Document by7gyEzgngMwBvGj1ODd7QBpk

Inspection Date: Time: Media: Statute(s)/Program(s): Type of inspection: Access: REGION 5 Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Division INSPECTION REPORT 08/25/2022 Announced: Yes Entry: 08:35 AM (ET) Exit: 02:24 PM (ET) Water Clean Water Act, NPDES, WWTP CEI - Compliance Evaluation Inspection Granted Permittee Name: Facility or Site Name: Facility/Site Physical Address: (City, state, zip code) County/Parish: Facility GPS Coordinates: SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBE OF MICHIGAN SAGANING WWTP 2500 EAST WORTH ROAD STANDISH, MI 48658 ARENAC 43.92504, -83.90606 Facility/Site Identifier: Permit Number: 110039409985 MI0058582 Persons Participating in Inspection: Title Name Lead Inspector Inspector Operator Operator Water and Wastewater Manager Dean Maraldo Jake Berger Cody Berk Stacy Ancel Jonas Wilcox Phone 3123532098 (312) 353-8024 (989) 775-5990 Email Present at Opening Conf. Maraldo.Dean@epa.gov Yes Berger.Jake@epa.gov Yes No sancel@sagchip.org No jwilcox@sagchip.org Yes Present at Closing Conf. Yes Yes No No Yes Lead Inspector: Dean Maraldo [Signature] REGION 5 DINO MARALDO Digitally signed by DINO MARALDO Date: 2022.08.29 16:47:34 -05'00' Maraldo.Dean@epa.gov (312) 353-2098 Supervisor Review: Ryan Bahr [Signature] REGION 5 Digitally signed by Bahr, Bahr, Ryan Ryan Date: 2022.09.01 13:06:50 -05'00' bahr.ryan@epa.gov 1 of 92 SAGANING WWTP Inspection Date: 08/25/2022 SECTION I - INTRODUCTION Site Entry and Inspection Objectives I, Region 5 Lead Inspector, Dean Maraldo, arrived at the SAGANING WWTP (the "Site" or "Facility"), located at 2500 EAST WORTH ROAD, at 08:35 AM (ET) on 08/25/2022 for an announced inspection. REGION 5 inspector Jake Berger joined me for the inspection and we both presented our credentials to the Water and Wastewater Manager Jonas Wilcox ("Manager") and informed him that this was a REGION 5 inspection to determine compliance with the Clean Water Act (CWA) and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program. The inspection was conducted under the authority of the Federal CWA (Section 308). The table above identifies the attendees that participated in the inspection. This report is based on information supplied by Facility representatives, observations made by the Region 5 inspectors, and records and reports maintained by the permittee and the Region 5 inspectors, including: direct observations made by the Region 5 inspectors, photographs taken by Region 5 inspectors, physical evidence collected by the Region 5 inspectors, verbal or written statements made by or information supplied by Facility representatives (the permittee) during or subsequent to the on-site inspection, and materials, processes, data, photographs, or documents shown, demonstrated, or submitted to the Region 5 inspectors by Facility representatives during or subsequent to the on - site Inspection. In addition, information gathered prior to or subsequent to the inspection from a review of USEPA, State, and public records may be included in this report. After opening introductions, we went over the inspection plan for the day. I asked if there were any questions. The Manager had no questions. Facility/Site Description I began by asking about the Facility information provided in the latest NPDES permit. The Manager confirmed the following (Manager responses are in italics): There are three influent pumps that send the water to a 2mm fine screen. Correct an automatic sampler is located in between the pumps and drum screen. Correct Wastewater is then gravity fed into one of two membrane bioreactor (MBR) units. Correct. Collection system is all gravity. The water is then pumped through the three chambers located in the MBR unit where Aluminum Sulfate is added for phosphorus removal. Correct. Mixed liquor is then pumped into the filter unit located at the head of the MBR where it is filtered out at approximately 75 gallons per minute. Correct. (50-75 gpm) Treated water then flows through a UV disinfection unit where an automatic sampler is located. Correct. Water can be diverted into ponds around the building and/or has the option of discharging through Outfall 001 (Lat: 43.921478; Long: -83.906254) to an unnamed tributary to Saginaw Bay of Lake Huron. Correct. The plant has a design flow of 0.4 million gallons per day (mgd). At this time, the plant only processes approximately .025 mgd with an average of 1500 gallons of sludge wasted. Now up to about 0.058 mgd. The sludge is wasted from the filter area of the MBR with storage tanks located outside. The sludge is allowed to settle and the decant is brought back into the headworks. We try to decant as best as possible, return to head of the plant influent wet well. The sludge is ultimately taken to the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan's Isabella Reservation WWTP for treatment followed by land application. Correct, but currently looking to haul to City of Bay City. Any lift stations? One lift station at the head of the plant. Is a copy of the current permit onsite? Yes. 2 of 92 SAGANING WWTP Inspection Date: 08/25/2022 Facility/Site Information Responses below provided by the Manager. Responsible official WWTP Design Capacity & Average Daily Flow WWTP Approx. # of residents served Contributing (or shared) Jurisdictions Outfalls: (and do the numbers, locations, and receiving waters match the permit?) Operation schedule (days of operation, # shifts/day, # operators/shift, coverage overnight, weekends & emergencies), and is staffing sufficient for proper operation? Do you use in-house or contract out for laboratory analyses? (including for metals or WET testing?) Do you accept waste from septage haulers? If so, what problems have you experienced? Is there currently any portion of the treatment train that is non-operational? Are there any plans for renovation or additional equipment to allow for increased wastewater flow? Any CBI concerns? Jonas Wilcox Max 0.4 mgd, avg 0.05-0.06 mgd since hotel added 2019 Casino, campground, tribal center, laundry warehouse, no residential No 001, unnamed tributary, ("private ditch") to the bay. 7am-5pm, 5 days/week; weekends one operator 8am1pm; one certified wastewater operator (Jonas Wilcox) In-house TSS , BOD, ammonia, Phosphorus, E.coli. mercury and any additional metals sent to outside lab No One composite effluent composite sampler is down. They have one composite sampler for each of the two MBR units Phase 1 - October will add bypass to wet well for cleaning; Phase 2 - add another MBR and new EQ basin, add mixers in sludge tank, possible sludge treatment. Phase 2 estimated for 2024 Manager not aware of any CBI concerns Inspection Units Unit/Area DMR Review Other Permit Reports Flow Measurement Self Monitoring Operations and Maintenance Sanitary Sewer Overflows Records Review Wastewater Treatment Plant Components Laboratory Headworks MBR Ultraviolet ("UV") Disinfection Outfall Chemical Room Generator SCADA Description Interview questions and observations Physical inspection 3 of 92 SAGANING WWTP Inspection Date: 08/25/2022 SECTION II - OBSERVATIONS Observations may not be in sequential order. Unit: Interview/DMR Review Observation #: DM1-OB-001 Contains CBI: No Date: 08/25/2022 According to NetDMR, no monthly discharge monitoring reports ("DMRs") have been submitted to EPA for the Saganing WWTP since September 2020. On May 18, I sent an email to the Manager asking to please submit all late DMRs as soon as possible. The Manager said he will try to submit the overdue DMRs by the end of the week after the inspection. In lieu of DMRs, I asked for copies of the last six months of sampling reports. The Manager provided copies of monthly sampling reports for January thru July 2022. Unit: Interview/Other Permit Reports Observation #: DM1-OB-002 Contains CBI: No Date: 08/25/2022 We reviewed non-DMR Permit reporting. The Manager provided the responses below. 1) Pollutant Minimization Program for Mercury Status Report due by January 31, each year (Part l.A.4). Status: The Manager was not aware of submitting the Mercury Status Report by January 31, 2022. 2) Operation and Maintenance Plan Report due by January 31, each year (Part I.A.7.b). Status: The Manager was not aware of submitting the O&M Report by January 31, 2022. 3) Sewage Sludge Removal Report by January 31, each year (Part I.C). Status: The Manager was not aware of submitting Sewage Sludge Removal Report by January 31, 2022. 4) As a condition of this permit, the permittee shall monitor the discharge from monitoring point 001 for the constituents listed below. Testing shall be conducted in September 2020, March 2021, May 2022 and July 2023. Status: The Manager said they probably haven't collected additional samples per this requirement. Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Nitrate plus Nitrite Nitrogen Oil and Grease The Manager confirmed that records and reports are maintained for at least 3 years. Unit: Interview/Flow Measurement Contains CBI: No Observation #: DM1-OB-003 Date: 08/25/2022 The Manager answered the following flow measurement questions (responses in italics): 1) How do you measure daily influent and effluent flow (Permit Part I.1 and I.2)? Influent flow is measured by a mag meter; effluent flow is measured by a mag meter after each of the two MBR units. 2) Are influent and effluent flow measuring devices professionally calibrated, at least once per year? (40CFR122.41(e). Yes, they are calibrated every year. However, the last calibration was at the end of 2020, due to COVID. The Manager hopes to reschedule calibration for October 2022. 4 of 92 SAGANING WWTP Inspection Date: 08/25/2022 3) Do facility personnel check the calibration of the flow measuring device(s), between the annual professional calibrations, at least three times per year? (Recommendation only) If no, explain frequency. No. Unit: Interview/Self Monitoring Observation #: DM1-OB-004 Contains CBI: No Date: 08/25/2022 Unless noted otherwise, the Manager provided the responses (in italics) to the self-monitoring questions below: Are the influent and effluent sampling locations as specified in permit representative of the waste stream? Influent samples are collected at the head of plant at the pump control room. Effluent samples are collected after each of the MBR units. One autosampler (MBR #2) is out of service (approximately 1.5 years). Currently, for compliance sampling they collect composite samples from MBR #1 and grab samples from MBR #2. Stacy Ancel added that for DMR reporting for effluent parameters requiring 24-composite samples, they use only composite samples from MBR #1, which has the only working composite sampler. Required effluent grab samples are collected from one MBR train or the other on any given day. They usually alternate. Conduct sampling and analysis in frequency specified by permit? Yes. Are the correct effluent sample types (grab or composite) taken? Not currently, they cannot collect composite samples from MBR #2. If composite samples are required, are they flow proportioned (note permit allows time or volume flow proportioning)? flow proportioned. Are composite samples cooled to <4C to properly preserve them during the compositing period? Composite samplers are refrigerated. a) If the composite sample is cooled with ice or gel packs, do you measure the final composite sample temperature to make sure that the cooling is sufficient? Yes. b) Do you record these results? The facility does not keep logs of temperatures within each composite sampler. If a refrigerator is used for preserving composite samples, is there a thermometer in the refrigerator? Yes, and they maintain a temperature log. Are all grab samples cooled with ice, gel packs or refrigerated to <6 C from the time of collection until analysis including shipping time, if applicable? E.coli - 100ml sterile container, sample collected right from container. Samples are processed immediately so no need for cooling. Are all samples which require preservation properly preserved? Most samples analyzed immediately, so no need. Unless they are samples sent out to lab, then yes. Are pH and DO readings collected within 15 minutes of sample collection and is this documented? Samples are collected and analyzed in the on-site laboratory within 15 minutes. I commented about the consistent record of 0 E.coli/100ml for effluent samples. Stacy Ancel said they also consistently measure "0" E.coli/100ml before UV disinfection. I asked if they could collect an E.coli sample preMBR, just to confirm that their E.coli laboratory analysis procedures are able to detect E.coli. Stacy Ancel agreed to collect the sample and provide the results. 5 of 92 SAGANING WWTP Inspection Date: 08/25/2022 Unit: Interview/Operations and Maintenance Observation #: DM1-OB-005 Contains CBI: No Date: 08/25/2022 The Manager answered (in italics) the following O&M-related questions: Maintenance record system exists and include: a. As-built drawings - yes b. Shop drawings -yes c. Construction specifications- yes d. Maintenance history- daily log book. No other maintenance tracking. e. Repair history- also daily log book. Each MBR has a maintenance record. f. Records of equipment repair and timely return to service - no g. instruction files for operation and maintenance of each item of major equipment. Yes. h. Operation and maintenance manual is available? Other than manufacturers manuals, they are working on a comprehensive O&M plan. Does the facility have an adequate, qualified operating staff to carry out the operations at the facility? The Manager is the only certified wastewater operator (Class C&D, Michigan). The two other non-certified operators are trying to work on wastewater certificates. According to the Manager, they could use "2 or 3 more wastewater operators" to help stay on top of maintenance, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements. Operators conduct settleability tests 3x/week, and they need to get back to daily testing. They collect samples from mixed liquor after the MBR bio tank and filters. Any Bypasses over the last three years? No bypasses. Does the wastewater treatment facility have an alarm system for all essential equipment? Yes, they have a Sensaphone application that alerts operators if generator runs, influent is high level, or MBR is high level. Alarm capability will be upgraded with a new SCADA system (approx. 