Document aBE32dypz1bZbv73ZKGz2e1kR
AR226-3108
HLiufenSticniegndcoens
CONFIDENTIAL
DPT 438/984469
ASSESSMENT OF READY BIODEGRADABILITY MODIFIED STURM TEST
Sponsor
Dupont Speciality Chemicals, Jackson Laboratory, Chambers Works, Deepwater, NJ 08023, USA.
Research Laboratory
Huntingdon Life Sciences Ltd, Eye, Suffolk, 1P23 7PX, ENGLAND.
Final report issued: 18 December 1998
Page 1 of 19
Company Sanitized. Does not contain T3CA CBS
i DPT 438/984469
CONTENTS COMPLIANCE WITH GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE STANDARDS
Page 3
QUALITY ASSURANCE STATEMENT........................................................ CONTRIBUTING SCIENTISTS.......................... ........................................... SUMMARY...................................................................................................... INTRODUCTION.................................................................................... ......... TEST SUBSTANCE......................................................................................... EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE................................................................... MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS.................................... ......... :.................... RESULTS...:....................................................................................................... / DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS.............................................................
4 5 6 7 8 9 13 14 16
ii FIGURE 1. Degradation of the test and reference substances (CO2/TCO2)...............
17
TABLE
1. Blank-corrected cumulative CO2 production and degradation as a percentage of TCO2 in reference and test mixtures
18
APPENDIX
1. Preparation of mineral salts medium
19
: 2 : v pd Q"oc not corcato TSCA CBl
C o m p ii' Samiszea-
-
i
DPT 438/984469 COMPLIANCE WITH GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE STANDARDS
The study described in this report was conducted in compliance with the following Good Laboratory Practice standards and I consider the data generated to be valid. The UK Good Laboratory Practice Regulations 1997 (Statutory Instrument No. 654). EC Council Directive 87/18/EEC of 18 December 1986 (Official Journal No. L 15/29). OECD Principles of Good Laboratory Practice (as revised in 1997), ENV/MC/CHEM(98)17.
Christine E. Burwood B.Sc. (Hons.), Study Director, Huntingdon Life Sciences Ltd.
\ V 1 l oe ^ k u . >f. O i Date
:3: it contsin TSCA CBi
QUALITY ASSURANCE STATEMENT The following have been inspected or audited in relation to this study:
DPT 438/984469
Study Phases Inspected
Protocol
Process Based Inspections Formulation and test set-up Collection of activated sewage sludge Determination of CO, by titration Audit
Report
Date of Inspection 17.08.98
16.09.98 24.06.98 26.06.98 02.04.98 14.12.98
Date of Reporting 17.08.98
16.09.98 24.06.98 26.06.98 02.04.98 14.12.98
Protocol: An audit of the protocol for this study was conducted and reported to the Study Director
and Company Management as indicated above.
.
Process based inspections: At or about the time this study was in progress inspections and audits of routine and repetitive procedures employed on this type of study were carried out. These were conducted and reported to appropriate Company Management as indicated above.
Report Audit: This report has been audited by the Quality Assurance Department. This audit was J conducted and reported to the Study Director and Company Management as indicated above. I
The methods, procedures and observations were found to be accurately described and the reported results to reflect the raw data.
Helen Comb B.Sc. (Hons.), Principal Auditor, Department of Quality Assurance, \ Huntingdon Life Sciences Ltd.
Date
v_y
:4 : Company Sanitized. Dssa nott contain
CONTRIBUTING SCIENTISTS
Christine E. Burwood, B.Sc. (Hons.) (Study Director)
Robert A. Dickinson, Higher National Certificate (Applied Biology) (Senior Laboratory Technician)
Faye O. Shanahan (Laboratory Technician)
DPT 438/984469
:5 : Compaq
- ''SCA CBS
SUMMARY
DPT 438/984469
The ready biodegradability o
ras assessed in the CO2 Evolution test (Modified
Sturm test, Procedure C.4-C ofTtne Annex to uireAcctive 92/69/EEC; OECD Procedure 30IB).
^ ^ i v a s added to two vessels containing mineral salts medium inoculated with activated ^ m !d g ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ o lid s/l) to give a nominal test substance concentration of 10 mgCarbon[C]/l. Control
vessels comprised two containing inoculated mineral salts medium alone, and one containing inoculated mineral salts medium plus the reference substanc^odhim_benzoate (10 mgC/1). ` additional mixture containing sodium benzoate (10 mgC/1) was established in order to assess the potential inhibitory ^nects of the tes^suDstance on tl
microbial inoculum.
