Document gadx64NBXJjbo646ZZGJZxmZq
SPONSOR ElfAtochemS.A.
Cours Michelet La Defense 10 92091 Paris-la-Defense CEDEX
France
TEST SUBSTANCE
STUDY TITLE ACUTE ORAL TOXICITY
IN RATS
STUDY DIRECTOR
Xavier Manciaux
AR226-3141
CONFIDENTIAL
IFM redierc'ie S M C. W CAflMl D S ii0 COC f S!EC SOClAt :.'.lBt^T - ;;005 VRU.l
fffp.-^n ^< fl:"< r-'.-aciw
STUDY COMPLETION DATE
13 December 1999
PERFORMING LABORATORY
err
Centre' International de Toxicologie BP 563 - 27005 Evreux - France
LABORATORY STUDY NUMBER 18748 TAR
Company S,^.0oe.< "" TSCACM.
CENTRE INTERNATIONAL D TOXICOLOG.'E
B. P. 563 2700S Evreux Cedex Tel.:+33 2 32 29 26 26
France
CONTENTS
STATEMENT OF THE STUDY DIRECTOR
4
OTHER SCIENTISTS INVOLVED IN THIS STUDY
4
STATEMENT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE UNIT
5
SUMMARY
6
RESUME
7
1. INTRODUCTION
8
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
8
2.1 TEST SUBSTANCE
2.1.1 Identification 2.1.2 Formulation procedure
2.2 TEST SYSTEM
9
2.2.1 Animals
9
2.2.2 Environmental conditions
9
2.2.3 Food and water
9
2.3 TREATMENT
10
2.3.1 Fasting of the animals
10
2.3.2 Administration of the test substance
10
2.3.3 Chronology of the study
10
2.4 CLINICAL EXAMINATIONS
10
2.4.1 Clinical signs and mortality
10
2.4.2 Body weight
10
2.5 NECROPSY
11
2.6 DATA EVALUATION
11 -
-
2.7 PROTOCOL ADHERENCE
11
2.8 ARCHIVING
11
3. RESULTS
12
3.1 CLINICAL EXAMINATIONS
12
3.1.1 Clinical signs and mortality (table 1)
12
3.1.2 Body weight (figures 1 and 2, tables 2 and 3)
12
.
3.2 PATHOLOGY (table 4) 4. CONCLUSION
12
contain TSCA}^
complysanifl2e.d-n-cs sal
Lil/^tuay INO. is/48 i/udf^^^JU^lt Atocnem ii.A.
3
Figure 1: Body weight of treated rats
13
Figure 2: Body weight of CIT historical control rats
14
Table 1: Individual clinical signs and mortality
15
Table 2: Individual and mean body weight and weekly body weight change (g)
16
Table 3: Mean body weight and weekly body weight change of CIT historical control rats
17
Table 4: Individual macroscopic examinations at necropsy
18
APPENDICES 1. Test article description and analytical certificate 2. Diet formula
19 20
23 and 24
.^nTSC^Bl
v.^.o^5^ Gon^23""
CIT/Study No. 18748 TARI^--------UF^' Atochem S.A.
4
STATEMENT OF THE STUDY DIRECTOR
The study was performed in compliance with the principles of Good Laboratory Practice as
described in:
. OECD Principles on Good Laboratory Practice (as revised in 1997), ENV/MC/CHEM (98) 17.
. Decret N 90-206 du 7 mars 1990 concemant les Bonnes Pratiques de Laboratoire (Journal
Officiel du 9 mars 1990), Ministere de 1'Industrie et de 1'Amenagement du Territoire. . Council Directive 87/18/EEC of 18 December 1986 on the harmonization of laws,
regulations or administrative provisions relating to the application of the Principles of Good Laboratory Practice and the verification of their applications for tests on chemical substances (OJNo.L15ofl7.1-87).
I declare that this report constitutes a true and faithful record of the procedures undertaken and the results obtained during the performance of the study.
This study was performed at CIT, Centre International de Toxicologie, BP 563, 27005 Evreux,
France.
