Document aDVR9aE5jqY4nVYGbR9aNGBVN

To: From: Sent: Subject: Jackson, RyanOackson.ryan@epa.gov] do-not-reply@concursolutions.com Wed 9/13/2017 10:04:32 PM ConcurGov Correspondence JACKSON.RYAN@EPA.GOV Your Auth AUTH210464-1 was just stamped FOREIGN TRVL APPROVE by ALLEN, REGINALD E. You can access ConcurGov at: https://cge.concursolutions.com 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00003870-00001 To: Jackson, RyanOackson.ryan@epa.gov] From: Marc Himmelstein Sent: Sat 7/8/2017 10:37:35 PM Subject: Language 40 CFR 49.101-105 red-lined.docx > > Attached is the National Tribal NSR FIP regulatory (CFR) language with two (2) proposed red-lined edits. > > Both proposed edits are on the first page of the attachment. The edits include (1) striking 49.101(b)(1)(v) and (2) striking the previous reference to subsection (v) in 49.101(b)(1). The statement (i.e. subsection (v)) that we are proposing to delete is "[t]he oil and natural gas source as defined in 49.102 is not located in a designated area' > > Sent from my iPhone 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00003872-00001 To: From: Sent: Subject: Jackson, RyanOackson.ryan@epa.gov] Elizabeth Heaton Fri 5/26/2017 6:41:56 PM NAFTA Ag Alert - Issue No. 9 NAFTA Ag Alert May 26, 2017 Issue No. 9 Other Ag Commodities Push Back as Sugar Puts Mexico U.S. Trade in Jeopardy Trump Administration Annoyed at Sugar Tactics; Dispute Deadline June 5 This time is different. Mexico ready to retaliate, and U.S. farmers, ranchers and processors will suffer. Lighthizer to Perdue: Objective is do no harm. Pork Producers see `devastating consequences' if NAFTA scuttled. Desperate sugar industry disseminates Hawaii myth. Sugar may be a minor crop in the United States, but the industry has a history of getting what it wants. This time, however, is different. The sugar industry has extended its demands beyond limits on what Mexico can export to the U.S. and the prices it must charge. The industry now wants to cut the proportion of exports that can be refined from 53% to 15% and is demanding that the U.S. government protect two outmoded refiners from competition by an innovative domestic competitor. What else is different this time? The political situation in Mexico has vastly increased that government's willingness to retaliate against high-fructose corn syrup imports from the United States. Also different: Mexico can freely impose punitive duties, thanks to a World Trade 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00003875-00001 Org Firs If th baci endangering the future of NAFTA for agriculture - all because of the intransigence of one relatively insignificant commodity. That's different, too. American farmers are skittish about NAFTA. And no wonder. Agricultural exports to Mexico totaled $18 billion last year. As Inside U.S. Trade reported Wednesday: U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer this week told Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue and members of the House Agriculture Committee the Trump administration will prioritize exports of U.S. agriculture products and that "do no harm has got to be our objective" for upcoming NAFTA talks with Mexico and Canada - a renegotiation process the panel's chairman, Mike Conaway (R-TX), described as "unsettling" to the ag community. "Do no harm" is a good motto. And harm is precisely what the sugar industry is doing. Trump Administration Annoyed and Upset The Trump Administration is increasingly upset at U.S. sugar's intransigence, according to our sources. Wilbur Ross, the Commerce secretary, must decide by June 5 whether to risk a huge decline in corn syrup exports, a trade war, and the potential destruction of NAFTA - all to please a small domestic industry dominated by a single family. Pork Producers: `Devastating Consequences' Sugar Industry's Hawaii Myth Faced with mounting pressure from corn, pork and soon other commodities as well, the sugar liiuuaiiy iiitu uic yiuuiiu. 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00003875-00002 Si A bn Th In 20 co Int ie T De e qo 3 EAH Strategies LLC | Headquarters, Grand Rapids, Ml 49546 Unsubscribe iackson.ryan@epa.gov Update Profile | About our service provider Sent by elizabeth@eahstrateqiesllc.com in collaboration with Try it free today 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00003875-00003