Test; control-and reference mixtures were aerated for 29 days with-air that had been treated to remove carbon dioxide (CO2). The CO2 produced by each culture was trapped in a series of Dreschel bottles containing barium hydroxide which were connected to the outlet from each test vessel. The residual barium hydroxide was determined at intervals by titration.
The pH of control, reference and test mixtures was measured at the start of the test and after 28 days. The pH of the test plus reference mixture was measured at the start of the test and on the day of its termination (Day 9).
podium benzQfUe had been biodegraded by 60% after 5 days and 85% after 2 9 ^ a y ^ u ^ ^ ^ and by 72% after 9 days in its presence which confirmed t h a j ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
Inhibitory to fFTe microbial inoculum.
enee of as not
Cumulative levels of CO2 production in the controls after 29 days (43.2 and 44.3 mgC02) were within the acceptable range for this assay system (recommended maximum = 120 mgCC>2 for a three-litre culture). These results confirm that the inoculum was viable and that the test was valid.
Mean cumulative CO2 production by mixtures c o n t a i n i n d j H m m H w a s equivalent to 10% of the theoretical value (TCO2, 109.6 mgC02) after 5 days o^mcubatior^r^r 16% by the end of the test
on Day 29.
.
Substances are considered to be readily biodegradable in this test if CO2 productioi greater than 60% of the theoretical value within 10 days of the level achieving 10%.J cannot, therefore, be considered to be readily biodegradable.
:6 : C om ply S an ded. Does not contain 7SCA CBi
INTRODUCTION
DPT 438/984469
The objective of this study was^to. assess the biotic degradability
It was conducted
in accordance with Procedure C.4-C `CO2 Evolution test' of th^^nnex to Directive 92/69/EEC
(OECD Procedure 301B).
The parameter determined in thi<= {pst is the cumulative amount of carbon dioxide produced by mixtures conta.iningflH H H H |H |m ineral salts medium and activated sludge inoculum after 29 days of incubation at temperatures nominally in the range 20 to 24C.
The study was preceded by a preliminary formulation trial.
Owing to the formulation procedure employed, actual test concentrations were slightly higher than the.,,value given in the protocol at 10.3 mgC/1 in both test vessels and 10.4 mgC/1 in the inhibition vessel.
The protocol was approved by Huntingdon Life Sciences Management on 7 July 1998, by the Sponsor on 17 July 1998, and by the Study Director on 13 August 1998.
The experimental phase of the study was conducted between 18 August and 19 September 1998.
: 7 ontainTSCACBl aav Sanitized. Doss note-
COETIP2" *
Identity: Chemical name:
TEST SUBSTANCE
DPT 438/984469
Lot number / Batch number:
Expiry date:
.
Purity / Composition:
Appearance:
Storage conditions:
Date received:
2 years from date of receipt 25% Pale yellow slurry Room temperature 23 June 1998
:8: Company Sanitized. Doss ro t contain TSCA CD!
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
DPT 438/984469
REFERENCE SUBSTANCE
"
Sodium benzoate (AR grade, product number S/24^1/53) was obtained from Fisher Scientifi^I UK. ' Kr
STANDARD SOLUTIONS USED IN THE DETERMINATION OF CARBON DIOXIDE PRODUCTION
The following solutions were obtained from BDH chemicals:
Hydrochloric acid - Concentrated volumetric solutions (0.5N/1000 ml), product number 18077.
Sodium hydroxide - Concentrated volumetric solutions (0.5N/500 ml), product number 18024.
Barium hydroxide - Analytical volumetric solutions (0.1N), product number 192356P.
INOCULUM
A sample of activated sludge was collected on the day before the test from Oakley sewage treatment
works which treats predominantly domestic waste. Aliquots (25 ml) of a homogenised sample were
filtered through dried (115C) and pre-weighed Whatman GFC filter papers. The filters were dried
for one hour, allowed to cool and re-weighed. The solids level in the sludge was determined and then
an appropriate volume used to inoculate control and test vessels to give a final suspended solids
concentration of 30 mg/1.
.