Toxicology
X. Manciaux Study Director
Doctor of Pharmacy
Date: 13 December 1999
OTHER SCIENTISTS INVOLVED IN THIS STUDY
For Pharmacy:
P.O. Guillaumat Doctor of Pharmacy
For Toxicology: C. Pelcot Study Supervisor
^co^nTSC.cm
Con^5^1- n ..'.-"ft
"U^U<r."'~-13^ I '
CIT/Study No. 18748T
Bit' Atochem S.A.
STATEMENT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE UNIT
Type of inspections
Protocol Report
Inspections
4 June 1999 10 November 1999
Dates
Reported to Study
Director (*)
4 June 1999 8 December 1999
Reported to
Management (*)
4 June 1999 10 December 1999
In addition to the above-mentioned inspections, at about the same time as the study described in the present report, "process-based" and routine facility inspections of critical procedures relevant to this study type were also made by the Quality Assurance Unit. The findings of these inspections were reported to the Study Director and to CTT Management.
The Inspectionswere performed in compliance with CIT Quality Assurance Unit procedures and
the Good Laboratory Practice.
The reported methods and procedures were found to describe those used and the results to constitute an accurate and complete reflection of the study raw data.
(^o^r^
L. Valette-TaIbi
Date: 13 December 1999
Doctor of Biochemistry
Head of Quality Assurance Unit
and Scientific Archives
(*) The dates indicated correspond to the dates of signature of audit reports by Study Director
and Management.
G ^ ^ y -..-,,', sos^ct/-.-"'r1Aa'iO'^^
CIT/Study No. 18/48 1 Alf----^B^mcii mocnem O.A.
SUMMARY
substancqH^^BHIIH|m|HmHwas At the reoues^fElf Atochem S.A; Paris-la-Defense, France, the acute oral toxicity of the test evaluated in rats according to OECD (No. 401,24th February 1987) and EC'(92/69/EEC, B.I, 31st July 1992) guidelines. The study was conducted in compliance with the principles of Good Laboratory Practice
Regulations.
Methods The test substance was administered by oral route (gavage) to one group of ten fasted Sprague-Dawley rats (five males and five females). The test substance was administered undiluted at the dose of 2000 mg/kg, taking into consideration that its specific gravity was 1.1 g/ml. Clinical signs, mortality and body weight gain were checked for a period of up to 14 days following the single administration of the test substance. All animals were subjected to necropsy.
Results No deaths occurred at 2000 mg/kg. The general behaviour and body weight gain of the animals were not affected by treatment with the test substance. No apparent abnormalities were observed at necropsy in all animals.
Conclusion Under our experimental conditions, the oral LDo of the test
.
|UUB|s substance|fH^JJUH ""this dose. ^ equal to or higher than 2000 mg/kg in rats. No signs of toxicity were observed at
According to the classification criteria laid down in Commission Directive 93/2 I/EEC (27th April 1993) adapting to technical progress for the eighteenth time Council Directive 67/548/EEC, the test substance does not present a significant acute toxic risk if swallowed.
;onte5"TSCACBl
Comps"y eS.<-.^rw...T.-e^d.Soes^
dl/^tuay INO. is/48 l/u^^^^^H^^Hcn Alocnem ^./\.
/
RESUME
ll^^^HBii^BHiBBlpP1'68 A la demande_de ElfLAtochem _S.A.. Paris-la-Defense, France, la toxicite aigue du produit administration unique par voie orale chez Ie Rat a ete evaluee conformement aux lignesairectrices de 1'OCDE (n 401, 24 fevrier 1987) et de la CEE
(92/69/EEC, B.I, 31 juillet 1992).
L'etude a ete realisee conformement aux regles de Bonnes Pratiques de Laboratoire.
Mefhode
Le produit a ete administre par voie orale (gavage) a un groupe de 10 rats Sprague-Dawley (5 males et 5 femelles) mis a la diete hydrique.
L'administration a ete effectuee avec le produit non dilue a la dose de 2000 mg/kg, en tenant compte de sa densite (d - 1,1 g/ml).
Les signes cliniques, la mortalite et 1'evolution ponderale des animaux ont ete suivis pendant une periode de 14 jours apres 1'administration unique du produit.
Un examen anatomopathologique a ete effectue sur tous les animaux.
Resultats
La mortalite est nulle a la dose de 2000 mg/kg.
Aucun signe clinique n'est observe pendant 1'etude.
L'evolution ponderale des animaux n'est pas influencee par le traitement.
