Document mmxLVp2pKnReOk9Kzoa218rRO
To: From: Sent: Subject:
Jackson, Ryan[jackson.ryan@epa.gov] danielle quist Fri 7/21/2017 8:55:55 PM Danielle Quist's LD2 reports
Ryan, thank you for meeting with me this afternoon and considering me for this unique position. I have attached sections of AFBF's LD2s for 2015 and 2016 where my name is listed as a lobbyist. I will send the 2017 reports to you on Monday. The reports list multiple specific issues and lobbyists in each general issue area - but that does not mean I lobbied on each specific issue listed.
Kind regards, Danielle Quist
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
ED_001523_00003527-00001
To:
Jackson, Ryan[jackson.ryan@epa.gov]; Cheatham, Reggie[cheatham.reggie@epa.gov];
Breen, Barry[Breen.Barry@epa.gov]; Bowman, Liz[Bowman.Liz@epa.gov]; Grantham,
Nancy[Grantham.Nancy@epa.gov]; Wagner, Kenneth[wagner.kenneth@epa.gov]; Lyons,
Troy[lyons.troy@epa.gov]; Greenwait, Sarah[greenwalt.sarah@epa.gov]; Shapiro,
MikefShapiro.Mike@epa.gov]; Coleman, Sam[Coleman.Sam@epa.gov]; Gray,
Davidfgray.david@epa.gov]; Edlund, Carl[Edlund.Carl@epa.govj; Heard, Anne[Heard.Anne@epa.gov];
Kaplan, Robert[kaplan.robert@epa.gov]; Rodrigues, Cecil[rodrigues.cecil@epa.gov]; Kelly,
Albert[kelly.albert@epa.gov]; Brown, Byron[brown.byron@epa.gov]; Washington, Tiffeny[Washington.Tiffeny@epa.gov]; Simon, Nigelisimon.Nigel@epa.gov]; Davis,
Patrick[davis.patrick@epa.gov]; Brooks, Becky[Brooks.Becky@epa.gov]; Armstead, John A.[Armstead.John@epa.gov]; Melvin, Karen[Melvin.Karen@epa.gov]; Richardson, Robin H[Richardson.RobinH@epa.gov]; Clark, BeckifClark.Becki@epa.gov]; Forsgren, Lee[Forsgren.Lee@epa.gov]; Indermark, Michele[lndermark.Michele@epa.gov]; Smith, Monicafsmith.monica@epa.gov]; Carroll, CraigfCarroll.Craig@epa.gov]; Kling, David[Kling.Dave@epa.gov]; Shaw, Betsy[Shaw.Betsy@epa.gov]; Kavlock,
RobertfKavlock.Robert@epa.gov]; Minoli, Kevin[Minoli.Kevin@epa.gov]; Fotouhi,
David[Fotouhi.David@epa.gov]; Hill, Franklin[Hill.Franklin@epa.gov]; Irizarry,
Gilberto[lrizarry.Gilberto@epa.gov]; Webster, James[Webster.James@epa.gov]; Badalamente,
Mark[Badalamente.Mark@epa.gov]; Starfield, Lawrence[Starfield.Lawrence@epa.gov]; Yamada, Richard
(Yujiro)[yamada.richard@epa.gov]; Morales, Oscar[Morales.Oscar@epa.gov]; Peterson,
Mary[Peterson.Mary@epa.gov]; Beck, Nancy[Beck.Nancy@epa.gov]; Guerriero,
Margaret[guerriero.margaret@epa.gov]; Ballotti, Doug[ballotti.douglas@epa.gov]; Borries,
Samuelfborries.samuel@epa.gov]; Prince, JohnfPrince.John@epa.gov]; Mosher,
Eric[Mosher.Eric@epa.gov]; Mears, Mary[Mears.Mary@epa.gov]; Drazan, Dan[Drazan.Dan@epa.gov];
Schlieger, Brianfschlieger.brian@epa.gov]; Oh, Peter[Oh.Peter@epa.gov]
Cc:
Flynn, Mike[Flynn.Mike@epa.gov]; Gross, Bonnie[Gross.bonnie@epa.gov]; Glenn,
Trey[Glenn.Trey@epa.gov]; Jenkins, Brandi[Jenkins.Brandi@epa.gov]; Cory, Preston
(Katherine)[Cory.Preston@epa.gov]; Newton, CherylJNewton.Cheryl@epa.gov]; Dorsey,
Claudette[Dorsey.Claudette@epa.gov]; Veal, Lee[Veal.Lee@epa.gov]; Moore,
Tonyfmoore.tony@epa.gov]; EOC_Manager,[EOC_Manager@epa.gov];
kohlflynn[
Ex. 6 - Personal Privacy
Leonard, Paulfleonard.paul@epa.gov]; Falvo,
Nicholas[falvo.nicholas@epa.gov]; Rodan, Bruce[rodan.bruce@epa.gov]; Grevatt,