TEST PROCEDURE
The day before the start of the test, air-saturated ultrapure water was added to each of six, five litre glass culture bottles followed by the volumes of each of the stock solutions required to prepare three litres of mineral salts medium (MSM, Appendix 1). Each culture bottle was then inoculated with activated sludge (30 mg solids/1) and the mixtures aerated overnight with a supply of air obtained by passing oil-free compressed air through cylinders containing fused calcium chloride and Carbosorb AS followed by traps containing 0.025N nominal (0.0125M) barium hydroxide solution, to remove carbon dioxide.
The test substance was provided as an aqueous slurry containing 25% active ingredient (A.I.), which was known to be poorly soluble in water at ambient temperature. To promote dissolution of the active ingredient, the slurry was heated in a waterbath at 39.5C until a clear solution was obtained. An approximate amount o f the test substance was then transferred to pre-weighed volumetric flasks (50 ml). The flasks were allowed to cool and a final weight recorded once a stable balance reading could be obtained. Ultrapure water was then added to each flask and the mixtures treated with ultrasound for 30 minutes and added to the appropriate test vessels. The preparation flasks were then rinsed with further 50 ml portions of ultrapure water and the rinsings added to the appropriate vessels. An allowance was made for the concentration of the active ingredient during the formulation
: 9 : Company Sanitized. B ,3 nc contain T3CA 031
DPT 438/984469
procedure. The actual weights of
in dioxide production of each test mixture was calculated from the dded.
A magnetic follower was added to each bottle followed by the three-litre volumes of inoculated, aerated mineral salts medium. Each bottle was stoppered, the contents were mixed by swirling and placed on an electrically-operated magnetic stirrer fitted with a perspex insulating cover.
The reference substance sodium benzoate was added to one bottle containing the test substance and to one containing inoculated mineral salts medium alone; no additions were made to the remaining two control vessels containing inoculated mineral salts medium alone.
The mixtures prepared for the test are summarised in the following table:
Bottle No.
Contents
1, 2 Controls - mineral salts medium plus inoculum (30 mg solids/1) 3 Reference - inoculated mineral salts medium plus sodium benzoate (10;0 mgC/1) 4, 5 Test substance (10.3 mgC/1) plus inoculated mineral salts medium
6 Sodium benzoate (10.0 mgC/1) plus test substance (10.4 mgC/1) plus inoculated mineral salts medium
Following these preparation of test and control mixtures, samples (100 ml) were removed for the determination of pH. Each vessel was then fitted with a stopper holding an air inlet tube reaching approximately 10 cm below the liquid surface and an air outlet just below the stopper.
The vessels contents were continuously flushed for 29 days with treated air. The air outlet from each vessel was connected to three Dreschel bottles in series, each containing 0.025N, nominal barium hydroxide (100 ml).
The residual concentrations of barium hydroxide in the bottles nearest to the test vessels were determined at intervals by duplicate titration of 20 ml samples with hydrochloric acid (0.05N), using phenolphthalein indicator.
Following the removal o f the first Dreschel bottle in a series, the second was connected to the test vessel, and a bottle containing fresh barium hydroxide was connected to the outlet of the bottle at the end of the series.
The degradation of the reference substance in the test plus reference mixture was calculated to confirm that the test substance was not inhibitory to the microbial inoculum. When the level of degradation reached 60% or more, the pH was measured and the treatment terminated.
On Day 28 of the test, titrations were undertaken and samples (approximately 100 ml) removed from each test vessel for pH determination. Concentrated hydrochloric acid (1 ml) was then added to each vessel to drive off dissolved inorganic carbon.
The contents of the vessels were aerated overnight and the final titrations carried out on Day 29.
The rate of air flow through the apparatus was determined at intervals during the test.
: 10 : Company Sanitize: Doss not contain i eCA CBS
DPT 438/984469
The minimum and maximum temperature of the test area and of a three-litre volume o f water held in a culture bottle under test conditions was recorded daily using a thermometer.
CALCULATION OF RESULTS
Theoretical carbon dioxide production (TCO2)
The theoretical amount of CO2 that can be generated by a 2.9-litre mixture containing the test or reference substance at concentrations of 10 mgC/1 and 10.3 mgC/1, was calculated in the following way:
TCO2 /mg carbon = mw of carbon dioxide = 3.67 mg C02/mg mw carbon
Reference mixture TCO2 = Volume (2.9 1) x conc.(10 mgC/1) x 3.67
= 106.4 mgC02
Test mixture TCO2 = Volume (2.9 I) x conc.(10.3 mgC/1) x 3.67
= 109.6 mgCCb
CO2 production
Carbon dioxide production by control, reference and test mixtures was calculated in the following way.
