Document XOMQzGxbRaaGamzn4rKGrYOoJ

Message From: Sent: To: Subject: Bennett, Tate [/0=EXCHANGELABS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=1FA92542F7CA4D01973B18B2F11B9141-BENNETT, EL] 8/14/2018 2:18:58 AM Paul Schlegel [pauls@fb.org] Re: Draft language Sorry- we are working a redline to show you where language along these lines would fit in. Might be easier that way. Standby. > On Aug 13, 2018, at 8:49 PM, Paul Schlegel <pauls@fb.org> wr ot e: > > Do you have a context for this? > > Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 13, 2018, at 9:48 PM, Bennett, Tate <Bennett.Tate@epa.gov> wr ot e: However, EPA could take advantage of exi sti ng enforcement authori ty (albei t not EPA authori ty) whi ch could provide a credi ble deterrent agai nst di sclosure by designated representatives. EPA coul d add to 170.311(b)(9) a requi rement that the designated representative must give the agricultural employer a signed statement that he/she will di sclose the informati on only to the worker/handler, that statement would then be requi red by EPA regulati ons and therefore a false statement would crimi nally enforceable by US attorneys under 28 USC 1001. Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 3/4 ED 002061 00075292-00001