Document ZBO5DjqVbkXLRoVoNmEvLrQwY
DISCUSSION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING 3% ADMINISTRATIVE COST POOLS
Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA
Tier 3/4
ED 002061 00176494-00001
OVERVIEW
> Bucket 2 and Bucket 3 cannot use the same methodology to
develop and track their 3% administrative cost pools.
For Bucket 3, each State is entitled to pre-defined amounts by formula, therefore the amount of the 3% admin pool is known
- The Bucket 3 pool is calculated on the amounts actually deposited into the trust fund
- Anticipated deposits cannot be factored into the current amount that is available calculation
The Bucket 2 pool is calculated using the amounts of approved FPLsas a base - The ultimate amount of B2 funds each Member will receive is not known
The proposed Rule requires at least annual public posting of the amounts available in the 3% cost pools by component - Council members should track their respective cost pools - Council members should reconcile their records with staff records before data is provided to Treasury for posting
Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA
Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council Staff Work Product - Subject to Council Approval
Tier 3/4
ED 002061 00176494-00002
Bucket 2 3% ADMIN COSTS POOL
> The 3% pool is developed and maintained as follows:
3% of the funding for each approved FPL project proposal is
calculated and aggregated by sponsor
The sum of these amounts comprise the sponsor's current admin pool The pool, and the current balance in the pool have been calculated - see slides 8-11
As awards are made, each grant or IAA may charge admin costs (as defined by the Rule) up to the allowed amount as calculated per the recipient's negotiated indirect cost rate (NICRA) or federal agency overhead rate.
The amount charged to each grant/IAA reduces the pool accordingly If a grant or IAA awarded is less than the proposal amount, the 3% pool is
reduced by the relative difference If the award is made to an entity other than the sponsor, the 3% admin
calculated for the proposal would transfer to that entity If the award is amended or closed and the award is reduced, the pool will
be adjusted relative to the reduction in the award amount
Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council Staff Work Product - Subject to Council Approval
Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA
Tier 3/4
ED 002061 00176494-00003
FPL DEVELOPMENT
When developing a suite of potential project proposals:
- Calculate and aggregate 3% of the total cost of each proposal (irrespective of the allowed indirect costs per the NICRA or
federal overhead rate)
- For planning purposes, add this potential amount to your 3% pool available balance
To determine if you will have sufficient funds in the pool to cover your indirect costs (subject to the cap) calculate the allowed indirect costs of each proposal per the NICRA or federal overhead rate and subtract from the "planning" pool
- Once the FPL is finalized, update your actual 3% pool to add an amount equal to 3% of the approved project proposals
As awards are made, reduce the pool accordingly
Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA
Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council Staff Work Product - Subject to Council Approval
Tier 3/4
ED 002061 00176494-00004
, o ^ T E c O,
m
i
f ' / I ;'
'WT5T^ B2 ADMIN COST POOLS - SUMMARY
! BUCKET 2 INDIRECT COST POOL CALCULATIONS AND USAGE
6/30/2018
\
Project Name |TOTAL ALABAMA/ADCNR |TOTAL IOUISIANA/CPRA TOTAL DEPT OF COMMERCE / NOAA TOTAL DEPT OF INTERIOR/BIA, FWS, NPS, USGS TOTAL ENVIRON MENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY |TOTAL FLORIDA TOTAL MISSISSIPPI TOTAL TEXAS TOTAL DEPT OF DEFENCE / USAGE TOTAL DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY / USCG TOTAL DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE GRAN DTOTAL
Total Funding
Cat 1
$11,251,000