Since 1 mmol of carbon dioxide is produced for every 2 mmol of hydrochloric acid titrated, the amount of CO2 precipitated as BaCC>3 in a Dreschel bottle containing 100 ml Ba(OH)2 is:
mgCCb = FN x fVs - Vtl x j00 x mw(CC>2) " 2V
where: N Vs
Vt V mw(C02)
normality of hydrochloric acid. volume of hydrochloric acid used to titrate the stock solution of barium
hydroxide. volume of hydrochloric acid used to titrate test samples, volume of sample titrated, molecular weight of carbon dioxide.
On each occasion when CO2 levels were determined, the mean CO2 levels in the control group was subtracted from that in reference or test groups to give the blank-corrected value. The cumulative production of CO2 in each group was calculated by adding successive estimates of blank-corrected
CO2 production.
: 11 :
Company Sanitized. Dees not contain T3CA CBi
DPT 438/984469
Estimates of the percentage degradation of test and reference substances at intervals during the test were calculated from blank-corrected cumulative CO2 production in the following way:
% degradation = cumulative COofmg) x 100 TOO2 of test mixture
In the mixture containing both sodium benzoate and the test substance, the mean CO2 levels in the control mixtures and mean blank-corrected CO2 production by mixtures containing the test substance alone were subtracted from the measured CO2 production of the test plus reference mixture to give an estimate of the amount of carbon dioxide derived from the degradation of sodium benzoate. The resultant estimate of carbon dioxide production was expressed in cumulative production of CO2 was calculated by adding successive estimates of blank-corrected CO2 production.
: 12 :
Company Sanitized. Does net contain TSCA C'J
} DPT 438/984469
MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS
All specimens, raw data and study related documents generated during the course of the study at Huntingdon Life Sciences, together with a copy of the final report will be lodged in the Huntingdon Life Sciences Archive.
Specimens and records will be retained for a minimum of five years from the date of issue of the final report. At the end of the five year retention period the Sponsor will be contacted and advice sought on their future requirements. Under no circumstances will any item be discarded without the Sponsor's knowledge.
: 13 :
Company Sanitized, u ses not com :in TSCA CBE
RESULTS
DPT 438/984469
CALCULATION OF THE THEORETICAL ORGANIC CARBON CONTENT
The theoretical organic carbon content o:
tnd sodium benzoate were calculated to be:
"05.08^6.35? 13.16SO3N0 45
MW = 439.75 `
Sodium benzoate C7H502Na MW = 144
Carbon content = 22.0% .
Carbon content = 58.3%
MODIFIED STURM TEST
The weights of the test substance added to test vessels and the actual concentrations achieved are given below:
Vessel Test 1
Nominal Concentration
(mgC/I)
Weight Added (mg)
Actual Concentration
(mgC/1)*
iO.O 561.18 10.3
Test 2
10.0 563.11 10.3
Inhibition
10.0
568.08
10.4
""Sbdium benzoaffy
` Allowing for an A.I. content of 25%
The blank-corrected CO2 production and percentage degradation in test and reference mixtures at intervals during the test are given in Table 1. Degradation of the test and reference substances are illustrated graphically in Figure 1.
Cumulative CO2 production in the controls (43.2 and 44.3 mgC02) was within the acceptable range for this assay system (recommended maximum for a three litre culture = 120 mgCC>2). The degradation of sodium benzoate was rapid and achieved 60% of its TCCb after 5 days and 85% after 29 days. These results confirm that the inoculum was viable and that the test was valid.
: 14 :
Company Sanitized. e s not contain TSCA CBS
DPT 438/984469 The degradation of sodium benzoate was also rapid in the presence o f M ^ ^ ^ J ^ A n d achieved 67% of its TCO2 after 7 days. This test vessel was terminated on Day 9 of the study; THe final pH of the culture was 7.5. Mean cumulative CO2 production by the mixtures c o n ta in in g f^ ^ H J ^ ^ H v a s equivalent to 10% of the TCO2 after 5 days and 16% by the end of the test onD a^29. A TlSgradation plateau was achieved after approximately 12 days. The pH of all test and control mixtures ranged from 7.4 to 7.6 at the start of the test, and from 7.4 to 7.7 on Day 28. The rate of air flow during the test was typically in the range 30 to 80 ml/minute. On six occasions during the test the rate of air flow fell below the recommended minimum for this type of test (30 ml/min) to a minimum of 20 ml/min. This deviation is not considered to be significant, nor to have. afTected..the_inte.grity of the test. The temperature of a three-litre volume of water, held under test conditions ranged from 20.8 to 23.9C over the test period.