2023). Are alarms sent to qualified personnel who can respond immediately to remedy the problem? Yes, alarm sent in series and to all operators. Does the facility maintain written procedures for responding to emergencies such as power failures, floods, fires, and other natural disasters? Yes, follow an emergency plan. Is a logbook kept which documents all plant activities on a daily basis? Yes. Does the facility maintain an inventory of spare parts, either at the facility or close by, sufficient to keep all of its treatment units operational? Not currently, but working on it. Does the facility have standby power for all treatment units? ((40CFR122.41(e). Yes Is the standby power regularly exercised under load? ((40CFR122.41(e). Yes, monthly. Diesel generator. The Manager provided copies of the MBR Maintenance Procedure Plan, and the Saganing Water and Wastewater Improvements presentation (see Appendix 2, Inspection Documents). Document(s) 6 of 92 SAGANING WWTP Inspection Date: 08/25/2022 1. Pages from Saganing Inspection_Records Received_OM Records.pdf Unit: Interview/Sanitary Sewer Overflows Observation #: DM1-OB-006 Contains CBI: No Date: 08/25/2022 I asked if there had been any backups or overflows in the sanitary sewer collection system, including pump stations, manholes and piping over the last three years? The Manager said that they have not experienced any backups or overflows in the collection system. Unit: Physical Inspection/Laboratory Observation #: DM1-OB-007 Contains CBI: No Date: 08/25/2022 We began the physical inspection of the Facility at 12:05 pm ET. We started in the laboratory. Stacy Ancel and Cory Berk represented the Facility to start the lab inspection. The Manager arrived shortly after we began. I asked Stacy Ancel to review the sample analysis procedures for E.coli, BOD, Ammonia, Phosphorus, pH, and TSS. Some observations are provided below: E.coli: I noted that one of the E.coli M-Coliblue 24 sample broths was expired (5/31/2019). Some of the MColiblue 24 sample broth packages were still within expiration dates. Facility representatives could not locate the written procedure currently used for E.coli analysis. I noted several instances where "dates received" and "dates opened" were left blank on opened laboratory chemical and standards containers. Before concluding the laboratory review, I asked for copies of the SOPs for Phosphorus and Ammonia-Nitrogen analyses (see Appendix 2, Inspection Documents). I also received copies of a lab equipment list and an analytical methods summary (see Appendix 2, Inspection Documents). Document(s): Saganing Inspection_Records Received_Lab SOPs_EquipList_Methods.pdf Unit: Physical Inspection/Headworks Observation #: DM1-OB-008 Contains CBI: No Date: 08/25/2022 The Manager led the tour of the wastewater plant, along with Cody Berk. We started at the influent wet well (see Photo Log image SAGA0100). The influent wet well has a basket/rag screen at the bottom of the rail (see Photo Log image SAGA0101). The Manager pointed out where the sludge decant flows returned to the influent wet well and noted that they estimate the amount of return flows and subtract from influent flow totals to avoid double counting of flows. We then entered the treatment plant building and stopped in the influent room to observe the influent flow meter (see Photo Log image SAGA0102) and ISCO influent composite sampler. I noted a thermometer in the ISCO sampler (see Photo Log image SAGA0103). Next we entered the fine screen room and observed the twin fine screen units (see Photo Log image SAGA0104). The Manager said the fine screens are working well. 7 of 92 SAGANING WWTP Inspection Date: 08/25/2022 Photo(s) 1. SAGA0101.JPG 2. SAGA0102.JPG 3. SAGA0103.JPG 4. SAGA0100.JPG 5. SAGA0104.JPG Unit: Physical Inspection/MBR Observation #: DM1-OB-009 Contains CBI: No Date: 08/25/2022 We observed the twin MBR units from the upstairs balcony (see Photo Log image SAGA0105). The Manager explained that flows go from the fine screens and split to each of the two MBR units, MBR #1 and MBR #2. Each MBR unit has three tanks (aerated anoxic 1, aerated anoxic 2, and aerobic). From the tanks, flows go to the MBR membrane units. Each MBR membrane unit consists of two tanks, each with four racks. Each rack has five filters. So each MBR membrane unit has a total of 40 membrane filters. The inside of one of the tanks is shown in Photo Log image SAGA0106. We walked down to floor level and observed the MBR control panel and screen (see Photo Log image SAGA0107). Last, I observed the composite sampler for MBR #2, which is currently out of service (see Photo Log image SAGA0108). The Manager showed us the port where they are currently collecting grab samples in lieu of composite samples for the MBR #2 treatment train. Photo(s) 1. SAGA0106.JPG 2. SAGA0107.JPG 3. SAGA0108.JPG 4. SAGA0105.JPG Unit: Physical Inspection/UV Observation #: DM1-OB-010 Contains CBI: No Date: 08/25/2022 I observed the ultraviolet light (UV) disinfection units for MBR #1 (see Photo Log image SAGA0109), and MBR #2 (see Photo Log image SAGA0110). Photo(s) 1. SAGA0110.JPG 2. SAGA0109.JPG Unit: Physical Inspection/Outfall Contains CBI: No Observation #: DM1-OB-011 Date: 08/25/2022 After viewing the UV systems, we left the building and headed to final outfall 001. First, we stopped at the manhole used to control the direction of treated flow to the ponds or the final outfall (see Photo Log image SAGA0111). At the time of the inspection, treated flows in the manhole were clear and were directed to the final outfall. We then walked to final outfall 001, where I observed a turbid discharge into the receiving water (see Photo Log image SAGA0112). The Manager attributed the turbidity to muskrat activity within outfall piping. 8 of 92 SAGANING WWTP Inspection Date: 08/25/2022 He said they will install a screen to keep muskrats from entering the outfall. Before leaving the outfall, I recorded the coordinates 4355'17"N; 8354'23"W. Photo(s) 1. SAGA0112.JPG 2. SAGA0111.JPG Unit: Physical Inspection/Chemical Room Observation #: DM1-OB-012 Contains CBI: No Date: 08/25/2022 We returned to the treatment building and viewed the Chemical Room. I observed the areas where MBR cleaning chemical are stored, including the sodium hypochlorite area (see Photo Log image SAGA0113), and 50% citric acid area (see Photo Log image SAGA0114). I also observed the aluminum sulfate storage area (see Photo Log image SAGA0115). Aluminum sulfate is used for phosphorus removal. I asked about the cleaning schedule for the MBR units. The Manager explained that each MBR is cleaned with chlorine once every two weeks, and with citric acid once a month. Photo(s) 1. SAGA0114.JPG 2. SAGA0115.JPG 3. SAGA0113.JPG Unit: Physical Inspection/Generator Observation #: DM1-OB-013 Contains CBI: No Date: 08/25/2022 I observed the diesel Caterpillar generator which provides backup power for the Facility (see Photo Log image SAGA0116). Photo(s) 1. SAGA0116.JPG Unit: Physical Inspection/SCADA Observation #: DM1-OB-014 Contains CBI: No Date: 08/25/2022 Before concluding the physical inspection we stopped in the office and viewed the wastewater SCADA system display. See Photo Log image SAGA0117 of the SCADA totalizer screen. We concluded the physical inspection and returned to the conference room to review our notes prior to the closing conference. Photo(s) 1. SAGA0117.JPG 9 of 92 SAGANING WWTP Inspection Date: 08/25/2022 SECTION III - RECORDS REVIEW Record: Laboratory Analysis Reports Ref #: DM1-RR-001 Reviewed By: Dean Maraldo AOC: No Reviewed Date: 08/25/2022 We reviewed Lab Analysis Reports for January - July 2022. No issues were identified. The reports are included in Appendix 2 (Inspection Documents). Document(s) 1. Saganing Inspection_Records Received_Lab Reports.pdf Record: Facility Map AOC: No Ref #: DM1-RR-002 Reviewed By: Dean Maraldo Reviewed Date: 08/25/2022 The map below is included in Appendix 2 (Inspection Documents). Area Topo Map Document(s) 1. Saganing Inspection_Records Received_Facility Map.pdf Record: Other - Wastewater Improvement Plan Ref #: DM1-RR-003 Reviewed By: Dean Maraldo AOC: No Reviewed Date: 08/25/2022 The Wastewater Improvement Plan is included in Appendix 2 (Inspection Documents). Document(s) 1. Saganing Inspection_Records Received_WW Improvement Plan.pdf Record: Process Description/Flow Diagram Ref #: DM1-RR-004 Reviewed By: Dean Maraldo AOC: No Reviewed Date: 08/25/2022 The maps and diagrams below are included in Appendix 2 (Inspection Documents). Flow schematic of Saganing WWTP Saganing District Sanitation Map (2) Saganing WWTP discharge map Saganing WWTP Piping Plans (2) Document(s) 1. Saganing Inspection_Records Received_Schematics_flow.pdf SECTION IV - SAMPLING ACTIVITIES AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS No sampling was conducted. SECTION V - AREAS OF CONCERN Areas of Concern may not be in sequential order. The presentation of areas of concern does not constitute a formal compliance determination or violation. 10 of 92 SAGANING WWTP Inspection Date: 08/25/2022 Unit: Interview DM1-OB-001 Area: DMR Review According to NetDMR, and confirmed by the Manager, no monthly discharge monitoring reports have been submitted to EPA for the Saganing WWTP since September 2020. Unit: Interview DM1-OB-002 Citations: Permit Part I.A.6 Area: Other Permit Reports As a condition of this permit, the permittee shall monitor the discharge Citations: Permit Part I.A.3.b from monitoring point 001 for the constituents listed below. Testing shall be conducted in September 2020, March 2021, May 2022 and July 2023. The Manager said they probably haven't collected additional samples per this requirement. Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Nitrate plus Nitrite Nitrogen Oil and Grease The Manager was not aware of submitting a Sewage Sludge Removal Citations: Permit Part I.C Report by January 31, 2022. The Manager was not aware of submitting a Mercury Status Report by Citations: Permit Part I.A.1 January 31, 2022. The Manager was not aware of submitting an Operation and Maintenance Plan Report by January 31, 2022. Unit: Interview DM1-OB-003 Citations: Permit Part I.A.7.b Area: Flow Measurement Influent and effluent flow measuring devices are usually professionally Citations: 40 CFR Part 122.41(e) calibrated at least once per year. However, the last calibration was at the end of 2020, due to COVID. The Manager hopes to reschedule calibration for October 2022. Unit: Interview DM1-OB-004 Area: Self Monitoring The Facility does not keep logs of temperatures within each composite sampler. Citations: 40 CFR Part 136 11 of 92 SAGANING WWTP Inspection Date: 08/25/2022 Effluent samples are collected after each of the MBR units. One autosampler (MBR #2) is out of service (approximately 1.5 years). Currently, for compliance sampling they collect composite samples from MBR #1 and grab samples from MBR #2. Stacy Ancel explained that they only use composite samples from MBR #1 for DMR reporting for effluent parameters requiring 24-composite samples. Citations: Permit Part I.A.1; Permit Part I.A.7 Unit: Interview DM1-OB-005 Area: Operations and Maintenance The Facility does not maintain an inventory of spare parts sufficient to Citations: 40 CFR Part 122.41(e); keep all of its treatment units operational. Permit Part I.A.7.a.G The Manager said they could use "2 or 3 more wastewater operators" Citations: Permit Part I.A.7.a.B to help stay on top of maintenance, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements. Unit: Physical Inspection DM1-OB-007 Area: Laboratory I noted that one of the E.coli M-Coliblue 24 sample broths was expired Citations: 40 CFR Part 136; Permit (5/31/2019). Part II.B.1 Facility representatives could not locate the written procedure currently used for E.coli analysis. Citations: 40 CFR Part 136; Permit Part II.B.1 I noted several instances where "dates received" and "dates opened" were left blank on opened laboratory chemical and standards containers. Citations: 40 CFR Part 136; Permit Part II.B.1 Unit: Physical Inspection DM1-OB-011 Area: Outfall I observed a turbid discharge from final outfall 001 into the receiving water (see Photo Log image SAGA0112). The Manager attributed the turbidity to muskrat activity within outfall piping. Citations: Permit Part I.A.1.a SECTION VI - CLOSING CONFERENCE AND FOLLOW UP Closing Conference I held the inspection closing conference with Facility personnel at 02:15 PM (ET) on 08/25/2022. During the closing conference, I discussed the observations and potential Areas of Concern identified during the inspection. Observations and Areas of Concern have not yet been evaluated for a formal compliance determination. 12 of 92 SAGANING WWTP Inspection Date: 08/25/2022 Next, I reviewed records received during the inspection, including: 1) Area Topo Map 2) Flow schematic of Saganing WWTP 3) Saganing District Sanitation Map (2) 4) Saganing WWTP discharge map 5) Saganing WWTP Piping Plans (2) 6) Wastewater Improvement Plan 7) Lab Instrument list 8) Lab Methods 9) MBR O&M Procedures 10) Plant influent and effluent sheets - Jan-July 2022 11) Saganing Water and Wastewater Improvements Presentation 12) Hach SOPs sheets for Nitrogen-ammonia and Phosphorus Copies of the above records are included in Appendix 2 of this report. There was one follow-up item. I asked that they collect an E.coli sample pre-MBR, just to confirm that their E.coli laboratory analysis procedures are able to detect E.coli. Stacy Ancel agreed to collect the sample and provide the results. Before concluding, I asked if there were any questions. The Manager asked if we observed any safety concerns. I replied that we did not observe any safety issues. I provided a timeframe for completing the inspection report and we concluded the inspection. Communication Log No additional information was received by EPA after exiting the Facility on 08/25/2022. SECTION VII - LIST OF APPENDICES 1. Photo Log 2. Inspection Documents 13 of 92 SAGANING WWTP Inspection Date: Influent wet well SAGA0100.JPG 08/25/2022 12:35 PM (ET) Dean Maraldo Physical Inspection/Headworks No CBI No PII APPENDIX 1: PHOTOLOG Influent wet well SAGA0101.JPG 08/25/2022 12:35 PM (ET) Dean Maraldo Physical Inspection/Headworks No CBI No PII Note basket/rag screen at bottom of rails. Influent flow meter SAGA0102.JPG 08/25/2022 12:38 PM (ET) Dean Maraldo Physical Inspection/Headworks No CBI No PII 14 of 92 08/25/2022 SAGANING WWTP Inspection Date: Influent Autosampler (ISCO) SAGA0103.JPG 08/25/2022 12:39 PM (ET) Dean Maraldo Physical Inspection/Headworks No CBI No PII Note, thermometer located inside unit. Twin fine screens SAGA0104.JPG 08/25/2022 12:45 PM (ET) Dean Maraldo Physical Inspection/Headworks No CBI No PII View of MBR units SAGA0105.JPG 08/25/2022 12:42 PM (ET) Dean Maraldo Physical Inspection/MBR No CBI No PII 15 of 92 08/25/2022 SAGANING WWTP Inspection Date: View of MBR Tank SAGA0106.JPG 08/25/2022 12:48 PM (ET) Dean Maraldo Physical Inspection/MBR No CBI No PII MBR control screen SAGA0107.JPG 08/25/2022 12:50 PM (ET) Dean Maraldo Physical Inspection/MBR No CBI No PII Effluent Autosampler