id e
TN RATS
Study Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the potential for oral absorption, urinary and fecal clearance and biological persistence of Perfluorooctane Sulfonamide (PFOSA) in male
Sprague Dawley rats after a single oral dose. Analysis of the serum, liver, urine and feces for potential metabolites of PFOSA will be performed by LCMS and perhaps other methods. Previous studies of the N-ethyl derivative of PFOSA have concluded that PFOSA is the ultimate metabolite in rats (1,2); however, the analytical technique used in these studies was unable to detect all potential metabolites, including perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS). No pharmacokinetic studies have yet been done on PFOSA to resolve this issue and search for other possible metabolites in the urine and feces. Recently, validated methods have been developed for the quantitation of PFOSA and its potential metabolite, PFOS, in serum and liver down to the low part per billion level (3). One goal of this study is to determine the potential for, if occurring, the extent of conversion o f PFOSA to PFOS. This information will help to explain the pharmacokinetics of NEtFOSE and its metabolites and provide data for proper risk
characterization.
Research Client:
3M Specialty Chemicals Division 3M Center, Building 236 Saint Paul, MN 55144
Sponsor: Study Locution:
3M Specialty Chemicals Division 3M Center, Building 236 Saint Paul, MN 55144
3M Strategic Toxicology Laboratory 3M Center, Building 270-3 S-06 room SB314 Saint Paul, MN 55144
Study Director:
Andrew M. Seacat, Ph.D. Toxicology Specialist 3M Medical Dept. / Corporate Toxicology 3M Center, Building 220-2E-02 Saint Paul, MN 55144 Ph.: 651-575-3161 FAX: 651-733-1773
Study Toxicologist.
Deanna Luebker, MS Advanced Research Toxicologist 3M Medical Dept. / Corporate Toxicology 3M Center, Building 220-2E-02 Saint Paul, MN 55144
Ph: 651-737-1374 FAX: 651-733-1773
T-7132.2: ST-39 PFOSA PK
Proposed Study Timeline ln-Life Start Date: October 4th, 1999 In-Life End Date: November 2nd, 1999 Analytical Completion Date: TBA Final Report Completion Date: TBA
Regulatory Compliance: This study will be performed in the 3M Strategic Toxicology Laboratory under a defined protocol and classified as a "Class B Study" as explained in TOX SOP 0950, Strategic
Toxicology Lab GLP Program Procedure.
Test Material: Dan Hakes. Product Responsibility Liaison 3M Chemicals Division will furnish high-purity
PFOSA. Identification: Name: Perfluorooctanesulfonamide Molecular Formula: C8F17SO2NH2 Lot Number: L-10009 (Prepared by George Moore, 3M SMD Lab, Bldg 236, April 1996) Purity: Analysis by GCMS determined that the staring material was over 99% pure (4). Qualitative and quantitative compositional results that were derived from the single trial 'H /19F-NMR cross-integration analysis revealed that the composition was 65.8% CF3(CF2)x-S02-NH2 (Normal chain), 18.7% CF3(CF2)x-CF(CF3)-(CF2)y-S02-NH2 (Internal monomethyl branch), 11.2% (CF3)2CF-(CF2)x-S02-NH2 (Isopropyl branch), 3.5% CxF2x+l-CF(CF3)-S02-NH2 (Alpha branch) and 0.28% (CF3)3C-(CF2)x-S02-NH2 (t-Butyl branch)(5). HPLC/MS characterization of the PFOSA sample revealed 9,600 ppm ofPFOS, 1,100 ppm of C7F 15SO2NH2, 510 ppm o f C9F 19SO2NH2, 6,600 ppm o f CgF16HSO2NH2, 24,000 ppm of C18F36HSO2NH2, 1,200 ppm of C8F 15H2SO2NH2 and lower concentrations of several other amides. Based on the sum of the impurities, the purity of the PFOSA sample would be approximately 96 % (6 & appendix I).
Stability: Documentation will be kept on file with the Sponsor.
Storage Conditions: Upon receipt, test material will be stored tightly sealed at room temperature.
Characteristics: Information on synthesis methods, composition or other characteristics that define the test material will be kept on file with the Sponsor.
