Document gbD8VE39JqBpDmBVY2edK5Dkq

To: From: Sent: Subject: Jackson, Ryan[jackson.ryan@epa.gov] Marcella Burke Fri 8/18/2017 7:36:51 PM Re: Absolutely, mornings or afternoons work. Is there a time I can set aside? Marcella Burke j Deliberative Process Privilege/Ex. 5 ! On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 1:27 PM Jackson, Ryan <jackson.ryan@epa.gov> wrote: Marcella, do you have a moment to talk again Monday or Tuesday? Ryan Jackson Chief of Staff U.S. EPA Deliberative Process Privilege/Ex. 5 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA ED_001523_00001388-00001 To: Judicial Watch[jw@pr.judicialwatch.org]; cfedeli@judicialwatch.org[cfedeli@judicialwatch.org]; Contact[contact@aclj.org]; Pruitt, Scott[Pruitt.Scott@epa.gov]; Wampler, David[Wampler.David@epa.gov]; OIG Hotline[OIG_Hotline@epa.gov]; Estrada, Fabiola[Estrada.Fabiola@epa.gov]; Rodriguez, RobertofRodriguez.Roberto@epa.gov]; Bowles, JackfBowles.Jack@epa.gov]; Minoli, Kevin[Minoli.Kevin@epa.gov]; Davis, Patrick[davis.patrick@epa.gov]; Hope, BrianfHope.Brian@epa.gov]; Richardson, Robin H[Richardson.RobinH@epa.gov]; Wagner, Kenneth[wagner.kenneth@epa.gov]; Jackson, Ryan[jackson.ryan@epa.gov]; editorial@thedailybeast.com[editorial@thedailybeast.com]; Eric T. Schneiderman[nysag@ag.ny.gov]; tluna@sacbee.com[tluna@sacbee.com]; Tips At The New York Times[tips@nytimes.com]; tips@nypost.com[tips@nypost.com]; tips@patch.com[tips@patch.com]; gavalos@bayareanewsgroup.com[gavalos@bayareanewsgroup.com]; sectyrodriquez@calepa.ca.gov[sectyrodriquez@calepa. ca.gov]; secretary@resources.ca.gov[secretary@resources.ca.gov]; info@americanoversight.org[info@americanoversight.org]; maureen.leary@ag.ny.gov[maureen.Ieary@ag.ny.gov]; Sherman Bill (ATG)[bill.sherman@atg.wa.gov]; Watson Laura (ATG)[lauraw2@atg.wa.gov]; andrea.baker@maryland.gov[andrea.baker@maryland.gov]; Goldberg Andy (AGO)[andy.goldberg@state.ma.us]; Martinez Michael C. (ENRD)[michael.c.martinez@usdoj.gov] From: will rogers Sent: Wed 10/4/2017 11:21:12 AM Subject: Fw: EPA response to your Feb. 25, 2017 email Dear Secretary Pruitt, How can you claim to be a Christian when you guys seat there a lie to another Christian in this email about this incident being thoroughly investigated when it obviously wasn't and the investigators lied in his report by reporting statements that I did not make to discredit me ? The simple fact that PG&E removed the waste water, the facility, the equipment and cleaned up the site before they were inspected and while there was a ongoing investigation and refused to examine the records, logs and manifest to determine if more waste water came in than went out helps prove that this incident wasn't thoroughly investigated. If you are going to claim to be a Christian and be the EPA Secretary then you should stop lying especially when it is helping big industry to get away with basically oppressing the common citizen. I believe you should go back and study the Bible about what it says about lying, justice, the poor, showing favoritism to the wealthy / influential and helping your brothers and sisters because you are setting a bad examples for other Christians. If you guys are going to blatantly lie to me regarding this incident then the public and officials should also suspect or assume that you will also lie about Chlorpyrifos and other incidents that the EPA is investigating and involved in while you are the EPA Secretary . Sincerely- Will Rogers -- Forwarded Message -- From: "Wampler, David" <Wampler.David@epa.gov> To: "willgrogers@yahoo.com" <willgrogers@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 9:15 PM Subject: EPA response to your Feb. 25, 2017 email Dear Mr. Rogers, 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA ED_001523_00001393-00001 Thank you for contacting EPA's Administrator, Mr. Scott Pruitt, regarding your concerns from the PG&E activities in Live Oak, California, during the spring of 2016. I have been asked to provide a response to your email to Administrator Pruitt, dated February 25, 2017. EPA takes your request for additional investigation into the PG&E activities very seriously. We have thoroughly read your email, reviewed the State's water discharge permit issued to PG&E, talked with the State's investigator, and thoroughly read the State's May 20, 2016 investigation report. Based on the information from you and from those who conducted the investigation, we do not have reason to believe there were unauthorized discharges in the winter/spring of 2016 associated with the PG&E project in your area during the spring of 2016. We believe the State completed a timely and thorough investigation of the concerns you raised and we have no reason to believe their investigation was inadequate. Lastly, EPA has no information supporting your claims of governmental fraud in the State of California. Sincerely, David Wampler Manager, Water Enforcement Section II US EPA Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street (ENF 3-2) San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 972-3975 wampler.david@epa.gov 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA ED_001523_00001393-00002