Total of Award Amounts
$2,100,000
$40,417,409 $40,417,409
$14,790,544 $9,200,000
$21,252,747 $10,384,950
$6,828,160 $4,102,960
$19,295,450 $19,289,330 $22,800,000 $5,028,847 $20,567,500 $19,599,500
$5,500,000
$0
$2,100,000 $1,964,776
$20,262,084 $15,162,084
$185,064,894 $127,249,856
3% Pool
Sum of 3% Avalla
Award or FPL Indirect Costs Indirect Costs 1
Indirect Costs Used on not yet used 1
Amt Allowed Awards on Awards
$337,530
$63,000
s $274,530|
$1,212,522 $1,212,522 $443,716 $108,951
$0| 1
$334,765| 1
$636,479
$253,249
$383,2301 1
$204,845
$39,781
$165,0641 1
$578,680 $683,965 $617,025
$267,790 $144,784 $73,028
$310,890| 1
$539,1811 1
$543,9971 i
$165,000
$0 $165,000| 1
$58,943 $607,863 $5,546,568
$0 $0 $2,163,105
$58,943| 1
$607,863| 1
$3,383,463
Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA
Tier 3/4
ED 002061 00176494-00005
o
B3 ADMIN COSTS POOLS - SUMMARY
SEP Trust Fund Balance as of 6/30/2018 $419,704309
SEP Funds deposited
to date
Total Grant Awards
Balance of Current SEP
Funds Available
3% pool
Indirect Costs Used on Awards
Balance of 3% Pool Available
ALABAMA
$ 85,619,679 $
- $ 85,619,679 $ 2,568,590 $
- $2,568,590
FLORIDA CONSORTIUM $ 77,057,711 $ 4,640,675 $ 72,417,036 $ 2311,731 $
- $ 2311331
LOUISIANA
$145,175,721 $ 37,988,070 $107,187,651 $ 4,355,272 $1,139,641 $3,215,631
MISSISSIPPI TEXAS
$ 80,037,612 $1,374,612 $ 78,663,000 $ 2,401,128 $ 41,238 $2,359,890 $ 31,813,587 $ 292,503 $ 31,521,084 $ 954,408 $ 8,775 $ 945,633
Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA
Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council Staff Work Product - Subject to Council Approval
Tier 3/4
ED 002061 00176494-00006
BACK-UP SLIDES FPL DETAILS FOR EACH MEMBER
Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA
Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council Staff Work Product - Subject to Council Approval
Tier 3/4
ED 002061 00176494-00007
, o ^ T E c O,
jfl ' :jj&/ , ;
FPL ADMIN POOL-A L , LA, DOC
State P ro je ct Nam e
A L Collaboration and Planning Support
CPS
A L A la b a m a Living S h o re lin e s P ro gra m <P)
1
A L A lab am a Subm erged A q uatic Vegetation Restoration & Morsitc 1
A L C o a s ta l A la b a m a C o m p re h e n siv e W a te rs h e d R e sto ra tio n PI am 1
A L Com prehensive Living Shoreline M onitoring (P)
1
A L Enhancing O pportunities for Beneficial Use of Dredged Sedime 1
TO TAL ALA8AM A/AD CN R
En tity AL AL AL AL AL AL
Funding EGID Cat 1
$2,100,000 64 $908,500 $875,000
$4,342,500 $25,000
$3,000,000
$ 1 1 ,2 5 1 ,0 0 0
A w a rd Am ounts
$2,100,000
$ 2 ,1 0 0 ,0 0 0
LA G olden Triangle M arsh Creation (P) LA W est G rand Terre Beach N ourishm ent & Stabilizatio n (P) LA Biloxi M arsh Living Shoreline (P) LA Low erm ost M ississippi River M anagem ent (Pj LA Missisippi River Rintroduction into M aurepas Sw am p (P) LA Colfaboratiori: and Planning Support
T O T A L LO U iS IA N A /C P R A
1
CPRA
1
CPRA
1
CPRA
1
CPRA
1
CPRA
CPS
CPRA
$4,347,733 13
$4,347,733
$7,259,216 24
$7,259,216
$3,220,460 25
$3,220,460
$9,300,000 35
$9,300,000
$14,190,000 44 $14,190,000
$2,100,000 55 $2,100,000
$40,417,409
$ 4 0 ,4 1 7 ,4 0 9
G W Council M onitoring & A sse ssm e nt Program D evelopm ent (P)
1
T X B ahia G ran de W etland System Restoration (P)
1
A L M arsh R e sto ra tio n in Fish River, W e e k s Bay, O yste r B ay & M ea 1
A L M arsh R e sto ra tio n in Fish River, W e e k s Bay, O yste r B ay S M ea 1
A L M arsh R e sto ra tio n in Fish River, W e e k s Bay, O yste r B ay & M ea 1
FL Robinson Preserve W etlands Restoration (P&l)
1
G W Collaboration: and Planning Support
CPS
G W G ulf of M exico Habitat Restoration via Conservation Corps Par 1
F L M oney Bayou W etlands Restoration (Pj
1
NOAA NOAA NOAA NOAA NOAA NOAA NOAA NOAA NOAA
$1,700,000 38 $404,318 $333,651 $264,652 $309,651
$1,790,546 $2,100,000 $7,500,000 30
$387,726
$ 1 4 ,7 9 0 ,5 4 4
Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council Staff Wat Product - Subject to Coundi Approva!
Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA
Tier 3/4
$1,700,000
$7,500,000 $9,200,000
3% Pool Aw ard or FPL Indirect Costs Am t Allow ed
In d ire ct Costs Am t
U sed on each A w ard
3% Available in d irect Costs
not used on Aw ards
$
63,000
$63,000
0
$
27,255
$
27,255
$
26,250
$
26,250
$ 130,275
$
130,275
$
750
$
750
$
90,000
$
90,000
$337,530
$63,000
$274,530
$ 130,432
$130,432 $
(0)
$ 217,776
$217,776 $
0
$
96,614
$96,614 $
01
$ 279,000
$279,000 $
*
$ 425,700
$425,700 $
$
63,000
$ 6 3 ,0 0 0 >
-
$ 1 ,2 1 2 ,5 2 2 $ 1 ,2 1 2 ,5 2 2
$0
$
51,000
$0 $
51,000
$
12,130
$
12,130
$
10,010
$
10,010
$
7,940
$
7,940
$
9,290
$
9,290
$
53,716
$
53,716
$
63,000
$ 225,000
$ $108,951 $
63,000 116,049
$
11,632
11,632
$443,716 $ 1 0 8 ,9 5 1
$ 3 3 4 ,7 6 5
8
ED 002061 00176494-00008
m
i i
V
/
il M
f
W
} ,
FPL ADMIN POOL - DOI, EPA, FL
State Project Nam e
GW Collaboration and Planning Support
CPS
G W G ulf of M exico H abitat Restoration via C onservation Corps Par 1
G W Strategic C o nservation A sse ssm e n t Fram ew ork (P)
1
T X Plug A b an d o n e d Oil & G as W ells (I)
1
LA Jean Lafltte C an al Backfilling (I)
1
G W Baseline Flow, Gage A n alysis & O nline Tool to Su p po rt Restora 1
G W Council M onitoring & A sse ssm e n t Program D evelo p m en t (P)
1
Entity DOI B IA FW S NPS NPS USGS USGS
FL Tam pa Bay National Estuary Program (P&l)
1/2
EPA
G W G ulf of M exico Estuary Program (P)
1
EPA
A L M obile Bay N ational Estuary Program (P)
1
EPA
G W Baseline Flow, Gage A n alysis & O nline Tool to Su p po rt Restora 1
EPA
G W G ulf of M exico Conservation Enhancem ent G rant Program (P) 1
EPA
GW Collaboration and Planning Support
CPS
EPA
FL Apalachicola W atershed Agriculture W ater Quality Improvem e 1
FL Suw anee River Partnership Irrigation W ater Enhancem ent Pro 1
FL Bayou Chico Contam inated Sedim ent Rem oval - Planning, Desi 1
FL Beach Haven - Joint Storm w ater & W astew ater Im provem ent 1
FL Apalachicola Bay Oyster Restoration (P&l)
1
FL Pensacola Bay Living Shoreline - Phase 1 (P)
1
FL Palm River Restoration Project Phase 2, East M cKay Bay (P&l)
1
FL Collaboration and Planning Support
CPS
FDEP FDEP FDEP FDEP FDEP FDEP FDEP FDEP
Funding Cat 1
EGID
$ 2 ,1 0 0 ,0 0 0
$ 5 0 0 ,0 0 0
2
$ 1 ,8 7 9 ,3 8 0
5
$ 1 ,3 1 7 ,5 6 7
3
$ 8 ,7 3 1 ,0 0 0
$ 5 ,5 4 9 ,8 0 0
1