PeterfGrevatt.Peter@epa.gov]; Mccabe, Catherine[McCabe.Catherine@epa.gov]; Fonseca,
Silvina[Fonseca.Silvina@epa.gov]; Levine, CarolynfLevine.Carolyn@epa.gov]; Price,
Lisa[Price..Lisa@epa,aQyl;..SnowbargerJ..R.Qbert[Snowbarger.Robert@epa.gov];
ronheard
Ex. 6 - Personal Privacy
Edwards, JonathanfEdwards.Jonathan@epa.gov];
Opalski, DanfOpalski.Dan@epa.gov]; Perovich, GinafPerovich.Gina@epa.gov]; Lincoln,
Larry[Lincoln. Larry@epa.gov]
Ex. 6 - Personal Privacy
> Lapierre,
Kenneth[Lapierre.Kenneth@epa.gov]; Gettle, Jeaneanne[Gettle.Jeaneanne@epa.gov]; Jones-Johnson,
Shea[Jones-Johnson.Shea@epa.gov]; Scheraga, Joel[Scheraga.Joel@epa.gov]; Allen,
Reginald[Allen.Reginald@epa.gov]; Chu, Ed[Chu.Ed@epa.gov]; Nalipinski,
Mike[Nalipinski.Mike@epa.gov]; Edwards, Crystal[Edwards.Crystal@epa.gov]; Mugdan,
Walter[Mugdan.Walter@epa.gov]; EOC_Deputy_Manager[EOC_Deputy_Manager@epa.gov]; Caraballo,
Mario[Caraballo.Mario@epa.gov]; Michaud, John[Michaud.John@epa.gov]; Mclain,
Jennifer[Mclain. Jennifer@epa.gov]
From: EOC Documentation
Sent: Thur 9/14/2017 3:01:06 PM
Subject: Re: Hurricane Irma/Harvey: PCC Meeting and Conference Call
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
ED_O01523_00003530-00001
Materials for today's meeting attached. Non-responsive Conference Code/Ex.6
Hurricane Harvey/lrma Policy Coordinating Committee Agenda
September 14, 2017
Opening Remarks Barry Breen
Ryan Jackson
Situational Updates
For each situational update would you please address the following topic areas in addition to Regional/Program specific highlights:
What are you being asked to do/support from our Federal, State and Local partners?
Are there actions you are considering leaning forward on to address a need or expedite our response activities?
Are there program policy, legal, or resource issues impacting your operations?
Discussion of recovery efforts
Region 2
Region 4
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
ED_001523_00003530-00002
Region 3
OPA
OLEM
Harvey Update
Region 6
General Discussion
Next Meeting
EOC Documentation Unit EOC_Documentation@epa.gov
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
ED_001523_00003530-00003
Hurricane Irma Response EPA Region 4
SITUATION REPORT #13
1700-0900 EST, September 14, 2017
SEPTEMBER 14, 0900 UPDATES
EPA Preparation and Response Activities o Facility assessment teams started assessments of 194 facilities prioritized by the Florida SEOC ESF10 Desk. 177 facilities are assigned for assessment. 94 facilities were assessed with no issues reported. The list is composed of a combination of facility types (e.g., Facility Response Plan [FRP] and Risk Management Plan [RMP] facilities). o APTMD contacted 103 RMP facilities in FL. One of those facilities, Pilgrim's Pride, Live Oak, FL indicated that they had a release that is now stopped. Will be prioritized for a field assessment. All other facilities contacted indicated that they had no known releases. o Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) has requested a fuel waiver to address a shortage of Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel (ULSD) and a specific diesel fuel availability circumstance in the aftermath of Hurricane Irma.
