Document e73N3gDQbBv4MreRkGNxE9kgm

DRAFT PRESENTATION QUEST Kenneth A. Mundt, PhD, FACE P. Robinan Gentry, PhD, DABT Sonja Sax, ScD Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA OF THE Tier 3/4 ED 002061 00269818-00001 EPA published the IRIS Toxicological Review of Chloroprene in 2010, with an inhalation unit risk (IUR) of 5 x 10-4perjig/m3. This is the 5th highest IUR derived by IRIS for any chemical classified by IARC as carcinogenic (Group 1) or probably carcinogenic (Group 2a). IARC classified chloroprene as possibly carcinogenic (Group 2b). Ramboll Environ was requested to conduct a detailed review of the 2010 IRIS, and to derive an IUR for Chloroprene. Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 3/4 2 ED 002061 00269818-00002 Key Findings: All lines of evidence indicate that the IUR should be corrected: The highest quality epidemiological studies demonstrated no excess lung or liver cancer risk. Toxicological data do not support a mutagenic mode of action. Multiple lines of evidence indicate large differences between across species. Using NRC best practices recommendations, EPA methods and pharmacokinetic data, the Ramboll Environ IUR is 156 times lower than the 2010 IRIS IUR. Cancer risk estimates based on the Ramboll Environ IUR are consistent with the epidemiological data. Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 3/4 3 ED 002061 00269818-00003 EPA published the IRIS Toxicological Review of Chloroprene* in 2010, with an inhalation unit risk (IUR) of 5 x 10"4per xg/m3. Denka Performance Elastomer (DPE) acquired the Neoprene production facility in LaPlace, Louisiana from DuPont on November 1, 2015. On December 17, 2015, EPA published the 2011 National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA), including a risk assessment based on facility's emissions and the 2010 IRIS IUR. The NATA study identified DPE's facility as associated with one of the highest offsite cancer risks of any chemical facility in the US. DPE retained Ramboll Environ to evaluate the scientific validity of the 2010 IRIS IUR. Using EPA standard methods and publicly available data, Ramboll Environ determined that the 2010 IRIS IUR is overestimated by a factor of 156. * U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/635/R-09/010F, 2010. LNViRON Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 3/4 ED 002061 00269818-00004 Evaluate the 2010 IRIS Review of Chloroprene, especially the IUR, in light of NRC (2011, 2014) guidance on improving IRIS assessments: How studies are evaluated: quality assessment and weighting Better integration of data across all lines of evidence Critically review and integrate the published epidemiological, toxicological, and mode of action evidence on chloroprene carcinogenicity. Apply a standard pharmacokinetic correction to the chloroprene IUR. Provide a "reality check"for the IUR. RON Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 3/4 5 ED 002061 00269818-00005 Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 3/4 ED 002061 00269818-00006 US and Europe Armenia Key Criteria ( M a r s h e t a / . 2 0 0 7 ) (Bulbulyanet ai. 1999) Sample Size 12,430 2,314 Follow -up 1949--2000 Exposure Exposure modeling - Assessment 7 categories 1979--1993 Index (none, low, high)before/after 1980 Baseline rates National, local plant area counties 1960-1994 Confounding Used local rate comparisons; Low prevalence of other liver cancer risk factors Armenian rates 1980-1989 Alcohol use (high cirrhosis rates) and smoking prevalent i. Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 3/4 Russia China (Bulbulyanef al. 1998) (Li e t a L 1 9 8 9 ) 5,185 1,258 1979-1993 Index (none, med, high)IH (inadequate) + job Moscow rates 1979-1993 or 1992-1993 (liver) 1969" 1983 High vs. low based on recall From "local area" 1973-1975 expected lung cancers: 0.4 Alcohol use (high cirrhosis rates) and smoking; Co-exposure to VC Hepatitis B and aflatoxin; Co-exposures to VC 7 ED 002061 00269818-00007 US ERA Criteria Clear objectives Marsh et al. (2007 a,b) Study Kentucky1 North Louisiana1 France- Ireland Mortality1 Armenia2 Ht H H H H Comparison groups H H-M H-M M M Exposure H H H H M Follow-up H H-M H H-M M-L Case ascertainment H H-M H-M H-M M Control of bias H-M H-M H-M M M-L Sample size H H M L M-L Data collection and p\/a li ip tin n Adequate response H H H H M H H H H M Documentation of results H H H H M-L Overall rank (l=best) 1 2 3 4 5 Other Studies France- Russia4 Incidence3 China5 H-M H M M M-L L M L L M-L M-L M-L M M H-M M M M-L L H-M M-L M M-L M-L M M H-M M M L 5 5 6 Source: Bukowski 2009 t Subjective estimate of study quality for each specific criterion H=high, M=medium, L=low; 