$ 1 ,1 7 5 ,0 0 0
6
$21,252,747
A w ard Am ounts
$ 5 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 ,8 4 2 ,5 8 3 $ 1 ,3 1 7 ,5 6 7
$ 5 ,5 4 9 ,8 0 0 $ 1 ,1 7 5 ,0 0 0 $10,384,950
$1,544,960 17 $2,200,000 27
$358,000 28 $ 2 5 0 ,2 0 0 $ 3 7 5 ,0 0 0 $ 2 ,1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $6,828,160
$ 1 ,5 4 4 ,9 6 0 $ 2 ,2 0 0 ,0 0 0
$ 3 5 8 ,0 0 0
$4,102,960
$ 2 ,2 1 9 ,8 5 6
8
$ 2 ,2 1 9 ,8 5 6
$2,884,000 15
$ 2 ,8 8 4 ,0 0 0
$356,850 18
$ 3 5 6 ,8 5 0
$5,967,000 26
$ 5 ,9 6 7 ,0 0 0
$4,680,000 39 $231,314 40 $856,430 47
$2,100,000 54
$ 4 ,6 8 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 3 1 ,3 1 4 $ 8 5 6 ,4 3 0
$ 2 ,0 9 3 ,8 8 0
$19,295,450
$19,289,330
3% Pool Award or FPL Indirect Costs Amt Allowed
Indirect Costs Am t
Used on each Award
3% Available Indirect Costs
not used on Aw ards
$
63,000
$
15,000
$
55,277
$
39,527
$ $0 $ $52,999 $ $0 $
63,000 15,000
2,278 39,527
$ 261,930
$ 166,494
$
35,250
$636,479
$ $165,000 $
$35,250 $ $253,249
261,930 1,494 -
$383,230
$
46,349
$
66,000
$
10,740
$
7,506
$
11,250
$
63,000
$204,845
$10,764 $ $27,868 $
$1,149 $ $ $ $
$39,781
35,585 38,132
9,591 7,506 11,250 63,000 $165,064
$
66,596
$
86,520
$
10,706
$ 179,010
$ 140,400
$
6,939
$
25,693
$
62,816
$578,680
$20,664 $ $19,805 $
$6,822 $ $114,125 $
$30,895 $ $4,416 $ $8,247 $
$62,816 $ $267,790
45,932 66,715
3,884 64,885 109,505
2,523 17,446
0 $310,890
Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA
Tier 3/4
ED 002061 00176494-00009
FPL ADMIN POOL MS, TX, DOD, DHS, USDA
State Project N am e
M S SeaGrant Education & Outreach (P&i)
1
M S En h an cin g O p p o rtun itie s fo r Beneficia! Use of Dredge Sedinter 1
M S Strategic Land Protection, Conservation - Priority Landscapes^ 1
M S The M ississippi Sound Estuarine Program (P&I)
1
M S C oliaboration and Planning Support
CPS
E n tity M DEQ M DEQ M DEQ M DEQ M DEQ
F u n d in g Cat 1
E G ID
$750,000 20
$ 2 ,1 8 0 ,0 0 0 22
$15,500,000
$2,270,000
$2,100,000 56
$ 2 2 ,8 0 0 ,0 0 0
Aw ard Am ounts
$750,000 $2,178,847
$2,100,000 $ 5 ,0 2 8 ,8 4 7
T X M atago rd a B ay System Priority Landscape Conservation {!} T X Bahia G ra n d e C o astal C o rrid o r {I) T X Bayou Greertways (P&i) T X T e xa s B en e ficiai Use / M a rsh R e sto ratio n (P> T X Coliaboration and Planning Support
1
TCEQ
1
TCEQ
1
TCEQ
1
TCEQ.