2
T-7132.2; ST-39 PFOSA PK
A n im a ls: Species:
Rat
Strain:
Sprague Dawley
Source:
Harlan
Age at initiation of treatment:
Weight at initiation of treatment:
Number and sex: 30 males
6-8 weeks approximately 150-250g
i auic i - i/v ^
Group
Dose
1 0 mg/kg
2 5 mg/kg
N 15
15
Euthanasia 5 each on days 1, 4 and 29 post dose 5 each on days 1, 4 and 29 post dose
Identification: AUA Number:
ear tag with animal number or unique tail mark. 2246
Husbandry: Housing: All rats from groups 1 and 2, which are to be sacrificed on day 29 post dose, will be housed individually in metabolism cages for portions o f the study (see Table 2). When not in metabolism cages, these rats will be group housed in standard cages. All other rats will be group housed in
standard cages throughout the study.
Diet/Water: Harlan Teklad LM-485 Mouse/Rat Sterilizable Diet, supplied by Harlan Teklad, Madison, WI, and tap water will be provided to all rats ad libitum
throughout the study.
Environment: Environmental controls for the animal room will be set to maintain a temperature of 72 3F, humidity of 30-70%, a minimum of 10 exchanges
of room air per hour and a 12 hour light/dark cycle
Dose and Dosing Procedures: Method of administration/Dose preparation: A single 5mg/kg dose o f PFOSA will be administered via oral gavage to rats in group 2 on day zero of the study. The PFOSA will be prepared from a stock solution o f 1nOrng/ml PFOSA in acetone A final 0.1% (1 mo/mil
uniform suspension (or emulsion) of PFOSA in 2% Tween 80 and 1% acetone will be prepared using a 15 ml dounce tissue grinder. A volume of 5 ml suspension / kg body weight will be administered to each rat. Re suspension of solids will be performed with 5 strokes of the tissue grinder pestel before each sample is drawn-up in the syringe for dosing. A single 5
3
T-7132.2; ST-39 PFOSA PK
ml / kg body weight dose of vehicle, 2% Tween 80 and 1% acetone, will be administered via oral gavage to rats in group 1 on day zero of the study.
Observation o f Animals: Clinical Observations: Each animal will be observed daily (excluding weekends and holidays) for mortality and morbidity and notable findings will be recorded. Additional findings will be recorded as they are observed.
Body Weights: Each animal will be weighed immediately prior to treatment, weekly thereafter and immediately prior to euthanasia.
Specimen Collection: Frequency (See table 2): Urine and feces collections will be made on days 1 - 4 post dose Necropsies will be performed on days 1, 4 and 29 post dose.
Table 2 - Schedule
Sun Mon
Oct 3
Oct 4
day 0
DOSING
Oct 10 dav 6 PD Oct 17 day 13 PD
Oct 11 dav 7 PD
Oct 18 day 14 PD
Tues Oct 5 day 1 PD Collection, Dy 1PD sac
Oct 12 day 8 PD Oct 19 day 15 PD
Wed Oct 6 day 2 PD Collection
Oct 13 day 9 PD Oct 20 day 16 PD
Tburs Oct 7 day 3 PD Collection
Oct 14 day 10 PD Oct 21 day 17 PD
Fri Oct 8 day 4 PD Collection Switch to reg cages. Dy 4 PD sac.
Oct 15 dav 11 PD Oct 22 day 18 PD
Sat Oct 9 day 5 PD
Oct 16 dav 12 PD Oct 23 day 19 PD
Oct 24 dav 20 PD
Oct 31 day 27 PD
Oct 25 dav 21 PD
Novi day 28 PD
Oct 26 dav 22 PD
Nov 2 day 29 PD Dy 29 PD sac.