L'autopsie des animaux ne met en evidence aucune anomalie apparente.
Conclusion
Dans nos conditions experimentales, la DL 0 orale du produifHIB
est superieure ou egale a 2000 mg/kg chez le Rat. Aucun signe de toxicite n'est observe a cette
dose.
Selon les criteres de classification decrits dans la Directive 93/21/CEE (27 avril 1993) portant dix-huitieme adaptation au progres technique de la Directive 67/548/CEE, le produit ne presente pas de risque toxique aigii significatif en cas d'ingestion.
,.ccn^nTSCACBl
. nQas^"1--
Company ^riulze-'
CIT/Study No. 18748 TAEM|^B--------EIfAtochem S.A.
8
1. INTRODUCTION
The objective of this study was to evaluate the toxicity of the test substance
following a single oral administration in rats.
{
In the assessment of the toxic characteristics of a test substance, determination of acute oral toxicity is an initial step. It provides information on health hazards likely to arise following a short-term exposure by the oral route in humans.
The study was conducted in compliance with: . OECD guideline No. 401, 24th February 1987, . EC Directive No. 92/69/EEC, B.I, 31st July 1992.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.1 TEST SUBSTANCE
The test substancej||^U|HHused in the study was supplied by Elf Atochem S.A.
The test substance was identified as follows:
- protocol and labellingfHHBJk
. Elf Atochem filing number: CAL 1392/99
. description: amber liquid . container: one smoked glass flask . date of receipt: 5 May 1999 . storage conditions: at room temperature and protected from light . expiry date: May 2000.
Data relating to the characterization of the test substance are documented in a test article description and in analytical certificate (presented in appendix 1) provided by the Sponsor.
2.1.2 Formulation procedure The test substance was used undiluted.
,^onlainTSCACai CompanySa.n,--'1a--n--oe-s0r6' 1-""-
CIT/Study No. 18748 T,
Elf Atochem S.A.
2.2 TEST SYSTEM
2.2.1 Animals Species, strain: rat, Sprague-Dawley ICO: OFA-SD (IOPS Caw). Reason for this choice: rodent species generally accepted by regulatory authorities for this type of study. Breeder Ufa Credo, 69210 L'Arbresle, France.
Number and sex: one group of ten animals (five males and five females). Age/weight: on the day of treatment, the animals were approximately 6 weeks old, and had a mean body weight standard deviation of 179 8 g for the males and 144 5 g for the females. Acclimatization: at least 5 days before the beginning of the study. Identification of the animals: the animals were identified individually by eamotches.
2.2.2 Environmental conditions During the acclimatization period and throughout the study, the conditions in the animal room were set as follows:
.temperature: 212C
. relative humidity: 30 to 70% . light/dark cycle: 12h/12h . ventilation: approximately 12 cycles/hour of filtered, non-recycled air. The temperature and relative humidity were under continuous control and recording. The records were checked daily and filed. In addition to these daily checks, the housing conditions and corresponding instrumentation and equipment are verified and calibrated at regular intervals. The animals were housed in polycarbonate cages (48 cm x 27 cm x 20 cm). Each cage contained one to seven animals of the same sex during the acclimatization period and five rats of the same sex during the treatment period. Each cage contained dust-free sawdust (SICSA, 94142 Alfortville, France). Bacteriological and chemical analyses of the sawdust, including the detection of possible contaminants (pesticides, heavy metals), are performed regularly by external laboratories. The results of these analyses are archived at CIT.
2.2.3 Food and water
All the animals had free access to A04C pelleted diet (UAR, 91360 Villemoisson-sur-Orge,
France), except as noted in "2.3.1 Fasting of the animals". Each batch of food "was analysed by the supplier for composition and contaminant levels. The diet formula is presented in appendix 2.
Drinking water filtered by a FG Millipore membrane (0.22 micron) was provided ad libitum. Bacteriological and chemical analyses of the water and diet, including the detection of possible contaminants (pesticides, heavy metals and nitrosamines), are performed regularly by external
laboratories.
The results of these analyses are archived at CIT.
No contaminants were known to have been present in the diet, drinking water or bedding material at levels which may be expected to have interfered with or prejudiced the outcome of the study.