1 - Marsh et al. 2007; 2 - Bulbulyan et al. 1999; 3 - Colonna and Laydevant 2001; 4 - Bulbulyan et al. 1998; 5 - Li et al. 1989 I N VIRON 8 Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 3/4 ED 002061 00269818-00008 Respiratory cancers RRs and SMRs by cumulative chloroprene exposure, Louisville plant p-trend =0.71 Liver cancers RRs and SMRs by cumulative chloroprene exposure, Louisville plant p-trend =0.09 ENVIRON Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Source; Marsh 2007b Tier 3/4 Cumulative (ppm-yrs) Source; Marsh 2007b ED 002061 00269818-00009 Cancer incidence data from the Louisiana Tumor Registry for St. John the Baptist Parish (where DPE plant is located) and for the state of Louisiana Five most recent years Cancer site All cancers Respiratory cancers Liver cancers Parish Rate State Rate 463.2 60.1 < 3 cases (too few to report) 478.7 70.5 Ranking ( l =lowest cancer rate) 15/64 7/64 Unknown * `Unknown as as there were 28 parishes with too few liver cancer cases Source: https://statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov/incidencerates/index.php?stateFIPS=22&cancer= 001&race=00&sex=0&age=001&type=incd&sortVariableName=rate&sortC)rder=default#results ENVIRON Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 3/4 10 ED 002061 00269818-00010 Marsh et al. (2007a) results for 1,357 workers at the Pontchartrain facility in LA (US and local reference rates) Cancer site All cancers Respiratory cancers Liver cancers US-based SMR 0,74 (0.51-1.04) 0.72 (0.37-1.26) None reported Local-based SMR 0.68 (0.47-0.95) 0.62 (0.32-1.09) None reported INVIKON Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 3/4 ED 002061 00269818-00011 Marsh et al. (2007) should be given greater weight than studies from Asia, Russia and Armenia: " We conclude that persons exposed to ch/oroprene or vinyl chloride at the levels encountered in the four study sites did not have elevated risks of mortality from any of the causes o f death examined, including all cancers combined and lung and liver cancer, the cancer sites of a priori interest." "This conclusion is corroborated by our detailed analyses of mortality in relation to qualitative and quantitative exposures to CD and VC at each of the four study sites." Source: G.M. Marsh et ai. / Chemico-Biological Interactions 166 (2007) 285-300 ENVIRON Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 3/4 12 ED 002061 00269818-00012 Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 ISIDCA Tier 3/4 ED 002061 00269818-00013 Studies conducted in B6C3F1 mice and Fischer rats (NTP, 1998), and in Wistar rats and Syrian hamsters (Trochimowicz et al., 1998) at chloroprene concentrations ranging from 10 to 80 ppm. A significant incidence of tumors seen across many organ sites, primarily in mice and at the highest exposure levels. The most sensitive species/tumorsite is the female mouse and the lung. Fewer tumors in Wistar rats and Syrian hamsters; little consistency across species both in the number of tumors and in tumor location. Differences in tumor incidence can be explained by using PBPK modeling and the calculated internal dose of metabolized chloroprene. ENVIRON! Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 3/4 ED 002061 00269818-00014 K^^M Exposure concentration (ppm) Syrian Hamster 0 (Trochimowicz et 10 al., 1998) 50 Wistar rat 0 (Trochimowicz et 10 al., 1998) 50 0 Fischer rat (NTP, 1998) 12.8 32 80 O B6C3F1 mouse (NTP, 1998) 12.8 32 80 Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA PBPK internal dose (mg/g) 0 0.18 0.88 0 0.18 0.89 0 0.22 0.55 1.37 O 3.46 5.3 7.18 Tier 3/4 Lung tumor incidence 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 6 9 15 32 40 46 Number of animals 100 97 97 97 13 100 50 50 49 50 50 50 50 15 50 ED_002061_00269818-00015 In vitro mutagenicity results are inconsistent Study Bartsch et al., 1979 Westphal et al., 1994 NTP, 1998 Willems, 1980 Method Desiccator Pre-incubation Pre-incubation Desiccator Exposure 4 hours 2 hours 20 min. 24-48 hours Response + In vivo results are mostly negative, and mutagenicity profile is different from 1,3-butadiene Chemical In Vivo (B6C3F1 mouse) CA SCE MN Chloroprene - 1,3 - Butadiene + + + CA - chrom osom e aberrations; SCE - sister chromatid exchange; MN - micro nucleus test; Source: Tice 1988 Weight of evidence is not consistent with a mutagenic MOA. An alternative MOA should be considered in accordance with EPA and NRC guidelines. 