SAGA0108.JPG 08/25/2022 12:52 PM (ET) Dean Maraldo Physical Inspection/MBR No CBI No PII 16 of 92 08/25/2022 SAGANING WWTP Inspection Date: MBR#1 UV system SAGA0109.JPG 08/25/2022 12:54 PM (ET) Dean Maraldo Physical Inspection/UV No CBI No PII MBR#2 UV system SAGA0110.JPG 08/25/2022 12:56 PM (ET) Dean Maraldo Physical Inspection/UV No CBI No PII Manhole with access to pond/outfall flow controls SAGA0111.JPG 08/25/2022 12:58 PM (ET) Dean Maraldo Physical Inspection/Outfall No CBI No PII 17 of 92 08/25/2022 SAGANING WWTP Inspection Date: Final outfall 001 SAGA0112.JPG 08/25/2022 1:03 PM (ET) Dean Maraldo Physical Inspection/Outfall No CBI No PII Note turbid discharge. Sodium hypochlorite area SAGA0113.JPG 08/25/2022 1:08 PM (ET) Dean Maraldo Physical Inspection/Chemical Room No CBI No PII 50% citric acid area SAGA0114.JPG 08/25/2022 1:09 PM (ET) Dean Maraldo Physical Inspection/Chemical Room No CBI No PII 18 of 92 08/25/2022 SAGANING WWTP Inspection Date: Aluminum sulfate storage area SAGA0115.JPG 08/25/2022 1:09 PM (ET) Dean Maraldo Physical Inspection/Chemical Room No CBI No PII Facility backup generator (Diesel) SAGA0116.JPG 08/25/2022 1:11 PM (ET) Dean Maraldo Physical Inspection/Generator No CBI No PII WWTP SCADA Totalizer Screen SAGA0117.JPG 08/25/2022 1:17 PM (ET) Dean Maraldo Physical Inspection/SCADA No CBI No PII 19 of 92 08/25/2022 SAGANING WWTP Inspection Date: 08/25/2022 APPENDIX 2: INSPECTION DOCUMENTS (attached below) Document Type Document Name Contains Contains Date Received CBI PII Process Description/Flow Diagram Saganing Inspection_Records Received_Schematics_flow.pdf No No 08/25/2022 Facility Map Saganing Inspection_Records Received_Facility Map.pdf No No 08/25/2022 Laboratory Analysis Reports Saganing Inspection_Records Received_Lab Reports.pdf No No 08/25/2022 Other - Saganing Inspection_Records No No 08/25/2022 Wastewater Received_WW Improvement Plan.pdf Improvement Plan Facility SOPs Pages from Saganing Inspection_Records No Received_OM Records.pdf No 08/25/2022 Laboratory SOPs Saganing Inspection_Records No No 08/25/2022 Received_LabSOPs_EquipList_Methods.pdf 20 of 92 TTTT I; -c I Ii/tpt . LJ4 - - _____\ \ , \ '/ \ ' - - 1- ' E-' E 41 [Ti! H> i;-- 1: - - L IL /, jk V'f 01 I IJ -7i--- T -- .$)$ I . + ) -_-- \/* t4 - Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 21 of 92 L ' ? 6 IA LL ;-.;_r. -3. - - /: - / a I __ SIEMENS Industry, Inc. The diagram below depicts the overall flow scheme for the Saganing WWTP: Biological Blower Membrane Air Scour Blower Recirculation Pump Saganing WWTP- FDS Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 14 of 67 page 22 of 92 (T fluent WAS - - ___________________ ______________________________ N SCIT Sanin.g District Sanitation - ----. '-'T 2 \- n - /1 /Tur tJL1 (p1 rt1Tr1 is- ______ ___JT .- - ' \ T. _________________ Buildings o Sewer-Cleanout I Catch Basins Sewer Manholes -Storm Mains -Sewer Mains - Rivers & Drains rL,itCiLi :. - ----- pc Q4r i7 2 I Ste \ 4k- -- ), . I jk _. I - -- T1 ir --' - - rJ fs __ jt t ,. I; . + A I ... - L Fiue - - _________ 1 -H-Y1 -J . . ,f \ J . , ' u-.-- j .5 1, tL L ---- .. I . . -.- Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 . page 23 of 92 Source SCIT GIS :2O22 IPPe SCIT Saganing District Sanitation OF Sagring White BabhRid Saganing Casino Resort I (I) \3 lklkl 0) Li a / Community Center lrrlg0n. pump house StoraBarn V3aehouse Storage Barn Sanitation Station - Whites 0) Worth Road Bull dings c Sewer Cleanout Catch Basins Sewer Manholes -Storm Mains -Sewer Mains - Rivers & Drains Ditch River_LaksPoly Ponds Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 - page 24 of 92 r:se 'ff1 Cl r_1D L L. ri Source SCIT GIS :2O2 I Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 25 of 92 Docu me ci Path: F 'P rol actaiS aga ningiSaga flingWrPDacha ng a mc -rf [C01AN08 r.SCAtEi 210 j - 6V80&00.t ._FrEiaLi I ___ 10 TANY 1- El S2nUH-i 6 Elk N 0 I 82V1N50165 _______ 6 NV 10:583.00 SW 00060-3 - _ -. .11'i' 6flRM58JjH _____________________________________ II a! // -fl 4 Dlk 20010572.70 o 2 NV DiV 575.60 81-10 8 118. Ni 585.57 2 IWO IN: 030.00 .::2..a 2.T 2 MANHOLE DROP PIPE DETAIL 100000 00 U A ' 1, - / . \\ __________ -a I'II IIijLaa2ao ___ I FAGUTY AREA ___ [fj w.0itwA1 I j 1Rttz 855.0100 82258 100560.13 I' _ _ ,a 6601685 ;:- -- ___ 2002 7/// / / \ r_____________ 0.620006662001 6H 6000 6621000 0666005396 ;5f8LET T0-40kJ? l 'M, AND EKTM.S - . . -;v 10 ;- ii ..l .. / ___ II - /t ______- \.\ K'/ O7E - -. -=- raDio /i J2YAI.00 J I .-2 NO IN: 082.20 -' h2 160 06312 582101 jjj582.I4 rcA1EvAt85.688 rItz II I 0610 I ii I PEElS 01.058010 .-I 4 VIA. SLUDGE TANK PLAN VIEW INV Ni 583.20 INV OUT: 583.1oil 102.00 (822-106600002 1 I I I 'CFIUCVJLSS 91 I 58 8 ___ 026b g ZO 6326 nil dEItz:aiir isw00.36 500 231010 _________ 6DI Wa+' I - L. 00010600 cI) LU -O - L) ------------ I h PLN6 66800 5-1 AS CONSTRUCTED TELE500PII2O VALVE DETAI s--- 002060 U 100 20226 0666010 SLUDGE TANK SECI100AL ViEW SCALE FILNU63005 WW-0026 SHEET SUM 005 0.2 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 26 of 92 r,-ri SCLE 2 - - - -'- -I dNS h "tasAMTMy j_.' YB\ \ J I \ \ ___ M4-I r 01k _, . - (1I ti*:y :f 2/lL\iV it / 7' / _________ / - ? . '.- /01 /( A,'>.> A - 4;. 4 0 ;.;-;-? 0T I II , Tl /4JIVi I L VlI =1 1iffi - L--ILO I ' 1801 1811011 01011180 WAIU1 WI0010II08T FAIJW 0EA .......8 ii in 7L _-'l -.-- I 18808 / -//->- 8o1E 00011011 7' 1.',':' 4 'I,;,o ,":/:: / S ..,,A, :k ='- -- _______ FWUOZ 0I18I010 LEA ./,A ;.'-, /.,/V/Y.' ;' .' . f"A,'' /(J'/,',/ ' / I I / / I .. _______ -- v-o I F-.i 1101 00T110,S I : _______ /f114 0111, r81-i0 6' 0111. 0807 010100 000.00 _, 2 01101 111J0111 075 ____ row ii, Eo2o 188;l: r, , MANHOLE DROP PIPE DETAIL 180808 08 ' ' '-,o,ovo,. :JL1HI '1! ____________ ____ 01 01 K _________ 8% 011118 I ,.-ow 000115 I 0-001 10810 - AS CONSTRUCTED III!I -- 1flESC08INC VALVE wTA'I rCO t I-' -""-'S- SWDGETAIJKSECIIOOLVL18EW 0101011 011011118010 WN-OI8 SICETIIA1200 _______ Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 27 of 92 Saganing Wastewater Improvement Plan Developed by Fishbeck (ftch) Engineering 9- 17-20 To: Mr. Dean Maraldo Water Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Branch U.S. EPA - Region 5 Wastewater Treatment System Improvements The following improvements to the wastewater treatment system are recommended to increase capacity and improve reliability to handle current wastewater flow from existing Tribal operations and projected future wastewater flow from the Standish Township Whites Beach Service Area (WBSA). The recommended wastewater treatment improvements presented in the study are as follows. SCIT Tribal Council and Tribal Administration has committed to developing these ftch recommendations. Ftch expects to complete the WWTP improvement design by 9-30-22. Finally, SCIT has an agreement with Kennedy Industries for headwork's pump replacement those improvements should be completed soon. Influent Pumping Station/Screen Building Provide an odor control system at the location of the onsite WBSA junction manhole. Install a new bar screen or influent chopper pumps to handle excessive solids and rags in the influent wastewater. Replace the combustible gas detection system in the Screen Building. Influent Equalization Construct a new 100,000-gallon above grade equalization tank. Fishbeck will consider steel versus concrete and present advantages of each alternative. MBR System Add a third EVOQUA Xpress membrane bioreactor (MBR) unit. Install overflow pipes on bioreactor tanks and route to equalization tank. Effluent Discharge and Disinfection System Install a new effluent sampler on common effluent discharge piping from all MBR systems. Install redundant ultraviolet (UV) disinfection units on each MBR system, or provide a centralized UV disinfection system with an appropriate level of redundancy. Biosolids Storage and Treatment Evaluate biosolids stabilization systems and current biosolids storage capacity. Design the selected biosolids stabilization system. Remote Monitoring System Provide a SCADA system to be able to remotely monitor and control lift stations. Upgrade the WWTP SCADA system to include remote monitoring and control capabilities, and an alarm callout system. Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 28 of 92 furnace autoclave refrigerator dessicator spectrophotometer oven scale pH probe D.O. probe Ambient Chamber Water Bath Flow Meter Influent Flow Meter Effluent manual manual manual manual manual manual manual manual manual manual manual manual manual fl Thermo Scientific Thermolyne FB1415M 10-6226-D 230-250 F 0-30 psi Da nby Designer Bel-Art Secador Scienceware 8255 Hach DR3900 2020513 Fisher Isotemp 151030503 Ohaus Adventurer-Pro AV264 B033141159 Orion 81O2BNUWP Thermo Fisher Optical RDO Fisher Isotemp 3720 Incubator Fisher Isotemp 205 Water Master Hart fex 100 ABB FET1211AOY1B1A Magflo Mag 5000/ Siemens Sitrans F M MAG 3100 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 29 of 92 L\ p41 CI p4 I I5C I Uichi Qglfr(e ctd ia ____ _________ '1dLL2 9fl hffL5'o C I U? ) mp c I -- V IiLiikj +(1C}flC (V?'oqU1 ph'iru VT 4. 0 1LO \ 5Q I crtd _____________________________ JOZ9 '7- coL' iu 2 4 i 1 U - () _____ Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 30 of 92 SIEMENS SECTION 6: MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES ,... The maintenance procedures for the Memjet Xpress are minimal. The following document details the maintenance procedures for the mechanical equipment as well as the membranes cleaning procedures and repair as required. The instructions and recommendations in this document are intended to assist the Plant Operator and Maintenance Personnel. 6.1 Summary of Maintenance Requirements The following table gives a quick lookup of the maintenance requirements for major equipment and components of the Xpress Unit. In11I111 [ 11i .IThtifli1 Re-grease bearings - Check Mechanical Seal Record suction and charge Pump pressures (Pressure indicators) 1TI _______ ________ 14II lL1ili1 X ________ ________ _________ LIT!T1 WT1t1 X _______ ________ ________ ________ ________ Blower Check oil levels _______ Lubrication - fill the oil sump n each end of the blower Check for hot spots - detected by observing_the_surface_of_the_casing _______ Check for changes in vibration & noise _______ Record operating pressures and temperatures X ________ ________ _____ ________ _________ _________ ________ _______ _______ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ Re -grease bearings _______ ________ ________ Check oil levels - _______ ________ ________ Screen Check nozzles for blockages _______ ________ ________ ________ X ________ X _______ X Mixer Monitor the current consumption ________ ________ Check power supply cable insulation resistance ________ ______ Visual inspection of power supply cable _______ ________ Visual inspection of the cable holder and the cable bracing _______ ________ Visual inspection of accessories, e.g. lowering device, hoisting gears, etc. ________ Oil check and oil change of sealing chamber, if necessary _____- ________ Functional inspection of the safety and monitoring devices and auxiliary hoisting gear ________ ________ Coating check and touch-up as required _______ ________ XPRESS MAINTENANCE PROCEDURE lOOK XPRESS X _________ _________ _________ ________ ________ _________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ X ________ ________ ________ ________ __________________ ________ x _________________ Private and Confidential Page 1 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 31 of 92 SIEMENS .]Hi Chemical Dosing Pumps _____________ Dissolved Oxygen Probe ____________ Turbidimeter ___________ Pressure Transmitters The pump should be run with water for_one_minute The tubing should be flushed out with water after every chemical clean A visual check should be performed on the motor flange and the stroke adjustment_knob_for_leaks. Clean sensor with a soft, wet cloth Check sensor cap inspected for damage Calibrate probe Clean sensor with a soft, wet cloth Calibrate sensor Check lamp assembly Check calibration of instrument ___________________________________ IbIJL ________ ________ ________ ________ _______ _______ ________ ________ _______ ________ I1A!IIj IYr11iWJ [TTF111 V4.i1iiiiJ x ________ X ________ _________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ _______ ________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ ________ __________ X ________ X x ________ ________ X X _______ ________ _______ X ________ ________ X x Fine bubble diffusers Membranes ____________ lnfluent/ Effluent Quality ____________ Valves _____________ Check aeration patterns Dewater and clean diffusers _______ ________ _________ X ________ AS REQUIRED - LONGER THAN ANNUAL Check TMP, aeration & MLSS level X _______ ________ Check alarwmasrn- insghutdown & x _______ ________ ________ Clean-in-Place _______ ________ ________ Perform leak test _______ ________ ________ lnfluent - BOD, TKN, NH3-N, TP, TSS,_pH,_Alkanity,_Flow_rates _______ x _______ ________ Mixed Liquor - MLSS, SRT _______ X ________ Effluent - BaD, TN, TP, TSS, Turbidity, other parameters required X for_permit _______ ________ _________ Manually stoke to ensure valves are not sticking ________ ________ __________ _______ _______ ________ ________ X ________ ________ X _______ _______ _______ _______ ________ _______ X _________ ________ For details of how to perform the preventive maintenance schedule see specific Vendor Literature. XPRESS MAINTENANCE PROCEDURE lOOK XPRESS Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 32 of 92 Private and confidential Page 2 ______________________ - Day ________ 1 Type 2 3 4 5 snow 6 sunny 7 sunny 8 9 10 11 12 cloudy 13 cloudy 14 cloudy 15 16 17 18 19 p/c 20 p/c 21 sunny 22 23 24 25 26 clear 27 28 cloudy 29 30 31 Total X Avg. X Mm. X Max. X Weather Saganing WWTP January 2022 _______ Plant_Influent_Sheet Flow Raw Sewage Temp. Precip. Total Temp. pH DO TSS BOD F inches MGD C S.U. mg/L mg/L mg/L 30 0.02 0.053 17 0 0.058 19 0 0.056 21 0 0.056 37 0 0.051 16.5 7.7 6 68 308 23 0 0.05 15.9 7.6 6.3 50 374 0 0.07 0.05 16.2 7.7 7.8 41 224 15 0.01 0.056 30 0 0.06 11 0 0.054 7 0 0.057 35 0 0.054 15.8 7.6 6.7 95 160 32 0 0.061 16.4 7.5 7.1 96 21 0 0.072 16.6 7.7 7.4 161 172 22 0 0.069 46 0 0.061 31 0 0.057 29 0 0.059 37 0.01 0.061 16.9 7.6 7.6 99 191 20 0 0.061 16.8 7.6 7.6 31 160 15 0 0.062 16.6 8.1 8.2 47 145 21 0 0.063 14 0 0.06 20 0 0.061 7 0 0.056 2 0 0.059 17.7 6.9 7 114 241 18 0 0.052 15.2 7.7 8.1 31 151 10 0 0.056 15.1 7.7 8.1 70 152 2 0 0.059 14 0 0.066 25 0.01 0.061 X 0.12 1.811 X X X X X 20.35484 0.00387097 0.0584194 16.3083 7.61667 7.325 73.36363636 197.8333333 0 0 0.05 15.1 6.9 6 31 96 46 0.07 0.072 17.7 8.1 8.2 161 374 ___________ CBOD mg/L 312 390 197 179 103 