CPS TCEQ
$6,012,000 9 $4,378,500 10
$6,012,000 $4,378,500
$ 7 ,1 0 9 ,0 0 0 11
$7,109,000
$968,000 $2,100,000 61
$2,100,000
$ 2 0 ,5 6 7 ,5 0 0
$ 1 9 ,5 9 9 ,5 0 0
M S Deer island Beneficial Use Site jlj A L U p p er M obile Bay B eneficiai Use W etland C reatio n Site (P)
1 USAGE 1 USAGE
6 W Coliaboration and Planning Support
CPS USCG
$3,000,000 $2,500,000 $ 5 ,5 0 0 ,0 0 0
$2,100,030 59 $ 2 ,1 0 0 ,0 0 0
$0 !
$ 1 ,9 6 4 ,776|
$ 1 ,9 6 4 ,7 7 6
LA B ayo u Dularge Rid ge, M arsh & H y d ro lo g ic R e sto ra tio n (P) 1
GW G u lf C o ast C o n se rva tio n Reserve Program - A L {P&I)
1
GW G u lf C o ast C o n se rva tio n Reserve Program - M S (P&I)
1
FL T a t e 's H e ll S t r a t e g y 1 (P & I)
1
GW G u lf C o ast C o n se rva tio n Reserve Program - FL {P& i)
1
GW G u lf C o ast C o n se rva tio n Reserve Program - TX (P&I)
1
G W C o llab o ratio n and Plan nin g Support
CPS
USDA USDA USDA USDA USDA USDA USDA
$5,162,084 7 $ 1 ,5 0 0 ,0 0 0 14 $ 1 ,5 0 0 ,0 0 0 15 $7,000,000 41 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $2,100,030
$ 2 0 ,2 6 2 ,0 8 4
Guif Coast Ecosystem Restoration Coondi Staff Wark Prosiuoi Subject to Cooaoii Approvai
Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA
Tier 3/4
$5,162,084 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $ 7 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
$ 1 5 ,1 6 2 ,0 8 4
3% Pool Aw ard or FPL Indirect Costs A m t Allowed
In d ire c t Costs A m t
Used on each A w ard
3% Ava liable Indirect Costs
not used on Aw ards
$
22,500
$20,288 $
2,212
$
65,365
$61,496 $
3,869
$ 465,000
$
465,000
$
68,100
$
68,100
$
63,000
$ 6 8 3 ,9 6 5
$63,000 5 $ 1 4 4 ,7 8 4
$ 5 3 9 ,1 8 1
$ 180,360
S 131,355
s 213,270
s
29,040
s
63,000
$ 6 1 7 ,0 2 5
$3,495 $ $2,502 $ $4,031 $
$ $63,000 $ $7.3,028
176,865 128,853 209,239 29,040
$ 5 4 3 ,9 9 7
$
90,000
$
75,000
$ 1 6 5 ,0 0 0
$ $ $0
90,000 75,000 $ 1 6 5 ,0 0 0
*
58,943
$ 5 8 ,9 4 3
s 154,863
s
45,000
$
45,000
$ 210,000
/;>
45,000
$
45,000
$
63,000
$ 6 0 7 ,8 6 3
$0 $ $0
$0 $ $0 $ $0 $ $0 $
/> $ $ $0
58,943 $ 5 8 ,9 4 3
154,863 45,000 45,000 210,000 45,000 45,000 63,000 $ 6 0 7 ,8 6 3
ED 002061 00176494-00010