: 15 : Company Sanitized. Dsas not contain TSCA 035
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
DPT 438/984469
The biodegradation of sodium benzoate in the presence of the test substance was monitored in order to assess whether any inhibitory effects were exerted on the inoculum. No inhibitory effects were observed.
The mean cumulative CO2 production by mixtures c o n ta in in g M ^ |^ H ||^ p at 10 mgC/1 was equivalent to 10% of the TCO2 after 5 days and 16% by the end of the test on Day 29. A degradation plateau was achieved after approximately 12 days.
Substances are considered to be readily biodegradable in this test if CO2 productioi greater than 60% of the theoretical value within ten days of the level achieving 10%J cannot, therefore, be considered to be readily degradable.
equal to
Owing to the stringency of this type of test failure to achieve more than 60% degradation does not necessarily mean that the substance is not biodegradable under environmental conditions. More favourable conditions such as a higher concentration of sewage microorganisms, a more diverse microbial population, or a longer exposure period may be necessary to establish biodegradability.
The results obtained for the degradation of sodium benzoate (60% of its TCCb after 5 days and 85% after 29 days) and for cumulative CO2 production by the control mixtures (43.2 and 44.3 mg) fulfil the validity criteria for this test.
: 16 : Company Sanitized. Doss not contain TSCA 03!
I DPT 438/984469
FIGURE I Degradation of the test and reference substances (CO2/TCO2)
KEY 1 100-1 (0Pl-otteSdodviuamluebsefnozoi^ajMmlfhnfo|HC^ivL e the mean andrange of replicates)
. A - Sodiumbenzoate (10 mgC/l) in inhibition mixture 90-
>)
Tune in days
: 17 : Company Sanitized. Doi
,1contain TSCA CBt
DPT 438/984469
TABLE 1
Blank-corrected cumulative CO2 production
and degradation as a percentage of TCO2 in reference and test mixtures
Day sodium benzoate (10mgC/l)
obIhd --- PTMsodiumhenzoateJn
CO, (mg) %TCO,
(10.4 mgC/1) + sodium benzoate (10 mgC/1)
' mixture
CO, (mg) % TCO,
Culture 1 CO, (mg) %TCO,
Culture 2 CO, (mg) %TCO,
2 23.3
22
22.8
21
3.5
3
4.1
4
4 48.9
46
47.2 44
7.1
6
8.2
7
5 64.3
60
61.2 58
10.4
9
10.9
10
7 73.9 9 78.3 12 : 82.7 15 84.8 20 ; 87.6 25 89.2
69 74 78 80 82 84
71.6 67 76.5 72
- '- '- -' -
12.3 11 11.7 14.5 13 11.7 16.7 15 13.3 17:7 16 13.8 18.8 17 13.8 18.8 17 13.8
11 11 12 13 13 13
28 90.6
85
-
-
19.6 IS 13.8
13
29 90.6
85
-
- 19.6 IS 13.8 13
18 : Compaannyy Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBi
DPT 438/984469
APPENDIX 1
PREPARATION OF MINERAL SALTS MEDIUM
DILUTION WATER
The dilution water used to prepare stock and test solutions of mineral salts and aqueous preparations of the test substance was tap water that had been softened and treated by reverse osmosis (Elga Ltd, Prima 4 reverse osmosis unit) and then purified (Elga Ltd, UHP) to give a resistivity of 18 Megohm/cm. This water complies with the relevant standards (British Standard (BS) 2486, 1978; American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D 1193-77) for classification as ultrapure water.
MINERAL SALTS MEDIUM
The mineral salts medium (MSM) for the final test was prepared by mixing 10 ml of stock solution 1 with 800 ml dilution water and then adding 1 ml of solutions 2 to 4 to each litre of water required for the test.
Stock 1
Potassium dihydrogen phosphate di-Potassium hydrogen phosphate di-Sodium monohydrogen phosphate dihydrate Ammonium chloride
g/1
8.50 21.75 33.40 0.50
Stock 2
Magnesium sulphate heptahydrate
22.50
Stock 3
Calcium chloride dihydrate
36.40
Stock 4
Iron (III) chloride hexahydrate
0.25
Minor variations in the weights taken are riot considered to be significant.
: 19 :
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSC C3I