16 Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 3/4 ED 002061 00269818-00016 HLOROPRENEIUR LNVRQN Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 3/4 ED 002061 00269818-00017 Compound (Year of Review) IUR per ug/m3 Basis PBPK adjustment Classification Chloroprene (2010) Multiple tumors in 5 x 10"4 mice, mutagenic MOA No Possibly Carcinogenic 1,3 Butadiene (2002a) Benzene(2002b) 5 Human occupational j X 1U st, ud,.ies 2 x 10'6- Human occupational 7.8 x 10"6 studies Vinyl Chloride (2000) 4.4 x 10"6 Liver tumors in rats No Known Carcinogen No Known Carcinogen Yes Known Carcinogen Ratio 1 -20 250 --100 Adjusted IUR of chloroprene is more in line with other known carcinogens; e.g., VC IUR is based on animal data, but with PBPK model adjustments. ENVIRON Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 3/4 18 ED 002061 00269818-00018 Step Most sensitive endpoint/species (portal-of-entry DAF=1.7) Most sensitive endpoint/species (systemic lesion DAF=1) Multiple tumor adjustment Rounding Application of ADAF IUR per ug/m3 1.06 x IO 4 1.81 x IO 4 2.7 x IO"4 3 x 10"4 5 x IQ'4 Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 3/4 Basis Lung tumors in female mice as a porta I-of-entry effect Lung tumors in female mice as a systemic effect Multiple tumors Rounding Adjustment US EPA (2010) IUR per ug/m3 5 x IO"4 Allen et al. (2014) 1,86 x IO'6 Ramboll Environ (2017) 3,2 x IO"6 Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Basis Resulting decrease in IUR Fully adjusted composite value in female mice with ADAF correction Referent PBPK dosimetric adjustment of lung tumors in female mice in target organ; includes animal and human data PBPK dosimetric adjustment of lung tumors in female mice in the target organ; based on animal data only -250 fold decrease 156 fold decrease Tier 3/4 20 ED 002061 00269818-00020 PBPK model was published by Himmelstein et al. (2004). Data were provided to EPA at the time of the review to check the validity of the model; however, EPA did not incorporate these data into the final IUR estimate. Data provided to EPA have been published (Yang et al., 2012; Thomas et al., 2013). Allen et al. (2014) reported that an IUR that incorporates pharmacokinetic differences 250 times lower than the 2010 IRIS IUR. Using the internal dose estimates from PBPK modeling from Yang et al. (2012) Ramboll Environ derived an IUR of 3.2 x 10-6 per ug/m3which is 156 times lower than the 2010 IRIS IUR. Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 3/4 21 ED 002061 00269818-00021 Source US ERA (2010) lung tumor multi tumor w/ADAF Allen et al. (2014) lung tumor Ramboll Environ lung tumor Unit Risk (per ppm) 0.65 1.08 1.80 0.0067 0.012 *Mean exposure reported by Marsh et al. 2007a Mean Exposure* (ppm) 8.42 8.42 8.42 8.42 8.42 Excess Cancers (Risk Estimate) 5.5 9.1 15.2 0.06 0.1 Excess Cancers (Observed-Expected) Local referent -84 (lung) -1.9 (liver) IUR corrected for pharmacokinetic differences results in a cancer risk estimate consistent with epidemiological results (i.e., no observable excess risk). L N VI R O N Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 3/4 22 ED 002061 00269818-00022 :ancer classification ENVIRON Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 3/4 ED 002061 00269818-00023 EPA classified chloroprene as "likely to be a human carcinogen" based on : National Toxicology Program (NTP, 1998) chronic inhalation bioassay; Associations between chloroprene exposure and liver cancer in four of nine epidemiological studies; Limited evidence of lung cancer; Proposed mutagenic mode of action; and Analogies with 1,3-butadiene and vinyl chloride Critical review of the evidence indicated that four of these five cannot be substantiated. The classification should be revisited and a dearer narrative provided. ENVIRON Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 3/4 24 ED 002061 00269818-00024 Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA ED 002061 00269818-00025 The highest quality epidemiological studies do not demonstrate a causal relationship between occupational exposures to chloropreneand cancer. Many lines of evidence point to pharmacokinetic differences across species. PBPK modeling is the best approach for correcting the IUR because of large pharmacokinetic differences between the mouse and humans. Using PBPK model output and standard EPA methods, Ramboll Environ calculated an IUR that is 156 times lower than the 2010 IRIS IUR. Integration of the full body of evidence indicates that the pharmacokinetic differences between the mouse and humans require that the IUR be corrected using PBPK model results. I N Vi RON Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 3/4 26 ED 002061 00269818-00026 Ken Mundt kmundt@ramboll.com Robinan Gentry raentrv @ ramboll.com Sonja Sax ssax@ramboll.com Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 3/4 27 ED 002061 00269818-00027