Oct 27 dav 23 PD
Oct 28 dav 24 PD
Oct 29 dav 25 PD
Oct 30 day 26 PD
Method of Specimen Collection: Urine and feces will be collected from each metabolism cage at the designated times. The initial volume of urine will be recorded, the sides of the urine collection apparatus will be washed with approximately 5-10ml deionized water and the final volume of urine vrill be brought to 15 ml with additional deionized water. Daily feces weight will be recorded for each animal. At the designated times, animals will be euthanized by CO2 and gross necropsy performed. During necropsy, blood ( 6 ml) will be collected via the abdominal aorta and transferred to blood collection tubes without anticoagulant. Blood samples will be allowed to clot for a period
4
T-7132.2: ST-39 PFOSA PK
of 15 to 30 minutes at room temperature and the clot will be spun down in a centrifuge at 1100 x g for 5 minutes. The serum will be transferred to labeled 1.5 ml microfuge tubes and centrifuged again at 2000 x g to remove any remaining red blood cells. Each sera sample will then be transferred to a separate labeled polypropylene microfuge tube and frozen in dry ice. Livers will be removed, weighed, placed individually into labeled sterile sample bags and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen then maintained on dry ice.
Specimen Handling: Specimens will temporarily be stored in a freezer set to maintain -60 to 80C. For metabolite analysis, these specimens will be packed in dry ice
and shipped to.
Kris Hansen, Ph D 3M Environmental Technology and Safety Services 935 Bush Avenue St. Paul, MN 55133-3331 Ph. 612-778-6081, FAX: 612-778-6176.
All results will be provided for inclusion in the final report.
The number, type and date of collection of specimens to be generated for analysis are as follows:
Table 3 - Specimens
Specimen
day 1
post
dose
Serum
10
(5/group/day)
Liver
10
(5/group/day)
Urine
10
(5/group/day)
Feces
10
(5/group/day)
day 2 post dose
10 10
Day 3 post dose
10 10
day 4 post dose 10
10
10
10
day 29 post dose 10
Total 30
10 30
40
40
Data Analysis: Data collected on parent compound and identifiable metabolites will be analyzed fr*r toxicokinetic parameters and for statistically significant differences between groups using
ANOVA and /or Students T-test.
5
T-7132.2: ST-39 PFOSA PK
Responsibilities: Deanna Luebker and Andrew Seacat will be responsible for dosing the animals,
collecting in-life specimens, performing the necropsies and collecting and sending tissue specimens for analysis. Kris Hansen, 3M Environmental, will be responsible for analytical evaluation of the Andrew Seacat will draft a final report and ensure the report receives appropriate 3M review before a final report is issued.
6
Signatures:
01_____ ).
Andrew M. Seacat Ph.D. Toxicology Specialist Study Director
Deanna Luebker, MS Advanced Research Toxicologist Study Toxicologist
T-7132.2; ST-39 PFOSA PK
t2-
Date
rO /'7 /4 9
Date
7
\*
T-7132.2; ST-39 PFOSA PK
References:
1. Grossman M R. and Bowen J.M. (1990) Tissue analysis of fluorinated sulfonamide pesticide: an evaluation of distribution, elimination, and potential for bioaccumulation in orally exposed rats. M.S. Thesis, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA. (also possibly published as: Grossman Mark R. and Bowen J.M. (1990) Tissue distribution and elimination of a fluorinated sulfonamide pesticide in rats. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol., but notfound).
2. Grossman M.R., Mispagel, M E. and Bowen J.M. (1992) Distribution and tissue in rats during and after prolonged dietary exposure to a highly fluorinated sulfonamide pesticide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 40, 2505 - 2509.
3. K.J. Hansen, L.A. Clemen, M.E. Ellefson, H.O. Johnson. (1999). Compound Specific Characterization of Organic Fluorochemicals in General Population Human Sera Samples. 3M Environmental Lab, St. Paul, MN 55133.
4. Payfer R.M. GC/MS analyses of PFOSA (L-10009). SA&C Analytical Request No. 59426. Report 9/24/99. 3M SA&C Lab Building 236-2B-11.
5 Tom Kestner Chemical Characterization o f PFOSA, L-10009, by 1H and 19FNMR Spectroscopy Requests # 59426. 3M Specialty Adhesives & Chemicals Analytical Laboratory / SMMD-236-2B-11, September 25, 1999.
6. DeRoos F.L. Characterization of PFOSA Samples, T-7132-1 (L-10009) and TNA-1584. Request # A-151254. Report 10/7/99. Corporate Analytical Technology Center, Building 201-1-29, CATC - Chromatography Group.