National Priority List Site Assessment o Florida. 6 NPL Assessment Teams were deployed on Tuesday, September 12th and arrived and began assessment work on September 13th. 30 of 90 total sites were assessed yesterday. 2 Sites require follow up. O Fairfax Wood Treating in Jacksonville. Due to heavy rain, some runoff concerns were identified at an on-site retention point and a washout underneath some site fencing. Crews are being mobilized to address the washout and samples and samples will be collected from the pond to determine whether contamination issues are present/absent. US Navy Air Station Cecil Field, Jacksonville, Florida. Due to flood, the air-sparging unit has a compressor failure. Several monitoring wells were also flooded but appeared to be in good shape. A contractor is currently working to repair the air-sparging unit. o Georgia. 10 of 35 sites were assessed yesterday. No issued identified or follow up required at this time. o South Carolina. 9 of 22 sites assessed yesterday. No issues identified or follow up required at this time o Figure 1 (provided at the end of this report) depicts FRP and RMP facilities and NPL sites in the State of Florida.
State (FL, GA, NC, SC, TN and Tribal Updates o Alabama No significant issues to update. o Florida Florida SEOC remains at level 1 activation. o Georgia Georgia State Operation Center is at Level 1 Full Activation and fully staffed. O All 159 Counties now included in FEMA 3387-EM-GA for Emergency Services and Debris Removal 0 Damage assessments, debris removal, and recovery operations are underway throughout the State. o North Carolina O Returned to normal daily operations, no additional SITREPs are anticipated.
Page 1 EPA SharePoint>Region 4 Hurricane IRMA Response>Documents>Situation Reports
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
ED_001523_00003532-00001
o South Carolina 0 The South Carolina Emergency Operations Center (SEOC) returned to Operating Condition 3 (OPCON 3) as of 12 September 2017 @ 20:00 and is maintaining limited 24hr operations. The State Emergency Response Team (SERT) is transitioning to damage assessment, re-entry and sheltering operations following the impacts from Hurricane Irma.
o Tennessee 0 The Tennessee SEOC remains at Elevated activation as post-tropical cyclone Irma weakens.
o Tribal Nations 0 No significant issue are reported.
Page 2 EPA SharePoint>Region 4 Hurricane IRMA Response>Documents>Situation Reports
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
ED_001523_00003532-00002
*
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
Page 3 EPA SharePoint>Region 4 Hurricane IRMA Response>Documents>Situation Reports
ED_001523_00003532-00003
NATIONAL RESPONSE CENTER (NRC) o Table 1 below provides a summary of NRC reports received in Hurricane Irma impact areas. Incidents that may require action by the EPA Region 4 field teams are summarized in the Region 4 States section of the Situation Report.
Table I
NRC Report Tracking
Location
Hazardous Materials
Open
Closed
Oil
Open
Closed
Oi icr Open
Florida
0
4
0
55
0
Georgia
0
0
0
1
0
Alabama
0
0
0
0
0
South
0
0
0
0
0
Carolina
Open means response status unknown or currently responding Closed means response addressed by owner-operator or Federal, State, or local agency; no EPA assistance requested.
Closed 6 0 0 0
o Significant NRC Reports o Nothing significant to report
CURRENT HURRICANE JOSE STATUS o Hurricane Jose is located about 445 miles east northeast of the south eastern Bahamas. The storm has sustained winds of 75 mph and is moving to the West at 3 miles per hour (mph). o Current National Hurricane Center (NHC) models indicate the storm will continue its slow anticyclonic loop before heading to the north, northwest
Note The cone contains the probable path of the storm center but does not show tne six'* of the storm Hazardous conditions can occur outside of the cone
TON
IIm^
Hurricane Jose
Tbu'Sday Septembe' 14 2017 5 AM AST Advisory 36
NWS National Hunivare Center
75W
70W
t.5V>'
Current information: x
Conte! location 25.1 N 66 5 W Maximum sustained wind 75 mph Movement W at 3 mph
GOV,'
55W
50W
Forecast positions:
Tmpv^a. Cyuonc Q Post Potential TC Sustained winds. D v 39 mph S 39-73 mph H 74-110 mph M > 110 mph
Potential track area: Watches:
CSjwiy ? 03!Mix 4r-
Humwie
mpSW
Warnings:
lllHuiiLdiKj
Current wind extent:
il
T-op Stm
Page 4 EPA SharePoint>Region 4 Hurricane IRMA Response>Documents>Situation Reports
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
ED_001523_00003532-00004
REOC STATUS AND ACTIVITIES
PLANNING AND PREPARATIONS The EPA Region 4 REOC maintains a Level 3 activation.