205 222 58 248 257 150 144 X 205.4166667 58 390 ___________ TSS mg/L 7 Day Average 53 128 59 71.66666667 77.91666667 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 33 of 92 - - - Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2.6 27 28 29 30 31 Total Avg. Mm. Max. _____________ Weather Type Temp. _______ 0 F 30 0 17 0 19 0 21 snow 37 sunny 23 sunny 0 0 15 0 30 0 11 0 7 cloudy 35 cloudy 32 cloudy 21 0 22 0 46 0 31 0 29 p/c 37 p/c 20 sunny 15 0 21 0 14 0 20 0 7 clear 2 0 18 cloudy 10 0 2 0 14 0 25 X X X 20.35484 X 0 X 46 Saganing WWTP January 2022 Plant Effluent Sheet _____ Flow Total _______ Temp. - _______ pH DO Treated Sewage__________ ________ TSS CBOD Ammonia MGD C S.U. mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L Phos mg/L ________ E.coli ct/looml 0.065 _______ _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ 0.07 _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ _______ 0.067 _______ _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ 0.064 0 0 0 0 0.061 21.7 7.6 8.4 0.02 -1.06 0.06 0.11 0 0.062 17.6 7.4 8.3 0.06 -0.38 0.09 0.85 0 0.062 21.5 7.4 8.7 0.07 -0.21 0.08 0.62 0 0.078 _______ _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ 0 0.091 _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ _______ 0 0.092 _______ _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ 0 0.091 _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ _______ 0 0.087 15.7 7.4 9 0.14 -0.16 0.03 0.14 0 0.074 18.9 7.2 7.8 -0.7 0.01 0.12 0 0.082 20.8 6.6 8.6 0.18 0.21 0.02 0.15 0 0.077 _______ - _______ ______ _______ __________ _______ 0 0.071 _______ _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ 0 0.066 _______ - _______ ______ _______ __________ _______ 0 0.07 _______ _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ 0 0.07 18.8 7.4 8.3 0.04 0.15 0.02 0.15 0 0.072 17.4 7.4 7.5 0.03 0.09 0.01 0.13 0 0.072 15.9 7.7 8.9 0.07 1.18 0.04 0.05 0 0.071 _______ _______ - ______ ______ _______ _________ 0.069 _______ - ______ ______ _______ _________ _______ 0.071 _______ _______ - ______ ______ _______ _________ 0.056 0 0 0 0 0.07 15.7 7.7 8.9 0.02 -0.51 0.01 0.16 0 0.055 17.2 7.7 8.7 0.02 0.49 0.02 0.22 0 0.066 17.7 7.6 8.2 0.05 -1.09 0.01 0.16 0 0.069 0 0.068 _______ 0.069 _______ 2.218 X - ______ - ______ X X ______ ______ X _______ _______ X _________ _________ X _______ _______ X 0 0 0 0.07155 18.24167 7.425 8.44167 0.06455 -0.16583 0.03333333 0.238333 0 0.055 15.7 6.6 7.5 0.02 -1.09 0.01 0.05 0 0.092 21.7 7.7 9 0.18 1.18 0.09 0.85 0 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 34 of 92 ________ Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Average Mm. Max. Saganing WWTP January 2022 CBOD %Removal TSS %Removal #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/O! #DIV/0! #DIV/O! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 100.816036 99.92966719 100.2419333 99.70284217 100.2647154 99.57747987 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/O! #DIV/O! #DIV/O! #DIV/0! #DIV/O! #DIV/0! 100.2884352 99.52627096 101.6626011 99.76693857 #DIV/0! 99.74566546 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 99.84504704 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 99.90731239 99.63436103 99.7718101 98.90097381 99.65468099 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 100.4719943 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 99.95837917 99.31135372 99.86361664 101.8002868 99.79816308 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/O! #DIV/O! #DIV/O! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/O! #DIV/0! #DV/0! Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 35 of 92 ______ ______ Day 1 2 3 4 ~ 6 7 8 9 10 11 ~~ 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Total Avg. Mi Max. ____________ Areation Vol. MGD 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 X X X X ________ F:M Ratio #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.216328 0.320843 0.318435 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.121335 #DlV/0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.27924 0.131607 0.094164 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/ol #DIV/0! 0.230573 0.185626 0.122828 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! X #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Saganing WWTP January 2022 MISS mg/I MLVSS mg/I Settle 30 mm. ________ _______ ________ _______ 12708 8656 5608 ________ _______ ________ _______ 2017 1619 977 ________ _______ ________ _______ 990 950 960 ________ ________ ________ ________ 12036 ________ ________ ________ ________ 1978 ________ ________ ________ ________ 990 ________ ________ 12200 ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ 14016 12452 12460 ________ 1159 2060 2652 ________ 990 ________ ________ ________ ________ 990 980 970 ________ ________ ________ ________ _______ ________ ________ 12988 9032 12816 ________ 1713 1175 1925 ________ ________ ________ ________ 990 990 970 _______ ________ ________ _______ ________ ________ ________ X ________ X 11361.09 1727.5 5608 977 14016 2652 ________ X 979.0909 950 990 _______ SVI ______ #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 77.904 109.75 171.18 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 82.253 #DIV/0! 81.148 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 70.634 78.702 77.849 #DlV/0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DlV/0 76.224 109.61 75.687 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! X #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! ________ Wasted Gallons 0 0 1500 0 1500 0 0 0 0 1500 0 0 1500 0 0 0 0 0 3000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3000 0 0 3000 15000 483.871 0 3000 _________ CRT Days #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 24 #DIV/0! 17.06161 19.35484 16.58986 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 24 #DIV/0! 5.91133 24 4.878049 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 8.181818 33.33333 14.28571 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 51.42857 65.45455 7.228916 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 12 X #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 36 of 92 ________________ Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Total Lbs. Soln. Total Lbs. Chemical Average Max. Mm. ________________ Aluminum Sulfate, 50% Pounds 48 40 48 46 46 46 20 28 34 32 32 22 24 28 32 28 24 22 28 30 26 26 30 28 28 30 28 28 28 26 30 966 483 31.16129032 48 20 Saganing WWTP January 2022 Citric Acid, 50% (cleaning) Pounds _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ __________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ ___________________ __________________ _________________ _________________ 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 0 Sodium Bicarb Pounds 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 100 0 0 100 700 693 22.58064516 100 0 ___________________________ Sodium Hypochlorite, 12.5% (cleaning) Pounds __________________________ _________________________ _________________________ _________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ _________________________ ___________________________ __________________________ __________________________ _________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ ___________________________ __________________________ _________________________ _________________________ 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 0 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 37 of 92 LL) - ________ Type Day 1 2 snow 3 cloudy 4 sunny 5 6 7 8 9 cloudy 10 cloudy 11 snow 12 13 14 15 16 cloudy 17 p/c 18 cloudy 19 20 21 22 23 p/c 24 sunny 25 snow 26 27 28 Weather Temp. F 27 34 15 2 11 18 24 21 24 32 35 25 10 1 17 42 35 15 20 20 28 32 23 19 17 15 26 23 Saganing WWTP February 2022 Plant Influent Sheet Flow Row Sewage Precip. inches Total Temp. pH MGD C S.U. DO mg/L TSS mg/L BOD mg/L 0 0.061 0.02 0.059 14.3 7.4 8.8 67 185 0 0.054 17.6 7.6 7.8 112 256 0 0.055 17.4 7.6 7.1 154 110 0.03 0.055 ___________ ___________ 0.01 0.067 ___________ ___________ 0.02 0.064 __________ __________ 0.01 0.086 0 0.049 17.6 7.7 7.2 150 108 0.03 0.103 17.6 7.7 7.3 134 74 0 0.077 17.6 7.6 7.4 220 59 0.07 0.057 ___________ ___________ 0.01 0.069 ___________ 0 0.064 ___________ ___________ 0 0.07 0 0.064 15.2 7.3 7.9 91 227 0.26 0.058 16.1 8 7.9 214 175 0 0.054 15.7 7.8 6.8 78 27 0.1 0.062 ___________ 0 0.062 ___________ ___________ 0 0.064 ___________ 0.3 0.06 0.66 0.063 14.4 7.5 8.1 98 282 0 0.058 15.4 6.9 8.1 45 239 0.01 0.07 15.4 7.1 8.1 87 172 0.2 0.068 __________ 0 0.068 ___________ 0 0.066 ___________ ___________ ___________ CBOD mg/L 166 203 -154 ___________ ___________ __________ 147 69 110 ___________ ___________ ___________ 224 187 90 ___________ ___________ ___________ 243 206 142 __________ ___________ ___________ ___________ TSSmg/L7 Day Average 111 ___________ 168 ___________ 127.6666667 ___________ 76.66666667 Total X X 1.73 1.807 X X X X X X Avg. X 21.82143 0.06178571 0.0645357 16.1917 7.51667 7.708333 120.8333333 159.5 136.0833333 120.8333333 Mm. X 1 0 0.049 14.3 6.9 6.8 45 27 -154 Max. X 42 0.66 0.103 17.6 8 8.8 220 282 243 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 38 of 92 Saganing WWTP February 2022 Plant Influent Sheet - Day Flow MGD Raw Sewage TSS BOD lbs. lbs. _________ CBOD lbs. 1 0.061 0 0 0 2 0.059 32.96802 91.0311 81.68196 3 0.054 50.44032 115.29216 91.42308 4 0.055 70.6398 50.457 -70.6398 5 0.055 0 0 0 6 0.067 0 0 0 7 0.064 0 0 0 8 0.086 0 0 0 9 0.049 61.299 44.13528 60.07302 10 0.103 115.1087 63.56748 59.27238 11 0.077 141.2796 37.88862 70.6398 12 0.057 0 0 0 13 0.069 0 0 0 14 0.064 0 0 0 15 0.07 0 0 0 16 0.064 48.57216 121.16352 119.56224 17 0.058 103.5161 84.651 90.45564 18 0.054 35.12808 12.15972 40.5324 19 0.062 0 0 0 20 0.062 0 0 0 21 0.064 0 0 0 22 0.06 0 0 0 23 0.063 51.49116 148.16844 127.67706 24 0.058 21.7674 115.60908 99.64632 25 0.07 50.7906 100.4136 82.8996 26 0.068 0 0 0 27 0.068 0 0 0 28 0.066 0 0 0 __!_ __.2_ --- Total 0 0 0 1.807 0 0 0 783.0009 0 0 0 984.537 0 0 0 853.2237 Avg. 0.064536 25.25809 31.7592581 27.523345 Mm. 0.049 21.7674 12.15972 0 Max. 0.103 141.2796 148.16844 127.67706 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 39 of 92 - _______ Plant Effluent Sheet ________ _______ _______ - - Day 1 2 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 27 - 28 - 29 30 - 31 - Total - Avg. Mm. Max. - - - - - Flow MGD 0.067 0.065 0.063 0.063 0.059 0.064 0.053 0.055 0.044 0.087 0.067 0.071 0.07 0.077 0.082 0.078 0.07 0.07 0.075 0.077 0.077 0.075 0.076 0.076 0.079 0.083 0.078 0.083 0 0 0 1.984 0.07085 0.044 0.087 _______ _______ _______ _______ TSS lbs. 0 0.016263 0.005254 0.005254 0 0 0 0 0.022018 0.021767 0.016763 0 0 0 0 0.006505 0.046704 0.052542 0 0 0 0 0.050707 0.069722 0.039532 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.353032 0.011388 0 0.069722 ________ ________ ________ ________ CBOD lbs. 0 -0.0705 0.83542 -1.1717 0 0 0 0 0.28256 0.31926 0.2738 0 0 0 0 -1.6003 -0.5955 0.25687 0 0 0 0 1.2867 1.16627 -0.9158 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.06714 0.00217 -1.6003 1.2867 _______ _______ _______ _______ Amm. Phos. Day lbs. lbs. 25 0 0 26 0.032526 0.043 27 0.010508 0.005254 0 0 0.053 28 -_ 0.053 29 -_ 0 30 - 0 31 0 0 0.014678 0.021767 0.005588 0 1 -_ 0 2 -_ 0.037 3 - 0.007 4 - 0.056 5 0 0 0 0 0.058547 0 6 - 0 7 -_ 0 8 - 0 9 -_ 0.52 10 0.017514 0.058 11 -_ 0.02919 0.082 12 0 0 13 -_ 0 0 14 0 0 15 - 0 0 16 0.03803 0.101 17 0.012677 0.019 18 - 0.006589 0.02 19 _ 0 0 20 0 0 21 -_ 0 0 22 0 0 23 0 0 24 0 0.252869 0.008157 0 25 -_ 1.049 26 _ 0.034 27 0 0 28 0.058547 0.52 29 30 -_ 31 _______ - Avg. _______ - Mm. _______ - Max. _______ - Total 7 Day Averages CBOD TSS mg/L ibs. mg/L lbs. 0.59 0.110302 0.03 0.005397 1.16143 0.222535 0.04142857 0.00795 1.25571 0.242325 0.04428571 0.009174 1.39 0.261888 0.03857143 0.007697 1.27714 0.265498 0.06 0.01395i 1.23286 0.254179 0.09 0.019635 ___ 1.41 0.294926 0.08714286 0.01942 1.18816 0.235951 0.05591837 0.01189 1.27362 0.2539 0.05962099 0.012818 1.28964 - 1.29449 1.28084 0.258381 0.260675 ___ 0.260501 0.06221991 0.06478194 0.06852629 0.013512 0.014132 0.015051 1.28137 1.2883 -0.2567 0.259788 0.260589 _ -0.05811 0.06974434 0.06685057 0.01666667 0.015208 _ 0.014576 0.003824 -0.2567 -0.05811 0.01666667 0.003824 0.04333 -0.00767 0.02666667 0.004647 -0.34 -0.08141 0.03333333 0.007006 0.56667 0.125088 0.04 0.00865 0.56667 0.125088 0.04 0.00865 0.56667 0.125088 0.04 0.00865 0.56667 0.125088 0.04 __ 0.56667 0.125088 0.04 0.00865 0.00865 -0.51 -0.14389 0.02333333 0.006434 -0.9967 -0.27456 0.04 0.009996 -1.0133 -0.27698 0.06 0.015107 -1.0133 -0.27698 0.06 0.015107 -1.0133 -0.27698 0.06 0.015107 -1.0133 -0.27698 0.06 0.015107 -1.0133 -0.27698 0.06 0.015107 0.48333 0.135442 0.08333333 0.021422 1.43667 0.387119 0.09333333 0.02471 0.82667 0.219592 0.08333333 0.022852 0.82667 0.219592 0.08333333 0.022852 0.82667 0.219592 0.08333333 0.022852 0.82667 0.219592 0.08333333 0.022852 0.82667 0.219592 0.08333333 0.02285i 0.225 0.035779 0.085 0.015608 0.34273 0.066544 0.05750524 0.013797 -1.0133 -0.27698 0.01665567 0.003824 1.43667 0.387119 0.09333333 0.02471 X 2.06286 X 0.427703 ______ E. coil ct/100m1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ________ Ammonia lbs. 0.187459371 0.2345208 0.240334971 0.243813943 0.258182571 0.225656571 0.189163114 0.225590192 0.231037452 0.230539831 0.229140525 0.227044322 0.222596001 0.222158777 0.006898371 0.006898371 0.004348714 0.005957143 0.0060048 0.0060048 0.0060048 0.0060048 0.0060048 0.012271714 0.011664086 0.015035829 0.015035829 0.015035829 0.015035829 0.015035829 0.012104914 0.011413886 0.008185114 0.008185114 0.008185114 0.008185114 0.008185114 0.0027522 0.058340168 0.0027522 0.231037452 1.808545214 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 40 of 92 ________ Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Average Mm. Max. Saganing WWTP February 2022 CBOD %Removal TSS %Removal #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 100.1727036 99.9013894 98.18896292 99.97916884 96.73677108 99.98512507 #DIV/O! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DJV/0! 99.0636849 99.92818906 98.92852344 99.962 18654 99.22778651 99.976272 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 102.7132123 99.97321787 101.3253392 99.90980544 98.74049235 99.70130147 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 98.00456307 99.80323879 97.68626984 99.36143235 102.2341379 99.84445604 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! - - #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DlV/0 #DIV/0! - #DIV/0! Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 41 of 92 ________________ Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________ Aluminum Sulfate, 50% Pounds 30 28 30 30 30 28 30 32 36 30 36 38 38 38 44 46 52 40 46 48 44 52 40 46 50 40 44 46 Saganing WWTP February 2022 Citric Acid, 50% (cleaning) Pounds __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ ___________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ __________________ ___________________ ___________________ __________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ __________________ Sodium Bicarb Pounds 0 100 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 50 0 100 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 ___________________________ Sodium Hypochlorite, 12.5% (cleaning) Pounds __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ ___________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ __________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ _________________________ _________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ _________________________ __________________________ Total Lbs. Soln. Total Lbs. Chemical Average Max. Mm. 1092 546 39 52 28 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 0 550 544.5 19.64285714 100 0 0 0 #DlV/0 0 0 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 42 of 92 - _______________________ - - Day _______ Type 1 2 sunny 3 clear 4 sunny 5 6 7 8 9 p/c 10 sunny 11 p/c 12 13 14 Weather Temp. F Precip. inches Saganing WWTP March 2022 Plant Influent Sheet _______ Flow Raw Sewage Total Temp. pH DO TSS BOD MGD C S.U. mg/L mg/L mg/L 22 0 19 0 17 0 _ __ 32 0 29 0 22 0 0.078 17.2 8 7.9 180 0.064 17.2 8 8 192 0.065 16.8 8.1 8.2 44 _________ _________ __________ ______________ ___________ ________ ________ _________ _________ __________ __________ ______________ ______________ __ 0.058 17.1 __ 7.4 7.8 0.059 17.2 7.4 7.9 0.06 13.2 7.8 8.2 28 63 92 __________ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _________ _________ ________ _____________ _____________ ____________ 345 306 245 _____________ _____________ _____________ __ 123 -57 260 ____________ ____________ ___________ 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Total Avg. Mm. Max. p/c sunny p/c ______ 32 42 38 0.06 0 0 0.062 0.062 0.066 __________ 15.9 7.7 15.9 7.8 16.3 7.7 _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ __ 7.6 7.6 8.5 _________ _________ ________ 114 58 44 ____________ ____________ ___________ __ 228 100 227 ____________ ____________ ___________ rain p/c p/c rain rain X X X X 39 0.51 0.067 17.6 8 7.9 192 218 39 0.58 0.06 17.4 8.2 7.8 155 69 38 0.14 0.048 120 149 _______ _______ ________ ___________ ___________ _______ ________ ___________ ___________ _______ ________ ___________ ___________ 35 _________ _______ _______ ________ ___________ ___________ 0.15 0.066 16.9 7.9 8.3 344 55 1 0.066 17.9 7.9 8.4 386 X 2.44 0.881 X X X X 32.78571 0.17428571 0.0629286 16.6615 7.83846 8.007692 143.7142857 17 0 0.048 13.2 7.4 7.6 28 55 1 0.078 17.9 8.2 8.5 386 264 288 X 197.5 -57 345 __________ CBOD mg/L ___________ 263 205 151 __________ TSS mg/L 7 Day Average 138.6666667 _____________ _____________ _____________ ______________ 85 -116 204 61 ____________ ____________ ___________ ____________ 230 107 171 72 _____________ _____________ ___________ ___________ 239 120 359 ____________ 155.6666667 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ 238 226 X 177.2857143 -116 359 239.5 133.3666667 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 43 of 92 - - Day _____________ Weather Type Temp. F 1 0 0 2 sunny 22 3 clear 19 4 sunny 17 __!_ 0 0 _!_ 0 0 _2._ 0 0 _!_ 0 0 9 p/c 32 10 sunny 29 11 p/c 22 0 0 __ _1:_ 0 0 0 0 __ 0 0 16 p/c 32 17 sunny 42 18 p/c 38 0 0 ___ 0 0 __ 0 0 __ 22' 0 0 23 rain 39 24 p/c 39 25 p/c 38 _!_ 0 0 __Z_ 0 0 0 0 ___ 0 0 -- 30 rain 35 31 rain 55 x x Avg. X 32.78571 Mm. X 17 Max. X 55 Saga fling WWTP March 2022 Plant Effluent Sheet _____ Flow _______ - _______ Treated Sewage Total MGD Temp. C _!!:!_ S.U. DO mg/L TSS mg/L CBOD mg/L Ammonia mg/L _______ Phos mg/L ________ E. coD ct/looml 0 0.094 14.4 7.9 8.9 0.05 3.98 0.01 0.06 0 0.08 14.6 7.9 8.8 0.01 3.2 0.01 0.1 0 0.082 14.3 7.9 8.7 0.02 -0.67 0.03 0.06 0 ______ _______ ______ _______ ______ _______ ______ 0.075 _______ 17.2 - _______ - _______ - _______ - _______ 7.5 8.3 ______ ______ _______ _______ _________ _________ ______ _______ _________ ______ 0.01 _______ -1.09 _________ 0.04 _______ _______ _______ _______ 0.06 0 0 0 0 0 0.075 17.2 7.5 8.3 0.02 -0.61 0.02 0.08 0 0.074 14.2 8.1 8.1 0.01 2.4 0.01 0.08 0 _____ ______ - ______ ______ _______ _________ _______ 0 0 _____ ______ - ______ ______ _______ _________ _______ 0 _____ ______ - ______ ______ _______ _________ _______ 0 0.079 21.3 8.1 8.7 0.01 1.33 0.01 0.03 0 0.079 21.2 8 8.6 0.01 0.14 0.01 0.02 0 0.072 17.8 7.7 8.1 0.01 0.95 0.04 0.03 0 ___ ___ - ___ ___ ___ _____ ___ ___ ___ - ___ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ ___ - ___ ___ ___ ____ 0 0 0 0 0.083 16.8 7.9 8.9 0.01 0.3 0.02 0.07 0 0.076 16.7 7.9 8.2 0.01 0.22 0.02 0.06 0 0.066 17.3 7.6 8.5 0.01 0.64 0.01 0.07 0 ___ ___ - ___ ___ ___ _____ ___ 0 ___ ___ - ___ ___ ___ _____ ___ 0 ___ ___ ___ - ___ ___ ___ _____ 0 ___ ___ - ___ ___ ___ _____ ___ 0 0.079 16.9 7.8 8.6 0.03 0.09 0.01 0.08 0 0.077 18.5 7.8 8.7 0.03 -0.55 0.06 0.08 0 1.091 X X X X X X X 0 0.07793 17.02857 7.829 8.52857 0.01714 0.737857 0.02142857 0.062857 0 0.066 14.2 7.5 8.1 0.01 -1.09 0.01 0.02 0 0.094 21.3 8.1 8.9 0.05 3.98 0.06 0.1 0 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 44 of 92 _____ _____ Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Total Avg. Mi Max. ____________ Areation Vol. MGD 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 X X X X _________ F:M Ratio #DlV/0! 0.994016 0.680851 0.773359 #DlV/0! #DIV/0l #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.224679 -0.15339 0.439932 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DlV/ol 0.164364 0.430556 0.274335 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.507788 0.073342 0.149824 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.44 0.326531 X #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Saganing WWTP March 2022 MISS mg/I MLVSS mg/I Settle 30 mm. ________ 3504 5088 3884 ________ 752 799 572 ________ 440 970 810 _______ ________ ________ ________ 5060 4840 4748 _______ ________ ________ ________ 882 609 985 _______ ________ ________ ________ 980 910 870 ________ ________ _______ ________ ________ ________ ________ 12320 3956 12896 ________ 2389 400 1517 ________ _______ ________ ________ 960 850 980 ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ 5088 11920 13816 ________ 799 1568 1326 ________ ________ ________ ________ 970 980 970 _______ ________ ________ _______ ________ ________ _______ ________ ________ _______ 7260 13328 X 7693.429 3504 13816 ________ 1100 1617 X 1093.929 400 2389 ________ 960 990 X 902.8571 440 990 _______ SVI ______ #DIV/0l 125.57 190.64 208.55 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DlV/0! #DIV/0! 193.68 188.02 183.24 #DIV/0! #DIV/01 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 77.922 214.86 75.993 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 190.64 82.215 70.208 #DIV/oi #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/01 132.23 74.28 X #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! ________ Wasted Gallons 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1500 48.3871 0 1500 _________ CRT Days #DIV/0! 15.31915 90 43.90244 #DIV/0! #DIV/ol #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 96 48 97.2973 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/ol 91.13924 91.13924 100 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 86.74699 19.14894 109.0909 #DIV/0! #DIV/ol #DIV/ol #DIV/0! 30.37975 31.16883 X #DIV/O! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 45 of 92 ________________ ________________ Aluminum Sulfate, 50% Day Pounds 1 48 2 44 3 36 4 42 5 50 6 46 7 40 8 46 9 46 10 46 11 44 12 46 13 46 14 44 15 44 16 34 17 44 18 14 19 32 20 26 21 24 22 56 23 28 24 28 25 30 26 30 27 32 28 0 29 28 30 26 31 24 Total Lbs. Soln. 1124 Total Lbs. Chemical 562 Average 36.25806452 Max. 56 Mm. o Saganing WWTP March 2022 Citric Acid, 50% (cleaning) Pounds _________________ _________________ __________________ _________________ __________________ __________________ _________________ __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ __________________ __________________ _________________ _________________ __________________ _________________ __________________ _________________ _________________ __________________ __________________ ___________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ _________________ 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 0 Sodium Bicarb Pounds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 50 49.5 1.612903226 50 0 ___________________________ Sodium Hypochlorite, 12.5% (cleaning) Pounds _________________________ _________________________ __________________________ _________________________ __________________________ __________________________ _________________________ __________________________ __________________________ ____________ _________________________ __________________________ __________________________ _________________________ _________________________ __________________________ _________________________ __________________________ _________________________ _________________________ __________________________ __________________________ ___________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ _________________________ 0 0 #DlV/0! 0 0 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 46 of 92 - _______________________ - Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Type p/c rain rain p/c p/c sunny sunny p/c sunny p/c p/c sunny p/c Weather Temp. F 34 46 48 34. 37 39 45 39 40 43 45 40 44 38 52 42 53 38 37 29 50 41 50 62 51 45 32 30 39 43 Precip. inches 0.06 0 0.01 0 0.2 0.01 0.89 0.05 0.15 0 0.03 0 0.05 0.52 0 0 0 0 0.19 0 0.18 0 0.12 0 0.04 0 0.03 0 0 0 Saga fling WWTP April 2022 Plant Influent Sheet _______ Flow Raw Sewage Total Temp. pH DO TSS BOD MGD C S.U. mg/L mg/L mg/L 0.066 16.9 7.9 8.3 199 162 0.065 0.068 0.065 0.064 0.064 0.063 0.07 15.4 15.8 15.6 ___________ ________ ___________ ______ __________ 8 9.2 61 8.1 9.1 65 8.1 9.1 66 ___________ ___________ ______ ___________ 97 80 100 0.071 0.072 0.066 ________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ 0.077 0.076 0.052 0.047 19.8 16.6 16.5 7.5 ________ 6.7 7.8 6.6 7.7 6.5 __________ 61 47 66 ___________ 163 263 153 0.066 0.07 0.065 0.065 0.07 0.066 0.081 17.3 17.5 18.2 ________ 7 7.8 7.4 7.5 7.7 7.6 ___________ __________ __________ ___________ 82 61 47 ___________ __________ __________ ___________ 268 81 60 0.073 0.072 0.072 0.072 0.077 0.066 0.07 17.7 19.2 17.5 __________ ________ __________ ___________ 7.8 7.5 ___________ 51 7.8 8.4 44 7.9 7.4 42 __________ __________ ___________ ___________ 132 126 126 0.066 __________ ___________ __________ CBOD mg/L 137 ___________ ___________ ______ ___________ 181 138 79 ___________ ___________ ___________ __________ 184 154 143 ___________ __________ __________ ___________ 240 132 58 __________ __________ ___________ ___________ 122 94 96 __________ __________ TSS mg/L 7 Day Average 199 64 58 63.33333333 45.66666667 Total X Avg. X Mm. X Max. X X 2.53 2.037 X X X X X X 42.2 0.08433333 0.0679 17.2308 7.74615 7.823077 68.61538462 139.3076923 135.2307692 96.08333333 29 0 0.047 15.4 7 6.5 42 60 58 62 0.89 0.081 19.8 8.1 9.2 199 268 240 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 47 of 92 - - - Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 _____________ Weather Type Temp. F ______ p/c 34 0 46 0 48 0 34 0 37 rain 39 rain 45 p/c 39 0 40 0 43 0 45 0 40 p/c 44 sunny 38 sunny 52 0 42 0 53 0 38 0 37 p/c 29 sunny 50 p/c 41 0 50 0 62 0 51 0 45 p/c 32 sunny 30 p/c 39 0 43 Saganing WWTP April 2022 Plant Effluent Sheet _____ Flow Total ________ Temp. - _______ pH DO Treated Sewage TSS CBOD Ammonia MGD C S.U. mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L 0.08 17 7.8 8.5 0.02 -0.18 0.05 0.078 _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ 0.08 _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ 0.079 _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ 0.078 0.076 17.3 8 9.1 0.1 0.6 0.04 0.077 17.3 8.1 9.1 0.01 0.65 0.09 0.081 17.2 8.1 9.1 0.07 0.96 0.06 0.082 0.083 0.079 0.087 0.086 _______ _______ _______ _______ 21.4 - _______ - _______ - _______ - _______ 7.9 7.4 ______ _______ ______ _______ ______ _______ ______ 0.05 _______ 0.14 _________ _________ _________ _________ 0.03 0.068 17 8 9 0.04 0.62 0.05 0.068 16.5 7.7 6.5 0.05 0.35 0.19 0.078 _______ 0.082 _______ 0.079 _______ 0.077 _______ 0.083 15.1 - _______ - _______ - _______ - _______ 7 8.2 ______ _______ ______ _______ _______ _______ ______ 0.05 _______ 2.17 _________ _________ __________ _________ 0.15 0.077 16.7 8.1 8 0.14 0.56 0.25 0.089 20.3 7.8 8.4 0.03 1.26 0.17 0.084 0.075 0.077 0.081 0.085 _______ _______ _______ _______ 20.5 - _______ - _______ - _______ - _______ 7.9 8.5 ______ ______ ______ _______ _______ _______ _________ _________ _________ ______ _______ _________ 0.02 0.85 0.1 0.078 20.1 7.9 8.2 0.02 0.46 0.09 0.082 20.4 7.9 8.4 0.09 0.65 0.19 0.078 _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ _______ Phos mg/L 0.07 _______ _______ _______ 0.08 0.07 0.07 _______ _______ _______ _______ 0.08 0.08 0.07 _______ _______ _______ _______ 0.08 0.08 0.07 _______ _______ _______ _______ 0.09 0.08 0.08 _______ ________ E.coli ct/lo0ml 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total X Avg. X Mm. X Max. X X 2.387 X X X X X X X 0 42.2 0.07957 18.21538 7.862 8.33846 0.05308 0.699231 0.11230769 0.076923 0 29 0.068 15.1 7 6.5 0.01 -0.18 0.03 0.07 0 62 0.089 21.4 8.1 9.1 0.14 2.17 0.25 0.09 0 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 48 of 92 ________ Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Average Mm. Max. Saganing WWTP April 2022 CBOD %Removal TSS %Removal 100.3190217 99.97563872 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 99.21579418 99.61141221 98.85522155 99.96240023 97.22670014 99.75484632 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 99.82795133 99.81466716 98.9525674 99.77766152 99.29427114 99.7810266 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! *tDIV/0! #DIV/0! 