Document ZJEyxkamX1GnQDV4o01em88LJ
DATE:
June 22, 2017
DRAFT
TO:
Richard Cardinale, Acting Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management
Scott Cameron, Acting Assistant Secretary for Water and Science
FROM:
William Werkheiser, Acting Director - United States Geological Survey (USGS)
SUBJECT: Joint Plan (USGS-BLM-BOEM) Response for Resource Assessment to Secretarial Order No. 3352
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this memo is to respond to Secretarial Order No. 3352, which aims to jump-start Alaskan energy production on the North Slope of Alaska. Specifically, this memo discusses plans by which current resource assessments in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A) and the Section 1002 Area of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge will be updated. This memo includes information from USGS, BLM, and BOEM.
The proposed resource assessments will be conducted using established USGS protocol and as transparently as permitted by non-disclosure agreements related to proprietary data. This work will be coordinated with and will involve Alaska technical agencies including the Division of Geological and Geophysical Services, the Division of Oil and Gas, and the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservations Commission. The assessments include the following:
1
BACKGROUND
2
Table 1: Cost information, Alaska North Slope Assessment Options (numbers in millions of dollars)
Assessment
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Total
National Petroleum Reserve - Alaska Alaska National Wildlife Refuge
ANWR - Option 1
1.600 0.950 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.550 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
ANWR - Option 2
1.350 2.550 0.950 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.850
ANWR - Option 3 Central North Slope
0.000 0.000
0.375 0.000
2.250 3.250
0.950 2.200
0.000 0.950
0.000 0.000
3.575 6.400
West of NPRA
0.000 0.000 0.000 1.250 2.400 0.750 4.400
Note: Totals not provided due to range of assessment scenarios provided
National Petroleum Reserve - Alaska (NPRA)
3
Figure 2: Estimated completion timeline for NPRA Resource Assessment
Task
CY 2017
CY 2018
CY 2019
Review technical data and interpret seismic data
IQ 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q
Refine interpretations of seismic and well data
Define AUs; prepare for public review & assessment
Conduct public review meetings
Conduct assessment
Prepare release document (fact sheet)
Conduct technical and editorial review
Release assessment
Hold briefings for Admin., Congress, State et al.
Alaska National Wildlife Refuge 1002 Area
4
(b (5)
Figure 3: Estimated completion timeline for ANWR Resource Assessment (Scenario 2)
Task
CY 2017
CY 2018
CY 2019
Seismic data reprocessing (existing 2-D data) *
1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q
Review technical data and interpret seismic data
Refine interpretations of seismic and well data
Define AUs; prepare for public review & assessment
Conduct public review meetings
Conduct assessment
D
Prepare release document (fact sheet)
Conduct technical and editorial review
Release assessment
Hold briefings for Admin., Congress, State, et al.
* USGS does not procure reprocessed vintage 2-D seismic c ata, but provides geo ogical and geophysical advice to seismic vendor
5
Figure 4: Estimated completion timeline for ANWR Resource Assessment (Scenario 3)
Task
CY 2017
CY 2018
CY 2019
3-D seismic survey and processing of data *
1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q IQ 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q
Review technical data and interpret seismic data
Refine interpretations of seismic and well data
Define AUs; prepare for public review & assessment
Conduct public review meetings
Conduct assessment
Prepare release document (fact sheet)
]
Conduct technical and editorial review
Release assessment
Hold briefings for Admin., Congress, State, et al.
* USGS plays no role in designing or acquiring a 3-D seismic survey
Central North Slope
6
7