.,-^,^-tcoBlal"TSCACBl
Cowpa"^'st-"-'
CIT/Study No. 1874 TA^UI^------hIr Atochem ^.A.
iu
2J TREATMENT
2.3.1 Fasting of the animals The animals were fasted for an overnight period of approximately 18 hours before dosing, but had free access to water. Food was given back approximately 4 hours after administration of the test substance.
2.3.2 Administration of the test substance As the test substance was anticipated to be non-toxic at 2000 mg/kg, a limit test was performed by administering 2000 mg/kg of the test substance to one group of ten animals (five males and five females).
The test substance was administered undiluted, taking into consideration its specific gravity (1.1 g/ml).
The administration was performed in a single dose by oral route using a metal gavage tube fitted to a 1 ml plastic syringe (0.01 ml graduations).
The volume administered to each animal was adjusted according to body weight determined on the day of treatment.
2.3.3 Chronology of the study
The single administration was performed on 13 July 1999 in the morning (day 1) and was followed by a 14-day observation period until 27 July 1999 (day 15).
2.4 CLINICAL EXAMINATIONS
2.4.1 Clinical signs and mortality The animals were observed frequently during the hours following administration of the test substance, for detection of possible treatment-related clinical signs. Thereafter, observation of the animals was made at least once a day until day 15. Type, time of onset and duration of clinical signs were recorded for each animal individually.
Time of death was recorded individually, in terms of the number of hours or days after dosing.
2.4.2 Body weight The animals were weighed individually just before administration of the test substance on day 1 and then on days 8 and 15.
The body weight gain of the treated animals was compared to that of CIT control animals with the same initial body weight.
Company eSa,.n-;.*--"."-- D""o'a"s' "ol contain TSCA CB1.
2.5 NECROPSY
On day 15, all animals were killed by carbon dioxide asphyxiation and a macroscopic examination was performed.
After opening the thoracic and abdominal cavities, a macroscopic examination of the main organs (digestive tract, heart, kidneys, liver, lungs, pancreas, spleen and any other organs with obvious abnormalities) was performed. In case of macroscopic lesions, organ samples were taken and preserved in 10% buffered formalin.
No microscopic examination was performed.
2.6 DATA EVALUATION Evaluation of the toxicity of the test substance following a single oral administration in rats
should include the relationship, if any. between the animals'exposure to the test substance and the incidence and severity of all abnormalities including behavioural and clinical abnormalities, macroscopic lesions, body weight changes, mortality and any other toxic effects.
2.7 PROTOCOL ADHERENCE The study was performed in accordance with Study Protocol No. 18748 TAR and subsequent
amendments, with the following deviations from the agreed Study Protocol: . the temperature and relative humidity recorded in the animal room were sometimes outside of
the target ranges specified in the protocol.
These minor deviations were not considered to compromise the validity or integrity of the study.
2.8 ARCHIVING
The study documentation and specimens generated during the course of the study are archived at CIT, 27005 Evreux, France, for 10 years after the end of the in vivo phase of the study.
The archived study materials include: . protocol and possible amendments, . raw data, . correspondence, . final report and possible amendments.
On completion of this period, the archived study materials will be returned to the Sponsor, or
may be archived at CIT for a further period.
Company Sanitized. Doss not contain TSCA CBt
3. RESULTS 3.1 CLINICAL EXAMINATIONS 3.1.1 Clinical signs and mortality (table 1) No clinical signs and no deaths were observed during the study. 3.1.2 Body weight (figures 1 and 2, tables 2 and 3) The body weight gain of the treated animals was similar to that of CIT historical control animals. 3.2 PATHOLOGY (table 4) Macroscopic examination of the main organs of the animals revealed no apparent abnormalities. 4. CONCLUSION
Under our experimental conditions, the oral LDo of the test substanceHB^H^HBUB I^^B^^^ys equal to or higher than 2000 mg/kg in rats. No signs of toxicity were observed at
Sdose*1
According to the classification criteria laid down in Commission Directive 93/2 I/EEC (27th April 1993) adapting to technical progress for the eighteenth time Council Directive 67/548/EEC, the test substance does not present a significant acute toxic risk if swallowed.
,-,.,,B^""ot"ai"Tsl;A<;&
CcTOS"?38"'
CIT/StudyNo. 18748T Figure 1: Body weight of treated rats
,lt Atoctiem Si.A.
