Document n90Ly4dywVZyv5z19dapq3EjX

Message From: Sent: To: CC: Subject: Attachments: Macy, Jim [jim.macy@nebraska.gov] 9/7/2017 4:31:50 PM Chu, Ed [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=a7a6452e3e0941b4bblfafalbalae424-Chu, Edward] Kelly, Albert [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=08576e43795149e5a3f9669726dd044c-Kelly, Albe]; Wagner, Kenneth [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=048236ab99bc4d5eal6cl39blb67719c-Wagner, Ken] Superfund ROD decision Dana Site West Highway 6 & 281 site scan0013.pdf; Dana Non-Concurance.pdf Ed: Please see the attached memo describing NDEQ preferred alternative, G-4, for the West Highway 6 & 281 site in Hastings, Nebraska. Although NDEQ sent a non-concurrence letter, dated August 21, 2017 (attached), I thought it may be helpful to send additional correspondence describing our concerns with EPA's preferred alternative, G-3. Just this morning we learned, via phone conservation, that EPA was going to select NDEQ's preferred alternative, G-4, in the Record of Decision. We still thought there was a benefit in sending this memo. We would like to thank you and your staff for working with NDEQ to accelerate the pace of cleanup and lessen the long-term cost to the State of Nebraska at this site. Jim Macy Director, NDEQ Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 10 ED 002061 00116119-00001