97.87857676 99.85550517 99.01497638 99.46591095 95.33734985 99.85983038 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 98.47352436 99.91345738 98.84997788 99.89261967 98.42617336 99.49921625 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 49 of 92 ________________ Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ________________ Aluminum Sulfate, 50% Pounds 26 30 26 26 28 32 28 30 30 30 28 30 32 36 36 34 28 30 36 34 40 40 42 50 50 42 44 46 46 50 Saganing WWTP April 2022 Citric Acid, 50% (cleaning) Pounds ___________________ __________________ __________________ _________________ ___________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ ___________________ __________________ __________________ _________________ ___________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ _________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ Sodium Bicarb Pounds 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ___________________________ Sodium Hypochlorite, 12.5% (cleaning) Pounds ____________________________ __________________________ __________________________ _________________________ ___________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ ___________________________ __________________________ ___________________________ __________________________ __________________________ _________________________ ___________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ _________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ Total Lbs. Soln. Total Lbs. Chemical Average Max. Mm. 1060 530 35.33333333 50 26 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 0 150 148.5 5 50 0 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 0 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 50 of 92 - ______________________ - ________ - Day Type 1 2 3 4 clear 5 clear 6 cloudy 7 8 9 10 11 rain 12 sunny 13 sunny 14 15 16 17 18 p/c 19 sunny 20 sunny 21 22 23 24 25 p/c 26 p/c 27 p/c 28 29 30 31 Total X Avg. X Mm. X Max. X Weather Temp. F 50 Precip. inches 0.42 Saganing WWTP May 2022 Plant Influent Sheet _______ Flow Row Sewage Total Temp. pH DO TSS BOD MGD C S.U. mg/L mg/L mg/L 0.07 ___________ CBOD mg/L ___________ TSS mg/L 7 Day Average 54 48 0.04 0.066 __________ ___________ ___________ 52 0 0.063 ___________ ___________ ___________ 48 0.45 0.071 21.6 7 8.7 67 230 187 42 0 0.07 15.6 7.4 7 49 237 215 46 0 0.065 16.7 8.3 6.3 46 152 168 48 0 0.061 49 0 0.052 __________ ___________ ___________ ___________ 50.66666667 54 0 0.054 ___________ ___________ ___________ 61 0 0.061 ___________ ___________ ___________ 63 0 0.065 17.2 6.1 8.1 39 217 224 63 0.03 0.061 17.9 7.4 7 50 165 191 67 0 0.07 19.4 8.6 8.3 63 185 242 78 0 0.057 78 0.04 0.066 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ 145 61 0.02 0.066 ___________ ___________ ___________ 52 0 0.064 __________ __________ __________ 55 0 0.064 17.2 7.4 8.3 91 151 232 58 0.02 0.061 18 7.6 8.1 168 163 135 70 0 0.061 18.1 7.7 8.2 176 -49 79 64 0.75 0.06 52 0.1 0.065 __________ __________ __________ ___________ 60.66666667 ___________ 46 0 0.069 __________ __________ __________ 51 0 0.065 __________ __________ __________ 54 0 0.069 16.8 6.9 7.4 51 284 303 70 0.2 0.076 17.5 7.3 4.5 38 187 236 62 0.19 0.079 17.5 7.5 8.1 93 188 192 56 0.06 0.055 ___________ ___________ ___________ 66 0 0.064 __________ __________ __________ 72 0 0.066 ___________ ___________ ___________ 77 0 0.066 X 2.32 2.012 X X X ___________ X ___________ X - ___________ X 58.48387 0.07483871 0.0649032 17.7917 7.43333 7.5 77.58333333 175.8333333 200.3333333 77.58333333 42 0 0.052 15.6 6.1 4.5 38 -49 79 78 0.75 0.079 21.6 8.6 8.7 176 284 303 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 51 of 92 - Day _____________ Weather Type Temp. F _______ 1 0 50 2 0 48 3 0 52 Saga fling WWTP May 2022 Plant Effluent Sheet _____ Flow Total _______ Temp. - _______ pH DO Treated Sewage TSS CBOD Ammonia MGD C S.U. mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L 0.082 _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ 0.08 _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ 0.076 _______ Phos mg/L _______ _______ ________ E. coil ct/looml 0 0 0 4 clear 48 0.083 16 7 7.5 0.15 0.37 0.1 0.09 0 S clear 42 0.082 19.6 8.7 7.7 0.1 -1.87 0.07 0.09 0 6 cloudy 46 0.078 19.7 7.8 7.7 0.02 0.07 0.04 0.09 0 7 0 48 0.076 _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ _______ 0 8 0 49 0.069 0 9 0 54 0.072 _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ _______ 0 10 0 61 0.076 _______ _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ 0 11 rain 63 0.076 19.3 8.7 8.3 0.39 -0.1 0.04 0.07 0 12 sunny 63 0.073 19.2 8.2 8.6 0.09 -0.22 0.05 0.07 0 13 sunny 67 0.082 19.4 8.6 8.3 0.11 0.73 0.04 0.07 0 14 0 78 0.079 0 15 0 78 0.079 _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ _______ 0 16 0 61 0.08 _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ _______ 0 17 0 52 0.077 _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ _______ 0 18 p/c 55 0.078 18.1 8.6 8.5 0.07 -0.94 0.04 0.04 0 19 sunny 58 0.073 18.3 8.6 8.4 0.13 -1.51 0.04 0.05 0 20 sunny 70 0.076 18.4 8.5 8.3 0.12 -1.31 0.04 0.08 0 21 0 64 0.074 _______ - ______ ______ _______ _________ _______ 0 22 0 52 0.078 _______ - _______ _______ _______ __________ _______ 0 23 0 46 0.083 0 24 0 51 0.078 _______ - ______ ______ _______ _________ _______ 0 25 p/c 54 0.081 19.1 8.5 7.5 0.09 -1.49 0.18 0.07 0 26 p/c 70 0.087 17.9 7.9 7.9 0.09 -0.66 0.19 0.07 0 27 p/c 62 0.089 17.4 7.8 8.5 0.03 -1.53 0.14 0.07 0 28 0 56 0.066 0 29 0 66 0.078 _______ - ______ ______ _______ _________ _______ 0 30 0 72 0.081 _______ _______ - ______ ______ _______ _________ 0 31 0 77 0.081 _______ - ______ ______ _______ _________ _______ 0 Total X X 2.423 X X X X X X X 0 Avg. X 58.48387 0.07816 18.53333 8.242 8.1 0.11583 -0.705 0.08083333 0.071667 0 Mm. X 42 0.066 16 7 7.5 0.02 -1.87 0.04 0.04 0 Max. X 78 0.089 19.7 8.7 8.6 0.39 0.73 0.19 0.09 0 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 52 of 92 _____ _____ Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Total Avg. Mi Max. ___________ Areation Vol. MGD 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 X X X X ________ F:M Ratio #DIV/01 #DIV/0! #DIV/ol 0.121873 0.136462 0.078078 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.290873 0.143819 0.553419 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.04774 0.923727 -0.05973 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.256277 0.376696 0.604034 #DIV/0! #DlV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! X #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Saganing WWTP May 2022 MISS mg/I MLVSS mg/I Settle 30 mm. _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ 17000 16968 15226 _______ 3722 3377 3515 ________ 950 970 980 ________ ________ ________ ________ 6408 15296 6332 ________ ________ ________ ________ 1347 1944 650 ________ ________ ________ ________ 950 970 970 ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ 16236 4332 12644 ________ 5623 299 1390 ________ ________ ________ ________ 980 950 970 _______ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ 15576 14032 7040 ________ 2124 1048 683 ________ ________ ________ ________ 990 980 950 ________ _______ _______ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ X 12257.5 4332 17000 ________ X 2143.5 299 5623 ________ X 967.5 950 990 _______ SVI ______ #DIV/0! #DlV/0! #DIV/0! 55.882 57.166 64.364 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 148.25 63.415 153.19 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 60.36 219.3 76.716 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 63.559 69.84 134.94 #DIV/ol #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! X #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! ________ Wasted Gallons 0 0 0 1500 1500 0 0 0 0 1500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1500 0 0 0 0 0 1500 0 0 1500 0 0 0 0 9000 290.3226 0 1500 ________ CRT Days #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 4.660194 6.428571 46.15385 #DIV/0! #DIV/0 #DIV/0! 24 2.42915 10.9589 7.982262 #DlV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DlV/0! 8.510638 7.586934 7.894737 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 24 9.876543 9.195402 12.69841 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! X #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 53 of 92 ________________ ________________ Aluminum Sulfate, 50% Day Pounds 1 46 2 46 3 48 4 46 5 46 6 48 7 46 8 46 9 46 10 46 11 50 12 44 13 48 14 48 15 48 16 42 17 48 18 30 19 36 20 42 21 40 22 38 23 36 24 40 25 42 26 46 27 48 28 42 29 46 30 48 31 52 Total Lbs. Soln. 1378 Total Lbs. Chemical 689 Average 44.4516129 Max. 52 Mm. 30 Saganing WWTP May 2022 Citric Acid, 50% (cleaning) Pounds __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ _________________ _________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ _________________ __________________ _________________ __________________ __________________ ___________________ __________________ _________________ _________________ __________________ 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 0 Sodium Bicarb Pounds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ___________________________ Sodium Hypochlorite, 12.5% (cleaning) Pounds __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ _________________________ _________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ _________________________ __________________________ _________________________ __________________________ __________________________ ___________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ ___________________________ 0 0 #DIV/0 0 0 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 54 of 92 - ______________________ - ________ Type Day 1 p/c 2 p/c 3 p/c 4 5 6 7 8 sunny 9 sunny 10 sunny 11 12 13 14 15 p/c 16 sunny 17 sunny 18 19 20 21 22 sunny 23 clear 24 sunny 25 26 27 28 29 sunny 30 sunny )u Weather Temp. F 73 58 55 55 65 63 60 58 61 58 67 69 56 62 73 75 69 58 57 65 69 78 65 69 91 84 63 59 67 70 Precip. inches 0.25 0 0 0 0 0.05 0.07 0 0.16 0 0.03 0.18 0 0.07 0 0.05 0 0 0 0.46 0.08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.63 0 Saganing WWTP2O22 Plant Influent Sheet _______ Flow Raw Sewage Total Temp. pH DO TSS BOD MGD C S.U. mg/L mg/L mg/L 0.067 20.2 6.5 6.2 90 234 0.062 18.4 6.5 6.3 38 162 0.063 18.4 6.6 6.3 41 188 0.06 0.074 0.068 0.066 0.066 18.2 7.9 7.8 45 206 0.062 18.3 7.8 7.4 45 227 0.064 18.4 7.7 7.3 48 238 0.064 0.064 0.064 0.066 0.064 18.6 7.8 7.4 72 -60 0.067 21.3 7.4 1.8 42 182 0.066 20.7 7.3 4.2 416 202 0.057 0.099 0.115 0.157 0.061 19.8 7.4 6.4 44 175 0.064 19.4 6.5 6.7 52 205 0.066 19.6 7.8 6.6 51 403 0.065 0.066 0.08 0.072 0.068 19.4 7.2 6.8 128 230 0.063 18.2 8.6 4.1 154 -85 () ___________ CBOD mg/L 266 188 96 __________ TSS mg/L 7 Day Average 56.33333333 180 46 211 248 -100 176.6666667 204 207 ___________ ___________ 159 189 328 49 __________ 204 -97 141 Total X X 2.03 2.145 X X X X X X Avg. X 65.73333 0.06766667 0.0715 19.2071 7.35714 6.092857 90.42857143 179.0714286 163.0714286 93.8 Mm. X 55 0 0.057 18.2 6.5 1.8 38 -85 -100 Max. X 91 0.63 0.157 21.3 8.6 7.8 416 403 328 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 55 of 92 - _____________ Weather Type Temp. Day F _______ 1 p/c 73 2 p/c 58 3 p/c 55 4 0 55 5 0 65 6 0 63 7 0 60 8 sunny 58 9 sunny 61 3.0 sunny 58 11 0 67 12 0 69 13 0 56 14 0 62 15 p/c 73 16 sunny 75 17 sunny 69 18 0 58 19 0 57 20 0 65 21 0 69 22 sunny 78 23 clear 65 24 sunny 69 25 0 91 26 0 84 27 0 63 28 0 59 29 sunny 67 30 sunny 70 Saganing WWTP June 2022 Plant Effluent Sheet _____ Flow Total _______ Temp. - _______ pH DO Treated Sewage TSS CBOD Ammonia MGD C S.U. mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L 0.083 19.4 7 7.8 0.02 -1.28 0.17 0.078 19 7.8 7.7 0.03 -0.14 0.19 0.079 19.1 7.8 7.6 0.08 -1.09 0.17 0.078 _________ 0.089 _______ __________ 0.081 __________ 0.082 0.079 _______ 18.1 - _______ 7.8 8.6 ______ 0.07 _______ 1.23 _________ 0.03 0.078 19.5 9 8 0.36 -2.05 0.11 0.078 19.4 8.9 7.6 0.15 -2.01 0.18 0.079 __________ 0.079 _________ 0.079 __________ 0.08 0.081 18.5 8.6 7.6 0.05 -1.35 0.19 0.081 19.8 8.1 7.6 0.07 -1.38 0.05 0.079 19.2 8.4 7.4 0.13 -1.1 0.19 0.07 0.024 _________ 0.03 __________ 0.031 0.054 20.1 8.6 8.8 0.12 __________ -1.47 0.19 0.08 19.7 6.8 8.1 0.08 0.78 0.03 0.082 20 8.2 8.6 0.02 -2.36 0.19 0.08 0.091 _________ 0.089 0.081 0.083 18.4 8.1 7.4 0.06 -1.73 0.18 0.079 17.3 8.3 6.2 0.13 -2.45 0.02 _______ Phos mg/L 0.07 0.07 0.07 _______ _______ _______ _______ 0.04 0.02 0.06 _______ _______ _______ _______ 0.07 0.02 0.08 _______ _______ _______ _______ 0.08 0.04 0.08 _______ _______ _______ _______ 0.07 0.07 ________ E. coil ct/looml 0 0 0 ________ ________ ________ ________ 0 0 0 ________ ________ ________ ________ 0 0 0 ________ ________ ________ ________ 0 0 0 ________ ________ ________ ________ 0 0 Total X X 2.237 X X X X X X X 0 Avg. X 65.73333 0.07457 19.10714 8.1 7.78571 0.09786 -1.17143 0.135 0.06 0 Mm. X 55 0.024 17.3 6.8 6.2 0.02 -2.45 0.02 0.02 0 Max. X 91 0.091 20.1 9 8.8 0.36 1.23 0.19 0.08 0 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 56 of 92 ________ Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Average Mi Max. Saganing WWTP June 2022 CBOD %Removal TSS %Removal 101.1993841 99.94495711 100.187547 99.80155533 102.8886813 99.51184095 #DIV/O! #DIV/O! #DIV/O! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 98.37741303 99.62830151 102.4748299 98.00715381 101.9952632 99.24117132 #DIV/0! #DIV/0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 96.64021753 99.82437311 101.6491323 99.59782528 101.2802852 99.92521737 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 101.650377 99.51830157 98.97354915 99.61612284 101.8040055 99.90260242 #DIV/0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0 #DIV/0 #DIV/0! 102.0918664 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 99.88563529 93.85999001 99.78851494 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 57 of 92 ________________ Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ________________ Aluminum Sulfate, 50% Pounds 46 44 50 46 50 46 48 48 46 50 48 50 46 46 50 46 50 26 32 34 32 28 30 32 34 30 22 40 34 32 Saganing WWTP June 2022 Citric Acid, 50% (cleaning) Sodium Bicarb Pounds Pounds __________________ __________________ __________________ _________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ ___________________ ___________________ __________________ ___________________ __________________ ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ __________________ ___________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ __________________ ___________________ _________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ____________ ____________ ___________ ____________ ___________ ____________ ____________ ____________ ___________ ____________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ____________ ____________ ____________ ___________ ____________ ___________ 50 ___________________________ Sodium Hypochlorite, 12.5% (cleaning) Pounds __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ _________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ __________________________ ___________________________ __________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ____________________________ __________________________ ___________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ __________________________ ___________________________ _________________________ Total Lbs. Soln. 1216 0 50 Total Lbs. Chemical 608 0 49.5 Average 40.53333333 #DlV/0! 