8
\
T-7132.2; ST-39 PFOSA PK
Appendix 1:
Tel: 736-0665 201-1W-29
Corporate Analytical Technology Center
To; Larry A. Wendling/US-Corporate/3M/US cc: Andrew Seacat/US-Corporate/3M/US Subject; Characterization of PFOSA Sample for Toxicology
Larry,
I have completed the HPLC/MS characterization of the PFOSA sample (T-7132-, L-10009 prepared by G. Moore 4/96) that is proposed to be used for the animial feeding study. I found 9,600 ppm o f PFOS, 1,100 ppm o f C7F15S0 2NH2, 510 ppm o f C9F19S0 2NH2, 6,600 ppm of C8F16HS02NH2, 24,000 ppm o f C18F36HS02NH2, 1,200 ppm of
c 8f 15h 2S 0 2n h 2 and ,ower concentrations o f several other amides. Based on the sum of the impurities, the purity o f the PFOSA sample would be approximately 96 %.
I've thought a little more about apparent presence of C igF3gHS0 2 NH2 in the sample. The identification of this compound was based primarily on the observed molecular weight and the relative elution order in the chromatogram. Rather than C13F36HSO2NH2 , it seems more probable that this compound is actually (C8F-]7S0 2 )2NH. Confirmation of this identification will require additional analyses. I also need to think more about whether the other partially hydrogenated perfluoroamides may actually be of this
The PFOS was quantified using a standard curve prepared by analyzing PFOS standards so its concentration should be accurate. The amide impurities, however, including the partially hydrogenated amides, were all quantified using a PFOSA standard curve assuming that they had the same mass spectral response factor as did PFOSA. While this assumption will introduce some error to the quantitative data, it is the best we can do since we do not have standards for each of these amides. Also, this calculated purity assumes that all of the impurities are amenable to HPLC and are detected by the analysis. While not always true, this sample was analyzed by Rick Payfer using GC/MS and by CATC using our GC method. Neither of the analyses found volatile or semivolatile impurities, e.g., N-methyl FOSE, Nethyl FOSE, etc. at concentrations greater than 50 ppm.
I also carried out a semiquantitative assessment of the purity of the PFOSA by comparing the PFOSA response to a PFOSA standard curve. Using this technique, the purity of the PFOSA sample was found to be 118 %. These analyses were carried out in duplicate, with triplicate injections of each solution, so they should be relatively accurate as analytical variation would be averaged. In general, however, it is not highly accurate to use a chromatographic method to quantify a relatively pure material due to the extremely large dilution factor, in this case >100,000, that must be applied. It is not expected that instrumental variation would bias the Duritv high. It is possible that the purity of the sample is actually higher than the purity of the PFOSA that we are using as a standard! If this were true, the purity would be determined to be > 100%.
Andrew Seacat has reviewed the concentrations of the impurities that were determined and calculated that the concentration of PFOS will not adversely affect the study. At 9,600 ppm, he calculates that the rats receiving 3 mg/kg/day would ingest app. 0.20 mg PFOS total in
9
'**
T-7132.2; ST-39 PFOSA PK
Appendix I Continued:
28 days assuming a 0.25 kg rat. If we further assume that 30 % of that is deposited in the liver (based on previous feeding studies) and liver is approximately 12 grams, then the predicted concentration in the liver from the residual PFOS would be 200 ug PFOS x 0.3 /12 g liver weight = 5 ug/gram, or 5 ppm, which in itself should not impose any toxicological consequences. Any PFOS measured significantly over that could be attributed to metabolism of PFOSA to PFOS.
He believes that the 1-H and 2-H perfluoro amides are interesting as they may be subject to metabolic attack, however these amides should be analytically distinct from the Perfluorinated species on down the line, and would not amount to a foreseeable toxic concentration and therefore would be acceptable if no other substitute can be prepared. Andrew is still thinking about whether the (CgF-|7S02)2NH will have a negative impact on the study.
Please give me a call at 6-0665 it you have any questions concerning our analyses or if i can provide additional information.
Fred L. DeRoos CATC
10