Message
From:
Sent: To:
CC: Subject: Attachments:
rich.gold@hklaw.com [rich.gold@hklaw.com] 6/13/2017 10:38:13 PM Brown, Byron [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=9242d85c7df343d287659f840d730e65-Brown, Byro] Dimitri.Karakitsos@hklaw.com FW: Portland Harbor - EPA's Draft Sampling Plan ATT00001.htm; ATT00002.htm; PH baseline sampling cover letters Final.pdf; Portland HarborREVISED Working Draft Sampling Plan_6-6-17.pdf
Importance: High
This is basically a plan asking the private parties to re-do the Remedial Investigation which will take At MINIMUM 5 years and cost more than $25-30 million at least. This is what they are presenting In the meeting tomorrow. This is presented as the EPA position on the sampling plan.
From: "Cora, Lori" < Cofa.Lori@ epa.gov> Cc: "Ebright, Stephanie" <EBRIGHT,STEPHAN iE@ EPA.GOV>, "Sheldrake, Sean" <sheklrake.sean@e p3.gov>, "Zhen, Davis" <Zhen.D3vis@ epa.gov> Subject: Portland Harbor - EPA's Draft Sampling Plan
Attached is the sampling plan that EPA and its government partners have been working on. I would appreciate if you would distribute to the Pre-Remedial Design Group. We are sending this to the State, City, NW Natural, and Federal PRPs as well. We look forward to meeting with the Pre-Remedial Design Group on all ideas about pre-remedial design sampling.
Lori Houck Cora j Assistant Regional Counsel U.S. Environmental Protection Agency |Region 10 P: {206} 553,111S |F: (206) 553.1762 |coraJori@jepa.gov
Follow @EPAnorthwest on Twitter! https://twitter.com/EPAnorthwest
NOTE: This e-mail is from a law firm, Holland & Knight LLP ("H&K"), and is intended solely for the use of the Indlvldual(s) to whom It Is addressed. If you believe you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete the e-mail from your computer and do not copy or disclose it to anyone else. If you are not an existing client of H&K, do not construe anything in this e-mail to make you a client unless it contains a specific statement to that effect and do not disclose anything to H&K in reply that you expect it to hold in confidence. If you properly received this e-mail as a client, co-counsel or retained expert of H&K, you should maintain its contents in confidence in order to preserve the attorney-client or work product privilege that may be available to protect confidentiality.
Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA
Tiers 8&9
ED 002061 00087452-00001