Fable 2
Current Region 4 Stalling
Locations
Organization
EPA R4
FEMA Atlanta Florida SEOC Florida Field
EPA
Atlanta
32
1
Support
R4 -21 , R5 - 0
START
3
0
1
9
Staffing provided in this Table represents all EPA and contractor staff associated with the Hurricane Irma response.
FEMA RRCC The EPA Region 4 is currently staffing the ESF-10 desk at the RRCC to facilitate coordination with FEMA.
NATIONAL PRIORITY SITES Florida. 6 NPL Assessment Teams were deployed on Tuesday, September 12th and arrived and began
assessment work on September 13th. 30 of 90 total sites were assessed yesterday. 2 Sites require follow up. o Fairfax Wood Treating in Jacksonville. Due to heavy rain, some runoff concerns were identified at an on-site retention point and a washout underneath some site fencing. Crews are being mobilized to address the washout and samples and samples will be collected from the pond to determine whether contamination issues are present/absent. o US Navy Air Station Cecil Field, Jacksonville, Florida. Due to flood, the air-sparging unit has a compressor failure. Several monitoring wells were also flooded but appearedto be in good shape. A contractor is currently working to repair the air-sparging unit.
Georgia. 10 of 35 sites were assessed yesterday. No issued identified or follow up required at this time. South Carolina. 9 of 22 sites assessed yesterday. No issues identified or follow up required at this time
FINANCE Summary of mission assignments is found below:
Mission Assignment X umber FL-17083101-EPA-01
3385EM-FL-EPA-O1
4337DR-FL-EPA-04
fable 3
FEMA Mission Assignment Status
Type of Mission
Period of
Cost
Assignment
Performance
Share
Federal Operations
September 4 to 0%
Support
October 3, 2017
Direct Federal
September 10 to 0%
Assistance
25, 2017
Disaster
September 4 to 0%
October 3, 2017
Funding $35,000
( ost to Date $18,547
$525,000 $253,127
$9,000,000 $0.00
REGION 4 PREPAREDNESS 8 Region 4 began contacting FRPs within FL outside of FDEPs prioritized counties. No impacts reported. FRPs prioritized by the state of Florida are being assessed by field teams. Region 4 Field Assessment teams, comprised of OSCs and START contractors, began assessments in Jacksonville and Tampa. 98 assessments completed from 194 target facilities with follow up required at 00 facilities.
Page 5 EPA SharePoint>Region 4 Hurricane IRMA Response>Documents>Situation Reports
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
ED_001523_00003532-00005
The Region 4 SFD program deployed six Rapid Assessment teams, comprised ofRPMs and field staff from the Region 4 SESD, to Florida to conduct rapid assessments at all NationalPriority List (NPL) sites within the State. Rapid assessments began today.
The WPD continues to coordinate with the FDEP and the USACE relative to Wate and Drinking Water issues. A Water Team will join USAGE at the Florida SEOC in Tallahassee, Florida today to support preliminary water and wastewater system assessments.
REGION 4 STATES FLORIDA
Category
SiaiBS
Declaration Information FEMA-3385-EM-FL
SEOC Status
Level 1 (Full activation and fully staffed)
Evacuations
Power outages
Approximately 2,708,432 without power
Boil Waler Ads ison
A boil advisory is in effect for all or portions of 34 counties.
Other
Fuel shortages continue to be an issue. Port Everglades, Port Canaveral
and Port of Tampa are all open and are actively prioritizing fuel tanker
ships. The Florida Highway Patrol has 20 troopers dedicated to escorting
fuel resupply trucks to communities in need.
There arc more than 9,000 soldiers and airmen on the ground, as a
combined force of members of the Florida National Guard, partner
National Guard states and active duty components, that have conducted
hundreds of missions across the state.
More than 160 shelters are open throughout Florida with a total
population of more than 21,000 individuals. More than 60 special needs
shelters are open with a total population of more than 10,000 individuals.
1. Florida Division of Emergency Management, http://www. floridadisaster, org/index. asp.
The Florida SEOC ESF-10 Desk has identified 194 priority facilities within 23 counties. The list is composed of a combination of facility types (e.g., Facility Response Plan [FRP] and Risk Management Plan [RMP] facilities).