Cowpa"^8^3'
CIT/Study No. 1874S lAKl^------------^ir Atocnem ;>.A.
14
Figure 2: Body weight ofCIT historical control rats
e.g.: Crr Historical data of animals dosed by the oral route: results of control animals from
October 1995 to December 1997.
,., ewpwr53"11'" ^^amwc^
CIT/Study No. 1S748 TAJ^BB|^Hft.it Atocnem S.A.
13
Table 1: Individual clinical signs and mortality
Dose (mg/kg)
Time
Animals
Males
Females
Mortality
2000
1 h
1
2h-4h } 01-02-03-04-05 06-07-08-09-10 No
D2toD15 J
min: minutes
h : hour D : day
Clinical signs None
c^s^.------"--------^
CIT/Study No. lo74oTA
,11 Atocnem a.A.
10
Table 2: Individual and mean body weight and weekly body weight change (g)
Dose mg/kg
Volume Sex
ml/kg
Animals 1
Days
(1)
8
(1)
2000
1.82
Male
01
194
84
278
72
02
179
74
253
58
03
176
76
252
54
04
175
73
248
62
05
173
68
241
61
M
179
75
254
61
SD
8
6
14
7
2000
1.82
Female
06
142
42
184
31
07
146
31
177
34
08
137
36
173
29
.
09
142
42
184
19
10
151
37
188
27
M
144
38
181
28
SD
5
5
6
6
(1) - Body weight gain
M
- Mean
SD - Standard Deviation
15
350 311 306 310 302
316 19
215 211 202 203 215
209 6
nolccn.a.nTOC'1081 Con-pa"!^."^-0065
cn'/iStudy i^o. 18/48 i
,n Alocnem a.A.
i /
Table 3: Mean body weight and weekly body weight change of CIT historical control rats
BODY WEIGHT OF CONTROL RATS (g)
Days
mg/kg
ml/kg
1
8
0
10
Male
M
182
261
SD
10
12
n
45
45
0
10
Female
M
147
190
SD
10
15
n
45
45
M mean
SD standard deviation .
n
number of animals
15
315 21 45
215
17 45
BODY WEIGHT CHANGE OF CONTROL RATS
(g)
mg/kg
ml/kg
0
10
Male
M
SD
-
0
10
Female
M
SD
M : mean
SD : standard deviation
Days
1 to 8
79 7
43 8
8 to 15
54 13
25 7
e.g.: CIT Historical data of animals dosed by the oral route: results of control animals from
October 1995 to December 1997.
Aoonl^TSCACBl
Sani^-0033"01
CofflpaW
CIT/Study No. 18748T.
it Atochem b.A.
is
Table 4: Individual macroscopic examinations at necropsy
Dose mg/kg
Time
Males
Animals Females
2000 D: day
D 15
01-02-03-04-05 06-07-08-09-10
Macroscopic abnormalities
No apparent abnormalities
notconlatoTSCACBl
Co^S^-0^
U 1/Stuay INO. 18 /46 1 AJ^^Bii^lHBlcir Aluc-ncin o./^..
* '
^^
APPENDICES
^^^, ^^^SCAC^
CIT/Study No. 1S748 TAKUH^HfP|tlt Atoctiem S.A.
2U
l.Test article description and analytical certificate
.--.-"--""'
CIT/Study No. l874yi
bit Atochem t>.A.
/I
TOXICOLOGY DEPARTMENT
CONFIDENTIAL April 99
elf atochem s.a. La defense 10, cours Michelet
92091 Paris-la-Defense, France
TEST ARTICLE DESCRIPTION
IDENTITY
Test article name Chemical name
CAS number EINECS number Purity Origin and batch Batch Elf Atochem filing number
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
Appearance pH Density Boiling point Flash point Solubility
amber liquid
51
HOOkg/m3 at20C 98-100 C
no flash point
water: insoluble soluble in alcohols, aromatic hydrocarbons
TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATIONS AND USE SAFETY
See safety data sheet__
__
STORAGE AND DISPOSAL
Storage Expiry date
Disposal__
in dark and at room temperature may 2000
incineration
.Company. Sanity. Does not cont^n TSCA CBl
CIT/Study No. 18748T,
eiF atochem
^ S i--\r--i'--^.