50 Max. 50 0 50 Mm. 22 0 50 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 0 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 58 of 92 (L) - ______________________ - - Day 1 ________ Type _______ p/c 2 3 4 5 6 p/c 7 p/c 8 p/c 9 10 11 12 13 p/c 14 sunny 15 sunny 16 17 18 19 20 p/c 21 p/c 22 sunny 23 24 25 26 27 sunny 28 sunny 29 sunny 30 31 Total X Avg. X Miii. X Max. X Weather Temp. F 73 61 64 70 72 69 62 66 80 72 69 66 64 62 71 70 68 68 76 77 74 70 76 70 61 63 69 68 65 61 79 X 68.90323 61 80 Precip. inches 0.04 0 0 0 0.13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.29 0.15 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.03 0 0 0.8 0.05 0 0 0.12 0 0 0 1.91 0.0616129 0 0.8 Saganing WWTP July 2022 Plant Influent Sheet _______ Flow Raw Sewage Total Temp. pH DO TSS BOD MGD C S.U. mg/L mg/L mg/L 0.062 20.7 7.1 4.8 71 205 0.064 0.063 __________ 0.065 0.06 0.067 20 7 3.4 71 597 0.061 19.7 7.2 5.3 107 222 0.069 19.6 7.2 5.4 107 175 0.061 0.065 0.061 0.064 0.088 20.4 7.6 6.7 38 110 0.051 20.3 7.6 6.5 48 439 0.059 20.8 7.8 5.3 129 161 0.051 0.067 0.055 0.053 0.051 105 239 0.042 135 184 0.039 19.8 7.8 4 129 -52 0.048 0.067 __________ 0.053 0.074 0.055 19.7 8 3.8 23 326 0.045 19.9 8 3.6 39 158 0.054 19.9 7.6 6.7 39 0.33 0.048 0.05 1.812 X X X X X 0.0584516 20.0727 7.53636 5.045455 80.07692308 212.6407692 0.039 19.6 7 3.4 23 -52 0.088 20.8 8 6.7 135 597 __________ CBOD mg/L 214 ___________ __________ 568 260 223 __________ ___________ 120 328 158 __________ ___________ 207 174 -51 __________ ___________ 345 172 10 ___________ X 209.8461538 -51 568 __________ TSS mg/L 7 Day Average 71 95 71.66666667 123 33.66666667 90.16666667 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 59 of 92 Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Total Avg. Mm. Max. ____________ Weather Type Temp. F p/c 73 0 61 0 64 0 70 0 72 p/c 69 p/c 62 p/c 66 0 80 0 72 0 69 0 66 p/c 64 sunny 62 sunny 71 0 70 0 68 0 68 0 76 p/c 77 p/c 74 sunny 70 0 76 0 70 0 61 0 63 sunny 69 sunny 68 sunny 65 0 61 0 79 X X X 68.90323 X 61 X 80 Saga ning WWTP July 2022 _____ Plant_Effluent_Sheet Flow ________ - _______ Treated Sewage__________ _______ Total Temp. pH DO TSS CBOD Ammonia Phos ________ E. coli MGD C S.U. mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L ct/looml 0.078 20.3 8.1 8.4 0.09 2.1 0.04 0.02 0 0.079 _________ _______ _______ - _______ _______ _______ 0 0.079 _______ _________ _______ - _______ _______ _______ 0 0.079 _______ _________ _______ - _______ ______ _______ 0 0.078 - _______ _______ _______ _______ _________ _______ 0 0.081 19.8 8.8 7.9 0.1 -5.73 0.17 0.07 0 0.078 19.9 8.6 8.1 0.01 -1.23 0.02 0.06 0 0.084 19.9 8.4 8.1 0.14 -1.63 0.01 0.07 0 0.075 _______ _________ _______ - _______ ______ _______ 0 0.08 _______ __________ _______ - _______ _______ _______ 0 0.076 _______ _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ 0 0.08 _______ _________ _______ - _______ ______ _______ 0 0.095 20.7 7.8 6.8 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.07 0 0.096 20.7 7.8 6.7 0.01 -0.32 0.19 0.07 0 0.058 19.2 8.8 9.2 0.01 -0.08 0.03 0.08 0 0.042 _______ _______ - _______ ______ _______ _________ 0 0.074 _________ _______ _______ - _______ ______ _______ 0 0.054 _______ _________ _______ - _______ ______ _______ 0 0.054 _______ _________ _______ - _______ ______ _______ 0 0.055 23.2 8.1 9.1 0.03 -2.29 0.02 0.06 0 0.044 19.6 8.4 9.3 0.05 -2.07 0.01 0.06 0 0.042 20.1 6.1 7 0.03 -1.11 0.02 0.07 0 0.048 _______ __________ _______ - _______ ______ _______ 0.069 _______ _______ - ______ ______ _______ _________ 0.064 _______ _________ _______ - ______ ______ _______ 0.076 0 0 0 0 0.057 18.4 7.8 9.5 0.02 -3.81 0.02 0.07 0 0.047 18.5 7.7 9.3 0.02 -1.8 0.03 0.07 0 0.056 19.9 7.8' 6.7 0.1 0.04 0.01 0.22 0 0.049 0 0.05 _______ _______ - _______ ______ _______ __________ 0 2.077 X X X X X X X 0 0.067 20.01538 8.015 8.16154 0.05846 -1.36769 0.05692308 0.076154 0 0.042 18.4 6.1 6.7 0.01 -5.73 0.01 0.02 0 0.096 23.2 8.8 9.5 0.15 2.1 0.19 0.22 0 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 60 of 92 ________ Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Average Mm. Max. Saganing WWTP July 2022 CBOD %Removal TSS %Removal 97.56101193 99.68156189 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0 #DIV/O! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 102.4693105 99.66002812 101.2171991 99.97610214 101.7956627 99.68193694 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 99.73047734 99.15134371 100.3679641 99.92159937 100.099599 99.98476006 #DIV/01 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 102.4149055 99.93839433 102.5240684 99.92242869 95.41957733 99.9499231 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 102.315513 99.81992513 102.2102046 99.89293484 99.17379758 99.46959651 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 61 of 92 ________________ Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Total Lbs. Soln. Total Lbs. Chemical Average Max. Mm. ________________ Aluminum Sulfate, 50% Pounds 34 30 30 40 30 36 34 34 38 38 38 28 36 36 36 32 32 36 36 38 38 36 40 36 50 48 46 46 46 42 54 1174 587 37.87096774 54 28 Saganing WWTP July 2022 Citric Acid, 50% (cleaning) Pounds _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ __________________ __________________ _________________ __________________ __________________ ________________ ___________________ __________________ ___________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ _________________ __________________ _________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ _________________ __________________ 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 0 Sodium Bicarb Pounds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ___________________________ Sodium Hypochlorite, 12.5% (cleaning) Pounds __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ _________________________ _________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ _________________________ __________________________ __________________________ ________________________ ___________________________ __________________________ ___________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ _________________________ __________________________ _________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ _________________________ __________________________ 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 0 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 62 of 92 (T Saga nng Water ;3nd Wastewater mprovements Prepared by Fish beck fortheSaginawChippewalndianTribe(scll) Of M1G' TfShbCft Engineers I Architects I Scientist Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 63 of 92 Introduction Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe (SCIT) retained Fishbeck to complete a water and wastewater treatment system evaluation of their facility in Saganing, Michigan. SCIT recently opened a 148-room hotel and signed an agreement with Standish Township to provide water and wastewater services to the nearby Whites Beach Service Area (WBSA). In July of 2020, a report was prepared entitled "Saga ning Casino Water and Wastewater Treatment System Evaluation" Fishbeck evaluated the existing water demands and I wastewater flows, estimated the impact of the future demand and flow associated with the Whites Beach Service Area, and then determined if the SCIT facilities could reliably handle the projected future water demand and wastewater flow ', J _____ Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 64 of 92 Background In 2018 the SCIT signed an agreement with Standish Township to provide potable water and wastewater treatment services to a defined area in the Township identified as the Whites Beach Service Area (WBSA). A 2016 Master Plan prepared by Rowe Engineering is the planning document that projected demands from the Casino and from the 240 acres adjacent to the casino that may be developed. Fishbeck has prepared drawings and specifications for Phase 1 improvements at the Water Wastewater Plant in Sagan ing. The project is out for bids currently. Fishbeck is also finishing a Scoping Study for a Phase 2 Expansion at the Saganing plant that will establish future treatment and facilities for the demands on the system over a 20-year planning period. Short Term Phase 1 Improvements are intended to cover a 4-year timeline. Fishbeck has prepared a Water System Evaluation Study which looked at the water system, future water system demands, and the location of a possible elevated storage tank. Fish beck will proceed with the design of the elevated storage tank upon authorization from the SCIT. Upon completion of the Scoping Phase Fishbeck will proceed with the design of the selected improvements and facilities for the Phase 2 improvements. Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 65 of 92 Water System Current Water Treatment Plant Description Constructed in 2011. The water treatment plant (WTP) receives raw water from the Saginaw-Midland Municipal Water Supply Corporation (SMMWSC). Two Siemens MEMCOR XP18 membrane skids treat the water by using ultrafiltration to remove particulate contaminants. B Ti - Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 66 of 92 Water System Current Water Treatment Plant Description, Continued Each skid has a nominal capacity of 75,000 gallons per day (gpd). Filtered water is disinfected and stored in clear wells in the building until it is pumped out to the distribution system that services the casino, hotel, and tribal facilities. Medium and high flow pumps deliver treated water to the distribution system. S Pumps are running continuously to maintain pressure on the system, and a pressure sustaining valve vents water back into the clear wells if not needed in the system. Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 67 of 92 Water System Current Demands % ccc c ccc 7C CCC 6C CX sc ccc 4C CCC ccc LI 2C CCC 1C CCC Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 68 of 92 Future Development Rowe Study Other Land Use Planning studies Water Demand Projections Water System Evaluation Study projections Saginaw-Midland Municipal Water Supply Corporation (SMMWSC) and SCIT Agreement Period Maximum Allowable Daily Use (gpd) 2011 to 2015, inclusive 2016 to 2020, inclusive 2021 to 2025, inclusive 2026 to 2030, inclusive 2031 to 2034 and thereafter 40,000 130,000 250,000 500,000 1,000,000 gpd - gallons per day Cumulative Water Demands Through Full Build-Out 2022-2026 2027-2031 2032-2036 Area Classification ADD (gal/day) ADD (gal/day) ADD (gal/day) Existing System* 63,000 WBSA ______________________ 18,800 1 Low Density Commercial - 2 Low Density Commercial - 3 Residential - 4 Forest & Recreation 5 High Density Commercial 6 High Density Commercial 7 Low Density Commercial 8 Residential 9 Forest & Recreation 10 High Density Commercial - 12,091 2,970 6,037 7,996 3,491 9,818 11 High Density Commercial 12 Forest & Recreation 10,728 6,109 14 High Density Commercial 4,455 15 Forest & Recreation 330 18 Forest & Recreation Total System ADD (mgd) Total System MDD (mgd) Total System PKHR (mgd) 1,610 0.15 0.25 0.58 Existing system is atfull buildout according to Rowe's study 63,000 18,800 6,263 4,731 228 1,348 30,228 7,424 15,094 19,990 8,728 19,637 26,819 15,273 8,909 824 4,024 0.25 0.46 0.89 63,000 18,800 18,788 14,193 684 4,044 54,410 13,364 27,169 35,981 15,710 32,728 48,274 27,492 14,849 1,484 7,244 0.40 0.75 1.33 2037-2041 ADD (gal/day) 63,000 18,800 34,445 26,020 1,254 7,414 84,638 20,788 42,262 55,971 24,437 49,092 75,093 42,765 22,273 2,308 11,268 0.58 1.12 1.88 Full Build-Out ADD (gal/day) 63,000 18,800 62,627 47,309 2,280 13,479 120,912 29,698 60,375 79,958 34,910 65,456 107,275 61,093 29,698 3,297 16,097 0.82 1.59 2.58 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 69 of 92 Future Development, Continued Utility Corridor Map ( I / ________ - 4 ____________ _____ U ------ - - ? 1I / - I _ _ ( I Area No 8 52Aes - ao I.-' - , .-'- 7/ AeaN //// / /I / I fl - I - - - --, -I -'_ I_--. -- ____________ - II ________ ULEGEND '- '.-- -. i - - Roeecntial Freost&Reuea000 LOv.-Oeos8y Conrd HIgh-Deflate COflfl,c,d %uTIUTYcoRRlDoRMAP - Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 70 of 92 Future Development, Continued Utility Corridor Development Timeline rea No. _____________________ Zone 1 Low Density Commercial 2 Low Density Commercial 3 Residential 4 Forest & Recreation 5 High Density Commercial 6 High Density Commercial 7 Low Density Commercial 2022-2026 __________ 0% 0% 0% 0% 10% 10% 10% S Residential 10% S Forest & Recreation 10% 10 High Density Commercial 15% 11 High Density Commercial 10% 12 Forest & Recreation 10% 13 High Density Commercial 15% 14 Forest & Recreation 10% 15 Forest & Recreation 10% 16 Existing SCIT Water User 17 Existing SCIT Water User 100% 100% 18 Existing SCIT Water User 100% 2027-2031 __________ 10% 10% 10% 10% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 30% 25% 25% 30% 25% 25% 100% 100% 100% 2032-2036 __________ 30% 30% 30% 30% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% 50% 45% 45% 50% 45% 45% 100% 100% 100% 2037-2041 __________ 55% 55% 55% 55% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 75% 70% 70% 75% 70% 70% 100% 100% 100% Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 71 of 92 Phase 1 Water System The following improvements are included in the Phase 1 design documents: Demolition of the low flow pumps and controls. One redundant medium flow pump. One redundant pressure sustaining valve (PSV). Two Ultrafiltration (UF) equipment skids (procured equipment). Installation of the UF procured equipment. New finished water pump control and control panel. An additional inline booster pump and new control panel. Process piping Improvements. Associated control and electrical conduit and wiring. Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 72 of 92 Water System Build out Capacity Memcor XPsr18 Skid Production Volumes No of Skids Filtrate Produced (gal) One 8-hour Shift Filtrate Produced (gal) Two 8-hour Shifts 1 25,000 2 50,000 3 75,000 4 100,000 5 125,000 6 150,000 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 Filtrate Produced (gal) Three 8-hour Shifts 75,000 150,000 225,000 300,000 375,000 450,000 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 73 of 92 Water System Elevated Tank Recommendations: The Water System Evaluation Study has recommended the construction of a minimum 250,000-gallon tank. Various selections of site locations were identified with the most favorable as indicated in the next slides. Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 74 of 92 Water System Existing Water Distribution System Pressure Contours -, irI ______ -' :HVTFI- S -.---- - - - ---- Ir '1): T -,--=--- -- -. Ct.] / 3- - - I --., , - - - nzfJl /.- ' i'-;: ___ -'--A I tL__ ___ -'. - 1I LEGEND r pant I: - - - prnnre contoo ______ , EXISTING AVERAGE DAY 2O5n DEMANDPRESSURECONTOURS tORTH 6 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 75 of 92 - :,t 0)-i I--' c-1 -' 0)- -, 0) (1) CD B II/ 7 __J / 1' I - I - - - - -I - 6 _______ : ; Z I m --- , h!!' m _}. 0 - Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe ArnoConIy.M hI SagIng CaIn Wat.r Dl,tribtlon Syst.n d Elev.ted Wte, Strqe Tank EvItin - 1 r is Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 76 of 92 ec( Wastewater System Current Wastewater Flows 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 11 \ \2 \ \ \ \ 9 \ \ \ \v Date - - ...... - Covid .-. -. 0 c 9 \ \ \ 0) I) Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 77 of 92 Wastewater System Wastewater System Capacity The current treatment system consists of 2 Siemens Xpress Membrane Biological Reactor (MBR) treatment units. Table 5 - MBR Treatment Unit Capacity Allowable Number of Units Sustained in Service Continuous Flow (gpm) 1 70 2 140 Net Throughput for Sustained Flow with Relaxation Periods (gpd) 100,800 201,600 Allowable Peak Flow or Three Day Sustained Flow (gpm) Allowable Peak Flow with Relaxation Period (gpd) 140 201,600 280 403,200 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 78 of 92 Wastewater System Projected Wastewater Treatment plant flows: Typical wastewater generation is about 80% of the water flow. Assuming that relationship holds true for future water wastewater design flows the following projections of wastewater flow are made over the 20-year planning period. Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 79 of 92 Wastewater Treatment System Wastewater Flows Projections Area Classification 2022-2026 ADF (gal/day) 2027-2031 ADF (gal/day) 2032-2036 ADF (gal/day) 2037-2041 ADF (gal/day) Full Bud-Out ADF Existing System WBSA 1 Low Density Commercial 2 Low Density Commercial 3 Residential 4 Forest & Recreation 5 High Density Commercial 6 High Density Commercial 7 Low Density Commercial 8 Residential 9 Forest & Recreation 10 High Density Commercial 11 High Density Commercial 12 Forest & Recreation 14 High Density Commercial 15 Forest & Recreation 18 Forest & Recreation Eotal System ADF (mgd) rotal System MDF (mgd) fatal System PKI-IR (mgd) 49,500 15,000 0 0 0 0 9,673 2,376 4,830 6,397 2,793 7,854 8,582 4,887 3,564 264 1,288 0.12 0.16 0.46 49,500 15,000 5,010 3,785 182 1,078 24,182 5,939 12,075 15,992 6,982 15,710 21,455 12,218 7,127 659 3,219 0.20 0.28 0.78 49,500 15,000 15,030 11,354 547 3,235 43,528 10,691 21,735 28,785 12,568 26,182 38,619 21,994 11,879 1,187 5,795 0.32 0.44 1.24 49,500 15,000 27,556 20,816 1,003 5,931 67,710 16,630 33,810 44,777 19,550 39,274 60,074 34,212 17,818 1,846 9,014 0.46 0.64 1.81 49,500 15,000 50,102 37,847 1,824 10,783 96,730 23,758 48,300 63,966 27,928 52,365 85,820 48,874 23,758 2,638 12,878 0.65 0.90 2.54 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 80 of 92 Wastewater System The following WWTP improvements are included in the Phase 1 design documents: Demolition of the influent pumps and replacement of 3 existing pumps. Piping improvements to allow the bypass of the raw wastewater wetwell for repair, cleaning and maintenance. Process piping Improvements. Control panel updating and associated control and electrical conduit and wiring. -I __ Ii F I Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 81 of 92 Water Wastewater System Conclusions Current system reliability and redundancy concerns and the necessity to handle immediate demands requires that the Phase 1 project be constructed. Improvements for Phase 1 are interim measures, and a Phase 2 design report is currently being completed for recommended improvements over the 20-year planning period. Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 82 of 92 Water Wastewate r System Co nd usio ns, Continued Expected Phase 2 water improvements: Additional UF skids or other membrane system in a building expansion. Associated booster pump and air compressor capacity. SCADA system for better process control and remote monitoring. Upsizing high service Pumps. Additional clear well capacity. Expected Phase 2 wastewater Improvements: An equalization tank with aeration and mixing. Large solids removal prior to the Raw Wastewater Pumping Station. Possible oil and grease removal system. Additional Membrane Biological Reactor (MBR) or Moving Bed Biofilm Additional building expansion to contain the treatment units. Sludge handling and storage facilities Long term agreements for sludge hauling and disposal. SCADA system for better process control and remote monitoring. Upgrade Chemical Feed Systems. Reactor (MBBR). Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 83 of 92 Water Wastewater System Conclusions, Continued Elevated Storage Tank The completion of the Water System Evaluation allows for the Elevated Tank design to begin. A minimum 250,000-gallon tank has been recommended in the Water System Evaluation Study recently completed. Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 84 of 92 Water Wastewater Project Schedule 0 Task I W 1201562055 Phase I Oseign and 8idng 2$ lwphsgPhase(Phase2Deslgnlaslsnnndy) 29 W Phase 2Deslgnand6Idding 10 (lenatedlank Design and Biddlisg 89 r 90 Pnel-PrvcuredEqutShopliravdsgs and delivery 94 U PhaselCerutructlon 137 Phase 2- Procured lqulpmeirtshup Dr2wing and delivery 112 Phane2 cononrecnicn 2 1 127 U Elevaned Tank Conanruellon Dsoa1or I 132 days Stan Moss 10111/21 Saganing Design and Construction Preliminary Schedule Feuds Tue 6/21/22 Psodevessors 2102rC2n2l ovi,ocui askpdadsv02roneonutyo __ 72 days Tue 3/2/22 Wed 6/15/22 303 days Wed 6/13/22 Mon 8/14/23 383d2y5 Thvll/4/21 Mon4/Z4/23 1,202500 20220053522 Qoa, 2022 Tel. 532305-02123003.2C23 Scaphrg Phase (Phase 2 Design Eons Shady) Phase 2 Design and Bidding ________________________________ Eienated Tank Design and Bidding 3 t.2C2305rZ232$SOi 202$ 186 days Tue 3/2/22 The 10/11/22 235 days Wed 6/22/22 Tue 4/1.3/23 126 days Fri 3/3/23 Fri 8/25/23 305 days Tue 8/16/23 Mon 12/03/24 -. Phase 1- Provured EcpmrO9 lImp Dramlogn and delivery - Phase 1 Ceimtniclian ___________ Phase 2- Procured Equipment Shop Drandngand delivery ____________________________________ Phase 2 Connnrncticn 252 days Tue 4/21/23 Wed 4/10/24 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 85 of 92 .27Q2.m,7pN Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 '-I .) ii CdF Of rfnshbeckI Engineers Architects Scientists Constructors ___________ page 86 of 92 TNT 830 Nitrogen, Ammonia ,j3 D0C312.53.94125 0.015-2.000 mg/L NH3-N Ultra Low Range TNTplus Scope and application: For municipal and industrial wastewaters, environmental waters and watershed protection monitoring. Test preparation Reagent storage pHlTemperature Before starting Storage temperature: 2-8 C (35-46 F) The pH of the water sample must be between pH 4-8. The temperature of the water sample and reagents must be between 20-23 C (68-73.4 F). In case of not working at the correct recommended temperature an incorrect resultrnay be obtained. Analyze the samples as soon as possible for best results. Time dependency: The final absorbance is reached after a reaction time of 15 minutes and then remains constant fora further 15 minutes. Review safety information and expiration date on the package. Review the Safety Data Sheets (MSDS/SDS) for the chemicals that are used. Use the recommended personal protective equipment. Dispose of reacted solutions according to local, state and federal regulations. Refer to the Safety Data Sheets for disposal information for unused reagents. Refer to the environmental, health and safety staff for your facility and/or local regulatory agencies for further disposal information. Procedure 1. Carefully remove the foil from the screwed-on DosiCap Zip. 2. Unscrew the DosiCap Zip. 3. Carefully pipet 5.0 mL of sample. 4. Immediately screw the DosiCap Zip back on; fluting at the top. Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 87 of 92 5. Shake vigorously (2-3 times). 6. After 15 minutes, thoroughly clean the outside of the vial and evaluate. 7. Insert the vial into the cell holder. DR 1900: Go to LCK/TNTplus methods. Select the test, push READ. Interferences Interference level 1000 mg/L 500 mg/L 50 mg/L 25 mg/L 10 mg/L 5 mg/L 2 mg/L The ions listed in the table have been individually checked against the given concentrations and do not cause interference. The cumulative effects and the influence of other ions have not been determined. Primary amines are also determined and cause high-bias results. A 10,000-fold excess of urea does not interfere. All reducing agents interfere and cause low-bias results. A large excess of ammonium can cause result displays within the measuring range. It is advisable to carry out a plausibility check by making dilutions. The measurement results must be subjected to plausibility checks (dilute and/or spike the sample). Interfering substance CI, SO42- K, Nat Ca2 C032, NO3-, Fe3t Crt Crt Zn2t Cu2t Co2t Ni2t Hg2' Fe2 Sn2 Pb2 Ag Summary of method Ammonium ions react at pH 12.6 with hypochiorite ions and salicylate ions in the presence of sodium nitroprusside as a catalyst to form indophenol blue. TN rInUIuIIsI ________ FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, PRICE INFORMATION AND ORDERING: HACH COMPANY in the U.S.A. - Call toli.free 800.227.4224WORLD HEADQUARTERS Outside the U.S.A. - Contact the HACH office or distributor serving you. Telephone: (970) 669-3050 On the Worldwide Web - www.hach.com; E-mail - techhelp@hach.com FAX: (970) 669-2932 Hach Company, 2019. All rights reserved. 02/2019, Edition I Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 88 of 92 I, ('S TNT 843 Phosphorus, Reactive (Orthophosphate) and Total 0.05-1.50 mg/L P043 -P or 0.15-4.50 mglL P043 Low Range TNTpIus -Method 10209/10210 Scope and application: For wastewater, drinking water, boiler water, surface water and process analysis. L[I1 Test preparation Reagent storage pH/Temperature Before starting Storage temperature: 15-25 C (59-77 F) The pH of the water sample must be between pH 2-10. The temperature of the water sample and reagents must be between 15-25 C (59-77 F). ATTENTION-Important information for the evaluation! Without hydrolysis, onlythe (dissolved) orthophosphate is measured. The result of the orthophosphate measurement can be expressed as: mg/L P04-P (for example,process,analysis), mg/L P04 (for example, drinking water or boiler water analysis), mg/L P205 (for example, soil analysis). With hydrolysis, all of the phosphorus (Total-P, Ptotal) is measured. The result of the total phosphorus measurement can be expressed as: mg/L Ptot = Display mg/L P04-P (for example,for monitoring threshold values in wastewater), mg/L P04 (for example, drinking water or boiler water analysis), mg/L P205 (for example, soil analysis). Inverting the vial after hydrolysis improves the reliability of the result. Determination of orthophosphate: filtrate the samplbefore the analysis In case of not working at the correct recommended temperature an incorrect result may be obtained. feview safety information and expiration date on the package. Review the Safety Data Sheets (MSDS/SDS) for the chemicals that are used. Use the recommended personal protective equipment. Dispose of reacted solutions according to local, state and federal regulations. Refer to the Safety Data Sheets for disposal information for unused reagents. Refer to the environmental, health and safety staff for your facility and/or local regulatory agencies for further disposal information. Procedure-Phosphorus Total 1r ,4lII5A r I -. 1. Preheat the reactor to 2. Carefully remove the foil 3. Unscrew the DosiCap 100 C (212 F). from the screwed -on Zip. DosiCap Zip. __________ __________ 6 4. Carefully pipet 2.0 mL of sample. Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 89 of 92 5. Immediately screw the DosiCap Zip back on; fluting at the top. Vt J 6. Shake vigorously. _____ 7. Heatin the reactorforl hour at 100 C (212 F). F U 8. Allow to cool to room temperature. 9. Shake vigorously 10. Unscrew the DosiCap Zip. : on1 11. Pipet into the cooled vial: 0.2 mL reagent B. Close reagent B immediately after use. 12. Screw a grey colored DosiCap C on the vial. 13. Invert a few times until the freeze-dried contents are completely dissolved 14. After 10 minutes, invert a few more times, thoroughly clean the outside of the vial and evaluate. 15. Insert the vial into the cell holder. DR 1900: Go to LCKITNTplus methods. Select the test, push READ. 2 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 TNT 843 Phosphorus, Reactive (Orthophosphate) and Total page 90 of 92 Procedure-Phosphorus Reactive (Orthophosphate) (2:: a 1. Carefully pipet 2.0 mL of sample. i: Q' 2. Pipet 0.2 mL reagent B. Close reagent B immediately after use. : ___ 3. Screw a grey colored DosiCap C on the vial. 4. Invert a few times until the freeze-dried contents are completely dissolved. 5. After 10 minutes, invert a few more times, thoroughly clean the outside of the vial and evaluate. 6. Insert the vial into the cell holder. DR 1900: Go to LCK/TNTplus methods. Select the test, push READ. Interferences Interferencelevel 5000 mg/L 2000 mg/L 1000 mg/L 500 mg/L 250 mg/L 100 mg/L 50 mg/L 5 mg/L 2.5 mg/L 1 mg/L 0.5 mg/L ' The ions listed in the table have been individually checked against the given concentrations and do not cause interference. The cumulative effects and the influence of other ions have not been determined. The measurement results must be subjected to plausibility checks (dilute and/or spike the sample). Interfering substance S042 Cl K, Na NO3Ca2 Mg2 Co2, Fe2, Fe3, Zn2, Cu2, Ni2, 1, NO2-, Cd2, NH4, Mn2, Al3, C032, SiO2 Sn4, Hg2 Ag, Pb21 Cr TNT 843 Phosphorus, Reactive (Orthophosphate) and Total 3 Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 91 of 92 Summary of method Phosphate ions react with molybdate and antimony ions in an acidic solution to form an antimonyl phosphormolybdate complex, which is reduced by ascorbic acid to phosphormolybdenum blue. TNTp"il1ls _______ FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, PRICE INFORMATION AND ORDERING: In the U.S.A. - Call toll-free 800-227-4224 _____________ Outside the U.S.A. - Contact the HACH office or distributor serving you. On the Worldwide Web - www.hach.com; E-mail - techhelp@hach.com Hach Company, 2019. All rights reserved. Saganing WWTP Inspection Report Appendix 2 page 92 of 92 HACH COMPANY WORLD HEADQUARTERS Telephone: (970) 669-3050 FAX: (970) 669-2932 03/2019, Edition I