Florida ESF-12 (Energy) personnel plan to assess FRP regulated power generating facilities. Florida ESF-10 personnel continue to assist State, Tribal, and Federal partners post landfall response and
mitigation actions. The primary focus will be in three areas: o Conducting assessments at Hazardous Substance and oil storage facilities to ensure no negative impacts to responders or returning residents are present. o Ensuring that impacted drinking water and wastewater facilities are returned to service as quickly as possible. The EPA is supporting this activity with Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and the USAGE. o Developing and implementing debris management strategies and operations. EPA is working with FDEP, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), and the USAGE to support their needs.
The table below provides a summary of priority facilities in Florida. Other Region 4 states are being updated at this time.
Table 4
""ir _______________ Priori Hk H Sites iu Florida
Drinking W ater
API.
1,641
386
1
90
Notes: WWTP - Wastewater Treatment Plant NPL - National Priority List sites
FRP - Facility Response Plan facilities RMP - Risk Management Plan facilities
GEORGIA
RMP 263
FRP 122
Page 6 EPA SharePoint>Region 4 Hurricane IRMA Response>Documents>Situation Reports
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
ED_001523_00003532-00006
Calegorv
Status
Declaration 1 nfornia t ion 1 EM \-33x'-l \l-(> \
All 159 Counties declared. Local State of Emergencies in 85 counties.
SEOC Status
Level 1 (Full activation and fully staffed)
Evacuations
Evacuation order lifted for all six coastal counties.
Power outages
Over 479,773 without power
Boil W ater Ads isors
McIntosh County: Boil water advisory countywide.
Other
Brunswick and Savannah Ports open.
Derived from Georgia Emergency Management Agency/Homeland Security. State Operations Center Situational Report September 13, 2017 0700-1900.
SOUTH CAROLINA Category
Status
Declaration Infor mat ion SEOC Status
The Executive Order for a State of Emergency 2017-20, and the Federal Emergency Declaration 3386-SC-DR South Carolina Emergency Operations Center (SEOC) returned to Operating Condition 3 (OPCON 3)
Evacuations
No State evacuation orders in effect. Order issued for by Governor on H9/09/17 for barrier islands, rescinded on 09/12/17.
Power outages
No information reported
Boil W ater Ads isory
No information reported
Other
NORTH CAROLINA The North Carolina SEOC is currently operating at normal operations.
ALABAMA Category
Status
Declaration Information The Governor issued a full Slate of Emergency on September 8.
SEOC Status
The Alabama Emergency Management Agency (EMA) returned to
normal daily operations as of September 14.
Iv acuations
No evacuations issued
Power outages
Approximately 20,000 customers lost power on September II. No update has been provided.
Boil W ater Advisory
No information reported
Other
TENNESSEE Category
Status
Page 7 EPA SharePoint>Region 4 Hurricane IRMA Response>Documents>Situation Reports
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
ED_001523_00003532-00007
Declaration In fo r in a t ion
SEOC Status
The SEOC remains at Elevated activation.
Exacuations
No information reported
Power outages
No information reported
Boil Water Ads isorx
No information reported
Other
Five shelters remain open shelters in Tennessee. Welcome Centers providing hotel information to evacuees.
REGION 4 FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED TRIBES Region 4 continues to coordinate with the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Seminole Tribe of Florida The tribe continues to experience power outages and lack of Internet service. EPA continues to maintain communication with the tribe to determine if EPA assistance is needed.
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida The tribe continues to experience power outages, downed trees and lack of Internet service. Damage assessment teams have been out today and will continue through the week for property damage. EPA continues to maintain communication with the tribe to determine if EPA assistance is needed.
Catawba Indian Nation (South Carolina) No serious issues to report.
Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians (North Carolina) Approximately 400 tribal members are without power resulting in two shelters opening on the
reservation. EPA continues to maintain communication with the tribe to determine if EPA assistance is needed.
Poarch band of Creek Indians (Alabama) No serious issues to report.
AIR, PESTICIDE & TOXICS MANAGEMENT DIVISION (APTMD) APTMD has contacted 103 facilities in Florida. There are no additional facilities identified as having a release. ADEM and Georgia EPD stated there are no impacted RMP facilities in their states. No issues were reported in NC or SC. Fuel and Energy Actions o September 13, 2017, EPA issued a No Action Assurance letter to FDEP to allow the use of Duke's diesel reserves to be used for on-road response vehicles where the engines have been certified that this fuel will not cause damage. The No Action Assurance is issued through September 22, 2017.