:lf Atochem S.A.
22
Elf Atochem S.A.
Usln d Vaiera-Soi'nt-Paul ZA Vinars Saini Paul Rteux
B.P. 20 60870 Ricux (Fianco)
TAI: 4<.74.<4.74 . Fax : 4.74.2.07 TtlBl: 140 2- ATO VSP
----------------------------------------y----------------.----
Villcn Suo( Pul. Ic 9 Novcnibre t'W
-^--------------------------------------------
CERT1FICAT D'ANALYSE
f ;t
LotN
Extrait Sec Tcrtio Butanol
Acrylamidc Acidc acrylique Test d'extinction
UDit6 %
Rdsultat 30,3
Specification dc
fabrication
29131
M6thodc d'amlysc
LCU 622
%
0.95
Q\ 1
LCU653
%
0.07
OAO,1
LCU 658
%
0.1
Oi2
LCU 658
1
posilif
positif.
SA-t 021
Lc Chcfdc Scm'oe du Laboratoirc WWATURE:
N0,^: Rnhert Gnippo
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCACBI
h"U''l--l,(..pita|3(;lU5norr.,or5
CIT/Study No. 18748 TAK|--------MB|^lt Atochem S.A.
23
2. Diet formula
P^^co^TSCACft
Company ,,S-a,,,^,,^,,",'
Lii/anlay INO. io/'+o i/\.
i^tl niu^iicin o.n.
Ref: A04
COMPLETE DIET RAT AND MOUSE MAINTENANCE DIET
Appearance: 15 nun diameter pellets or powder Conditioning: 25 kg double paper bag with aluminium on the outside
Daily portion: Rat 18-25 g. Mouse 5-10 g, water ad libltum.
FORMULA %
Cereals and cereal byproducts...... 88
Vegetable protein (soya bean
meal, yeast)..................................
7
Animal protein (fish)....................
2
Vitamin and mineral mixture.......
3
AVERAGE ANALYSIS %
Calorific value (KCal/kg)
Moisture........................... Proteins............................, Lipids................................ Carbohydrates (N.F.E.)..... Fibre.................................. Minerals (ash)...................
2900
12 17
3
58.7
4 5
AMINO ACID VALUES (calculated in mg/kg)
MIr'IERALS (caIculated in nrig/kg)
Nat
CMV
val.
val.
Total
P ..... 5900
Ca
3300
K
6700
Na
300
Me
1900
Mn
50
Fe , 90
Cu
15
Zn
40
Co
T
I
0.3
0 5000
0 1600
100 40
150 15 45
1.5 0
5900 8300 6700 1900 2000
90 240
30 85
1.5 0.3
vrTAMINS (calculated pe-rkg)
Nat
CMV
val.
val.
Total
Arginine ..... Cystine ....... Lysine......... Methionine. Tryptophan.
Glycine.......
FATTY ACID VALUES (calculated in mg/kg)
Palmitic acid..... Palmitoleic acid. Stearicacid......... Oleic acid........... Linoleic acid....... Linolenic acid.....
9800 2300 8500 3200 1900 8100
2600 Traces
500 8000 14500 Traces
Vitamin A Vitamin D3 Vitamin Bl Vitamin B2 Vitamin B3 Vitamin B6 Vitamin B12 Vitamin E Vitamin K3 Vitamin PP
Folic acid
Biotin
Choline
Traces
Traces
6mg 2mg
10 mg
1.3mg 0.01 mg
15 mg 0.25 mg
60 mg
0.5 mg 0.04 mg 1200mg
7500 IU 1500IU
1 mg
4.5 mg
6.5 mg
1.3mg O.P1 mg
15 mg 2.25 mg
15 mg Omg
Omg 400 mg
7500 IU 1500IU
7mg
6.5 mg 16.5 mg 2.6 mg -0.02 mg
30 mg 2.5 mg 75 mg 0.5 mg 0.04 mg
l600mg
Available under quality "Control Ref.: A04 C "
UAR,7rueGallieni,91360Villemoisson-Tei: 01.69.04.03.57 - Fax : 01.69.04.81.97 (Ref. Doc. UAR: 1992)
Company San^."n"ossno