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT (RCRA) Identified four EPA-lead RCRA corrective action sites in Florida and one each in Georgia and South Carolina that are being prioritized for assessment by NPL field teams. The South Carolina site was assessed yesterday with no issues.
SCIENCE AND ECOSYSTEM SUPPORT DIVISION Power issues were resolved yesterday and the lab is fully operational.
Page 8 EPA SharePoint>Region 4 Hurricane IRMA Response>Documents>Situation Reports
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
ED_001523_00003532-00008
WATER PROTECTION DIVISION
Florida The Water Team is conducting water and wastewater system assessments. Water and wastewater facilities continue to submit their requests for assistance. The WPD compiled an inventory of community drinking water systems (CWS) and POTW that may be used during post storm damage assessment in Florida (Tables 5 and 6).
Table 5 Tolal Number of Coninuiniiy Drinking Waler Systems (CWS) and Tolal Population Senedin florida
Large CWS (Over 3,300)
Small CWS (under 3,300)
Operational: Partially Operational: Non Operational: Unknown:
# Systems
338 20 1 23
Population Served
18,247,738 595,307 3,894 434,627
# Systems
496 24 132 601
Population Served 386,091 24,452 36,204 271,114
Totals:
382
19,281,566
1,253
717,861
Operational: Facilityproducingsafe*** drinking walerfor greater than 90%, ofcustomers under normal operatingcondiiions Partially Operational: l-'acililyproducingsafe*** drinking waler under adverse conditions and/or supplying less than 90%, of customers Non Operational: Facility not producingor supplying safe*** drinking waler
Unknown: Status offacility unknown at this time
*** Safe Drinking ll'a/er is defined as water that satisfies all Slate A Federal requirements.
Page 9 EPA SharePoint>Region 4 Hurricane IRMA Response>Documents>Situation Reports
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
ED_001523_00003532-00009
1 aille 6
Total Number of Pul dically ()wned Wasi e wat er
Treatmcni Plants (POTWs)
StiHc or Tribe
NPDES Permit led Facilities
Shite Permits (Non-NPDES)
POTW
Non-POIM ( 1 ndusl rial)
Operational:
89
72
372
Partially Operational:
7
2
40
Non Operational:
0
7
87
Unknown:
48
159
1,522
Totals:
144
240
2,021
Comments: Data is compiled from the State of Florida's Storm Tracker System. The NPDES universe tracked in Storm Tracker
represents a subset of the total inventory of NPDES permitted systems that are identified by the State of Florida as the most critical
facilities for operational status determination following a hurricane event.
Operational: bacility 4- associated collection system is properly conveying. and effectively providing wastewater treatment, in
accordance with applicablepermit conditions and regulations. (Operatingon full or backup generatorpower.) Part iallv Operational: 1'acility and'or associated collect ion system is properly conveying and providing wastewater treatment al a compromised capacity, i.e. one or more treatment train components are non-operational, one or more lift stations are non operational, etc. Non Operational: Facility and/or associated collection system is not providing wastewater treatment in accordance with applicable permit conditions and regulations
Unknown: Status offacility unknown at this time
Georgia The State of Georgia ESF-3 Desk is responding to resource requests from drinking water and wastewater facilities and receiving reports of status at the same time. Georgia Rural Water Association (GRWA) is assisting the state in making calls to check assessment status. GAEPD regional offices are making calls to water facilities and reporting this information to the state ESF-3 desk. GAWARN (municipal mutual aid network for water and wastewater) and GRWA have both been assisting with fulfilling resource requests. No requests for federal assistance have been made for water and wastewater facility assessments or for temporary power supply.
REGION 4 OFFICE OF REGIONAL COUNSEL (ORC) No updates during the operational period.
OFFICE OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS (OPA)
No updates during the operational period.
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE One PIO from HQ mobilized to support REOC operations.
Page 10 EPA SharePoint>Region 4 Hurricane IRMA Response>Documents>Situation Reports
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
ED_001523_00003532-00010
Figure 1 Hurricane Irma Emergency Response - FRP and RMP facilities and NFL Sites
iN' 1 4 * filili*
o tttr
-
tu
Page 11 EPA SharePoint>Region 4 Hurricane IRMA Response>Documents>Situation Reports
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
ED_001523_00003532-00011
